lafler
cooper
argued
october
decided
march
respondent
charged
michigan
law
assault
intent
murder
three
offenses
prosecution
offered
dismiss
two
charges
recommend
sentence
two
exchange
guilty
plea
communication
respondent
admitted
guilt
expressed
willingness
accept
offer
rejected
offer
allegedly
attorney
convinced
prosecution
unable
establish
intent
murder
victim
shot
waist
trial
respondent
convicted
counts
received
mandatory
minimum
sentence
subsequent
hearing
state
trial
rejected
respondent
claim
attorney
advice
reject
plea
constituted
ineffective
assistance
michigan
appeals
affirmed
rejecting
claim
ground
respondent
knowingly
intelligently
turned
plea
offer
chose
go
trial
respondent
renewed
claim
federal
habeas
finding
state
appellate
unreasonably
applied
constitutional
standards
laid
strickland
washington
hill
lockhart
district
granted
conditional
writ
ordered
specific
performance
original
plea
offer
sixth
circuit
affirmed
applying
strickland
found
counsel
provided
deficient
performance
advising
respondent
incorrect
legal
rule
respondent
suffered
prejudice
lost
opportunity
take
favorable
sentence
offered
plea
held
counsel
ineffective
advice
led
offer
rejection
prejudice
alleged
stand
trial
defendant
must
show
ineffective
advice
reasonable
probability
plea
offer
presented
accepted
terms
conviction
sentence
offer
terms
less
severe
actual
judgment
sentence
imposed
pp
parties
agree
counsel
performance
deficient
question
apply
strickland
prejudice
test
ineffective
assistance
results
rejection
plea
offer
defendant
convicted
ensuing
trial
pp
context
strickland
prejudice
test
requires
defendant
show
reasonable
possibility
outcome
plea
process
different
competent
advice
sixth
circuit
federal
appellate
courts
agreed
strickland
prejudice
test
rejected
pleas
adopted
petitioner
solicitor
general
propose
narrow
view
strickland
prejudice
arise
plea
bargaining
defendant
later
convicted
fair
trial
reasoning
unpersuasive
first
claim
sixth
amendment
sole
purpose
protect
right
fair
trial
amendment
actually
requires
effective
assistance
critical
stages
criminal
proceeding
including
pretrial
stages
consistent
right
effective
assistance
appeal
see
halbert
michigan
right
counsel
sentencing
see
glover
followed
rigid
rule
otherwise
fair
trial
remedies
errors
occurring
trial
instead
inquired
whether
trial
cured
particular
error
issue
see
vasquez
hillery
second
previously
rejected
petitioner
argument
lockhart
fretwell
modified
strickland
fretwell
nix
whiteside
demonstrate
unjust
characterize
likelihood
different
outcome
legitimate
williams
taylor
defendants
receive
windfall
result
application
incorrect
legal
principle
defense
strategy
outside
law
however
respondent
seeks
relief
counsel
failure
meet
valid
legal
standard
third
petitioner
seeks
preserve
conviction
arguing
sixth
amendment
purpose
ensure
conviction
reliability
argument
fails
comprehend
full
scope
sixth
amendment
refuted
precedent
question
fairness
reliability
trial
processes
preceded
caused
respondent
lose
benefits
received
counsel
ineffective
assistance
furthermore
reliable
trial
may
foreclose
relief
counsel
failed
assert
rights
may
altered
outcome
see
kimmelman
morrison
petitioner
position
fair
trial
wipes
clean
ineffective
assistance
plea
bargaining
also
ignores
reality
criminal
justice
today
part
system
pleas
system
trials
see
missouri
frye
ante
pp
defendant
shows
ineffective
assistance
caused
rejection
plea
leading
severe
sentence
trial
remedy
must
neutralize
taint
constitutional
violation
morrison
must
grant
windfall
defendant
needlessly
squander
resources
state
properly
invested
criminal
prosecution
see
mechanik
sole
advantage
defendant
received
lesser
sentence
plea
evidentiary
hearing
determine
whether
defendant
accepted
plea
may
exercise
discretion
determining
whether
defendant
receive
term
offered
plea
sentence
received
trial
something
however
resentencing
based
conviction
trial
may
suffice
offered
guilty
plea
less
serious
counts
ones
defendant
convicted
trial
mandatory
sentence
confines
judge
sentencing
discretion
circumstances
proper
remedy
may
require
prosecution
reoffer
plea
judge
exercise
discretion
deciding
whether
vacate
conviction
trial
accept
plea
leave
conviction
undisturbed
either
situation
must
weigh
various
factors
suffices
give
two
relevant
considerations
first
may
take
account
defendant
earlier
expressed
willingness
unwillingness
accept
responsibility
actions
second
necessary
decide
constitutional
rule
judge
required
disregard
information
concerning
crime
discovered
plea
offer
made
petitioner
argues
implementing
remedy
open
floodgates
litigation
defendants
seeking
unsettle
convictions
years
courts
recognized
claims
indication
system
overwhelmed
defendants
receiving
windfalls
result
strategically
timed
strickland
claims
addition
prosecution
trial
courts
may
adopt
measures
help
ensure
meritless
claims
see
frye
ante
pp
case
arises
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
aedpa
michigan
appeals
analysis
respondent
claim
contrary
clearly
established
federal
law
aedpa
presents
bar
relief
respondent
satisfied
strickland
test
parties
concede
fact
deficient
performance
respondent
shown
performance
reasonable
probability
trial
accepted
guilty
plea
addition
result
accepting
plea
convicted
trial
received
minimum
sentence
