herring
argued
october
decided
january
officers
coffee
county
arrested
petitioner
herring
based
warrant
listed
neighboring
dale
county
database
search
incident
arrest
yielded
drugs
gun
revealed
warrant
recalled
months
earlier
though
information
never
entered
database
herring
indicted
federal
gun
drug
possession
charges
moved
suppress
evidence
ground
initial
arrest
illegal
assuming
fourth
amendment
violation
district
concluded
exclusionary
rule
apply
denied
motion
suppress
eleventh
circuit
affirmed
finding
arresting
officers
innocent
wrongdoing
dale
county
failure
update
records
merely
negligent
therefore
concluded
benefit
suppression
marginal
nonexistent
evidence
admissible
rule
leon
held
police
mistakes
leading
unlawful
search
result
isolated
negligence
attenuated
search
rather
systemic
error
reckless
disregard
constitutional
requirements
exclusionary
rule
apply
pp
fact
search
arrest
unreasonable
necessarily
mean
exclusionary
rule
applies
illinois
gates
rule
individual
right
applies
deterrent
effect
outweighs
substantial
cost
letting
guilty
possibly
dangerous
defendants
go
free
leon
example
apply
police
acted
objectively
reasonable
reliance
invalid
warrant
applying
leon
rule
police
reasonably
relied
mistaken
information
database
arrest
warrant
outstanding
arizona
evans
left
unresolved
issue
confronted
whether
evidence
suppressed
police
committed
error
pp
extent
exclusionary
rule
justified
deterrent
effect
varies
degree
law
enforcement
culpability
see
leon
supra
indeed
abuses
gave
rise
rule
featured
intentional
conduct
patently
unconstitutional
see
weeks
error
arising
nonrecurring
attenuated
negligence
far
removed
core
concerns
led
rule
adoption
pp
trigger
exclusionary
rule
police
conduct
must
sufficiently
deliberate
exclusion
meaningfully
deter
sufficiently
culpable
deterrence
worth
price
paid
justice
system
pertinent
analysis
objective
inquiry
arresting
officers
subjective
awareness
see
leon
supra
pp
conduct
objectively
culpable
require
exclusion
marginal
benefits
might
follow
suppressing
evidence
obtained
circumstances
justify
substantial
costs
exclusion
leon
supra
pp
affirmed
roberts
delivered
opinion
scalia
kennedy
thomas
alito
joined
ginsburg
filed
dissenting
opinion
stevens
souter
breyer
joined
breyer
filed
dissenting
opinion
souter
joined
bennie
dean
herring
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
eleventh
circuit
january
chief
justice
roberts
delivered
opinion
fourth
amendment
forbids
unreasonable
searches
seizures
usually
requires
police
probable
cause
warrant
making
arrest
officer
reasonably
believes
outstanding
arrest
warrant
belief
turns
wrong
negligent
bookkeeping
error
another
police
employee
parties
agree
ensuing
arrest
still
violation
fourth
amendment
dispute
whether
contraband
found
search
incident
arrest
must
excluded
later
prosecution
cases
establish
suppression
automatic
consequence
fourth
amendment
violation
instead
question
turns
culpability
police
potential
exclusion
deter
wrongful
police
conduct
error
result
isolated
negligence
attenuated
arrest
hold
circumstances
jury
barred
considering
evidence
july
investigator
mark
anderson
learned
bennie
dean
herring
driven
coffee
county
sheriff
department
retrieve
something
impounded
truck
herring
stranger
law
enforcement
anderson
asked
county
warrant
clerk
sandy
pope
check
outstanding
warrants
herring
arrest
found
none
anderson
asked
pope
check
sharon
morgan
counterpart
neighboring
dale
county
checking
dale
county
computer
database
morgan
replied
active
arrest
warrant
herring
failure
appear
felony
charge
pope
relayed
information
anderson
asked
morgan
fax
copy
warrant
confirmation
anderson
deputy
followed
herring
left
impound
lot
pulled
arrested
search
incident
arrest
revealed
methamphetamine
herring
pocket
pistol
felon
possess
vehicle
app
however
mistake
warrant
dale
county
sheriff
computer
records
supposed
correspond
actual
arrest
warrants
