superior
argued
february
decided
june
california
filed
complaint
nurse
charging
murdering
patients
administering
massive
doses
heart
drug
lidocaine
magistrate
granted
defendant
motion
exclude
public
preliminary
hearing
complaint
california
statute
requires
proceedings
open
unless
exclusion
public
necessary
order
protect
defendant
right
fair
impartial
trial
conclusion
preliminary
hearing
magistrate
refused
petitioner
request
transcript
proceedings
released
thereafter
state
supported
petitioner
opposed
defendant
moved
unsuccessfully
california
superior
transcript
released
petitioner
filed
peremptory
writ
mandate
california
appeal
meanwhile
defendant
waived
right
jury
trial
superior
released
transcript
holding
controversy
moot
appeal
denied
writ
california
also
denied
writ
holding
general
first
amendment
right
access
preliminary
hearings
california
statute
defendant
establishes
reasonable
likelihood
substantial
prejudice
burden
shifts
prosecution
media
show
preponderance
evidence
reasonable
probability
prejudice
held
even
though
superior
ultimately
released
transcript
question
case
moot
controversy
capable
repetition
yet
evading
review
globe
newspaper
superior
gannett
depasquale
thus
jurisdiction
qualified
first
amendment
right
access
criminal
proceedings
applies
preliminary
hearings
conducted
california
first
tradition
public
accessibility
preliminary
hearings
type
conducted
california
opposed
grand
jury
proceedings
preliminary
hearings
conducted
neutral
detached
magistrates
open
public
second
public
access
preliminary
hearings
essential
proper
functioning
criminal
justice
system
proper
functioning
made
less
essential
fact
preliminary
hearing
result
conviction
adjudication
magistrate
without
jury
absence
jury
makes
importance
public
access
even
significant
pp
since
qualified
first
amendment
right
access
attaches
preliminary
hearings
conducted
california
proceedings
closed
unless
specific
record
findings
made
demonstrating
closure
essential
preserve
higher
values
narrowly
tailored
serve
interest
superior
interest
asserted
defendant
right
fair
trial
preliminary
hearing
shall
closed
unless
substantial
probability
right
prejudiced
publicity
closure
prevent
reasonable
alternatives
closure
adequately
protect
right
reasonable
likelihood
test
applied
california
placed
lesser
burden
defendant
substantial
probability
test
required
first
amendment
moreover
failed
consider
whether
alternatives
short
closure
protected
defendant
interests
pp
burger
delivered
opinion
brennan
white
marshall
blackmun
powell
joined
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
part
ii
rehnquist
joined
post
james
ward
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
sharon
waters
joyce
ellen
manulis
reikes
argued
cause
respondent
brief
gerald
geerlings
glenn
robert
salter
ephriam
margolin
filed
brief
diaz
real
party
interest
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
state
california
john
van
de
kamp
attorney
general
andrea
sheridan
ordin
steve
white
chief
assistant
attorneys
general
marian
johnston
deputy
attorney
general
american
civil
liberties
union
et
al
robert
warren
rex
heinke
charles
sims
american
newspaper
publishers
association
et
al
bruce
sanford
lee
levine
terry
maguire
richard
schmidt
george
vradenburg
iii
lawrence
gunnels
mark
tuft
robert
sack
alice
neff
lucan
susan
garsh
harvey
lipton
norton
armour
robert
brinkmann
lois
schiffer
samuel
klein
nancy
hendry
jane
kirtley
alexander
wellford
cameron
de
vore
carol
melamed
copley
press
et
al
harold
fuson
judith
epstein
edward
mcintyre
william
niese
donald
zachary
mark
tuft
lawrence
gunnels
robert
landes
kenneth
vittor
jonathan
kotler
grover
trask
ii
pro
se
filed
brief
district
attorney
county
riverside
amicus
curiae
chief
justice
burger
delivered
opinion
granted
certiorari
decide
whether
petitioner
first
amendment
right
access
transcript
preliminary
hearing
growing
criminal
prosecution
december
state
california
filed
complaint
riverside
county
municipal
charging
robert
diaz
counts
murder
seeking
death
penalty
complaint
alleged
diaz
nurse
murdered
patients
administering
massive
doses
heart
drug
lidocaine
preliminary
