clinton
jones
argued
january
decided
may
held
need
address
two
important
constitutional
issues
encompassed
within
questions
presented
certioraripetition
whether
claim
comparable
petitioner
assertion
immunity
might
succeed
state
tribunal
whether
may
compel
president
attendance
specific
time
place
pp
deferral
litigation
petitioner
presidency
ends
constitutionally
required
pp
petitioner
principal
submission
exceptional
cases
constitution
affords
president
temporary
immunity
civil
damages
litigation
arising
events
occurred
took
office
sustained
basis
precedent
principal
rationale
affording
presidents
immunity
damages
actions
based
official
acts
enable
perform
designated
functions
effectively
without
fear
particular
decision
may
give
rise
personal
liability
see
nixon
fitzgerald
provides
support
immunity
unofficial
conduct
moreover
immunities
acts
clearly
within
official
capacity
grounded
nature
function
performed
identity
actor
performed
forrester
white
also
unpersuaded
petitioner
historical
evidence
sheds
little
light
question
issue
largely
canceled
conflicting
evidence
consistent
doctrine
presidential
immunity
set
forth
fitzgerald
rejection
immunity
claim
case
pp
separation
powers
doctrine
require
federal
courts
stay
private
actions
president
leaves
office
even
accepting
unique
importance
presidency
constitutional
scheme
follow
doctrine
violated
allowing
action
proceed
doctrine
provides
self
executing
safeguard
encroachment
aggrandizement
one
three
co
equal
branches
government
expense
another
buckley
valeo
case
suggestion
federal
judiciary
asked
perform
function
might
way
described
executive
respondent
merely
asking
courts
exercise
core
article
iii
jurisdiction
decide
cases
controversies
whatever
outcome
possibility
decision
curtail
scope
executive
branch
official
powers
rejects
petitioner
contention
case
well
potential
additional
litigation
affirmance
eighth
circuit
judgment
might
spawn
may
place
unacceptable
burdens
president
hamper
performance
official
duties
assertion
finds
little
support
either
history
evidenced
paucity
suits
sitting
presidents
private
actions
therelatively
narrow
compass
issues
raised
particular
case
greater
significance
settled
judiciary
may
severely
burden
executive
branch
reviewing
legality
president
official
conduct
see
youngstown
sheet
tube
sawyer
may
direct
appropriate
process
president
see
nixon
must
follow
federal
courts
power
determine
legality
president
unofficial
conduct
reasons
rejecting
categorical
rule
requiring
federal
courts
stay
private
actions
president
term
apply
well
rule
petitioner
words
require
stay
exceptional
cases
pp
contrary
eighth
circuit
ruling
district
stay
order
functional
equivalent
unconstitutional
grant
temporary
immunity
rather
district
broad
discretion
stay
proceedings
incident
power
control
docket
see
landis
north
american
moreover
potential
burdens
president
posed
litigation
appropriate
matters
evaluate
management
case
high
respect
owed
presidency
matter
inform
conduct
entire
proceeding
nevertheless
district
stay
decision
abuse
discretion
took
account
importance
respondent
interest
bringing
case
trial
premature
nothing
record
enable
judge
assess
whether
postponement
trial
completion
discovery
warranted
pp
persuaded
seriousness
alleged
risks
decision
generate
large
volume
politically
motivated
harassing
frivolous
litigation
national
security
concerns
might
prevent
president
explaining
legitimate
need
continuance
confidence
ability
federal
judges
deal
concerns
congress
deems
appropriate
afford
president
stronger
protection
may
respond
legislation
pp
affirmed
stevens
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
scalia
kennedy
souter
thomas
ginsburg
joined
breyer
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
wash
ington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
william
jefferson
clinton
petitioner
paula
corbin
jones
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
may
justice
stevens
delivered
opinion
case
raises
constitutional
prudential
question
concerning
office
president
respondent
private
citizen
seeks
recover
damages
current
occupant
office
based
actions
allegedly
taken
term
began
president
submits
exceptional
cases
constitution
requires
federal
courts
defer
litigation
term
ends
event
respect
office
warrants
stay
despite
force
arguments
supporting
president
submissions
conclude
must
rejected
petitioner
william
jefferson
clinton
elected
presidency
elected
term
office
expires
january
governor
state
arkansas
respondent
paula
corbin
jones
resident
california
lived
arkansas
employee
arkansas
industrial
development
commission
may
commenced
action
district
eastern
district
arkansas
filing
complaint
naming
petitioner
danny
ferguson
former
arkansas
state
police
officer
defendants
complaint
alleges
two
federal
claims
two
state
law
claims
federal
jurisdiction
diverse
citizenship
parties
case
comes
us
required
assume
truth
detailed
yet
untested
factual
allegations
