connick
district
attorney
et
al
thompson
argued
october
decided
march
petitioner
orleans
parish
district
attorney
office
concedes
prosecuting
respondent
thompson
attempted
armed
robbery
prosecutors
violated
brady
maryland
failing
disclose
crime
lab
report
robbery
conviction
thompson
elected
testify
later
murder
trial
convicted
month
scheduled
execution
lab
report
discovered
reviewing
vacated
convictions
thompson
found
guilty
retrial
murder
charge
filed
suit
district
attorney
office
alleging
inter
alia
brady
violation
caused
office
deliberate
indifference
obvious
need
train
prosecutors
avoid
constitutional
violations
district
held
prove
deliberate
indifference
thompson
need
show
pattern
similar
brady
violations
demonstrate
need
training
obvious
jury
found
district
attorney
office
liable
failure
train
awarded
thompson
damages
fifth
circuit
affirmed
equally
divided
held
district
attorney
office
may
held
liable
failure
train
prosecutors
based
single
brady
violation
pp
plaintiffs
seeking
impose
liability
local
governments
must
prove
injury
caused
action
pursuant
official
municipal
policy
includes
decisions
government
lawmakers
acts
policymaking
officials
practices
persistent
widespread
practically
force
law
monell
new
york
city
dept
social
local
government
decision
train
certain
employees
legal
duty
avoid
violating
citizens
rights
may
rise
level
official
government
policy
purposes
failure
train
must
amount
deliberate
indifference
rights
persons
untrained
employees
come
contact
canton
harris
deliberate
indifference
context
requires
proof
city
policymakers
disregarded
known
obvious
consequence
particular
omission
training
program
cause
city
employees
violate
citizens
constitutional
rights
board
bryan
cty
brown
pp
pattern
similar
constitutional
violations
untrained
employees
ordinarily
necessary
demonstrate
deliberate
indifference
bryan
supra
without
notice
course
training
deficient
decisionmakers
hardly
said
deliberately
chosen
training
program
cause
violations
constitutional
rights
thompson
contend
proved
pattern
similar
brady
violations
four
reversals
louisiana
courts
dissimilar
brady
violations
years
robbery
trial
put
district
attorney
office
notice
need
specific
training
pp
thompson
mistakenly
relies
liability
hypothesized
canton
contending
brady
violation
case
obvious
consequence
failing
provide
specific
brady
training
obviousness
showing
substitute
pattern
violations
ordinarily
necessary
establish
municipal
culpability
canton
theorized
city
armed
police
force
deployed
public
capture
fleeing
felons
without
training
officers
constitutional
limitation
use
deadly
force
failure
train
reflect
city
deliberate
indifference
highly
predictable
consequence
namely
violations
constitutional
rights
failure
train
prosecutors
brady
obligations
fall
within
narrow
range
canton
hypothesized
liability
obvious
need
specific
legal
training
present
canton
scenario
police
academy
applicants
unlikely
familiar
constitutional
constraints
deadly
force
absent
training
obtain
knowledge
absent
attorneys
trained
law
equipped
tools
interpret
apply
legal
principles
understand
constitutional
limits
exercise
legal
judgment
receive
training
entering
profession
must
usually
satisfy
continuing
education
requirements
often
train
job
experienced
attorneys
must
satisfy
licensing
standards
ongoing
ethical
obligations
prosecutors
equipped
ethically
bound
know
brady
entails
perform
legal
research
uncertain
thus
recurring
constitutional
violations
obvious
consequence
failing
provide
prosecutors
formal
training
nuance
allegedly
necessary
training
also
distinguishes
case
example
canton
prosecutors
familiar
general
brady
rule
thus
thompson
rely
lack
ability
cope
constitutional
situations
underlies
canton
hypothetical
must
assert
prosecutors
trained
particular
brady
evidence
specific
scenario
related
violation
case
sort
nuance
simply
support
inference
deliberate
indifference
contrary
holding
follow
brady
gray
areas
brady
decisions
difficult
prosecutors
obviously
make
wrong
decisions
failing
train
amounts
must
decision
city
violate
constitution
canton
concurring
part
dissenting
part
pp
reversed
thomas
delivered
opinion
roberts
scalia
kennedy
alito
joined
scalia
filed
concurring
opinion
alito
joined
ginsburg
filed
dissenting
opinion
breyer
sotomayor
kagan
joined
harry
connick
district
attorney
et
petitioners
john
thompson
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
march
justice
thomas
delivered
opinion
orleans
parish
district
attorney
office
concedes
prosecuting
respondent
john
thompson
attempted
armed
robbery
prosecutors
failed
disclose
evidence
turned
defense
brady
maryland
thompson
convicted
conviction
thompson
elected
testify
defense
later
trial
murder
convicted
thompson
spent
years
prison
including
years
death
row
one
month
thompson
scheduled
execution
investigator
discovered
undisclosed
evidence
armed
robbery
trial
reviewing
determined
evidence
exculpatory
thompson
convictions
vacated
release
prison
thompson
sued
petitioner
harry
connick
official
capacity
orleans
parish
district
attorney
damages
rev
stat
thompson
alleged
connick
failed
train
prosecutors
adequately
duty
produce
exculpatory
evidence
lack
training
caused
nondisclosure
thompson
case
jury
awarded
thompson
million
appeals
fifth
circuit
affirmed
evenly
divided
en
banc
granted
certiorari
decide
whether
district
attorney
office
may
held
liable
failure
train
based
single
brady
violation
hold
early
john
thompson
charged
murder
raymond
liuzza
new
orleans
publicity
following
murder
charge
led
victims
unrelated
armed
robbery
identify
thompson
attacker
district
attorney
charged
thompson
attempted
armed
robbery
part
robbery
investigation
crime
scene
technician
took
one
victims
pants
swatch
fabric
stained
robber
blood
approximately
one
week
thompson
armed
robbery
trial
swatch
sent
crime
laboratory
two
days
trial
assistant
district
attorney
bruce
whittaker
received
crime
lab
report
stated
perpetrator
blood
type
evidence
prosecutors
ever
thompson
blood
tested
knew
blood
type
whittaker
claimed
placed
report
assistant
district
attorney
james
williams
desk
williams
denied
seeing
report
never
disclosed
thompson
counsel
williams
tried
armed
robbery
case
assistant
district
attorney
gerry
deegan
first
day
trial
deegan
checked
physical
evidence
case
police
property
room
including
swatch
deegan
checked
evidence
swatch
courthouse
property
room
prosecutors
mention
swatch
crime
lab
report
trial
jury
convicted
thompson
attempted
armed
robbery
weeks
later
williams
special
prosecutor
eric
dubelier
tried
thompson
liuzza
murder
armed
robbery
conviction
thompson
chose
testify
defense
convicted
sentenced
death
state
thompson
la
years
following
thompson
murder
conviction
state
federal
courts
reviewed
denied
challenges
conviction
sentence
see
state
ex
rel
thompson
cain
la
thompson
cain
state
scheduled
thompson
execution
may
late
april
thompson
private
investigator
discovered
crime
lab
report
armed
robbery
investigation
files
new
orleans
police
crime
laboratory
thompson
tested
found
blood
type
proving
blood
swatch
thompson
attorneys
presented
evidence
district
attorney
office
turn
moved
stay
execution
vacate
thompson
armed
robbery
louisiana
appeals
reversed
thompson
murder
conviction
concluding
armed
robbery
conviction
unconstitutionally
deprived
thompson
right
testify
defense
murder
trial
state
thompson
la
app
district
attorney
office
retried
thompson
liuzza
jury
found
guilty
thompson
brought
action
district
attorney
office
connick
williams
others
alleging
conduct
caused
wrongfully
convicted
incarcerated
years
nearly
executed
claim
proceeded
trial
thompson
claim
district
attorney
office
violated
brady
failing
disclose
crime
lab
report
armed
robbery
trial
see
brady
thompson
alleged
liability
two
theories
brady
violation
caused
unconstitutional
policy
district
attorney
office
violation
caused
connick
deliberate
indifference
obvious
need
train
prosecutors
office
order
avoid
constitutional
violations
trial
connick
conceded
failure
produce
crime
lab
report
constituted
brady
see
record
accordingly
district
instructed
jury
issue
whether
nondisclosure
caused
either
policy
practice
custom
district
attorney
office
deliberately
indifferent
failure
train
office
prosecutors
record
although
prosecutor
remembered
specific
training
session
regarding
brady
prior
undisputed
trial
prosecutors
familiar
general
brady
requirement
state
disclose
defense
evidence
possession
favorable
accused
prosecutors
testified
office
policy
turn
crime
lab
reports
scientific
evidence
defense
also
testified
discovery
undisclosed
crime
lab
report
prosecutors
disagreed
whether
disclosed
brady
absent
knowledge
thompson
blood
type
jury
rejected
thompson
claim
unconstitutional
office
policy
caused
brady
violation
found
district
attorney
office
liable
failing
train
prosecutors
jury
awarded
thompson
million
damages
district
added
million
attorney
fees
costs
verdict
connick
renewed
objection
raised
summary
judgment
deliberately
indifferent
obvious
need
different
brady
training
evidence
aware
pattern
similar
brady
violations
district
rejected
argument
reasons
given
summary
judgment
order
order
concluded
pattern
violations
necessary
prove
deliberate
indifference
need
training
obvious
civ
ed
app
pet
cert
wl
relying
canton
harris
held
thompson
demonstrate
deliberate
indifference
proving
da
office
knew
moral
certainty
assistan
district
attorneys
acquire
brady
material
without
training
always
obvious
brady
requires
withholding
brady
material
virtually
always
lead
substantial
violation
constitutional
rights
app
pet
cert
wl
panel
appeals
fifth
circuit
affirmed
panel
acknowledged
thompson
present
evidence
pattern
similar
brady
violations
held
thompson
need
prove
pattern
according
panel
thompson
demonstrated
connick
notice
obvious
need
brady
training
presenting
evidence
attorneys
often
fresh
law
school
undoubtedly
required
confront
brady
issues
da
office
erroneous
decisions
regarding
brady
evidence
result
serious
constitutional
violations
resolution
brady
issues
often
unclear
training
brady
helpful
appeals
sitting
en
banc
vacated
panel
opinion
granted
rehearing
divided
evenly
thereby
affirming
district
per
curiam
four
opinions
divided
en
banc
disputed
whether
thompson
