evenwel
et
al
abbott
governor
texas
et
argued
december
decided
april
principle
jurisdictions
must
design
legislative
districts
equal
populations
see
wesberry
sanders
reynolds
sims
context
state
local
legislative
districting
may
deviate
somewhat
perfect
population
equality
accommodate
traditional
districting
objectives
maximum
population
deviation
largest
smallest
district
less
state
local
legislative
map
presumptively
complies
rule
texas
like
uses
numbers
decennial
census
drawing
legislative
districts
census
texas
adopted
state
senate
map
maximum
deviation
safely
within
presumptively
permissible
range
however
measured
baseline
eligible
voters
registered
voters
map
maximum
population
deviation
exceeds
appellants
live
texas
senate
districts
particularly
large
populations
filed
suit
texas
governor
secretary
state
basing
apportionment
total
population
appellants
contended
dilutes
votes
relation
voters
senate
districts
violation
principle
equal
protection
clause
appellants
sought
injunction
barring
use
existing
senate
map
favor
map
equalize
voter
population
district
district
dismissed
complaint
failure
state
claim
relief
granted
held
constitutional
history
precedent
practice
demonstrate
state
locality
may
draw
legislative
districts
based
total
population
pp
constitutional
history
shows
time
founding
framers
endorsed
allocating
house
seats
based
total
population
debating
become
fourteenth
amendment
congress
reconsidered
proper
basis
apportioning
house
seats
retaining
rule
congress
rejected
proposals
allocate
house
seats
basis
voter
population
see
amdt
framers
recognized
use
baseline
served
principle
representational
equality
appellants
rule
inconsistent
theory
constitution
cong
globe
recognized
wesberry
underlying
method
allocating
house
seats
also
method
apportioning
legislative
seats
within
pp
past
decisions
reinforce
conclusion
localities
may
comply
principle
designing
districts
equal
total
populations
appellants
assert
language
precedent
supports
view
equalize
population
districts
every
sentence
appellants
quote
one
respond
line
casting
guarantee
terms
equality
representation
see
reynolds
moreover
reynolds
consistently
looked
figures
evaluating
whether
districting
maps
violate
equal
protection
clause
deviating
impermissibly
perfect
population
equality
pp
settled
practice
confirms
constitutional
history
prior
decisions
strongly
suggest
adopting
apportionment
constitutional
command
upset
approach
districting
countless
local
jurisdictions
long
followed
framers
constitution
fourteenth
amendment
comprehended
representatives
serve
residents
eligible
vote
nonvoters
important
stake
many
policy
debates
receiving
constituent
services
ensuring
representative
subject
requests
suggestions
number
constituents
apportionment
promotes
equitable
effective
representation
pp
constitutional
history
precedent
practice
reveal
infirmity
appellants
claim
need
resolve
whether
texas
argues
may
draw
districts
equalize
population
rather
total
population
affirmed
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
roberts
kennedy
breyer
sotomayor
kagan
joined
thomas
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
alito
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
thomas
joined
except
part
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
sue
evenwel
et
appellants
greg
abbott
governor
texas
et
al
appeal
district
western
district
texas
april
justice
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
texas
like
draws
legislative
districts
basis
total
population
texas
voters
challenge
uniform
method
districting
ground
produces
districts
measured
population
population
total
population
urge
must
used
ensure
votes
devalued
relation
citizens
votes
districts
hold
based
constitutional
history
decisions
longstanding
practice
state
may
draw
legislative
districts
based
total
population
long
resisted
role
overseeing
process
draw
legislative
districts
remedy
unfairness
districting
held
secure
state
legislatures
apportion
invoke
ample
powers
congress
colegrove
green
courts
enter
political
thicket
justice
frankfurter
put
ibid
judicial
abstention
left
pervasive
malapportionment
unchecked
opening
half
century
massive
population
shift
away
rural
areas
toward
suburban
urban
communities
nevertheless
many
ran
elections
early
based
maps
drawn
equalize
district
population
composed
around
used
maps
allocating
certain
number
legislators
county
regardless
population
schemes
left
many
rural
districts
significantly
underpopulated
comparison
urban
suburban
districts
rural
legislators
benefited
malapportionment
scant
incentive
adopt
new
maps
might
put
office
confronted
ingrained
structural
baker
carr
case
presented
equal
protection
challenge
tennessee
map
redrawn
since
see
also
observing
meantime
substantial
growth
redistribution
state
population
rather
steering
clear
political
thicket
yet
held
first
time
malapportionment
claims
justiciable
conclude
complaint
allegations
denial
equal
protection
present
justiciable
constitutional
cause
action
upon
appellants
entitled
trial
although
baker
reach
merits
equal
protection
claim
baker
justiciability
ruling
set
stage
came
known
principle
two
years
baker
sanders
invalidated
georgia
malapportioned
congressional
map
population
one
congressional
district
two
three
times
larger
population
others
relying
article
constitution
required
congressional
districts
drawn
equal
populations
later
term
reynolds
sims
upheld
equal
protection
challenge
alabama
malapportioned
maps
equal
protection
clause
concluded
requires
seats
houses
bicameral
state
legislature
must
apportioned
population
basis
ibid
wesberry
reynolds
together
instructed
jurisdictions
must
design
congressional
districts
equal
populations
must
regularly
reapportion
districts
prevent
ensuing
decades
several
times
elaborated
scope
rule
must
draw
congressional
districts
populations
close
perfect
equality
possible
see
kirkpatrick
preisler
drawing
state
local
legislative
districts
jurisdictions
permitted
deviate
somewhat
perfect
population
equality
accommodate
traditional
districting
objectives
among
preserving
integrity
political
subdivisions
maintaining
communities
interest
creating
geographic
compactness
see
brown
thomson
maximum
population
deviation
largest
smallest
district
less
held
state
local
legislative
map
presumptively
complies
rule
maximum
deviations
presumptively
impermissible
ibid
see
also
mahan
howell
approving
map
maximum
population
deviation
accommodate
state
interest
maintaining
integrity
political
subdivision
lines
cautioning
deviation
may
well
approach
tolerable
limits
contrast
repeated
disputes
permissibility
deviating
perfect
population
equality
little
controversy
centered
population
base
jurisdictions
must
equalize
rare
occasions
jurisdictions
relied
populations
districts
see
burns
richardson
holding
hawaii
use
population
base
hawaii
special
population
problems
particular
substantial
temporary
military
population
overwhelming
majority
cases
jurisdictions
equalized
total
population
measured
decennial
census
today
use
numbers
census
designing
congressional
districts
seven
adjust
census
numbers
meaningful
appellants
challenge
consensus
census
texas
redrew
state
senate
districts
using
baseline
time
texas
subject
preclearance
requirements
voting
rights
act
requiring
jurisdictions
receive
approval
department
justice
district
district
columbia
implementing
certain
voting
changes
became
clear
new
senate
map
receive
preclearance
advance
elections
district
western
district
texas
drew
interim
senate
map
also
equalized
total
population
district
see
davis
perry
direct
appeal
observed
district
failed
take
guidance
state
recently
enacted
plan
drafting
interim
plan
therefore
vacated
district
map
perry
perez
per
curiam
slip
district
remand
used
census
data
draw
districts
included
roughly
size
total
population
texas
used
new
interim
map
elections
texas
legislature
adopted
permanent
senate
map
see
app
brief
texas
senate
hispanic
caucus
et
al
amici
curiae
reproducing
current
senate
map
permanent
map
maximum
deviation
safely
within
presumptively
permissible