complaint
allegations
principally
describe
events
said
occurred
afternoon
may
official
conference
held
excelsior
hotel
little
rock
arkansas
governor
delivered
speech
conference
respondent
working
state
employee
staffed
registration
desk
alleges
ferguson
persuaded
leave
desk
visit
governor
business
suite
hotel
made
abhorrent
sexual
advances
vehemently
rejected
claims
superiors
work
subsequently
dealt
hostile
rude
manner
changed
duties
punish
rejecting
advances
finally
alleges
petitioner
elected
president
ferguson
defamed
making
statement
reporter
implied
accepted
petitioner
alleged
overtures
various
persons
authorized
speak
president
publicly
branded
liar
denying
incident
occurred
respondent
seeks
actual
damages
punitive
damages
complaint
contains
four
counts
first
charges
petitioner
acting
color
state
law
deprived
rights
protected
constitution
violation
rev
stat
second
charges
petitioner
andferguson
engaged
conspiracy
violate
federal
rights
also
actionable
federal
law
see
rev
stat
third
state
common
law
claim
intentional
infliction
emotional
distress
grounded
primarily
incident
hotel
fourth
count
also
based
state
law
defamation
embracing
comments
allegedly
made
press
ferguson
statements
petitioner
agents
inasmuch
legal
sufficiency
claims
yet
challenged
assume
without
deciding
four
counts
cause
action
matter
law
exception
last
charge
arguably
may
involve
conduct
within
outer
perimeter
president
official
responsibilities
perfectly
clear
alleged
misconduct
petitioner
unrelated
official
duties
president
indeed
occurred
elected
office
response
complaint
petitioner
promptly
advised
district
intended
file
motion
dismiss
grounds
presidential
immunity
requested
defer
pleadings
motions
immunity
issue
resolved
relying
cases
holding
immunity
questions
decided
earliest
possible
stage
litigation
supp
ed
ark
recognition
singular
importance
president
duties
quoting
nixon
fitzgerald
fact
question
require
analysis
allegations
complaint
granted
request
petitioner
thereupon
filed
motion
dismiss
without
prejudice
toll
statutes
limitation
may
applicable
longer
president
time
plaintiff
may
refile
instant
suit
record
doc
extensive
submissions
made
district
parties
department
justice
district
judge
denied
motion
dismiss
immunity
grounds
ruled
discovery
case
go
forward
ordered
trial
stayed
end
petitioner
presidency
supp
ed
ark
although
recognized
thin
majority
nixon
fitzgerald
held
president
absolute
immunity
civil
damage
actions
arising
execution
official
duties
office
convinced
president
absolute
immunity
civil
causes
action
arising
prior
assuming
office
however
persuaded
reasoning
opinion
fitzgerald
deferring
trial
one
required
appropriate
relying
part
fact
respondent
failed
bring
complaint
two
days
beforethe
year
period
limitations
expired
concluded
public
interest
avoiding
litigation
might
hamper
president
conducting
duties
office
outweighed
demonstrated
need
immediate
trial
parties
appealed
divided
panel
appeals
affirmed
denial
motion
dismiss
regarded
order
postponing
trial
president
leaves
office
functional
equivalent
grant
temporary
immunity
reversed
order
writing
majority
judge
bowman
explained
president
like
government
officials
subject
laws
apply
members
society
find
case
public
official
ever
granted
immunity
suit
unofficial
acts
rationale
official
immunity
inapposite
personal
private
conduct
president
issue
majority
specifically
rejected
argument
unless
immunity
available
threat
judicial
interference
executive
branch
scheduling
orders
potential
contempt
citations
sanctions
violate
separation
powers
principles
judge
bowman
suggested
judicial
case
management
sensitive
burdens
presidency
demands
president
schedule
avoid
perceived
danger
dissent
judge
ross
submitted
even
though
holding
fitzgerald
involved
official
acts
logic
opinion
placed
primary
reliance
prospect
president
discharge
constitutional
powers
duties
impaired
subject
suits
damages
applies
equal
force
case
view
unless
exigent
circumstances
shown
private
actionsfor
damages
sitting
president
must
stayed
completion
term
ibid
case
judge
ross
saw
reason
stay
prevent
respondent
ultimately
obtaining
adjudication
claims
response
dissent
judge
beam
wrote
separate
concurrence
suggested
prolonged
delay
may
well
create
significant
risk
irreparable
harm
respondent
unforeseeable
loss
evidence
possible
death
party
moreover
argued
civil
rights
cases
brought
public
interest
ordinary
citizen
timely
vindication
fundamental
rights
alleged
abuse
power
government
officials
view
dissent
concern
judicial
interference
functioning
presidency
greatly
overstated
ibid
neither
involvement
prior
presidents
litigation
either
parties
witnesses
character
relatively
uncomplicated
civil
litigation
indicated
threat
serious
finally
saw
basis
staying
discovery
trial
claims
trooper
ferguson
president
represented
private
counsel
filed
petition
certiorari
solicitor
general
representing
supported
petition
arguing
decision
appeals
fundamentally
