lockhart
fretwell
argued
november
decided
january
arkansas
jury
convicted
respondent
fretwell
capital
felony
murder
sentenced
death
finding
inter
alia
aggravating
factor
murder
occurred
robbery
committed
pecuniary
gain
direct
appeal
fretwell
argued
sentence
unconstitutional
eighth
circuit
precedent
collins
lockhart
based
aggravating
factor
duplicated
element
underlying
felony
murder
course
robbery
however
state
declined
consider
whether
follow
collins
fretwell
objected
aggravator
use
sentencing
phase
later
rejected
state
habeas
corpus
challenge
raised
claim
district
conditionally
vacated
sentence
federal
habeas
holding
counsel
failure
raise
collins
objection
amounted
prejudice
strickland
washington
deficient
performance
prejudice
identified
two
components
claim
although
appeals
overruled
collins
affirmed
reasoning
trial
sustained
collins
objection
made
fretwell
trial
jury
sentenced
death
held
counsel
failure
make
collins
objection
sentencing
proceeding
constitute
prejudice
within
meaning
strickland
washington
supra
show
prejudice
strickland
defendant
must
demonstrate
counsel
errors
serious
deprive
trial
whose
result
unfair
unreliable
merely
outcome
different
unfairness
unreliability
result
unless
counsel
ineffectiveness
deprives
defendant
substantive
procedural
right
law
entitles
sentencing
proceeding
result
present
case
neither
unfair
unreliable
appeals
decided
collins
overruled
perry
lockhart
four
years
later
thus
respondent
suffered
prejudice
counsel
deficient
performance
contrary
fretwell
argument
prejudice
determined
laws
existing
time
trial
although
contemporary
assessment
counsel
conduct
used
determining
deficient
performance
component
strickland
test
prejudice
component
focus
fairness
reliability
implicate
concerns
motivated
former
component
adoption
rigid
requirement
dampen
ardor
impair
independence
defense
counsel
discourage
acceptance
assigned
cases
undermine
trust
attorney
client
instant
holding
inconsistent
retroactivity
rule
announced
teague
lane
circumstances
gave
rise
rule
apply
claims
raised
federal
habeas
petitioner
interest
finality
judgment
incarcerated
unlike
ordinarily
claim
reliance
past
judicial
precedent
basis
actions
pp
reversed
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
white
scalia
kennedy
souter
thomas
joined
post
thomas
post
filed
concurring
opinions
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
blackmun
joined
post
winston
bryant
attorney
general
arkansas
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
clint
miller
senior
assistant
attorney
general
brent
standridge
assistant
attorney
general
amy
wax
argued
cause
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
brief
solicitor
general
starr
assistant
attorney
general
mueller
deputy
solicitor
general
bryson
richard
friedman
ricky
medlock
appointment
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
state
california
et
al
daniel
lungren
attorney
general
california
george
williamson
chief
assistant
attorney
general
ward
campbell
deputy
attorney
general
mark
krotoski
special
assistant
attorney
general
james
evans
attorney
general
alabama
charles
cole
attorney
general
alaska
grant
woods
attorney
general
arizona
gale
norton
attorney
general
colorado
richard
palmer
chief
state
attorney
connecticut
charles
oberly
iii
attorney
general
delaware
robert
butterworth
attorney
general
florida
larry
echohawk
attorney
general
idaho
chris
gorman
attorney
general
kentucky
marc
racicot
attorney
general
montana
stenberg
attorney
general
nebraska
frankie
sue
del
papa
attorney
general
nevada
robert
del
tufo
attorney
general
new
jersey
lacy
thornburg
attorney
general
north
carolina
charles
crookham
attorney
general
oregon
ernest
preate
attorney
general
pennsylvania
travis
medlock
attorney
general
south
carolina
mark
barnett
attorney
general
south
dakota
jeffrey
amestoy
attorney
general
vermont
kenneth
eikenberry
attorney
general
washington
joseph
meyer
attorney
general
wyoming
criminal
justice
legal
foundation
kent
scheidegger
michael
mello
martin
mcclain
filed
brief
office
capital
collateral
representative
florida
et
al
amicus
curiae
chief
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
case
decide
whether
counsel
failure
make
objection
state
criminal