establish
municipal
liability
failure
train
prosecutors
based
single
brady
violation
without
proving
prior
pattern
similar
violations
evidence
make
showing
granted
certiorari
ii
brady
violation
conceded
case
occurred
one
four
prosecutors
involved
thompson
armed
robbery
prosecution
failed
disclose
crime
lab
report
thompson
counsel
thompson
theory
bore
burden
proving
connick
policymaker
district
attorney
office
deliberately
indifferent
need
train
prosecutors
brady
disclosure
obligation
respect
evidence
type
lack
training
actually
caused
brady
violation
case
connick
argues
entitled
judgment
matter
law
thompson
prove
actual
constructive
notice
therefore
deliberately
indifferent
need
different
brady
training
title
provides
relevant
part
every
person
color
statute
ordinance
regulation
custom
usage
state
subjects
causes
subjected
citizen
person
within
jurisdiction
thereof
deprivation
rights
privileges
immunities
secured
constitution
laws
shall
liable
party
injured
action
law
suit
equity
proper
proceeding
redress
municipality
local
government
may
liable
section
governmental
body
subjects
person
deprivation
rights
causes
person
subjected
deprivation
see
monell
new
york
city
dept
social
local
governments
responsible
illegal
acts
pembaur
cincinnati
citing
monell
vicariously
liable
employees
actions
see
canton
board
bryan
cty
brown
collecting
cases
plaintiffs
seek
impose
liability
local
governments
must
prove
action
pursuant
official
municipal
policy
caused
injury
monell
see
official
municipal
policy
includes
decisions
government
lawmakers
acts
policymaking
officials
practices
persistent
widespread
practically
force
law
see
ibid
pembaur
supra
adickes
kress
action
municipality
actually
responsible
pembaur
supra
limited
circumstances
local
government
decision
train
certain
employees
legal
duty
avoid
violating
citizens
rights
may
rise
level
official
government
policy
purposes
municipality
culpability
deprivation
rights
tenuous
claim
turns
failure
train
see
oklahoma
city
tuttle
plurality
opinion
far
nebulous
good
deal
removed
constitutional
violation
policy
monell
satisfy
statute
municipality
failure
train
employees
relevant
respect
must
amount
deliberate
indifference
rights
persons
untrained
employees
come
contact
canton
shortcoming
properly
thought
city
custom
actionable
eliberate
indifference
stringent
standard
fault
requiring
proof
municipal
actor
disregarded
known
obvious
consequence
action
bryan
thus
city
policymakers
actual
constructive
notice
particular
omission
training
program
causes
city
employees
violate
citizens
constitutional
rights
city
may
deemed
deliberately
indifferent
policymakers
choose
retain
program
city
policy
inaction
light
notice
program
cause
constitutional
violations
functional
equivalent
decision
city
violate
constitution
canton
concurring
part
dissenting
part
less
stringent
standard
fault
claim
result
de
facto
respondeat
superior
liability
municipalities
see
also
pembaur
supra
opinion
brennan
unicipal
liability
attaches
deliberate
choice
follow
course
action
made
among
various
alternatives
relevant
officials
pattern
similar
constitutional
violations
untrained
employees
ordinarily
necessary
demonstrate
deliberate
indifference
purposes
failure
train
bryan
policymakers
continued
adherence
approach
know
know
failed
prevent
tortious
conduct
employees
may
establish
conscious
disregard
consequences
action
indifference
necessary
trigger
municipal
liability
without
notice
course
training
deficient
particular
respect
decisionmakers
hardly
said
deliberately
chosen
training
program
cause
violations
constitutional
rights
although
thompson
contend
proved
pattern
similar
brady
violations
vacated
en
banc
points
ten
years
preceding
armed
robbery
trial
louisiana
courts
overturned
four
convictions
brady
violations
prosecutors
connick
four
reversals
put
connick
notice
office
brady
training
inadequate
respect
sort
brady
violation
issue
none
cases
involved
failure
disclose
blood
evidence
crime
lab
report
physical
scientific
evidence
kind
incidents
similar
violation
issue
put
connick
notice
specific
training
necessary
avoid
constitutional
instead
relying
pattern
similar
brady
violations
thompson
relies
liability
hypothesized
canton
contends
brady
violation
case
obvious
consequence
failing
provide
specific
brady
training
showing
obviousness
substitute
pattern
violations
ordinarily
necessary
establish
municipal
culpability
canton
left
open
possibility
narrow
range
circumstances
pattern
similar
violations
might
necessary
show
deliberate
indifference
bryan
supra
posed
hypothetical
example
city
arms
police
force
firearms
deploys
armed
officers
public
capture
fleeing
felons
without
training
officers
constitutional
limitation
use
deadly
force
canton
supra
given
known
frequency
police
attempt
arrest
fleeing
felons
predictability
officer
lacking
specific
tools
handle
situation
violate
citizens
rights
theorized
city
decision
train
officers
constitutional
limits
use
deadly
force
reflect
city
deliberate
indifference
highly
predictable
consequence
namely
violations
constitutional
rights
bryan
supra
sought
foreclose
possibility
however
rare
unconstitutional
consequences
failing
train
patently
obvious
city
liable
without
proof
pattern
violations
failure
train
prosecutors
brady
obligations
fall
within
narrow
range
canton
hypothesized
liability
obvious
need
specific
legal
training
present
canton
scenario
absent
armed
police
must
sometimes
make
decisions
consequences
reason
assume
police
academy
applicants
familiar
constitutional
constraints
use
deadly
force
absence
training
way
novice
officers
obtain
legal
knowledge
require
circumstances
obvious
need
form
training
stark
contrast
legal
raining
differentiates
attorneys
average
public
employees
opinion
clement
attorneys
trained
law
equipped
tools
interpret
apply
legal
principles
understand
constitutional
limits
exercise
legal
judgment
may
enter
profession
receive
law
license
attorneys
must
graduate
law
school
pass
substantive
examination
attorneys
vast
majority
jurisdictions
must
see
la
state
bar
assn
lsba
articles
incorporation
la
rev
stat
ann
ch
art
west
supp
amended
threshold
requirements
designed
ensure
new
attorneys
learned
find
understand
apply
legal
rules
cf
cronic
noting
presumption
lawyer
competent
provide
guiding
hand
defendant
needs
applies
even
young
inexperienced
lawyers
first
jury
trial
even
case
complex
professional
training
end
graduation
jurisdictions
require
attorneys
satisfy
requirements
see
lsba
articles
incorporation
art
rule
effective
la
sup
rule
xxx
effective
even
jurisdictions
impose
mandatory
requirements
mandate
attorneys
represent
clients
competently
encourage
attorneys
engage
continuing
study
education
see
mass
rule
prof
conduct
comment
west
louisiana
adopted
requirements
imposed
similar
general
competency
requirements
state
bar
lsba
articles
incorporation
art
ec
dr
west
effective
attorneys
practice
attorneys
district
attorney
offices
also
train
job
learn
experienced
attorneys
instance
orleans
parish
district
attorney
office
junior
prosecutors
trained
senior
prosecutors
supervised
worked
together
prepare
cases
trial
trial
chiefs
oversaw
preparation
cases
senior
attorneys
also
circulated
decisions
instructional
memoranda
keep
prosecutors
abreast
relevant
legal
developments
addition
attorneys
jurisdictions
must
satisfy
character
fitness
standards
receive
law
license
personally
subject
ethical
regime
designed
reinforce
profession
standards
see
lsba
articles
incorporation
art
see
generally
art
code
professional
responsibility
trial
lawyers
duty
bring
bear
skill
knowledge
render
trial
reliable
adversarial
testing
process
strickland
washington
prosecutors
special
duty
seek
justice
merely
convict
lsba
articles
incorporation
art
ec
aba
standards
criminal
justice
ed
among
prosecutors
unique
ethical
obligations
duty
produce
brady
evidence
defense
see
lsba
articles
incorporation
art
ec
aba
model
rule
prof
conduct
attorney
violates
ethical
obligations
subject
professional
discipline
including
sanctions
suspension
disbarment
see
lsba
articles
incorporation
art
art
dr
aba
model
rule
prof
conduct
light
regime
legal
training
professional
responsibility
recurring
constitutional
violations
obvious
consequence
failing
provide
prosecutors
formal
training
obey
law
bryan
prosecutors
equipped
also
ethically
bound
know
brady
entails
perform
legal
research
uncertain
district
attorney
entitled
rely
prosecutors
professional
training
ethical
obligations
absence
specific
reason
pattern
violations
believe
tools
insufficient
prevent
future
constitutional
violations
usual
recurring
situations
prosecutors
must
deal
canton
licensed
attorney
making
legal
judgments
capacity
prosecutor
brady
material
simply
present
highly
predictable
constitutional
danger
canton
untrained
officer
second
significant
difference
case
example
canton
nuance
allegedly
necessary
training
canton
hypothetical
assumes
armed
police
officers
knowledge
constitutional
limits
use
deadly
force
undisputed
prosecutors
connick
office
familiar
general
brady
rule
thompson
complaint
therefore
rely
utter
lack
ability
cope
constitutional
situations
underlies
canton
hypothetical
rather
must
assert
prosecutors
trained
particular
brady
evidence
specific
scenario
related
violation
case
sort
nuance
simply
support
inference
deliberate
indifference
said
canton
virtually
every
instance
person
constitutional
rights
violated
city
employee
plaintiff
able
point
something
city
done
prevent
unfortunate
incident
citing
tuttle
plurality
opinion
thompson
suggests
absence
formal
training
sessions
brady
equivalent
complete
absence
legal
training
imagined
canton
liability
concerned
substance
training
particular
instructional
format
statute
provide
plaintiffs
courts
carte
blanche
micromanage
local
governments
throughout
assume
prosecutors
always
make
correct
brady
decisions
guidance
regarding
specific
brady
questions
assist
prosecutors
showing
merely
additional
training
helpful
making
difficult
decisions
establish
municipal
liability
rov
ing
injury
accident
avoided
employee
better
training
sufficient
equip
avoid
particular
conduct
suffice
canton
supra
possibility
liability
left
open
canton
dissent
rejects
holding
canton
hypothesized
liability
legal