mistaken
created
serious
risks
institution
presidency
brief
opposition
certiorari
respondent
argued
one
kind
case
singularly
inappropriate
exercise
certiorari
jurisdiction
create
conflict
among
courts
appeals
pose
conceivable
threat
functioning
executive
branch
precedent
supporting
president
position
decision
grant
petition
expressed
judgment
concerning
merits
case
reflect
appraisal
importance
representations
made
behalf
executive
branch
potential
impact
precedent
established
appeals
merit
respectful
deliberate
consideration
true
often
stressed
importance
avoiding
premature
adjudication
constitutional
questions
doctrine
avoidance
however
applicable
entire
federal
judiciary
cf
arizonans
official
english
arizona
comes
play
acquired
jurisdiction
case
dictatea
discretionary
denial
every
certiorari
petition
raising
novel
constitutional
question
however
make
appropriate
identify
two
important
constitutional
issues
encompassed
within
questions
presented
petition
certiorari
need
address
today
first
claim
immunity
asserted
federal
relies
heavily
doctrine
separation
powers
restrains
three
branches
federal
government
encroaching
domain
two
see
buckley
valeo
necessary
consider
decide
whether
comparable
claim
might
succeed
state
tribunal
case
heard
state
forum
instead
advancing
separation
powers
argument
petitioner
presumably
rely
federalism
comity
concerns
well
interest
protecting
federal
officials
possible
local
prejudice
underlies
authority
remove
certain
cases
brought
federal
officers
state
afederal
see
mesa
california
whether
concerns
present
compelling
case
immunity
question
us
second
decision
rejecting
immunity
claim
allowing
case
proceed
require
us
confront
question
whether
may
compel
attendance
president
specific
time
place
assume
testimony
president
discovery
use
trial
may
taken
white
house
time
accommodate
busy
schedule
trial
held
necessity
president
attend
person
though
elect
petitioner
principal
submission
exceptional
cases
brief
petitioner
constitution
affords
president
temporary
immunity
civil
damages
litigation
arising
events
occurred
took
office
sustained
basis
precedent
three
sitting
presidents
defendants
civil
litigation
involving
actions
prior
taking
office
complaints
theodore
roosevelt
harry
truman
dismissed
took
office
dismissals
affirmed
respective
inaugurations
two
companion
cases
arising
automobile
accident
filed
john
kennedyin
presidential
campaign
taking
office
unsuccessfully
argued
status
commander
chief
gave
right
stay
soldiers
sailors
civil
relief
act
app
motion
stay
denied
district
matter
settled
thus
none
cases
sheds
light
constitutional
issue
us
principal
rationale
affording
certain
public
servants
immunity
suits
money
damages
arising
official
acts
inapplicable
unofficial
conduct
cases
involving
prosecutors
legislators
judges
repeatedly
explained
immunity
serves
public
interest
enabling
officials
perform
designated
functions
effectively
without
fear
particular
decision
may
give
rise
personal
liability
explained
ferri
ackerman
public
servants
prosecutor
judge
represent
interest
society
whole
conduct
official
duties
may
adversely
affect
wide
variety
different
individuals
may
potential
source
future
controversy
societal
interest
providing
public
officials
maximum
ability
deal
fearlesslyand
impartially
public
large
long
recognized
acceptable
justification
official
immunity
point
immunity
officials
forestall
atmosphere
intimidation
conflict
resolve
perform
designated
functions
principled
fashion
reasoning
provides
support
immunity
unofficial
conduct
explained
fitzgerald
sphere
protected
action
must
related
closely
immunity
justifying
purposes
president
broad
responsibilities
werecognized
case
immunity
damages
claims
arising
official
acts
extending
outer
perimeter
authority
never
suggested
president
official
immunity
extends
beyond
scope
action
taken
official
capacity
see
burger
concurring
noting
president
like
members
congress
judges
prosecutors
congressional
aides
absolute
immunity
immune
acts
outside
official
duties
see
also
moreover
defining
scope
immunity
acts
clearly
taken
within
official
capacity
applied
functional
approach
frequently
decisions
held
official
absolute
immunity
extend
acts
performance
particular
functions
office
hence
example
judge
absolute
immunity
extend
actions
performed
purely
administrative
capacity
see
forrester
white
opinions
made
clear
immunities
grounded
nature
function
performed
identity
actor
performed
petitioner
effort
construct
immunity
suit
unofficial
acts
grounded
purely
identity
office
unsupported
precedent
also
unpersuaded
evidence
historical
record
petitioner
called
attention
points
comment
thomas
jefferson
protesting
subpoena
duces
tecum
chief
justice
marshall
directed
burr
trial
statement
diaries
kept
senator
william
maclay
first
senate
debates
vice
president
john
adams
senator
oliver
ellsworth
recorded
said
president
personally
subject
process
whatever
lest
put
power
common
justice
exercise
