cunningham
california
argued
october
decided
january
petitioner
cunningham
tried
convicted
continuous
sexual
abuse
child
california
determinate
sentencing
law
dsl
offense
punishable
one
three
precise
terms
imprisonment
lower
term
sentence
years
middle
term
sentence
years
upper
term
sentence
years
dsl
obliged
trial
judge
sentence
cunningham
middle
term
unless
judge
found
one
additional
circumstances
aggravation
rules
adopted
implement
dsl
define
circumstances
aggravation
facts
justify
upper
term
facts
rules
provide
must
established
preponderance
evidence
based
sentencing
hearing
judge
found
preponderance
evidence
six
aggravating
facts
including
particular
vulnerability
victim
one
mitigating
fact
cunningham
record
prior
criminal
conduct
concluding
aggravators
outweighed
sole
mitigator
judge
sentenced
cunningham
upper
term
years
california
appeal
affirmed
state
denied
review
decision
published
nine
days
earlier
people
black
cal
held
dsl
survived
sixth
amendment
inspection
held
dsl
placing
factfinding
within
judge
province
violates
defendant
right
trial
jury
safeguarded
sixth
fourteenth
amendments
pp
apprendi
new
jersey
held
sixth
amendment
fact
prior
conviction
exposes
defendant
sentence
excess
relevant
statutory
maximum
must
found
jury
judge
established
beyond
reasonable
doubt
merely
preponderance
evidence
see
applied
rule
apprendi
facts
subjecting
defendant
death
penalty
ring
arizona
facts
permitting
sentence
excess
standard
range
washington
sentencing
reform
act
reform
act
blakely
washington
facts
triggering
sentence
range
elevation
federal
sentencing
guidelines
booker
blakely
booker
bear
closely
question
presented
maximum
penalty
blakely
offense
washington
reform
act
ten
years
imprisonment
facts
beyond
reflected
jury
verdict
found
trial
judge
blakely
receive
sentence
standard
range
months
blakely
sentenced
months
three
years
standard
range
based
judge
finding
deliberate
cruelty
applying
apprendi
held
sentence
unconstitutional
state
blakely
endeavored
distinguish
apprendi
contending
blakely
sentence
within
judge
discretion
based
solely
guilty
verdict
dismissed
argument
blakely
sentenced
standard
range
absent
additional
fact
consequently
fact
subject
sixth
amendment
guarantee
matter
blakely
sentence
though
outside
standard
range
within
maximum
judge
imposed
sentence
outside
standard
range
without
finding
additional
fact
top
range
months
years
relevant
statutory
maximum
also
rejected
state
arguments
apprendi
satisfied
reform
act
specify
exclusive
catalog
facts
judge
might
base
departure
standard
range
ultimately
left
decision
whether
depart
judge
discretion
booker
sentenced
federal
sentencing
guidelines
facts
found
jury
yielded
base
guidelines
range
months
imprisonment
range
judge
exceed
without
undertaking
additional
factfinding
judge
making
finding
boosted
booker
higher
guidelines
range
held
booker
sentence
impermissible
sixth
amendment
distinction
constitutional
significance
federal
sentencing
guidelines
washington
procedures
issue
blakely
mandatory
impose
binding
requirements
sentencing
judges
ibid
members
agreed
however
guidelines
implicate
sixth
amendment
advisory
ibid
facing
remedial
question
concluded
rendering
guidelines
advisory
came
closest
congress
intended
known
guidelines
vulnerable
sixth
amendment
challenge
advisory
guidelines
system
described
booker
judges
longer
confined
sentencing
range
dictated
guidelines
obliged
take
account
range
along
sentencing
goals
enumerated
sentencing
reform
act
sra
place
sra
provision
governing
appellate
review
sentences
mandatory
guidelines
scheme
installed
reasonableness
standard
review
pp
material
respects
california
dsl
resembles
sentencing
systems
invalidated
blakely
booker
following
reasoning
cases
middle
term
prescribed
california
law
upper
term
relevant
statutory
maximum
aggravating
facts
authorize
upper
term
found
judge
need
established
preponderance
evidence
dsl
violates
rule
apprendi
end
matter
blakely
people
black
california
insisted
dsl
survives
inspection
precedents
black
reasoned
given
ample
discretion
afforded
trial
judges
identify
aggravating
facts
warranting
upper
term
sentence
dsl
represent
legislative
effort
shift
proof
particular
facts
elements
crime
proved
jury
sentencing
factors
decided
judge
cal
cautioned
blakely
however
broad
discretion
decide
facts
may
support
enhanced
sentence
determine
whether
enhanced
sentence
warranted
particular
case
shield
sentencing
system
force
decisions
black
also
urged
dsl
cause
concern
reduced
penalties
crimes
prior
indeterminate
sentencing
scheme
system
fair
defendants
dsl
requires
statutory
sentence
enhancements
distinguished
aggravators
charged
indictment
proved
jury
beyond
reasonable
doubt
black
examination
short
satisfied
california
sentencing
system
implicate
significantly
concerns
underlying
sixth
amendment
guarantee
decisions
however
leave
room
examination
asking
whether
defendant
basic
right
preserved
though
facts
essential
punishment
reserved
determination
judge
inquiry
apprendi
rule
designed
exclude
ultimately
black
relied
equation
california
dsl
federal
system
attempted
comparison
unavailing
booker
held
federal
guidelines
incompatible
sixth
amendment
mandatory
impose
binding
requirements
sentencing
judges
remedy
constitutional
infirmity
excised
provisions
rendered
system
mandatory
leaving
guidelines
place
advisory
dsl
however
resemble
advisory
system
booker
view
california
system
judges
free
exercise
discretion
select
specific
sentence
within
defined
range
ibid
california
legislature
adopted
sentencing
triads
three
fixed
sentences
ranges
cunningham
sentencing
judge
discretion
select
sentence
within
range
years
impose
years
nothing
less
nothing
unless
judge
found
facts
allowing
sentence
years
factfinding
elevate
sentence
years
decisions
make
plain
falls
within
province
jury
employing
standard
bailiwick
judge
determining
preponderance
evidence
lies
black
attempted
rescue
dsl
judicial
factfinding
authority
typing
reasonableness
constraint
equivalent
constraint
operative
federal
system
reasonableness
however
touchstone
sixth
amendment
analysis
reasonableness
requirement
booker
anticipated
federal
system
operates
within
constitutional
constraints
delineated
precedent
substitute
constraints
dsl
allocates
judges
sole
authority
find
facts
permitting
imposition
upper
term
sentence
system
violates
sixth
amendment
booker
remedy
federal
guidelines
short
recipe
rendering
sixth
amendment
case
law
toothless
elaboration
federal
reasonableness
standard
neither
necessary
proper
granted
review
two
cases
argued
decided
later
term
raising
questions
trained
matter
claiborne
rita
pp
adjustment
california
sentencing
system
light
ruling
ball
lies
california
booker
several
modified
systems
wake
apprendi
blakely
retain
determinate
sentencing
calling
upon
jury
find
fact
necessary
imposition
elevated
sentence
chosen
permit
judges
genuinely
exercise
broad
discretion
within
statutory
range
everyone
agrees
encounters
sixth
amendment
shoal
california
may
follow
paths
taken
sister
otherwise
alter
system
long
observes
sixth
amendment
limitations
declared
decisions
pp
reversed
part
remanded
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
