branch
et
al
smith
et
argued
december
decided
march
census
caused
mississippi
lose
one
congressional
seat
state
legislature
failed
pass
new
redistricting
plan
anticipating
deadline
qualifying
candidates
appellants
state
plaintiffs
filed
suit
october
asking
state
chancery
issue
redistricting
plan
elections
similar
action
appellees
federal
plaintiffs
asked
federal
district
enjoin
current
plan
plan
order
elections
pursuant
miss
code
ann
alternatively
devise
redistricting
plan
district
permitted
state
plaintiffs
intervene
concluded
assert
jurisdiction
became
clear
january
state
plan
place
march
eve
state
trial
state
ruled
chancery
jurisdiction
issue
redistricting
plan
chancery
adopted
plan
december
state
attorney
general
submitted
plan
decision
department
justice
doj
preclearance
pursuant
voting
rights
act
doj
requested
additional
information
state
noting
review
period
commence
information
received
information
provided
february
meanwhile
federal
district
promulgated
plan
fix
state
congressional
districts
elections
plan
precleared
february
date
passed
district
enjoined
state
using
plan
ordered
plan
used
state
produced
precleared
constitutional
plan
based
injunction
failure
timely
preclearance
plan
found
alternative
plan
unconstitutional
state
appeal
doj
declined
make
determination
preclearance
submission
district
injunction
rendered
plan
incapable
administration
held
judgment
affirmed
supp
affirmed
justice
scalia
delivered
opinion
respect
parts
ii
holding
district
properly
enjoined
enforcement
plan
pp
two
critical
distinctions
cases
growe
emison
first
suggestion
district
failed
allow
state
adequate
opportunity
develop
redistricting
plan
second
plan
subject
voting
rights
act
controversy
whether
plan
precleared
centers
proviso
whenever
covered
jurisdiction
shall
enact
seek
administer
voting
change
change
may
enforced
attorney
general
object
within
days
pp
doj
failure
object
within
days
state
attorney
general
original
submission
render
plan
enforceable
february
jurisdiction
seeking
preclearance
must
provide
attorney
general
information
sufficient
prove
change
nondiscriminatory
doj
regulations
wholly
reasonable
consistent
act
georgia
provide
incomplete
state
submissions
start
clock
clock
begins
run
date
requested
information
received
doj
request
neither
frivolous
unwarranted
postponed
period
pp
plan
also
precleared
days
state
attorney
general
submitted
requested
information
state
seek
ing
administer
changes
within
meaning
attorney
general
made
initial
submission
doj
provided
additional
information
however
state
failed
appeal
district
injunction
ceased
seek
ing
administer
plan
period
longer
running
plan
rendered
enforceable
operation
law
private
party
actions
state
state
plaintiffs
appeal
insufficient
demonstrate
state
still
seek
administer
plan
pp
since
affirms
injunction
ground
plan
precleared
precleared
time
election
vacates
district
alternative
holding
plan
unconstitutional
district
properly
fashioned
congressional
reapportionment
plan
tension
apparent
pending
redistricting
requires
elections
state
loses
congressional
seat
enacted
years
later
requires
one
representative
use
districts
contrary
federal
plaintiffs
contention
limited
legislative
action
also
applies
action
state
federal
courts
prescribed
legislative
action
forthcoming
adopted
issue
precisely
courts
involvement
fashioning
electoral
plans
voting
rights
act
recently
enacted
decisions
baker
carr
ushered
new
era
federal
courts
overseeing
efforts
badly
malapportioned
conform
congressional
districts
standards
given
risk
judges
simply
order
elections
unlikely
directed
solely
legislative
apportionment
found
limited
addition
language
susceptible
interpretation
pp
justice
scalia
joined
chief
justice
justice
kennedy
justice
ginsburg
concluded
part
prescribes
constitutional
paragraph
applies
state
legislature
state
federal
courts
failed
redistrict
pursuant
interpretation
allows
given
effect
section
governs
manner
election
held
ntil
state
redistricted
manner
provided
state
law
apportionment
redistricts
pursuant
necessarily
manner
must
follow
state
policies
preferences
districting
white
weiser
may
invoke
stopgap
provision
election
imminent
redistricting
pursuant
state
law
including
mandate
completed
without
disrupting
election
process
mississippi
provision
deemed
operative
state
provision
envisions
legislatively
judicially
prescribed
change
come
play
long
feasible
state
federal
complete
redistricting
pp
justice
stevens
joined
justice
souter
justice
breyer
agreeing
district
properly
enjoined
plan
enforcement
promulgated
plan
concluded
impliedly
repealed
federal
act
mississippi
statutory
authorization
congressional
elections
presumption
implied
repeals
like
overcome
irreconcilable
conflict
two
provisions
later
act
clearly
intended
cove
whole
subject
earlier
one
posadas
national
city
bank
prohibiting
one
representative
electing
representatives
act
unambiguously
forbids
elections
otherwise
authorize
thus
either
posadas
standards
act
repealed
earlier
mississippi
law
fair
reading
history
leading
act
passage
shows
parties
believed
changes
debating
completely
replace
statute
final
gasp
protracted
legislative
process
four
versions
original
bill
expressly
repealed
disagreement
provision
bill
pass
less
controversial
parts
including
attached
private
bill
absence
discussion
debate
reference
repeal
provision
legislative
process
prevents
omission
final
private
bill
seen
deliberate
choice
congress
pp
scalia
announced
judgment
delivered
opinion
unanimous
respect
parts
ii
opinion
respect
part
rehnquist
stevens
kennedy
souter
ginsburg
breyer
joined
opinion
respect
parts
iv
rehnquist
kennedy
ginsburg
joined
kennedy
filed
concurring
opinion
part
ii
stevens
souter
breyer
joined
stevens
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
souter
breyer
joined
filed
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
thomas
joined
beatrice
branch
et
appellants
john
robert
smith
et
al
john
robert
smith
et
appellants
beatrice
branch
et
al
appeals
district
southern
district
mississippi
march
justice
scalia
announced
judgment
delivered
opinion
respect
parts
ii
opinion
respect
parts
iv
chief
justice
justice
kennedy
justice
ginsburg
join
cases
decide
whether
district
properly
enjoined
mississippi
state
proposed
congressional
redistricting
plan
whether
properly
fashioned
congressional
reapportionment
plan
rather
order
elections
census
caused
mississippi
lose
one
congressional
seat
reducing
representation
house
representatives
five
members
four
state
legislature
however
failed
pass
new
redistricting
plan
decennial
census
results
published
anticipation
march
deadline
qualification
candidates
see
miss
code
ann
lexis
appellant
beatrice
branch
others
state
plaintiffs
filed
suit
mississippi
state
chancery
october
asking
state
issue
redistricting
plan
congressional
elections
november
appellee
john
smith
others
federal
plaintiffs
filed
similar
action
rev
stat
district
southern
district
mississippi
claiming
current
districting
plan
miss
code
ann
lexis
dividing
state
five
rather
four
congressional
districts
unconstitutional
unenforceable
federal
plaintiffs
asked
district
enjoin
current
redistricting
plan
subsequently
asked
enjoin
plan
developed
state
asserted
violate
article
constitution
event
enforced
state
assertion
redistricting
authority
precleared
voting
rights
act
stat
asked
order
elections
pursuant
miss
code
ann
stat
tively
devise
redistricting
plan
district
convened
pursuant
initially
district
interfere
state
chancery
efforts
develop
redistricting
plan
order
filed
december
smith
clark
supp
sd
miss
district
permitted
state
plaintiffs
intervene
deferred
ruling
federal
plaintiffs
motion
preliminary
injunction
staying
hand
district
recognized
constitution
leaves
primary
responsibility
apportionment
federal
congressional
districts
quoting
growe
emison
concluded
clear
january
state
authorities
redistricting
plan
place
march
assert
jurisdiction
necessary
draft
implement
plan
reapportioning
state
congressional
districts
supp
see
also
supp
sd
miss
eve
state
chancery
trial
mississippi
denied
petitions
writs
prohibition
mandamus
filed
state
defendant
others
challenging
chancery
jurisdiction
engage
congressional
redistricting
held
chancery
jurisdiction
issue
redistricting
plan
mauldin
civ
app
juris
statement
following
trial
december
state
chancery
adopted
redistricting
plan
submitted
state
plaintiffs
december
state
attorney
general
submitted
plan
along
mississippi
mauldin
decision
arguably
changed
process
drawing
congressional
districts
authorizing
chancery
create
redistricting
plan
department
justice
doj
preclearance
february
doj
sent
letter
state
attorney
general
requesting
additional
information
mauldin
decision
information
sent
date
regarding
change
voting
procedure
insufficient
app
juris
statement
letter
advised
review
period
begin
receive
information
specified
state
attorney
general
provided
additional
information
february
meanwhile
january
district
expressing
serious
doubts
whether
mississippi
order
plan
adopted
chancery
pursuant
order
precleared
prior
march
candidate
qualification
deadline
supp
begun
develop
redistricting
plan
february
promulgated
redistricting
plan
used
absent
timely
preclearance
chancery
plan
supp
sd
february
ordered
chancery