authority
stop
whole
machine
government
quotation
justice
story
commentaries
constitution
none
sources
sheds
much
light
question
hand
respondent
turn
called
attention
conflicting
historical
evidence
speaking
favor
constitution
adoption
pennsylvania
convention
james
wilson
participated
philadelphia
convention
document
drafted
explained
although
president
placed
high
single
privilege
annexed
character
far
laws
amenable
private
character
citizen
public
character
impeachment
elliot
debates
federal
constitution
ed
emphasis
omitted
description
consistent
doctrine
presidential
immunity
set
forth
fitzgerald
rejection
immunity
claim
case
respect
acts
taken
public
character
official
acts
president
may
disciplined
principally
impeachment
private
lawsuits
damages
otherwise
subject
laws
purely
private
acts
end
applied
particular
question
us
reach
conclusion
historical
materials
justice
jackson
described
confronted
issue
concerning
dimensions
president
power
forefathers
envision
envisioned
foreseen
modern
conditions
must
divined
materials
almost
enigmatic
dreams
joseph
called
upon
interpret
pharoah
century
half
partisan
debate
scholarly
speculation
yields
net
result
supplies
less
apt
quotations
respected
sources
side
largely
canceleach
youngstown
sheet
tube
sawyer
concurring
opinion
petitioner
strongest
argument
supporting
immunity
claim
based
text
structure
constitution
contend
occupant
office
president
law
sense
conduct
entirely
immune
judicial
scrutiny
president
argues
merely
postponement
judicial
proceedings
determine
whether
violated
law
argument
grounded
character
office
created
article
ii
constitution
relies
separation
powers
principles
structured
constitutional
arrangement
since
founding
starting
premise
petitioner
contends
occupies
unique
office
powers
responsibilities
vast
important
public
interest
demands
devote
undivided
time
attention
public
duties
submits
given
nature
office
doctrine
separation
powers
places
limits
authority
federal
judiciary
interfere
executive
branch
transgressed
allowing
action
proceed
dispute
initial
premise
argument
former
presidents
george
washingtonto
george
bush
consistently
endorsed
petitioner
characterization
office
serving
term
lyndon
johnson
observed
nights
president
many
got
sleep
mornings
wake
twenty
fifth
amendment
constitution
adopted
ensure
continuity
performance
powers
duties
office
one
sponsors
amendment
stressed
importance
providing
times
president
complete
control
able
perform
duties
justice
jackson
pointed
presidency
concentrates
executive
authority
single
head
whose
choice
whole
nation
part
making
focus
public
hopes
expectations
drama
magnitude
finality
decisions
far
overshadow
others
almost
alone
fills
public
eye
ear
youngstown
sheet
tube
sawyer
jackson
concurring
short
long
recognized
unique
position
constitutional
scheme
office
occupies
fitzgerald
thus
suspect
even
ourmodern
era
remains
truth
chief
justice
marshall
suggestion
duties
presidency
entirely
unremitting
burr
cas
cc
accept
initial
premise
executive
argument
follow
however
separation
powers
principles
violated
allowing
action
proceed
doctrine
separation
powers
concerned
allocation
official
power
among
three
co
equal
branches
government
framers
built
tripartite
federal
government
self
executing
safeguard
encroachment
aggrandizement
one
branch
expense
buckley
valeo
thus
example
congress
may
exercise
judicial
power
revise
final
judgments
plaut
spendthriftfarm
executive
power
manage
airport
see
metropolitan
washington
airports
authority
citizens
abatement
aircraft
noise
holding
power
executive
constitution
permit
agent
congress
exercise
see
hampton
congress
may
invest
members
either
executive
power
judicial
power
similarly
president
may
exercise
legislative
power
authorize
seizure
private
property
public
use
youngstown
judicial
power
decide
cases
controversies
include
provision
purely
advisory
opinions
executive
permit
federal
courts
resolve
nonjusticiable
questions
course
lines
powers
three
branches
always
neatly
defined
see
mistretta
case
suggestion
federal
judiciary
asked
perform
function
might
way
described
executive
respondent
merely
asking
courts
exercise
core
article
iii
jurisdiction
decide
cases
controversies
whatever
outcome
case
possibility
decision
curtail
scope
official
powers
executive
branch
litigation
questions
relate
entirely
unofficial
conduct
individual
happens
president
poses
perceptible
risk
misallocation
either
judicial
power
executive
power
rather
arguing
decision
case
produce
either
aggrandizement
judicial
power
narrowing
executive
power
petitioner
contends
product
otherwise
traditional
exercise
judicial
power
burdens
placed
president
hamper
performance
official
duties
recognized
ven
branch
arrogate
power
separation
powers
doctrine
requires
branch
impair
another
performance
constitutional
duties
loving
slip
see
also
nixon
administrator
general
services
factual
matter
petitioner
contends
particular
case
well
potential
additional