office
also
maintains
morgan
went
files
retrieve
actual
warrant
fax
pope
morgan
unable
find
called
clerk
learned
warrant
recalled
five
months
earlier
normally
warrant
recalled
clerk
office
judge
chambers
calls
morgan
enters
information
sheriff
computer
database
disposes
physical
copy
whatever
reason
information
recall
warrant
herring
appear
database
morgan
immediately
called
pope
alert
mixup
pope
contacted
anderson
secure
radio
unfolded
minutes
herring
already
arrested
found
gun
drugs
hundred
yards
sheriff
office
herring
indicted
district
middle
district
alabama
illegally
possessing
gun
drugs
violations
moved
suppress
evidence
ground
initial
arrest
illegal
warrant
rescinded
magistrate
judge
recommended
denying
motion
arresting
officers
acted
belief
warrant
still
outstanding
thus
even
fourth
amendment
violation
reason
believe
application
exclusionary
rule
deter
occurrence
future
mistakes
app
district
adopted
magistrate
judge
recommendation
supp
appeals
eleventh
circuit
affirmed
eleventh
circuit
found
arresting
officers
coffee
county
entirely
innocent
wrongdoing
carelessness
assumed
whoever
failed
update
dale
county
sheriff
records
also
law
enforcement
official
noted
conduct
question
wa
negligent
failure
act
deliberate
tactical
choice
act
ibid
error
merely
negligent
attenuated
arrest
eleventh
circuit
concluded
benefit
suppressing
evidence
marginal
nonexistent
ibid
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
evidence
therefore
admissible
rule
leon
courts
required
exclusion
evidence
obtained
similar
police
errors
hoay
state
ark
granted
herring
petition
certiorari
resolve
conflict
affirm
eleventh
circuit
judgment
ii
determination
based
reasonable
mistaken
assumptions
person
subjected
search
seizure
necessarily
victim
constitutional
violation
phrase
probable
cause
confirms
fourth
amendment
demand
possible
precision
whether
error
traced
mistake
state
actor
source
may
bear
analysis
purposes
deciding
case
however
accept
parties
assumption
fourth
amendment
violation
issue
whether
exclusionary
rule
applied
fourth
amendment
protects
right
people
secure
persons
houses
papers
effects
unreasonable
searches
seizures
contains
provision
expressly
precluding
use
evidence
obtained
violation
commands
arizona
evans
nonetheless
decisions
establish
exclusionary
rule
applicable
forbids
use
improperly
obtained
evidence
trial
see
weeks
stated
judicially
created
rule
designed
safeguard
fourth
amendment
rights
generally
deterrent
effect
calandra
analyzing
applicability
rule
leon
admonished
must
consider
actions
police
officers
involved
necessary
consider
objective
reasonableness
officers
eventually
executed
warrant
also
officers
originally
obtained
provided
information
material
determination
coffee
county
officers
nothing
improper
indeed
error
noticed
quickly
coffee
county
requested
faxed
confirmation
warrant
eleventh
circuit
concluded
however
somebody
dale
county
updated
computer
database
reflect
recall
arrest
warrant
also
concluded
error
negligent
find
reckless
deliberate
fact
crucial
holding
error
enough
require
extreme
sanction
exclusion
leon
supra
fact
fourth
amendment
violation
occurred
search
arrest
unreasonable
necessarily
mean
exclusionary
rule
applies
illinois
gates
indeed
exclusion
always
last
resort
first
impulse
hudson
michigan
precedents
establish
important
principles
constrain
application
exclusionary
rule
first
exclusionary
rule
individual
right
applies
appreciable
deterrence
leon
supra
quoting
janis
repeatedly
rejected
argument
exclusion
necessary
consequence
fourth
amendment
violation
leon
supra
evans
supra
pennsylvania
bd
probation
parole
scott
instead
focused
efficacy
rule
deterring
fourth
amendment
violations
future
see
calandra
supra
stone
powell
addition
benefits
deterrence
must
outweigh
costs
leon
supra
never
suggested
exclusionary
rule
must
apply
every
circumstance
might
provide
marginal
deterrence
scott
supra
extent
