reed
elsevier
et
al
muchnick
et
argued
october
decided
march
copyright
act
act
generally
requires
copyright
holders
register
works
suing
copyright
infringement
complaint
consolidated
copyright
infringement
suit
alleged
named
plaintiffs
least
one
copyright
typically
freelance
article
written
newspaper
magazine
registered
accordance
class
however
included
authors
registered
works
authors
parties
moved
district
certify
settlement
class
approve
settlement
agreement
district
objections
freelance
authors
appeal
second
circuit
sua
sponte
raised
question
whether
deprives
federal
courts
jurisdiction
infringement
claims
involving
unregistered
copyrights
concluding
district
lacked
jurisdiction
certify
class
approve
settlement
held
section
registration
requirement
precondition
filing
copyright
infringement
claim
copyright
holder
failure
comply
requirement
restrict
federal
jurisdiction
infringement
claims
involving
unregistered
works
pp
jurisdiction
refers
adjudicatory
authority
kontrick
ryan
thus
jurisdictional
properly
applies
prescriptions
delineating
classes
cases
jurisdiction
persons
personal
jurisdiction
implicating
authority
ibid
distinction
jurisdictional
conditions
rules
confusing
practice
federal
courts
litigants
use
term
jurisdictional
apposite
ibid
statutory
requirement
considered
jurisdictional
congress
clearly
count
jurisdictional
condition
rank
ed
treated
nonjurisdictional
character
arbaugh
arbaugh
held
coverage
requirement
title
vii
civil
rights
act
jurisdictional
requirement
provision
clearly
stat
numerosity
rule
counted
jurisdictional
prior
title
vii
cases
compel
conclusion
rule
nonetheless
jurisdictional
requirement
location
provision
separate
title
vii
section
indicated
congress
ranked
rule
jurisdictional
pp
like
title
vii
numerosity
requirement
arbaugh
clearly
stat
registration
requirement
jurisdictional
although
last
sentence
contains
word
jurisdiction
sentence
speaks
adjudicatory
authority
determine
copyright
claim
registrability
says
nothing
whether
federal
jurisdiction
adjudicate
claims
infringement
unregistered
works
moreover
registration
requirement
like
title
vii
requirement
located
provision
separate
granting
federal
courts
jurisdiction
respective
claims
factor
suggests
registration
requirement
read
jurisdictional
terms
refer
way
jurisdiction
district
courts
ibid
conclusion
affected
fact
requirement
arbaugh
considered
element
title
vii
claim
rather
prerequisite
initiating
lawsuit
see
zipes
trans
world
airlines
pp
contrary
result
required
bowles
russell
finding
congress
ranked
jurisdictional
requirement
parties
civil
action
file
notice
appeal
within
days
judgment
analyzed
specific
language
historical
treatment
accorded
type
limitation
analysis
consistent
arbaugh
framework
context
relevant
whether
statute
rank
requirement
jurisdictional
pp
declines
apply
judicial
estoppel
affirm
second
circuit
judgment
vacating
settlement
petitioners
arguments
tension
made
accepting
arguments
create
type
inconsistent
determinations
favor
estoppel
meant
address
see
new
hampshire
maine
pp
restrict
federal
jurisdiction
need
address
question
whether
district
authority
approve
settlement
second
circuit
erroneous
reading
also
declines
decide
whether
registration
requirement
mandatory
precondition
suit
district
courts
may
enforce
sua
sponte
dismissing
copyright
infringement
claims
involving
unregistered
works
pp
reversed
remanded
thomas
delivered
opinion
roberts
scalia
kennedy
alito
joined
ginsburg
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
stevens
breyer
joined
sotomayor
took
part
consideration
decision
case
reed
elsevier
et
petitioners
irvin
muchnick
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
second
circuit
march
justice
thomas
delivered
opinion
subject
certain
exceptions
copyright
act
act
requires
copyright
holders
register
works
suing
copyright
infringement
supp
case
appeals
second
circuit
held
copyright
holder
failure
comply
registration
requirement
deprives
federal
jurisdiction
adjudicate
copyright
infringement
claim
disagree
section
registration
requirement
precondition
filing
claim
restrict
federal
jurisdiction
constitution
grants
congress
power
promote
progress
science
useful
arts
securing
limited
times
authors
exclusive
right
writings
art
cl
exercising
power
congress
crafted
comprehensive
statutory
scheme