matter
encompass
failure
train
prosecutors
brady
obligation
instead
apply
canton
hypothetical
case
thus
devotes
almost
opinion
explaining
evidence
supports
liability
dissent
attempt
address
holding
pointing
prosecutors
necessarily
enrolled
criminal
procedure
class
misses
point
see
post
reason
canton
hypothetical
inapplicable
attorneys
unlike
police
officers
equipped
tools
find
interpret
apply
legal
principles
end
opinion
however
dissent
finally
reveals
real
disagreement
holding
today
precedent
dissent
see
reason
post
conclusion
bryan
county
pattern
violations
ordinarily
necessary
demonstrate
deliberate
indifference
purposes
failure
train
cf
explaining
pattern
violations
ordinarily
necessary
cf
post
describing
reliance
bryan
county
imply
ing
new
limitation
precedent
makes
clear
proving
municipality
actually
caused
constitutional
violation
failing
train
offending
employee
presents
difficult
problems
proof
must
adhere
stringent
standard
fault
lest
municipal
liability
collapse
respondeat
bryan
county
see
canton
district
appeals
panel
erroneously
believed
thompson
proved
deliberate
indifference
showing
obviousness
need
additional
training
based
conclusion
connick
awareness
prosecutors
confront
brady
issues
district
attorney
office
inexperienced
prosecutors
expected
understand
brady
requirements
brady
gray
areas
make
difficult
choices
erroneous
decisions
regarding
brady
evidence
result
constitutional
violations
app
pet
cert
wl
insufficient
follow
brady
gray
areas
brady
decisions
difficult
prosecutors
obviously
make
wrong
decisions
failing
train
amounts
decision
city
violate
constitution
canton
concurring
part
dissenting
part
prove
deliberate
indifference
thompson
needed
show
connick
notice
absent
additional
specified
training
highly
predictable
prosecutors
office
confounded
gray
areas
make
incorrect
brady
decisions
result
fact
thompson
show
predictable
failing
train
prosecutors
amounted
conscious
disregard
defendants
brady
rights
see
bryan
canton
supra
iii
role
prosecutor
see
justice
done
berger
much
prosecutor
duty
refrain
improper
methods
calculated
produce
wrongful
conviction
use
every
legitimate
means
bring
one
ibid
admission
prosecutors
tried
thompson
armed
robbery
case
failed
carry
responsibility
issue
us
whether
connick
policymaker
district
attorney
office
deliberately
indifferent
need
train
attorneys
authority
conclude
case
fall
within
narrow
range
liability
hypothesized
canton
possible
exception
pattern
violations
necessary
prove
deliberate
indifference
actions
alleging
failure
train
district
granted
connick
judgment
matter
law
claim
thompson
prove
pattern
similar
violations
establish
inaction
functional
equivalent
decision
city
violate
constitution
canton
supra
opinion
judgment
appeals
fifth
circuit
reversed
ordered
harry
connick
district
attorney
et
petitioners
john
thompson
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
march
justice
scalia
justice
alito
joins
concurring
join
opinion
full
write
separately
address
several
aspects
dissent
dissent
lengthy
excavation
trial
record
puzzling
exertion
question
presented
review
whether
municipality
liable
single
brady
violation
one
prosecutors
even
though
pattern
practice
prior
violations
put
municipality
notice
need
specific
training
prevented
see
brady
maryland
question
legal
one
whether
brady
violation
presents
one
rare
circumstances
hypothesized
canton
need
training
constitutional
requirements
obvious
ex
ante
municipality
failure
provide
training
amounts
deliberate
indifference
constitutional
violations
see
canton
harris
dissent
defers
consideration
question
page
opinion
first
devotes
considerable
space
allegations
connick
prosecutors
misunderstood
brady
asked
trial
see
post
opinion
ginsburg
supposed
gaps
brady
guidance
provided
connick
office
prosecutors
including
deficiencies
unrelated
specific
brady
violation
issue
case
policy
manual
published
connick
office
three
years
thompson
trial
see
post
none
relevant
thompson
theory
trial
based
pervasive
culture
indifference
brady
rather
inevitability
mistakes
enough
iterations
criminal
trials
district
instructed
jury
find
connick
deliberately
indifferent
first
district
attorney
certain
prosecutors
confront
situation
decide
evidence
required
constitution
provided
accused
second
situation
involved
difficult
choice
one
prosecutors
history
mishandling
additional
training
supervision
monitoring
clearly
needed
third
wrong
choice
prosecutor
situation
frequently
cause
deprivation
accused
constitutional
rights
app
theory
deliberate
indifference
repeal
law
favor
law
large
numbers
brady
mistakes
inevitable
species
error
routinely
confronted
prosecutors
authorizing
bad
warrant
losing
claim
crossing
line
closing
argument
eliciting
hearsay
violates
confrontation
clause
nevertheless
de
facto
respondeat
superior
liability
canton
violation
rubric
simply
municipality
professional
educational
program
covering
specific
violation
sufficient
thompson
theory
law
need
canton
confine
hypothetical
extreme
circumstance
arming
police
officers
guns
without
telling
constitutional
limitations
upon
shooting
fleeing
felons
district
instructions
cover
every
recurring
situation
citizens
rights
violated
result
squared
admonition
liability
available
limited
circumstances
pattern
violations
ordinarily
necessary
establish
municipal
culpability
causation
board
bryan
cty
brown
restrictions
indispensable
without
failure
train
become
talismanic
incantation
producing
municipal
liability
virtually
every
instance
person
constitutional
rights
violated
city
employee
monell
rejects
canton
worse
engage
federal
courts
endless
exercise
municipal
programs
thereby
diminishing
autonomy
state
local
governments
ibid
perhaps
reason
dissent
seriously
contend
thompson
theory
recovery
proper
rather
accuses
connick
acquiescing
theory
trial
see
post
accusation
false
connick
central
claim
liability
brady
violation
premised
single
incident
requires
pattern
practice
previous
violations
pressed
argument
summary
judgment
stage
rebuffed
trial
connick
offered
jury
instruction
effect
trial
judge
effectively
told
stop
bringing
subject
connick
counsel
also
part
definition
location
honor
like
include
language
says
deliberate
indifference
training
requires
pattern
similar
violations
proof
deliberate
indifference
requires
single
isolated
act
thompson
counsel
law
honor
giving
motion
summary
judgment
denied
tr
nothing
required
preserve
claim
error
see
fed
rule
civ
proc
event
recover
municipality
plaintiff
must
satisfy
rigorous
standard
causation
bryan
must
demonstrate
direct
causal
link
municipal
action
deprivation
federal
rights
thompson
meet
standard
withholding
evidence
case
almost
certainly
caused
failure
give
prosecutors
specific
training
miscreant
prosecutor
gerry
deegan
willful
suppression
evidence
believed
exculpatory
effort
railroad
thompson
according
deegan
colleague
michael
riehlmann
deegan
confessed
conversation
deegan
revealed
months
live
suppressed
blood
evidence
armed
robbery
trial
john
thompson
way
exculpated
defendant
app
see
also
deegan
told
failed
inform
defense
exculpatory
information
reason
disbelieve
account
particularly
since
riehlmann
testimony
hardly
paints
flattering
picture
riehlmann
kept
silent
deegan
misconduct
another
five
years
result
incurred
professional
sanctions
see
riehlmann
la
riehlmann
story
true
moving
force
bryan
supra
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
behind
suppression
evidence
deegan
failure
continuing
legal
education
dissent
suspends
disbelief
insisting
proper
brady
training
surely
least
one
prosecutors
thompson
trial
turned
lab
report
blood
swatch
post
training
must
consist
mere
broad
encomiums
brady
made
clear
identified
deficiency
city
training
program
must
closely
related
ultimate
injury
canton
supra
even
indulging
dissent
assumption
thompson
prosecutors
failed
disclose
lab
report
good
faith
way
prevented
training
sort
training
prevented
nondisclosure
blood
report
known
exculpatory
perhaps
better
question
ask
legally
accurate
training
prevented
dissent
suggestion
instruct
prosecutors
ignore
portion
brady
limiting
prosecutors
disclosure
obligations
evidence
favorable
accused
instead
dissent
proposes
connick
communicated
orleans
parish
prosecutors
uncertain
terms
physical
evidence
tested
establish
innocence
person
charged
turn
post
quoting
tr
oral
arg
though
labeled
training
suggestion
dissent
proposal
better
described
sub
silentio
expansion
substantive
law
brady
cases
establishes
obligation
never
read
dissent
cite
since
thompson
trial
however
decided
case
appears
say
opposite
training
dissent
require
arizona
youngblood
held
unless
criminal
defendant
show
bad
faith
part
police
failure
preserve
potentially
useful
evidence
constitute
denial
due
process
law
acknowledged
brady
makes
good
bad
faith
state
irrelevant
state
fails
disclose
defendant
material
exculpatory
evidence
concluded
due
process
clause
requires
different
result
deal
failure
state
preserve
evidentiary
material
said
subjected
tests
results
might
exonerated
defendant
perhaps
one
day
recognize
distinction
failures
preserve
destruction
evidence
whose
inculpatory
exculpatory
character
unknown
failures
turn
evidence
defense
failure
train
prosecutors
observe
distinction
constitute
deliberate
indifference
reader
doubtless
guessed
secret
case
probably
brady
violation
except
deegan
since
knowing
violation
possibly
attributed
lack
training
dissent
surely
knows
leans
heavily
fact
connick
conceded
brady
violated
honor
concession
analysis
case
even
extends
beyond
deegan
deliberate
actions
remains
irrelevant
connick
training
obligations
brady
violation
apart
deegan
surely
frontier
brady
jurisprudence
connick
possibly
notice
decades
ago
required
instruct
prosecutors
respect
right
untested
evidence
still
recognized
consequence
even
accepted
dissent
conclusion
liability
premised
single
brady
error
agree
lack
accurate
training
regimen
caused
violation
connick
conceded
harry
connick
district
attorney
et
petitioners
john
thompson
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
march
justice
ginsburg
justice
breyer
justice
sotomayor
justice
kagan
join
dissenting
brady
maryland
held
due
process
requires
prosecution
turn
evidence
favorable
accused
material
guilt
punishment
