pepper
argued
december
decided
march
pleading
guilty
drug
charges
petitioner
pepper
sentenced
federal
sentencing
guidelines
months
imprisonment
nearly
percent
downward
departure
low
end
guidelines
range
based
part
substantial
assistance
followed
five
years
supervised
release
pepper
eighth
circuit
reversed
remanded
resentencing
light
inter
alia
booker
pepper
begun
serving
supervised
release
testified
resentencing
hearing
longer
drug
addict
completed
drug
treatment
program
prison
enrolled
community
college
achieved
good
grades
working
part
time
pepper
father
testified
son
longer
estranged
pepper
probation
officer
testified
sentence
reasonable
light
pepper
substantial
assistance
postsentencing
rehabilitation
demonstrated
low
recidivism
risk
district
sentenced
pepper
months
granting
percent
downward
departure
based
pepper
substantial
assistance
downward
variance
based
inter
alia
pepper
rehabilitation
since
initial
sentencing
pepper
ii
eighth
circuit
reversed
remanded
resentencing
concluding
pepper
postsentencing
rehabilitation
considered
factor
supporting
downward
variance
directing
case
assigned
different
district
judge
vacated
remanded
pepper
ii
judgment
light
gall
eighth
circuit
pepper
iii
reversed
remanded
second
resentencing
hearing
pepper
informed
new
district
judge
still
school
promoted
job
married
supporting
new
family
noting
nearly
identical
remand
language
pepper
ii
pepper
iii
observed
bound
reduce
pepper
range
percent
substantial
assistance
instead
found
entitled
percent
reduction
refused
grant
downward
variance
inter
alia
postsentencing
rehabilitation
imposed
prison
term
months
supervised
release
pepper
iv
eighth
circuit
rejected
pepper
postsentencing
rehabilitation
argument
also
rejected
claim
law
case
pepper
ii
pepper
iii
required
district
reduce
applicable
guidelines
range
least
percent
held
defendant
sentence
set
aside
appeal
district
resentencing
may
consider
evidence
defendant
postsentencing
rehabilitation
evidence
may
appropriate
cases
support
downward
variance
guidelines
range
pp
consistent
principle
punishment
fit
offender
merely
crime
williams
new
york
observed
consistent
uniform
policy
sentencing
judge
exercise
wide
discretion
sources
types
evidence
used
assist
determining
kind
extent
punishment
imposed
within
limits
fixed
law
particularly
fullest
information
possible
concerning
defendant
life
characteristics
principle
codified
provides
limitation
shall
placed
information
sentencing
may
consider
concerning
defendant
background
character
conduct
specifies
sentencing
courts
must
consider
among
things
defendant
history
characteristics
guidelines
booker
made
effectively
advisory
starting
point
initial
benchmark
district
courts
may
impose
sentences
within
statutory
limits
based
appropriate
consideration
factors
subject
appellate
review
reasonableness
gall
sentencing
framework
applies
initial
sentencing
subsequent
resentencing
sentence
set
aside
appeal
pp
postsentencing
rehabilitation
evidence
may
support
downward
variance
advisory
guidelines
range
plain
language
makes
clear
limitation
background
character
conduct
information
makes
distinction
initial
sentencing
subsequent
resentencing
addition
postsentencing
rehabilitation
evidence
may
highly
relevant
several
factors
district
courts
required
consider
sentencing
extensive
evidence
pepper
rehabilitation
since
initial
sentencing
clearly
relevant
selection
appropriate
sentence
fundamentally
evidence
provides
picture
history
characteristics
time
initial
sentencing
unemployed
drug
addict
estranged
family
sold
drugs
second
resentencing
nearly
five
years
attending
college
top
employee
slated
promotion
relationship
father
married
supporting
family
postsentencing
conduct
also
sheds
light
likelihood
engage
future
criminal
conduct
central
factor
sentencing
courts
must
consider
see
pp
contrary
arguments
advanced
amicus
appointed
defend
judgment
unpersuasive
pp
prohibits
district
resentencing
imposing
sentence
outside
guidelines
range
except
upon
ground
relied
upon
prior
sentencing
effectively
precludes
considering
postsentencing
rehabilitation
provision
invalid
booker
like
provisions
invalidated
booker
requires
district
courts
effectively
treat
guidelines
mandatory
entire
set
cases
thus
proper
remedy
invalidate
provision
applying
resentencing
always
result
sixth
amendment
violation
rejects
partial
invalidation
leave
guidelines
effectively
mandatory
cases
advisory
others
fact
permits
resentencing
remand
impose
sentence
prior
sentence
expressly
relied
departure
upheld
appeals
also
cure
constitutional
infirmity
argument
constitutional
infirmity
remedied
invalidating
rejected
pp
finds
unpersuasive
amicus
arguments
focusing
congress
sentencing
objectives
contrary
amicus
contention
reflect
congressional
purpose
preclude
consideration
postsentencing
rehabilitation
evidence
thus
provision
bearing
analysis
whether
permits
consideration
evidence
consideration
postsentencing
rehabilitation
inconsistent
sentencing
factor
directs
sentencing
courts
consider
pertinent
policy
statement
sentencing
commission
particularly
pertinent
policy
statement
case
based
unconvincing
policy
rationales
reflected
relevant
sentencing
statutes
consideration
postsentencing
rehabilitation
also
inconsistent
requires
courts
consider
need
avoid
unwarranted
sentenc
ing
disparities
among
defendants
similar
records
found
guilty
similar
conduct
disparity
arises
normal
trial
sentencing
process
differences
procedural
opportunity
may
result
defendants
inevitably
sentenced
error
must
resentenced
kinds
unwarranted
sentencing
disparities
congress
sought
eliminate
pp
remand
district
consider
give
appropriate
weight
postsentencing
rehabilitation
evidence
well
additional
evidence
concerning
pepper
conduct
since
last
sentencing
pp
eighth
circuit
pepper
iii
set
aside
pepper
entire
sentence
remanded
de
novo
resentencing
district
bound
law
case
doctrine
apply
percent
departure
applied
original
sentencing
judge
avoid
undermining
district
original
sentencing
intent
appellate
reversing
one
part
sentence
may
vacate
entire
sentence
remand
trial
reconfigure
sentencing
plan
satisfy
sentencing
factors
greenlaw
eighth
circuit
pp
vacated
part
affirmed
part
remanded
sotomayor
delivered
opinion
roberts
scalia
kennedy
ginsburg
joined
breyer
alito
joined
part
iii
breyer
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
alito
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
thomas
filed
dissenting
opinion
kagan
took
part
consideration
decision
case
jason
pepper
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
march
justice
sotomayor
delivered
opinion
long
recognized
sentencing
judges
exercise
wide
discretion
types
evidence
may
consider
imposing
sentence
ighly
relevant
essential
selection
appropriate
sentence
possession
fullest
information
possible
concerning
defendant
life
characteristics
williams
new
york
congress
codified
principle
provides
limitation
shall
placed
information
sentencing
may
consider
concerning
defendant
background
character
sets
forth
certain
factors
sentencing
courts
must
consider
including
history
characteristics
defendant
appeals
eighth
circuit
concluded
case
district
resentencing
petitioner
initial
sentence
set
aside
appeal
consider
evidence
petitioner
rehabilitation
since
initial
sentencing
conclusion
conflicts
