college
savings
bank
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
education
expense
board
et
argued
april
decided
june
individual
may
sue
state
congress
authorized
suit
exercise
power
enforce
fourteenth
amendment
fitzpatrick
bitzer
state
waived
sovereign
immunity
consenting
suit
clark
barnard
trademark
remedy
clarification
act
trca
subjects
suits
brought
trademark
act
lanham
act
false
misleading
advertising
petitioner
markets
sells
certificates
deposit
designed
finance
college
costs
respondent
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
education
expense
board
florida
prepaid
florida
state
entity
began
tuition
prepayment
program
petitioner
filed
suit
alleging
florida
prepaid
violated
misrepresenting
program
granting
florida
prepaid
motion
dismiss
sovereign
immunity
grounds
district
rejected
arguments
made
petitioner
intervened
constructive
waiver
doctrine
parden
terminal
docks
florida
prepaid
waived
immunity
engaging
interstate
marketing
administration
program
trca
made
clear
activity
subject
suit
congress
abrogation
sovereign
immunity
trca
effective
since
enacted
enforce
fourteenth
amendment
due
process
clause
third
circuit
affirmed
held
federal
courts
jurisdiction
entertain
suit
florida
sovereign
immunity
neither
validly
abrogated
trca
voluntarily
waived
pp
trca
abrogate
florida
sovereign
immunity
congress
may
legislate
fourteenth
amendment
enforce
amendment
provisions
object
legislation
must
remediation
prevention
constitutional
violations
petitioner
argument
congress
enacted
trca
remedy
prevent
state
deprivations
two
property
interests
without
due
process
rejected
neither
right
free
business
competitor
false
advertising
product
right
secure
one
business
interests
qualifies
protected
property
right
first
hallmark
constitutionally
protected
property
interest
right
exclude
others
lanham
act
provisions
bear
relationship
right
exclude
florida
prepaid
alleged
misrepresentation
concerning
products
intruded
upon
interest
petitioner
exclusive
dominion
second
asserted
property
interest
business
assets
property
state
taking
assets
deprivation
business
sense
activity
business
making
profit
property
impinged
upon
competitor
false
advertising
product
pp
florida
sovereign
immunity
voluntarily
waived
activities
interstate
commerce
generally
waiver
occurs
state
voluntarily
invokes
clearly
declares
intends
submit
jurisdiction
federal
courts
petitioner
maintain
implied
constructive
waiver
possible
congress
provides
unambiguously
state
subject
private
suit
engages
certain
federally
regulated
conduct
state
voluntarily
elects
engage
conduct
rely
decision
parden
supra
held
federal
employers
liability
act
authorized
private
suit
operating
railroads
virtue
general
provision
permitting
suit
common
carriers
engaged
interstate
commerce
never
applied
parden
holding
another
statute
fact
narrowed
case
every
subsequent
opinion
consideration
even
supplemented
requirement
unambiguous
statement
congressional
intent
subject
suit
parden
squared
cases
requiring
state
express
waiver
sovereign
immunity
unequivocal
see
great
northern
life
ins
read
also
inconsistent
recent
decision
seminole
tribe
relevant
asserted
basis
constructive
waiver
conduct
state
undertaken
profit
traditionally
performed
private
entities
otherwise
resembles
behavior
ket
participants
whatever
may
remain
decision
parden
expressly
overruled
pp
affirmed
scalia
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
kennedy
thomas
joined
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
breyer
filed
dissenting
opinion
stevens
souter
ginsburg
joined
college
savings
bank
petitioner
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
education
expense
board
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
third
circuit
june
justice
scalia
delivered
opinion
trademark
remedy
clarification
act
trca
stat
subjects
suits
brought
trademark
act
lanham
act
false
misleading
advertising
stat
question
presented
case
whether
provision
effective
permit
suit
state
alleged
misrepresentation
product
either
trca
effects
constitutionally
permissible
abrogation
state
sovereign
immunity
trca
operates
invitation
waiver
immunity
automatically
accepted
state
engaging
activities
regulated
lanham
act
chisholm
georgia
dall
asserted
jurisdiction
action
assumpsit
brought
south
carolina
citizen
state
georgia
reasoned
georgia
sovereign
immunity
qualified
general
jurisdictional
provisions
article
iii
specifically
provision
extending
federal
judicial
power
controversies
state
citizens
another
state
art
iii
cl
shock
surprise
created
decision
principality
monaco
mississippi
prompted
immediate
adoption
eleventh
amendment
provides
judicial
power
shall
construed
extend
suit
law
equity
commenced
prosecuted
one
citizens
another
state
citizens
subjects
foreign
state
though
precise
terms
bar
federal
jurisdiction
suits
brought
one
state
citizens
another
state
foreign
state
long
recognized
eleventh
amendment
accomplished
much
repudiated
central
premise
chisholm
jurisdictional
heads
article
iii
superseded
sovereign
immunity
possessed
entering
union
understanding
amendment
since
landmark
case
hans
louisiana
see
also
ex
parte
new
york
principality
monaco
supra
pennhurst
state
school
hospital
halderman
seminole
tribe
florida
immunity
suit
absolute
recognized
two
circumstances
individual
may
sue
state
first
congress
may
authorize
suit
exercise
power
enforce
fourteenth
amendment
amendment
enacted
eleventh
amendment
specifically
designed
alter
balance
fitzpatrick
bitzer
second
state
may
waive
sovereign
immunity
consenting
suit
clark
barnard
case
turns
whether
either
two
circumstances
present
ii
section
lanham
act
enacted
created
private
right
action
ny
person
uses
false
descriptions
makes
false
representations
commerce
trca
amends
defining
person
include
state
instrumentality
state
employee
state
instrumentality
state
acting
official
capacity
stat
trca
amends
lanham
act
provide
state
entities
shall
immune
eleventh
amendment
constitution
doctrine
sovereign
immunity
suit
federal
person
including
governmental
nongovernmental
entity
violation
act
remedies
shall
available
state
entities
extent
remedies
available
suit
nonstate
entity
codified
petitioner
college
savings
bank
new
jersey
chartered
bank
located
princeton
new
jersey
since
marketed
sold
collegesure
certificates
deposit
designed
finance
costs
college
education
college
savings
holds
patent
upon
methodology
administering
collegesure
certificates
respondent
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
education
expense
board
florida
prepaid
arm
state
florida
since
administered
tuition
prepayment
program
designed
provide
individuals
sufficient
funds
cover
future
college
expenses
college
savings
brought
patent
infringement
