davis
argued
march
decided
june
petitioner
member
navy
initially
waived
rights
remain
silent
counsel
interviewed
naval
investigative
service
agents
connection
murder
sailor
hour
half
interview
said
maybe
talk
lawyer
however
agents
inquired
asking
lawyer
replied
took
short
break
reminded
rights
interview
continued
another
hour
asked
lawyer
present
saying
anything
military
judge
denied
motion
suppress
statements
made
interview
holding
mention
lawyer
interrogation
request
counsel
convicted
murder
ultimately
military
appeals
affirmed
held
knowing
voluntary
waiver
rights
miranda
arizona
law
enforcement
officers
may
continue
questioning
unless
suspect
clearly
requests
attorney
suspect
entitled
assistance
counsel
custodial
interrogation
even
though
constitution
provide
assistance
suspect
invokes
right
time
police
must
immediately
cease
questioning
attorney
present
edwards
arizona
edwards
rule
serves
prophylactic
purpose
preventing
officers
badgering
suspect
waiving
previously
asserted
miranda
rights
applicability
requires
courts
determine
whether
accused
actually
invoked
right
counsel
objective
inquiry
requiring
statement
reasonably
construed
page
ii
expression
desire
attorney
assistance
however
reference
ambiguous
equivocal
reasonable
officer
light
circumstances
understood
suspect
might
invoking
right
counsel
edwards
require
officers
stop
questioning
suspect
extending
edwards
create
requirement
transform
miranda
safeguards
wholly
irrational
obstacles
legitimate
investigative
activity
needlessly
preventing
police
questioning
suspect
absence
attorney
even
suspect
wish
one
present
edwards
rule
provides
bright
line
applied
officers
real
world
investigation
interrogation
without
unduly
hampering
gathering
information
clarity
ease
application
lost
officers
required
cease
questioning
based
ambiguous
equivocal
reference
attorney
since
forced
make
difficult
judgment
calls
suspect
wants
threat
suppression
guess
wrong
often
good
police
practice
officers
clarify
whether
suspect
making
ambiguous
statement
really
wants
attorney
required
ask
clarifying
questions
pp
reason
disturb
conclusion
courts
petitioner
remark
maybe
talk
lawyer
request
counsel
pp
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
scalia
kennedy
thomas
joined
scalia
filed
concurring
opinion
souter
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
blackmun
stevens
ginsburg
joined
davis
justice
delivered
opinion
edwards
arizona
held
law
enforcement
officers
must
immediately
cease
questioning
suspect
clearly
asserted
right
counsel
present
custodial
interrogation
case
decide
law
enforcement
officers
respond
suspect
makes
reference
counsel
insufficiently
clear
invoke
edwards
prohibition
questioning
pool
brought
trouble
river
city
charleston
naval
base
petitioner
member
navy
spent
evening
october
shooting
pool
club
base
another
sailor
keith
shackleford
lost
game
wager
petitioner
shackleford
refused
pay
club
closed
shackleford
beaten
death
pool
cue
loading
dock
behind
commissary
body
found
early
next
morning
investigation
naval
investigative
service
nis
gradually
focused
petitioner
investigative
agents
determined
petitioner
club
evening
absent
without
authorization
duty
station
next
morning
agents
also
davis
learned
privately
owned
pool
cues
removed
club
premises
petitioner
owned
two
cues
one
bloodstain
agents
told
various
people
petitioner
either
admitted
committing
crime
recounted
details
clearly
indicated
involvement
killing
november
petitioner
interviewed
nis
office
required
military
law
agents
advised
petitioner
suspect
killing
required
make
statement
statement
used
trial
entitled
speak
attorney
attorney
present
questioning
see
art
uniform
code
military
justice
ucmj
evid
manual
petitioner
waived
rights
remain
silent
counsel
orally
writing
hour
half
interview
petitioner
said
maybe
talk
lawyer
app
according
uncontradicted
testimony
one
interviewing
agents
interview
proceeded
follows
ade
clear
violate