sentencing
proceeding
objection
supported
decision
subsequently
overruled
constitutes
prejudice
within
meaning
decision
strickland
washington
result
sentencing
proceeding
case
rendered
neither
unreliable
fundamentally
unfair
result
counsel
failure
make
objection
answer
question
negative
hold
otherwise
grant
criminal
defendants
windfall
entitled
august
arkansas
jury
convicted
respondent
bobby
ray
fretwell
capital
felony
murder
penalty
phase
state
argued
evidence
presented
guilt
phase
established
two
aggravating
factors
murder
committed
pecuniary
gain
murder
committed
facilitate
respondent
escape
finding
existence
first
factors
mitigating
factors
jury
sentenced
respondent
death
direct
appeal
respondent
argued
inter
alia
sentence
reversed
light
collins
lockhart
cert
denied
case
appeals
eighth
circuit
held
death
sentence
unconstitutional
based
aggravating
factor
duplicates
element
underlying
felony
factor
genuinely
narrow
class
persons
eligible
death
penalty
accordingly
respondent
argued
death
sentence
unconstitutional
pecuniary
gain
element
underlying
felony
capital
conviction
murder
course
robbery
arkansas
declined
consider
whether
follow
collins
respondent
failed
object
use
pecuniary
gain
aggravator
sentencing
proceeding
rejecting
remainder
respondent
claims
arkansas
affirmed
conviction
death
sentence
fretwell
state
ark
respondent
filed
state
habeas
corpus
challenge
arguing
trial
counsel
ineffective
failing
raise
collins
objection
arkansas
rejected
claim
arkansas
courts
passed
collins
question
time
respondent
trial
fretwell
state
ark
respondent
filed
petition
seeking
federal
habeas
corpus
relief
district
eastern
district
arkansas
among
things
argued
trial
counsel
perform
effectively
failed
raise
collins
objection
district
held
counsel
duty
aware
law
relevant
death
penalty
cases
failure
make
collins
objection
amounted
prejudice
strickland
washington
supra
ed
ark
district
granted
habeas
relief
conditionally
vacated
respondent
death
sentence
appeals
affirmed
divided
vote
even
though
two
years
earlier
overruled
decision
collins
light
decision
lowenfield
phelps
see
perry
lockhart
cert
denied
majority
believed
arkansas
trial
bound
supremacy
clause
obey
eighth
circuit
interpretation
federal
constitution
based
belief
reasoned
counsel
made
objection
trial
sustained
objection
jury
sentenced
respondent
death
remanded
ordering
district
sentence
respondent
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
parole
held
since
respondent
entitled
benefit
collins
time
original
sentencing
proceeding
perpetuate
prejudice
caused
original
sixth
amendment
violation
resentence
current
law
dissenting
judge
argued
strickland
prejudice
involves
determination
outcome
different
also
involves
concepts
reliability
fairness
focusing
probable
effect
counsel
error
time
fretwell
sentencing
majority
misses
broader
important
point
sentencing
proceeding
reached
neither
unreliable
unfair
result
granted
certiorari
reverse
decisions
emphasized
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
exists
order
protect
fundamental
right
fair
trial
strickland
washington
supra
nix
whiteside
noting
strickland
benchmark
right
counsel
fairness
adversary
proceeding
cronic
without
counsel
right
trial
little
avail
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
morrison
right
counsel
meant
assure
fairness
adversary
criminal
process
thus
right
effective
assistance
counsel
recognized
sake
effect
ability
accused
receive
fair
trial
absent
effect
challenged
conduct
reliability
trial
process
sixth
amendment
guarantee
generally
implicated
cronic
supra
test
formulated
strickland
determining
whether
counsel
rendered
constitutionally
ineffective
assistance
reflects
concern
strickland
identified
two
components
ineffective
assistance
claim
deficient
performance
prejudice
decisions
criminal
defendant
alleging
prejudice
must
show
counsel
errors
serious
deprive
defendant
fair
trial
trial
whose
result
reliable
strickland
see
also
kimmelman
morrison
essence
claim
counsel
unprofessional
errors
upset
adversarial
balance
defense
prosecution
trial
rendered
unfair
verdict
rendered
suspect
nix
whiteside
supra
thus
analysis
focusing
solely
mere
outcome
determination
without
attention
whether
result
proceeding
fundamentally
