vartelas
holder
attorney
general
argued
january
decided
march
passage
illegal
immigration
reform
immigrant
responsibility
act
iirira
immigration
law
provided
deportation
hearings
excludable
aliens
already
entered
exclusion
hearings
excludable
aliens
seeking
entry
lawful
permanent
residents
regarded
making
entry
upon
return
innocent
casual
brief
excursion
outside
country
borders
rosenberg
fleuti
iirira
congress
abolished
distinction
exclusion
deportation
procedures
creating
uniform
removal
proceeding
see
congress
made
admission
key
word
defined
admission
mean
lawful
entry
alien
inspection
authorization
immigration
officer
alteration
board
immigration
appeals
bia
determined
superseded
fleuti
thus
lawful
permanent
residents
returning
trip
abroad
regarded
seeking
admission
committed
offense
identified
section
including
relevant
crime
involving
moral
turpitude
conspiracy
commit
crime
petitioner
vartelas
lawful
permanent
resident
since
pleaded
guilty
felony
conspiring
make
counterfeit
security
served
prison
sentence
years
conviction
even
iirira
passage
vartelas
regularly
traveled
greece
visit
aging
parents
vartelas
returned
trip
greece
immigration
officer
classified
alien
seeking
admission
based
conviction
vartelas
removal
proceedings
attorneys
conceded
removability
requested
discretionary
relief
former
immigration
nationality
act
immigration
judge
denied
request
relief
ordered
vartelas
removed
greece
bia
affirmed
vartelas
filed
bia
timely
motion
reopen
removal
proceedings
alleging
previous
attorneys
ineffective
among
lapses
conceding
removability
sought
withdraw
concession
removability
ground
iirira
new
admission
provision
reach
back
deprive
lawful
resident
status
based
conviction
bia
denied
motion
second
circuit
affirmed
rejecting
vartelas
argument
iirira
operated
prospectively
therefore
govern
case
second
circuit
reasoned
relied
prior
legal
regime
time
committed
disqualifying
crime
held
impact
vartelas
brief
travel
abroad
permanent
resident
status
determined
iirira
legal
regime
force
time
conviction
pp
principle
retroactive
legislation
invoked
vartelas
courts
read
laws
prospective
application
unless
congress
unambiguously
instructed
retroactivity
see
landgraf
usi
film
products
presumption
retroactive
legislation
embodies
legal
doctrine
centuries
older
republic
numerous
decisions
invoked
justice
story
formulation
determining
law
retrospective
application
collide
doctrine
namely
relevant
application
attac
new
disability
respect
transactions
considerations
already
past
society
propagation
gospel
wheeler
cas
see
ins
cyr
hughes
aircraft
ex
rel
schumer
landgraf
vartelas
urges
applying
iirira
attach
new
disability
effectively
ban
travel
outside
respect
past
events
specifically
offense
guilty
plea
conviction
punishment
occurring
prior
iirira
passage
congress
expressly
prescribe
temporal
reach
therefore
proceeds
dispositive
question
whether
application
iirira
travel
restraint
vartelas
retroactive
effect
congress
authorize
see
vartelas
presents
firm
case
application
antiretroactivity
principle
beyond
genuine
doubt
restraint
lawful
permanent
residents
like
vartelas
ranks
new
disability
able
journey
abroad
fulfill
religious
obligations
respond
family
emergencies
face
potential
banishment
severe
sanction
see
padilla
kentucky
government
suggests
vartelas
avoided
adverse
consequences
simply
stayed
home
losing
ability
travel
abroad
harsh
penalty
made
devastating
means
enduring
separation
close
family
members
rejected
arguments
retroactivity
similar
cases
see
chew
heong
cyr
cases
loss
stake
less
momentous
see
landgraf
hughes
aircraft
pp
finds
disingenuous
government
argument
retroactive
effect
involved
case
relevant
event
alien
return
vartelas
return
occasioned
treatment
new
entrant
reason
new
disability
conviction
past
misconduct
wrongful
activity
targeted
pp
determining
change
iirira
wrought
retroactive
effect
second
circuit
homed
words
committed
offense
reasoned
reliance
prior
law
essential
application
antiretroactivity
principle
vartelas
commit
crime
reliance
immigration
laws
reasoning
doubly
flawed
party
required
show
reliance
prior
law
structuring
conduct
see
landgraf
event
vartelas
likely
relied
immigration
law
likelihood
strengthens
case
reading
newly
enacted
law
prospectively
cyr
illustrative
lawful
permanent
resident
pleaded
guilty
criminal
charge
made
deportable
immigration
law
effect
convicted
eligible
apply
waiver
deportation
removal
proceeding
commenced
iirira
withdrew
dispensation
disallowance
discretionary
waivers
attached