longstanding
principles
federal
law
congress
express
directives
although
separate
statutory
provision
prohibits
district
resentencing
imposing
sentence
outside
federal
sentencing
guidelines
range
except
upon
ground
relied
upon
prior
sentencing
thus
effectively
precluding
considering
postsentencing
rehabilitation
purposes
imposing
sentence
provision
survive
holding
booker
expressly
invalidate
today
hold
defendant
sentence
set
aside
appeal
district
resentencing
may
consider
evidence
defendant
postsentencing
rehabilitation
evidence
may
appropriate
cases
support
downward
variance
federal
sentencing
guidelines
range
separately
affirm
appeals
ruling
law
case
doctrine
require
district
case
apply
percentage
departure
guidelines
range
substantial
assistance
applied
petitioner
prior
sentencing
october
petitioner
jason
pepper
arrested
charged
conspiracy
distribute
grams
methamphetamine
violation
pleading
guilty
pepper
appeared
sentencing
judge
mark
bennett
district
northern
district
iowa
pepper
sentencing
range
guidelines
government
moved
downward
departure
pursuant
ussg
based
pepper
substantial
assistance
recommended
percent
downward
district
however
sentenced
pepper
prison
term
resulting
approximately
percent
downward
departure
low
end
guidelines
range
followed
five
years
supervised
release
government
appealed
pepper
sentence
june
appeals
eighth
circuit
reversed
remanded
resentencing
light
intervening
decision
booker
another
reason
relevant
see
pepper
pepper
pepper
completed
sentence
three
days
pepper
issued
began
serving
term
supervised
release
may
district
conducted
resentencing
hearing
heard
three
witnesses
testimony
pepper
first
recounted
previously
drug
addict
successfully
completed
drug
treatment
program
prison
longer
used
drugs
app
pepper
explained
since
release
prison
enrolled
local
community
college
student
earned
classes
prior
semester
pepper
also
testified
obtained
employment
within
weeks
released
custody
continuing
work
attending
school
pepper
confirmed
compliance
conditions
supervised
release
described
changed
attitude
since
arrest
see
life
basically
headed
either
guess
ended
prison
death
optimism
life
life
glad
got
chance
try
guess
say
decent
life
life
going
nowhere
think
going
somewhere
pepper
father
testified
virtually
contact
pepper
period
leading
arrest
pepper
drug
treatment
program
according
father
truly
sobered
made
way
thinking
change
explained
pepper
much
mature
serious
terms
planning
future
consequence
relationship
son
finally
pepper
probation
officer
testified
view
sentence
reasonable
light
pepper
substantial
assistance
postsentencing
rehabilitation
demonstrated
low
risk
recidivism
probation
officer
also
prepared
sentencing
memorandum
set
forth
reasons
supporting
recommendation
sentence
district
adopted
findings
fact
testimony
three
witnesses
probation
officer
sentencing
memorandum
granted
percent
downward
departure
based
pepper
substantial
assistance
reducing
bottom
guidelines
range
months
granted
percent
downward
variance
based
inter
alia
pepper
rehabilitation
since
initial
sentencing
sentenced
pepper
months
imprisonment
concluding
advance
purpose
federal
sentencing
policy
policy
behind
federal
sentencing
guidelines
send
defendant
back
prison
government
appealed
pepper
sentence
appeals
reversed
remanded
resentencing
see
pepper
pepper
ii
concluded
close
call
say
district
abused
discretion
granting
percent
downward
departure
substantial
assistance
found
percent
downward
variance
however
abuse
discretion
held
pepper
rehabilitation
impermissible
factor
consider
granting
downward
variance
stated
evidence
postsentencing
relevant
permitted
resentencing
district
considered
evidence
time
original
sentencing
permitting
courts
consider
rehabilitation
resentencing
create
unwarranted
sentencing
disparities
inject
blatant
inequities
sentencing
process
appeals
directed
case
assigned
different
district
judge
resentencing
ibid
appeals
mandate
issued
pepper
case
reassigned
remand
chief
judge
linda
reade
july
chief
judge
reade
issued
order
scope
remand
pepper
ii
stating
consider
bound
reduce
pepper
advisory
sentencing
guidelines
range
pursuant
ussg
pepper
wl
nd
iowa
meantime
pepper
petitioned
writ
certiorari
january
granted
petition
vacated
judgment
pepper
ii
remanded
case
appeals
consideration
light
gall
see
pepper
remand
appeals
held
gall
alter
prior
conclusion
rehabilitation
impermissible
factor
consider
granting
downward
variance
pepper
iii
reversed
sentence
remanded
resentencing
october
chief
judge
reade
convened
pepper
second
resentencing
hearing
pepper
informed
still
attending
school
working
supervisor
night
crew
warehouse
retailer
recently
selected
management
associate
year
likely
promoted
following
january
app
pepper
also
stated
recently
married
supporting
wife
daughter
pepper
father
reiterated
pepper
moving
forward
career
family
life
remained
close
touch
son
see
december
chief
judge
reade
issued
sentencing
memorandum
noting
remand
language
pepper
iii
nearly
identical
language
pepper
ii
observed
bound
reduce
pepper
advisory
sentencing
guidelines
range
substantial
assistance
concluded
pepper
entitled
percent
downward
departure
assistance
timely
helpful
important
way
extraordinary
sealed
sentencing
memorandum
nd
iowa
doc
pp
also
rejected
pepper
request
downward
variance
based
inter
alia
postsentencing
rehabilitation
district
reconvened
pepper
resentencing
hearing
january
decision
grant
percent
downward
departure
substantial
assistance
resulted
advisory
guidelines
range
months
also
granted
government
motion
rule
federal
rules
criminal
procedure
account
investigative
assistance
pepper
provided
initially
sentenced
imposed
term
imprisonment
followed
months
supervised
appeals
affirmed
pepper
sentence
pepper
iv
relevant
appeals
rejected
pepper
argument
district
erred
refusing
consider
postsentencing
rehabilitation
acknowledged
pepper
made
significant
progress
following
initial
period
imprisonment
commend
ed
pepper
positive
changes
made
life
concluded
pepper
argument
foreclosed
circuit
precedent
holding
rehabilitation
permissible
factor
consider
granting
downward
variance
citing
jenners
mcmannus
appeals
also
rejected
pepper
claim
scope
remand
law
case
pepper
ii
pepper
iii
required
district
reduce
applicable
guidelines
range
least
percent
pursuant
ussg
noted
remand
orders
pepper
ii
pepper
iii
general
remand
resentencing
place
limitations
discretion
newly
assigned
district
judge
resentencing
noted
although
issues
decided
appellate
become
law
case
remand
sentencing
earlier
decisions
merely
held
percent
downward
departure
substantial
assistance
abuse
discretion
district
bound
percent
departure
previously
granted
granted
pepper
petition
writ
certiorari
decide
two
questions
whether
district
defendant
sentence
set
aside
appeal
may
consider
evidence
defendant
postsentencing
rehabilitation
support
downward
variance
resentencing
defendant
question
divided
courts
appeals
whether
resentencing
required
law
case
doctrine
apply
percentage
departure
guidelines
range
substantial
assistance
applied
pepper
prior
sentencing
confessed
error
appeals
ruling
first
question
appointed
amicus
curiae
defend
appeals
vacate
eighth
circuit
ruling
first
question
affirm
ruling
second
ii
uniform
constant
federal
judicial
tradition
sentencing
judge
consider
every
convicted