litigation
affirmance
appeals
judgment
might
spawn
may
impose
unacceptable
burden
president
time
energy
thereby
impair
effective
performance
office
petitioner
predictive
judgment
finds
little
support
either
history
relatively
narrow
compass
issues
raised
particular
case
already
noted
year
history
republic
three
sitting
presidents
subjected
suits
private
actions
see
supra
past
indicator
seems
unlikely
deluge
litigation
ever
engulf
presidency
case
hand
properly
managed
district
appears
us
highly
unlikely
occupy
substantial
amount
petitioner
time
greater
significance
petitioner
errs
presuming
interactions
judicial
branch
theexecutive
even
quite
burdensome
interactions
necessarily
rise
level
constitutionally
forbidden
impairment
executive
ability
perform
constitutionally
mandated
functions
ur
system
imposes
upon
branches
degree
overlapping
responsibility
duty
interdependence
well
independence
absence
preclude
establishment
nation
capable
governing
effectively
mistretta
quoting
buckley
madison
explained
separation
powers
mean
branches
partial
agency
controul
acts
fact
federal
exercise
traditional
article
iii
jurisdiction
may
significantly
burden
time
attention
chief
executive
sufficient
establish
violation
constitution
two
long
settled
propositions
first
announced
chief
justice
marshall
support
conclusion
first
long
held
president
takes
official
action
authority
determine
whether
acted
within
law
perhaps
dramatic
example
case
holding
president
truman
exceeded
constitutional
authority
issued
order
directing
secretary
commerce
take
possession
operate
nation
steel
mills
order
avert
national
catastrophe
youngstown
sheet
tube
sawyer
despite
serious
impact
decision
ability
executive
branch
accomplish
assigned
mission
substantial
time
president
must
necessarily
devoted
matter
result
judicial
involvement
exercised
article
iii
jurisdiction
todecide
whether
official
conduct
conformed
law
holding
application
principle
established
marbury
madison
cranch
emphatically
province
duty
judicial
department
say
law
second
also
settled
president
subject
judicial
process
appropriate
circumstances
although
thomas
jefferson
apparently
thought
otherwise
chief
justice
marshall
presiding
treason
trial
aaron
burr
ruled
subpoena
duces
tecum
directed
president
burr
cas
cc
unequivocally
emphatically
endorsed
marshall
position
held
president
nixon
obligated
comply
subpoena
commanding
produce
certain
tape
recordings
conversations
aides
nixon
explained
neither
doctrine
separation
powers
need
confidentiality
high
level
communications
without
sustain
absolute
unqualified
presidential
privilege
immunity
judicial
process
circumstances
sitting
presidents
responded
orders
provide
testimony
information
sufficient
frequency
interactions
judicial
executive
branches
scarcely
thought
novelty
president
monroe
responded
written
interrogatories
see
rotunda
presidents
ex
presidents
witnesses
brief
historical
president
nixon
noted
produced
tapes
response
subpoena
duces
tecum
see
nixon
president
ford
complied
order
give
deposition
criminal
trial
fromme
supp
ed
cal
president
clinton
twice
given
videotaped
testimony
criminal
proceedings
see
mcdougal
supp
ed
ark
branscum
ed
june
moreover
sitting
presidents
also
voluntarily
complied
judicial
requests
testimony
president
grant
gave
lengthy
deposition
criminal
case
circumstances
rotunda
nowak
treatise
constitutional
law
ed
president
carter
similarly
gave
videotaped
testimony
use
criminal
trial
ibid
sum
settled
law
separation
powers
doctrine
bar
every
exercise
jurisdiction
president
fitzgerald
judiciary
may
severely
burden
executive
branch
reviewing
legality
president
official
conduct
may
direct
appropriate
process
president
mustfollow
federal
courts
power
determine
legality
unofficial
conduct
burden
president
time
energy
mere
product
review
surely
considered
onerous
direct
burden
imposed
judicial
review
occasional
invalidation
official
actions
therefore
hold
doctrine
separation
powers
require
federal
courts
stay
private
actions
president
leaves
office
reasons
rejecting
categorical
rule
apply
well
rule
require
stay
exceptional
cases
brief
petitioner
indeed
framers
constitution
thought
necessary
protect
president
burdens
private
litigation
think
far
likely
adopted
categorical
rule
rule
required
president
litigate
question
whether
specific
case
belonged
exceptional
case
subcategory
events
question
whether
specific
case
receive
exceptional
treatment
appropriately
subject
exercise
judicial
discretion
interpretation
constitution
accordingly
turn
question
whether
district
decision
stay
trial
petitioner
leaves
office
abuse
discretion
appeals
described
district
discretionary
decision
stay
trial
functional
equivalent
grant
temporary
immunity
concluding
petitioner
constitutionally
entitled
immunity
held
error
grant
stay
ibid
although
ultimately
conclude
stay
granted
think
issue
difficult
opinion
appeals
suggests
strictly
speaking
stay
functional
equivalent
constitutional
