descamps
argued
january
decided
june
armed
career
criminal
act
acca
increases
sentences
certain
federal
defendants
three
prior
convictions
violent
felony
including
burglary
arson
extortion
determine
whether
past
conviction
one
crimes
courts
use
categorical
approach
compare
statutory
elements
prior
conviction
elements
generic
crime
offense
commonly
understood
statute
elements
narrower
generic
offense
prior
conviction
qualifies
acca
predicate
prior
conviction
violating
divisible
statute
one
sets
one
elements
alternative
burglary
involving
entry
building
automobile
modified
categorical
approach
used
approach
permits
sentencing
courts
consult
limited
class
documents
indictments
jury
instructions
determine
alternative
element
formed
basis
defendant
prior
conviction
petitioner
descamps
convicted
felon
possession
firearm
government
sought
acca
sentence
enhancement
pointing
descamps
three
prior
convictions
including
one
burglary
california
penal
code
ann
provides
person
enters
certain
locations
intent
commit
grand
petit
larceny
felony
guilty
burglary
imposing
enhanced
sentence
district
rejected
descamps
argument
conviction
serve
acca
predicate
goes
beyond
generic
definition
burglary
ninth
circuit
affirmed
holding
decision
de
oca
permits
application
modified
categorical
approach
prior
conviction
statute
categorically
broader
generic
offense
found
descamps
conviction
revealed
plea
colloquy
rested
facts
satisfying
elements
generic
burglary
held
modified
categorical
approach
apply
statutes
like
contain
single
indivisible
set
elements
pp
caselaw
resolves
case
taylor
shepard
approved
use
modified
categorical
approach
narrow
range
cases
divisible
statute
listing
potential
offense
elements
alternative
renders
opaque
element
played
part
defendant
conviction
sentencing
tell
simply
looking
divisible
statute
version
offense
defendant
convicted
permitted
consult
documents
assess
whether
defendant
convicted
particular
statutory
definition
corresponds
generic
offense
nijhawan
holder
johnson
also
emphasized
rationale
modified
categorical
approach
approach
plays
role
dispute
concern
alternative
elements
simple
discrepancy
generic
burglary
pp
ninth
circuit
approach
turns
inquiry
one
asking
whether
statutory
definitions
necessarily
require
adjudicator
find
generic
offense
whether
prosecutor
case
realistically
led
adjudicator
find
certain
facts
roots
precedents
fact
subverts
decisions
conflicting
rationales
supporting
categorical
approach
threatening
undo
benefits
pp
taylor
categorical
approach
comports
acca
text
history
avoids
sixth
amendment
concerns
arise
sentencing
courts
making
factual
findings
properly
belong
juries
averts
practical
difficulties
potential
unfairness
factual
approach
acca
language
shows
congress
intended
sentencing
courts
look
fact
defendant
convicted
crimes
falling
within
certain
categories
facts
underlying
prior
convictions
ninth
circuit
approach
runs
headlong
congressional
choice
instead
reviewing
documents
determine
alternative
element
basis
conviction
circuit
looks
materials
discover
defendant
actually
acca
sentencing
finding
predicate
offense
indisputably
increases
maximum
penalty
accordingly
finding
least
raise
serious
sixth
amendment
concerns
went
beyond
merely
identifying
prior
conviction
shepard
refused
permit
sentencing
courts
make
disputed
determination
facts
must
supported
defendant
conviction
plurality
opinion
yet
ninth
circuit
flouts
reasoning
authorizing
judicial
factfinding
goes
far
beyond
recognition
prior
conviction
ninth
circuit
decision
also
creates
daunting
difficulties
inequities
first
encouraged
adoption
categorical
approach
sentencing
courts
following
expend
resources
examining
often
aged
documents
evidence
defendant
admitted
prosecutor
showed
facts
although
unnecessary
crime
conviction
satisfied
element
relevant
generic
offense
approach
also
deprive
many
defendants
benefits
negotiated
plea
deals
pp
defending
ninth
circuit
denied
real
distinction
divisible
indivisible
statutes
extending
generic
offense
circuit
efforts
imaginatively
reconceive
indivisible
statutes
divisible
ones
unavailing
divisible
statutes
enable
sentencing
conclude
jury
judge
plea
hearing
convicted
defendant
every
element
generic
crime
pp
government
offers
slightly
different
argument
contends
modified
categorical
approach
apply
mismatch
elements
crime
conviction
generic
offense
results
missing
element
element
overbreadth
distinction
malleable
manipulable
event
distinction
without
difference
whether
statute
conviction
overbroad
missing
element
problem
mismatch
elements
person
convicted
statute
never
convicted
generic
crime
pp
generic
unlawful
entry
element
alternative
element
conviction
statute
never
generic
burglary
descamps
acca
enhancement
therefore
improper
pp
fed
appx
reversed
kagan
delivered
opinion
roberts
scalia
kennedy
ginsburg
breyer
sotomayor
joined
kennedy
filed
concurring
opinion
thomas
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
alito
filed
dissenting
opinion
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
matthew
robert
descamps
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
june
justice
kagan
delivered
opinion
armed
career
criminal
act
acca
act
increases
sentences
certain
federal
defendants
three
prior
convictions
violent
felony
including
burglary
arson
extortion
determine
whether
past
conviction
one
crimes
courts
use
become
known
categorical
approach
compare
elements
statute
forming
basis
defendant
conviction
elements
generic
crime
offense
commonly
understood
prior
conviction
qualifies
acca
predicate
statute
elements
narrower
generic
offense
previously
approved
variant
method
labeled
inventively
modified
categorical
approach
prior
conviction
violating
divisible
statute
kind
statute
sets
one
elements
offense
alternative
example
stating
burglary
involves
entry
building
automobile
one
alternative
say
building
matches
element
generic
offense
say
automobile
modified
categorical
approach
permits
sentencing
courts
consult
limited
class
documents
indictments
jury
instructions
determine
alternative
formed
basis
defendant
prior
conviction
categorical
approach
demands
compare
elements
crime
conviction
including
alternative
element
used
case
elements
generic
crime
case
presents
question
whether
sentencing
courts
may
also
consult
additional
documents
defendant
convicted
indivisible
statute
one
containing
alternative
elements
criminalizes
broader
swath
conduct
relevant
generic
offense
enable
decide
based
information
case
underlying
facts
defendant
prior
conviction
qualifies
acca
predicate
even
though
elements
crime
fail
satisfy
categorical
test
result
contravene
prior
decisions
principles
underlying
hold
sentencing
courts
may
apply
modified
categorical
approach
crime
defendant
convicted
single
indivisible
set
elements
petitioner
michael
descamps
convicted
felon
possession
firearm
violation
unadorned
offense
carries
maximum
penalty
years
prison
government
however
sought
enhanced
sentence
acca
based
descamps
prior
state
convictions
burglary
robbery
felony
harassment
acca
prescribes
mandatory
minimum
sentence
years
person
violates
three
previous
