hiibel
sixth
judicial
district
nevada
humboldt
county
et
argued
march
decided
june
counsel
record
petitioners
hiibel
james
logan
nevada
public
defender
office
carson
city
nv
respondents
sixth
judicial
district
et
al
conrad
hafen
senior
deputy
attorney
general
las
vegas
nv
petitioner
hiibel
arrested
convicted
nevada
refusing
identify
police
officer
investigative
stop
involving
reported
assault
nevada
stop
identify
statute
requires
person
detained
officer
suspicious
circumstances
identify
state
intermediate
appellate
affirmed
rejecting
hiibel
argument
state
law
application
case
violated
fourth
fifth
amendments
nevada
affirmed
held
petitioner
conviction
violate
fourth
amendment
rights
fifth
amendment
prohibition
pp
state
stop
identify
statutes
often
combine
elements
traditional
vagrancy
laws
provisions
intended
regulate
police
behavior
course
investigatory
stops
vary
state
state
permit
officer
ask
require
suspect
disclose
identity
papachristou
jacksonville
invalidated
traditional
vagrancy
law
vagueness
broad
scope
imprecise
terms
recognized
similar
constitutional
limitations
brown
texas
invalidated
conviction
violating
texas
stop
identify
statute
fourth
amendment
grounds
kolender
lawson
invalidated
vagueness
grounds
california
modified
stop
identify
statute
required
suspect
give
officer
credible
reliable
identification
asked
identify
case
begins
cases
left
initial
stop
based
reasonable
suspicion
satisfying
fourth
amendment
requirements
noted
brown
hiibel
alleged
nevada
statute
unconstitutionally
vague
kolender
statute
narrower
precise
contrast
credible
reliable
identification
requirement
kolender
nevada
interpreted
instant
statute
require
suspect
disclose
name
apparently
require
produce
driver
license
document
chooses
either
state
name
communicate
officer
means
statute
satisfied
violation
occurs
pp
officer
conduct
violate
hiibel
fourth
amendment
rights
ordinarily
investigating
officer
free
ask
person
identification
without
implicating
amendment
ins
delgado
beginning
terry
ohio
recognized
officer
reasonable
suspicion
person
may
involved
criminal
activity
permits
officer
stop
person
brief
time
take
additional
steps
investigate
although
well
established
officer
may
ask
suspect
identify
terry
stop
see
hensley
open
question
whether
suspect
arrested
prosecuted
refusal
answer
see
brown
supra
view
terry
principles
permit
state
require
suspect
disclose
name
course
terry
stop
terry
supra
nevada
statute
consistent
fourth
amendment
prohibitions
unreasonable
searches
seizures
properly
balances
intrusion
individual
interests
promotion
legitimate
government
interests
see
delaware
prouse
identity
request
immediate
relation
terry
stop
purpose
rationale
practical
demands
threat
criminal
sanction
helps
ensure
request
become
legal
nullity
hand
statute
alter
nature
stop
changing
neither
duration
location
hiibel
argues
unpersuasively
statute
circumvents
requirement
allowing
officer
arrest
person
suspicious
thereby
creating
impermissible
risk
arbitrary
police
conduct
familiar
concerns
underlay
kolender
brown
papachristou
met
requirement
terry
stop
justified
inception
reasonably
related
scope
circumstances
justified
initial
stop
terry
request
case
commonsense
inquiry
effort
obtain
arrest
failure
identify
terry
stop
yielded
insufficient
evidence
stop
request
state
requirement
response
contravene
fourth
amendment
pp
hiibel
contention
conviction
violates
fifth
amendment
prohibition
fails
disclosure
name
identity
presented
reasonable
danger
incrimination
fifth
amendment
prohibits
compelled
testimony
incriminating
see
brown
walker
protects
disclosures
witness
reasonably
believes
used
criminal
prosecution
lead
evidence
might
used
kastigar
hiibel
refusal
disclose
based
articulated
real
appreciable
fear
name
used
incriminate
furnish
evidence
needed
prosecute
hoffman
appears
refused
identify
thought
name
none
officer
business
recognizes
strong
belief
disclose
identity
fifth
amendment
override
nevada
legislature
judgment
contrary
absent
reasonable
belief
disclosure
tend
incriminate
answering
request
disclose
name
likely