application
exclusionary
rule
provide
incremental
deterrent
possible
benefit
must
weighed
substantial
social
costs
illinois
krull
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
principal
cost
applying
rule
course
letting
guilty
possibly
dangerous
defendants
go
free
something
offends
basic
concepts
criminal
justice
system
leon
supra
rule
costly
toll
upon
law
enforcement
objectives
presents
high
obstacle
urging
application
scott
supra
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
also
havens
payner
principles
reflected
holding
leon
police
act
warrant
invalid
lack
probable
cause
exclusionary
rule
apply
police
acted
objectively
reasonable
reliance
subsequently
invalidated
search
warrant
perhaps
confusingly
called
objectively
reasonable
reliance
good
faith
companion
case
massachusetts
sheppard
held
exclusionary
rule
apply
warrant
invalid
judge
forgot
make
clerical
corrections
shortly
thereafter
extended
holdings
warrantless
administrative
searches
performed
reliance
statute
later
declared
unconstitutional
krull
supra
finally
evans
applied
rule
police
reasonably
relied
mistaken
information
database
arrest
warrant
outstanding
held
mistake
made
judicial
employee
give
rise
exclusion
three
reasons
exclusionary
rule
crafted
curb
police
rather
judicial
misconduct
employees
unlikely
try
subvert
fourth
amendment
important
basis
believing
application
exclusionary
rule
circumstances
significant
effect
deterring
errors
evans
left
unresolved
whether
evidence
suppressed
police
personnel
responsible
error
issue
argued
state
case
one
confront
extent
exclusionary
rule
justified
deterrence
principles
varies
culpability
law
enforcement
conduct
said
leon
assessment
flagrancy
police
misconduct
constitutes
important
step
calculus
applying
exclusionary
rule
similarly
krull
elaborated
evidence
suppressed
said
law
enforcement
officer
knowledge
may
properly
charged
knowledge
search
unconstitutional
fourth
amendment
quoting
peltier
anticipating
exception
exclusionary
rule
judge
friendly
wrote
beneficent
aim
exclusionary
rule
deter
police
misconduct
sufficiently
accomplished
practice
outlawing
evidence
obtained
flagrant
deliberate
violation
rights
bill
rights
code
criminal
procedure
rev
footnotes
omitted
see
also
brown
illinois
powell
concurring
part
deterrent
value
exclusionary
rule
likely
effective
official
conduct
flagrantly
abusive
fourth
amendment
rights
indeed
abuses
gave
rise
exclusionary
rule
featured
intentional
conduct
patently
unconstitutional
weeks
foundational
exclusionary
rule
case
officers
broken
defendant
home
using
key
shown
neighbor
confiscated
incriminating
papers
returned
marshal
confiscate
even
search
warrant
held
required
gotten
one
tried
lacking
sworn
particularized
information
even
order
justified
procedure
silverthorne
lumber
petitioner
repeatedly
relies
similar
federal
officials
without
shadow
authority
went
defendants
office
made
clean
sweep
every
paper
find
even
government
seemed
acknowledge
seizure
outrage
equally
flagrant
conduct
issue
mapp
ohio
overruled
wolf
colorado
extended
exclusionary
rule
officers
forced
open
door
mapp
house
kept
lawyer
entering
brandished
concluded
false
warrant
forced
handcuffs
canvassed
house
obscenity
see
friendly
supra
situation
mapp
featured
flagrant
deliberate
violation
rights
error
arises
nonrecurring
attenuated
negligence
thus
far
removed
core
concerns
led
us
adopt
rule
first
place
fact
since
leon
never
applied
rule
exclude
evidence
obtained
violation
fourth
amendment
police
conduct
intentional
culpable
trigger
exclusionary
rule
police
conduct
must
sufficiently
deliberate
exclusion
meaningfully
deter
sufficiently
culpable
deterrence
worth
price
paid
justice
system
laid
cases
exclusionary
rule
serves
deter
deliberate
reckless
grossly
negligent
conduct
circumstances
recurring
systemic
negligence
error
case
rise
decision
franks
delaware
provides
analogy
cf
leon
supra
franks
held