redistricting
plan
precleared
close
business
monday
february
district
plan
fix
mississippi
congressional
districts
elections
supp
february
came
went
action
doj
february
district
enjoined
state
using
chancery
plan
ordered
use
district
plan
elections
succeeding
elections
state
produced
constitutional
redistricting
plan
precleared
supp
said
basis
injunction
order
reflected
opinion
february
failure
timely
preclearance
voting
rights
act
hinds
county
chancery
plan
however
event
appeal
determined
erred
february
ruling
put
forth
alternative
holding
article
constitution
prohibited
state
chancery
issuing
redistricting
plan
without
express
authorization
state
legislature
ibid
state
file
notice
appeal
april
doj
informed
state
letter
inappropriate
attorney
general
make
determination
concerning
state
preclearance
submission
district
injunction
rendered
plan
incapable
administration
app
state
plaintiffs
intervenors
district
filed
timely
notice
appeal
district
jurisdictional
statement
federal
plaintiffs
filed
jurisdictional
statement
conditional
noted
probable
jurisdiction
appeals
consolidated
ii
outset
observe
two
critical
distinctions
cases
one
us
growe
emison
growe
federal
district
refused
abstain
defer
redistricting
proceedings
reversing
reminded
federal
courts
said
many
occasions
reapportionment
primarily
duty
responsibility
state
legislature
body
rather
federal
quoting
chapman
meier
held
bsent
evidence
state
branches
fail
timely
perform
duty
federal
must
neither
affirmatively
obstruct
state
reapportionment
permit
federal
litigation
used
impede
emphasis
added
present
case
unlike
growe
suggestion
district
failed
allow
state
adequate
opportunity
develop
redistricting
plan
second
distinction
plan
unlike
growe
subject
voting
rights
act
district
rested
injunction
plan
ground
necessary
preclearance
obtained
challenged
premise
examine
first
section
voting
rights
act
provides
whenever
covered
jurisdiction
mississippi
see
fed
reg
shall
enact
seek
administer
change
voting
qualification
prerequisite
voting
standard
practice
procedure
state
must
obtain
preclearance
district
district
columbia
attorney
general
change
may
enforced
act
requires
preclearance
voting
changes
ibid
see
dougherty
county
bd
ed
white
dispute
includes
voting
changes
mandated
order
state
see
mcmillin
miss
rather
controversy
pertains
proviso
effect
preclearance
submission
made
attorney
general
voting
change
may
enforced
attorney
general
interposed
objection
within
sixty
days
submission
appellants
originally
state
plaintiffs
assert
district
erred
believing
chancery
plan
lacked
preclearance
automatically
rendered
enforceable
contend
doj
failure
object
within
period
running
state
attorney
general
initial
submission
december
alternative
subsequently
rendered
enforceable
doj
failure
object
within
period
running
state
attorney
general
submission
additional
information
february
consider
contentions
turn
jurisdiction
seeking
administrative
preclearance
must
prove
change
nondiscriminatory
purpose
effect
reno
bossier
parish
school
bears
burden
providing
attorney
general
information
sufficient
make
proof
georgia
failure
cause
attorney
general
object
see
ibid
cfr
doj
view
however
incomplete
state
submissions
start
clock
review
see
regulations
implementing
authorize
doj
request
additional
information
jurisdiction
initially
omitted
information
considered
necessary
evaluation
submission
jurisdiction
responds
supplying
additional
information
stating
unavailable
clock
begins
run
date
response
received
upheld
regulations
wholly
reasonable
consistent
act
georgia
supra
accord
morris
gressette
doj
february
request
additional
information
within
attorney
general
discretion
cfr
thereby
postponing
time
period
objections
requested
information
received
request
neither
frivolous
unwarranted
see
georgia
supra
doj
believed
mississippi
mauldin
order
holding
chancery
jurisdiction
engage
redistricting
change
voting
procedures
sought
additional
information
demonstrating
change
purpose
effect
denying
abridging
right
vote
account
race
color
membership
language
minority
group
required
fact
district
identified
issue
posing
hurdle
preclearance
suggests
doj
request
frivolous
supp
request
information
frivolous
unwarranted
time
made
regardless
whether
ultimately
develops
mauldin
chancery
assertion
jurisdiction
redistrict
voting
changes
required
preclearance
appellants
contend
even
state
chancery
plan
precleared
operation
law
february
precleared
april
days
state
attorney
general
submitted
additional
information
requested
think
section
provides
henever
covered
jurisdiction
shall
enact
seek
administer
voting
change
change
may
enforced
submitted
attorney
general
objection
attorney
general
within
days
emphasis
added
clearly
state
chancery
redistricting
plan
enacted
state
mississippi
enactment
product
legislation
adjudication
see
webster
new
international
dictionary
ed
defining
enact
make
act
law
perform
legislative
act
reference
bill
gives
validity
law
black
law
dictionary
ed
defining
legislate
make
enact
laws
web
state
federal
litigation
us
consequence
mississippi
legislature
failure
enact
plan
chancery
redistricting
plan
eligible
preclearance
state
seek
ing
administer
doubt
state
seek
ing
administer
changes
preclearance
sought
mississippi
attorney
general
made
initial
submission
doj
december
provided
additional
information
regarding
plan
february
february
however
district
enjoined
state
implementing
congressional
redistricting
plan
adopted
state
supp
state
never
appealed
injunction
uncontrovertibly
state
longer
seek
ing
administer
plan
thus
time
period
doj
review
longer
running
passing
days
date
state
february
submission
additional
requested
information
legal
significance
plan
rendered
enforceable
operation
law
appellants
argument
appeal
intervenors
sufficient
demonstrate
state
still
seek
administer
plan
invalid
face
actions
private
party
actions
state
satisfy
prerequisite
preclearance
since
affirm
injunction
basis
district
principal
stated
ground
plan
precleared
prospect
precleared
time
election
occasion
address
district
alternative
holding
state
chancery
redistricting
plan
unconstitutional
holding
district
specified
set
forth
cover
eventuality
principal
stated
ground
rejected
appeal
therefore
vacate
basis
injunction
district
alternative
holding
regarded
supporting
injunction
affirmed
principal
ground
binding
upon
state
federal
officials
mississippi
seek
future
administer
redistricting
plan
adopted
chancery
iii
determined
district
properly
enjoined
enforcement
redistricting
plan
turn
propriety
redistricting
plan
district
adopted
originally
state
plaintiffs
amicus
curiae
argue
district
required
draw
congressional
districts
originally
federal
plaintiffs
contend
required
order
elections
congressional
seats
must
decide
whether
contend
district
governed
provisions
contend
provisions
article
cl
constitution
provides
times
places
manner
holding
elections
senators
representatives
shall
prescribed
state
legislature
thereof
reserves
congress
however
power
time
law
make
alter
regulations
except
places
chusing
senators
ibid
pursuant
authority
congress
enacted
current
statutory
scheme
governing
apportionment
house
representatives
congress
added
provisions
subsection
addressing
done
pending
redistricting
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
apportionment
representatives
state
entitled
apportionment
shall
elected
following
manner
change
number
representatives
shall
elected
districts
prescribed
law
state
elected
state
large
shall
continue
elected
increase
number
representatives
additional
representative
representatives
shall
elected
state
large
representatives
districts
prescribed
law
state
decrease
number
representatives
number
districts
state
equal
decreased
number
representatives
shall
elected
districts
prescribed
law
state
decrease
number
representatives
number
districts
state
less
number
representatives
number
representatives
number
districts
exceeded
shall
elected
state
large
representatives
districts
prescribed
law
state
decrease
number
representatives
number
districts
state
exceeds
decreased
number
representatives
shall
elected
state
large
years
enacted
congress
adopted
provides
relevant
state
entitled
congress
subsequent
congress
thereafter
one
representative
apportionment
made
pursuant
provisions
section
title
shall
established
law
number
districts
equal
number
representatives
state
entitled
representatives
shall
elected
districts
established
district
elect
one
representative
tension
two
provisions
apparent
section
requires
entitled
one
representative
elect
representatives
districts
rather
multimember
districts
state
large
section
however
requires
multimember
districts
elections
certain
situations
particular
relevance
present
cases
mississippi
reason
census
lost
congressional
seat
requires
elections
reconcile
two
provisions
interpreting
introductory
phrase
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
apportionment
phrase
established
law
refer
exclusively
legislative
redistricting
tells
legislatures
districting
provides
happen
absent
legislative
action
present
cases
mandating
elections
problem
reconciliation
provisions
limited
role
assigns
governing
legislative
apportionment
judicial
apportionment
contradicted
historical
context
enactment
