magwood
patterson
warden
et
argued
march
decided
june
petitioner
magwood
sentenced
death
murder
alabama
courts
denied
relief
direct
appeal
postconviction
proceedings
sought
federal
habeas
relief
district
conditionally
granted
writ
sentence
mandating
released
resentenced
state
trial
sentenced
death
second
time
filed
another
federal
habeas
application
challenging
new
sentence
grounds
fair
warning
time
offense
conduct
permit
death
sentence
alabama
law
attorney
rendered
ineffective
assistance
resentencing
proceeding
district
conditionally
granted
writ
eleventh
circuit
reversed
holding
relevant
part
magwood
challenge
new
death
sentence
unreviewable
second
successive
challenge
raised
claim
earlier
habeas
application
held
judgment
reversed
case
remanded
reversed
remanded
justice
thomas
delivered
opinion
except
part
concluding
magwood
habeas
application
challenges
new
judgment
first
time
second
successive
pp
case
turns
claim
deemed
arise
second
successive
habeas
corpus
application
state
contends
amended
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
aedpa
read
bar
claims
prisoner
prior
opportunity
present
one
opportunity
rule
magwood
claim
second
successive
opportunity
raise
first
application
magwood
counters
apply
first
application
challenging
new
judgment
intervening
habeas
applications
agrees
phrase
second
successive
defined
aedpa
term
art
slack
mcdaniel
determine
meaning
looks
first
statutory
context
section
limitations
apply
habeas
corpus
application
application
behalf
person
custody
pursuant
judgment
state
text
relief
provides
indicate
second
successive
must
interpreted
respect
judgment
challenged
petitioner
seeks
invalidation
judgment
authorizing
confinement
wilkinson
dotson
conditional
writ
granted
state
may
seek
new
judgment
new
trial
new
sentencing
proceeding
ibid
state
errs
contending
relevant
custody
judgment
proper
reference
unlawful
custody
substance
requirement
habeas
relief
argument
unpersuasive
section
articulates
kind
custody
may
challenged
applies
custody
pursuant
judgment
judgment
inextricable
essential
relief
requirement
distinguishes
statutes
permitting
constitutional
relief
see
state
custody
rule
also
difficult
justify
applying
second
successive
subsequent
application
filed
prisoner
release
require
prisoner
remains
continuous
custody
unrelated
conviction
satisfy
strict
rules
challenge
unrelated
conviction
first
time
nothing
statutory
text
context
supports
anomalous
result
pp
also
convinced
state
argument
one
opportunity
rule
consistent
statute
adopted
better
reflects
aedpa
purpose
preventing
piecemeal
litigation
gamesmanship
aedpa
uses
second
successive
modify
application
claim
state
contends
refused
adopt
interpretation
elid
difference
artuz
bennett
state
reading
also
reflects
fundamental
error
undermine
render
superfluous
much
circumstances
increase
restrictions
review
applying
rules
imposes
restrictions
others
decrease
restrictions
review
applying
lenient
rules
mandates
stricter
requirements
pp
interpretation
consistent
precedents
none
cases
state
invokes
wong
doo
applies
second
successive
application
challenging
new
judgment
cases
shed
light
question
presented
cases
contradict
approach
adopted
burton
stewart
comes
close
addressing
threshold
question
whether
application
second
successive
challenges
new
judgment
decision
confirms
existence
new
judgment
dispositive
holding
petitioner
habeas
petitions
challenged
judgment
burton
expressly
recognized
new
judgment
intervening
habeas
petitions
result
might
different
intervening
judgment
magwood
first
application
challenging
intervening
judgment
magwood
challenges
trial
error
first
sentencing
new
error
conducted
full
resentencing
reviewed
aggravating
evidence
afresh
pp
magwood
attempted
challenge
underlying
conviction
occasion
address
state
objection
reading
allows
petitioner
obtains
conditional
writ
sentence
file
subsequent
application
challenging
resulting
new
sentence
also
original
undisturbed
conviction
address
whether
magwood
claim
procedurally
defaulted
whether
eleventh
circuit
erred
rejecting
claim
pp
thomas
delivered
opinion
except
part
scalia
joined
full
stevens
breyer
sotomayor
joined
except
part
breyer
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
stevens
sotomayor
joined
kennedy
filed
dissenting
opinion
roberts
ginsburg
alito
joined
billy
joe
magwood
petitioner
tony
patterson
warden
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
eleventh
circuit
june
justice
thomas
delivered
opinion
except
part
petitioner
billy
joe
magwood
sentenced
death
murdering
sheriff
alabama
courts
denied
relief
direct
appeal
postconviction
proceedings
magwood
filed
application
writ
habeas
corpus
federal
district
challenging
conviction
sentence
district
conditionally
granted
writ
sentence
mandating
magwood
either
released
resentenced
state
trial
conducted
new
sentencing
hearing
sentenced
magwood
death
magwood
filed
application
writ
habeas
corpus
federal
challenging
new
sentence
district
conditionally
granted
writ
finding
constitutional
defects
new
sentence
appeals
eleventh
circuit
reversed
holding
relevant
part
magwood
challenge
new
death
sentence
unreviewable
second
successive
challenge
mounted
challenge
original
death
sentence
granted
certiorari
reverse
magwood
habeas
challenges
new
judgment
first
time
second
successive
conviction
drug
offense
magwood
served
several
years
coffee
county
jail
elba
alabama
watch
sheriff
neil
grantham
incarceration
magwood
long
history
mental
illness
became
convinced
grantham
imprisoned
without
cause
vowed
get
even
upon
release
magwood
followed
threat
morning
march
shortly
release
parked
outside
jail
awaited
sheriff
arrival
grantham
exited
car
magwood
shot
fled
scene
magwood
indicted
grand
jury
murder
sheriff
capital
offense
alabama
code
tried
prosecution
asked
jury
find
magwood
guilty
aggravated
murder
charged
indictment
sought
death
penalty