unfair
unreliable
defective
set
aside
conviction
sentence
solely
outcome
different
counsel
error
may
grant
defendant
windfall
law
entitle
see
cronic
supra
decision
nix
whiteside
supra
makes
point
respondent
case
argued
received
ineffective
assistance
counsel
refused
cooperate
presenting
perjured
testimony
obviously
respondent
presented
false
testimony
jury
might
reasonable
probability
jury
returned
verdict
guilty
sheer
outcome
determination
however
sufficient
make
claim
sixth
amendment
held
matter
law
counsel
conduct
establish
prejudice
required
relief
second
strand
strickland
inquiry
touchstone
claim
fairness
adversary
proceeding
judging
prejudice
likelihood
different
outcome
defendant
entitlement
luck
lawless
decisionmaker
ibid
quoting
strickland
supra
see
also
nix
whiteside
supra
blackmun
concurring
judgment
extent
whiteside
claim
rests
assertion
acquitted
able
testify
falsely
whiteside
claims
right
law
simply
recognize
since
whiteside
deprived
neither
fair
trial
specific
constitutional
rights
designed
guarantee
fair
trial
suffered
prejudice
result
sentencing
proceeding
present
case
neither
unfair
unreliable
appeals
decided
collins
overruled
perry
four
years
later
trial
chosen
follow
collins
counsel
error
deprived
respondent
chance
state
make
error
favor
brief
amicus
curiae
respondent
argues
use
hindsight
inappropriate
determining
prejudice
strickland
element
determined
laws
existing
time
trial
support
relies
upon
language
used
strickland
discussing
first
part
necessary
showing
deficient
performance
held
order
determine
whether
counsel
performed
level
expected
reasonably
competent
attorney
necessary
judge
counsel
challenged
conduct
facts
particular
case
viewed
time
counsel
conduct
strickland
claims
raised
cases
defendant
found
guilty
offense
charged
perspective
hindsight
natural
tendency
speculate
whether
different
trial
strategy
might
successful
adopted
rule
contemporary
assessment
counsel
conduct
rigid
requirement
dampen
ardor
impair
independence
defense
counsel
discourage
acceptance
assigned
cases
undermine
trust
attorney
client
ibid
prejudice
component
strickland
test
implicate
concerns
focuses
question
whether
counsel
deficient
performance
renders
result
trial
unreliable
proceeding
fundamentally
unfair
see
kimmelman
powell
concurring
unreliability
unfairness
result
ineffectiveness
counsel
deprive
defendant
substantive
procedural
right
law
entitles
noted
premise
grant
case
perry
correctly
decided
respondent
entitled
objection
based
double
counting
respondent
therefore
suffered
prejudice
counsel
deficient
performance
dissent
contends
holding
inconsistent
retroactivity
rule
announced
teague
lane
think
otherwise
teague
stands
proposition
new
constitutional
rules
criminal
procedure
announced
applied
collateral
review
dissent
acknowledges
post
retroactivity
rule
motivated
respect
strong
interest
finality
criminal
convictions
recognition
state
penalized
relying
constitutional
standards
prevailed
time
original
proceedings
took
place
teague
supra
plurality
opinion
internal
citations
omitted
new
rule
principle
therefore
validates
reasonable
interpretations
existing
precedents
made
state
courts
even
though
shown
contrary
later
decisions
butler
mckellar
federal
habeas
petitioner
interest
finality
judgment
incarcerated
indeed
purpose
habeas
petition
overturn
judgment
petitioner
ordinarily
claim
reliance
past
judicial
precedent
basis
actions
corresponds
state
interest
described
quotation
butler
supra
result
differences
state
benefit
teague
decision
federal
habeas
cases
habeas
petitioner
result
dissent
windfall
state
instead
perfectly
logical
limitation
teague
circumstances
gave
rise
cessante
ratione
legis
cessat
et
ipsa
lex
judgment
appeals
reversed
footnotes
contrary
dissent
suggestion
today
decision
involve
require
inquiry
analysis
triggered
reviewing
discovers
error
committed
strickland
washington
error
constitutional
magnitude
occurs
sixth
amendment
context
defendant
demonstrates
deficient
performance
prejudice
opinion
nothing
apply
prejudice
inquiry
always
built
strickland
test
since
find
constitutional
error
need
consider
harmlessness
dissent
attempt
distinguish
nix
whiteside
unpersuasive
ignores
reasoning
employed
nix
reject
respondent
claim
prejudice