new
disability
past
conduct
aliens
like
cyr
almost
certainly
relied
upon
th
likelihood
receiving
discretionary
relief
deciding
plead
guilty
thereby
forgo
ing
right
trial
applying
iirira
withdrawal
cyr
obvious
severe
retroactive
effect
congress
made
intention
plain
prior
law
governed
cyr
case
vartelas
case
least
clear
cyr
declining
apply
new
law
retroactively
cyr
seek
attorney
general
discretionary
dispensation
vartelas
fleuti
free
without
seeking
official
permission
make
short
trips
see
assist
parents
greece
second
circuit
compounded
initial
misperception
antiretroactivity
principle
holding
otherwise
fleuti
continues
govern
vartelas
travel
pp
reversed
remanded
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
roberts
kennedy
breyer
sotomayor
kagan
joined
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
thomas
alito
joined
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
panagis
vartelas
petitioner
eric
holder
attorney
general
writ
certiorari
appeals
second
circuit
march
justice
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
panagis
vartelas
native
greece
became
lawful
permanent
resident
pleaded
guilty
felony
conspiring
make
counterfeit
security
served
prison
sentence
four
months
offense
vartelas
traveled
greece
visit
parents
return
week
later
treated
inadmissible
alien
placed
removal
proceedings
law
governing
time
vartelas
plea
alien
situation
travel
abroad
brief
periods
without
jeopardizing
resident
alien
status
see
ed
construed
rosenberg
fleuti
congress
enacted
illegal
immigration
reform
immigrant
responsibility
act
iirira
stat
act
effectively
precluded
foreign
travel
lawful
permanent
residents
conviction
like
vartelas
iirira
aliens
return
sojourn
abroad
however
brief
may
permanently
removed
see
case
presents
question
retroactivity
addressed
congress
lawful
permanent
resident
convicted
crime
effective
date
iirira
regime
governs
one
force
time
conviction
iirira
former
vartelas
brief
trip
abroad
disturb
lawful
permanent
resident
status
latter
may
denied
reentry
conclude
relevant
provision
iirira
attached
new
disability
denial
reentry
respect
past
events
vartelas
offense
plea
conviction
guided
deeply
rooted
presumption
retroactive
legislation
hold
apply
vartelas
conviction
impact
vartelas
brief
travel
abroad
permanent
resident
status
therefore
determined
iirira
legal
regime
force
time
conviction
iirira
passage
immigration
law
established
two
types
proceedings
aliens
denied
hospitality
deportation
hearings
exclusion
hearings
landon
plasencia
exclusion
hearings
held
certain
aliens
seeking
entry
deportation
hearings
held
certain
aliens
already
entered
country
see
ibid
regime
entry
defined
coming
alien
foreign
port
place
statute
however
provided
exception
lawful
permanent
residents
aliens
lawfully
residing
regarded
making
entry
departure
foreign
port
place
intended
reasonably
expected
presence
foreign
port
place
voluntary
ibid
interpreting
cryptic
provision
held
fleuti
congress
intend
exclude
aliens
long
resident
upon
return
innocent
casual
brief
excursion
outside
country
borders
instead
determined
congress
meant
rank
resident
new
entrant
foreign
excursion
meaningfully
interrupt
ed
alien
residence
absent
disrupti
alien
residency
alien
subject
consequences
country
return
iirira
congress
abolished
distinction
exclusion
deportation
procedures
created
uniform
proceeding
known
removal
see
judulang
holder
slip
congress
made
admission
key
word
defined
admission
mean
lawful
entry
alien
inspection
authorization
immigration
officer
alteration
board
immigration
appeals
bia
determined
superseded
fleuti
see
en
banc
thus
lawful
permanent
residents
returning
like
vartelas
may
required
admission
without
regard
whether
alien
departure
might
previously
ranked
casual
innocent
fleuti
doctrine
alien
seeking
admission
subject
various
requirements
see
gain
entry
deemed
inadmissible
numerous
grounds
set
immigration
statutes
see
iirira
lawful
permanent
residents
regarded
seeking
admission
fall
six
enumerated
categories
relevant
fifth
categories
covers
aliens
ha
committed
offense
identified
section
title
offenses
category
include
crime
involving
moral
turpitude
purely
political
offense
attempt
conspiracy
commit
crime
sum
iirira
lawful
permanent
residents
committed
crime
moral
turpitude
fleuti
doctrine
return
brief
trips
abroad
without
applying
admission
iirira
residents
subject
admission
procedures
potentially
removal
grounds
panagis
vartelas
born
raised
greece
resided
years
originally
admitted
student
visa
issued
vartelas