hearing
complaint
commenced
july
diaz
moved
exclude
public
proceedings
cal
penal
code
ann
west
requires
proceedings
open
unless
exclusion
public
necessary
order
protect
defendant
right
fair
impartial
trial
magistrate
granted
unopposed
motion
finding
closure
necessary
case
attracted
national
publicity
one
side
may
get
reported
media
app
preliminary
hearing
continued
days
testimony
evidence
presented
state
medical
scientific
remainder
consisted
testimony
personnel
worked
diaz
shifts
patients
died
diaz
introduce
evidence
counsel
subjected
witnesses
vigorous
diaz
held
answer
charges
conclusion
hearing
petitioner
company
asked
transcript
proceedings
released
magistrate
refused
sealed
record
january
state
moved
superior
transcript
preliminary
hearing
released
public
petitioner
later
joined
support
motion
diaz
opposed
motion
contending
release
transcript
result
prejudicial
pretrial
publicity
superior
found
information
transcript
factual
facts
neither
inflammatory
exciting
nonetheless
reasonable
likelihood
release
part
transcripts
might
prejudice
defendant
right
fair
impartial
trial
petitioner
filed
peremptory
writ
mandate
appeal
originally
denied
writ
ordered
california
set
matter
hearing
meanwhile
diaz
waived
right
jury
trial
superior
released
transcript
holding
controversy
moot
appeal
denied
writ
mandate
california
thereafter
denied
petitioner
peremptory
writ
mandate
holding
general
first
amendment
right
access
preliminary
hearings
cal
reasoned
right
access
criminal
proceedings
recognized
superior
globe
newspaper
superior
extended
actual
criminal
trials
cal
furthermore
reasons
asserted
closing
proceedings
globe
interests
witnesses
third
parties
right
asserted
case
defendant
right
fair
impartial
trial
jury
uninfluenced
news
accounts
found
general
first
amendment
right
access
considered
circumstances
closure
proper
california
access
statute
cal
penal
code
ann
west
statute
reasoned
defendant
establishes
reasonable
likelihood
substantial
prejudice
burden
shifts
prosecution
media
show
preponderance
evidence
reasonable
probability
prejudice
cal
granted
certiorari
reverse
ii
must
first
consider
whether
jurisdiction
article
iii
constitution
petitioner
challenges
superior
original
refusal
release
transcript
preliminary
hearing
noted
specific
relief
petitioner
seeks
already
granted
transcript
preliminary
hearing
released
diaz
waived
right
jury
trial
however
globe
newspaper
supra
gannett
depasquale
controversy
capable
repetition
yet
evading
review
reasonably
assumed
petitioner
subjected
similar
closure
order
criminal
proceedings
typically
short
duration
order
likely
evade
review
globe
gannett
therefore
require
conclusion
case
moot
accordingly
turn
merits
iii
important
identify
precisely
california
decided
conclude
magistrate
shall
close
preliminary
hearing
upon
finding
reasonable
likelihood
substantial
prejudice
impinge
upon
right
fair
trial
penal
code
section
makes
clear
primary
right
right
fair
trial
public
right
access
must
give
way
conflict
cal
right
open
public
trial
shared
right
accused
public
common
concern
assurance
fairness
recently
waller
georgia
example
considered
whether
defendant
sixth
amendment
right
open
trial
prevented
closure
suppression
hearing
defendant
objection
noted
first
amendment
right
access
instances
attach
proceedings
explicit
sixth
amendment
right
accused
less
protective
public
trial
implicit
first
amendment
right
press
public
defendant
objects
closure
suppression
hearing
therefore
hearing
must
open
unless
party
seeking
close
hearing
advances
overriding
interest
likely
prejudiced
unlike
waller
right
asserted
defendant
sixth
amendment
right
public
trial
since
defendant
requested
closed
preliminary
hearing
instead
right
asserted
public
first
amendment
see
gannett
supra
powell
concurring
california
concluded
first
amendment
implicated
proceeding
criminal
trial
preliminary
hearing
however
first
amendment
question
resolved
solely
label
give
event
trial
otherwise
particularly
preliminary
hearing
functions
much
like
trial
cases
dealing
claim
first
amendment
right
access
criminal
proceedings
decisions
emphasized
two
complementary
considerations
first