immunity
petitioner
claimed
district
ordered
discovery
proceed
moreover
stay
either
trial
discovery
might
justified
considerations
require
recognition
constitutional
immunity
district
broad
discretion
stay
proceedings
incident
power
control
docket
see
landis
north
american
explained
specially
cases
extraordinary
public
moment
plaintiff
may
required
submit
delay
immoderate
extent
oppressive
consequences
public
welfare
convenience
thereby
promoted
although
rejected
argument
potential
burdens
president
violate
separation
powers
principles
burdens
appropriate
matters
district
evaluate
management
case
high
respect
owed
office
chief
executive
though
justifying
rule
categorical
immunity
matter
inform
conduct
entire
proceeding
including
timing
scope
discovery
nevertheless
persuaded
abuse
discretion
district
defer
trial
president
leaves
office
lengthy
categorical
stay
takes
account
whatever
respondent
interest
bringing
case
trial
complaint
filed
within
statutory
limitations
period
albeit
near
end
period
delaying
trial
increase
danger
prejudice
resulting
loss
evidence
including
inability
witnesses
recall
specific
facts
possible
death
party
decision
postpone
trial
furthermore
premature
proponent
stay
bears
burden
establishing
need
case
stage
district
made
ruling
way
assess
whether
stay
trial
completion
discovery
warranted
fact
trial
may
consume
president
time
attention
nothing
record
enable
judge
assess
potential
harm
may
ensue
scheduling
trial
promptly
discovery
concluded
think
district
courtmay
given
undue
weight
concern
trial
might
generate
unrelated
civil
actions
conceivably
hamper
president
conducting
duties
office
occur
discretion
permit
manage
actions
fashion
including
deferral
trial
interference
president
duties
occur
impingement
upon
president
conduct
office
shown
add
final
comment
two
matters
discussed
length
briefs
risk
decision
generate
large
volume
politically
motivated
harassing
frivolous
litigation
danger
national
security
concerns
might
prevent
president
explaining
legitimate
need
continuance
persuaded
either
risks
serious
frivolous
vexatious
litigation
terminated
pleading
stage
summary
judgment
little
personal
involvement
defendant
see
fed
rules
civ
proc
moreover
availability
sanctions
provides
significant
deterrent
litigation
directed
president
unofficial
capacity
purposes
political
gain
harassment
history
indicates
likelihood
significant
number
cases
filed
remote
although
scheduling
problems
may
arise
reason
assume
district
courts
either
unable
accommodate
president
needs
unfaithful
tradition
especially
matters
involving
national
security
giving
utmost
deference
presidential
responsibilities
several
presidents
including
petitioner
given
testimony
without
jeopardizing
nation
security
see
supra
short
confidence
ability
federal
judges
deal
concerns
congress
deems
appropriate
afford
president
stronger
protection
may
respond
appropriate
legislation
petitioner
notes
brief
congress
enacted
one
statute
providing
deferral
civil
litigation
accommodate
important
public
interests
brief
petitioner
see
litigation
debtor
stayed
upon
filing
bankruptcy
petition
soldiers
sailors
civil
relief
act
app
provisions
governing
inter
alia
tolling
stay
civil
claims
military
personnel
course
active
duty
constitution
embodied
rule
president
advocates
congress
course
repeal
holding
today
raises
barrier
statutory
response
concerns
federal
district
jurisdiction
decide
case
like
every
citizen
properly
invokes
jurisdiction
respondent
right
orderly
disposition
claims
accordingly
judgment
appeals
affirmed
ordered
footnotes
see
jurisdiction
federal
claims
authorized
complaint
matter
us
see
jones
clinton
address
question
whether
president
immunity
damages
liability
acts
taken
within
outer
perimeter
official
responsibilities
provides
defense
fourth
count
complaint
see
nixon
fitzgerald
record
doc
see
supp
ed
ark
see
app
pet
cert
explained
nowhere
constitution
congressional
acts
writings
judge
scholar
may
credible
support
proposition
found
contrary
form
government
asserts
english
magna
carta
petition
right
even
sovereign
subject
god
law
ibid
although
noted
district
initial
order
permitted
discovery
go
forward
later
stayed
discovery
pending
outcome
appeals
immunity
issue
supp
ed
ark
dissent
judge
mcmillian
appeals
denied
suggestion
rehearing
en
banc
brief
support
petition
brief
opposition
explained
one
doctrine
deeply
rooted
process
constitutional
adjudication
pass
questions
constitutionality
unless
adjudication
unavoidable
spector
motor
service
mclaughlin
long
considered
practice
decide
abstract
hypothetical
contingent
questions
decide
constitutional
question
advance
necessity
decision
formulate
rule
constitutional
law
broader
required
precise
facts
applied
decide
constitutional
question
except
reference
particular
facts
applied
alabama
state
federation
labor
mcadory
habit
decide
questions
constitutional
nature
unless
absolutely
necessary
decision
case
burton
rescue
army