times
greater
received
plea
remedy
district
ordered
specific
performance
plea
agreement
correct
remedy
order
state
reoffer
plea
respondent
accepts
offer
state
trial
exercise
discretion
determining
whether
vacate
respondent
convictions
resentence
pursuant
plea
agreement
vacate
convictions
resentence
accordingly
leave
conviction
sentence
resulting
trial
undisturbed
pp
fed
appx
vacated
remanded
kennedy
delivered
opinion
ginsburg
breyer
sotomayor
kagan
joined
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
thomas
joined
roberts
joined
part
iv
alito
filed
dissenting
opinion
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
blaine
lafler
petitioner
anthony
cooper
writ
certiorari
appeals
sixth
circuit
march
justice
kennedy
delivered
opinion
case
missouri
frye
ante
also
decided
today
criminal
defendant
seeks
remedy
inadequate
assistance
counsel
caused
nonacceptance
plea
offer
proceedings
led
less
favorable
outcome
frye
defense
counsel
inform
defendant
plea
offer
offer
lapsed
defendant
still
pleaded
guilty
severe
terms
favorable
plea
offer
reported
client
advice
counsel
rejected
frye
later
guilty
plea
plea
offer
rejected
full
fair
trial
jury
guilty
verdict
defendant
received
sentence
harsher
offered
rejected
plea
bargain
instant
case
comes
concession
counsel
advice
respect
plea
offer
fell
standard
adequate
assistance
counsel
guaranteed
sixth
amendment
applicable
fourteenth
amendment
evening
march
respondent
pointed
gun
toward
kali
mundy
head
fired
record
unclear
respondent
trial
suggested
might
acted
either
defense
another
person
event
shot
missed
mundy
fled
respondent
followed
pursuit
firing
repeatedly
mundy
shot
buttock
hip
abdomen
survived
assault
respondent
charged
michigan
law
assault
intent
murder
possession
firearm
felon
possession
firearm
commission
felony
misdemeanor
possession
marijuana
habitual
offender
two
occasions
prosecution
offered
dismiss
two
charges
recommend
sentence
months
two
exchange
guilty
plea
communication
respondent
admitted
guilt
expressed
willingness
accept
offer
respondent
however
later
rejected
offer
occasions
allegedly
attorney
convinced
prosecution
unable
establish
intent
murder
mundy
shot
waist
first
day
trial
prosecution
offered
significantly
less
favorable
plea
deal
respondent
rejected
trial
respondent
convicted
counts
received
mandatory
minimum
sentence
months
imprisonment
ginther
hearing
state
trial
see
people
ginther
respondent
argued
attorney
advice
reject
plea
constituted
ineffective
assistance
trial
judge
rejected
claim
michigan
appeals
affirmed
people
cooper
wl
mar
per
curiam
app
pet
cert
michigan
appeals
rejected
claim
ineffective
assistance
counsel
ground
respondent
knowingly
intelligently
rejected
two
plea
offers
chose
go
trial
michigan
denied
respondent
application
leave
file
appeal
people
cooper
table
respondent
filed
petition
federal
habeas
relief
renewing
claim
finding
required
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
aedpa
michigan
appeals
unreasonably
applied
constitutional
standards
effective
assistance
counsel
laid
strickland
washington
hill
lockhart
district
granted
conditional
writ
cooper
lafler
wl
ed
mar
app
pet
cert
remedy
violation
district
ordered
specific
performance
respondent
original
plea
agreement
minimum
sentence
range
months
app
pet
cert
appeals
sixth
circuit
affirmed
fed
appx
finding
ven
full
deference
aedpa
salvage
state
decision
applying
strickland
appeals
found
respondent
attorney
provided
deficient
performance
informing
respondent
incorrect
legal
rule
fed
respondent
suffered
prejudice
lost
opportunity
plead
guilty
receive
lower
sentence
offered
granted
certiorari
ii
defendants
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
right
extends
process
frye
ante
see
also
padilla
kentucky
slip
hill
supra
plea
negotiations
defendants
entitled
effective
assistance
competent
counsel
mcmann
richardson
hill
held
strickland
washington
test
applies
challenges
guilty
pleas
based
ineffective
assistance
counsel
performance
prong
strickland
requires
defendant
show
counsel
representation
fell
objective
standard
reasonableness
quoting
strickland
case
parties
agree
performance
respondent
counsel
deficient
advised
respondent
reject
plea
offer
grounds
convicted
trial
light
concession
unnecessary
explore
issue
question
apply
strickland
prejudice
test
ineffective
assistance
results
rejection
plea
offer
defendant
convicted
ensuing
trial
establish
strickland
prejudice
defendant
must
show
reasonable
probability
counsel
unprofessional
errors
result
proceeding
different
context
pleas
defendant
must
show
outcome
plea
process
different
competent
advice
see
frye
ante
noting
strickland
inquiry
applied
advice
respect
plea
bargains
turns
whether
result
proceeding
quoting
strickland
supra
see
also
hill
requirement
focuses
whether
counsel
constitutionally
ineffective
performance
affected
outcome
plea
process
hill
evaluating
petitioner
claim
ineffective
assistance
led
improvident
acceptance
guilty
plea
required
petitioner
show
reasonable
probability
counsel
errors
defendant
pleaded
guilty
insisted
going
trial
ibid
contrast
hill
ineffective
advice
led
offer
acceptance
rejection
stand
trial
choosing
waive
prejudice
alleged
circumstances
defendant
must
show
ineffective
advice
counsel
reasonable
probability
plea
offer
presented
defendant
