armstrong
et
al
exceptional
child
center
et
argued
january
decided
march
providers
habilitation
services
idaho
medicaid
plan
reimbursed
state
department
health
welfare
section
medicaid
act
requires
idaho
plan
assure
payments
consistent
efficiency
economy
quality
care
safeguard
ing
unnecessary
utilization
care
services
respondents
providers
habilitation
services
sued
petitioners
idaho
health
welfare
department
officials
claiming
idaho
reimbursed
rates
lower
permits
seeking
enjoin
petitioners
increase
rates
district
entered
summary
judgment
providers
ninth
circuit
affirmed
concluding
supremacy
clause
gave
providers
implied
right
action
sue
implied
right
action
seek
injunction
requiring
idaho
comply
held
judgment
reversed
fed
appx
reversed
justice
scalia
delivered
opinion
except
part
iv
concluding
supremacy
clause
confer
private
right
action
medicaid
providers
sue
injunction
requiring
compliance
pp
supremacy
clause
instructs
courts
give
federal
law
priority
state
federal
law
clash
gibbons
ogden
wheat
federal
rights
golden
state
transit
los
angeles
certainly
create
cause
action
nothing
clause
text
suggests
otherwise
nothing
suggests
ever
understood
conferring
private
right
action
article
vests
congress
broad
discretion
manner
implementing
enumerated
powers
art
mcculloch
maryland
wheat
unlikely
constitution
gave
congress
broad
discretion
regard
enactment
laws
simultaneously
limiting
congress
power
manner
implementation
making
impossible
leave
enforcement
federal
law
federal
actors
pp
reading
supremacy
clause
confer
private
right
action
consistent
preemption
jurisprudence
ability
sue
enjoin
unconstitutional
actions
state
federal
officers
creation
courts
equity
reflects
long
history
judicial
review
illegal
executive
action
tracing
back
england
never
held
suggested
remedy
application
state
officers
rests
upon
implied
right
action
contained
supremacy
clause
pp
respondents
suit
proceed
equity
power
federal
courts
equity
enjoin
unlawful
executive
action
subject
express
implied
statutory
limitations
see
seminole
tribe
florida
express
provision
single
remedy
state
failure
comply
medicaid
requirements
withholding
medicaid
funds
secretary
health
human
services
sheer
complexity
associated
enforcing
combine
establish
congress
intent
foreclose
equitable
relief
verizon
md
public
serv
pp
scalia
delivered
opinion
respect
parts
ii
iii
roberts
thomas
breyer
alito
joined
opinion
respect
part
iv
roberts
thomas
alito
joined
breyer
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
sotomayor
filed
dissenting
opinion
kennedy
ginsburg
kagan
joined
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
richard
armstrong
et
petitioners
exceptional
child
center
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
march
justice
scalia
delivered
opinion
except
part
iv
consider
whether
medicaid
providers
sue
enforce
medicaid
act
stat
codified
amended
medicaid
federal
program
subsidizes
provision
medical
services
families
dependent
children
aged
blind
disabled
individuals
whose
income
resources
insufficient
meet
costs
necessary
medical
services
like
spending
clause
legislation
medicaid
offers
bargain
congress
provides
federal
funds
exchange
agreement
spend
accordance
congressionally
imposed
conditions
order
qualify
medicaid
funding
state
idaho
adopted
federal
government
approved
medicaid
plan
idaho
administers
department
health
welfare
idaho
plan
includes
habilitation
services
care
individuals
provision
services
require
level
care
provided
hospital
nursing
facility
intermediate
care
facility
mentally
retarded
cost
reimbursed
state
plan
providers
services
reimbursed
department
health
welfare
section
medicaid
act
requires
idaho
plan
provide
methods
procedures
relating
utilization
payment
care
services
available
plan
may
necessary
safeguard
unnecessary
utilization
care
services
assure
payments
consistent
efficiency
economy
quality
care
sufficient
enlist
enough
providers
care
services
available
plan
least
extent
care
services
available
general
population
geographic
area
respondents
providers
habilitation
services
persons
covered
idaho
medicaid
plan
sued
petitioners
two
officials
idaho
department
health
welfare
district
district
idaho
claiming
idaho
violates
reimbursing
providers
habilitation
services
rates
lower
permits
asked
enjoin
petitioners
increase
rates
district
entered
summary
judgment
providers
holding
idaho
set
rates
manner
consistent
inclusion
armstrong
supp
