beckles
argued
november
decided
march
petitioner
beckles
convicted
possession
firearm
convicted
felon
presentence
investigation
report
concluded
eligible
sentencing
enhancement
career
offender
sentencing
guideline
offense
qualified
crime
violence
residual
clause
district
sentenced
petitioner
career
offender
eleventh
circuit
affirmed
petitioner
filed
postconviction
motion
vacate
sentence
arguing
offense
crime
violence
district
denied
motion
eleventh
circuit
affirmed
petitioner
next
filed
petition
writ
certiorari
petition
pending
held
identically
worded
residual
clause
armed
career
criminal
act
acca
unconstitutionally
vague
johnson
vacated
remanded
petitioner
case
light
johnson
remand
eleventh
circuit
affirmed
distinguishing
acca
unconstitutionally
vague
residual
clause
residual
clause
sentencing
guidelines
held
federal
sentencing
guidelines
including
residual
clause
subject
vagueness
challenges
due
process
clause
pp
due
process
clause
prohibits
government
taking
away
someone
life
liberty
property
criminal
law
vague
fails
give
ordinary
people
fair
notice
conduct
punishes
standardless
invites
arbitrary
enforcement
johnson
supra
doctrine
laws
fix
permissible
sentences
criminal
offenses
must
specify
range
available
sentences
sufficient
clarity
batchelder
johnson
held
acca
residual
clause
fixed
impermissibly
vague
way
higher
range
sentences
certain
defendants
advisory
guidelines
fix
permissible
range
sentences
merely
guide
exercise
discretion
choosing
appropriate
sentence
within
statutory
range
pp
limited
scope
doctrine
context
rooted
history
federal
sentencing
congress
long
permitted
district
courts
wide
discretion
decide
whether
offender
incarcerated
long
mistretta
yet
never
doubted
authority
judge
exercise
broad
discretion
imposing
sentence
within
statutory
range
booker
suggested
defendant
successfully
challenge
vague
sentencing
statute
conferring
discretion
select
appropriate
sentence
within
statutory
range
even
discretion
unfettered
see
batchelder
supra
pp
sentencing
reform
act
departed
regime
establishing
several
factors
guide
district
courts
exercising
sentencing
discretion
also
created
sentencing
commission
charged
establishing
federal
sentencing
guidelines
guidelines
rendered
effectively
advisory
booker
supra
guide
district
courts
exercising
discretion
constrain
discretion
accordingly
amenable
vagueness
challenges
system
unfettered
discretion
unconstitutionally
vague
difficult
see
present
system
guided
discretion
neither
implicate
twin
concerns
underlying
vagueness
doctrine
providing
notice
preventing
arbitrary
enforcement
applicable
statutory
range
establishes
permissible
bounds
sentencing
discretion
provides
notice
required
similarly
guidelines
invite
arbitrary
enforcement
within
meaning
case
law
permit
sentencing
prohibit
behavior
prescribe
sentencing
ranges
available
rather
advise
sentencing
courts
exercise
discretion
within
bounds
established
congress
pp
holding
case
render
advisory
guidelines
immune
constitutional
scrutiny
see
peugh
render
sentencing
procedure
entirely
immune
scrutiny
due
process
clause
williams
new
york
holds
sentencing
guidelines
subject
challenge
doctrine
pp
holding
cast
doubt
validity
factors
sentencing
courts
must
consider
exercising
sentencing
discretion
see
contrary
holding
however
cast
serious
doubt
factors
many
appear
least
unclear
residual
clause
rejects
government
argument
individualized
sentencing
required
factors
distinguishable
required
guidelines
far
obvious
residual
clause
implicates
twin
concerns
vagueness
factors
neither
guidelines
factors
implicate
concerns
absence
guidance
government
concedes
constitutional
pp
fed
appx
affirmed
thomas
delivered
opinion
roberts
kennedy
breyer
alito
joined
kennedy
filed
concurring
opinion
ginsburg
sotomayor
filed
opinions
concurring
judgment
kagan
took
part
consideration
decision
case
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
travis
beckles
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
eleventh
circuit
march
justice
thomas
delivered
opinion
time
petitioner
sentencing
advisory
sentencing
guidelines
included
residual
clause
defining
crime
violence
offense
involves
conduct
presents
serious
potential
risk
physical
injury
another
sentencing
commission
guidelines
manual
ussg
held
johnson
identically
worded
residual
clause
armed
career
criminal
act
acca
unconstitutionally
vague
petitioner
contends
guidelines
residual
clause
also
void
vagueness
hold
advisory
guidelines
subject
vagueness
challenges
due
process
clause
reject
petitioner
argument
petitioner
travis
beckles
convicted
possession
firearm
convicted
felon
according