rights
wants
lawyer
stop
kind
questioning
going
pursue
matter
unless
clarified
asking
lawyer
making
comment
lawyer
said
asking
lawyer
continued
said
want
lawyer
davis
general
petitioner
moved
suppress
statements
made
november
interview
military
judge
denied
motion
holding
mention
lawyer
petitioner
course
interrogation
form
request
counsel
agents
properly
determined
petitioner
indicating
desire
invoking
right
counsel
petitioner
convicted
one
specification
unpremeditated
murder
violation
art
ucmj
sentenced
confinement
life
dishonorable
discharge
forfeiture
pay
allowances
reduction
rank
lowest
pay
grade
convening
authority
approved
findings
sentence
corps
military
review
affirmed
app
pet
cert
military
appeals
granted
discretionary
review
affirmed
recognized
state
federal
courts
developed
three
different
approaches
suspect
ambiguous
equivocal
request
counsel
jurisdictions
held
mention
counsel
however
ambiguous
sufficient
require
questioning
cease
others
attempted
define
threshold
standard
clarity
invoking
right
counsel
held
comments
falling
short
threshold
invoke
right
counsel
jurisdictions
held
interrogation
offense
must
immediately
cease
whenever
suspect
mentions
counsel
allow
interrogators
ask
narrow
questions
designed
clarify
earlier
statement
suspect
desires
respecting
counsel
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
davis
although
twice
previously
noted
varying
approaches
lower
courts
adopted
respect
ambiguous
equivocal
references
counsel
custodial
interrogation
see
connecticut
barrett
smith
illinois
per
curiam
addressed
issue
merits
granted
certiorari
ii
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
attaches
initiation
adversary
criminal
proceedings
see
gouveia
proceedings
initiated
suspect
criminal
investigation
constitutional
right
assistance
counsel
nevertheless
held
miranda
arizona
suspect
subject
custodial
interrogation
right
consult
attorney
counsel
present
questioning
police
must
explain
right
questioning
begins
right
counsel
established
miranda
one
series
recommended
procedural
safeguards
rights
protected
constitution
instead
measures
insure
right
compulsory
protected
michigan
tucker
see
amdt
person
shall
compelled
criminal
case
witness
davis
right
counsel
recognized
miranda
sufficiently
important
suspects
criminal
investigations
held
requir
es
special
protection
knowing
intelligent
waiver
standard
edwards
arizona
see
oregon
bradshaw
plurality
opinion
powell
concurring
judgment
suspect
effectively
waives
right
counsel
receiving
miranda
warnings
law
enforcement
officers
free
question
north
carolina
butler
suspect
requests
counsel
time
interview
subject
questioning
lawyer
davis
made
available
suspect
reinitiates
conversation
edwards
arizona
supra
second
layer
prophylaxis
miranda
right
counsel
mcneil
wisconsin
designed
prevent
police
badgering
defendant
waiving
previously
asserted
miranda
rights
michigan
harvey
end
held
suspect
invoked
right
counsel
questioned
regarding
offense
unless
attorney
actually
present
minnick
mississippi
arizona
roberson
remains
clear
however
prohibition
questioning
like
aspects
miranda
required
fifth
amendment
prohibition
coerced
confessions
instead
justified
reference
prophylactic
purpose
connecticut
barrett
supra
applicability
rigid
prophylactic
rule
edwards
requires
courts
determine
whether
accused
actually
invoked
right
counsel
smith
illinois
supra
emphasis
added
quoting
fare
michael
avoid
difficulties
proof
provide
guidance
officers
conducting
interrogations
objective
inquiry
see
connecticut
barrett
supra
invocation
miranda
right
counsel
requires
minimum
statement
reasonably
construed
expression
desire
assistance
attorney
mcneil
wisconsin
supra
suspect
makes
reference
attorney
ambiguous
equivocal
reasonable
officer
light
circumstances
understood
suspect
might
invoking
right
counsel
precedents
require
cessation
questioning
see
ibid
likelihood
suspect
wish
counsel
present
test
applicability
davis
edwards