tradition
accessibility
implies
favorable
judgment
experience
globe
newspaper
quoting
richmond
newspapers
virginia
brennan
concurring
judgment
considered
whether
place
process
historically
open
press
general
public
example
observed
since
development
trial
jury
process
selection
jurors
presumptively
public
process
exceptions
good
cause
shown
richmond
newspapers
reviewed
early
history
england
open
trials
day
trial
much
like
town
meeting
days
norman
conquest
criminal
cases
brought
moots
collection
freemen
community
public
trial
one
essential
qualities
justice
england
recognized
early
colonies
risks
course
inherent
town
meeting
trial
risk
might
become
gathering
moved
emotions
passions
growing
nature
crime
lynch
mob
ambience
hardly
conducive
calm
reasoned
based
evidence
plainly
modern
trial
jurors
open
interrogation
possible
bias
far
cry
town
meeting
trial
ancient
english
practice
yet
even
modern
procedural
protections
origin
ancient
principle
provided
closed
proceedings
rather
rules
conduct
attend
trials
richmond
newspapers
supra
second
setting
traditionally
considered
whether
public
access
plays
significant
positive
role
functioning
particular
process
question
globe
newspaper
supra
although
many
governmental
processes
operate
best
public
scrutiny
takes
little
imagination
recognize
kinds
government
operations
totally
frustrated
conducted
openly
classic
example
proper
functioning
grand
jury
system
depends
upon
secrecy
grand
jury
proceedings
douglas
oil
petrol
stops
proceedings
plainly
require
public
access
summarized
holdings
prior
cases
noting
openness
criminal
trials
including
selection
jurors
enhances
basic
fairness
criminal
trial
appearance
fairness
essential
public
confidence
system
considerations
experience
logic
course
related
history
experience
shape
functioning
governmental
processes
particular
proceeding
question
passes
tests
experience
logic
qualified
first
amendment
right
public
access
attaches
even
right
access
attaches
absolute
globe
newspaper
superior
supra
open
criminal
proceedings
give
assurances
fairness
public
accused
limited
circumstances
right
accused
fair
trial
might
undermined
publicity
cases
trial
must
determine
whether
situation
rights
accused
override
qualified
first
amendment
right
access
stated
presumption
may
overcome
overriding
interest
based
findings
closure
essential
preserve
higher
values
narrowly
tailored
serve
interest
interest
articulated
along
findings
specific
enough
reviewing
determine
whether
closure
order
properly
entered
iv
considerations
led
apply
first
amendment
right
access
criminal
trials
richmond
newspapers
globe
selection
jurors
lead
us
conclude
right
access
applies
preliminary
hearings
conducted
california
first
tradition
accessibility
preliminary
hearings
type
conducted
california
although
grand
jury
proceedings
traditionally
closed
public
accused
preliminary
hearings
conducted
neutral
detached
magistrates
open
public
long
ago
celebrated
trial
aaron
burr
treason
example
chief
justice
marshall
sitting
trial
judge
hearing
held
hall
house
delegates
virginia
courtroom
small
accommodate
crush
interested
citizens
burr
cas
cc
burr
present
day
near
uniform
practice
state
federal
courts
conduct
preliminary
hearings
open
noted
gannett
several
following
original
new
york
field
code
criminal
procedure
published
allowed
preliminary
hearings
closed
motion
accused
even
proceedings
presumptively
open
public
closed
cause
shown
open
preliminary
hearings
therefore
accorded
favorable
judgment
experience
globe
second
question
whether
public
access
preliminary
hearings
conducted
california
plays
particularly
significant
positive
role
actual
functioning
process
already
determined
richmond
newspapers
globe
public
access
criminal
trials
selection
jurors
essential
proper
functioning
criminal
justice
system
california
preliminary
hearings
sufficiently
like
trial
justify
conclusion
california
bring
felon
trial
prosecutor
choice
securing
grand
jury
indictment
finding
probable
cause
following
preliminary
hearing
even
accused
indicted
grand
jury
however
absolute
right
elaborate
preliminary
hearing
neutral
magistrate
hawkins
superior
cal
accused
right
