gasperini
center
humanities
argued
april
decided
june
law
new
york
appellate
courts
empowered
review
size
jury
verdicts
order
new
trials
jury
award
deviates
materially
reasonable
compensation
civ
prac
law
rules
cplr
section
seventh
amendment
governs
proceedings
federal
state
right
trial
jury
shall
preserved
fact
tried
jury
shall
otherwise
according
rules
common
law
compatibility
provisions
action
based
new
york
law
tried
federal
reason
parties
diverse
citizenship
issue
confronts
case
petitioner
gasperini
journalist
occasional
photographer
loaned
original
slide
transparencies
respondent
center
humanities
inc
center
lost
transparencies
gasperini
commenced
suit
district
southern
district
new
york
invoking
diversity
jurisdiction
center
conceded
liability
trial
damages
jury
awarded
gasperini
per
transparency
asserted
industry
standard
compensation
lost
transparency
contending
inter
alia
verdict
excessive
center
moved
new
trial
district
without
comment
denied
motion
appeals
second
circuit
observing
new
york
law
governed
controversy
endeavored
apply
cplr
section
evaluate
center
contention
verdict
excessive
guided
new
york
appellate
division
decisions
reviewing
damage
awards
lost
transparencies
second
circuit
held
verdict
materially
deviates
reasonable
compensation
vacated
judgment
entered
jury
verdict
ordered
new
trial
unless
gasperini
agreed
award
held
new
york
law
controlling
compensation
awards
excessiveness
inadequacy
given
effect
without
detriment
seventh
amendment
review
standard
set
cplr
section
applied
federal
trial
judge
appellate
control
trial
ruling
confined
abuse
discretion
pp
heighten
judicial
check
size
jury
awards
new
york
codified
deviates
materially
standard
review
replacing
shock
conscience
formulation
previously
used
new
york
courts
design
operation
section
influences
outcomes
tightening
range
tolerable
awards
although
phrased
direction
new
york
intermediate
appellate
courts
section
courts
instructs
state
trial
judges
well
pp
cases
like
gasperini
new
york
law
governs
claims
relief
must
determine
whether
new
york
law
also
supplies
test
review
size
verdict
federal
diversity
jurisdiction
provides
alternative
forum
adjudication
rights
carry
generation
rules
substantive
law
doctrine
erie
tompkins
federal
courts
sitting
diversity
apply
state
substantive
law
federal
procedural
law
classification
law
substantive
procedural
erie
purposes
sometimes
challenging
endeavor
guaranty
trust
york
early
interpretation
erie
propounded
test
oes
significantly
affect
result
litigation
federal
disregard
law
state
controlling
action
upon
claim
parties
state
later
pathmarking
case
qualifying
guaranty
trust
explained
test
must
applied
mechanically
sweep
manner
variations
instead
application
must
guided
twin
aims
erie
rule
discouragement
avoidance
inequitable
administration
laws
hanna
plumer
informed
decisions
concludes
although
decisionmaking
authority
new
york
appellate
division
state
objective
manifestly
substantive
rigorous
comparative
evaluations
attend
application
section
deviates
materially
standard
common
law
shock
conscience
test
federal
courts
ignore
change
new
york
standard
persist
applying
shock
conscience
test
damage
awards
claims
governed
new
york
law
substantial
variations
state
federal
money
judgments
may
expected
see
therefore
agrees
second
circuit
new
york
check
excessive
damages
warrants
application
federal
erie
doctrine
precludes
recovery
federal
significantly
larger
recovery
tolerated
state
pp
standard
federal
appellate
review
attend
essential
characteristic
federal
system
byrd
blue
ridge
rural
elec
cooperative
seventh
amendment
governs
proceedings
federal
state
bears
allocation
trial
functions
judge
jury
issue
byrd
also
controls
allocation
authority
review
verdicts
issue
concern
keeping
historic
understanding
seventh
amendment
clause
inhibit
authority
trial
judges
grant
new
trials
reasons
new
trials
heretofore
granted
actions
law
courts
fed
rule
civ
proc
contrast
appellate
review
federal
trial
denial
motion
set
aside
jury
verdict
excessive
relatively
late
less
secure
development
review
deemed
inconsonant
seventh
amendment
clause
expressly
approved
today
see
industries
kelco
disposal
circuit
decisions
unanimously
recognize
however
appellate
review
confined
abuse
discretion
reconcilable
seventh
amendment
control
necessary
proper
fair
administration
justice
approves
line
decisions
pp
case
principal
state
federal
interests
accommodated
new
york
dominant
interest
substantive
law
guide
allowable
damages
arising
claim
relief
respected
without
disrupting
federal
system
recognized
federal
district
capable
applying
state
deviates
materially
standard
recalls
regard
deviates
materially
standard
serves
guide
applied
trial
well
appellate
courts
new
york
within
federal
system
practical
reasons