consistent
understanding
courts
almost
years
since
enactment
congress
adopted
immediate
issue
precisely
involvement
courts
fashioning
electoral
plans
voting
rights
act
recently
enacted
assigning
federal
courts
jurisdiction
involve
elections
see
stat
amended
codified
et
even
significant
decisions
baker
carr
wesberry
sanders
reynolds
sims
ushered
new
era
federal
courts
overseeing
efforts
badly
malapportioned
conform
congressional
electoral
districts
constitutionally
required
standards
world
role
federal
courts
redistricting
disputes
transformed
spectating
see
colegrove
green
opinion
frankfurter
directing
risk
arose
judges
forced
fashion
remedies
simply
order
elections
time
congress
enacted
least
six
district
courts
two
specifically
invoking
suggested
state
legislature
unable
redistrict
correct
malapportioned
congressional
districts
order
state
entire
congressional
delegation
elected
large
march
district
ordered
pending
enactment
constitutional
redistricting
plan
michigan
legislature
michigan
representatives
elected
large
calkins
hare
supp
ed
october
district
entered
similar
order
state
texas
see
bush
martin
supp
sd
tex
february
district
arkansas
whose
house
delegation
decreased
six
four
members
census
stated
legislature
taken
action
apportionment
congressmen
required
run
large
reasoning
compel
require
elections
legislature
adopted
malapportioned
congressional
districts
park
faubus
supp
ed
ark
august
district
missouri
whose
house
delegation
decreased
members
census
informed
state
unable
redistrict
accordance
constitution
pursuant
command
section
sic
congressional
elections
missouri
ordered
conducted
large
new
constitutional
districts
created
preisler
secretary
state
missouri
supp
wd
mo
aff
per
curiam
meeks
anderson
supp
baker
clement
supp
md
district
courts
stayed
hands
held
forth
possibility
requiring
elections
threat
judicially
imposed
elections
far
aware
threat
legislatively
imposed
change
elections
unlikely
directed
solely
legislative
reapportionment
courts
ever
thought
contrary
every
addressed
issue
held
requires
courts
remedying
failure
redistrict
constitutionally
draw
districts
whenever
possible
first
examine
two
weeks
statute
enacted
district
missouri
previously
threatened
order
elections
accordance
decision
december
observed
enactment
relieved
prior
existing
congressional
command
order
succeeding
congressional
elections
missouri
held
large
preisler
secretary
state
missouri
supp
wd
mo
aff
accordingly
reversed
prior
position
stated
fashion
districting
plan
state
failed
fulfill
duty
four
years
later
virginia
denied
writ
mandamus
directing
elections
replace
allegedly
unconstitutional
redistricting
act
ground
reason
legally
issue
writ
simpson
mahan
next
year
california
reached
conclusion
required
establish
districts
see
legislature
reinecke
cal
conclusion
reaffirmed
see
assembly
state
cal
deukmejian
cal
shayer
kirkpatrick
supp
wd
mo
aff
sub
nom
schatzle
kirkpatrick
district
concluded
nothing
section
suggests
limitation
applicability
declined
order
elections
pursuant
appears
prohibit
elections
carstens
lamm
supp
district
reached
substantially
identical
result
although
contemplating
provided
measure
event
constitutional
redistricting
plan
exists
eve
congressional
election
enough
time
either
legislature
courts
develop
acceptable
plan
bears
noting
affirmed
two
district
decisions
described
see
preisler
supp
shayer
supra
one
without
discussing
one
summarily
observed
dictum
congress
reinstated
district
requirement
existed
enactment
whitcomb
chavis
course
implausibility
given
circumstances
enactment
meant
apply
legislative
reapportionment
unbroken
unanimity
state
federal
courts
opposition
interpretation
consequence
text
unmistakably
demanded
interpretation
indeed
readily
susceptible
opposite
interpretation
clause
shall
established
law
number
districts
equal
number
representatives
state
entitled
sure
interpreted
phrase
law
refers
legislative
action
common
meaning
however
encompasses
judicial
decisions
well
see
hope
pelzer
referring
judicial
decisions
established
law
qualified
immunity
context
swidler
berlin
referring
judicial
decisions
established
law
privilege
context
frady
referring
judicially
established
standard
review
motion
law
see
also
clearly
established
federal
law
determined
marbury
madison
cranch
province
duty
judicial
department
say
law
think
therefore
assuredly
envisions
legislative
action
also
embraces
action
state
federal
courts
prescribed
legislative
action
forthcoming
might
note
giving
law
less
common
meaning
cause
immediately
following
clause
representatives
shall
elected
districts
established
emphasis
added
exclude
courts
redistricting
including
even
state
courts
acting
pursuant
state
legislative
authorization
event
legislative
default
hard
see
plausible
congressional
purpose
serve
situation
decrease
number
representatives
formerly
elected
districts
enables
courts
prescribe
elections
paragraph
assuming
section
subsists
see
infra
said
constitutional
fallback
occur
situation
called
application
paragraphs
none
constitutionally
enforceable
usual
decennial
census
shown
proscribed
degree
disparity
voting
population
established
districts
absolute
prohibition
representatives
shall
elected
districts
legislatively
established
subject
exception
courts
despite
baker
carr
congressionally
forbidden
act
state
legislature
redistricted
utterly
unavoidable
interpret
statute
require
unconstitutional
result
far
situation
sum
readily
enforced
courts
state
legislatures
binding
courts
federal
state
legislatures
determined
enacting
congress
mandated
provide
election
representatives
districts
mandate
applies
equally
courts
remedying
state
legislature
failure
redistrict
constitutionally
confront
remaining
question
make
observed
earlier
texts
tension
representatives
elected
districts
elected
large
courts
confronted
conflict
concluded
repeals
implication
see
shayer
kirkpatrick
assembly
state
cal
deukmejian
cal
something
said
position
especially
since
paragraphs
become
postenactment
decisions
virtually
situations
plainly
unconstitutional
unlikely
exception
situation
decennial
census
makes
districting
change
constitutionally
necessary
eighty
percent
section
dead
letter
congress
adhere
flotsam
paragraph
repeatedly
stated
however
absent
clearly
expressed
congressional
intention
morton
mancari
repeals
implication
favored
universal
interpretive
shuttle
washington
metropolitan
area
transit
implied
repeal
found
provisions
two
statutes
irreconcilable
conflict
latter
act
covers
whole
subject
earlier
one
clearly
intended
substitute
posadas
national
city
bank
strong
argument
substitute
think
better
answer
prescribes
constitutional
regard
paragraph
continues
apply
section
course
provisionally
applicable
governs
manner
election
representatives
election
held
ntil
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
apportionment
language
clashes
interpreted
forbid
judicial
redistricting
unless
state
legislature
first
acted
interpretation
whereas
categorically
instructs
courts
redistrict
forbids
anything
order
elections
unless
state
legislature
acted
course
need
interpretation
state
redistricted
certainly
refer
redistricting
courts
well
legislatures
indeed
interpretation
seem
preferable
one
even
necessary
means
reconciling
two
sections
prior
versions
default
stopgap
provisions
invoked
state
legislature
state
redistrict
ed
state
act
ch
stat
emphasis
added
see
act
ch
stat
state
redistricted
herein
prescribed
legislature
said
state
emphasis
added
act
ch
stat
shall
elected
large
unless
legislatures
said
provided
shall
otherwise
provide
emphasis
added
provisions
stark
contrast
text
current
ntil
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
expansive
natural
interpretation
adopted
condition
met
demand
elections
suspended
follows
command
state
federal
redistricts
pursuant
necessarily
manner
provided
state
law
must
follow
policies
preferences
state
expressed
statutory
constitutional
provisions
reapportionment
plans
proposed
state
legislature
except
course
adherence
state
policy
detract
requirements
federal
constitution
white
weiser
federal
constitutional
prescriptions
federal
statutory
commands
appropriately
regarded
purposes
part
state
election
law
thus
inapplicable
unless
state
legislature
state
federal
courts
failed
redistrict
pursuant
long
await
redistricting
determining
governs
forthcoming
election
think
election
imminent
entity
competent
complete
redistricting
pursuant
state
law
including
mandate
able
without
disrupting
election
process
may
stopgap
provisions
invoked
thus
properly
applied
neither
legislature
long
feasible
federal
courts
effect
redistricting
mandated
interpreted
continues
function
always
remedy
applied
eve
congressional
election
constitutional
redistricting
plan
exists
time
either
state
legislature
courts
develop
one
cf
carstens
lamm
remains
considered
mississippi
election
provision
reads
follows
election
representatives
congress
occur
number
representatives
state
entitled
shall
changed
consequence
new
apportionment
made
congress
districts
shall
changed
conform
new
apportionment
representatives
shall
chosen
follows
case
number
representatives
state
entitled
increased
one
member
shall
chosen
district
organized
additional
member
members
shall
chosen
electors
state
