burger
kemp
argued
march
decided
june
georgia
trial
jury
found
petitioner
guilty
murder
sentenced
death
petitioner
coindictee
thomas
stevens
gave
full
confessions
crime
stevens
tried
later
separate
trial
georgia
ordering
second
sentencing
hearing
petitioner
resulted
reimposition
death
sentence
affirmed
sentence
throughout
proceedings
petitioner
represented
appointed
counsel
alvin
leaphart
experienced
local
attorney
exhausting
state
collateral
remedies
petitioner
represented
different
attorney
sought
habeas
corpus
relief
federal
district
ground
leaphart
representation
constitutionally
inadequate
particularly
conflict
interest
since
leaphart
law
partner
appointed
represent
stevens
trial
leaphart
assisted
representation
trial
defendant
strategy
emphasize
coindictee
culpability
order
avoid
death
penalty
petitioner
also
based
sixth
amendment
claim
ineffective
representation
leaphart
failure
present
mitigating
circumstances
sentencing
hearings
allegedly
inadequate
investigation
possibility
evidentiary
hearing
district
rejected
sixth
amendment
claim
appeals
ultimately
affirmed
held
merit
petitioner
claim
based
leaphart
alleged
conflict
interest
even
assuming
law
partners
considered
one
attorney
determining
claim
requiring
permitting
single
attorney
represent
codefendants
per
se
violative
constitutional
guarantees
effective
assistance
counsel
overlap
counsel
infect
leaphart
representation
constitute
active
representation
competing
interests
actual
conflict
established
fact
leaphart
prepared
appellate
briefs
petitioner
stevens
make
lesser
culpability
argument
petitioner
brief
second
appeal
georgia
decision
sound
strategic
basis
found
federal
courts
attributable
fact
partner
stevens
lawyer
fact
assisted
partner
stevens
representation
moreover
record
support
petitioner
contention
asserted
actual
conflict
interest
leaphart
negotiate
plea
bargain
life
sentence
prosecutor
fact
refused
bargain
take
advantage
petitioner
lesser
culpability
compared
stevens
pp
petitioner
receive
ineffective
assistance
leaphart
failure
develop
present
mitigating
evidence
either
two
sentencing
hearings
evidence
might
presented
disclosed
petitioner
exceptionally
unhappy
unstable
childhood
based
interviews
petitioner
mother
others
leaphart
decided
petitioner
interest
served
presenting
evidence
decision
supported
reasonable
professional
judgment
thus
met
standard
set
forth
strickland
washington
pp
stevens
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
white
scalia
joined
blackmun
filed
dissenting
opinion
brennan
marshall
joined
part
ii
powell
joined
post
powell
filed
dissenting
opinion
brennan
joined
post
joseph
nursey
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
millard
farmer
william
hill
senior
assistant
attorney
general
georgia
argued
cause
respondent
brief
michael
bowers
attorney
general
marion
gordon
first
assistant
attorney
general
susan
boleyn
senior
assistant
attorney
general
justice
stevens
delivered
opinion
jury
superior
wayne
county
georgia
found
petitioner
christopher
burger
guilty
murder
sentenced
death
january
habeas
corpus
proceeding
contends
denied
constitutional
right
effective
assistance
counsel
lawyer
labored
conflict
interest
failed
make
adequate
investigation
possibly
mitigating
circumstances
offense
full
evidentiary
hearing
district
rejected
claim
persuaded
appeals
judgment
district
must
affirmed
sordid
story
crime
involves
four
soldiers
army
stationed
fort
stewart
georgia
september
evening
petitioner
coindictee
thomas
stevens
privates
drinking
club
post
talked
telephone
private
james
botsford
arrived
savannah
airport
agreed
pick
bring
back
base
stole
butcher
knife
sharpening
tool
mess
hall
called
cab
driven
roger
honeycutt
soldier
worked
taxi
company
way
airport
petitioner
held
knife
stevens
held
sharpening
tool
honeycutt
forced
stop
automobile
robbed
placed
backseat
petitioner
took
driving
stevens
ordered
honeycutt
undress
threw
article
clothing
car
window
searching
blindfolded
tied
hands
behind
back
petitioner
drove
stevens
climbed
backseat
honeycutt
compelled
honeycutt
commit
oral
sodomy
anally
sodomized
stopping
car
second
time
petitioner
stevens
placed
victim
nude
blindfolded
hands
tied
behind
back
trunk
cab
proceeded
pick
botsford
airport
ride
back
fort
stewart
told
botsford
stolen
cab
confirmed
story
conversing
honeycutt
trunk
exchange
botsford
promise
notify
authorities
promised
harm
honeycutt
leaving
botsford
base
ultimately
however
petitioner
stevens
drove
pond
wayne
county
gone
swimming
past
removed
cab
radio
stevens
hiding
radio
bushes
petitioner
opened
trunk
asked
honeycutt
right
answered
affirmatively
petitioner
closed
trunk
started
automobile
put
gear
getting
entered
water
honeycutt
drowned
week
later
botsford
contacted
authorities
military
police
arrested
petitioner
stevens
two
men
made
complete
confessions
petitioner
also
took
military
police
pond
identified
point
honeycutt
body
found
petitioner
confession
private
botsford
testimony
primary
evidence
used
burger
trial
evidence
consistent
defense
thesis
stevens
rather
petitioner
primarily
responsible
plan
kidnap
cabdriver
physical
abuse
victim
decision
kill
stevens
years
old
time
killing
petitioner
psychologist
testified
iq
functioned
level
child
ii
alvin
leaphart
appointed
represent
petitioner
week
arrest
leaphart
practicing
law
wayne
county
years
served
county
attorney
time
served
board
governors
state
bar
association
percent
practice
criminal
law
tried
dozen
capital
cases
apparent
lawyer
thoroughly
familiar
practice
sentencing
juries
local
community
represented
petitioner
proceedings
resulted
conviction
sentence
appeal
georgia
resulted
vacation
death
penalty
second
sentencing
hearing
also
second
appeal
resulted
affirmance
petitioner
capital
sentence
burger
state
burger
state
cert
denied
leaphart
paid
approximately
services
exhausting
state
collateral
remedies
petitioner
represented
different
attorney
filed
habeas
corpus
proceeding
district
southern
district
georgia
advanced
several
claims
including
charge
leaphart
representation
constitutionally
inadequate
district
conducted
evidentiary
hearing
emphatically
rejected
claim
concluded
trial
instructions
jury
permitted
base
sentencing
decision
invalid
aggravating
circumstance
accordingly
district
vacated
petitioner
death
sentence
blake
zant
supp
appeals
affirmed
part
reversed
part
reinstated
death
penalty
burger
zant
issue
leaphart
competence
adopted
district
opinion
dissent
judge
johnson
dissent
found
leaphart
conflict
interest
partner
robert
smith
appointed
represent
stevens
later
separate
trial
murder
honeycutt
leaphart
assisted
representation
interviewed
stevens
assisted
partner
stevens
trial
moreover
two
partners
shared
legal
research
discussed
cases
one
another
judge
johnson
persuaded
conflict
created
actual
prejudice
petitioner
interest
two
reasons
first
two
defendants
sought
emphasize
culpability
order
avoid
death
penalty
second
leaphart
failed
negotiate
plea
bargain
petitioner
testimony
stevens
might
traded
life
sentence
judge
johnson
also
persuaded
leaphart
performance
defective
conduct
adequate
investigation
possible
mitigating
circumstances
valid
strategic
explanation
failure
offer
mitigating
evidence
either
first
second
sentencing
hearing
appeals
rendered
decision
decided
strickland
washington
granted
burger
petition
certiorari
remanded
case
appeals
consideration
effectiveness
counsel
assistance
petitioner
second
sentencing
hearing
light
decision
burger
zant
appeals
turn
remanded
case
district
instructions
extend
revise
findings
appropriate
conclusions
claim
burger
zant
district
wrote
extensive
opinion
issue
concluded
merit
petitioner
claim
appeals
affirmed
basis
district
opinion
dissent
judge
johnson
burger
kemp
per
curiam
granted
petition
certiorari
vacated
remanded
reconsideration
light
francis
franklin
question
whether
jury
instruction
impermissibly
shifted
burden
proof
issue
intent
burger
kemp
appeals
assumed
trial
charge
intent
unconstitutionally
shifted
burden
proof
found
error
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
per
curiam
granted
certiorari
affirm
first
consider
counsel