governing
existence
scope
opyright
protection
original
works
authorship
fixed
tangible
medium
expression
scheme
gives
copyright
owners
exclusive
rights
specified
statutory
exceptions
distribute
reproduce
publicly
perform
works
anyone
violates
exclusive
rights
copyright
owner
provided
act
infringer
copyright
infringement
occurs
copyright
owner
entitled
subject
requirements
section
institute
action
copyright
infringement
emphasis
added
case
concerns
requirements
section
refers
section
provides
inter
alia
certain
exceptions
civil
action
infringement
copyright
work
shall
instituted
preregistration
registration
copyright
claim
made
accordance
title
provision
part
act
remedial
scheme
establishes
condition
copyright
registration
plaintiffs
ordinarily
must
satisfy
filing
infringement
claim
invoking
act
remedial
provisions
address
whether
also
deprives
federal
courts
jurisdiction
adjudicate
infringement
claims
involving
unregistered
works
relevant
proceedings
case
began
issued
opinion
new
york
times
tasini
tasini
agreed
appeals
second
circuit
several
owners
online
databases
print
publishers
infringed
copyrights
six
freelance
authors
reproducing
authors
works
electronically
without
first
securing
permission
see
holding
affirmed
principal
theory
liability
underlying
copyright
infringement
suits
freelance
authors
filed
appeals
issued
opinion
tasini
suits
stayed
pending
decision
tasini
resumed
issued
opinion
consolidated
district
southern
district
new
york
judicial
panel
multidistrict
litigation
consolidated
complaint
alleged
named
plaintiffs
least
one
copyright
typically
freelance
article
written
newspaper
magazine
registered
accordance
class
however
included
authors
registered
copyrighted
works
authors
see
app
growing
size
complexity
lawsuit
district
referred
parties
mediation
three
years
freelance
authors
publishers
insurers
electronic
databases
insurers
negotiated
finally
march
reached
settlement
agreement
parties
intended
achieve
global
peace
publishing
industry
literary
works
electronic
databases
copyright
litigation
parties
moved
district
certify
class
settlement
approve
settlement
agreement
ten
freelance
authors
including
irvin
muchnick
hereinafter
muchnick
respondents
objected
district
overruled
objections
certified
settlement
class
freelance
authors
federal
rules
civil
procedure
approved
settlement
fair
reasonable
adequate
rule
entered
final
judgment
time
muchnick
respondents
party
urge
district
dismiss
case
refuse
certify
class
approve
settlement
lack
jurisdiction
muchnick
respondents
appealed
renewing
objections
settlement
procedural
substantive
grounds
shortly
oral
argument
appeals
sua
sponte
ordered
briefing
question
whether
deprives
federal
courts
jurisdiction
infringement
claims
involving
unregistered
copyrights
parties
filed
briefs
asserting
district
jurisdiction
approve
settlement
agreement
even
though
included
unregistered
works
relying
two
circuit
precedents
holding
registration
requirement
jurisdictional
see
citing
toy
mfg
goffa
morris
business
concepts
appeals
concluded
district
lacked
jurisdiction
certify
class
claims
arising
infringement
unregistered
works
also
lacked
jurisdiction
approve
settlement
respect
claims
citing
widespread
agreement
among
circuits
section
jurisdictional
judge
walker
dissented
concluded
like
nonjurisdictional
requirement
arbaugh
jurisdictional
statutory
time
limit
bowles
russell
accordingly
reasoned
registration
requirement
limit
federal
jurisdiction
infringement
suits
involving
unregistered
works
ibid
granted
owners
publishers
petition
writ
certiorari
formulated
question
presented
ask
whether
restricts
jurisdiction
federal
courts
copyright
infringement
actions
party
supports
appeals
jurisdictional
holding
appointed
amicus
curiae
defend
appeals
reverse
ii
jurisdiction
refers
adjudicatory
authority
kontrick
ryan
accordingly
term
jurisdictional
properly
applies
prescriptions
delineating
classes
cases
jurisdiction
persons
personal
jurisdiction
implicating
authority
ibid
see
also
steel
citizens
better
environment
jurisdiction
refers
courts
statutory
constitutional
power
adjudicate
case
emphasis
original
landgraf
usi
film
products
urisdictional
statutes
power
rather
rights
obligations
quoting
republic
nat
bank
miami
thomas
concurring
perhaps
clear
theory
distinction
jurisdictional
conditions