edwards
arizona
supra
impermissible
authorities
reinterrogate
accused
custody
clearly
asserted
right
counsel
emphasis
added
rather
suspect
must
unambiguously
request
counsel
observed
statement
either
assertion
right
counsel
smith
illinois
brackets
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
although
suspect
need
speak
discrimination
oxford
post
souter
concurring
judgment
must
articulate
desire
counsel
present
sufficiently
clearly
reasonable
police
officer
circumstances
understand
statement
request
attorney
statement
fails
meet
requisite
level
clarity
edwards
require
officers
stop
questioning
suspect
see
moran
burbine
interrogation
must
cease
attorney
present
individual
wants
attorney
citations
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
decline
petitioner
invitation
extend
edwards
require
law
enforcement
officers
cease
questioning
immediately
upon
making
ambiguous
equivocal
reference
attorney
see
arizona
roberson
supra
kennedy
dissenting
rule
edwards
rule
constitutional
command
obligation
justify
expansion
rationale
underlying
edwards
police
must
respect
suspect
wishes
regarding
right
attorney
present
custodial
interrogation
officers
conducting
questioning
reasonably
know
whether
suspect
wants
lawyer
rule
requiring
immediate
cessation
questioning
transform
miranda
safeguards
wholly
irrational
obstacles
legitimate
police
investigative
activity
michigan
mosley
davis
needlessly
prevent
police
questioning
suspect
absence
counsel
even
suspect
wish
lawyer
present
nothing
edwards
requires
provision
counsel
suspect
consents
answer
questions
without
assistance
lawyer
miranda
expressly
rejected
suggestion
police
station
must
station
house
lawyer
present
times
advise
prisoners
held
instead
suspect
must
told
right
attorney
present
may
questioned
invoking
right
counsel
also
noted
suspect
indecisive
request
counsel
officers
need
always
cease
questioning
see
recognize
requiring
clear
assertion
right
counsel
might
disadvantage
suspects
fear
intimidation
lack
linguistic
skills
variety
reasons
clearly
articulate
right
counsel
although
actually
want
lawyer
present
primary
protection
afforded
suspects
subject
custodial
interrogation
miranda
warnings
ull
comprehension
rights
remain
silent
request
attorney
sufficient
dispel
whatever
coercion
inherent
interrogation
process
moran
burbine
supra
suspect
knowingly
voluntarily
waives
right
counsel
right
explained
indicated
willingness
deal
police
unassisted
although
edwards
provides
additional
protection
suspect
subsequently
requests
attorney
questioning
must
cease
one
must
affirmatively
invoked
suspect
considering
suspect
must
invoke
right
counsel
must
consider
side
miranda
equation
need
effective
law
enforcement
although
courts
ensure
compliance
miranda
davis
requirements
exclusionary
rule
police
officers
must
actually
decide
whether
question
suspect
edwards
rule
questioning
must
cease
suspect
asks
lawyer
provides
bright
line
applied
officers
real
world
investigation
interrogation
without
unduly
hampering
gathering
information
require
questioning
cease
suspect
makes
statement
might
request
attorney
clarity
ease
application
lost
police
officers
forced
make
difficult
judgment
calls
whether
suspect
fact
wants
lawyer
even
though
said
threat
suppression
guess
wrong
therefore
hold
knowing
voluntary
waiver
miranda
rights
law
enforcement
officers
may
continue
questioning
unless
suspect
clearly
requests
attorney
course
suspect
makes
ambiguous
equivocal
statement
often
good
police
practice
interviewing
officers
clarify
whether
actually
wants
attorney
procedure
followed
nis
agents
case
clarifying
questions
help
protect
rights
suspect
ensuring
gets
attorney
wants
one
minimize
chance
confession
suppressed
due
subsequent
judicial
meaning
suspect
statement
regarding
counsel
decline
adopt
rule
requiring
officers
ask
clarifying
questions
suspect
statement
unambiguous
unequivocal
request
counsel
officers
obligation
stop
questioning