became
lawful
permanent
resident
currently
lives
new
york
area
works
sales
manager
roofing
company
vartelas
opened
auto
body
shop
queens
new
york
one
business
partners
used
shop
photocopier
make
counterfeit
travelers
checks
vartelas
helped
partner
perforate
sheets
individual
checks
vartelas
sell
checks
receive
money
venture
pleaded
guilty
conspiracy
make
possess
counterfeit
securities
violation
sentenced
four
months
incarceration
followed
two
years
supervised
release
vartelas
regularly
traveled
greece
visit
aging
parents
years
conviction
even
passage
iirira
return
visits
remained
uneventful
january
however
vartelas
returned
trip
greece
immigration
officer
classified
alien
seeking
admission
officer
based
classification
vartelas
conviction
see
ex
rel
volpe
smith
counterfeiting
ranks
crime
moral
turpitude
vartelas
removal
proceedings
initial
attorney
conceded
removability
requested
discretionary
relief
removal
former
immigration
nationality
act
ina
see
ed
repealed
attorney
twice
failed
appear
hearings
failed
submit
requested
brief
vartelas
engaged
new
attorney
continued
concede
removability
request
discretionary
relief
immigration
judge
denied
request
relief
ordered
vartelas
removed
greece
bia
affirmed
immigration
judge
decision
july
vartelas
filed
bia
timely
motion
reopen
removal
proceedings
alleging
previous
attorneys
ineffective
among
lapses
conceding
removability
sought
withdraw
concession
removability
ground
iirira
new
admission
provision
codified
reach
back
deprive
lawful
resident
status
based
conviction
bia
denied
motion
declaring
vartelas
prejudiced
lawyers
performance
legal
authority
prevented
application
iirira
vartelas
conduct
appeals
second
circuit
affirmed
bia
decision
agreeing
vartelas
failed
show
prejudiced
attorneys
allegedly
ineffective
performance
rejecting
vartelas
argument
iirira
operated
prospectively
therefore
govern
case
second
circuit
reasoned
relied
prior
legal
regime
time
committed
disqualifying
crime
see
ruling
second
circuit
created
split
two
circuits
fourth
ninth
circuits
held
new
may
applied
lawful
permanent
residents
committed
crimes
listed
among
crimes
moral
turpitude
prior
iirira
enactment
see
olatunji
ashcroft
camins
gonzales
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflict
among
circuits
ii
earlier
explained
see
supra
resident
alien
committed
crime
moral
turpitude
travel
abroad
short
durations
without
jeopardizing
status
lawful
permanent
resident
iirira
return
foreign
travel
alien
treated
new
arrival
shores
may
removed
vartelas
question
congress
authority
restrict
reentry
manner
contend
congress
retroactively
instead
invokes
principle
retroactive
legislation
courts
read
laws
prospective
application
unless
congress
unambiguously
instructed
retroactivity
see
landgraf
usi
film
products
presumption
retroactive
legislation
recalled
landgraf
embodies
legal
doctrine
centuries
older
republic
several
provisions
constitution
noted
embrace
doctrine
among
ex
post
facto
clause
contract
clause
fifth
amendment
due
process
clause
numerous
decisions
repeat
classic
formulation
justice
story
penned
determining
retrospective
application
law
collide
doctrine
story
stated
application
tak
away
impai
vested
rights
acquired
existing
laws
creat
new
obligation
impos
new
duty
attac
new
disability
respect
transactions
considerations
already
past
society
propagation
gospel
wheeler
cas
cc
nh
see
ins
cyr
invoking
story
formulation
hughes
aircraft
ex
rel
schumer
landgraf
vartelas
urges
applying
iirira
rather
law
existed
time
conviction
attach
new
disability
effectively
ban
travel
outside
respect
events
already
past
offense
guilty
plea
conviction
punishment
occurring
prior
passage
iirira
evaluating
vartelas
argument
note
first
matter
disputed
government
congress
expressly
prescribe
temporal
reach
iirira
provision
question
see
landgraf
asks
first
whether
congress
expressly
prescribed
new
proper
reach
brief
respondent
holding
ins
cyr
compels
conclusion
congress
prescribed
statute
proper
quoting
landgraf
several
provisions
iirira
contrast
expressly
direct
retroactive
application
iirira
amendment
aggravated
felony
definition
applies
expressly
conviction
entered
statute
enactment
date
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
cyr
setting
examples
accordingly
proceed
dispositive
question
whether
vartelas
maintains
application
iirira
travel
restraint
retroactive
effect
congress
authorize
see
landgraf
vartelas
presents
firm
case
application
antiretroactivity
principle
neither
sentence
immigration
law