range
measured
baseline
eligible
voters
registered
voters
map
maximum
population
deviation
exceeds
appellants
sue
evenwel
edward
pfenninger
live
texas
senate
districts
one
four
respectively
particularly
large
populations
contending
basing
apportionment
total
population
dilutes
votes
relation
voters
senate
districts
violation
principle
equal
protection
appellants
filed
suit
district
western
district
texas
named
defendants
governor
secretary
state
texas
sought
permanent
injunction
barring
use
existing
senate
map
favor
map
equalize
voter
population
district
case
referred
district
hearing
decision
see
shapiro
mcmanus
slip
dismissed
complaint
failure
state
claim
relief
granted
appellants
district
explained
rel
upon
theory
never
accepted
circuit
metric
apportionment
employed
texas
total
population
results
unconstitutional
apportionment
achieve
equality
measured
plaintiffs
chosen
metric
voter
population
app
juris
statement
decisions
district
concluded
permit
jurisdictions
use
neutral
nondiscriminatory
population
baseline
including
total
population
drawing
state
local
legislative
districts
noted
probable
jurisdiction
affirm
ii
parties
advance
different
positions
case
district
appellants
insist
equal
protection
clause
requires
jurisdictions
draw
state
local
legislative
districts
equal
populations
thus
protecting
voter
equality
right
eligible
voters
equal
vote
brief
appellants
comply
proposed
rule
appellants
suggest
jurisdictions
design
districts
based
cvap
data
census
bureau
american
community
survey
acs
annual
statistical
sample
population
texas
responds
jurisdictions
may
consistent
equal
protection
clause
design
districts
using
population
baseline
including
total
population
population
long
choice
rational
invidiously
discriminatory
although
use
data
census
permissible
texas
therefore
argues
used
acs
cvap
data
instead
sharing
texas
position
equal
protection
clause
mandate
use
population
urges
us
address
texas
separate
assertion
constitution
allows
use
alternative
population
baselines
including
population
equalizing
total
population
maintains
vindicates
principle
representational
equality
ensur
ing
voters
district
power
elect
representative
represents
number
constituents
representatives
brief
amicus
curiae
agreement
texas
reject
appellants
attempt
locate
mandate
equal
protection
clause
history
precedent
practice
demonstrate
plainly
permissible
jurisdictions
measure
equalization
total
population
state
local
legislative
districts
begin
constitutional
history
time
founding
framers
confronted
question
analogous
one
issue
basis
congressional
districts
allocated
framers
solution
known
great
compromise
provide
state
number
seats
senate
allocate
house
seats
based
total
populations
representatives
direct
taxes
wrote
shall
apportioned
among
several
may
included
within
union
according
respective
numbers
art
cl
emphasis
added
fundamental
principle
proposed
constitution
james
madison
explained
federalist
papers
aggregate
number
representatives
allotted
several
founded
aggregate
number
inhabitants
right
choosing
allotted
number
state
exercised
part
inhabitants
state
may
designate
federalist
carey
mcclellan
eds
words
basis
representation
house
include
inhabitants
although
slaves
counted
person
even
though
remained
free
deny
many
inhabitants
right
participate
selection
endorsing
apportionment
based
total
population
alexander
hamilton
declared
truer
principle
every
individual
large
equal
right
protection
government
records
federal
convention
farrand
ed
debating
fourteenth
amendment
congress
reconsidered
proper
basis
apportioning
house
seats
concerned
southern
willingly
enfranchise
freed
slaves
aware
slave
freedom
swell
state
population
purposes
representation
house
one
person
rather
framers
fourteenth
amendment
considered
length
possibility
allocating
house
seats
basis
voter
population
sneed
footprints
rocks
mountain
account
enactment
fourteenth
amendment
see
also
apportionment
issue
consumed
time
fourteenth
amendment
debates
december
thaddeus
stevens
leader
radical
republicans
introduced
constitutional
amendment
allocated
house
seats
according
respective
legal
voters
addition
proposed
amendment
mandated
true
census
legal
voters
shall
taken
time
regular
census
cong
globe
supporters
apportionment
based
voter
population
employed
reasoning
appellants
echo
see
remarks
orth
true
principle
representation
congress
voters
alone
form
basis
voter
equal
political
weight
government
remarks
lawrence
use
total
population
disregards
fundamental
idea
representation
every
voter
equal
political
power
union
apportionment
proponents
encountered
fierce
resistance
proponents
apportionment
much
opposition
grounded
principle
representational
equality
abstract
proposition
argued
representative
james
blaine
leading
critic
allocating
house
seats
based
voter
population
one
deny
population
true
basis
representation
women
children
classes
may
vital
interest
legislation
country
actually
deposit
ballot
see
also
remarks
conkling
arguing
use
basis
shut
four
fifths
citizens
country
women
children
citizens
taxed
always
represented
remarks
ward
hat
becomes
large
class
found
every
section
matter
represented
certainly
enumerated
making
whole
number
entitled
product
debates
fourteenth
amendment
retained
total
population
congressional
apportionment
base
see
amdt
representatives
shall
apportioned
among
several
according
respective
numbers
counting
whole
number
persons
state
excluding
indians
introducing
final
version
amendment
senate
floor
senator
jacob
howard
explained
basis
representation
numbers
whole
population
except
untaxed
indians
persons
excluded
state
laws
rebellion
crime
committee
adopted
numbers
satisfactory
basis
principle
upon
constitution
originally
framed
basis
representation
depend
upon
numbers
think
safest
secure
principle
upon
government
rest
numbers
voters
numbers
property
theory
constitution
cong
globe
appellants
ask
us
find
fourteenth
amendment
equal
protection
clause
rule
inconsistent
theory
constitution
recognized
wesberry
theory
underlies
method
allocating
house
seats
applies
well
method
apportioning
legislative
seats
within
debates
constitutional
convention
explained
make
least
one
fact
abundantly
clear
delegates
agreed
house
represent
intended
allocating
congressmen
number
assigned
state
determined
solely
number
inhabitants
may
possible
draw
congressional
districts
mathematical
precision
acknowledged
excuse
ignoring
constitution
plain
objective
making
equal
representation
equal
numbers
people
fundamental
goal
house
representatives
emphasis
added
fourteenth
amendment
calls
apportionment
congressional
districts
based
total
population
simultaneously
prohibits
apportioning
legislative
districts
basis
cordoning
constitutional
history
congressional
districting
appellants
stress
two
first
draw
distinction
allocating
seats
apportioning
seats
within
framers
selected
total
population
former
appellants
amici
argue
federalism
concerns
inapposite
districting
concerns
included
perceived
risk
base
might
encourage
expand
franchise
unwisely
hope
base
might
counter
incentive
undercount
populations
thereby
reducing
share
direct
taxes
wesberry
however
rejected
distinction
appellants
press
see
supra
even
without
weight
wesberry
find
appellants
distinction
unconvincing
one
accept
federalism
justice
alito
emphasizes
partisan
regional
political
advantage
see
post
figured
framers
selection
total
population
basis
allocating
congressional
seats
even
remains
beyond
doubt
principle
representational
equality
figured
prominently
decision
count
people
whether
qualify
second
appellants
justice
alito
urge
see
post
typically
refused
analogize
features
federal
electoral
system
constitutional
scheme
governing
congressional
apportionment
considering
challenges
state
local
election
laws
true
reynolds
rejected
alabama
argument
permissibly
modeled
state
senate
apportionment
scheme
one
senator
county
senate
federal
analogy
explained
inapposite
irrelevant
state
legislative
districting
schemes
system
representation
two
houses
federal
congress
arose
unique
historical
circumstances