ninth
circuit
affirmed
fed
appx
said
providers
implied
right
action
supremacy
clause
seek
injunctive
relief
enforcement
implementation
state
legislation
citing
independent
living
center
southern
cal
shewry
granted
certiorari
ii
supremacy
clause
art
vi
cl
reads
constitution
laws
shall
made
pursuance
thereof
treaties
made
shall
made
authority
shall
law
land
judges
every
state
shall
bound
thereby
thing
constitution
laws
state
contrary
notwithstanding
apparent
clause
creates
rule
decision
courts
shall
regard
constitution
laws
made
pursuance
thereof
law
land
must
give
effect
state
laws
conflict
federal
laws
gibbons
ogden
wheat
equally
apparent
supremacy
clause
federal
rights
golden
state
transit
los
angeles
quoting
chapman
houston
welfare
rights
organization
certainly
create
cause
action
instructs
courts
state
federal
law
clash
silent
regarding
may
enforce
federal
laws
circumstances
may
hamilton
wrote
supremacy
clause
declares
truth
flows
immediately
necessarily
institution
federal
government
federalist
cooke
ed
story
described
clause
positive
affirmance
necessarily
implied
commentaries
constitution
descriptions
grossly
inapt
clause
understood
give
affected
parties
constitutional
hence
congressionally
unalterable
right
enforce
federal
laws
understood
provide
significant
private
rights
one
expect
find
mentioned
preratification
historical
record
contained
ample
discussion
supremacy
clause
supporters
opponents
ratification
see
drahozal
supremacy
clause
reference
guide
constitution
federalist
madison
aware
mention
respondents
provided
conspicuous
absence
militates
strongly
position
additionally
important
read
supremacy
clause
context
constitution
whole
article
vests
congress
broad
discretion
manner
implementing
enumerated
powers
giving
authority
make
laws
shall
necessary
proper
carrying
execution
art
said
confers
upon
legislature
discretion
respect
means
powers
constitution
confers
carried
execution
enable
body
perform
high
duties
assigned
mcculloch
maryland
wheat
unlikely
constitution
gave
congress
broad
discretion
regard
enactment
laws
simultaneously
limiting
congress
power
manner
implementation
making
impossible
leave
enforcement
federal
law
federal
actors
supremacy
clause
includes
private
right
action
constitution
requires
congress
permit
enforcement
laws
private
actors
significantly
curtailing
ability
guide
implementation
law
strange
indeed
give
clause
makes
federal
law
reading
limits
congress
power
enforce
law
imposing
mandatory
private
enforcement
limitation
regard
state
legislatures
say
supremacy
clause
confer
right
action
diminish
significant
role
courts
play
assuring
supremacy
federal
law
case
controversy
properly
comes
judges
bound
federal
law
thus
may
convict
criminal
defendant
violating
state
law
federal
law
prohibits
see
pennsylvania
nelson
similarly
may
hold
civil
defendant
liable
state
law
conduct
federal
law
requires
see
mutual
pharmaceutical
bartlett
slip
long
recognized
individual
claims
federal
law
immunizes
state
regulation
may
issue
injunction
upon
finding
state
regulatory
actions
preempted
ex
parte
young
respondents
contend
preemption
jurisprudence
specifically
fact
regularly
considered
whether
enjoin
enforcement
state
laws
alleged
violate
federal
law
demonstrates
supremacy
clause
creates
cause
action
violation
incorrect
true
enough
long
held
federal
courts
may
circumstances
grant
injunctive
relief
state
officers
violating
planning
violate
federal
law
see
osborn
bank
wheat
ex
parte
young
supra
citing
davis
gray
wall
true
respect
violations
federal
law
state
officials
also
respect
violations
federal
law
federal
officials
see
american
school
magnetic
healing
mcannulty
see
generally
jaffe
judicial
control
administrative
action
thus
supremacy
clause
need
light
textual
analysis
explanation
cases
demonstrate
proper
case
relief
may
given
equity
prevent
injurious
act
public
officer
carroll
safford
ability
sue
enjoin
unconstitutional
actions
state
federal
officers
creation
courts
equity
reflects
long
history
judicial
review
illegal
executive
action
tracing
back
england
see
jaffe
henderson
judicial
review
rule
law
historical
origins
rev
remedy
never
held
even
suggested
application
state
officers
rests
upon
implied
right
action
contained
supremacy
clause
even
dissent
implicitly
acknowledges
post
opinion
sotomayor
ninth
circuit
erred
holding
otherwise
iii
turn
next
respondents
contention
quite
apart
cause
action
conferred
supremacy