effect
convicted
sentenced
blocked
occasional
visits
parents
greece
current
applied
thus
attach
new
disability
conduct
done
well
provision
enactment
beyond
genuine
doubt
note
restraint
places
lawful
permanent
residents
like
vartelas
ranks
new
disability
able
journey
abroad
fulfill
religious
obligations
attend
funerals
weddings
family
members
tend
vital
financial
interests
respond
family
emergencies
permanent
residents
situated
vartelas
face
potential
banishment
several
times
recognized
severity
sanction
see
padilla
kentucky
slip
answer
say
government
suggests
vartelas
avoided
adverse
consequences
simply
stayed
home
residence
years
prior
visit
parents
greece
see
brief
opposition
vartelas
avoided
application
statute
refrain
ing
departing
returning
post
loss
ability
travel
abroad
harsh
made
devastating
means
enduring
separation
close
family
members
living
abroad
see
brief
asian
american
justice
center
et
al
amici
curiae
describing
illustrative
cases
rejected
arguments
retroactivity
similar
cases
cases
loss
stake
less
momentous
chew
heong
pathmarking
decision
confronted
chinese
restriction
act
barred
chinese
laborers
reentering
without
certificate
issued
departure
held
reentry
bar
inapplicable
aliens
left
country
prior
act
passage
tried
return
afterward
without
certificate
act
text
observed
clear
positive
leave
room
doubt
retroactive
application
intention
legislature
landgraf
question
whether
amendment
title
vii
ban
employment
discrimination
authorizing
compensatory
punitive
damages
applied
conduct
held
doubt
complaint
employer
charged
discrimination
violated
act
time
occurred
compensatory
punitive
damages
available
remedies
later
provision
damages
determined
operated
prospectively
apply
employers
whose
discriminatory
conduct
occurred
prior
amendment
see
hughes
aircraft
held
provision
removing
affirmative
defense
qui
tam
suits
apply
fraud
landgraf
provision
attached
new
disability
past
wrongful
conduct
therefore
apply
retrospectively
unless
congress
clearly
manifested
intention
hughes
aircraft
recently
cyr
took
case
alien
entered
plea
deportable
offense
time
plea
alien
eligible
discretionary
relief
deportation
iirira
enacted
entry
plea
removed
eligibility
held
iirira
provision
point
applied
alien
attached
new
disability
guilty
plea
congress
instructed
result
iii
government
echoed
part
dissent
argues
retroactive
effect
involved
case
legislature
attached
disability
past
conduct
rather
made
relevant
event
alien
act
returning
see
brief
respondent
post
find
argument
disingenuous
vartelas
return
occasioned
treatment
new
entrant
reason
new
disability
imposed
lawful
foreign
travel
indeed
conviction
offense
qualifying
one
moral
turpitude
past
misconduct
words
present
travel
wrongful
activity
congress
targeted
government
observes
lower
courts
upheld
racketeer
influenced
corrupt
organizations
act
prosecutions
encompassed
conduct
see
brief
respondent
citing
brown
campanale
per
curiam
prosecutions
depended
criminal
activity
act
racketeering
occuring
provision
effective
date
section
contrast
require
showing
criminal
conduct
postdating
iirira
enactment
gonzales
featured
government
dissent
brief
respondent
post
similarly
inapposite
case
involved
iirira
addition
provides
alien
reenters
removed
removed
removal
order
held
provision
applied
alien
reentered
illegally
iirira
enactment
explaining
decision
said
conduct
remaining
country
predicate
action
statute
applies
stop
indefinitely
continuing
violation
therefore
alien
choice
continue
illegal
presence
effective
date
new
la
subjects
new
legal
regime
past
act
helpless
undo
emphasis
added
vartelas
several
times
stressed
engaged
criminal
activity
iirira
passage
simply
took
brief
trip
greece
anticipating
return
without
incident
past
visits
parents
indefinitely
continuing
crime
occurred
instead
vartelas
apprehended
crime
helpless
undo
ibid
government
refers
lower
decisions
cases
involving
prohibits
possession
firearms
convicted
felons
brief
respondent
citing
pfeifer
hemmings
ongstanding
prohibitions
possession
firearms
felons
district
columbia
heller
however
target
present
danger
danger
posed
felons
bear
arms
see
pfeifer
hazardous
conduct
statute
targets
occurred
enactment
statute
omnibus
crime
control
safe
streets
act
stat
noting
hazards
involved
felons
possess
firearms
recidivism
sentencing
enhancements
support
government
position
enhanced
punishment
imposed
later
offense
viewed
additional
penalty
earlier
crimes
instead
penalty
latest
crime
considered
aggravated
offense
repetitive
one
witte