magwood
pleaded
guilty
reason
insanity
however
jury
found
guilty
capital
murder
imposed
sentence
death
based
aggravation
charged
indictment
accordance
alabama
law
trial
reviewed
basis
jury
decision
see
although
find
existence
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
relied
ex
parte
kyzer
find
murder
sheriff
duty
official
acts
capital
felony
definition
involves
aggravation
sufficient
death
trial
found
magwood
young
age
time
offense
lack
significant
criminal
history
qualified
mitigating
factors
found
mitigation
related
magwood
mental
state
weighing
aggravation
two
mitigating
factors
approved
sentence
death
alabama
courts
affirmed
see
magwood
state
crim
app
ex
parte
magwood
denied
certiorari
magwood
alabama
alabama
set
execution
date
july
magwood
filed
coram
nobis
petition
application
stay
execution
trial
held
hearing
petition
denied
relief
july
eight
days
scheduled
execution
magwood
filed
application
writ
habeas
corpus
district
granted
stay
execution
briefing
parties
district
upheld
magwood
conviction
vacated
sentence
conditionally
granted
writ
based
trial
failure
find
statutory
mitigating
circumstances
relating
magwood
mental
see
magwood
smith
supp
md
appeals
affirmed
see
magwood
smith
response
conditional
writ
state
trial
held
new
sentencing
proceeding
september
time
judge
found
magwood
mental
state
well
age
lack
criminal
history
qualified
statutory
mitigating
circumstances
found
magwood
capital
felony
included
sufficient
aggravation
render
death
eligible
proposed
findings
magwood
attorney
agreed
magwood
offense
rendered
death
eligible
argued
death
sentence
inappropriate
light
mitigating
factors
trial
imposed
penalty
death
stating
record
new
judgment
sentence
result
complete
new
assessment
evidence
arguments
counsel
law
sentencing
tab
alabama
courts
affirmed
see
magwood
state
crim
app
ex
parte
magwood
denied
certiorari
see
magwood
alabama
magwood
filed
petition
relief
alabama
former
temporary
rule
criminal
procedure
rule
crim
proc
rule
petition
claiming
inter
alia
death
sentence
exceeded
maximum
sentence
authorized
statute
death
sentence
violated
fifth
eighth
fourteenth
amendments
rested
upon
unforeseeable
interpretation
capital
sentencing
statute
attorney
rendered
ineffective
assistance
counsel
resentencing
trial
denied
relief
held
statutory
basis
magwood
death
sentence
affirmed
direct
appeal
relitigated
trial
also
held
magwood
attorney
played
substantive
role
resentencing
obligation
dispute
aggravation
given
district
required
trial
consider
additional
mitigating
factors
magwood
appealed
denial
rule
petition
arguing
inter
alia
sentence
unconstitutional
fair
warning
offense
punished
death
received
constitutionally
ineffective
assistance
counsel
resentencing
see
record
appeal
crim
app
tab
pp
alabama
criminal
appeals
affirmed
citing
decision
direct
appeal
propriety
death
sentence
see
magwood
state
citing
kyzer
jackson
state
crim
app
alabama
denied
certiorari
see
see
magwood
alabama
april
magwood
sought
leave
file
second
successive
application
writ
habeas
corpus
challenging
judgment
conviction
see
requiring
authorization
appeals
file
second
successive
application
appeals
denied
request
see
magwood
simultaneously
filed
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
challenging
new
death
sentence
district
conditionally
granted
see
magwood
culliver
supp
md
petition
magwood
argued
sentence
unconstitutional
fair
warning
time
offense
conduct
sufficient
warrant
death
sentence
alabama
law
attorney
rendered
ineffective
assistance
resentencing
proceeding
addressing
merits
magwood
claim
district
sua
sponte
considered
whether
application
barred
successive
petition
concluded
abeas
petitions
challenging
constitutionality
resentencing
proceeding
successive
petitions
challenge
underlying
conviction
original
sentence
citing
hertz
liebman
federal
habeas
corpus
practice
procedure
ed
petitioner
files
second
subsequent
petition
challenge
criminal
judgment
one
attacked
earlier
petition
said
two
petitions
emphasis
original
district
rejected
state
argument
magwood
procedurally
defaulted
claim
failing
present
adequately
state
courts
noting
magwood
presented
claim
rule
petition
appeal
denial
petition
see
supp
supra
addressing
merits
district
ruled
magwood
death
sentence
unconstitutional
time
offense
conduct
magwood
fair
notice
sentenced
death
absent
least
one
aggravating
circumstance
enumerated
former
code
supp
district
also
found
state
grounds
rejecting
magwood
claim
unreasonable
light
clearly
established
federal
law
noting
magwood
attorney
fact
engaged
substantively
complete
new
resentencing
although
attorney
expected
object
grounds
foreclosed
precedent
clearly
ineffective
failing
raise
federal
claim
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
appeals
reversed
relevant
part
see
concluded
first
step
determining
whether
applies
separate
new
claims
challenging
resentencing
old
claims
presented
prior
application
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
appeals
approach
claim
challenge
new
amended
component
sentence
regarded
part
first
petition
claim
challenge
component
original
sentence
amended
regarded
part
second
petition
ibid
applying
test
held
magwood
claim
challenged
trial
reliance
allegedly
improper
aggravating
factor
trial
relied
upon
magwood
original
sentence
claim
governed
restrictions
second
successive
habeas
applications
appeals
dismissed
claim
magwood
argue
reviewable
one
exceptions
general
rule
requiring
dismissal
claims
first
presented
successive
see
granted
certiorari
determine
whether
magwood
application
challenging
death
sentence
imposed
part
resentencing
response
conditional
writ
district
subject
constraints
imposes
review
second
successive
habeas
applications
ii
amended
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
aedpa
provides
relevant
part
claim
presented
second
successive
habeas
corpus