roberts
stevens
scalia
souter
thomas
joined
kennedy
filed
dissenting
opinion
breyer
joined
alito
filed
dissenting
opinion
kennedy
breyer
joined
john
cunningham
petitioner
california
writ
certiorari
appeal
california
first
appellate
district
january
justice
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
california
determinate
sentencing
law
dsl
assigns
trial
judge
jury
authority
find
facts
expose
defendant
elevated
upper
term
sentence
facts
found
neither
inherent
jury
verdict
embraced
defendant
plea
need
established
preponderance
evidence
beyond
reasonable
doubt
question
presented
whether
dsl
placing
factfinding
within
judge
province
violates
defendant
right
trial
jury
safeguarded
sixth
fourteenth
amendments
hold
decisions
instruct
federal
constitution
guarantee
proscribes
sentencing
scheme
allows
judge
impose
sentence
statutory
maximum
based
fact
prior
conviction
found
jury
admitted
defendant
apprendi
new
jersey
ring
arizona
blakely
washington
booker
relevant
maximum
clarified
maximum
sentence
judge
may
impose
finding
additional
facts
maximum
may
impose
without
additional
findings
blakely
emphasis
original
petitioner
case
jury
verdict
alone
limited
permissible
sentence
years
additional
factfinding
trial
judge
however
yielded
upper
term
sentence
years
california
appeal
affirmed
harsher
sentence
reverse
disposition
elevation
based
judicial
factfinding
denied
petitioner
right
jury
trial
petitioner
john
cunningham
tried
convicted
continuous
sexual
abuse
child
age
dsl
offense
punishable
imprisonment
lower
term
sentence
years
middle
term
sentence
years
upper
term
sentence
years
cal
penal
code
ann
west
hereinafter
penal
code
explained
see
infra
dsl
obliged
trial
judge
sentence
cunningham
middle
term
unless
judge
found
one
additional
facts
aggravation
based
sentencing
hearing
trial
judge
found
preponderance
evidence
six
aggravating
circumstances
among
particular
vulnerability
cunningham
victim
cunningham
violent
conduct
indicated
serious
danger
community
tr
sentencing
app
mitigation
judge
found
one
fact
cunningham
record
prior
criminal
conduct
ibid
concluding
aggravators
outweighed
sole
mitigator
judge
sentenced
cunningham
upper
term
years
panel
california
appeal
affirmed
conviction
sentence
one
judge
dissented
part
urging
precedent
precluded
increase
cunningham
sentence
apr
app
jones
concurring
part
dissenting
part
california
denied
review
june
en
banc
reasoned
decision
published
nine
days
earlier
considered
question
presented
held
dsl
survived
sixth
amendment
inspection
people
black
cal
june
enacted
dsl
replaced
indeterminate
sentencing
regime
force
california
years
see
cassou
taugher
determinate
sentencing
california
new
numbers
game
pac
hereinafter
cassou
taugher
prior
regime
courts
imposed
prison
terms
often
one
year
life
parole
board
adult
authority
determined
amount
time
felon
ultimately
spend
prison
black
cal
roberts
cal
cassou
taugher
contrast
dsl
fixed
terms
imprisonment
offenses
eliminated
possibility
early
release
parole
see
penal
code
et
seq
west
supp
witkin
epstein
california
criminal
law
ed
brief
respondent
dsl
california
lawmakers
aimed
promote
uniform
proportionate
punishment
penal
code
black
cal
offenses
including
cunningham
dsl
regime
implemented
following
manner
statute
defining
offense
prescribes
three
precise
terms
imprisonment
lower
middle
upper
term
sentence
penal
code
west
person
convicted
continuous
sexual
abuse
child
shall
punished
imprisonment
state
prison
term
years
see
also
black
cal
penal
code
west
supp
controls
trial
judge
choice
provides
shall
order
imposition
middle
term
unless
circumstances
aggravation
mitigation
crime
ircumstances
aggravation
mitigation
determined
consideration
several
items
trial
record
probation
officer
report
statements
aggravation
mitigation
submitted
parties
victim
victim
family
evidence
introduced
sentencing
hearing
ibid
dsl
directed
state
judicial
adopt
rules
guiding
sentencing
judge
decision
whether
mpose
lower
upper
prison
term
penal
code
west
restating
council
rules
provide
middle
term
shall
selected
unless
imposition
upper
lower
term
justified
circumstances
aggravation
mitigation
rule
circumstances
aggravation
crisply
defined
judicial
council
means
facts
justify
imposition
upper
prison
term
rule
emphasis
added
facts
aggravating
offense
rules
instruct
shall
established
preponderance
evidence
rule
must
stated
orally
record
rule
rules
provide
nonexhaustive
list
aggravating
circumstances
including
acts
relating
crime
rule
acts
relating
defendant
rule
ny
facts
statutorily
declared
circumstances
aggravation
rule
beyond
enumerated
circumstances
judge
free
consider
criteria
reasonably
related
decision
made
black
cal
quoting
rule
fact
element
crime
however
shall
used
impose
upper
term
rule
sum
california
dsl
rules
governing
application
direct
sentencing
start
middle
term
move
term
finds
places
record
facts
whether
related
offense
offender
beyond
elements
charged
offense
justice
alito
maintains
however
circumstance
aggravation
need
fact
view
policy
judgment
even
judge
subjective
belief
regarding
appropriate
sentence
qualifies
aggravating
circumstance
post
dissenting
opinion
california
rules
however
constantly
refer
facts
noted
rules
define
circumstances
aggravation
facts
justify
imposition
upper
prison
term
rule
emphasis
added
circumstances
aggravation
rules
unambiguously
declare
shall
established
preponderance
evidence
rule
clear
factfinding
directive
exception
see
people
hall
cal
selection
upper
term
justified
circumstances
aggravation
established
preponderance
evidence
emphasis
added
rules
list
eneral
objectives
sentencing
rule
nowhere
objectives
cast
circumstances
aggravation
alone
authorize
upper
term
sentence
rules
also
state
enumeration
criteria
making
discretionary
sentencing
decisions
prohibit
application
additional
criteria
reasonably
related
decision
made
rule
california
courts
read
language
unmoor
circumstances
aggravation
factfinding
anchor
line
rules
california
repeatedly
referred
circumstances
aggravation
facts
see
black
cal
legislature
identify
particular
facts
justify
upper
term
emphasis
added
people
wiley
cal
rial
courts
assigned
task
deciding
whether
impose
upper
lower
term
imprisonment
based
upon
determination
whether
circumstances
aggravation
mitigation
crime
determination
invariably
requires
numerous
factual
findings
emphasis
added
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
unsurprising
state
counsel
oral
argument
acknowledged
knew
case
california
trial
judge
gone
beyond
middle
term
based
fact
judge
found
solely
basis
policy
judgment
subjective
belief
see
tr
oral
arg
notably
penal
code
permits
elevation
sentence
upper
term
based
specified
statutory
enhancements
relating
defendant
criminal
history
circumstances
crime
see
penal
code
et
seq
west
supp
et
seq
see
also
black
cal
unlike
aggravating
circumstances
statutory
enhancements
must
charged
indictment
underlying
facts
must
proved
jury
beyond
reasonable
doubt
penal
code
black
cal
fact
underlying
enhancement
double
duty
used
impose
upper
term
sentence
top
enhanced
term
penal
code
permitted
statute
however
judge
may
use
fact
qualifying
enhancer
impose
upper
term