quoting
gryger
burke
vartelas
case
however
aggravated
repetitive
offense
contrast
criminal
offense
vartelas
travel
abroad
return
innocent
acts
see
fleuti
burdened
offense
sum
vartelas
brief
trip
abroad
involved
criminal
infraction
iirira
disabled
leaving
returning
lawful
permanent
resident
new
disability
rested
continuing
criminal
activity
single
crime
committed
years
iirira
enactment
antiretroactivity
principle
instructs
application
new
proscription
render
vartelas
arrival
country
gateway
iv
second
circuit
homed
words
committed
offense
determining
change
iirira
wrought
retroactive
effect
matters
vartelas
may
relied
prospect
continuing
visits
greece
deciding
plead
guilty
reasoned
border
absurd
observed
suggest
vartelas
committed
counterfeiting
crime
reliance
immigration
laws
reasoning
doubly
flawed
government
acknowledges
th
required
party
challenging
application
statute
show
relied
prior
law
structuring
conduct
brief
respondent
landgraf
example
issue
retroactivity
compensatory
punitive
damages
remedies
employment
discrimination
oncerns
upsetting
expectations
attenuated
case
intentional
employment
discrimination
noted
discrimination
unlawful
generation
ven
conduct
question
morally
reprehensible
illegal
added
degree
unfairness
inherent
whenever
law
imposes
additional
burdens
based
conduct
occurred
past
hughes
aircraft
found
congress
removal
defense
qui
tam
action
apply
conduct
light
presumption
retroactivity
landgraf
relevant
conduct
submitting
false
claim
unlawful
decades
see
operative
presumption
congress
intends
laws
govern
prospectively
see
supra
strange
third
circuit
commented
arises
showing
actual
reliance
ponnapula
ashcroft
essential
inquiry
stated
landgraf
whether
new
provision
attaches
new
legal
consequences
events
completed
enactment
occurred
event
vartelas
likely
relied
immigration
law
presumption
retroactive
application
statutes
require
showing
detrimental
reliance
see
olatunji
reasonable
reliance
noted
among
familiar
considerations
animating
presumption
see
landgraf
presumption
reflects
familiar
considerations
fair
notice
reasonable
reliance
settled
expectations
although
necessary
predicate
invoking
antiretroactivity
principle
likelihood
reliance
prior
law
strengthens
case
reading
newly
enacted
law
prospectively
see
olatunji
discussing
cyr
cyr
illustrative
case
involved
lawful
permanent
resident
pleaded
guilty
criminal
charge
made
deportable
immigration
law
effect
convicted
eligible
apply
waiver
deportation
removal
proceeding
commenced
congress
iirira
withdrew
dispensation
disallowance
discretionary
waivers
recognized
attache
new
disability
respect
transactions
considerations
already
past
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
aliens
like
cyr
observed
almost
certainly
relied
upon
th
likelihood
receiving
discretionary
relief
deciding
plead
guilty
thereby
forgo
ing
right
trial
hence
applying
iirira
withdrawal
cyr
obvious
severe
retroactive
effect
ibid
congress
made
intention
plain
held
prior
law
permitting
relief
deportation
governed
cyr
case
retroactivity
one
might
think
vartelas
case
even
easier
cyr
cyr
seek
attorney
general
discretionary
dispensation
vartelas
fleuti
free
without
seeking
official
permission
make
trips
short
duration
see
assist
parents
second
circuit
thought
otherwise
compounding
initial
misperception
treating
reliance
essential
application
antiretroactivity
principle
deportation
provision
involved
cyr
referred
alien
convict
ion
crime
statutory
words
sub
judice
vartelas
case
committed
offense
see
supra
practical
difference
far
retroactivity
concerned
escapes
grasp
ordinarily
determine
whether
clear
convincing
evidence
alien
committed
qualifying
crime
immigration
officer
border
check
alien
records
conviction
call
session
piepowder
entertain
plea
conduct
trial
satisfied
vartelas
case
least
clear
cyr
declining
apply
new
law
retroactively
hold
fleuti
continues
govern
vartelas
travel
reasons
stated
judgment
appeals
second
circuit
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
scalia
dissenting
panagis
vartelas
petitioner
eric
holder
attorney
general
writ
certiorari
appeals
second
circuit
march
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
justice
alito
join
dissenting
part
illegal
immigration
reform
immigrant
responsibility
act
iirira
congress
required
lawful
permanent
residents
committed
certain
crimes
seek
formal
admission
return
abroad
case
presents
straightforward
question
statutory
interpretation
statute
apply
lawful
permanent
residents
like
vartelas
committed
