kimmelman
morrison
argued
march
decided
june
respondent
bench
trial
new
jersey
resulting
conviction
rape
police
officer
testified
hours
rape
accompanied
victim
respondent
apartment
rape
occurred
another
tenant
let
respondent
apartment
officer
seized
sheet
respondent
bed
point
testimony
respondent
counsel
sought
suppress
introduction
sheet
testimony
ground
officer
seized
without
search
warrant
violation
fourth
amendment
judge
ruled
counsel
suppression
motion
late
applicable
new
jersey
rule
judge
rejected
counsel
attempt
justify
omission
grounds
heard
seizure
day
trial
began
state
obligation
inform
case
even
though
made
pretrial
request
discovery
revealed
search
seizure
expected
go
trial
told
victim
wish
proceed
respondent
retained
new
counsel
trial
appeal
alleged
ineffective
assistance
counsel
trial
error
trial
refusal
entertain
suppression
motion
trial
appellate
rejected
claims
affirmed
respondent
conviction
thereafter
respondent
unsuccessfully
sought
postconviction
relief
trial
judge
grounds
obtained
habeas
corpus
relief
federal
district
held
inter
alia
established
claim
appeals
concluded
stone
powell
held
federal
courts
withhold
habeas
review
state
provided
opportunity
full
fair
litigation
fourth
amendment
claim
extended
bar
federal
habeas
consideration
sixth
amendment
claims
based
counsel
alleged
failure
competently
litigate
fourth
amendment
claims
reviewing
district
determination
ineffective
assistance
test
established
intervening
decision
strickland
washington
held
establish
ineffective
assistance
defendant
must
prove
incompetence
counsel
prejudice
appeals
determined
respondent
trial
counsel
grossly
ineffective
vacated
remanded
district
consider
whether
standards
set
forth
strickland
respondent
prejudiced
attorney
incompetence
held
restriction
federal
habeas
review
fourth
amendment
claims
announced
stone
powell
supra
extend
sixth
amendment
claims
founded
primarily
incompetent
representation
respect
fourth
amendment
issue
federal
courts
may
grant
habeas
relief
appropriate
cases
regardless
nature
underlying
attorney
error
pp
respondent
sixth
amendment
claim
fact
fourth
amendment
claim
directly
controlled
stone
petitioners
assert
two
claims
distinct
nature
requisite
elements
proof
pp
rationale
purposes
stone
fully
applicable
sixth
amendment
claim
based
principally
defense
counsel
failure
litigate
fourth
amendment
claim
competently
stone
held
remedy
fourth
amendment
violations
provided
exclusionary
rule
personal
constitutional
right
instead
predominately
judicially
created
structural
remedy
designed
safeguard
fourth
amendment
rights
generally
deterrent
effect
rule
minimal
utility
context
federal
collateral
proceedings
respondent
sought
direct
federal
habeas
protection
fundamental
personal
right
effective
assistance
counsel
collateral
review
frequently
means
accused
effectuate
right
moreover
merit
contention
defendant
allowed
vindicate
federal
habeas
review
right
effective
assistance
counsel
counsel
primary
error
failure
make
timely
request
exclusion
illegally
seized
evidence
often
probative
information
bearing
defendant
guilt
innocence
right
counsel
conditioned
upon
actual
innocence
pp
petitioners
prediction
every
fourth
amendment
claim
fails
state
fully
litigated
federal
habeas
proceedings
sixth
amendment
guise
result
many
judgments
disturbed
incorrect
ignores
rigorous
standard
strickland
washington
supra
erects
claims
although
meritorious
fourth
amendment
issue
necessary
success
sixth
amendment
claim
like
respondent
good
fourth
amendment
claim
alone
earn
prisoner
federal
habeas
relief
habeas
petitioners
prove
strickland
denied
fair
trial
gross
incompetence
attorneys
entitled
writ
retrial
without
challenged
evidence
pp
respondent
satisfied
incompetence
prong
test
ineffective
assistance
counsel
set
forth
strickland
appeals
err
remanding
case
district
determination
prejudice
strickland
standard
pp
failure
file
suppression
motion
constitute
per
se
ineffective
assistance
counsel
record
clearly
reveals
respondent
attorney
failed
file
timely
suppression
motion
due
trial
strategy
considerations
unaware
search
state
intention
introduce
bedsheet
evidence
due
failure
conduct
pretrial
discovery
failure
required
strickland
reasonable
accord
prevailing
professional
norms
pp
respect
prejudice
prong
strickland
test
merit
petitioners
contention
statement
made
trial
judge
hearing
respondent
motion
bail
pending
appeal
constituted
finding
even
bedsheet
excluded
found
respondent
guilty
finding
subsidiary
finding
historical
fact
respondent
prejudiced
attorney
incompetence
entitled
presumption
correctness
federal
habeas
proceedings
record
sufficiently
complete
enable
apply
strickland
prejudice
prong
directly
facts
case
remand
district
redetermination
prejudice
proper
pp
brennan
delivered
opinion
white
marshall
blackmun
stevens
joined
powell
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
burger
rehnquist
joined
post
allan
nodes
argued
cause
petitioners
brief
irwin
kimmelman
attorney
general
new
jersey
catherine
foddai
mildred
vallerini
spiller
arlene
weiss
deputy
attorneys
general
william
staehle
appointment
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
leon
friedman
charles
sims
burt
neuborne
filed
brief
american
civil
liberties
union
et
al
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
justice
brennan
delivered
opinion
question
address
case
whether
restrictions
federal
habeas
review
fourth
amendment
claims
announced
stone
powell
extended
sixth
amendment
claims
ineffective
assistance
counsel
principal
allegation
manifestation