rules
confusing
practice
courts
including
sometimes
mischaracterized
rules
elements
cause
action
jurisdictional
limitations
particularly
characterization
central
case
thus
require
close
analysis
see
arbaugh
supra
citing
examples
steel
recent
cases
evince
marked
desire
curtail
jurisdictional
rulings
easily
miss
critical
difference
true
jurisdictional
conditions
nonjurisdictional
limitations
causes
action
kontrick
supra
see
also
arbaugh
light
important
distinctions
jurisdictional
prescriptions
rules
see
encouraged
federal
courts
litigants
facilitat
clarity
using
term
jurisdictional
apposite
kontrick
supra
arbaugh
described
general
approach
distinguish
jurisdictional
conditions
requirements
elements
claim
legislature
clearly
threshold
limitation
statute
scope
shall
count
jurisdictional
courts
litigants
duly
instructed
left
wrestle
issue
congress
rank
statutory
limitation
coverage
jurisdictional
courts
treat
restriction
nonjurisdictional
character
citation
omitted
plaintiff
arbaugh
brought
claim
title
vii
civil
rights
act
makes
unlawful
employer
discriminate
inter
alia
basis
sex
employees
bring
title
vii
claims
employers
fifteen
employees
arbaugh
addressed
whether
employee
numerosity
requirement
affects
jurisdiction
instead
delineates
substantive
ingredient
title
vii
claim
relief
held
latter
holding
turned
principally
examination
text
section
title
vii
numerosity
requirement
appears
section
clearly
stat
employee
numerosity
threshold
title
vii
scope
count
jurisdictional
nothing
prior
title
vii
cases
compelled
conclusion
even
though
numerosity
requirement
lacks
clear
jurisdictional
label
nonetheless
imposed
jurisdictional
limit
see
similarly
text
structure
demonstrate
congress
rank
ed
requirement
jurisdictional
see
observed
employee
numerosity
requirement
located
provision
separate
title
vii
section
distinguishing
threshold
ingredient
jurisdiction
arbaugh
accordingly
numerosity
requirement
fairly
read
jurisdictional
terms
way
refer
jurisdiction
district
courts
quoting
zipes
trans
world
airlines
thus
refrain
ed
construing
numerosity
requirement
constric
title
vii
jurisdictional
provision
arbaugh
supra
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
apply
approach
section
provides
except
action
brought
violation
rights
author
section
subject
provisions
subsection
civil
action
infringement
copyright
work
shall
instituted
preregistration
registration
copyright
claim
made
accordance
title
case
however
deposit
application
fee
required
registration
delivered
copyright
office
proper
form
registration
refused
applicant
entitled
institute
civil
action
infringement
notice
thereof
copy
complaint
served
register
copyrights
register
may
option
become
party
action
respect
issue
registrability
copyright
claim
entering
appearance
within
sixty
days
service
register
failure
become
party
shall
deprive
jurisdiction
determine
issue
must
consider
whether
clearly
registration
requirement
jurisdictional
arbaugh
supra
amicus
disagrees
pointing
presence
word
jurisdiction
last
sentence
contending
use
term
indicates
jurisdictional
cast
first
sentence
well
brief
amicus
curiae
support
judgment
hereinafter
amicus
brief
reference
jurisdiction
bear
weight
amicus
places
upon
sentence
upon
amicus
relies
register
copyrights
may
option
become
party
copyright
infringement
action
respect
issue
registrability
copyright
claim
entering
appearance
within
sixty
days
service
register
failure
become
party
shall
deprive
jurisdiction
determine
issue
emphasis
added
congress
added
sentence
act
stat
clarify
federal
determine
issue
registrability
copyright
claim
even
register
appear
infringement
suit
clarification
necessary
courts
interpreted
precursor
imposed
similar
registration
requirement
prohibiting
copyright
owners
refused
registration
register
copyrights
suing
infringement
owners
first
sought
mandamus
register
see
vacheron
coultre
watches
benrus
watch
construing
precursor
amendment
made
clear
federal
plainly
adjudicatory
authority
determine
issue
emphasis
added
issue
registrability
regardless
whether
register
party
infringement
suit
word
jurisdiction
used
thus
says
nothing
whether
federal
jurisdiction
adjudicate
claims
infringement
unregistered
works
moreover
registration
requirement
like
title
vii
numerosity
requirement
located
provision
separate
granting
federal
