morgan
stanley
capital
group
public
utility
district
snohomish
county
et
argued
february
decided
june
doctrine
federal
energy
regulatory
commission
ferc
must
presume
electricity
rate
set
freely
negotiated
contract
meets
reasonable
requirement
federal
power
act
fpa
see
presumption
may
overcome
ferc
concludes
contract
seriously
harms
public
interest
see
gas
pipe
line
mobile
gas
service
fpc
sierra
pacific
power
ferc
current
regulatory
regime
wholesale
electricity
seller
may
file
tariff
simply
utility
enter
freely
negotiated
contracts
purchasers
contracts
filed
ferc
go
effect
dramatic
increase
price
electricity
western
result
respondents
entered
contracts
petitioners
locked
rates
high
historical
standards
respondents
subsequently
asked
ferc
modify
contracts
contending
rates
presumed
reasonable
administrative
law
judge
concluded
presumption
applied
contracts
seriously
harm
public
interest
ferc
affirmed
ninth
circuit
remanded
held
contract
rates
presumptively
reasonable
ferc
initial
opportunity
review
contracts
without
applying
presumption
therefore
presumption
apply
contracts
entered
tariffs
alternatively
held
different
standard
overcoming
presumption
purchaser
challenges
contract
whether
contract
exceeds
zone
reasonableness
held
commission
required
apply
presumption
evaluating
contracts
sierra
held
rate
set
contract
must
presumed
reasonable
absent
serious
harm
public
interest
regardless
contract
challenged
fpc
texaco
distinguished
also
ninth
circuit
rule
requiring
ferc
ask
whether
contract
formed
environment
market
dysfunction
supported
cases
plainly
undermines
role
contracts
fpa
statutory
scheme
pp
ninth
circuit
zone
reasonableness
test
fails
accord
adequate
level
protection
contracts
standard
buyer
challenge
must
generally
standard
seller
challenge
contract
rate
must
seriously
harm
public
interest
ninth
circuit
misread
sierra
holding
standard
evaluating
challenge
setting
aside
contract
rate
whether
consumers
electricity
bills
higher
contract
rates
equaled
marginal
cost
presumption
setting
aside
contract
rate
requires
finding
unequivocal
public
necessity
permian
basin
area
rate
cases
extraordinary
circumstances
arkansas
louisiana
gas
hall
pp
judgment
nonetheless
affirmed
alternative
grounds
based
two
defects
ferc
analysis
first
analysis
flawed
incomplete
extent
ferc
looked
simply
whether
consumers
rates
increased
immediately
upon
conclusion
relevant
contracts
rather
determining
whether
contracts
imposed
excessive
burden
line
relative
rates
consumers
obtained
contracts
elimination
dysfunctional
market
sierra
excessive
burden
customers
current
burden
burden
imposed
contract
outset
see
second
unclear
ferc
orders
whether
found
respondents
evidence
inadequate
support
claim
petitioners
engaged
unlawful
market
manipulation
altered
playing
field
contract
negotiations
case
commission
presume
contract
reasonable
like
fraud
duress
unlawful
market
activity
directly
affecting
contract
negotiations
eliminates
premise
presumption
rests
contract
rates
product
fair
negotiations
remand
ferc
amplify
clarify
findings
two
points
pp
affirmed
remanded
scalia
delivered
opinion
kennedy
thomas
alito
joined
ginsburg
joined
part
iii
ginsburg
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
souter
joined
roberts
breyer
took
part
consideration
decision
cases
morgan
stanley
capital
group
petitioner
public
utility
district
snohomish
county
washington
et
al
american
electric
power
service
corporation
et
petitioners
public
utility
district
snohomish
county
washington
et
al
writs
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
june
justice
scalia
delivered
opinion
doctrine
federal
energy
regulatory
commission
ferc
commission
must
presume
rate
set
freely
negotiated
contract
meets
reasonable
requirement
imposed
law
presumption
may
overcome
ferc
concludes
contract
seriously
harms
public
interest
cases
present
two
questions
scope
doctrine
first
presumption
apply
ferc
initial
opportunity
review
contract
rate
without
presumption
second
presumption
impose
high
bar
challenges
purchasers
wholesale
electricity
challenges
sellers
statutory
background
federal
power
act
fpa
stat
amended
gives
authority
regulate
sale
electricity
interstate
commerce
market
historically
characterized
natural
monopoly
therefore
subject
abuses
market
power
see
et
seq
modeled
interstate
commerce
act
fpa
requires
regulated
utilities
file
compilations
rate
schedules
tariffs
commission
provide
service
electricity
purchasers
terms
prices
set
forth
utilities
wishing
change
tariffs
must
notify
commission
days
change
go
effect
unlike
interstate
commerce
act
however
fpa
also
permits
utilities
set
rates
individual
electricity
purchasers
bilateral
contracts
explained
elsewhere
fpa
departed
scheme
purely
regulation
acknowledged
contracts
commercial
buyers
sellers
used
ratesetting
verizon
communications
fcc
like
tariffs
contracts
must
filed
commission
go
effect
fpa
requires
rates
reasonable
utility
files
new
rate
commission
change
tariff
new
contract
commission
may
suspend
rate
five
months
investigates
whether
rate
reasonable
commission
may
however
decline
investigate
permit
rate
go
effect
amount
determination
rate
reasonable
see
cfr
rate
goes
effect
whether
commission
deemed
reasonable
filed
commission
may
conclude
response
complaint
motion
rate
reasonable
replace
lawful
rate
supp
statutory
requirement
rates
reasonable
obviously
incapable
precise
judicial
definition
afford
great
deference
commission
rate
decisions
see
fpc
texaco
permian
basin
area
rate
cases
repeatedly
emphasized
commission
bound
one
ratemaking
formula
see
mobil
oil
exploration
producing
southeast
distribution
permian
basin
supra
ferc
must
choose
method
entails
appropriate
balancing
investor
consumer
interests
fpc
hope
natural
gas
exercising
broad
discretion
commission
traditionally
reviewed
set
tariff
rates
method
ensures
seller
electricity
recovers
costs
plus
rate
return
sufficient
attract
necessary
capital
see
mcgrew
federal
energy
regulatory
commission
hereinafter
mcgrew
two
cases
decided
day
addressed
authority
commission
modify
rates
set
bilaterally
contract
rather
unilaterally
tariff
gas
pipe
line
mobile
gas
service
rejected
utility
argument
natural
gas
act
requirement
file
new
rates
commission
authorized
abrogate
lawful
contract
purchaser
simply
filing
new
tariff
see
filing
requirement
explained
merely
precondition
changing
rate
authorization
change
rates
violation
lawful
contract
contract
sets
reasonable
rate
see
fpc
sierra
pacific
power
applied
holding
mobile
analogous
provisions
fpa
concluding
complaining
utility
supersede
contract
rate
simply
filing
new
tariff
sierra
however
commission
concluded
contrary
holding
newly
filed
tariff
superseded
contract
also
contract
rate