person
individual
every
case
unique
study
human
failings
sometimes
mitigate
sometimes
magnify
crime
punishment
ensue
koon
underlying
tradition
principle
punishment
fit
offender
merely
crime
williams
see
also
pennsylvania
ex
rel
sullivan
ashe
determination
sentences
justice
generally
requires
consideration
particular
acts
crime
committed
taken
account
circumstances
offense
together
character
propensities
offender
consistent
principle
observed
since
american
colonies
became
nation
courts
country
england
practiced
policy
sentencing
judge
exercise
wide
discretion
sources
types
evidence
used
assist
determining
kind
extent
punishment
imposed
within
limits
fixed
law
williams
particular
emphasized
ighly
relevant
essential
selection
appropriate
sentence
possession
fullest
information
possible
concerning
defendant
life
characteristics
permitting
sentencing
courts
consider
widest
possible
breadth
information
defendant
ensures
punishment
suit
merely
offense
individual
defendant
wasman
congress
codified
longstanding
principle
sentencing
courts
broad
discretion
consider
various
kinds
information
watts
per
curiam
section
ed
provided
limitation
shall
placed
information
concerning
background
character
conduct
person
convicted
offense
may
receive
consider
purpose
imposing
appropriate
sentence
emphasis
added
sentencing
reform
act
sra
et
congress
effected
fundamental
changes
federal
sentencing
creating
federal
sentencing
commission
introducing
guidelines
scheme
however
congress
recodified
without
change
sentencing
commission
moreover
expressly
incorporated
guidelines
determining
sentence
impose
within
guideline
range
whether
departure
guidelines
warranted
may
consider
without
limitation
information
concerning
background
character
conduct
defendant
unless
otherwise
prohibited
law
see
ussg
emphasis
added
congress
sentencing
commission
thus
expressly
preserved
traditional
discretion
sentencing
courts
conduct
inquiry
broad
scope
largely
unlimited
either
kind
information
may
consider
source
may
come
tucker
sra
constrain
sentencing
courts
discretion
important
respects
notably
making
guidelines
mandatory
see
supp
iv
specifying
various
factors
courts
must
consider
exercising
discretion
see
seminal
decision
booker
held
facts
found
judge
preponderance
evidence
increased
applicable
guidelines
range
treating
guidelines
mandatory
circumstances
violated
sixth
amendment
right
criminal
defendants
tried
jury
every
element
offense
proved
government
beyond
reasonable
doubt
remedial
opinion
booker
invalidated
two
offending
provisions
sra
see
invalidating
instructed
district
courts
treat
guidelines
effectively
advisory
opinions
make
clear
although
sentencing
must
give
respectful
consideration
guidelines
booker
permits
tailor
sentence
light
statutory
concerns
well
kimbrough
internal
quotation
marks
citation
omitted
accordingly
although
guidelines
starting
point
initial
benchmark
district
courts
may
impose
sentences
within
statutory
limits
based
appropriate
consideration
factors
listed
subject
appellate
review
reasonableness
gall
sentencing
framework
applies
defendant
initial
sentencing
subsequent
resentencing
sentence
set
aside
appeal
see
district
case
remanded
shall
resentence
defendant
accordance
section
see
also
dillon
slip
distinguishing
proceedings
implicate
interests
identified
booker
plenary
resentencing
proceedings
light
federal
sentencing
framework
described
think
clear
defendant
sentence
set
aside
appeal
case
remanded
resentencing
district
may
consider
evidence
defendant
rehabilitation
since
prior
sentencing
evidence
may
appropriate
cases
support
downward
variance
advisory
guidelines
range
preliminarily
congress
clearer
directing
limitation
placed
information
concerning
background
character
conduct
defendant
district
may
receive
consider
purpose
imposing
appropriate
sentence
plain
language
makes
distinction
defendant
initial
sentencing
subsequent
resentencing
prior
sentence
set
aside
appeal
recognized
broad
language
provide
basis
courts
invent
blanket
prohibition
considering
certain
types
evidence
sentencing
watts
categorical
bar
consideration
postsentencing
rehabilitation
evidence
directly
contravene
congress
expressed
intent
addition
evidence
postsentencing
rehabilitation
may
highly
relevant
several
factors
congress
expressly
instructed
district
courts
consider
sentencing
example
evidence
postsentencing
rehabilitation
may
plainly
relevant
history
characteristics
defendant
evidence
may
also
pertinent
need
sentence
imposed
serve
general
purposes
sentencing
set
forth
particular
afford
adequate
deterrence
criminal
conduct
protect
public
crimes
defendant
provide
defendant
needed
educational
vocational
training
correctional
treatment
manner
see
mcmannus
melloy
concurring
assessing
deterrence
protection
public
rehabilitation
seem
better
evidence
defendant
conduct
postsentencing
rehabilitation
may
also
critically
inform
sentencing
judge
overarching
duty
impose
sentence
sufficient
greater
necessary
comply
sentencing
purposes
set
forth
original
sentencing
judge
recognized
extensive
evidence
pepper
rehabilitation
since
initial
sentencing
clearly
relevant
selection
appropriate
sentence
case
fundamentally
evidence
pepper
conduct
since
release
custody
june
provides
picture
pepper
history
characteristics
see
bryson
duty
always
sentence
defendant
stands
day
sentencing
time
initial
sentencing
pepper
drug
addict
unemployed
estranged
family
recently
sold
drugs
part
methamphetamine
conspiracy
time
second
resentencing
pepper
nearly
five
years
attended
college
achieved
high
grades
top
employee
job
slated
promotion
relationship
father
married
supporting
wife
daughter
question
evidence
pepper
conduct
since
initial
sentencing
constitutes
critical
part
history
characteristics
defendant
congress
intended
sentencing
courts
consider
pepper
postsentencing
conduct
also
sheds
light
likelihood
engage
future
criminal
conduct
central
factor
district
courts
must
assess
imposing
sentence
see
gall
gall
rehabilitation
lends
strong
support
conclusion
imprisonment
necessary
deter
gall
engaging
future
criminal
conduct
protect
public
future
criminal
acts
citing
recognized
pepper
probation
officer
pepper
steady
employment
well
successful
completion
drug
treatment
program
condition
also
suggest
diminished
need
educational
vocational
training
correctional
treatment
finally
pepper
exemplary
postsentencing
conduct
may
taken
accurate
indicator
present
purposes
tendencies
significantly
suggest
period
restraint
kind
discipline
imposed
upon
ashe
accordingly
evidence
pepper
postsentencing
rehabilitation
bears
directly
district
overarching
duty
impose
sentence
sufficient
greater
necessary
serve
purposes
sentencing
sum
appeals
ruling
prohibiting
district
considering
evidence
pepper
postsentencing
rehabilitation
resentencing
conflicts
longstanding
principles
federal
sentencing
law
contravenes
congress
directives
amicus
nevertheless
advances
two
principal
arguments
defense
appeals
ruling
restricts
discretion
resentencing
remand
impose
sentence
effectively
forecloses
consideration
defendant
postsentencing
rehabilitation
permitting
district
courts
consider
postsentencing
rehabilitation
defeat
congress
objectives
persuaded
amicus
main
argument
relies
provision
appeals
cite
provision
sentence
set
aside
appeal
district
