blueford
arkansas
argued
february
decided
may
state
arkansas
charged
petitioner
alex
blueford
capital
murder
death
child
charge
included
lesser
offenses
murder
manslaughter
negligent
homicide
start
deliberations
trial
instructed
jury
consider
offenses
follows
reasonable
doubt
defendant
guilt
charge
capital
murder
consider
charge
murder
first
degree
reasonable
doubt
defendant
guilt
charge
murder
first
degree
consider
charge
manslaughter
reasonable
doubt
defendant
guilt
charge
manslaughter
consider
charge
negligent
homicide
also
presented
jury
set
verdict
forms
allowed
jury
either
convict
blueford
one
charged
offenses
acquit
acquitting
others
option
deliberating
hours
jury
reported
reach
verdict
inquired
jury
progress
offense
foreperson
disclosed
jury
unanimous
guilt
charges
capital
murder
murder
deadlocked
manslaughter
voted
negligent
homicide
told
jury
continue
deliberate
jury
still
reach
verdict
declared
mistrial
state
subsequently
sought
retry
blueford
moved
dismiss
capital
murder
charges
double
jeopardy
grounds
trial
denied
motion
arkansas
affirmed
interlocutory
appeal
held
double
jeopardy
clause
bar
retrying
blueford
charges
capital
murder
murder
pp
jury
acquit
blueford
capital
murder
blueford
contends
foreperson
report
jury
unanimous
guilt
murder
offenses
represented
resolution
elements
offenses
favor
report
final
resolution
anything
foreperson
told
jury
voted
offense
jury
deliberations
yet
concluded
jurors
fact
went
back
jury
room
deliberate
nothing
instructions
prohibited
reconsidering
votes
capital
murder
deliberations
continued
foreperson
report
prior
end
deliberations
therefore
lacked
finality
necessary
amount
acquittal
offenses
lack
finality
undermines
blueford
reliance
green
price
georgia
cases
verdict
jury
final
decision
report
foreperson
pp
trial
declaration
mistrial
improper
trial
discontinued
without
barring
subsequent
one
offense
particular
circumstances
manifest
necessity
declare
mistrial
wade
hunter
blueford
contends
necessity
mistrial
capital
murder
given
foreperson
report
jury
voted
unanimously
guilt
charges
according
blueford
time
taken
action
whether
new
partial
verdict
forms
means
allow
jury
give
effect
votes
considered
mistrial
remaining
charges
blueford
acknowledges
however
trial
reason
declaring
mistrial
jury
unable
reach
verdict
long
considered
classic
basis
establishing
necessity
arizona
washington
never
required
trial
declaring
mistrial
hung
jury
consider
particular
means
breaking
impasse
let
alone
consider
giving
jury
new
options
verdict
see
renico
lett
permitted
arkansas
law
jury
options
case
limited
two
either
convict
one
offenses
acquit
trial
abuse
discretion
refusing
add
another
option
acquitting
offenses
others
pp
ark
affirmed
roberts
delivered
opinion
scalia
kennedy
thomas
breyer
alito
joined
sotomayor
filed
dissenting
opinion
ginsburg
kagan
joined
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
alex
blueford
petitioner
arkansas
writ
certiorari
arkansas
may
chief
justice
roberts
delivered
opinion
double
jeopardy
clause
protects
tried
twice
offense
clause
however
bar
second
trial
first
ended
mistrial
jury
concluded
deliberations
case
reported
unanimous
guilt
charges
capital
murder
murder
deadlocked
manslaughter
voted
negligent
homicide
told
jury
continue
deliberate
jury
still
reach
verdict
declared
mistrial
agree
defendant
may
retried
charges
manslaughter
negligent
homicide
question
whether
may
also
retried
charges
capital
murder
matthew
mcfadden
suffered
severe
head
injury
november
home
mother
boyfriend
alex
blueford
despite
treatment
hospital
mcfadden
died
days
later
state
arkansas
charged
blueford
capital
murder
waived
death
penalty
state
theory
trial
blueford
injured
mcfadden
intentionally
causing
boy
death
nder