action
florida
prepaid
district
new
jersey
action
subject
today
decision
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
ed
expense
bd
college
savings
bank
ante
addition
college
savings
filed
instant
action
alleging
florida
prepaid
violated
lanham
act
making
misstatements
tuition
savings
plans
brochures
annual
reports
florida
prepaid
moved
dismiss
action
ground
barred
sovereign
immunity
argued
congress
abrogated
sovereign
immunity
case
trca
enacted
pursuant
congress
powers
article
constitution
decisions
seminole
tribe
supra
fitzpatrick
supra
congress
abrogate
state
sovereign
immunity
legislates
enforce
fourteenth
amendment
intervened
defend
constitutionality
trca
college
savings
argued
doctrine
constructive
waiver
articulated
parden
terminal
docks
dept
florida
prepaid
waived
immunity
lanham
act
suits
engaging
interstate
marketing
administration
program
trca
made
clear
activity
subject
florida
prepaid
suit
college
savings
also
argued
congress
purported
abrogation
florida
prepaid
sovereign
immunity
trca
effective
since
enacted
merely
pursuant
article
also
enforce
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
district
rejected
arguments
granted
florida
prepaid
motion
dismiss
supp
appeals
affirmed
granted
certiorari
iii
turn
first
contention
florida
sovereign
immunity
validly
abrogated
decision
three
terms
ago
seminole
tribe
supra
held
power
regulate
commerce
conferred
article
constitution
gives
congress
authority
abrogate
state
sovereign
immunity
authority
abrogation
present
case
petitioner
relies
upon
fourteenth
amendment
held
fitzpatrick
bitzer
reaffirmed
seminole
tribe
see
used
purpose
section
fourteenth
amendment
provides
state
shall
deprive
person
property
without
due
process
law
section
provides
congress
shall
power
enforce
appropriate
legislation
provisions
article
made
clear
city
boerne
flores
term
enforce
taken
seriously
object
valid
legislation
must
carefully
delimited
remediation
prevention
constitutional
violations
petitioner
claims
respect
lanham
act
congress
enacted
trca
remedy
prevent
state
deprivations
without
due
process
two
species
property
rights
right
free
business
competitor
false
advertising
product
generalized
right
secure
one
business
interests
neither
qualifies
property
right
protected
due
process
clause
first
hallmark
protected
property
interest
right
exclude
others
one
essential
sticks
bundle
rights
commonly
characterized
property
kaiser
aetna
right
possess
use
public
lands
property
right
anyone
hence
sardonic
maxim
explaining
economists
call
tragedy
commons
res
publica
res
nullius
lanham
act
may
well
contain
provisions
protect
constitutionally
cognizable
property
interests
notably
provisions
dealing
infringement
trademarks
property
owner
exclude
others
using
see
mart
cartier
trademark
law
like
contract
law
confers
private
rights
rights
exclusion
grants
trademark
owner
bundle
rights
lanham
act
provisions
however
bear
relationship
right
exclude
florida
prepaid
alleged
misrepresentations
concerning
products
intruded
upon
interest
petitioner
exclusive
dominion
unsurprisingly
petitioner
points
decision
matter
recognizing
property
right
freedom
competitor
false
advertising
products
closest
petitioner
comes
dicta
international
news
service
associated
press
found
equity
jurisdiction
claim
rule
equity
concerns
protection
property
rights
treats
civil
right
pecuniary
nature
property
right
say
equity
treats
civil
right
pecuniary
nature
property
right
say
civil
rights
pecuniary
nature
property
rights
fact
one
reads
full
passage
statement
taken
clear
saying
opposite
namely
equity
treat
civil
rights
pecuniary
nature
property
rights
even
though
properly
order
sustain
jurisdiction
equity
controversy
need
affirm
general
absolute
property
news
rule
equity
concerns
protection
property
rights
treats
civil
right
pecuniary
nature
property
right
right
quire
property
honest
labor
conduct
lawful
business
much
entitled
protection
right
guard
property
already
acquired
right
furnishes
basis
jurisdiction
ordinary
case
unfair
competition
id
may
also
note
unfair
competition
issue
international
news
service
amounted
nothing
short
theft
proprietary
information
something
power
exclude
others
said
exist
see
id
petitioner
argues
tort
unfair
competition
definition
protects
property
interests
brief
petitioner
thus
trca
definition
designed
remedy
prevent
deprivations
interests
context
even
logical
matter
follow
since
everything
protects
property
interests
designed
remedy
prevent
deprivations
property
interests
municipal
ordinance
prohibiting
billboards
residential
areas
protects
property
interests
homeowners
although
erecting
billboards
ordinarily
deprive
property
sweep
within
fourteenth
amendment
elusive
property
interests
definition
protected
law
violate
frequent
admonition
due
process
clause
merely
font
tort
law
paul
davis
petitioner
second
assertion
property
interest
rests
upon
argument
similar
one
discussed
suffers
flaw
petitioner
argues
businesses
property
within
meaning
due
process
clause
congress
legislates
passes
law
prevents
state
interference
business
false
advertising
brief
petitioner
assets
business
including
good
unquestionably
property
state
taking
assets
unquestionably
deprivation
fourteenth
amendment
business
sense
activity
business
activity
making
profit
property
ordinary
sense
business
asset
impinged
upon
competitors
false
advertising
finding
deprivation
property
issue
need
pursue
question
city
boerne
otherwise
require
us
resolve
whether
prophylactic
measure
taken
purported
authority
prohibition
claims
violation
fourteenth
amendment
genuinely
necessary
prevent
violation
fourteenth
amendment
turn
next
question
whether
florida
sovereign
immunity
though
abrogated
voluntarily
waived
iv
long
recognized
state
sovereign
immunity
personal
privilege
may
waive
pleasure
clark
barnard
decision
waive
immunity
however
altogether
voluntary
part
sovereignty
beers
arkansas
accordingly
test
determining
whether
state
waived
immunity
jurisdiction
stringent
one
atascadero
state
hospital
scanlon
generally
find
waiver
either
state
voluntarily
invokes
jurisdiction
gunter
atlantic
coast
line
else
state
makes
clear
declaration
intends
submit
jurisdiction
great
northern
life
ins
read
see
also
pennhurst
state
school
hospital
halderman
state
consent
suit
must
unequivocally
expressed
thus
state
consent
suit
federal
merely
consenting
suit
courts
creation
smith
reeves
consent
suit
federal
merely
stating
intention
sue
sued
florida
dept
health
rehabilitative
servs
florida
nursing
home
assn
per
curiam
even
authorizing
suits
competent
jurisdiction
kennecott
copper
state
tax
even
held
state
may
absent
contractual
commitment
contrary
alter
conditions
waiver
apply
changes
pending
suit
beers
arkansas
