et
al
argued
october
decided
november
component
double
jeopardy
clause
bars
second
contest
issue
fact
law
raised
necessarily
resolved
prior
judgment
ashe
swenson
burden
defendant
demonstrate
issue
seeks
shield
reconsideration
actually
decided
prior
jury
verdict
acquittal
schiro
farley
jury
returns
irreconcilably
inconsistent
verdicts
issue
question
defendant
meet
burden
acquittal
therefore
gains
preclusive
effect
regarding
count
conviction
powell
issue
preclusion
however
attend
jury
verdict
acquittal
jury
proceeding
fails
reach
verdict
different
count
turning
issue
ultimate
fact
yeager
case
jury
convicted
petitioners
juan
bravo
hector
martínez
bribery
violation
simultaneously
jury
acquitted
conspiring
violate
traveling
interstate
commerce
violate
contested
issue
trial
whether
bravo
martínez
violated
elements
acquitted
charges
agreement
travel
undisputed
jury
verdicts
irreconcilably
inconsistent
unlike
guilty
verdicts
powell
however
petitioners
convictions
later
vacated
appeal
error
judge
instructions
unrelated
verdicts
inconsistency
first
circuit
view
proscribes
quid
pro
quo
bribery
yet
charge
permitted
jury
find
petitioners
guilty
gratuity
theory
remand
bravo
martínez
moved
judgments
acquittal
standalone
charges
argued
component
double
jeopardy
clause
barred
government
retrying
charges
jury
necessarily
determined
guilty
violating
acquitted
related
conspiracy
travel
act
offenses
district
denied
motions
first
circuit
affirmed
holding
eventual
invalidation
petitioners
convictions
undermine
powell
instruction
issue
preclusion
apply
jury
returns
logically
inconsistent
verdicts
held
component
double
jeopardy
clause
bar
government
retrying
defendants
like
petitioners
jury
returned
irreconcilably
inconsistent
verdicts
conviction
acquittal
convictions
later
vacated
legal
error
unrelated
inconsistency
pp
petitioners
trial
yielded
incompatible
jury
verdicts
petitioners
establish
jury
necessarily
resolved
favor
question
whether
violated
view
government
inability
obtain
review
acquittals
powell
inconsistent
jury
findings
weigh
heavily
according
acquittals
effect
subsequent
vacatur
petitioners
bribery
convictions
alter
analysis
critical
inquiry
whether
jury
actually
decided
petitioners
violate
ashe
instructs
courts
approach
task
realism
rationality
particular
examine
trial
record
eye
circumstances
proceedings
ibid
jury
verdicts
convicting
petitioners
violating
remain
relevant
practical
inquiry
even
convictions
later
vacated
appeal
unrelated
trial
error
petitioners
retried
appeals
vacated
bribery
convictions
insufficient
evidence
see
burks
trial
error
resolve
apparent
inconsistency
jury
verdicts
evidence
sufficient
convict
petitioners
quid
pro
quo
bribery
theory
first
circuit
approved
instructional
error
account
jury
inconsistent
determinations
error
applied
equally
every
count
pp
petitioners
argue
vacated
judgments
excluded
ashe
inquiry
vacated
convictions
like
hung
counts
yeager
legal
nullities
never
accorded
respect
matter
law
history
yeager
argument
misapprehends
ashe
inquiry
bravo
martínez
bear
burden
showing
issue
whether
violated
determined
valid
final
judgment
acquittal
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
judge
whether
carried
burden
must
realistically
examine
record
identify
ground
acquittals
ashe
conviction
contradicts
acquittals
plainly
relevant
determination
less
simply
later
overturned
appeal
unrelated
legal
error
see
powell
petitioners
contend
yeager
convictions
meaningless
jury
allowed
convict
basis
conduct
criminal
first
circuit
payment
gratuity
yeager
rest
inability
detect
basis
decision
jury
fact
rendered
rather
jury
hangs
decision
hence
inconsistency
contrast
verdict
guilt
jury
decision
even
subsequently
vacated
therefore
evince
jury
inconsistency
case
petitioners
gained
second
trial
standalone
bribery
charges
entitled
issue
preclusion
doctrine
commandeer
inconsistent
verdicts
shroud
mystery