convictions
violent
felony
serious
drug
offense
act
defines
violent
felony
mean
felony
whether
state
federal
element
use
attempted
use
threatened
use
physical
force
person
another
burglary
arson
extortion
involves
use
explosives
otherwise
involves
conduct
presents
serious
potential
risk
physical
injury
another
descamps
argued
prior
burglary
conviction
count
acca
predicate
offense
categorical
approach
pleaded
guilty
violating
california
penal
code
ann
west
provides
person
enters
certain
locations
intent
commit
grand
petit
larceny
felony
guilty
burglary
statute
require
entry
unlawful
way
burglary
laws
whereas
burglary
statutes
generally
demand
breaking
entering
similar
conduct
california
covers
example
shoplifter
enters
store
like
customer
normal
business
hours
see
people
barry
cal
sweeping
widely
state
law
goes
beyond
normal
generic
definition
burglary
according
descamps
asymmetry
offense
elements
precluded
conviction
serving
acca
predicate
whether
burglary
involved
unlawful
entry
satisfied
requirements
generic
crime
district
disagreed
according
modified
categorical
approach
permitted
examine
certain
documents
including
record
plea
colloquy
discover
whether
descamps
admitted
elements
generic
burglary
entering
plea
app
transcript
ruled
showed
descamps
done
plea
hearing
prosecutor
proffered
crime
involve
breaking
entering
grocery
store
descamps
failed
object
statement
ibid
plea
proceedings
district
thought
thus
established
descamps
prior
conviction
qualified
generic
burglary
violent
felony
acca
applying
requisite
penalty
enhancement
sentenced
descamps
months
prison
twice
term
otherwise
received
appeals
ninth
circuit
affirmed
relying
recently
issued
decision
de
oca
en
banc
per
curiam
divided
en
banc
took
much
view
modified
categorical
approach
district
case
en
banc
held
sentencing
considers
conviction
statute
categorically
broader
generic
offense
may
scrutinize
certain
documents
determine
factual
basis
conviction
see
applying
approach
appeals
found
descamps
plea
revealed
colloquy
rested
facts
satisfy
elements
generic
definition
burglary
fed
appx
granted
certiorari
resolve
circuit
split
whether
modified
categorical
approach
applies
statutes
like
contain
single
indivisible
set
elements
sweeping
broadly
corresponding
generic
hold
reverse
ii
caselaw
explaining
categorical
approach
modified
counterpart
resolves
case
decisions
shown
modified
approach
serves
limited
function
helps
effectuate
categorical
analysis
divisible
statute
listing
potential
offense
elements
alternative
renders
opaque
element
played
part
defendant
conviction
understood
modified
approach
convert
descamps
conviction
acca
predicate
state
law
defines
burglary
alternatively
broadly
generic
offense
begin
taylor
established
rule
determining
defendant
prior
conviction
counts
one
acca
enumerated
predicate
offenses
burglary
taylor
adopted
formal
categorical
approach
sentencing
courts
may
look
statutory
definitions
elements
defendant
prior
offenses
particular
facts
underlying
convictions
relevant
statute
elements
generic
acca
crime
prior
conviction
serve
acca
predicate
statute
defines
crime
narrowly
anyone
convicted
law
necessarily
guilty
generic
crime
elements
statute
sweeps
broadly
generic
crime
conviction
law
count
acca
predicate
even
defendant
actually
committed
offense
generic
form
key
emphasized
elements
facts
example
held
defendant
receive
acca
enhancement
burglary
convicted
crime
basic
elements
generic
burglary
unlawful
unprivileged
entry
remaining
building
structure
intent
commit
crime
ibid
indeed
indicated
statute
issue
fit
bill
california
defines
broadly
include
shoplifting
time
taylor
recognized
narrow
range
cases
sentencing
courts
applying
later
dub
modified
categorical
approach
may
look
beyond
statutory
elements
charging
paper
jury
instructions
used
case
explain
courts
resort
approach
hypothesized
statute
alternative
elements
particularly
burglary
statute
otherwise
conforming
generic
crime
prohibits
entry
automobile
well
building
ibid
one
alternatives
building
corresponds
element
generic
burglary
whereas
automobile
typical
case
brought
statute
prosecutor
charges
one
two
alternatives
judge
instructs
jury
accordingly
case
involves
entry
building
jury
actually
required
find
elements
generic
burglary
categorical
approach
demands
ibid
statute
alone
disclose
whether
occurred
statute
divisible
comprises
multiple
alternative
versions
crime
later
sentencing
tell
without
reviewing
something
defendant
conviction
generic
building
automobile
form
burglary
hence
taylor
permitted
sentencing
courts
tool
implementing
categorical
approach
examine
limited
class
documents
determine
statute
alternative
elements
formed
basis
defendant
prior
conviction
shepard
hypothetical
posited
taylor
became
real
confronted
massachusetts
burglary
statute
covering
entries
boats
cars
well
buildings
defendant
pleaded
guilty
violating
statute
first
confirmed
taylor
categorical
approach
applies
jury
verdicts
also
plea
agreements
meant
held
conviction
based
guilty
plea
qualify
acca
predicate
defendant
necessarily
admitted
elements
generic
offense
anticipated
taylor
divisible
nature
massachusetts
burglary
statute
confounded
inquiry
one
know
looking
statute
version
offense
shepard
convicted
accordingly
authorized
sentencing
courts
scrutinize
restricted
set
materials
terms
plea
agreement
transcript
colloquy
judge
defendant
determine
defendant
pleaded
guilty
entering
building
alternatively
car
boat
ibid
yet
underscored
narrow
scope
review
determine
defendant
state
judge
must
understood
factual
basis
prior
plea
assess
whether
plea
version
crime
massachusetts
statute
burglary
building
corresponding
generic
offense
plurality
opinion
two
recent
decisions
emphasized
rationale
applicable
divisible
statutes
examining
documents
like
indictment
plea
agreement
nijhawan
holder
discussed
another
massachusetts
statute
one
prohibiting
breaking
entering
four
alternative
places
building
ship
vessel
vehicle
recognized
statute
refer
several
different
crimes
qualify
acca
predicate
must
determine
crime
formed
basis
defendant
conviction
ibid
explained
taylor
shepard
developed
modified
categorical
approach
reviewing
materials
approved
cases
courts
discover
statutory
phrase
contained
within
statute
listing
several
different
crimes
covered
prior
conviction
year
later
repeated
understanding
courts
resort
documents
categorical
approach
approved
permits
determine
statutory
phrase
basis
conviction
johnson
citation
omitted
applied
way
way
ever
allowed
modified
approach
merely
helps
implement
categorical
approach
defendant
convicted
violating
divisible
statute
modified
approach
thus
acts
exception
instead
tool
retains
categorical
approach
central
feature
focus
elements
rather
facts
crime
preserves
categorical
approach
basic
method
comparing
elements
generic
offense
modified
approach
adds
mechanism
making
comparison
statute
lists
multiple
alternative
elements
effectively
creates
several
different
crimes
nijhawan
least
one
crimes
matches
generic
version
needs
way
find
defendant
convicted
job
always
understood
modified
approach
identify
among
several
alternatives