application
section
presented
prior
application
shall
dismissed
claim
presented
second
successive
habeas
corpus
application
section
presented
prior
application
shall
dismissed
unless
applicant
shows
claim
relies
new
rule
constitutional
law
made
retroactive
cases
collateral
review
previously
unavailable
factual
predicate
claim
discovered
previously
exercise
due
diligence
ii
facts
underlying
claim
proven
viewed
light
evidence
whole
sufficient
establish
clear
convincing
evidence
constitutional
error
reasonable
factfinder
found
applicant
guilty
underlying
offense
case
turns
meaning
phrase
second
successive
specifically
turns
claim
deemed
arise
second
successive
habeas
corpus
application
application
second
successive
petitioner
must
obtain
leave
appeals
filing
district
see
district
must
dismiss
claim
presented
authorized
second
successive
application
unless
applicant
shows
claim
satisfies
certain
statutory
requirements
see
thus
magwood
application
second
successive
district
dismissed
entirety
failed
obtain
requisite
authorization
appeals
however
magwood
application
second
successive
subject
claim
reviewable
absent
procedural
default
state
contends
although
amended
aedpa
applies
phrase
second
successive
application
statute
brief
respondents
laims
applications
barred
citing
artuz
bennett
according
state
phrase
read
reflect
principle
prisoner
entitled
one
one
full
fair
opportunity
wage
collateral
attack
see
brief
respondents
citing
beyer
litscher
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
state
asserts
one
opportunity
rule
magwood
claim
successive
opportunity
raise
first
application
see
brief
respondents
magwood
contrast
reads
apply
second
successive
application
challenging
judgment
according
magwood
resentencing
led
new
judgment
first
application
challenging
new
judgment
second
successive
apply
agree
begin
text
although
congress
define
phrase
second
successive
used
modify
habeas
corpus
application
section
well
settled
phrase
simply
refe
applications
filed
second
successively
time
panetti
quarterman
see
creating
exceptio
second
application
raising
claim
unripe
petitioner
presented
first
application
stewart
treating
second
application
part
first
application
premised
newly
ripened
claim
dismissed
first
application
premature
slack
mcdaniel
declining
apply
second
application
district
dismissed
first
application
lack
exhaustion
described
phrase
second
successive
term
art
determine
meaning
look
first
statutory
context
limitations
imposed
apply
habeas
corpus
application
application
writ
habeas
corpus
behalf
person
custody
pursuant
judgment
state
emphasis
added
reference
judgment
significant
term
application
defined
vacuum
petitioner
applying
something
petition
seeks
invalidation
whole
part
judgment
authorizing
prisoner
confinement
wilkinson
dotson
emphasis
added
petition
results
district
granting
writ
state
may
seek
new
judgment
new
trial
new
sentencing
proceeding
ibid
emphasis
original
thus
text
relief
provides
indicate
phrase
second
successive
must
interpreted
respect
judgment
challenged
state
disagrees
contending
relevant
focus
statute
reference
judgment
reference
custody
brief
respondents
compare
establishing
rules
review
application
writ
habeas
corpus
behalf
person
custody
pursuant
judgment
state
emphasis
added
specifying
application
may
entertained
ground
petitioner
custody
violation
constitution
laws
treaties
emphasis
added
state
explains
unlawful
custody
key
whereas
held
pursuant
judgment
merely
requirement
brief
respondents
quoting
liebman
hertz
federal
habeas
corpus
practice
procedure
find
argument
unpersuasive
section
articulates
kind
confinement
may
challenged
ground
petitioner
held
violation
constitution
laws
treaties
requirement
custody
pursuant
judgment
distinguishes
statutory
provisions
authorizing
relief
constitutional
violations
allows
challenges
judgments
federal
courts
allows
suits
state
local
officials
custody
crucial
purposes
inextricable
judgment
authorizes
state
custody
rule
difficult
justify
another
reason
state
approach
applying
phrase
second
successive
subsequent
application
filed
prisoner
release
mean
prisoner
remains
continuous
custody
completely
unrelated
conviction
satisfy
strict
rules
review
challenge
unrelated
conviction
first
time
nothing
statutory
text
context
supports
much
less
requires
anomalous
result
see
beyer
prisoner
entitled
one
collateral
attack
per
judgment
rather
one
attack
per
stretch
imprisonment
cf
dotson
supra
scalia
concurring
hen
habeas
petitioner
challenges
one
several
consecutive
sentences
may
invalidate
challenged
sentence
even
though
prisoner
remains
custody
serve
others
iii
appearing
recognize
magwood
stronger
textual
argument
state
argues
rule
based
statutory
purpose
according
state
one
opportunity
rule
consistent
statutory
text
better
reflects
aedpa
purpose
preventing
piecemeal
litigation
gamesmanship
persuaded
aedpa
uses
phrase
second
successive
modify
application
see
state
reads
phrase
modify
claims
see
brief
respondents
congress
intent
aedpa
eradicate
successive
claims
replace
actual
text
speculation
congress
intent
previously
found
congress
use
word
application
significant
refused
adopt
interpretation
elid
difference
artuz
see
also
gonzalez
crosby
purposes
habeas
relief
filing
contains
one
therefore
although
agree
state
many
rules
focus
claims
entitle
us
rewrite
statute
make
phrase
second
successive
modify
claims
state
reading
leads
second
fundamental
error
state
one
opportunity
rule
phrase
second
successive
apply
claim
petitioner
full
fair
opportunity
raise
prior
application
phrase
second
successive
apply
claim
petitioner
full
fair
opportunity
raise
previously
reading
considerably
undermine
render
superfluous
exceptions
dismissal
set
forth
section
describes
circumstances
claim
presented
earlier
may
considered
intervening
retroactive
case
law
newly
discovered
facts
suggesting
reasonable