clause
suit
proceed
idaho
equity
power
federal
courts
equity
enjoin
unlawful
executive
action
subject
express
implied
statutory
limitations
see
seminole
tribe
equity
disregard
statutory
constitutional
requirements
provisions
courts
law
ins
pangilinan
quoting
hedges
dixon
county
brackets
omitted
view
medicaid
act
implicitly
precludes
private
enforcement
respondents
invoking
equitable
powers
circumvent
congress
exclusion
private
enforcement
see
douglas
independent
living
center
southern
roberts
dissenting
slip
two
aspects
establish
congress
intent
foreclose
equitable
relief
verizon
md
public
serv
first
sole
remedy
congress
provided
state
failure
comply
medicaid
requirements
state
breach
spending
clause
contract
withholding
medicaid
funds
secretary
health
human
services
elsewhere
explained
express
provision
one
method
enforcing
substantive
rule
suggests
congress
intended
preclude
others
alexander
sandoval
provision
secretary
enforcement
withholding
funds
might
preclude
availability
equitable
relief
see
virginia
office
protection
advocacy
stewart
slip
combined
judicially
unadministrable
nature
text
difficult
imagine
requirement
broader
less
specific
mandate
state
plans
provide
payments
consistent
efficiency
economy
quality
care
safeguard
ing
unnecessary
utilization
care
services
explicitly
conferring
enforcement
standard
upon
secretary
alone
establishes
think
congress
wanted
make
agency
remedy
provided
exclusive
thereby
achieving
expertise
uniformity
widespread
consultation
resulting
administrative
guidance
accompany
agency
decisionmaking
avoiding
comparative
risk
inconsistent
interpretations
misincentives
arise
occasional
inappropriate
application
statute
private
action
gonzaga
univ
doe
breyer
concurring
judgment
sheer
complexity
associated
enforcing
coupled
express
provision
administrative
remedy
shows
medicaid
act
precludes
private
enforcement
courts
dissent
agrees
us
supremacy
clause
provide
implied
right
action
congress
may
displace
equitable
relief
traditionally
available
enforce
federal
law
disagrees
conclusion
displacement
occurred
dissent
insists
congress
undoubtedly
aware
federal
courts
practice
enjoining
preempted
state
action
generally
presumed
contemplate
enforcement
unless
affirmatively
manifests
contrary
intent
post
emphasis
added
practice
justify
rule
denies
statutory
text
fairest
reading
section
fairly
read
context
medicaid
act
display
intent
foreclose
availability
equitable
relief
verizon
supra
warrant
revise
congress
scheme
simply
affirmatively
preclude
availability
action
equity
see
seminole
tribe
supra
inferring
absence
affirmative
statement
congress
equitable
relief
unavailable
equally
unavailing
dissent
reliance
history
section
amended
december
include
dissent
calls
equal
access
mandate
post
requirement
reimbursement
rates
sufficient
enlist
enough
providers
care
services
available
plan
least
extent
care
services
available
general
population
geographic
area
stat
existed
time
another
provision
known
boren
amendment
likewise
imposed
broad
requirements
state
medicaid
plans
supp
lower
courts
interpreted
boren
amendment
privately
enforceable
dissent
infers
congress
amended
failed
anticipate
broad
language
least
equal
access
mandate
interpreted
enforceable
private
action
thus
concludes
dissent
congress
failure
expressly
preclude
private
enforcement
suggests
intended
preclude
private
enforcement
post
argument
appears
rely
canon
rule
judicial
interpretations
settled
meaning
existing
statutory
provision
repetition
language
new
statute
presumed
incorporate
interpretation
bragdon
abbott
canon
application
language
two
provisions
nowhere
near
identical
even
question
whether
boren
amendment
permitted
private
actions
far
settled
congress
amended
already
granted
certiorari
decide
yet
decided
whether
boren
amendment
enforced
suit
see
baliles
virginia
hospital
granting
certiorari
decision
permitting
action
issue
june
almost
six
months
amendment
wilder
virginia
hospital
existence
granted
petition
certiorari
demonstrates
quite
clearly
question
whether
boren
amendment
enforced
unsettled
time
amendment
congress
aware
parallel
highly
doubtful
course
awareness
prompted
legislative
silence
rather
express
specification
availability
private
enforcement
congress
intended
finally
dissent
speaks
though
leave
plaintiffs
resort
case
relief
must
sought
initially
secretary
rather
courts
dissent
complaint
sanction
available
secretary
funding
massive