alleged
conflict
interest
argument
failure
offer
mitigating
evidence
iii
certainly
much
substance
petitioner
argument
appointment
two
partners
represent
coindictees
respective
trails
creates
possible
conflict
interest
prejudice
either
clients
moreover
risk
prejudice
increased
two
lawyers
cooperate
one
another
planning
conduct
trial
strategy
leaphart
partner
assuming
without
deciding
two
law
partners
considered
one
attorney
settled
equiring
permitting
single
attorney
represent
codefendants
often
referred
joint
representation
per
se
violative
constitutional
guarantees
effective
assistance
counsel
holloway
arkansas
never
held
possibility
prejudice
inheres
almost
every
instance
multiple
representation
justifies
adoption
inflexible
rule
presume
prejudice
cases
see
cuyler
sullivan
instead
presume
prejudice
defendant
demonstrates
counsel
actively
represented
conflicting
interests
actual
conflict
interest
adversely
affected
lawyer
performance
strickland
citation
omitted
see
also
cuyler
initial
matter
agree
district
overlap
counsel
infect
leaphart
representation
constitute
active
representation
competing
interests
particularly
smaller
communities
supply
qualified
lawyers
willing
accept
demanding
unrewarding
work
representing
capital
prisoners
extremely
limited
defendants
may
actually
benefit
joint
efforts
two
partners
supplement
one
another
preparation
many
cases
common
defense
gives
strength
common
attack
holloway
arkansas
quoting
glasser
dissenting
opinion
frankfurter
moreover
generally
presume
lawyer
fully
conscious
overarching
duty
complete
loyalty
client
trial
courts
appropriately
necessarily
rely
large
measure
upon
good
faith
good
judgment
defense
counsel
cuyler
addition
petitioner
stevens
tried
separate
proceedings
noted
cuyler
provision
separate
murder
trials
three
coindictees
significantly
reduced
potential
divergence
interests
ibid
effort
identify
actual
conflict
interest
petitioner
points
leaphart
prepared
briefs
stevens
second
appeal
georgia
leaphart
make
lesser
culpability
argument
appellate
brief
behalf
petitioner
even
though
relied
petitioner
lesser
culpability
trial
defense
given
fact
petitioner
actually
killed
honeycutt
immediately
opening
trunk
ask
right
fact
georgia
expressed
opinion
petitioner
actions
outrageously
wantonly
vile
inhuman
reasonable
standard
human
conduct
burger
state
decision
forgo
issue
sound
strategic
basis
reaffirmed
smith
murray
process
winnowing
weaker
claims
appeal
focusing
likely
prevail
far
evidence
incompetence
hallmark
effective
appellate
advocacy
jones
barnes
addition
determining
actual
conflict
interest
requires
attribution
leaphart
motivation
making
lesser
culpability
argument
fact
partner
stevens
lawyer
fact
assisted
partner
representation
district
obviously
credited
testimony
contrary
see
findings
twice
sustained
appeals
thus
inappropriate
factually
unsupportable
speculate
drafting
brief
appeal
tainted
lawyer
improper
motivation
duty
search
constitutional
error
painstaking
care
never
exacting
capital
case
nevertheless
lower
courts
found
lawyer
performed
solemn
duties
case
lower
boundary
professional
competence
respect
bar
deference
shared
conclusion
two
reviewing
courts
prevent
us
substituting
speculation
considered
opinions
district
judge
presumably
familiar
legal
talents
character
lawyers
practice
local
bar
saw
heard
witness
testify
far
better
position
evaluate
charge
kind
regional
courts
appeals
far
better
position
conduct
appellate
review
heavily
rulings
also
conclude
asserted
actual
conflict
interest
even
established
harm
lawyer
advocacy
petitioner
argues
joint
representation
adversely
affected
quality
counsel
received
two
ways
leaphart
negotiate
plea
agreement
resulting
life
sentence
failed
take
advantage
petitioner
lesser
culpability
compared
coindictee
stevens
find
neither
argument
provides
basis
relief
notion
prosecutor
receptive
plea
bargain
completely
unsupported
record
evidence
defendants
guilt
including
confessions
eyewitness
tangible
evidence
overwhelming
uncontradicted
prosecutor
need
petitioner
eyewitness
testimony
persuade
jury
convict
stevens
sentence
death
circumstances
slightest
reason
appellate
doubt
veracity
leaphart
testimony
ever
engage
plea
negotiations
case
yes
tell
substance
well
constantly
time
represented
burger
tried
negotiate
plea
district
attorney
life
sentence
first
trial
flatly
refused
even
discuss
terms
got
reversed
sentence
feature
continued
time
try
negotiate
district
attorney
entering
plea
burger
serve
life
sentence
insisted
trying
insisted
seeking
death
penalty
app
argument
partner
representation
stevens
inhibited
leaphart
arguing
petitioner
lesser
culpability
reliance
prejudicial
stevens
also
unsupported
record
argument
might
persuasive
two
defendants
tried
together
state
conducted
prosecutions
however
defendant
confession
used
trial
neither
used
coindictee
trials
separate
leaphart
particular
reason
concern
possible
impact
tactics
petitioner
trial
outcome
stevens
trial
moreover
initial
habeas
corpus
proceeding
district
credited
leaphart
uncontradicted
testimony
way
tailored
strategy
toward
protecting
stevens
district
concluded
testimony
strongly
supported
examination
trial
record
shows
considerable
effort
gain
mercy
petitioner
portraying
stevens
chief
architect
crime
ibid
effort
bolster
claim
adverse
effect
resulted
leaphart
actual
conflict
interest
petitioner
argues
tried
small
community
facts
crime
widely
known
necessarily
follows
public
possibly
members
jury
knew
cases
tried
inherently
inconsistent
theories
brief
petitioner
observation
nothing
establish
actual
deleterious
conflict
interest
leaphart
work
client
partner
representation
stevens
two
unaffiliated
lawyers
complete
strangers
one
another
represented
burger
stevens
respectively
advanced
defenses
advanced
community
awareness
theories
inherently
inconsistent
undoubtedly
conflict
interest
burger
stevens
nature
defenses
inherent
conflict
two
participants
single
criminal
undertaking
transformed
sixth
amendment
violation
simply
community
might
aware
respective
attorneys
law
partners
iv
district
expressed
much
concern
petitioner
argument
leaphart
failed
develop
present
mitigating
evidence
either
two
sentencing
hearings
see
hearings
leaphart
offered
mitigating
evidence
capital
sentencing
proceeding
sufficiently
like
trial
adversarial
format
existence
standards
decision
counsel
role
two
proceedings
comparable
ensure
adversarial
testing
process
works
produce
result
standards
governing
decision
strickland
therefore
must
determine
whether
leaphart
performance
evaluating
mitigating
evidence
available
deciding
pursue
mitigating
evidence
undermines
confidence
adversarial
process
case
embarking
review
district
conclusions
guided
recent
admonition
subject
judicial
scrutiny
counsel
performance
must
highly
deferential
tempting
defendant
counsel
assistance
conviction
adverse
sentence
easy
examining
counsel
defense
proved
unsuccessful
conclude
particular
act
omission
counsel
unreasonable
cf
engle
isaac
fair
assessment
attorney
performance
requires
every
effort
made
eliminate
distorting
effects
hindsight
reconstruct
circumstances
counsel
challenged
conduct
evaluate
conduct
counsel
perspective
time
strickland
washington
leaphart
aware
family
history
prior
petitioner
trial
talked
petitioner
mother
several
occasions
attorney
indiana
befriended
petitioner
mother
psychologist
leaphart
employed
conduct
examination
petitioner
preparation
trial
reviewed
psychologists
reports
obtained
help
petitioner
mother
also
interviewed
stevens
men
fort
stewart
based
interviews
leaphart
made
reasonable
decision
client
interest
served
presenting
type
evidence
meetings
petitioner
well
testimony
psychologist
hearing
admissibility
petitioner
confession
convinced
leaphart
unwise
put
petitioner
witness
stand
record
indicates
petitioner
never
expressed
remorse
crime
psychologist
testimony
indicates
might
even
bragged
witness
stand
leaphart
formed
opinion
burger
enjoyed
talking
crimes
worried
jury
might
regard
burger
attitude
witness
stand
indifferent
worse
quite
obviously
district
concluded
experienced
trial
lawyer
properly
decided
put
