buckley
fitzsimmons
argued
february
decided
june
petitioner
buckley
sought
damages
respondent
prosecutors
fabricating
evidence
preliminary
investigation
highly
publicized
rape
murder
illinois
making
false
statements
press
conference
announcing
return
indictment
claimed
three
separate
lab
studies
failed
make
reliable
connection
bootprint
murder
site
boots
respondents
obtained
positive
identification
one
robbins
allegedly
known
willingness
fabricate
unreliable
expert
testimony
thereafter
convened
grand
jury
sole
purpose
investigating
murder
months
later
respondent
fitzsimmons
state
attorney
announced
indictment
news
conference
buckley
arrested
unable
meet
bond
held
jail
robbins
provided
principal
evidence
trial
jury
unable
reach
verdict
robbins
died
buckley
retrial
charges
dropped
released
three
years
incarceration
action
district
held
respondents
entitled
absolute
immunity
fabricated
evidence
claim
press
conference
claim
however
appeals
ruled
absolute
immunity
claims
theorizing
prosecutors
entitled
absolute
immunity
acts
cause
injury
extent
case
proceeds
entitled
qualified
immunity
constitutional
wrong
complete
case
begins
remand
found
nothing
burns
reed
held
prosecutors
absolute
immunity
actions
participating
probable
cause
hearing
giving
advice
police
undermined
initial
holding
held
respondents
entitled
absolute
immunity
pp
certain
immunities
well
established
enacted
presumes
congress
specifically
provided
wished
abolish
public
officials
entitled
qualified
immunity
however
sometimes
actions
fit
within
common
law
tradition
absolute
immunity
whether
determined
nature
function
performed
identity
actor
performed
forrester
white
available
conduct
prosecutors
intimately
associated
judicial
phase
criminal
process
imbler
pachtman
pp
acts
undertaken
prosecutor
preparing
initiation
judicial
proceedings
trial
occur
course
role
advocate
state
entitled
protections
absolute
immunity
however
endeavoring
determine
whether
bootprint
made
buckley
respondents
acting
advocates
investigators
searching
clues
corroboration
might
give
probable
cause
recommend
arrest
activities
immune
liability
common
law
performed
police
officers
detectives
actions
entitled
qualified
immunity
immunity
applies
prosecutors
performing
actions
convening
grand
jury
consider
evidence
work
produced
retroactively
transform
work
administrative
prosecutorial
pp
fitzsimmons
statements
media
also
entitled
absolute
immunity
common
law
immunity
prosecutor
statements
press
imbler
comments
functional
tie
judicial
process
made
prosecutor
policy
considerations
support
extending
absolute
immunity
press
statements
since
license
establish
immunities
actions
interests
judges
sound
public
policy
since
presumption
qualified
rather
absolute
immunity
sufficient
protect
government
officials
exercise
duties
pp
stevens
delivered
opinion
unanimous
respect
parts
ii
iii
opinion
respect
parts
blackmun
scalia
thomas
joined
scalia
filed
concurring
opinion
post
kennedy
filed
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
rehnquist
white
souter
joined
post
flint
taylor
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
john
stainthorp
james
sotos
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondents
jeffrey
minear
argued
cause
amicus
curiae
urging
affirmance
brief
solicitor
general
starr
assistant
attorney
general
gerson
deputy
solicitor
general
mahoney
michael
bradbury
filed
brief
appellate
committee
california
district
attorneys
association
amicus
curiae
justice
stevens
delivered
opinion
action
brought
petitioner
seeks
damages
respondent
prosecutors
allegedly
fabricating
evidence
preliminary
investigation
crime
making
false
statements
press
conference
announcing
return
indictment
questions
presented
whether
respondents
absolutely
immune
liability
either
claims
case
comes
us
occasion
consider
whether
respondents
conduct
may
protected
qualified
immunity
moreover
make
two
important
assumptions
case
first
petitioner
allegations
entirely
true
second
allege
constitutional
violations
provides
remedy
statement
facts
therefore
derived
entirely
petitioner
complaint
limited
matters
relevant
respondents
claim
absolute
immunity
petitioner
commenced
action
march
following
release
jail
du
page
county
illinois
incarcerated
three
years
charges
growing
highly
publicized
murder
jeanine
nicarico
child
february
complaint
named
defendants
including
du
page
county
sheriff
seven
assistants
two
expert
witnesses
estate
third
five
respondents
respondent
fitzsimmons
duly
elected
du
page
county
state
attorney
time
nicarico
murder
december
succeeded
respondent
ryan
defeated
republican
primary
election
march
respondent
knight
assistant
state
attorney
fitzsimmons
served
special
prosecutor
nicarico
case
ryan
respondents
kilander
came
office
ryan
king
assistant
prosecutors
also
assigned
case
theory
petitioner
case
order
obtain
indictment
case
engendered
extensive
publicity
intense
emotions
community
prosecutors
fabricated
false
evidence
order
gain
votes
fitzsimmons
made
false
statements
petitioner
press
conference
announcing
arrest
indictment
days
primary
election
petitioner
claims
respondents
misconduct
created
highly
prejudicial
inflamed
atmosphere
seriously
impaired
fairness
judicial
proceedings
innocent
man
caused
suffer
serious
loss
freedom
mental
anguish
humiliation
fabricated
evidence
related
bootprint
door
nicarico
home
apparently
left
killer