realistic
source
relief
seems
us
mistaken
doubt
secretary
notice
state
compensation
scheme
inadequate
ignored
iv
last
possible
source
cause
action
respondents
medicaid
act
claim
rightly
section
lacks
sort
language
needed
imply
private
right
action
sandoval
supra
phrased
directive
federal
agency
charged
approving
state
medicaid
plans
conferral
right
sue
upon
beneficiaries
state
decision
participate
medicaid
act
says
secretary
shall
approve
plan
fulfills
conditions
specified
subsection
subsection
includes
held
language
reveals
congressional
intent
create
private
right
action
sandoval
supra
see
also
universities
research
coutu
explicitly
conferred
means
enforcing
compliance
secretary
withholding
funding
suggests
means
enforcement
precluded
sandoval
supra
spending
clause
legislation
like
medicaid
much
nature
contract
pennhurst
state
school
hospital
halderman
notion
respondents
right
sue
derives
perhaps
fact
beneficiaries
medicaid
agreement
intended
beneficiaries
modern
times
least
sue
enforce
private
contracting
parties
see
lord
williston
contracts
pp
ed
doubt
begin
providers
intended
beneficiaries
opposed
mere
incidental
beneficiaries
medicaid
agreement
concluded
benefit
infirm
providers
serve
rather
benefit
providers
see
pharmaceutical
research
mfrs
america
walsh
thomas
concurring
judgment
fundamentally
however
modern
jurisprudence
permitting
intended
beneficiaries
sue
generally
apply
contracts
private
party
government
astra
usa
santa
clara
county
slip
see
williston
supra
murray
corbin
contracts
rev
ed
much
less
contracts
two
governments
precedents
establish
private
right
action
federal
law
created
mere
implication
must
unambiguously
conferred
gonzaga
nothing
medicaid
act
suggests
congress
meant
change
commitments
made
judgment
ninth
circuit
appeals
reversed
ordered
opinion
breyer
richard
armstrong
et
petitioners
exceptional
child
center
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
march
justice
breyer
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
join
parts
ii
iii
opinion
like
members
characterize
question
us
terms
supremacy
clause
cause
action
rather
ask
whether
federal
courts
may
circumstances
grant
injunctive
relief
state
officers
violating
planning
violate
federal
law
ante
post
sotomayor
dissenting
believe
answer
question
answer
follow
application
simple
fixed
legal
formula
separating
federal
statutes
may
underlie
kind
injunctive
action
may
statute
books
many
laws
diverse
purposes
complex
single
legal
formula
offer
courts
general
guidance
gonzaga
univ
doe
breyer
concurring
judgment
rather
believe
several
characteristics
federal
statute
us
taken
together
make
clear
congress
intended
foreclose
respondents
bringing
particular
action
injunctive
relief
one
thing
majority
points
medicaid
act
sets
forth
federal
mandate
broad
nonspecific
see
ante
applies
broad
standards
setting
rates
history
ratemaking
demonstrates
administrative
agencies
far
better
suited
task
judges
century
ago
congress
created
interstate
commerce
commission
first
great
federal
regulatory
agency
endowed
authority
set
reasonable
railroad
rates
ch
stat
part
judicial
efforts
maintain
reasonable
rate
levels
proved
inadequate
see
sharfman
railway
regulation
analysis
underlying
problems
railway
economics
standpoint
government
regulation
reading
underscores
complexity
nonjudicial
nature
task
provision
requires
state
medicaid
plans
assure
payments
consistent
efficiency
economy
quality
care
sufficient
enlist
enough
providers
assure
care
services
equivalent
available
general
population
geographic
area
methods
state
agency
idaho
department
health
welfare
uses
make
kind
determination
may
involve
subsidiary
determinations
example
actual
cost
providing
quality
services
including
personnel
total
operating
expenses
changes
public
expectations
respect
delivery
services
inflation
comparison
rates
paid
neighboring
comparable
services
comparison
rates
paid
comparable
services
public
private
capacities
see
app
reply
brief
opposition
idaho
code
ann
time
applies
broadly
covering
reimbursements
provided
approximately
million
doctors
serving
million
patients
across
nation
see
dept
health
human
office
inspector
general
access
care
provider
availability
medicaid
managed
care
engage
efforts
obtain
public
input
proposed
plan
amendments
see
kansas
medicaid
design
implementation
public
input
stakeholder
consult
process
prepared
deloitte
consulting
llp
describing
public
input
kansas