jury
necessarily
decided
pp
affirmed
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
unanimous
thomas
filed
concurring
opinion
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
juan
hector
petitioners
writ
certiorari
appeals
first
circuit
november
justice
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
case
concerns
component
double
jeopardy
criminal
prosecutions
civil
litigation
principle
means
issue
ultimate
fact
determined
valid
final
judgment
issue
litigated
parties
future
lawsuit
ashe
swenson
issue
preclusion
apply
jury
returns
inconsistent
verdicts
convicting
one
count
acquitting
another
count
counts
turn
issue
ultimate
fact
case
held
verdicts
stand
government
barred
double
jeopardy
clause
challenging
acquittal
see
green
verdicts
rationally
irreconcilable
acquittal
gains
preclusive
effect
powell
issue
preclusion
attend
jury
acquittal
verdict
jury
proceeding
fails
reach
verdict
different
count
turning
critical
issue
answered
yes
circumstances
acquittal
preclusive
force
yeager
way
decipher
hung
count
represents
reasoned
jury
failure
decide
place
analysis
ibid
see
fact
jury
hangs
evidence
nothing
course
failed
decide
case
us
jury
returned
irreconcilably
inconsistent
verdicts
conviction
acquittal
without
powell
control
retrial
charges
yielded
acquittals
view
inconsistent
verdicts
acquittals
effect
charges
yielded
convictions
case
however
unlike
powell
guilty
verdicts
vacated
appeal
error
judge
instructions
unrelated
verdicts
inconsistency
petitioners
urge
jury
failure
decide
place
analysis
vacated
guilty
verdicts
figure
analysis
hold
otherwise
one
know
jury
report
returned
verdict
host
reasons
account
jury
failure
decide
sharp
confusion
issues
exhaustion
long
trial
name
yeager
actual
inconsistency
jury
verdicts
reality
vacatur
conviction
unrelated
legal
error
reconcile
jury
inconsistent
returns
therefore
bracket
case
powell
yeager
affirm
judgment
appeals
held
issue
preclusion
apply
verdict
inconsistency
renders
unanswerable
jury
necessarily
decided
doctrine
claim
preclusion
instructs
final
judgment
merits
foreclos
es
successive
litigation
claim
new
hampshire
maine
see
restatement
second
judgments
hereinafter
restatement
instructing
doctrine
serves
avoid
multiple
suits
identical
entitlements
obligations
parties
wright
miller
cooper
federal
practice
procedure
ed
wright
miller
long
operative
civil
litigation
restatement
claim
preclusion
also
essential
constitution
prohibition
successive
criminal
prosecutions
person
double
jeopardy
clause
shall
subject
offense
twice
put
jeopardy
life
limb
amdt
clause
protects
second
prosecution
offense
conviction
well
protects
second
prosecution
offense
acquittal
north
carolina
pearce
verdict
acquittal
justice
system
final
last
word
criminal
charge
therefore
operates
bar
subsequent
prosecution
offense
green
allied
doctrine
issue
preclusion
ordinarily
bars
relitigation
issue
fact
law
raised
necessarily
resolved
prior
judgment
see
restatement
wright
miller
applies
civil
criminal
proceedings
important
distinction
civil
litigation
issue
preclusion
ramifications
first
developed
availability
appellate
review
key
factor
restatement
comment
see
reporter
note
noting
pervasive
importance
reviewability
application
preclusion
doctrine
significant
part
preclusion
doctrine
premised
underlying
confidence
result
achieved
initial
litigation
substantially
correct
standefer
see
restatement
comment
absence
appellate
review
observed
confidence
often
unwarranted
standefer
civil
suits
inability
obtain
review
exceptional
occurs
typically
controversy
become
moot
criminal
cases
however
one
side
defendant
recourse
appeal
adverse
judgment
merits
government
secure
appellate
review
acquittal
even
one
based
upon
egregiously
erroneous
foundation
arizona
washington
juries
enjoy
unreviewable
power
return
verdict
guilty
impermissible
reasons
government
precluded
appealing
otherwise
upsetting