kicked
door
three
separate
studies
experts
du
page
county
crime
lab
illinois
department
law
enforcement
kansas
bureau
identification
unable
make
reliable
connection
print
pair
boots
petitioner
voluntarily
supplied
respondents
obtained
positive
identification
one
louise
robbins
anthropologist
north
carolina
allegedly
well
known
willingness
fabricate
unreliable
expert
testimony
opinion
obtained
early
stages
investigation
conducted
joint
supervision
direction
sheriff
respondent
fitzsimmons
whose
police
officers
assistant
prosecutors
performing
essentially
investigatory
functions
thereafter
failed
obtain
sufficient
evidence
support
petitioner
anyone
else
arrest
respondents
convened
special
grand
jury
sole
purpose
investigating
nicarico
case
investigation
grand
jury
heard
testimony
witnesses
including
bootprint
experts
still
unable
return
indictment
january
respondent
fitzsimmons
admitted
public
statement
insufficient
evidence
indict
anyone
rape
murder
jeanine
nicarico
although
additional
evidence
obtained
interim
indictment
returned
march
fitzsimmons
held
defamatory
press
conference
shortly
primary
election
petitioner
arrested
unable
meet
bond
set
million
held
jail
petitioner
trial
began
months
later
january
principal
evidence
provided
robbins
north
carolina
anthropologist
jury
unable
reach
verdict
charges
petitioner
trial
judge
declared
mistrial
petitioner
remained
prison
two
years
third
party
confessed
crime
prosecutors
prepared
petitioner
retrial
robbins
died
however
charges
dropped
released
filed
action
ii
concerned
petitioner
actions
police
officers
asserted
defense
qualified
immunity
expert
witnesses
whose
trial
testimony
granted
absolute
immunity
district
app
du
page
county
whose
motion
dismiss
grounds
granted
part
issue
action
prosecutors
moved
dismiss
based
claim
absolute
immunity
district
held
respondents
entitled
absolute
immunity
claims
except
claim
fitzsimmons
based
press
conference
respect
claim
based
alleged
fabrication
evidence
district
framed
question
whether
effort
obtain
definitive
boot
evidence
linking
petitioner
crime
nature
acquisition
evidence
nature
evaluation
evidence
purpose
initiating
criminal
process
concluded
appears
evaluative
acquisitive
petitioner
fitzsimmons
appealed
divided
panel
appeals
seventh
circuit
ruled
prosecutors
absolute
immunity
claims
buckley
fitzsimmons
appeals
view
damages
remedies
unnecessary
ourts
curtail
costs
prosecutorial
blunders
cutting
short
prosecution
mitigating
effects
thus
acts
cause
injury
extent
case
proceeds
prosecutor
entitled
absolute
immunity
defendant
must
look
case
pends
protect
interests
contrast
constitutional
wrong
complete
case
begins
prosecutor
entitled
qualified
immunity
applying
unprecedented
theory
petitioner
allegations
appeals
concluded
neither
press
conference
fabricated
evidence
caused
constitutional
injury
independent
indictment
trial
judge
fairchild
dissented
part
agreed
district
fitzsimmons
entitled
qualified
immunity
press
statements
noted
majority
failed
examine
particular
function
fitzsimmons
performing
concluded
conducting
press
conference
among
functions
entitle
judges
prosecutors
judicial
branch
absolute
immunity
opinion
dissenting
part
concurring
part
responding
directly
majority
reasoning
wrote
true
procedures
afforded
system
justice
give
defendant
good
chance
avoid
results
prejudicial
publicity
excessive
bail
difficulty
inability
selecting
impartial
jury
like
procedures
reduce
cost
impropriety
prosecutor
find
courts
recognized
availability
sufficient
reason
conferring
immunity
ibid
judge
fairchild
dissented
adhered
earlier
conclusion
fitzsimmons
entitled
qualified
immunity
press
conference
also
persuaded
burns
drawn
line
conduct
closely
related
judicial
process
conduct
role
administrator
investigative
officer
agreed
trial
preparation
falls
absolute
immunity
side
line
felt
otherwise
search
favorable
evidence
might
link
bootprint
petitioner
year
long
investigation
aggressively
supervised
fitzsimmons
opinion
dissenting
part
granted
certiorari
second
time
limited
issues
relating
prosecutorial
immunity
reverse
iii
principles
applied
determine
scope
immunity
state
officials
sued
amended
familiar
section
face
admits
defense
official
immunity
subjects
liability
person
acting
color
state
law
commits
prohibited
acts
tenney
brandhove
however
held
congress
intend
abrogate
immunities
well
grounded
history
reason
certain
immunities
well
established
enacted
presume
congress
specifically
provided
wished
abolish
pierson
ray
see
also
newport
fact
concerts
although
found
immunities
appear
face
statute
license
establish
immunities
actions
interests
judge
sound
public
policy
tower
glover
ur
role
interpret
intent
congress
enacting
make
freewheeling
policy
choice
malley
briggs
since
tenney
recognized
two
kinds
immunities
public
officials
entitled
qualified
immunity
harlow
fitzgerald
butz
economou
form
immunity
government
officials
subject
damages
liability
performance
discretionary
functions
conduct
violate
clearly
established
statutory
constitutional
rights
reasonable
person
known
harlow
fitzgerald
cases
qualified
immunity
sufficient
protect
officials
required
exercise
discretion
related
public
interest
encouraging
vigorous
exercise
official
authority
butz
economou
recognized
however
officials
perform
special
functions
similarity
functions
immune
congress
enacted
deserve
absolute
protection