courts
jurisdiction
respective
claims
see
arbaugh
supra
federal
district
courts
jurisdiction
copyright
infringement
actions
based
neither
confers
jurisdiction
questions
federal
law
specific
copyright
claims
conditions
jurisdictional
grant
whether
copyright
holders
registered
works
suing
infringement
cf
arbaugh
supra
title
vii
jurisdictional
provision
specif
threshold
ingredient
akin
monetary
floor
factor
suggest
registration
requirement
read
jurisdictional
terms
refer
way
jurisdiction
district
courts
arbaugh
quoting
zipes
first
significantly
expressly
allows
courts
adjudicate
infringement
claims
involving
unregistered
works
three
circumstances
work
work
infringement
claim
concerns
rights
attribution
integrity
holder
attempted
register
work
registration
refused
separately
permits
courts
adjudicate
infringement
actions
certain
kinds
unregistered
works
author
declare
intention
secure
copyright
work
makes
registration
work
required
subsection
within
three
months
work
first
transmission
least
unusual
ascribe
jurisdictional
significance
condition
subject
sorts
numerosity
requirement
arbaugh
considered
element
title
vii
claim
rather
prerequisite
initiating
lawsuit
change
conclusion
decision
zipes
demonstrates
zipes
upon
arbaugh
relied
held
title
vii
requirement
claimants
timely
file
discrimination
charge
eeoc
filing
civil
action
federal
nonjurisdictional
see
establishing
specific
time
periods
within
discrimination
claimant
must
file
lawsuit
filing
charge
eeoc
statutory
condition
requires
party
take
action
filing
lawsuit
automatically
jurisdictional
prerequisite
suit
zipes
emphasis
added
rather
jurisdictional
analysis
must
focus
legal
character
requirement
discerned
looking
condition
text
context
relevant
historical
treatment
see
also
national
railroad
passenger
corporation
morgan
similarly
treated
nonjurisdictional
types
threshold
requirements
claimants
must
complete
exhaust
filing
registration
requirement
fits
mold
section
imposes
precondition
filing
claim
clearly
labeled
jurisdictional
located
provision
admits
congressionally
authorized
exceptions
see
section
thus
imposes
type
precondition
suit
supports
nonjurisdictional
treatment
precedents
amicus
insists
decision
bowles
compels
conclusion
contrary
one
reach
today
amicus
cites
bowles
proposition
congress
explicitly
label
statutory
condition
jurisdictional
nevertheless
treat
condition
consistently
interpreted
congress
disturbed
interpretation
amicus
brief
specifically
amicus
relies
bowles
argue
bowles
improper
characterize
statutory
condition
nonjurisdictional
override
century
worth
treating
registration
requirement
jurisdictional
amicus
brief
quoting
bowles
supra
argument
focuses
result
bowles
rather
analysis
employed
bowles
hold
statutory
condition
devoid
express
jurisdictional
label
treated
jurisdictional
simply
courts
long
treated
hold
statutory
conditions
imposing
time
limit
considered
rather
bowles
stands
proposition
context
including
interpretation
similar
provisions
many
years
past
relevant
whether
statute
ranks
requirement
jurisdictional
bowles
considered
requires
parties
civil
action
file
notice
appeal
within
days
judgment
appealed
rule
federal
rules
appellate
procedure
carries
practice
analyzing
specific
language
historical
treatment
type
limitation
imposes
statutory
deadlines
filing
appeals
concluded
congress
ranked
statutory
condition
jurisdictional
focus
bowles
historical
treatment
statutory
conditions
taking
appeal
thus
consistent
arbaugh
framework
indeed
bowles
emphasized
long
treated
conditions
jurisdictional
including
statutes
specifically
statutes
predated
creation
courts
appeals
see
bowles
therefore
demonstrates
relevant
question
amicus
puts
whether
long
labeled
jurisdictional
whether
type
limitation
imposes
one
properly
ranked
jurisdictional
absent
express
designation
statutory
limitation
bowles
type
long
held
speak
jurisdictional
terms
even
absent
jurisdictional
label
nothing
text
context
historical
treatment
type
limitation
justified
departure
view
case
however
types
conditions
zipes
arbaugh
analysis
leads
us
conclude
implicate
jurisdiction
federal
courts
although
historical
treatment
jurisdictional
factor
analysis
dispositive
factors
discussed
demonstrate
registration
requirement
analogous
nonjurisdictional
conditions
considered
zipes
arbaugh
statutory
time