crime
conviction
compare
generic
modified
approach
thus
role
play
case
dispute
concern
list
alternative
elements
rather
involves
simple
discrepancy
generic
burglary
crime
established
former
requires
unlawful
entry
along
lines
breaking
entering
see
lafave
substantive
criminal
law
ed
hereinafter
lafave
latter
indeed
covers
simple
shoplifting
even
government
acknowledges
see
brief
barry
taylor
words
define
burglary
broadly
generic
offense
true
california
get
conviction
need
prove
descamps
broke
entered
violation
serve
acca
predicate
whether
descamps
break
enter
makes
difference
likewise
whether
ever
admitted
breaking
entering
irrelevant
decisions
authorize
review
plea
colloquy
approved
documents
statute
defines
burglary
overbroadly
instead
alternatively
one
statutory
phrase
corresponding
generic
crime
another
circumstance
may
look
additional
documents
determine
statutory
offenses
generic
formed
basis
defendant
conviction
uncertainty
kind
exists
categorical
approach
needs
help
modified
partner
know
descamps
crime
conviction
correspond
relevant
generic
offense
prior
decisions
inquiry
iii
appeals
took
different
view
dismissing
everything
said
subject
lack
ing
conclusive
weight
ninth
circuit
held
modified
categorical
approach
turn
conviction
statute
acca
predicate
offense
statute
like
contain
single
indivisible
set
elements
covering
far
conduct
generic
crime
still
sentencing
conside
degree
factual
basis
defendant
conviction
otherwise
stated
particular
acts
defendant
committed
specifically
look
reliable
materials
charging
document
jury
instructions
plea
colloquy
forth
determine
facts
confident
ly
thought
underlie
defendant
conviction
light
prosecutorial
theory
case
facts
put
forward
government
makes
difference
ninth
circuit
view
whether
specific
words
statute
conviction
actually
jury
judge
accepting
plea
find
particular
generic
element
quoting
taylor
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
approach
objecting
judge
aptly
called
modified
factual
berzon
concurring
judgment
turns
inquiry
one
asks
whether
statutory
definitions
necessarily
require
adjudicator
find
generic
offense
instead
whether
prosecutor
case
realistically
led
adjudicator
make
determination
makes
examination
documents
tool
used
narrow
range
cases
identify
relevant
element
statute
multiple
alternatives
rather
device
employed
every
case
evaluate
facts
judge
jury
found
point
clear
ninth
circuit
new
way
identifying
acca
predicates
roots
precedents
subverts
decisions
conflicting
rationales
supporting
categorical
approach
threatening
undo
benefits
offered
three
grounds
establishing
formal
categorical
approach
taylor
first
comports
acca
text
history
second
avoids
sixth
amendment
concerns
arise
sentencing
courts
making
findings
fact
properly
belong
juries
third
averts
practical
difficulties
potential
unfairness
factual
approach
assessed
light
three
reasons
ninth
circuit
ruling
strikes
swinging
start
statutory
text
history
long
recognized
acca
increases
sentence
defendant
three
previous
convictions
violent
felony
defendant
thrice
committed
crime
see
taylor
language
shows
taylor
explained
congress
intended
sentencing
look
fact
defendant
convicted
crimes
falling
within
certain
categories
facts
underlying
prior
convictions
ibid
see
shepard
congress
wanted
increase
sentence
based
facts
prior
offense
presumably
said
statutes
contexts
speak
way
see
nijhawan
construing
immigration
statute
requiring
approach
acca
taylor
found
congress
made
deliberate
decision
treat
every
conviction
crime
manner
lengthy
debate
preceding
statute
enactment
one
suggested
particular
crime
might
sometimes
count
towards
enhancement
sometimes
depending
facts
case
congress
instead
meant
acca
function
switch
directing
prior
crime
qualify
predicate
offense
cases
none
ninth
circuit
approach
runs
headlong
congressional
choice
instead
reviewing
documents
like
indictment
plea
colloquy
determine
statutory
phrase
basis
conviction
ninth
circuit
looks
materials
discover
defendant
actually
johnson
case
demonstrates
point
descamps
convicted
generic
burglary
government
agrees
contain
crime
required
element
see
brief
colloquy
showed
descamps
committed
generic
burglary
hypothetically
convicted
law
criminalizing
conduct
said
taylor
elsewhere
enough
see
holder
slip
rejecting
hypothetical
given
similar
statute
directive
look
conviction
rather
might
charged
necessary
result
ninth
circuit
method
exactly
differential
treatment
thought
congress
enacting
acca
took
care
prevent
two
years
since
ninth
circuit
treated
convictions
acca
predicates
based
minor
variations
cases
plea
documents
compare
fed
descamps
conviction
counts
generic
burglary
similarly
consider
though
categorical
approach
sixth
amendment
underpinnings
held
ther
fact
prior
conviction
fact
increases
penalty
crime
beyond
prescribed
statutory
maximum
must
submitted
jury
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
apprendi
new
jersey
acca
finding
predicate
offense
indisputably
increases
maximum
penalty
accordingly
finding
least
raise
serious
sixth
amendment
concerns
went
beyond
merely
identifying
prior
conviction
concerns
recognized
shepard
counsel
allowing
sentencing
make
disputed
determination
defendant
state
judge
must
understood
factual
basis
prior
plea
jury
prior
trial
must
accepted
theory
crime
plurality
opinion
see
thomas
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
stating
finding
giv
rise
constitutional
error
doubt
hence
insistence
categorical
approach
yet
ninth
circuit
ruling
flouts
reasoning
extending
judicial
factfinding
beyond
recognition
prior
conviction
modified
categorical
approach
merely
assists
sentencing
identifying
defendant
crime
conviction
held
sixth
amendment
permits
ninth
circuit
reworking
authorizes
try
discern
trial
showed
plea
proceeding
revealed
defendant
underlying
conduct
see
constitutional
rub
sixth
amendment
contemplates
jury
sentencing
find
facts
unanimously
beyond
reasonable
doubt
facts
sure
jury
found
constituting
elements
offense
distinct
amplifying
legally
extraneous
circumstances
see
richardson
similarly
shepard
indicated
defendant
pleads
guilty
crime
waives
right
jury
determination
offense
elements
whatever
says
fails
say
superfluous
facts
license
later
sentencing
impose
extra
punishment
see
plurality
opinion
district
enhanced
descamps
sentence
based
supposed
acquiescence
prosecutorial
statement
broke
entered
irrelevant
crime
charged
said
rely
finding
fact
increase
defendant
maximum
sentence
finally
ninth
circuit
decision
creates
daunting
difficulties
inequities
first
encouraged
us
adopt
categorical
approach
taylor
case
case
sentencing
courts
following
expend
resources
examining
often
aged
documents
evidence
defendant
admitted
plea
colloquy
prosecutor
showed
trial
facts
although
unnecessary
crime
conviction
satisfy
element
relevant
generic
offense
meaning
documents
often
uncertain
statements
fact
may
downright
wrong
defendant
often
little
incentive
contest
facts
elements
charged
offense
may
good
reason
trial
extraneous
facts
arguments
may
confuse
jury
indeed
may
prohibit
reason
plea
hearings
defendant
may
wish
irk
prosecutor
squabbling