large
number
representatives
shall
diminished
whole
number
shall
chosen
electors
state
large
miss
code
ann
lexis
interpretation
provision
mississippi
courts
believe
designed
track
deemed
operative
provisions
say
phrase
districts
shall
changed
conform
new
apportionment
envisions
legislatively
judicially
prescribed
change
statute
come
play
long
remains
feasible
state
federal
complete
redistricting
cases
district
properly
completed
redistricting
mississippi
pursuant
thus
neither
mississippi
code
applicable
iv
justice
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
hereinafter
dissent
agrees
district
properly
acted
remedy
constitutional
violation
see
post
contends
looked
rather
selecting
appropriate
remedy
think
explained
makes
sense
apply
longer
reasonable
prospect
redistricting
according
state
law
whereupon
applies
like
dissent
forgo
analysis
simply
ask
abstract
two
provisions
primacy
probably
still
select
one
cast
absolute
rather
conditional
terms
dissent
gives
hint
reason
believes
primacy
says
text
directs
federal
courts
order
elections
ntil
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
post
equally
true
directs
federal
courts
redistrict
absolutely
without
qualification
dissent
contemplate
role
federal
courts
redrawing
congressional
districts
state
redistricted
first
instance
post
entirely
clear
entities
dissent
considers
competent
initial
redistricting
certainly
legislature
perhaps
also
state
courts
courts
part
provided
law
thereof
post
dissent
also
says
enforce
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
enforce
state
initially
redistricted
post
one
takes
words
face
value
leaves
room
initial
redistricting
assume
dissent
mean
precisely
said
dissent
implicitly
differentiates
federal
state
courts
effectively
holding
state
courts
may
undertake
initial
redistricting
satisfy
prerequisite
federal
courts
may
presumably
rests
distinction
upon
belief
state
courts
capable
redistricting
manner
provided
law
thereof
whereas
federal
courts
see
post
read
phrase
potentially
including
state
federal
courts
dissent
takes
word
manner
refer
process
procedures
rather
substantive
requirements
see
ibid
state
process
redistricting
includes
courts
may
courts
redistrict
rendering
inapplicable
reading
renders
phrase
manner
provided
law
thereof
redundant
requirement
state
redistricted
course
state
redistricted
districts
drawn
someone
without
authority
redistrict
ambitious
county
clerk
individual
legislator
sit
draw
districting
map
one
think
state
within
meaning
statute
redistricted
view
word
manner
refers
state
substantive
policies
preferences
redistricting
white
weiser
see
also
upham
seamon
per
curiam
thus
federal
redistricts
state
manner
complies
state
substantive
districting
principles
manner
provided
law
thereof
see
supra
certainly
remains
preferable
state
legislature
complete
constitutionally
required
redistricting
pursuant
requirements
see
abrams
supra
state
courts
see
growe
state
legislature
authorized
body
produce
needed
decision
federal
courts
left
embark
delicate
task
redistricting
abrams
supra
dissent
claims
read
statutory
phrase
ntil
state
redistricted
mean
ntil
election
imminent
entity
competent
complete
redistricting
pursuant
mandate
able
without
disrupting
election
process
post
premise
proceeds
mount
vigorous
principles
espouses
highly
edifying
plain
meaning
attack
upon
holding
unfortunately
premise
patently
false
less
dissent
acknowledge
text
tells
us
long
govern
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
post
issue
long
governs
long
continuing
mandate
wait
ordering
election
dissent
treats
though
prescribes
application
facts
present
case
immediate
establishment
statewide
districts
election
representatives
prescribes
thing
says
ntil
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
representatives
shall
elected
state
large
point
issues
command
point
bites
election
time
election
time
redistricting
manner
provided
state
law
occurred
become
operative
despite
dissent
ardent
protestations
contrary
see
dissent
less
must
confront
question
ow
long
await
redistricting
determining
governs
forthcoming
election
surely
dissent
possibly
believe
since
text
tells
us
long
govern
declare
immediately
congressional
reapportionment
state
legislature
even
chance
act
state
next
elections
representatives
large
say
state
legislature
state
federal
courts
given
full
time
available
right
time
delay
disrupt
election
process
reapportion
according
state
law
since
dissent
disagrees
wonder
time
line
might
claim
time
line
simply
assert
contains
imminence
requirement
absurd
dissent
suggests
reading
runs
afoul
anticommandeering
jurisprudence
see
post
dissent
fails
recognize
state
legislature
obligation
prescribe
times
places
manner
holding
congressional
elections
grounded
article
cl
constitution
mere
statutory
requirement
acknowledged
dissent
federal
plaintiffs
alleged
constitutional
violation
failure
provide
election
proper
number
representatives
accordance
article
cl
federal
drew
plan
remedy
violation
post
crafting
remedy
district
appropriately
followed
regulations
congress
prescribed
regulations
article
cl
constitution
expressly
permits
congress
make
see
supra
sure
envisions
legislative
action
supra
context
article
cl
regulations
expressly
allowed
enacting
matter
congress
placing
statutory
obligation
state
legislatures
new
york
rather
regulating
constitution
specifically
permits
manner
state
fulfill
constitutional
obligations
article
interpretation
permits
commandeering
machinery
state
government
dissent
understanding
view
state
fails
redistrict
federal
courts
may
dissent
view
state
fails
redistrict
loses
congressional
seats
federal
courts
must
order
elections
pursuant
see
post
reading
runs
afoul
anticommandeering
principles
dissent
commits
sin
another
straw
man
erected
dissent
found
insistence
though
response
argument
ince
enacted
decades
baker
line
cases
subsequent
development
change
interpretation
post
never
said
cases
changed
meaning
said
help
explain
meaning
enacted
decided
course
rudimentary
rule
statutory
construction
one
thought
familiar
dissenters
prone
preachment
subject
see
post
courts
interpret
statutes
isolation
context
corpus
juris
part
including
statutes
correct
rule
interpretation
divers
statutes
relate
thing
taken
consideration
construing
one
thing
contained
subsequent
statute
within
reason
former
statute
shall
taken
within
meaning
statute
gathered
subsequent
statute
pari
materia
meaning
legislature
attached
words
former
statute
amount
legislative
declaration
meaning
govern
construction
first
statute
freeman
say
meaning
illuminated
baker
carr
line
cases
sheds
light
upon
meaning
finally
dissent
gives
statutory
phrase
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
meaning
highly
unusual
means
according
dissent
redistricted
state
law
requires
even
state
law
unconstitutional
even
unconstitutional
redistricting
satisfies
clause
enables
applied
know
instance
federal
statute
acknowledges
state
law
provision
violates
supremacy
clause
therefore
legal
nullity
particularly
peculiar
dissent
allow
unconstitutional
redistricting
satisfy
clause
allow
nonprecleared
redistricting
satisfy
clause
subject
voting
rights
act
see
post
say
dissent
view
redistricted
state
redistricted
within
meaning
districts
precleared
redistricted
even
districts
patently
unconstitutional
long
precleared
state
subject
preclearance
requirement
section
course
preclearance
exception
redistricting
manner
provided
state
law
ineffective
federal
statute
preclearance
disregarded
surely
also
ineffective
federal
constitution
disregarded
dissent
reads
text
redistricted
manner
provided
state
law
distinctions
basis
reality
judgment
district
affirmed
beatrice
branch
et
appellants
john
robert
smith
et
al
john
robert
smith
et
appellants
beatrice
branch
et
al
appeals
district
southern
district
mississippi
march
justice
kennedy
justice
stevens
justice
souter
justice
breyer
join
part
ii
concurring
join
opinion
plurality
opinion
parts
iv
opinion
makes
clear
district
correct
enjoin
ing
plan
developed
mississippi
state
chancery
precleared
voting
rights
act
ante
vacates
district
alternative
holding
plan
violated
article
constitution
ante
ii
seems
appropriate
explain
view
ruling
vacating
judgment
mandated
earlier
cases
precedent
ruling
see
connor
waller
per
curiam
board
supervisors
warren
per
curiam
connor
finch
wise
lipscomb
opinion
white
see
also
post
concurring
part
dissenting
part
district
found
preclearance
premature
given
statutory
scheme
consider
constitutional
question
state
reapportionment
enactments
precleared
accordance
district
err
deciding
constitutional
challenges
acts
connor
waller
rule
prescribed
connor
reflects
purposes
behind
voting
rights
act
concerned
covered
jurisdictions
exercise
ingenuity
devise
new
subtle
forms
discrimination
congress
prohibited
jurisdictions
implementing
change
voting
procedure
without
obtaining
preclearance
hathorn
lovorn
jurisdiction
covered
must
seek
approval
either
attorney
general
district
district
columbia
see
clark
roemer
lopez
monterey
county
absent
preclearance
voting
change
neither
effective
enforceable
matter
federal
law
connor
waller
supra
board
supervisors
supra
finch
supra
wise
supra
hathorn
supra
clark
supra
post
concurring
part
dissenting
part
process