police
negligence
obtaining
warrant
even
rise
level
fourth
amendment
violation
let
alone
meet
stringent
test
triggering
exclusionary
rule
held
constitution
allowed
defendants
circumstances
challenge
truthfulness
factual
statements
made
affidavit
supporting
warrant
even
warrant
issued
false
statements
necessary
magistrate
judge
determination
warrant
voided
ibid
find
false
statements
relevant
must
allegations
deliberate
falsehood
reckless
disregard
truth
llegations
negligence
innocent
mistake
insufficient
case
franks
concern
false
information
provided
police
franks
negligent
police
miscommunications
course
acquiring
warrant
provide
basis
rescind
warrant
render
search
arrest
invalid
miscommunications
occurred
different
context
warrant
issued
recalled
fact
require
excluding
evidence
obtained
pertinent
analysis
deterrence
culpability
objective
inquiry
subjective
awareness
arresting
officers
reply
brief
petitioner
see
also
post
ginsburg
dissenting
already
held
inquiry
confined
objectively
ascertainable
question
whether
reasonably
well
trained
officer
known
search
illegal
light
circumstances
leon
circumstances
frequently
include
particular
officer
knowledge
experience
make
test
subjective
one
probable
cause
looks
officer
knowledge
experience
ornelas
subjective
intent
whren
suggest
recordkeeping
errors
police
immune
exclusionary
rule
case
however
conduct
issue
objectively
culpable
require
exclusion
leon
held
marginal
nonexistent
benefits
produced
suppressing
evidence
obtained
objectively
reasonable
reliance
subsequently
invalidated
search
warrant
justify
substantial
costs
exclusion
true
evidence
obtained
objectively
reasonable
reliance
subsequently
recalled
warrant
police
shown
reckless
maintaining
warrant
system
knowingly
made
false
entries
lay
groundwork
future
false
arrests
exclusion
certainly
justified
cases
misconduct
cause
fourth
amendment
violation
said
much
leon
explaining
officer
obtain
warrant
basis
bones
affidavit
rely
colleagues
ignorant
circumstances
warrant
obtained
conduct
search
citing
whiteley
warden
wyo
state
penitentiary
petitioner
fears
decision
cause
police
departments
deliberately
keep
officers
ignorant
brief
petitioner
thus
unfounded
dissent
also
adverts
possible
unreliability
number
databases
relevant
case
post
case
systemic
errors
demonstrated
might
reckless
officers
rely
unreliable
warrant
system
see
evans
concurring
surely
reasonable
police
rely
recordkeeping
system
routinely
leads
false
arrests
second
emphasis
added
hudson
kennedy
concurring
widespread
pattern
violations
shown
reason
grave
concern
emphasis
added
evidence
errors
dale
county
system
routine
widespread
officer
anderson
testified
never
reason
question
information
dale
county
warrant
app
sandy
pope
sharon
morgan
testified
remember
similar
miscommunication
ever
happening
watch
even
less
error
database
issue
evans
also
found
reliance
database
objectively
reasonable
similar
error
every
three
four
years
showings
made
see
supp
eleventh
circuit
correct
affirm
denial
motion
suppress
petitioner
claim
police
negligence
automatically
triggers
suppression
squared
principles
underlying
exclusionary
rule
explained
cases
light
repeated
holdings
deterrent
effect
suppression
must
substantial
outweigh
harm
justice
system
leon
conclude
police
mistakes
result
negligence
described
rather
systemic
error
reckless
disregard
constitutional
requirements
marginal
deterrence
pay
way
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
case
criminal
go
free
constable
blundered
people
defore
opinion
cardozo
judgment
appeals
eleventh
circuit
affirmed
ordered
bennie
dean
herring
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
eleventh
circuit
january
justice
ginsburg
justice
stevens
justice
souter
justice
breyer
join
dissenting
petitioner
bennie
dean
herring
arrested
subjected
search
incident
arrest
although
warrant
outstanding
police
lacked
probable
cause
believe