inadequate
representation
counsel
failure
file
timely
motion
suppress
evidence
allegedly
obtained
violation
fourth
amendment
respondent
neil
morrison
convicted
state
new
jersey
raping
case
presented
state
respondent
bench
trial
consisted
scientific
evidence
testimony
victim
mother
police
officers
handled
victim
complaint
victim
testified
morrison
employer
taken
apartment
forced
onto
bed
raped
upon
returning
home
girl
related
incident
mother
first
summoning
morrison
asking
account
events
phoned
police
police
came
victim
home
transported
hospital
examined
tested
indicia
sexual
assault
state
also
called
witness
detective
dolores
one
officers
investigated
rape
complaint
testified
accompanied
victim
morrison
apartment
building
hours
rape
morrison
home
another
tenant
building
let
respondent
apartment
stated
seized
sheet
respondent
bed
point
testimony
respondent
counsel
objected
introduction
sheet
testimony
concerning
ground
seized
without
search
warrant
new
jersey
rules
however
require
suppression
motions
made
within
days
indictment
unless
time
enlarged
trial
good
cause
rule
deadline
long
since
expired
trial
judge
ruled
counsel
motion
late
defense
counsel
explained
heard
seizure
day
trial
began
client
known
police
left
receipt
sheet
prosecutor
responded
defense
counsel
case
beginning
never
asked
discovery
trial
counsel
done
prosecutor
observed
police
reports
revealed
search
seizure
prosecutor
stated
one
month
trial
sent
defense
counsel
copy
laboratory
report
concerning
tests
conducted
stains
hairs
found
sheets
asked
repeatedly
trial
conducted
discovery
respondent
attorney
asserted
state
obligation
inform
case
client
even
though
made
request
discovery
judge
rejected
assertion
stated
hate
say
say
remiss
think
evidence
available
examination
inquiry
tr
defense
counsel
attempted
justify
omission
ground
expected
go
trial
told
victim
wish
proceed
judge
rejected
justification
also
reminding
counsel
indictment
handed
decision
go
complaint
longer
belongs
victim
requires
order
dismiss
indictment
judge
agreed
defense
counsel
br
valid
basis
suppression
motion
brought
timely
made
refused
entertain
motion
suppress
middle
trial
state
called
number
expert
witnesses
conducted
laboratory
tests
stains
hairs
found
sheet
stain
found
victim
underpants
blood
hair
samples
provided
victim
respondent
testimony
established
bedsheet
stained
semen
man
type
blood
stains
victim
underwear
similarly
exhibited
semen
man
type
blood
defendant
type
blood
vaginal
tests
performed
girl
hospital
demonstrated
presence
sperm
hairs
recovered
sheet
morphologically
similar
head
hair
morrison
victim
defense
counsel
aggressively
expert
witnesses
defense
called
four
friends
acquaintances
defendant
defendant
attempt
establish
different
version
facts
defense
theory
girl
mother
fabricated
rape
order
punish
respondent
delinquent
girl
wages
according
morrison
girl
mother
intended
go
prosecution
ultimately
found
impossible
extricate
lies
morrison
admitted
taken
girl
apartment
denied
intercourse
claimed
sexual
activity
women
accounted
stains
sheet
hair
girl
head
sheet
seated
bed
defense
counsel
also
implied
girl
underwear
vaginal
secretions
tested
positive
semen
sperm
probably
recently
engaged
relations
father
baby
counsel
however
call
girl
boyfriend
testify
tested
blood
type
omission
upon
prosecution
commented
closing
argument
trial
judge
rendering
verdict
noted
cases
nothing
cut
dry
discrepancies
state
case
discrepancies
defense
presented
tr
pointing
troublesome
inconsistencies
testimony
several
witnesses
judge
declared
conclusion
state
proved
case
beyond
reasonable
doubt
trial
respondent
dismissed
attorney
retained
new
counsel
appeal
appeal
respondent
alleged
ineffective
assistance
counsel
error
trial
refusal
entertain
suppression
motion
trial
appeals
announced
summarily
found
merit
either
claim
affirmed
respondent
conviction
new
jersey
subsequently
denied
respondent
petition
discretionary
review
respondent
sought
postconviction
relief
new
jersey
superior
judge
tried
case
morrison
presented
identical
issues
raised
direct
appeal
denied
relief
ground
bound
appellate
resolution
issues
respondent
respondent
sought
writ
habeas
corpus
federal
district
raising
claims
ineffective
assistance
counsel
erroneous
admission
illegally
seized
evidence
district
ruled
respondent
allege
state
denied
opportunity
litigate
fourth
amendment
claim
fully
fairly
direct
consideration
claim
federal
habeas
review
barred
stone
powell
supp
nj
district
find
respondent
claim
meritorious
district
rendered
decision
announced
standards
applied
claims
constitutionally
deficient
representation
strickland
washington
district
relied
third
circuit
precedent
guidance
particularly
baynes
moore
like
strickland
cases
required
inquiry
counsel
competence
prejudicial
effect
counsel
unprofessional
errors
respect
trial
counsel
competence
district
used
standard
customary
skill
knowledge
normally
prevails
time
place
quoting
moore
supra
noting
standard
entails
careful
inquiry
particular
circumstances
surrounding
case
quoting
baynes
supra
concluded
ounsel
failed
conduct
meaningful
pretrial
discovery
thus
totally
unaware
certain
damaging
evidence
might
appropriate
subject
suppression
motion
counsel
seems
acted
misapprehension
state
obligated
turn
anything
defense
might
interested
examining
little
else
offered
way
excuse
morrison
lawyer
face
repeated
criticism
state
trial
judge
except
counsel
rather
remarkable
attempt
justify
conduct
noting
trial
told
victim
want
go
ahead
case
based
unmitigated
negligence
petitioner
trial
counsel
failing
conduct