presentence
investigation
report
firearm
shotgun
petitioner
therefore
eligible
sentencing
enhancement
career
offender
sentencing
guidelines
version
guidelines
effect
petitioner
provided
defendant
career
offender
defendant
least
eighteen
years
old
time
defendant
committed
instant
offense
conviction
instant
offense
conviction
felony
either
crime
violence
controlled
substance
offense
defendant
least
two
prior
felony
convictions
either
crime
violence
controlled
substance
offense
ussg
guidelines
defined
crime
violence
offense
federal
state
law
punishable
imprisonment
term
exceeding
one
year
element
use
attempted
use
threatened
use
physical
force
person
another
burglary
dwelling
arson
extortion
involves
use
explosives
otherwise
involves
conduct
presents
serious
potential
risk
physical
injury
another
emphasis
added
clause
beginning
otherwise
definition
known
residual
clause
commentary
guideline
provided
possession
shotgun
crime
violence
see
unlawfully
possessing
firearm
described
shotgun
term
means
shotgun
barrel
barrels
less
inches
length
district
agreed
petitioner
qualified
career
offender
guidelines
petitioner
years
age
time
offense
criminal
history
included
multiple
prior
felony
convictions
controlled
substance
offenses
furthermore
district
view
petitioner
conviction
qualified
crime
violence
qualified
career
offender
petitioner
guidelines
range
months
life
imprisonment
district
sentenced
petitioner
months
appeals
affirmed
petitioner
conviction
sentence
denied
certiorari
beckles
cert
denied
september
petitioner
filed
motion
vacate
sentence
arguing
conviction
unlawful
possession
firearm
crime
violence
therefore
qualify
career
offender
guidelines
district
denied
motion
appeals
affirmed
petitioner
filed
second
petition
certiorari
petition
pending
decided
johnson
holding
imposing
increased
sentence
residual
clause
acca
contained
language
guidelines
residual
clause
violate
constitution
guarantee
due
process
clause
unconstitutionally
vague
slip
subsequently
granted
petition
vacated
judgment
appeals
remanded
consideration
light
johnson
beckles
remand
petitioner
argued
enhanced
sentence
based
residual
clause
contended
unconstitutionally
vague
johnson
appeals
affirmed
noted
petitioner
sentenced
career
offender
based
acca
residual
clause
based
express
language
sentencing
guidelines
classifying
offense
violence
fed
appx
per
curiam
johnson
appeals
reasoned
says
decided
nothing
enhancements
sentencing
guidelines
guidelines
commentary
underlying
petitioner
status
ibid
appeals
denied
rehearing
en
banc
petitioner
filed
another
petition
certiorari
contending
residual
clause
void
vagueness
resolve
conflict
among
courts
appeals
question
whether
johnson
vagueness
holding
applies
residual
clause
granted
certiorari
respondent
agrees
petitioner
guidelines
subject
vagueness
challenges
appointed
adam
mortara
amicus
curiae
argue
contrary
position
ably
discharged
responsibilities
ii
held
due
process
clause
prohibits
government
taking
away
someone
life
liberty
property
criminal
law
vague
fails
give
ordinary
people
fair
notice
conduct
punishes
standardless
invites
arbitrary
enforcement
johnson
slip
citing
kolender
lawson
applying
standard
invalidated
two
kinds
criminal
laws
void
vagueness
laws
define
criminal
offenses
laws
fix
permissible
sentences
criminal
offenses
former
explained
doctrine
requires
penal
statute
define
criminal
offense
sufficient
definiteness
ordinary
people
understand
conduct
prohibited
manner
encourage
arbitrary
discriminatory
enforcement
latter
explained
statutes
fixing
sentences
johnson
supra
slip
citing
batchelder
must
specify
range
available
sentences
sufficient
clarity
see
also
evans
cf
giaccio
pennsylvania
johnson
applied
vagueness
rule
statute
fixing
permissible
sentences
acca
residual
clause
applicable
required
sentencing
courts
increase
defendant
prison
term
statutory
maximum
years
minimum
years
requirement
thus
fixed
impermissibly
vague
way
higher
range
sentences
certain
defendants
see
alleyne
describing
legally
prescribed
range
available
sentences
penalty
fixed
crime
unlike
acca
however
advisory
guidelines
fix
permissible
range
sentences
contrary
merely
guide
exercise
discretion
choosing
appropriate
sentence
within
statutory
range
accordingly
guidelines
subject
vagueness
challenge
due
process
clause
residual
clause
therefore
void
vagueness
limited
scope
doctrine
context
rooted
history
federal
sentencing
instead
enacting
specific
sentences
particular
federal
crimes
congress
historically
permitted
district
courts
wide
discretion
decide
whether
offender
incarcerated
long
mistretta
crimes
congress
set
forth
range
sentences