one
specified
offenses
traveled
abroad
proper
approach
determining
statute
temporal
application
answer
yes
text
contain
clear
statement
answering
question
presented
correct
case
governed
longstanding
interpretive
principle
absence
contrary
indication
statute
construed
retroactive
application
see
landgraf
usi
film
products
operative
provision
text
provision
specifies
act
prohibits
prescribes
says
lawful
permanent
residents
convicted
offenses
similar
vartelas
must
seek
formal
admission
return
abroad
since
vartelas
returned
statute
effective
date
application
text
reentry
give
statute
retroactive
effect
determining
whether
statute
applies
retroactively
concern
statute
actual
operation
regulated
parties
retroactivity
abstract
concept
substitute
fairness
concerns
impossible
decide
whether
statute
application
retrospective
prospective
without
first
identifying
reference
point
moment
time
statute
effective
date
either
subsequent
antecedent
otherwise
obvious
question
retroactive
reference
remains
unanswered
view
identity
reference
point
turns
activity
statute
intended
regulate
given
regulated
party
reference
point
retroactivity
event
moment
party
statute
forbids
fails
requires
see
martin
hadix
scalia
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
landgraf
supra
scalia
concurring
judgments
identified
reference
point
retroactivity
analysis
simple
person
engaged
primary
regulated
activity
statute
effective
date
statute
application
retroactive
person
engages
primary
regulated
activity
statute
effective
date
statute
application
prospective
latter
case
interpretive
presumption
retroactivity
bar
statute
application
commonsense
approach
relatively
easy
case
although
class
aliens
affected
defined
respect
past
crimes
regulated
activity
reentry
terms
statute
controlling
admission
border
specifies
six
criteria
identify
lawful
permanent
residents
subject
formal
admission
procedures
relate
circumstances
departure
trip
reentry
titles
statutory
sections
containing
confirm
focus
admission
rather
crime
provision
located
within
title
iii
iirira
inspection
apprehension
detention
adjudication
removal
inadmissible
deportable
aliens
subtitle
revision
procedures
removal
aliens
treating
persons
present
without
authorization
admitted
stat
specific
subsection
iirira
issue
entitled
defined
amendment
definition
entry
general
definitions
section
immigration
nationality
act
ina
see
ante
original
provision
told
border
officials
regulate
admission
punish
crime
amendment
well
section
thus
retroactive
effect
vartelas
reference
point
vartelas
readmission
trip
abroad
occurred
years
statute
effective
date
although
vartelas
change
fact
prior
conviction
avoided
entirely
consequences
simply
remaining
left
remaining
greece
effect
vartelas
performed
activity
clear
indication
statute
application
purely
prospective
see
gonzales
retroactive
effect
statute
question
operate
completed
preenactment
act
instead
turned
failure
take
timely
action
avoided
application
new
law
altogether
ii
avoids
conclusion
insisting
ast
misconduct
present
travel
wrongful
activity
congress
targeted
ante
assertion
however
basis
statute
text
structure
pretend
otherwise
instead
simply
asserts
vartelas
lawful
foreign
travel
surely
reason
disability
imposed
ibid
emphasis
added
reason
prohibition
nothing
whether
prohibition
applied
past
rather
future
act
may
relevant
legal
inquiries
example
whether
legislative
act
violates
one
ex
post
facto
clauses
article
see
smith
doe
one
due
process
clauses
fifth
fourteenth
amendments
see
williamson
lee
optical
takings
clause
fifth
amendment
see
kelo
new
london
obligation
contracts
clause
article
see
trust
new
jersey
direct
bearing
upon
whether
statute
retroactive
failure
differentiate
question
whether
giving
certain
effect
provision
make
retroactive
hence
presumptively
unintended
validity
question
whether
giving
certain
effect
provision
unlawful
full
display
attempts
distinguish
similar
statutes
take
example
discussion
racketeer
influenced
corrupt
organizations
act
rico
act
targets
patterns
racketeering
expressly
defines
patterns
include
conduct
see
courts
interpreting
rico
therefore
need
consider
presumption
retroactivity
instead
cases
cited
majority
consider
whether
rico
violates
ex
post
facto
clause
see
brown
campanale
per
curiam
government
recognized
distinction
cited
rico
make
point
ex
post
facto
clause
rather
presumption
retroactivity
brief
respondent
evidently
confident
assertion
congress
surely
meant
statute
apply
vartelas
whose
foreign
travel