discovery
combined
likelihood
success
suppression
motion
timely
made
find
petitioner
deprived
effective
representation
although
district
address
relevance
stone
supra
respondent
sixth
amendment
claim
appeals
relying
language
stone
different
natures
fourth
sixth
amendment
claims
appeals
concluded
stone
extended
bar
federal
habeas
consideration
sixth
amendment
claims
based
counsel
alleged
failure
competently
litigate
fourth
amendment
claims
strickland
recently
decided
appeals
reviewed
district
determination
ineffective
assistance
strickland
test
appeals
determined
respondent
trial
counsel
grossly
ineffective
vacated
remanded
district
consider
whether
standards
set
forth
strickland
supra
respondent
prejudiced
attorney
incompetence
petitioners
attorney
general
new
jersey
superintendent
rahway
state
prison
petitioned
certiorari
granted
petition
affirm
ii
petitioners
urge
sixth
amendment
veil
lifted
respondent
habeas
petition
reveal
petitioners
argue
really
attempt
litigate
defaulted
fourth
amendment
claim
argue
respondent
claim
fact
form
fourth
amendment
one
stone
directly
controls
alternatively
petitioners
maintain
even
morrison
sixth
amendment
claim
may
legitimately
considered
distinct
defaulted
fourth
amendment
claim
rationale
purposes
stone
fully
applicable
claims
principal
allegation
inadequate
representation
counsel
failure
file
timely
motion
suppress
evidence
allegedly
obtained
violation
fourth
amendment
stone
argue
emasculated
unless
extend
bar
federal
habeas
review
sort
sixth
amendment
claim
finally
petitioners
maintain
consideration
defaulted
fourth
amendment
claims
sixth
amendment
federal
collateral
proceedings
violate
principles
comity
federalism
seriously
interfere
state
interest
finality
criminal
convictions
share
petitioners
perception
identity
respondent
fourth
sixth
amendment
claims
defense
counsel
failure
make
timely
suppression
motion
primary
manifestation
incompetence
source
prejudice
advanced
respondent
two
claims
nonetheless
distinct
nature
requisite
elements
proof
although
frequently
invoked
criminal
trials
fourth
amendment
trial
right
protection
affords
governmental
intrusion
one
home
affairs
pertains
citizens
gravamen
fourth
amendment
claim
complainant
legitimate
expectation
privacy
violated
illegal
search
seizure
see
katz
order
prevail
complainant
need
prove
search
seizure
illegal
violated
reasonable
expectation
privacy
item
place
issue
see
rawlings
kentucky
right
counsel
fundamental
right
criminal
defendants
assures
fairness
thus
legitimacy
adversary
process
gideon
wainwright
essence
claim
counsel
unprofessional
errors
upset
adversarial
balance
defense
prosecution
trial
rendered
unfair
verdict
rendered
suspect
see
strickland
washington
cronic
order
prevail
defendant
must
show
counsel
representation
fell
objective
standard
reasonableness
strickland
exists
reasonable
probability
counsel
unprofessional
errors
result
proceeding
different
defense
counsel
failure
litigate
fourth
amendment
claim
competently
principal
allegation
ineffectiveness
defendant
must
also
prove
fourth
amendment
claim
meritorious
reasonable
probability
verdict
different
absent
excludable
evidence
order
demonstrate
actual
prejudice
thus
respondent
defaulted
fourth
amendment
claim
one
element
proof
sixth
amendment
claim
two
claims
separate
identities
reflect
different
constitutional
values
also
disagree
petitioners
contention
reasoning
purposes
stone
fully
applicable
sixth
amendment
claim
based
principally
defense
counsel
failure
litigate
fourth
amendment
claim
competently
issue
stone
proper
scope
federal
collateral
protection
criminal
defendants
right
evidence
seized
violation
fourth
amendment
excluded
trial
state
determining
federal
courts
withhold
habeas
review
state
provided
opportunity
full
fair
litigation
fourth
amendment
claim
found
crucial
remedy
fourth
amendment
violations
provided
exclusionary
rule
personal
constitutional
right
see
also
expressed
understanding
rule
calculated
redress
injury
privacy
victim
search
seizure
instead
explained
exclusionary
rule
predominately
judicially
created
structural
remedy
designed
safeguard
fourth
amendment
rights
generally
deterrent
effect
ibid
quoting
calandra
noted
case
remedial
device
application
rule
restricted
areas
remedial
objectives
thought
efficaciously
served
quoting
calandra
supra
rule
extended
situations
grand
jury
proceedings
citing
calandra
supra
impeachment
defendant
testifies
broadly
behalf
citing
walder
rule
costs
outweigh
utility
deterrent
police
misconduct
applying
pragmatic
analysis
question
whether
prisoners
afforded
full
fair
opportunity
state
invoke
exclusionary
rule
may
raise
fourth
amendment
claims
federal
habeas
review
determined
may
accepting
exclusionary
rule
deterrent
effect
outweighs
costs
enforced
trial
direct
appeal
found
additional
contribution
consideration
claims
collateral
review
small
relation
costs
justify
federal
habeas
review
stone
also
made
clear
decision
concerned
scope
habeas
corpus
statute
authority
litigating
constitutional
claims
generally
emphasis
original
rather
simply
reaffirm
ed
exclusionary
rule
judicially
created
remedy
rather
personal
constitutional
right
emphasiz
ed
minimal
utility
rule
context
federal
collateral
proceedings
ibid
see
also
rose
mitchell
stone
powell
carefully
limited
reach
opinion
cases
involving
judicially
created
exclusionary
rule
minimal
utility
applied
habeas
corpus
proceeding
jackson
virginia
declining
extend
stone
claims
state
prisoners
violation
constitutional
standard
set
forth
winship
evidence
support
convictions
sufficient