reasonable
solely
yield
ed
less
fair
return
net
invested
capital
utility
thus
confronted
question
commission
may
evaluate
whether
contract
rate
reasonable
answered
question
following
way
commission
conclusion
appears
face
based
erroneous
standard
hile
may
commission
may
normally
impose
upon
public
utility
rate
produce
less
fair
return
follow
public
utility
may
agree
contract
rate
affording
less
fair
return
entitled
relieved
improvident
bargain
circumstances
sole
concern
commission
seem
whether
rate
low
adversely
affect
public
interest
might
impair
financial
ability
public
utility
continue
service
cast
upon
consumers
excessive
burden
unduly
discriminatory
emphasis
deleted
said
later
case
regulatory
system
created
fpa
premised
contractual
agreements
voluntarily
devised
regulated
companies
contemplates
abrogation
agreements
circumstances
unequivocal
public
necessity
permian
basin
supra
past
years
decisions
courts
appeals
refined
presumption
allow
greater
freedom
contract
gas
pipe
line
memphis
light
gas
water
held
parties
contract
presumption
specifying
contracts
new
rate
filed
commission
supersede
contract
rate
courts
appeals
held
contracting
parties
may
also
agree
middle
option
memphis
light
contract
allow
seller
supersede
contract
rate
filing
new
rate
may
nonetheless
permit
commission
set
aside
contract
rate
results
unfair
rate
return
violates
public
interest
see
papago
tribal
util
auth
ferc
cadc
louisiana
power
light
ferc
thus
doctrine
developed
regulated
parties
retained
broad
authority
specify
whether
ferc
review
contract
rate
solely
whether
violates
public
interest
also
whether
results
unfair
rate
return
presumption
remains
default
rule
moreover
even
though
challenges
mobile
sierra
brought
sellers
lower
courts
concluded
presumption
also
applies
purchaser
rather
seller
asks
ferc
modify
contract
see
potomac
elec
power
ferc
cadc
boston
edison
ferc
seemingly
blessed
conclusion
explaining
fpa
hen
commercial
parties
avail
rate
agreements
principal
regulatory
responsibility
relieve
contracting
party
unreasonable
rate
verizon
citing
sierra
supra
years
commission
began
refer
two
modes
review
one
presumption
without
public
interest
standard
reasonable
standard
see
southern
co
gulf
utils
southern
co
ferc
pp
decisions
courts
appeals
likewise
see
kansas
cities
ferc
cadc
northeast
utils
serv
ferc
take
nomenclature
stand
obviously
indefensible
proposition
standard
different
statutory
standard
applies
contract
rates
rather
term
public
interest
standard
refers
differing
application
standard
contract
rates
see
philadelphia
elec
less
confusing
adopt
solicitor
general
terminology
referring
two
differing
applications
standard
ordinary
reasonable
standard
public
interest
standard
see
reply
brief
respondent
ferc
recent
ferc
innovations
tariffs
recent
decades
commission
undertaken
ambitious
program
reforms
part
impetus
changes
technological
evolution
historically
electric
utilities
vertically
integrated
monopolies
particular
geographic
area
single
utility
control
generation
electricity
transmission
distribution
consumers
see
midwest
iso
transmission
owners
ferc
cadc
since
however
engineering
innovations
lowered
cost
generating
electricity
transmitting
long
distances
enabling
new
entrants
challenge
regional
generating
monopolies
traditional
utilities
see
generally
new
york
ferc
public
util
dist
snohomish
cty
ferc
cadc
take
advantage
changes
commission
attempted
break
regulatory
economic
barriers
hinder
free
market
wholesale
electricity
sought
promote
competition
areas
industry
amenable
competition
segment
generates
electric
power
ensuring
segment
industry
characterized
natural
monopoly
namely
transmission
grid
conveys
generated
electricity
exert
monopolistic
influence
areas
see
new
york
supra
snohomish
supra
end
ferc
required
order
transmission
provider
offer
transmission
service
customers
equal
basis
filing
open
access
transmission
tariff
promoting
wholesale
competition
open
access
transmission
services
public
utilities
fed
reg
see
new
york
supra
requirement
prevents
utilities
grid
offering
favorable
transmission
terms
affiliates
thereby
extending
monopoly
power
areas
industry
pry
open
market
reduce
technical
inefficiencies
caused
different
utilities
operate
different
portions
grid
independently
commission
encouraged
transmission
providers
establish
regional
transmission
organizations
entities
transmission
providers
transfer
operational
control
facilities
purpose
efficient
coordination
order
fed
reg
see
midwest
iso
supra
encouraged
management
entities
independent
system
operators
entities
operate
transmission
facilities
nondiscriminatory
manner
see
midwest
iso
supra
addition
coordinating
transmission
service
regional
transmission
organizations
perform
functions
running
auction
markets
electricity
sales
offering
contracts
hedging
potential
grid
congestion
see
blumsack
measuring
benefits
costs
regional
electric
grid
integration
energy
backdrop
technological
change
reforms
commission
past
two
decades
begun
permit
sellers
wholesale
electricity
file
tariffs
tariffs
instead
setting
forth
rate
schedules
contracts
simply
state
seller
enter
freely
negotiated
contracts
purchasers
see
generally
rates
wholesale
sales
electric
energy
capacity
ancillary
services
public
utilities
order
fed
reg
hereinafter
rates
mcgrew
ferc
subject
contracts
entered
tariffs
subjected
traditional
contracts
requirement
immediate
filing
apparently
theory
requirement
satisfied
initial
filing
tariffs
see
brief
respondent
ferc
hereinafter
brief
ferc
ferc
grant
approval
tariff
utility
demonstrates
lacks
adequately
mitigated
market
power
lacks
capacity
erect
barriers
entry
avoided
giving
preferences
affiliates
see
rates
fed
reg
addition
initial
authorization
tariff
ferc
imposes
ongoing
reporting
requirements
seller
must
file
quarterly
reports
summarizing
contracts
entered
even
extremely
contracts
see
california
ex
rel
lockyer
ferc
must
also
demonstrate
every
four
months
still
lacks
adequately
mitigated
market
power
see
ibid
ferc
determines
filings
seller
reattained
market
power
may
revoke
authority
prospectively
see
rates
fed
reg
commission
finds
seller
violated
regional
transmission
organization
market
rules
tariff
commission
orders
commission
may
take
appropriate
remedial
action
ordering
refunds
requiring
disgorgement
profits
imposing
civil
penalties
see
ibid
ninth
circuit
circuit
generally
approved
ferc
scheme
tariffs
see
lockyer
supra
louisiana
energy
power
auth
ferc
cadc
hitherto
approved
express
opinion
today
lawfulness
system
one
issues
us
suffices
present
cases
recognize
seller
files
tariff
purchasers
longer
option
buying
electricity
rate
set
tariff
contracts
longer
need
filed
ferc
subjected
investigatory
power
going
effect
california