accepted
plea
prosecution
withdrawn
light
intervening
circumstances
accepted
terms
conviction
sentence
offer
terms
less
severe
judgment
sentence
fact
imposed
appeals
sixth
circuit
agreed
test
strickland
prejudice
context
rejected
plea
bargain
consistent
test
adopted
applied
appellate
courts
without
demonstrated
difficulties
systemic
disruptions
see
fed
see
also
rodriguez
rodriguez
per
curiam
gordon
per
curiam
day
beckham
wainwright
julian
bartley
wanatee
ault
nunes
mueller
williams
jones
per
curiam
gaviria
cadc
per
curiam
petitioner
solicitor
general
propose
different
far
narrow
view
sixth
amendment
contend
finding
strickland
prejudice
arising
plea
bargaining
defendant
later
convicted
fair
trial
three
reasons
petitioner
solicitor
general
offer
approach
unpersuasive
first
petitioner
solicitor
general
claim
sole
purpose
sixth
amendment
protect
right
fair
trial
errors
trial
argue
cognizable
sixth
amendment
unless
affect
fairness
trial
see
brief
petitioner
brief
amicus
curiae
sixth
amendment
however
narrow
reach
cf
frye
ante
holding
defendant
show
prejudice
strickland
even
absent
showing
deficient
performance
precluded
going
trial
sixth
amendment
requires
effective
assistance
counsel
critical
stages
criminal
proceeding
protections
designed
simply
protect
trial
even
though
counsel
absence
stages
may
derogate
accused
right
fair
trial
wade
constitutional
guarantee
applies
pretrial
critical
stages
part
whole
course
criminal
proceeding
proceeding
defendants
presumed
make
critical
decisions
without
counsel
advice
consistent
rule
defendants
right
effective
assistance
counsel
appeal
even
though
way
characterized
part
trial
see
halbert
michigan
evitts
lucey
precedents
also
establish
exists
right
counsel
sentencing
noncapital
see
glover
mempa
rhay
capital
cases
see
wiggins
smith
even
though
sentencing
concern
defendant
guilt
innocence
ineffective
assistance
counsel
sentencing
hearing
result
strickland
prejudice
amount
additional
jail
time
sixth
amendment
significance
glover
supra
moreover
followed
rigid
rule
otherwise
fair
trial
remedies
errors
occurring
trial
inquired
instead
whether
trial
cured
particular
error
issue
thus
vasquez
hillery
deliberate
exclusion
grand
jury
prejudicial
defendant
may
tried
charges
brought
properly
constituted
grand
jury
see
ballard
dismissing
indictment
returned
grand
jury
women
excluded
see
also
stirone
reversing
defendant
conviction
jury
may
based
verdict
acts
charged
indictment
contrast
mechanik
error
violation
grand
jury
rule
meant
ensure
probable
cause
existed
believe
defendant
guilty
subsequent
trial
resulting
verdict
guilt
cured
error
see
instant
case
respondent
went
trial
rather
accept
plea
deal
conceded
result
ineffective
assistance
plea
negotiation
process
respondent
received
severe
sentence
trial
one
times
severe
likely
received
pleading
guilty
far
curing
error
trial
caused
injury
error
even
trial
free
constitutional
flaw
defendant
goes
trial
instead
taking
favorable
plea
may
prejudiced
either
conviction
serious
counts
imposition
severe
sentence
second
petitioner
claims
refined
strickland
prejudice
analysis
fretwell
add
additional
requirement
defendant
show
ineffective
assistance
counsel
led
denied
substantive
procedural
right
brief
petitioner
rejected
argument
fretwell
modified
strickland
see
williams
taylor
virginia
erred
holding
decision
lockhart
fretwell
modified
way
supplanted
rule
set
strickland
see
also
glover
supra
explained
last
term
williams
holding
lockhart
supplant
strickland
analysis
fretwell
show
strickland
prejudice
resulting
attorney
failure
object
use
sentencing
factor
eighth
circuit
erroneously
temporarily
found
impermissible
fretwell
objection
upon
claim
premised
meritless
fretwell
demonstrate
error
entitling
relief
case
presented
unusual
circumstance
defendant
attempts
demonstrate
prejudice
based
considerations
matter
law
inform
inquiry
ibid
concurring
see
also
ibid
recognizing
determinative
question
whether
reasonable
probability
counsel
unprofessional
errors
result
proceeding
different
remains
unchanged
internal
quotation
marks
citation
omitted
reason
defendant
show
prejudice
based
counsel
refusal
present
perjured
testimony
even
testimony
might
affected
outcome
case
see
nix
whiteside
holding
first
counsel
refusal
present
perjured
testimony
breached
professional
duty
second
establish
prejudice
strickland
fretwell
nix
instructive
demonstrate
also
situations
unjust
characterize
likelihood
different
outcome
legitimate
williams
supra
defendants
receive
windfall
result
application
incorrect
legal
principle
defense
strategy
outside
law
however
injured
client
seeks
relief
counsel
failure
meet
valid
legal
standard
counsel
refusal
violate
maintains
absent
ineffective
counsel
accepted
plea
offer
sentence
prosecution
evidently
deemed
consistent
sound
administration
criminal
justice
favorable
sentence
eluded
defendant
criminal
proceeding
appears
sentence
others
position
received
ordinary
course
absent
failings
counsel
see
bibas
regulating
market
caveat
emptor
consumer
protection
cal
rev
expected
sentence
imposed
percent
cases
like
sticker
price
cars
ignorant
consumer
view
full
price
norm
anything
less
bargain
see
also
frye
ante
plea
bargain
offered
defendant
right
effective
assistance
counsel
considering
whether
accept
right
denied
prejudice
shown
loss