rather
enhanced
sentence
ibid
rule
ii
repeatedly
held
sixth
amendment
fact
exposes
defendant
greater
potential
sentence
must
found
jury
judge
established
beyond
reasonable
doubt
merely
preponderance
evidence
rule
rooted
longstanding
practice
explicit
statement
decisions
recent
jones
examined
sixth
amendment
historical
doctrinal
foundations
recognized
judicial
factfinding
operating
increase
defendant
otherwise
maximum
punishment
posed
grave
constitutional
question
construed
statute
issue
avoid
question
jones
opinion
presaged
decision
months
later
apprendi
new
jersey
charles
apprendi
convicted
possession
firearm
unlawful
purpose
offense
new
jersey
law
punishable
five
ten
years
imprisonment
separate
hate
crime
statute
authorized
extended
term
imprisonment
ten
twenty
years
imposed
trial
judge
found
preponderance
evidence
defendant
committing
crime
acted
purpose
intimidate
individual
group
individuals
race
color
gender
handicap
religion
sexual
orientation
ethnicity
quoting
stat
ann
west
supp
judge
apprendi
case
found
therefore
sentenced
defendant
years
imprisonment
held
sixth
amendment
proscribed
enhanced
sentence
prior
conviction
see
held
apprendi
fact
increases
penalty
crime
beyond
prescribed
statutory
maximum
must
submitted
jury
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
also
harris
plurality
opinion
apprendi
said
fact
extending
defendant
sentence
beyond
maximum
authorized
jury
verdict
considered
element
aggravated
crime
thus
domain
jury
framed
bill
since
reaffirmed
rule
apprendi
applying
facts
subjecting
defendant
death
penalty
ring
arizona
facts
permitting
sentence
excess
standard
range
washington
sentencing
reform
act
blakely
washington
facts
triggering
sentence
range
elevation
federal
sentencing
guidelines
booker
blakely
booker
bear
closely
question
presented
case
ralph
howard
blakely
convicted
kidnapping
firearm
class
felony
washington
law
blakely
overall
statutory
maximum
class
felony
ten
years
state
sentencing
reform
act
reform
act
added
important
qualification
facts
beyond
reflected
jury
verdict
found
trial
judge
defendant
receive
sentence
standard
range
months
reform
act
permitted
require
judge
exceed
standard
range
found
compelling
reasons
justifying
exceptional
sentence
ibid
quoting
rev
code
ann
reform
act
set
nonexhaustive
list
aggravating
facts
sentence
elevation
based
also
clarified
fact
taken
account
fixing
standard
range
fact
found
jury
circumstances
count
determination
whether
impose
exceptional
sentence
blakely
sentenced
months
imprisonment
three
years
standard
range
based
trial
judge
finding
acted
deliberate
cruelty
applying
rule
apprendi
held
blakely
sentence
unconstitutional
state
blakely
endeavored
distinguish
apprendi
ground
nder
washington
guidelines
exceptional
sentence
within
discretion
result
guilty
verdict
brief
respondent
blakely
washington
rejected
argument
judge
sentenced
blakely
standard
range
without
finding
additional
fact
deliberate
cruelty
consequently
fact
subject
sixth
amendment
guarantee
matter
explained
blakely
sentence
though
outside
standard
range
within
maximum
class
felonies
precedents
make
clear
maximum
apprendi
purposes
maximum
sentence
judge
may
impose
solely
basis
facts
reflected
jury
verdict
admitted
defendant
words
relevant
maximum
maximum
sentence
judge
may
impose
finding
additional
facts
maximum
may
impose
without
additional
findings
judge
inflicts
punishment
jury
verdict
alone
allow
jury
found
facts
law
makes
essential
punishment
judge
exceeds
proper
authority
emphasis
original
quoting
bishop
criminal
procedure
ed
judge
blakely
case
imposed
sentence
outside
standard
range
without
finding
additional
fact
top
range
months
years
relevant
statutory
maximum
state
additionally
argued
blakely
apprendi
rule
satisfied
washington
reform
act
specify
exclusive
catalog
potential
facts
judge
might
base
departure
standard
range
rejected
argument
well
whether
judge
authority
impose
enhanced
sentence
depends
finding
specified
fact
one
several
specified
facts
aggravating
fact
observed
remains
case
jury
verdict
alone
authorize
sentence
emphasis
original
held
irrelevant
reform
act
ultimately
left
decision
whether
depart
judge
discretion
whether
judicially
determined
facts
require
sentence
enhancement
merely
allow
noted
verdict
alone
authorize
sentence
emphasis
original
freddie
booker
convicted
possession
intent
distribute
crack
cocaine
sentenced
federal
sentencing
guidelines
facts
found
booker
jury
yielded
base
guidelines
range
months
imprisonment
range
judge
exceed
without
undertaking
additional
factfinding
booker
judge
finding
preponderance
evidence
booker
possessed
amount
drugs
excess
amount
determined
jury
verdict
finding
boosted
booker
higher
guidelines
range
booker
sentenced
bottom
higher
range
months
prison
opinion
written
justice
stevens
majority
held
booker
sentence
impermissible
sixth
amendment
majority
judgment
distinction
constitutional
significance
federal
sentencing
guidelines
washington
procedures
issue
blakely
systems
mandatory
impose
binding
requirements
sentencing
judges
justice
stevens
opinion
bears
emphasis
next
expressed
view
disagreement
among
justices
acknowledged
federal
guidelines
implicate
sixth
amendment
advisory
guidelines
currently
written
read
merely
advisory
provisions
recommended
rather
required
selection
particular
sentences
response
differing
sets
facts
use
implicate
sixth
amendment
never
doubted
authority
judge
exercise
broad
discretion
imposing
sentence
within
statutory
range
indeed
everyone
agrees
constitutional
issues
presented
case
avoided
entirely
congress
omitted
federal
sentencing
reform
act
provisions
make
guidelines
binding
district
judges
trial
judge
exercises
discretion
select
specific
sentence
within
defined
range
defendant
right
jury
determination
facts
judge
deems
relevant
guidelines
written
however
advisory
mandatory
binding
judges
ibid
citations
omitted
opinion
written
justice
breyer
also
garnering
majority
faced
remedial
question
turned
assessment
legislative
intent
alteration
congress
intended
known
guidelines
vulnerable
sixth
amendment
challenge
three
choices
apparent
invalidate
entirety
sentencing
reform
act
sra
law
comprehensively
delineating
federal
sentencing
system
preserve
sra
mandatory
guidelines
regime
sra
established
attaching
requirement
fact
increasing
defendant
base
guidelines
range
finally
render
guidelines
advisory
severing
two
provisions
sra
ed
supp
iv
recognizing
reasonable
minds
differ
remedial
question
majority
concluded
advisory
guidelines
solution
came
closest
congressional
mark
system
described
justice
breyer
opinion
booker
judges
longer
tied
sentencing
range
indicated
guidelines
obliged
take
account
range
along
sentencing
goals
congress
enumerated
sra
severed
provision
sra
governing
appellate
review
sentences
mandatory
guidelines
scheme
see
supra
installed
consistent
act
sound
administration
justice
reasonableness
standard
review
without
attempting
elaborate
discussion
standard
justice
breyer
remedial
opinion
observed
section
remains
effect
sets
forth
numerous
factors
guide
sentencing
factors
turn
guide
appellate
courts
past
determining
whether
sentence
reasonable
emphasized
provisional
character