factfinder
found
applicant
guilty
underlying
offense
ii
either
circumstance
petitioner
said
prior
opportunity
raise
claim
state
rule
claim
successive
apply
true
even
claim
raised
second
application
challenging
addition
duplicating
exceptions
circumstances
state
rule
dilute
others
whereas
exception
dismissal
claims
presented
prior
application
applies
facts
provide
clear
convincing
evidence
constitutional
error
reasonable
factfinder
found
applicant
guilty
underlying
offense
ii
state
rule
matters
facts
discovered
previously
exercise
due
diligence
decline
adopt
reading
thus
truncate
requirements
iv
persuaded
state
dissent
approach
take
contradicts
precedents
state
invokes
several
cases
denying
review
claims
second
successive
applications
petitioners
avail
prior
opportunities
present
claims
see
wong
doo
antone
dugger
per
curiam
woodard
hutchins
per
curiam
delo
stokes
per
curiam
mccleskey
zant
cases
state
contends
show
magwood
claim
dismissed
second
successive
raised
raise
claim
first
application
none
decisions
applies
phrase
second
successive
application
challenging
new
judgment
therefore
decisions
cast
light
question
today
whether
rules
modified
aedpa
apply
application
challenging
new
judgment
state
misplaced
reliance
cases
stems
failure
distinguish
threshold
inquiry
whether
application
second
successive
subsequent
inquiry
whether
claims
successive
application
must
dismissed
dissent
similarly
errs
interpreting
phrase
second
successive
reference
longstanding
doctrine
governing
abuse
writ
aedpa
modifies
principles
creates
new
statutory
rules
rules
apply
second
successive
applications
dissent
contends
reading
renders
aedpa
inapplicable
broad
range
abusive
claims
barred
prior
rules
yet
dissent
fails
cite
case
dismissed
claim
successive
abusive
petitioner
raised
application
challenging
new
judgment
dissent
conclusion
reading
unmoor
phrase
successive
textual
historical
underpinnings
post
unwarranted
usage
phrase
second
successive
consistent
reading
review
habeas
precedents
shows
cases
affirmatively
define
phrase
second
successive
appears
aedpa
congress
even
apply
phrase
second
successive
applications
filed
state
prisoners
enacted
aedpa
phrase
originally
arose
federal
context
see
supp
ii
applied
applications
raising
previously
adjudicated
claims
see
sanders
interpreted
law
permit
dismissal
abusive
claims
distinguished
successive
claims
see
congress
codified
restrictions
types
claims
still
without
using
phrase
second
successive
see
supp
iv
providing
rules
governing
applications
filed
state
well
federal
prisoners
aedpa
incorporated
phrase
second
successive
light
complex
history
phrase
second
successive
must
rely
upon
current
text
determine
phrase
applies
rather
precedents
superseded
statutory
cases
contradict
approach
one
burton
stewart
per
curiam
comes
close
addressing
threshold
question
whether
application
second
successive
challenges
new
judgment
case
confirms
existence
new
judgment
dispositive
burton
petitioner
convicted
sentenced
state
see
successfully
moved
resentencing
based
vacatur
unrelated
prior
conviction
state
appellate
affirmed
conviction
remanded
second
resentencing
ibid
march
trial
entered
amended
judgment
new
sentence
december
state
review
new
sentence
still
pending
petitioner
filed
application
challenging
conviction
district
denied
merits
appeals
affirmed
denied
certiorari
ibid
exhausting
state
sentencing
appeal
petitioner
filed
petition
challenging
sentence
district
denied
relief
merits
appeals
affirmed
reversed
holding
petition
challenging
sentence
dismissed
unauthorized
second
successive
application
see
rejected
petitioner
argument
petitions
challenged
different
judgments
see
although
petitioner
styled
first
petition
challenge
conviction
second
petition
challenge
sentence
concluded
attacked
judgment
sentence
already
place
petitioner
filed
first
application
federal
habeas
relief
see
words
judgment
challenged
application
one
challenged
subsequent
petition
judgment
pursuant
petitioner
detained
ibid
emphasis
added
expressly
recognized
case
might
different
new
judgment
intervening
two
habeas
petitions
ibid
judgment
burton
intervening
judgment
magwood
first
application
challenging
intervening
judgment
errors
alleges
new
obvious
us
state
dispute
claim
ineffective
assistance
resentencing
turns
upon
new
errors
according
state
claim
state
made
mistake
disagree
error
made
second
time
still
new
error
especially
clear
state
conducted
full
resentencing
reviewed
aggravating
evidence
afresh
see
sentencing
tab
mulating
present
judgment
considered
original
record
trial
sentence
present
judgment
sentence
result
complete
new
assessment
evidence
arguments
counsel
law
emphasis
added
dissent
concern
rule
allow
petitioners
bring
abusive
claims
long
victory
pursuant
prior
federal
habeas
petition
post
greatly
exaggerated
petitioner
may
raise
federal
error
failed
raise
properly
state
challenge
judgment
reflecting
error
petitioner
satisfy
procedural
requirements
bringing
error
state
attention
whether
trial
appellate
habeas
proceedings
state
law
may
require
procedural
default
bar
federal
review
see
coleman
thompson
boerckel
stating
petitioner
failure
present
three
federal
habeas
claims
state
timely
fashion
resulted
procedural
default
claims
case
state
argued
magwood
procedurally
defaulted
claim
failing
raise
properly
collateral
challenge
judgment
sought
dismissal
ground
ruling
magwood
procedurally
default
claim
district
sua
sponte
consider
whether
barred
leave
ruling
appeals
review
first
instance
underscore
rules
continue
constrain
review
claims
applications
whether
applications
second
successive
ironically
effort
effectuate
believe
congress
intent
give
unfair
benefit
habeas
petitioners
state
dissent
propose
alternative
rule
close
doors
class
habeas
petitioners
seeking
review
without
clear
indication
congress
intent
castro
many
examples
given
one
suffices