plea
opportunity
led
trial
resulting
conviction
serious
charges
imposition
severe
sentence
course
true
defendants
right
offered
plea
federal
right
judge
accept
frye
ante
circumstances
beside
point
plea
offer
made
plea
deal
accepted
defendant
rejected
judge
issue
raised
simply
arise
much
reasoning
guides
cases
find
criminal
defendants
right
effective
assistance
counsel
direct
appeals
even
though
constitution
require
provide
system
appellate
review
see
evitts
see
also
douglas
california
cases
hen
state
opts
act
field
action
significant
discretionary
elements
must
nonetheless
act
accord
dictates
constitution
evitts
supra
third
petitioner
seeks
preserve
conviction
obtained
state
arguing
purpose
sixth
amendment
ensure
reliability
conviction
following
trial
brief
petitioner
argument
fails
comprehend
full
scope
sixth
amendment
protections
refuted
precedent
strickland
recognized
benchmark
judging
claim
ineffectiveness
must
whether
counsel
conduct
undermined
proper
functioning
adversarial
process
trial
relied
produced
result
goal
result
divorced
reliability
conviction
see
cronic
question
fairness
reliability
trial
fairness
regularity
processes
preceded
caused
defendant
lose
benefits
received
ordinary
course
counsel
ineffective
assistance
instances
furthermore
reliable
trial
foreclose
relief
counsel
failed
assert
rights
may
altered
outcome
kimmelman
morrison
held
attorney
failure
timely
move
suppress
evidence
trial
grounds
federal
habeas
relief
rejected
suggestion
failure
make
timely
request
exclusion
illegally
seized
evidence
basis
sixth
amendment
violation
evidence
reliable
often
probative
information
bearing
guilt
innocence
defendant
quoting
stone
powell
constitutional
rights
criminal
defendants
observed
granted
innocent
guilty
alike
consequently
decline
hold
either
guarantee
effective
assistance
counsel
belongs
solely
innocent
attaches
matters
affecting
determination
actual
guilt
logic
applies
fact
respondent
guilty
mean
entitled
sixth
amendment
effective
assistance
suffered
prejudice
attorney
deficient
performance
plea
bargaining
end
petitioner
three
arguments
amount
one
general
contention
fair
trial
wipes
clean
deficient
performance
defense
counsel
plea
bargaining
position
ignores
reality
criminal
justice
today
part
system
pleas
system
trials
percent
federal
convictions
percent
state
convictions
result
guilty
pleas
see
frye
ante
explained
frye
right
adequate
assistance
counsel
defined
enforced
without
taking
account
central
role
plea
bargaining
plays
securing
convictions
determining
sentences
ibid
insufficient
simply
point
guarantee
fair
trial
backstop
inoculates
errors
pretrial
process
even
defendant
shows
ineffective
assistance
counsel
caused
rejection
plea
leading
trial
severe
sentence
question
constitutes
appropriate
remedy
question
must
addressed
sixth
amendment
remedies
tailored
injury
suffered
constitutional
violation
unnecessarily
infringe
competing
interests
morrison
thus
remedy
must
neutralize
taint
constitutional
violation
time
grant
windfall
defendant
needlessly
squander
considerable
resources
state
properly
invested
criminal
prosecution
see
mechanik
reversal
conviction
entails
substantial
social
costs
forces
jurors
witnesses
courts
prosecution
defendants
expend
time
energy
resources
repeat
trial
already
taken
place
victims
may
asked
relive
disturbing
experiences
specific
injury
suffered
defendants
decline
plea
offer
result
ineffective
assistance
counsel
receive
greater
sentence
result
trial
come
least
one
two
forms
cases
sole
advantage
defendant
received
plea
lesser
sentence
typically
case
charges
admitted
part
plea
bargain
charges
defendant
convicted
trial
situation
may
conduct
evidentiary
hearing
determine
whether
defendant
shown
reasonable
probability
counsel
errors
accepted
plea
showing
made
may
exercise
discretion
determining
whether
defendant
receive
term
imprisonment
government
offered
plea
sentence
received
trial
something
situations
may
resentencing
alone
full
redress
constitutional
injury
example
offer
guilty
plea
count
counts
less
serious
ones
defendant
convicted
trial
mandatory
sentence
confines
judge
sentencing
discretion
trial
resentencing
based
conviction
trial
may
suffice
see
williams
riggs
fairman
circumstances
proper
exercise
discretion
remedy
constitutional
injury
may
require
prosecution
reoffer
plea
proposal
occurred
judge
exercise
discretion
deciding
whether
vacate
conviction
trial
accept
plea
leave
conviction
undisturbed
implementing
remedy
situations
trial
must
weigh
various
factors
boundaries
proper
discretion
need
defined
principles
elaborated
time
decisions
state
federal
courts
statutes
rules
serve
give
complete
guidance
factors
bear
upon
exercise
judge
discretion
point
however
suffices
note
two
considerations
relevance
first
may
take
account
defendant
earlier
expressed
willingness
unwillingness
accept
responsibility
actions
second
necessary
decide
constitutional
rule
judge
required
prescind
say
disregard
information
concerning
crime
discovered
plea
offer
made
time
continuum
makes
difficult
restore
defendant
prosecution
precise
positions
occupied
prior
rejection
plea
offer
baseline
consulted
finding
remedy
require
prosecution
incur
expense
conducting
new
trial
petitioner
argues
implementing
remedy
open
floodgates
litigation
defendants
seeking
unsettle