circumstances
manifesting
extreme
indifference
value
human
life
ark
code
ann
supp
defense
contrast
portrayed
death
result
blueford
accidentally
knocking
mcfadden
onto
ground
trial
instructed
jury
charge
capital
murder
included
three
lesser
offenses
murder
manslaughter
negligent
homicide
addition
describing
offenses
addressed
order
jury
consider
reasonable
doubt
defendant
guilt
charge
capital
murder
consider
charge
murder
first
degree
reasonable
doubt
defendant
guilt
charge
murder
first
degree
consider
charge
manslaughter
reasonable
doubt
defendant
guilt
charge
manslaughter
consider
charge
negligent
homicide
app
prosecution
commented
instructions
closing
argument
told
jury
example
consider
lesser
included
capital
murder
must
first
vote
man
guilty
capital
murder
prosecution
explained
situation
lay
everything
say
well
four
choices
one
fit
rather
prosecution
emphasized
unless
agree
man
actions
consistent
capital
murder
go
murder
first
degree
ibid
parties
concluded
arguments
presented
jury
set
five
verdict
forms
representing
possible
verdict
four
separate
forms
allowing
jury
convict
charged
offenses
capital
murder
murder
manslaughter
negligent
homicide
fifth
form
allowed
jury
return
verdict
acquittal
jury
found
blueford
guilty
offense
form
allowing
jury
acquit
offenses
others
stated
instructions
jury
either
find
defendant
guilty
one
offenses
acquit
outright
verdict
whether
convict
one
acquit
unanimous
hours
beginning
deliberations
jury
sent
note
asking
happens
agree
charge
called
jury
back
courtroom
issued
allen
instruction
emphasizing
importance
reaching
verdict
see
allen
jury
deliberated
half
hour
sending
second
note
stating
agree
one
charge
case
app
summoned
jury
jury
foreperson
reported
jury
hopelessly
deadlocked
ibid
asked
foreperson
disclose
jury
votes
offense
right
numbers
together
want
names
numbers
like
know
count
capital
murder
juror
number
one
unanimous
okay
murder
first
degree
juror
number
one
unanimous
okay
manslaughter
juror
number
one
nine
three
okay
negligent
homicide
juror
number
one
vote
sir
vote
juror
number
one
sir
get
past
manslaughter
supposed
go
past
thought
supposed
go
one
time
following
exchange
gave
another
allen
instruction
sent
jurors
back
jury
room
deliberations
resumed
blueford
counsel
asked
submit
new
verdict
forms
jurors
completed
counts
reached
verdict
prosecution
objected
grounds
jury
still
deliberating
verdict
acquittal
nothing
denied
blueford
request
allow
partial
verdict
explained
like
changing
horses
middle
stream
given
jury
already
received
instructions
verdict
forms
ibid
informed
counsel
declare
mistrial
jury
make
decision
jury
returned
half
hour
later
foreperson
stated
reached
verdict
declared
mistrial
discharged
jury
state
subsequently
sought
retry
blueford
moved
dismiss
capital
murder
charges
double
jeopardy
grounds
citing
foreperson
report
jurors
voted
unanimously
guilt
offenses
trial
denied
motion
arkansas
affirmed
interlocutory
appeal
according
state
foreperson
report
effect
state
ability
retry
blueford
foreperson
making
formal
announcement
acquittal
disclosed
jury
votes
ark
case
observed
formal
verdict
announced
entered
record
ibid
added
trial
err
denying
blueford
request
new
verdict
forms
allowed
jury
render
partial
verdict
charges
capital
murder
blueford
sought
review
granted
certiorari
ii
double
jeopardy
clause
provides
person
shall
subject
offence
twice
put
jeopardy
life
limb
amdt
clause
guarantees
state
shall
permitted
make
repeated
attempts
convict
accused
thereby
subjecting
embarrassment
expense
ordeal
compelling
live
continuing
state
anxiety
insecurity
well
enhancing
possibility
even
though
innocent
may
found
guilty
martin
linen
supply
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
blueford
contends