superfluous
factual
allegations
case
example
descamps
may
let
prosecutor
statement
go
irrelevant
proceedings
likely
thinking
possibility
silence
come
back
haunt
acca
sentencing
years
future
actually
thinking
thought
acca
even
books
time
descamps
burglary
conviction
still
worse
approach
deprive
defendants
benefits
negotiated
plea
deals
assume
happens
every
day
defendant
surrenders
right
trial
exchange
government
agreement
plead
guilty
less
serious
crime
whose
elements
match
acca
offense
ninth
circuit
view
later
sentencing
still
treat
defendant
though
pleaded
acca
predicate
based
legally
extraneous
statements
found
old
record
taylor
recognized
problem
guilty
plea
lesser
nonburglary
offense
result
plea
bargain
stated
seem
unfair
impose
sentence
enhancement
defendant
pleaded
guilty
generic
burglary
way
proceeding
top
everything
else
allow
later
sentencing
rewrite
parties
bargain
ninth
circuit
defended
excessively
modified
approach
denying
real
distinction
divisible
indivisible
statutes
extending
generic
offense
conceptual
difference
reasoned
divisible
statute
creates
explicitly
finite
list
possible
means
commission
indivisible
one
creates
implied
list
every
means
commission
otherwise
fits
definition
given
crime
example
indivisible
statute
requir
ing
use
meaningfully
different
says
ninth
circuit
statute
simply
lists
every
kind
weapon
existence
axe
sword
baton
slingshot
knife
machete
bat
ibid
similar
way
every
indivisible
statute
imaginatively
reconstructed
divisible
one
true
ninth
circuit
asks
limit
modified
categorical
approach
explicitly
divisible
statutes
simple
answer
divisible
statutes
enable
sentencing
conclude
jury
judge
plea
hearing
convicted
defendant
every
element
generic
crime
prosecutor
charging
violation
divisible
statute
must
generally
select
relevant
element
list
alternatives
see
confiscation
cases
wall
indictment
criminal
information
charges
person
accused
disjunctive
guilty
one
another
several
offences
destitute
necessary
certainty
wholly
insufficient
jury
instructions
case
make
clear
must
find
element
unanimously
beyond
reasonable
doubt
assume
along
lines
ninth
circuit
example
statute
criminalizes
assault
eight
specified
weapons
suppose
ninth
circuit
assault
gun
counts
acca
offense
later
sentencing
need
check
charging
documents
instructions
refer
gun
something
else
determine
whether
convicting
defendant
divisible
statute
jury
necessarily
found
committed
crime
none
true
overbroad
indivisible
statute
sentencing
sure
hypothetically
reconceive
statute
divisible
terms
reveals
blessed
sufficient
time
imagination
devise
laundry
list
potential
weapons
eight
ninth
circuit
mentioned
also
starters
grenades
pipe
bombs
spears
tire
irons
bb
guns
nunchucks
crossbows
thing
hypothetical
lists
well
hypothetical
long
statute
requires
indeterminate
weapon
indictment
must
likely
allege
jury
instructions
must
likely
mention
important
jury
must
find
convict
defendant
jurors
need
agree
whether
defendant
used
gun
knife
tire
iron
particular
weapon
might
appear
imagined
divisible
statute
actual
statute
requires
jury
find
weapon
even
many
cases
jury
readily
reached
consensus
weapon
used
later
sentencing
supply
missing
judgment
whatever
underlying
facts
evidence
presented
defendant
still
convicted
deliberate
considered
way
constitution
guarantees
offense
narrower
elements
supposed
generic
crime
assault
gun
indeed
accepting
ninth
circuit
contrary
reasoning
altogether
collapse
distinction
categorical
approach
ninth
circuit
weapons
example
tip
iceberg
courts
go
much
reconceiving
indivisible
statutes
impliedly
divisible
ones
fact
every
element
every
statute
imaginatively
transformed
ninth
circuit
suggests
every
crime
seen
containing
infinite
number
corresponding
possible
ways
individual
commit
think
professor
plum
ballroom
candlestick
colonel
mustard
conservatory
rope
snowy
day
cover
affair
mrs
peacock
sentencing
ninth
circuit
holds
compare
implied
means
commission
generic
acca
offense
ibid
emphasis
deleted
categorical
approach
end
point
merely
asking
whether
particular
set
facts
leading
conviction
conforms
generic
acca
offense
expressly
repeatedly
forbidden
courts
may
modify
categorical
approach
accommodate
alternative
statutory
definitions
ibid
cf
mci
telecommunications
american
telephone
telegraph
modify
means
change
moderately
minor
fashion
may
pretending
every
fact
pattern
implied
statutory
definition
convert
approach
opposite
iv
government
tries
distance
ninth
circuit
offering
purportedly
narrower
theory
although
indivisible
statute
truly
missing
element
generic
offense
give
rise
acca
conviction
california
burglary
law
merely
contains
broader
version
generic
element
unlawfulness
entry
brief
government
argument
proceeds
three
steps
begins
premise
sentencing
courts
applying
acca
consider
statute
defining
prior
crime
also
judicial
interpretations
next
government
points
california
decision
holding
surprisingly
defendant
burglariz
home
case
reasoning
government
notes
though
saying
explicitly
requires
entry
invades
possessory
right
people
gauze
cal
given
precedent
government
contends
includes
kind
unlawful
entry
element
although
broader
generic
crime
analogous
requirement
finally
government
asserts
sentencing
courts
may
use
modified
approach
determine
whether
particular
defendant
conviction
overbroad
statute
actually
generic
crime
brief
although
elaborately
developed
government
brief
argument
first
two
steps
turn
sideshows
may
reserve
question
whether
determining
crime
elements
sentencing
take
account
relevant
statute
text
judicial
rulings
interpreting
may
assume
government
insists
california
caselaw
treats
including
element
entry
invading
possessory
right
although
truth
told
find
state
decisions
score
contradictory
even
assumptions
elements
come
line
generic
burglary
government
concedes
almost
every
entry
onto
another
property
intent
steal
including
example
shoplifter
walking
open
store
invades
possessory
right
see
brief
gauze
cal
contrast
generic
burglary
element
excludes
case
person
enters
premises
open
public
matter
intent
generic
crime
requires
breaking
entering
similar
unlawful
activity
see
brief
lafave
everything
rests
government
third
point
mismatch
preclude
applying
modified
categorical
approach
results
missing
element
instead
element
overbreadth
starters
see
principled
way
make
distinction
overbroad
statutes
also
characterized
missing
element
statutes
missing
element
also
labeled
overbroad
conclusion
agree
difficult
impossible
determine
example
gave
follows
statute
conviction
punishes
possession
pornography
federal
law
carries
sentence
enhancement
possession
child
pornography
statute
conviction
overbroad
includes
adult
child
pornography
law
instead
missing
element
involvement
minors
name
game
played
government
labors
mightily
turn
fears
looks
like
statute
overbroad
statute
incorporation
judicial
decisions
even
putting
decisions
aside
government
might
described
merely
overbroad
element
entry
includes
lawful
unlawful
kind
conversely
descamps
claim
even
judicially
interpreted
entirely
missing
generic
burglary
element
breaking
entering
similar
unlawful
conduct