either
petitioner
psychologist
thus
evaluated
position
subjected
might
literally
fatal
two
witnesses
leaphart
considered
using
petitioner
mother
indiana
lawyer
acted
petitioner
big
brother
leaphart
talked
mother
several
occasions
concluded
testimony
helpful
might
counterproductive
record
stood
absolutely
evidence
petitioner
prior
criminal
record
kind
testimony
indicates
petitioner
committed
least
one
petty
offense
app
district
judge
heard
testimony
given
direct
examination
sentencing
hearing
convinced
aided
petitioner
case
surely
unreasonable
leaphart
concluded
might
well
revealed
matters
historical
fact
harmed
client
chances
life
sentence
indiana
lawyer
willing
travel
georgia
testify
petitioner
behalf
nothing
record
describes
content
testimony
might
given
although
leaphart
unable
recall
details
background
information
received
indiana
lawyer
testified
information
helpful
petitioner
indiana
lawyer
apparently
agreed
assessment
consistently
conclusion
petitioner
present
counsel
even
benefit
hindsight
submitted
affidavit
lawyer
establishing
offered
substantial
mitigating
evidence
testified
accordingly
leaphart
judgment
may
erroneous
record
surely
permit
us
reach
conclusion
finally
petitioner
submitted
several
affidavits
describe
evidence
leaphart
might
used
conducted
thorough
investigation
affidavits
present
information
petitioner
troubled
family
background
affected
jury
adversely
introducing
facts
disclosed
clean
adult
criminal
record
affidavits
indicate
affiants
testified
might
well
referred
direct
examination
encounters
law
enforcement
authorities
example
former
neighbor
phyllis
russell
stated
petitioner
father
want
associate
got
trouble
juvenile
probation
record
petitioner
uncle
earnest
holtsclaw
narrated
petitioner
got
involved
drugs
florida
cathy
russell
ray
petitioner
friend
junior
high
school
stated
chris
father
supposed
go
juvenile
get
release
join
service
army
even
apart
references
damaging
facts
papers
means
uniformly
helpful
petitioner
suggest
violent
tendencies
odds
defense
strategy
portraying
petitioner
actions
night
murder
result
stevens
strong
influence
upon
example
district
judge
pointed
affidavit
submitted
petitioner
uncle
attests
petitioner
came
broken
home
unwanted
parents
opined
burger
split
personality
sometimes
burger
nice
normal
guy
times
flip
get
violent
nothing
affidavit
earnest
holtcsclaw
sic
see
also
affidavit
cathy
russell
ray
hairtrigger
temper
get
mad
punch
walls
broke
knuckles
got
one
hand
jury
react
sympathy
tragic
childhood
burger
endured
hand
since
burger
sanity
issue
case
prosecution
use
testimony
pointing
petitioner
nevertheless
responsible
acts
emphasize
unpredictable
propensity
violence
played
prominent
role
death
burger
victim
see
note
supra
itigation
ay
eye
beholder
stanley
zant
cir
omitted
ineffectiveness
case
particular
decision
investigate
must
directly
assessed
reasonableness
circumstances
applying
heavy
measure
deference
counsel
judgments
reasonableness
counsel
actions
may
determined
substantially
influenced
defendant
statements
actions
counsel
actions
usually
based
quite
properly
informed
strategic
choices
made
defendant
information
supplied
defendant
particular
investigation
decisions
reasonable
depends
critically
information
example
facts
support
certain
potential
line
defense
generally
known
counsel
defendant
said
need
investigation
may
considerably
diminished
eliminated
altogether
defendant
given
counsel
reason
believe
pursuing
certain
investigations
fruitless
even
harmful
counsel
failure
pursue
investigations
may
later
challenged
unreasonable
petitioner
established
light
circumstances
identified
acts
omissions
counsel
outside
wide
range
professionally
competent
assistance
made
showing
justice
sentence
rendered
unreliable
breakdown
adversary
process
caused
deficiencies
counsel
assistance
accordingly
judgment
appeals
affirmed
footnotes
definitely
finds
basis
concluding
leaphart
representation
constitutionally
inadequate
blake
zant
supp
added
particularly
concerned
arguments
raised
respect
ineffective
assistance
counsel
certainly
question
wisdom
propriety
advancing
every
legitimate
argument
petitioner
behalf
however
many
allegations
made
leaphart
directly
contradicted
record
thus
possibly
benefit
burger
hand
raising
unfounded
charges
must
significant
chilling
effect
willingness
experienced
attorneys
like
leaphart
undertake
defense
capital
cases
petitioner
attorneys
might
well
reconsider
apparent
policy
routinely
attacking
performance
trial
counsel
light
fact
leaphart
smith
members
professional
corporation
form
business
organization
relevant
case
described
partners
sake
convenience
opinion
district
published
appendix
appeals
opinion
petitioner
also
argues
proceeding
malice
charge
given
jury
guilt
innocence
phase
trial
unconstitutional
francis
franklin
trial
charged
jury
person
sound
mind
discretion
presumed
intend
natural
probable
consequences
acts
appeals
observed
jury
instruction
virtually
identical
one
held
unconstitutional
franklin
even
though
trial
also
instructed
jury
person
presumed
act
criminal
intent
specific
intent
commit
crime
charged
essential
element
crime
state
must
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
appeals
found
error
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
agree
appeals
pretermitting
inquiry
whether
trial
judge
charge
jury
impermissibly
shifted
burden
proof
question
petitioner
criminal
intent
commit
murder
evidence
dispositive
intent
said
beyond
reasonable
doubt
jury
found
unnecessary
rely
presumption
see
rose
clark
quoting
connecticut
johnson
powell
dissenting
note
leaphart
persisted
strategy
closing
argument
jury
second
sentencing
hearing
argued
part
every
one
acts
according
statement
introduced
evidence
initiation
crime
act
robbery
acts
sodomy
acts
tying
telling
get
trunk
saying
let
kill
telling
drive
telling
must
get
rid
car
must
get
rid
fingerprints
stevens
stevens
trial
today
boy
seventeen
years
old
time
stevens
twenty
know
influence
twenty
year
old
person
seventeen
year
old
person
looks
friend
companion
bears
stevens
one
control
may
recommend
life
imprisonment
even
though
found
aggravating
circumstances
one
aggravating
circumstances
given
charge
existed
beyond
reasonable
doubt
well
law
law
situations
moving
force
person
follows
along
beating
bidding
individual
gets
convicted
murder
person
actually
perpetrated
crime
actually
catalyst
moving
force
carried
things
even
though
person
part
punishment
one
different
punishment
discretion
particular
situation
even
though
say
set
circumstances
things
existed
burger
none
except
involved
time
going
along
stevens
leader
tr
second
sentencing
hearing
doubt
potential
testimony
relevant
mitigating
evidence
sentencer
refused
consider
precluded
considering
counsel
sought
introduce
see
hitchcock
dugger
skipper
south
carolina
eddings
oklahoma
lockett
ohio
plurality
opinion
light
petitioner
youth
time
offense
evidence
neglectful
sometimes
even
violent
family
background
testimony
mental
emotional
development
level
several
years
chronological
age
excluded
state
eddings
equally
clear
however
undisputed
relevancy
information
trial
corresponding
duty
allow
consideration
bearing
quite
distinct
question
us
issue
whether
counsel
acted
reasonably
deciding
introduce
evidence
apprehension
contribute
little
client
chances
obtaining
life
sentence
revealing
possibly
damaging
details
past
allowing
foreseeably
devastating
conflict
testimony
respect
extent
conversations
district
described
first
treatment
issue
follows
foster
testified
leaphart
made
minimal
efforts
discuss
petitioner
case
develop
possible
mitigating
factors
leaphart
account
suggested
talked
foster
several
times
made
adequate
hardly
ideal
inquiries
leaphart
account
supported
bill
lists
two
conferences
totaling
three
half
hours
prior
trial
four
conferences
unstated
duration
prior
retrial
defendant
exhibits
thus
must
conclude
leaphart
investigation
appears
meet
least
minimal
professional
standards
interviews
burger
burger
mother
attorney
befriended
burger
mother
addition
consultation
psychologist
review
psychologists
reports
obtained
burger
mother
convinced