foreperson
report
means
tried
charges
capital
murder
according
blueford
double
jeopardy
clause
prohibits
second
trial
charges
two
reasons
blueford
primary
submission
retried
capital
murder
jury
actually
acquitted
offenses
see
green
arkansas
noted
blueford
acknowledges
formal
judgment
acquittal
entered
case
none
necessary
blueford
maintains
acquittal
matter
substance
form
quoting
decision
martin
linen
supra
blueford
contends
despite
absence
formal
verdict
jury
announcement
constitutes
acquittal
represents
resolution
factual
elements
offense
charged
brief
petitioner
according
blueford
foreperson
announcement
jury
unanimous
votes
capital
murder
represented
resolution
elements
offenses
blueford
favor
disagree
foreperson
report
final
resolution
anything
foreperson
told
jury
voted
offense
jury
deliberations
yet
concluded
jurors
fact
went
back
jury
room
deliberate
even
foreperson
delivered
report
emerged
half
hour
later
foreperson
stated
unable
reach
verdict
gave
indication
whether
still
case
jurors
believed
blueford
guilty
capital
murder
believed
guilty
manslaughter
vote
taken
negligent
homicide
fact
deliberations
continued
report
deprives
report
finality
necessary
constitute
acquittal
murder
offenses
blueford
maintains
however
possibility
jurors
revisited
murder
offenses
foreclosed
instructions
given
jury
instructions
contends
required
jury
consider
offenses
order
greater
lesser
also
prevented
transitioning
one
offense
next
without
unanimously
definitively
resolving
greater
offense
favor
jury
presumed
follow
instructions
weeks
angelone
blueford
says
foreperson
report
jury
deadlocked
manslaughter
necessarily
establishes
jury
acquitted
blueford
greater
offenses
capital
murder
even
assume
instructions
required
unanimous
vote
jury
consider
lesser
offense
state
assumes
purposes
case
see
brief
respondent
nothing
instructions
prohibited
jury
reconsidering
vote
instructions
said
simply
reasonable
doubt
defendant
guilt
charge
greater
offense
consider
charge
lesser
offense
app
jurors
never
told
reasonable
doubt
rethink
issue
jury
free
reconsider
greater
offense
even
considering
lesser
simple
example
illustrates
point
jury
enters
jury
room
given
instructions
foreperson
decides
make
sense
determine
extent
jurors
agreement
discussions
begin
accordingly
conducts
vote
capital
murder
everyone
votes
guilt
murder
everyone
votes
guilt
calls
vote
manslaughter
disagreement
jurors
engage
discussion
circumstances
crime
considering
arguments
jurors
death
caused
one
jurors
starts
rethinking
stance
greater
offense
reflecting
evidence
comes
believe
defendant
knowingly
cause
death
satisfying
definition
murder
point
nothing
instructions
prohibits
jury
juries
often
revisit
prior
vote
object
jury
system
secure
unanimity
comparison
views
arguments
among
jurors
allen
single
juror
change
mind
takes
require
jury
reconsider
greater
offense
therefore
possible
blueford
jury
revisit
offenses
capital
murder
notwithstanding
earlier
votes
possibility
foreperson
report
prior
end
deliberations
lacked
finality
necessary
amount
acquittal
offenses
quite
apart
requirement
formal
verdict
returned
judgment
entered
lack
finality
undermines
blueford
reliance
green
price
georgia
cases
held
double
jeopardy
clause
violated
defendant
tried
greater
offense
convicted
lesser
included
offense
later
retried
greater
offense
see
green
supra
price
supra
blueford
argues
fact
distinguishing
case
green
price
case
involves
deadlock
lesser
included
offense
opposed
conviction
view
distinction
favors
double
jeopardy
clause
anything
afford
greater
protection
defendant
found
guilty
lesser
included
offense
blueford
argument
assumes
however
votes
reported
foreperson
change
even
though
jury
deliberated
report
assumption
unjustified