recapitulate
held
miranda
suspect
entitled
assistance
counsel
custodial
interrogation
even
though
constitution
provide
assistance
held
edwards
suspect
invokes
right
counsel
time
davis
police
must
immediately
cease
questioning
attorney
present
unwilling
create
third
layer
prophylaxis
prevent
police
questioning
suspect
might
want
lawyer
unless
suspect
actually
requests
attorney
questioning
may
continue
courts
found
petitioner
remark
nis
agents
maybe
talk
lawyer
request
counsel
see
reason
disturb
conclusion
nis
agents
therefore
required
stop
questioning
petitioner
though
entirely
proper
clarify
whether
petitioner
fact
wanted
lawyer
ground
suppression
petitioner
statements
judgment
military
appeals
affirmed
never
occasion
consider
whether
fifth
amendment
privilege
attendant
davis
right
counsel
custodial
interrogation
applies
force
military
need
president
exercising
authority
prescribe
procedures
military
criminal
proceedings
see
art
ucmj
decreed
statements
obtained
violation
clause
generally
admissible
trials
mil
rules
evid
military
appeals
held
cases
construing
fifth
amendment
right
counsel
apply
military
interrogations
control
admissibility
evidence
trials
see
mclaren
applewhite
parties
contest
point
proceed
assumption
precedents
apply
apply
state
federal
criminal
prosecutions
also
note
government
sought
rely
case
statute
governing
admissibility
confessions
federal
prosecutions
slip
therefore
decline
invitation
amici
consider
see
brief
washington
legal
foundation
et
al
amici
curiae
although
consider
arguments
raised
amicus
brief
see
teague
lane
plurality
opinion
reluctant
issue
one
first
impression
involving
interpretation
federal
statute
department
justice
expressly
declines
take
position
see
tr
oral
arg
davis
justice
scalia
concurring
section
title
code
statute
governing
admissibility
confessions
federal
prosecutions
slip
provision
declares
confession
shall
admissible
evidence
voluntarily
given
issue
voluntariness
shall
determined
basis
circumstances
surrounding
giving
confession
including
whether
defendant
advised
knew
required
make
statement
whether
defendant
advised
prior
questioning
right
assistance
counsel
whether
defendant
without
assistance
counsel
questioned
emphases
added
continues
lest
import
doubtful
presence
absence
factors
need
conclusive
issue
voluntariness
confession
legal
analysis
admissibility
confession
without
reference
provisions
equivalent
legal
analysis
admissibility
hearsay
without
consulting
rules
evidence
unreal
exercise
yet
observes
see
ante
precisely
davis
undertaken
case
raise
asserted
issue
brief
first
case
declined
invoke
us
even
first
case
failure
called
attention
see
tr
oral
arg
green
pp
fact
limited
exceptions
provision
studiously
avoided
every
administration
lower
courts
since
enactment
years
ago
see
office
legal
policy
dept
justice
report
attorney
general
law
interrogation
discussing
abortive
implementation
passage
davis
agree
proper
given
government
failure
raise
point
render
judgment
without
taking
account
refusal
consider
arguments
raised
sound
prudential
practice
rather
statutory
constitutional
mandate
times
prudence
dictates
contrary
see
nat
bank
independent
ins
agents
america
slip
proper
appeals
consider
whether
allegedly
controlling
statute
repealed
despite
parties
failure
upon
invitation
assert
point
far
concerned
time
arrived
case
comes
within
terms
statute
next
presented
us
century
voluntariness
vel
non
touchstone
admissibility
confessions
see
miranda
arizona
harlan
dissenting
section
title
seems
provide
standard
federal
criminal
prosecutions
today
say
seems
wish
prejudge
issue
law
entirely
open
argument
mean
appears
say
inapplicable
reason
even
unconstitutional
longer
open
argument
continue
ignore
commands
simply
executive
declines
insist
observe
executive
power
whether
right
effectively
nullify
provisions
law
mere
failure
prosecute
exercise
prosecutorial
discretion
power
whether
right
avoid
application
simply