supra
suggestion
respondent
florida
prepaid
expressly
consented
sued
federal
case
state
affirmatively
invoked
jurisdiction
rather
petitioner
college
savings
maintain
florida
prepaid
impliedly
constructively
waived
immunity
lanham
act
suit
authority
parden
terminal
docks
dept
elliptical
opinion
stands
nadir
waiver
matter
sovereign
immunity
jurisprudence
parden
permitted
employees
railroad
owned
operated
alabama
bring
action
federal
employers
liability
act
fela
employer
despite
absence
provision
statute
specifically
referring
held
act
authorized
suits
virtue
general
provision
subjecting
suit
common
carrier
railroad
engaging
commerce
several
held
alabama
waived
immunity
fela
suit
even
though
alabama
law
expressly
disavowed
waiver
enacting
fela
congress
conditioned
right
operate
railroad
interstate
commerce
upon
amenability
suit
federal
provided
act
thereafter
operating
railroad
interstate
commerce
alabama
must
taken
accepted
condition
thus
consented
suit
four
dissenting
justices
parden
refused
infer
waiver
congress
expressly
declared
state
operating
commerce
subject
liability
went
acknowledge
concession
strictly
speaking
necessary
analysis
congress
possessed
power
effect
waiver
state
constitutionally
protected
immunity
long
clarity
id
opinion
white
nine
years
later
employees
dept
public
health
welfare
mo
department
public
health
welfare
mo
began
retreat
parden
case
held
opinion
written
one
parden
dissenters
solitary
dissent
parden
author
state
missouri
immune
suit
brought
fair
labor
standards
act
employees
state
health
facilities
although
statute
specifically
covered
state
hospitals
question
see
ed
coverage
unquestionably
enforceable
federal
think
statute
expressed
clarity
congress
intention
supersede
immunity
suits
brought
individuals
put
one
side
parden
case
characterized
involving
dramatic
circumstances
rather
isolated
state
activity
unlike
provision
fair
labor
standards
act
question
applied
broad
class
state
employees
also
distinguished
railroad
parden
ground
operated
profit
area
private
persons
corporations
normally
ran
enterprise
justice
marshall
joined
justice
stewart
went
even
concluding
although
view
congress
clearly
purported
subject
suits
individuals
federal
courts
lacked
constitutional
authority
opinion
concurring
result
next
year
observed
dictum
place
doctrine
constructive
waiver
jurisprudence
emphasized
find
waiver
stated
express
language
overwhelming
implications
text
leave
room
reasonable
construction
edelman
jordan
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
several
terms
later
welch
texas
dept
highways
public
transp
although
expressly
avoided
addressing
constitutionality
congress
conditioning
state
engaging
activity
upon
state
waiver
sovereign
immunity
said
doubt
parden
discussion
congressional
intent
negate
eleventh
amendment
immunity
longer
good
law
overruled
parden
extent
inconsistent
requirement
abrogation
eleventh
amendment
immunity
congress
must
expressed
unmistakably
clear
language
college
savings
concede
surely
must
intervening
decisions
seriously
limited
holding
parden
maintain
however
employees
welch
distinguishable
core
principle
parden
remains
good
law
parden
waiver
immunity
say
still
possible
employees
welch
long
following
two
conditions
satisfied
first
congress
must
provide
unambiguously
state
subject
suit
engages
certain
specified
conduct
governed
federal
regulation
second
state
must
voluntarily
elect
engage
federally
regulated
conduct
subjects
suit
latter
regard
argument
goes
state
never
deemed
constructively
waived
sovereign
immunity
engaging
activities
realistically
choose
abandon
operation
police
force
constructive
waiver
appropriate
state
runs
enterprise
profit
operates
field
traditionally
occupied
private
persons
corporations
engages
activities
sufficiently
removed
core
state
functions
reply
brief
otherwise
acts
market
participant
interstate
commerce
cf
white
massachusetts
council
constr
employers
theory
florida
prepaid
constructively
waived
immunity
suit
engaging
voluntary
nonessential
activity
selling
advertising
educational
investment
vehicle
interstate
commerce
put
notice
clear
language
trca
subject
lanham
act
liability
think
experiment
parden
ill
conceived
see
merit
attempting
salvage
remnant
explain
detail
parden
broke
sharply
prior
cases
fundamentally
incompatible
later
ones
never
applied
holding
parden
another
statute
fact
narrowed
case
every
subsequent
opinion
consideration
short
parden
stands
anomaly
jurisprudence
sovereign
immunity
indeed
jurisprudence
constitutional
law
today
drop
shoe
whatever
may
remain
decision
parden
expressly
overruled
begin
square
parden
cases
requiring
state
express
waiver
sovereign
immunity
unequivocal
see
great
northern
life
ins
read
whole
point
requiring
clear
declaration
state
waiver
certain
state
fact
consents
suit
little
reason
assume
actual
consent
based
upon
state
mere
presence
field
subject
congressional
regulation
fundamental
difference
state
expressing
unequivocally
waives
immunity
congress
expressing
unequivocally
intention
state
takes
certain
action
shall
deemed
waived
immunity
latter
situation
said
certainty
state
put
notice
congress
intends
subject
suits
brought
individuals
far
concluding
state
made
altogether
voluntary
decision
waive
immunity
beers
indeed
parden
waivers
simply
unheard
context
constitutionally
protected
privileges
said
edelman
onstructive
consent
doctrine
commonly
associated
surrender
constitutional
rights
example
imagine
congress
amended
securities
laws
provide
unmistakable
clarity
anyone
committing
fraud
connection
buying
selling
securities
interstate
commerce
entitled
jury
federal
criminal
prosecution
fraud
persons
engaging
securities
fraud
adoption
amendment
deemed
constructively
waived
constitutionally
protected
rights
trial
jury
criminal
cases
trading
securities
vital
activity
one
person
decision
trade
regarded
voluntary
choice
answer
course
classic
description
effective
waiver
constitutional
right
intentional
relinquishment
abandonment
known
right
privilege
johnson
zerbst
ourts
indulge
every
reasonable
presumption
waiver
fundamental
constitutional
rights
aetna
ins
kennedy
ex
rel
bogash
see
also
ohio
bell
telephone
public
util
ohio
presume
acquiescence
loss
fundamental
rights
state
sovereign
immunity
less
right
trial
jury
criminal
cases
constitutionally
protected
great
northern
pennhurst
context
federal
sovereign
immunity
obviously
closest
analogy
present
case
well
established
waivers
implied
see
king
describing
settled
propositio
waiver
sovereign
immunity
implied
must
unequivocally
expressed
see
reason
rule
different
respect
state
sovereign
immunity
given
anomalous
speak
constructive
waiver
constitutionally
protected
privilege
surprising
cornerstone
parden
opinion