booker
remedy
recognizing
authority
speak
last
word
resides
congress
said
ball
lies
congress
national
legislature
equipped
devise
install
long
term
sentencing
system
compatible
constitution
congress
judges
best
federal
system
justice
turn
instant
case
light
parts
booker
opinion
earlier
decisions
point
iii
california
dsl
upper
term
sentence
may
imposed
trial
judge
finds
aggravating
circumstance
see
supra
element
charged
offense
essential
jury
determination
guilt
admitted
defendant
guilty
plea
qualify
circumstance
see
supra
instead
aggravating
circumstances
depend
facts
found
discretely
solely
judge
accord
blakely
therefore
middle
term
prescribed
california
statutes
upper
term
relevant
statutory
maximum
maximum
apprendi
purposes
maximum
sentence
judge
may
impose
solely
basis
facts
reflected
jury
verdict
admitted
defendant
emphasis
original
circumstances
aggravation
found
judge
jury
need
established
preponderance
evidence
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
supra
dsl
violates
apprendi
rule
except
prior
conviction
fact
increases
penalty
crime
beyond
prescribed
statutory
maximum
must
submitted
jury
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
hat
end
matter
blakely
people
black
california
held
otherwise
view
dsl
survived
examination
precedent
intact
see
cal
black
acknowledged
california
system
appears
surface
inspection
tension
rule
apprendi
operation
effect
said
dsl
simply
authorize
sentencing
engage
type
factfinding
traditionally
incident
judge
selection
appropriate
sentence
within
statutorily
prescribed
sentencing
range
cal
therefore
concluded
upper
term
maximum
trial
imposition
upper
term
sentence
violate
defendant
right
jury
trial
principles
set
forth
apprendi
blakely
booker
ibid
see
kennard
concurring
dissenting
nothing
high
majority
opinions
apprendi
blakely
booker
suggests
constitutionality
state
sentencing
scheme
turns
whether
words
majority
involves
type
factfinding
traditionally
performed
judge
quoting
black
conclusion
upper
term
middle
term
qualifies
relevant
statutory
maximum
rested
several
considerations
first
reasoned
given
ample
discretion
afforded
trial
judges
identify
aggravating
facts
warranting
upper
term
sentence
dsl
represent
legislative
effort
shift
proof
particular
facts
elements
crime
proved
jury
sentencing
factors
decided
judge
instead
afforded
sentencing
judge
discretion
decide
guidance
rules
statutes
whether
facts
case
history
defendant
justify
higher
sentence
system
diminish
traditional
power
jury
omitted
cautioned
blakely
however
broad
discretion
decide
facts
may
support
enhanced
sentence
determine
whether
enhanced
sentence
warranted
particular
case
shield
sentencing
system
force
decisions
jury
verdict
alone
authorize
sentence
instead
judge
must
find
additional
fact
impose
longer
term
sixth
amendment
requirement
satisfied
blakely
black
also
urged
dsl
cause
concern
reduced
penalties
crimes
prior
indeterminate
sentencing
regime
cal
see
kennard
concurring
dissenting
aspect
sentencing
law
differ
significantly
washington
sentencing
scheme
high
invalidated
blakely
supra
furthermore
california
system
unfair
defendants
reasonably
expect
guarantee
upper
term
imposed
given
judges
broad
discretion
impose
upper
term
sentence
keep
punishment
middle
term
cal
black
additionally
noted
dsl
requires
statutory
enhancements
distinguished
aggravators
use
firearm
dangerous
weapon
infliction
great
bodily
injury
penal
code
west
supp
charged
indictment
proved
jury
beyond
reasonable
doubt
cal
black
examination
dsl
short
satisfied
california
sentencing
system
implicate
significantly
concerns
underlying
sixth
amendment
guarantee
decisions
however
leave
room
examination
asking
whether
defendant
basic
right
preserved
though
facts
essential
punishment
reserved
determination
judge
said
inquiry
apprendi
rule
designed
exclude
see
blakely
see
black
cal
stating
remarkably
high
precedents
draw
bright
line
ultimately
black
relied
equation
california
dsl
system
federal
system
level
discretion
available
california
judge
selecting
three
available
terms
impose
said
appears
comparable
level
discretion
high
chosen
permit
federal
judges
sentencing
cal
equation
drives
justice
alito
dissent
see
post
california
sentencing
law
indistinguishable
constitutionally
significant
respect
advisory
guidelines
scheme
approved
booker
attempted
comparison
unavailing
earlier
explained
see
supra
booker
held
federal
sentencing
guidelines
incompatible
sixth
amendment
guidelines
mandatory
imposed
binding
requirements
sentencing
judges
erely
advisory
provisions
recommending
requiring
selection
particular
sentences
response
differing
sets
facts
members
agreed
implicate
sixth
amendment
ibid
remedy
constitutional
infirmity
found
booker
majority
excised
provisions
rendered
system
mandatory
leaving
guidelines
place
advisory
see
also
supra
california
dsl
resemble
advisory
system
booker
view
california
system
judges
free
exercise
discretion
select
specific
sentence
within
defined
range
booker
california
legislature
adopted
sentencing
triads
three
fixed
sentences
ranges
cunningham
sentencing
judge
discretion
select
sentence
within
range
years
instruction
select
years
nothing
less
nothing
unless
found
facts
allowing
imposition
sentence
years
factfinding
elevate
sentence
years
decisions
make
plain
falls
within
province
jury
employing
standard
bailiwick
judge
determining
preponderance
evidence
lies
nevertheless
black
attempted
rescue
dsl
judicial
factfinding
authority
typing
simply
reasonableness
constraint
equivalent
constraint
operative
federal
system
see
cal
aggravating
factor
california
law
may
include
factor
judge
reasonably
deems
relevant
dsl
requirement
upper
term
sentence
imposed
aggravating
factor
exists
comparable
booker
requirement
federal
judge
sentencing
decision
reasonableness
however
black
touchstone
sixth
amendment
analysis
reasonableness
requirement
booker
anticipated
federal
system
operates
within
sixth
amendment
constraints
delineated
precedent
substitute
constraints
dsl
allocates
judges
sole
authority
find
facts
permitting
imposition
upper
term
sentence
system
violates
sixth
amendment
comforting
beside
point
california
system
requires
dsl
sentences
reasonable
booker
remedy
federal
guidelines
short
recipe
rendering
sixth
amendment
case
law
summarize
contrary
black
holding
decisions
apprendi
booker
point
middle
term
specified
california
statutes
upper
term
relevant
statutory
maximum
dsl
authorizes
judge
jury
find
facts
permitting
upper
term
sentence
system
withstand
measurement
sixth
amendment
iv
adjustment
california
sentencing
system
light
decision
ball
lies
california
booker
cf
supra
note
several
modified
systems
wake
apprendi
blakely
retain
determinate
sentencing
done
calling
upon
jury
either
trial
separate
sentencing
proceeding
find
fact
necessary
imposition
elevated
earlier
noted
california
already
employs
juries
manner
determine
statutory
sentencing
enhancements
see
supra
chosen
permit
judges
genuinely
exercise
broad
discretion
within
statutory
range
everyone
agrees
encounters
sixth
amendment
shoal
booker
california
may
follow
paths
taken
sister
otherwise
alter
system
long
state
observes
sixth
amendment