acquittal
constitution
double
jeopardy
clause
powell
absence
appellate
review
acquittals
cautioned
calls
guarded
application
preclusion
doctrine
criminal
cases
see
standefer
particularly
appears
jury
verdict
result
compromise
compassion
lenity
misunderstanding
governing
law
government
inability
gain
review
strongly
militates
giving
acquittal
issue
preclusive
effect
see
also
restatement
comment
circumstances
suggest
issue
resolved
erroneous
considerations
taking
prior
determination
face
value
purposes
second
action
impermissibly
extend
imperfections
adjudicative
process
comment
issue
preclusion
may
denied
evident
jury
verdict
verdict
result
compromise
wright
miller
case
requires
us
determine
whether
appellate
vacatur
conviction
alters
analysis
double
jeopardy
clause
three
prior
decisions
guide
disposition
first
interpreted
double
jeopardy
clause
incorporate
principle
issue
preclusion
ashe
swenson
ashe
involved
robbery
six
poker
players
group
masked
men
ashe
charged
robbing
one
players
jury
acquitted
due
insufficient
evidence
state
tried
ashe
time
robbing
another
poker
players
aided
substantially
stronger
testimony
witnesses
part
state
secured
conviction
held
second
prosecution
violated
double
jeopardy
clause
sole
issue
dispute
first
trial
whether
ashe
one
robbers
jury
acquittal
verdict
precluded
state
trying
convince
different
jury
fact
second
trial
decision
ashe
explained
issue
preclusion
criminal
cases
must
applied
realism
rationality
identify
jury
previous
trial
necessarily
decided
instructed
must
examine
record
prior
proceeding
taking
account
pleadings
evidence
charge
relevant
matter
ibid
quoting
mayers
yarbrough
bis
vexari
new
trials
successive
prosecutions
harv
rev
inquiry
explained
must
set
practical
frame
viewed
eye
circumstances
proceedings
quoting
sealfon
also
made
clear
burden
defendant
demonstrate
issue
whose
relitigation
seeks
foreclose
actually
decided
prior
jury
verdict
acquittal
schiro
farley
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
accord
dowling
powell
held
defendant
meet
burden
jury
returns
irreconcilably
inconsistent
verdicts
question
seeks
shield
reconsideration
powell
starting
point
holding
dunn
criminal
defendant
may
attack
jury
finding
guilt
one
count
inconsistent
jury
verdict
acquittal
another
count
powell
opinion
dunn
stated
exceptions
rule
dunn
several
times
alluded
rule
established
principle
nevertheless
several
courts
appeals
recogniz
ed
exceptions
rule
powell
sought
exception
verdicts
guilt
faced
trial
jury
acquitted
powell
various
substantive
drug
charges
convicted
using
telephone
causing
facilitating
offenses
appealed
arguing
verdicts
inconsistent
therefore
entitled
reversal
telephone
facilitation
convictions
issue
preclusion
maintained
barred
acceptance
guilty
verdict
auxiliary
offenses
jury
acquitted
predicate
felonies
rejecting
powell
argument
noted
issue
preclusion
predicated
assumption
jury
acted
rationally
jury
returns
irreconcilably
inconsistent
verdicts
said
one
glean
either
acquittal
conviction
jury
speak
real
conclusions
quoting
dunn
although
discern
verdict
jurors
arrived
rationally
observed
show
convinced
defendant
guilt
powell
quoting
dunn
event
inconsistent
verdicts
pointed
likely
jury
convinced
guilt
properly
reached
conclusion
one
count
mistake
compromise
lenity
arrived
inconsistent
conclusion
related
offense
powell
loss
know
verdict
jury
really
meant
reasoned
principles
issue
preclusion
useful
predicated
assumption
jury
acted
rationally
found
certain
facts
reaching
verdict
holding
acquittals
preclusive
effect
counts
conviction
reaffirmed
dunn
rule
powell
convictions
acquittals
albeit
inconsistent
remained
undisturbed
finally
yeager
clarified
powell
holding
inconsistent
verdicts
extend
apparent
inconsistency
jury
verdict
acquittal
one
count
inability
reach
verdict
another
count
see
nconsistent
verdicts
present
entirely
different
context
one
involving