perjury
perhaps
paradigmatic
example
lawlessness
post
rather
held
respondent
show
strickland
prejudice
merely
demonstrating
outcome
different
counsel
behavior
nix
supra
contrary
dissent
suggestion
reasoning
invoked
resolve
factual
oddity
one
case
rather
represents
straightforward
application
rule
law
announced
strickland
nix
supra
respondent
argues
collins
lockhart
cert
denied
still
good
law
despite
decision
lowenfield
phelps
urges
us
decide
question
threshold
matter
decline
invitation
premise
underlying
question
presented
collins
properly
overruled
eighth
circuit
respondent
failed
bring
objections
premise
underlying
questio
presented
attention
opposition
petition
certiorari
decide
question
based
eighth
circuit
view
collins
longer
good
law
eastman
kodak
image
technical
services
alternative
argument
solicitor
general
relies
upon
language
habeas
corpus
statute
provides
habeas
relief
may
issue
applicant
custody
violation
constitution
laws
treaties
according
solicitor
general
lowenfield
decided
time
respondent
petitioned
federal
habeas
relief
argue
currently
custody
violation
constitution
disposition
case
basis
strickland
washington
supra
address
contention
justice
concurring
join
opinion
concur
judgment
write
separately
point
today
decision
vast
majority
cases
effect
prejudice
inquiry
strickland
washington
determinative
question
whether
reasonable
probability
counsel
unprofessional
errors
result
proceeding
different
remains
unchanged
case
however
concerns
unusual
circumstance
defendant
attempts
demonstrate
prejudice
based
considerations
matter
law
inform
inquiry
explained
strickland
certain
factors
real
though
may
simply
taken
account
assessment
likelihood
result
favorable
defendant
must
exclude
possibility
arbitrariness
whimsy
caprice
nullification
like
defendant
entitlement
luck
lawless
decisionmaker
even
lawless
decision
reviewed
assessment
prejudice
proceed
assumption
decisionmaker
reasonably
conscientiously
impartially
applying
standards
govern
decision
depend
idiosyncracies
particular
decisionmaker
unusual
propensities
toward
harshness
leniency
today
identifies
another
factor
inform
prejudice
inquiry
specifically
today
hold
making
prejudice
determination
may
consider
effect
objection
knows
wholly
meritless
current
governing
law
even
objection
might
considered
meritorious
time
omission
narrow
holding
course
precisely
disposes
case
appeared
eighth
circuit
omitted
objection
respondent
complained
well
may
sustained
raised
trial
time
eighth
circuit
reviewed
respondent
ineffective
assistance
claim
circuit
authority
bound
hold
objection
meritless
arkansas
rejected
objection
well
perry
lockhart
cert
denied
state
ark
consequently
respondent
claim
prejudice
based
allegation
denied
advantage
law
might
permit
predicated
instead
suggestion
might
denied
right
law
simply
recognize
nix
supra
blackmun
concurring
judgment
namely
right
state
make
error
favor
ante
opinion
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
seems
impact
advocating
decidedly
incorrect
point
law
like
influence
perjured
testimony
proper
consideration
assessing
likelihood
result
favorable
defendant
strickland
supra
therefore
join
holding
somewhat
unusual
circumstances
appeals
concluded
respondent
suffered
legally
cognizable
prejudice
justice
thomas
concurring
join
opinion
entirety
write
separately
call
attention
described
fundamental
misunderstanding
supremacy
clause
part
appeals
concluding
respondent
prejudiced
attorney
failure
make
objection
based
upon
collins
lockhart
cert
denied
appeals
said
following
ince
state
courts
bound
supremacy
clause
obey
federal
constitutional
law
conclude
reasonable
state
trial
sustained
objection
based
collins
fretwell
attorney
made
one
understand
statement
mean
reasonable
probability
arkansas
trial
found
collins
persuasive
therefore
chosen
follow
instead
appeals
appears
impression
arkansas
trial
compelled
follow
collins
supremacy
clause
mistaken
supremacy
clause
demands
state
law
yield
federal
law
neither
federal
supremacy
principle
federal
law
requires
state
interpretation
federal
law
give
way
lower
federal
interpretation
federal
system
state
trial
interpretation
federal
law
less
authoritative
federal
appeals
whose
circuit
trial
located
see
steffel
thompson