illustrate
point
suppose
petitioner
files
application
raising
meritorious
claims
challenging
conviction
district
grants
conditional
writ
based
one
without
reaching
remaining
nine
upon
retrial
state
commits
legal
mistakes
new
errors
new
sentencing
error
magwood
case
application
presenting
claims
based
errors
new
judgment
second
successive
rule
advanced
state
dissent
answer
must
yes
claims
dismissed
see
requiring
dismissal
claim
presented
prior
application
state
attempts
avoid
procedural
anomal
castro
supra
suggesting
treat
nine
unadjudicated
claims
part
first
application
never
adjudicated
merits
cf
slack
adjudicated
claim
espondents
assume
state
judges
follow
instructions
imposed
federal
courts
federal
courts
consider
petitioner
claim
state
violated
due
process
failing
honor
federal
mandate
brief
respondents
see
need
engage
novel
complex
rationalizations
aedpa
text
commands
straightforward
rule
unlike
burton
new
judgment
intervening
two
habeas
petitions
application
challenging
resulting
new
judgment
second
successive
state
objects
reading
allow
petitioner
obtains
conditional
writ
sentence
file
subsequent
application
challenging
resulting
new
sentence
also
original
undisturbed
conviction
state
believes
result
follows
sentence
conviction
form
single
judgment
purposes
habeas
review
case
gives
us
occasion
address
question
magwood
attempted
challenge
underlying
base
conclusion
text
text
altered
consequences
state
speculates
follow
another
reasons
conclude
magwood
first
application
challenging
new
sentence
judgment
second
successive
appeals
erred
reading
bar
review
claim
magwood
presented
application
address
whether
claim
procedurally
defaulted
address
magwood
contention
appeals
erred
rejecting
claim
addressing
whether
attorney
objected
federal
law
judgment
appeals
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
billy
joe
magwood
petitioner
tony
patterson
warden
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
eleventh
circuit
june
justice
breyer
justice
stevens
justice
sotomayor
join
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
join
opinion
exception
part
neither
purports
alter
alter
holding
panetti
quarterman
see
ante
panetti
declined
interpret
successive
referring
applications
filed
second
successively
time
even
later
filings
address
judgment
already
challenged
prior
application
emphasis
added
case
contrast
determine
applies
habeas
petition
first
petition
address
new
judgment
already
challenged
prior
application
reasons
provided
first
petition
second
successive
course
dissent
correctly
magwood
challenging
undisturbed
judgment
second
time
principles
apply
including
panetti
holding
application
containing
claim
petitioner
fair
opportunity
raise
first
habeas
petition
second
successive
application
post
opinion
kennedy
contrary
dissent
assertion
post
decision
today
decision
panetti
fit
comfortably
together
billy
joe
magwood
petitioner
tony
patterson
warden
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
eleventh
circuit
june
justice
kennedy
chief
justice
justice
ginsburg
justice
alito
join
dissenting
today
decides
state
prisoner
succeeds
first
federal
habeas
petition
discrete
sentencing
claim
may
later
file
second
petition
raising
numerous
previously
unraised
claims
even
petition
abuse
writ
habeas
corpus
respectful
submission
reaches
conclusion
misreading
precedents
meaning
phrase
second
successive
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
aedpa
rewrites
aedpa
text
refuses
grapple
logical
consequences
editorial
judgment
straightforward
application
principles
articulated
panetti
quarterman
consistent
conclusions
courts
appeals
considered
issue
dictates
opposite
result
design
purpose
aedpa
avoid
abuses
writ
habeas
corpus
recognition
potential
writ
intrusive
effect
state
criminal
justice
systems
today
opinion
considerable
irony
step
back
aedpa
protection
also
step
back
even
principles
place
aedpa
respectful
dissent
becomes
necessary
absent
two
exceptions
inapplicable
relevant
statutory
provision
aedpa
provides
claim
presented
second
successive
habeas
corpus
application
section
presented
prior
application
shall
dismissed
question
whether
petitioner
billy
joe
magwood
filed
second
successive
application
raising
claim
second
habeas
petition
available
yet
failed
raise
first
petition
term
second
successive
habeas
term
art
slack
mcdaniel
incorporates
doctrine
panetti
today
legal
principle
established
decisions
see
ibid
slack
rule
determine
whether
application
second
successive
must
look
substance
claim
application
raises
decide
whether
petitioner
full
fair
opportunity
raise
claim
prior
application
panetti
applying
analytical
framework
puts
applications
one
three
categories
first
petitioner
full
fair
opportunity
raise
claim
prior
application
application
seeks
raise
claim
barred
second
successive
consistent
cases
applying
doctrine
bar
second
successive
applications
see
wong
doo
second
application
barred
petitioner
full
opportunity
offer
proof
claim
first
habeas
application
woodard
hutchins
powell
concurring
writing
majority
second
application
barred
claims
raised
first
petition
delo
stokes
per
curiam
subsequent
application
barred
claim
raised
first
petition
federal
habeas
corpus
mccleskey
zant
explained
petitioner
abuse
writ
raising
claim
subsequent
petition
raised
first
regardless
whether
failure
raise
earlier
stemmed
deliberate
choice
see
also
habeas
corpus
rule
instructing
habeas
petitioners
specify
grounds
relief
available
state
facts
supporting
ground
schlup
delo
describing
adoption
habeas
legislation
judicial
decision
modified
res
judicata
claim
preclusion
doctrine
wright
miller
cooper
federal
practice
procedure
ed
claim
preclusion
aspect
res
judicata
doctrine
bars
matters
raised
prior
litigation
second
petitioner
fair
opportunity
raise
claim
prior
application
subsequent
application
raising
claim
second
successive
bar