obligation
parties
stipulated
dishonored
case
consequently
john
thompson
spent
years
prison
isolated
death
row
truth
came
light
innocent
charge
attempted
armed
robbery
subsequent
trial
murder
charge
prosecutorial
design
fundamentally
unfair
holds
orleans
parish
district
attorney
office
district
attorney
office
office
held
liable
civil
rights
action
grave
injustice
thompson
suffered
tells
us
thompson
shown
aberrant
brady
violation
routine
practice
giving
short
shrift
brady
requirements
evidence
presented
jury
awarded
compensation
thompson
however
points
distinctly
away
assessment
trial
record
action
reveals
conceded
prosecutorial
transgressions
neither
isolated
atypical
top
evidence
showed
members
district
attorney
office
including
district
misperceived
brady
compass
therefore
inadequately
attended
disclosure
obligations
throughout
pretrial
trial
proceedings
thompson
team
four
engaged
prosecuting
armed
robbery
murder
hid
defense
exculpatory
information
thompson
requested
constitutional
right
receive
prosecutors
despite
multiple
opportunities
spanning
nearly
two
decades
set
record
straight
based
prosecutors
conduct
relating
thompson
trials
fact
trier
reasonably
conclude
inattention
brady
standard
operating
procedure
district
attorney
office
happened
opinion
obscures
momentary
oversight
single
incident
lone
officer
misconduct
instead
evidence
demonstrated
misperception
disregard
brady
disclosure
requirements
pervasive
orleans
parish
evidence
hold
established
persistent
deliberately
indifferent
conduct
district
attorney
office
bears
responsibility
dissent
judgment
mindful
brady
violations
case
illustrates
easily
detected
chance
discovery
made
defense
team
investigator
weeks
thompson
scheduled
execution
evidence
led
exoneration
might
remained
wraps
prosecutorial
concealment
thompson
encountered
however
bound
repeated
unless
municipal
agencies
bear
responsibility
made
tangible
liability
adequately
conveying
brady
requires
monitoring
staff
compliance
failure
train
said
give
rise
municipal
liability
failure
amounts
deliberate
indifference
rights
persons
untrained
employees
come
contact
canton
harris
standard
well
met
case
turn
first
contextual
account
brady
violations
infected
thompson
trials
early
morning
hours
december
assailant
shot
killed
raymond
liuzza
son
prominent
new
orleans
business
executive
street
fronting
victim
home
one
witness
saw
assailant
recorded
two
contemporaneous
police
reports
eyewitness
initially
described
assailant
six
feet
tall
close
cut
hair
record
thompson
five
feet
eight
inches
tall
time
murder
styled
hair
large
afro
police
reports
witness
immediate
identification
disclosed
thompson
engaged
murder
investigation
orleans
parish
prosecutors
linked
thompson
another
violent
crime
committed
three
weeks
later
december
assailant
attempted
rob
three
siblings
gunpoint
struggle
perpetrator
blood
stained
oldest
child
pant
leg
blood
preserved
swatch
fabric
cut
pant
leg
crime
scene
analyst
eventually
tested
test
conclusively
established
perpetrator
blood
type
thompson
blood
type
prosecutors
failed
disclose
existence
swatch
test
results
one
month
liuzza
murder
richard
perkins
man
knew
thompson
approached
liuzza
family
perkins
family
announcement
reward
information
leading
murderer
conviction
police
officers
surreptitiously
recorded
documented
tape
perkins
told
family
mind
helping
catch
perpetrator
like
help
know
help
family
assured
perkins
side
want
try
help
perkins
intimated
thompson
another
man
kevin
freeman
involved
liuzza
murder
perkins
thereafter
told
police
learned
freeman
murder
information
recorded
police
report
based
perkins
account
thompson
freeman
arrested
murder
charges
freeman
six
feet
tall
went
name
kojak
kept
hair
closely
trimmed
scalp
visible
unlike
thompson
freeman
fit
eyewitness
initial
description
liuzza
assailant
height
hair
style
notes
ante
freeman
became
key
witness
prosecution
thompson
trial
murder
liuzza
thompson
arrest
liuzza
murder
father
armed
robbery
victims
saw
newspaper
photo
thompson
large
afro
hairstyle
showed
children
reported
district
attorney
office
children
identified
thompson
attacker
children
picked
photo
photographic
lineup
record
indicting
thompson
basis
questionable
identifications
district
attorney
office
pause
test
pant
leg
swatch
dyed
perpetrator
blood
lapse
ignored
overlooked
prosecutor
notation
office
may
wish
blood
test
murder
trial
scheduled
begin
armed
later
indictment
thompson
robbery
however
prosecutors
made
strategic
choice
switched
order
two
trials
proceeding
first
robbery
indictment
aim
twofold
robbery
conviction
gained
first
serve
inhibit
thompson
testifying
defense
murder
trial
prior
conviction
used
impeach
credibility
addition
armed
robbery
conviction
invoked
penalty
phase
murder
trial
support
prosecution
plea
death
penalty
recognizing
need
effective
prosecution
team
petitioner
harry
connick
district
attorney
parish
orleans
appointed
eric
dubelier
special
prosecutor
cases
dubelier
enlisted
jim
williams
try
armed
robbery
case
assist
murder
case
gerry
deegan
assisted
williams
armed
robbery
case
bruce
whittaker
fourth
prosecutor
involved
cases
approved
thompson
armed
robbery
pretrial
proceedings
armed
robbery
case
thompson
filed
motion
requesting
access
materials
information
favorable
defendant
material
relevant
issue
guilt
punishment
well
results
reports
scientific
tests
experiments
prosecutorial
responses
motion
fell
far
short
brady
first
prosecutors
blocked
defense
counsel
inspection
pant
leg
swatch
stained
robber
blood
although
dubelier
april
response
stated
inspection
permitted
swatch
signed
property
room
next
day
returned
noon
april
day
trial
thompson
attorney
inspected
evidence
made
available
found
blood
evidence
one
told
defense
counsel
swatch
recent
removal
property
room
tr
cf
ante
thompson
attorney
access
evidence
locker
swatch
recorded
evidence
second
dubelier
whittaker
ordered
crime
laboratory
rush
pretrial
test
swatch
tr
whittaker
received
lab
report
addressed
attention
two
days
trial
commenced
immediately
thereafter
placed
lab
report
williams
desk
record
although
lab
report
conclusively
identified
perpetrator
blood
type
district
attorney
office
never
revealed
report
third
deegan
checked
swatch
property
room
morning
first
day
trial
prosecution
produce
swatch
trial
deegan
return
swatch
property
room
trial
swatch
never
found
tr
oral
arg
ased
solely
descriptions
provided
three
victims
record
jury
convicted
thompson
attempted
armed
robbery
sentenced
years
without
possibility
parole
maximum
available
sentence
prosecutors
continued
disregard
brady
murder
trial
held
may
prosecution
strategy
achieved
prosecuting
thompson
armed
robbery
first
withholding
blood
evidence
might
exonerated
thompson
charge
district
attorney
office
disabled
thompson
testifying
defense
murder
earlier
observed
see
supra
impeaching
use
prior
conviction
severely
undermined
thompson
credibility
thompson
effectively
stopped
testifying
defense
testimony
witnesses
gained
force
prosecution
failure
reveal
evidence
impeached
witnesses
helped
seal
thompson
fate
first
prosecution
undermined
thompson
efforts
impeach
perkins
perkins
testified
volunteered
information
police
knowledge
reward
money
record
prosecutors
produced
audiotapes
perkins
conversations
liuzza
family
police
summary
tapes
thompson
attorneys
little
cast
doubt
perkins
credibility
closing
argument
prosecution
emphasized
thompson
presented
direct
evidence
reward
money
motivated
witnesses
second
prosecution
impeded
thompson
impeachment
key
witness
kevin
freeman
failing
disclose
police
report
containing
perkins
account
learned
freeman
murder
see
supra
freeman
trial
testimony
materially
inconsistent
report
tr
record
lacking
knowledge
police
report
thompson
point
inconsistencies
third
vital
eyewitness
initial
description
assailant
hair
see
supra
prime
relevance
suggested
freeman
thompson
murdered
liuzza
see
supra
materiality
eyewitness
contemporaneous
description
murderer
altogether
apparent
prosecution
failure
produce
police
reports
setting
eyewitness
first
said
undermined
efforts
impeach
witness
police
officer
initially
interviewed
omission
left
defense
counsel
without
knowledge
prosecutors
restyling
killer
close
cut
hair
afro
prosecutors
finessed
discrepancy
eyewitness
initial
description
thompson
appearance
asked
leading
questions
prompting
eyewitness
agree
stand
perpetrator
hair
afro
type
yet
straight
back
record
corroboratively
police
officer
refreshing
recollection
reviewing
material
prosecution
table
gave
artful
testimony
characterized
witness
initial
description
perpetrator
hair
black
short
afro
style
emphasis
added
prosecutors
well
knew
nothing
withheld
police
reports
described
murderer
hair
simply
close
cut
portrayed
perpetrator
afro
hair
jury
found
thompson
guilty
murder
prevented
thompson
testifying
freeman
killer
prosecution
delivered
ultimate
argument
thompson
already
serving
sentence
attempted
armed
robbery
prosecution
urged
way
punish
murder
execute
strategy
worked
planned
thompson
sentenced
death
thompson
discovered
prosecutors
misconduct
serendipitous
series
events
nine
years
thompson
convictions
deegan
assistant
prosecutor
armed
robbery
trial
learned
terminally
ill
soon
thereafter
deegan
confessed
friend
michael
riehlmann
suppressed
blood
evidence
armed
robbery
case
deegan
heed
riehlmann
counsel
reveal
done
five
years
riehlmann
former
orleans
parish
prosecutor
kept
deegan
confession
april
state
louisiana
scheduled
thompson
execution
effort
save
life
thompson
attorneys
hired
private
investigator
deep
crime
lab
archives
investigator
unearthed
microfiche
copy
lab
report
identifying
robber
blood
type
copy
showed
report
addressed
whittaker
see
supra
thompson
attorneys
contacted
whittaker
informed
riehlmann
lab
report
found
riehlmann
thereupon
told
whittaker
deegan
failed
turn
stuff
might
exculpatory
tr
riehlmann
prepared
affidavit
describing
deegan
disclosure
intentionally
suppressed
blood
evidence
armed
robbery
trial
john
thompson
record
thompson
lawyers
presented
trial
crime
lab
report
showing
robber
blood
type
report
identifying
thompson
blood
type
evidence
proved
thompson
innocent
robbery
immediately
stayed
thompson
execution
commenced
proceedings
assess
newly
discovered
evidence
connick
sought