insignificant
incriminating
unusual
circumstances
see
baltimore
city
dept
social
servs
bouknight
case
arises
substantial
allegation
furnishing
identity
time
stop
given
police
link
chain
evidence
needed
convict
individual
separate
offense
consider
whether
fifth
amendment
privilege
applies
whether
violated
remedy
must
follow
questions
need
resolved
affirmed
kennedy
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
scalia
thomas
joined
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
breyer
filed
dissenting
opinion
souter
ginsburg
joined
larry
hiibel
petitioner
sixth
judicial
district
nevada
humboldt
county
et
al
writ
certiorari
nevada
june
justice
kennedy
delivered
opinion
petitioner
arrested
convicted
refusing
identify
stop
allowed
terry
ohio
challenges
conviction
fourth
fifth
amendments
constitution
applicable
fourteenth
amendment
sheriff
department
humboldt
county
nevada
received
afternoon
telephone
call
reporting
assault
caller
reported
seeing
man
assault
woman
red
silver
gmc
truck
grass
valley
road
deputy
sheriff
lee
dove
dispatched
investigate
officer
arrived
scene
found
truck
parked
side
road
man
standing
truck
young
woman
sitting
inside
officer
observed
skid
marks
gravel
behind
vehicle
leading
believe
come
sudden
stop
officer
approached
man
explained
investigating
report
fight
man
appeared
intoxicated
officer
asked
identification
understand
request
produce
driver
license
form
written
identification
man
refused
asked
officer
wanted
see
identification
officer
responded
conducting
investigation
needed
see
identification
unidentified
man
became
agitated
insisted
done
nothing
wrong
officer
explained
wanted
find
man
continued
refusals
comply
officer
request
identification
man
began
taunt
officer
placing
hands
behind
back
telling
officer
arrest
take
jail
routine
kept
several
minutes
officer
asked
identification
times
refused
time
warning
man
arrested
continued
refuse
comply
officer
placed
arrest
know
man
arrested
grass
valley
road
larry
dudley
hiibel
hiibel
charged
willfully
resist
ing
delay
ing
obstruct
ing
public
officer
discharging
attempting
discharge
legal
duty
office
violation
rev
stat
nrs
government
reasoned
hiibel
obstructed
officer
carrying
duties
nevada
statute
defines
legal
rights
duties
police
officer
context
investigative
stop
section
provides
relevant
part
peace
officer
may
detain
person
officer
encounters
circumstances
reasonably
indicate
person
committed
committing
commit
crime
officer
may
detain
person
pursuant
section
ascertain
identity
suspicious
circumstances
surrounding
presence
abroad
person
detained
shall
identify
may
compelled
answer
inquiry
peace
officer
hiibel
tried
justice
union
township
agreed
hiibel
refusal
identify
required
obstructed
delayed
dove
public
officer
attempting
discharge
duty
violation
app
hiibel
convicted
fined
sixth
judicial
district
affirmed
rejecting
hiibel
argument
application
case
violated
fourth
fifth
amendments
review
nevada
rejected
fourth
amendment
challenge
divided
opinion
hiibel
petitioned
rehearing
seeking
explicit
resolution
fifth
amendment
challenge
petition
denied
without
opinion
granted
certiorari
ii
nrs
enactment
sometimes
referred
stop
identify
statute
see
code
west
ark
code
ann
rev
stat
del
code
tit
stat
code
ann
comp
ch
stat
ann
la
code
crim
proc
art
west
mo
rev
stat
mont
code
ann
neb
rev
stat
rev
stat
ann
lexis
stat
ann
crim
proc
law
west
cent
code
laws
utah
code
ann
stat
tit
supp
stat
see
also
note
stop
identify
statutes
new
form
inadequate
solution
old
problem
rutgers
note
statutes
kolender
lawson
exploring
fourth
fifth
amendment
issues
iowa
rev
stop
identify
statutes
often
combine
elements
traditional
vagrancy
laws
provisions
intended
regulate
police
behavior
course
investigatory
stops
statutes
vary
state
state
permit
officer
ask
require
suspect
disclose
identity
model
statutes
uniform
arrest
act
model
code
permits
officer
stop
person
reasonably
suspected
committing
crime
demand
name
address
business
abroad
whither
going
warner
uniform
arrest
act
rev
statutes
based
text
proposed
american
law
institute
part
institute
model