declining
introduce
evidence
confessions
admissible
terms
prosecution
commenced
confession
introduced
executive
assuredly
neither
power
right
davis
determine
objections
admissibility
confession
valid
law
section
title
provision
law
directed
courts
reflecting
people
assessment
proper
balance
struck
concern
persons
interrogated
custody
needs
effective
law
enforcement
shirk
duty
systematically
disregard
statutory
command
simply
justice
department
systematically
declines
remind
us
repeated
refusal
invoke
combined
courts
traditional
albeit
merely
prudential
refusal
consider
arguments
raised
caused
federal
judiciary
confront
host
miranda
issues
might
entirely
irrelevant
federal
law
see
addition
present
case
green
cert
moot
griffin
vazquez
scalf
worse
still
may
produced
era
intense
national
concern
problem
crime
acquittal
nonprosecution
many
dangerous
felons
enabling
continue
depredations
upon
citizens
excuse
perhaps
though
immediately
see
justice
department
good
basis
believing
allowing
prosecutions
defeated
grounds
avoided
invocation
consistent
executive
obligation
take
care
laws
faithfully
executed
art
ii
point
point
whether
continuing
refusal
consider
consistent
third
branch
obligation
decide
according
law
think
makes
unusually
assertion
provision
event
appear
applicable
cases
since
cases
criminal
prosecutions
within
meaning
sixth
amendment
therefore
appear
criminal
prosecution
purposes
section
governed
article
uniform
code
military
justice
rules
military
rules
evidence
first
point
seems
questionable
meaning
terms
statutes
necessarily
parallel
meaning
constitution
moreover
even
accepting
premise
apply
directly
apply
indirectly
rule
military
rules
evidence
requires
apply
rules
evidence
generally
recognized
trial
criminal
cases
district
courts
second
point
cited
provisions
uniform
code
military
rules
may
though
doubt
independent
reasons
confession
excluded
possibly
reasons
prevent
miranda
arizona
basis
excluding
issue
us
event
today
bases
refusal
consider
upon
fact
provision
inapplicable
upon
fact
government
failed
argue
refusal
present
statement
addresses
davis
justice
souter
justice
blackmun
justice
stevens
justice
ginsburg
join
concurring
judgment
midst
questioning
naval
investigators
petitioner
said
maybe
talk
lawyer
investigators
promptly
stopped
questioning
davis
killing
keith
shackleton
instead
undertook
determine
whether
meant
invoke
right
counsel
see
miranda
arizona
according
testimony
accepted
courts
davis
answered
investigators
questions
point
saying
asking
lawyer
want
talk
lawyer
interrogation
resume
stopping
good
petitioner
said
think
want
lawyer
say
anything
else
agree
majority
constitution
forbid
law
enforcement
officers
pose
questions
like
directed
davis
aimed
solely
clarifying
whether
suspect
ambiguous
reference
counsel
meant
assert
fifth
amendment
right
accordingly
concur
judgment
affirming
davis
conviction
resting
partly
evidence
statements
given
agents
ascertained
wish
deal
counsel
however
join
davis
colleagues
conclusion
investigators
inclined
liberty
disregard
davis
reference
lawyer
entirely
accordance
general
rule
interrogators
legal
obligation
discover
custodial
subject
meant
ambiguous
statement
reasonably
understood
express
desire
consult
lawyer
precedent
reasonable
judgments
majority
many
courts
already
addressed
issue
us
advocacy
considerable
body
law
enforcement
officials
contrary
argue
approach
today
draws
sharp
line
interrogated
suspects
clearly
assert
right
counsel
ante
say
something
may
may
express
desire
counsel
presence
former
suspects
assured
questioning
resume
davis
without
counsel
present
see
miranda
supra
edwards
arizona
minnick
mississippi
latter
left
fend
concerns
fairness
practicality
long
anchored
miranda
case
law
point
different
response
law
enforcement
officials
reasonably
know
whether
suspect
wants
lawyer
ante
stop
interrogation
ask
make
choice
clear
question
address
today
open
one
davis
answer
requires
coherence