verdicts
seemingly
inconsistent
hung
yeager
tried
charges
fraud
insider
trading
jury
acquitted
fraud
offenses
appeals
concluded
must
reflected
finding
insider
information
contradicted
presented
public
yet
jury
failed
reach
verdict
charges
possession
insider
information
likewise
critical
issue
ultimate
fact
arguing
jury
therefore
acted
inconsistently
government
sought
retry
yeager
hung
counts
ruled
retrial
barred
double
jeopardy
clause
jury
speaks
verdict
noted
number
reasons
including
confusion
issues
sheer
exhaustion
observed
cause
jury
hang
ibid
accordingly
said
jury
decisions
failures
decide
identify
jury
necessarily
determined
trial
hung
count
reveals
nothing
jury
failure
reach
decision
reasoned
supplies
evidence
jury
irrationality
hung
counts
therefore
held
ha
place
analysis
jury
acquits
one
count
failing
reach
verdict
another
count
concerning
issue
ultimate
fact
acquittal
acquittal
counts
preclusion
purposes
given
preclusive
effect
acquittal
concluded
yeager
retried
hung
count
controlling
precedent
view
turn
inconsistent
verdicts
rendered
case
prosecution
stemmed
alleged
bribe
paid
petitioner
juan
bravo
entrepreneur
petitioner
hector
martínez
senator
serving
commonwealth
puerto
rico
alleged
bribe
took
form
trip
las
vegas
including
seat
professional
boxing
match
featuring
popular
puerto
rican
contender
fernandez
according
government
bravo
intended
bribe
secure
martínez
help
shepherding
legislation
puerto
rico
senate
enacted
provid
substantial
financial
benefits
bravo
enterprise
ibid
leadup
las
vegas
trip
martínez
submitted
legislation
senate
consideration
issued
committee
report
supporting
within
week
returning
las
vegas
martínez
issued
another
favorable
report
voted
enact
legislation
based
events
federal
grand
jury
puerto
rico
indicted
petitioners
inter
alia
bribery
violation
conspiracy
violate
violation
traveling
interstate
commerce
violations
violation
travel
act
following
trial
jury
convicted
bravo
martínez
standalone
bribery
offense
acquitted
related
conspiracy
travel
act
charges
fernandez
received
sentence
months
prison
appeals
first
circuit
vacated
convictions
instructional
error
first
circuit
view
jury
erroneously
charged
constitutes
criminal
conduct
statute
charge
permitted
jury
find
bravo
martínez
guilty
offering
receiving
gratuity
appeals
held
proscribes
quid
pro
quo
bribes
gratuities
true
acknowledged
jury
instructed
theories
bribery
evidence
trial
sufficed
support
guilty
verdict
either
theory
appeals
say
confidence
erroneous
charge
harmless
vacated
convictions
remanded
proceedings
remand
relying
component
double
jeopardy
clause
bravo
martínez
moved
judgments
acquittal
standalone
charges
supp
pr
retried
bribery
offense
insisted
jury
necessarily
determined
guilty
violating
acquitted
conspiring
violate
traveling
interstate
commerce
violations
petitioners
maintained
contested
issue
trial
whether
bravo
offered
martínez
accepted
bribe
within
meaning
see
tr
oral
arg
dispute
agreed
go
boxing
match
together
dispute
get
las
vegas
puerto
rico
travel
across
state
district
denied
motions
acquittal
supp
sole
issue
disputed
trial
whether
bravo
martínez
violated
explained
jury
acted
irrationally
jury
simultaneously
convicted
bravo
martínez
standalone
charges
verdict
simply
inconsistent
ibid
first
circuit
affirmed
denial
petitioners
motions
acquittal
agreeing
jury
inconsistent
returns
fatal
petitioners
plea
jury
received
bribery
instructions
count
involving
noted
verdicts
convicting
standalone
bribery
charges
acquitting
related
travel
act
conspiracy
counts
reconciled
appeals
rejected
petitioners
argument
eventual
invalidation
bribery
convictions
rendered
powell
rule
inapplicable
ashe
reminded
calls
practical
appraisal
based
complete
record
prior
proceeding
bribery
convictions
like
acquittals
part
record
see
vacated
convictions
like
hung
counts
purposes
continued
informed
decision
yeager
first
circuit
recognized