personally
appear
hearing
represented
counsel
hostile
witnesses
present
exculpatory
evidence
exclude
illegally
obtained
evidence
cal
penal
code
ann
west
west
supp
magistrate
determines
probable
cause
exists
accused
bound
trial
finding
leads
guilty
plea
majority
cases
true
unlike
criminal
trial
california
preliminary
hearing
result
conviction
accused
adjudication
magistrate
judicial
officer
without
jury
features
standing
alone
make
public
access
less
essential
proper
functioning
proceedings
overall
criminal
justice
process
extensive
scope
preliminary
hearing
often
final
important
step
criminal
proceeding
see
waller
georgia
california
stated
san
jose
municipal
cal
preliminary
hearing
many
cases
provides
sole
occasion
public
observation
criminal
justice
system
see
also
richmond
newspapers
similarly
absence
jury
long
recognized
inestimable
safeguard
corrupt
overzealous
prosecutor
complaint
biased
eccentric
judge
duncan
louisiana
makes
importance
public
access
preliminary
hearing
even
significant
people
open
society
demand
infallibility
institutions
difficult
accept
prohibited
observing
richmond
newspapers
denying
transcript
preliminary
hearing
frustrate
characterized
community
therapeutic
value
openness
criminal
acts
especially
certain
violent
crimes
provoke
public
concern
outrage
hostility
public
aware
law
enforced
criminal
justice
system
functioning
outlet
provided
understandable
reactions
emotions
see
also
weihofen
urge
punish
reik
compulsion
confess
sum
value
openness
lies
fact
people
actually
attending
trials
confidence
standards
fairness
observed
sure
knowledge
anyone
free
attend
gives
assurance
established
procedures
followed
deviations
become
known
openness
thus
enhances
basic
fairness
criminal
trial
appearance
fairness
essential
public
confidence
system
supra
emphasis
original
since
qualified
first
amendment
right
access
attaches
preliminary
hearings
california
cal
penal
code
ann
et
seq
west
proceedings
closed
unless
specific
record
findings
made
demonstrating
closure
essential
preserve
higher
values
narrowly
tailored
serve
interest
supra
see
also
globe
newspaper
interest
asserted
right
accused
fair
trial
preliminary
hearing
shall
closed
specific
findings
made
demonstrating
first
substantial
probability
defendant
right
fair
trial
prejudiced
publicity
closure
prevent
second
reasonable
alternatives
closure
adequately
protect
defendant
fair
trial
rights
see
supra
richmond
newspapers
supra
california
interpreting
access
statute
concluded
magistrate
shall
close
preliminary
hearing
upon
finding
reasonable
likelihood
substantial
prejudice
cal
acknowledged
reasonable
likelihood
test
places
lesser
burden
defendant
substantial
probability
test
hold
called
first
amendment
see
ibid
see
also
lucas
concurring
dissenting
moreover
failed
consider
whether
alternatives
short
complete
closure
protected
interests
accused
gannett
observed
publicity
concerning
pretrial
suppression
hearings
one
involved
present
case
poses
special
risks
unfairness
whole
purpose
hearings
screen
unreliable
illegally
obtained
evidence
insure
evidence
become
known
jury
cf
jackson
denno
publicity
concerning
proceedings
pretrial
hearing
however
influence
public
opinion
defendant
inform
potential
jurors
inculpatory
information
wholly
inadmissible
actual
trial
standard
applied
california
failed
consider
first
amendment
right
access
criminal
proceedings
accordingly
judgment
california
reversed
ordered
footnotes
similarly
interests
accused
may
implicated
protection
victims
sex
crimes
trauma
embarrassment
public
scrutiny
may
justify
closing
certain
aspects
criminal
proceeding
see
globe
newspaper
superior
vast
majority
considering
issue
concluded
tradition
accessibility
applies
criminal
trials
applies
preliminary
proceedings
see
arkansas
television
tedder
ark
miami
herald
publishing
lewis
page
lumpkin
gannett
pacific
richardson
haw
state
ex
rel
publishing
porter
superior
ind
ashland
publishing
asbury
app
great
falls
tribune
district
mont
keene
publishing
cheshire
county
superior
state
williams
westchester
rockland
newspapers
leggett
minot
daily
news
holum
state
ex
rel
dayton
newspapers
phillips
ohio