leaphart
exhaustive
investigation
burger
background
profitable
pursuit
also
concluded
presenting
background
character
evidence
sentencing
jury
best
unproductive
worst
harmful
client
burger
kemp
footnotes
omitted
citations
transcript
second
sentencing
hearing
omitted
opinion
based
examination
burger
use
wechsler
iq
test
examination
based
experience
psychologist
opinion
whether
appreciate
consequences
making
confession
think
enjoy
idea
frankly
great
opportunity
display
psychopathological
behavior
probably
shout
wind
much
things
might
done
appreciate
trouble
consequences
magnitude
grade
deficiency
relative
iq
beyond
concept
understanding
right
wrong
psychopathology
make
want
wrong
basically
within
structure
determined
evil
preacher
determined
good
use
illustration
concept
appreciating
confession
make
almost
compelling
need
psychopath
pleasure
joy
unless
point
along
line
let
world
know
behavior
us
unseemingly
tr
first
sentencing
hearing
strickland
washington
set
forth
standards
govern
consideration
criminal
defendant
claims
denied
sixth
amendment
right
effective
assistance
counsel
petitioner
burger
presents
two
claims
case
believe
claim
meets
specified
standards
establishing
constitutional
violation
therefore
calls
grant
federal
habeas
corpus
relief
sought
petitioner
accordingly
dissent
judgment
denies
relief
petitioner
first
claim
rests
right
assistance
counsel
long
ago
glasser
recognized
assistance
component
sixth
amendment
right
effective
assistance
counsel
right
fundamental
adversarial
system
criminal
justice
public
defender
offices
many
jurisdictions
rules
precluding
representation
one
criminal
defendants
involved
offense
federal
rules
criminal
procedure
rules
governing
professional
responsibility
consent
criminal
defendant
necessary
prerequisite
joint
representation
trial
inquiry
whether
defendant
made
knowing
voluntary
waiver
right
representation
strongly
encouraged
required
read
majority
opinion
departing
earlier
approval
practices
see
cuyler
sullivan
nn
although
believe
case
definitely
misapplied
sixth
amendment
standard
informed
rules
recognizes
unique
nature
claims
arise
conflict
interest
impose
claims
standard
inadequate
performance
prejudice
see
strickland
washington
applies
general
claims
ineffective
assistance
instead
prejudice
presumed
defendant
demonstrates
attorney
actively
represented
conflicting
interests
actual
conflict
interest
adversely
affected
lawyer
performance
quoting
cuyler
sullivan
presumption
prejudice
cases
presenting
conflict
interest
adversely
affected
counsel
performance
warranted
duty
loyalty
client
perhaps
basic
responsibility
counsel
difficult
measure
precise
effect
defense
representation
corrupted
conflicting
interests
strickland
washington
difficulty
assessing
prejudice
resulting
conflict
interest
due
part
fact
conflict
may
affect
almost
aspect
lawyer
preparation
presentation
case
conflict
primarily
compels
lawyer
pursue
certain
arguments
take
certain
actions
difficult
discern
effect
see
holloway
arkansas
case
joint
representation
conflicting
interests
evil
advocate
finds
compelled
refrain
trial
also
possible
pretrial
plea
negotiations
sentencing
process
emphasis
original
presumption
prejudice
cases
particularly
appropriate
lawyers
charged
knowledge
obliged
avoid
conflict
see
supra
judge
avoid
problem
questioning
defendant
early
stage
criminal
process
case
presenting
situation
may
give
rise
conflict
order
determine
whether
defendant
aware
possible
conflict
whether
waived
right
representation
although
purports
apply
ineffectiveness
standard
present
case
see
ante
agree
conclusions
contrary
reasoning
simply
doubt
petitioner
attorney
actively
represented
conflicting
interests
role
defenses
petitioner
coindictee
thomas
stevens
defense
counsel
appointed
represent
petitioner
partner
law
firm
appointed
represent
stevens
app
two
lawyers
interviewed
defendants
beginning
assisted
preparation
cases
partner
sat
counsel
petitioner
trial
helped
apparently
others
viewed
two
lawyers
joint
counsel
petitioner
first
trial
inasmuch
prosecutor
directed
attention
prospective
jurors
voir
dire
lawyers
asked
jurors
whether
ever
represented
either
first
tr
partner
listed
appearing
petitioner
burger
transcript
trial
record
evidence
petitioner
counsel
assisted
stevens
trial
counsel
conceded
addition
assistance
pretrial
research
strategy
interviews
stevens
prepared
appellate
briefs
petitioner
stevens
second
sentencing
proceedings
app
see
burger
kemp
district
opinion
adopted
appeals
noting
may
said
two
attorneys
times
acted
one
prepared
trial
appeal
facts
therefore
demonstrate
two
actively
represented
petitioner
stevens
active
representation
two
coindictees
petitioner
counsel
constituted
representation
actual
conflicting
interests
petitioner
stevens
interest
diametrically
opposed
issue
counsel
considered
crucial
outcome
petitioner
case
comparative
culpability
petitioner
stevens
petitioner
confessed
participation
crime
placed
primary
blame
stevens
second
tr
confession
petitioner
stated
thought
simply
abandon
taxicab
ibid
botsford
petitioner
stevens
taxicab
corroborated
petitioner
statement
testimony
petitioner
stevens
trials
questioned
petitioner
stevens
told
going
taxicab
driver
botsford
replied
well
tom
stevens
said
thought
kill
told
thought
crazy
burger
like
idea
killing
either
burger
said
let
go
drive
woods
somewhere
let
take
car
somewhere
put
like
think
somebody
mentioned
ocean
see
also
first
tr
botsford
agreeing
petitioner
sorta
going
along
sorta
sorta
like
stevens
telling
disregards
direct
conflict
petitioner
stevens
respective
interests
instead
attempts
minimize
active
representation
defendants
two
opines
overlap
counsel
constitute
active
representation
competing
interests
petitioner
counsel
ante
supports
assertion
blandly
relying
perception
shortage
lawyers
handle
cases
view
benefits
defendants
may
derive
joint
representation
common
defense
assumption
lawyers
aware
duty
loyalty
clients
ante
however
identify
record
evidence
indicating
lawyers
available
appointment
addition
factors
questionable
relevance
case
involve
common
defense
two
coindictees
counsel
even
consider
conflict
interest
might
exist
also
points
fact
petitioner
stevens
tried
separately
relies
observation
cuyler
sullivan
separate
trials
case
reduced
potential
divergence
defendants
interests
ante
separate
trials
case
however
absolutely
nothing
reduce
potential
divergence
interests
two
critical
stages
petitioner
argues
adversely
affected
conflict
interest
pretrial
plea
negotiations
appeal
attempt
disavow
existence
actual
conflict
interest
suggesting
strategic
reasons
actions
taken
petitioner
counsel
appeal
pretrial
negotiations
respect
supported
record
suggestion
counsel
failure
make
lesser
culpability
argument
appeal
result
sound
strategic
conclusion
claim
weak
ante
sheer
speculation
demonstrated
petitioner
confession
botsford
testimony
lesser
culpability
argument
certainly
lack
evidentiary
foundation
speculation
counsel
dropped
claim
trial
weak
argument
appeal
counterintuitive
lesser
culpability
argument
stronger
appeal
trial
appeal
reviewing
cases
time
thus
actual
position
able
compare
cases
time
reviewed
appropriateness
sentences
imposed
moreover
speculation
counsel
dropped
argument
appeal
weakness
ignores
fact
comparative
culpability
directly
relevant
statutorily
mandated
appellate
review
capital
cases
georgia
state
statute
specifies
georgia
review
capital
cases
include
consideration
hether
sentence
death
excessive
disproportionate
penalty
imposed
similar
cases
considering
crime
defendant
code
ann
emphasis
added
evidence
argument
presented
trial
concerning
petitioner
role
follower
stevens
directions
petitioner
lesser
involvement
assaultive
behavior
prior
murder
clearly
relevant
appeal
terms
statute
hence
even
counsel
base
decision
strategic
reason
suggested
decision
based
erroneous
view
law
thus
reasonable
see
kimmelman
morrison
counsel
judgment
found
contrary
prevailing
professional
norms
justifications
offered
counsel
reflected
ignorance
law
attempt
shift
blame
inadequate
preparation
setting
aside
speculation
counsel
motive
becomes
clear
joint