limitations
declared
decisions
reasons
stated
judgment
california
appeal
reversed
part
case
remanded
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
john
cunningham
petitioner
california
writ
certiorari
appeal
california
first
appellate
district
january
justice
kennedy
justice
breyer
joins
dissenting
dissenting
opinion
justice
alito
join
full
well
explains
continues
wrong
unfortunate
direction
cases
following
apprendi
new
jersey
see
booker
breyer
dissenting
part
blakely
washington
dissenting
kennedy
dissenting
see
also
apprendi
supra
dissenting
jones
kennedy
dissenting
discussion
dissenting
opinion
fully
sufficient
show
respectful
view
analysis
holding
mistaken
seem
appropriate
add
brief
comment
view
apprendi
line
cases
remains
incorrect
yet
may
principled
rationale
permitting
cases
control
within
central
sphere
concern
reducing
collateral
widespread
harm
criminal
justice
system
corrections
process
resulting
wooden
unyielding
insistence
expanding
apprendi
doctrine
far
beyond
necessary
boundaries
distinguish
sentencing
enhancements
based
nature
offense
apprendi
principle
apply
sentencing
enhancements
based
nature
offender
california
attempted
make
initial
distinction
compare
cal
rule
criminal
cases
west
listing
aggravating
acts
relating
crime
rule
listing
aggravating
acts
relating
defendant
foreclose
efforts
california
notes
experimented
earlier
indeterminate
sentencing
system
ante
state
reposed
vast
power
discretion
nonjudicial
agency
set
release
date
convicted
felons
system
seems
untouched
apprendi
state
sought
reform
system
might
chosen
give
judges
authority
sentence
maximum
depart
downward
unexplained
reasons
considerable
irony
untouched
apprendi
instead
california
sought
use
system
based
guided
discretion
apprendi
holds
today
forecloses
option
dissenting
opinions
suggested
constitution
interpreted
strike
aspects
sentencing
systems
grant
judicial
discretion
legislative
direction
control
judges
legislators
must
capacity
develop
consistent
standards
standards
individual
juries
empaneled
short
time
elaborate
permanent
way
see
blakely
opinion
opinion
kennedy
explaining
entencing
guidelines
prime
example
collaborative
process
courts
legislatures
judges
sentencing
officials
broad
view
commitment
correctional
systems
juries
judicial
officers
corrections
professionals
guidance
control
legislature
encouraged
participate
ongoing
manner
improve
various
sentencing
schemes
country
system
guided
discretion
permitted
large
extent
confined
apprendi
rule
sentencing
enhancements
based
nature
offense
include
example
fact
weapon
used
violence
employed
stated
amount
drugs
contraband
involved
crime
motivated
victim
race
gender
status
protected
statute
juries
consider
matters
without
serious
disruption
factors
often
part
statutory
definition
aggravated
crime
event
evidence
support
enhancements
likely
central
part
prosecution
case
hand
judicial
determination
appropriate
regard
factors
exhibited
defendant
include
example
prior
convictions
cooperation
noncooperation
law
enforcement
remorse
lack
aspects
defendant
history
bearing
upon
background
contribution
community
even
relevant
facts
found
judge
preponderance
evidence
facts
taken
account
sentencing
little
significance
whether
defendant
committed
crime
see
berman
bibas
making
sentencing
sensible
ohio
crim
line
offense
offender
always
clear
instances
nature
offense
defined
manner
ensures
problem
categories
difficult
apprendi
suffers
similar
problem
facts
must
considered
jury
considerations
judge
take
account
main
part
apprendi
holding
retained
far
less
systemic
disruption
regretted
decision
today
appears
foreclose
consideration
approach
reasonable
efforts
develop
systems
guided
discretion
within
general
constraint
apprendi
imposes
john
cunningham
petitioner
california
writ
certiorari
appeal
california
first
appellate
district
january
justice
alito
justice
kennedy
justice
breyer
join
dissenting
california
sentencing
law
strikes
today
indistinguishable
constitutionally
significant
respect
advisory
guidelines
scheme
approved
booker
sentencing
schemes
grant
trial
judges
considerable
discretion
sentencing
subject
exercise
discretion
appellate
review
reasonableness
california
law
explicitly
federal
scheme
implicitly
require
sentencing
judge
find
factor
justify
sentence
minimum
imposed
based
solely
jury
verdict
held
unequivocally
federal
sentencing
system
satisfies
requirements
sixth
amendment
true
regard
california
system
therefore
respectfully
dissent
apprendi
new
jersey
cases
followed
wake
held
certain
circumstances
criminal
defendant
possesses
sixth
amendment
right
jury
find
facts
result
increased
sentence
however
never
suggested
factual
findings
affect
defendant
sentence
must
made
jury
contrary
apprendi
later
cases
consistently
stated
trial
makes
fully
discretionary
sentencing
decision
sentencing
decision
reform
act
federal
sentencing
system
sixth
amendment
permits
base
sentence
factual
findings
see
blakely
washington
booker
supra
see
also
harris
applying
rule
booker
unanimously
agreed
judicial
factfinding
purely
advisory
guidelines
system
likewise
comport
sixth
amendment
writing
five
justices
struck
mandatory
federal
sentencing
guidelines
system
justice
stevens
stated
guidelines
currently
written
read
merely
advisory
provisions
recommended
rather
required
selection
particular
sentences
response
differing
sets
facts
use
implicate
sixth
amendment
never
doubted
authority
judge
exercise
broad
discretion
imposing
sentence
within
statutory
range
trial
judge
exercises
discretion
select
specific
sentence
within
defined
range
defendant
right
jury
determination
facts
judge
deems
relevant
booker
supra
similar
vein
remedial
portion
opinion
booker
written
justice
breyer
held
sixth
amendment
permits
system
advisory
guidelines
reasonableness
justice
breyer
opinion
avoided
blanket
invalidation
guidelines
excising
provision
sentencing
reform
act
supp
iv
required
sentencing
judge
impose
sentence
within
applicable
guidelines
range
see
booker
justice
breyer
explained
existence
necessary
condition
constitutional
violation
say
without
provision
statute
falls
outside
scope
apprendi
requirement
ibid
federal
sentencing
system
district
courts
bound
apply
guidelines
must
consult
guidelines
take
account
sentencing
addition
sentencing
courts
must
take
account
general
sentencing
goals
set
forth
congress
including
avoiding
unwarranted
sentencing
disparities
providing
restitution
victims
reflecting
seriousness
offense
promoting
respect
law
providing
punishment
affording
adequate
deterrence
protecting
public
effectively
providing
defendant
needed
educational
vocational
training
medical
care
see
citing
ed
supp
iv
significant
booker
rendering
guidelines
advisory
reinstitute
federal
sentencing
system
doctrine
bar
red
review
exercise
sentencing
discretion
within
broad
sentencing
ranges
imposed
criminal
statutes
dorszynski
rather
booker
conditioned
district
sentencing
discretion
appellate
review
reasonableness
light
guidelines
factors
see
booker
supra
section
remains
effect
sets
forth
numerous
factors
guide
sentencing
factors
turn
guide
appellate
courts
past
determining
whether
sentence
unreasonable
although