philadelphia
newspapers
jerome
lewis
utah
herald
ellison
federated
publications
kurtz
state
ex
rel
herald
mail
hamilton
williams
stafford
wyo
cf
midland
publishing
proceedings
leading
person
indictment
open
public
courts
noted
pretrial
proceedings
historical
counterpart
given
importance
pretrial
proceeding
criminal
trial
traditional
right
access
still
apply
see
iowa
freedom
information
council
wifvat
iowa
minneapolis
star
tribune
kammeyer
richmond
newspapers
commonwealth
see
state
mckenna
idaho
davis
sheriff
although
arizona
iowa
montana
north
dakota
pennsylvania
utah
closure
statutes
based
field
code
see
gannett
found
either
state
constitutional
right
public
attend
pretrial
proceedings
see
phoenix
newspapers
superior
iowa
freedom
information
council
wifvat
supra
great
falls
tribune
district
supra
minot
daily
news
holum
supra
commonwealth
hayes
lewis
supra
justice
stevens
justice
rehnquist
joins
part
ii
dissenting
constitutional
question
presented
case
whether
members
public
first
amendment
right
insist
upon
access
transcript
preliminary
hearing
period
public
trial
even
though
accused
prosecutor
trial
judge
agreed
sealing
transcript
order
assure
fair
trial
preliminary
hearing
transcript
petitioner
sought
access
consists
pages
testimony
prosecution
witnesses
heard
eight
weeks
testimony
contained
volumes
accuses
robert
diaz
nurse
murdering
patients
hospital
worked
injecting
lethal
doses
heart
drug
transcript
reveals
defense
put
witnesses
immediately
magistrate
ordered
defendant
bound
trial
defense
counsel
moved
transcript
preliminary
hearing
sealed
protect
client
right
fair
trial
transcript
words
magistrate
revealed
one
side
story
app
transcript
also
contained
magistrate
characterization
diaz
dangerous
type
individual
prosecutor
oppose
motion
magistrate
hearing
petitioner
objection
ordered
transcript
sealed
superior
trial
judge
denied
motion
unseal
transcript
found
finding
amply
supported
record
reasonable
likelihood
making
part
transcripts
public
might
prejudice
defendant
right
fair
impartial
trial
accord
magistrate
earlier
rejected
less
restrictive
alternatives
sealing
transcript
concluding
way
protect
defendant
fair
trial
right
seal
transcript
appeal
agreed
trial
judge
denied
peremptory
writ
mandate
sought
petitioner
rejected
petitioner
assertion
superior
failed
state
reasons
make
specific
finding
support
sealing
order
app
pet
cert
instead
confirmed
trial
judge
determinations
transcript
indicative
prosecutorial
side
case
public
right
access
overborne
reasonable
likelihood
substantial
prejudice
defendant
right
fair
trial
lternatives
sealing
transcript
suffice
case
california
similarly
denied
petitioner
request
peremptory
writ
mandate
affirming
preliminary
hearing
transcript
sealed
upon
showing
reasonable
likelihood
substantial
prejudice
impinge
upon
right
fair
trial
cal
view
trial
judge
obvious
legitimate
reason
refusing
make
transcript
public
sooner
decision
plainly
violate
defendant
right
public
trial
sixth
amendment
defendant
objected
release
transcript
see
gannett
depasquale
opinion
judge
decision
violate
first
amendment
either
although
perhaps
obvious
bears
emphasis
first
amendment
right
asserted
petitioner
right
publish
otherwise
communicate
information
lawfully
unlawfully
acquired
right
lies
core
first
amendment
erased
legacy
restraints
publication
drafters
amendment
rebelled
see
grosjean
american
press
may
overcome
governmental
objective
highest
order
attainable
less
intrusive
way
see
smith
daily
mail
publishing
landmark
communications
virginia
oklahoma
publishing
district
per
curiam
nebraska
press
assn
stuart
cox
broadcasting
cohn
first
amendment
right
asserted
petitioner
case
contrast
right
publicize
information
possession
right
acquire
access
thereto
long
believed
proper
construction
first
amendment
embraces
right
access
information
conduct
public
affairs
madison
wrote
popular
government
without
popular
information
means
acquiring
prologue
farce
tragedy
perhaps
knowledge
forever
govern
ignorance
people
mean
governors
must
arm
power
knowledge
gives
writings
james
madison
hunt
ed
sufficient
therefore
channels
communication
free
governmental
restraints