penal
code
see
ali
model
penal
code
comment
pp
provision
originally
designated
provides
person
loitering
circumstances
justify
suspicion
may
engaged
engage
crime
commits
violation
refuses
request
peace
officer
identify
give
reasonably
credible
account
lawfulness
conduct
purposes
tentative
draft
suspect
refusal
identify
misdemeanor
offense
civil
violation
others
factor
considered
whether
suspect
violated
loitering
laws
suspect
may
decline
identify
without
penalty
stop
identify
statutes
roots
early
english
vagrancy
laws
required
suspected
vagrants
face
arrest
unless
gave
good
account
geo
ch
power
reflected
rights
private
persons
arrest
suspicious
detain
till
give
good
account
hawkins
pleas
crown
ch
ed
recent
decades
found
constitutional
infirmity
traditional
vagrancy
laws
papachristou
jacksonville
held
traditional
vagrancy
law
void
vagueness
broad
scope
imprecise
terms
denied
proper
notice
potential
offenders
permitted
police
officers
exercise
unfettered
discretion
enforcement
law
see
recognized
similar
constitutional
limitations
scope
operation
stop
identify
statutes
brown
texas
invalidated
conviction
violating
texas
stop
identify
statute
fourth
amendment
grounds
ruled
initial
stop
based
specific
objective
facts
establishing
reasonable
suspicion
believe
suspect
involved
criminal
activity
see
absent
factual
basis
detaining
defendant
held
risk
arbitrary
abusive
police
practices
great
stop
impermissible
four
terms
later
invalidated
modified
stop
identify
statute
vagueness
grounds
see
kolender
lawson
california
law
kolender
required
suspect
give
officer
identification
asked
identify
held
statute
void
provided
standard
determining
suspect
must
comply
resulting
unrestrained
power
arrest
charge
persons
violation
quoting
lewis
new
orleans
powell
concurring
result
present
case
begins
prior
cases
left
question
initial
stop
based
reasonable
suspicion
satisfying
fourth
amendment
requirements
noted
brown
petitioner
alleged
statute
unconstitutionally
vague
kolender
nevada
statute
narrower
precise
statute
kolender
interpreted
require
suspect
give
officer
credible
reliable
identification
contrast
nevada
interpreted
nrs
require
suspect
disclose
name
see
opinion
young
suspect
required
provide
private
details
background
merely
state
name
officer
reasonable
suspicion
exists
understand
statute
require
suspect
give
officer
driver
license
document
provided
suspect
either
name
communicates
officer
means
choice
assume
suspect
may
make
statute
satisfied
violation
occurs
see
iii
hiibel
argues
conviction
stand
officer
conduct
violated
fourth
amendment
rights
disagree
asking
questions
essential
part
police
investigations
ordinary
course
police
officer
free
ask
person
identification
without
implicating
fourth
amendment
nterrogation
relating
one
identity
request
identification
police
constitute
fourth
amendment
seizure
ins
delgado
beginning
terry
ohio
recognized
law
enforcement
officer
reasonable
suspicion
person
may
involved
criminal
activity
permits
officer
stop
person
brief
time
take
additional
steps
investigate
delgado
supra
ensure
resulting
seizure
constitutionally
reasonable
terry
stop
must
limited
officer
action
must
inception
reasonably
related
scope
circumstances
justified
interference
first
place
sharpe
quoting
terry
supra
example
seizure
continue
excessive
period
time
see
place
resemble
traditional
arrest
see
dunaway
new
york
decisions
make
clear
questions
concerning
suspect
identity
routine
accepted
part
many
terry
stops
see
hensley
ability
briefly
stop
suspect
ask
questions
check
identification
absence
probable
cause
promotes
strong
government
interest
solving
crimes
bringing
offenders
justice
hayes
florida
articulable
facts
supporting
reasonable
suspicion
person
committed
criminal
offense
person
may
stopped
order
identify
question
briefly
detain
briefly
attempting
obtain
additional
information
adams
williams
brief
stop
suspicious
individual
order
determine
identity
maintain
status
quo
momentarily
obtaining
information
may
reasonable
light
facts
known
officer
time
obtaining
suspect
name
course
terry
stop
serves