damages
liability
official
seeking
absolute
immunity
bears
burden
showing
immunity
justified
function
question
burns
reed
antoine
byers
anderson
even
identify
common
law
tradition
absolute
immunity
given
function
considered
whether
history
purposes
nonetheless
counsel
recognizing
immunity
actions
tower
glover
surprisingly
quite
sparing
recognizing
absolute
immunity
state
actors
context
forrester
white
determining
whether
particular
actions
government
officials
fit
within
common
law
tradition
absolute
immunity
general
standard
qualified
immunity
applied
functional
approach
see
burns
looks
nature
function
performed
identity
actor
performed
forrester
white
twice
applied
approach
determining
whether
functions
contemporary
prosecutors
entitled
absolute
immunity
imbler
pachtman
held
state
prosecutor
absolute
immunity
initiation
pursuit
criminal
prosecution
including
presentation
state
case
trial
noting
earlier
cases
predicated
upon
considered
inquiry
immunity
historically
accorded
relevant
official
common
law
interests
behind
focused
functions
prosecutor
often
invited
tort
actions
concluded
common
law
rule
immunity
prosecutors
well
settled
considerations
public
policy
underlie
rule
likewise
countenance
absolute
immunity
considerations
supported
rule
absolute
immunity
conduct
prosecutors
intimately
associated
judicial
phase
criminal
process
concluding
initiating
prosecution
presenting
state
case
prosecutor
immune
civil
suit
damages
attempt
describe
line
prosecutor
acts
preparing
functions
absolutely
immune
acts
investigation
administration
applied
imbler
analysis
two
terms
ago
burns
reed
suit
challenged
two
acts
prosecutor
giving
legal
advice
police
propriety
hypnotizing
suspect
whether
probable
cause
existed
arrest
suspect
participating
probable
cause
hearing
held
latter
entitled
absolute
immunity
immunity
action
accorded
common
law
absolute
immunity
prosecutors
attorneys
eliciting
false
defamatory
testimony
witnesses
making
false
defamatory
statements
related
judicial
proceedings
scalia
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
analysis
appearing
judge
presenting
evidence
support
motion
search
warrant
involved
prosecutor
role
advocate
state
quoting
imbler
issuance
search
warrant
judicial
act
appearance
probable
cause
hearing
intimately
associated
judicial
phase
criminal
process
burns
quoting
imbler
decided
however
prosecutors
entitled
absolute
immunity
actions
giving
legal
advice
police
unable
identify
historical
common
law
support
absolute
immunity
performance
function
also
noted
threat
judicial
process
harassment
intimidation
associated
litigation
based
advice
police
insufficient
overcome
bsen
ce
tradition
immunity
comparable
common
law
immunity
malicious
prosecution
formed
basis
decision
imbler
though
noted
several
checks
civil
litigation
prevent
prosecutorial
abuses
advising
police
one
important
checks
judicial
process
effective
cases
especially
end
suspect
prosecuted
sum
held
providing
legal
advice
police
function
closely
associated
judicial
process
iv
case
appeals
held
respondents
entitled
absolute
immunity
injuries
suffered
petitioner
occurred
criminal
proceedings
holding
contrary
approach
consistently
followed
since
imbler
noted
imbler
approach
focuses
conduct
immunity
claimed
harm
conduct
may
caused
question
whether
lawful
location
injury
may
relevant
question
whether
complaint
adequately
alleged
cause
action
damages
question
case
present
see
supra
irrelevant
however
question
whether
conduct
prosecutor
protected
absolute
immunity
accordingly
although
appeals
reasoning
may
relevant
proper
resolution
issues
us
provide
acceptable
basis
concluding
either
preindictment
fabrication
evidence
postindictment
press
conference
function
protected
absolute
immunity
therefore
turn
consider
respondents
claims
absolute
immunity
first
address
petitioner
argument
prosecutors
entitled
absolute
immunity
claim
conspired
manufacture
false
evidence
link
boot
bootprint
murderer
left
front
door
obtain
false
evidence
petitioner
submits
prosecutors
shopped
experts
found
one
provide
opinion
sought
app
time
assistant
prosecutors
working
hand
hand
sheriff
detectives
joint
supervision
sheriff
state
attorney
fitzsimmons
petitioner
argues
imbler
protection
prosecutor
conduct
initiating
prosecution
presenting
state
case
extends
act
initiation
conduct
occurring
courtroom
extreme
position
plainly
foreclosed
opinion
imbler
expressly
stated
duties
prosecutor
role
advocate
state
involve
actions
preliminary
initiation
prosecution
actions
apart
courtroom
nonetheless
entitled
absolute
immunity
noted
particular
effort
control
presentation
witness
testimony
entitled
absolute
immunity
fairly
within
prosecutor
function
advocate
sure
burns
made
explicit
point
reserved
imbler
prosecutor
administrative
duties
investigatory
functions
relate
advocate
preparation
initiation
prosecution
judicial
proceedings
entitled
absolute
immunity
see
burns
retreated
however
principle
acts
undertaken
prosecutor
preparing
initiation
judicial
proceedings
trial
occur
course
role
advocate
state
entitled
protections
absolute
immunity
acts
must
include
professional
evaluation
evidence
assembled
police
appropriate
preparation
presentation
trial
grand
jury
decision
seek
indictment
made
hand
function
test
imbler
recognizes
actions
prosecutor
absolutely
immune
merely
performed
prosecutor
qualified
immunity
represents
norm