reported
votes
reasons
noted
final
blueford
thus
overlooks
real
distinction
cases
green
price
verdict
jury
final
decision
report
foreperson
blueford
maintains
even
jury
acquit
capital
murder
second
trial
offenses
nonetheless
violate
double
jeopardy
clause
trial
declaration
mistrial
improper
blueford
acknowledges
trial
discontinued
without
barring
subsequent
one
offense
particular
circumstances
manifest
necessity
declare
mistrial
wade
hunter
see
also
perez
wheat
also
acknowledges
trial
reason
declaring
mistrial
jury
unable
reach
verdict
long
considered
classic
basis
establishing
necessity
arizona
washington
blueford
therefore
accepts
second
trial
manslaughter
negligent
homicide
pose
double
jeopardy
problem
contends
however
necessity
mistrial
capital
murder
given
foreperson
report
jury
voted
unanimously
guilt
charges
according
blueford
time
taken
action
whether
partial
verdict
forms
means
allow
jury
give
effect
votes
considered
mistrial
remaining
charges
reply
brief
petitioner
reject
suggestion
never
required
trial
declaring
mistrial
hung
jury
consider
particular
means
breaking
impasse
let
alone
consider
giving
jury
new
options
verdict
see
renico
lett
slip
permitted
arkansas
law
jury
options
case
limited
two
either
convict
one
offenses
acquit
instructions
explained
options
plain
terms
verdict
forms
likewise
contemplated
outcome
separate
forms
convict
possible
offenses
one
form
acquit
acquit
foreperson
disclosed
jury
votes
capital
murder
trial
abuse
discretion
refusing
add
another
option
acquitting
offenses
others
however
precisely
relief
blueford
seeks
relief
double
jeopardy
clause
afford
jury
case
convict
blueford
offense
acquit
either
jury
unable
return
verdict
trial
properly
declared
mistrial
discharged
jury
consequence
double
jeopardy
clause
stand
way
second
trial
offenses
judgment
arkansas
affirmed
sotomayor
dissenting
alex
blueford
petitioner
arkansas
writ
certiorari
arkansas
may
justice
sotomayor
justice
ginsburg
justice
kagan
join
dissenting
double
jeopardy
clause
unequivocally
prohibits
second
trial
following
acquittal
arizona
washington
implement
rule
cases
articulated
two
principles
first
acquittal
occurs
jury
decision
whatever
label
actually
resolution
correct
factual
elements
offense
charged
martin
linen
supply
trial
judge
may
defeat
defendant
entitlement
verdict
tribunal
might
believe
favorably
disposed
fate
declaring
mistrial
deliberations
end
absent
defendant
consent
jorn
plurality
opinion
quoting
perez
wheat
today
decision
misapplies
longstanding
holds
petitioner
alex
blueford
acquitted
capital
murder
even
though
forewoman
arkansas
jury
empaneled
try
announced
open
jury
unanimous
convicting
blueford
crimes
concludes
double
jeopardy
clause
oblige
trial
judge
take
action
give
effect
jury
unambiguous
decision
declaring
mistrial
offenses
thus
grants
state
constitution
withholds
proverbial
bite
apple
burks
respectfully
dissent
bar
retrials
following
acquittals
fundamental
rule
history
double
jeopardy
jurisprudence
martin
linen
see
ball
blackstone
commentaries
laws
england
prohibition
stops
state
resources
power
mounting
abusive
harassing
reprosecutions
green
subject
defendant
embarrassment
expense
anxiety
insecurity
possibility
may
found
guilty
even
though
innocent
difrancesco
ascertaining
whether
acquittal
occurred
form
exalted
substance
sanabria
rather
ask
whether
factfinder
made
substantive
determination
prosecution
failed
carry
burden
smith
massachusetts
different
procedures
respecting
announcement
verdicts
entry
judgments
diversity
constitutional
significance
jeopardy
terminates
upon
determination
however
characterized
evidence
insufficient
prove
defendant
factual
guilt
smalis
pennsylvania
thus
treated
acquittals
trial
judge
directed
verdict