likewise
gray
sanders
georgia
unsuccessfully
attempted
defend
analogy
electoral
college
scheme
assigning
certain
number
units
winner
county
statewide
elections
reynolds
gray
however
involved
features
federal
electoral
system
contravene
principles
voter
representational
equality
favor
interests
relevance
outside
federal
context
senate
seats
allocated
equal
basis
respect
state
sovereignty
increase
odds
smaller
ratify
constitution
see
wesberry
describing
history
great
compromise
see
also
reynolds
political
subdivisions
counties
cities
whatever
never
never
considered
sovereign
entities
relationship
federal
government
hardly
less
electoral
college
created
permit
members
community
choose
executive
nation
whose
continental
dimensions
thought
preclude
informed
choice
citizenry
large
williams
rhodes
harlan
concurring
result
see
also
gray
inclusion
electoral
college
constitution
result
specific
historical
concerns
validated
collegiate
principle
despite
inherent
numerical
inequality
omitted
contrast
earlier
developed
constitutional
scheme
congressional
apportionment
rests
part
representational
concerns
exist
regarding
state
local
legislative
districting
framers
answer
apportionment
question
congressional
context
therefore
undermines
appellants
contention
districts
must
based
voter
population
consistent
constitutional
history
past
decisions
reinforce
conclusion
localities
may
comply
principle
designing
districts
equal
total
populations
quoting
language
decisions
appellants
view
supports
principle
equal
voting
power
emphasizing
phrase
appellants
contend
mind
constantly
meant
equalize
population
districts
see
reynolds
individual
right
vote
state
legislators
unconstitutionally
impaired
weight
substantial
fashion
diluted
compared
votes
citizens
living
parts
state
gray
concept
people
constitution
visualizes
preferred
class
voters
equality
among
meet
basic
see
also
hadley
junior
college
dist
metropolitan
kansas
city
hen
members
elected
body
chosen
separate
districts
district
must
established
basis
insure
far
practicable
equal
numbers
voters
vote
proportionally
equal
numbers
appellants
however
extract
far
much
selectively
chosen
language
slogan
every
sentence
appellants
quote
opinions
one
respond
line
casting
guarantee
terms
equality
representation
voter
equality
reynolds
instance
described
fundamental
principle
representative
government
country
one
equal
representation
equal
numbers
people
see
also
davis
bandemer
formulating
one
person
one
vote
formula
characterized
question
posed
election
districts
disparate
size
issue
fair
representation
reynolds
rejecting
state
districting
schemes
give
number
representatives
unequal
numbers
constituents
suggested
repeatedly
districting
based
total
population
serves
state
interest
preventing
vote
dilution
interest
ensuring
equality
representation
see
board
estimate
city
new
york
morris
districts
widely
unequal
population
elect
equal
number
representatives
voting
power
citizen
larger
constituencies
debased
citizens
districts
smaller
share
representation
smaller
see
also
kirkpatrick
recognizing
case
qual
representation
equal
numbers
people
principle
designed
prevent
debasement
voting
power
diminution
access
elected
representatives
moreover
reynolds
consistently
looked
figures
evaluating
whether
districting
maps
violate
equal
protection
clause
deviating
impermissibly
perfect
population
equality
see
brief
appellees
collecting
cases
brought
equal
protection
clause
see
also
collecting
cases
appellants
point
instance
determined
permissibility
deviation
based
data
hardly
make
sense
mandated
voter
equality
sub
silentio
used
baseline
evaluate
compliance
rule
likely
think
always
assumed
permissibility
drawing
districts
equalize
total
population
appellants
counter
distribution
voting
population
generally
deviate
distribution
total
population
degree
necessary
raise
issue
brief
appellants
support
assertion
appellants
cite
district
decision
found
significant
deviation
distribution
voter
total
population
densely
populated
areas
new
york
state
wmca
lomenzo
supp
sdny
aff
per
curiam
assumed
equivalence
national
scale
likely
said
instead
gaffney
cummings
acknowledged
voters
may
distributed
unevenly
within
jurisdictions
weight
person
vote
matters
observed
total
population
even
stable
accurately
taken
may
actually
reflect
body
voters
whose
votes
must
counted
weighed
purposes
reapportionment
persons
voters
nonetheless
gaffney
recognized
rule
designed
facilitate
air
effective
representation
evaluated
compliance
rule
based
total
population
alone
constitutional
history
prior
decisions
strongly
suggest
settled
practice
confirms
adopting
apportionment
constitutional
command
upset
approach
districting
countless
local
jurisdictions
followed
decades
even
centuries
appellants
shown
reason
disturb
longstanding
use
total
population
see
walz
tax
city
new
york
unbroken
practice
followed
openly
affirmative
state
action
covertly
state
inaction
something
lightly
cast
aside
see
also
burson
freeman
plurality
opinion
upholding
law
limiting
campaigning
areas
around
polling
places
part
maintain
laws
widespread
consensus
legislation
order
serves
important
state
interests
framers
constitution
fourteenth
amendment
comprehended
representatives
serve
residents
eligible
registered
vote
see
supra
nonvoters
important
stake
many
policy
debates
children
parents
even
grandparents
example
stake
strong
system
receiving
constituent
services
help
navigating
bureaucracies
ensuring
representative
subject
requests
suggestions
number
constituents
apportionment
promotes
equitable
effective
representation
see
mccormick
serving
constituents
supporting
legislation
benefit
district
individuals
groups
therein
everyday
business
legislator
sum
rule
appellants
urge
mooring
equal
protection
clause
texas
senate
map
therefore
conclude
complies
requirements
history
precedent
practice
suffice
reveal
infirmity
appellants
claims
need
resolve
whether
texas
argues
may
draw
districts
equalize
population
rather
total
population
reasons
stated
judgment
district
western
district
texas
affirmed
thomas
concurring
judgment
sue
evenwel
et
appellants
greg
abbott
governor
texas
et
al
appeal
district
western
district
texas
april
justice
thomas
concurring
judgment
case
concerns
whether
texas
violated
equal
protection
clause
interpreted
cases
creating
legislative
districts
contain
approximately
equal
total
population
vary
widely
number
eligible
voters
district
agree
majority
precedents
require
state
equalize
total
number
voters
district
may
opt
equalize
total
population
therefore
concur
majority
judgment
appellants
challenge
fails
write
separately
never
provided
sound
basis
principle
years
struggled
define
right
principle
protects
many
precedents
suggest
protects
right
eligible
voters
cast
votes
receive
equal
weight
despite
frequent
explanation
precedents
often
conclude
equal
protection
clause
satisfied
individuals
within
district
voters
equal
share
representation
majority
today
concedes
cases
produced
clear
answer
point
see
ante
view
majority
failed
provide
sound
basis
principle
basis
exists
constitution
prescribe
one
basis
apportionment
within
instead
leaves
significant
leeway
apportioning
districts
equalize
total
population
equalize
eligible
voters
promote
principle
consistent
republican
form
government
majority
recognize
futility
choosing
one
options
constitution
leaves
choice
people
alone
decided
equal
protection
clause
requires
draw
legislative
districts
based
rule
decisions
never
coalesced
around
single
theory
must
equalize
equal
protection
clause
prohibits
state
deny
ing
person
within
jurisdiction
equal
protection
laws
amdt
nearly
century
ratification
interpreted
clause
application
politically
charged
issue
apportion
populations
political
districts
see
colegrove
green
plurality
opinion
instead
left
drawing
political
boundaries
long
state
deprive
people
right
vote
reasons
prohibited
constitution
see
gomillion
lightfoot
finding
justiciable
claim
city
boundary
redrawn
square
shape
strangely
irregular
figure
remove
nearly
black
voters
city
meant
state
refusal
allocate
voters