without
protection
acquisition
information
operation
public
institutions
prisons
public
large
process
contemplated
framers
stripped
substance
reason
information
gathering
entitled
measure
constitutional
protection
houchins
kqed
stevens
dissenting
always
apparent
freedom
obtain
information
government
legitimate
interest
disclosing
see
globe
newspaper
superior
stevens
dissenting
far
narrower
freedom
disseminate
information
virtually
absolute
contexts
richmond
newspapers
virginia
stevens
concurring
case
risk
prejudice
defendant
right
fair
trial
perfectly
obvious
risk
far
significant
countervailing
interest
publishing
transcript
preliminary
hearing
sooner
rather
later
cf
gannett
depasquale
upholding
closure
suppression
hearing
part
denial
access
case
absolute
temporary
interest
prompt
publication
view
greater
interest
prompt
publication
grand
jury
transcripts
explained
fully
always
recognized
legitimacy
governmental
interest
secrecy
grand
jury
proceedings
unpersuaded
difference
proceedings
rather
elaborate
procedure
determining
probable
cause
california
adopted
strengthens
first
amendment
claim
access
asserted
case
ii
nevertheless
reaches
opposite
conclusion
applying
two
complementary
considerations
ante
experience
logic
ante
view
neither
reasoning
result
reaches
supported
precedents
historical
evidence
proffered
case
far
less
probative
evidence
adduced
prior
cases
granting
public
access
criminal
proceedings
cases
tradition
openness
time
first
amendment
ratified
suggested
intention
expectation
part
framers
ratifiers
proceedings
remain
presumptively
open
thus
richmond
newspapers
virginia
chief
justice
explained
hat
significant
present
purposes
throughout
evolution
trial
open
cared
observe
historical
evidence
demonstrates
conclusively
time
organic
laws
adopted
criminal
trials
england
long
presumptively
open
emphasis
added
history
relevant
demonstrated
bill
rights
enacted
backdrop
long
history
trials
presumptively
open
public
access
trials
regarded
important
aspect
process
opinion
globe
newspaper
superior
also
concerned
presumptive
openness
criminal
trial
relied
expressly
opinion
chief
justice
richmond
newspapers
point
criminal
trials
open
time
organic
laws
adopted
later
superior
quoted
identical
passage
richmond
newspapers
see
concluded
ublic
jury
selection
thus
common
practice
america
constitution
adopted
dispel
doubt
regarding
significance
evidence
explained
question
address
whether
voir
dire
process
must
open
focuses
first
amendment
values
historical
backdrop
first
amendment
enacted
emphasis
added
thus
prior
cases
history
mattered
primarily
revealed
intentions
framers
ratifiers
first
amendment
case
however
uncontroverted
right
access
inhere
preliminary
proceedings
time
first
amendment
adopted
framers
ratifiers
provision
intended
proceedings
remain
open
justice
stewart
wrote
gannett
depasquale
exists
persuasive
evidence
common
law
members
public
right
attend
pretrial
proceedings
indeed
substantial
evidence
contrary
time
adoption
constitution
pretrial
proceedings
precisely
concern
fair
trial
never
characterized
degree
openness
actual
trials
english
common
law
public
right
attend
pretrial
proceedings
jenks
book
english
law
ed
must
course
remembered
principle
publicity
applies
actual
trial
case
necessarily
preliminary
prefatory
stages
proceedings
maitland
justice
police
preliminary
examination
accused
persons
gradually
assumed
judicial
form
place
held
indeed
open
public
excluded
magistrate
thinks
ends
justice
thus
best
answered
see
also
indictable
offenses
act
ch
providing
pretrial
proceedings
deemed
open
public
therefore
excluded
magistrates
courts
act
geo
eliz
ch
footnotes
omitted
thing
important
another
administration
justice
jurymen
come
trial
persons
whose
guilt
innocence
decide
minds
pure
unprejudiced
trials
law
fairly
reported
although
may
occasionally
prove
injurious
individuals
held
privileged
let
continue
privileged
preliminary
examinations
privilege
tendency
prejudge
law
still
presumes
innocent
poison
sources
justice
king
fisher
camp
eng
historical
evidence
proves
little
value
openness
ante
quoting
superior
relies
proves
much
measure
open
public
scrutiny
far