representation
petitioner
stevens
precluded
matter
professional
responsibility
pursuing
lesser
culpability
argument
petitioner
appellate
brief
inconsistent
duty
loyalty
stevens
argue
georgia
reduce
petitioner
sentence
life
imprisonment
stevens
culpable
defendant
deserved
death
sentence
heinous
murder
difficult
imagine
direct
conflict
existed
counsel
preparing
appellate
brief
petitioner
time
preparing
appellate
brief
stevens
state
statute
specifies
one
roles
appellate
process
consider
comparative
culpability
sentences
defendants
involved
similar
crimes
counsel
abandonment
lesser
culpability
argument
appeal
stage
two
cases
reviewed
contemporaneously
indicative
struggle
serve
two
masters
see
holloway
arkansas
quoting
glasser
record
compels
finding
counsel
representation
conflicting
interests
petitioner
stevens
adverse
effect
performance
petitioner
counsel
defense
counsel
representation
conflicting
interests
also
placed
untenable
position
earlier
stage
proceedings
pretrial
plea
bargaining
two
partners
helped
period
two
cases
part
pretrial
preparation
petitioner
counsel
talked
petitioner
stevens
beginning
app
counsel
position
negotiate
prosecution
detriment
stevens
although
asserted
continually
attempted
negotiate
prosecutor
behalf
petitioner
sentence
life
imprisonment
conceded
never
offered
prosecutor
petitioner
testimony
stevens
certainly
counsel
reasonable
expecting
plea
bargain
offering
prosecutor
significant
bargaining
chip
possessed
petitioner
testimony
stevens
also
disagree
rejection
petitioner
argument
actual
conflict
interest
aggravated
widespread
knowledge
cases
small
area
jury
drawn
ante
juror
knowledge
two
cases
tried
local
law
partners
inconsistent
theories
create
conflict
interest
order
preserve
credibility
argument
either
case
lawyers
deny
validity
contradictory
approach
crucial
feature
case
credibility
defendant
lawyer
minds
jury
observation
community
awareness
theories
inherently
inconsistent
two
unaffiliated
lawyers
advanced
inconsistent
defenses
ante
may
well
true
says
nothing
difference
awareness
make
community
view
cooperating
credibility
fails
recognize
although
credibility
two
unaffiliated
attorneys
presenting
inconsistent
arguments
questioned
credibility
two
local
law
partners
assisting
two
cases
well
questioned
known
lawyers
working
together
presented
inconsistent
theories
separate
cases
obviously
jury
might
suspect
one
cases
lawyers
pressing
argument
believe
true
adverse
effect
conflict
credibility
magnified
petitioner
stevens
cases
remanded
second
sentencing
proceeding
blameshifting
arguments
repeated
time
second
sentencing
hearing
verdicts
original
trials
sentencing
proceedings
become
known
community
community
aware
law
partners
together
representing
two
defendants
capital
cases
arguing
inconsistent
theories
placed
blame
defendant
happen
trial
moment
lawyers
credibility
effectiveness
counsel
significantly
undermined
finally
conclude
trial
case
erred
failing
inquire
whether
petitioner
knowingly
voluntarily
waived
constitutional
right
representation
opinion
cuyler
sullivan
addressed
question
state
trial
duty
make
inquiry
specified
unless
trial
knows
reasonably
know
particular
conflict
exists
need
initiate
inquiry
emphasis
added
trial
judge
appointed
two
defense
counsel
presided
petitioner
trial
stevens
trial
known
conflict
outset
inasmuch
two
confessions
given
two
partners
appointed
direct
conflict
question
defendant
prime
architect
crime
event
time
appeal
taken
trial
undoubtedly
familiar
role
comparative
culpability
plays
appellate
review
capital
cases
georgia
statute
well
aware
primary
defense
defendant
death
sentence
culpable
therefore
obligation
inquire
whether
petitioner
consented
joint
representation
knowledge
possible
conflicts
interests
see
glasser
trial
protect
right
accused
assistance
counsel
properly
rely
assumption
petitioner
given
knowing
voluntary
consent
judge
became
aware
actual
conflict
particularly
made
aware
suppression
hearing
petitioner
time
appointment
counsel
iq
functioned
level
diagnosed
psychological
problems
first
tr
ii
even
conflict
interest
existed
case
still
dissent
denial
relief
petitioner
deprived
effective
assistance
counsel
connection
proceeding
counsel
failed
investigate
mitigating
evidence
failed
present
evidence
sentencing
hearing
despite
fact
petitioner
adolescent
psychological
problems
apparent
diminished
mental
capabilities
agree
adversarial
nature
georgia
proceedings
sufficiently
similar
trial
petitioner
claim
governed
standards
apply
general
claims
ineffective
assistance
counsel
trial
ante
see
strickland
washington
also
important
keep
mind
counsel
function
elaborated
prevailing
professional
norms
make
adversarial
testing
process
work
particular
case
applying
standard
petitioner
claim
light
record
case
yields
finding
inaction
petitioner
lawyer
outside
wide
range
professionally
competent
assistance
prejudicial
petitioner
strickland
specifically
addressed
counsel
duty
investigate
explained
trategic
choices
made
thorough
investigation
law
facts
relevant
plausible
options
virtually
unchallengeable
strategic
choices
made
less
complete
investigation
reasonable
precisely
extent
reasonable
professional
judgments
support
limitations
investigation
words
counsel
duty
make
reasonable
investigations
make
reasonable
decision
makes
particular
investigations
unnecessary
ineffectiveness
case
particular
decision
investigate
must
directly
assessed
reasonableness
circumstances
applying
heavy
measure
deference
counsel
judgments
counsel
stated
based
decision
move
complete
psychological
examination
petitioner
prior
experience
mental
hospital
assumed
petitioner
sent
examination
app
stated
results
personnel
central
hospital
far
defense
concerned
good
added
thought
examinations
yield
psychopathic
diagnosis
reached
psychologist
examined
petitioner
briefly
primarily
administer
iq
test
purposes
hearing
whether
petitioner
confession
admissible
ibid
counsel
failure
request
examination
considered
biased
procedure
constituted
breakdown
adversarial
process
fact
procedure
psychological
examinations
indigent
criminal
defendant
jurisdiction
biased
role
petitioner
counsel
least
seek
alternative
examination
process
challenge
biased
procedure
counsel
decision
forgo
psychological
examination
imperiled
petitioner
ability
counter
prosecutor
argument
deserved
executed
role
murder
therefore
undermined
reliability
sentencing
proceeding
moreover
decision
proceed
without
examination
case
adolescent
indications
significant
psychological
problems
diminished
mental
capabilities
faces
death
penalty
contrary
professional
norms
competent
assistance
usefulness
thorough
evaluation
case
indications
capital
defendant
problems
kind
obvious
see
eddings
oklahoma
cf
ake
oklahoma
counsel
decision
investigate
petitioner
family
childhood
background
also
within
range
professionally
reasonable
judgment
viewed
time
decided
get
touch
family
member
investigate
place
petitioner
lived
counsel
provided
inadequate
assistance
relied
petitioner
suggest
possible
witnesses
mitigating
evidence
question
petitioner
whether
produce
evidence
anything
good
app
hardly
expected
yield
information
petitioner
childhood
broken
home
unlikely
response
question
defendant
volunteer
facts
father
threw
house
mother
stepfathers
beat
mother
one
stepfather
involved
drugs
alcohol
age
mitigating
evidence
highly
relevant
see
eddings
oklahoma
furthermore
counsel
testified
spoke
petitioner
perhaps
half
dozen
times
longest
robably
hour
app
bare
six
hours
provided
counsel
little
time
discuss
possible
mitigating
evidence
sentencing
proceeding
counsel
surely
also
discuss
detail
circumstances
surrounding
petitioner
confession
challenging
features
phase
trial
moreover
petitioner
death
sentence
vacated
appeal
case
remanded
counsel
perform
investigation
whatsoever
period
second
hearing
simply
proceeded
manner
resulted
petitioner
sentenced
death
first
hearing
reason
counsel
spoke
petitioner
mother
sought
learning
elsewhere
son
charged
murder
even
petitioner
mother
initiated
contact
counsel
conduct
inexplicable
testified
never
explained
penalty
phase
trial
petitioner
mother