executive
officers
malley
briggs
quoting
harlow
fitzgerald
prosecutor
functions
administrator
rather
officer
entitled
qualified
immunity
imbler
difference
advocate
role
evaluating
evidence
interviewing
witnesses
prepares
trial
one
hand
detective
role
searching
clues
corroboration
might
give
probable
cause
recommend
suspect
arrested
hand
prosecutor
performs
investigative
functions
normally
performed
detective
police
officer
neither
appropriate
justifiable
act
immunity
protect
one
hampton
chicago
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
cert
denied
thus
prosecutor
plans
executes
raid
suspected
weapons
cache
greater
claim
complete
immunity
activities
police
officers
allegedly
acting
direction
question
whether
prosecutors
carried
burden
establishing
functioning
advocates
endeavoring
determine
whether
bootprint
scene
crime
made
petitioner
foot
careful
examination
allegations
concerning
conduct
prosecutors
period
convened
special
grand
jury
investigate
crime
provides
answer
see
supra
prosecutors
contend
probable
cause
arrest
petitioner
initiate
judicial
proceedings
period
mission
time
entirely
investigative
character
prosecutor
neither
consider
advocate
probable
cause
anyone
arrested
well
alleged
fabrication
false
evidence
concerning
bootprint
special
grand
jury
empaneled
finally
convened
immediate
purpose
conduct
thorough
investigation
crime
return
indictment
suspect
already
probable
cause
arrest
buckley
arrested
fact
months
grand
jury
convened
finally
indicted
circumstances
prosecutors
conduct
occurred
well
properly
claim
acting
advocates
respondents
cited
authority
supports
argument
prosecutor
fabrication
false
evidence
preliminary
investigation
unsolved
crime
immune
liability
common
law
either
date
enactment
therefore
remains
protected
qualified
immunity
burns
anomalous
say
least
grant
prosecutors
qualified
immunity
offering
legal
advice
police
unarrested
suspect
endow
absolute
immunity
conducting
investigative
work
order
decide
whether
suspect
may
arrested
prosecutors
later
called
grand
jury
consider
evidence
work
produced
retroactively
transform
work
administrative
prosecutorial
prosecutor
may
shield
investigative
work
aegis
absolute
immunity
merely
suspect
eventually
arrested
indicted
tried
work
may
retrospectively
described
preparation
possible
trial
every
prosecutor
might
shield
liability
constitutional
wrong
innocent
citizens
ensuring
go
trial
functions
prosecutors
detectives
immunity
protects
also
next
consider
petitioner
claims
regarding
fitzsimmons
statements
press
petitioner
alleged
prosecutor
public
announcement
indictment
fitzsimmons
made
false
assertions
numerous
pieces
evidence
including
bootprint
evidence
tied
buckley
burglary
ring
committed
nicarico
murder
app
petitioner
also
alleged
fitzsimmons
released
mug
shots
media
prominently
repeatedly
displayed
television
newspapers
ibid
petitioner
legal
theory
hese
false
prejudicial
statements
inflamed
populace
dupage
county
ibid
see
also
thereby
defaming
resulting
deprivation
right
fair
trial
causing
jury
deadlock
rather
acquit
fitzsimmons
statements
media
entitled
absolute
immunity
fitzsimmons
suggest
existed
common
law
immunity
prosecutor
attorney
statement
press
appeals
agreed
historical
precedent
exists
indeed
prosecutors
like
attorneys
entitled
absolute
immunity
defamation
liability
statements
made
course
judicial
proceedings
relevant
see
burns
imbler
white
concurring
judgment
statements
made
received
good
faith
immunity
common
law
rule
speech
counsel
privileged
occasion
spoken
flint
pike
barn
cress
bayley
functional
approach
imbler
conforms
common
law
theory
leads
us
conclusion
comments
media
functional
tie
judicial
process
made
prosecutor
press
conference
fitzsimmons
act
role
advocate
state
burns
reed
supra
quoting
imbler
pachtman
conduct
press
conference
involve
initiation
prosecution
presentation
state
case
actions
preparatory
functions
statements
press
may
integral
part
prosecutor
job
see
national
district
attorneys
national
prosecution
standards
ed
may
serve
vital
public
function
respects
prosecutor
different
position
executive
officials
deal
press
noted
supra
qualified
immunity
norm
fitzsimmons
argues
nonetheless
policy
considerations
support
extending
absolute
immunity
press
statements
brief
respondents
two
responses
submissions
first
license
establish
immunities
actions
interests
judge
sound
public
policy
tower
glover
prosecutorial
function
within
advocate
role
historical
tradition
immunity
draw
inquiry
end
second
presumption
qualified
rather
absolute
immunity
sufficient
protect
government
officials
exercise
duties
burns
reed
even
policy
considerations
allowed
us
carve
new
absolute
immunities
liability
constitutional
wrongs
see
little
reason
suppose
qualified
immunity
provide
adequate
protection
prosecutors
provision
legal
advice
police
see
yet
fail
provide
sufficient
protection
present
context
complaint
petitioner
also
charged
prosecutors
violated
rights
due
process
clause
extraction
statements
implicating
coercing
two
witnesses
paying
money
app
precise
contours
claims
unclear
addressed
leave
passed
first
instance
appeals
remand
stated
supra
petitioner
challenge
many
aspects
appeals
decision
reviewed
remain
undisturbed
opinion
two
challenged
rulings
absolute
immunity
however
judgment
appeals
seventh
circuit
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
defendant