preliminary
hearings
conducted
california
comforting
phrase
invoked
one
form
another
eight
times
opinion
brief
rationale
opening
california
preliminary
hearing
often
final
important
step
criminal
proceeding
provides
sole
occasion
public
observation
criminal
justice
system
lacks
protective
presence
jury
closure
denies
outlet
community
catharsis
ante
quotation
omitted
obvious
defect
approach
reasoning
applies
traditionally
secret
grand
jury
much
force
applies
california
preliminary
hearings
grand
jury
indictment
likely
final
step
criminal
proceeding
sole
occasion
public
scrutiny
preliminary
hearing
moreover
many
critics
grand
jury
maintain
grand
jury
protects
accused
less
well
legally
knowledgeable
judge
personally
presides
preliminary
hearing
see
hawkins
superior
cal
holding
deprivation
preliminary
hearing
constitute
denial
equal
protection
state
constitution
part
grand
jury
total
captive
prosecutor
candid
concede
indict
anybody
time
almost
anything
grand
jury
quoting
campbell
eliminate
grand
jury
crim
finally
closure
grand
juries
denies
outlet
community
rage
explanatory
veneer
stripped
away
emerges
reality
california
preliminary
hearing
functionally
identical
traditional
grand
jury
chief
justice
emphasized
quotation
cox
coleridge
eng
concurring
opinion
gannett
depasquale
emphasis
added
proceeding
preliminary
inquiry
whether
sufficient
ground
commit
prisoner
trial
proceeding
grand
jury
precisely
nature
difficult
right
exists
present
case
deny
preliminary
inquiry
trial
makes
mind
difference
fact
logic
access
right
extends
even
beyond
confines
criminal
justice
system
encompass
proceedings
held
civil
side
docket
well
justice
stewart
explained
existence
rule
test
whether
sixth
amendment
public
right
public
trial
therefore
right
civil
well
criminal
cases
short
principled
basis
upon
public
right
access
judicial
proceedings
limited
criminal
cases
scope
right
defined
common
law
rather
text
structure
constitution
indeed
many
advantages
public
criminal
trials
equally
applicable
civil
trial
context
thus
civil
cases
public
interest
access
salutary
effect
publicity
may
strong
stronger
criminal
cases
gannett
depasquale
abjuring
strict
reliance
history
emphasizing
broad
value
openness
tacitly
recognizes
importance
public
access
government
proceedings
generally
regrettably
taken
seriously
stated
requirement
sealing
transcript
justified
compelling
overriding
governmental
interest
closure
order
narrowly
tailored
serve
interest
ante
quoting
superior
superior
quoting
globe
newspaper
superior
see
ante
standard
well
test
history
logic
formed
basis
decision
today
originated
two
helpful
principles
justice
brennan
eloquent
concurrence
richmond
newspapers
virginia
concurrence
recognized
restrictions
action
clothed
ingenious
argument
garb
decreased
data
flow
quoting
zemel
rusk
contrast
decision
today
stressed
assertion
prerogative
gather
information
must
accordingly
assayed
considering
information
sought
opposing
interests
invaded
omitted
determination
much
matter
sensitivity
practical
necessities
abstract
reasoning
ibid
cases
denying
access
done
far
lesser
showing
required
compelling
governmental
restrictive
means
analysis
see
supra
cases
granting
access
recognized
legitimate
grounds
closure
interests
fall
far
short
traditionally
thought
compelling
see
superior
privacy
interest
venirepersons
sufficient
reason
close
presumptively
open
voir
dire
proceeding
see
also
richmond
newspapers
virginia
stewart
concurring
judgment
presence
legitimate
reason
closure
case
requires
affirmance
constitutionally
grounded
fair
trial
interests
accused
bound
trial
reputational
interests
accused
provide
substantial
reason
delaying
access
transcript
least
short
time
trial
taking
verbal
formulation
seriously
reverses
without
comment
explanation
attempt
reconciliation
holding
gannett
reasonable
probability
prejudice
enough
overcome
first
amendment
right
access
preliminary
proceeding
unfortunate
neglects
opportunity
fit
result
case
body
precedent
dealing
access
rights
generally
fear
today
decision
simply
unsettle
law
area
respectfully
dissent
ruling
magistrate
recognized
affirmative
constitutional
duty
insure