hung
count
reveals
jury
failure
decide
therefore
evidence
actual
inconsistency
jury
decision
contrast
said
vacated
convictions
jury
decisions
jury
spoken
later
upset
conviction
unrelated
ground
reasoned
undermine
powell
recognition
inconsistent
verdicts
make
impossible
determine
jury
necessarily
decided
first
circuit
therefore
concluded
vacated
convictions
unlike
hung
counts
relevant
ashe
inquiry
ibid
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflict
among
courts
question
component
double
jeopardy
clause
bar
government
retrying
defendants
like
bravo
martínez
jury
returned
irreconcilably
inconsistent
verdicts
conviction
acquittal
convictions
later
vacated
legal
error
unrelated
inconsistency
holding
double
jeopardy
clause
bar
retrial
circumstances
affirm
first
circuit
judgment
ii
conviction
overturned
appeal
general
rule
double
jeopardy
clause
bar
reprosecution
justices
boston
municipal
lydon
ordinary
consequence
vacatur
government
elects
new
trial
shorn
error
infected
first
trial
continuing
jeopardy
rule
neither
gives
effect
vacated
judgment
offends
double
jeopardy
principles
rather
reflects
reality
criminal
proceedings
accused
run
full
course
ibid
permitting
new
trial
post
vacatur
rule
serves
society
criminal
defendants
interests
fair
administration
justice
high
price
indeed
society
pay
recognized
every
accused
granted
immunity
punishment
defect
sufficient
constitute
reversible
error
proceedings
leading
conviction
tateo
rights
criminal
defendants
suffer
least
doubtful
appellate
courts
zealous
protecting
effects
improprieties
trial
pretrial
stage
knew
reversal
conviction
put
accused
irrevocably
beyond
reach
prosecution
ibid
bravo
martínez
ask
us
deviate
general
rule
post
vacatur
conviction
new
trial
order
conviction
vacated
appeal
maintain
acquittal
verdict
simultaneously
returned
preclude
government
retrying
defendant
vacated
count
precedent
harmonious
doctrine
opposes
foreclosure
petitioners
seek
bravo
martínez
bear
burden
demonstrating
jury
necessarily
resolved
favor
question
whether
violated
schiro
explained
see
supra
defendant
meet
burden
trial
yielded
incompatible
jury
verdicts
issue
defendant
seeks
insulate
relitigation
jury
convicted
bravo
martínez
violating
acquitted
conspiring
traveling
intent
violate
convictions
acquittals
irreconcilable
elements
travel
act
conspiracy
counts
disputed
see
supra
unknowable
inconsistent
verdicts
acquittal
conviction
jury
really
meant
quoting
powell
see
restatement
comment
determination
relied
preclusive
inconsistent
adjudication
issue
confidence
determination
generally
view
government
inability
obtain
review
acquittals
powell
inconsistent
jury
findings
weigh
heavily
according
acquittals
effect
see
standefer
petitioners
bribery
convictions
later
vacated
trial
error
alter
analysis
critical
inquiry
whether
jury
actually
decided
bravo
martínez
violate
ashe
counsels
us
approach
task
realism
rationality
particular
examine
trial
record
eye
circumstances
proceedings
ibid
appeals
explained
fact
jury
convicted
bravo
martínez
violating
seem
quite
obvious
relevance
practical
inquiry
even
though
convictions
later
vacated
issue
preclusion
depends
jury
assessment
facts
light
charges
presented
trial
conviction
overturned
appeal
appropriately
considered
assessment
acquittal
verdict
preclusive
effect
citron
indeed
jurors
case
might
acquitted
travel
act
conspiracy
counts
absent
belief
bribery
convictions
stand
see
ibid
bravo
martínez
retried
bribery
counts
course
appeals
vacated
convictions
insufficient
evidence
support
convictions
double
jeopardy
purposes
evaluation
evidence
insufficient
convict
equivalent
acquittal
therefore
bars
second
prosecution
offense
see
burks
cf
powell
noting
defendants
afforded
protection
jury
irrationality
error
courts
independent
review
sufficiency
evidence
scarcely
case
prosecution
failed
muster
sufficient
evidence
first
proceeding
burks
quite
opposite