guilty
smith
appellate
reversal
conviction
insufficiency
evidence
burks
pertinent
jury
announcement
guilty
verdict
followed
judgment
ball
straightforward
application
principle
suffices
decide
case
arkansas
classic
jurisdiction
see
generally
people
richardson
arkansas
model
jury
instructions
require
jury
complete
deliberations
greater
offense
may
consider
lesser
ark
model
jury
ed
matter
arkansas
law
efore
may
consider
offense
jury
must
first
determine
proof
insufficient
convict
greater
offense
thus
jury
must
essence
acquit
defendant
greater
offense
considering
guilt
offense
hughes
state
ark
trial
judge
instructed
blueford
jury
consider
offenses
order
charged
offense
capital
murder
lesser
included
offenses
murder
manslaughter
negligent
homicide
judge
told
jury
proceed
past
capital
murder
upon
unanimous
finding
reasonable
doubt
offense
upon
acquittal
see
winship
state
closing
arguments
repeated
directive
efore
consider
lesser
included
capital
murder
must
first
vote
man
guilty
capital
murder
app
forewoman
colloquy
judge
leaves
doubt
jury
understood
instructions
mandate
unanimous
acquittal
greater
offense
prerequisite
consideration
lesser
forewoman
reported
jury
voted
negligent
homicide
jurors
get
past
manslaughter
count
deadlocked
context
forewoman
announcement
open
jury
unanimous
conviction
capital
murder
acquittal
double
jeopardy
per
arkansas
law
jury
determination
reasonable
doubt
offenses
acquittal
essence
hughes
deciding
state
failed
come
forward
sufficient
proof
jury
resolved
charges
capital
murder
adversely
state
burks
acquittal
reconsidered
without
putting
blueford
twice
jeopardy
green
price
georgia
bolster
conclusion
green
jury
convicted
defendant
lesser
included
offense
murder
without
returning
verdict
charged
offense
murder
concluded
result
implicit
acquittal
greater
offense
murder
barring
retrial
defendant
forced
run
gantlet
charge
jury
refused
convict
given
choice
finding
guilty
either
first
second
degree
murder
chose
latter
ibid
see
also
price
consistently
refused
rule
jeopardy
offense
continues
acquittal
whether
acquittal
express
implied
conviction
lesser
included
offense
jury
given
full
opportunity
return
verdict
greater
charge
omitted
notably
green
acknowledged
finding
implicit
acquittal
assumption
jury
made
express
statement
respect
greater
offense
blueford
position
even
stronger
jury
silent
murder
counts
announced
unanimous
conviction
trial
judge
specifically
instructed
jury
consider
manslaughter
acquitting
blueford
murder
counts
courts
several
jurisdictions
held
jury
deadlock
lesser
included
offense
justifies
assumption
jury
acquitted
greater
offenses
see
state
tate
stone
superior
san
diego
cal
assumption
even
necessary
jury
unmistakably
announced
acquittal
majority
holds
forewoman
announcement
acquittal
final
resolution
anything
ante
majority
view
jury
might
revisited
decisions
murder
counts
minutes
deliberations
followed
forewoman
announcement
know
whether
jury
majority
reasons
jury
discharged
without
confirming
remained
unanimous
convicting
blueford
capital
murder
ante
putting
one
side
lack
record
evidence
support
speculation
far
plausible
inference
jurors
spent
minutes
attempting
resolve
deadlock
manslaughter
agree
jury
free
reconsider
decisions
deliberations
resumed
verdict
acquittal
issue
guilt
innocence
course
absolutely
final
bullington
missouri
jury
heard
instructions
argument
required
unanimously
acquit
capital
murder
reach
manslaughter
forewoman
colloquy
makes
plain
jury
followed
instructions
scrupulously
reason
believe
jury
vote
anything
verdict
substance
final
collective
decision
reached
full
deliberation
consideration
compromise
among
individual
jurors
harrison
gillespie
en
banc
decision
announced
open
became
entitled
full
double