sentencing
courts
almost
unfettered
discretion
select
actual
length
defendant
sentence
within
customarily
wide
range
congress
enacted
see
also
apprendi
new
jersey
williams
new
york
discretion
allowed
district
courts
craft
individualized
sentences
taking
account
facts
crime
history
defendant
result
erious
disparities
sentences
common
mistretta
supra
yet
long
history
discretionary
sentencing
never
doubted
authority
judge
exercise
broad
discretion
imposing
sentence
within
statutory
range
booker
see
also
apprendi
supra
othing
history
suggests
impermissible
judges
exercise
discretion
imposing
judgment
within
range
prescribed
statute
giaccio
supra
intend
cast
doubt
whatever
constitutionality
settled
practice
many
leave
juries
finding
defendants
guilty
crime
power
fix
punishment
within
legally
prescribed
limits
specifically
cases
never
suggested
defendant
successfully
challenge
vague
sentencing
statute
conferring
discretion
select
appropriate
sentence
within
statutory
range
even
discretion
unfettered
fact
reasoning
batchelder
suggests
opposite
considered
case
constitutionality
two
overlapping
criminal
provisions
authorized
different
maximum
penalties
conduct
held
sentencing
provisions
void
vagueness
specified
penalties
available
defined
punishment
authorized
upon
conviction
crime
although
statutes
create
uncertainty
crime
may
charged
therefore
penalties
may
imposed
id
greater
extent
single
statute
authorizing
various
alternative
punishments
ibid
emphasis
added
specifying
range
penalties
prosecutors
judges
may
seek
impose
congress
fulfilled
duty
citing
evans
supra
emphasis
added
indeed
party
case
suggests
system
purely
discretionary
sentencing
subject
vagueness
challenge
sentencing
reform
act
departed
regime
establishing
several
factors
guide
district
courts
exercising
traditional
sentencing
discretion
congress
act
created
sentencing
commission
charged
establishing
guidelines
used
sentencing
tretta
supra
result
commission
work
federal
sentencing
guidelines
one
sentencing
factors
act
requires
courts
consider
guidelines
initially
binding
district
courts
booker
booker
rendered
effectively
advisory
although
guidelines
remain
starting
point
initial
benchmark
sentencing
sentencing
may
longer
rely
exclusively
guidelines
range
rather
must
make
individualized
assessment
based
facts
presented
statutory
factors
gall
guidelines
thus
continue
guide
district
courts
exercising
discretion
serving
framework
sentencing
peugh
slip
constrain
th
discretion
thomas
dissenting
slip
merely
guide
district
courts
discretion
guidelines
amenable
vagueness
challenge
discussed
system
purely
discretionary
sentencing
predated
guidelines
constitutionally
permissible
system
unfettered
discretion
unconstitutionally
vague
difficult
see
present
system
guided
discretion
advisory
guidelines
also
implicate
twin
concerns
underlying
vagueness
doctrine
providing
notice
preventing
arbitrary
enforcement
notice
even
perfectly
clear
guidelines
provide
notice
person
seeks
regulate
conduct
avoid
particular
penalties
within
statutory
range
see
grayned
city
rockford
even
person
behaves
avoid
enhanced
sentence
guideline
sentencing
retains
discretion
impose
enhanced
sentence
see
pepper
ur
decisions
make
clear
district
may
appropriate
cases
impose
sentence
based
disagreement
commission
views
held
irizarry
due
process
concerns
require
notice
world
mandatory
guidelines
longer
apply
see
expectation
subject
due
process
protection
criminal
defendant
receive
sentence
within
presumptively
applicable
guidelines
range
survive
decision
booker
invalidated
mandatory
features
guidelines
notice
required
provided
applicable
statutory
range
establishes
permissible
bounds
sentencing
discretion
advisory
guidelines
also
implicate
vagueness
doctrine
concern
arbitrary
enforcement
laws
regulate
persons
entities
explained
must
sufficiently
clear
enforcing
law
act
arbitrary
discriminatory
way
fcc
fox
television
stations
see
also
grayned
supra
vague
law
impermissibly
delegates
basic
policy
matters
judges
resolution
ad
hoc
subjective
basis
unconstitutionally
vague
law
invites
arbitrary
enforcement
sense
leaves
judges
jurors
free
decide
without
legally
fixed
standards
prohibited
particular
case
giaccio
permits
prescribe
sentences
sentencing
range
available
cf
alleyne
slip
legally
prescribed
range
penalty
affixed
crime
guidelines
however
regulate
public
prohibiting
conduct
establishing
minimum
maximum
penalties
crime
mistretta
sentencing
guidelines
bind
regulate
primary
conduct
public
rather
guidelines
advise
sentencing
courts
exercise
discretion
within
bounds
established
congress
case
example