evidence
presented
finds
reasonable
counsel
decision
petitioner
mother
testify
concluded
testimony
might
counterproductive
might
reveal
petty
offense
petitioner
committed
ante
decision
prime
example
however
strategic
choice
made
investigation
therefore
supported
informed
professional
judgment
counsel
reasonably
determine
whether
presenting
character
witnesses
pose
risk
disclosing
past
criminal
behavior
petitioner
without
first
determining
whether
criminal
behavior
although
reference
record
incident
shoplifting
candy
bar
app
another
reference
automobile
accident
indication
counsel
ever
determined
whether
petitioner
fact
prior
criminal
record
account
provided
petitioner
mother
petitioner
hitchhiking
florida
thrown
father
house
sell
shoes
trip
get
food
may
well
outweighed
relevance
earlier
petty
theft
also
find
troubling
fact
defense
counsel
rejected
assistance
another
lawyer
known
petitioner
merely
basis
lawyer
black
lawyer
offered
come
georgia
expense
provide
assistance
counsel
thought
assistance
might
ill
effect
however
trial
petitioner
white
counsel
testified
lawyer
agreed
race
wise
lawyer
testify
question
whether
reasonable
professional
decision
adversarial
duty
petitioner
counsel
pursue
means
present
testimony
witness
best
safeguard
trial
racial
prejudice
see
turner
murray
counsel
apparently
made
effort
investigate
possible
racial
bias
petitioner
jury
app
like
counsel
abandonment
psychological
investigation
suspected
unfairness
examination
procedure
surrender
perceived
risk
racial
discrimination
without
effort
eliminate
risk
inconsistent
adversarial
role
responsibility
reliability
proceeding
acceptance
unpleasant
likelihood
racial
prejudice
trial
however
justify
counsel
failure
accept
assistance
lawyer
number
ways
investigating
petitioner
childhood
background
indianapolis
lawyer
known
petitioner
testimony
petitioner
mother
federal
habeas
corpus
hearing
revealed
lawyer
law
school
worked
volunteer
big
brother
organization
men
spent
time
children
relationship
big
brother
undoubtedly
familiar
petitioner
friends
family
members
affidavits
submitted
federal
hearing
record
indicate
many
persons
still
reside
indianapolis
never
approached
counsel
sum
reluctantly
conclude
counsel
fell
short
duty
make
reasonable
investigations
make
reasonable
decision
makes
particular
investigations
unnecessary
strickland
washington
application
strickland
standard
case
convinces
investigation
compelled
constitutionally
inadequate
information
reasonable
professional
judgment
limit
investigation
made
concluded
conduct
petitioner
lawyer
failing
pursue
investigation
petitioner
psychological
problems
family
childhood
background
professionally
unreasonable
given
circumstances
known
counsel
time
must
also
address
question
whether
inadequate
performance
prejudiced
petitioner
view
information
adolescent
psychological
problems
troubled
childhood
unfortunate
family
history
available
reasonable
probability
sentencer
including
appellate
extent
independently
reweighs
evidence
concluded
balance
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
warrant
death
strickland
washington
refrain
remarking
similarities
evidence
petitioner
childhood
presented
eddings
oklahoma
recognizing
force
evidence
decision
whether
individual
sentenced
die
held
death
sentence
vacated
case
remanded
another
sentencing
proceeding
sentencing
authority
consider
mitigating
evidence
decision
present
evidence
sentencing
authority
petitioner
case
supported
reasonable
professional
judgments
reliability
proceeding
undermined
defense
counsel
disinterest
developing
mitigating
evidence
permit
informed
decision
reasonable
possibility
outcome
sentencing
hearing
different
counsel
conduct
undermined
proper
functioning
adversarial
process
sentencing
hearing
relied
produced
result
strickland
washington
iii
petitioner
denied
effective
assistance
counsel
guaranteed
sixth
amendment
due
trial
counsel
active
representation
conflicting
interests
given
indications
petitioner
psychological
problems
diminished
mental
capabilities
known
petitioner
lawyer
counsel
failure
perform
investigation
problems
petitioner
background
denied
petitioner
effective
assistance
counsel
hearing
petitioner
entitled
new
trial
representation
counsel
new
hearing
effective
assistance
counsel
respectfully
dissent
judgment
denying
relief
agree
conclusion
ante
appeals
affirmed
extent
held
impermissible
effect
jury
instruction
malice
given
phase
trial
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
clarified
also
agree
observation
ante
petitioner
advanced
question
constitutionality
executing
person
murder
committed
minor
thus
need
address
merits
issue
availability
claim
petitioner
future
proceeding
cuyler
sullivan
noted
vast
majority
public
defender
offices
strong
policy
multiple
representation
approximately
half
never
undertake
representation
see
also
lowenthal
joint
representation
criminal
cases
critical
appraisal
rev
observed
cuyler
private
bar
may
less
aware
conflicts
interests
instances
observation
certainly
supported
testimony
petitioner
attorney
case
never
even
considered
conflict
might
arise
representation
two
defendants
facing
death
penalty
commission
murder
see
app
criminal
rule
provides
relevant
part
whenever
two
defendants
jointly
charged
represented
retained
assigned
counsel
associated
practice
law
shall
promptly
inquire
respect
joint
representation
shall
personally
advise
defendant
right
effective
assistance
counsel
including
separate
representation
ethical
cannon
aba
code
professional
responsibility
instances
lawyer
justified
representing
two
clients
differing
interests
nevertheless
essential
client
given
opportunity
evaluate
need
representation
free
potential
conflict
obtain
counsel
desires
thus
lawyer
may
represent
multiple
clients
explain
fully
client
implications
common
representation
accept
continue
employment
clients
consent
lawyer
required
decline
employment
withdraw
employment
disciplinary
rule
partner
associate
lawyer
affiliated
firm
may
accept
continue
employment
except
preliminary
matters
initial
hearings
applications
bail
lawyer
lawyers
associated
practice
undertake
defend
one
defendant
criminal
case
duty
one
defendants
may
conflict
duty
another
potential
conflict
interest
representing
multiple
defendants
grave
ordinarily
lawyer
decline
act
one
several
codefendants
except
unusual
situations
careful
investigation
clear
conflict
likely
develop
ii
several
defendants
give
informed
consent
multiple
representation
iii
consent
defendants
made
matter
judicial
record
determining
presence
consent
defendants
trial
judge
make
appropriate
inquiries
respecting
actual
potential
conflicts
interest
counsel
whether
defendants
fully
comprehend
difficulties
attorney
sometimes
encounters
defending
multiple
clients
instances
accepting
continuing
employment
one
defendant
criminal
case
unprofessional
conduct
aba
standards
criminal
justice
ed
emphases
original
subsequent
petitioner
trial
georgia
exercising
supervisory
authority
adopted
rule
capital
cases
codefendants
must
provided
separate
independent
counsel
fleming
state
cert
denied
cited
provision
code
professional
responsibility
requires
lawyer
affiliated
firm
lawyer
disqualified
must
also
disqualified
thereby
indicated
rule
applies
representation
single
attorney
members
firm
explained
rule
separate
independent
representation
especially
necessary
death
penalty
sought
cases
even
slight
conflict
irrelevant
guilt
innocence
may
important
sentencing
phase
see
also
bowles
concurring
two
defendants
share
equal
responsibility
crime
usually
one
culpable
number
reasons
greater
degree
responsibility
occurred
one
may
also
entitled
leniency
based
factors
age
intelligence
motive
background
previous
conduct
record
etc
common
counsel
eliminates
practical
possibility
plea
bargaining
see
hill
concurring
specially
cautioning
although
presumption
joint
representation
appropriate
per
se
rule
joint
representation
may
capital
defendants
able
waive
right
representation
benefit
jordan
dissenting
arguing
defendant
case
permitted
opportunity
make
informed
voluntary
waiver
right
representation
happened
petitioner