notion
state
sovereign
immunity
constitutionally
grounded
parden
discussion
waiver
began
observation
empowering
congress
regulate
commerce
necessarily
surrendered
portion
sovereignty
stand
way
regulation
since
imposition
fela
right
action
upon
interstate
railroads
within
congressional
regulatory
power
must
follow
application
act
railroad
precluded
sovereign
immunity
see
also
id
recent
decision
seminole
tribe
expressly
repudiates
proposition
formally
overruling
parden
make
explicit
case
implied
recognizing
congressional
power
exact
constructive
waivers
sovereign
immunity
exercise
article
powers
also
practical
matter
permit
congress
circumvent
antiabrogation
holding
seminole
tribe
forced
waiver
abrogation
even
different
sides
coin
side
coin
congressional
creations
private
rights
action
attach
recovery
defendant
commission
act
possession
status
field
congress
authority
regulate
conduct
thus
federal
prescriptions
insofar
prospective
application
concerned
sense
conditional
extent
objects
prescriptions
consciously
engage
activity
hold
status
produces
liability
redescribed
invitations
waiver
pennsylvania
union
gas
scalia
dissenting
see
also
fitzpatrick
referring
congressional
intent
abrogate
state
sovereign
immunity
necessary
predicate
parden
waiver
little
verbal
distinction
saying
congress
make
florida
liable
private
parties
false
misleading
advertising
interstate
commerce
prepaid
tuition
program
saying
thing
adding
end
florida
chooses
engage
advertising
evidence
constructive
waiver
little
abrogation
another
name
consider
revealing
facts
case
statutory
provision
relied
upon
demonstrate
florida
constructively
waived
sovereign
immunity
provision
purported
abrogate
think
constitutionally
grounded
principle
state
sovereign
immunity
less
robust
asserted
basis
constructive
waiver
conduct
state
realistically
choose
abandon
undertaken
profit
traditionally
performed
private
citizens
corporations
otherwise
resembles
behavior
market
participants
permitting
abrogation
constructive
waiver
constitutional
right
conditions
exist
course
limit
evil
hard
say
limitation
support
text
tradition
say
limiting
abrogation
constructive
waiver
last
friday
month
since
sovereign
immunity
traditionally
limited
factors
since
bearing
upon
voluntariness
waiver
principled
reason
enter
waiver
analysis
held
seminole
tribe
sovereign
immunity
barred
action
brought
indian
gaming
regulatory
act
state
florida
alleged
failure
negotiate
gambling
compact
seminole
tribe
indians
pause
consider
whether
florida
decision
negotiate
somehow
involuntary
pause
consider
whether
running
tugboat
towing
service
fair
reasonable
rates
traditionally
performed
private
citizens
corporations
otherwise
resembled
behavior
market
participants
held
ex
parte
new
york
sovereign
immunity
foreclosed
admiralty
action
state
new
york
damages
caused
state
engaging
activity
hans
involved
action
louisiana
recover
coupons
bond
issuance
surely
rendered
louisiana
participant
financial
markets
market
participant
cases
jurisprudence
relied
upon
inapposite
see
white
massachusetts
council
constr
employers
reeves
stake
hughes
alexandria
scrap
cases
hold
state
acts
participant
private
market
may
prefer
goods
services
citizens
even
though
acting
market
regulator
since
state
proprietary
activities
may
often
burdened
restrictions
imposed
private
market
participants
venhandedness
suggests
acting
proprietors
similarly
share
existing
freedoms
federal
constraints
including
inherent
limits
dormant
commerce
clause
white
supra
market
participant
exception
judicially
created
restrictions
makes
sense
evil
addressed
restrictions
prospect
use
custom
duties
exclusionary
trade
regulations
exercises
governmental
power
opposed
expenditure
state
resources
favor
citizens
see
hughes
supra
entirely
absent
buying
selling
market
contrast
suit
individual
unconsenting
state
evil
eleventh
amendment
directed
exists
whether
state
acting
profit
traditionally
private
enterprise
market
ticipant
context
moreover
venhandness
individuals
expected
constitutional
role
sets
apart
employers
defendants
welch
cf
atascadero
points
two
contexts
asserts
permitted
congress
exercise
article
powers
extract
constructive
waivers
state
sovereign
immunity
petty
bridge
held
bistate
commission
created
pursuant
interstate
compact
assumed
partook
state
sovereign
immunity
consented
suit
reason
suability
provision
attached
congressional
approval
compact
held
cases
south
dakota
dole
congress
may
exercise
spending
power
condition
grant
funds
upon
taking
certain
actions
congress
require
take
acceptance
funds
entails
agreement
actions
cases
seem
us
fundamentally
different
present
one
compact
clause
art
cl
form
interstate
compact
without
first
obtaining
express
consent
congress
granting
consent
gratuity
also
congress
obligation
use
spending
clause
power
disburse
funds
funds
gifts
present
case
however
congress
threatens
state
refuses
agree
condition
denial
gift
gratuity
sanction
exclusion
state
otherwise
permissible
activity
justice
breyer
dissent
acknowledges
intuitive
difference
two
asserts
disappears
gift
threatened
withheld
substantial
enough
post
perhaps
cases
involving
conditions
attached
federal
funding
acknowledged
financial
inducement
offered
congress
might
coercive
pass
point
pressure
turns
compulsion
dole
supra
quoting
steward
machine
davis
event
think
constitutionally
guaranteed
protection
sovereign
immunity
involved
point
coercion
automatically
passed
voluntariness
waiver
destroyed
attached
refusal
waive
exclusion
state
otherwise
lawful
activity
principal
thrust
justice
breyer
dissent
attack
upon
legitimacy
state
sovereign
immunity
regard
justice
breyer
dissenters
proclaim
yet
ready
post
emphasis
added
adhere
precedent
seminole
tribe
decision
hans
supports
accordingly
justice
breyer
reiterates
outline
form
thankfully
revisionist
accounts
eleventh
amendment
set
forth
opinions
degree
repetitive
detail
despoiled
northern
woods
compare
post
atascadero
supra
brennan
dissenting
welch
supra
brennan
dissenting
seminole
tribe
stevens
dissenting
id
souter
dissenting
see
alden
maine
post
souter
dissenting
arguments
recited
sources
soundly
refuted
position
marshaled
rejected
constitutional
tradition
precedent
clear
conclusive
almost
venerable
consigns
debate
whether
marbury
madison
wrongly
decided
forums
see
union
gas
scalia
dissenting
seminole
tribe
alden
post
score
think
nothing
need
said
except
two
minor
observations
peculiar
case
first
justice
breyer
dissenters
adopted
decidedly
perverse
theory
stare
decisis
finding
entirely
unconstrained
venerable
precedent
hans
imbedded
within
legal
system
century
see
welch
supra
union
gas
supra
scalia
dissenting
time
cling
desperately
anomalous
severely
undermined
decision
parden
surely
approach
