sprint
communications
jacobs
et
argued
november
decided
december
sprint
communications
sprint
national
telecommunications
service
provider
withheld
payment
intercarrier
access
fees
imposed
windstream
iowa
communications
windstream
local
telecommunications
carrier
long
distance
voice
internet
protocol
voip
calls
concluding
telecommunications
act
preempted
intrastate
regulation
voip
traffic
windstream
responded
threatening
block
sprint
customer
calls
led
sprint
ask
iowa
utilities
board
iub
enjoin
windstream
discontinuing
service
sprint
windstream
retracted
threat
sprint
moved
withdraw
complaint
concerned
dispute
recur
iub
continued
proceedings
order
resolve
question
whether
voip
calls
subject
intrastate
regulation
rejecting
sprint
argument
question
governed
federal
law
iub
ruled
intrastate
fees
applied
voip
calls
sprint
sued
respondents
iub
members
collectively
iub
federal
district
seeking
declaration
telecommunications
act
preempted
iub
decision
relief
sprint
sought
injunction
enforcement
iub
order
sprint
also
sought
review
iub
order
iowa
state
reiterating
preemption
argument
made
sprint
complaint
asserting
several
claims
invoking
younger
harris
federal
district
abstained
adjudicating
sprint
complaint
deference
parallel
proceeding
eighth
circuit
affirmed
district
abstention
decision
concluding
younger
abstention
required
ongoing
review
concerned
iowa
important
interest
regulating
enforcing
state
utility
rates
held
case
fall
within
three
classes
exceptional
cases
younger
abstention
appropriate
pp
district
jurisdiction
decide
whether
federal
law
preempted
iub
decision
see
verizon
md
public
serv
thus
virtually
unflagging
obligation
hear
decide
case
colorado
river
water
conservation
dist
younger
recognized
exception
obligation
cases
parallel
pending
state
criminal
proceeding
extended
younger
abstention
particular
state
civil
proceedings
akin
criminal
prosecutions
see
huffman
pursue
implicate
state
interest
enforcing
orders
judgments
courts
see
pennzoil
texaco
reaffirmed
exceptional
circumstances
justify
federal
refusal
decide
case
deference
new
orleans
public
service
council
city
new
orleans
nopsi
nopsi
identified
three
exceptional
circumstances
first
younger
precludes
federal
intrusion
ongoing
state
criminal
prosecutions
see
second
certain
civil
enforcement
proceedings
warrant
younger
abstention
ibid
finally
federal
courts
refrain
interfering
pending
civil
proceedings
involving
certain
orders
uniquely
furtherance
state
courts
ability
perform
judicial
functions
ibid
applied
younger
outside
three
exceptional
categories
rules
accord
nopsi
define
younger
scope
pp
initial
iub
proceeding
fall
within
nopsi
three
exceptional
categories
therefore
trigger
younger
abstention
first
third
categories
plainly
accommodate
iub
proceeding
civil
criminal
character
touch
state
ability
perform
judicial
function
iub
order
act
civil
enforcement
kind
younger
extended
iub
proceeding
akin
criminal
prosecution
huffman
initiated
state
sovereign
capacity
trainor
hernandez
sanction
sprint
wrongful
act
see
middlesex
county
ethics
comm
garden
state
bar
rather
action
initiated
sprint
private
corporation
state
authority
conducted
investigation
sprint
activities
lodged
formal
complaint
sprint
sprint
withdrew
complaint
commenced
administrative
proceedings
iub
argues
proceedings
became
essentially
civil
enforcement
action
however
iub
adjudicative
authority
invoked
settle
civil
dispute
two
private
parties
sanction
sprint
wrongful
act
holding
abstention
proper
course
eighth
circuit
misinterpreted
decision
middlesex
mean
younger
abstention
warranted
whenever
ongoing
state
judicial
proceeding
implicates
important
state
interests
provide
adequate
opportunity
raise
federal
challenges
middlesex
invoked
younger
bar
federal
entertaining
lawyer
challenge
state
ethics
committee
pending
investigation
lawyer
unlike
iub
proceeding
however
state
ethics
committee
hearing
middlesex
plainly
akin
criminal
proceeding
investigation
formal
complaint
preceded
hearing
agency
state
initiated
hearing
hearing
purpose
determine
whether
lawyer
disciplined
failing
meet
state
professional
conduct
standards
three
middlesex
conditions
invoked
appeals
therefore
dispositive
instead
additional
factors
appropriately
considered
federal
invoking
younger
younger
extends
three
exceptional
circumstances
identified
nopsi
pp
reversed
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
unanimous
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
sprint
communications
petitioner
elizabeth
jacobs
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
december