case
therefore
unlikely
repeated
georgia
distinction
prejudice
showing
showing
adverse
effect
attorney
performance
apparently
difficult
courts
discern
see
generally
note
conflicts
interest
representation
multiple
criminal
defendants
clarifying
cuyler
sullivan
geo
decision
strickland
washington
made
clear
however
demonstrating
conflict
adversely
affected
counsel
performance
equate
standard
applied
general
ineffectiveness
claims
requires
showing
reasonable
probability
counsel
unprofessional
errors
result
proceeding
different
standard
necessary
cases
trigger
presumption
prejudice
presumption
cases
limited
nature
automatic
presumption
prejudice
arises
cases
actual
constructive
denial
assistance
counsel
altogether
cases
state
interference
assistance
counsel
transcripts
petitioner
first
trial
including
first
sentencing
hearing
second
sentencing
hearing
submitted
exhibit
exhibit
respectively
respondent
answer
petitioner
federal
habeas
corpus
petition
district
see
record
pleading
citations
transcript
first
trial
hearing
designated
first
tr
citations
second
hearing
designated
second
tr
great
degree
deference
accords
lower
courts
conclusions
matter
ante
emphasis
heavily
rulings
ante
appear
misplaced
analysis
case
question
multiple
representation
mixed
determination
law
fact
requires
application
legal
principles
historical
facts
cuyler
sullivan
general
ineffectiveness
question
performance
prejudice
components
ineffectiveness
inquiry
strickland
washington
fact
defendants
given
separate
trials
may
eliminate
problems
created
conflict
interest
severance
alleviate
numerous
dilemmas
faced
lawyers
representing
two
defendants
charged
indicted
together
see
developments
law
conflicts
interest
legal
profession
harv
rev
geer
representation
multiple
criminal
defendants
conflicts
interest
professional
responsibilities
defense
attorney
rev
right
representation
counsel
pretrial
appellate
proceedings
criminal
cases
may
significant
representation
trial
earlier
discussion
hazards
attorney
representing
one
coindictee
described
conflicts
present
case
joint
representation
conflicting
interests
suspect
tends
prevent
attorney
example
case
may
well
precluded
defense
counsel
exploring
possible
plea
negotiations
possibility
agreement
testify
prosecution
provided
lesser
charge
favorable
sentencing
recommendation
acceptable
generally
speaking
conflict
may
also
prevent
attorney
challenging
admission
evidence
prejudicial
one
client
perhaps
favorable
another
arguing
sentencing
hearing
relative
involvement
culpability
clients
order
minimize
culpability
one
emphasizing
another
holloway
arkansas
contrary
speculation
counsel
claim
dropped
lesser
culpability
argument
weakness
rather
stated
raise
issue
difference
culpability
two
coindictees
petitioner
appellate
brief
although
thought
key
issue
trial
app
thought
jury
decision
based
evidence
way
see
raise
issue
theory
lack
evidence
sustain
finding
jury
punishment
give
basis
action
certainly
considered
strategically
sound
reflects
erroneous
legal
interpretation
appellate
review
capital
cases
georgia
failing
argue
petitioner
behalf
less
culpable
stevens
counsel
diminished
reliability
georgia
proportionality
review
case
held
proportionality
review
important
component
georgia
system
see
gregg
georgia
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
therefore
even
counsel
assistance
appeal
hindered
actual
conflict
interest
one
may
well
question
whether
conduct
regard
met
minimal
level
professional
reasonableness
counsel
declarations
permit
representation
stevens
affect
representation
petitioner
outweigh
conflict
revealed
record
counsel
fully
disinterested
party
proceeding
due
collateral
consequences
result
determination
rendered
ineffective
assistance
counsel
certainly
interest
disavowing
conflict
interest
may
receive
appointments
source
clients
criminal
defense
work
partners
practice
app
approximate
fee
counsel
received
case
representation
petitioner
largest
firm
ever
received
criminal
case
ibid
payment
along
payment
received
partner
appointment
stevens
case
went
firm
account
discounts
counsel
failure
offer
prosecutor
petitioner
testimony
stevens
stating
indication
prosecutor
receptive
offer
ante
focuses
strength
evidence
petitioner
stevens
guilt
concludes
reason
doubt
prosecutor
refused
discuss
matter
prior
first
trial
insisted
seeking
death
penalty
remand
case
ante
reasoning
however
misses
point
petitioner
argument
question
whether
prosecutor
insisted
seeking
death
penalty
petitioner
counsel
attempted
persuade
otherwise
offering
petitioner
testimony
stevens
although
easy
assume
prosecutor
indulged
plea
bargaining
case
significant
evidence
guilt
approach
ignores
reality
bargaining
capital
cases
evidence
guilt
factor
prosecutors
consider
rather
relevant
factors
include
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
surrounding
case
well
practical
considerations
cost
pursuing
death
penalty
see
gross
mauro
patterns
death
stan
rev
since
death
penalty
prosecutions
require
large
allocations
scarce
prosecutorial
resources
prosecutors
must
choose
small
number
cases
receive
expensive
treatment
practical
considerations
might
weigh
even
heavily
prior
second
trial
remand
state
appellate
reversal
first
death
sentence
furthermore
may
collateral
evidentiary
considerations
pretrial
phase
warrant
plea
life
imprisonment
one
coindictee
exchange
evidence
strengthen
case
example
case
prosecutor
thought
likelihood
petitioner
counsel
might
prevail
argument
petitioner
confession
suppressed
petitioner
counsel
offered
petitioner
testimony
stevens
prosecutor
might
decided
rather
risk
possibility
case
petitioner
destroyed
suppression
confession
permit
petitioner
plead
life
sentence
exchange
testimony
stevens
pursue
death
sentence
stevens
petitioner
attorney
duty
serve
role
adversary
system
make
offer
petitioner
behalf
testify
stevens
petitioner
willing
thereby
avoid
possibility
executed
petitioner
burden
showing
conflict
interest
adversely
affected
counsel
performance
therefore
met
suggestion
whether
prosecutor
accepted
offer
determinative
factor
verges
requiring
showing
prejudice
course
inappropriate
context
petitioner
claim
see
supra
counsel
complete
failure
offer
petitioner
testimony
stevens
capital
case
nature
petitioner
lesser
culpability
suggested
confession
corroborated
testimony
key
witness
minimal
professional
standards
counsel
testified
several
newspaper
accounts
proceedings
first
second
sentencing
hearings
certain
people
community
aware
sentence
received
first
trial
app
record
indicates
persons
asked
voir
dire
second
sentencing
hearing
whether
heard
first
trial
responded
affirmatively
second
tr
counsel
made
effort
question
prospective
jurors
extent
knowledge
earlier
trials
whether
extended
theories
petitioner
stevens
trials
argued
counsel
also
testified
explanation
failure
seek
change
venue
expected
jurors
sat
petitioner
trial
aware
pretrial
proceedings
including
unsuccessful
effort
change
venue
app
agree
observation
dissenting
opinion
appeals
defense
strategy
make
prosecutor
prove
case
see
app
tantamount
strategy
reliance
upon
strategy
capital
sentencing
proceeding
alternative
investigating
presenting
available
mitigating
evidence
patently
unreasonable
burger
kemp
justice
powell
justice
brennan
joins
dissenting
join
part
ii
justice
blackmun
dissenting
opinion
reverse
judgment
appeals
ground
counsel
unreasonably
failed
investigate
present
sentencing
jury
available
mitigating
evidence
raised
substantial
question
whether
sentence
death
imposed
seriously
backward
minor
therefore
reach
question
whether
conflict
interest
resulting
fact
two
law
partners
represented
burger
stevens
separate
trials
write
separately
emphasize
aspects
burger
claim
find
particularly
troubling
committed
crime
executed
burger
physical
age
years
iq
functioning
level
possibly
suffered
brain
damage
beatings
younger
see
burger
kemp
johnson
dissenting
testimony
burger
mother
federal
habeas
corpus
hearing
confirmed
childhood
turbulent
filled
violence
app
see
ante
affidavits
burger
childhood
friends
also
attested
troubled
upbringing
see
ante
defense
counsel
knew