stare
decisis
exactly
backwards
unless
course
one
wishes
use
weapon
rather
guide
case
old
approach
second
stress
following
observation
bearing
upon
resolution
case
find
puzzling
justice
breyer
choose
occasion
criticize
jurisprudence
ungrounded
constitutional
text
since
present
lawsuit
allow
go
forward
apparently
commenced
state
florida
citizen
another
state
college
savings
bank
new
jersey
seems
fall
four
square
within
literal
text
eleventh
amendment
judicial
power
shall
construed
extend
suit
law
equity
commenced
prosecuted
one
citizens
another
state
const
amdt
emphasis
added
see
seminole
tribe
supra
stevens
dissenting
diffuse
treatment
subject
federalism
contained
last
portion
justice
breyer
opinion
alarming
learn
many
members
subscribe
theory
federalism
rejects
details
particular
federalist
doctrine
says
change
reflect
nation
changing
needs
puts
forward
unchanging
goal
federalism
worth
mentioning
protection
liberty
believes
directly
achieved
promoting
sharing
among
citizens
governmental
authority
turn
demands
finally
come
point
necessary
legislative
flexibility
people
representatives
congress
post
proposition
protection
liberty
directly
achieved
promoting
sharing
among
citizens
governmental
authority
might
well
dropped
lips
robespierre
surely
madison
jefferson
hamilton
whose
north
star
governmental
power
even
indeed
especially
governmental
power
wielded
people
dispersed
countered
say
degree
dispersal
hence
degree
check
governed
congress
need
legislative
flexibility
deny
federalism
utterly
justice
breyer
opinion
comes
close
admitting
example
federalism
constraint
bear
acknowledge
appropriate
judicial
recognition
invalidation
state
law
things
given
passion
text
characterizes
parts
opinion
dormant
commerce
clause
post
legislative
flexibility
part
congress
touchstone
federalism
capacity
support
combustion
becomes
acid
test
fire
extinguisher
congressional
flexibility
desirable
course
within
bounds
federal
power
established
constitution
beyond
bounds
theory
constitution
goes
menace
opinion
today
sought
discern
bounds
dissent
denies
permanent
place
finally
must
comment
upon
justice
breyer
comparison
decision
today
discredited
case
lochner
new
york
resembles
lochner
course
respect
rejects
novel
assertion
governmental
power
legislature
believed
justified
alone
enough
qualify
lochner
list
lochners
endless
judgments
invalidating
state
federal
laws
fit
description
always
thought
distinctive
feature
lochner
nicely
captured
justice
holmes
dissenting
remark
herbert
spencer
social
statics
id
sought
impose
particular
economic
philosophy
upon
constitution
think
feature
aptly
characterizes
opinion
justice
breyer
dissent
believes
enjoy
normal
constitutional
protections
sovereign
immunity
step
proper
economic
role
engage
sure
herbert
spencer
shocked
ordinary
commercial
ventures
post
ever
happened
need
legislative
flexibility
concluding
foregoing
reasons
sovereign
immunity
state
florida
neither
validly
abrogated
tradmark
remedy
clarification
act
voluntarily
waived
state
activities
interstate
commerce
hold
federal
courts
without
jurisdiction
entertain
suit
arm
state
florida
judgment
third
circuit
dismissing
action
affirmed
ordered
college
savings
bank
petitioner
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
education
expense
board
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
third
circuit
june
justice
stevens
dissenting
case
argued
decided
basis
assumptions
may
entirely
correct
accepting
arguendo
judgment
appeals
reversed
reasons
set
forth
justice
breyer
dissent
joined
believe
importance
case
two
rights
cases
decided
today
merits
additional
comment
procedural
posture
case
requires
assume
florida
prepaid
arm
state
florida
activities
relate
state
educational
programs
ante
validity
assumption
doubtful
jurisprudence
area
based
primarily
assumptions
status
doctrine
sovereign
immunity
century
sovereigns
play
kind
role
commercial
marketplace
today
future
cases
may
therefore
appropriate
limit
coverage
state
sovereign
immunity
treating
commercial
enterprises
like
commercial
activities
foreign
sovereigns
foreign
sovereign
immunities
act
majority
also
assumes
petitioner
complaint
alleged
violation
lanham
act
one
sufficiently
serious
amount
deprivation
property
ante
think
neither
assumptions
relevant
principal
issue
raised
case
namely
whether
congress
constitutional
power
authorize
suits
state
instrumentalities
violation
judgment
constitution
granted
ample
power
section
fourteenth
amendment
authorizes
congress
enact
appropriate
legislation
prevent
deprivations
property
without
due
process
unlike
majority
persuaded
trademark
remedy
clarification
act
valid
exercise
power
even
florida
prepaid
allegedly
false
advertising
case
violate
constitution
conclusion
rests
two
premises
rejects
first
opinion
activity
business
activity
making
profit
ante
form
property
asset
often
appears
company
balance
sheet
good
substantial
equivalent
activity
kind
property
congress
described
sherman
act
stat
clayton
act
stat
state
deliberate
destruction
going
business
surely
deprivation
property
within
meaning
due
process
clause
second
validity
congressional
decision
abrogate
sovereign
immunity
category
cases
depend
strength
claim
asserted
particular
case
within
category
instead
decision
depends
whether
congress
reasonable
basis
concluding
abrogation
necessary
prevent
violations
otherwise
occur
given
presumption
validity
supports
federal
statutes
believe
must
shoulder
burden
demonstrating
judgment
congress
command
respect
done
reasons
well
expressed
justice
breyer
respectfully
dissent
college
savings
bank
petitioner
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
education
expense
board
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
third
circuit
june
justice
breyer
justice
stevens
justice
souter
justice
ginsburg
join
dissenting
holds
congress
exercise
commerce
power
require
state
waive
immunity
suit
federal
even
state
engages
activity
might
readily
withdraw
federally
regulated
commercial
activity
previously
held
contrary
parden
terminal
docks
dept
abandon
precedent
years
ago
unanimously
subscribed
holding
today
overrules
justice
white
writing
four
members
dissented
different
issue
succinctly
described
holding
follows
within
power
congress
condition
state
permit
engage
interstate
transportation
business
waiver
state
sovereign
immunity
suits
arising
business
congress
might
well
determine
allowing
regulable
conduct
operation
railroad
undertaken
body
legally
immune
liability
directly
resulting
operations
inimical
purposes
regulation
state
must
put
option
either
foregoing
participation
conduct
consenting
legal
responsibility
injury
caused
thereby
id
opinion
white
joined
douglas
harlan
stewart
majority
seeking
justify