proposed
medicaid
amendments
recognize
federal
courts
long
become
accustomed
reviewing
reasonableness
constitutionality
determinations
made
agencies
see
fpc
hope
natural
gas
action
instead
lower
courts
relying
standard
articulated
orthopaedic
hospital
belshe
required
state
set
rates
approximate
cost
quality
care
provided
efficiently
economically
see
inclusion
armstrong
supp
idaho
aff
fed
appx
find
law
basis
courts
engage
direct
set
precedent
allowing
similar
actions
potentially
resulting
rates
set
federal
judges
several
hundred
outside
ordinary
channel
federal
judicial
review
agency
decisionmaking
consequence
fear
increased
litigation
inconsistent
results
disorderly
administration
highly
complex
federal
programs
demand
public
consultation
administrative
guidance
coherence
success
believe
congress
intended
allow
injunctive
action
poses
risks
features
mention
recognize
courts
might
particular
instances
able
resolve
requests
injunctive
relief
quite
easily
see
easy
way
separate
advance
potentially
simple
sheep
harmful
goats
event
case
fear
belongs
latter
category
see
belshe
supra
compare
brief
respondents
claiming
respondents
seek
enforce
federally
approved
methodology
brief
amicus
curiae
relevant
methodology
approved
see
also
idaho
code
ann
describing
general
terms
appears
complex
methodology
leaving
unclear
extent
idaho
bound
use
rather
merely
consider
actual
provider
costs
another
thing
like
majority
ask
complex
area
forms
relief
inadequate
secretary
health
human
services
concludes
state
failing
follow
legally
required
federal
rules
secretary
withhold
federal
funds
see
ante
citing
withholding
funds
work
federal
agency
may
able
sue
state
compel
compliance
federal
rules
see
tr
oral
arg
solicitor
general
respondents
acknowledging
federal
government
might
able
sue
state
enjoin
paying
less
requires
arizona
allowing
similar
action
another
context
moreover
respondents
ask
federal
agency
interpret
rules
respondents
satisfaction
modify
rules
promulgate
new
rules
enforce
old
ones
see
normally
requests
denied
injured
party
seek
judicial
review
agency
refusal
grounds
arbitrary
capricious
abuse
discretion
otherwise
accordance
law
injured
party
ask
compel
agency
action
unlawfully
withheld
unreasonably
delayed
see
also
tr
oral
arg
arguing
providers
bring
action
administrative
procedure
act
apa
whenever
waiver
program
renewed
seek
new
agency
rulemaking
japan
whaling
assn
american
cetacean
apa
challenge
secretary
commerce
failure
act
recognize
law
may
give
federal
agency
broad
discretionary
authority
decide
exercise
enforce
statutes
rules
see
massachusetts
epa
result
may
difficult
respondents
prevail
apa
claim
unless
stems
agency
particularly
egregious
failure
act
congress
decided
vest
broad
discretion
agency
interpret
enforce
see
reason
circumvent
congressional
determination
allowing
action
proceed
sotomayor
dissenting
richard
armstrong
et
petitioners
exceptional
child
center
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
march
justice
sotomayor
justice
kennedy
justice
ginsburg
justice
kagan
join
dissenting
suits
federal
restrain
state
officials
executing
laws
assertedly
conflict
constitution
federal
statue
novel
contrary
adjudicated
requests
equitable
relief
since
early
days
republic
nevertheless
today
holds
congress
foreclosed
private
parties
invoking
equitable
powers
federal
courts
require
comply
medicaid
act
without
pointing
sort
detailed
remedial
scheme
previously
deemed
necessary
establish
congressional
intent
preclude
resort
equity
instead
relies
congress
provision
agency
enforcement
enforcement
mechanism
sort
already
definitively
determined
foreclose
private
actions
mere
fact
contains
relatively
broad
language
agree
statutory
provisions
demonstrate
requisite
congressional
intent
restrict
equitable
authority
federal
courts
respectfully
dissent
parties
may
call
upon
federal
courts
enjoin
unconstitutional
government
action
subject
serious
dispute
perhaps
famous
exposition
principle
decision
ex
parte
young
doctrine
derives
usual
name
held
shareholders
railroad
seek
injunction
preventing
minnesota
attorney
general
enforcing
state
law
setting
maximum
railroad
rates
eleventh
amendment
provide
officials
immunity
action
federal
power
equity
grant
temporary
injunction
earlier
recognized
similar
equitable
authority
osborn
bank
wheat
federal
issued
injunction
prohibiting
ohio
official
executing
state
law
taxing
bank
affirmed
relevant
part
concluding