something
facts
although
details
app
prior
sentencing
hearing
counsel
interviewed
burger
burger
mother
attorney
befriended
burger
mother
also
reviewed
psychologists
reports
provided
burger
mother
spoken
psychologist
testified
burger
iq
psychological
maturity
suppression
hearing
review
counsel
made
judgment
presenting
evidence
sentencing
addition
burger
chronological
age
facts
degree
participation
crimes
burger
benefit
app
see
ii
strickland
washington
held
defendant
claim
counsel
assistance
defective
require
reversal
conviction
death
sentence
two
components
first
defendant
must
show
counsel
errors
serious
performance
counsel
guaranteed
sixth
amendment
deficient
second
defendant
must
show
suffered
prejudice
counsel
performance
context
capital
sentence
defendant
must
demonstrate
reasonable
probability
absent
errors
sentencer
concluded
balance
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
warrant
death
assessing
adequacy
counsel
performance
strategic
choices
made
thorough
investigation
law
facts
relevant
plausible
options
virtually
unchallengeable
strategic
choices
made
less
complete
investigation
reasonable
precisely
extent
reasonable
professional
judgments
support
limitations
investigation
counsel
believe
evidence
burger
violent
disturbed
family
background
benefit
client
burger
involved
beating
number
things
indicated
violence
stuff
earlier
age
app
counsel
reason
presenting
sentencing
jury
evidence
burger
mental
emotional
immaturity
ambiguous
appears
counsel
believed
relevant
testimony
mitigation
capital
sentence
something
like
good
boy
went
church
telling
counsel
explanation
type
mitigating
evidence
relevant
sentencing
hearing
anything
good
anything
course
understanding
broad
generally
put
anything
find
good
anybody
mitigation
sentence
burger
stunted
intellectual
emotional
growth
details
tragic
childhood
far
good
true
background
information
indicated
violence
stuff
earlier
age
decisions
emphasize
mitigating
evidence
necessarily
good
factors
mitigate
individual
defendant
moral
culpability
ste
diverse
frailties
humankind
woodson
north
carolina
plurality
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
jj
emphasis
added
capital
case
defendant
youthful
fact
child
measured
chronological
emotional
intellectual
maturity
evidence
facts
extraordinarily
germane
individualized
inquiry
sentencing
jury
constitutionally
required
perform
vidence
turbulent
family
history
beatings
harsh
father
severe
emotional
disturbance
particularly
relevant
eddings
oklahoma
belief
long
held
society
defendants
commit
criminal
acts
attributable
disadvantaged
background
emotional
mental
problems
may
less
culpable
defendants
excuse
california
brown
concurring
see
zant
stephens
defendant
mental
illness
perhaps
mitigate
penalty
previous
observation
bears
emphasis
outh
chronological
fact
time
condition
life
person
may
susceptible
influence
psychological
damage
history
replete
laws
judicial
recognition
minors
especially
earlier
years
generally
less
mature
responsible
adults
particularly
formative
years
childhood
adolescence
minors
often
lack
experience
perspective
judgment
expected
adults
bellotti
baird
eddings
oklahoma
supra
footnotes
omitted
information
sentencing
stage
capital
case
may
highly
relevant
counsel
burden
justifying
failure
investigate
present
similarly
heightened
indication
counsel
understood
relevance
much
less
extraordinary
importance
facts
burger
mental
emotional
immaturity
character
background
investigated
presented
case
evidence
bears
directly
burger
culpability
responsibility
murder
fact
directly
supports
strategy
counsel
claimed
deemed
best
emphasize
difference
criminal
responsibility
two
participants
crime
absent
explanation
appear
record
counsel
decision
introduce
even
discover
mitigating
evidence
unreasonable
performance
constitutionally
deficient
imposing
death
penalty
individual
yet
legally
adult
unusual
raises
special
concern
least
state
permits
execution
minor
great
care
must
taken
ensure
minor
truly
deserves
treated
adult
specific
inquiry
including
age
actual
maturity
family
environment
education
emotional
mental
stability
prior
record
particularly
relevant
minor
criminal
culpability
issue
see
fare
michael
powell
dissenting
inquiry
occurred
case
every
realistic
sense
burger
minor
according
law
clearly
mental
capacity
subnormal
point
jury
reasonably
believed
death
appropriate
punishment
reasonable
probability
evidence
presented
sentencing
jury
case
affected
outcome
burger
demonstrated
prejudice
due
counsel
deficient
performance
iii
conclude
counsel
performance
case
deficient
deficiency
may
well
influenced
sentence
burger
received
vacate
burger
death
sentence
remand
resentencing
counsel
testified
felt
way
try
case
take
evidence
try
minimize
burger
participation
crime
felt
case
tried
facts
make
district
attorney
say
make
use
whatever
rules
evidence
exclude
harmful
facts
use
opinion
representing
burger
use
facts
show
entitled
treated
manner
person
main
actor
thing
secondary
secondary
position
since
two
punishments
particular
situation
given
lesser
two
think
way
case
tried
way
tried
know
today
go
back
try
manner
say
manner
much
manner
using
thing
hope
got
different
jury
app
counsel
testified
particular
psychologist
gave
burger
test
found
also
opinion
burger
sociopath
psychopathic
personality
cross
examination
confession
phase
attorney
asked
commented
effect
ca
remember
exact
comment
sociopath
crazy
belong
insane
asylum
treated
criminal
compulsive
behavior
made
something
well
ca
put
insane
asylum
let
know
felt
related
questions
asked
presence
jury
decided
point
use
testimony
psychologist
phase
opinion
know
question
sanity
used
instance
opinion
see
benefit
going
trying
find
sociologist
psychologist
use
particular
trial
particular
place
think
effective
although
individual
may
held
criminally
responsible
age
code
ann
age
legal
majority
georgia
years
notes
ante
alvin
leaphart
appointed
counsel
represented
petitioner
state
courts
experienced
respected
lawyer
concluding
ineffective
assistance
case
question
view
lawyer
participated
litigation
knows
judgment
calls
particularly
trial
always
reasonable
correct
moreover
yet
addressed
question
presented
thompson
state
crim
app
cert
granted
whether
eighth
amendment
imposes
age
limitation
application
death
penalty
see
eddings
oklahoma
also
share
concern
expressed
judge
edenfield
blake
zant
supp
sd
routine
raising
charges
ineffective
assistance
counsel
likely
significant
chilling
effect
willingness
experienced
lawyers
undertake
defense
capital
cases
see
ante
case
however
conclude
facts
circumstances
one
disputes
clearly
show
counsel
made
serious
mistake
judgment
failing
fully
develop
introduce
mitigating
evidence
concedes
relevant
jury
compelled
consider
see
ante
noted
eddings
oklahoma
state
country
makes
separate
provision
juvenile
offenders
citing
gault
enacted
statutes
since
decision
furman
georgia
prohibit
execution
persons
time
offense
three
impose
prohibition
age
nevada
sets
limit
age
streib
eighth
amendment
capital
punishment
juveniles
cleveland
state
rev
nn
permitting
imposition
death
penalty
juveniles
half
explicitly
denominate
youth
mitigating
factor
american
law
institute
model
penal
code
statute
exclusion
defendants
years
age
time
commission
crime
institute
reasons
civilized
societies
tolerate
spectacle
execution
children
opinion
confirmed
american
experience
punishing
youthful
offenders
comment
american
bar
association
adopted
resolution
stating
organization
oppo
ses
principle
imposition
capital
punishment
person
offense
committed
person
age
see
aba
opposes
capital
punishment
persons
international
opinion
issue
reflected
article
international
convenant
civil
political
rights
american
convention
human
rights
see
nations
human
rights
compilation
international
instruments
see
also
weissbrodt
ratification
human
rights
covenants
rev
prohibit
execution
individuals
age
time
crime
party
either
treaties
least
nations
signed
ratified
international
covenant
see
weissbrodt
supra
european
countries
forbid
imposition
death
penalty
time
offense
streib
supra
citing
amnesty
international
death
penalty