permit
rational
trier
fact
find
guilt
beyond
reasonable
doubt
contrast
habeas
petitioner
stone
sought
merely
avail
exclusionary
rule
morrison
seeks
direct
federal
habeas
protection
personal
right
effective
assistance
counsel
right
accused
counsel
beyond
question
fundamental
right
see
gideon
right
one
charged
crime
counsel
may
deemed
fundamental
essential
fair
trials
countries
without
counsel
right
fair
trial
little
consequence
see
cronic
supra
ash
argersinger
hamlin
gideon
supra
johnson
zerbst
powell
alabama
counsel
accused
secures
rights
maine
moulton
cronic
supra
see
also
schaefer
federalism
state
criminal
procedure
harv
rev
rights
accused
person
right
represented
counsel
far
pervasive
affects
ability
assert
rights
may
constitutional
guarantee
counsel
however
satisfied
mere
formal
appointment
avery
alabama
accused
entitled
assisted
attorney
whether
retained
appointed
plays
role
necessary
ensure
trial
fair
strickland
supra
words
right
counsel
right
effective
assistance
counsel
evitts
lucey
strickland
supra
cronic
cuyler
sullivan
mcmann
richardson
collateral
review
frequently
means
accused
effectuate
right
counsel
restricting
litigation
sixth
amendment
claims
trial
direct
review
seriously
interfere
accused
right
effective
representation
layman
ordinarily
unable
recognize
counsel
errors
evaluate
counsel
professional
performance
cf
powell
alabama
supra
consequently
criminal
defendant
rarely
know
represented
competently
trial
appeal
usually
consults
another
lawyer
case
indeed
accused
often
realize
meritorious
ineffectiveness
claim
begins
collateral
review
proceedings
particularly
retained
trial
counsel
direct
appeal
extend
stone
hold
criminal
defendants
may
raise
claims
based
primarily
incompetent
handling
fourth
amendment
issues
federal
habeas
deny
defendants
whose
trial
attorneys
performed
incompetently
regard
opportunity
vindicate
right
effective
trial
counsel
deny
defendants
whose
appellate
counsel
performed
inadequately
respect
fourth
amendment
issues
opportunity
protect
right
effective
appellate
counsel
see
evitts
supra
thus
say
able
say
stone
restriction
federal
habeas
review
severely
interfere
protection
constitutional
right
asserted
habeas
petitioner
furthermore
may
free
analysis
stone
refuse
reasons
prudence
comity
burden
state
costs
exclusionary
rule
contexts
believes
price
rule
exceed
utility
constitution
constrains
ability
allocate
see
fit
costs
ineffective
assistance
sixth
amendment
mandates
state
bear
risk
constitutionally
deficient
assistance
counsel
see
murray
carrier
post
procedural
default
result
ineffective
assistance
counsel
sixth
amendment
requires
responsibility
default
imputed
state
cuyler
supra
right
counsel
prevents
conducting
trials
persons
face
incarceration
must
defend
without
adequate
legal
assistance
see
also
evitts
supra
constitutional
mandate
addressed
action
state
also
reject
suggestion
criminal
defendants
allowed
vindicate
federal
habeas
review
right
effective
assistance
counsel
counsel
primary
error
failure
make
timely
request
exclusion
illegally
seized
evidence
evidence
typically
reliable
often
probative
information
bearing
guilt
innocence
defendant
stone
recognized
premise
adversary
system
criminal
justice
partisan
advocacy
best
promote
ultimate
objective
guilty
convicted
innocent
go
free
evitts
quoting
herring
new
york
underlies
gives
meaning
right
effective
assistance
cronic
supra
never
intimated
right
counsel
conditioned
upon
actual
innocence
constitutional
rights
criminal
defendants
granted
innocent
guilty
alike
consequently
decline
hold
either
guarantee
effective
assistance
counsel
belongs
solely
innocent
attaches
matters
affecting
determination
actual
guilt
furthermore
petitioners
suggest
claim
asserted
direct
review
fail
want
actual
prejudice
whenever
counsel
primary
error
failure
make
meritorious
objection
admission
reliable
evidence
exclusion
might
affected
outcome
proceeding
decline
hold
scope
right
effective
assistance
counsel
altered
manner
simply
right
asserted
federal
habeas
review
rather
direct
review
stone
restriction
federal
habeas
review
petitioners
warn
stripped
practical
effect
unless
extend
sixth
amendment
claims
based
principally
defense
counsel
incompetent
handling
fourth
amendment
issues
petitioners
predict
every
fourth
amendment
claim
fails
defaulted
state
fully
litigated
federal
habeas
proceedings
sixth
amendment
guise
result
many
judgments
disturbed
seem
believe
prisoner
need
allege
ineffective
assistance
underlying
meritorious
fourth
amendment
claim
writ
issue
state
obligated
retry
without
challenged
evidence
ignores
rigorous
standard
strickland
erected
claims
petitioners
forecast
simply
incorrect
order
establish
ineffective
representation
defendant
must
prove
incompetence
prejudice
strong
presumption
counsel
performance
falls
within
wide
range
professional
assistance
defendant
bears
burden
proving
counsel
representation
unreasonable
prevailing
professional
norms
challenged
action
sound
strategy
reasonableness
counsel
performance
evaluated
counsel
perspective
time
alleged
error
light
circumstances
standard
review
highly
deferential
defendant
shows
prejudiced
attorney
ineffectiveness
demonstrating
reasonable
probability
counsel
unprofessional
errors
result
proceeding
different
see
also
defendant
challenges
conviction
must
show
exists
reasonable
probability
absent
errors
factfinder
reasonable
doubt
respecting
guilt
determining
existence
vel
non
prejudice
must
consider
totality
evidence
judge
jury
ibid
obvious
strickland
standard
although
means
insurmountable
highly