abbreviated
hearing
full
hearing
unnecessary
urged
office
confessed
error
moved
dismiss
armed
robbery
charges
see
insisted
public
hearing
given
history
case
said
willing
accept
representations
connick
office
made
motion
dismiss
full
day
hearing
vacated
thompson
attempted
armed
robbery
conviction
dismissed
charges
admonished
day
long
number
young
assistant
sitting
courtroom
watching
hope
take
home
take
heart
message
kind
conduct
go
parish
criminal
justice
system
going
work
district
attorney
office
initiated
grand
jury
proceedings
prosecutors
withheld
lab
report
connick
terminated
grand
jury
one
day
maintained
lab
report
brady
material
prosecutors
know
thompson
blood
type
tr
cf
supra
told
investigating
prosecutor
grand
jury
ould
make
job
difficult
tr
protest
prosecutor
tendered
resignation
thereafter
louisiana
appeal
reversed
thompson
murder
conviction
state
thompson
unlawfully
procured
robbery
conviction
held
violated
thompson
right
testify
thus
fully
present
defense
murder
trial
merits
several
brady
claims
arising
murder
trial
observed
therefore
become
moot
see
also
record
cf
ante
suggesting
brady
violations
murder
prosecution
adjudicated
violations
undeterred
assistants
disregard
thompson
rights
connick
retried
liuzza
murder
thompson
defense
bolstered
evidence
earlier
unavailable
ten
exhibits
prosecution
disclosed
thompson
first
tried
newly
produced
items
included
police
reports
describing
assailant
murder
case
close
cut
hair
police
report
recounting
perkins
meetings
liuzza
family
see
supra
audio
recordings
meetings
supplemental
police
report
deliberating
minutes
jury
found
thompson
guilty
may
served
years
prison
crimes
commit
thompson
released
ii
july
thompson
commenced
civil
action
alleging
connick
officials
orleans
parish
district
attorney
office
office
violated
constitutional
rights
wrongfully
withholding
brady
evidence
thompson
sought
hold
connick
district
attorney
office
liable
failure
adequately
train
prosecutors
concerning
brady
obligations
liability
attaches
agree
failure
amount
indifference
rights
persons
untrained
employees
come
contact
ante
quoting
canton
harris
disagree
however
conclusion
thompson
failed
prove
deliberate
indifference
weighed
evidence
jury
case
found
thompson
concluding
district
attorney
office
deliberately
indifferent
thompson
brady
rights
need
training
supervision
safeguard
rights
viewing
evidence
light
favorable
thompson
appropriate
light
verdic
rendered
jury
patrick
burget
see
cause
upset
district
determination
affirmed
fifth
circuit
ample
evidence
adduced
trial
supported
jury
verdict
record
years
ago
observed
municipality
failure
provide
training
may
egregious
even
without
notice
prior
constitutional
violations
failure
properly
characterized
indifference
constitutional
rights
canton
light
duties
assigned
specific
officers
employees
canton
recognized
may
happen
need
different
training
obvious
inadequacy
likely
result
violation
constitutional
rights
policymakers
reasonably
said
deliberately
indifferent
need
thompson
presented
convincing
evidence
satisfy
standard
thompson
suit
proceeded
jury
trial
two
theories
liability
first
orleans
parish
office
official
brady
policy
unconstitutional
second
connick
deliberately
indifferent
obvious
need
train
prosecutors
brady
obligations
connick
brady
policy
directed
prosecutors
turn
required
state
federal
law
brief
petitioners
jury
thus
understandably
rejected
thompson
claim
official
policy
unconstitutional
ante
jury
found
however
connick
deliberately
indifferent
need
train
prosecutors
brady
command
special
verdict
form
jury
answered
yes
following
question
brady
violation
armed
robbery
case
infringements
john
thompson
rights
murder
trial
substantially
caused
connick
failure
deliberate
indifference
establish
policies
procedures
protect
one
accused
crime
constitutional
violations
record
consistent
question
put
jury
without
objection
instructed
jurors
ou
limited
nonproduced
blood
evidence
resulting
infringement
thompson
right
testify
murder
trial
may
consider
evidence
presented
trial
tr
record
cf
ante
ante
scalia
concurring
maintaining
case
involves
single
brady
violation
evidence
included
stipulation
retrial
liuzza
murder
thompson
introduced
ten
exhibits
containing
relevant
information
withheld
prosecution
see
supra
abundant
evidence
supported
jury
finding
additional
brady
training
obviously
necessary
ensure
brady
violations
occur
connick
office
sole
policymaker
misunderstood
brady
leaders
office
bore
direct
responsibility
training
less
experienced
prosecutors
similarly
uninformed
brady
prosecutors
office
received
brady
training
office
shirked
responsibility
keep
prosecutors
abreast
relevant
legal
developments
concerning
brady
requirements
result
multiple
shortfalls
hardly
surprising
brady
violations
fact
occurred
severely
undermining
integrity
thompson
trials
connick
office
sole
policymaker
testimony
exposed
flawed
understanding
prosecutor
brady
obligations
first
connick
admitted
jury
earlier
understanding
brady
conveyed
prior
sworn
testimony
narrow
tr
second
connick
confessed
withheld
crime
lab
report
one
time
prosecutor
got
indicted
attorney
third
even
trial
connick
persisted
misstating
brady
requirements
example
connick
urged
brady
violation
arising
inadvertent
conduct
assistant
pressure
lot
case
load
tr
however
correctly
instructed
jury
determining
whether
brady
violation
good
bad
faith
prosecution
matter
tr
testimony
leaders
district
attorney
office
revealed
similar
misunderstandings
misunderstandings
jury
find
large
part
responsible
gross
disregard
brady
rights
thompson
experienced
dubelier
admitted
never
reviewed
police
files
simply
relied
police
flag
potential
brady
information
tr
however
instructed
jury
individual
prosecutor
duty
learn
favorable
evidence
known
others
acting
government
behalf
case
including
police
record
williams
asked
whether
brady
material
includes
documents
possession
district
attorney
used
impeach
witness
show
lying
responded
simply
mistakenly
tr
testimony
individuals
orleans
parish
district
attorney
office
thompson
expert
exposed
complete
errors
brady
required
prosecutors
dubelier
understanding
obligations
brady
whatsoever
expert
observed
williams
still
sure
obligations
brady
cf
ante
undisputed
trial
prosecutors
familiar
general
brady
requirement
state
disclose
defense
evidence
possession
favorable
jury
attribute
violations
thompson
rights
directly
prosecutors
misapprehension
brady
prosecution
obligation
produce
hair
police
reports
williams
maintained
newspaper
reports
suggested
witness
descriptions
consistent
thompson
appearance
therefore
williams
urged
defense
already
everything
tr
dubelier
tendered
alternative
explanation
nondisclosure
dubelier
view
descriptions
inconsistent
thompson
appearance
portrayed
police
photograph
showing
thompson
hair
extending
least
three
inches
forehead
record
williams
insisted
discharged
prosecution
duty
disclose
blood
evidence
mentioning
motion
hearing
prosecution
intended
obtain
blood
sample
thompson
tr
armed
robbery
trial
williams
told
one
victims
results
blood
test
made
swatch
inconclusive
testified
action
lab
report
brady
material
know
blood
type
thompson
tr
see
supra
district
instructed
jury
lab
report
brady
material
connick
comprehended
orleans
parish
prosecutors
lacked
essential
guidance
brady
application
fact
connick
effectively
conceded
brady
training
office
inadequate
tr
oral
arg
connick
explained
jury
prosecutors
offices
must
make
clear
new
prosecutors
responsibility
brady
must
giv
lot
leeway
tr
jury
heard
ample
evidence
connick
office
gave
prosecutors
brady
guidance
installed
procedures
monitor
brady
compliance
connick
acknowledged
many
prosecutors
coming
fresh
law
school
office
uge
turnover
allowed
attorneys
little
experience
advance
quickly
supervisory
positions
see
tr
dubelier
williams
two
highest
ranking
attorneys
office
yet
neither
man
even
five
years
experience
prosecutor
see
supra
record
tr
dubelier
williams
learned
prosecutorial
craft
connick
office
earlier
observed
see
supra
testimony
manifested
woefully
deficient
understanding
brady
dubelier
williams
told
jury
recall
brady
training
office
tr
connick
testified
relied
supervisors
including
dubelier
williams
ensure
prosecutors
familiar
brady
obligations
tr
yet
connick
inquire
whether
supervisors
understood
importance
teaching
newer
prosecutors
brady
riehlmann
recall
ever
trained
instructed
anybody
brady
obligations
job
otherwise
tr
whittaker
agreed
possible
inexperienced
lawyers
weeks
law
school
training
bear
responsibility
decisions
whether
material
brady
material
produced
thompson
expert
characterized
connick
supervision
regarding
brady
blind
leading
blind
tr
example
trial
attorneys
sometimes
went
connick
brady
questions
tell
proceed
tr
connick
acknowledged
stopped
reading
law
books
looking
opinions
first
elected
district
attorney
part
training
prosecutors
purportedly
attended
pretrial
conference
office
chief
trials
taking
case
trial
connick
intended
practice
provide
training
accountability
achieved
neither
aim
thompson
prosecutions
dubelier
williams
senior
prosecutors
office
free
take
cases
trial
without
pretrying
proceeded
thompson
prosecutions
record
cf
ante
rial
chiefs
oversaw
preparation
prosecutors
confirmed
training
district
attorney
office
overall
deficient
soon
connick
retired
survey
assistant
district
attorneys
office
revealed
half
felt
received
training
needed
jobs
tr
thompson
bears
emphasis
complaining
absence
formal
training
sessions
tr
oral
arg
cf
ante
complaint
demand
brady
compliance
enforced
particular
way
asks
brady
obligations
communicated
accurately
genuinely
happen
district
attorney
office
inevitable
prosecutors
misapprehend
brady
brady
importance
brought
home
prosecutors
surely
least
one
four
officers
knew
swatch
lab
report
revealed
existence
defense
counsel
louisiana
require
continuing
legal
education
time
thompson
trials
tr
cf
ante
primary
responsibility
keeping
prosecutors
au
courant
developments
law
therefore
resided
district
attorney
office
course
connick
tenure
district
attorney
jury
learned
office
chief
appeals
circulated
memoranda
appellate
courts
issued
important
opinions
tr
office
policy
manual
compilation
memoranda
criminal
law
practice
circulated
prosecutors
connick
became