rehnquist
concurring
ex
rel
lawrence
woods
cert
denied
shapiro
state
courts
federal
declaratory
judgments
arkansas
trial
bound
arkansas
arkansas
appeals
interpretation
federal
law
follows
eighth
circuit
interpretation
federal
law
chooses
must
agree
holding
appeals
misinterpreted
sixth
amendment
wish
make
clear
misinterpreted
supremacy
clause
well
justice
stevens
justice
blackmun
joins
dissenting
concerned
respondent
fretwell
otherwise
receive
windfall
life
imprisonment
see
ante
today
reaches
astonishing
conclusion
deficient
performance
counsel
prejudice
defendant
even
results
erroneous
imposition
death
sentence
aversion
windfalls
seems
disappear
however
state
favored
recipient
end
result
case
state
coincidence
inadequate
representation
fortuitous
timing
may
carry
death
sentence
invalid
imposed
extraordinary
result
rests
entirely
retrospective
application
two
changes
law
occurring
respondent
trial
sentencing
first
changes
relies
explicitly
affected
eligibility
defendants
like
fretwell
death
penalty
second
change
never
directly
identified
unprincipled
transformation
standards
governing
claims
introduction
element
hindsight
place
sixth
amendment
jurisprudence
view
appeals
correctly
determined
fundamental
unfairness
exists
prisoner
receives
death
sentence
rather
life
imprisonment
solely
attorney
error
post
hoc
rationale
avoiding
conclusion
today
unconvincing
unjust
unless
defendant
charged
serious
offense
counsel
able
invoke
procedural
substantive
safeguards
distinguish
system
justice
serious
risk
injustice
infects
trial
cuyler
sullivan
reason
held
squarely
right
counsel
guaranteed
constitution
right
effective
assistance
counsel
see
cronic
absent
competent
counsel
ready
able
subject
prosecution
case
crucible
meaningful
adversarial
testing
guarantee
adversarial
system
function
properly
produce
reliable
results
see
strickland
washington
strickland
washington
decided
certain
errors
counsel
give
rise
similar
presumption
adversarial
breakdown
consequences
attend
presumption
setting
aside
conviction
sentence
serious
took
pains
limit
class
errors
support
claim
first
error
must
egregious
indicates
deficient
performance
counsel
falling
outside
wide
range
reasonable
professional
assistance
second
error
must
severe
gives
rise
prejudice
defined
quite
clearly
strickland
reasonable
probability
counsel
unprofessional
errors
result
proceeding
different
many
significant
errors
recognized
kimmelman
morrison
meet
highly
demanding
standard
require
reversal
deprive
defendant
discrete
independent
trial
right
strickland
held
reflect
performance
counsel
undermined
proper
functioning
adversarial
process
trial
relied
produced
result
standard
district
appeals
determined
respondent
entitled
relief
claim
counsel
performance
wanting
deficient
strickland
purposes
contested
seriously
disputed
decision
reached
reasonably
likely
different
counsel
failure
make
objection
supported
eighth
circuit
law
strickland
end
inquiry
respondent
identified
error
magnitude
falls
within
narrow
class
attorney
errors
precluding
reliance
outcome
proceeding
see
sixth
amendment
terms
though
respondent
shown
actual
conflict
interest
complete
absence
counsel
part
sentencing
proceeding
adversary
process
malfunctioned
resulting
verdict
therefore
without
constitutionally
unacceptable
however
standard
applies
today
instead
demands
respondent
point
additional
indicia
unreliability
specific
way
breakdown
adversarial
process
affected
respondent
discrete
trial
rights
ante
precisely
kind
harmless
error
inquiry
rejected
time
sixth
amendment
context
criminal
proceeding
loses
character
confrontation
adversaries
cronic
harm
done
defendant
certain
difficult
define
accordingly
consistently
declined
require
defendant
faces
state
without
adequate
assistance
show
harmed
result
see
cuyler
sullivan
holloway
arkansas
hamilton
alabama
williams
kaiser
right
assistance
counsel
fundamental
absolute
allow
courts
indulge
nice
calculations
amount
prejudice
arising
denial
glasser
compounds
error
insisting
respondent
make
newly
required
showing
vantage
point
hindsight
hindsight
place
sixth
amendment
jurisprudence
focuses
quite
rightly
protecting
adversarial
balance
trial
respondent
denied
assistance
necessary
justify
reliance
outcome
proceeding