knight
various
others
sic
defendants
including
doria
fitzsimmons
burandt
apparently
satisfied
defendant
german
conclusions
contacted
anthropologist
louise
robbins
defendant
olsen
kansas
bureau
indentification
sic
crime
lab
search
positive
boot
identification
confronted
three
different
expert
reports
failed
match
plaintiff
boot
footprint
door
defendants
including
knight
burandt
german
procured
positive
identification
louise
robbins
whose
theories
reputation
forensic
community
generally
discredited
viewed
great
skepticism
fact
defendants
knew
known
defendants
knight
king
involved
sheriff
police
early
stages
investigation
including
interrogation
witnesses
potential
suspects
specifically
sheriff
detectives
including
defendants
wilkosz
kurzawa
direction
supervision
sometimes
presence
assistance
defendants
knight
king
soucek
lepic
repeatedly
interrogated
alleged
suspects
including
plaintiff
buckley
alex
hernandez
represented
counsel
despite
intense
pressure
intimidation
plaintiff
buckley
steadfastly
maintained
innocence
demonstrated
knowledge
crime
hernandez
told
wild
palpably
false
stories
mental
instability
obvious
defendants
result
interrogations
least
one
experienced
sheriff
detective
participated
concluded
buckley
hernandez
involved
nicarico
crime
conclusion
buttressed
general
knowledge
bootprint
evidence
repeatedly
communicated
conclusion
basis
defendants
named
herein
including
defendants
doria
knight
king
soucek
lepic
wilkosz
unable
solve
case
defendants
doria
fitzsimmons
knight
king
convened
special
dupage
county
investigative
grand
jury
devoted
solely
investigating
nicarico
case
app
respect
issue
us
petitioner
claims
subject
coercive
interrogations
respondent
prosecutors
found
extent
immunity
depended
nature
claims
reasoned
claims
based
miranda
arizona
clause
fifth
amendment
depend
happens
trial
prosecutors
entitled
absolute
immunity
claims
contrast
qualified
immunity
available
petitioner
claims
coercive
tactics
independently
wrongful
characterize
nature
claims
remanded
proceedings
concerning
fitzsimmons
king
knight
issue
although
petitioner
also
alleged
respondents
violated
constitutional
rights
presenting
fabricated
evidence
grand
jury
trial
jury
see
app
presented
question
regarding
claims
appeals
agreed
district
see
held
actions
protected
absolute
immunity
buckley
fitzsimmons
selection
evidence
present
grand
jurors
manner
questioning
witnesses
basis
liability
may
equivalent
activities
petit
jury
decision
made
according
traditional
principles
absolute
immunity
however
depend
original
theory
absolute
prosecutorial
immunity
concerned
included
within
questions
presented
petitioner
petition
certiorari
particular
expressed
concern
fear
potential
liability
undermine
prosecutor
performance
duties
forcing
consider
potential
liability
making
prosecutorial
decisions
diverting
energy
attention
pressing
duty
enforcing
criminal
law
imbler
pachtman
suits
prosecutors
devolve
virtual
retrial
criminal
offense
new
forum
undermine
vigorous
enforcement
law
providing
prosecutor
incentive
go
forward
close
case
acquittal
likely
trigger
suit
damages
also
expressed
concern
availability
damages
action
might
cause
judges
reluctant
award
relief
convicted
defendants
motions
course
determination
probable
cause
guarantee
prosecutor
absolute
immunity
liability
actions
taken
afterwards
even
determination
opinion
dissenting
part
points
post
prosecutor
may
engage
police
investigative
work
entitled
qualified
immunity
furthermore
true
anomaly
post
denying
absolute
immunity
state
actor
investigative
acts
made
probable
cause
suspect
arrested
prosecutor
entitled
absolute
immunity
malicious
prosecution
someone
lacked
probable
cause
indict
criticism
ignores
essence
function
test
reason
lack
probable
cause
allows
us
deny
absolute
immunity
state
actor
former
function
fabrication
evidence
common
law
tradition
immunity
whether
performed
police
officer
prosecutor
reason
grant
latter
function
malicious
prosecution
found
common
law
tradition
immunity
prosecutor
decision
bring
indictment
whether
probable
cause
insisting
equation
two
functions
merely
prosecutor
might
subject
liability
one
dissent
allows
particular
policy
concerns
erase
function
test
purports
respect
general
dissent
distress
denial
absolute
immunity
prosecutors
fabricate
evidence
regarding
unsolved
crimes
post
like
holding
appeals
seems
conflate
question
whether
plaintiff
stated
cause
action
question
whether
defendant
entitled
absolute
immunity
actions
cf
burns
reed
indeed
incongruous
allow
prosecutors
absolutely
immune
liability
giving
advice
police
allow
police
officers
qualified
immunity
following
advice
almost
action
prosecutor
including
direct
participation
purely
investigative
activity
said
way
related
ultimate
decision
whether
prosecute
never
indicated
absolute
immunity
expansive
police
guidance
prosecutors
solicited
allegedly
fabricated
testimony
course
entitled
anything
qualified
immunity
see
imbler
pachtman
preparation
initiation
criminal
process
trial
may
require
obtaining
reviewing
evaluating
evidence
point
respect
decisions
prosecutor
doubt
functions
administrator
rather
officer
drawing
proper
line
functions
may
present
difficult
questions
case
require
us
anticipate
although
respondents
rely
first
sentence
passage
suggest
prosecutor
actions
obtaining
reviewing
evaluating
evidence
always
protected
absolute
immunity
sentence