case
remanded
shall
impose
sentence
outside
applicable
guidelines
range
except
upon
ground
specifically
affirmatively
included
written
statement
reasons
required
section
connection
previous
sentencing
defendant
prior
appeal
held
appeals
remanding
case
permissible
ground
departure
operation
restricts
discretion
district
remand
precluding
imposing
sentence
outside
guidelines
range
except
upon
ground
departure
expressly
relied
upon
prior
sentencing
upheld
appeal
amicus
thus
correctly
contends
face
effectively
forecloses
resentencing
considering
evidence
defendant
postsentencing
rehabilitation
purposes
imposing
sentence
practical
matter
evidence
exist
time
prior
sentencing
government
concedes
however
invalid
booker
explained
booker
held
judicial
factfinding
increases
defendant
applicable
sentencing
guidelines
range
treating
guidelines
mandatory
circumstances
violate
defendant
sixth
amendment
right
tried
jury
every
element
offense
proved
government
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
supra
recognized
booker
although
sra
permitted
departures
applicable
guidelines
range
limited
departures
available
every
case
fact
unavailable
instances
judge
bound
impose
sentence
within
guidelines
range
concluded
availability
departures
certain
circumstances
avoid
constitutional
issue
ibid
remedy
constitutional
problem
rendered
guidelines
effectively
advisory
invalidating
two
provisions
sra
supp
iv
generally
required
sentencing
courts
impose
sentence
within
applicable
guidelines
range
ed
supp
iv
prescribed
standard
appellate
review
including
de
novo
review
guidelines
departures
invalidated
provisions
even
though
recognized
mandatory
application
guidelines
always
result
sixth
amendment
indeed
although
government
suggested
booker
render
guidelines
advisory
cases
constitution
prohibits
judicial
factfinding
rejected
proposal
reasoning
congress
authorized
mandatory
system
cases
system
others
given
administrative
complexities
system
create
see
dillon
slip
incomplete
remedy
rejected
booker
required
courts
treat
guidelines
differently
similar
proceedings
leading
potentially
unfair
results
considerable
administrative
challenges
expressly
mention
rationale
set
forth
opinion
invalidating
applies
equally
provisions
requires
district
courts
effectively
treat
guidelines
mandatory
entire
set
cases
specifically
precludes
district
remand
imposing
sentence
outside
applicable
guidelines
range
except
upon
ground
departure
expressly
relied
upon
prior
sentencing
upheld
appeals
circumstances
district
rely
upon
departure
ground
prior
sentencing
require
remand
impose
sentence
within
applicable
guidelines
range
thus
rendering
guidelines
effectively
mandatory
large
set
cases
judicial
factfinding
increase
applicable
guidelines
range
beyond
supported
solely
facts
established
jury
verdict
guilty
plea
requiring
sentencing
judge
remand
apply
guidelines
range
often
result
sixth
amendment
violation
reasons
explained
booker
accordingly
provisions
booker
proper
remedy
invalidate
sentencing
proceeding
issue
booker
illustrates
withstand
sixth
amendment
scrutiny
district
booker
increased
defendant
guidelines
range
based
finding
rather
jury
made
held
guidelines
must
treated
advisory
remanded
case
resentencing
remained
valid
booker
district
remand
required
sentence
within
guidelines
range
depart
guidelines
original
sentencing
accordingly
resentencing
judge
booker
required
impose
guidelines
sentence
based
facts
concerning
drug
quantity
precise
result
booker
forbids
result
occur
sentencing
district
erroneously
refuses
impose
sentence
outside
guidelines
range
based
misunderstanding
authority
depart
vary
guidelines
reply
brief
example
remained
valid
remedy
resentencing
district
erroneously
believed
guidelines
presumptively
reasonable
see
nelson
per
curiam
slip
mistakenly
thought
sentence
required
extraordinary
circumstances
see
gall
incorrectly
concluded
vary
guidelines
based
policy
disagreement
disparate
treatment
crack
powder
cocaine
see
kimbrough
cases
district
initial
sentencing
proceeding
necessarily
imposed
sentence
within
guidelines
range
thus
require
imposition
guidelines
sentence
remand
see
reply
brief
petitioner
describing
categories
cases
booker
remedy
entirely
unavailable
valid
sure
applying
resentencing
always
result
sixth
amendment
violation
example
applicable
guidelines
range
rests
solely
facts
found
jury
beyond
reasonable
doubt
application
resentencing
render
sentence
constitutionally
infirm
explained
possibility
equally
true
respect
sentencing
provisions
invalidated
booker
see
supra
provisions
assume
congress
faced
statute
invalidity
key
applications
preferred
apply
statute
many
instances
possible
rejected
system
booker
made
guidelines
mandatory
cases
advisory
others
reject
partial
invalidation
leave
us
result
fact
permits
resentencing
remand
impose
sentence
cases
prior
sentence
expressly
relied
upon
departure
upheld
appeals
also
cure
constitutional
infirmity
explained
observed
booker
availability
departures
applicable
guidelines
ranges
specified
circumstances
avoid
constitutional
issue
departures
available
every
case
fact
unavailable
held
remedying
sixth
amendment
problem
required
invalidation
remedial
approach
requires
us
invalidate
amicus
contends
constitutional
infirmity
remedied
invalidating
rather
brief
amicus
curiae
support
judgment
section
provides
ground
departure
permissible
purposes
inter
alia
authorized
section
booker
noted
statutory
sra
provisions
invalidated
also
constitutionally
infirm
incorporates
one
provisions
invalidated
booker
amicus
suggests
invalidating
cure
constitutional
defect
government
explains
however
even
invalidated
district
depart
ground
initial
sentencing
district
able
depart
new
ground
resentencing
long
remains
force
amicus
proposed
solution
still
result
guidelines
effectively
mandatory
resentencing
entire
set
cases
fails
remedy
fundamental
constitutional
defect
amicus
next
cluster
arguments
focuses
congress
sentencing
objectives
preliminarily
amicus
contends
even
constitutionally
invalid
provision
reflects
congressional
policy
determination
information
available
time
original
sentencing
considered
policy
determination
inform
analysis
whether
permits
consideration
postsentencing
rehabilitation
evidence
argument
however
based
faulty
premise
contrary
amicus
contention
reflect
congressional
purpose
preclude
consideration
evidence
postsentencing
rehabilitation
resentencing
sure
incidental
effect
limiting
weight
sentencing
may
place
postsentencing
rehabilitation
precluding
resentencing
outside
guidelines
range
ground
departure
previously
rely
face
nothing
prohibits
district
considering
postsentencing
developments
including
postsentencing
rehabilitation
selecting
sentence
within
applicable
guidelines
range
section
also
apply
resentencings
occur
reasons
sentence
overturned
appeal
case
remanded
sentence
set
aside
collateral
review
circumstances
restrict
district
much
less
respect
consideration
postsentencing
developments
accordingly
see
general
congressional
policy
reflected
preclude
resentencing
courts
considering
postsentencing
provision
bearing
analysis
whether
permits
consideration
evidence
postsentencing
rehabilitation
explained
evidence
postsentencing
rehabilitation
may
highly
relevant
several
sentencing
factors
congress
specifically