engaged
criminal
activity
arrest
ensuing
search
therefore
violated
herring
fourth
amendment
right
secure
unreasonable
searches
seizures
appeals
determined
government
contend
otherwise
exclusionary
rule
provides
redress
fourth
amendment
violations
placing
government
position
unconstitutional
arrest
search
rule
thus
strongly
encourages
police
compliance
fourth
amendment
future
however
holds
rule
inapplicable
careless
recordkeeping
police
flagrant
deliberate
misconduct
accounts
herring
arrest
constrict
domain
exclusionary
rule
hold
rule
dispositive
case
courts
power
discourage
police
error
kind
issue
must
application
exclusionary
rule
arizona
evans
stevens
dissenting
unlawful
search
case
contested
police
found
methamphetamine
herring
pocket
pistol
truck
serious
impact
holding
innocent
persons
wrongfully
arrested
based
erroneous
information
carelessly
maintained
computer
data
base
warrant
herring
arrest
recalled
february
apparently
issued
error
see
brief
petitioner
citing
app
warrant
database
dale
county
sheriff
department
however
automatically
update
reflect
changes
app
member
dale
county
sheriff
department
parties
identified
returned
hard
copy
warrant
county
circuit
clerk
office
correct
department
database
show
warrant
recalled
erroneous
entry
warrant
remained
database
undetected
five
months
july
afternoon
herring
came
coffee
county
sheriff
department
retrieve
belongings
vehicle
impounded
department
lot
investigator
mark
anderson
department
day
knew
herring
prior
interactions
herring
told
district
attorney
among
others
suspicion
anderson
involved
killing
local
teenager
anderson
pursued
herring
get
drop
accusations
informed
herring
impoundment
lot
anderson
asked
coffee
county
warrant
clerk
whether
outstanding
warrant
herring
arrest
clerk
sandy
pope
found
warrant
anderson
asked
pope
call
neighboring
dale
county
sheriff
department
inquire
whether
warrant
arrest
herring
outstanding
upon
receiving
pope
phone
call
sharon
morgan
warrant
clerk
dale
county
department
checked
computer
database
recounted
department
database
preserved
error
morgan
check
therefore
showed
incorrectly
active
warrant
herring
arrest
morgan
gave
misinformation
pope
relayed
investigator
anderson
armed
report
warrant
existed
anderson
promptly
arrested
herring
performed
incident
search
minutes
detection
error
appeals
concluded
government
contest
failure
bring
dale
county
sheriff
department
records
date
least
negligent
quoting
michigan
tucker
uncontested
herring
arrest
violated
fourth
amendment
rights
sole
question
presented
therefore
whether
evidence
police
obtained
unlawful
search
holds
suppression
unwarranted
exclusionary
rule
core
concerns
raised
isolated
negligent
recordkeeping
error
attenuated
arrest
ante
view
opinion
underestimates
need
forceful
exclusionary
rule
gravity
recordkeeping
errors
law
enforcement
ii
exclusionary
rule
defendant
right
ante
rather
simply
remedy
applicable
suppression
result
appreciable
deterrence
outweighs
cost
justice
system
ante
see
also
ante
exclusionary
rule
serves
deter
deliberate
reckless
grossly
negligent
conduct
circumstances
recurring
systemic
discussion
invokes
view
exclusionary
rule
famously
held
renowned
jurists
henry
friendly
benjamin
nathan
cardozo
years
ago
cardozo
seated
new
york
appeals
commented
critically
federal
exclusionary
rule
yet
applied
suggested
least
cases
rule
exacted
high
price
criminal
justice
system
see
people
defore
words
often
quoted
cardozo
questioned
whether
criminal
go
free
constable
blundered
judge
friendly
later
elaborated
cardozo
query
sole
reason
exclusion
friendly
wrote
experience
demonstrated
effective
method
deterring
police
violating
constitution
bill
rights
code
criminal
procedure
rev
thought
excessive
light
rule
aim
deter
police
conduct
require
exclusion
constable
merely
blundered
police
officer
committed
technical
error
judgment
made
slight
unintentional
miscalculation
recounts
judge