strickland
washington
counsel
performance
far
professional
standards
satisfied
strickland
first
prong
severely
lacking
verdict
reasonably
likely
different
absent
errors
second
prong
simply
irrelevant
say
hindsight
counsel
failed
make
objection
four
years
fact
performance
neither
deficient
prejudicial
happened
counsel
failure
object
came
time
signified
breakdown
adversarial
process
post
hoc
vision
case
years
later
bearing
force
showing
surprisingly
reliance
hindsight
finds
support
strickland
strickland
makes
clear
merits
claim
must
viewed
time
counsel
conduct
notes
point
stated
explicitly
respect
strickland
first
prong
quality
counsel
performance
ante
ignores
however
point
implicit
strickland
entire
discussion
second
prong
defining
prejudice
terms
effect
counsel
errors
outcome
proceedings
based
totality
evidence
judge
jury
strickland
establishes
point
reference
firmly
time
trial
sentencing
justify
revision
strickland
standards
judging
ineffective
assistance
claims
relies
large
part
nix
whiteside
ante
nix
however
perform
heavy
duty
assigns
rather
unusual
case
nix
involved
claim
counsel
ineffective
refused
present
defense
based
perjured
testimony
suffice
say
reliance
perjured
testimony
reliance
current
appeals
case
law
remotely
comparable
suggest
otherwise
simply
disingenuous
distinction
needed
need
search
far
find
first
decision
nix
rests
part
conclusion
counsel
refusal
cooperate
presentation
perjury
falls
well
within
range
reasonable
professional
conduct
acceptable
strickland
nix
whiteside
cf
cronic
course
sixth
amendment
require
counsel
impossible
unethical
bona
fide
defense
charge
counsel
create
one
words
claims
predicated
failure
make
wholly
frivolous
unethical
arguments
generally
dispensed
strickland
first
prong
without
recourse
second
hence
raise
questions
issue
case
extent
nix
address
strickland
second
prejudice
prong
context
quite
different
presented
strickland
cautioned
assessment
likelihood
different
outcome
exclude
possibility
lawless
decisionmaker
fails
reasonably
conscientiously
impartially
appl
standards
govern
decision
nix
faced
perhaps
paradigmatic
example
lawlessness
strickland
referred
suggestion
perjured
testimony
might
undermined
decisionmaker
judgment
concluded
quite
correctly
defendant
rely
effects
perjury
make
claim
nix
whiteside
see
also
blackmun
concurring
judgment
read
decision
today
suggesting
state
trial
need
fear
label
lawless
follows
decision
appeals
matter
federal
constitutional
law
accordingly
nix
discussion
perjury
lawlessness
simply
inapposite
issues
presented
ii
disputed
case
performance
respondent
counsel
deficient
met
strickland
standard
deserves
emphasis
proven
connection
deficiency
outcome
respondent
sentencing
proceeding
well
presumptive
effect
counsel
performance
adversarial
process
respondent
convicted
committing
murder
course
robbery
arkansas
trial
held
separate
sentencing
hearing
devoted
exclusively
question
whether
respondent
eligible
death
penalty
instead
receive
life
sentence
without
parole
state
relied
two
aggravating
circumstances
establish
right
execute
respondent
first
alleged
purpose
avoiding
arrest
found
jury
unsupported
evidence
second
felony
committed
purposes
pecuniary
gain
obviously
supported
evidence
respondent
already
convicted
robbery
connection
murder
thus
critical
question
respondent
turned
whether
permissible
matter
law
double
count
relying
pecuniary
gain
aggravating
circumstance
also
robbery
element
crime
counsel
duty
stage
proceedings
clear
addition
general
investigation
preparation
penalty
phase
counsel
primary
obligation
advise
trial
judge
correct
answer
crucial
question
law
handled
professional
responsibility
anything
approaching
reasonableness
demanded
strickland
found
eighth
circuit
case
directly
point
addressing
arkansas
statute
respondent
sentenced
holding
double
counting
unconstitutional
collins
lockhart
cert
denied
failure
find
critically
important
case
constitutes
irrefutable
evidence
counsel
inadequate
performance
fact
collins
later
overruled
minimize
slightest
force
evidence
moreover
counsel
made
collins
objection
pecuniary
gain
aggravating
circumstance
must
assume
trial
sustained
district
stated
although
collins
since
overruled
law
eighth
circuit
time
respondent
trial
reason