case
cognizable
equity
holding
proper
grant
equitable
relief
insofar
state
tax
repugnant
federal
law
creating
national
bank
recently
confirmed
vitality
doctrine
free
enterprise
fund
public
company
accounting
oversight
found
support
argument
challenge
action
appointments
clause
treated
differently
every
constitutional
claim
equitable
relief
long
recognized
proper
means
preventing
entities
acting
unconstitutionally
suit
like
one
seeks
relief
state
officials
acting
pursuant
state
law
allegedly
preempted
federal
statute
falls
comfortably
within
doctrine
claim
state
law
contravenes
federal
statute
basically
constitutional
nature
deriving
force
operation
supremacy
clause
douglas
seacoast
products
application
preempted
state
law
therefore
unconstitutional
crosby
national
foreign
trade
council
accord
mcculloch
maryland
wheat
power
enact
laws
interfering
operations
constitutional
laws
enacted
congress
unavoidable
consequence
supremacy
constitution
declared
state
law
unconstitutional
void
thus
long
entertained
suits
party
seeks
prospective
equitable
protection
injurious
preempted
state
law
without
regard
whether
federal
statute
issue
provided
right
bring
action
see
foster
love
state
election
law
permitted
winner
state
primary
deemed
winner
election
congress
held
preempted
federal
statute
setting
date
congressional
elections
shaw
delta
air
lines
state
law
preempted
part
federal
employee
retirement
income
security
act
railroad
transfer
service
chicago
city
ordinance
imposing
licensing
requirements
motor
carrier
transporting
railroad
passengers
held
preempted
federal
interstate
commerce
act
campbell
hussey
state
law
requiring
labeling
certain
strains
tobacco
held
preempted
federal
tobacco
inspection
act
railway
mcshane
wall
state
taxation
land
possessed
railroad
company
held
invalid
federal
act
july
indeed
reason
characterized
availability
prospective
relief
sort
awarded
ex
parte
young
giving
life
supremacy
clause
green
mansour
thus
even
though
correct
somewhat
misleading
speak
implied
right
action
contained
supremacy
clause
ante
mean
parties
may
enforce
supremacy
clause
bringing
suit
enjoin
preempted
state
action
also
recognizes
long
held
federal
courts
may
circumstances
grant
injunctive
relief
state
officers
violating
planning
violate
federal
law
ante
important
purposes
case
mere
existence
equitable
authority
fact
exceedingly
well
established
supported
puts
long
history
ante
congress
may
chooses
either
expressly
implicitly
preclude
ex
parte
young
enforcement
actions
respect
particular
statute
category
lawsuit
see
prohibiting
federal
judicial
restraints
collection
state
taxes
seminole
tribe
florida
comprehensive
alternative
remedial
scheme
establish
congress
intent
foreclose
ex
parte
young
actions
congress
undoubtedly
aware
federal
courts
practice
enjoining
preempted
state
action
generally
presumed
contemplate
enforcement
unless
affirmatively
manifests
contrary
intent
unless
statute
many
words
necessary
inescapable
inference
restricts
jurisdiction
equity
full
scope
jurisdiction
recognized
applied
porter
warner
holding
respect
equitable
preemption
actions
differ
suits
brought
plaintiffs
invoking
implied
right
action
enforce
federal
statute
suits
redress
designed
halt
prevent
constitutional
violation
rather
award
money
damages
seek
traditional
forms
relief
stanley
contrast
plaintiff
invoking
implied
statutory
cause
action
may
seek
variety
remedies
including
damages
potentially
broad
range
parties
rather
simply
pointing
background
equitable
principles
authorizing
action
congress
presumably
overridden
plaintiff
must
demonstrate
specific
congressional
intent
create
statutory
right
remedies
see
gonzaga
univ
doe
alexander
sandoval
see
also
golden
state
transit
los
angeles
kennedy
dissenting
preemption
claim
seek
enforce
statutory
right
injured
party
need
vest
right
assert
attempted
exercise
jurisdiction
control
violates
proper
distribution
powers
within
federal
system
reasons
principles
developed
determine
whether
statute
creates
implied
right
action
enforceable
transferable
ex
parte
young
context
ii
concluding
congress
implicitly
preclude
private
enforcement
ante
ignores
critical
distinction
threatens
vitality
ex
parte
young
jurisprudence
identifies
single
prior
decision
seminole
tribe
ever
discerned
congressional
intent
foreclose
equitable
enforcement
statutory
mandate
ante
even
cursory
review
decision
reveals
far
afield
case
seminole
tribe
plaintiff