important
government
interests
knowledge
identity
may
inform
officer
suspect
wanted
another
offense
record
violence
mental
disorder
hand
knowing
identity
may
help
clear
suspect
allow
police
concentrate
efforts
elsewhere
identity
may
prove
particularly
important
cases
police
investigating
appears
domestic
assault
officers
called
investigate
domestic
disputes
need
know
dealing
order
assess
situation
threat
safety
possible
danger
potential
victim
although
well
established
officer
may
ask
suspect
identify
course
terry
stop
open
question
whether
suspect
arrested
prosecuted
refusal
answer
see
brown
decision
holding
routine
traffic
stop
custodial
stop
requiring
protections
miranda
arizona
course
explaining
terry
stops
subject
miranda
suggested
reasons
terry
stops
nonthreatening
character
among
fact
suspect
detained
terry
stop
obliged
respond
questions
see
berkemer
supra
according
petitioner
statements
establish
right
refuse
answer
questions
terry
stop
read
statements
controlling
passages
recognize
fourth
amendment
impose
obligations
citizen
instead
provides
rights
government
result
fourth
amendment
require
suspect
answer
questions
case
concerns
different
issue
however
source
legal
obligation
arises
nevada
state
law
fourth
amendment
statutory
obligation
go
beyond
answering
officer
request
disclose
name
see
nrs
person
detained
shall
identify
may
compelled
answer
inquiry
peace
officer
result
view
dicta
berkemer
justice
white
concurrence
terry
answering
question
whether
state
compel
suspect
disclose
name
terry
stop
principles
terry
permit
state
require
suspect
disclose
name
course
terry
stop
reasonableness
seizure
fourth
amendment
determined
balancing
intrusion
individual
fourth
amendment
interests
promotion
legitimate
government
interests
delaware
prouse
nevada
statute
satisfies
standard
request
identity
immediate
relation
purpose
rationale
practical
demands
terry
stop
threat
criminal
sanction
helps
ensure
request
identity
become
legal
nullity
hand
nevada
statute
alter
nature
stop
change
duration
place
supra
location
dunaway
supra
state
law
requiring
suspect
disclose
name
course
valid
terry
stop
consistent
fourth
amendment
prohibitions
unreasonable
searches
seizures
petitioner
argues
nevada
statute
circumvents
probable
cause
requirement
effect
allowing
officer
arrest
person
suspicious
according
petitioner
creates
risk
arbitrary
police
conduct
fourth
amendment
permit
brief
petitioner
familiar
concerns
central
opinion
papachristou
also
decisions
limiting
operation
stop
identify
statutes
kolender
brown
petitioner
concerns
met
requirement
terry
stop
must
justified
inception
reasonably
related
scope
circumstances
justified
initial
stop
principles
officer
may
arrest
suspect
failure
identify
request
identification
reasonably
related
circumstances
justifying
stop
noted
similar
limitation
hayes
suggested
terry
may
permit
officer
determine
suspect
identity
compelling
suspect
submit
fingerprinting
reasonable
basis
believing
fingerprinting
establish
negate
suspect
connection
crime
clear
case
request
identification
reasonably
related
scope
circumstances
justified
stop
terry
supra
officer
request
commonsense
inquiry
effort
obtain
arrest
failure
identify
terry
stop
yielded
insufficient
evidence
stop
request
state
requirement
response
contravene
guarantees
fourth
amendment
iv
petitioner
contends
conviction
violates
fifth
amendment
prohibition
compelled
fifth
amendment
person
shall
compelled
criminal
case
witness
qualify
fifth
amendment
privilege
communication
must
testimonial
incriminating
compelled
see
hubbell
respondents
urge
us
hold
statements
nrs
requires
nontestimonial
outside
clause
scope
decline
resolve
case
basis
testimonial
accused
communication
must
explicitly
implicitly
relate
factual
assertion
disclose
information
doe
see
also
hubbell
stating
one
name
may
qualify
assertion
fact
relating
identity
production
identity
documents
might
meet
definition
well
noted
hubbell
acts
production
may
yield
testimony
establishing
existence
authenticity
custody
items
police
seek
even
required
actions
testimonial
however