believe
trial
chosen
disregard
ed
ark
neither
petitioner
relies
disagreement
finding
see
supra
explained
strickland
open
state
argue
idiosyncratic
state
trial
judge
might
refused
follow
circuit
precedent
overruled
collins
objection
applying
strickland
facts
district
correctly
held
counsel
failure
call
trial
judge
attention
collins
constituted
ineffective
assistance
seriously
undermined
proper
functioning
adversarial
process
granted
relief
basis
district
found
unnecessary
reach
additional
ineffective
assistance
claims
predicated
counsel
alleged
failure
investigate
prepare
penalty
phase
time
case
reached
appeals
deficient
performance
conceded
eighth
circuit
affirm
district
conclusion
reasonable
state
trial
sustained
objection
based
collins
fretwell
attorney
made
one
thus
counsel
deficient
performance
form
failure
discover
collins
bring
attention
directly
linked
outcome
respondent
sentencing
proceeding
counsel
error
respondent
received
death
penalty
rather
life
imprisonment
strickland
course
respondent
need
show
quite
much
sufficient
decision
reached
reasonably
likely
different
absent
errors
fortiori
showing
outcome
determination
strong
made
enough
support
strickland
claim
judgment
respondent
might
well
entitled
relief
even
show
prejudice
defined
strickland
second
prong
fact
counsel
performance
constituted
abject
failure
address
important
legal
question
issue
client
death
penalty
hearing
gives
rise
without
powerful
presumption
breakdown
entire
adversarial
system
presumption
least
strong
stronger
inferences
adversarial
malfunction
required
reversal
cases
like
holloway
glasser
see
supra
words
may
exceptional
cases
counsel
performance
falls
grievously
far
acceptable
standards
strickland
first
prong
functions
equivalent
actual
conflict
interest
generating
presumption
prejudice
automatic
reversal
think
may
well
one
cases
wrote
holloway
reversal
appropriate
even
particular
prejudice
shown
even
defendant
clearly
guilty
internal
quotation
marks
citation
omitted
course
need
go
nearly
far
resolve
case
us
strickland
standard
prevailed
today
respondent
entitled
relief
claim
shown
deficient
performance
reasonable
likelihood
different
outcome
avoid
result
effecting
dramatic
change
standard
applying
retroactively
respondent
case
view
decision
marks
startling
unwise
departure
commitment
system
ensures
fairness
reliability
subjecting
prosecution
case
meaningful
adversarial
testing
iii
changes
law
characteristic
constitutional
adjudication
prior
changes
direction
increasing
protection
afforded
individual
accused
crime
vindicate
legitimate
reliance
interests
state
law
enforcement
authorities
however
recognition
state
interest
preserving
outcome
trials
adhering
contemporaneous
standards
often
refused
apply
new
rules
retroactively
teague
lane
gave
full
expression
general
policy
allowing
keep
prison
defendants
whose
trials
appeals
conformed
constitutional
standards
holding
claims
federal
habeas
petitioners
exceptional
cases
judged
standards
prevailing
time
trial
since
relevant
changes
law
often
different
direction
affording
less
rather
protection
individual
defendants
even
handed
approach
retroactivity
seem
require
continue
evaluate
defendants
claims
law
stood
time
trial
teague
defendant
may
take
advantage
subsequent
changes
law
favorable
reason
state
able
take
advantage
subsequent
changes
law
adverse
interests
however
takes
directly
contrary
approach
today
decision
rests
critically
proposition
respondent
claim
judged
law
exists
today
rather
law
existed
time
trial
sentencing
ante
words
respondent
must
make
case
perry
lockhart
cert
denied
decided
four
years
sentencing
unlike
state
entitled
rely
constitutional
standards
teague
rendered
ineligible
death
penalty
time
sentence
imposed
already
explained
reliance
hindsight
incompatible
right
counsel
jurisprudence
also
judgment
inconsistent
case
law
insists
contemporaneous
constitutional
standards
benchmark
defendants
claims
measured
rule
generally
precludes
defendants
taking
advantage
postconviction
changes
law
allows
state
reconciled
duty
administer
justice
impartially
elementary
fairness
dictates
evaluate
respondent
claim
law
stood
convicted
sentenced
collins
also
strickland
understood
today
see
windfall
issue
one
conferred
upon