within
districts
based
population
changes
matter
federal
courts
decide
cases
part
larger
jurisprudence
holding
question
whether
state
government
proper
republican
form
rested
congress
pacific
telephone
telegraph
oregon
changed
course
baker
carr
locating
equal
protection
clause
right
citizens
votes
expanding
decision
later
held
equal
protection
clause
requires
seats
houses
bicameral
state
legislature
must
apportioned
population
basis
reynolds
sims
created
analogous
requirement
congressional
redistricting
rooted
article
requirement
representatives
chosen
people
several
wesberry
sanders
rules
established
cases
come
known
one
person
one
vote
since
baker
empowered
federal
courts
resolve
redistricting
disputes
struggled
explain
whether
principle
ensures
equality
among
eligible
voters
instead
protects
broader
right
every
citizen
equal
representation
lack
clarity
point
turn
left
unclear
whether
must
equalize
number
eligible
voters
across
districts
total
population
number
cases
said
must
protect
right
eligible
voters
votes
receive
equal
weight
view
one
way
comply
principle
must
draw
districts
contain
substantially
equal
number
eligible
voters
per
district
seminal
decision
baker
exemplifies
view
decided
baker
involved
failure
tennessee
legislature
reapportion
districts
years
since
tennessee
last
apportionment
state
population
grown
million
residents
million
number
voters
district
changed
significantly
time
producing
widely
varying
voting
populations
district
facts
held
reapportionment
claims
justiciable
plaintiffs
claimed
eligible
voters
alleged
debasement
votes
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
similarly
emphasized
equal
treatment
eligible
voters
gray
sanders
case
involved
challenge
georgia
county
unit
system
voting
system
used
state
democratic
party
nominate
candidates
primary
gave
county
two
votes
every
representative
county
lower
house
general
assembly
voting
done
county
winner
county
taking
county
votes
democratic
party
nominee
candidate
votes
person
individual
votes
effect
system
give
heavier
weight
rural
ballots
urban
ones
held
system
violated
principle
holding
emphasized
right
issue
belongs
qualified
voters
right
one
vote
counted
protected
dilution
applying
principle
state
legislative
districts
also
emphasized
vote
dilution
also
supports
notion
principle
ensures
equality
among
eligible
voters
notably
reynolds
case
alabama
failed
reapportion
state
legislature
decades
resulting
ratios
state
senate
house
explaining
alabama
failure
reapportion
violated
equal
protection
clause
stated
individual
right
vote
state
legislators
unconstitutionally
impaired
weight
substantial
fashion
diluted
compared
votes
citizens
living
parts
state
decisions
likewise
define
principle
terms
eligible
voters
thus
imply
allocating
districts
eligible
voters
mind
suggested
much
hadley
junior
college
dist
metropolitan
kansas
city
case
involved
missouri
system
permitting
separate
school
districts
establish
joint
junior
college
district
six
trustees
oversee
joint
district
apportioned
basis
relative
numbers
children
subsidiary
district
held
plan
violated
equal
protection
clause
trustees
junior
college
district
must
apportioned
manner
deprive
voter
right
vote
given
much
weight
far
practicable
voter
junior
college
district
holding
emphasized
reynolds
called
attention
prior
cases
indicating
qualified
voter
constitutional
right
vote
elections
without
vote
wrongfully
denied
debased
diluted
hadley
see
contrast
aspiration
giving
equal
treatment
eligible
voters
also
expressed
different
understanding
principle
several
cases
suggested
protects
interests
individuals
district
whether
eligible
voters
reynolds
example
said
fundamental
principle
representative
government
country
one
equal
representation
equal
numbers
people
see
also
ante
collecting
cases
view
comply
equal
protection
clause
equalizing
number
eligible
voters
district
must
instead
equalize
total
population
per
district
line
view
generally
focused
total
population
total
number
voters
determining
state
compliance
requirement
gaffney
cummings
example
upheld
state
legislative
districts
maximum
deviation
measured
basis
contrast
chapman
meier
struck
reapportionment
total
deviation
based
total
population
plan
view
failed
achieve
goal
population
equality
little
de
minimis
variation
lack
clarity
redistricting
cases
left
little
guidance
political
institutions
must
structured
although
required
state
legislative
districts
apportioned
population
basis
reynolds
supra
yet
tell
whether
limited
choosing
relevant
population
must
equally
distribute
chen
houston
thomas
dissenting
denial
certiorari
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
provided
firm
account
must
districting
left
guess
much
flexibility
use
different
methods
apportionment
ii
inconsistency
opacity
merely
consequence
equivocal
statements
one
person
one
vote
problem
fundamental
simply
way
make
principled
choice
interpreting
one
person
one
vote
protecting
eligible
voters
protecting
total
inhabitants
within
state
though
theories
noble
constitution
make
either
exclusive
means
apportionment
state
local
representatives
guaranteeing
republican
form
government
art
iv
constitution
resolve
whether
ultimate
basis
representation
right
citizens
cast
equal
ballot
right
inhabitants
equal
representation
constitution
instead
reserves
matters
people
majority
attempt
today
divine
single
apportionment
based
representation
ante
quoting
cong
globe
rests
flawed
reading
history
wrongly
picks
one
side
debate
framers
resolve
constitution
constitution
lacks
single
comprehensive
theory
representation
framers
understood
tension
majority
rule
protecting
fundamental
rights
majorities
understanding
led
mixed
constitutional
structure
embrace
single
theory
representation
instead
struck
compromise
sought
equitable
system
representation
concerned
majority
abuse
plenary
control
public
policy
madison
wrote
dependence
people
doubt
primary
controul
government
experience
taught
mankind
necessity
auxiliary
precautions
federalist
cooke
ed
theory
constitution
framers
therefore
made
difficult
compromises
apportionment
federal
representation
prescribe
one
theory
divide
legislatures
view
framers
ultimate
political
power
derives
citizens
created
equal
declaration
independence
beliefs
equality
representation
extension
majority
rule
influenced
constitutional
structure
years
revolution
framing
framers
experimented
different
ways
securing
political
system
improper
influence
electoral
safeguards
representational
system
critical
equality
representation
wood
creation
american
republic
wood
framers
preference
apportionment
representation
majority
rule
driven
partially
belief
citizens
inherently
equal
system
citizens
equal
legislature
equal
representation
equal
interests
among
people
equal
interests
assembly
thoughts
government
works
john
adams
adams
ed
british
parliament
fell
short
goal
addition
hereditary
nobility
half
members
democratic
house
commons
elected
sparsely
populated
districts
rotten
boroughs
wood
baker
frankfurter
dissenting
framers
preference
majority
rule
also
reaction
shortcomings
articles
confederation
articles
state
cast
one
vote
regardless
population
congress
act
assent
nine
articles
confederation
art
ix
cl
art
art
xi
system
proved
undesirable
small
ability
paralyze
national
legislature
see
federalist
hamilton
consequently
topic
dividing
representation
came
constitutional
convention
framers
advocated
proportional
representation
throughout
national
legislature
records
federal
convention
pp
farrand
ed
alexander
hamilton
voiced
concerns
unfairness
allowing
minority
rule
majority
explaining
convention
opposed
giving
equal
vote
national
legislature
hamilton
asked
rhetorically
three
contain
majority
inhabitants
america
governed
minority
see
also
federalist
hamilton
objecting
supermajoritarian
voting
requirements
allow
entrenched
minority
controul
opinion
majority
respecting
best
mode
conducting
public
business
james
madison
opined
general
government
needed
direct
mandate
people
federal
power
immediately
derived
people
proportion
numbers
according
madison