limit
issue
thus
conclude
registration
requirement
nonjurisdictional
notwithstanding
prior
jurisdictional
iii
amicus
argues
even
nonjurisdictional
nonetheless
affirm
estoppel
grounds
appeals
judgment
vacating
district
order
approving
settlement
dismissing
case
according
amicus
petitioners
asserted
previously
proceedings
copyright
registration
jurisdictional
assertion
estop
asserting
right
waive
objections
authors
failure
register
amicus
urges
us
prevent
parties
fast
loose
courts
changing
positions
according
exigencies
moment
amicus
brief
quoting
new
hampshire
maine
agree
statements
parties
submissions
district
appeals
tension
arguments
decline
apply
judicial
estoppel
explained
new
hampshire
doctrine
typically
applies
among
things
party
succeeded
persuading
accept
party
earlier
position
judicial
acceptance
inconsistent
position
later
proceeding
create
perception
either
first
second
misled
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
circumstances
exist
two
reasons
first
parties
made
prior
statements
negotiating
defending
settlement
agreement
fault
parties
lawyers
invoking
negotiations
binding
circuit
precedent
supported
clients
positions
perhaps
importantly
approving
settlement
district
adopt
petitioners
interpretation
jurisdictional
second
appeals
asked
petitioners
brief
whether
restricted
district
jurisdiction
argued
appeals
rejected
arguments
see
app
reply
brief
petitioners
accepting
petitioners
arguments
thus
create
inconsistent
determinations
favor
new
hampshire
supra
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
therefore
hold
district
authority
adjudicate
parties
request
approve
settlement
iv
holding
restrict
federal
jurisdiction
precludes
need
us
address
parties
alternative
arguments
whether
district
authority
approve
settlement
even
appeals
erroneous
reading
concluding
district
jurisdiction
approve
settlement
express
opinion
settlement
merits
also
decline
address
whether
registration
requirement
mandatory
precondition
suit
like
threshold
conditions
arizona
california
res
judicata
defense
day
mcdonough
habeas
statute
limitations
hallstrom
tillamook
county
resource
conservation
recovery
act
notice
provision
district
courts
may
enforce
sua
sponte
dismissing
copyright
infringement
claims
involving
unregistered
works
reverse
judgment
appeals
second
circuit
remand
case
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
justice
sotomayor
took
part
consideration
decision
case
reed
elsevier
et
petitioners
irvin
muchnick
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
second
circuit
march
justice
ginsburg
justice
stevens
justice
breyer
join
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
agree
characterization
supp
provision
instructs
authors
register
copyrights
commencing
suit
infringement
precondition
filing
claim
restrict
federal
jurisdiction
ante
agree
arbaugh
controlling
precedent
see
ante
bowles
russell
counsel
otherwise
however
undeniable
tension
two
decisions
aiming
stave
continuing
controversy
qualifies
jurisdictional
set
understanding
opinions
arbaugh
bowles
ground
reconcile
rulings
arbaugh
held
nonjurisdictional
prescription
confining
title
vii
coverage
employers
employees
observing
threshold
id
speak
jurisdictional
terms
refer
way
jurisdiction
district
courts
quoting
zipes
trans
world
airlines
arbaugh
opinion
announced
applied
readily
administrable
bright
line
legislature
clearly
threshold
limitation
statute
scope
shall
count
jurisdictional
courts
litigants
duly
instructed
left
wrestle
issue
congress
rank
statutory
limitation
coverage
jurisdictional
courts
treat
restriction
nonjurisdictional
character
applying
readily
administrable
bright
line
case
hold
threshold
number
employees
application
title
vii
element
plaintiff
claim
relief
jurisdictional
issue
citation
omitted
passage
indicates
unanimous
arbaugh
anticipated
federal
courts
thereafter
adhere
bright
line
held
dispositive
day
bowles
moved
different
direction
sharply
divided
held
mandatory
jurisdictional
time
limits
filing
notice
appeal
stated
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
bowles
mentioned
arbaugh
distinguish
involving
statute
setting
requirement
time
limit
section
time
limits
jurisdictional
bowles
explained
contained
statute
merely
rule
ha
long
held
taking
appeal
within
prescribed
time
jurisdictional