particular
administrative
scheme
designed
covered
state
rapid
method
rendering
new
state
election
law
enforceable
georgia
quoting
allen
state
bd
elections
consistent
statutory
scheme
district
courts
entertain
constitutional
challenges
nonprecleared
voting
changes
way
anticipate
ruling
yet
made
executive
proposed
changes
capable
implementation
constitutional
objections
may
resolved
preclearance
process
constitutional
challenge
presented
district
fell
within
ambit
connor
rule
previous
cases
addressed
contentions
state
reapportionment
plan
violated
principle
diluted
minority
voting
strength
connor
waller
supp
sd
miss
rev
per
curiam
board
supervisors
supra
wise
supra
litigation
appellees
objected
constitutionality
state
assumption
authority
devise
redistricting
plan
fact
appellees
framed
constitutional
argument
state
authority
pass
redistricting
plan
rather
plan
components
make
claim
reviewable
plan
yet
precleared
cause
appellees
injury
enforcement
implementation
deciding
address
constitutional
challenge
district
motivated
commendable
purpose
enabling
examine
issues
presented
litigation
one
appeal
approach
however
forces
federal
courts
undertake
unnecessary
review
complex
constitutional
issues
advance
executive
determination
risks
frustrating
mechanism
established
voting
rights
act
cases
instance
district
decision
led
delay
preclearance
attorney
general
whether
authorized
statute
refused
consider
plan
constitutional
injunction
remained
place
app
advance
determination
moreover
risk
least
perception
executive
revising
judgment
article
iii
adherence
rule
connor
provides
covered
time
remedy
constitutional
defects
without
involvement
federal
courts
given
statutory
command
direct
review
also
helps
ensure
constitutional
issues
necessary
resolution
electoral
dispute
brought
us
beatrice
branch
et
appellants
john
robert
smith
et
al
john
robert
smith
et
appellants
beatrice
branch
et
al
appeals
district
southern
district
mississippi
march
justice
stevens
justice
souter
justice
breyer
join
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
congress
enacted
brief
statutory
provision
banned
elections
representatives
opinion
portion
statute
codified
impliedly
repealed
reasons
support
conclusion
also
persuade
federal
act
mississippi
statutory
authorization
election
representatives
congress
accordingly
join
parts
ii
opinion
join
parts
iv
question
whether
act
congress
repealed
earlier
federal
statute
similar
question
whether
state
statute
congress
clearly
expresses
intent
repeal
must
respect
expression
fails
expressly
presumption
implied
repeals
like
presumption
overcome
two
situations
irreconcilable
conflict
provisions
two
acts
later
act
clearly
intended
cove
whole
subject
earlier
one
posadas
national
city
bank
read
statute
entirely
prohibits
one
congressional
district
adopting
either
multimember
district
electing
representatives
elections
one
narrow
exception
applied
election
two
rather
long
contentious
legislative
process
congress
enacted
brief
provision
act
relief
doctor
ricardo
vallejo
samala
provide
congressional
redistricting
enacted
senate
house
representatives
america
congress
assembled
purposes
immigration
nationality
act
doctor
ricardo
vallejo
samala
shall
held
considered
lawfully
admitted
permanent
residence
august
state
entitled
congress
subsequent
congress
thereafter
one
representative
apportionment
made
pursuant
provisions
subsection
section
act
june
entitled
act
provide
apportionment
representatives
stat
amended
shall
established
law
number
districts
equal
number
representatives
state
entitled
representatives
shall
elected
districts
established
district
elect
one
representative
except
state
entitled
one
representative
previous
elections
elected
representatives
large
may
elect
representatives
large
congress
pub
stat
emphasis
added
second
paragraph
statute
enacts
general
rule
prohibiting
one
congressional
representative
electing
representatives
congress
single
exception
congressional
command
applied
hawaii
new
mexico
election
emphasizes
fact
act
applies
every
state
every
election
thus
unambiguously
forbids
elections
otherwise
authorized
creates
irreconcilable
conflict
law
covers
whole
subject
congressional
elections
posadas
either
accepted
standards
identifying
implied
repeals
repealed
earlier
federal
statute
addition
statute
mississippi
statute
setting
default
rule
elections
first
paragraph
statute
suggests
answer
question
congress
failed
enact
express
repeal
law
intent
seems
obvious
statute
became
law
december
final
gasp
protracted
legislative
process
began
january
chairman
celler
house
judiciary
committee
introduced
renewing
efforts
made
preceding
congress
provide
legislative
standards
responsive
holding
wesberry
sanders
principle
applies
congressional
bill
introduced
representative
celler
contained
express
language
replacing
introduced
three
principal
components
relevant
implied
repeal
analysis
first
bill
required
district
elections
shall
established
law
number
districts
equal
number
representatives
state
entitled
representatives
shall
elected
districts
established
district
elect
one
representative
second
bill
limited
gerrymandering
requiring
district
times
composed
contiguous
territory
compact
form
practicable
ibid
third
bill
required
proportional
representation
district
established
state
ninetieth
subsequent
congress
shall
contain
number
persons
excluding
indians
taxed
per
centum
greater
less
average
obtained
dividing
population
number
representatives
ibid
bill
generated
great
controversy
discussion
importantly
present
purposes
however
two
three
components
discussed
depth
point
either
numerous
conference
reports
lengthy
floor
debates
disagreement
regarding
language
expressly
repealing
district
requirement
appear
rather
debate
confined
gerrymandering
requirement
proportionality
rule
scope
duration
temporary
exceptions
broad
prohibition
elections
house
judiciary
committee
amended
bill
limiting
proportional
differences
districts
exceed
percent
creating
exception
general
rule
congresses
elections
allowed
hawaii
new
mexico
continue
elect
representatives
large
proportional
differences
large
percent
house
passed
amended
bill
senate
judiciary
committee
amended
bill
striking
hawaii
exception
allowing
percent
rather
percent
variation
districts
congresses
bill
went
conference
twice
conference
recommended
two
sets
amendments
first
conference
report
issued
june
recommended
striking
exception
general
rule
limiting
proportional
variation
percent
less
see
conf
compromise
failed
pass
either
house
senate
conference
recommended
measure
similar
second
paragraph
private
bill
eventually
passed
general
rule
requiring
districts
exception
unlimited
duration
hawaii
new
mexico
conf
importantly
every
version
bill
discussed
house
report
senate
report
conference
reports
contained
provision
expressly
repealing
spite
several
modifications
bill
recommended
last
conference
failed
pass
either
chamber
decision
attach
private
bill
reflected
deadlock
indeed
proponents
attachment
remarked
sought
take
uncontroversial
components
prior
legislation
ensure
congress
pass
legislation
response
wesberry
sanders
absence
discussion
debate
reference
provision
expressly
repealing
private
bill
prevents
omission
final
bill
seen
deliberate
choice
congress
fair
reading
history
leading
passage
bill
demonstrates
parties
involved
operating
belief
changes
debating
completely
replace
justice
provided
us
convincing
exposition
flaws
justice
scalia
textual
interpretation
see
post
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
ironically
however
misled
undue
reliance
text
statutes
enacted
period
history
long
congress
enacted
voting
rights
legislation
recognized
central
importance
protecting
minority
access
polls
important
federal
interest
prohibiting
voting
particularly
like
mississippi
became
matter
congressional
concern
intervening
dramatic
historical
change
significantly
lessens
relevance
earlier
statutes
present
analysis
moreover
analysis
implied
repeal
issue
apparently
assumes
two
provisions
coexist
statute
one
impliedly
repeal
enacted
successive
statutes
thus
makes
comment
proviso
statute
preserved
elections
new
mexico
hawaii
proviso
surely
supports
conclusion
exception
intended
congress
otherwise
total
prohibition
elections
authorization
elections
statute
cited
justice
also
set
forth
proviso
although
words
provided
omitted
statutes
contain
examples
differently
worded
exceptions
general
rule
also
important
note
text
statute
unlike
four
earlier
statutes
uses
word
create
categorical
prohibition
elections
matter
plain
english
conflict
prohibition
permitted
elections
surely
irreconcilable
justice
consideration
legislative
history
statute
fails
give
appropriate
consideration
four
bills
expressly
repealed
see
supra
bills
coupled
absence
expression
anyone
involved
protracted
legislative
process
intent
preserve
elections
anywhere
except
new
mexico
hawaii
provide
powerful
support
conclusion
literal
reading
text
plainly
congress
intended
enact
categorical
prohibition
elections
odd
circumstance
final
version
prohibition
added
private
bill
makes
quite
clear
omission
clause
expressly
repealing
simply
inadvertence
canons
statutory
construction
presumption
implied
repeals
presumption
often
less
reliable
guides
search