electricity
regulation
consequences
california
enacted
assembly
bill
ab
massively
restructured
california
electricity
market
see
cal
stat
ch
codified
cal
pub
util
code
ann
west
supp
see
generally
cudahy
whither
deregulation
look
portents
annual
survey
law
hereinafter
cudahy
bill
transferred
operational
control
transmission
facilities
california
three
largest
utilities
independent
service
operator
see
pacific
gas
elec
ferc
also
established
california
power
exchange
calpx
nonprofit
entity
operated
market
spot
market
electricity
bill
required
california
three
largest
utilities
divest
facilities
required
utilities
purchase
sell
bulk
electricity
calpx
spot
market
permitting
limited
leeway
enter
contracts
see
public
util
dist
snohomish
cty
ferc
case
ferc
approved
consistent
requirements
independent
service
operator
established
order
ferc
also
approved
calpx
utilities
authority
make
sales
rates
calpx
finding
light
divesture
generation
units
conditions
imposed
restructuring
plan
utilities
adequately
mitigated
market
power
see
pacific
gas
elec
ferc
pp
calpx
opened
business
march
summer
expanded
include
auction
sales
electricity
forward
contracts
contracts
sellers
promise
deliver
electricity
one
day
future
sometimes
many
years
participation
california
large
utilities
forward
market
limited
said
ab
strictly
capped
amount
power
purchase
outside
spot
market
see
diminishment
role
contracts
california
electricity
market
turned
one
seeds
energy
crisis
summer
price
electricity
calpx
spot
market
jumped
dramatically
fifteenfold
see
ibid
increase
result
combination
natural
economic
regulatory
factors
flawed
market
rules
inadequate
addition
generating
facilities
preceding
years
drop
available
hydropower
due
drought
conditions
rupture
major
pipeline
supplying
natural
gas
california
strong
growth
economy
electricity
demand
unusually
high
temperatures
increase
unplanned
outages
extremely
old
generating
facilities
market
manipulation
californians
renewable
energy
sellers
energy
ancillary
ferc
pp
california
utilities
part
forbidden
obtain
power
contracts
turmoil
spot
market
hit
hard
see
cudahy
high
prices
led
rolling
blackouts
saddled
utilities
mounting
debt
late
commission
took
action
central
plank
emergency
effort
eliminate
utilities
reliance
calpx
spot
market
shift
purchases
forward
market
end
ferc
abolished
requirement
utilities
purchase
sell
power
calpx
encouraged
enter
contracts
see
san
diego
gas
electric
sellers
energy
ancillary
ferc
pp
see
also
commission
also
put
price
caps
wholesale
electricity
see
san
diego
gas
elec
sellers
energy
ancillary
ferc
june
electricity
prices
began
decline
normal
levels
genesis
cases
principal
respondents
cases
western
utilities
purchased
power
contracts
tumultuous
period
although
located
california
high
prices
california
spilled
western
see
petitioners
sellers
entered
contracts
respondents
contracts
parties
included
rates
high
historical
standards
example
respondent
snohomish
signed
contract
purchase
electricity
petitioner
morgan
stanley
rate
hour
mwh
whereas
prices
pacific
northwest
historically
averaged
contract
prices
substantially
lower
however
prices
snohomish
paid
spot
market
energy
crisis
prices
peaked
see
crisis
passed
buyer
remorse
set
respondents
asked
ferc
modify
contracts
contended
rates
contracts
presumed
reasonable
given
sellers
tariffs
contracts
never
initially
approved
commission
without
presumption
see
nevada
power
enron
power
marketing
ferc
pp
respondents
also
argued
contract
modification
warranted
even
presumption
contract
rates
high
violated
public
interest
see
ferc
preliminary
order
commission
instructed
administrative
law
judge
alj
consider
different
factors
deciding
whether
presumption
overcome
contracts
terms
contracts
available
alternatives
time
sale
relationship
rates
commission
benchmarks
effect
contracts
financial
health
purchasers
impact
contract
modification
national
energy
markets
hearing
alj
concluded
presumption
apply
contracts
contracts
seriously
harm
public
interest
fact
according
alj
even
presumption
apply
respondents
entitled
contracts
modified
ferc
alj
decision
commission
ruling
commission
staff
issued
report
staff
report
concluding
unlawful
activities
various
sellers
spot
market
affected
prices
forward
market
see
respondents
raised
report
oral
argument
commission
argued
petitioners
unlawfully
manipulating
market
prices
thereby
engaging
fraud
deception
violation
rate
tariffs
ibid
petitioners
contended
however
staff
report
demonstrated
correlation
rates
spot
forward
markets
causal
connection
see
ibid
ferc
affirmed
alj
commission
first
held
presumption
apply
contracts
issue
although
agreeing
respondents
presumption
applies
ferc
initial
opportunity
review
contract
rate
commission
relied
somewhat
metaphysical
ground
grant
authority
petitioners
qualified
initial
opportunity
see
ferc
commission
held
respondents
overcome
presumption
recognized
staff
report
found
spot
market
distortions
flowed
forward
power
prices
ferc
concluded
finding
even
true
determinative
finding
unjust
unreasonable
spot
market
caused
forward
bilateral
prices
unjust
unreasonable
relevant
contract
modification
reasonable
standard
review
interest
standard
justify
contract
modification
enough
show
forward
prices
became
unjust
unreasonable
due
impact
spot
market
dysfunctions
must
shown
rates
terms
conditions
contrary
public
interest
commission
determined
factors
identified
sierra
well
test
respondents
demonstrated
contracts
threatened
public
interest
see
ferc
rehearing
respondents
reiterated
complaints
including
charge
contracts
product
market
manipulation
enron
morgan
stanley
sellers
ferc
pp
commission
answered
evidence
support
finding
market
manipulation
specifically
affected
contracts
issue
ibid
respondents
filed
petitions
review
ninth
circuit
granted
petitions
remanded
commission
finding
two
flaws
commission
first
agreed
respondents
rates
set
contract
whether
pursuant
tariff
presumptively
reasonable
ferc
initial
opportunity
review
contracts
without
applying
presumption
satisfy
prerequisite
tariff
regime
said
commission
must
promptly
review
terms
contracts
formation
must
modify
appear
reasonable
evaluated
without
presumption
rather
merely
revoking
authority
prospectively
leaving
contracts
intact
see
initial
review
must
include
inquiry
market
conditions
contracts
issue
formed
market
dysfunction
ground
finding
contract
reasonable
second
ninth
circuit
held
even
assuming
presumption
applied
standard
overcoming
presumption
different
purchaser
challenge
contract
namely
whether
contract
rate
exceeds
zone
reasonableness
granted
certiorari
see
ii
application
presumption
contracts
concluded
rate
authority
noted
earlier
ferc
order
review
agreed
ninth
circuit
premise