district
attorney
manual
contained
four
sentences
nothing
slim
instruction
jury
learned
notably
inaccurate
incomplete
dated
tr
cf
ante
senior
attorneys
also
circulated
decisions
instructional
memoranda
keep
abreast
relevant
legal
example
manual
acknowledge
giglio
made
plain
impeachment
evidence
brady
material
prosecutors
obligated
sum
evidence
permitted
jury
reach
following
conclusions
first
connick
ensure
prosecutors
office
knew
brady
obligations
neither
confirmed
familiarity
brady
hired
saw
training
took
place
watch
second
need
brady
training
monitoring
obvious
connick
indeed
testified
third
connick
cavalier
approach
staff
knowledge
observation
brady
requirements
contributed
culture
inattention
brady
orleans
parish
earlier
noted
see
supra
connick
resisted
effort
hold
prosecutors
accountable
brady
compliance
felt
effort
make
job
difficult
tr
never
disciplined
fired
single
prosecutor
violating
brady
tr
jury
told
decision
kyles
whitley
capital
case
prosecuted
connick
office
garnered
attention
featured
many
instances
state
failure
disclose
exculpatory
evidence
stevens
concurring
questioned
kyles
connick
told
jury
satisfied
office
practices
saw
need
occasioned
kyles
make
changes
tr
quantity
quality
evidence
canvassed
sufficient
warrant
jury
determination
connick
prosecutors
served
merely
negligent
regarding
brady
rather
deliberately
indifferent
law
requires
canton
spoke
circumstances
need
training
may
obvious
lack
training
likely
result
constitutional
violations
policymakers
provide
requisite
training
reasonably
said
deliberately
indifferent
need
training
case
convinced
belongs
category
canton
marked
canton
offered
illustration
ity
policymakers
know
moral
certainty
police
officers
required
arrest
fleeing
felons
policymakers
canton
observed
equip
police
officers
firearms
facilitate
arrests
ibid
need
instruct
armed
officers
constitutional
limitations
use
deadly
force
canton
said
obvious
failure
train
officers
properly
characterized
indifference
constitutional
rights
ibid
district
tracking
canton
language
instructed
jury
thompson
prevail
deliberate
indifference
claim
evidence
persuaded
jury
three
points
first
connick
certain
prosecutors
confront
situation
decide
evidence
required
constitution
provided
accused
tr
second
situation
involved
difficult
choice
one
prosecutors
history
mishandling
additional
training
supervision
monitoring
clearly
needed
ibid
third
wrong
choice
prosecutor
situation
frequently
cause
deprivation
accused
constitutional
rights
ibid
record
see
canton
walker
new
york
petitioners
used
formulation
failure
train
standard
pretrial
submissions
record
proposed
jury
instruction
deliberate
petitioners
dispute
connick
kn
moral
certainty
prosecutors
regularly
face
brady
decisions
see
canton
jury
furthermore
reasonably
find
brady
rights
may
involve
choices
difficult
connick
obviously
knew
known
prosecutors
needed
perfunctory
training
make
correct
choices
see
canton
demonstrated
earlier
see
supra
even
trial
prosecutors
failed
give
accurate
account
brady
obligations
emphasized
earlier
see
supra
evidence
permitted
jury
conclude
connick
known
brady
training
office
bordered
zero
see
tr
oral
arg
moreover
connick
understood
newer
prosecutors
needed
clear
guidance
left
grapple
brady
tr
thus
obvious
jury
find
constitutional
rights
jeopardy
prosecutors
received
slim
brady
training
based
evidence
presented
jury
conclude
brady
errors
untrained
prosecutors
frequently
cause
deprivations
defendants
constitutional
rights
jury
learned
several
brady
oversights
thompson
trials
heard
testimony
connick
office
one
worst
brady
records
country
tr
prosecutors
faced
considerable
pressure
get
convictions
instructed
turn
required
state
federal
law
brief
petitioners
risk
real
err
withholding
rather
revealing
information
favorable
defense
sum
despite
justice
scalia
protestations
contrary
ante
brady
violations
thompson
prosecutions
singular
aberrational
one
expect
given
attitude
toward
brady
pervasive
district
attorney
office
thompson
demonstrated
fewer
five
prosecutors
four
trial
prosecutors
riehlmann
disregarded
brady
rights
established
kept
year
upon
year
evidence
vital
defense
conduct
showed
equal
force
foreseeable
consequence
lax
training
absence
monitoring
legal
requirement
fundamental
fair
unquestionably
municipality
leaves
police
officers
untrained
constitutional
limits
use
deadly
weapons
places
lives
jeopardy
canton
case
vividly
shows
municipality
empowers
prosecutors
press
death
sentence
without
ensuring
prosecutors
know
honor
brady
rights
may
less
deliberately
indifferent
risk
innocent
lives
brady
long
recognized
among
basic
safeguards
brigading
criminal
defendant
fair
trial
right
see
cone
bell
slip
see
also
bagley
marshall
dissenting
vigilance
superintending
prosecutors
attention
brady
requirement
important
reason
brady
violation
nature
causes
suppression
evidence
beyond
defendant
capacity
ferret
absence
withheld
evidence
may
result
conviction
innocent
defendant
unconscionable
impose
reasonable
controls
impelling
prosecutors
bring
information
light
nevertheless
holds
canton
example
inapposite
maintains
professional
obligations
ethics
rules
training
including
training
set
attorneys
apart
municipal
employees
including
rookie
police
officers
ante
connick
every
incentive
trial
attempt
establish
reasonably
rely
professional
education
status
staff
cf
ante
jury
heard
rejected
argument
effect
tr
advances
connick
argument
greater
clarity
greater
support
basis
one
confident
law
schools
acquaint
students
prosecutors
unique
obligation
brady
whittaker
told
jury
recall
covering
brady
criminal
procedure
class
law
school
tr
dubelier
alma
mater
like
law
faculties
make
criminal
procedure
required
connick
suggested
bar
examination
ensures
new
attorneys
know
brady
demands
tr
research
indicates
however
present
brady
questions
accounted
even
total
points
criminal
law
procedure
section
administration
louisiana
bar
person
sitting
louisiana
bar
examination
moreover
need
pass
five
exam
nine
one
qualify
admission
profession
showing
even
passing
knowledge
criminal
law
procedure
majority
suggestion
lawyers
need
brady
training
equipped
tools
find
interpret
apply
legal
principles
ante
blinks
reality
belied
facts
case
see
brief
former
federal
civil
rights
officials
prosecutors
amici
curiae
connick
recognized
prosecutors
inexperience
equipped
indeed
understanding
complying
brady
obligations
easy
tasks
appropriate
way
resolve
brady
issues
always
brief
former
federal
civil
rights
officials
prosecutors
amici
curiae
brady
compliance
therefore
much
risk
fundamental
fairness
criminal
justice
system
taken
granted
training
remains
critical
majority
suggests
prior
pattern
similar
violations
necessary
show
deliberate
indifference
defendants
brady
rights
see
ante
text
contains
reason
imply
district
attorney
deliberate
indifference
might
shown
several
ways
short
prior
case
one
instance
connick
indicted
suppression
evidence
created
tinderbox
orleans
parish
brady
violations
nigh
inevitable
occur
connick
insisted
need
change
anything
opposed
efforts
hold
prosecutors
accountable
ground
make
job
difficult
district
attorney
aware
office
high
turnover
rate
recruits
prosecutors
fresh
law
school
promotes
rapidly
ranks
bears
responsibility
ensuring
training
takes
place
short
buck
stops
recognizes
duty
produce
brady
evidence
defense
mong
prosecutors
unique
ethical
obligations
ante
evidence
case
presents
overwhelming
support
conclusion
orleans
parish
office
slighted
responsibility
profession
state
system
justice
providing
brady
training
connick
entitled
rely
prosecutors
professional
training
ante
connick
principal
insurer
training
reasons
stated
affirm
judgment
appeals
fifth
circuit
like
district
uphold
jury
verdict
awarding
damages
thompson
gross
deliberately
indifferent
violation
fair
trial
right
footnotes
thompson
discovered
crime
lab
report
former
assistant
district
attorney
michael
riehlmann
revealed
deegan
confessed
intentionally
suppressed
blood
evidence
armed
robbery
trial
john
thompson
way
exculpated
defendant
record
see
also
deegan
apparently
recently
diagnosed
terminal
cancer
made
confession
following
disciplinary
complaint
district
attorney
office
louisiana
reprimanded
riehlmann
failing
disclose
deegan
admission
earlier
riehlmann
la
thompson
testified
defense
second
trial
presented
evidence
suggesting
another
man
committed
murder
man
government
key
witness
first
murder
trial
died
interval
first
second
trials
connick
conceded
failure
disclose
crime
lab
report
violated
brady
question
presented
address
district
rejected
connick
proposed
deliberate
indifference
jury
instruction
required
thompson
prove
pattern
similar
violations
reasons
summary
judgment
motion
tr
record
see
also
tr
oral
arg
conclude
thompson
failed
prove
deliberate
indifference
need
reach
causation
thus
address
whether
alleged
training
deficiency
cause
force
canton
harris
quoting
monell
new
york
city
dept
social
polk
county
dodson
actually
caused
failure
disclose
crime
lab
report
canton
supra
said
dissent
however
affirming
verdict
favor
thompson
require
finding
proved
deliberate
indifference
proved
causation
perhaps
unsurprisingly
dissent
conducted
second
step
analysis
require
showing
failure
provide
particular
training
dissent
never
clearly
identifies
actually
caused
flagrant
quite
possibly
intentional
misconduct
occurred
case
see
post
opinion
ginsburg
assuming
ad
brady
importance
brought
home
prosecutors
violation
issue
surely
occurred
dissent
believes
evidence
prosecutors
allegedly
misapprehen
ded
brady
proves
causation
post
course
evidence
need
training
sufficient
prove
lack
training
actually
caused
violation
issue
causation
requirement
necessary
every
plaintiff
satisfied
deliberate
indifference
requirement
necessarily
satisfy
causation
requirement
thompson
every
incentive
trial
attempt
establish
pattern
similar
violations
given
jury
instruction
allowed
jury
find
deliberate
indifference
based
among
things
prosecutors
history
mishandling
similar
situations
record
thompson
also
asserts
case
single
incident
four
prosecutors
may
responsible
nondisclosure
crime
lab
report
according
allegations
withheld
additional
evidence
armed
robbery
murder
trials
contemporaneous
subsequent
conduct
establish
pattern