overruling
clear
precedent
describes
parden
holding
constitutional
anomaly
broke
sharply
prior
cases
fundamentally
incompatible
later
ones
narrowed
every
subsequent
opinion
ante
parden
none
things
far
anomalous
parden
holding
finds
support
reason
precedent
state
engages
ordinary
commercial
ventures
acts
like
private
person
outside
area
core
responsibilities
way
unlikely
prove
essential
fulfillment
basic
governmental
obligation
congress
decides
regulate
state
commercial
activities
rather
exempt
state
likely
believes
exemption
treating
state
differently
identically
situated
private
persons
threaten
objectives
federal
regulatory
program
aimed
primarily
private
conduct
compare
supp
iii
exempting
state
companies
regulations
covering
federal
bank
holding
companies
exempting
securities
federal
securities
laws
exempting
definition
employer
subject
federal
occupational
safety
health
laws
subjecting
federal
bankruptcy
judgments
subjecting
suit
violation
lanham
act
subjecting
suit
copyright
infringement
subjecting
suit
patent
infringement
congress
includes
state
within
substantive
regulatory
rules
also
expressly
within
related
system
private
remedies
likely
believes
remedial
exemption
similarly
threaten
program
see
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
ed
expense
bd
college
savings
bank
ante
stevens
dissenting
thereby
avoids
enforcement
gap
allied
pressures
competitive
marketplace
place
state
regulated
private
competitors
significant
disadvantage
considerations
make
congress
need
possess
power
condition
entry
market
upon
waiver
sovereign
immunity
necessary
proper
exercise
commerce
power
unusually
strong
deny
congress
power
deny
congress
power
effectively
regulate
private
conduct
cf
california
taylor
time
make
state
need
exercise
sovereign
immunity
unusually
weak
state
unlikely
supply
private
firms
already
supply
may
fairly
demand
special
treatment
even
protect
public
purse
neither
one
easily
imagine
constitution
founders
thought
assertion
sovereign
immunity
special
context
considerations
differing
kind
degree
support
general
congressional
abrogation
power
indicate
parden
holding
sound
irrespective
decisions
seminole
tribe
florida
alden
maine
ante
neither
parden
break
sharply
prior
cases
parden
cited
authority
found
related
waivers
least
roughly
comparable
circumstances
california
example
held
state
engaging
interstate
commerce
rail
subjected
commerce
power
id
amounted
waiver
different
though
related
substantive
immunity
see
also
taylor
supra
parden
also
relied
authority
holding
seeking
necessary
congressional
approval
interstate
compact
venturing
federal
realm
assume
waiver
sovereign
immunity
conditions
attached
quoting
petty
bridge
earlier
case
law
found
waiver
sovereign
immunity
state
decision
bring
creditor
claim
bankruptcy
see
gardner
new
jersey
later
case
law
suggesting
waiver
may
found
state
acceptance
federal
grant
see
atascadero
state
hospital
scanlon
supports
parden
conclusion
sharp
break
majority
one
answer
question
believes
case
law
requires
waiver
express
unequivocal
ante
cases
referred
show
majority
tries
explain
cases
away
statement
attached
refusal
waive
cases
forgoing
federal
beneficence
involved
exclusion
state
otherwise
lawful
activity
ante
statement
explain
away
difference
simply
difference
demands
explanation
statement
appeal
intuition
namely
somehow
easier
state
hence
voluntary
forgo
federal
beneficence
refrain
otherwise
lawful
activity
somehow
compelling
oppressive
congress
forbid
state
perform
otherwise
lawful
act
withhold
beneficence
force
intuition
depends
upon
example
one
chooses
illustration
realistic
examples
suggest
intuition
sound
present
context
given
amount
money
stake
may
harder
easier
state
refuse
highway
funds
refrain
entering
investment
services
business
see
dept
commerce
bureau
census
federal
aid
fiscal
year
apr
federal
government
provided
billion
highways
compelling
oppressive
congress
threaten
withhold
state
funds
needed
educate
children
threaten
subject
suit
competes
directly
private
investment
company
see
id
federal
government
provided
billion
education
distinction
majority
seeks
make
drawn
terms
gifts
entitlements
exist
majority
also
wrong
say
narrowed
parden
subsequent
opinion
ante
least
way
relevant
today
decision
parden
considered
two
separate
issues
congress
power
require
state
waive
immunity
clearly
must
congress
speak
narrowed
parden
respect
second
issue
first
today
concerned
first
employees
dept
public
health
welfare
mo
department
public
health
welfare
example
discussed
whether
congress
lift
ed
sovereign
immunity
whether
done
id
congress
lift
sovereign
immunity
emphasis
added
employees
limitation
parden
area
private
persons
corporations
normally
ran
enterprise
took
place
context
clarity
power
specifying
congress
act
outside
limited
area
emphasis
added
although
two
justices
limited
parden
holding
respect
power
limitation
simply
required
congress
give
advance
notice
consequence
loss
sovereign
immunity
noted
happened
parden
marshall
concurring
result
remaining
cases
majority
mentions
offer
greater
support
one
said
assume
without
deciding
intimating
view
question
authority
congress
subject
unconsenting
suit
federal
confined
fourteenth
amendment
welch
texas
dept
highways
public
two
others
also
considered
legislative
clarity
power
atascadero
state
hospital
supra
rehabilitation
act
falls
far
short
clearly
indicating
waiver
state
accepting
funds
act
edelman
jordan
social
security
act
even
seminole
tribe
carefully
avoided
calling
parden
question
specifying
congress
exercise
article
powers
abrogate
unilaterally
immunity
suit
left
open
scope
term
unilaterally
referring
parden
without
criticism
standing
unremarkable
completely
unrelated
proposition
may
waive
sovereign
immunity
short
except
today
majority
member
ever
questioned
holding
parden
today
discards
find
merit
attempting
salvage
remnant
ante
parden
never
questioned
seminole
tribe
still
makes
sense
line
today
rejects
drawn
place
outside
ordinary
dormant
commerce
clause
rules
act
market
participants
white
massachusetts
council
constr
employers
reeves
stake
hughes
alexandria
scrap
congress
drawn
line
related
context
foreign
state
sovereign
immunity
congress
followed
modern
trend
spread
rapidly
second
world
war
regarding
foreign
state
sovereign
immunity
restatement
third
foreign
relations
law
ch
introductory
note
recognizing
immunity
gave
unfair
advantage
competition
private
commercial
enterprise
see
also
report
international
law
commission
work
session
art
nations
doc
state
engages
commercial
contract
foreign
person
state
considered
consented
exercise
foreign
jurisdiction
proceeding
arising
contract
indeed
given
widely
accepted
view
among
modern
nations
state
engages
ordinary
commercial