convictions
see
brief
petitioner
petitioner
concern
misplaced
courts
recognized
claims
sort
years
see
supra
yet
indication
system
overwhelmed
types
suits
defendants
receiving
windfalls
result
strategically
timed
strickland
claims
see
also
padilla
slip
confronted
similar
concern
hill
flood
follow
decision
wake
addition
prosecution
trial
courts
may
adopt
measures
help
ensure
late
frivolous
fabricated
claims
later
less
advantageous
plea
offer
accepted
trial
leading
conviction
frye
ante
see
also
ibid
listing
procedures
currently
used
various
help
ensure
meritless
claims
iii
standards
ineffective
assistance
counsel
defendant
rejects
plea
offer
goes
trial
must
applied
case
respondent
brings
federal
collateral
challenge
conviction
aedpa
federal
may
grant
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
unless
state
adjudication
merits
contrary
involved
unreasonable
application
clearly
established
federal
law
determined
decision
contrary
clearly
established
law
state
applies
rule
contradicts
governing
law
set
forth
cases
williams
taylor
opinion
appeals
sixth
circuit
determine
whether
michigan
appeals
addressed
respondent
claim
decided
even
whether
correct
legal
rule
identified
fed
state
decision
may
quite
opaque
appeals
sixth
circuit
thought
yet
federal
correct
note
aedpa
present
bar
granting
respondent
relief
michigan
appeals
identified
respondent
claim
failed
apply
strickland
assess
rather
applying
strickland
state
simply
found
respondent
rejection
plea
knowing
voluntary
cooper
wl
app
pet
cert
inquiry
whether
rejection
plea
knowing
voluntary
however
correct
means
address
claim
ineffective
assistance
counsel
see
hill
applying
strickland
assess
claim
ineffective
assistance
counsel
arising
plea
negotiation
process
stating
incorrect
standard
moreover
state
made
irrelevant
observation
counsel
performance
trial
mischaracterized
respondent
claim
complaint
attorney
obtain
favorable
plea
bargain
failing
apply
strickland
assess
claim
respondent
raised
state
adjudication
contrary
clearly
established
federal
law
circumstance
federal
courts
habeas
action
determine
principles
necessary
grant
relief
see
panetti
quarterman
respondent
satisfied
strickland
test
regarding
performance
perhaps
accepted
unclear
whether
respondent
counsel
believed
respondent
convicted
assault
intent
murder
matter
law
shots
hit
mundy
waist
whether
simply
thought
persuasive
argument
make
jury
show
lack
specific
intent
appeals
sixth
circuit
suggested
erroneous
strategic
prediction
outcome
trial
necessarily
deficient
performance
however
fact
deficient
performance
conceded
parties
case
comes
us
assumption
need
address
question
prejudice
respondent
shown
counsel
deficient
performance
reasonable
probability
trial
accepted
guilty
plea
see
fed
addition
result
accepting
plea
convicted
trial
respondent
received
minimum
sentence
times
greater
received
plea
standard
ineffective
assistance
strickland
thus
satisfied
remedy
district
ordered
specific
performance
original
plea
agreement
correct
remedy
circumstances
however
order
state
reoffer
plea
agreement
presuming
respondent
accepts
offer
state
trial
exercise
discretion
determining
whether
vacate
convictions
resentence
respondent
pursuant
plea
agreement
vacate
convictions
resentence
respondent
accordingly
leave
convictions
sentence
trial
undisturbed
see
rule
plea
agreement
terms
provide
defendant
plea
made
exchange
specific
sentence
disposition
prosecutorial
sentence
recommendation
may
reject
agreement
today
decision
leaves
open
trial
best
exercise
discretion
circumstances
case
judgment
appeals
sixth
circuit
vacated
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
scalia
dissenting
blaine
lafler
petitioner
anthony
cooper
writ
certiorari
appeals
sixth
circuit
march
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
joins
chief
justice
joins
part
iv
dissenting
plea
bargain
offered
defendant
right
effective
assistance
counsel
considering
whether
accept
right
denied
prejudice
shown
loss
plea
opportunity
led
trial
resulting
conviction
serious
charges
imposition
severe
sentence
ante
inquiry
becomes
define
duty
responsibilities
defense
counsel
plea
bargain
process
difficult
question
bargaining
nature
defined
substantial
degree
personal
style
case
presents
neither
necessity
occasion
define
duties
defense
counsel
respects
missouri
frye
ante
words
companion
case
today
opens
whole
new
field
constitutionalized
criminal
procedure
law
ordinary
criminal
process
become
long
expensive
unpredictable
small
part
consequence
intricate
federal
code
criminal
procedure
imposed
pursuit
perfect
justice
see
friendly
bill
rights
code
criminal
procedure
cal
rev
moves
bring
perfection
alternative
prosecutors
defendants
sought
relief
today
opinions
deal
two
aspects
counsel
inadequacy
leave
aspects
knows
might
worked
constitutional
litigation
burden
criminal
process
foolish
think
constitutional
rules
governing
counsel
behavior
followed
rules
governing
prosecution
behavior
process
today
announces
criminal
justice
system
frye
ante
quoting
approvingly
scott
stuntz
plea
bargaining
contract
yale
hereinafter
scott
constitutional
example
prosecution
withdraw
plea
offer
already
accepted
withdraw
offer
defense
adequate
time
consider
accept
make
plea
offer
even
though
case
weak
thereby
excluding
defendant
criminal
justice
system