nearly
three
decades
case
law
addressing
relationship
police
criminal
suspects
custodial
interrogation
throughout
period
two
precepts
commanded
broad
assent
miranda
safeguards
exist
assure
individual
right
choose
speech
silence
remains
unfettered
throughout
interrogation
process
see
connecticut
barrett
quoting
miranda
supplying
emphasis
justification
miranda
rules
intended
operate
real
world
must
consistent
practical
realities
arizona
roberson
kennedy
dissenting
rule
barring
government
agents
interrogation
determine
whether
suspect
ambiguous
statement
meant
request
counsel
fulfills
ambitions
assures
suspect
choice
whether
deal
police
counsel
scrupulously
honored
davis
miranda
supra
cf
michigan
mosley
white
concurring
result
faces
reasons
misunderstandings
arise
suspect
interrogator
limitations
capacity
police
trial
courts
apply
fine
distinctions
intricate
rules
tested
two
principles
approach
adopts
fare
well
first
majority
expressly
acknowledges
see
ante
criminal
suspects
may
miranda
words
thrust
unfamiliar
atmosphere
run
menacing
police
interrogation
procedures
seem
odd
group
single
demand
heightened
linguistic
care
substantial
percentage
lack
anything
like
confident
command
english
language
see
de
la
jara
many
woefully
ignorant
miranda
supra
cf
davis
north
carolina
many
sufficiently
intimidated
interrogation
process
overwhelmed
uncertainty
predicament
ability
speak
assertively
abandon
indeed
awareness
davis
realities
past
dissuaded
placing
burden
clarity
upon
individuals
custody
led
instead
require
requests
counsel
give
broad
rather
narrow
interpretation
see
michigan
jackson
barrett
courts
indulge
every
reasonable
presumption
johnson
zerbst
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
suspect
waived
right
counsel
miranda
see
oregon
bradshaw
powell
concurring
unanimous
agreeing
miranda
right
counsel
prime
example
rights
requiring
special
protection
knowing
intelligent
waiver
standard
internal
quotation
marks
brackets
omitted
cf
minnick
scalia
dissenting
adhered
principle
nothing
less
zerbst
standard
appropriate
miranda
waivers
may
standard
governing
waivers
expressed
statements
deflected
away
drawing
distinction
initial
waivers
miranda
rights
subsequent
decisions
reinvoke
theory
long
burden
demonstrate
waiver
rests
government
fair
make
suspect
shoulder
burden
showing
clear
subsequent
assertion
miranda
discredited
legitimacy
distinction
opinion
described
object
warning
assure
continuous
opportunity
exercise
right
silence
see
also
moran
burbine
stevens
dissenting
accord
davis
ontinuous
opportunity
suggests
unvarying
one
governed
common
standard
effectiveness
suggestion
confirmed
first
statement
follows
questioning
suspect
indicates
manner
stage
process
wishes
consult
attorney
miranda
stage
obviously
includes
stage
initial
waiver
commencement
questioning
indicates
manner
rule
plainly
tension
indication
vengeance
see
harlan
dissenting
require
exercise
continuous
right
point
initial
waiver
defends
tolerable
certainty
poorly
expressed
requests
counsel
disregarded
ground
miranda
warnings
suffice
alleviate
inherent
coercion
custodial
interrogation
ante
warning
delivered
conduct
interrogation
suffice
assure
right
choose
silence
speech
remains
unfettered
throughout
interrogation
process
defense
reflect
sound
reading
case
relies
moran
burbine
supra
beyond
duty
inform
miranda
requires
police
respect
suspect
decision
exercise
rights
outlined
warnings
individual
indicates
manner
time
prior
questioning
wishes
remain
silent
wants
attorney
interrogation
must
cease
quoting
miranda
supra
davis
indeed
easy
amidst
discussion
layers
protection
lose
sight
real
risk
majority
approach
going
close
core
held
fifth
amendment
provides
experience
timid
verbally
inept
suspect
whose
existence
acknowledges
may
always
closely
follow
defendant
edwards
arizona
whose
purported
waiver
right
counsel
made
invoked
right
held
ineffective
lest
police
tempted
badge
others
like
see
michigan