instructed
district
courts
consider
see
supra
discussing
amicus
however
argues
consideration
postsentencing
inconsistent
two
sentencing
factors
directs
sentencing
courts
consider
pertinent
policy
statement
sentencing
commission
requires
courts
consider
need
avoid
unwarranted
sentenc
ing
disparities
among
defendants
similar
records
found
guilty
similar
conduct
regard
amicus
points
sentencing
commission
policy
statement
ussg
provides
rehabilitative
efforts
even
exceptional
undertaken
defendant
imposition
term
imprisonment
instant
offense
appropriate
basis
downward
departure
resentencing
defendant
offense
according
amicus
policy
statement
clear
unequivocal
exercise
sentencing
commission
core
function
given
effect
brief
amicus
curiae
support
judgment
sure
recognized
commission
continues
fil
important
institutional
role
capacity
courts
lack
base
determinations
empirical
data
national
experience
guided
professional
staff
appropriate
expertise
kimbrough
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
accordingly
instructed
district
courts
must
still
give
respectful
consideration
guidelines
accompanying
policy
statements
amicus
acknowledges
however
decisions
make
clear
district
may
appropriate
cases
impose
sentence
based
disagreement
commission
views
see
particularly
true
commission
views
rest
wholly
unconvincing
policy
rationales
reflected
sentencing
statutes
congress
enacted
commentary
ussg
expresses
commission
view
departures
based
postsentencing
rehabilitation
inconsistent
policies
established
congress
governing
good
time
credit
statutory
provisions
reducing
time
served
imprisoned
person
inequitably
benefit
gain
opportunity
resentenced
de
novo
regard
first
proffered
rationale
sentencing
reduction
based
postsentencing
rehabilitation
hardly
said
inconsistent
policies
underlying
award
good
time
credit
two
serve
distinctly
different
penological
indeed
difference
two
reflected
obviously
fact
bop
authority
award
good
time
credit
case
defendant
good
behavior
occurs
sentence
already
commission
second
proffered
rationale
fares
better
sure
allowing
district
courts
consider
evidence
postsentencing
rehabilitation
may
result
disparate
treatment
defendants
sentenced
properly
must
resentenced
disparity
arises
arbitrary
random
sentencing
practices
ordinary
operation
appellate
sentencing
review
closely
related
vein
amicus
argues
consideration
postsentencing
rehabilitation
inconsistent
requires
sentencing
courts
consider
need
avoid
unwarranted
sentencing
disparities
appeals
also
rested
holding
ground
reasoning
postsentencing
rehabilitation
evidence
influence
defendant
sentence
grossly
unfair
vast
majority
defendants
receive
review
positive
rehabilitative
efforts
quoting
mcmannus
amicus
points
evidence
aware
suggesting
congress
enacted
concern
disparities
resulting
normal
trial
sentencing
differences
procedural
opportunity
may
result
defendants
inevitably
sentenced
error
must
resentenced
kinds
unwarranted
sentencing
disparities
congress
sought
eliminate
cf
labonte
disparity
arising
exercise
prosecutorial
discretion
unwarranted
rhodes
cadc
distinguishing
prisoners
whose
convictions
reversed
appeal
prisoners
hardly
seems
government
explains
moreover
logic
appeals
approach
rehabilitation
relevant
district
considered
evidence
time
original
sentencing
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
require
sentencing
courts
categorically
ignore
postsentencing
rehabilitation
postsentencing
information
including
example
evidence
defendant
committed
postsentencing
offenses
precedents
however
provide
basis
support
categorical
bar
see
wasman
sentencing
authority
may
justify
increased
sentence
affirmatively
identifying
relevant
conduct
events
occurred
subsequent
original
sentencing
proceedings
cf
north
carolina
pearce
indeed
even
appeals
accept
logical
consequence
approach
permits
district
courts
consider
postsentencing
conduct
support
higher
sentence
see
stapleton
nothing
however
remotely
suggests
congress
intended
district
courts
consider
postsentencing
evidence
detrimental
defendant
turning
blind
eye
favorable
evidence
defendant
postsentencing
rehabilitation
cf
jones
obviously
discretion
booker
accords
sentencing
judges
impose
sentences
escalator
goes
finally
note
describe
two
seven
sentencing
factors
courts
must
consider
imposing
sentence
root
amicus
effectively
invites
us
elevate
two
factors
others
reject
invitation
see
gall
instructing
sentencing
courts
consider
factors
emphasis
added
reasons
stated
hold
appeals
erred
categorically
precluding
district
considering
evidence
pepper
postsentencing
rehabilitation
initial
sentence
set
aside
appeal
district
courts
may
consider
evidence
defendant
postsentencing
rehabilitation
resentencing
evidence
may
appropriate
cases
support
downward
variance
advisory
guidelines
government
informs
us
granting
pepper
motion
release
pending
disposition
appeal
see
supra
district
stated
exercised
discretion
grant
pepper
downward
variance
based
postsentencing
rehabilitation
statement
however
made
light
appeals
erroneous
views
regarding
postsentencing
rehabilitation
evidence
expressly
reject
views
today
unclear
record
whether
district
imposed
sentence
properly
considered
extensive
evidence
pepper
postsentencing
rehabilitation
remand
district
consider
give
appropriate
weight
evidence
well
additional
evidence
concerning
pepper
conduct
since
last
sentencing
january
accordingly
vacate
eighth
circuit
judgment
respect
pepper
sentence
remand
case
resentencing
consistent
opinion
iii
second
question
presented
case
merits
brief
discussion
noted
original
sentencing
judge
case
granted
pepper
percent
downward
departure
pursuant
ussg
based
pepper
substantial
assistance
sentenced
months
imprisonment
appeals
vacated
sentence
pepper
ii
pepper
iii
case
reassigned
remand
chief
judge
reade
resentencing
pepper
chief
judge
reade
ruled
bound
prior
sentencing
judge
decision
grant
percent
downward
departure
instead
granted
percent
downward
departure
appeals
upheld
pepper
iv
pepper
argues
law
case
doctrine
required
chief
judge
reade
apply
percent
departure
granted
original
sentencing
judge
disagree
preliminarily
note
mandates
pepper
ii
pepper
iii
general
remand
resentencing
place
limitations
discretion
newly
assigned
district
judge
resentencing
pepper
merits
briefs
pepper
challenge
scope
validity
appeals
mandate
ordering
de
novo
resentencing
thus
abandoned
argument
mandate
restricted
district
imposing
different
substantial
assistance
question
us
whether
law
case
doctrine
required
chief
judge
reade
adhere
original
sentencing
judge
decision
granting
percent
downward
departure
although
described
law
case
amorphous
concept
commonly
defined
doctrine
posits
decides
upon
rule
law
decision
continue
govern
issues
subsequent
stages
case
arizona
california
doctrine
directs
discretion
limit
tribunal
power
ibid
accordingly
doctrine
apply
prior
decision
clearly
erroneous
work
manifest
injustice
agostini
felton
quoting
arizona
alteration
original
pepper
argues
original
sentencing
judge
decision
grant
percent
departure
never
set
aside
appeals
constituted
law
case
pepper
contends
chief
judge
reade
disturbed
ruling
absent
compelling
justification
overturning
brief
petitioner
according
pepper
chief
judge
reade
identified
justification
law
case
doctrine
required
adhere