commission
must
initial
opportunity
review
contract
without
presumption
maintained
authorization
rate
authority
qualified
initial
review
however
ferc
changes
tune
arguing
prerequisite
least
ferc
reasonably
conclude
therefore
chevron
deference
order
see
brief
ferc
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
uphold
discretionary
agency
decision
agency
offered
justification
different
provided
opinion
see
sec
chenery
ferc
lucked
chenery
doctrine
application
cases
conclude
commission
required
decision
sierra
apply
presumption
evaluation
contracts
provided
different
rationale
necessary
result
cause
upsetting
ruling
remand
idle
useless
formality
chenery
require
convert
judicial
review
agency
action
game
nlrb
plurality
opinion
broad
agreement
ninth
circuit
central
premise
one
statutory
standard
assessing
wholesale
electricity
rates
whether
set
contract
tariff
standard
plain
text
fpa
rates
shall
reasonable
see
also
supp
disagree
ninth
circuit
interpretation
sierra
requiring
contrary
statute
commission
apply
standard
differently
depending
contract
rate
challenged
ninth
circuit
view
sierra
premised
idea
long
rate
reasonable
contract
formed
presumption
reasonableness
continued
throughout
term
contract
words
long
commission
concludes
either
hearing
allowing
rate
go
effect
contract
rate
reasonable
initially
filed
rate
presumed
reasonable
future
proceedings
misreading
sierra
sierra
grounded
commonsense
notion
wholesale
markets
party
charging
rate
party
charged
often
sophisticated
businesses
enjoying
presumptively
equal
bargaining
power
expected
negotiate
reasonable
rate
two
verizon
therefore
mutually
contract
rate
seriously
harms
consuming
public
may
commission
declare
sierra
thus
provided
definition
means
rate
satisfy
standard
contract
context
definition
applies
regardless
contract
reviewed
ninth
circuit
contrast
essentially
read
sierra
equivalent
estoppel
doctrine
whereby
initial
commission
opportunity
review
prevents
commission
modifying
rates
absent
serious
future
harm
public
interest
tewksbury
lim
applying
doctrine
rate
contracts
energy
sierra
said
nothing
sort
given
commission
passive
permission
rate
go
effect
constitute
finding
rate
reasonable
odd
treat
initial
opportunity
review
curtailing
later
challenges
ninth
circuit
found
support
prerequisite
decision
fpc
texaco
case
warned
commission
attempt
rely
solely
market
forces
evaluate
rates
charged
small
producers
inconsistent
natural
gas
act
insistence
rates
reasonable
see
ninth
circuit
apparently
took
mean
initially
filed
contracts
must
subject
review
without
presumption
texaco
nothing
doctrine
held
commission
improperly
implemented
scheme
total
deregulation
applying
standard
review
rates
see
cast
doubt
proposition
proper
regulatory
scheme
ordinary
mode
evaluating
contractually
set
rates
look
whether
rates
seriously
harm
public
interest
whether
unfair
one
parties
voluntarily
assented
contract
cf
agree
ninth
circuit
ferc
must
inquire
whether
contract
formed
environment
market
dysfunction
applying
presumption
markets
perfect
one
reasons
parties
enter
contracts
precisely
hedge
volatility
market
imperfections
produce
one
commission
responses
energy
crisis
remove
regulatory
barriers
contracts
perverse
rule
rendered
contracts
less
likely
enforced
volatility
market
rule
come
play
contract
formed
period
dysfunction
significantly
harm
consuming
public
since
contracts
seriously
harm
public
set
aside
even
presumption
enabling
sophisticated
parties
weathered
market
turmoil
entering
contracts
renounce
contracts
storm
passed
ninth
circuit
holding
reduce
incentive
conclude
contracts
future
rule
support
case
law
plainly
undermines
role
contracts
fpa
statutory
scheme
sure
ferc
ample
authority
set
aside
contract
unfair
dealing
contract
formation
stage
instance
finds
traditional
grounds
abrogation
contract
fraud
duress
see
ferc
evidence
unfairness
bad
faith
duress
original
negotiations
addition
dysfunctional
market
conditions
contract
formed
caused
illegal
action
one
parties
ferc
apply
presumption
see
part
iii
infra
mere
fact
market
imperfect
even
chaotic
reason
undermine
stabilizing
force
contracts
fpa
embraced
alternative
purely
regulation
verizon
may
add
evaluating
market
dysfunction
difficult
highly
speculative
task
one
fpa
likely
require
agency
engage
holding
sophisticated
parties
bargains
reiterate
address
lawfulness
ferc
scheme
assuredly
critics
needed
revision
scheme
properly
addressed
challenge
scheme
disfigurement
venerable
doctrine
hold
ferc
may
abrogate
valid
contract
harms
public
interest
application
excessive
burden
exception
challenges
turn
ninth
circuit
second
holding
zone
reasonableness
test
used
evaluate
buyer
challenge
rate
high
view
fails
accord
adequate
level
protection
contracts
standard
buyer
challenge
must
generally
speaking
standard
seller
challenge
contract
rate
must
seriously
harm
public
interest
standard
commission
applied
proceedings
agreement
ninth
circuit
starting
premise
clear
three
factors
identified
sierra
rate
might
impair
financial
ability
public
utility
continue
service
cast
upon
consumers
excessive
burden
unduly
discriminatory
precisely
applicable
challenge
purchaser
example
relevant
question
whether
customers
utility
excessively
burdened
whether
customers
purchaser
three
factors
event
exclusive
components
public
interest
decision
commission
recognized
realities
see
ferc
nevada
companies
failed
show
contract
terms
issue
impose
excessive
burden
customers
emphasis
added
record
also
demonstrates
snohomish
presented
evidence
contract
morgan
stanley
adversely
affected
snohomish
ratepayers
emphasis
added
evaluating
totality
circumstances
see
also
brief
ferc
disagree
ninth
circuit
overarching
zone
reasonableness
standard
established
evaluating
challenge
setting
aside
contract
rate
whether
consumers
electricity
bills
higher
otherwise
challenged
contracts
called
rates
within
reasonable
range
rates
equal
marginal
cost
ninth
circuit
derived
test
statement
sierra
contract
rate
modified
low
imposed
excessive
burden
wholesale
purchasers
ninth
circuit
took
excessive
burden
mean
merely
burden
caused
one
set
consumers
forced
pay
marginal
cost
compensate
rates
charged
consumers
see
proceeded
apply
similar
notion
excessive
burden
challenges
burden
contract
rate
falls
purchaser
customers
affect
customers
third
parties
misreading
sierra
later
cases
presumption
validity
disappears
rate
marginal
cost
presumption
validity
reinstitution
rather
regulation
said
presumption
setting
aside
contract
rate
requires
finding
unequivocal
public
necessity
permian
basin
extraordinary
circumstances
arkansas
louisiana
gas
hall
way
descriptions
thought
refer
mere
exceeding
marginal
cost
ninth
circuit
standard
give
short
shrift
important
role
contracts