anthony
cooper
received
full
fair
trial
found
guilty
charges
unanimous
jury
given
sentence
law
prescribed
nonetheless
concludes
cooper
entitled
sort
habeas
corpus
relief
perhaps
attorney
allegedly
incompetent
advice
regarding
plea
offer
caused
receive
full
fair
trial
conclusion
foreclosed
precedents
even
foreclosed
constitutional
right
effective
establishes
least
new
rule
law
undermine
michigan
appeals
decision
therefore
serve
basis
habeas
relief
remedy
announces
namely
whatever
state
trial
discretion
prescribes
including
remedy
quite
absurd
violation
constitutional
right
respectfully
dissent
case
companion
missouri
frye
ante
raise
relatively
straightforward
questions
scope
right
effective
assistance
counsel
case
law
originally
derived
right
due
process
clause
guarantee
fair
trial
see
seminal
case
strickland
washington
located
right
within
sixth
amendment
notes
ante
right
counsel
begin
trial
extends
stage
prosecution
formal
informal
counsel
absence
might
derogate
accused
right
fair
trial
wade
applying
principle
held
entry
guilty
plea
whether
misdemeanor
felony
charge
ranks
stage
right
counsel
adheres
iowa
tovar
see
also
hill
lockhart
follows
acceptance
plea
offer
critical
stage
nothing
point
observation
padilla
kentucky
slip
negotiation
plea
bargain
critical
phase
litigation
purposes
sixth
amendment
right
effective
assistance
counsel
defendant
padilla
accepted
plea
bargain
pleaded
guilty
abandoning
right
fair
trial
entitled
advice
competent
counsel
never
held
rule
articulated
padilla
tovar
hill
extends
aspects
plea
negotiations
requiring
advice
competent
counsel
defendant
accepts
plea
bargain
pleads
guilty
also
advice
competent
counsel
defendant
rejects
plea
bargain
stands
constitutional
right
fair
trial
latter
vast
departure
past
cases
protecting
constitutionally
prescribed
right
fair
adjudication
guilt
punishment
judicially
invented
right
effective
plea
bargaining
also
apparent
strickland
bad
plea
bargaining
nothing
ineffective
assistance
counsel
constitutional
sense
strickland
explained
giving
meaning
requirement
effective
assistance
must
take
purpose
ensure
fair
trial
guide
since
right
effective
assistance
counsel
recognized
sake
effect
ability
accused
receive
fair
trial
cronic
benchmark
inquiry
evaluating
claim
ineffective
assistance
whether
counsel
performance
undermined
proper
functioning
adversarial
process
failed
produce
reliably
result
strickland
strickland
requirement
prejudice
consists
right
effective
assistance
purpose
assurance
fair
trial
right
infringed
unless
counsel
mistakes
call
question
basic
justice
defendant
conviction
sentence
today
entirely
clear
defendant
must
show
counsel
errors
serious
deprive
defendant
fair
trial
trial
whose
result
reliable
see
also
supra
impairment
fair
trial
distinguish
unfortunate
attorney
error
error
constitutional
sure
strickland
stated
rule
thumb
measuring
prejudice
applied
blindly
context
support
holding
today
defendant
must
show
reasonable
probability
counsel
unprofessional
errors
result
proceeding
different
strickland
cautioned
however
test
applied
mechanical
fashion
courts
divert
ultimate
focus
fundamental
fairness
proceeding
whose
result
challenged
today
followed
course
lockhart
fretwell
deficient
performance
issue
failure
counsel
defendant
sentenced
death
make
objection
produced
sentence
life
imprisonment
instead
objection
fully
supported
circuit
law
sentencing
compelled
sustain
producing
life
sentence
principles
double
jeopardy
likely
make
final
see
stevens
dissenting
bullington
missouri
time
fretwell
claim
came
us
however
circuit
law
overruled
light
one
cases
determined
prejudice
analysis
focusing
solely
mere
outcome
determination
without
attention
whether
result
proceeding
fundamentally
unfair
unreliable
defective
fretwell
counsel
error
deprive
defendant
substantive
procedural
right
law
entitles
defendant
sentencing
proceeding
fair
result
reliable
even
though
counsel
error
may
affected
outcome
williams
taylor
explained
even
though
fretwell
mechanically
apply
test
prejudice
reasoning
perfectly
consistent
strickland
fretwell
counsel
deprived
substantive
procedural
right
law
entitled
precedents
leave
doubt
answer
question
presented
observes
criminal
defendant
right
plea
bargain
ante
constitutional
right
plea
bargain
prosecutor
need
prefers
go
trial
weatherford
bursey
counsel
mistakes
case
thus
deprive
defendant
substantive
procedural
right
law
entitles
williams
supra
far
beside
point
ante
critical
correct
application
precedents
like
fretwell
case
concerns
unusual
circumstance
defendant
attempts
demonstrate
prejudice
based
considerations
matter
law
inform
inquiry
concurring
claims
might
denied
right
law
simply
recognize
strickland
fretwell
williams
instruct
pure
test
relies
erroneous
measure
cognizable
prejudice
ignoring
strickland
ultimate
focus
fundamental
fairness
proceeding
whose
result
challenged
lost
forest
trees
leading
accept
previously
rejected
novel
argument
constitutional
rights
infringed
trying
defendant
rather
accepting
plea
guilty
weatherford
supra
ii
novelty
alone
second
independent
reason
decision
wrong
case
arises
federal
habeas
hence
governed
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
aedpa
since
acknowledges
michigan
appeals
adjudicated
cooper
claim
merits
aedpa
bars
federal
courts
granting
habeas