district
enforce
guideline
petitioner
enforced
prohibition
possession
firearm
felon
prohibited
petitioner
conduct
mandate
sentence
years
life
imprisonment
fixed
permissible
range
petitioner
sentence
relied
guideline
merely
advice
exercising
discretion
choose
sentence
within
statutory
limits
justice
sotomayor
concurrence
suggests
judges
interpreting
vague
sentencing
guideline
might
rely
statistical
analysis
gut
instinct
judge
feelings
decide
whether
defendant
conviction
crime
violence
post
opinion
concurring
judgment
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
judge
granted
unfettered
discretion
use
approaches
determining
defendant
sentence
indeed
concurrence
notes
federal
judges
guidelines
considered
view
proper
sentencing
policy
among
considerations
post
yet
never
suggested
unfettered
discretion
void
vagueness
accordingly
hold
advisory
sentencing
guidelines
subject
vagueness
challenge
due
process
clause
residual
clause
void
vagueness
iii
holding
today
render
advisory
guidelines
immune
constitutional
scrutiny
held
peugh
example
retrospective
increase
guidelines
range
applicable
defendant
violates
ex
post
facto
clause
slip
ex
post
facto
inquiries
analytically
distinct
see
slip
distinguishing
ex
post
facto
inquiry
sixth
amendment
inquiry
ex
post
facto
cases
focused
whether
change
law
creates
risk
higher
sentence
ibid
retroactive
change
guidelines
creates
risk
sentencing
decisions
anchored
guidelines
establish
framework
sentencing
slip
contrast
doctrine
requires
different
inquiry
question
whether
law
regulating
private
conduct
fixing
permissible
sentences
provides
notice
avoids
arbitrary
enforcement
clearly
specifying
range
penalties
available
government
rebuttal
doctrines
concerned
justice
reply
brief
ignores
contours
precedents
also
recognized
eighth
amendment
context
district
reliance
vague
sentencing
factor
capital
case
even
indirectly
taint
sentence
brief
citing
espinosa
florida
per
curiam
emphasis
added
approach
vagueness
due
process
clause
interchangeable
rationale
cases
construing
applying
eighth
amendment
maynard
cartwright
decision
espinosa
thus
inapposite
involve
advisory
sentencing
guidelines
due
process
clause
finally
holding
today
also
render
sentencing
procedure
entirely
immune
scrutiny
due
process
clause
williams
see
townsend
burke
holding
due
process
violated
relies
extensively
materially
false
evidence
impose
sentence
uncounseled
defendant
hold
advisory
sentencing
guidelines
including
residual
clause
subject
challenge
doctrine
iv
addition
directing
sentencing
courts
consider
guidelines
see
congress
directed
consider
number
factors
exercising
sentencing
discretion
see
government
concedes
american
judges
long
made
th
sorts
judgments
called
factors
schemes
never
understood
discretionary
determinations
raise
vagueness
concerns
brief
factors
like
guidelines
mandate
specific
sentences
rather
guide
exercise
district
discretion
within
applicable
statutory
range
holding
today
casts
doubt
validity
holding
guidelines
subject
vagueness
challenges
due
process
clause
however
cast
serious
doubt
validity
many
factors
appear
least
unclear
residual
clause
example
courts
must
assess
need
sentence
imposed
achieve
certain
goals
reflect
seriousness
offense
promote
respect
law
provide
punishment
offense
afford
adequate
deterrence
criminal
conduct
provide
defendant
needed
educational
vocational
training
effective
manner
petitioner
correct
residual
clause
subject
vagueness
challenge
hard
pressed
find
factors
sufficiently
definite
provide
adequate
notice
prevent
arbitrary
enforcement
government
tries
ways
arguing
individualized
sentencing
required
factors
different
kind
required
guidelines
inscrutably
vague
advisory
guideline
contends
injects
arbitrariness
sentencing
process
found
exercise
unguided
discretion
traditional
sentencing
system
reply
brief
far
obvious
residual
clause
implicates
twin
concerns
vagueness
statutory
command
sentencing
courts
impose
sentence
tailored
example
promote
respect
law
neither
guidelines
factors
implicate
concerns
absence
guidance
government
concedes
constitutional
government
also
suggests
guidelines
like
factors
require
decide
whether
facts
case
satisfy
legal
standard
order
derive
specific
numerical
range
distinguish
sentencing
factors
require
courts
thing
section
district
courts
shall
impose
sentence
sufficient
greater
necessary
comply
purposes
set
forth
fact
guidelines
generally
offer
concrete
advice
imposing
particular
sentence
make
easier
review
whether
abused
substantial
discretion
sound
reason
conclude
guidelines
sentencing
factors
amenable
vagueness
review
advisory
sentencing