jeopardy
protection
see
commonwealth
roth
mass
declining
give
effect
verdict
received
lips
foreman
open
elevate
form
substance
stone
cal
determining
verdict
jury
intended
return
oral
declaration
jurors
endorsing
result
true
return
verdict
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
also
dixon
state
ark
technical
defect
verdict
consequence
whatever
verdict
need
writing
may
announced
foreman
jury
orally
state
mills
ark
verdict
validity
delivered
jury
majority
example
jury
takes
preliminary
vote
greater
offenses
advances
consideration
lesser
returns
greater
inapposite
see
ante
majority
example
jury
announced
vote
open
moreover
instructions
case
contemplate
jury
deliberations
take
course
majority
imagines
arkansas
model
instruction
requires
acquittal
prerequisite
consideration
lesser
offense
double
jeopardy
clause
entitles
acquittal
indeed
purpose
instruction
ensure
careful
conclusive
deliberation
greater
offense
see
tsanas
friendly
instruction
avoids
danger
jury
adequately
discharge
duties
respect
greater
offense
instead
move
quickly
lesser
true
arkansas
instruction
expressly
forbid
reconsideration
expressly
permit
reconsideration
either
event
nothing
indicates
jury
announced
decisions
tentative
compromises
mere
steps
en
route
final
verdict
double
jeopardy
clause
demands
ambiguity
resolved
favor
defendant
see
downum
fact
jury
given
express
option
acquitting
individual
offenses
irrelevant
see
ante
arkansas
law
ascribes
significance
presence
options
verdict
form
see
rowland
state
ark
jury
may
prepare
present
form
verdict
lack
state
procedural
vehicle
entry
judgment
acquittal
prevent
recognition
acquittal
constitutional
purposes
see
hudson
louisiana
finally
majority
distinction
green
price
unavailing
majority
observes
green
price
unlike
case
involved
final
decisions
ante
explained
view
forewoman
announcements
acquittal
case
similarly
final
event
green
clarified
defendant
claim
former
jeopardy
based
previous
conviction
second
degree
murder
instead
original
jury
refusal
convict
first
degree
murder
accord
jury
silence
greater
offense
spoke
sufficient
clarity
justify
assumption
acquittal
invoke
double
jeopardy
clause
see
also
price
light
forewoman
announcement
fortiori
case
short
double
jeopardy
clause
demands
inquiry
substance
jury
actions
blueford
jury
option
convict
capital
murder
expressly
declined
end
matter
ii
even
majority
correct
jury
might
reconsidered
acquitted
count
doubtful
assumption
reasons
explained
defeat
blueford
double
jeopardy
claim
long
established
integral
part
double
jeopardy
jurisprudence
defendant
put
jeopardy
even
prosecution
culminate
conviction
acquittal
crist
bretz
rule
evolved
response
abhorrent
practice
stuart
monarchs
terminating
prosecutions
thereby
evading
bar
retrials
appeared
crown
proof
might
insufficient
washington
see
ireland
case
tr
accordingly
retrial
barred
jury
discharged
returning
verdict
unless
defendant
consents
manifest
necessity
discharge
perez
see
also
king
perkins
eng
perez
explained
manifest
necessity
high
bar
power
used
greatest
caution
urgent
circumstances
plain
obvious
causes
since
perez
relaxed
showing
required
see
washington
requiring
necessity
downum
imperious
necessity
see
also
coolidge
cas
cc
mass
story
extraordinary
striking
circumstances
mistrial
therefore
trial
judge
must
weigh
heavily
defendant
valued
right
trial
completed
particular
tribunal
wade
hunter
light
historical
abuses
double
jeopardy
clause
guards
trial
judge
must
tread
special
care
mistrial
help
prosecution
trial
case
going
badly
affording
another
favorable
opportunity
convict
accused
gori
see
green
jury
genuine
inability
reach
verdict
constitutes
manifest
necessity
jurisdiction
jury
advances
consideration
lesser
included
offense