eye
beholder
prone
endless
manipulation
event
fundamentally
see
reason
government
distinction
matter
whether
statute
conviction
overbroad
missing
element
problem
mismatch
elements
person
convicted
statute
never
convicted
generic
crime
case
example
descamps
convicted
generic
burglary
whether
viewed
missing
element
containing
overbroad
one
require
breaking
entering
every
reason
given
textual
constitutional
practical
rejecting
ninth
circuit
proposed
approach
applies
government
well
see
supra
bottom
government
wants
thing
ninth
circuit
nominally
fewer
cases
wishes
sentencing
look
beyond
elements
evidence
otherwise
said
explore
whether
person
convicted
one
crime
also
convicted
another
serious
offense
review
categorical
approach
precludes
explained
adopted
modified
approach
help
implement
categorical
inquiry
undermine
descamps
may
may
broken
entered
committed
generic
burglary
crime
convicted
require
factfinder
whether
jury
judge
make
determination
generic
unlawful
entry
element
alternative
element
conviction
statute
never
generic
burglary
decides
case
descamps
favor
district
enhanced
sentence
ninth
circuit
erred
invoking
modified
categorical
approach
look
behind
descamps
conviction
search
record
evidence
actually
committed
generic
offense
modified
approach
authorize
sentencing
substitute
inquiry
one
may
use
modified
approach
determine
alternative
element
divisible
statute
formed
basis
defendant
conviction
accordingly
reverse
judgment
appeals
ordered
kennedy
concurring
matthew
robert
descamps
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
june
justice
kennedy
concurring
explains
case
concerns
earlier
convictions
state
statutes
classified
cases
courts
appeals
today
opinion
indivisible
see
de
oca
en
banc
per
curiam
beardsley
category
used
describe
class
criminal
statutes
drafted
single
set
elements
broader
generic
definition
corresponding
crime
enumerated
armed
career
criminal
act
acca
ii
one
substantial
concerns
correct
consider
regular
course
criminal
process
convictions
may
entered
often
guilty
pleas
either
attorney
client
given
consideration
possible
later
consequences
acca
see
ante
result
certain
facts
documents
approved
judicial
examination
shepard
may
go
uncontested
alter
sentencing
consequences
crime
even
though
effect
require
later
enhancement
acca
significant
risk
failing
consider
full
consequences
plea
conviction
troubling
balanced
justice
alito
indicates
dichotomy
divisible
indivisible
state
criminal
statutes
clear
see
post
dissenting
opinion
effect
today
decision
unspecified
number
likely
large
number
state
criminal
statutes
indivisible
often
reach
serious
crimes
otherwise
subject
acca
provisions
must
amended
state
legislatures
otherwise
meet
federal
requirements
even
though
come
within
acca
terms
state
statute
drafted
different
way
intrusive
demand
due
consideration
concerns
well
expressed
persuade
reaches
correct
result
disruption
federal
policy
underlying
acca
nevertheless
troubling
substantial
see
post
alito
dissenting
congress
wishes
pursue
policy
proper
efficient
way
without
mandating
uniformity
among
respect
criminal
statutes
scores
serious
offenses
without
requiring
amendment
number
federal
criminal
statutes
well
congress
act
may
determine
whether
acca
design
structure
modified
meet
concerns
expressed
dissenting
opinion
observations
join
opinion
thomas
concurring
judgment
matthew
robert
descamps
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
june
justice
thomas
concurring
judgment
petitioner
matthew
descamps
convicted
felon
possession
firearm
subjected
maximum
sentence
years
imprisonment
district
however
applied
armed
career
criminal
act
acca
enhancement
mandatory
minimum
years
based
part
descamps
earlier
california
conviction
burglary
see
california
law
says
person
enters
number
structures
intent
commit
grand
petit
larceny
felony
guilty
burglary
california
penal
code
ann
west
law
face
require
jury
determine
whether
entry
unlawful
required
element
generic
offense
burglary
qualifies
acca
predicate
see
taylor
majority
holds
may
review
underlying
facts
descamps
state
crime
determine
whether
entered
building
unlawfully
thus
burglary
conviction
may
used
predicate
offense
acca
agree
conclusion
disagree
reasoning
previously
explained
acca
runs
afoul
apprendi
new
jersey
allows
judge
mak
finding
raises
defendant
sentence
beyond
sentence
lawfully
imposed
reference
facts
found
jury
admitted
defendant
james
dissenting
opinion
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
logic
apprendi
may
find
facts
prior
conviction
findings
increase
statutory
maximum
whether
determining
whether
prior
conviction
entered
see
thomas
concurring
attempting
discern
facts
necessary
prior
conviction
see
james
pra
thomas
dissenting
either
case
inappropriately
finding
fact
must
submitted
jury
increases
penalty
crime
beyond
prescribed
statutory
maximum
apprendi
supra
light
foregoing
matter
whether
statute
divisible
indivisible
see
ante
courts
struggle
contours
modified
categorical
approach
ibid
reason
descamps
acca
enhancement
us
yet
reconsidered
draws
exception
apprendi
line
cases
judicial
factfinding
concerns
defendant
prior
convictions
shepard
thomas
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
regardless
framework
adopted
judicial
factfinding
increases
statutory
maximum
violation
sixth
amendment
however
today
opinion
least
limits
situations
courts
make
factual
determinations
prior
convictions
concur
judgment
alito
dissenting
matthew
robert
descamps
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
june
justice
alito
dissenting
holds
highly
technical
grounds
california
burglary
conviction
qualifies
burglary
conviction
armed
career
criminal
act
acca
according
burglary
california
law
broader
generic
burglary
unlawfully
entering
remaining
building
intent
commit
crime
california
burglary
statute
divisible
modified
categorical
approach
used
case
involving
indivisible
statute
even
apparent
california
burglary
conviction
based
everyone
imagines
term
burglary
mentioned
breaking
home
steal
valuables
conviction
holds
must
ignored
give
acca
practical
reading
clear
defendant
necessarily
admitted
jury
necessarily
found
defendant
committed
elements
generic
burglary
conviction
qualify
petitioner
burglary
conviction
meets
requirement
therefore
affirm
decision
appeals
petitioner
charged
case
us
already
compiled
criminal
record
included
convictions
washington
state
assault
threatening
kill
judge
convictions
california
robbery
burglary
see
app
fed
appx
release
custody
earlier
crimes
petitioner
fired
gun
direction
man
supposedly
owed
money
methamphetamine
result
charged
federal
possession
firearm
convicted
felon
violation
jury
found
guilty
district
imposed
enhanced
sentence
acca
requisite
number
previous
convictions
violent
felony
serious
drug
offense
acca
defines
violent
felony
include
burglary
punishable
imprisonment
term
exceeding
one
year
district
appeals
found
petitioner
california
conviction
fit
definition
concept
conviction
burglary
might
seem
simple
things
worked
way
case
law
taylor
held
burglary
acca
means
called
generic
burglary
unlawful
unprivileged