guidelines
subject
due
process
vagueness
challenge
residual
clause
void
vagueness
judgment
appeals
accordingly
affirmed
ordered
justice
kagan
took
part
consideration
decision
case
kennedy
concurring
travis
beckles
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
eleventh
circuit
march
justice
kennedy
concurring
sentencing
laws
standards
continue
evolve
cases
may
arise
formulation
sentencing
provision
leads
sentence
pattern
sentencing
challenged
arbitrary
implicates
constitutional
concerns
instance
litigant
might
use
word
vague
general
sense
say
imprecise
unclear
trying
establish
sentencing
decision
flawed
something
vague
general
matter
however
necessarily
mean
vague
within
legal
meaning
term
seems
unlikely
definitional
structure
used
explain
vagueness
context
fair
warning
transgressor
preventing
arbitrary
enforcement
automatic
transference
applicable
subject
sentencing
judicial
discretion
involved
distinct
statutory
command
see
johnson
existing
principles
defining
vagueness
transported
uncritically
realm
judicial
discretion
sentencing
explication
constitutional
limitations
likely
required
considerations
inform
reading
opinion
join
ginsburg
concurring
judgment
travis
beckles
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
eleventh
circuit
march
justice
ginsburg
concurring
judgment
case
simple
solution
travis
beckles
convicted
violating
official
commentary
sentencing
guideline
expressly
designated
offense
conviction
possessing
shotgun
felon
crime
violence
see
ante
sentencing
commission
guidelines
manual
harmonious
federal
law
text
commentary
authoritative
stinson
beckles
therefore
indeed
claim
vague
applied
conduct
clearly
proscribed
also
complain
vagueness
guideline
applied
conduct
others
holder
humanitarian
law
project
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
rejecting
vagueness
challenge
terrorism
statute
accordingly
defer
encompassing
ruling
case
agreed
take
requires
one
sotomayor
concurring
judgment
travis
beckles
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
eleventh
circuit
march
justice
sotomayor
concurring
judgment
justice
ginsburg
explains
holding
today
unnecessary
see
ante
opinion
concurring
judgment
petitioner
travis
beckles
sentenced
years
prison
basis
commentary
promulgated
sentencing
commission
interpreting
sentencing
provision
identical
residual
clause
held
unconstitutionally
vague
two
years
ago
johnson
johnson
affords
beckles
relief
commentary
sentenced
unconstitutionally
vague
majority
limited
conclusion
joined
opinion
instead
majority
reaches
far
beyond
necessary
resolve
case
announces
sentencing
guidelines
whole
immune
vagueness
challenges
write
separately
explain
holding
unnecessary
also
deeply
unsound
guidelines
anchor
every
sentence
imposed
federal
district
courts
real
sense
basis
sentence
slip
quoting
peugh
slip
emphasis
deleted
due
process
clause
requires
rules
weighty
drafted
sufficient
definiteness
ordinary
people
understand
manner
encourage
arbitrary
discriminatory
enforcement
kolender
lawson
agree
majority
conclusion
contrary
respectfully
concur
judgment
due
process
clause
prohibits
government
taking
away
someone
life
liberty
property
criminal
law
vague
fails
give
ordinary
people
fair
notice
conduct
punishes
standardless
invites
arbitrary
enforcement
johnson
slip
prohibition
vagueness
criminal
proceedings
requirement
consonant
alike
ordinary
notions
fair
play
settled
rules
law
connally
general
constr
doctrine
rests
two
justifications
first
ensures
people
receive
fair
notice
prohibited
williams
second
safeguards
integrity
judicial
system
ensuring
criminal
adjudications
conducted
arbitrary
manner
terms
imprisonment
imposed
ad
hoc
subjective
basis
grayned
city
rockford
principles
apply
statutes
defining
elements
crimes
also
statutes
fixing
sentences
johnson
slip
two
terms
ago
struck
sentencing
law
armed
career
criminal
act
acca
residual
clause
unconstitutionally
vague
see
slip
spent
little
time
whether
vagueness
doctrine
applied
provisions
slip
good
reason
statute
fixing
sentence
imposes
less
deprivation
liberty
statute
defining
crime
sixth
amendment
jurisprudence
makes
plain
see
apprendi
new
jersey
instead
analyzed
residual
clause
light
ine
years
experience
trying
derive
meaning
slip
declared
experiment
failure
invoking
shapeless
provision
condemn
someone
prison
years
life
held
comport
constitution
guarantee
due
process
ibid
question
us
principles
apply
sentencing
guidelines
congress
established
sentencing
commission
order
address
undamental
widespread
dissatisfaction
regime
discretionary
sentencing
mistretta
see
sentencing
reform
act
stat
charged
commission