demonstrated
inability
decide
guilt
innocence
greater
acquitted
greater
green
unquestionably
true
jury
convicts
lesser
see
anomalous
double
jeopardy
clause
offered
less
protection
defendant
whose
jury
deadlocked
lesser
thus
convicted
nothing
see
stone
cal
therefore
hold
double
jeopardy
clause
requires
trial
judge
jurisdiction
honor
defendant
request
partial
verdict
declaring
mistrial
ground
jury
deadlock
courts
jurisdictions
held
see
tate
whiteaker
state
alaska
app
stone
cal
state
pugliese
per
curiam
state
castrillo
see
also
crim
proc
law
ann
west
requiring
partial
verdict
jurisdiction
ensures
jurisdiction
takes
bitter
sweet
general
instruction
increases
likelihood
conviction
greater
offense
see
people
boettcher
true
instruction
may
also
result
deadlock
greater
preventing
state
obtaining
conviction
lesser
charge
otherwise
forthcoming
thus
require
expense
retrial
tsanas
state
willing
incur
expense
loses
nothing
overcharging
regime
worst
state
enjoys
second
opportunity
convict
possibility
earlier
run
strengthen
prosecution
case
crist
powell
dissenting
state
wants
benefits
requiring
jury
acquit
compromising
permitted
deprive
defendant
corresponding
benefits
acquitted
double
jeopardy
clause
expressly
prohibits
outcome
majority
observes
never
required
trial
declaring
mistrial
hung
jury
consider
particular
means
breaking
impasse
let
alone
consider
giving
jury
new
options
verdict
ante
citing
renico
lett
slip
approach
dilutes
perez
beyond
recognition
never
excused
trial
judge
exercising
scrupulous
care
discharging
jury
jorn
opinion
rather
insisted
trial
judge
may
act
irrationally
irresponsibly
washington
retreated
rule
reviewing
courts
obligation
ensure
trial
judge
exercised
discretion
declaring
mistrial
quoting
perez
even
double
jeopardy
clause
compel
broader
rule
facts
case
confirm
necessity
let
alone
manifest
necessity
mistrial
reason
judge
asked
jury
prior
discharge
whether
remained
unanimous
conviction
capital
murder
intrusion
jury
deliberative
process
judge
required
issue
new
instructions
verdict
forms
allow
new
arguments
direct
deliberations
take
action
might
threatened
coerce
jury
merely
repeating
earlier
question
sufficed
judge
failed
take
even
modest
step
indeed
explore
alternatives
mistrial
even
make
finding
manifest
necessity
conclude
abuse
discretion
see
see
also
washington
marshall
dissenting
manifest
necessity
requires
showing
meaningful
practical
alternatives
mistrial
trial
scrupulously
considered
available
found
wanting
termination
proceedings
indeed
reason
divine
judge
failure
take
modest
step
misperception
arkansas
law
respect
transitional
instruction
colloquy
forewoman
judge
commented
sidebar
jurors
even
taken
vote
negligent
homicide
think
completed
deliberation
mean
reasonable
circumstances
least
take
vote
negligent
homicide
app
jury
retired
last
deliberations
judge
said
think
understanding
really
get
past
every
charge
unanimously
move
next
charge
misstated
arkansas
law
well
judge
instructions
jury
required
reach
unanimous
decision
greater
offense
considering
lesser
see
supra
discharging
jury
judge
said
madam
foreman
seems
lot
confusion
part
jury
instructions
confusion
timeliness
amount
hours
gone
without
able
reach
verdict
going
declare
mistrial
app
comments
suggest
judge
wrongly
believed
jury
required
reach
unanimity
greater
offense
considering
lesser
accorded
insufficient
finality
weight
forewoman
earlier
announcement
acquittal
capital
murder
mistake
law
negates
deference
due
judge
decision
declare
mistrial
judge
explained
jury
discharged
part
based
confusion
respect
instructions
fact
confusion
judge
ibid
see
washington
record
reveals
trial
judge
failed
exercise
discretion
entrusted
reason
deference
appellate
disappears
illinois
somerville