federal
government
weak
congress
articles
confederation
records
federal
convention
many
ways
constitution
reflects
preference
majority
rule
pass
congress
ordinary
legislation
requires
simple
majority
present
members
vote
favor
features
apportionment
house
representatives
reflected
idea
wield
political
power
approximate
proportion
number
inhabitants
ante
thus
equal
representation
equal
numbers
people
ante
internal
quotation
marks
emphasis
omitted
features
prominently
representatives
apportioned
among
features
constitution
reflect
preference
members
founding
generation
equality
representation
explained
single
theory
constitution
framers
also
understood
unchecked
majorities
lead
tyranny
majority
result
many
viewed
antidemocratic
checks
indispensable
republican
government
included
among
antidemocratic
checks
legislatures
deviated
perfect
equality
representation
framers
believed
proper
government
promoted
common
good
conceived
good
objective
inherently
coextensive
majoritarian
preferences
see
federalist
hamilton
defining
common
good
public
good
true
interests
community
madison
permanent
aggregate
interests
community
government
promote
common
good
simply
obey
majority
see
ibid
discussing
majoritarian
factions
government
must
also
protect
fundamental
rights
see
declaration
independence
blackstone
commentaries
principal
aim
society
protect
individuals
enjoyment
absolute
rights
vested
immutable
laws
nature
particular
concern
framers
majority
people
violating
property
rights
minority
madison
observed
common
durable
source
factions
various
unequal
distribution
property
federalist
poignant
example
occurred
massachusetts
became
known
shays
rebellion
armed
debtors
attempted
block
legal
actions
creditors
recover
debts
although
rebellion
ultimately
put
debtors
sought
relief
state
legislatures
auspices
constitutional
forms
letter
james
madison
thomas
jefferson
apr
papers
thomas
jefferson
boyd
ed
see
wood
structural
political
checks
democratic
lawmaking
creditors
found
rights
jeopardized
state
laws
relieving
debtors
obligation
pay
authorizing
forms
payment
devalued
contracts
mcconnell
contract
rights
property
rights
case
study
relationship
individual
liberties
constitutional
structures
cal
rev
see
also
fletcher
peck
cranch
marshall
explaining
contract
clause
came
framers
desire
shield
property
effects
sudden
strong
passions
men
exposed
framers
concerns
placing
unchecked
power
political
majorities
constitution
majoritarian
provisions
part
complex
republican
structure
framers
also
placed
several
antidemocratic
provisions
constitution
original
constitution
permitted
direct
election
representatives
art
cl
senators
president
selected
indirectly
see
art
cl
art
ii
cls
great
compromise
guaranteed
large
small
voting
equality
senate
malapportioning
senate
framers
prevented
large
outvoting
small
adopt
policies
advance
large
interests
expense
small
see
federalist
madison
countermajoritarian
measures
reflect
framers
aspirations
promoting
competing
goals
rejecting
hereditary
class
system
thought
political
power
resided
people
time
sought
check
majority
rule
promote
common
good
mitigate
threats
fundamental
rights
framers
understood
designing
government
fulfill
conflicting
tasks
respecting
fundamental
equality
persons
promoting
common
good
requires
making
incommensurable
tradeoffs
reason
attempt
restrict
one
form
government
instead
constitution
broadly
required
maintain
republican
form
government
art
iv
framers
otherwise
left
make
tradeoffs
reconcile
competing
goals
republican
governments
promote
common
good
placing
power
hands
people
curtailing
majority
ability
invade
minority
fundamental
rights
framers
recognized
universal
formula
accomplishing
goals
framing
many
state
legislatures
bicameral
often
reflecting
multiple
theories
representation
ix
original
thirteen
based
representation
houses
state
legislatures
population
hayden
false
promise
one
person
one
vote
rev
common
base
representation
least
part
state
political
subdivisions
even
subdivisions
varied
heavily
populations
wood
baker
frankfurter
dissenting
reflecting
history
constitution
continued
afford
significant
leeway
structuring
republican
governments
framing
republican
referred
lacing
government
people
republick
state
power
lodged
one
johnson
dictionary
english
language
ed
see
also
federalist
madison
may
define
republic
least
may
bestow
name
government
derives
powers
directly
indirectly
great
body
people
administered
persons
holding
offices
pleasure
limited
period
good
behaviour
requiring
republican
governments
constitution
prohibited
monarchies
aristocracies
see
argue
constitution
also
prohibited
adopting
direct
democracies
compare
wood
republicanism
equated
democracy
amar
america
constitution
biography
arguing
provision
prohibited
monarchies
aristocracies
direct
democracy
see
also
federalist
madison
distinguishing
democracy
republic
beyond
however
constitution
left
matters
open
people
decide
constitution
says
nothing
type
republican
government
must
follow
framers
wanted
deny
powers
state
governments
explicitly
see
art
cl
state
shall
pass
bill
attainder
ex
post
facto
law
law
impairing
obligation
contracts
none
reconstruction
amendments
changed
original
understanding
republican
government
amendments
brought
blacks
within
existing
american
political
community
fourteenth
amendment
pressured
adopt
universal
male
suffrage
reducing
noncomplying
state
representation
congress
amdt
fifteenth
amendment
prohibited
restricting
right
suffrage
based
race
amdt
far
amendments
went
justice
harlan
explained
reynolds
neither
amendment
provides
theory
much
weight
vote
must
receive
require
state
apportion
houses
legislature
solely
population
basis
see
dissenting
opinion
justice
alito
quite
convincingly
demonstrates
majority
errs
reading
theory
equal
representation
apportionment
provision
fourteenth
amendment
see
post
opinion
concurring
judgment
attempt
impose
political
theory
upon
produced
morass
problems
problems
antithetical
values
framers
embraced
constitution
problems
confirm
wrong
entangle
political
process
first
embracing
one
person
one
vote
arrogated
judiciary
important
value
judgments
constitution
reserves
people
reynolds
example
proclaimed
egislators
represent
people
trees
acres
egislators
elected
voters
farms
cities
economic
interests
accordingly
electoral
districts
must
roughly
equal
population
explained
constitution
permits
impose
view
beyond
reynolds
assertions
driven
belief
single
correct
answer
question
much
voting
strength
individual
citizen
assertions
overlook
control
factions
legislate
common
good
individual
voting
strength
must
sometimes
yield
countermajoritarian
checks
principle
less
force
within
federal
system
see
federalist
madison
recognizing
smaller
republics
individual
prone
capture
special
interests
instead
large
versus
small
interests
may
pit
urban
areas
versus
rural
manufacturing
versus
agriculture
property
versus
without
cf
reynolds
supra
harlan
dissenting
single
method
reconciling
competing
interests
role
calibrate
democracy
vain
search
optimum
solution
government
argues
apportioning
legislators
metric
total
population
risks
rendering
residents
country
ineligible
unwilling
unable
vote
invisible
irrelevant
system
representative
democracy
brief
amicus
curiae
argument
rests
faulty
premise
system
representative
democracy
requires
specific
groups
representation
specific
manner
explained
constitution
impose
requirement
see
parts
supra
recently
reminded
us
free
serve
democracy
arizona
state
legislature
arizona
independent
redistricting
slip
laboratory
extends
experimenting
nature
democracy
second
efforts
monitor
political
process
failed
provide
consistent
guidance
even
justifiable
enforce
principle
majority
rule
unable
principled
manner
precedents
address
myriad
ways
minorities
fleeting
majorities
entrench
political
system
place
policy
choices
constitutions
supermajoritarian
voting
rules
legislative
assembly
see
art
constitutionalizing
public
employee
pensions
ill
art
vii
requiring
vote
general
assembly
certain
local
ordinances
theory
course
seem
make
difference
state