friendly
suggested
deterrence
police
improprieties
sufficiently
accomplished
confining
rule
evidence
obtained
flagrant
deliberate
violation
rights
ibid
ante
others
described
majestic
conception
fourth
amendment
adjunct
exclusionary
rule
evans
stevens
dissenting
protective
fundamental
right
people
secure
persons
houses
papers
effects
amendment
constraint
power
sovereign
merely
agents
ibid
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
stewart
road
mapp
ohio
beyond
origins
development
future
exclusionary
rule
cases
colum
rev
share
vision
amendment
exclusionary
rule
remedy
necessary
ensure
fourth
amendment
prohibitions
observed
fact
see
kamisar
exclusionary
rule
rest
principled
basis
rather
empirical
proposition
creighton
rev
rule
service
essential
auxiliary
amendment
earlier
inclined
hold
two
inseparable
see
whiteley
warden
wyo
state
penitentiary
cf
olmstead
holmes
dissenting
brandeis
dissenting
beyond
doubt
main
objective
rule
deter
compel
respect
constitutional
guaranty
effectively
available
way
removing
incentive
disregard
elkins
rule
also
serves
important
purposes
enabl
es
judiciary
avoid
taint
partnership
official
lawlessness
assur
es
people
potential
victims
unlawful
government
conduct
government
profit
lawless
behavior
thus
minimizing
risk
seriously
undermining
popular
trust
government
calandra
brennan
dissenting
see
also
terry
ohio
rule
admitting
evidence
criminal
trial
recognize
necessary
effect
legitimizing
conduct
produced
evidence
application
exclusionary
rule
withholds
constitutional
imprimatur
kamisar
supra
principal
reason
exclusionary
rule
aid
denied
order
maintain
respect
law
preserve
judicial
process
quoting
olmstead
brandeis
dissenting
exclusionary
rule
bears
emphasis
often
remedy
effective
redress
fourth
amendment
violation
see
mapp
ohio
noting
obvious
futility
relegating
fourth
amendment
protection
remedies
amsterdam
perspectives
fourth
amendment
rev
describing
exclusionary
rule
primary
instrument
enforcing
ourth
mendment
civil
liability
lie
vast
majority
ourth
mendment
violations
frequent
infringements
motivated
commendable
zeal
condemnable
malice
stewart
colum
criminal
prosecutions
administrative
sanctions
offending
officers
injunctive
relief
widespread
violations
even
farther
cry
see
iii
maintains
herring
case
one
exclusionary
rule
scant
deterrent
effect
therefore
pay
way
ante
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
disagree
exclusionary
rule
suggests
capable
marginal
deterrence
misconduct
issue
merely
careless
intentional
reckless
see
ante
suggestion
runs
counter
foundational
premise
tort
law
liability
negligence
lack
due
care
creates
incentive
act
greater
care
government
acknowledges
see
brief
cf
reply
brief
mistake
involved
failure
make
computer
entry
hardly
means
application
exclusionary
rule
minimal
value
risk
respondeat
superior
liability
encourages
employers
supervise
employees
conduct
carefully
risk
exclusion
evidence
encourages
policymakers
systems
managers
monitor
performance
systems
install
personnel
employed
operate
systems
evans
ginsburg
dissenting
consider
potential
impact
decision
applying
exclusionary
rule
case
earlier
observed
see
supra
record
indicates
electronic
connection
warrant
database
dale
county
sheriff
department
county
circuit
clerk
office
located
basement
building
app
warrant
recalled
one
many
different
people
access
th
warrants
must
find
hard
copy
warrant
two
three
different
places
department
houses
warrants
return
clerk
office
manually
update
department
database
see
record
reflects
routine
practice
checking
database
accuracy
failure
remove
entry
herring
warrant
discovered
investigator
anderson
sought
pursue
herring
five
months
later
altogether
obvious
department
take
precautions
ensure
integrity
database
sheriff
department
position
remedy
situation
might
well
exclusionary
rule
remove
incentive
otherwise
lafave
search
seizure
ed
see
also
evans
stevens