apply
occur
claim
yet
ripe
time
first
petition
see
panetti
supra
alleged
violation
occurred
denial
first
petition
state
failure
grant
prisoner
parole
required
state
law
see
hill
alaska
crouch
norris
cain
respond
concern
see
ante
applicant
second
petition
raises
claim
raised
first
petition
district
left
unaddressed
discretion
second
application
second
successive
reraising
previously
unaddressed
claim
abusive
definition
believes
examples
principles
unfairly
close
door
state
prisoners
seeking
federal
habeas
review
one
think
able
come
example
third
mixed
petition
raising
abusive
nonabusive
claims
second
successive
circumstance
petitioner
obtain
authorization
appeals
proceed
nonabusive
claims
see
see
also
moore
et
federal
practice
ed
appeals
makes
determination
district
may
consider
nonabusive
claims
petitioner
fair
opportunity
present
first
petition
dismiss
abusive
claims
see
operation
rule
exemplified
decision
panetti
panetti
claim
mentally
incompetent
executed
ford
wainwright
become
ripe
denial
first
habeas
petition
ford
claim
became
ripe
panetti
filed
second
habeas
petition
raising
ford
claim
first
time
concluding
second
habeas
petition
second
successive
application
explained
second
successive
refe
applications
filed
second
successively
time
rather
takes
full
meaning
case
law
including
decisions
predating
enactment
aedpa
relied
aedpa
purpose
ing
principles
comity
finality
federalism
quoting
cockrell
aversion
empty
formality
requiring
prisoners
file
unripe
claims
cases
regarding
doctrine
panetti
thus
looked
nature
claim
raised
habeas
petition
determine
application
second
successive
ibid
principles
apply
situation
like
present
one
petitioner
first
habeas
proceeding
succeeds
obtaining
conditional
grant
relief
allows
state
correct
error
occurred
original
sentencing
assume
alleged
correcting
error
new
sentencing
proceeding
state
duplicates
different
mistake
also
occurred
first
sentencing
second
application
second
successive
respect
claim
alleged
error
raised
first
petition
woodard
opinion
powell
put
another
way
principles
petitioner
loses
right
challenge
error
raising
claim
first
opportunity
claim
becomes
ripe
hand
petitioner
raises
claim
second
habeas
petition
raised
earlier
petition
perhaps
error
occurred
first
time
resentencing
application
raising
claim
second
successive
bar
apply
although
authorities
adequate
show
application
case
second
successive
must
noted
previous
case
dealt
precise
sequence
events
petitioner
attempts
bring
previously
unraised
claim
second
resentencing
proceeding
followed
grant
federal
habeas
relief
conclusion
application
barred
second
successive
unless
claim
previously
unavailable
consistent
approach
every
appeals
considered
issue
although
cases
highlight
subtleties
relevant
principles
see
pratt
galtieri
lang
cases
arose
context
federal
prisoners
challenges
convictions
sentences
second
successive
bar
applies
motions
see
supp
ii
present
case
conclude
magwood
filed
second
successive
habeas
corpus
application
filed
first
federal
habeas
petition
raising
nine
claims
including
trial
improperly
failed
consider
two
mitigating
factors
imposed
magwood
death
sentence
district
granted
magwood
petition
ordered
relief
mitigating
factor
claim
state
trial
held
new
sentencing
proceeding
considered
mitigating
factors
reimposed
death
penalty
magwood
brought
second
habeas
petition
time
raising
argument
raised
first
petition
argument
eligible
death
penalty
fair
notice
crime
rendered
death
eligible
reason
magwood
raised
identical
argument
first
habeas
petition
magwood
full
fair
opportunity
adjudicate
claim
first
petition
petition
raising
claim
barred
second
successive
ii
reaches
opposite
result
creating
exception
second
successive
application
bar
respectful
view
makes
two
critical
errors
first
errs
rejecting
panetti
approach
determining
whether
application
second
successive
second
imposes
atextual
exception
bar
second
successive
applications
requiring
application
brought
judgment
second
error
underscored
fact
refuses
deal
logical
implications
newly
created
rule
concludes
aedpa
refers
second
successive
applications
rather
second
successive
claims
nature
claims
raised
second
application
irrelevant
see
ante
lthough
agree
state
many
rules
focus
claims
entitle
us
rewrite
statute
make
phrase
successive
modify
claims
well
incorrect
explained
panetti
establishes
deciding
whether
application
second
successive
requires
looking
nature
claim
application
raises
determine
whether
petitioner
full
fair
opportunity
raise
claim
earlier
petition
indeed
way
panetti
concluded
application
second
successive
look
underlying
claim
application
raised
asserts
calling
panetti
doubt
see
ante
even
attempt
explain
analysis
consistent
opinion
cf
panetti
thomas
dissenting
aedpa
enactment
phrase
successive
meant
thing
today
subsequent
federal
habeas
application
challenging
judgment
best
said
limiting
new
doctrine
applicability
previously
unexhausted
ford
claims
confining
holding
panetti
facts
case
thomas
dissenting
today
decision
thus
stands
proposition
ford
claims
somehow
deserve
special
unjustified
exemption
statute
plain
import
failing
consider
nature
claim
deciding
whether
application
barred
second
successive
raises
difficulties
consider
habeas
petition
challenging
alleged
violation
occurred
entirely
denial
first
petition
example
failure
grant
prisoner
parole
time
promised
state
law
unlawful
withdrawal
credits
see
supra
rule
appear
habeas
application
challenging
alleged
violations
barred
second
successive
application
challenging
custody
pursuant
judgment
result
inconsistent
principles
might
work
suspension
writ
habeas
corpus
unmoored
phrase
second
successive
textual
historical
underpinnings
creates
new
puzzle
nature
claim
makes
application
second
successive
look
finding
reference
point
text
searches
aedpa
different
peg
believes
finds
peg
different
provision
district