indian
tribe
invoked
ex
parte
young
seeking
compel
state
florida
negotiate
good
faith
tribe
toward
formation
compact
governing
certain
gaming
activities
required
provision
indian
gaming
regulatory
act
rejected
effort
observing
congress
passed
conjunction
carefully
crafted
intricate
remedial
scheme
set
forth
latter
provision
allowed
tribe
sue
violations
duty
negotiate
days
requesting
negotiations
specifically
limited
remedy
grant
order
directing
state
indian
tribe
conclude
compact
within
days
provided
sanction
violation
order
require
parties
submit
proposed
compact
mediator
iii
iv
statute
directed
state
fail
abide
mediator
selected
compact
sole
remedy
secretary
interior
consultation
tribe
prescribe
regulations
governing
gaming
see
vii
concluded
congress
must
intended
procedural
route
exclusive
means
enforcing
explained
enforced
suit
ex
parte
young
superfluous
difficult
see
indian
tribe
suffer
intricate
scheme
complete
immediate
relief
available
ex
parte
young
equivalent
carefully
crafted
intricate
remedial
scheme
enforcement
relies
two
aspects
medicaid
act
whether
considered
separately
combination
neither
suffices
first
cites
authorizes
secretary
health
human
services
hhs
withhold
federal
medicaid
payments
state
whole
part
secretary
determines
state
failed
comply
obligations
set
including
see
ante
striking
contrast
remedial
provision
set
indian
gaming
regulatory
act
provides
specific
procedure
parties
actually
affected
state
violation
statutory
obligations
may
invoke
lieu
ex
parte
young
leaving
without
avenue
seeking
relief
state
always
provide
particularly
effective
means
redressing
state
violations
state
violated
refusing
reimburse
medical
providers
level
sufficient
enlist
enough
providers
care
services
available
medicaid
beneficiaries
extent
available
general
population
agency
action
resulting
reduced
flow
federal
funds
state
often
see
brief
former
hhs
officials
amici
curiae
noting
hhs
often
reluctant
initiate
compliance
actions
state
creates
scenario
withholding
state
funds
lead
depriving
poor
essential
medical
assistance
far
rendering
superfluous
ex
parte
young
actions
seem
anticipated
possibly
necessary
supplement
limited
mechanism
seminole
tribe
indeed
presumably
reasons
recently
rejected
contention
accepts
holding
fact
federal
government
exercise
oversight
federal
spending
program
even
withhold
withdraw
funds
demonstrate
congress
displayed
intent
provide
complete
immediate
relief
otherwise
available
ex
parte
young
virginia
office
protection
advocacy
stewart
slip
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
section
also
parallels
provisions
scattered
throughout
social
security
act
likewise
authorize
withholding
federal
funds
fail
fulfill
obligations
see
yet
consistently
authorized
judicial
enforcement
act
see
maine
thiboutot
collecting
cases
rosado
wyman
provides
fitting
illustration
considered
provision
social
security
act
mandating
calculating
benefits
participants
aid
families
dependent
children
program
make
adjustments
reflect
fully
changes
living
costs
quoting
supp
iv
expressed
hesitation
concluding
federal
courts
require
compliance
obligation
explaining
peculiarly
part
duty
tribunal
less
welfare
field
areas
law
resolve
disputes
whether
federal
funds
allocated
expended
consonance
conditions
congress
attached
use
held
notwithstanding
existence
enforcement
provision
permitting
federal
agency
make
total
partial
cutoff
federal
funds
see
citing
second
perhaps
attempting
reconcile
treatment
ed
longstanding
precedent
focuses
particular
language
contending
provision
least
judicially
unadministrable
congress
must
intended
preclude
enforcement
private
suits
ante
admittedly
standard
set
fairly
broad
requiring
state
medicaid
plan
provide
methods
procedures
relating
utilization
payment
care
services
available
plan
may
necessary
safeguard
unnecessary
utilization
care
services
assure
payments
consistent
efficiency
economy
quality
care
sufficient
enlist
enough
providers
care
services
available
plan
least
extent
care
services
available
general
population
geographic
area
mere
breadth
statutory
language
require
give
hope
judicial
enforcement
important
infer
congress
must
done
fact
contention
language
intended
foreclose
private
enforcement
actions
entirely
difficult
square
provision
history
specific
equal
access
mandate
invoked
plaintiffs
case
reimbursement
rates
sufficient
enlist
enough
providers
care
services
available
plan