evidence
presented
petitioners
trial
appeals
determined
supported
guilty
verdict
gratuity
theory
first
circuit
ruled
impermissible
well
quid
pro
quo
theory
first
circuit
approved
vacatur
compelled
sole
reason
first
circuit
found
jury
charge
erroneous
extent
encompassed
gratuities
see
supra
therefore
general
rule
allowing
new
trial
rectify
trial
error
applied
burks
emphasis
deleted
government
acknowledges
retrial
tolerable
trial
error
resolve
apparent
inconsistency
jury
verdicts
see
brief
example
jury
receives
erroneous
instruction
count
conviction
correct
instruction
charge
acquits
instructional
error
may
reconcile
instructional
error
account
jury
contradictory
determinations
error
applied
equally
every
count
see
supra
powell
case
problem
jury
reached
inconsistent
results
convictions
later
invalidation
unrelated
ground
erase
reconcile
inconsistency
bear
factual
determinations
actually
necessarily
made
jury
serv
turn
jury
otherwise
inconsistent
irrational
verdict
consistent
rational
verdict
people
wilson
markman
dissenting
bravo
martínez
therefore
establish
factual
predicate
necessary
preclude
government
retrying
standalone
charges
namely
jury
first
proceeding
actually
decided
violate
federal
bribery
statute
support
argument
issue
preclusion
bravo
martínez
highlight
decision
yeager
yeager
point
recognized
hung
counts
never
accorded
respect
matter
law
history
also
true
vacated
convictions
urge
vacated
convictions
like
hung
counts
excluded
ashe
inquiry
jury
necessarily
determined
brief
petitioners
asserting
never
held
invalid
conviction
relevant
evidence
anything
tr
oral
arg
bravo
martínez
argue
taking
account
vacated
conviction
analysis
give
effect
legal
nullity
brief
petitioners
see
wilson
majority
opinion
considering
vacated
count
impermissibly
bring
legally
vacated
conviction
back
life
argument
misapprehends
ashe
inquiry
undisputed
petitioners
convictions
invalid
judgments
may
used
establish
guilt
question
whether
issue
preclusion
stops
government
prosecuting
anew
question
bravo
martínez
bear
burden
showing
issue
whether
violated
determined
valid
final
judgment
acquittal
yeager
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
judge
whether
carried
burden
must
examine
record
identify
ground
acquittals
ashe
conviction
contradicts
acquittals
plainly
relevant
determination
less
simply
later
overturned
appeal
unrelated
legal
error
split
verdict
finding
violated
standalone
counts
violated
related
travel
act
conspiracy
counts
tells
us
one
count
jury
follo
instructions
whether
mistake
compromise
lenity
powell
see
supra
petitioners
acquittals
therefore
support
application
issue
preclusion
relying
yeager
bravo
martínez
contend
vacated
convictions
ignored
hung
counts
way
decipher
represent
brief
petitioners
quoting
yeager
convictions
meaningless
maintain
jury
allowed
convict
basis
conduct
criminal
first
circuit
payment
gratuity
brief
petitioners
argument
trips
yeager
reasoning
yeager
rest
inability
detect
basis
jury
decision
rather
reasoned
jury
hangs
decision
hence
evidence
irrationality
verdict
guilt
contrast
jury
decision
even
subsequently
vacated
appeal
therefore
evince
irrationality
case
petitioners
dispute
government
evidence
trial
supported
guilty
verdict
quid
pro
quo
theory
gratuity
instruction
held
erroneous
appeals
applied
every
offense
rational
jury
reached
conflicting
verdicts
counts
petitioners
convictions
reveal
jury
relevant
issue
even
reveal
theory
liability
jurors
relied
upon
reaching
inconsistent
verdicts
brief
words
know
jury
concluded
instructional
error
brief
petitioners
new
trial
counts
conviction
order
bravo
martínez
succeeded
appeal
extent
entitled
split
verdict
impede
government
renewing
double
jeopardy
clause
first
circuit
explained
forever
bars
government
prosecuting
bravo
martínez
conspiracy
travel
act
offenses
acquittals
remain
inviolate
bravo
martínez
also
gained
benefit
appellate
victory