shall
entertain
application
writ
habeas
corpus
behalf
person
custody
pursuant
judgment
state
ground
custody
violation
constitution
laws
treaties
provision
purport
create
prerequisites
bar
second
successive
applications
accepted
reading
quoted
language
mere
status
requirement
see
hertz
liebman
federal
habeas
corpus
practice
procedure
ed
provision
stands
simple
proposition
petitioner
must
held
pursuant
judgment
state
able
file
petition
first
place
reading
also
explains
federal
habeas
petitions
attack
judgment
pursuant
petitioner
held
also
duration
sentence
conditions
sentence
served
including
rules
basis
parole
good
time
credits
reading
phrase
pursuant
judgment
state
limitation
second
successive
application
bar
artificial
amend
read
claim
presented
second
successive
habeas
corpus
application
section
presented
prior
application
judgment
shall
dismissed
says
wholly
glosses
another
significant
problem
atextual
analysis
relies
upon
notion
error
made
second
time
still
new
error
ante
making
statement
mean
one
two
different
things
first
mean
error
logically
encompassed
reentered
judgment
new
error
criminal
judgment
generally
includes
conviction
sentence
see
fed
rule
crim
proc
criminal
judgment
must
set
forth
plea
jury
verdict
findings
adjudication
sentence
teague
lane
often
stated
criminal
judgment
necessarily
includes
sentence
imposed
upon
defendant
principle
applies
federal
habeas
context
petitioner
custody
pursuant
judgment
person
held
custody
pursuant
sentence
pursuant
one
judgment
includes
conviction
sentence
see
burton
stewart
per
curiam
explaining
aedpa
statute
limitations
run
judgment
conviction
sentence
became
final
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
principle
holding
today
allow
challenger
magwood
position
raise
challenge
guilt
phase
criminal
judgment
second
application
since
new
judgment
consisting
conviction
sentence
reentered
errors
apparently
occurred
anew
illustration
state
trial
reentered
following
judgment
resentencing
therefore
ordered
adjudged
billy
joe
magwood
guilty
offense
aggravated
murder
billy
joe
magwood
sentenced
death
app
pet
cert
mean
magwood
attorney
dig
anything
occurred
voir
dire
witnesses
jury
guilty
verdict
raise
alleged
errors
first
time
second
habeas
application
trial
properly
consider
two
mitigating
factors
magwood
first
sentencing
proceeding
second
alternatively
retreat
even
statutory
text
conclude
parts
reentered
judgment
open
challenge
way
second
habeas
application
magwood
example
argues
challenge
previously
unraised
errors
made
sentencing
brief
petitioner
indeed
magwood
goes
suggests
even
sentencing
reopened
case
order
leads
trial
revise
defendant
term
supervised
release
adopting
exception
second
successive
application
bar
unclear
error
magwood
raises
new
error
magwood
challenge
death
eligibility
first
habeas
petition
disputed
get
death
penalty
matter
discretion
trial
properly
weighed
aggravating
mitigating
factors
state
trial
conducted
reweighing
reason
reconsider
uncontested
finding
magwood
death
eligible
hard
see
trial
failure
reconsider
sua
sponte
previous
finding
new
error
failure
reconsider
various
errors
may
taken
place
guilt
phase
new
errors
contends
approach
dictated
panetti
considerably
undermine
render
superfluous
ante
exceptions
allow
petitioner
bring
claim
second
successive
application
based
certain
factual
discoveries
based
new
precedent
applied
retroactively
seems
saying
applying
panetti
rule
make
exceptions
superfluous
claim
satisfy
exceptions
necessarily
satisfy
general
rule
derived
doctrine
misconceives
scope
rule
application
second
successive
raises
first
time
claim
raised
second
petition
raising
claim
raised
prior
petition
even
though
strengthened
new
decision
based
upon
newly
discovered
evidence
still
second
successive
thus
subsequent
application
permitted
qualified
pertinent
subsection
exception
fact
approach
limits
relevance
subsection
exceptions
theory
second
successive
bar
apply
applications
filed
petitioners
magwood
situation
thus
subsection
exceptions
operation
context
iii
approach
disregards
aedpa
comity
finality
federalism
panetti
quoting
newly
created
exception
second
successive
application
bar
defendant
succeeds
even
minor
discrete
issue
relating
sentencing
able
raise
new
sentencing
claims
second
habeas
petition
based
arguments
failed
raise
first
petition
reexamination
convictio
first
round
habeas
offends
federalism
comity
offense
increases
state
must
defend
conviction
second
subsequent
habeas
proceeding
grounds
even
raised
first
petition
mccleskey
novel
exception
also
allow
petitioner
reraise
every
argument
sentence
rejected
federal
courts
first
round
federal
habeas
review
respondents
explain
theory
petitioner
simply
staple
new
cover
page
words
petition
attacking
new
judgment
previously
adjudicated
petition
brief
respondents
traditional
res
judicata
principles
apply
federal
habeas
proceedings
see
salinger
loisel
force
federal
courts
address
twice
thrice
claims
error
state
victims
bear
anew
significant
costs
federal
habeas
corpus
review
mccleskey
supra
petitioner
previously
succeeded
wholly
different
discrete
possibly
unrelated
claim
suggestion
take
long
dispose
claims
already
analyzed
legal
issues
ante
misses
point
reassurance
cold
comfort
overworked
state
district
attorneys
waste
time
resources
writing
briefs
analyzing
dozens
claims
barred
principles
difficult
motivate
even
dedicated
professionals
best
work
day
day
deal
dispiriting
task
responding
previously
rejected
otherwise
abusive
claims
exactly
mandating
statute
designed
require
opposite
result
analysis
dissent
sound
hoped
document
ill
effects
opinion
costs
deficiencies
better
understood
issue
related
one
come
new
exception
apply
death
penalty
cases
like
present
one
newly
raised
claim
appears
arguably
meritorious
apply
federal
habeas
petitions
following
prior
successful
petition
death
cases
abusive
claims