percent
departure
granted
original
sentencing
judge
government
explains
however
appeals
pepper
iii
set
aside
pepper
entire
sentence
remanded
de
novo
resentencing
see
thus
even
assuming
arguendo
original
sentencing
decision
impose
percent
departure
one
point
law
case
pepper
iii
effectively
wiped
slate
clean
sure
pepper
iii
vacated
pepper
sentence
grounds
unrelated
substantial
assistance
departure
fact
affect
conclusion
criminal
sentence
package
sanctions
district
utilizes
effectuate
sentencing
intent
stinson
per
curiam
district
original
sentencing
intent
may
undermined
altering
one
portion
calculus
white
appellate
reversing
one
part
defendant
sentence
may
vacate
entire
sentence
remand
trial
reconfigure
sentencing
plan
satisfy
sentencing
factors
greenlaw
precisely
eighth
circuit
accordingly
appeals
pepper
iii
remanded
de
novo
resentencing
conclude
chief
judge
reade
bound
law
case
doctrine
apply
percent
departure
applied
pepper
prior
sentencing
reasons
stated
judgment
appeals
eighth
circuit
vacated
part
affirmed
part
case
remanded
resentencing
consistent
opinion
ordered
justice
kagan
took
part
consideration
decision
case
jason
pepper
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
march
justice
breyer
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
join
part
iii
opinion
second
question
presented
first
question
presented
agree
conclusion
agree
opinion
extent
consistent
concurrence
like
majority
believe
booker
requires
us
hold
unconstitutional
see
ante
booker
see
also
apprendi
new
jersey
like
majority
believe
law
require
sentencing
follow
guideline
policy
statement
forbids
taking
account
postsentencing
rehabilitation
sentencing
commission
guidelines
manual
ussg
emphasize
however
conclusion
leave
sentencing
free
disregard
guidelines
contrary
law
permits
disregard
guidelines
reasonable
booker
supra
gall
kimbrough
appellate
must
guided
basic
sentencing
objectives
statutes
create
guidelines
determining
whether
disregarding
guidelines
sentencing
acted
unreasonably
guideline
question
consists
policy
statement
sets
forth
exception
normal
guideline
rules
normally
guidelines
authorize
sentencing
judge
consider
departure
ordinary
guidelines
sentence
case
conduct
significantly
differs
norm
particular
guideline
linguistically
applies
ussg
ch
pt
discussing
guidelines
general
approach
departures
policy
statement
issue
one
handful
guideline
rules
nonetheless
forbid
departure
says
defendant
rehabilitative
efforts
even
exceptional
appropriate
basis
downward
departure
resentencing
ussg
policy
statement
thereby
adds
rehabilitative
efforts
factors
race
sex
national
origin
creed
religion
socioeconomic
status
guidelines
absolutely
prohibit
sentencing
judge
taking
account
ussg
ch
pt
ii
sentencing
despite
policy
statement
take
account
postsentencing
rehabilitation
particular
circumstances
case
presents
find
answer
question
language
sentencing
statutes
sentencing
traditions
case
williams
new
york
use
word
advisory
majority
points
sentencing
statute
forbids
concerning
background
character
may
consider
ante
quoting
emphasis
deleted
provision
must
refer
relevant
information
see
ussg
comment
generally
incorporating
noting
certain
factors
considered
purpose
guideline
policy
statement
absolute
prohibition
consideration
postsentencing
rehabilitation
legally
binding
information
score
like
information
race
religion
sex
national
origin
fall
outside
scope
provision
relevant
thus
reference
statute
begs
question
find
much
help
majority
reference
sentencing
considers
convicted
person
individual
ante
quoting
koon
individualized
sentencing
relevant
tradition
legal
system
seeks
treat
different
cases
differently
also
treat
like
cases
alike
fairness
requires
sentencing
uniformity
well
efforts
recognize
relevant
sentencing
differences
indeed
congress
enacted
sentencing
statutes
us
focused
upon
unfair
way
federal
sentencing
failed
treat
similar
offenders
similarly
congress
wrote
statutes
designed
primarily
though
exclusively
bring
greater
uniformity
sentencing
see
booker
supra
statutes
large
part
creation
system
guidelines
written
sentencing
commission
congress
intended
courts
follow
see
mistretta
sentencing
commission
constitutional
rita
identifying
relevant
factors
sentencing
including
uniformity
williams
case
similarly
unhelpful
congress
sentencing
reform
act
law
us
disavowed
individualized
approach
sentencing
case
followed
williams
emphasized
importance
sentencing
legal
power
tailor
punishment
ability
fit
circumstances
individual
offender
emphasizing
modern
concepts
individualizing
punishment
congress
concerned
individualized
sentencing
gone
far
wrote
new
sentencing
law
designed
help
correct
disparities
among
similar
defendants
sentenced
different
judges
see
sentencing
disparities
unfair
offenders
public
disparities
traced
directly
unfettered
discretion
law
confers
judges
parole
authorities
responsible
imposing
implementing
sentence
booker
description
guidelines
advisory
offers
somewhat
greater
assistance
word
read
light
sixth
amendment
analysis
precedes
held
sixth
amendment
forbids
congress
commission
create
guidelines
require
judges
without
juries
find
sentencing
facts
also
tie
facts
mandatory
imposition
particular
sentences
see
also
apprendi
sixth
amendment
requires
jury
findings
respect
factual
matters
require
judge
increase
sentence
blakely
washington
respect
state
mandatory
guidelines
light
sixth
amendment
prohibition
believing
congress
intended
introduce
new
juries
sentencing
proceeding
excised
particular
provisions
sentencing
statutes
specified
application
guidelines
mandatory
booker
believed
relevant
statutes
remained
workable
without
provisions
excision
congress
basic
sentencing
intentions
excision
likely
invalidation
entire
statutory
scheme
occasional
exception
statutory
provision
strike
today
reason
think
sentencing
statutes
limited
booker
run
afoul
sixth
amendment
ibid
booker
made
clear
remaining
statutory
provisions
leading
us
call
guidelines
advisory
rather
mandatory
give
sentencing
judge
carte
blanche
apply
apply
guidelines
judge
chooses
rather
district
courts
bound
apply
guidelines
must
consult
guidelines
take
account
sentencing
moreover
booker
held
appellate
review
sentencing
valid
booker
explained
statutory
language
structure
sentencing
reform
act
sound
administration
justice
taken
together
require
appellate
courts
apply
reasonableness
standard
review
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
reasonableness
standards
added
foreign
sentencing
law
act
long
required
use
important
sentencing
circumstances
review
departures
review
sentences
imposed
applicable
guideline
ibid
see
also
appellate
courts
apply
practical
standard
review
already
familiar
appellate
courts
review
ness
ourts
appeals
review
sentencing
decisions
unreasonableness
also
indicated
applying
reasonableness
standards
appellate
courts
take
account
sentencing
policy
embodied
statutes
guidelines
well
comparative
expertise
trial
appellate
courts
thus
kimbrough
observed
light
discrete
institutional
strengths
sentencing
commission
sentencing
judges
district
decision
vary
advisory
guidelines
may
attract
greatest
respect
sentencing
judge
finds
particular
case
heartland
commission
intends
individual
guidelines
apply
quoting
rita
supra
noted
however
guidelines
longer
binding
closer