reducing
great
variation
among
sentences
imposed
different
judges
upon
similarly
situated
offenders
resulting
uncertainty
time
offender
spend
prison
mistretta
sentencing
guidelines
product
mandate
guidelines
establish
framework
set
inputs
specific
given
case
particular
characteristics
offense
offender
yiel
predetermined
output
range
months
within
defendant
sentenced
peugh
slip
guidelines
ensure
uniformity
sentencing
imposed
different
federal
courts
similar
criminal
conduct
proportionality
sentencing
system
imposes
appropriately
different
sentences
criminal
conduct
different
severity
rita
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
guidelines
today
play
central
role
federal
sentencing
although
longer
binding
federal
courts
see
booker
guidelines
nonetheless
provide
framework
tens
thousands
federal
sentencing
proceedings
occur
year
slip
district
must
begin
sentencing
proceedings
correctly
calculating
applicable
guidelines
range
gall
must
entertain
parties
arguments
consider
factors
set
forth
possible
grounds
deviation
guidelines
range
may
presume
range
reasonable
must
explain
deviation
range
record
must
ensure
justification
sufficiently
compelling
support
degree
variance
ibid
see
peugh
slip
district
incorrectly
calculates
guidelines
range
commits
reversible
procedural
error
see
gall
district
imposes
sentence
within
correct
guidelines
range
contrast
may
afforded
presumption
sentence
imposed
reasonable
see
rita
importance
guidelines
process
explained
last
term
makes
starting
point
federal
sentencing
proceedings
also
lodestar
slip
cases
range
set
guidelines
minimum
maximum
term
imprisonment
set
statute
specifies
number
years
defendant
spend
prison
district
courts
impose
sentence
within
guidelines
guidelines
based
government
motion
time
ibid
see
annual
report
sourcebook
federal
sentencing
statistics
ed
figure
online
http
last
visited
guidelines
ranges
change
guidelines
change
informed
error
made
applying
sentences
change
see
slip
peugh
slip
therefore
exaggeration
say
guidelines
real
sense
basis
imposed
district
slip
quoting
peugh
slip
emphasis
deleted
follows
central
role
guidelines
play
sentencing
susceptible
vagueness
challenges
due
process
clause
contrary
majority
conclusion
inscrutably
vague
guideline
implicates
concerns
animating
prohibition
vagueness
first
district
reliance
guideline
deprives
ordinary
person
fair
notice
consequences
actions
see
johnson
slip
defendant
entitled
understand
legal
rules
determine
sentence
vague
guideline
definition
impossible
understand
take
guideline
issue
explained
johnson
identically
worded
provision
acca
created
pervasive
disagreement
among
courts
imposing
sentences
nature
inquiry
required
conduct
slip
result
law
impossible
apply
consistently
ibid
quoting
chambers
alito
concurring
judgment
ordinary
person
expected
understand
consequences
shapeless
provision
second
importantly
district
reliance
vague
guideline
creates
serious
risk
arbitrary
enforcement
see
johnson
slip
set
although
guidelines
bind
district
formal
matter
functional
matter
anchor
district
discretion
appellate
review
process
peugh
slip
introduces
unacceptable
degree
arbitrariness
sentencing
proceedings
begin
applying
rule
vague
efforts
interpret
boil
guesswork
intuition
johnson
slip
one
judge
may
conduct
statistical
analysis
decide
defendant
crime
conviction
crime
violence
another
may
rely
gut
instinct
conclude
still
third
may
throw
opinions
air
frustration
give
free
rein
feelings
making
decision
derby
scalia
dissenting
denial
certiorari
importantly
decision
end
ballgame
criminal
defendant
although
may
ask
judge
vary
downward
guidelines
range
must
take
range
starting
point
request
may
ask
month
month
negotiating
baseline
control
predict
result
sentencing
proceeding
hopelessly
skewed
outset
unpredictability
arbitrariness
johnson
slip
due
process
clause
tolerate
proceeding
consider
way
example
hypothetical
version
beckles
sentencing
proceeding
commentary
played
clarifying
role
beckles
convicted
possessing
firearm
convicted
felon
violation
sentenced
months
prison
sentence
sat
bottom
end
applicable
guidelines
range
factoring
guideline
months
life
guideline
applied
beckles
guidelines
range
calculated
district
significantly
lower
months
see
beckles
civ
sd
mar
app
absent
guideline
beckles
sentenced
fewer
months
prison
district
admitted
much
explaining
guideline
applied
imprisoned
beckles
months
prison
emphasis
deleted
years
beckles
life
thus
turned
solely
whether
guideline
applied
meaningful
way
guideline
exerted
less
effect
beckles
sentence
statute
setting
minimum
maximum
terms
imprisonment
indeed
guidelines
statute