municipal
los
angeles
two
questions
presented
certiorari
petition
whether
litigation
private
civil
damages
action
incumbent
president
must
exceptional
cases
deferred
president
leaves
office
whether
district
proper
exercise
judicial
discretion
may
stay
litigation
president
leaves
office
review
confined
issues
see
rule
supremacy
clause
makes
federal
law
law
land
art
vi
cl
direct
control
state
president
principal
responsibility
ensure
laws
faithfully
executed
art
ii
may
implicate
concerns
quite
different
interbranch
separation
powers
questions
addressed
hancock
train
mayo
see
tribe
american
constitutional
law
ed
absent
explicit
congressional
consent
state
may
command
federal
officials
take
action
derogation
federal
responsibilities
although
presidents
responded
written
interrogatories
given
depositions
provided
videotaped
trial
testimony
see
infra
sitting
president
ever
testified
ordered
testify
open
see
people
ex
rel
hurley
roosevelt
devault
truman
mo
see
bailey
kennedy
cal
super
hills
kennedy
cal
super
see
cases
defined
immunities
state
local
officials
actions
filed
see
imbler
pachtman
prosecutorial
immunity
tenney
brandhove
legislative
immunity
pierson
ray
judicial
immunity
rationale
underlying
official
immunity
jurisprudence
cases
alleging
constitutional
violations
brought
federal
officials
similar
see
butz
economou
petitioner
draws
attention
dicta
fitzgerald
suggests
helpful
cause
noted
ecause
singular
importance
president
duties
diversion
energies
concern
private
lawsuits
raise
unique
risks
effective
functioning
government
suggested
ognizance
personal
vulnerability
frequently
distract
president
public
duties
petitioner
argues
aspect
concern
parallel
issue
suggests
great
importance
case
possibility
sitting
president
might
distracted
need
participate
litigation
pendency
office
context
however
clear
dominant
concern
diversion
president
attention
decisionmaking
process
caused
needless
worry
possibility
damages
actions
stemming
particular
official
decision
moreover
fitzgerald
present
issue
raised
case
decision
involved
claims
former
president
jefferson
view
subpoena
jeopardized
separation
powers
subjecting
executive
branch
judicial
command
see
works
thomas
jefferson
ford
ed
fitzgerald
quoting
jefferson
comments
documentary
history
first
federal
congress
bowling
veit
diary
william
maclay
see
story
commentaries
constitution
pp
jefferson
argument
provides
little
support
respondent
position
explain
later
prerogative
jefferson
claimed
denied
chief
justice
decision
jefferson
protesting
subsequently
reaffirmed
holding
see
nixon
statements
supporting
similar
proposition
recorded
senator
maclay
diary
inconclusive
issue
us
reason
addition
material
hardly
proof
unequivocal
common
understanding
time
founding
immediately
mentioning
positions
adams
ellsworth
maclay
went
point
diary
virulently
disagreed
concluding
opponents
view
hows
clearly
amazingly
fond
old
leven
many
people
diary
maclay
finally
justice
story
comments
constitutional
law
treatise
provide
substantial
support
respondent
position
story
wrote
president
incidental
powers
must
include
power
perform
duties
without
obstruction
therefore
liable
arrest
imprisonment
detention
discharge
duties
office
purpose
person
must
deemed
civil
cases
least
possess
official
inviolability
story
emphasis
added
story
said
official
inviolability
ibid
emphasis
added
necessary
preserve
president
ability
perform
functions
office
specify
dimensions
necessary
immunity
held
immunity
suits
grounded
official
acts
necessary
serve
purpose
see
fitzgerald
follow
broad
immunity
civil
damages
suits
petitioner
seeks
also
necessary
reason
argument
place
reliance
english
ancestry
informs
common
law
jurisprudence
claim
prerogatives
monarchs
asserted
king
wrong
see
blackstone
commentaries
although
adopted
related
doctrine
sovereign
immunity
common
law
fiction
king
incapable
wrong
even
thinking
wrong
rejected
birth
republic
see
nevada
hall
nn
langford
see
tourtellot
presidents
presidency
citing
comments
among
others
george
washington
john
quincy
adams
benjamin
harrison
theodore
roosevelt
william
howard
taft
woodrow
wilson
finer
presidency
crisis
regeneration
citing
similar
remarks
number
presidents
including
james
monroe
james
polk
harry
truman
johnson
vantage
point
amendment
sets
forth
inter
alia
elaborate
procedure
presidential
succession
event
chief
executive
becomes
incapacitated
see
amdt
cong
rec
remarks
bayh
noted
fitzgerald
article
ii
constitution
provides
executive
power
shall
vested
president
ofthe
grant
authority
establishes
president
chief
constitutional
officer
executive
branch
entrusted
supervisory
policy
responsibilities
utmost
discretion
sensitivity
include
enforcement
federal
law
president
charged
constitutionally
take
care
laws
faithfully
executed
conduct
foreign
affairs
realm
recognized
intolerable
courts
without
relevant
information
review
perhaps
nullify
actions
executive
taken
information
properly
held
secret
management