fpa
reflected
decision
sierra
threaten
inject
volatility
electricity
market
undermining
key
source
stability
fpa
recognizes
contract
stability
ultimately
benefits
consumers
even
rates
subset
public
might
high
historical
standards
permits
rates
set
contract
tariff
commission
recently
put
first
foremost
duty
protect
consumers
unjust
unreasonable
rates
however
uncertainties
regarding
rate
stability
contract
sanctity
chilling
effect
investments
seller
willingness
enter
contracts
turn
harm
customers
long
run
rates
fed
reg
besides
wrong
principle
practical
effect
ninth
circuit
rule
impose
onerous
new
burden
commission
requiring
calculate
marginal
cost
power
sold
contract
assuming
ferc
even
ventured
undertake
analysis
rather
reverting
ancien
régime
ratesetting
regulatory
costs
enormous
think
fpa
intended
reserve
commission
power
extraordinary
circumstances
public
severely
iii
defects
ferc
analysis
supporting
remand
despite
significant
disagreement
ninth
circuit
find
two
errors
commission
analysis
therefore
affirm
judgment
alternative
grounds
first
appears
ninth
circuit
concluded
see
commission
may
looked
simply
whether
consumers
rates
increased
immediately
upon
relevant
contracts
going
effect
rather
determining
whether
contracts
imposed
excessive
burden
consumers
line
relative
rates
obtained
contracts
elimination
dysfunctional
market
example
commission
concluded
two
respondents
experience
rate
decreases
approximately
percent
retail
service
period
covered
contracts
ferc
baseline
computation
rate
paying
contracts
went
effect
disparity
certainly
relevant
consideration
disparity
contract
rate
rates
consumers
paid
contracts
line
open
market
longer
dysfunctional
disparity
past
certain
point
amount
excessive
burden
contemplated
sierra
involved
challenge
years
contract
excessive
burden
customers
opinion
referred
assuredly
current
burden
burden
imposed
outset
contract
see
unequivocal
public
necessity
justifies
overriding
presumption
disappear
factor
contract
enters
force
thus
ferc
analysis
point
flawed
least
incomplete
ninth
circuit
put
entirely
possible
rates
increased
high
energy
crises
dysfunction
spot
market
even
acknowledged
decrease
rates
consumers
still
paid
forward
contracts
otherwise
increase
great
even
taking
account
desirability
fostering
contracts
rates
impose
excessive
burden
consumers
otherwise
seriously
harm
public
interest
rates
must
disallowed
second
respondents
alleged
ferc
petitioners
cases
engaged
market
manipulation
spot
market
see
ferc
snohomish
nevada
companies
argue
contracts
product
market
manipulation
enron
morgan
stanley
respondents
established
commission
staff
engaged
market
manipulation
staff
report
concluded
said
abnormally
high
prices
spot
market
energy
crisis
influenced
terms
contracts
forward
market
commission
dismissed
relevance
staff
report
ground
demonstrated
forward
market
prices
high
overcome
presumption
conclude
however
clear
one
party
contract
engaged
extensive
unlawful
market
manipulation
alter
playing
field
contract
negotiations
commission
presume
contract
reasonable
like
fraud
duress
unlawful
market
activity
directly
affects
contract
negotiations
eliminates
premise
presumption
rests
contract
rates
product
fair
negotiations
mere
fact
unlawful
activity
occurred
different
related
market
automatically
establish
effect
upon
contract
especially
given
staff
report
unsurprising
finding
high
prices
one
market
produced
high
prices
unable
determine
commission
orders
whether
found
evidence
inadequate
support
claim
respondents
alleged
unlawful
activities
affected
contracts
issue
said
order
rehearing
ferc
found
evidence
support
finding
market
manipulation
respondents
specifically
affected
contracts
issue
perhaps
must
read
light
commission
described
rejection
staff
report
ground
high
spot
market
prices
caused
manipulation
irrelevant
unless
forward
market
prices
fail
standard
light
statement
initial
order
apparent
response
claim
manipulation
respondents
ferc
finding
unjust
unreasonable
spot
market
prices
caused
forward
bilateral
prices
unjust
unreasonable
relevant
contract
modification
reasonable
standard
review
emphasize
mere
fact
party
engaging
unlawful
activity
spot
market
deprive
forward
contracts
benefit
presumption
reason
ferc
able
abrogate
contract
grounds
without
finding
causal
connection
unlawful
activity
contract
rate
however
causality
established
presumption
apply
remand
commission
amplify
clarify
findings
two
points
judgment
appeals
affirmed
cases
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
chief
justice
justice
breyer
took
part
consideration
decision
cases
morgan
stanley
capital
group
petitioner
public
utility
district
snohomish
county
washington
et
al
american
electric
power
service
corporation
et
petitioners
public
utility
district
snohomish
county
washington
et
al
writs
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
june
justice
ginsburg
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
recommending
denial
petition
certiorari
cases
federal
energy
regulatory
commission
urged
review
premature
given
interlocutory
nature
th
issues
brief
respondent
federal
energy
regulatory
commission
opposition
regard
commission
called
attention
new
measures
taken
well
recent
enactments
congress
bearing
evaluation
contracts
view
developments
commission
suggested
await
record
produced
fer
remand
agree
better
informed
awaited
commission
decision
remand
think
plain
however
commission
erred
two
respects
identified
see
ante
therefore
concur
judgment
join
part
iii
opinion
morgan
stanley
capital
group
petitioner
public
utility
district
snohomish
county
washington
et
al
american
electric
power
service
corporation
et
petitioners
public
utility
district
snohomish
county
washington
et
al
writs
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
june
justice
stevens
justice
souter
joins
dissenting
basic
question
presented
complicated
cases
whether
federal
energy
regulatory
commission
ferc
commission
must
presume
rate
set
freely
negotiated
contract
meets
reasonable
requirement
imposed
law
ante
opening
sentence
opinion
tells
us
doctrine
term
makes
first
appearance
reports
today
mandates
affirmative
answer
holding
finds
support
either
case
lends
name
doctrine
nevertheless
interest
guarding
disfigurement
venerable
doctrine
ante
mangles
governing
statute
precedent
federal
power
act
fpa
stat
et
wholesale
electricity
prices
established
first
instance
public
utilities
either
via
tariffs
contracts
purchasers
whether
set
tariff
contract
rates
must
filed
commission
see
ibid
section
fpa
provides
rates
charges
shall
reasonable
rate
charge
reasonable
hereby
declared
unlawful
pursuant
ferc
determines
rate
rule
regulation
practice
contract
affect
ing
rate
unjust
unreasonable