entry
remaining
building
structure
intent
commit
crime
determining
whether
burglary
conviction
qualifies
definition
easy
elements
set
state
statute
narrower
elements
generic
burglary
see
state
offense
broader
event
held
federal
may
sometimes
apply
termed
modified
categorical
approach
may
examine
items
record
including
charging
documents
jury
instructions
statements
made
guilty
plea
proceedings
determine
defendant
actually
found
committed
elements
generic
offense
see
shepard
taylor
supra
petitioner
argues
conviction
burglary
california
penal
code
qualify
burglary
conviction
acca
purposes
particular
way
provision
worded
section
provides
person
enters
certain
locations
intent
commit
grand
petit
larceny
felony
guilty
burglary
cal
penal
code
ann
west
provision
broader
generic
burglary
two
respects
first
preclude
application
modified
categorical
approach
concerns
place
burglarized
generic
burglary
applies
offenses
involving
entry
building
california
provision
also
reaches
offenses
involving
entry
locations
see
ibid
cases
however
federal
considering
whether
apply
acca
may
determine
based
examination
certain
relevant
documents
whether
conviction
actually
based
entry
building
may
impose
increased
sentence
see
johnson
nijhawan
holder
shepard
supra
second
variation
consequential
whereas
generic
burglary
requires
entry
unlawful
unprivileged
california
statute
refers
without
qualification
person
enters
petitioner
argues
agrees
discrepancy
renders
modified
categorical
approach
inapplicable
california
burglary
conviction
ii
holds
sentencing
courts
may
apply
modified
categorical
approach
crime
defendant
convicted
single
indivisible
set
elements
ante
holding
based
distinction
divisible
indivisible
statutes
important
identify
precisely
taxonomy
means
understanding
statute
divisible
sense
used
offense
question
includes
separate
elements
elements
generic
offense
element
understand
mean
something
jury
must
agree
vote
required
convict
law
applicable
jurisdiction
see
ante
citing
richardson
although
reserves
decision
question
whether
sentencing
may
take
authoritative
judicial
decisions
account
identifying
elements
statute
see
ante
assume
sentencing
may
elements
criminal
offense
generally
set
statutory
text
courts
sometimes
find
unmentioned
elements
implicit
see
neder
holding
federal
mail
fraud
wire
fraud
bank
fraud
statutes
require
proof
materiality
even
though
element
mentioned
statutory
text
think
reason
authoritative
decision
sort
ignored
certainly
provided
therefore
proceed
assumption
statute
divisible
offense
properly
construed
requisite
elements
holding
modified
categorical
approach
may
used
statute
divisible
sense
required
acca
prior
cases
cause
serious
practical
problems
nothing
text
acca
mandates
exclusive
focus
elements
offense
acca
increases
sentence
defendant
three
previous
convictions
violent
felony
emphasis
added
claims
word
convictions
mandates
narrow
inquiry
see
ante
ordinary
speech
said
person
convicted
something
may
include
facts
go
beyond
bare
elements
relevant
criminal
offense
moncrieffe
holder
alito
dissenting
slip
exclusively
inquiry
mandated
acca
definition
violent
felony
crime
burglary
ii
drafting
provision
congress
say
crime
elements
burglary
indeed
fact
congress
referred
elements
elsewhere
subparagraph
see
defining
violent
felony
mean
crime
element
use
attempted
use
threatened
use
physical
force
person
another
emphasis
added
omitted
reference
elements
ii
suggests
anything
intend
focus
exclusively
elements
cf
caraco
pharmaceutical
laboratories
novo
nordisk
slip
says
precedents
require
approach
accuses
appeals
flout
ing
reasoning
taylor
shepard
nijhawan
johnson
see
ante
charge
unfounded
least
three
cases
thought
modified
categorical
approach
used
relation
statutes
may
divisible
shepard
concerned
prior
convictions
two
massachusetts
burglary
statutes
applied
entry
building
case
generic
burglary
also
entry
ship
vessel
vehicle
mass
laws
ch
west
see
also
shepard
think
feature
massachusetts
statutes
precluded
application
modified
categorical
approach
see
ante
see
also
nijhawan
discussing
shepard
today
decision
assumes
building
locations
enumerated
massachusetts
statutes
vessel
alternative
elements
questionable
quite
likely
entry
building
entry
vessel
simply
alternative
means
satisfying
element
see
commonwealth
cabrera
mass
elements
breaking
entering
nighttime
intent
commit
felony
breaking
entering
building
ship
vessel
vehicle
belonging
another
night
intent
commit
felony
egislatures
frequently
enumerate
alternative
means
committing
crime
without
intending
define
separate
elements
separate
crimes
schad
arizona
plurality
feature
distinguishes
elements
means
need
juror
agreement
see
richardson
supra
therefore
determining
whether
entry
building
entry
vessel
elements
means
critical
question
whether
jury
agree
nature
place
defendant
entered
case
decided
earlier
term
illustrates
building
vessel
may
means
separate
elements
lozman
riviera
beach
required
determine
whether
floating
home
buoyant
dwelling
vessel
seven
us
thought
two
us
thought
might
compare
slip
op
slip
sotomayor
dissenting
suppose
defendant
massachusetts
charged
breaking
structure
like
lozman
floating
home
order
convict
necessary
jury
agree
whether
structure
building
vessel
jurors
insisted
building
others
convinced
vessel
jury
hung
answer
yes
according
defendant
charged
burglarizing
lozman
floating
home
sitting
jury
defendant
escaped
conviction
burglary
matter
strong
evidence
jury
agree
whether
burglarized
building
vessel
found
massachusetts
decision
squarely
point
surely
argument
massachusetts
legislature
want
demand
juror
agreement
question
words
strong
argument
entry
building
entry
vessel
merely
alternative
means
alternative
elements
reasoning
shepard
undermines
argument
modified
categorical
approach
focuses
solely
elements
conduct
johnson
like
shepard
involved
statute
may
set
alternative
means
rather
alternative
elements
florida
statute
involved
case
battery
occurs
person
either
ctually
intentionally
touches
strikes
another
person
ntentionally
causes
bodily
harm
another
person
stat
distinct
possibility
one
foreclosed
florida
decision
aware
conviction
provision
require
juror
agreement
whether
defendant
firmly
touched
lightly
struck
victim
nevertheless
johnson
difficulty
concluding
modified
categorical
approach
see
far
mandating
approach
decisions
support
practical
understanding
modified
categorical
approach
thus
shepard
observed
factual
circumstances
defendant
prior
conviction
may
relevant
determining
whether
qualifies
violent
felony
acca
see
material
pleaded
case
later
generally
tell
whether
plea
rested
fact
identifying
burglary
generic
details
instructions
support
conclusion
jury
case
details
generically
limited
charging
document
sort
case
emphasis
added
citation
omitted
plurality
opinion
developments
law
since
taylor
provide
reason
adhere
demanding
requirement
prior
conviction
involved
prior
plea
necessarily
admitted
facts
equating
generic
burglary
emphasis
added
noting
context
nongeneric
burglary
statute
unless
charging
documents
narro
charge
generic
limits
certainty
generic
finding
lies
jury