executive
branch
task
imperative
reasons
requir
unrestricted
power
president
remove
important
subordinates
important
duties
footnotes
omitted
see
loving
slip
mistretta
concern
encroachment
aggrandizement
animated
separation
powers
jurisprudence
federalist
cooke
ed
great
security
gradual
concentration
several
powers
department
consists
giving
administer
department
necessary
constitutional
means
personal
motives
resist
encroachments
others
see
also
klein
wall
noting
congress
inadvertently
passed
limit
separates
legislative
judicial
power
see
also
bowsher
synar
structure
constitution
permit
congress
execute
laws
cf
ins
chadha
springer
philippine
islands
see
ferreira
hayburn
case
dall
explained
chicago
southern
air
lines
waterman
early
wisely
determined
give
advisory
opinions
even
asked
chief
executive
generally
broadly
stated
executive
administrative
duties
nonjudicial
nature
may
imposed
judges
holding
office
art
iii
constitution
morrison
olson
quoting
buckley
valeo
restrictions
judicial
activities
help
ensure
independence
judicial
branch
prevent
judiciary
encroaching
areas
reserved
branches
see
also
mistretta
long
held
federal
courts
may
resolve
matters
see
luther
borden
explained
nixon
controversy
nonjusticiable
involves
political
question
textually
demonstrable
constitutional
commitment
issue
coordinate
political
department
lack
judicially
discoverable
manageable
standards
resolving
baker
carr
courts
must
first
instance
interpret
text
question
determine
whether
extent
issue
textually
committed
see
ibid
powell
mccormack
see
also
olson
nixon
administrator
general
services
nixon
youngstown
sheet
tube
sawyer
jackson
concurring
fitzgerald
able
discount
lack
historical
support
proposition
official
capacity
actions
president
posed
serious
threat
office
ground
right
sue
federal
officials
damages
result
constitutional
violations
recently
recognized
see
fitzgerald
bivens
six
unknown
fed
narcotics
agents
situation
respect
suits
president
actions
taken
private
capacity
quite
different
suits
may
grounded
legal
theories
always
applicable
potential
defendant
moreover
president
contact
far
fewer
people
private
life
official
capacity
class
potential
plaintiffs
considerably
smaller
risk
litigation
less
intense
federalist
pp
cooke
ed
emphasis
original
see
mistretta
nixon
administrator
general
services
decision
rendered
jefferson
expressed
distress
letter
prosecutor
trial
noting
constitution
enjoins
president
constant
agency
concerns
millions
people
works
thomas
jefferson
ford
ed
asked
law
paramount
calls
behalf
single
one
ibid
see
also
fitzgerald
quoting
jefferson
comments
length
chief
justice
marshall
answer
quite
plainly
yes
course
follow
may
proceed
president
ordinary
individual
nixon
quoting
burr
cas
cc
special
caution
appropriate
materials
testimony
sought
relate
president
official
activities
respect
interest
inpreserving
confidentiality
weighty
indeed
entitled
great
respect
made
clear
criminal
case
powerful
interest
fair
administration
criminal
justice
requires
evidence
given
appropriate
circumstances
lest
integrity
judicial
system
eroded
doubt
truth
learned
hand
comment
lawsuit
dread
ed
beyond
almost
anything
else
short
sickness
death
association
bar
city
new
york
lectures
legal
topics
recognize
president
like
official
private
citizen
may
become
distracted
preoccupied
pending
litigation
presidents
officials
face
variety
demands
time
however
private
political
result
official
duty
distractions
may
vexing
subjected
ordinarily
implicate
constitutional
separation
powers
concerns
although
claims
fact
analytically
distinct
district
appear
drawn
distinction
rather
basing
decision
particular
factual
findings
might
buttressed
exercise
discretion
district
instead
suggested
discretionary
stay
supported
legal
conclusion
stay
required
fitzgerald
see
therefore
reject
petitioner
argument
lack
jurisdiction
respondent
cross
appeal
district
alternative
holding
decision
also
permitted
inter
alia
equity
powers
ibid
appeals
correctly
found
pendant
appellate
jurisdiction
issue
proper
see
district
legal
ruling
president
protected
temporary
immunity
trial
discovery
inextricably
intertwined
swint
chambers
county
suggestion
discretionary
stay
effect
might
proper
indeed
review
latter
decision
necessary
ensure
meaningful
review
former
ibid
see
fed
rule
civ
proc
chambers
nasco
noting
informed
discretion
neither
statute
rules
task
may
safely
rely
inherent
power
imposing
appropriate
sanctions
sanctions
may
set
level
sufficient
deter
repetition
conduct
comparable
conduct
others
similarly
situated
fed
rule
civ
proc
rule
indicates
sanctions
may
appropriate
claim
presented
improper
purpose
harass
including
claim
based
allegations
factual
contentions
lacking
evidentiary
support
unlikely
prove
well
groundedafter
reasonable
investigation
rules
nixon
see
also
fitzgerald
courts
traditionally
recognized
president
constitutional
responsibilities
status
factors
counseling
judicial
deference
restraint