least
extent
care
services
available
general
population
geographic
area
added
stat
time
multiple
federal
courts
appeals
held
boren
amendment
medicaid
act
enforceable
pursuant
soon
thereafter
concluded
see
wilder
virginia
hospital
boren
amendment
employed
language
quite
similar
used
requiring
state
plan
provide
payment
hospital
services
nursing
facility
services
services
intermediate
care
facility
mentally
retarded
provided
plan
use
rates
state
finds
makes
assurances
satisfactory
secretary
reasonable
adequate
meet
costs
must
incurred
efficiently
economically
operated
facilities
order
provide
care
services
conformity
applicable
state
federal
laws
regulations
quality
safety
standards
assure
individuals
eligible
medical
assistance
reasonable
access
inpatient
hospital
services
adequate
quality
supp
hard
believe
congress
enacted
operative
version
failed
anticipate
might
similarly
enforceable
even
observes
question
whether
boren
amendment
enforceable
unsettled
time
ante
emphasis
deleted
surely
congress
spoken
far
clarity
actually
intended
preclude
private
enforcement
also
ex
parte
young
course
broad
scope
language
irrelevant
rather
compelling
conclusion
provision
wholly
unenforceable
private
parties
breadth
counsels
favor
interpreting
provide
substantial
leeway
rare
extreme
circumstances
state
actually
held
violate
mandate
provision
scope
may
also
often
require
rely
hhs
comparatively
expert
statute
subject
matter
douglas
independent
living
center
southern
slip
agency
made
determination
respect
legal
standard
apply
validity
state
procedures
implementing
medicaid
plan
determination
accorded
appropriate
deference
see
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
skidmore
swift
faced
question
presents
special
demand
agency
expertise
might
call
views
agency
refer
question
agency
doctrine
primary
jurisdiction
see
rosado
pharmaceutical
research
mfrs
america
walsh
breyer
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
finally
authority
invoked
enforcing
equitable
nature
plaintiff
entitled
relief
right
sound
discretion
see
amoco
production
gambell
given
courts
ability
respect
legitimate
choices
defer
federal
agency
necessary
see
basis
presuming
congress
believed
judiciary
completely
incapable
enforcing
sum
far
identifying
carefully
crafted
remedial
scheme
demonstrating
congress
intended
foreclose
ex
parte
young
enforcement
seminole
tribe
points
two
provisions
first
provision
given
precedent
preclude
private
actions
second
perhaps
broad
understood
manifest
congressional
intent
preclude
judicial
involvement
error
today
real
consequences
previously
state
set
reimbursement
rates
low
providers
unwilling
furnish
covered
service
need
compelled
affected
respect
obligation
imposed
must
suffice
federal
agency
many
programs
oversee
authority
address
violations
drastic
often
counterproductive
measure
withholding
funds
pay
services
faithful
application
precedents
led
contrary
result
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
respondents
claim
wilder
establishes
precedent
private
cause
action
case
assert
action
since
later
opinions
plainly
repudiate
ready
implication
action
wilder
exemplified
see
gonzaga
univ
due
expressly
reject
ing
notion
implicit
wilder
cases
permit
anything
short
unambiguously
conferred
right
support
cause
action
brought
footnotes
say
appeals
case
necessarily
applied
correctly
indeed
good
reasons
think
construed
impose
overly
stringent
obligation
ninth
circuit
understood
compel
rely
responsible
cost
studies
reimburse
services
rates
approximate
cost
quality
care
provided
efficiently
economically
orthopaedic
hospital
belshe
courts
read
require
rates
high
enough
ensure
services
available
medicaid
participants
see
pennsylvania
pharmacists
assn
houstoun
evergreen
presbyterian
ministries
hood
methodist
hospitals
sullivan
declined
grant
certiorari
address
whether
ninth
circuit
reading
correct
see
justice
breyer
concurrence
appears
mistake
question
merits
ninth
circuit
standard
question
actually
granted
certiorari
address
whether
judicially
enforceable
see
ante
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
answer
question
one
need
recognize
justice
breyer
federal
courts
long
become
accustomed
reviewing
reasonableness
constitutionality
determinations
made
agencies
ante
private
party
invokes
jurisdiction
federal
courts
order
enjoin
state
agency
implementation
rates
unreasonably
low
violate
seeks
determination
exactly
sort