demanding
importantly
differs
significantly
elements
proof
applicable
straightforward
fourth
amendment
claim
although
meritorious
fourth
amendment
issue
necessary
success
sixth
amendment
claim
like
respondent
good
fourth
amendment
claim
alone
earn
prisoner
federal
habeas
relief
habeas
petitioners
prove
strickland
denied
fair
trial
gross
incompetence
attorneys
granted
writ
entitled
retrial
without
challenged
evidence
summary
reject
petitioners
argument
stone
restriction
federal
habeas
review
fourth
amendment
claims
extended
sixth
amendment
claims
founded
primarily
incompetent
representation
respect
fourth
amendment
issue
state
obtains
criminal
conviction
trial
accused
deprived
effective
assistance
counsel
state
unconstitutionally
deprives
defendant
liberty
cuyler
defendant
thus
custody
violation
constitution
federal
courts
habeas
jurisdiction
claim
hold
federal
courts
may
grant
habeas
relief
appropriate
cases
regardless
nature
underlying
attorney
error
iii
petitioners
also
argue
respondent
satisfied
either
performance
prejudice
prong
test
ineffective
assistance
counsel
set
forth
strickland
address
component
test
turn
respect
performance
component
strickland
test
petitioners
contend
morrison
overcome
strong
presumption
attorney
competence
established
strickland
acknowledging
said
single
serious
error
may
support
claim
ineffective
assistance
counsel
brief
petitioners
citing
cronic
petitioners
argue
mere
failure
file
timely
suppression
motion
alone
constitute
per
se
sixth
amendment
violation
maintain
record
amply
reflects
trial
counsel
crafted
sound
trial
strategy
iewed
entirety
counsel
pretrial
investigation
preparation
trial
performance
professionally
reasonable
brief
petitioners
footnotes
citations
omitted
agree
petitioners
view
failure
file
suppression
motion
constitute
per
se
ineffective
assistance
counsel
disagree
petitioners
assessment
counsel
performance
strickland
explained
access
counsel
skill
knowledge
necessary
accord
defendants
ample
opportunity
meet
case
prosecution
entitled
quoting
adams
ex
rel
mccann
counsel
duty
bring
bear
skill
knowledge
render
trial
reliable
adversarial
testing
process
counsel
competence
however
presumed
defendant
must
rebut
presumption
proving
attorney
representation
unreasonable
prevailing
professional
norms
challenged
action
sound
strategy
reasonableness
counsel
performance
evaluated
counsel
perspective
time
alleged
error
light
circumstances
making
competency
determination
keep
mind
counsel
function
elaborated
prevailing
professional
norms
make
adversarial
testing
process
work
particular
case
testing
process
generally
function
properly
unless
defense
counsel
done
investigation
prosecution
case
various
defense
strategies
noted
counsel
duty
make
reasonable
investigations
make
reasonable
decision
makes
particular
investigations
unnecessary
observed
particular
decision
investigate
must
directly
assessed
reasonableness
circumstances
applying
heavy
measure
deference
counsel
judgments
ibid
trial
record
case
clearly
reveals
morrison
attorney
failed
file
timely
suppression
motion
due
strategic
considerations
first
day
trial
unaware
search
state
intention
introduce
bedsheet
evidence
counsel
unapprised
search
seizure
conducted
pretrial
discovery
counsel
failure
request
discovery
based
strategy
counsel
mistaken
beliefs
state
obliged
take
initiative
turn
inculpatory
evidence
defense
victim
preferences
determine
whether
state
proceeded
trial
indictment
returned
viewing
counsel
failure
conduct
discovery
perspective
time
decided
forgo
stage
pretrial
preparation
applying
heavy
measure
deference
judgment
find
counsel
decision
unreasonable
contrary
prevailing
professional
norms
justifications
morrison
attorney
offered
omission
betray
startling
ignorance
law
weak
attempt
shift
blame
inadequate
preparation
ounsel
duty
make
reasonable
investigations
make
reasonable
decision
makes
particular
investigations
unnecessary
ibid
respondent
lawyer
neither
investigated
made
reasonable
decision
investigate
state
case
discovery
complete
lack
pretrial
preparation
puts
risk
defendant
right
ample
opportunity
meet
case
prosecution
quoting
adams
supra
reliability
adversarial
testing
process
see
petitioners
attempt
minimize
seriousness
counsel
errors
asserting
state
case
turned
far
credibility
witnesses
bedsheet
related
testimony
consequently
urge
defense
counsel
vigorous
attempts
discredit
witnesses
effort
establish
different
version
facts
lift
counsel
performance
back
realm
professional
acceptability
strickland
requires
reviewing
determine
whether
light
circumstances
identified
acts
omissions
outside
wide
range
professionally
competent
assistance
generally
appropriate
reviewing
assess
counsel
overall
performance
throughout
case
order
determine
whether
identified
acts
omissions
overcome
presumption
counsel
rendered
reasonable
professional
assistance
since
countless
ways
provide
effective
assistance
given
case
unless
consideration
given
counsel
overall
performance
trial
easy
examining
counsel
defense
proved
unsuccessful
conclude
particular
act
omission
counsel
unreasonable
ibid
case
however
deal
total
failure
conduct
pretrial
discovery
one
counsel
offered
implausible
explanations
counsel
performance
trial
generally
creditable
enough
suggests
better
explanation
apparent
pervasive
failure
make
reasonable
investigations
make
reasonable
decision
makes
particular
investigations
unnecessary
circumstances
although
failure
district
appeals
examine
counsel
overall
performance
inadvisable
think
omission
affect
soundness
conclusion
courts
reached