fix
ed
beckles
sentenc
every
meaningful
way
johnson
slip
nothing
substance
words
distinguishes
guidelines
kind
laws
held
susceptible
vagueness
challenges
johnson
law
guideline
alike
operate
extend
time
person
spends
prison
due
process
clause
apply
equally
ii
majority
brushes
past
logic
decision
shield
guidelines
vagueness
challenges
casts
sentencing
jurisprudence
doubt
upends
law
nearly
every
appeals
considered
none
explanations
justify
novel
sweeping
conclusion
majority
first
reasons
guidelines
susceptible
vagueness
challenges
fix
permissible
range
sentences
ante
merely
guide
district
courts
exercising
discretion
ante
embraced
formalism
majority
provides
coherent
justification
decision
indeed
refused
apply
exactly
formalistic
distinction
majority
embraces
espinosa
florida
per
curiam
held
state
capital
aggravating
factor
drafted
manner
vague
leave
sentencer
without
sufficient
guidance
determining
presence
absence
factor
violated
eighth
amendment
factor
unconstitutional
explained
notwithstanding
fact
jury
judge
instructed
factor
judge
jury
made
final
decision
sentence
defendant
death
judge
required
defer
jury
recommendation
kind
indirect
weighing
invalid
aggravating
factor
explained
creates
potential
arbitrariness
direct
weighing
invalid
aggravating
factor
effectively
rejected
argument
majority
embraces
advisory
guidelines
lack
kind
binding
legal
effect
subject
constitutional
scrutiny
doubt
advisory
sentencing
guidelines
subject
constitutional
limits
dispelled
peugh
held
guidelines
amenable
challenges
ex
post
facto
clause
see
slip
government
argued
advisory
nature
guidelines
rendered
immune
claims
slip
rejected
argument
federal
system
explained
adopts
procedural
measures
intended
make
guidelines
lodestone
sentencing
considerable
empirical
evidence
indicate
guidelines
intended
effect
slip
declined
government
invitation
limit
ex
post
facto
jurisprudence
rules
formal
matter
increase
maximum
sentence
defendant
eligible
slip
explained
rule
may
exert
legal
effect
procedural
rules
standards
appellate
review
combination
encourag
district
courts
sentence
within
guidelines
slip
true
concluded
guidelines
much
like
guideposts
enough
like
fences
ibid
instead
guidelines
fencelike
enough
lawlike
enough
shielded
constitution
reach
principle
dictate
result
case
guidelines
carry
sufficient
legal
weight
warrant
scrutiny
eighth
amendment
ex
post
facto
clause
enough
warrant
scrutiny
due
process
clause
cf
hurlburt
en
banc
see
principled
way
distinguish
peugh
doctrinal
grounds
majority
offers
convincing
answer
asserts
due
process
clause
requires
different
inquiry
provisions
ante
explain
views
relevant
constitutional
status
guidelines
considering
challenge
criminal
statute
ex
post
facto
clause
apply
different
legal
standard
considering
vagueness
challenge
statute
make
statute
less
susceptible
constitutional
challenge
one
context
opinion
peugh
particularly
difficult
majority
escape
given
ex
post
facto
clause
like
due
process
clause
prohibition
vagueness
rooted
concerns
fair
warning
fairness
plurality
opinion
slip
majority
musters
persuasive
explanation
concerns
less
force
context
one
none
majority
next
posits
courts
long
sentenced
defendants
purely
discretionary
regimes
vagueness
concern
system
like
guidelines
regime
sets
guideposts
exercise
discretion
ante
argument
fundamentally
misunderstands
problem
caused
reliance
vague
sentencing
guideline
true
enough
many
years
federal
courts
relied
system
indeterminate
sentencing
criminal
cases
mistretta
see
also
stith
cabranes
fear
judging
sentencing
guidelines
federal
courts
scheme
sentencing
judge
considers
full
range
relevant
aggravating
mitigating
facts
circumstances
well
view
proper
sentencing
policy
imposes
sentence
light
considerations
see
koon
uniform
constant
federal
judicial
tradition
sentencing
judge
consider
every
convicted
person
individual
every
case
unique
study
human
failings
sometimes
mitigate
sometimes
magnify
crime
punishment
ensue
majority
notes
party
suggests
system
purely
discretionary
sentencing
subject
vagueness
challenge
ante
majority
reasons
guidelines
limit
sentencing
judge
discretion
otherwise
enjoyed
must
therefore
also
immune
vagueness
attacks
ibid
majority
misapprehends
nature
constitutional
infirmity
occurs
sentencing
judge
relies
inscrutably
vague
guideline
defendant
sentenced
purely
discretionary
regime
face
prospect
arbitrary
enforcement
sentencing
judge
kolender
rather
faces
determination
informed
exercise
reasoned
judgment
defendant
sentenced
pursuant
impossibly
vague
guideline
contrast
put
untenable
position
lodestone
sentence
baseline
district
assess