justice
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
case
involves
two
proceedings
one
pending
state
federal
seeks
review
iowa
utilities
board
iub
board
order
presents
question
whether
windstream
iowa
communications
windstream
local
telecommunications
carrier
may
impose
sprint
communications
sprint
intrastate
access
charges
telephone
calls
transported
via
internet
jurisdiction
controversies
kind
confirmed
verizon
md
public
serv
invoking
younger
harris
district
southern
district
iowa
abstained
adjudicating
sprint
complaint
deference
parallel
proceeding
appeals
eighth
circuit
affirmed
district
abstention
decision
reverse
judgment
appeals
main
federal
courts
obliged
decide
cases
within
scope
federal
jurisdiction
abstention
order
simply
pending
proceeding
involves
subject
matter
new
orleans
public
service
council
city
new
orleans
nopsi
doctrine
pendency
state
judicial
proceedings
excludes
federal
recognized
however
certain
instances
prospect
undue
interference
state
proceedings
counsels
federal
relief
see
younger
exemplifies
one
class
cases
abstention
required
parallel
pending
state
criminal
proceeding
federal
courts
must
refrain
enjoining
state
prosecution
extended
younger
abstention
particular
state
civil
proceedings
akin
criminal
prosecutions
see
huffman
pursue
implicate
state
interest
enforcing
orders
judgments
courts
see
pennzoil
texaco
cautioned
however
federal
courts
ordinarily
entertain
resolve
merits
action
within
scope
jurisdictional
grant
refus
decide
case
deference
nopsi
circumstances
fitting
within
younger
doctrine
stressed
exceptional
include
catalogued
nopsi
state
criminal
prosecutions
civil
enforcement
proceedings
civil
proceedings
involving
certain
orders
uniquely
furtherance
state
courts
ability
perform
judicial
functions
case
presents
none
circumstances
ranked
exceptional
general
rule
governs
pendency
action
state
bar
proceedings
concerning
matter
federal
jurisdiction
colorado
river
water
conservation
dist
quoting
mcclellan
carland
sprint
national
telecommunications
service
provider
long
paid
intercarrier
access
fees
iowa
communications
company
windstream
formerly
iowa
telecom
certain
long
distance
calls
placed
sprint
customers
windstream
customers
however
sprint
decided
withhold
payment
subset
calls
classified
voice
internet
protocol
voip
concluding
telecommunications
act
preempted
intrastate
regulation
voip
response
windstream
threatened
block
calls
sprint
customers
sprint
filed
complaint
windstream
iub
asking
board
enjoin
windstream
discontinuing
service
sprint
sprint
view
iowa
law
entitled
withhold
payment
contested
access
charges
prohibited
windstream
carrying
disconnection
threat
answer
sprint
complaint
windstream
retracted
threat
discontinue
serving
sprint
sprint
moved
successfully
withdraw
complaint
conflict
sprint
windstream
voip
calls
likely
recur
however
iub
decided
continue
proceedings
resolve
underlying
legal
question
whether
voip
calls
subject
intrastate
regulation
order
sprint
communications
iowa
telecommunications
iub
iub
order
question
retained
iub
sprint
argued
governed
federal
law
within
iub
adjudicative
jurisdiction
iub
disagreed
ruling
intrastate
fees
applied
voip
seeking
overturn
board
ruling
sprint
commenced
two
lawsuits
first
sprint
sued
members
iub
respondents
official
capacities
district
southern
district
iowa
complaint
sprint
sought
declaration
telecommunications
act
preempted
iub
decision
relief
sprint
requested
injunction
enforcement
iub
order
second
sprint
petitioned
review
iub
order
iowa
state
state
petition
reiterated
preemption
argument
sprint
made
complaint
addition
sprint
asserted
state
law
procedural
due
process
claims
eighth
circuit
precedent
effectively
required
plaintiff
exhaust
state
remedies
proceeding
federal
see
alleghany
mccartney
sprint
urges
filed
state
suit
protective
measure
failing
sprint
explains
risked
losing
opportunity
obtain
review
federal
state
federal
decide
abstain
expiration
iowa
statute
limitations
see
brief
petitioner
sprint
anticipated
iub
filed
motion
asking
federal
district
abstain
light
state
suit
citing
younger
harris
district
granted
iub
motion
dismissed
suit
iub
decision
pending
review
district
said
composed
one
uninterruptible
process
implicating
important
state
interests
ground
ruled
younger
abstention
order
sprint
communications
berntsen
sd
iowa
app
pet
cert
part
eighth
circuit
agreed
district
judgment
appeals
rejected
argument
accepted
several
sister
courts
younger
abstention
appropriate
parallel
state
proceedings
coercive
rather
remedial
nature
cf
roceedings
must
coercive
cases
order