legislature
unresponsive
majority
residents
state
assembly
requires
vote
pass
bill
population
elects
representatives
far
constitution
concerned
single
correct
way
design
republican
government
republic
reconcile
giving
power
people
diminishing
influence
special
interests
wisdom
framers
recognized
dilemma
left
people
resolve
trying
impose
theory
democracy
hopelessly
adrift
amid
political
theory
politics
guiding
legal
principles
iii
case
illustrates
confusion
cases
wrought
parties
government
offer
three
positions
cases
require
equalize
appellants
view
fourteenth
amendment
protects
right
equal
vote
brief
appellants
appellees
contrast
argue
fourteenth
amendment
protects
invidious
discrimination
view
discrimination
occurs
rational
basis
population
base
select
even
base
leaves
eligible
voters
malapportioned
brief
appellees
solicitor
general
suggests
reapportionment
total
population
permissible
standard
reynolds
recognized
right
equal
representation
equal
numbers
people
brief
amicus
curiae
although
majority
choose
among
theories
necessarily
denies
equal
protection
clause
protects
right
cast
equally
weighted
ballot
prevail
appellants
deny
importance
equal
representation
equalize
total
population
total
voting
power
within
districts
show
right
cast
equally
weighted
vote
part
right
recognized
majority
declines
find
right
equal
protection
clause
ante
rather
majority
acknowledges
every
sentence
appellants
quote
opinions
establishing
right
equal
vote
one
respond
line
casting
guarantee
terms
equality
representation
voter
equality
ante
precedents
consistent
appellants
position
constitutionally
available
choice
allocate
districts
equalize
eligible
voters
majority
concludes
appellants
challenge
fails
ante
agree
majority
ultimate
disposition
case
far
original
understanding
constitution
concerned
state
wide
latitude
selecting
population
base
apportionment
see
part
supra
use
total
population
eligible
voters
nondiscriminatory
voter
base
ibid
bicameral
legislature
mixture
theories
one
population
base
lower
house
another
upper
chamber
ibid
precedents
compel
contrary
conclusion
appellants
correct
precedents
primarily
based
jurisprudence
theory
eligible
voters
right
vote
dilution
hadley
reynolds
jurisprudence
vacillated
much
conclude
precedents
preclude
allocating
districts
based
total
population
instead
see
burns
recognizing
may
choose
nondiscriminatory
population
bases
circumstances
choice
best
left
people
decide
apportion
legislature
single
correct
method
apportioning
state
legislatures
constitution
make
centralized
politburo
appointed
life
dictate
provinces
theories
democratic
representation
electoral
systems
securing
truly
government
holder
hall
thomas
concurring
judgment
majority
continues
misguided
search
concur
judgment
alito
concurring
judgment
sue
evenwel
et
appellants
greg
abbott
governor
texas
et
al
appeal
district
western
district
texas
april
justice
alito
justice
thomas
joins
except
part
concurring
judgment
question
must
decide
case
whether
texas
violated
principle
established
reynolds
sims
adopting
legislative
redistricting
plan
provides
districts
roughly
equal
total
population
appellants
contend
texas
required
create
districts
equal
number
eligible
voters
agree
texas
use
total
population
violate
rule
practical
considerations
precedent
support
conclusion
use
total
population
consistent
rule
decennial
census
required
constitution
tallies
total
population
art
cl
amdt
statistics
reliable
less
subject
manipulation
dispute
statistics
concerning
eligible
voters
since
reynolds
almost
uniformly
used
total
population
attempting
create
legislative
districts
equal
size
one
notable
exception
burns
richardson
cases
likewise
looked
total
population
moreover
much
time
creating
districts
equal
total
population
also
results
creation
districts
least
roughly
equal
eligible
voters
therefore
agree
permitted
use
total
population
redistricting
plans
ii
although
conclusion
sufficient
decide
case
us
texas
asks
us
go
hold
generally
free
use
total
population
statistics
barred
using
eligible
voter
statistics
texas
points
burns
held
hawaii
violate
principle
adopting
plan
sought
equalize
number
registered
voters
district
disagreeing
texas
solicitor
general
dismisses
burns
anomaly
argues
use
total
population
constitutionally
required
solicitor
general
contends
rule
means
persons
whether
eligible
vote
entitled
equal
representation
legislature
accordingly
argues
legislative
districts
must
equal
total
population
even
results
districts
grossly
unequal
number
eligible
voters
situation
likely
arise
aliens
disproportionately
concentrated
parts
state
argument
like
advanced
appellants
implicates
difficult
theoretical
empirical
questions
nature
representation
centuries
political
theorists
debated
proper
role
political
scientists
studied
conduct
legislators
interests
actually
need
wade
waters
case
whether
state
permitted
use
measure
total
population
important
sensitive
question
consider
us
state
districting
plan
unlike
current
texas
plan
uses
something
total
population
basis
equalizing
size
districts
iii
purport
decide
whether
state
may
base
districting
plan
something
total
population
picking
key
component
solicitor
general
argument
suggests
use
total
population
supported
constitution
formula
allocating
seats
house
representatives
among
house
seats
allocated
based
total
population
solicitor
general
argues
principle
requires
districts
equal
total
population
write
separately
primarily
endorse
meretricious
argument
first
allocation
congressional
representation
sheds
little
light
question
presented
solicitor
general
argument
allocation
plainly
violates
one
person
one
obviously
true
respect
senate
although
equal
representation
senate
populous
state
california
times
many
people
least
populous
wyoming
see
census
resident
population
data
http
even
allocation
house
seats
comport
one
person
one
vote
every
state
entitled
least
one
seat
house
even
state
population
lower
average
population
house
districts
nationwide
art
cl
today
north
dakota
vermont
wyoming
fall
category
see
census
apportionment
data
http
one
person
one
vote
applied
allocation
house
seats
among
much
doubt
uphold
plan
one
representative
represents
fewer
people
wyoming
nearly
million
people
next
door
second
reynolds
sims
squarely
rejected
argument
constitution
allocation
congressional
representation
establishes
test
constitutionality
state
legislative
districting
plan
one
alabama
districting
plan
case
seats
state
senate
allocated
county
much
seats
senate
allocated
state
time
upper
houses
state
legislatures
similar
respect
reynolds
noted
system
representation
two
houses
federal
congress
conceived
compromise
concession
indispensable
establishment
federal
republic
rejecting
alabama
argument
system
supported
constitutionality
state
apportionment
senate
seats
concluded
founding
fathers
clearly
intention
establishing
pattern
model
apportionment
seats
state
legislatures
system
representation
federal
congress
adopted
see
also
gray
sanders
third
reynolds
recognized
reliance
constitution
allocation
congressional
representation
profoundly
ahistorical
formula
allocating
house
seats
first
devised
reconsidered
time
adoption
fourteenth
amendment
overwhelming
concern
far
removed
abstract
theory
nature
representation
instead
dominant
consideration
distribution
political
power
among
original
constitution
allocation
house
seats
involved
reynolds
rather
delicately
termed
compromise
concession
seats
apportioned
among
according
respective
numbers
numbers
determined
adding
whole
number
free
persons
three
fifths
persons
art
cl
phrase
persons
euphemism
slaves
delegates
constitutional
convention
slave
insisted
infamous
clause
condition
support
constitution
clause
gave
slave
power
house
electoral
college
enjoyed
free
persons
delegates
demand
slave
representation
based
philosophical
notion
representatives
serve
residents
eligible
registered
vote
ante
account
original
constitution
allocation
also
plucks
context
alexander
hamilton
statement
apportionment
characterizes
hamilton
words
precisely
robert
yates
summary
fellow
new
yorker
words