petitioner
challenge
must
fail
case
disclosure
name
presented
reasonable
danger
incrimination
fifth
amendment
prohibits
compelled
testimony
incriminating
see
brown
walker
noting
answer
witness
directly
show
infamy
tend
disgrace
bound
answer
claim
fifth
amendment
privilege
must
establish
ground
apprehend
danger
witness
compelled
answer
danger
apprehended
must
real
appreciable
reference
ordinary
operation
law
ordinary
course
things
danger
imaginary
unsubstantial
character
reference
extraordinary
barely
possible
contingency
improbable
reasonable
man
suffer
influence
conduct
quoting
queen
boyes
best
cockburn
stated
kastigar
fifth
amendment
privilege
compulsory
protects
disclosures
witness
reasonably
believes
used
criminal
prosecution
lead
evidence
might
used
suspects
granted
immunity
prosecution
may
therefore
compelled
answer
threat
prosecution
removed
reasonable
belief
evidence
used
see
case
petitioner
refusal
disclose
name
based
articulated
real
appreciable
fear
name
used
incriminate
furnish
link
chain
evidence
needed
prosecute
hoffman
best
tell
petitioner
refused
identify
thought
name
none
officer
business
even
today
petitioner
explain
disclosure
name
used
criminal
case
recognize
petitioner
strong
belief
disclose
identity
fifth
amendment
override
nevada
legislature
judgment
contrary
absent
reasonable
belief
disclosure
tend
incriminate
narrow
scope
disclosure
requirement
also
important
one
identity
definition
unique
yet
another
sense
universal
characteristic
answering
request
disclose
name
likely
insignificant
scheme
things
incriminating
unusual
circumstances
see
baltimore
city
dept
social
servs
bouknight
suggesting
fact
state
readily
establish
may
render
testimony
regarding
existence
authenticity
insufficiently
incriminating
cf
california
byers
opinion
burger
every
criminal
case
known
must
known
arrested
tried
cf
pennsylvania
muniz
opinion
brennan
even
witnesses
plan
invoke
fifth
amendment
privilege
answer
names
called
take
stand
still
case
may
arise
substantial
allegation
furnishing
identity
time
stop
given
police
link
chain
evidence
needed
convict
individual
separate
offense
case
consider
whether
privilege
applies
fifth
amendment
violated
remedy
must
follow
need
resolve
questions
judgment
nevada
affirmed
larry
hiibel
petitioner
sixth
judicial
district
nevada
humboldt
county
et
al
writ
certiorari
nevada
june
justice
stevens
dissenting
nevada
law
issue
case
imposes
narrow
duty
speak
upon
specific
class
individuals
class
includes
persons
detained
police
officer
circumstances
reasonably
indicate
person
committed
committing
commit
crime
persons
words
targets
criminal
investigation
statute
therefore
directed
public
large
rather
highly
selective
group
inherently
suspect
criminal
activities
albertson
subversive
activities
control
nevada
law
member
targeted
class
may
compelled
answer
inquiry
except
command
identify
refusal
identify
oneself
upon
request
punishable
presumably
statute
require
detainee
answer
question
nevada
legislature
realized
fifth
amendment
prohibits
compelling
target
criminal
investigation
make
statement
judgment
broad
constitutional
right
remain
silent
derives
fifth
amendment
guarantee
person
shall
compelled
criminal
case
witness
amdt
circumscribed
suggests
admit
even
narrow
exception
defined
nevada
statute
doubt
fifth
amendment
privilege
available
outside
criminal
proceedings
serves
protect
persons
settings
freedom
action
curtailed
significant
way
compelled
incriminate
miranda
arizona
settled
principle
police
right
request
citizens
answer
voluntarily
questions
concerning
unsolved
crimes
right
compel
answer
davis
mississipi
protections
fifth
amendment
directed
squarely
toward
focus
government
investigative
prosecutorial
powers
criminal
trial
indicted
defendant
unqualified
right
refuse
testify
may
punished
invoking
right
see
carter
kentucky
unindicted
target
grand
jury
investigation
enjoys
constitutional
protection
even
served
subpoena
see
chavez
martinez
arrested
suspect
custodial
interrogation
police
station
miranda
reason
subject
police
interrogation
based
mere
suspicion
rather