state
decision
respondent
counsel
rendered
effective
assistance
state
required
justify
respondent
execution
legal
regime
included
collins
highly
unlikely
met
burden
arkansas
courts
see
supra
almost
certainly
done
federal
courts
habeas
review
however
state
permitted
exploit
ineffective
assistance
respondent
counsel
lapse
time
provided
capitalizing
postsentencing
changes
law
justify
execution
windfall
one
sixth
amendment
prevents
us
bestowing
respectfully
dissent
see
geders
consultation
prevented
overnight
recess
hamilton
alabama
assistance
denied
arraignment
see
cuyler
sullivan
actual
conflict
adversely
affecting
performance
constitutes
reversible
error
glasser
joint
representation
codefendants
inconsistent
interests
objection
constitutes
reversible
error
concluded
assistance
counsel
among
constitutional
rights
basic
fair
trial
infraction
never
treated
harmless
error
accordingly
defendant
deprived
presence
assistance
attorney
either
throughout
prosecution
critical
stage
least
prosecution
capital
offense
reversal
automatic
holloway
arkansas
internal
quotation
marks
citation
omitted
neither
petitioner
today
directly
challenges
district
unambiguous
conclusion
trial
followed
ruling
collins
trial
counsel
made
appropriate
motion
ed
ark
worth
noting
kimmelman
morrison
entirely
consistent
line
case
law
rendering
petitioner
reliance
case
misplaced
kimmelman
held
although
certain
fourth
amendment
violations
cognizable
federal
habeas
review
see
stone
powell
counsel
failure
litigate
fourth
amendment
claims
competently
may
still
give
rise
cognizable
claim
words
attorney
error
gives
rise
claim
connected
independent
right
defendant
entitled
upset
adversarial
balance
defense
prosecution
trial
rendered
unfair
verdict
suspect
kimmelman
one
point
refers
necessity
meritorious
fourth
amendment
claim
emphasized
justice
concurrence
ante
represents
straightforward
application
strickland
test
prejudice
simply
put
attorney
failure
make
fourth
amendment
objection
alter
outcome
proceeding
objection
meritless
hence
sustained
nothing
kimmelman
suggests
failure
make
objection
supported
current
precedent
hence
likely
sustained
amount
anything
less
ineffective
assistance
come
surprise
counsel
conduct
gave
rise
additional
claims
founded
deficiencies
attorney
makes
one
error
strickland
proportions
unlikely
turned
performance
adequate
respects
instance
may
well
coincidence
counsel
failed
discover
appeals
precedent
holding
application
arkansas
capital
sentencing
statute
defendants
like
client
unconstitutional
also
failed
convince
jury
existence
mitigating
circumstances
client
favor
connection
case
counsel
failure
make
collins
objection
overall
preparation
investigation
penalty
phase
seems
perfectly
clear
nothing
opinion
today
preclude
district
remand
considering
lack
objection
evidence
relevant
larger
question
adequacy
counsel
penalty
phase
preparation
investigation
agree
gloss
put
opinion
ante
justice
thomas
concurrence
ante
nothing
text
opinion
suggest
appeals
believed
arkansas
trial
bound
supremacy
clause
obey
eighth
circuit
precedent
appeals
simply
noted
trial
bound
supremacy
clause
obey
federal
constitutional
law
emphasis
added
eighth
circuit
precedent
giving
content
law
relevant
trial
decisionmaking
see
reason
infer
plain
correct
statement
law
eighth
circuit
actually
meant
express
view
addressed
justice
thomas
see
stovall
denno
factors
reliance
burden
administration
justice
mandate
retroactive
application
wade
gilbert
california
establishing
right
counsel
pretrial
identification
johnson
new
jersey
declining
apply
miranda
arizona
retroactively
tehan
ex
rel
shott
griffin
california
prohibiting
adverse
comment
defendant
silence
apply
retroactively
see
also
engle
isaac
discussing
frustration
state
courts
faithfully
apply
existing
constitutional
law
change
constitutional
standards
applied
retroactively
see
payne
tennessee
eighth
amendment
preclude
use
victim
impact
evidence
capital
defendant
sentencing
overruling
booth
maryland
south
carolina
gathers
arizona
fulminante
rule
applicable
admission
involuntary
confessions
duckworth
eagan
miranda
warnings
adequate
despite
suggestion
lawyer
appointed
interrogation
florida
riley
police
may
search
greenhouse
helicopter
altitude
feet
without
warrant