ibid
second
trial
standalone
bribery
charges
government
may
invoke
gratuity
theory
issue
preclusion
doctrine
commandeer
inconsistent
verdicts
shroud
mystery
jury
necessarily
decided
reasons
stated
judgment
appeals
first
circuit
affirmed
thomas
concurring
juan
hector
petitioners
writ
certiorari
appeals
first
circuit
november
justice
thomas
concurring
question
presented
case
whether
ashe
swenson
yeager
vacated
conviction
nullify
preclusive
effect
acquittal
prong
double
jeopardy
clause
originally
understood
double
jeopardy
clause
prong
english
pleas
auterfoits
acquit
auterfoits
convict
clause
based
barred
repeated
identical
act
crime
scalia
dissenting
quoting
blackstone
commentaries
laws
england
emphasis
added
dissent
see
also
grady
corbin
scalia
dissenting
ashe
departed
original
meaning
double
jeopardy
clause
holding
precludes
successive
prosecutions
distinct
crimes
facts
essential
conviction
second
crime
necessarily
resolved
defendant
favor
verdict
first
crime
yeager
supra
scalia
dissenting
yeager
erroneously
illogically
extended
ashe
see
ashe
held
clause
sometimes
bars
successive
prosecution
facts
found
prior
proceeding
quoting
ashe
supra
yeager
however
bar
red
retrial
hung
counts
prior
proceeding
simply
earlier
stage
proceeding
scalia
dissenting
appropriate
case
reconsider
holdings
ashe
yeager
today
properly
declines
extend
cases
indeed
reaches
correct
result
clause
original
meaning
join
opinion
footnotes
parties
use
expression
collateral
estoppel
component
observed
issue
preclusion
descriptive
term
yeager
see
restatement
second
judgments
comment
pp
though
earlier
recognized
res
judicata
embraces
claim
issue
preclusion
applies
criminal
well
civil
proceedings
link
inquiry
double
jeopardy
clause
see
sealfon
frank
mangum
principle
question
fact
law
distinctly
put
issue
directly
determined
competent
jurisdiction
afterwards
parties
applies
decisions
criminal
petitioners
indicted
several
charges
relevant
see
fernandez
first
circuit
acknowledged
holding
contrary
rulings
circuits
addressed
th
issue
three
federal
courts
appeals
considered
question
held
prohibits
gratuities
well
quid
pro
quo
bribes
see
bahel
hawkins
zimmerman
observed
see
supra
petitioners
urge
bribery
sole
issue
controversy
dispute
elements
travel
act
conspiracy
counts
see
tr
oral
arg
see
also
brief
accepting
jury
returned
irreconcilably
inconsistent
verdicts
another
element
explain
acquittals
inconsistency
argument
new
trial
bribery
see
infra
compare
citron
holding
retrial
violate
double
jeopardy
clause
circumstances
price
evans
state
kelly
people
wilson
holding
double
jeopardy
clause
bars
retrial
situation
first
circuit
explained
lthough
citron
price
predate
yeager
second
fifth
circuits
decided
vacated
counts
relevant
ashe
analysis
time
circuits
already
ruled
hung
counts
disregarded
purposes
ashe
inquiry
citing
mespoulede
nelson
second
circuit
moreover
adhered
citron
since
yeager
see
bruno
fed
appx
first
time
looked
vacated
conviction
ascertain
jury
decided
prior
proceeding
holding
morris
mathews
conviction
vacated
double
jeopardy
grounds
may
reduced
conviction
lesser
included
offense
jeopardy
barred
rested
exactly
rationale
see
relying
vacated
conviction
aggravated
murder
conclude
jury
necessarily
found
defendant
conduct
satisfie
elements
lesser
included
offense
simple
murder
number
lower
courts
reached
conclusion
see
citron
defendant
convicted
offense
subject
retrial
case
materially
different
one
acquittal
accompanied
failure
reach
verdict
price
case
jury
returned
verdict
conviction
compound
count
verdict
acquittal
substantive
count
instructive
whether
government
may
retry
defendant
inconsistent
verdict
vacated
evans
yeager
nothing
undermine
conclusion
defendant
may
retried
inconsistent
verdict
overturned
kelly
explaining
context
retrial
following
vacatur
yeager
application
case
involving
inconsistent
verdict
acquittals
convictions
returned
jury