booker
spell
detail
sentencing
judges
proceed
new
advisory
guidelines
regime
seems
clear
regime
permits
indeed
requires
sentencing
judges
make
factual
findings
base
sentences
findings
federal
criminal
statutes
generally
set
wide
sentencing
ranges
thus
case
sentencing
judge
must
use
criteria
selecting
sentence
imposed
federal
judges
generally
made
relied
upon
factual
determinations
nature
offense
offender
impossible
imagine
federal
judges
reasonably
carry
sentencing
responsibilities
without
making
factual
determinations
mandatory
federal
sentencing
guidelines
regime
factual
determinations
relatively
formal
precise
example
trial
judge
regime
might
found
based
proceeding
drug
offense
involved
six
kilograms
cocaine
loss
caused
mail
fraud
offense
million
contrast
reform
act
federal
system
factual
determinations
often
relatively
informal
imprecise
trial
judge
might
concluded
presentence
report
offense
involved
large
quantity
drugs
mail
fraud
scheme
caused
great
loss
systems
however
judges
made
factual
determinations
nature
offense
offender
determined
sentence
accordingly
courts
appeals
unanimously
concluded
federal
sentencing
regime
also
permits
trial
judges
make
factual
findings
rely
findings
selecting
sentences
appropriate
particular
system
defendant
believes
sentence
based
erroneous
factual
determination
seems
clear
defendant
may
challenge
finding
appeal
noted
system
permits
defendant
obtain
appellate
review
reasonableness
sentence
sentence
sentencing
justifies
solely
basis
erroneous
finding
fact
hardly
regarded
reasonable
thus
system
cases
likelihood
good
many
cases
question
whether
defendant
required
serve
greater
lesser
sentence
depends
whether
appeals
sustains
finding
fact
made
sentencing
judge
simple
example
illustrates
point
suppose
defendant
found
guilty
counts
mail
fraud
defendant
made
mailings
furtherance
scheme
defraud
see
supp
iv
mail
fraud
statute
district
discretion
sentence
defendant
sentence
ranging
probation
years
imprisonment
years
count
suppose
sentencing
judge
imposes
maximum
sentence
allowed
statute
years
imprisonment
without
identifying
single
fact
offense
offender
justification
lengthy
sentence
surely
unreasonable
sentence
sustained
appeal
suppose
alternatively
sentencing
finds
mail
fraud
scheme
caused
loss
million
victims
elderly
people
limited
means
suppose
based
findings
imposes
sentence
years
imprisonment
defendant
challenges
sentence
appeal
ground
findings
erroneous
question
whether
defendant
required
serve
years
lesser
sentence
may
well
depend
validity
district
findings
fact
booker
approved
sentencing
system
requires
sentencing
judge
consult
take
account
legislatively
defined
sentencing
factors
guidelines
subjects
sentencing
judge
exercise
sentencing
discretion
appellate
review
reasonableness
requires
sentencing
judges
make
factual
findings
order
support
exercise
discretion
ii
california
sentencing
law
strikes
today
meaningfully
different
federal
scheme
upheld
booker
initial
matter
california
law
gives
judge
least
much
sentencing
discretion
federal
scheme
california
system
sentencing
triads
separate
enhancements
enacted
achieve
sentences
proportion
seriousness
offense
determined
legislature
imposed
specified
discretion
cal
penal
code
ann
west
supp
specified
discretion
quite
broad
statute
sentencing
shall
order
imposition
middle
term
triad
unless
circumstances
aggravation
mitigation
crime
may
rely
fact
essential
element
crime
proven
enhancement
sentencing
judge
retains
considerable
discretion
identify
aggravating
factors
people
black
cal
exercising
sentencing
discretion
california
look
specific
aggravating
circumstances
see
cal
rule
criminal
cases
west
specific
mitigating
circumstances
see
rule
itemized
california
rules
california
trial
also
consider
eneral
objectives
sentencing
including
protecting
society
punishing
defendant
encouraging
defendant
lead
life
deterring
defendant
committing
future
offenses
deterring
others
criminal
conduct
demonstrating
consequences
preventing
defendant
committing
new
crimes
means
incarceration
securing
restitution
crime
victims
achieving
uniformity
rule
california
trial
finds
sentencing
authority
unduly
restricted
factors
california
recognized
largely
articulation
considerations
sentencing
judges
always
used
making
decisions
people
hernandez
cal
bank
overruled
grounds
people
king
cal
banc
california
sentencing
judge
also
authorized
consider
additional
criteria
reasonably
related
decision
made
rule
see
also
black
supra
legislature
identify
particular
facts
justify
upper
term
short
california
law
sentencing
judge
may
look
aggravation
mitigation
crime
include
everything
legitimate
bearing
matter
issue
people
guevara
cal
app
cal
rptr
see
also
rule
sentencing
judge
guided
statutory
statements
policy
criteria
rules
facts
circumstances
case
indeed
one
california
explained
sentencing
discretion
may
even
guided
judge
subjective
determination
appropriate
aggregate
sentence
based
experiences
prior
cases
record
defendant
case
people
stevens
cal
app
cal
rptr
judge
subjective
belief
regarding
length
sentence
imposed
improper
long
channeled
guided
discretion
outlined
myriad
statutory
sentencing
criteria
ibid
california
scheme
like
federal
advisory
guidelines
require
discretion
exercised
reasonably
indeed
california
authoritatively
construing
california
explained
requirement
aggravating
factor
exist
merely
requirement
decision
impose
upper
term
reasonable
black
cal
emphasis
original
see
also
jury
verdict
guilty
offense
authorizes
judge
sentence
defendant
three
terms
specified
statute
potential
punishments
offense
long
judge
exercises
discretion
reasonable
manner
consistent
requirements
guidelines
contained
statutes
rules
even
imposes
presumptive
middle
term
decision
reviewable
abuse
discretion
decision
sentence
standard
term
must
reasonable
see
people
cattaneo
cal
app
cal
rptr
moreover
california
system
like
federal
regime
recognizes
sentencing
judge
must
ability
look
relevant
facts
even
outside
trial
record
jury
verdict
exercising
discretion
judicial
factfinding
occurs
selection
process
type
judicial
factfinding
traditionally
part
sentencing
process
black
supra
iii
despite
similarities
california
system
advisory
guidelines
scheme
approved
booker
nevertheless
holds
california
regime
runs
afoul
sixth
amendment
reasons
follows
california
requires
aggravating
fact
apart
elements
offense
found
jury
must
support
upper
term
sentence
blakely
defined
statutory
maximum
maximum
sentence
judge
may
impose
solely
basis
facts
reflected
jury
verdict
admitted
defendant
emphasis
original
therefore
california
regime
violates
apprendi
rule
fact
increases
penalty
crime
beyond
prescribed
statutory
maximum
must
submitted
jury
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
apprendi
argument
flawed
one
thing
clear
california
must
find
adjudicative
fact
opposed
identifying
relevant
policy
consideration
imposing
upper
term
sentence
california
sentencing
must
find
circumstanc
aggravation
cal
penal
code
ann
emphasis
added
california
rules
make
clear
include
criteria
reasonably
related
decision
made
rule
california
courts
thus
empowered
take
account
full
panoply
factual
policy
considerations