instructions
findings
rulings
pleaded
case
defendant
admissions
accepted
findings
fact
confirming
factual
basis
valid
plea
emphasis
added
nijhawan
departed
categorical
approach
altogether
instead
applied
approach
see
anything
nijhawan
undermines
position
rigid
adherence
elements
always
required
fears
application
modified
categorical
approach
statutes
unfair
defendants
often
ha
little
incentive
contest
facts
elements
charged
offense
may
wish
irk
prosecutor
squabbling
superfluous
factual
allegations
ante
argument
attributes
criminal
defendants
attorneys
degree
timidity
may
realistic
event
even
defendant
think
worthwhile
squabbl
insignificant
factual
allegations
defendant
clearly
incentive
dispute
allegations
may
bearing
sentence
often
case
alternative
elements
means
suggest
different
degrees
culpability
cf
cal
penal
code
ann
providing
burglary
certain
inhabited
locations
enumerated
punishable
first
degree
burglary
locations
punishable
second
degree
approach
must
concede
one
benefit
provides
extra
measure
assurance
burglary
conviction
counted
acca
predicate
unless
defendant
went
trial
actually
found
jury
committed
elements
generic
offense
extra
bit
assurance
generally
quite
modest
best
see
compare
happen
indivisible
burglary
statute
simply
requires
entry
invading
possessory
right
divisible
statute
following
two
alternative
elements
entry
trespass
entry
invitation
undisclosed
criminal
intent
former
statute
jury
required
agree
defendant
invaded
possessory
right
entering
place
question
therefore
possible
jury
convict
even
jurors
thought
defendant
entered
trespassing
others
thought
entered
invitation
undisclosed
criminal
intent
latter
statute
contrast
jury
agree
either
trespassed
entered
invitation
undisclosed
criminal
intent
requirement
unanimity
practical
value
evidence
case
pointed
possibilities
great
many
cases
cases
prosecuted
california
burglary
statute
suspect
evidence
generally
points
either
trespassory
entry
typically
involving
breaking
building
covered
place
entry
invitation
undisclosed
criminal
intent
many
cases
shoplifting
cases
evidence
suggests
defendant
might
done
either
probably
common
cases
evidence
supporting
theories
presence
divisible
statute
containing
alternative
elements
solve
problem
guilty
verdict
reveal
alternative
jury
agreed
unless
jury
asked
return
special
verdict
something
generally
favored
criminal
cases
see
lafave
cases
end
guilty
plea
benefit
divisibility
even
less
judge
accepts
guilty
plea
typically
required
confirm
factual
basis
plea
see
ed
supp
proffer
factual
basis
generally
focus
exclusively
one
alternative
elements
nevertheless
suggests
extra
modicum
assurance
provided
cases
involving
divisible
statutes
needed
prevent
violations
sixth
amendment
jury
trial
right
ante
disagree
long
judge
applying
acca
determining
defendant
burglary
question
committed
jury
case
necessarily
found
defendant
pleading
guilty
necessarily
admitted
jury
trial
right
infringed
see
modified
categorical
approach
used
decide
whether
jury
actually
required
find
elements
generic
offense
defendant
already
enjoyed
sixth
amendment
right
jury
determination
elements
taylor
iii
producing
modest
benefits
holding
create
several
serious
problems
determining
whether
statute
divisible
often
harder
acknowledges
said
statutes
involved
shepard
johnson
illustrates
point
assumes
statutes
divisible
explained
possible
see
supra
determine
whether
statute
contains
alternative
elements
opposed
merely
alternative
means
satisfying
element
called
upon
apply
acca
required
look
beyond
text
statute
may
deceptive
take
example
michigan
compiled
laws
annotated
west
assault
gun
revolver
pistol
knife
iron
bar
club
brass
knuckles
dangerous
weapon
seems
assume
statute
like
enumerates
alternative
elements
ante
michigan
courts
held
otherwise
michigan
law
elements
assault
dangerous
weapon
intent
injure
place
victim
reasonable
apprehension
immediate
battery
people
avant
app
although
statute
lists
numerous
types
weapons
particular
type
weapon
element
prosecution
must
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
instead
list
weapons
statute
merely
enumerates
alternative
means
committing
even
federal
applying
acca
discovers
decision
holding
particular
fact
must
alleged
charging
document
research
end
charging
documents
must
generally
include
factual
allegations
go
beyond
bare
elements
crime
specifically
least
enough
detail
permit
defendant
mount
defense
see
lafave
jurisdictions
require
fairly
specific
factual
allegations
see
crim
proc
law
ann
west
enumerating
detailed
requirements
indictment
people
swanson
app
vacating
conviction
disorderly
conduct
submitting
false
police
report
information
id
describe
particularity
time
date
location
alleged
domestic
battery
acts
comprising
battery
statement
falsely
reported
edwards
state
crim
app
insufficient
indictment
robbery
allege
amount
money
taken
must
aver
denomination
money
taken
particular
denomination
unknown
grand
jury
thus
mere
fact
state
law
requires
particular
fact
alleged
charging
document
mean
fact
must
found
jury
admitted
defendant
way
sure
whether
particular
items
alternative
elements
simply
alternative
means
satisfying
element
may
find
cases
concerning
correctness
jury
instructions
treat
items
one
way
cases
may
arise
frequently
one
reasons
adopting
modified
categorical
approach
simplify
work
acca
courts
see
shepard
taylor
holding
today
serve
end
holding
also
frustrate
fundamental
acca
objectives
repeatedly
recognized
congress
enacted
acca
ensure
violent
dangerous
recidivists
subject
enhanced
penalties
enhanced
penalties
applied
uniformly
regardless
variations
see
see
also
terms
fundamental
fairness
act
ensure
extent
consistent
prerogatives
defining
offenses
type
conduct
punishable
federal
level
quoting
rejecting
disparate
results
across
based
label
given
state
particular
crime
holding
hamper
achievement
objectives
artificially
limiting
acca
reach
treating
similar
convictions
differently
based
solely
vagaries
state
law
defendants
convicted
elements
generic
burglary
california
subject
acca
defendants
engage
exactly
behavior
say
virginia
fall
within
acca
reach
see
code
ann
lexis
avoid
problems
applying
modified
categorical
approach
similar
burglary
statute
another
state
ask
whether
relevant
portions
state
record
clearly
show
jury
necessarily
found
defendant
necessarily
admitted
elements
generic
burglary
record
inconclusive
conviction
count
record
clear
see
reason
granting
special
dispensation
iv
modified
categorical
approach
applied
petitioner
conviction
clear
necessarily
admitted
therefore
convicted
committing
elements
generic
burglary
unlawful
unprivileged
entry
building
intent
commit
crime
complaint
information
alleged
petitioner
unlawfully
feloniously
enter
ed
building
centromart
intent
commit
theft
therein
app
trial
inquired
factual
basis
petitioner
plea
prosecutor
stated
petitioner
crime
involved
breaking
entering
grocery
store
neither
petitioner
attorney
voiced
ibid
order
accept
petitioner
plea
trial
required
california
law
ensure
plea
factual
basis
see
cal
penal
code
ann
app
must
presume
plea
proceedings
conducted
regular
manner