commission
shall
determine
reasonable
rate
rule
regulation
practice
contract
thereafter
observed
force
shall
fix
order
provisions
distinguish
roles
utilities
initially
set
rates
commission
may
override
rates
reasonable
distinguish
rates
set
unilaterally
tariff
rates
set
bilaterally
contract
however
utility
sets
prices
standard
review
rates
must
reasonable
purports
acknowledge
one
statutory
standard
assessing
wholesale
electricity
rates
whether
set
contract
tariff
standard
ante
unlike
rates
set
tariff
however
holds
freely
negotiated
contract
rate
presumptively
reasonable
unless
seriously
harms
public
interest
ante
according
presumption
represents
differing
application
standard
different
standard
altogether
ante
disagree
significant
difference
requiring
heightened
showing
overcome
otherwise
conclusive
presumption
imposing
heightened
standard
review
agree
applying
separate
standard
review
contract
rates
obviously
indefensible
also
true
respect
presumption
even
presumption
tantamount
separate
standard
nothing
statute
mandates
differing
application
statutory
standard
rates
set
contract
ibid
section
fpa
provides
without
qualification
exception
ferc
may
replace
unjust
unreasonable
contract
lawful
contract
permian
basin
area
rate
cases
construing
identical
language
natural
gas
act
statute
say
anything
mandatory
presumption
contracts
much
less
define
burden
proof
overcoming
delineate
circumstances
nonapplication
cf
ante
statute
prohibit
ferc
considering
marginal
cost
reviewing
rates
set
contract
cf
ante
congress
intended
impose
detailed
constraints
commission
authority
review
contract
rates
done
fpa
congress
instead
used
general
words
reasonable
wanted
give
ferc
courts
wide
latitude
setting
policy
explained
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
power
administrative
agency
administer
congressionally
created
program
necessarily
requires
formulation
policy
making
rules
fill
gap
left
implicitly
explicitly
congress
morton
ruiz
congress
explicitly
left
gap
agency
fill
express
delegation
authority
agency
elucidate
specific
provision
statute
regulation
legislative
regulations
given
controlling
weight
unless
arbitrary
capricious
manifestly
contrary
statute
sometimes
legislative
delegation
agency
particular
question
implicit
rather
explicit
case
may
substitute
construction
statutory
provision
reasonable
interpretation
made
administrator
agency
omitted
consistent
understanding
administrative
law
cases
interpreting
fpa
invariably
emphasized
courts
without
authority
set
aside
rate
adopted
commission
within
reasonableness
permian
basin
see
ante
asserting
reasonableness
test
fails
accord
adequate
level
protection
contracts
deference
makes
eminent
sense
agencies
bound
service
single
regulatory
formula
permitted
unless
statutory
authority
otherwise
plainly
indicates
make
pragmatic
adjustments
may
called
particular
circumstances
permian
basin
despite
paying
lipservice
principle
see
ante
binds
commission
rigid
formula
making
found
statutory
text
supports
vision
doctrine
invokes
important
role
contracts
fpa
ante
contracts
play
important
role
fpa
insofar
statute
departed
scheme
purely
regulation
verizon
communications
fcc
allowing
parties
establish
rates
contract
congress
intend
immunize
rates
review
gas
pipe
line
mobile
gas
service
fpc
sierra
pacific
power
supposed
progenitors
presumption
make
point
uncertain
terms
see
sierra
commission
undoubted
power
prescribe
change
contract
rates
whenever
determines
rates
unlawful
mobile
ontracts
remain
fully
subject
paramount
power
commission
modify
necessary
public
interest
accordingly
fact
fpa
tolerates
contracts
make
subservient
contracts
ii
neither
eponymous
cases
presumption
subsequent
decisions
substantiates
atextual
reading
acknowledges
mobile
says
nothing
standard
review
applies
rates
established
contract
see
ante
rather
mobile
merely
held
utilities
unilaterally
abrogate
contracts
purchasers
filing
new
rate
schedules
commission
see
neglects
mention
however
although
mobile
occasion
comment
standard
review
imply
congress
permitted
parties
establish
rates
contract
protection
public
interest
afforded
supervision
individual
contracts
end
must
filed
commission
made
public
sierra
public
utility
entered
contract
sell
electricity
special
low
rate
order
forestall
potential
competition
see
several
years
later
utility
complained
rate
provided
little
profit
therefore
reasonable
commission
agreed
set
aside
rate
solely
yield
ed
less
fair
return
net
invested
capital
see
vacated
remanded
ground
commission
applied
erroneous
standard
hile
may
commission
may
normally
impose
upon
public
utility
rate
produce
less
fair
return
reasoned
follow
public
utility
may
agree
contract
rate
affording
less
fair
return
entitled
relieved
improvident
bargain
seller
agreed
rate
later
challenges
low
sole
concern
commission
seem
whether
rate
low
adversely
affect
public
interest
might
impair
financial
ability
public
utility
continue
service
cast
upon
consumers
excessive
burden
unduly
discriminatory
ibid
elaborated
meant
public
interest
purpose
power
given
commission
protection
public
interest
distinguished
private
interests
utilities
evidenced
recital
act
scheme
regulation
imposed
necessary
public
interest
read
light
purpose
clear
contract
may
said
either
simply
unprofitable
public
utility
ibid
sierra
therefore
held
accordance
statement
policy
fpa
whether
rate
reasonable
measured
public
interest
private
interests
regulated
sellers
contrary
opinion
see
ante
sierra
instructs
public
interest
touchstone
review
rates
contract
rates
sierra
drew
distinction
commission
authority
impose
low
rates
utilities
authority
abrogate
low
rates
agreed
utilities
actions
impact
public
interest
differently
public
interest
governs
rates
set
bilaterally
rates
set
unilaterally
commission
imposes
rates
afford
less
fair
return
compromises
public
interest
attracting
necessary
capital
impact
different
however
utility
agreed
low
rate
investors
recognize
utility
regulator
responsible
unattractive
rate
return
sierra
used
public
interest
shorthand
interest
consumers
paying
lowest
possible
reasonable
rate
consistent
maintenance
adequate
service
public
interest
permian
basin
quoting
atlantic
refining
public
serv
whereas
high
rates
directly
implicate
interest
low
rates
indirectly
rate
low
might
impair
financial
ability
public
utility
continue
service
cast
upon
consumers
excessive
burden
unduly
discriminatory
sierra
nothing
sierra
purports
mandate
serious
harm
standard
review
require
assumption
high
rates
low
rates
impose
symmetric
burdens
public
interest
cf
ante
later
explained
fpc
texaco
commission
ignore
even
small
dent
consumer
pocket
act
makes
unlawful
rates
reasonable
say
little
unlawfulness
permitted
brushing
aside