relief
unless
decision
contrary
involved
unreasonable
application
clearly
established
federal
law
determined
yet
concludes
bar
relief
failing
apply
strickland
assess
claim
respondent
raised
state
adjudication
contrary
clearly
established
federal
law
ante
relevant
portion
michigan
appeals
decision
reads
follows
establish
ineffective
assistance
defendant
must
demonstrate
counsel
performance
fell
objective
standard
reasonableness
counsel
representation
prejudiced
defendant
deprived
fair
trial
respect
prejudice
aspect
test
defendant
must
demonstrate
reasonable
probability
counsel
errors
result
proceedings
different
attendant
proceedings
fundamentally
unfair
unreliable
defendant
challenges
trial
finding
ginther
hearing
defense
counsel
provided
effective
assistance
defendant
plea
bargaining
process
contends
defense
counsel
failed
convey
benefits
plea
offer
ignored
desire
plead
guilty
failures
led
reject
plea
offer
wishes
accept
however
record
shows
defendant
knowingly
intelligently
rejected
two
plea
offers
chose
go
trial
record
fails
support
defendant
contentions
defense
counsel
representation
ineffective
rejected
defense
based
claim
obtain
favorable
plea
bargain
defendant
people
cooper
mar
app
pet
cert
wl
per
curiam
citations
omitted
first
paragraph
far
ignoring
strickland
recites
standard
good
deal
accuracy
opinion
second
paragraph
presumably
application
standard
recited
first
says
defendant
knowingly
intelligently
rejected
two
plea
offers
chose
go
trial
regarded
denial
anything
fundamentally
unfair
cooper
conviction
sentence
strickland
prejudice
shown
hand
entire
second
paragraph
regarded
contention
cooper
claims
inadequate
representation
unsupported
record
state
analysis
admittedly
model
clarity
federal
habeas
corpus
guard
extreme
malfunctions
state
criminal
justice
systems
license
penalize
state
technique
harrington
richter
slip
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
readiness
find
error
michigan
opinion
inconsistent
presumption
state
courts
know
follow
law
woodford
visciotti
per
curiam
presumption
borne
state
recitation
correct
legal
standard
since
ambiguous
whether
state
holding
based
lack
prejudice
rather
factual
determination
deficient
performance
provide
relief
aedpa
must
conclude
holdings
unreasonable
applications
clearly
established
law
see
premo
moore
slip
first
impossible
since
never
held
defendant
cooper
position
establish
strickland
prejudice
sixth
circuit
thus
violated
aedpa
granting
habeas
relief
iii
impossible
conclude
discussion
today
extraordinary
opinion
without
commenting
upon
remedy
provides
unconstitutional
conviction
remedy
american
jurisprudence
willing
bet
jurisprudence
country
requires
michigan
reoffer
plea
agreement
rejected
bad
advice
counsel
ante
indeed
powerful
fact
cooper
acceptance
reoffered
agreement
conclusive
astoundingly
state
trial
exercise
discretion
determining
whether
vacate
convictions
resentence
respondent
pursuant
plea
agreement
vacate
convictions
resentence
respondent
accordingly
leave
convictions
sentence
trial
undisturbed
ibid
emphasis
added
one
might
ask
require
reoffer
plea
agreement
acceptance
defendant
district
finds
necessary
element
supposedly
strickland
prejudice
cooper
accepted
original
offer
thereby
avoided
trial
conviction
skip
minuet
simply
leave
discretion
state
trial
remedy
shall
answer
course
camouflage
trial
courts
regularly
accept
reject
plea
agreements
seems
nothing
extraordinary
accepting
rejecting
new
one
mandated
today
decision
acceptance
rejection
plea
agreement
status
whatever
constitution
worlds
apart
discretionary
specification
remedy
unconstitutional
criminal
conviction
sure
asserts
factors
bear
upon
presumably
limit
exercise
discretion
factors
prepared
specify
full
much
less
assign
determinative
weight
principles
elaborated
time
decisions
state
federal
courts
statutes
rules
rosy
view
sort
ante
find
extraordinary
statutes
rules
specify
remedy
criminal
defendant
unconstitutional
conviction
remedy
unconstitutional
conviction
ever
subject
trial
judge
discretion
finally
remedy
ever
include
remedy
suspect
squeamishness
fashioning
remedy
incoherence
comes
attributable
realization
deep
real
constitutional
violation
anyway
defendant
fairly
tried
lawfully
convicted
properly
sentenced
remedy
provided
nothing
undo
results
fair
adversarial
process
iv
many
perhaps
countries
world
plea
bargaining
forbidden
cases
serious
one
even
purpose
obtaining
testimony
enables
conviction
greater
malefactor
much
less
purpose
sparing
expense
trial
see
world
plea
bargaining
thaman
ed
europe
many
countries
adhere
aptly
call
legality
principle
requiring
prosecutors
charge
prosecutable
offenses
typically
incompatible
practice
see
xxii
langbein
land
without
plea
bargaining
germans
rev
describing
legalitätsprinzip
rule
compulsory
prosecution
germany
system
reflects
admirable
belief
law
law
break
pay
penalty
provided
plea
bargaining
today
regarded
necessary
evil
presents
grave
risks
prosecutorial
overcharging
effectively
compels
innocent
defendant
avoid
massive
risk
pleading
guilty
lesser
offense
guilty
defendants
often
perhaps
usually
results
sentence
well
law
prescribes
actual
crime
even
accept
plea
bargaining
many
believe
without
long
expensive
process
criminal
trial
sustain
burden
imposed
system
criminal
justice
grind
halt
see
alschuler