harvey
indeed
may
like
defendant
escobedo
illinois
supra
whose
sense
dilemma
heightened
interrogators
denial
requests
talk
lawyer
suspect
understands
expressed
wishes
ignored
hypothesis
said
something
objective
listener
reasonably
although
necessarily
take
request
contravention
rights
read
interrogator
may
well
see
objection
futile
confession
true
way
end
interrogation
davis
enough
say
statement
either
assertion
right
counsel
ante
quoting
smith
illinois
omitting
brackets
internal
quotation
marks
smith
neither
denied
possibility
reference
counsel
ambiguous
see
accord
rehnquist
dissenting
suggested
particular
statements
considered
isolation
might
fair
say
every
statement
meant
either
express
desire
deal
police
counsel
fact
dictate
rule
interrogators
hear
statement
consistent
either
possibility
may
presume
latter
forge
ahead
contrary
clarification
intuitively
sensible
course
justifications
offered
requisite
level
clarity
rule
ante
whatever
costs
society
strong
interest
effective
law
enforcement
ante
maintain
ease
application
long
concern
miranda
jurisprudence
respect
first
point
margin
difference
clarification
approach
advocated
one
adopts
defined
class
cases
suspect
asked
make
plain
meant
request
davis
counsel
point
questioning
cease
lost
confessions
extract
real
price
society
one
miranda
determined
borne
cf
brief
americans
effective
law
enforcement
et
al
amici
curiae
clarification
approach
preserves
interests
law
enforcement
public
welfare
escobedo
system
worth
preserving
fear
accused
permitted
consult
lawyer
become
aware
exercise
constitutional
rights
practical
application
every
approach
including
majority
involve
difficult
judgment
calls
rule
argued
relieve
davis
officer
responsibility
guessing
whether
suspect
fact
wants
lawyer
even
though
said
ante
contrary
assure
judgment
call
made
party
competent
resolve
ambiguity
case
law
always
assumed
make
individual
suspect
ii
although
convinced
taken
wrong
path
persuaded
petitioner
contention
even
ambiguous
statements
require
end
police
questioning
recognize
approach
petitioner
urges
us
claim
support
case
law
notably
indicates
manner
language
miranda
deny
rule
endorse
abused
clarifying
questions
shade
subtly
illicitly
badgering
suspect
wants
counsel
see
thompson
wainwright
cf
state
walkowiak
may
abrahamson
concurring
suggesting
means
properly
focus
clarification
enquiry
petitioner
proposal
entirely
harmony
major
themes
miranda
case
law
virtues
demerits
reverse
images
mark
rule
plainly
wrong
example
continue
interrogation
suspect
wants
stop
indicates
strong
bias
favor
individual
choice
may
also
disserved
stopping
questioning
davis
suspect
wants
continue
statement
might
understood
otherwise
see
michigan
mosley
white
concurring
result
rejected
paternalistic
rule
protecting
defendant
intelligent
voluntary
decisions
criminal
case
costs
society
losing
confessions
moreover
especially
hard
bear
suspect
asked
choice
chosen
continue
one
need
sign
majority
opinion
agree
resort
rule
petitioner
argues
experience
shows
less
drastic
means
safeguarding
suspects
constitutional
rights
job
see
generally
leon
blackmun
concurring
exclusionary
rule
exception
must
tested
real
world
state
federal
law
enforcement
attend
results
footnotes
see
brief
americans
effective
law
enforcement
international
association
chiefs
police
national
district
attorneys
association
national
sheriffs
association
amici
curiae
approach
advocated
common
sense
resolution
problem
fully
accommodates
rights
subject
time
preserv
ing
interests
law
enforcement
public
welfare
see
also
brief
approach
taken
fulfill
fundamental
purpose
miranda
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
majority
acknowledges
ante
declined
despite
persistence
divergent
approaches
lower
courts
decide
operative
rule
ambiguous
statements
see
connecticut
barrett
mueller
virginia
white
dissenting
denial
certiorari
suggests
conclusion
reaches
foreshadowed
mcneil
wisconsin
noted
likelihood