activity
sovereign
immunity
significant
role
play
today
holding
parden
creates
legal
anomaly
ii
resist
strongly
extension
seminole
tribe
case
although
accept
seminole
tribe
sovereign
immunity
decisions
yet
ready
adhere
proposition
law
set
forth
seminole
tribe
cf
eeoc
wyoming
stevens
concurring
view
congress
possess
authority
abrogate
state
sovereign
immunity
necessary
proper
exercise
article
power
reasons
include
justices
stevens
souter
already
described
detail
neither
constitutional
text
surrounding
debates
support
seminole
tribe
view
congress
lacks
article
power
abrogate
state
sovereign
immunity
federal
question
cases
unlike
diversity
cases
seminole
tribe
nn
stevens
dissenting
id
souter
dissenting
compare
majority
characterization
argument
ante
precedents
offer
important
legal
support
doctrine
sovereign
immunity
help
seminole
tribe
majority
focus
upon
critically
different
question
namely
whether
courts
acting
without
legislative
support
abrogate
state
sovereign
immunity
whether
congress
acting
legislatively
see
principality
monaco
mississippi
hans
louisiana
chisholm
georgia
dall
iredell
dissenting
seminole
tribe
supra
souter
dissenting
federal
legislation
purporting
pierce
state
immunity
issue
fairly
said
hans
held
state
sovereign
immunity
attained
constitutional
status
immunizing
abrogation
sovereign
immunity
doctrine
new
american
nation
received
doctrines
selectively
accepting
abandoning
others
frequently
modifying
accepted
light
new
nation
special
needs
circumstances
seminole
tribe
supra
souter
dissenting
new
nation
federalist
lodestar
dual
sovereignty
state
nation
demanded
modification
traditional
immunity
doctrine
thereby
permitting
congress
narrow
abolish
state
sovereign
immunity
necessary
dual
sovereignty
undercuts
doctrine
traditional
logical
practical
justification
namely
words
justice
holmes
legal
right
authority
makes
law
right
depends
kawananakoa
polyblank
state
sued
violating
federal
law
authority
assert
immunity
state
authority
made
federal
law
point
remains
true
even
treats
sovereign
immunity
principle
natural
law
alden
maine
ante
souter
dissenting
dual
sovereignty
granting
congress
power
create
substantive
rights
bind
despite
sovereignty
must
grant
congress
subsidiary
power
create
related
private
remedies
bind
despite
sovereignty
dual
sovereignty
means
congress
may
need
lesser
power
lest
subject
federal
remedies
ignore
substantive
federal
law
binds
thereby
disabling
national
government
weakening
union
constitution
creates
cf
mcculloch
maryland
wheat
cohens
virginia
wheat
interpreting
constitution
rendering
immutable
one
doctrine
sovereign
immunity
seminole
tribe
threatens
nation
ability
enact
economic
legislation
needed
future
much
way
lochner
new
york
threatened
nation
ability
enact
social
legislation
years
ago
shall
elaborate
upon
point
similarity
lochner
lies
risk
seminole
tribe
subsequent
cases
deprive
congress
necessary
legislative
flexibility
rules
make
difficult
congress
create
example
decentralized
system
individual
private
remedies
say
private
remedial
system
needed
protect
intellectual
property
including
educational
materials
irrespective
need
importance
system
century
advanced
economy
cf
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
ed
expense
bd
college
savings
bank
ante
stevens
dissenting
illustrating
harm
rules
work
patent
system
similarly
rules
inhibit
creation
innovative
legal
regimes
say
decentralized
regulatory
systems
deliberately
take
account
local
differences
assigning
roles
powers
responsibility
federal
administrators
citizens
least
regime
must
incorporate
private
remedy
state
state
water
polluter
work
effectively
yet
ironically
congress
needs
kind
flexibility
achieve
one
federalism
basic
objectives
basic
objective
confused
details
particular
federalist
doctrine
contours
federalist
doctrine
changed
course
nation
history
thomas
jefferson
purchase
louisiana
example
reshaped
great
debate
need
broad
rather
literal
interpretation
federal
powers
civil
war
effectively
ended
claim
state
right
nullify
federal
law
second
new
deal
ultimate
judicial
ratification
showed
federal
state
legislative
authority
mutually
exclusive
civil
rights
decisions
clarified
protection
state
infringement
fourteenth
amendment
offers
basic
human
liberty
instance
content
specific
federalist
doctrines
change
reflect
nation
changing
needs
territorial
expansion
end
slavery
great
depression
desegregation
changing
doctrines
reflect
least
one
unchanging
goal
protection
liberty
federalism
helps
protect
liberty
simply
modern
sense
helping
individual
remain
free
restraints
imposed
distant
government
directly
promoting
sharing
among
citizens
governmental
decisionmaking
authority
see
constant
political
writings
fontana
transl
describing
liberty
ancients
compared
moderns
ancient
world
understood
need
divide
sovereign
power
among
nation
citizens
thereby
creating
government
exercise
power
called
free
citizens
exercised
power
divided
nation
founders
understood
wrote
constitution
divided
governmental
authority
retained
great
power
state
local
levels
foresaw
indeed
assumed
democratic
citizen
participation
government
levels
including
levels
facilitated
citizen
participation
closer
citizen
home
today
world
legislative
flexibility
necessary
protect
kind
liberty
modern
commerce
technology
upon
rests
needs
large
markets
seeks
government
large
enough
secure
trading
rules
permit
industry
compete
global
market
place
prevent
pollution
crosses
borders
assure
adequate
protection
health
safety
discouraging
regulatory
race
bottom
yet
local
control
local
decisions
remains
necessary
uniform
regulatory
decisions
example
chemical
waste
disposal
pesticides
food
labeling
directly
affect
daily
life
every
locality
may
reflect
differing
views
among
localities
relative
importance
wage
levels
environmental
preferences
underlie
local
control
take
account
concerns
help
maintain
sense
community
despite
global
forces
threaten
federalism
matters
ordinary
citizens
seeking
maintain
degree
control
sense
community
increasingly
interrelated
complex
world
courts
remain
sensitive
needs
interpret
statutes
apply
constitutional
provisions
example
dormant
commerce
clause
courts
easily
draw
proper
basic
lines
authority
proper
balance
often
highly
context
specific
judicial
rules
allocate
power
often
far
broad
legislatures
however
write
laws
specifically
embody
balance
specific
regulatory
schemes
example
draw
lines
leave
certain
local
authority
untouched
involve
local
communities
citizens
directly
grant
funds
powers
rights
privileges
depending
upon
context
congress
may
encourage
require
interaction
among
citizens
working
various
levels
government
modern
substantive
federalist
problem
demands
flexible
legislative
response
help