review
may
order
sentencing
judge
varies
guidelines
based
solely
judge
view
guidelines
range
properly
reflect
considerations
even
case
iii
unlike
majority
decide
question
kimbrough
left
open
follow
suggested
framework
evaluating
reasonableness
suggests
takes
proper
account
comparative
institutional
abilities
trial
courts
appellate
courts
sentencing
commission
trial
typically
better
understands
individual
circumstances
particular
cases
commission
comparatively
greater
ability
gather
information
consider
broader
national
picture
compare
sentences
attaching
different
offenses
ultimately
write
coherent
overall
standards
reflect
nationally
uniform
simply
local
sentencing
policies
applying
kimbrough
suggested
framework
reason
much
majority
first
question
whether
sentencing
judge
might
sometimes
take
account
resentenced
offender
postsentencing
rehabilitation
despite
guideline
policy
statement
says
never
find
reasonable
judge
disregard
guidelines
absolute
prohibition
despite
commission
comparatively
greater
abilities
guideline
policy
statement
runs
counter
ordinary
guideline
sentencing
policy
rarely
forbids
departures
strong
policy
reasons
supra
see
ussg
ch
pt
commission
offers
convincing
justification
creating
exception
respect
postsentencing
rehabilitation
commission
commentary
says
judge
resentencing
lower
sentence
reason
reflecting
good
behavior
case
appeal
conflict
use
mechanisms
credits
purpose
defendant
sentencing
case
appeal
may
may
entitled
good
time
may
depend
upon
whether
remains
bail
upon
particular
rules
regardless
resentencing
judge
take
account
matter
see
also
ante
commission
commentary
also
suggests
inequitable
allow
offender
resentenced
receive
kind
credit
good
behavior
say
case
appeal
guidelines
permit
judge
take
account
offender
good
behavior
arrest
initial
sentencing
time
period
last
longer
time
taken
appeal
pretrial
behavior
count
appeal
time
behavior
count
like
majority
find
justification
policy
statement
unconvincing
see
ante
second
question
whether
given
sentencing
power
disregard
policy
statement
forbidding
departures
based
postsentencing
rehabilitation
facts
circumstances
warrant
departure
variance
reason
answer
view
yes
case
presents
unusual
rehabilitative
circumstances
majority
observes
time
second
resentencing
pepper
nearly
five
years
attended
college
achieved
high
grades
top
employee
job
slated
promotion
reestablished
relationship
father
married
supporting
wife
daughter
ante
facts
circumstances
kind
lead
appellate
courts
show
greatest
respect
sentencing
decision
including
departure
variance
rests
upon
iv
sum
sentencing
statutes
interpreted
require
courts
appeals
review
sentences
reasonableness
including
sentences
depart
vary
specific
guideline
appellate
courts
review
decisions
closely
rest
upon
disagreement
guidelines
policy
kimbrough
review
decisions
greater
deference
rest
upon
circumstances
place
case
outside
specific
guideline
heartland
see
ibid
rita
koon
interpreting
sentencing
statutes
way
remain
faithful
congress
basic
intent
writing
despite
need
invalidate
statutory
provisions
conflict
sixth
amendment
statutes
create
sentencing
commission
authority
develop
sentencing
policy
embodied
guidelines
guidelines
statutes
basic
objective
namely
greater
sentencing
uniformity
also
taking
account
special
individual
circumstances
primarily
permitting
sentencing
depart
nontypical
cases
collecting
trial
courts
reasons
departure
variance
examining
appellate
reactions
developing
statistical
empirical
information
considering
views
expert
penologists
others
commission
revise
guidelines
accordingly
see
ussg
ch
pt
trial
courts
appellate
courts
commission
role
play
meant
iterative
cooperative
institutional
effort
bring
uniform
equitable
sentencing
system
see
interpret
statutes
us
accordingly
jason
pepper
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
march
justice
thomas
dissenting
affirm
appeals
uphold
pepper
sentence
written
federal
sentencing
guidelines
permit
district
courts
impose
sentence
guidelines
range
based
defendant
postsentencing
see
sentencing
commission
guidelines
manual
ussg
therefore
respectfully
dissent
booker
rendered
entire
guidelines
scheme
advisory
remedy
far
broader
necessary
correct
constitutional
error
kimbrough
thomas
dissenting
principled
way
apply
booker
remedy
explained
best
apply
statute
written
including
makes
guidelines
mandatory
unless
actually
violate
sixth
amendment
see
booker
supra
thomas
dissenting
part
gall
thomas
dissenting
irizarry
thomas
concurring
apply
guidelines
written
case
violate
sixth
amendment
constitutional
problem
arises
judge
makes
finding
raises
sentence
beyond
sentence
lawfully
imposed
reference
facts
found
jury
admitted
defendant
booker
supra
opinion
thomas
pepper
admitted
plea
agreement
involvement
grams
methamphetamine
mixture
carries
sentence
years
life
viii
pepper
pepper
admitted
facts
support
much
longer
sentence
months
received
sixth
amendment
problem
case
mandatory
guidelines
regime
pepper
sentence
proper
district
correctly
calculated
guidelines
range
incorporated
ussg
departure
government
motion
federal
rule
criminal
procedure
settled
sentence
guideline
expressly
prohibits
downward
departures
based
rehabilitative
efforts
even
exceptional
provision
guidelines
variance
pepper
seeks
variances
creations
booker
remedy
therefore
affirm
appeals
decision
uphold
pepper
sentence
although
outcome
represent
policy
choice
bound
choices
made
congress
federal
sentencing
commission
like
majority
believe
postsentencing
rehabilitation
highly
relevant
meaningful
resentencing
see
ante
light
pepper
success
escaping
drug
addiction
becoming
productive
member
society
see
purpose
incarceration
serve
congress
made
guidelines
mandatory
see
authorized
ussg
constrained
apply
provisions
unless
constitution
prohibits
jason
pepper
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
march
justice
alito
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
join
part
iii
opinion
agree
decision
affirmed
basis
amicus
suggests
provision
designed
function
part
mandatory
guidelines
scheme
struck
booker
although
amicus
argument
ingenious
even
sort
surgery
sanctioned
booker
transform
provision
one
survive
world
also
concur
judgment
extent
holds
decision
regarding
evidence
postsentencing
rehabilitation
must
reversed
decision
entirely
precluded
consideration
evidence
consistent
policy
statement
sentencing
guidelines
booker
remedial
decision
permit
appeals
treat
guidelines
policy
decisions
binding
kimbrough
alito
dissenting
booker
however
district
judges
still
required
almost
cases
give
significant
weight
policy
decisions
embodied
federal
sentencing
guidelines
see
gall
alito
dissenting
congress
delegated
sentencing
commission
authority
make
policy
decisions
regarding
federal
sentencing
see
requiring
judges
give
significant
weight
commission
policy
decisions
run
afoul
sixth
amendment
right
mandatory
guidelines
system
found
violate
right
jury
make
certain
factual
findings
relevant
sentencing
continue
believe
sentencing
judges
required
give
significant
weight
guidelines
provisions
policy
statements
see
kimbrough
opinion
alito
kimbrough
held
sentencing
judges
may
required
give
weight
unusual
policy
decisions
see
majority
opinion
justice
breyer
makes
reasonable
case
particular
policy
statement
involved
case