warrant
instead
eighth
circuit
read
precedent
require
younger
abstention
whenever
ongoing
state
judicial
proceeding
implicates
important
state
interests
state
proceedings
provide
adequate
opportunity
raise
federal
challenges
citing
middlesex
county
ethics
comm
garden
state
bar
criteria
satisfied
appeals
held
ongoing
review
iub
decision
concerned
iowa
important
state
interest
regulating
enforcing
intrastate
utility
rates
recognizing
possibility
parties
might
return
federal
however
appeals
vacated
judgment
dismissing
sprint
complaint
lieu
dismissal
eighth
circuit
remanded
case
instructing
district
enter
stay
pendency
action
granted
certiorari
decide
whether
consistent
delineation
cases
encompassed
younger
doctrine
abstention
appropriate
ii
neither
party
questioned
district
jurisdiction
decide
whether
federal
law
preempted
iub
decision
rightly
verizon
md
public
serv
reviewed
similar
challenge
state
administrative
adjudication
case
party
seeking
review
state
agency
decision
urged
telecommunications
act
preempted
state
action
doubt
federal
courts
ha
federal
question
jurisdiction
entertain
suit
nothing
telecommunications
act
detracted
conclusion
see
federal
courts
early
famously
said
right
decline
exercise
jurisdiction
given
usurp
given
cohens
virginia
wheat
jurisdiction
existing
cautioned
federal
obligation
hear
decide
case
virtually
unflagging
colorado
river
water
conservation
dist
parallel
proceedings
detract
obligation
see
ibid
younger
recognized
exception
general
rule
new
orleans
public
service
council
city
new
orleans
nopsi
plaintiff
younger
sought
adjudication
constitutionality
california
criminal
syndicalism
act
requesting
injunction
act
enforcement
plaintiff
time
defendant
pending
state
criminal
prosecution
act
circumstances
said
federal
decline
enjoin
prosecution
absent
bad
faith
harassment
patently
invalid
state
statute
see
abstention
order
explained
basic
doctrine
equity
jurisprudence
courts
equity
act
restrain
criminal
prosecution
moving
party
adequate
remedy
law
suffer
irreparably
injury
denied
equitable
relief
estraining
equity
jurisdiction
within
narrow
limits
observed
prevent
erosion
role
jury
avoid
duplication
legal
proceedings
legal
sanctions
explained
well
doctrine
reinforced
notion
proper
respect
state
functions
ibid
since
applied
younger
bar
federal
relief
certain
civil
actions
huffman
pursue
pathmarking
decision
ohio
officials
brought
civil
action
state
abate
showing
obscene
movies
pursue
theater
state
party
proceeding
aid
closely
related
state
criminal
statutes
held
younger
abstention
appropriate
recently
nopsi
occasion
review
restate
younger
jurisprudence
nopsi
addressed
rejected
argument
federal
refuse
exercise
jurisdiction
review
state
council
ratemaking
decision
nly
exceptional
circumstances
reaffirmed
justify
federal
refusal
decide
case
deference
ibid
exceptional
circumstances
exist
determined
surveying
prior
decisions
three
types
proceedings
first
younger
precluded
federal
intrusion
ongoing
state
criminal
prosecutions
see
ibid
second
certain
civil
enforcement
proceedings
warranted
abstention
ibid
citing
huffman
finally
federal
courts
refrained
interfering
pending
civil
proceedings
involving
certain
orders
uniquely
furtherance
state
courts
ability
perform
judicial
functions
citing
juidice
vail
pennzoil
texaco
applied
younger
outside
three
exceptional
categories
today
hold
accord
nopsi
define
younger
scope
iub
assert
iowa
state
review
board
decision
considered
alone
implicates
younger
rather
initial
administrative
proceeding
justifies
staying
action
federal
iub
contends
state
review
process
concluded
argument
advanced
nopsi
assume
without
deciding
nopsi
administrative
adjudication
subsequent
state
review
count
unitary
process
younger
purposes
question
remains
however
whether
initial
iub
proceeding
sort
entitled
younger
treatment
ibid
iub
proceeding
conclude
fall
within
three
exceptional
categories
described
nopsi
therefore
trigger
younger
abstention
first
third
categories
plainly
accommodate
iub
proceeding
proceeding
civil
criminal
character
touch
state
ability
perform
judicial
function
cf
juidice
civil
contempt
order
pennzoil
requirement
posting
bond
pending
appeal
iub
order
rank
act
civil
enforcement
kind
younger
extended
decisions
applying
younger
instances
civil
enforcement
generally
concerned
state
proceedings
akin
criminal
prosecution
important
respects
huffman
see
also
middlesex
younger
abstention
appropriate
noncriminal
proceedings
bear
close
relationship
proceedings
criminal
nature
enforcement
actions
characteristically
initiated
sanction
federal
plaintiff