probable
cause
lesser
protection
indeed
said
fifth
amendment
protections
apply
equal
force
context
terry
stops
see
terry
ohio
officer
inquiry
must
related
scope
justification
stop
initiation
berkemer
mccarty
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
typically
means
officer
may
ask
detainee
moderate
number
questions
determine
identity
try
obtain
information
confirming
dispelling
officer
suspicions
detainee
obliged
respond
ibid
see
also
terry
white
concurring
course
person
stopped
obliged
answer
answers
may
compelled
refusal
answer
furnishes
basis
arrest
although
may
alert
officer
need
continued
observation
given
statements
effect
citizens
required
respond
police
officers
questions
terry
stop
surprise
petitioner
assumed
right
disclose
identity
correctly
observes
communication
enjoy
fifth
amendment
privilege
unless
testimonial
although
declines
resolve
question
ante
think
clear
case
concerns
testimonial
communication
recognizing
whether
communication
testimonial
sometimes
difficult
question
doe
stated
generally
information
accused
attempt
force
disclose
contents
mind
implicates
clause
citations
omitted
vast
majority
verbal
statements
thus
testimonial
extent
least
fall
within
privilege
certain
acts
physical
evidence
fall
outside
instances
afforded
fifth
amendment
tion
disclosure
question
admitted
content
rather
aspect
considered
light
precedents
compelled
statement
issue
case
clearly
testimonial
significant
communication
must
made
response
question
posed
police
officer
recently
explained
albeit
different
context
sixth
amendment
confrontation
clause
hatever
else
term
covers
applies
minimum
police
interrogations
crawford
washington
slip
surely
police
questioning
terry
stop
qualifies
interrogation
follows
responses
questions
testimonial
nature
rather
determining
whether
communication
issue
testimonial
instead
concludes
state
compel
disclosure
one
identity
incriminating
ante
cases
afforded
fifth
amendment
protection
statements
incriminating
much
broader
sense
suggests
long
settled
fifth
amendment
protection
encompasses
compelled
statements
lead
discovery
incriminating
evidence
even
though
statements
incriminating
introduced
evidence
hubbell
incriminating
meant
disclosures
used
criminal
prosecution
lead
evidence
might
used
kastigar
communications
words
furnish
link
chain
evidence
needed
prosecute
claimant
federal
crime
hoffman
thus
ompelled
testimony
communicates
information
may
incriminating
evidence
privileged
even
information
inculpatory
hubbell
citing
doe
given
proper
understanding
category
incriminating
communications
fall
within
fifth
amendment
privilege
clear
disclosure
petitioner
identity
protected
reasons
assume
disclosure
petitioner
name
used
incriminate
furnish
link
chain
evidence
needed
prosecute
ante
else
officer
ask
else
nevada
legislature
require
disclosure
circumstances
reasonably
indicate
person
committed
committing
commit
crime
correct
petitioner
refusal
cooperate
impede
police
investigation
indeed
accept
predicate
holding
statute
requires
nothing
useless
invasion
privacy
think
contrary
nevada
legislature
intended
provide
police
officers
useful
law
enforcement
tool
existence
statute
demonstrates
value
information
demands
person
identity
obviously
bears
informational
incriminating
worth
even
name
inculpatory
hubbell
name
provide
key
broad
array
information
person
particularly
hands
police
officer
access
range
law
enforcement
databases
information
turn
tremendously
useful
criminal
prosecution
therefore
quite
wrong
suggest
person
identity
provides
link
chain
incriminating
evidence
unusual
circumstances
ante
officer
case
told
petitioner
words
conducting
investigation
needed
see
identification
ante
target
investigation
petitioner
view
acted
well
within
rights
opted
stand
mute
accordingly
respectfully
dissent
larry
hiibel
petitioner
sixth
judicial
district
nevada
humboldt
county
et
al
writ
certiorari
nevada
june
justice
breyer
justice
souter
justice
ginsburg
join
dissenting
notwithstanding
vagrancy
statutes
majority
refers
see
ante
fourth
amendment
precedents
make
clear
police