traditionally
considered
judges
operating
fully
discretionary
sentencing
regimes
constitutionality
repeatedly
reaffirmed
california
law
explicitly
authorizes
sentencing
take
account
example
broad
sentencing
objectives
like
punishment
deterrence
restitution
uniformity
see
rule
even
judge
subjective
belief
appropriateness
sentence
see
stevens
supra
cal
long
final
result
policy
considerations
like
always
outside
province
jury
implicate
sixth
amendment
concerns
expressed
apprendi
short
requirement
california
find
circumstanc
aggravation
imposing
upper
term
sentence
requirement
find
aggravating
fact
california
sentencing
need
find
fact
beyond
reflected
jury
verdict
admitted
defendant
blakely
supra
emphasis
deleted
apprendi
rule
plainly
even
california
law
require
sentencing
find
aggravating
fact
imposing
upper
term
sentence
make
case
constitutionally
distinguishable
booker
previously
explained
advisory
guidelines
bounded
reasonableness
review
effectively
albeit
less
explicitly
impose
requirement
federal
judges
booker
reasonableness
review
necessarily
supposes
sentences
unreasonable
absence
additional
facts
justifying
recall
prior
hypothetical
case
posited
district
imposed
sentence
years
imprisonment
mail
fraud
without
citing
single
aggravating
fact
offense
offender
thus
although
guidelines
labeled
advisory
reasonableness
review
imposes
real
constraint
judge
ability
sentence
across
full
statutory
range
without
finding
aggravating
downplays
significance
booker
reasonableness
review
ground
reasonableness
operates
within
sixth
amendment
constraints
delineated
precedent
substitute
constraints
ante
emphasis
original
begs
question
concerns
scope
sixth
amendment
constraints
question
answered
remedial
holding
booker
necessarily
stands
proposition
consistent
sixth
amendment
imposition
enhanced
sentence
conditioned
factual
finding
made
sentencing
judge
jury
relies
heavily
blakely
admonition
maximum
apprendi
purposes
maximum
sentence
judge
may
impose
solely
basis
facts
reflected
jury
verdict
admitted
defendant
emphasis
original
fails
recognize
statement
must
understood
wake
booker
statutory
offense
must
sentence
represents
least
onerous
sentence
regarded
reasonable
light
bare
statutory
elements
found
jury
return
prior
example
mail
fraud
offense
must
sentence
represents
least
onerous
sentence
appropriate
case
statutory
elements
mail
fraud
satisfied
offense
offender
little
deserving
punishment
imagined
whether
sentence
statutory
minimum
probation
see
supp
iv
minimum
advisory
guidelines
also
probation
see
sentencing
commission
guidelines
manual
sentencing
table
irrelevant
present
purposes
relevant
must
minimum
reasonable
sentence
sentence
maximum
sentence
reasonably
imposed
solely
basis
facts
reflected
jury
verdict
admitted
defendant
blakely
supra
emphasis
deleted
booker
reasonableness
review
necessarily
anticipates
imposition
sentences
level
may
conditioned
upon
findings
fact
made
judge
jury
booker
held
system
advisory
guidelines
reasonableness
review
consistent
sixth
amendment
analysis
govern
california
requirement
decision
impose
upper
term
reasonable
black
cal
emphasis
original
california
requirement
explicit
federal
aggravating
factor
requirement
least
implicit
constitutionally
dispositive
unless
prepared
overrule
remedial
decision
booker
california
sentencing
scheme
issue
case
held
consistent
sixth
amendment
therefore
affirm
decision
california
appeal
footnotes
particular
vulnerability
victim
listed
cal
rule
criminal
cases
west
hereinafter
rule
fact
relating
crime
violent
conduct
indicating
serious
danger
society
listed
rule
fact
relating
defendant
addition
sixth
amendment
challenge
cunningham
disputed
substance
five
six
findings
made
trial
judge
appellate
panel
affirmed
trial
judge
vulnerable
victim
violent
conduct
findings
rejected
finding
cunningham
abused
position
trust
finding
overlapped
vulnerable
victim
finding
panel
decide
whether
judge
findings
warranted
concluding
properly
relied
least
two
aggravating
facts
imposing
upper
term
reasonably
probable
different
sentence
imposed
absent
improper
findings
app
may
order
modifying
opinion
denying
rehearing
murder
certain
grave
offenses
still
carry
lengthy
indeterminate
terms
possibility
early
release
parole
brief
respondent
see
penal
code
west
supp
judicial
council
includes
chief
justice
another
justice
california
three
judges
sitting
courts
appeal
ten
judges
superior
courts
nonvoting
members
cal
art
west
supp
california
constitution
grants
council
authority
inter
alia
adopt
rules
administration
practice
procedure
perform
functions
prescribed
statute
art
rules
amended
january
amendments
made
technical
changes
none
material
constitutional
question
us
refer
opinion
prior
text
rules
upon
parties
principal
authorities
rely
judge
must
provide
statement
reasons
sentence
lower
upper
term
sentence
imposed
rules
rule
fact
crime
involved
great
violence
great
bodily
harm
threat
great
bodily
harm
acts
disclosing
high
degree
cruelty
viciousness
rule
fact
defendant
engaged
violent
conduct
indicates
serious
danger
see
also
rule
selection
upper
term
justified
consideration
relevant
facts
circumstances
aggravation
outweigh
circumstances
mitigation
emphasis
added
rule
must
provide
concise
statement
ultimate
facts
deemed
constitute
circumstances
aggravation
mitigation
emphasis
added
california
dsl
note
context
resembles
federal
sentencing
ways
washington
sentencing
system
key
california
penal
code
provision
sentencing
shall
order
imposition
middle
term
absent
circumstances
aggravation
mitigation
crime
emphasis
added
move
upper
lower
term
must
justified
concise
statement
ultimate
facts
departure
rests
rule
emphasis
added
see
post
alito
dissenting
characterizing
california
dsl
indistinguishable
sentencing
title
mandated
imposition
guidelines
sentence
unless
district
found
aggravating
mitigating
circumstance
kind
degree
adequately
taken
consideration
sentencing
commission
formulating
guidelines
section
directed
appeals
determine
inter
alia
whether
district
correctly
applied
guidelines
sentence
imposed
fell
outside
applicable
guidelines
range
whether
sentencing
judge
provided
written
statement
reasons
whether
facts
case
warranted
departure
whether
degree
departure
reasonable
section
instructs
sentencing
judges
consider
nature
circumstances
offense
history
characteristics
defendant
kinds
sentences
available
guidelines
policy
statements
issued
sentencing
commission
avoidance
unwarranted
sentencing
disparities
need
provide
restitution
also
listed
concerns
judge
respond
enumeration
calls
imposition
sentence
sufficient
greater
necessary
reflect
seriousness
offense
promote
respect
law
provide
punishment
offense
afford
adequate
deterrence
criminal
conduct
protect
public
crimes
defendant
provide
defendant
needed
educational
vocational
training
medical
care
correctional
treatment
effective
manner
case
call
elaboration
reasonableness
check
federal
sentencing
note
granted
review
two
cases
raising
questions
trained
matter
claiborne
cert
granted
rita
cert
granted
claiborne
consider
whether
consistent
advisory
cast
guidelines
system
require
extraordinary
circumstances
attend
sentence
varying
substantially