congressional
intent
page
two
history
history
statute
coupled
plain
language
text
leads
one
conclusion
congress
impliedly
repealed
far
wiser
give
effect
manifest
intent
congress
plurality
attempts
engage
tortured
judicial
legislation
preserve
remnant
obsolete
federal
statute
equally
obsolete
state
statute
accordingly
concur
judgment
opinion
join
parts
iv
plurality
opinion
beatrice
branch
et
appellants
john
robert
smith
et
al
john
robert
smith
et
appellants
beatrice
branch
et
al
appeals
district
southern
district
mississippi
march
justice
justice
thomas
joins
concurring
part
dissenting
part
join
parts
ii
opinion
agree
mississippi
chancery
redistricting
plan
lacks
preclearance
join
part
consistent
decisions
holding
federal
courts
rule
constitutional
challenge
voting
change
change
yet
capable
implementation
see
connor
waller
per
curiam
see
also
ante
kennedy
concurring
join
part
iii
part
iv
however
disagree
command
disagree
plurality
regarding
proper
statutory
construction
first
agree
plurality
somewhat
reluctant
conclusion
impliedly
repeal
quite
easy
read
together
natural
statutory
reading
gives
force
section
applies
ntil
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
section
applies
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
plurality
justice
stevens
recognize
implied
repeal
exist
provisions
two
acts
irreconcilable
conflict
later
act
covers
whole
subject
earlier
one
clearly
intended
substitute
posadas
national
city
bank
see
also
ante
plurality
opinion
ante
stevens
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
indeed
two
statutes
capable
duty
courts
regard
effective
radzanower
touche
ross
quoting
morton
mancari
found
implied
repeal
statute
since
see
gordon
new
york
stock
exchange
outside
antitrust
context
appear
found
implied
repeal
statute
since
see
lewis
difficult
read
manner
gives
force
statutes
impliedly
repeal
see
burroughs
effect
reasonably
given
statutes
presumption
earlier
intended
remain
force
radzanower
touche
ross
supra
repeal
regarded
implied
necessary
make
later
enacted
law
work
even
minimum
extent
necessary
guiding
principle
reconciliation
two
statutory
schemes
alteration
original
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
previous
versions
confirm
implied
repeal
exist
since
versions
coexisted
indeed
apportionment
statutes
contained
district
requirement
well
default
requirement
compare
act
ch
stat
number
state
may
entitled
shall
elected
districts
one
district
electing
one
representative
emphasis
added
ibid
shall
elected
large
unless
legislatures
said
provided
shall
otherwise
provide
time
fixed
law
next
election
representatives
therein
emphasis
added
act
ch
stat
number
state
may
entitled
shall
elected
districts
said
districts
shall
equal
number
representatives
state
may
entitled
congress
one
district
electing
one
representative
emphasis
added
stat
uch
additional
representative
representatives
shall
elected
state
large
emphasis
added
act
ch
stat
number
state
may
entitled
shall
elected
districts
said
districts
shall
equal
number
representatives
state
may
entitled
congress
one
district
electing
one
representative
emphasis
added
stat
number
hereby
provided
shall
state
less
change
hereby
made
whole
number
state
hereby
provided
shall
elected
large
unless
legislatures
said
provided
shall
otherwise
provide
time
fixed
law
next
election
representatives
therein
emphasis
added
act
ch
stat
representatives
shall
elected
districts
said
districts
shall
equal
number
representatives
state
may
entitled
congress
one
district
electing
one
representative
emphasis
added
stat
uch
additional
representative
representatives
shall
elected
state
large
state
shall
redistricted
manner
provided
laws
thereof
justice
stevens
attempts
distinguish
prior
versions
contained
slightly
different
language
present
version
see
ante
even
assuming
however
version
slightly
different
present
version
versions
effect
materially
indistinguishable
present
version
indeed
statute
one
effect
time
congress
enacted
present
version
almost
word
word
current
statute
compare
act
ch
stat
state
shall
redistricted
manner
provided
laws
thereof
ntil
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
therof
see
also
smiley
holm
noting
version
apply
unless
new
districts
created
given
history
two
provisions
coexisting
statute
hold
impliedly
repeals
two
statutes
capable
covers
different
subject
matter
morton
mancari
supra
section
intended
cover
whole
subject
clearly
intended
substitute
posadas
national
city
bank
supra
section
requiring
elections
applies
unless
state
redistricts
requiring
districts
applies
state
completed
redistricting
process
fact
read
prior
versions
two
conflict
smiley
holm
supra
recognized
version
provisions
elections
appropriate
remedy
state
properly
redistricted
first
instance
see
nless
new
districts
created
representatives
allotted
state
must
elected
state
large
statute
expired
congress
reenact
instead
congress
passed
took
effect
concerned
elections
complementary
district
requirement
existed
congress
enacted
relevant
part
shall
established
law
number
districts
equal
number
representatives
state
entitled
representatives
shall
elected
districts
established
district
elect
one
representative
relevant
language
statute
tracks
language
prior
versions
justice
stevens
distinction
prior
versions
version
congress
added
word
latest
version
see
ante
one
word
thin
reed
rest
implied
repeal
justice
stevens
hold
instead
expressly
repealing
congress
added
word
addition
change
meaning
statute
basis
finding
implied
repeal
justice
stevens
argues
congress
intended
whole
redistricting
enacted
ante
quoting
posadas
national
city
bank
congress
given
serious
thought
earlier
statute
holding
result
earlier
consideration
repealed
qualified
reasonable
insist
legislature
using
language
showing
made
considered
determination
justice
stevens
strongest
argument
legislative
history
indicates
parties
involved
operating
belief
changes
debating
completely
replace
ante
yet
justice
stevens
acknowledges
congress
expressly
repealed
see
ante
justice
stevens
thinks
evidence
congress
tried
expressly
repeal
four
times
cuts
strongly
favor
implied
repeal
see
ante
four
attempts
repeal
unsuccessful
difficult
conclude
congress
impliedly
repeal
statute
deliberately
chose
expressly
repeal
statute
case
two
provisions
historically
congress
explicitly
rejected
express
repeal
find
implied
repeal
hold
instead
congress
passed
restore
redistricting
law
status
became
effective
without
complementary
provision
regarding
districts
floor
statements
colloquy
senators
baker
bayh
cited
justice
stevens
see
ante
overcome
strong
presumption
implied
repeals
especially
given
historical
evidence
peacefully
coexisted
since
century
explained
detail
part
infra
circumstances
leading
passage
support
finding
implied
repeal
short
capable
history
shows
cover
whole
subject
agree
plurality
impliedly
repeal
therefore
continues
apply
ante
ii
although
plurality
acknowledges
remains
full
force
inexplicably
adopts
reading
textual
basis
state
must
conduct
elections
ntil
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
instead
simply
reading
plain
text
statute
however
plurality
invents
version
text
plurality
holds
ntil
state
redistricted
means
ntil
election
imminent
entity
competent
complete
redistricting
pursuant
mandate
able
without
disrupting
election
process
ante
reading
faithful
text
statute
like
justice
stevens
believe
interpretation
nothing
tortured
judicial
legislation
ante
see
also
scalia
rule
law
law
rules
chi
rev
hen
one
solid
textual
anchor
established
social
norm
derive
general
rule
pronouncement
appears
uncomfortably
like
legislation
dictionary
definitions
confirm
plain
text
says
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
means
ntil
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
meaning
word
difficult
understand
specialized
term
art
see
webster
new
international
dictionary
ed
defining
mean
uring
whole
time
webster
collegiate
dictionary
ed
defining
mean
time
efore
word
redistricted
also
hard
comprehend
defining
redistrict
mean
divide
anew
districts
black
law
dictionary
ed
defining
redistrict
mean
organize
new
districts
esp
legislative
ones
reapportion
employs
dictionary
definitions
interpret
voting
rights
act
see
ante
notably
refrains
using
dictionary
definition
section
contains
imminence
requirement
credible
say
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
apportionment
means
ntil
election
imminent
entity
competent
complete
redistricting
pursuant
mandate
able
without
disrupting
election
process
ante
plurality
characterizes
stopgap
provisio
text
limited
ibid
plurality
asks
ow
long
await
redistricting
determining
governs
forthcoming
election
ibid
yet
text
provides
basis
plurality
ask
question
indeed
text
tells
us
long
govern
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
emphasis
added
plurality
reading
however
apply
even
though
terms
apply
state
yet
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
language
statute
bear
reading
cf
holloway
scalia
dissenting
amount
rationalization
change
reality
normal
far
know
exclusive
english
usage
word
statute
simply
bear
meaning
assigns
dispositive
question
text
says
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
apportionment
draw
districts
ibid