may
conduct
terry
stop
within
circumscribed
limits
one
limits
invalidates
laws
compel
responses
police
questioning
terry
ohio
considered
whether
police
absence
probable
cause
stop
question
frisk
individual
recognized
fourth
amendment
protects
every
individual
possession
control
person
quoting
union
pacific
botsford
time
recognized
certain
circumstances
public
safety
might
require
limited
seizure
stop
individual
consequently
set
forth
conditions
circumscribing
police
might
conduct
terry
stop
include
become
known
reasonable
suspicion
standard
justice
white
separate
concurring
opinion
set
forth
conditions
justice
white
wrote
course
person
stopped
obliged
answer
answers
may
compelled
refusal
answer
furnishes
basis
arrest
although
may
alert
officer
need
continued
observation
years
later
brown
texas
held
police
lacked
reasonable
suspicion
detain
particular
petitioner
require
identify
noted
trial
judge
asked
following
sure
officers
conducting
terry
stop
ask
everything
possibly
find
asking
state
interest
putting
man
jail
want
answer
appendix
opinion
emphasis
original
referred
justice
white
terry
concurrence
said
need
decide
matter
ibid
five
years
later
wrote
officer
may
ask
terry
detainee
moderate
number
questions
determine
identity
try
obtain
information
confirming
dispelling
officer
suspicions
detainee
obliged
respond
berkemer
mccarty
emphasis
added
see
also
kolender
lawson
brennan
concurring
terry
suspect
must
free
decline
answer
questions
put
illinois
wardlow
stating
ing
officers
stop
question
fleeing
person
quite
consistent
individual
right
go
business
stay
put
remain
silent
face
police
questioning
lengthy
history
concurring
opinions
references
clear
explicit
statements
means
statement
berkemer
technically
dicta
kind
strong
dicta
legal
community
typically
takes
statement
law
law
remained
undisturbed
years
good
reason
reject
statement
law
sound
reasons
rooted
fifth
amendment
considerations
adhering
fourth
amendment
legal
condition
circumscribing
police
authority
stop
individual
see
ante
stevens
dissenting
administrative
considerations
also
militate
change
state
addition
requiring
stopped
individual
answer
name
also
require
answer
license
number
live
police
officer
must
know
make
terry
stop
keep
track
constitutional
answers
answers
questions
may
may
incriminate
depending
upon
circumstances
indeed
majority
points
name
even
killer
bill
rough
harry
sometimes
provide
police
link
chain
evidence
needed
convict
individual
separate
offense
ante
majority
reserves
judgment
whether
compulsion
permissible
instances
ante
police
officer
midst
terry
stop
distinguish
majority
ordinary
case
special
case
majority
reserves
judgment
majority
presents
evidence
rule
enunciated
justice
white
berkemer
nearly
generation
set
forth
settled
stop
condition
significantly
interfered
law
enforcement
majority
presented
convincing
justification
change
begin
erode
clear
rule
special
exceptions
consequently
dissent
footnotes
rev
stat
case
petitioner
charged
violating
makes
crime
willfully
resis
dela
obstruc
public
officer
discharging
attempting
discharge
legal
duty
office
violation
provision
misdemeanor
unless
dangerous
weapon
involved
fifth
amendment
protection
compelled
applies
fourteenth
amendment
due
process
clause
see
malloy
hogan
suspect
may
made
example
provide
blood
sample
schmerber
california
voice
exemplar
dionisio
handwriting
sample
gilbert
california
see
pennsylvania
muniz
respondent
answer
birthday
question
protected
content
truthful
answer
supported
inference
mental
faculties
impaired
doe
content
must
testimonial
significance
fisher
owever
incriminating
contents
accountant
workpapers
might
act
producing
thing
taxpayer
compelled
involve
testimonial
gilbert
deserves
emphasis
case
presents
question
admissibility
evidence
anything
wade
said
lineup
implicates
privilege
rev
stat
suggests
furnishing
identification
also
allows
investigating
officer
assess
threat
others
see
ante
extent
officer
public
safety
immediately
issue
concern
sufficiently
alleviated
officer
ability
perform
limited
patdown
search
weapons
see
terry
ohio