distinguishable
almost
rules
commission
adopted
see
ante
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
position
seems
consistent
kimbrough
least
prevent
us
sliding
way
slippery
slope
leads
back
regime
entirely
discretionary
federal
sentencing
preceded
enactment
sentencing
reform
act
stat
anyone
familiar
history
criminal
sentencing
country
fail
see
irony
praise
sentencing
scheme
exemplified
williams
new
york
time
enactment
sentencing
reform
act
scheme
fallen
widespread
disrepute
see
mistretta
noting
undamental
widespread
dissatisfaction
uncertainties
disparities
scheme
difrancesco
observed
sentencing
one
areas
criminal
justice
system
need
reform
shameful
disparity
criminal
sentences
major
flaw
existing
criminal
justice
system
system
federal
district
judge
free
implement
individual
sentencing
philosophy
therefore
sentence
imposed
particular
case
often
depended
heavily
spin
wheel
determined
judge
case
assigned
see
bullington
missouri
attempt
separate
policymaking
individual
sentencing
determinations
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
frankel
criminal
sentences
law
without
order
almost
wholly
unchecked
sweeping
powers
give
judges
fashioning
sentences
terrifying
intolerable
society
professes
devotion
rule
law
language
today
opinion
reads
like
paean
old
regime
fear
may
interpreted
sanctioning
move
back
toward
system
prevailed
prior
occurs
suspect
day
come
irrationality
system
seen
perhaps
entire
booker
line
cases
reexamined
footnotes
although
charge
pepper
pleaded
guilty
carried
mandatory
minimum
months
imprisonment
mandatory
minimum
apply
eligible
relief
pursuant
ed
sentencing
guidelines
manual
ussg
ussg
provides
may
depart
guidelines
pon
motion
government
stating
defendant
provided
substantial
assistance
investigation
prosecution
another
person
committed
offense
pepper
provided
information
government
investigators
grand
jury
concerning
two
individuals
involved
illegal
drugs
guns
also
cited
pepper
lack
violent
history
lesser
extent
need
avoid
unwarranted
sentencing
disparity
pepper
app
appeals
also
held
district
erred
considering
pepper
lack
violent
history
history
already
accounted
sentencing
guidelines
calculation
considering
sentencing
disparity
among
pepper
without
adequate
foundation
explanation
pepper
ii
district
resentenced
pepper
months
imprisonment
pepper
returned
federal
custody
july
granted
pepper
petition
writ
certiorari
district
granted
motion
release
pending
disposition
case
compare
lorenzo
per
curiam
precluding
consideration
postsentencing
rehabilitative
conduct
sims
lloyd
permitting
consideration
postsentencing
rehabilitation
exceptional
cases
hughes
instructing
district
adjust
guidelines
calculation
remand
new
circumstances
arisen
events
occurred
since
defendant
sentenced
impact
range
prescribed
guidelines
appointed
adam
ciongoli
brief
argue
case
amicus
curiae
support
appeals
judgment
ciongoli
ably
discharged
assigned
responsibilities
course
sentencing
courts
discretion
subject
constitutional
constraints
see
leung
defendant
race
nationality
may
play
adverse
role
administration
justice
including
sentencing
see
supp
iv
permitting
departures
judge
finds
exists
aggravating
mitigating
circumstance
kind
degree
adequately
taken
consideration
sentencing
commission
example
regime
applicable
guidelines
range
depended
solely
facts
found
jury
beyond
reasonable
doubt
requiring
judge
sentence
within
range
run
afoul
sixth
amendment
see
dillon
stevens
dissenting
slip
citing
one
additional
provision
sra
excised
order
accomplish
remedy
amicus
national
association
criminal
defense
lawyers
nacdl
argues
permits
sentence
respect
certain
departures
provision
appears
preclude
sentencing
courts
remand
granting
variances
section
brief
nacdl
amicus
curiae
emphasis
added
irizarry
held
eparture
term
art
guidelines
refers
sentences
imposed
framework
set
guidelines
contrast
variance
refers
sentence
outside
guidelines
framework
irizarry
holding
construed
term
departure
rule
federal
rules
criminal
procedure
conclude
constitutionally
infirm
must
invalidated
need
decide
whether
reference
departure
includes
variances
us
relevant
legislative
history
confirms
provision
enacted
part
protect
act
stat
aimed
prohibiting
district
courts
considering
postsentencing
developments
rather
meant
ensure
guidelines
system
particular
departure
reversed
appeal
district
impose
sentence
remand
basis
different
departure
see
conf
pp
noting
protect
act
inter
alia
prevent
sentencing
courts
upon
remand
imposing
illegal
departure
different
theory
like
provisions
invalidated
booker
purpose
make
guidelines
sentencing
even
mandatory
recognized
booker
purpose
ceased
relevant
ibid
award
good
time
credit
bureau
prisons
bop
affect
length
sentence
rather
administrative
reward
provide
incentive
prisoners
institutional
disciplinary
regulations
barber
thomas
slip
quoting
alteration
original
credits
may
revoked
time
date
prisoner
release
see
contrast
imposition
reduced
sentence
based
postsentencing
rehabilitation
changes
terms
imprisonment
recognizes
defendant
conduct
since
initial
sentencing
warrants
less
severe
criminal
punishment
brief
imposed
sentence
may
modified
limited
circumstances
see
amicus
points
two
procedural
mechanisms
may
shorten
defendant
sentence
early
termination
term
supervised
release
see
potential
sentencing
reductions
based
postsentencing
substantial
assistance
see
fed
rule
crim
proc
neither
presents
adequate
substitute
district
consideration
postsentencing
rehabilitation
supervised
release
follows
term
imprisonment
serves
entirely
different
purpose
sentence
imposed
see
johnson
supervised
release
fulfills
rehabilitative
ends
distinct
served
incarceration
rule
departures
address
postsentencing
cooperation
government
postsentencing
rehabilitation
generally
thus
defendant
nothing
offer
government
gain
benefit
rule
indeed
defendants
longer
period
time
initial
custody
trial
trial
sentencing
defendants
particularly
released
bail
greater
opportunity
demonstrate
postoffense
presentencing
rehabilitation
even
booker
lower
courts
uniformly
held
evidence
rehabilitation
provide
basis
departing
applicable
guidelines
see
ussg
app
amdt
epartures
based
extraordinary
rehabilitative
efforts
prior
sentencing
allowed
every
circuit
ruled
matter
course
mean
imply
district
must
reduce
defendant
sentence
upon
showing
postsentencing
rehabilitation
mean
preclude
courts
appeals
issuing
limited
remand
orders
appropriate
cases
may
render
evidence
postsentencing
rehabilitation
irrelevant
light
narrow
purposes
remand
proceeding
see
bernardo
sanchez
event
appeals
recognized
neither
pepper
ii
pepper
iii
held
percent
downward
departure
reasonable
departure
sentencing
grant
pepper
substantial
assistance
rather
issue
opinions
actually
decided
downward
departure
abuse
discretion
footnotes
agree
law
case
doctrine
control
pepper
resentencing
see
ante
pepper
also
stated
understood
statutory
minimum
government
making
promises
exceptions
footnotes
insofar
permitted
sentencing
judge
consider
evidence
postsentencing
rehabilitation
provision
effectively
modified
subsequent
enactment
sentencing
reform
act
instructed
sentencing
commission
adopt
guidelines
policy
statements
avoid
unwarranted
sentencing
disparities
see
also
provided
sentencing
courts
shall
consider
pertinent
policy
statement