follows
qualifies
suggestion
confirms
actions
may
fall
administrative
rather
judicial
end
prosecutor
activities
therefore
entitled
qualified
immunity
absolute
immunity
apply
include
publication
defamatory
matter
commencement
termination
judicial
proceeding
unless
publication
act
incidental
proper
initiation
thereof
giving
legal
effect
thereto
apply
include
publication
defamatory
matter
person
place
publication
required
authorized
law
made
proper
conduct
judicial
proceedings
veeder
absolute
immunity
defamation
judicial
proceedings
footnotes
omitted
see
viosca
landfried
la
youmans
smith
see
also
bower
law
actionable
defamation
circuits
seventh
circuit
addressed
issue
applied
qualified
immunity
press
statements
see
powers
coe
marrero
hialeah
cert
denied
gobel
maricopa
county
england
hendricks
cert
denied
marx
gumbinner
cf
rose
bartle
yet
fitzsimmons
suggested
prosecutors
circuits
unduly
constrained
keeping
public
informed
pending
criminal
prosecutions
also
perceive
anything
except
firm
common
law
rule
entitle
prosecutor
absolute
immunity
statements
press
nonprosecutors
make
similar
statements
instance
attorney
general
press
spokesperson
police
officer
announcing
return
indictment
receive
qualified
immunity
justice
scalia
concurring
observes
respondents
demonstrated
function
either
fabricating
evidence
preliminary
investigation
crime
making
statements
press
protected
common
law
privilege
enacted
see
ante
follows
respondents
alleged
performance
acts
absolutely
immune
suit
since
presumed
legislative
intent
eliminate
traditional
immunities
justification
limiting
categorical
language
statute
burns
reed
scalia
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
accord
ante
policy
reasons
extending
protection
conduct
may
seem
persuasive
see
post
kennedy
concurring
part
dissenting
part
simply
license
establish
immunities
actions
interests
judge
sound
public
policy
tower
glover
therefore
easy
case
view
difficulty
joining
judgment
join
opinion
well
though
reservation
historical
authenticity
principle
acts
undertaken
prosecutor
preparing
initiation
judicial
proceedings
trial
occur
course
role
advocate
state
entitled
protections
absolute
immunity
ante
early
years
century
authority
proposition
traditional
defamation
immunity
extends
act
incidental
proper
initiation
pursuit
judicial
proceeding
tatements
made
counsel
proposed
witnesses
veeder
absolute
immunity
defamation
judicial
proceedings
see
bower
actionable
defamation
youmans
smith
found
previous
expression
principle
accede
judgment
existed
several
decades
earlier
enacted
least
sense
logically
derived
decisions
cf
burns
supra
scalia
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
future
cases
trust
aided
briefing
point
look
history
determine
precisely
outlines
principle
certainly
accord
principle
say
prosecutors
properly
claim
acting
advocates
probable
cause
anyone
arrested
ante
reference
common
law
cases
indispensable
show
properly
claim
acting
advocates
point
though
yet
course
judicial
proceedings
ante
believe
moreover
vagueness
principle
may
less
troublesome
practice
seems
theory
two
reasons
first
reaffirms
defendant
official
bears
burden
showing
conduct
seeks
immunity
privileged
common
law
see
ante
thus
application
principle
unclear
defendant
simply
loses
second
many
claims
directed
prosecutors
sort
based
acts
plainly
covered
conventional
malicious
prosecution
defamation
privileges
probably
actionable
may
dismissed
pleading
stage
without
regard
immunity
undermining
dissent
assertion
converted
absolute
prosecutorial
immunity
little
pleading
rule
post
think
petitioner
false
evidence
claims
present
case
illustrate
point
insofar
based
respondents
supposed
knowing
use
fabricated
evidence
grand
jury
trial
see
ante
acts
might
state
claim
denial
due
process
see
mooney
holohan
per
curiam
traditional
defamation
immunity
provides
complete
protection
suit
reframe
attack
preparation
evidence
post
claims
unlikely
cognizable
since
petitioner
cites
aware
authority
proposition
mere
preparation
false
evidence
opposed
use
fashion
deprives
someone
fair
trial
otherwise
harms
violates
constitution
see
buckley
fitzsimmons
vacated
remanded
justice
kennedy
chief
justice
justice
white
justice
souter
join
concurring
part
dissenting
part
agree
absolute
immunity
statements
made
press
conference
unable
agree
conclusion
respondents
entitled
absolute
immunity
petitioner
claim
conspired
manufacture
false
evidence
linking
petitioner
bootprint
found
front
door
jeanine
nicarico
home
join
parts
ii
iii
opinion
dissent
part
correct
observe
rules
determining
whether
particular
actions
government
officials
entitled
immunity
origin
historical
practice
resulted
functional
approach
ante
see
also
burns
reed
forrester
white
malley
briggs
cleavinger
saxner
briscoe
lahue
harlow
fitzgerald
butz
economou
imbler
pachtman
share
unwillingness
accept
buckley
argument
imbler
protection
prosecutor
conduct
initiating
prosecution
presenting
state
case
extends
act
initiation
conduct
occurring
courtroom
ante
imbler
acknowledged
duties
prosecutor
role
advocate
state
involve
actions
preliminary
initiation
prosecution
actions
apart
courtroom
explained
actions
prosecutor
undertaken
functional
role
advocate
entitled
absolute
immunity
see
ante
reason
even
fundamental
stated
rejecting
buckley
argument
imbler
applies
commencement
prosecution
conduct
formulation
absolute
prosecutorial