violations
provide
notice
cit
opportunity
conform
constitutional
dictates
canton
concurring
part
dissenting
part
moreover
ever
found
brady
violations
thompson
alleges
occurred
armed
robbery
murder
trials
louisiana
state
bar
code
professional
responsibility
included
broad
understanding
prosecutor
duty
disclose
respect
evidence
witnesses
prosecutor
responsibilities
different
lawyer
private
practice
prosecutor
make
timely
disclosure
defense
available
evidence
known
tends
negate
guilt
accused
mitigate
degree
offense
reduce
punishment
prosecutor
intentionally
avoid
pursuit
evidence
merely
believes
damage
prosecution
case
aid
accused
lsba
articles
incorporation
art
ec
see
also
aba
model
rule
prof
conduct
prosecutor
criminal
case
shall
make
timely
disclosure
defense
evidence
information
known
prosecutor
tends
negate
guilt
accused
mitigates
offense
addition
ethical
rules
louisiana
code
criminal
procedure
louisiana
prosecutors
doubt
familiar
required
prosecutors
upon
order
permit
inspection
evidence
favorable
defendant
material
relevant
issue
guilt
punishment
la
code
crim
proc
art
west
added
well
results
reports
scientific
tests
experiments
made
connection
material
particular
case
reports
exculpatory
intended
use
trial
art
contrary
dissent
assertion
see
post
citing
post
prosecutor
youth
specific
reason
rely
professional
training
ethical
obligations
see
supra
citing
cronic
thompson
also
argues
proved
deliberate
indifference
direct
evidence
policymaker
fault
presumably
need
rely
circumstantial
evidence
brief
respondent
support
thompson
contends
connick
created
culture
indifference
district
attorney
office
evidenced
connick
allegedly
inadequate
understanding
brady
office
unwritten
brady
policy
later
incorporated
handbook
officewide
restrictive
discovery
policy
brief
respondent
argument
essentially
assertion
connick
office
unconstitutional
policy
custom
jury
rejected
claim
thompson
challenge
finding
dissent
spends
considerable
time
finding
new
brady
violations
thompson
trials
see
post
violations
relevant
even
dissent
legal
analysis
mystery
post
dissent
list
violations
among
bundant
evidence
believes
supports
jury
finding
brady
training
obviously
necessary
post
dissent
quarrel
conclusion
contemporaneous
subsequent
conduct
establish
pattern
violations
point
appears
highlight
dissent
sees
sympathetic
even
legally
irrelevant
facts
event
dissent
findings
highly
suspect
finding
two
new
violations
dissent
belatedly
tries
reverse
appeals
decision
brady
claims
without
merit
compare
thompson
cain
rejecting
brady
claims
regarding
audiotapes
perkins
police
report
post
concluding
brady
violations
basis
dissent
suggestion
materially
new
facts
called
appeals
decision
question
cf
state
thompson
la
app
noting
thompson
admission
current
brady
claims
ha
rejected
louisiana
federal
courts
regarding
swatch
dissent
asserts
prosecutors
blocked
defense
inspecting
sending
crime
lab
testing
post
thompson
counsel
conceded
oral
argument
trial
counsel
access
evidence
locker
swatch
recorded
evidence
see
tr
oral
arg
record
evidence
card
identifying
one
piece
victims
sic
right
pants
leg
among
evidence
evidence
locker
indicating
evidence
checked
tr
testimony
thompson
counsel
ent
evidence
room
checked
evidence
testimony
evidence
card
available
public
available
thompson
counsel
seen
thompson
counsel
stapled
evidence
bag
normal
process
moreover
dissent
seriously
believe
jury
found
brady
violations
indisputably
questions
law
see
post
although
dissent
acknowledges
deliberate
indifference
liability
respondeat
superior
liability
one
opinion
suggests
believes
otherwise
post
see
post
asserting
buck
stops
district
attorney
post
suggesting
municipal
liability
attaches
prosecutors
deliberately
indifferent
law
requires
stand
longstanding
rule
reaffirmed
unanimous
earlier
term
prove
violation
plaintiff
must
prove
municipality
wrongful
conduct
caused
injury
municipality
ultimately
responsible
torts
employees
los
angeles
county
humphries
ante
see
humphries
ante
citing
monell
footnotes
monell
new
york
city
dept
social
batson
kentucky
share
dissent
confidence
result
avoided
instruction
requirement
likely
brady
material
produced
prosecutors
involved
underlying
criminal
cases
properly
trained
supervised
monitored
regarding
production
brady
evidence
post
quoting
tr
comforting
assurance
depends
entirely
proper
training
consists
limited
training
aspects
brady
repeatedly
violated
includes
dissent
include
training
avoid
violation
assurance
assurance
dissent
contention
instruction
connick
proposed
resembled
charge
given
district
post
disregards
requested
instruction
concerning
necessity
pattern
prior
violations
meaningless
say
rejected
connick
categorical
position
assail
district
formulation
deliberate
indifference
instruction
post
requirement
part
connick
requested
formulation
deliberate
indifference
prove
deliberate
indifference
plaintiff
must
demonstrate
least
pattern
similar
violations
arising
training
clearly
inadequate
obviously
likely
result
constitutional
violation
record
doc
emphasis
added
dissent
cite
support
theory
comes
unexpected
source
connick
testimony
qualifies
brady
material
see
post
connick
told
prosecutors
told
jury
asked
whether
prosecutor
must
disclose
crime
lab
report
defense
even
know
defendant
blood
type
law
qualifies
brady
material
quoting
tr
given
effort
dissent
expended
persuading
us
connick
understanding
brady
profoundly
misguided
newfound
trust
expertise
subject
say
least
surprising
dissent
response
jury
must
found
otherwise
since
instructed
liability
attach
failure
train
fault
must
training
program
particular
prosecutor
post
quoting
tr
instruction
require
jury
find
deegan
commit
knowing
violation
merely
prevented
jury
finding
connick
liable
failure
train
agree
part
point
footnotes
exhibits
entered
evidence
thompson
trial
herein
cited
reference
page
number
exhibit
binder
compiled
district
included
record
appeal
majority
endorses
fifth
circuit
conclusion
thompson
tried
murder
brady
violation
occurred
respect
audio
tapes
ecause
defense
counsel
knowledge
evidence
easily
requested
access
prosecution
thompson
cain
ante
basis
asserted
knowledge
mystery
recordings
secretly
made
come
light
long
thompson
trials
time
assignment
dubelier
served
district
attorney
office
three
half
years
williams
four
half
years
deegan
recent
law
school
graduate
less
one
year
whittaker
three
years
connick
dispute
failure
disclose
swatch
crime
lab
report
violated
brady
see
tr
cf
ante
limiting
connick
concession
connick
failure
disclose
crime
lab
report
justice
scalia
contrary
view
probably
brady
violation
violation
thompson
rights
surely
frontier
brady
jurisprudence
connick
possibly
notice
need
train
ante
connick
counsel
however
saw
matter
differently
ny
reasonable
prosecutor
recognized
blood
evidence
brady
material
said
indeed
proper
response
obvious
record
majority
assails
highly
suspect
suggestion
prosecutors
violated
brady
failing
disclose
swatch
see
ante
parties
stipulated
thompson
action
jury
informed
rior
armed
robbery
trial
thompson
attorneys
advised
existence
blood
evidence
evidence
tested
blood
type
determined
definitively
swatch
tr
consistent
stipulation
thompson
trial
counsel
testified
spoke
clerk
maintain
ed
evidence
learned
hey
blood
evidence
district
instructed
jury
objection
connick
nonproduced
blood
evidence
violated
thompson
constitutional
rights
matter
law
justice
scalia
questions
petitioners
concession
brady
violated
prosecution
failed
inform
thompson
blood
evidence
considers
evidence
outside
brady
prosecution
endeavor
test
thompson
blood
therefore
avoided
knowing
evidence
fact
exculpatory
ante
ask
tell
view
prosecutor
brady
obligations
garners
support
precedent
see
also
supra
infra
jury
deliberations
armed
robbery
case
williams
orleans
parish
trial
attorney
common
two
prosecutions
told
thompson
objective
uncertain
terms
going
fry
die
electric
chair
tr
louisiana
appeal
concluded
connick
dispute
thompson
testified
absence
attempted
armed
robbery
conviction
state
thompson
cf
ante
thompson
elected
testify
thompson
argued
state
failed
produce
police
reports
information
identified
whose
testimony
exonerated
inculpated
freeman
shown
perkins
stated
heard
thompson
admit
committing
murder
promised
reward
money
testimony
thompson
leaving
arguments
unaddressed
louisiana
appeal
surely
defer
fifth
circuit
earlier
assessment
claims
made
anemic
record
thompson
cain
louisiana
appeal
suggest
thompson
belatedly
tr
ying
reverse
fifth
circuit
decision
cf
ante
notes
thompson
cain
fifth
circuit
rejected
brady
claims
raised
thompson
characterizing
one
claims
without
merit
ante
quoting
thompson
see
supra
however
overlooks
date
fifth
circuit
decision
rendered
revelation
brady
violations
armed
robbery
trial
thompson
opportunity
discovery
suit
thompson
aware
close
cut
hair
police
reports
see
thompson
later
revelations
little
thompson
knew
count
example
fifth
circuit
believed
perkins
statement
recorded
police
report
differ
freeman
trial
testimony
evidence
put
jury
trial
showed
police
report
several
material
respects
inconsistent
freeman
trial
testimony
tr
connick
never
suggested
jury
trial
bound
fifth
circuit
brady
rulings
afford
ed
great
deference
state
trial
findings
made
relief
hearing
thompson
jury
trial
course
far
extensive
accurate
information
reach
decision
moreover
earlier
noted
trial
made
findings
outraged
subsequently
discovered
brady
violations
connick
reluctance
bring
violations
light
see
supra
certainly
judge
wanted
jury
assessed
connick
deliberate
indifference
trial
defer
findings
earlier
made
notably
incomplete
record
permitted
thompson
introduce
evidence
brady
violations
blood
evidence
alone
proved
violation
thompson
constitutional
rights
declined
specifically
ask
jury
whether
stuff
also
brady
tr
allowed
thompson
submit
proof
violations
sho
cumulative
nature
impact
evidence
training
deliberate
indifference
ibid
cf
ante
questioning
violations
relevant
case
far
indulging
factfindings
cf
ante
simply
recite
evidence
supporting
jury
verdict
thompson
trial
misleadingly
district
instructed
jury
issue
whether
nondisclosure
crime
lab
report
caused
either
policy
practice
custom
attorney
office
deliberately
indifferent
failure
train
office
prosecutors
ante
jury
instruction
majority