counsel
performance
fell
level
reasonable
professional
assistance
respects
alleged
moreover
petitioners
analysis
flawed
however
use
hindsight
evaluate
relative
importance
various
components
state
case
see
fair
assessment
attorney
performance
requires
every
effort
made
eliminate
distorting
effects
hindsight
reconstruct
circumstances
counsel
challenged
conduct
evaluate
conduct
counsel
perspective
time
time
morrison
lawyer
decided
request
discovery
ask
know
state
case
relative
importance
witness
credibility
bedsheet
related
expert
testimony
pertinent
determination
whether
respondent
prejudiced
attorney
incompetence
sheds
light
reasonableness
counsel
decision
request
discovery
therefore
agree
district
appeals
assistance
rendered
respondent
trial
counsel
constitutionally
deficient
petitioners
also
argue
respondent
suffered
prejudice
attorney
failure
make
timely
suppression
motion
third
circuit
erred
remanding
case
district
determination
prejudice
strickland
standard
essence
petitioners
argument
hearing
respondent
motion
bail
pending
appeal
judge
presided
respondent
trial
made
finding
historical
fact
entitled
presumption
correctness
finding
presumed
correct
petitioners
contend
dispositive
prejudice
issue
find
exists
reasonable
probability
absent
morrison
attorney
errors
factfinder
reasonable
doubt
respecting
guilt
strickland
thus
petitioners
conclude
ground
remand
exists
new
jersey
bail
conviction
appropriate
substantial
issue
review
exists
defendant
poses
threat
community
rule
morrison
bail
hearing
public
defender
representing
informed
judge
read
trial
transcript
appeal
entirely
sure
grounds
morrison
appeal
tr
motion
bail
pending
appeal
however
argue
trial
committed
two
legal
errors
present
substantial
issues
appellate
review
specifically
counsel
contended
erred
refusing
entertain
midtrial
motion
suppress
sheet
respondent
may
prejudiced
awareness
another
pending
indictment
respect
decision
admit
sheet
morrison
attorney
presented
accurately
characterized
argument
suggested
trial
counsel
surprised
introduction
sheet
waived
pretrial
filing
requirement
suppression
motions
permitted
midtrial
motion
judge
responded
argument
noting
matter
sheet
tests
resulted
therefrom
obviously
important
important
phases
case
means
obviously
important
phases
case
direct
testimony
victim
well
testimony
witnesses
police
medical
examinations
testimony
defense
testimony
defendant
sheet
one
small
phase
whole
case
think
substantial
issue
review
appellate
division
cause
likely
cause
reversal
agree
petitioners
statement
made
judge
respondent
bail
hearing
constitutes
finding
fact
subject
deference
case
section
provides
determination
hearing
merits
factual
issue
made
state
competent
jurisdiction
shall
presumed
correct
unless
merits
factual
dispute
resolved
state
hearing
issue
respondent
places
federal
habeas
courts
substantially
different
issue
presented
judge
bail
hearing
question
federal
courts
whether
reasonable
probability
exists
trial
judge
reasonable
doubt
concerning
respondent
guilt
sheet
related
testimony
excluded
contrast
state
called
upon
simply
decide
whether
argument
abused
discretion
refusing
entertain
respondent
suppression
motion
midtrial
raised
substantial
issue
appeal
morrison
likely
succeed
judge
asked
answer
question
presently
federal
courts
answer
stated
sheet
important
aspect
case
important
aspect
find
remark
tantamount
declaration
found
respondent
guilty
even
sheet
related
expert
testimony
admitted
saying
judge
asked
whether
reasonable
doubt
concerning
morrison
guilt
sheet
related
testimony
excluded
well
answered
affirmatively
without
contradicting
earlier
comment
although
sheet
may
important
components
state
case
may
tipped
balance
simply
know
fairly
said
merits
factual
dispute
regarding
existence
prejudice
resolved
bail
hearing
conclude
statements
judge
regarding
relative
importance
sheet
findings
fact
subject
deference
respondent
also
criticizes
appeals
decision
remand
redetermination
prejudice
argues
record
sufficiently
complete
enable
apply
strickland
prejudice
prong
directly
facts
case
urges
decline
respondent
invitation
existing
record
proved
adequate
application
strickland
competency
standard
incomplete
respect
prejudice
evidentiary
hearing
ever
held
merits
respondent
fourth
amendment
claim
state
conceded
illegality
search
seizure
tr
oral
arg
entitled
opportunity
establish
officer
search
came
within
one
exceptions
recognized
fourth
amendment
prohibition
warrantless
searches
even
respondent
may
unable
show
absent
evidence
concerning
bedsheet
reasonable
probability
trial
judge
reasonable
doubt
guilt
respondent
make
showing
matter
express
view
course
need
hold
evidentiary
hearing
fourth
amendment
claim
judgment
appeals
affirmed
footnotes
held
last
term
right
effective
assistance
counsel
confined
trial
extends
also
first
appeal
right
evitts
lucey
moreover
restriction
federal
habeas
relief
established
stone
powell
predicated
existence
trial
direct
review
opportunity
full
fair
litigation
constitutional
claim
advanced
habeas
petitioner
general
comparable
meaningful
opportunity
exists
full
fair
litigation
habeas
petitioner
claims
trial
direct
review
made
clear
stone
rested
holding
prudential
rather
jurisdictional
grounds
decision
mean
federal
lacks
jurisdiction
fourth
amendment
claim
application
exclusionary
rule
limited
observed
powell
alabama
layman
defendant
requires
guiding
hand
counsel
every
step
proceedings
emphasis
added
noted
charged
crime
incapable
generally
determining
whether
indictment
good
bad
unfamiliar
rules
evidence
left
without
aid