immunity
convert
substantial
degree
protection
prosecutors
little
pleading
rule
almost
decisions
initiate
prosecution
preceded
substantial
necessary
conduct
prosecutor
evaluating
evidence
preparing
introduction
almost
every
action
taken
courtroom
requires
measure
preparation
preparatory
actions
unprotected
absolute
immunity
criminal
defendant
turned
civil
plaintiff
simply
reframe
claim
attack
preparation
instead
absolutely
immune
actions
imbler
pachtman
supra
cf
eastland
servicemen
fund
allowing
avoidance
absolute
immunity
pleading
mechanism
undermine
large
part
protections
found
necessary
imbler
discourage
trial
preparation
prosecutors
way
buckley
proffered
standard
perverse
effect
encouraging
rather
penalizing
carelessness
cf
forrester
white
supra
discourage
early
participation
prosecutors
criminal
justice
process
applying
principles
case
us
believe
conduct
relating
expert
witnesses
falls
absolute
immunity
side
divide
recognized
imbler
burns
recognize
today
functional
approach
dictate
actions
prosecutor
accorded
absolute
immunity
prosecutor
performs
investigative
functions
normally
performed
detective
police
officer
neither
appropriate
justifiable
act
immunity
protect
one
ante
quoting
hampton
chicago
cert
denied
nonetheless
buckley
labels
prosecutors
actions
relating
bootprint
experts
investigative
believe
accurate
describe
prosecutors
conduct
preparation
trial
prosecutor
must
consult
potential
trial
witness
places
witness
stand
witness
critical
one
consultation
may
necessary
even
decision
whether
indict
obvious
outset
bootprint
critical
prosecution
case
prosecutors
consultation
experts
best
viewed
step
ensure
bootprint
admission
evidence
bolster
probative
value
eyes
jury
imbler
requires
decision
use
witness
must
insulated
liability
requires
well
steps
leading
decision
must
free
distortive
effects
potential
liability
least
extent
prosecutor
engaged
trial
preparation
actions
obtaining
reviewing
evaluating
witness
testimony
classic
function
prosecutor
advocate
pretrial
even
preindictment
consultation
intimately
associated
judicial
phase
criminal
process
potential
liability
premised
prosecutor
early
consultation
adverse
effect
upon
functioning
criminal
justice
system
concern
potential
liability
arising
pretrial
consultation
witness
might
hampe
prosecutor
exercise
judgment
whether
certain
witness
used
prospect
liability
may
induc
prosecutor
act
excess
caution
otherwise
skew
decisions
ways
result
less
full
fidelity
objective
independent
criteria
guide
conduct
forrester
white
moreover
xposing
prosecutor
liability
initial
phase
prosecutorial
work
interfere
exercise
independent
judgment
every
phase
work
since
prosecutor
might
come
see
later
decisions
terms
effect
potential
liability
malley
briggs
distortion
frustrate
objective
accuracy
determination
guilt
innocence
see
imbler
pachtman
supra
furthermore
matter
prosecutors
considering
decision
use
particular
expert
testimony
subjected
crucible
judicial
process
burns
reed
quoting
imbler
pachtman
supra
white
concurring
judgment
indeed
appears
constitutional
violations
actions
alleged
caused
occurred
within
judicial
process
question
buckley
presented
petition
certiorari
makes
point
whether
prosecutors
entitled
absolute
prosecutorial
immunity
supervision
participation
year
long
investigation
injury
suffered
criminal
defendant
occurred
later
criminal
proceedings
pet
cert
remedies
prosecutorial
liability
example
pretrial
ruling
inadmissibility
rejection
trier
fact
adequate
prevent
abuses
authority
prosecutors
burns
reed
supra
see
also
butz
economou
imbler
pachtman
supra
holding
burns
reed
supra
contrary
cautioned
prosecutors
entitled
absolute
immunity
every
conduct
every
action
said
way
related
ultimate
decision
whether
prosecute
premise
burns
providing
advice
police
prosecutor
acted
guide
police
prepare
case
see
noting
police
officers
sought
prosecutor
advice
first
find
whether
hypnosis
unacceptable
investigative
technique
later
determine
whether
basis
plac
suspect
arrest
circumstances
found
insufficient
link
judicial
process
warrant
absolute
immunity
situation
quite
different
reasons
already
explained
subjecting
prosecutor
pretrial
preindictment
witness
consultation
preparation
damages
actions
frustrate
impede
judicial
process
result
imbler
designed
avoid
ii
reaches
contrary
conclusion
issue
bootprint
evidence
superimposing
standard
onto
functional
approach
guided
past
decisions
according
prosecutor
neither
consider
advocate
probable
cause
anyone
arrested
ante
allow
otherwise
tells
us
create
anomalous
situation
whereby
prosecutors
granted
qualified
immunity
offering
legal
advice
police
regarding
unarrested
suspect
see
burns
supra
endowed
absolute
immunity
conducting
legal
work
regarding
unarrested
suspect
ante
suggest
probable
cause
demarcation
conduct
considered
absolutely
immune
advocacy
creates
true
anomaly
case
quite
clear
imbler
absolute
immunity
prosecutors
meant
anything
meant
prosecutors
subject
suit
malicious
prosecution
see
also
burns
supra
common
law
immunity
malicious
prosecution
formed
basis
decision
imbler
yet
central
component
malicious
prosecution
claim
prosecutor
question
acted
maliciously
without
probable
cause
see
wyatt
cole
kennedy
concurring
rehnquist
dissenting
keeton
dobbs
keeton
owen
prosser
keeton
law
torts
ed
means
withhold
absolute
immunity
whenever
alleged
injurious
actions
prosecutor