plea
bargaining
history
colum
rev
today
however
elevates
plea
bargaining
necessary
evil
constitutional
entitlement
longer
somewhat
embarrassing
adjunct
criminal
justice
system
rather
announces
companion
case
one
criminal
justice
system
frye
ante
quoting
approvingly
scott
thus
even
though
doubt
respondent
guilty
offense
charged
even
though
received
exorbitant
gold
standard
american
justice
criminal
trial
innumerable
constitutional
statutory
limitations
upon
evidence
prosecution
bring
forward
michigan
requirement
unanimous
guilty
verdict
impartial
jurors
says
conviction
invalid
deprived
constitutional
entitlement
less
saddened
outcome
case
says
attitude
toward
criminal
justice
today
embraces
theory
criminal
law
state
functions
like
conscientious
giving
player
fair
chance
beat
house
serve
less
time
law
says
deserves
player
excluded
tables
constitutional
rights
violated
subscribe
theory
one
least
justices
today
decision
upends
decades
cases
violates
federal
statute
opens
whole
new
boutique
constitutional
jurisprudence
law
without
even
specifying
remedies
boutique
offers
result
present
case
undoing
adjudicatory
process
worked
exactly
supposed
released
felon
anthony
cooper
shot
repeatedly
gravely
injured
woman
named
kali
mundy
tried
convicted
crimes
jury
peers
given
punishment
michigan
elected
representatives
deemed
appropriate
nothing
result
unfair
unconstitutional
contrary
wonderfully
infinitely
superior
today
opinion
affords
constitutional
status
respectfully
dissent
alito
dissenting
blaine
lafler
petitioner
anthony
cooper
writ
certiorari
appeals
sixth
circuit
march
justice
alito
dissenting
reasons
set
parts
ii
justice
scalia
dissent
holding
case
misapplies
case
law
violates
requirements
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
respondent
received
trial
free
identified
constitutional
error
result
basis
concluding
respondent
suffered
prejudice
certainly
granting
habeas
relief
weakness
analysis
highlighted
opaque
discussion
remedy
appropriate
plea
offer
rejected
due
defective
legal
representation
defendant
sixth
amendment
rights
violated
deficient
legal
advice
favorable
plea
offer
causes
opportunity
bargain
lost
logical
remedy
give
defendant
benefit
favorable
deal
remedy
cause
serious
injustice
many
instances
believe
tacitly
recognizes
therefore
eschews
logical
remedy
relies
lower
courts
exercise
sound
discretion
determining
done
time
tell
works
part
finds
unnecessary
define
boundaries
proper
discretion
today
opinion
ante
view
requiring
prosecution
renew
old
plea
offer
represent
abuse
discretion
least
two
circumstances
first
important
new
information
defendant
culpability
comes
light
offer
rejected
second
rejection
plea
offer
results
substantial
expenditure
scarce
prosecutorial
judicial
resources
lower
judges
must
implement
today
holding
may
hope
way
mitigates
potential
produce
unjust
results
depend
judges
come
rescue
interpretation
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
unsound
therefore
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
rather
addressing
constitutional
origins
right
effective
counsel
responds
broader
claim
raised
one
sole
purpose
sixth
amendment
protect
right
fair
trial
ante
emphasis
added
cf
brief
amicus
curiae
arguing
purpose
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
secure
fair
trial
emphasis
added
brief
petitioner
destroy
straw
man
cites
cases
violations
rights
right
effective
counsel
perplexingly
even
rights
found
outside
sixth
amendment
constitution
entirely
cured
subsequent
trial
vasquez
hillery
violation
equal
protection
grand
jury
selection
ballard
violation
statutory
scheme
providing
women
serve
juries
stirone
violation
fifth
amendment
right
indictment
grand
jury
unlike
right
effective
counsel
showing
prejudice
required
make
violations
rights
issue
vasquez
ballard
stirone
complete
see
vasquez
supra
iscrimination
grand
jury
undermines
structural
integrity
criminal
tribunal
amenable
review
ballard
supra
eversible
error
depend
showing
prejudice
individual
case
stirone
supra
deprivation
basic
right
far
serious
treated
nothing
variance
dismissed
harmless
error
cases
thus
irrelevant
question
presented
whether
defendant
establish
prejudice
strickland
washington
conceding
fairness
conviction
sentence
appeal
kimmelman
morrison
cited
ante
contradict
principle
case
predated
fretwell
williams
considered
whether
holding
fourth
amendment
claims
fully
litigated
state
raised
federal
habeas
extended
sixth
amendment
claims
ineffective
assistance
counsel
principal
allegation
manifestation
inadequate
representation
counsel
failure
file
timely
motion
suppress
evidence
allegedly
obtained
violation
fourth
amendment
negative
answer
question
nothing
issue
parties
kimmelman
raised
question
whether
admission
illegally
seized
reliable
evidence
ever
constitute
strickland
question
similar
one
presented
therefore
address
powell
concurring
judgment
see
also
kimmelman
made
clear
however
answer
question
determined
essence
claim
counsel
unprofessional
errors
upset
adversarial
balance
defense
prosecution
trial
rendered
unfair
verdict
rendered
suspect
emphasis
added
habeas
petitioners
prove
strickland
denied
fair
trial
granted
writ
emphasis
added
short
kimmelman
relevance
prove
opinion
wrong
see
people
cooks
lafave
israel
king
kerr
criminal
procedure
ed
supp