counsel
may
put
trial
without
proper
charge
convicted
upon
incompetent
evidence
evidence
irrelevant
issue
otherwise
inadmissible
lacks
skill
knowledge
adequately
prepare
defense
even
though
perfect
one
ibid
refer
cases
defendant
alleges
actual
ineffective
assistance
rather
contexts
ineffective
assistance
presumed
counsel
either
totally
absent
prevented
assisting
accused
critical
stage
proceeding
see
cronic
strickland
counsel
burdened
actual
conflict
interest
ibid
cuyler
sullivan
reason
believe
defense
attorneys
sandbag
consciously
default
poorly
litigate
clients
fourth
amendment
claims
state
hope
gaining
favorable
review
claims
sixth
amendment
federal
habeas
proceedings
first
virtually
inconceivable
attorney
deliberately
invite
judgment
performance
constitutionally
deficient
order
win
federal
collateral
review
client
second
counsel
client
little
anything
gain
everything
lose
strategy
remembered
incompetently
litigated
defaulted
fourth
amendment
claims
lead
reversal
defendant
conviction
sixth
amendment
grounds
potentially
claims
reasonable
lawyer
forgo
competent
litigation
meritorious
possibly
decisive
claims
remote
chance
deliberate
dereliction
might
ultimately
result
federal
habeas
review
furthermore
attorney
chooses
default
fourth
amendment
claim
also
loses
opportunity
obtain
direct
review
standard
chapman
california
requires
state
prove
defendant
prejudiced
error
defaulting
counsel
shifts
burden
defendant
prove
exists
reasonable
probability
absent
attorney
incompetence
convicted
cf
comment
effective
assistance
counsel
sixth
amendment
fair
trial
guarantee
chi
rev
see
also
smith
murray
post
murray
carrier
post
subsections
establish
exceptions
general
rule
determinations
made
state
hearing
merits
factual
issue
entitled
presumption
correctness
mean
suggest
comment
made
judge
bail
hearing
absolutely
relevance
prejudice
inquiry
hold
remark
finding
fact
subject
presumption
correctness
justice
powell
chief
justice
justice
rehnquist
join
concurring
judgment
agree
stone
powell
bar
consideration
respondent
claim
federal
habeas
corpus
conclusion
flows
logically
stone
strickland
washington
difficult
question
whether
admission
illegally
seized
reliable
evidence
ever
constitute
prejudice
strickland
strong
argument
argument
neither
raised
parties
discussed
various
courts
involved
case
consequently
proper
course
reject
petitioners
stone
powell
argument
go
though
appears
take
course
employs
unnecessarily
broad
language
may
suggest
considered
resolved
broader
strickland
issue
case
ante
write
separately
suggestion
mistaken
also
express
view
relationship
stone
sixth
amendment
right
effective
assistance
counsel
respondent
claim
uncomplicated
respondent
argues
trial
counsel
incompetently
failed
conduct
pretrial
discovery
counsel
conducted
discovery
known
police
seized
bedsheet
respondent
apartment
without
warrant
bedsheet
contained
hair
samples
matching
hair
respondent
rape
victim
sheet
also
contained
semen
stains
matching
found
victim
underpants
state
introduced
bedsheet
accompanying
expert
analysis
trial
trial
judge
denied
respondent
belated
motion
suppress
ground
untimely
respondent
contends
sheet
excluded
fourth
amendment
grounds
suppression
motion
timely
filed
thus
respondent
argues
counsel
failure
conduct
discovery
led
admission
evidence
damning
excludable
petitioners
attorney
general
new
jersey
superintendent
rahway
state
prison
argue
claim
depends
violation
fourth
amendment
claim
heard
federal
habeas
corpus
petitioners
argument
rests
stone
powell
supra
held
fourth
amendment
claims
cognizable
federal
habeas
corpus
long
state
provided
full
fair
opportunity
litigate
claims
state
properly
rejects
petitioners
argument
stone
holding
derives
two
propositions
neither
applies
claim
ineffective
assistance
counsel
first
reasoned
stone
exclusionary
rule
exist
remedy
wrong
committed
defendant
rather
deter
violations
fourth
amendment
law
enforcement
personnel
second
concluded
collateral
review
fourth
amendment
claims
add
little
exclusionary
rule
deterrent
value
entail
significant
costs
relations
particularly
public
interest
convicting
punishing
guilty
claims
stand
different
footing
strickland
makes
clear
right
effective
assistance
counsel
personal
defendant
explicitly
tied
defendant
right
fundamentally
fair
trial
trial
determination
guilt
innocence
reliable
strickland
supra
see
also
cronic
right
effective
assistance
counsel
recognized
sake
effect
ability
accused
receive
fair
trial
criminal
defendant
obtains
relief
strickland
receive
windfall
contrary
reversal
defendant
conviction
necessary
ensure
fair
result
strickland
supra
reason
strickland
explicitly
stated
principles
governing
ineffectiveness
claims
apply
federal
collateral
proceedings
direct
appeal
motions
new
trial
strickland
thus
leaves
room
argument
stone
indirectly
bars
claims
federal
habeas
corpus
proceedings
possible
conclude
since
claimed
prejudice
admission
illegally
seized
bedsheet
respondent
claim
actually
fourth
amendment
claim
barred
stone
directly
strickland
teaches
right
effective
assistance
counsel
ensures
defendants
fair
opportunity
contest
charges
defendant
valid
claim
whenever
denied
opportunity
regardless
law
counsel
error
based
follows
respondent
claim
must
judged
sixth
amendment
claim
according
standards
set
forth
strickland
fourth
amendment
claim
governed
stone
ii
applying
strickland
respondent
must
show
counsel
fell
basic
standards
competence
sufficiently
prejudiced
resulting
errors
strickland
petitioners
contend
trial
counsel
errors
egregious
enough
satisfy
strickland
performance