permits
wholly
lack
merit
vein
striking
decision
means
subject
federal
habeas
review
henceforth
receive
less
recognition
finality
interest
federal
government
direct
review
federal
criminal
convictions
see
parker
posner
party
use
accident
remand
raise
second
appeal
issue
well
raised
first
appeal
remand
affect
approach
also
turns
aedpa
bar
second
successive
applications
ratchet
favors
habeas
petitioners
unless
today
decision
read
unduly
limit
panetti
see
supra
aedpa
still
incorporates
recognized
exceptions
doctrine
allow
petitioners
bring
previously
unavailable
unripe
claims
see
ante
breyer
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
today
holding
aedpa
modifie
ante
principles
allows
petitioners
bring
abusive
claims
long
victory
pursuant
prior
federal
habeas
petition
thus
reads
aedpa
creating
new
loophole
habeas
petitioners
exploit
challenge
sentences
based
grounds
previously
neglected
raise
inconsistent
understanding
aedpa
adds
new
restrictions
successive
petitions
restricts
availability
relief
habeas
petitioners
felker
turpin
magwood
unsuccessful
first
petition
agree
claims
available
raised
barred
prevailed
attack
one
part
sentencing
proceeding
first
time
around
rules
free
postsentencing
pursue
claims
federal
habeas
review
might
raised
earlier
mistaken
concluding
congress
enacting
statute
aimed
placing
new
restrictions
successive
petitions
intended
irrational
result
magwood
every
chance
raise
claim
first
habeas
petition
abused
writ
raising
claim
first
time
second
petition
application
therefore
second
successive
affirm
judgment
appeals
footnotes
although
refers
habeas
application
use
word
petition
interchangeably
word
application
prior
cases
time
murder
alabama
code
provided
jury
finds
defendant
guilty
shall
fix
punishment
death
defendant
charged
indictment
following
offenses
aggravation
must
also
averred
indictment
offenses
included
murder
sheriff
duty
official
act
statute
set
forth
list
aggravating
circumstances
trial
found
none
existed
magwood
case
relevant
kyzer
away
prior
alabama
rule
aggravating
component
capital
felony
double
aggravating
factor
supporting
capital
sentence
kyzer
defendant
sentenced
death
intentional
murder
two
human
beings
see
crime
murder
defined
aggravated
serial
nature
magwood
crime
murder
defined
aggravated
fact
killed
sheriff
sheriff
acts
kyzer
alabama
ultimately
remanded
new
trial
order
guide
lower
remand
addressed
whether
aggravation
charged
crime
see
sufficient
impose
sentence
death
even
without
finding
aggravating
circumstance
enumerated
see
ruled
defendant
convicted
jury
trial
judge
sentencing
hearing
may
find
aggravation
averred
indictment
aggravating
circumstance
even
though
aggravation
listed
aggravating
circumstance
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
alabama
criminal
appeals
subsequently
affirmed
denial
magwood
coram
nobis
petition
see
magwood
state
alabama
denied
magwood
motion
file
appeal
decision
see
ex
parte
magwood
see
code
mitigating
circumstances
shall
following
capital
felony
committed
defendant
influence
extreme
mental
emotional
disturbance
capacity
defendant
appreciate
criminality
conduct
conform
conduct
requirements
law
substantially
impaired
jackson
state
alabama
criminal
appeals
held
kyzer
supported
death
sentence
defendant
convicted
offense
committed
kyzer
decided
resentenced
decision
treated
magwood
claim
new
free
restrictions
reversed
merits
possible
objection
alabama
highest
said
kyzer
aggravating
factor
used
aggravating
circumstance
prepared
require
counsel
raise
argument
already
decided
adversely
client
position
state
highest
order
avoid
found
ineffective
slack
mcdaniel
applied
law
id
suggest
definition
second
successive
different
aedpa
courts
followed
slack
cases
state
agrees
relevant
question
presented
see
brief
respondents
focus
judgment
accords
current
filing
requirements
see
habeas
corpus
rule
requiring
petitioner
ask
relief
judgment
contested
rule
prescribing
petitioner
seeks
relief
judgments
one
state
must
file
separate
petition
covering
judgment
judgments
dissent
recognizes
phrase
second
successive
applies
application
whole
see
post
opinion
kennedy
departs
significant
ways
statutory
text
see
infra
case
require
us
determine
whether
applies
every
application
filed
prisoner
custody
pursuant
judgment
prisoner
challenged
judgment
three
times
held
otherwise
see
slack
mcdaniel
stewart
panetti
quarterman
dissent
claim
reading
calls
one
decisions
panetti
doubt
see
post
unfounded
question
case
whether
first
application
challenging
new
sentence
intervening
judgment
second
successive
whether
application
challenging
judgment
must
always
second
successive
dissent
speculates
issues
far
beyond
question
see
post
suggesting
reading
calls
question
precedents
recognizing
habeas
petitions
challenging
denial
credits
parole
address
application
challenging
new
judgment
first
time
purport
constrain
scope
previously
defined
cf
walker
roth
none
new
claims
raised
first
petition
petitioner
attempting
challenge
constitutionality
proceeding
obviously
occurred
filed
obtained
relief
first
habeas
petition
see
supp
md
split
proceedings
current
petition
two
stages
stage
determining
whether
claims
procedurally
defaulted
stage
ii
considering
merits
claims
procedurally
defaulted
magwood
claims
survived
initial
cut
dissent
concern
petitioner
may
reraise
every
argument
sentence
rejected
federal
courts
first
round
federal
habeas
review
post
similarly
hyperbolic
take
long
dispose
claims
already
analyzed
legal
issues
several
courts
appeals
held
petitioner
succeeds
first
habeas
application
resentenced
may
challenge
portion
judgment
arose
result
previous
successful
action
lang
citing
decisions
see
also
walker
esposito
case
agree
dissent
reading
gives
windfall
defendant
succeeds
even
minor
discrete
issue
post
aedpa
permits
relief
ground
petitioner
custody
violation
constitution
laws
treaties