characteristics
conduct
set
rule
impossible
understand
proceeding
antithesis
due
process
see
giaccio
pennsylvania
implicit
due
process
premise
law
must
one
carries
understandable
meaning
legal
standards
courts
must
enforce
reliance
discretion
makes
sentencing
regime
vague
reliance
impenetrable
rule
baseline
exercise
discretion
reliance
rule
kind
whether
set
statute
guideline
comport
notions
fair
play
johnson
slip
majority
ends
speculating
permitting
vagueness
attacks
guidelines
call
question
validity
many
guidelines
even
factors
congress
instructed
courts
consider
imposing
sentences
see
ante
majority
resuscitates
arguments
already
considered
dismissed
johnson
confronted
rejected
version
argument
government
contended
dozens
federal
state
criminal
laws
use
terms
like
risk
risk
risk
terms
view
indistinguishable
residual
clause
issue
case
slip
rejected
argument
explaining
rules
call
ed
application
qualitative
standard
risk
conduct
law
full
instances
man
fate
depends
estimating
rightly
matter
degree
ibid
quoting
nash
rendered
acca
residual
clause
unconstitutionally
vague
explained
required
gauging
riskiness
conduct
individual
defendant
engages
particular
occasion
required
application
ambiguous
standard
idealized
ordinary
case
crime
slip
holding
residual
clause
unconstitutionally
vague
words
cast
doubt
dozens
laws
elsewhere
code
requiring
application
general
standards
particular
conduct
true
sentencing
factors
described
majority
bear
similarity
categorical
risk
analysis
held
unconstitutionally
vague
johnson
statutes
previously
found
vague
congress
instruction
district
courts
consider
instance
nature
circumstances
offense
history
characteristics
defendant
bears
little
resemblance
statutes
requiring
subjective
determinations
whether
conduct
annoying
unjust
see
coates
cincinnati
cohen
grocery
extent
majority
concern
subjecting
sentencing
factors
due
process
clause
prohibition
vagueness
risk
demise
discretionary
sentencing
regimes
prospect
unlikely
reasons
already
explained
violates
due
process
clause
condemn
someone
prison
basis
sentencing
rule
shapeless
resist
interpretation
slip
decision
today
permits
exactly
result
respect
concur
judgment
footnotes
one
exception
relevant
instructs
sentencing
courts
consider
guidelines
ranges
effect
date
defendant
sentenced
accordingly
references
opinion
guidelines
version
compare
matchett
holding
guidelines
subject
due
process
vagueness
challenges
townsend
fed
appx
declining
follow
matchett
pawlak
holding
guidelines
subject
due
process
vagueness
challenges
hurlburt
en
banc
madrid
footnotes
beckles
protests
commentary
inconsistent
thus
inoperative
residual
clause
stricken
guideline
impermissibly
vague
brief
petitioner
see
stinson
excising
problematic
provision
first
considering
illustrative
language
second
flip
normal
order
operations
adjudicating
vagueness
challenges
brief
routinely
rejected
variety
contexts
vagueness
claims
clarifying
construction
rendered
otherwise
enigmatic
provision
clear
applied
challenger
see
bell
cone
per
curiam
capital
aggravating
factor
clarified
precedent
hoffman
estates
flipside
hoffman
estates
ordinance
clarified
licensing
guidelines
red
lion
broadcasting
fcc
federal
regulation
clarified
agency
adjudications
footnotes
evidence
us
suggests
true
guideline
issue
given
near
consensus
among
lower
courts
guideline
unconstitutionally
vague
see
infra
courts
proceeded
resentence
defendants
whose
sentences
originally
enhanced
guideline
see
app
reply
brief
resentencings
every
defendant
one
received
sentence
lower
sentence
originally
imposed
average
defendant
received
sentence
three
years
lower
original
sentence
reply
brief
decision
irizarry
contrary
irizarry
held
federal
rule
criminal
procedure
require
judge
inform
defendant
advance
sentencing
proceeding
intent
vary
guidelines
range
narrow
decision
bearing
broader
question
whether
ordinary
people
entitled
fair
notice
due
process
clause
rules
dictate
punishment
see
hurlburt
en
banc
guidelines
subject
vagueness
challenges
calabretta
sheffield
cadc
pawlak
madrid
see
matchett
adherence
formalistic
distinction
mandatory
advisory
rules
least
leaves
open
question
whether
defendants
sentenced
terms
imprisonment
decision
booker
period
guidelines
fix
permissible
range
sentences
ante
may
mount
vagueness
attacks
sentences
see
brief
scholars
criminal
law
federal
courts
sentencing
amici
curiae
question
presented
case
like
majority
take
position
appropriate
resolution
indeed
ninth
circuit
held
decades
guidelines
subject
vagueness
challenges
see
helmy
yet
government
represents
never
found
guideline
unconstitutionally
vague
see
reply
brief