endorsing
apportionment
total
population
positions
words
hamilton
talking
apportionment
house
ante
neither
entirely
accurate
quote
comes
controversy
senate
apportionment
debate
turned
whether
apportion
population
see
generally
records
federal
convention
pp
farrand
ed
hamilton
argued
favor
allocating
senate
seats
population
question
interest
modifying
general
government
sacrifice
individual
rights
preservation
rights
artificial
called
truer
principle
every
individual
community
large
equal
right
protection
government
therefore
three
contain
majority
inhabitants
america
governed
minority
inhabitants
great
ever
submit
smaller
maintain
principle
love
power
larger
motives
equally
tenacious
preserve
power
clear
passage
quoted
hamilton
according
yates
thought
fight
apportionment
naked
power
lofty
ideal
nature
representation
interpretation
confirmed
james
madison
summary
statement
hamilton
truth
meaning
debate
apportionment
contest
power
liberty
state
delaware
souls
lose
power
votes
allowed
far
ndorsing
apportionment
based
total
population
ante
hamilton
merely
acknowledging
obvious
apportionment
new
national
government
outcome
contest
raw
political
power
abstract
political
theory
civil
war
fourteenth
amendment
drafted
question
apportionment
formula
arose
thaddeus
stevens
leader
radical
republicans
unsuccessfully
proposed
apportionment
based
eligible
voters
rather
total
population
opinion
suggests
rejection
stevens
proposal
signified
adoption
theory
representatives
properly
understood
represent
residents
districts
whether
eligible
vote
ante
case
however
power
politics
democratic
theory
carried
day
making
proposal
stevens
candidly
explained
proposal
primary
aim
perpetuate
dominance
republican
party
northern
cong
globe
van
alstyne
fourteenth
amendment
right
vote
understanding
congress
rev
van
alstyne
stevens
spelled
house
seats
based
total
population
power
former
slave
magnified
prior
civil
war
slave
counted
person
purposes
apportionment
house
seats
result
emancipation
proclamation
thirteenth
amendment
former
slaves
fully
counted
even
permitted
vote
stevens
calculation
give
south
additional
votes
house
electoral
college
cong
globe
van
alstyne
stevens
proposal
met
opposition
joint
committee
reconstruction
including
majority
notes
james
blaine
ante
yet
hamilton
majority
plucks
blaine
words
context
several
propositions
amend
federal
constitution
respect
basis
representation
congress
propositions
give
future
representation
proportioned
voters
instead
inhabitants
effect
contemplated
intended
change
perfectly
well
understood
hands
frankly
avowed
deprive
lately
rebellious
unfair
advantage
large
representation
house
based
colored
population
long
population
shall
denied
political
rights
legislation
direct
object
thus
aimed
respects
rebellious
generally
approved
little
thought
seems
given
incidental
evils
proposed
constitutional
amendment
inflict
large
portion
loyal
evils
judgment
serious
alarming
lead
oppose
amendment
form
yet
presented
abstract
proposition
one
deny
population
true
basis
representation
women
children
classes
may
vital
interest
legislation
country
actually
deposit
ballot
voters
instead
population
shall
made
basis
representation
certain
results
follow
fully
appreciated
perhaps
urgent
change
cong
globe
fully
appreciated
incidental
evi
blaine
view
disruption
loyal
representation
congress
blaine
described
varying
suffrage
requirements
loyal
lead
instance
california
entitled
eight
seats
house
vermont
entitled
three
despite
similar
populations
ibid
see
also
ackerman
people
transformations
van
alstyne
mattered
blaine
loyal
neither
deserved
suffer
loss
relative
political
power
blaine
therefore
proposed
apportion
representatives
whole
number
persons
except
civil
political
rights
privileges
denied
abridged
constitution
laws
state
account
race
color
cong
globe
simple
direct
way
seems
reaching
result
aimed
without
embarrassment
question
interest
leaves
population
heretofore
basis
representation
disturb
manner
harmonious
relations
loyal
conclusively
deprives
southern
representation
congress
account
colored
population
long
may
choose
abridge
deny
population
political
rights
privileges
accorded
others
ibid
obvious
lengthy
passages
blaine
recognized
generally
approved
result
aimed
deprive
southern
political
power
far
quibbling
aim
sought
achieve
limiting
collateral
damage
loyal
northern
see
van
alstyne
roscoe
conkling
majority
also
quotes
ante
seemed
concerned
apportionment
narrow
ing
basis
taxation
seriously
abstract
notions
representational
equality
cong
globe
representation
go
taxation
ibid
apportionment
citizenship
narrow
basis
taxation
cause
considerable
inequalities
respect
number
aliens
large
growing
larger
emigrants
reach
shores
rate
state
year
hamilton
ward
also
quoted
majority
ante
primarily
disturbed
fact
one
south
carolinian
whose
hands
red
blood
fallen
patriots
whose
skirts
reeking
odors
columbia
andersonville
voice
potential
halls
two
half
vermont
soldiers
come
back
grandest
history
maimed
scarred
contest
south
carolina
traitors
efforts
destroy
government
secondarily
worried
prospect
taxation
without
representation
cong
globe
even
jacob
howard
theory
constitution
language
ante
bemoaned
fact
basing
representation
total
population
allow
southern
obtain
advantage
possess
rebellion
emancipation
cong
globe
object
think
consistently
call
upon
us
grant
additional
number
representatives
simply
consequence
misconduct
lost
property
meaning
slaves
slaveholders
considered
property
possessed
served
basis
great
part
representation
ibid
list
go
bottom
line
leadup
fourteenth
amendment
claims
representational
equality
invoked
service
real
goal
preventing
southern
acquiring
much
power
national
government
much
debate
congress
eventually
settled
compromise
appears
fourteenth
amendment
provision
house
seats
apportioned
based
total
population
state
wrongfully
denies
right
vote
certain
percentage
population
representation
supposed
reduced
enforcement
remedy
however
dependent
action
congress
regrettably
remedy
never
used
long
period
voting
rights
widely
abridged
amar
light
history
article
original
constitution
fourteenth
amendment
clear
apportionment
seats
house
representatives
based
substantial
part
distribution
political
power
among
merely
theory
regarding
proper
nature
representation
impossible
draw
clear
constitutional
command
complex
history
reasons
hold
texas
permissibly
used
total
population
drawing
challenged
legislative
districts
therefore
concur
judgment
footnotes
avery
midland
county
applied
rule
legislative
apportionment
local
level
maximum
population
deviation
sum
percentage
deviations
perfect
population
equality
districts
see
chapman
meier
example
largest
district
overpopulated
smallest
district
underpopulated
map
maximum
population
deviation
constitutions
statutes
ten
california
delaware
hawaii
kansas
maine
maryland
nebraska
new
hampshire
new
york
washington
authorize
removal
certain
groups
apportionment
base
see
app
brief
appellees
listing
relevant
state
constitutional
statutory
provisions
hawaii
kansas
washington
exclude
certain
nonpermanent
residents
including
nonresident
members
military
haw
art
iv
kan
art
wash
art
ii
see
also
pt
art
authorizing
state
legislature
make
suitable
adjustments
general
census
account
temporarily
residing
state
california
delaware
maryland
new
york
exclude
inmates
domiciled
prior
incarceration
cal
elec
code
ann
west
cum
supp
del
code
tit
supp
md
state
govt
code
ann
legis
law
ann
west
cum
constitutions
maine
nebraska
authorize
exclusion
noncitizen
immigrants
art
iv
pt
neb
art
iii
neither
provision
operational
written
brief
amicus
curiae
various
plaintiffs
challenged
texas
state
house
state
senate
congressional
maps
inter
alia
voting
rights
act
sought
received
injunction
barring
texas
use
new
maps
maps
received
preclearance
see
allen
state
bd
elections
individual
may
bring
suit
declaratory
judgment
injunctive
relief
claiming
state
requirement
covered
subjected
required
federal
apart
objecting
baseline
appellants
challenge
senate
map
deviation
challenge
use
baseline
congressional
districting