fidelity
arbaugh
similarly
reasoned
decisions
dissent
bowles
observed
yielded
conclusion
statutory
time
limits
jurisdictional
congress
says
opinion
souter
bowles
arbaugh
reconciled
without
distorting
either
decision
however
ground
bowles
rel
ied
long
line
decisions
left
undisturbed
congress
union
pacific
locomotive
engineers
trainmen
comm
adjustment
central
region
slip
citing
bowles
true
decision
subsequent
bowles
john
sand
gravel
concluded
largely
stare
decisis
grounds
federal
claims
statute
limitations
requires
sua
sponte
consideration
lawsuit
timeliness
etitioner
succeed
convincing
us
overturned
overturn
earlier
plainly
read
arbaugh
bowles
point
conclusion
nonjurisdictional
section
speak
jurisdictional
terms
refer
way
jurisdiction
district
courts
zipes
arbaugh
readily
administrable
bright
line
therefore
controlling
bowles
detract
determination
amicus
reading
bowles
urges
authority
hold
jurisdictional
lest
disregard
century
worth
precedent
brief
amicus
curiae
support
judgment
quoting
bowles
see
ante
bowles
john
sand
gravel
explained
relied
longstanding
decisions
typing
relevant
prescriptions
jurisdictional
bowles
citing
inter
alia
scarborough
pargoud
curry
john
sand
gravel
amicus
cites
well
opinions
characterize
jurisdictional
one
jurisdictional
rulings
accorded
precedential
effect
arbaugh
quoting
steel
citizens
better
environment
see
arbaugh
ante
reasons
stated
join
judgment
concur
part
opinion
footnotes
sections
act
principally
detail
registration
process
establish
remedial
incentives
encourage
copyright
holders
register
works
see
ed
supp
see
la
resolana
architects
pa
clay
realtors
angel
fire
positive
black
talk
cash
money
records
xoom
imageline
murray
hill
publications
abc
communications
producers
video
data
grumman
systems
support
appointed
deborah
jones
merritt
brief
argue
case
amicus
curiae
support
appeals
judgment
merritt
ably
discharged
assigned
responsibilities
see
act
mar
stat
cf
zipes
relying
fact
congress
approved
least
cases
awarding
title
vii
relief
claimants
complied
statute
equal
employment
opportunity
commission
eeoc
filing
requirement
holding
filing
requirement
jurisdictional
prerequisite
suit
cotton
urisdiction
properly
refers
power
hear
case
matter
never
forfeited
waived
see
jones
bock
treating
administrative
exhaustion
requirement
prison
litigation
reform
act
plra
action
shall
brought
respect
prison
conditions
title
federal
law
prisoner
administrative
remedies
available
exhausted
affirmative
defense
even
though
question
exhaustion
mandatory
plra
unexhausted
claims
brought
woodford
ngo
bowles
example
distinguished
scarborough
principi
characterized
nonjurisdictional
express
statutory
time
limit
initiating
postjudgment
proceedings
attorney
fees
equal
access
justice
act
see
explained
time
limit
scarborough
concerned
mode
relief
ancillary
judgment
already
plenary
jurisdiction
quoting
scarborough
supra
emphasis
added
bowles
also
distinguished
kontrick
ryan
eberhart
per
curiam
cases
properly
held
certain
time
limits
nonjurisdictional
imposed
rules
purport
jurisdictional
significance
see
kontrick
involved
time
constraints
applicable
objections
discharge
bankruptcy
proceedings
case
first
examined
statute
conferring
jurisdiction
objections
discharge
observed
contain
timeliness
requirement
kontrick
rather
time
constraints
applicable
objections
discharge
contained
bankruptcy
rules
expressly
state
construed
extend
limit
jurisdiction
courts
see
ibid
quoting
fed
rule
bkrtcy
proc
eberhart
turn
treated
nonjurisdictional
certain
rules
held
closely
parallel
ed
kontrick
conclusion
mirrors
holding
zipes
title
vii
eeoc
filing
requirement
nonjurisdictional
even
though
decisions
characterized
jurisdictional
see
noting
legal
character
requirement
issue
earlier
cases
see
also
national
railroad
passenger
corporation
morgan
relying
analysis
zipes
amicus
remaining
jurisdictional
argument
policy
goals
underlying
copyright
registration
support
construing
registration
provisions
jurisdictional
see
amicus
brief
similarly
unavailing
agree
condition
ranked
jurisdictional
merely
promotes
important
congressional
objectives
see
arbaugh
holding
title
vii
numerosity
requirement
nonjurisdictional
even
though
serves
important
policy
goal
spar
ing
small
businesses
title
vii
liability
footnotes
eberhart
per
curiam
scarborough
principi
kontrick
ryan