subsequent
return
innocent
events
ante
simply
begs
question
presented
case
ignorance
course
excuse
ignorantia
legis
neminem
excusat
return
entirely
lawful
statute
us
render
unlawful
since
iirira
effective
date
lawful
permanent
residents
committed
crimes
moral
turpitude
forbidden
leave
return
without
formally
seeking
admission
see
result
vartelas
numerous
trips
abroad
uneventful
reentries
passage
iirira
see
ante
lawful
apply
course
precisely
matter
dispute
circular
reasoning
betrays
underlying
concern
believes
reentry
brief
trip
abroad
lawful
decline
apply
statute
clearly
provides
otherwise
certain
criminal
aliens
instinct
likely
produced
questionable
statutory
interpretation
rosenberg
fleuti
test
retroactivity
asking
whether
statute
creates
new
disability
respect
past
events
invites
focus
fairness
understandably
since
derived
justice
story
opinion
interpreting
provision
new
hampshire
constitution
forbade
retroactive
laws
provision
comparable
federal
constitution
ex
post
facto
prohibition
bearing
relation
presumption
retroactivity
unfair
irrational
hence
forbidden
nothing
whether
applying
statute
particular
act
prospective
thus
presumptively
intended
retroactive
thus
presumptively
unintended
latter
question
new
disability
respect
past
events
test
provides
meaningful
guidance
imagine
countless
laws
like
impose
new
disabilities
related
past
events
yet
operate
retroactively
example
statute
making
persons
convicted
drug
crimes
ineligible
student
loans
see
laws
prohibiting
convicted
sex
crimes
working
certain
jobs
involve
repeated
contact
minors
see
cal
penal
code
ann
west
supp
laws
prohibiting
previously
committed
mental
instability
purchasing
guns
see
concedes
consider
last
two
laws
inapplicable
convictions
commitments
ante
deny
statutes
impose
new
disability
respect
past
events
distinguishes
based
reason
enactment
statutes
address
dangers
arise
postenactment
ante
much
test
become
test
guarding
future
danger
reason
congress
may
wish
regulate
future
action
light
past
events
obviously
must
invent
yet
another
doctrine
address
first
example
law
making
persons
convicted
drug
crimes
ineligible
student
loans
according
statute
differs
prospective
thrust
ante
imagine
means
statute
regulates
conduct
course
rather
reconciling
distinctions
justice
story
formulation
retroactivity
leaves
lower
courts
unenviable
task
identifying
anyway
doubt
intended
guard
dangers
arise
postenactment
aliens
midst
shown
proclivity
crime
must
rejected
purpose
simply
congress
sought
achieve
possible
means
ferreting
dangerous
aliens
going
expensive
lengthy
process
deporting
least
danger
readily
eliminated
forcing
lawful
permanent
residents
committed
certain
crimes
undergo
formal
admission
procedures
borders
indeed
limiting
criminal
aliens
opportunities
travel
return
may
encourage
irrelevant
positing
legislative
purpose
always
slippery
enterprise
compared
simple
determination
whether
statute
regulates
future
event
rather
pronouncement
reason
governs
whether
statute
retroactive
effect
finally
avoid
observing
even
concern
fairness
rationality
applying
vartelas
relevant
statutory
interpretation
question
concern
greatly
exaggerated
disregard
federal
statute
convicted
criminal
vartelas
repeatedly
traveled
greece
without
ever
seeking
formal
admission
country
borders
finally
unlucky
enough
apprehended
sought
discretionary
relief
removal
former
ina
ed
immigration
judge
denying
application
found
vartelas
made
frequent
trips
greece
remained
long
periods
time
serious
tax
evader
offered
testimony
close
incredible
shown
hardship
estranged
wife
children
removed
see
brief
respondent
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
decrying
harsh
penalty
imposed
statute
vartelas
ignores
inconvenient
facts
ante
never
mind
sensible
approach
presumption
retroactivity
factual
subtleties
irrelevant
temporal
application
case
raises
question
statutory
interpretation
broader
questions
frustrated
expectations
fairness
approach
answering
question
similarly
straightforward
determine
relevant
activity
statute
regulates
reentry
absent
clear
statement
otherwise
relevant
activity
occurs
statute
effective
date
covered
reentries
construed
statute
unfair
irrational
enough
violate
constitution
another
matter
entirely
one
presented
interpretive
presumption
retroactivity
however
tool
ascertain
statute
means
license
rewrite
statute
way
considers
desirable
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
dissent
appears
driven
small
measure
dim
view
opinion
fleuti
see
post
instinct
operative