guidelines
rita
includes
question
whether
consistent
booker
accord
presumption
reasonableness
sentence
regard
note
justice
alito
view
california
dsl
essentially
federal
sentencing
post
maintain
position
dissent
previews
without
benefit
briefing
argument
reasonableness
review
works
post
neither
necessary
proper
join
issue
justice
alito
matter
justice
kennedy
urges
distinction
facts
concerning
offense
apprendi
apply
facts
concerning
offender
post
dissenting
opinion
apprendi
however
leaves
room
bifurcated
approach
justice
kennedy
proposes
see
ny
fact
increases
penalty
crime
beyond
prescribed
statutory
maximum
must
submitted
jury
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
emphasis
added
justice
alito
however
opinion
reads
remedial
portion
opinion
booker
override
blakely
render
academic
entire
first
part
booker
post
majority
booker
revision
blakely
essayed
dissent
grounded
notion
federal
reasonableness
review
operates
practice
justice
alito
necessarily
anticipates
question
aired
later
term
rita
claiborne
see
supra
forecast
responses
cases
affirm
continuing
vitality
prior
decisions
point
respondent
amici
argue
whatever
makes
california
sentencing
law
black
construction
law
consistent
sixth
amendment
authoritative
brief
respondent
brief
hawaii
et
al
amici
curiae
disagree
black
modify
california
law
align
sixth
amendment
precedent
see
cal
kennard
concurring
dissenting
rather
construed
decisions
endeavor
render
consistent
california
law
black
interpretation
federal
constitutional
law
plainly
qualify
deference
altered
systems
alaska
arizona
kansas
minnesota
north
carolina
oregon
washington
alaska
stat
rev
stat
ann
west
supp
stat
ann
supp
stat
subd
supp
stat
ann
lexis
sess
laws
ch
rev
code
colorado
adopted
approach
interim
solution
lopez
people
en
banc
see
also
stemen
wilhelm
finding
jury
state
legislative
responses
blakely
washington
fed
sentencing
rptr
majority
affected
retained
determinate
sentencing
systems
see
ind
code
ann
west
code
ann
footnotes
recognition
hardly
surprising
since
judge
mcconnell
pointed
fully
discretionary
sentencing
system
place
sixth
amendment
adopted
prevailed
federal
courts
founding
enactment
sentencing
reform
act
without
anyone
ever
suggesting
conflict
sixth
amendment
mcconnell
booker
mess
denver
rev
indeed
original
federal
criminal
statute
enacted
first
congress
set
forth
indeterminate
sentencing
ranges
variety
offenses
leaving
determination
precise
sentence
judge
discretion
see
act
apr
ch
stat
crime
misprision
treason
punishable
imprisonment
exceeding
seven
years
fine
exceeding
crime
misprision
felony
punishable
imprisonment
exceeding
three
years
fine
exceeding
crime
falsifying
federal
records
punishable
imprisonment
exceeding
seven
years
fine
exceeding
whipping
exceeding
stripes
see
generally
little
chen
lost
history
apprendi
blakely
petition
rehearing
fed
sentencing
four
justices
upheld
constitutionality
mandatory
federal
sentencing
guidelines
system
course
disagree
basic
point
indeed
view
istory
support
jury
trial
respect
sentencing
facts
booker
breyer
dissenting
part
dissenters
remedial
portion
opinion
disagreed
justice
breyer
severablity
analysis
suggest
resulting
advisory
guidelines
structure
unconstitutional
rather
recognized
justice
stevens
explained
portion
opinion
guidelines
currently
written
read
merely
advisory
provisions
recommended
rather
required
selection
particular
sentences
response
differing
sets
facts
use
implicate
sixth
amendment
every
appeals
address
issue
held
district
sentencing
may
rely
facts
found
judge
preponderance
evidence
see
kilby
cooper
vaughn
morris
price
magallanez
pirani
en
banc
yagar
mares
duncan
antonakopoulos
enhancements
add
additional
years
onto
term
selected
see
ante
must
pleaded
proved
jury
beyond
reasonable
doubt
issue
case
factors
similar
federal
sentencing
policies
set
forth
ed
supp
iv
directs
consider
among
things
need
promote
respect
law
provide
punishment
offense
afford
adequate
deterrence
criminal
conduct
protect
public
california
explained
black
adopting
sentencing
rules
judicial
council
considered
rejected
proposals
rules
provide
exclusive
list
sentencing
criteria
criteria
assigned
specific
weights
ground
legislature
intended
give
sentencing
judge
discretion
selecting
among
lower
middle
upper
terms
report
judicial
council
acted
adopting
rules
explains
exclusive
listing
inconsistent
statutory
mandate
adopt
rules
providing
criteria
consideration
trial
judge
since
language
purport
limit
discretion
afforded
five
enumerated
sentencing
decisions
calls
criteria
assist
courts
exercise
discretion
judicial
council
advisory
com
sentencing
rules
sentencing
reporting
system
attempt
impose
weighting
system
trial
courts
infringement
sentencing
power
substantive
law
section
give
discretion
trial
rules
guide
compel
exercise
discretion
cal
correctly
notes
need
defer
california
construction
federal
law
including
judgment
whether
california
law
consistent
sixth
amendment
jurisprudence
see
ante
california
exposition
california
law
authoritative
binding
see
mullaney
wilbur
tate
courts
ultimate
expositors
state
law
bound
constructions
except
extreme
circumstances
wainwright
goode
per
curiam
views
state
highest
respect
state
law
binding
federal
courts
ring
arizona
recognizing
arizona
construction
arizona
sentencing
law
authoritative
state
california
acknowledged
brief
rely
essentially
reason
placing
defendant
particular
offense
outside
mean
selecting
term
triad
impose
brief
respondent
california
counsel
acknowledged
oral
argument
concern
deterrence
light
uptick
crime
particular
community
example
circumstance
aggravation
supporting
imposition
upper
term
sentence
california
law
even
though
concern
based
facts
see
tr
oral
arg
true
california
rules
also
itemize
concrete
aggravating
circumstances
label
acts
relating
crime
acts
relating
defendant
see
cal
rules
criminal
cases
west
lists
exhaustive
impair
ability
take
account
general
sentencing
objectives
deciding
whether
sentence
defendant
upper
term
rules
provision
ircumstances
aggravation
mitigation
shall
established
preponderance
evidence
rule
clearly
meant
cover
types
adjudicative
facts
set
forth
rules
immediately
following
nothing
suggest
provision
excludes
consideration
general
sentencing
objectives
conducive
proof
rules
explicitly
recognize
different
categories
sentencing
considerations
mutually
exclusive
see
rule
sentencing
judge
guided
statutory
statements
policy
criteria
rules
facts
circumstances
case
believes
order
reach
conclusion
must
previe
review
works
ante
perhaps
even
prejudge
forthcoming
decisions
rita
claiborne
ante
point
much
modest
need
map
murky
contours
landscape
order
conclude
reasonableness
review
must
mean
something
reasonableness
review
empty
exercise
inevitably
sentences
absent
aggravating
fact
unreasonable
one
need
embrace
presumption
reasonableness
unreasonableness
accept
simple
point
case
see
given
endorsement
reasonableness
review
booker
meaningful
sixth
amendment
difference
california
sentencing
system
advisory
guidelines
sentencing
judge
operating
reasonableness
constraint
must
find
facts
beyond
jury
verdict
order
justify
imposition
least
sentences
high
end
statutory
range