emphasis
added
must
apply
terms
order
elections
however
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
applies
thus
state
redistricted
determines
redistricting
violates
constitution
voting
rights
act
correct
remedy
violation
procedure
drawing
districts
comport
federal
statutory
law
constitution
ntil
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
mandates
order
elections
short
enforce
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
enforce
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
plurality
seems
forget
cases
one
federal
power
redistrict
private
parties
alleged
violation
constitution
voting
rights
act
sections
create
independently
enforceable
private
rights
action
rather
provisions
address
remedy
federal
must
order
finds
violation
constitutional
statutory
federal
plaintiffs
case
alleged
constitutional
violation
federal
drew
plan
remedy
violation
found
constitutional
violation
federal
required
fashion
appropriate
remedy
depending
whether
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
plurality
reading
also
fails
terms
plurality
appears
acknowledge
ante
plain
text
requires
courts
apply
applying
yet
plurality
never
justifies
interpreting
looks
instead
reading
plain
language
state
law
really
includes
federal
law
maintains
equally
applicable
text
directs
federal
courts
order
elections
ntil
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
deciding
whether
applicable
answer
escape
directive
pointing
text
indeed
one
takes
face
value
plurality
statement
continues
apply
ante
look
state
complies
terms
section
antecedent
since
defines
elections
appropriate
moreover
interpretation
interplay
calls
question
jurisprudence
see
new
york
always
understood
even
congress
authority
constitution
pass
laws
requiring
prohibiting
certain
acts
lacks
power
directly
compel
require
prohibit
acts
printz
tate
legislatures
subject
federal
direction
scalia
plurality
anticommandeering
jurisprudence
inapplicable
article
section
gives
congress
power
regulat
times
places
manner
holding
congressional
elections
course
article
uses
similar
language
authorizes
congress
regulate
commerce
among
several
whether
anticommandeering
principle
new
york
printz
robust
article
context
font
congressional
authority
article
context
source
congressional
authority
cases
question
need
definitively
resolved
event
canon
constitutional
avoidance
counsels
strongly
reading
adopted
parts
iii
iv
principal
opinion
reading
see
ante
also
adopted
justice
stevens
invites
future
facial
attack
constitutional
validity
history
prior
versions
shows
never
treated
absolute
command
routinely
used
elections
previous
iterations
even
though
versions
also
stated
representatives
shall
elected
districts
act
june
ch
stat
act
july
ch
stat
act
stat
cf
supra
documenting
versions
see
also
martis
historical
atlas
congressional
districts
pp
hereinafter
martis
documenting
used
elections
congress
congress
passed
first
version
congress
last
version
expired
indeed
every
congress
least
one
state
used
form
representation
unless
willing
say
openly
flouted
federal
law
way
read
history
acknowledge
statutory
command
see
ante
plurality
opinion
statutory
comman
rather
predecessors
tell
type
redistricting
legislation
allowed
pass
others
prohibited
reading
also
comports
history
congressional
elections
congress
passed
first
version
routinely
elect
one
individual
specific
district
see
martis
listing
five
maryland
massachusetts
new
jersey
new
york
pennsylvania
used
multimember
districts
congress
congress
first
version
went
effect
however
longer
use
multimember
districts
rather
either
redistrict
using
districts
use
elections
short
tell
must
pass
redistricting
legislation
section
instead
restriction
type
legislation
state
may
pass
restriction
completely
consistent
new
york
printz
provides
elections
default
mechanism
choose
pass
redistricting
legislation
interpretation
mandates
courts
order
elections
ntil
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
mean
redistricting
plan
effect
applies
later
deems
apportionment
plan
invalid
words
specifically
refer
process
state
redistricts
manner
provided
law
thereof
section
longer
implicated
state
finishes
process
redistricting
manner
provided
law
thereof
apportionment
required
action
state
complete
state
plan
first
becomes
effective
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
ibid
plurality
construction
statutory
basis
way
understand
opinion
overlooking
words
statute
nontextual
prudential
reasons
cf
scalia
matter
interpretation
discussing
case
church
holy
trinity
noting
congress
enact
foolish
statutes
well
wise
ones
courts
decide
rewrite
former
prudential
reason
plurality
distort
plain
text
hold
sub
silentio
impliedly
repeals
else
plurality
note
tension
two
statutes
ante
note
something
said
implied
repeal
position
engage
long
exegesis
historical
context
surrounding
enactment
see
ante
majority
opinion
plurality
adopts
reading
proposed
one
district
decision
see
carstens
lamm
supp
recognizes
brief
reasoning
carstens
nothing
less
partial
implied
repeal
see
brief
amicus
curiae
section
unequivocal
mandate
members
house
representatives
elected
districts
except
exigencies
time
render
impracticable
see
carston
sic
lamm
supra
resolves
problem
creates
workable
sensible
regime
faithfully
fulfills
congress
purpose
enacted
section
see
also
repeal
implication
disfavored
failure
give
statute
full
scope
terms
require
moreover
neither
plurality
justice
stevens
rely
historical
context
cases
support
interpretations
history
fact
cuts
true
district
courts
threatened
impose
elections
state
redistricting
plan
ruled
unconstitutional
see
ante
majority
opinion
citing
cases
cases
however
legislature
already
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
thus
congress
response
enacting
read
target
anything
situations
state
already
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
course
state
redistricted
manner
terms
apply
anything
enactment
clarified
statutory
balance
existed
prior
versions
statute
continue
exist
cases
cited
resolve
question
happens
state
fails
redistrict
manner
provided
law
thereof
describes
cases
decisions
courts
remedying
failure
redistrict
constitutionally
ante
agree
strikes
state
apportionment
plan
mandates
draw
districts
whenever
possible
ibid
historical
context
confirms
state
redistricted
rules
plan
unconstitutional
ensures
courts
order
elections
cases
legislature
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
applicable
thus
rely
cases
support
notion
historical
context
surrounding
enactment
renders
toothless
indeed
unclear
examines
historical
context
cf
bank
one
chicago
midwest
bank
trust
scalia
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
view
law
means
text
appropriately
conveys
whatever
congress
enacted
might
law
law
says
content
reading
rather
psychoanalyzing
enacted
also
implies
reads
way
decisions
baker
carr
wesberry
sanders
reynolds
sims
ushered
new
era
federal
courts
overseeing
efforts
badly
malapportioned
conform
congressional
electoral
districts
constitutionally
required
standards
ante
justice
stevens
decisions
explain
congress
passed
see
ante
watershed
opinions
change
meaning
first
later
development
change
unamended
statute
see
vermont
agency
natural
resources
ex
rel
stevens
scalia
since
enacted
decades
baker
line
cases
subsequent
development
change
interpretation
second
decision
baker
carr
supra
rested
large
part
fact
courts
already
involved
overseeing
apportionment
cases
courts
directing
redistricting
disputes
since
well
baker
ante
indeed
baker
specifically
acknowledged
unbroken
line
precedents
sustains
federal
courts
jurisdiction
subject
matter
federal
constitutional
claims
nature
smiley
holm
example
specifically
reached
redistricting
question
held
prior
versions
mandated
elections
absence
redistricting
act
held
elections
required
order
afford
representation
state
constitutionally
entitled
general
provisions
act
regarded
intended
different
import
ibid
wood
broom
ruled
issue
strikingly
similar
front
today
effect
prior
versions
mississippi
congressional
delegation
reduced
one
seat
fact
district
wood
made
ruling
statutory
grounds
mirror
constitutional
review
district
held
new
districts
created
redistricting
act
composed
compact
contiguous
territory
nearly
practicable
number
inhabitants
hence
failed
comply
mandatory
requirements
act
august
see
also
hume
mahan
supp
ed
likewise
baker
state
courts
enforced
prior
versions
see
moran
bowley
state
ex
rel
carroll
becker
mo
short
baker
progeny
expanded
scope
federal
review
cases
change
fact
recognized
federal
jurisdiction
subject
matter
time
enactment
therefore
baker
line
cases
caused
magically
change
meaning
plurality
also
seems
base
sub
silentio
holding
implied
repeal
fact
ighty
percent
dead
letter
ante
even
assuming
first
four
parts
currently
unconstitutional
necessarily
unconstitutional
congress
passed
instance
specifies
change
number
representatives
shall
elected
districts
prescribed
law
state
true
today
district
probability
remain
exactly
apportionment
true
hold
strict
rule
applied
redistricting
cases
decision
karcher
daggett
indeed
decision
wesberry
sanders
supra
stated
congressional
districts
must
equal
nearly
practicable
justice
stevens
points
wesberry
house
passed
bill
permitting