occurred
probable
cause
believe
specified
individual
committed
crime
longer
claim
malicious
prosecution
subject
ready
dismissal
absolute
immunity
grounds
least
claimant
clever
enough
include
actions
taken
prosecutor
prior
initiation
prosecution
find
rather
strange
classic
case
invocation
absolute
immunity
falls
unprotected
side
new
dividing
line
also
find
hard
accept
line
easily
manipulated
criminal
defendants
turned
civil
plaintiffs
allowing
avoid
dismissal
absolute
immunity
grounds
throwing
allegation
prosecutor
acted
without
probable
cause
see
supra
perhaps
means
draw
line
point
appropriate
neutral
third
party
case
illinois
special
grand
jury
makes
determination
probable
cause
line
generate
anomalous
results
begin
perverse
effect
encouraging
prosecutors
seek
indictments
early
possible
attempt
shelter
liability
even
cases
otherwise
prefer
wait
seeking
indictment
ensure
accuse
innocent
person
given
stigma
emotional
trauma
attendant
indictment
arrest
promoting
premature
indictments
arrests
laudable
accomplishment
even
assuming
premature
actions
induced
rule
separating
absolute
immunity
qualified
immunity
based
determination
probable
cause
makes
little
sense
civil
plaintiff
claims
prosecutor
falsified
evidence
coerced
confessions
false
evidence
coerced
confession
served
basis
third
party
determination
probable
cause
alleged
difficult
fathom
securing
fraudulent
determination
transmogrifies
unprotected
conduct
protected
conduct
finally
question
conclusion
burns
absolute
immunity
attached
prosecutor
conduct
grand
jury
perform
judicial
function
quoting
prosser
law
torts
pp
see
also
yaselli
goff
aff
unclear
preparing
grand
jury
proceedings
obviously
occur
indictment
handed
intimately
associated
judicial
phase
criminal
process
subject
absolute
immunity
burns
supra
quoting
imbler
supra
troubling
line
drawn
find
reasons
equal
concern
advances
two
reasons
distinguishing
cause
cause
activity
prosecutors
first
distinction
needed
ensure
prosecutors
receive
greater
protection
police
officers
engaged
identical
conduct
ante
second
absent
clear
distinction
investigation
advocacy
fears
every
prosecutor
might
shield
liability
constitutional
wrong
innocent
citizens
ensuring
go
trial
ibid
step
alleged
enable
prosecutor
retrospectively
describ
investigative
work
preparation
possible
trial
therefore
request
benefits
absolute
immunity
ibid
find
neither
justifications
persuasive
first
concern
take
meant
restatement
one
unquestioned
goals
immunity
jurisprudence
ensuring
parity
treatment
among
state
actors
engaged
identical
functions
forrester
white
cleavinger
saxner
precise
reason
advancing
goal
adopted
functional
approach
absolute
immunity
first
place
see
need
augment
approach
developing
rules
cases
determining
whether
different
actors
engaged
identical
functions
involves
careful
attention
subtle
details
moreover
perceives
danger
disparate
treatment
assumes
establishing
probable
cause
police
prosecutors
perform
functions
ante
assumption
seem
unwarranted
understand
art
advocacy
inherent
temporal
limitation
say
prosecutors
never
functioning
advocates
determination
probable
cause
point
assumption
presumes
prosecutors
police
officers
engage
conduct
necessity
engaged
function
must
disagree
two
actors
take
part
similar
conduct
similar
inquiries
different
reasons
advance
different
functions
may
prosecutor
police
officer
examining
evidence
time
prosecutor
examining
evidence
determine
whether
persuasive
trial
assistance
trier
fact
police
officer
examines
evidence
decide
whether
provides
basis
arresting
suspect
conduct
functions
distinct
see
buchanan
teams
prosecutor
summer
advancing
second
reason
provided
line
drawing
think
overstates
danger
allowing
cause
conduct
constitute
advocacy
entitled
absolute
immunity
agree
institution
prosecution
retroactively
transform
work
administrative
prosecutorial
ante
declining
institute
prosecution
likewise
retroactively
transform
work
prosecutorial
administrative
cf
imbler
recognize
duties
prosecutor
role
advocate
state
involve
actions
preliminary
initiation
prosecution
include
questions
whether
present
case
grand
jury
whether
file
information
whether
prosecute
either
case
primary
question
one
confidence
federal
courts
able
answer
accuracy
whether
prosecutor
acting
advocate
investigator
administrator
took
actions
called
question
subsequent
action
long
federal
courts
center
attention
question
concern
prosecutors
disguise
investigative
administrative
actions
early
forms
advocacy
seems
unfounded
iii
recognizing
distinction
advocacy
investigation
functional
approach
requires
drawing
difficult
subtle
distinctions
understand
necessity
workable
standard
area
rule
adopts
created
problems
solved
example
even
probable
cause
arrest
suspect
suspect
indicted
prosecutor
might
act
police
investigative
work
say
finding
new
leads
case
qualified
immunity
apply
converse
also
true
even
investigators
satisfied
probable
cause
exists
indictment
secured
prosecutor
might
begin
preparations
present
testimony
grand
jury
trial
absolute
immunity
must
apply
case
respondents
functioned
advocates
preparing
prosecution
investigators
alleged
amassed
probable
cause
indictment
deemed
appropriate
judgment
respondents
entitled
absolute
immunity
involvement
expert
witnesses
case
respect
dissent
part
decision
reversing
appeals
judgment
absolute
immunity
respondents
conduct
relation
bootprint
evidence