text
fpa
well
holdings
mobile
sierra
cherry
picks
language
verizon
arkla
permian
basin
verizon
arkla
mentioned
line
cases
passing
neither
case
anything
review
rates
see
verizon
arkla
furthermore
statement
permian
basin
unequivocal
public
necessity
speaks
difficulty
establishing
injury
public
interest
context
challenge
reliance
stray
sentences
calls
mind
admonishment
permian
basin
commission
exercise
regulatory
authority
must
assessed
light
purposes
consequences
references
isolated
phrases
previous
cases
iii
lacking
grounding
fpa
precedent
concludes
matter
policy
presumption
necessary
ensure
stability
volatile
energy
markets
reduce
regulatory
costs
see
ante
course
desirability
fostering
contracts
ante
plays
public
interest
insofar
commission
responsibilities
include
protection
future
well
present
consumer
interests
permian
basin
see
also
gas
pipe
line
memphis
light
gas
water
seems
plain
congress
expressing
conviction
public
interest
requires
protection
consumers
excessive
prices
natural
gas
also
manifesting
concern
legitimate
interests
natural
gas
companies
whose
financial
stability
public
vital
stake
fpa
congress
charged
ferc
courts
balancing
interests
consumers
see
permian
basin
responsibility
supplant
commission
balance
interests
one
nearly
liking
instead
assure
commission
given
reasoned
consideration
pertinent
factors
moreover
even
ferc
authority
endorse
rule
announced
today
fpa
indulge
much
less
require
practically
insurmountable
presumption
see
papago
tribal
util
auth
ferc
cadc
opinion
scalia
rates
set
contract
comport
public
interest
therefore
reasonable
congress
enacted
fpa
precisely
concluded
regulation
necessary
protect
consumers
deficient
markets
follows
commission
lacks
authority
place
exclusive
reliance
market
prices
texaco
see
also
subjecting
producers
regulation
anticompetitive
conditions
industry
congress
assumed
reasonable
rates
conclusively
determined
reference
market
price
reason
already
rejected
policy
rationale
proffered
today
may
economists
persuasively
argued
assumptions
competitive
structure
natural
gas
industry
true
longer
true
today
may
also
control
prices
industry
time
shortage
counterproductive
interests
consumer
increasing
production
natural
gas
role
however
overturn
congressional
assumptions
embedded
framework
regulation
established
act
proper
task
legislature
public
interest
may
considered
multifaceted
points
view
representational
process
omitted
balancing
interests
consumers
entails
difficult
judgment
calls
extent
ferc
actually
engages
balancing
reasoned
determination
entitled
deference
ferc
abdicate
statutory
responsibility
ensure
reasonable
rates
expedient
presumption
say
commission
abrogate
contract
increases
rates
underscore
agency
obliged
step
regulatory
process
assess
requirements
broad
public
interests
entrusted
protection
congress
permian
basin
iv
even
holds
today
presumption
merely
differing
application
statutory
standard
ferc
orders
must
set
aside
decided
basis
ferc
orders
repeatedly
aver
agency
applying
public
interest
standard
different
distinctly
demanding
statutory
standard
see
app
burden
showing
contract
contrary
public
interest
higher
burden
showing
contract
reasonable
fact
contract
may
found
unjust
unreasonable
demonstrate
contract
contrary
public
interest
cases
indeed
commission
misunderstanding
cases
egregious
sellers
concerned
orders
overturned
asked
commission
clarification
public
interest
standard
review
authorize
unjust
unreasonable
rates
ferc
clarified
follows
rates
become
unjust
unreasonable
contract
issue
subject
standard
review
commission
precedent
may
change
contract
simply
longer
reasonable
parties
rate
contracts
provide
public
interest
standard
review
commission
bound
higher
burden
support
modification
contracts
whereas
texaco
faulted
commission
failing
expressly
mention
standard
cases
ferc
refused
outright
apply
addition
misrepresenting
ferc
understanding
doctrine
presumption
rather
separate
standard
overstates
extent
ferc
considered
lawfulness
rates
recognizes
must
three
factors
identified
sierra
neither
exclusive
precisely
applicable
challenge
purchaser
see
ante
brief
respondent
ferc
although
ferc
applied
termed
sierra
test
app
contends
agency
err
also
evaluated
circumstances
see
ante
ferc
review
infected
misapprehension
standard
dictated
doctrine
app
whereas
focus
reasonableness
rates
charged
conduct
contracting
parties
ferc
restricted
review
contracting
parties
behavior
around
time
formation
see
ferc
seems
thought
powerless
conduct
review
unless
contract
already
subject
abrogation
based
contract
defenses
fraud
duress
including
contracts
within
scope
however
congress
must
concluded
contract
defenses
insufficient
protect
public
interest
see
ante
holding
presumption
applies
circumstances
absent
traditional
grounds
abrogation
illegal
action
contracting
party
indeed
nothing
fpa
cases
precludes
ferc
considering
circumstances
exogenous
contract
negotiations
including
natural
disasters
market
manipulation
entities
parties
challenged
ferc
error
obvious
face
orders
repeatedly
state
commission
belief
consider
evidence
relevant
reasonableness
contract
although
commission
attempt
recast
ferc
orders
applying
statutory
standard
see
ante
brief
respondent
ferc
doctrine
set
forth
sec
chenery
accept
appellate
counsel
post
hoc
rationalizations
agency
action
agency
order
must
upheld
basis
articulated
order
agency
texaco
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
furthermore
even
assuming
ferc
subjectively
believed
applying
standard
despite
repeated
declarations
contrary
order
must
deemed
ambiguous
falls
short
standard
clarity
administrative
orders
must
exhibit
order
get
around
chenery
doctrine
mischaracterizes
ferc
orders
also
takes
radical
tack
concludes
whatever
rationale
set
forth
ferc
orders
chenery
apply
commission
required
decision
sierra
apply
presumption
evaluation
contracts
ante
point
prompts
comment
ferc
lucked
ibid
commission
lucked
purely
fortuitous
victory
also
pyrrhic
one
although
ferc
prevails
cases
despite
offered
justification
different
provided
opinion
paid
tremendous
price
curtailed
agency
authority
interpret
terms
reasonable
thereby
substantially
narrowed
ferc
discretion
protect
public
interest
means
thinks
best
contrary
congressional
intent
ferc
longer
flexibility
adjust
review
contractual
rates
account
changing
conditions
energy
markets
among
consumers
cf
permian
basin
dministrative
authorities
must
permitted
consistently
obligations
due
process
adapt
rules
policies
demands
changing
circumstances
decision
appeals
ninth
circuit
deserves
praise
efforts
bring
freewheeling
doctrine
back
line
fpa
cases
endorse
opinion
entirety
however
verges
sort
improper
policymaking
criticized
opinion
decisions
hobble