suspect
wish
counsel
present
dispositive
addressing
degree
clarity
required
activate
counsel
right
let
alone
endorsing
standard
embraced
today
evident
page
mcneil
cited
careful
say
miranda
counsel
right
requires
minimum
statement
reasonably
construed
expression
desire
assistance
attorney
ibid
mcneil
instead
made
different
familiar
point
courts
may
presume
silent
defendant
want
lawyer
whenever
circumstances
suggest
representation
interest
may
case
disposed
italicizing
words
edwards
arizona
effect
suspect
clearly
assert
right
questioning
must
cease
see
ante
even
putting
aside
particular
statement
case
entirely
clear
highest
address
question
described
equivocal
see
state
edwards
see
also
davis
edwards
decided
legal
consequences
less
clear
statement
miranda
saying
explicit
waivers
sufficient
settled
whether
necessary
see
north
carolina
butler
holding
otherwise
need
edwards
identify
issue
unresolved
see
barrett
supra
smith
illinois
per
curiam
finally
plausible
read
miranda
presage
rule
account
language
suggesting
questioning
need
stop
request
counsel
indecisive
ante
quoting
miranda
statement
quoted
however
taken
holding
rather
lengthy
direct
quotation
letter
solicitor
general
purporting
summarize
fbi
practice
observed
consistent
rule
announced
event
letter
explains
fbi
policy
indecisive
suspect
may
question
ed
whether
waive
counsel
approach
closer
one
advocated
one
adopts
social
science
confirms
common
sense
suggest
individuals
feel
intimidated
powerless
likely
speak
equivocal
nonstandard
terms
ambiguity
equivocation
meant
see
linguistic
evidence
language
power
strategy
courtroom
suspects
police
interrogation
strong
candidates
effects
even
resort
police
third
degree
abated
since
miranda
basic
forms
psychological
pressure
applied
police
appear
changed
less
compare
miranda
supra
principal
psychological
factor
contributing
successful
interrogation
privacy
quoting
inbau
reid
davis
criminal
interrogations
confessions
inbau
reid
buckley
criminal
interrogation
confessions
ed
principal
psychological
factor
contributing
successful
interrogation
privacy
see
people
harper
defendant
asked
interrogator
retrieve
attorney
business
card
wallet
told
necessary
held
availed
right
counsel
see
also
cooper
dupnik
see
en
banc
davis
describing
elaborate
police
task
force
plan
ignore
systematically
suspect
requests
counsel
theory
induce
hopelessness
thereby
elicit
admission
used
keep
suspect
witness
stand
see
oregon
haas
statements
obtained
violation
miranda
rules
admissible
impeachment
purposes
indeed
smith
decision
quoting
dissent
adverts
sentence
possibility
bona
fide
doubt
officer
may
still
whether
defendant
desires
counsel
case
strictly
limited
questioning
prescribed
see
people
smith
opinion
simon
abstract
nothing
may
seem
clear
clear
statement
rule
police
stations
trial
courts
question
clear
clear
readily
answered
suspect
says
uh
yeah
like
told
right
lawyer
clearly
asserted
right
compare
smith
illinois
per
curiam
statement
neither
indecisive
ambiguous
citation
omitted
rehnquist
dissenting
questioning
clarity
see
also
oregon
bradshaw
plurality
opinion
want
attorney
goes
much
edwards
want
attorney
making
deal
cf
supra
indeed
case
davis
finally
said
think
want
lawyer
say
anything
else
agents
ceased
questioning
see
people
kendricks
agents
need
stop
interrogation
suspect
says
think
might
need
lawyer
cf
people
santiago
app
div
supply
lawyer
may
ask
continue
interview
moment
held
unequivocal
invocation
see
generally
smith
supra
rehnquist
dissenting
noting
statements
rarely
ifferences
certainty
hesitancy
may
well
turn
inflection
words
spoken
especially
statement
isolated
statements
surrounding
davis
practical
matter
course
primary
arbiters
clarity
interrogators
tend
well
courts
preferred
source
determining
precise
words
suspect
used
inculpatory
statement
obtained
result
unrecorded
incommunicado
interrogation
officers
rarely
lose
swearing
matches
criminal
defendants
suppression
hearings
page