defendant
fair
trial
app
gannett
depasquale
safeguard
due
process
rights
accused
trial
judge
affirmative
constitutional
duty
minimize
effects
prejudicial
pretrial
publicity
constitution
pervasive
concern
due
process
rights
trial
judge
may
surely
take
protective
measures
even
strictly
inescapably
necessary
citation
omitted
indeed
appeal
determined
release
transcript
employment
alternatives
tend
exacerbate
existing
prejudice
app
pet
cert
emphasis
added
citation
omitted
see
richmond
newspapers
virginia
brennan
concurring
judgment
saxbe
washington
post
powell
dissenting
separate
writing
houchins
appended
quotation
justice
stewart
dissenting
opinion
branzburg
hayes
emphasis
added
stated
right
gather
news
dimensions
must
exist
majority
agreed
observation
acknowledging
news
gathering
without
first
amendment
protections
without
protection
seeking
news
freedom
press
eviscerated
see
also
zemel
rusk
right
speak
publish
carry
unrestrained
right
gather
information
emphasis
added
houchins
explained
believed
plaintiffs
entitled
put
end
warden
policy
concealing
prison
conditions
public
conditions
wholly
without
claim
confidentiality
prison
officials
interest
time
manner
public
acquisition
information
institutions
administer
legitimate
penological
justification
concealing
citizens
conditions
fellow
citizens
confined
seemed
clear
official
prison
policy
concealing
knowledge
public
arbitrarily
cutting
flow
information
source
abridges
freedom
speech
press
protected
first
fourteenth
amendments
constitution
omitted
accord
geis
preliminary
hearings
press
ucla
rev
preliminary
hearings
american
colonies
closely
followed
prescriptions
english
statutes
omitted
chief
justice
pointed
concurring
opinion
gannett
common
law
different
presumption
favor
closure
proceedings
preceded
trial
one
ever
suggested
right
public
present
pretrial
proceedings
available
time
bill
rights
adopted
ironically
california
michigan
preliminary
proceedings
generally
open
public
thus
surprisingly
part
recent
trend
favor
openness
relied
facts
record
case
california
courts
ordered
transcript
sealed
since
many
decisions
collected
hold
right
public
preliminary
hearing
personal
accused
see
state
porter
superior
ind
azbill
fisher
commonly
overcome
showing
potentially
prejudicial
publicity
equivalent
less
required
california
see
state
burak
supp
likelihood
prejudice
edwards
likelihood
cert
denied
gannett
pacific
richardson
haw
substantial
likelihood
westchester
rockland
newspapers
leggett
strong
likelihood
lewis
utah
realistic
likelihood
prejudice
richmond
newspapers
commonwealth
likelihood
federated
publications
kurtz
likelihood
jeopardy
courts
presumably
also
denied
access
presented
facts
case
observation
view
fact
reasoning
state
courts
heavily
dependent
cases
granting
access
criminal
proceedings
even
ultimately
grounded
state
law
remarkable
finds
historical
basis
public
right
access
preliminary
proceedings
showing
excess
required
california
met
defendant
case
given
focus
history
preliminary
proceedings
general
reliance
broad
values
served
openness
see
ante
see
relevance
fact
preliminary
proceedings
california
bear
outward
resemblance
criminal
trials
extent
matters
california
accused
right
personally
appear
hearing
represented
counsel
hostile
witnesses
present
exculpatory
evidence
exclude
illegally
obtained
evidence
ante
citing
cal
penal
code
ann
west
west
bears
mention
many
reformed
grand
juries
include
one
procedural
reforms
see
lafave
israel
criminal
procedure
today
decision
one
wonder
whether
public
enjoys
right
access
proceedings
well
five
reasons
commonly
given
policy
grand
jury
secrecy
prevent
escape
whose
indictment
may
contemplated
insure
utmost
freedom
grand
jury
deliberations
prevent
persons
subject
indictment
friends
importuning
grand
jurors
prevent
subornation
perjury
tampering
witnesses
may
testify
grand
jury
later
appear
trial
indicted
encourage
free
untrammeled
persons
information
respect
commission
crimes
protect
innocent
accused
exonerated
disclosure
fact
investigation
expense
standing
trial
probability
guilt
douglas
oil
petrol
stops
northwest
quoting
rose
procter
gamble
see
illinois
abbott
associates