commission
albeit
different
sides
congress
authorized
courts
prescribe
energy
policy
imposing
presumptions
prerequisites
making
marginal
cost
sole
concern
concern
therefore
vacate
remand
cases
order
give
commission
opportunity
evaluate
contract
rates
light
proper
understanding
discretion
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
together
american
electric
power
service
et
al
public
utility
district
snohomish
county
et
also
certiorari
footnotes
also
use
commission
refer
federal
power
commission
ferc
predecessor
holding
challenged
ninth
circuit
concluded
contracts
issue
contain
memphis
clause
citing
gas
pipe
line
memphis
light
gas
water
see
supra
precluded
application
presumption
say
dissent
alleges
post
opinion
stevens
public
interest
also
relevant
challenge
unilaterally
set
rates
contract
case
see
fpc
sierra
pacific
power
dissent
criticizes
commission
decision
took
account
heading
totality
circumstances
circumstances
contract
formation
circumstances
exogenous
contract
negotiations
including
natural
disasters
market
manipulation
entities
parties
challenged
contract
post
considerations
relevant
whether
contracts
impose
excessive
burden
consumers
relative
paid
absent
contracts
precisely
uncertainty
whether
commission
considered
circumstances
exogenous
contract
negotiations
discussed
part
iii
opinion
causes
us
approve
remand
ferc
elsewhere
ninth
circuit
softened
standard
somewhat
saying
ven
particular
rate
exceeds
marginal
cost
may
still
within
reasonable
range
reasonableness
price
results
normal
market
forces
part
general
trend
toward
rates
reflect
cost
sure
think
one
sure
precisely
means
basis
opinions
event
wrong
point
departure
general
principle
rates
exceed
marginal
cost
contradicts
ninth
circuit
purported
find
support
zone
reasonableness
test
case
law
district
columbia
circuit
cited
case
stands
proposition
scheme
must
assure
market
forces
long
pull
cause
rates
approximate
marginal
cost
interstate
natural
gas
assn
ferc
nowhere
opinion
suggest
standard
reforming
particular
contract
validly
entered
scheme
whether
rates
approximate
marginal
cost
token
approval
ferc
decision
set
prospective
area
rates
solely
reference
contract
prices
permian
basin
area
rate
cases
support
dissent
thinks
post
view
standard
abrogating
existing
valid
contract
anything
less
standard
standard
permian
basin
applied
actually
confronted
issue
contract
modification
see
dissent
claims
misread
fpa
provisions
distinguish
rates
set
unilaterally
tariff
rates
set
bilaterally
contract
post
dissent
interpretation
whatever
plausibility
original
matter
squared
sierra
plainly
distinguished
unilaterally
bilaterally
set
rates
said
relevant
consideration
commission
latter
case
whether
public
interest
harmed
circumstances
identified
sierra
implicating
public
interest
refer
something
small
dent
consumer
pocket
subsequent
cases
described
standard
high
one
end
day
dissent
simply
argues
settled
understanding
fpa
prevailed
lower
courts
commission
half
century
although
dissent
correct
never
used
phrase
doctrine
cases
probably
understanding
uniform
circuit
split
concerning
meaning
arose
ninth
circuit
erroneous
decision
cases
one
searches
commission
reports
decisions
since
alone
cited
doctrine
see
brief
electric
power
supply
association
et
al
amici
curiae
courts
appeals
used
term
doctrine
doctrine
times
since
ever
context
understanding
honored
statutory
decision
subject
revision
congress
understood
way
many
years
lower
courts
federal
agency
statute
governs
hence
surely
private
actors
trying
observe
law
footnotes
see
also
arkansas
louisiana
gas
hall
arkla
clear
purpose
congressional
scheme
rate
filing
gran
commission
opportunity
every
case
judge
reasonableness
rate
permian
basin
area
rate
cases
commission
plenary
authority
limit
proscribe
contractual
arrangements
contravene
relevant
public
interests
repeatedly
quotes
following
snippet
opinion
permian
basin
regulatory
system
created
act
premised
contractual
agreements
voluntarily
devised
regulated
companies
contemplates
abrogation
agreements
circumstances
unequivocal
public
necessity
cited
ante
like
fpc
sierra
pacific
power
however
permian
basin
made
statement
course
rejecting
challenge
read
context
reference
unequivocal
public
necessity
loose
restatement
sierra
required
evidence
injury
public
interest
underscored
rarely
utility
able
demonstrate
contract
price
adversely
affect
public
interest
quoting
sierra
expansive
reading
unequivocal
public
necessity
statement
squared
permian
basin
discussion
commission
authority
review
rates
set
contract
although
natural
gas
act
premised
upon
continuing
system
private
contracting
commission
plenary
authority
limit
proscribe
contractual
arrangements
contravene
relevant
public
interests
citation
omitted
reconciled
permian
basin
rejection
producers
arguments
commission
wrongly
invalidated
existing
contracts
imposing
ceiling
rates
see
commission
compelled
adopt
contract
prices
basis
computing
area
rates
see
contends
ferc
application
doctrine
honored
represents
settled
understanding
fpa
ante
explained
however
ferc
interpretation
fpa
cases
construing
fpa
indefensible
supra
quoting
ante
therefore
entitled
deference
quite
sensibly
instructs
ferc
clear
one
party
contract
engaged
extensive
unlawful
market
manipulation
alter
playing
field
contract
negotiations
commission
presume
contract
reasonable
mere
fact
unlawful
activity
occurred
different
related
market
automatically
establish
effect
upon
contract
especially
given
staff
report
unsurprising
finding
high
prices
one
market
produced
high
prices
ante
disagree
however
suggestion
fpa
restricts
ferc
review
contract
rates
limited
criteria
fpa
specify
market
deficiencies
weigh
ferc
review
contract
rates
depending
circumstances
one
balances
interests
consumers
evidence
market
turmoil
may
argues
support
rather
detract
finding
contract
rates
reasonable
see
ante
whether
given
contract
rate
ultimately
benefits
consumers
ante
however
determination
congress
vested
ferc
see
app
finding
unjust
unreasonable
spot
market
prices
caused
forward
bilateral
prices
unjust
unreasonable
relevant
contract
modification
reasonable
standard
review
previously
concluded
contracts
issue
proceeding
provide
standard
rather
evidence
intent
contracts
may
changed
pursuant
interest
standard
review
interest
standard
justify
contract
modification
enough
show
forward
prices
became
unjust
unreasonable
due
impact
spot
market
dysfunctions
omitted
complainants
required
meet
public
interest
standard
review
reasonable
standard
review
taken
account
causal
connection
spot
market
prices
forward
bilateral
market
prices
staff
report
make
findings
regarding
justness
reasonableness
contract
rates
findings
relevant
reasonable
standard
applicable