critiquing
erratic
mistrial
inquiry
gori
douglas
dissenting
noting
state
cases
second
prosecution
barred
jury
discharged
trial
judge
misconstruction
law
collecting
cases
trial
definition
abuses
discretion
makes
error
law
koon
core
double
jeopardy
clause
reflects
wisdom
founding
generation
familiar
person
acquainted
history
governments
trials
employed
formidable
engine
hands
dominant
administration
prevent
mischief
ancient
common
law
provided
one
acquittal
conviction
satisfy
law
ex
parte
lange
wall
quoting
commonwealth
olds
double
jeopardy
clause
enacted
perpetuate
wise
rule
favorable
necessary
liberty
citizen
government
like
case
demonstrates
threat
individual
freedom
reprosecutions
favor
unfairly
rescue
weak
cases
waned
time
vigilance
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
reaching
contrary
conclusion
post
opinion
sotomayor
dissent
construes
jury
instructions
require
jury
complete
deliberations
greater
offense
may
consider
lesser
post
emphasis
added
requirement
found
text
instructions
dissent
attempt
glean
requirement
arkansas
decision
hughes
state
ark
unavailing
decision
nowhere
addresses
issue
whether
jury
reconsider
greater
offense
considering
lesser
one
finding
reliance
renico
perplexing
dissent
reads
decision
little
say
trial
judge
responsibilities
direct
review
post
renico
discussion
applicable
legal
principles
concerns
dissent
event
dispute
never
required
trial
consider
particular
means
breaking
jury
impasse
footnotes
state
taken
position
see
brief
appellee
boyd
state
cr
ark
nanimity
essence
jury
verdict
pertains
acquitting
defendant
charged
offense
subsequent
consideration
offenses
jury
acquittals
murder
counts
unsurprising
light
deficiencies
state
case
example
adam
craig
medical
examiner
autopsied
victim
matthew
mcfadden
whose
testimony
essential
state
theory
crime
board
certified
anatomical
pathology
failed
certification
examination
five
times
craig
took
slides
matthew
brain
called
prevailing
professional
standards
dismissed
blueford
explanation
matthew
death
blueford
accidentally
knocked
matthew
floor
basis
outdated
paper
child
head
injuries
acknowledging
vaguely
aware
recent
seminal
paper
supported
blueford
account
record
see
goldsmith
plunkett
biomechanical
analysis
causes
traumatic
brain
injury
infants
children
forensic
med
pathology
blueford
expert
pathologist
robert
bux
testified
craig
autopsy
inadequate
establish
whether
matthew
death
accidental
intentional
blueford
expert
pediatrician
john
galaznik
testified
state
theory
blueford
slammed
matthew
mattress
floor
likely
cause
boy
injuries
assessed
view
current
medical
literature
record
even
trial
judge
observed
state
proof
circumstantial
best
probably
lesser
included
offense
case
granted
certiorari
decide
hether
jury
deadlocks
offense
double
jeopardy
clause
bars
reprosecution
greater
offense
jury
announces
voted
guilt
greater
offense
pet
cert
resolves
question
presented
determining
forewoman
announcements
final
blueford
jury
necessarily
deadlock
lesser
included
offense
manslaughter
see
ante
light
determination
read
today
opinion
express
view
respect
requirements
double
jeopardy
clause
jury
deadlock
lesser
offense
state
tate
whiteaker
state
alaska
app
majority
reliance
renico
habeas
corpus
case
decided
deferential
standard
review
prescribed
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
aedpa
perplexing
renico
made
clear
question
whether
trial
judge
declared
mistrial
even
whether
abuse
discretion
done
applicable
standard
direct
review
question
aedpa
instead
whether
determination
michigan
abuse
discretion
unreasonable
application
clearly
established
federal
law
slip
quoting
accord
slip
renico
thus
little
say
trial
judge
responsibilities
direct
review
cf
cullen
pinholster
slip