see
parke
raley
unmistakable
inference
arising
plea
transcript
trial
judge
quite
reasonably
understood
petitioner
attorney
assent
factual
basis
provided
prosecutor
district
appeals
concluded
petitioner
admitted
practical
matter
convicted
committed
elements
generic
burglary
agree
review
determination
see
granting
certiorari
limited
question
presented
petition
even
determination
reviewed
however
lower
courts
conclusion
sustained
california
burglary
statute
interpreted
state
defendant
must
either
commit
trespass
entering
location
question
enter
violation
possessory
right
see
people
gauze
cal
case
judge
accepted
petitioner
guilty
plea
must
relied
petitioner
implicit
admission
broke
store
petitioner
admitted
entered
store
judge
able
assess
whether
invaded
possessory
right
admission
merely
entering
store
permitted
judge
assess
whether
petitioner
entered
intent
commit
crime
petitioner
admission
breaking
therefore
critical
element
well
cf
black
law
dictionary
rev
ed
breaking
denotes
tearing
away
removal
part
house
locks
latches
fastenings
intended
secure
otherwise
exerting
force
gain
entrance
intent
commit
felony
explained
burglary
means
unlawful
unprivileged
entry
remaining
building
structure
intent
commit
crime
taylor
based
petitioner
guilty
plea
shepard
documents
clear
petitioner
necessarily
admitted
elements
generic
burglary
unlawfully
entered
building
intent
commit
crime
accordingly
hold
petitioner
conviction
qualifies
conviction
burglary
reasons
affirm
decision
appeals
therefore
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
compare
fed
appx
case
applying
modified
categorical
approach
armstead
applying
approach
similar
indivisible
statute
beardsley
holding
modified
categorical
approach
applies
divisible
statutes
giggey
en
banc
dissent
delves
nuances
various
laws
effort
cast
doubt
understanding
prior
holdings
arguing
used
modified
categorical
approach
cases
like
taylor
shepard
johnson
relation
statutes
may
divisible
way
described
post
alito
dissent
claims
state
laws
issue
cases
set
merely
alternative
means
alternative
elements
offense
post
news
us
important
news
taylor
shepard
johnson
courts
decisions
rested
explicit
premise
laws
contain
ed
statutory
phrases
cover
several
different
crimes
several
different
methods
committing
one
offense
johnson
citing
nijhawan
dissent
real
point
distinguishing
alternative
elements
alternative
means
difficult
see
reason
worry
whatever
statute
lists
whether
elements
means
documents
approved
taylor
shepard
indictment
jury
instructions
plea
colloquy
plea
agreement
reflect
crime
elements
need
parse
state
law
way
dissent
suggests
state
law
drafted
alternative
merely
resorts
approved
documents
compares
elements
revealed
generic
offense
dissent
understand
takes
view
ninth
circuit
accordingly
reasons
statutory
constitutional
practical
leads
us
reject
proves
fatal
dissent
position
well
dissent
several
times
obscures
call
explore
facts
language
categorical
cases
asking
whether
relevant
portions
state
record
clearly
show
jury
necessarily
found
defendant
necessarily
admitted
elements
generic
offense
post
see
shepard
plurality
opinion
reiterating
taylor
demanding
requirement
prior
conviction
involve
jury
finding
element
generic
offense
emphasis
added
dissent
nowhere
explains
factfinder
necessarily
found
fact
definition
necessary
support
conviction
dissent
fundamental
view
sentencing
able
make
reasonable
inference
factfinder
really
even
though
necessarily
found
see
post
position
accords
dissenting
colleague
previously
expressed
skepticism
categorical
approach
see
moncrieffe
holder
slip
alito
dissenting
hold
categorical
approach
controlling
state
conviction
issue
based
state
statute
encompasses
substantial
number
cases
qualify
federal
standard
substantial
number
situations
appropriate
look
beyond
elements
state
offense
rely
well
facts
admitted
state
taking
realistic
view
clearly
proved
several
decades
water
dam
dissent
offers
newly
persuasive
reasons
revisiting
precedents
see
also
wright
leipold
federal
practice
procedure
criminal
pp
ed
single
statute
sets
forth
several
different
offenses
pleading
indicate
crime
defendant
allegedly
committed
insufficient
lafave
israel
king
kerr
criminal
procedure
ed
statute
specifies
several
different
ways
crime
committed
courts
often
hold
pleading
must
refer
particular
alternative
presented
individual
case
several
decisions
treat
invasion
possessory
right
aspect
entry
element
see
people
waidla
cal
fortes
sacramento
munic
ct
cal
app
cal
rptr
others
view
issue
possessory
right
bearing
affirmative
defense
consent
see
people
sherow
cal
app
cal
rptr
people
felix
cal
app
cal
rptr
california
pattern
jury
instructions
require
jury
find
invasion
possessory
right
convicting
defendant
burglary
see
cal
jury
government
forfeited
alternative
argument
qualifies
predicate
offense
acca
residual
clause
covers
statutes
involv
ing
conduct
presents
serious
potential
risk
physical
injury
another
ii
express
view
argument
merits
compare
mayer
holding
oregon
burglary
statute
falls
within
residual
clause
even
though
include
generic
burglary
elements
kozinski
dissenting
denial
rehearing
en
banc
arguing
panel
opinion
train
wreck
making
footnotes
however
shepard
documents
reveal
whether
johnson
found
touched
struck
determine
whether
relatively
innocuous
phrase
ctually
intentionally
touch
ing
another
person
constituted
physical
force
purposes
see
johnson
remaining
case
taylor
may
also
involved
statute
divisible
situation
less
clear
defendant
several
missouri
burglary
convictions
missouri
several
different
burglary
provisions
effect
time
question
see
particular
provision
involved
cases
certain
ibid
least
one
provisions
however
may
divisible
provision
mo
rev
stat
repealed
applied
buildings
also
booth
tent
boat
vessel
railroad
car
entirely
clear
whether
missouri
required
jurors
agree
particular
choice
list
state
vandergriff
mo
missouri
held
information
deficient
omitted
description
type
building
might
burglarized
defined
thereby
omitted
essential
element
offense
burglary
second
degree
information
must
generally
include
factual
details
go
beyond
elements
offense
see
lafave
israel
king
kerr
criminal
procedure
ed
hereinafter
lafave
possible
missouri
mean
say
type
building
element
sense
understand
use
term
board
game
clue
refers
see
ante
provide
sound
legal
guidance
game
matters
whether
colonel
mustard
bashed
victim
head
candlestick
wrench
lead
pipe
real
life
colonel
almost
certainly
escape
conviction
simply
jury
unable
agree
particular
type
blunt
instrument
used
commit
murder
ninth
circuit
held
applying
modified
categorical
approach
may
rely
prosecutor
statement
factual
basis
guilty
plea
statement
offered
record
defendant
presence
defendant
object
petitioner
challenged
ninth
circuit
rule
issue
within
scope
question
granted
certiorari
accordingly
apply
purposes
case
majority
suggests
california
law
ambiguous
requirement
see
ante
confusion
appears
arisen
petitioner
conviction
therefore
irrelevant
purposes
case
cf
mcneill
slip
way
answer
acca
question
whether
previous
conviction
serious
drug
offense
consult
law
applied
time
conviction