dissenting
potential
deterrence
worth
costs
imposes
see
ante
light
paramount
importance
accurate
recordkeeping
law
enforcement
answer
yes
next
explain
see
herring
motion
presents
particularly
strong
case
suppression
electronic
databases
form
nervous
system
contemporary
criminal
justice
operations
recent
years
breadth
influence
dramatically
expanded
police
today
access
databases
include
updated
national
crime
information
center
ncic
also
terrorist
watchlists
federal
government
employee
eligibility
system
various
commercial
databases
brief
electronic
privacy
information
center
epic
et
al
amicus
curiae
moreover
actively
expanding
information
sharing
jurisdictions
result
law
enforcement
increasing
supply
information
within
easy
electronic
reach
see
brief
petitioner
risk
error
stemming
databases
slim
herring
amici
warn
law
enforcement
databases
insufficiently
monitored
often
date
brief
amicus
epic
government
reports
describe
example
flaws
ncic
terrorist
watchlist
databases
associated
federal
government
employment
eligibility
verification
inaccuracies
expansive
interconnected
collections
electronic
information
raise
grave
concerns
individual
liberty
offense
dignity
citizen
arrested
handcuffed
searched
public
street
simply
bureaucrat
failed
maintain
accurate
computer
data
base
evocative
use
general
warrants
outraged
authors
bill
rights
evans
stevens
dissenting
assures
exclusion
certainly
justified
police
shown
reckless
maintaining
warrant
system
knowingly
made
false
entries
lay
groundwork
future
false
arrests
ante
concession
provides
little
comfort
first
restricting
suppression
bookkeeping
errors
deliberate
reckless
majority
leaves
herring
others
like
remedy
violations
constitutional
rights
see
supra
serious
assertion
relief
available
arresting
officer
sheltered
qualified
immunity
see
harlow
fitzgerald
police
department
liable
negligent
acts
employees
see
monell
new
york
city
dept
social
moreover
identifying
department
employee
committed
error
may
impossible
second
doubt
police
forces
already
possess
sufficient
incentives
maintain
records
government
argues
police
desire
send
officers
arrests
unnecessarily
arrests
consume
resources
place
officers
danger
facts
case
fit
description
police
motivation
officer
wanted
arrest
herring
consulted
department
records
legitimate
predisposition
see
app
third
even
deliberate
reckless
conduct
afoot
assurance
often
empty
promise
impecunious
defendant
make
required
showing
answer
defendant
entitled
discovery
necessary
audit
police
databases
see
tr
oral
arg
imposed
considerable
administrative
burden
courts
law
iv
negligent
recordkeeping
errors
law
enforcement
threaten
individual
liberty
susceptible
deterrence
exclusionary
rule
remedied
effectively
means
errors
present
occasion
erode
exclusionary
rule
rule
needed
make
fourth
amendment
something
real
guarantee
carry
exclusion
evidence
obtained
violation
chimera
calandra
brennan
dissenting
keeping
rule
core
concerns
ante
suppression
attended
unconstitutional
search
case
reasons
stated
reverse
judgment
eleventh
circuit
bennie
dean
herring
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
eleventh
circuit
january
justice
breyer
justice
souter
joins
dissenting
agree
justice
ginsburg
join
dissent
write
separately
note
one
additional
supporting
factor
believe
important
arizona
evans
held
recordkeeping
errors
made
clerk
trigger
exclusionary
rule
long
police
reasonably
relied
upon
clerk
recordkeeping
concurring
rationale
decision
premised
distinction
judicial
errors
police
errors
gave
several
reasons
recognizing
distinction
first
noted
exclusionary
rule
historically
designed
means
deterring
police
misconduct
mistakes
employees
emphasis
added
second
found
evidence
employees
inclined
ignore
subvert
fourth
amendment
lawlessness
among
actors
requires
application
extreme
sanction
exclusion
third
recognized
basis
believing
application
exclusionary
rule