prong
addition
argue
trial
judge
comments
bail
hearing
constitute
factual
finding
errors
prejudicial
correctly
finds
arguments
mistaken
holding
disposes
claims
petitioners
make
respect
legal
standards
claims
far
serious
argument
petitioners
make
case
addressed
respondent
sole
claim
prejudice
stems
admission
evidence
concededly
reliable
although
arguably
inadmissible
mapp
ohio
progeny
parties
courts
assumed
evidence
question
fact
inadmissible
reasonable
probability
use
trial
affected
verdict
strickland
prejudice
prong
satisfied
cf
strickland
view
assumption
justified
strickland
emphasized
claims
designed
protect
defendants
fundamental
unfairness
sixth
amendment
recognizes
right
assistance
counsel
envisions
counsel
playing
role
critical
ability
adversarial
system
produce
results
see
also
benchmark
judging
claim
ineffectiveness
must
whether
counsel
conduct
undermined
proper
functioning
adversarial
process
trial
relied
produced
result
accordingly
cautioned
reasonable
probability
test
applied
mechanically
number
practical
considerations
important
application
standards
outlined
important
adjudicating
claim
actual
ineffectiveness
counsel
keep
mind
principles
stated
establish
mechanical
rules
although
principles
guide
process
decision
ultimate
focus
inquiry
must
fundamental
fairness
proceeding
whose
result
challenged
every
case
concerned
whether
despite
strong
presumption
reliability
result
particular
proceeding
unreliable
breakdown
adversarial
process
system
counts
produce
results
emphasis
added
many
cases
indicate
admission
illegally
seized
reliable
evidence
lead
unjust
fundamentally
unfair
verdict
held
repeatedly
evidence
ordinarily
excluded
deterrence
reasons
relation
fairness
defendant
trial
leon
stone
powell
calandra
indeed
long
clear
exclusion
illegally
seized
wholly
reliable
evidence
renders
verdicts
less
fair
deflects
truthfinding
process
often
frees
guilty
stone
powell
see
also
white
dissenting
noting
often
consequence
exclusion
unimpeachable
probative
evidence
kept
trier
fact
function
proceedings
substantially
impaired
trial
totally
aborted
thus
harm
suffered
respondent
case
denial
fair
reliable
adjudication
guilt
rather
absence
windfall
fundamental
fairness
trial
affected
reasoning
strickland
strongly
suggests
harm
amount
prejudicial
ineffective
assistance
counsel
sixth
amendment
common
sense
reinforces
conclusion
emphasized
last
term
recognizes
today
ante
premise
adversary
system
criminal
justice
partisan
advocacy
sides
case
best
promote
ultimate
objective
guilty
convicted
innocent
go
free
evitts
lucey
emphasis
added
quoting
herring
new
york
right
effective
assistance
counsel
flows
logically
premise
shake
right
loose
constitutional
moorings
hold
sixth
amendment
protects
criminal
defendants
errors
merely
deny
defendants
windfall
case
example
bedsheet
may
provided
critical
evidence
respondent
guilt
evidence
whose
relevance
reliability
seriously
questioned
admission
bedsheet
thus
harmed
respondent
sense
helped
factfinder
make
determination
respondent
guilt
innocence
view
nothing
strickland
compels
us
conclude
injury
establishes
prejudice
purposes
respondent
ineffective
assistance
claim
nevertheless
vote
reverse
appeals
neither
parties
courts
considered
question
raise
questions
presented
petition
certiorari
encompass
aspect
strickland
application
raise
issue
rhetoric
might
mistakenly
read
answer
question
asked
ante
decline
hold
either
guarantee
effective
assistance
counsel
belongs
solely
innocent
attaches
matters
affecting
determination
actual
guilt
courts
litigants
deceived
pronouncements
notwithstanding
broad
language
explicitly
recognizes
general
applicability
strickland
context
discussed
parties
ante
limits
holding
right
effective
assistance
counsel
equally
enforceable
direct
appeal
federal
collateral
review
ante
thus
question
whether
strickland
prejudice
encompasses
admission
reliable
illegally
obtained
evidence
remains
open
one
considered
remand
case
agree
stone
powell
govern
case
concur
judgment
leave
application
strickland
prejudice
prong
claims
one
another
day
reason
petitioners
argument
respondent
claim
barred
wainwright
sykes
lacks
merit
gist
argument
respondent
failed
timely
raise
fourth
amendment
claim
direct
appeal
thereby
forfeited
right
rely
fourth
amendment
violation
collateral
review
argument
ignores
fact
respondent
claim
evidence
admitted
trial
violation
fourth
amendment
exclusionary
rule
rather
counsel
failure
argue
together
counsel
failure
conduct
pretrial
discovery
deprived
sixth
amendment
right
effective
assistance
counsel
two
claims
distinct
cf
cronic
cronic
held
prejudice
may
presumed
kinds
extreme
circumstances
counsel
given
time
prepare
defense
see
discussing
powell
alabama
circumstances
defendant
effect
deprived
counsel
altogether
thereby
deprived
meaningful
opportunity
subject
state
evidence
adversarial
testing
prejudice
presumed
reason
presumed
gideon
wainwright
see
chapman
california
recognizing
denial
counsel
trial
never
harmless
error
see
amsterdam
search
seizure
section
comment
rev
granted
many
criminals
must
go
free
deter
constables
blundering
pursuance
policy
liberation
beyond
confines
necessity
inflicts
gratuitous
harm
public
interest
quoted
stone
powell
questions
presented
ask
hether
stone
powell
bars
claim
ineffective
assistance
counsel
habeas
corpus
basis
claim
failure
make
fourth
amendment
suppression
motion
trial
whether
claim
barred
wainwright
sykes
fourth
amendment
issue
preserved
trial
whether
appeals
gave
sufficient
weight
certain
supposed
factual
findings
state
trial
judge
pet
cert