cites
simply
directed
jury
regard
blood
evidence
matter
law
thompson
constitutional
rights
violated
record
preclude
jury
assessing
evidence
infringements
thompson
rights
see
kyles
whitley
state
obligation
brady
turns
cumulative
effect
evidence
suppressed
government
objection
petitioners
found
thompson
expert
joseph
lawless
qualified
testify
expert
criminal
law
procedure
tr
lawless
practiced
criminal
law
years
assistant
district
attorney
thereafter
entered
private
practice
author
prosecutorial
misconduct
law
procedure
forms
ed
first
published
tr
text
used
class
ethics
tactics
criminal
lawyer
harvard
law
school
federal
defender
training
program
administrative
office
courts
ward
brady
violations
kind
connick
conceded
example
connick
communicated
orleans
parish
prosecutors
uncertain
terms
physical
evidence
tested
establish
innocence
person
charged
turn
tr
oral
arg
evidence
conclusively
establish
scientific
certainty
innocence
person
charged
turn
connick
told
prosecutors
told
jury
asked
whether
prosecutor
must
disclose
crime
lab
report
defense
even
prosecutor
know
defendant
blood
type
law
qualifies
brady
material
louisiana
law
must
turn
brady
must
turn
failed
disclose
crime
lab
report
one
time
prosecutor
got
indicted
attorney
tr
cf
ante
scalia
concurring
questioning
connick
notice
need
train
prosecutors
brady
violations
conceded
case
scarcely
disagree
respect
dubelier
williams
whittaker
acknowledges
flagran
cy
deegan
conduct
see
ante
dispute
pretrial
prosecutors
knew
existence
swatch
lab
report
section
manual
titled
brady
material
full
cases
response
request
defense
attorneys
judge
orders
state
produce
called
brady
material
information
possession
state
exculpatory
regarding
defendant
duty
produce
brady
material
ongoing
continues
throughout
entirety
trial
failure
produce
brady
material
resulted
mistrials
reversals
well
extended
battles
jeopardy
issues
cases
review
brady
issues
including
apparently
statements
made
defendant
must
included
conference
assistant
must
familiar
law
regarding
exculpatory
information
possessed
state
record
relevant
time
period
many
significant
developments
brady
jurisprudence
among
decisions
handed
bagley
rejected
distinction
impeachment
evidence
exculpatory
evidence
brady
context
weatherford
bursey
brady
implicated
claim
state
revealed
present
eyewitness
testimony
particular
agent
defendant
trial
agurs
brady
claim
may
arise
undisclosed
evidence
demonstrates
prosecution
case
includes
perjured
testimony
prosecution
knew
known
perjury
defense
counsel
makes
pretrial
request
specific
evidence
government
fails
accede
request
defense
counsel
makes
request
government
fails
disclose
obviously
exculpatory
evidence
decisions
referenced
manual
compiled
circulated
memoranda
period
louisiana
issued
dozens
opinions
discussing
brady
including
state
sylvester
impeachment
evidence
must
disclosed
response
specific
request
create
reasonable
doubt
otherwise
exist
state
brooks
brady
extends
material
information
favorable
accused
state
carney
reversible
error
prosecution
fails
even
inadvertently
disclose
bargain
witness
justice
scalia
contends
theory
deliberate
indifference
repeal
law
monell
creates
danger
train
become
talismanic
incantation
producing
municipal
liability
virtually
every
instance
person
constitutional
rights
violated
city
employee
ante
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
district
charge
however
cautiously
cabined
jury
assessment
connick
deliberate
indifference
see
tr
thompson
must
prove
likely
brady
material
produced
prosecutors
involved
underlying
criminal
cases
properly
trained
supervised
monitored
regarding
production
brady
see
also
deliberate
indifference
jury
instruction
case
based
second
circuit
opinion
walker
new
york
applying
canton
complaint
alleging
district
attorney
failed
train
prosecutors
brady
justice
scalia
fears
calmed
experience
second
circuit
litigation
flood
even
rainfall
skinner
switzer
slip
circuit
walker
wake
see
brief
national
association
criminal
defense
lawyers
amicus
curiae
tellingly
second
circuit
nearly
years
since
decided
walker
successful
lawsuits
constitutional
violations
committed
prosecutors
trial
reported
violation
brady
case
citation
omitted
brief
center
administration
criminal
law
new
york
university
school
law
et
al
amici
curiae
walker
prompted
flood
liability
instruction
connick
proposed
resembled
charge
given
district
see
supra
connick
proposed
instruction
read
district
attorney
failure
train
supervise
constitutes
deliberate
indifference
constitutional
rights
citizens
plaintiff
must
show
harry
connick
knew
moral
certainty
employees
confront
given
situation
plaintiff
must
show
situation
either
presents
employee
difficult
choice
training
supervision
make
choice
less
difficult
history
employees
mishandling
situation
plaintiff
must
show
wrong
choice
assistant
district
attorney
frequently
cause
deprivation
citizen
constitutional
rights
record
citing
canton
punctuation
altered
cf
ante
scalia
concurring
criticizing
thompson
theory
deliberate
indifference
petitioners
true
argued
along
prove
deliberate
indifference
thompson
demonstrate
pattern
violations
brief
appellants
see
ante
scalia
concurring
rejected
categorical
position
petitioners
otherwise
assail
district
formulation
deliberate
indifference
instruction
record
courts
noted
often
trying
nature
prosecutor
brady
obligation
see
state
whitlock
la
app
recognizing
case
involving
brady
issues
connick
office
usually
difficult
determine
whether
inconsistencies
omitted
information
witnesses
statements
material
defendant
guilt
quoting
state
davenport
la
jury
draw
direct
causal
connection
connick
deliberate
indifference
prosecutors
misapprehension
brady
brady
violations
thompson
case
see
supra
prosecutors
misunderstandings
brady
large
part
responsible
gross
disregard
brady
rights
thompson
experienced
supra
jury
attribute
violations
thompson
rights
directly
prosecutors
misapprehension
brady
supra
williams
believe
brady
required
disclosure
impeachment
evidence
believe
obligation
turn
impeaching
hair
police
reports
supra
time
armed
robbery
trial
williams
reported
results
blood
test
swatch
inconclusive
ibid
williams
testified
lab
report
brady
material
supra
dubelier
williams
lead
prosecutors
thompson
trials
learned
prosecutorial
craft
connick
office
recall
brady
training
demonstrated
woefully
deficient
understanding
brady
received
supervision
thompson
trials
supra
brady
importance
brought
home
prosecutors
surely
least
one
four
officers
knew
swatch
lab
report
revealed
existence
defense
counsel
supra
connick
want
hold
prosecutors
accountable
brady
compliance
felt
make
job
difficult
supra
connick
never
disciplined
single
prosecutor
violating
brady
supra
prosecutors
faced
considerable
pressure
get
convictions
instructed
turn
required
state
federal
law
risk
real
err
withholding
rather
revealing
information
favorable
defense
citations
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
cf
ante
dissent
believes
evidence
prosecutors
allegedly
ded
brady
proves
note
furthermore
jury
received
clear
instructions
causation
element
neither
connick
majority
disputes
accuracy
adequacy
instruction
prevail
thompson
must
prove
likely
brady
material
produced
prosecutors
involved
underlying
criminal
cases
properly
trained
supervised
monitored
regarding
production
brady
evidence
tr
jury
properly
instructed
liability
attach
failure
train
fault
must
training
program
particular
prosecutor
instruction
finding
connick
liable
jury
necessarily
rejected
argument
echoed
justice
scalia
deegan
bad
guy
see
also
ante
indeed
thompson
shown
simply
deegan
deliberately
withheld
evidence
agree
basis
liability
reams
evidence
showed
disregard
brady
occurred
orleans
parish
thompson
robbery
murder
trials
see
tulane
university
law
school
curriculum
http
select
academics
select
curriculum
visited
mar
clerk
case
file
see
louisiana
committee
bar
admissions
compilation
louisiana
state
bar
examinations
july
available
clerk
case
file
see
la
state
bar
articles
incorporation
art
la
rev
stat
ann
ch
app
west
ibid
west
board
bryan
cty
brown
reaffirmed
evidence
single
violation
federal
rights
accompanied
showing
municipality
failed
train
employees
handle
recurring
situations
presenting
obvious
potential
violation
trigger
municipal
liability
conducting
inquiry
acknowledged
may
easy
task
factfinder
canton
harris
bryan
county
retreat
conclusion
canton
judge
jury
respective
jobs
adequate
task
see
also
bryan
county
absent
pattern
municipal
liability
may
predicated
particular
glaring
omission
training
regimen
cf
ante
suggesting
set
facts
plaintiff
establish
deliberate
indifference
failure
train
prosecutors
brady
obligation
without
showing
prior
pattern
violations
congress
sought
render
claim
relief
contingent
showing
pattern
practice
expressly
see
shall
unlawful
governmental
authority
engage
pattern
practice
conduct
law
enforcement
officers
deprives
persons
rights
protected
constitution
person
adversely
affected
pattern
practice
telemarketing
may
bring
civil
action
authorizing
attorney
general
bring
civil
action
reason
believe
person
engaged
pattern
practice
violating
section
see
also
authorizing
federal
communications
commission
establish
additional
rules
commission
finds
prior
adjudicated
violations
section
constitute
pattern
practice
violations
end
majority
leaves
open
possibility
something
pattern
violations
also
give
district
attorney
specific
reason
know
additional
training
necessary
see
ante
connick
admission
reason
see
supra
example
prosecutor
office
deliberately
indifferent
longstanding
policy
abandoned
policy
failed
provide
training
show
prosecutors
comply
brady
obligations
altered
circumstances
district
attorney
deliberately
indifferent
practice
paring
prosecutors
untrained
prosecutors
knew
supervision
stopped
untrained
prosecutors
committing
brady
violations
nevertheless
changed
staffing
cases
untrained
prosecutors
worked
without
supervision
majority
reads
statement
endorsement
respondeat
superior
liability
ante
entirely
misses
point
cf
ante
canton
recognized
deliberate
indifference
liability
respondeat
superior
liability
one
connick
directly
responsible
brady
violations
thompson
prosecutions
hired
prosecutors
violated
brady
deliberate
indifference