significant
effect
employees
responsible
informing
police
warrant
quashed
clerks
adjuncts
law
enforcement
team
engaged
often
competitive
enterprise
ferreting
crime
stake
outcome
particular
criminal
prosecutions
citation
omitted
taken
together
reasons
explain
police
recordkeeping
errors
treated
differently
judicial
ones
cases
applying
good
faith
exception
exclusionary
rule
similarly
recognized
distinction
police
errors
errors
made
others
judicial
officers
legislatures
see
leon
police
reasonably
relied
magistrate
issuance
warrant
massachusetts
sheppard
illinois
krull
police
reasonably
relied
statute
constitutionality
distinguishing
police
recordkeeping
errors
judicial
ones
consistent
precedent
also
far
easier
courts
administer
chief
justice
multifactored
inquiry
degree
police
culpability
therefore
apply
exclusionary
rule
police
personnel
responsible
recordkeeping
error
results
fourth
amendment
violation
need
clear
line
recognition
line
precedent
reasons
support
outcome
justice
ginsburg
dissent
reach
footnotes
earlier
point
opinion
eleventh
circuit
described
error
least
negligent
quoting
michigan
tucker
next
paragraph
clarified
error
negligent
failure
act
deliberate
tactical
choice
act
question
presented
treats
error
negligen
one
see
pet
cert
brief
opposition
parties
briefed
case
basis
justice
ginsburg
dissent
champions
describes
majestic
conception
exclusionary
rule
post
quoting
arizona
evans
stevens
dissenting
exclude
evidence
even
deterrence
justify
majestic
cases
reject
conception
see
leon
perhaps
reason
dissent
relies
almost
exclusively
previous
dissents
support
analysis
thus
reject
justice
breyer
suggestion
evans
entirely
premised
distinction
judicial
errors
police
errors
post
dissenting
opinion
rationale
decision
reason
us
expressly
carefully
leave
police
error
unresolved
addition
extent
evans
viewed
presaging
particular
result
noteworthy
dissent
view
case
distinction
justice
breyer
regards
determinative
instead
artificial
ginsburg
dissenting
quarrel
justice
ginsburg
claim
liability
negligence
creates
incentive
act
greater
care
post
suggest
exclusion
evidence
deterrent
effect
cases
require
deterrence
weighed
social
costs
exacted
exclusionary
rule
illinois
krull
quoting
leon
exclusion
worth
cost
justice
ginsburg
notes
earlier
suppression
hearing
morgan
testified
apparently
confusion
miscommunications
everal
times
post
quoting
app
pet
cert
later
realized
misspoken
morgan
emphatically
corrected
record
app
noting
district
found
morgan
times
statement
confusing
essentially
unhelpful
concluded
credible
evidence
routine
problems
disposing
recalled
warrants
supp
factual
determination
supported
record
credited
appeals
see
course
entitled
deference
footnotes
recordkeeping
error
occurred
dale
county
rather
coffee
county
inconsequential
suppression
analysis
notes
must
consider
actions
police
officers
involved
ante
see
also
leon
altogether
clear
isolated
error
case
dale
county
sheriff
department
warrant
clerk
first
asked
ow
many
times
dale
county
problems
problems
communicating
warrants
responded
several
times
app
pet
cert
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
dept
justice
bureau
justice
statistics
brien
improving
access
integrity
criminal
history
records
ncj
july
available
http
internet
materials
visited
included
clerk
case
see
dept
justice
office
inspector
general
audit
department
justice
terrorist
watchlist
nomination
processes
audit
mar
http
see
social
security
office
inspector
general
congressional
response
report
accuracy
social
security
administration
numident
file
http
asserted
police
departments
become
sufficiently
professional
need
external
deterrence
avoid
fourth
amendment
violations
see
tr
oral
arg
cf
hudson
michigan
professionalism
sign
exclusionary
rule
efficacy
superfluity
clear
squares
focus
deliberate
conduct
recognition
application
exclusionary
rule
require
inquiry
mental
state
police
see
ante
whren