party
challenging
state
action
wrongful
act
see
middlesex
disciplinary
proceedings
lawyer
violation
state
ethics
rules
cases
genre
state
actor
routinely
party
state
proceeding
often
initiates
action
see
ohio
civil
rights
dayton
christian
schools
administrative
proceedings
enforce
state
civil
rights
laws
moore
sims
proceeding
gain
custody
children
allegedly
abused
parents
trainor
hernandez
civil
proceeding
brought
state
sovereign
capacity
recover
welfare
payments
defendants
allegedly
obtained
fraud
huffman
proceeding
enforce
obscenity
laws
investigations
commonly
involved
often
culminating
filing
formal
complaint
charges
see
dayton
noting
preliminary
investigation
complaint
middlesex
iub
proceeding
resemble
state
enforcement
actions
found
appropriate
younger
abstention
akin
criminal
prosecution
huffman
initiated
state
sovereign
capacity
trainor
private
corporation
sprint
initiated
action
state
authority
conducted
investigation
sprint
activities
state
actor
lodged
formal
complaint
sprint
brief
iub
emphasizes
sprint
decision
withdraw
complaint
commenced
proceedings
board
point
iub
argues
sprint
longer
willing
participant
proceedings
became
essentially
civil
enforcement
action
see
brief
respondents
iub
adjudicative
authority
however
invoked
settle
civil
dispute
two
private
parties
sanction
sprint
commission
wrongful
act
although
sprint
withdrew
complaint
administrative
efficiency
misconduct
sprint
prompted
iub
answer
underlying
federal
question
determining
intercarrier
compensation
regime
applicable
voip
calls
iub
sought
avoid
renewed
litigation
parties
dispute
underlying
legal
question
remained
unsettled
board
observed
controversy
likely
recur
iub
order
nothing
suggests
iub
proceeding
akin
criminal
prosecution
civil
cases
huffman
holding
abstention
proper
course
eighth
circuit
relied
heavily
decision
middlesex
younger
abstention
warranted
appeals
read
middlesex
say
whenever
three
conditions
met
ongoing
state
judicial
proceeding
implicates
important
state
interests
provide
adequate
opportunity
raise
federal
challenges
citing
middlesex
iub
endorsed
eighth
circuit
approach
brief
respondents
appeals
iub
attribute
decision
middlesex
extraordinary
breadth
invoked
younger
middlesex
bar
federal
entertaining
lawyer
challenge
new
jersey
state
ethics
committee
pending
investigation
lawyer
unlike
iub
proceeding
state
ethics
committee
hearing
middlesex
indeed
akin
criminal
proceeding
noted
investigation
formal
complaint
preceded
hearing
agency
state
initiated
hearing
purpose
hearing
determine
whether
lawyer
disciplined
failure
meet
state
standards
professional
conduct
see
also
brennan
concurring
judgment
noting
nature
bar
disciplinary
proceedings
three
middlesex
conditions
recited
dispositive
instead
additional
factors
appropriately
considered
federal
invoking
younger
divorced
context
three
middlesex
conditions
extend
younger
virtually
parallel
state
federal
proceedings
least
party
identify
plausibly
important
state
interest
see
tr
oral
arg
result
irreconcilable
dominant
instruction
even
presence
parallel
state
proceedings
abstention
exercise
federal
jurisdiction
exception
rule
hawaii
housing
authority
midkiff
quoting
colorado
river
short
guide
federal
courts
today
clarify
affirm
younger
extends
three
exceptional
circumstances
identified
nopsi
reasons
stated
judgment
appeals
eighth
circuit
reversed
footnotes
federal
communications
commission
yet
provide
view
whether
telecommunications
act
categorically
preempts
intrastate
access
charges
voip
calls
see
connect
america
fund
fcc
rcd
reserving
question
whether
voip
calls
must
subject
exclusively
federal
regulation
conclusion
iub
proceedings
sprint
paid
windstream
contested
fees
convenience
refer
respondents
collectively
iub
since
granted
certiorari
iowa
state
issued
opinion
rejecting
sprint
preemption
claim
merits
sprint
communications
iowa
utils
app
joint
supp
brief
iowa
dist
iowa
decision
parties
view
moot
case
see
joint
supp
brief
agree
sprint
intends
appeal
decision
controversy
remains
live
exxon
mobil
saudi
basic
industries
iub
agrees
sprint
decision
burford
sun
oil
independently
sustain
eighth
circuit
abstention
analysis
see
brief
respondents
cf
new
orleans
public
service
council
city
new
orleans
determine
whether
state
proceeding
enforcement
action
younger
several
courts
appeals
noted
see
supra
inquire
whether
underlying
state
proceeding
coercive
rather
remedial
see
devlin
kalm
though
referenced
dichotomy
see
ohio
civil
rights
dayton
christian
schools
find
inquiry
necessary
inevitably
helpful
given
susceptibility
designations
manipulation