fleuti
case
bia
determined
fleuti
doctrine
longer
held
sway
rooted
longer
existent
definition
ina
board
also
noted
congress
amended
law
expressly
preserve
fleuti
doctrine
provided
lawful
permanent
resident
absent
less
days
regarded
seeking
admission
except
certain
enumerated
circumstances
among
prior
commission
crime
moral
turpitude
see
ibid
citing
ii
vartelas
challenge
ruling
therefore
assume
decide
iirira
amendments
abrogated
fleuti
although
iirira
created
uniform
removal
procedure
excludable
deportable
aliens
list
criminal
offenses
subject
aliens
exclusion
remains
separate
list
offenses
render
alien
deportable
lists
sometimes
overlapping
sometimes
divergent
judulang
holder
slip
pertinent
although
single
crime
involving
moral
turpitude
may
render
alien
inadmissible
render
deportable
see
listing
excludable
crimes
listing
deportable
crimes
dissent
asserts
justice
story
opinion
bear
relation
presumption
retroactivity
post
bold
statement
view
many
references
justice
story
formulation
cases
involving
presumption
statutes
operate
prospectively
absence
clear
congressional
statement
contrary
cyr
rejected
government
contention
congress
directed
retroactive
application
iirira
entirety
see
kent
dulles
freedom
movement
across
frontiers
may
close
heart
individual
choice
eats
wears
reads
aptheker
secretary
state
douglas
concurring
right
travel
home
abroad
important
business
cultural
political
social
activities
commingling
gregarious
man
enjoys
dissent
see
post
notes
two
statutes
genre
laws
prohibiting
persons
convicted
sex
crime
victim
years
age
working
jobs
involving
frequent
contact
minors
laws
prohibiting
person
adjudicated
mental
defective
committed
mental
institution
possessing
guns
dissent
correct
statutes
operate
retroactively
rather
address
dangers
arise
postenactment
sex
offenders
history
child
molestation
working
close
proximity
children
mentally
unstable
persons
purchasing
guns
act
flying
greece
contrast
render
lawful
permanent
resident
like
vartelas
hazardous
plausible
congress
solution
problem
dangerous
lawful
permanent
residents
pass
law
deter
persons
ever
leaving
student
loans
unlikely
provision
noted
dissent
raise
retroactivity
questions
first
place
statute
prospective
thrust
concerns
uspension
eligibility
student
receiving
college
loan
commits
drug
crime
suspension
runs
date
th
conviction
specified
periods
two
years
second
offense
possession
moreover
eligibility
may
restored
period
ineligibility
ends
student
establishes
prescribed
criteria
rehabilitation
deleted
defense
permitted
qui
tam
defendants
escape
liability
information
private
plaintiff
relator
relied
already
government
possession
detrimental
reliance
hardly
apparent
government
statutory
change
bring
suit
information
monetary
liability
faced
false
claims
act
defendant
whether
action
brought
government
qui
tam
relator
little
doubt
noted
cyr
general
matter
alien
defendants
considering
whether
enter
plea
agreement
acutely
aware
immigration
consequences
convictions
indeed
reserving
right
remain
may
important
potential
jail
sentence
ibid
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
padilla
kentucky
slip
holding
counsel
duty
sixth
amendment
inform
noncitizen
defendant
plea
make
eligible
deportation
armed
knowledge
guilty
plea
preclude
travel
abroad
aliens
like
vartelas
might
endeavor
negotiate
plea
nonexcludable
offense
vartelas
case
possession
counterfeit
securities
exercise
right
trial
words
committed
offense
next
words
identified
section
section
refers
alien
convicted
admits
committed
inter
alia
crime
involving
moral
turpitude
emphasis
added
entire
phrase
committed
offense
identified
section
straightforward
reading
appears
advert
lawful
permanent
resident
convicted
offense
admits
one
piepowder
dusty
feet
courts
temporary
mercantile
courts
held
trade
fairs
medieval
europe
local
merchants
guild
members
assemble
hear
commercial
disputes
courts
provided
fast
informal
resolution
trade
conflicts
settling
cases
merchants
feet
still
dusty
callahan
medieval
church
norms
fiduciary
duties
partnership
cardozo
rev
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
quoting
berman
law
revolution
formation
western
legal
tradition
footnotes
say
direct
bearing
prospective
application
statute
raise
constitutional
doubts
effect
conduct
reason
presume
legislative
intent
apply
unless
conduct
question
consider
retroactive
conduct
question
see
clark
martinez
issue
statute
expressly
made
new
admission
rule
applicable
aliens
prior
convictions
constitutionality
doubt