constitutionalize
ahistoric
view
sovereign
immunity
freezing
remedial
limitations
tends
place
state
beyond
reach
law
recognize
possibility
congress
may
achieve
objectives
ways
ex
parte
young
still
available
though
effective
damages
remedies
important
congress
might
create
federal
enforcement
bureaucracy
charged
responsibilities
congress
prefer
place
hands
private
citizens
alden
maine
ante
printz
breyer
dissenting
perhaps
congress
able
achieve
results
seeks
including
decentralization
embodying
necessary
state
waivers
federal
funding
programs
case
decisions
simply
impose
upon
congress
burden
rewriting
legislation
apparent
reason
none
alternatives
satisfactory
unfortunately
seminole
tribe
today
related
decisions
separate
one
formal
strand
federalist
skein
strand
understood
since
time
cicero
elevate
strand
level
immutable
constitutional
principle
akin
thought
james
james
madison
role
sovereign
immunity
played
helping
assure
political
independence
remain
even
joining
union
longer
holds
center
stage
see
nevada
hall
federal
ability
enforce
judgment
state
longer
major
concern
see
federalist
rossiter
ed
hamilton
without
adequate
legal
support
grounded
either
history
practical
need
contrary
making
doctrine
immune
congressional
article
modification
makes
difficult
congress
decentralize
governmental
decisionmaking
provide
individual
citizens
local
communities
variety
enforcement
powers
diminishing
congressional
flexibility
makes
somewhat
difficult
satisfy
modern
federalism
important
needs
sense
counterproductive
iii
know
whether
state
engaged
false
advertising
unfair
competition
college
savings
bank
alleges
case
dismissed
threshhold
congress
clearly
said
college
savings
bank
may
bring
lanham
act
suit
circumstances
reasons
set
forth
opinion
believe
congress
constitutional
power
provide
therefore
reverse
judgment
appeals
footnotes
see
hardin
tragedy
commons
science
response
string
cases
criticizing
narrowing
holding
parden
justice
breyer
holds
three
parden
cases
decisions
support
ed
parden
post
least
carefully
avoided
calling
question
post
perception
support
atascadero
state
hospital
scanlon
rests
upon
nothing
substantial
fact
case
suggest
ed
waiver
may
found
state
acceptance
federal
grant
post
make
suggestion
today
utterly
rejecting
parden
explain
elsewhere
detail
see
infra
conditions
attached
state
receipt
federal
funds
simply
analogous
parden
conditions
attached
state
decision
engage
otherwise
lawful
commercial
activity
justice
breyer
second
case
welch
overruled
parden
part
discuss
think
quite
impossible
believe
following
statement
opinion
questio
holding
parden
today
discards
post
assume
without
deciding
intimating
view
question
authority
congress
subject
unconsenting
suit
federal
confined
fourteenth
amendment
calling
prior
case
flatly
decided
question
need
deciding
lest
doubt
point
making
clear
intimat
view
whether
answer
given
prior
case
correct
surely
handwriting
wall
even
inept
cryptologist
recognize
spelling
caption
today
opinion
seminole
tribe
explain
elsewhere
see
infra
case
logically
practically
inconsistent
parden
even
though
expressly
overrule
justice
breyer
realizes
well
enough
else
call
overruling
case
occupies
almost
half
dissent
see
post
supremely
irrelevant
matter
us
attempt
cast
doubt
characterization
parden
groundbreaking
case
justice
breyer
points
three
earlier
decisions
allegedly
demonstrate
parden
worked
major
change
cases
however
tenuous
relation
parden
actual
holding
one
might
suspect
dissent
description
roughly
comparable
involving
quotation
marks
waivers
post
first
two
california
california
taylor
involved
neither
state
immunity
suit
waiver
entirely
different
question
whether
substantive
provisions
commerce
clause
legislation
applied
former
concerned
suit
brought
state
situation
state
sovereign
immunity
exist
see
texas
latter
expressly
acknowledged
eleventh
amendment
us
last
case
gardner
new
jersey
held
bankruptcy
entertain
trustee
objections
claim
filed
state
stands
unremarkable
proposition
state
waives
sovereign
immunity
voluntarily
invoking
jurisdiction
federal
courts
see
supra
sum
none
cases
laid
foundation
parden
whose
author
quite
correct
acknowledging
presented
question
first
impression
employees
dept
public
health
welfare
mo
department
public
health
welfare
mo
brennan
dissenting
suggestion
justice
breyer
limit
state
sovereign
immunity
state
activities
congress
limited
foreign
sovereign
immunity
accord
modern
trend
see
post
citing
foreign
sovereign
immunities
act
fsia
see
also
justice
stevens
dissent
post
proposal
ignores
fact
state
sovereign
immunity
unlike
foreign
sovereign
immunity
constitutional
doctrine
meant
immutable
congress
resistant
trends
text
eleventh
amendment
course
makes
distinction
commercial
state
activities
combine
dissent
literalistic
interpretation
amendment
affection
fsia
commercial
activities
exception
suits
except
commenced
federal
citizens
another
state
disposition
hardly
makes
sense
post
breyer
dissenting
justice
breyer
purports
accept
seminole
tribe
sovereign
immunity
decisions
post
mean
hans
rather
distorted
view
hans
prevailed
briefly
parden
seminole
tribe
parden
first
case
suggest
sovereign
immunity
announced
hans
fragile
flower
abrogated
article
suggestion
contrary
reality
hans
involved
congressional
conferral
jurisdiction
enacted
article
see
union
gas
scalia
dissenting
moreover
conferral
jurisdiction
combined
hans
substantive
claim
contracts
clause
constitution
one
think
greater
rather
lesser
abrogative
force
substantive
statute
enacted
pursuant
commerce
clause
dissent
apparently
interpose
statute
hans
expressly
purpor
pierce
state
immunity
post
quoting
seminole
tribe
souter
dissenting
opinion
hans
allude
refinement
parden
think
made
difference
clear
statement
rule
even
adumbrated
nine
years
parden
employees
supra
difficult
square
dissent
reliance
upon
distinction
present
case
involves
federal
question
therefore
explicitly
covered
eleventh
amendment
see
post
professed
fidelity
hans
whole
point
sovereign
immunity
reflected
rather
created
eleventh
amendment
transcends
narrow
text
amendment
put
differently
seminole
tribe
sovereign
immunity
decisions
dissent
pledges
allegiance
appear
include
chisholm
georgia
see
const
amdt
footnotes
see
commercial
activity
exception
foreign
sovereign
immunity
statute
provides
following
definition
commercial
activity
either
regular
course
commercial
conduct
particular
commercial
transaction
act
commercial
character
activity
shall
determined
reference
nature
course
conduct
particular
transaction
act
rather
reference
purpose
held
pennsylvania
union
gas
commerce
clause
granted
congress
power
abrogate
defense
sovereign
immunity
remain
convinced
case
correctly
decided
reasons
stated
principal
concurring
opinions