district
noted
ninth
circuit
likewise
rejected
appellants
theory
voter
population
must
roughly
equalized
see
garza
county
also
declining
mandate
apportionment
fourth
fifth
circuits
suggested
choice
apportionment
base
may
present
nonjusticiable
political
question
see
chen
houston
eminently
political
question
left
political
process
daly
hunt
quintessentially
decision
made
state
federal
courts
inherently
political
legislative
process
district
appellants
suggested
districting
bodies
also
comply
rule
equalizing
populations
districts
appellants
repeated
argument
see
tr
oral
arg
observes
choice
constitutional
language
reflects
historical
fact
constitution
drafted
later
amended
right
vote
closely
correlated
citizenship
brief
amicus
curiae
restrictions
franchise
left
large
groups
citizens
including
women
many
males
land
unable
cast
ballots
yet
framers
understood
citizens
nonetheless
entitled
representation
government
justice
alito
observes
hamilton
stated
principle
opposing
allocation
equal
number
senate
seats
state
post
opinion
concurring
judgment
context
however
diminish
hamilton
principled
argument
allocating
seats
protect
representational
rights
every
individual
community
large
records
federal
convention
farrand
ed
justice
alito
goes
quote
james
madison
proposition
hamilton
concerned
simply
outcome
contest
raw
political
power
post
notably
statement
justice
alito
quotes
madison
attributing
motive
hamilton
instead
according
madison
hamilton
attributing
motive
advocates
equal
representation
farrand
supra
one
need
gainsay
hamilton
backdrop
political
controversies
day
reality
however
deterred
past
reliance
statements
principle
see
printz
justice
alito
adds
third
claiming
allocation
representation
sheds
little
light
meaning
rule
allocation
plainly
violates
one
person
one
vote
post
proposition
justice
alito
notes
constitutional
guarantee
two
senate
seats
least
one
house
seat
state
regardless
population
guarantees
bear
kinship
separate
question
dominated
fourteenth
amendment
ratification
debates
state
received
guaranteed
house
seat
basis
additional
seats
allocated
justice
alito
asserts
taken
statements
fourteenth
amendment
framers
context
post
see
also
post
laims
representational
equality
invoked
service
real
goal
preventing
southern
acquiring
much
power
national
like
alexander
hamilton
see
supra
fourteenth
amendment
framers
doubtless
made
arguments
rooted
practical
political
realities
well
principle
politics
played
part
however
warrant
rejecting
principled
argument
event
motivations
aside
framers
ultimate
choice
total
population
rather
voter
population
surely
relevant
whether
appellants
argue
equal
protection
clause
mandates
use
voter
population
rather
total
population
appellants
also
observe
standing
cases
rested
plaintiffs
status
voters
whose
votes
diluted
considered
standing
nonvoters
challenge
map
malapportioned
basis
issue
moreover
unlikely
ever
arise
given
ease
finding
voters
willing
serve
plaintiffs
malapportionment
cases
contrast
insubstantial
evidence
marshaled
appellants
cites
several
studies
documenting
uneven
distribution
immigrants
throughout
country
see
brief
amicus
curiae
appellants
point
constituents
constitutional
right
equal
access
elected
representatives
state
certainly
interest
taking
reasonable
nondiscriminatory
steps
facilitate
access
residents
insofar
appellants
suggest
texas
roughly
equalized
total
population
population
never
required
jurisdictions
use
multiple
population
baselines
event
appellants
never
presented
map
manages
equalize
measures
perhaps
map
exist
map
necessarily
ignore
traditional
redistricting
principles
including
maintaining
communities
interest
respecting
municipal
boundaries
footnotes
opinions
used
one
person
one
vote
one
man
one
vote
interchangeably
compare
gray
sanders
one
person
one
vote
hadley
junior
college
dist
metropolitan
kansas
city
one
man
one
vote
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
gray
used
one
person
one
vote
noting
expansion
political
equality
history
including
adoption
nineteenth
amendment
guaranteed
women
right
vote
footnotes
see
pitkin
concept
representation
iscussions
representation
marked
persistent
controversies
seem
defy
solution
ibid
another
vexing
seemingly
endless
controversy
concerns
proper
relation
representative
constituents
political
representation
shapiro
stokes
wood
kirshner
eds
elations
democratic
ideal
everyday
practice
political
representation
never
well
defined
remain
subject
vigorous
debate
among
historians
political
theorists
lawyers
citizens
need
better
understanding
complex
relations
multifarious
parts
aspiring
develop
general
theory
representation
dovi
political
representation
stanford
encyclopedia
philosophy
zalta
ed
spring
ur
common
understanding
political
representation
one
contains
different
conflicting
conceptions
political
representatives
represent
holds
representatives
standards
mutually
incompatible
online
http
internet
materials
last
visited
mar
ibid
hat
exactly
representatives
hotly
contested
issue
see
andeweg
roles
legislatures
oxford
handbook
legislative
studies
martin
saalfeld
strøm
eds
explaining
social
sciences
succeeded
distilling
unambiguous
concept
ion
role
legislator
introduction
like
political
science
general
scholars
legislatures
approach
topic
different
least
partially
competing
theoretical
perspectives
diermeier
formal
models
legislatures
formal
study
legislative
politics
come
long
way
much
remains
done
best
vogel
sociology
legislators
legislatures
stable
representative
democracies
institutional
frameworks
informal
arrangements
achieve
equilibrium
competing
demands
constituents
political
opponents
situation
affects
daily
interactions
legislators
largely
unknown
justice
thomas
notes
ante
opinion
concurring
judgment
plan
house
representatives
based
large
part
view
equality
representation
answer
question
whether
eligible
voters
appellants
urge
citizens
residents
equally
represented
constitution
allocates
house
seats
based
total
inhabitants
explain
dominant
exclusive
reason
choice
allocation
political
power
among
brushes
original
constitution
allocation
congressional
representation
narrowing
fourteenth
amendment
ratification
debates
ante
debates
held
shadow
original
allocation
congress
decided
debates
retain
original
apportionment
formula
minus
infamous
clause
attach
penalty
disenfranchisement
eligible
voters
short
fourteenth
amendment
made
structural
changes
apportionment
bear
rule
see
amar
america
constitution
biography
amar
best
justification
clause
sounded
neither
republican
principle
revolutionary
ideology
raw
politics
see
also
explaining
protective
coloring
camouflaging
slave
power
grab
wasted
constitution
pegged
apportionment
number
voters
glaringly
inconsistent
nonvoting
slaves
cf
van
cleve
slaveholders
union
slave
saw
slave
representation
direct
political
protection
wealth
consisting
slave
property
possible
northern
attacks
slavery
told
convention
unequivocally
needed
protection
order
obtain
ratification
constitution
compromise
representation
awarded
disproportionate
shares
representative
influence
certain
vested
interests
one
slave
labor
economies
see
amar
masters
rule
claim
virtually
represent
best
interests
slaves
masters
claimed
right
maim
sell
slaves
doom
yet
unborn
posterity
perpetual
bondage
count
virtual
representation
anything
section
provides
representatives
shall
apportioned
among
several
according
respective
numbers
counting
whole
number
persons
state
excluding
indians
taxed
right
vote
election
choice
electors
president
vice
president
representatives
congress
executive
judicial
officers
state
members
legislature
thereof
denied
male
inhabitants
state
years
age
citizens
way
abridged
except
participation
rebellion
crime
basis
representation
therein
shall
reduced
proportion
number
male
citizens
shall
bear
whole
number
male
citizens
years
age
state
needless
say
reference
provision
male
inhabitants
years
age
superseded
nineteenth
amendments
notably
reduction
representation
pegged
proportion
eligible
voters
denied
suffrage
section
provision
makes
appearance
structural
analysis