congressional
districts
deviate
much
see
ante
congress
passed
house
passed
bill
permitting
congressional
districts
deviate
much
see
ante
appears
least
state
new
mexico
congressional
apportionment
plan
change
census
see
martis
noting
new
mexico
used
districting
plan
congresses
words
principles
also
explain
similarly
constitutional
even
parts
unconstitutional
today
redistrict
existing
district
lines
make
districts
constitutional
ordering
election
additional
representatives
indeed
approach
best
accords
principle
federal
modifications
state
plan
limited
necessary
cure
constitutional
statutory
defect
upham
seamon
per
curiam
even
constitutional
plurality
correctly
recognizes
easily
severable
rest
statute
see
ante
finally
fact
must
enter
order
mandating
elections
necessarily
mean
plan
violate
voting
rights
act
traditional
elections
required
statewide
basis
rather
acknowledge
brief
pp
tr
oral
arg
design
election
plan
awards
seats
cumulative
basis
method
result
plan
satisfies
voting
rights
act
cf
growe
emison
rogers
lodge
holder
hall
thomas
concurring
judgment
dillard
chilton
county
bd
supp
md
see
also
issacharoff
karlan
pildes
law
democracy
rev
ed
pildes
donoghue
cumulative
voting
chi
legal
short
agree
phrase
ntil
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
contains
sort
imminence
requirement
requirement
without
statutory
mooring
although
plurality
claims
hold
impliedly
repeal
plurality
opinion
makes
sense
serves
partial
implied
repeal
difficult
say
plurality
continues
apply
ante
also
say
plurality
applies
election
imminent
entity
competent
complete
redistricting
pursuant
mandate
able
without
disrupting
election
process
ante
unless
congress
expressly
repeals
hold
federal
courts
required
order
form
elections
ntil
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
apportionment
iii
concluded
applies
ntil
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
apportionment
necessary
consider
question
intentionally
avoids
whether
state
mississippi
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
applies
district
ordered
elections
redistricted
district
correct
draw
districts
consistent
case
law
mississippi
state
law
state
redistricted
apportionment
plan
precleared
voting
rights
act
mississippi
plan
precleared
hold
applies
held
new
reapportionment
plan
enacted
state
considered
law
submitted
received
clearance
wise
lipscomb
plurality
opinion
quoting
connor
finch
citation
omitted
accord
connor
waller
section
requires
covered
jurisdictions
delay
implementation
validly
enacted
state
legislation
federal
authorities
opportunity
determine
whether
legislation
conforms
constitution
provisions
voting
rights
act
clark
roemer
hathorn
lovorn
opinions
repeatedly
note
failure
follow
preclearance
procedures
renders
change
unenforceable
indeed
hathorn
lovorn
held
mississippi
implement
change
parties
comply
preclearance
final
step
process
redistricting
apportionment
plan
precleared
effective
law
implemented
case
law
state
redistricted
clearance
process
complete
covered
jurisdiction
receives
clearance
federal
government
may
force
state
make
changes
redistricting
plan
state
receives
preclearance
may
implement
voting
change
mississippi
recognized
redistricting
process
complete
apportionment
plan
cleared
voting
changes
subject
effective
law
unless
cleared
mcmillin
miss
quoting
connor
waller
supra
mcmillan
mississippi
held
plan
nonpartisan
judicial
elections
passed
legislature
yet
effective
precleared
consequently
ordered
elections
occur
old
plan
required
partisan
judicial
elections
see
ibid
consequently
statutes
currently
governing
primary
judicial
elections
setting
elections
tuesday
june
enforceable
provisions
regarding
said
primaries
thus
despite
fact
legislature
passed
law
mandating
nonpartisan
judicial
elections
despite
fact
new
law
expressly
repealed
old
law
despite
fact
governor
signed
law
despite
fact
state
submitted
new
law
attorney
general
preclearance
new
law
operative
one
reason
attorney
general
precleared
new
law
time
new
primary
elections
see
thus
least
mississippi
old
voting
plan
remains
effect
new
plan
precleared
accordingly
terms
apply
district
ordered
elections
entire
state
congressional
delegation
congress
expressly
repeal
quite
easily
done
presume
act
congress
stead
read
manner
divorced
semblance
textual
fidelity
order
reach
deems
correct
unintrusive
result
therefore
respectfully
dissent
part
opinion
parts
iv
plurality
opinion
footnotes
together
smith
et
al
branch
et
also
appeal
footnotes
contrary
dissent
assertion
post
reading
creates
conflict
pennhurst
state
school
hospital
halderman
federal
granted
relief
basis
federal
law
specifically
federal
constitution
district
instruc
state
officials
conform
conduct
state
law
pennhurst
supra
rather
deferred
state
policies
preferences
redistricting
white
weiser
far
intruding
state
sovereignty
deference
respects
footnotes
compare
posadas
federal
statute
implicitly
overrides
state
law
either
scope
statute
indicates
congress
intended
federal
law
occupy
field
exclusively
english
general
elec
state
law
actual
conflict
federal
law
hawaii
new
mexico
two
met
statutory
exception
entitled
one
representative
previous
elections
elected
representatives
large
pub
stat
house
representatives
passed
bill
identical
relevant
respects
bill
representative
celler
introduced
january
see
sess
specifically
expressly
repealed
following
language
present
final
version
section
act
june
entitled
act
provide
fifteenth
subsequent
decennial
censuses
provide
apportionment
representatives
stat
amended
amended
follows
subsection
amended
striking
language
subsection
inserting
place
thereof
following
senator
bayh
introduced
one
amendment
private
bill
excluded
hawaii
new
mexico
senator
baker
offered
another
exceptions
senator
bayh
characterized
amendment
follows
tried
take
part
conference
report
dispute
minimal
amount
dispute
attach
part
bill
pending
business
cong
rec
senator
baker
described
amendment
follows
measure
makes
provision
nothing
gerrymandering
nothing
compactness
nothing
census
strictly
provides
straightforward
manner
one
member
house
representatives
state
state
must
districted
members
may
run
large
believe
amendment
straightforward
direct
simple
way
get
urgent
need
entire
field
redistricting
prevent
several
union
threat
representatives
house
representatives
stand
election
large
colloquy
senators
bayh
baker
floor
agreed
final
amendment
left
doubt
effect
make
mandatory
congressmen
elected
districts
whether
reapportionment
done
state
legislatures
federal
remarks
senator
bayh
footnotes
matter
whether
applies
exclusively
legislative
redistricting
terms
courts
involved
redistricting
process
extent
courts
part
manner
provided
law
thereof
courts
may
redistrict
contrary
plurality
interpretation
text
makes
clear
manner
refers
exclusively
state
law
manner
state
redistricts
refer
process
state
redistricts
moreover
plurality
conflation
state
federal
law
substantial
tension
opinion
pennhurst
state
school
hospital
halderman
delineating
distinction
state
federal
law
federal
enters
injunction
coercive
congress
say
state
comply
legislative
command
federal
enter
injunction
making
state
conform
congress
command
see
new
york
striking
congress
take
title
provision
choice
two
unconstitutional
choices
choice
command
however
state
choice
passing
redistricting
legislation
using
elections
section
merely
limits
type
remedies
federal
may
adopt
response
violation
federal
law
neither
affirmatively
provides
courts
authority
draw
districts
absent
violation
rather
specifies
remedy
appropriate
constitutional
violation
see
must
order
elections
ntil
state
redistricted
manner
provided
law
thereof
alabama
congresses
arkansas
congresses
california
congresses
colorado
congresses
connecticut
congresses
florida
congresses
georgia
congresses
iowa
congress
kansas
congresses
idaho
congresses
illinois
congresses
indiana
congress
louisiana
congress
new
york
congresses
maine
congress
michigan
congress
minnesota
congresses
mississippi
congresses
missouri
congresses
montana
congresses
new
hampshire
congresses
new
mexico
congress
north
carolina
congress
north
dakota
congresses
ohio
congress
oklahoma
congress
pennsylvania
congresses
south
carolina
congress
south
dakota
congresses
tennessee
congress
texas
congresses
utah
congress
virginia
congress
washington
congresses
west
virginia
congresses
wisconsin
congress
see
calkins
hare
supp
ed
plaintiffs
challenged
constitutionality
congressional
districting
state
bush
martin
supp
sd
tex
question
whether
texas
congressional
redistricting
act
constitutional
park
faubus
supp
ed
ark
alleged
act
second
extraordinary
session
acts
general
assembly
state
arkansas
year
act
divides
state
arkansas
congressional
districts
deprives
plaintiff
others
similarly
situated
right
vote
citation
omitted
preisler
secretary
state
supp
wd
mo
plaintiffs
contest
constitutional
validity
missouri
congressional
redistricting
act
meeks
anderson
supp
action
brought
qualified
voters
four
five
congressional
districts
kansas
seeking
kansas
statutes
last
congressional
reapportionment
kansas
legislature
declared
unconstitutional
citation
omitted
baker
clement
supp
md
case
presents
question
whether
statute
creating
tennessee
nine
congressional
districts
violates
article
section
constitution