combine
seventh
amendment
constraints
lodge
district
appeals
primary
responsibility
application
section
check
district
applications
deviates
materially
standard
subject
appellate
review
standard
circuits
employ
inadequacy
excessiveness
asserted
appeal
abuse
discretion
pp
appear
district
checked
jury
verdict
relevant
new
york
decisions
accordingly
vacates
judgment
appeals
instructs
remand
case
district
trial
judge
revisiting
ruling
new
trial
motion
may
test
jury
verdict
clpr
section
deviates
materially
standard
vacated
remanded
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
kennedy
souter
breyer
joined
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
rehnquist
thomas
joined
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
end
syllabus
william
gasperini
petitioner
center
humanities
inc
gasperini
commenced
suit
district
southern
district
new
york
invoking
diversity
jurisdiction
pursuant
section
alleged
several
claims
relief
including
breach
contract
conversion
negligence
see
app
center
conceded
liability
lost
transparencies
issue
damages
tried
jury
trial
gasperini
expert
witness
testified
industry
standard
within
photographic
publishing
community
valued
lost
transparency
see
industry
standard
expert
explained
represented
average
license
fee
commercial
photograph
earn
full
course
photographer
copyright
gasperini
case
lifetime
plus
years
see
see
also
section
gasperini
estimated
earnings
photography
totaled
period
also
testified
intended
produce
book
containing
best
photographs
central
america
see
app
trial
jury
awarded
gasperini
compensatory
damages
sum
jury
foreperson
announced
slides
moving
new
trial
federal
rule
civil
procedure
center
attacked
verdict
various
grounds
including
excessiveness
without
comment
district
denied
motion
see
app
pet
cert
appeals
second
circuit
vacated
judgment
entered
jury
verdict
mindful
new
york
law
governed
controversy
appeals
endeavored
apply
cplr
section
instructs
jury
returns
itemized
verdict
jury
case
new
york
appellate
division
shall
determine
award
excessive
inadequate
deviates
materially
reasonable
compensation
second
circuit
application
section
check
size
jury
verdict
followed
circuit
precedent
elaborated
two
weeks
earlier
consorti
armstrong
world
industries
superseded
surveying
appellate
division
decisions
reviewed
damage
awards
lost
transparencies
second
circuit
concluded
testimony
industry
standard
alone
insufficient
justify
verdict
prime
among
factors
warranting
consideration
uniqueness
slides
subject
matter
photographer
earning
level
guided
appellate
division
rulings
second
circuit
held
verdict
materially
deviates
reasonable
compensation
gasperini
transparencies
second
circuit
recognized
unique
notably
capturing
combat
situations
gasperini
photographer
present
others
depicted
either
generic
scenes
events
professional
photojournalists
present
slides
merited
award
concluded
iving
gasperini
every
benefit
doubt
ibid
absent
evidence
showing
significant
earnings
photographic
endeavors
concrete
plans
publish
book
determined
damage
award
remaining
slides
excessive
remittiturs
presen
difficult
problems
appellate
courts
second
circuit
acknowledged
appeals
judges
review
evidence
cold
paper
record
ibid
nevertheless
second
circuit
set
aside
verdict
ordered
new
trial
unless
gasperini
agreed
award
case
presents
important
question
regarding
standard
federal
uses
measure
alleged
excessiveness
jury
verdict
action
damages
based
state
law
therefore
granted
certiorari
ii
standard
determining
excessiveness
appropriateness
remittitur
new
york
somewhat
ambiguous
prior
new
york
law
employed
standard
federal
courts
see
matthews
cti
container
transport
cir
authorized
remittitur
jury
verdict
excessive
shocked
conscience
state
federal
courts
trial
judges
made
excessiveness
assessment
first
instance
appellate
judges
ordinarily
deferred
trial
judgment
see
mcallister
adam
packing
app
div
dept
trial
determination
adequacy
jury
verdict
disturbed
appellate
said
trial
exercise
discretion
reasonably
grounded
martell
boardwalk
enterprises
trial
refusal
set
aside
reduce
jury
award
overturned
abuse
part
series
tort
reform
measures
new
york
codified
standard
judicial
review
size
jury
awards
placed
cplr
section
prescription
reads
reviewing
money
judgment
contended
award
excessive
inadequate
new
trial
granted
unless
stipulation
entered
different
award
appellate
division
shall
determine
award
excessive
inadequate
deviates
materially
reasonable
compensation
new
york
opinions
confirm
section
deviates
materially
standard
calls
closer
surveillance
shock
conscience
oversight
see
graziosi
app
div
dept
apparent
intent
legislation
facilitate
appellate
changes
verdicts
harvey
mazal
american
partners
instructing
appellate
division
use
setting
remittitur
deviates
materially
standard
shock
conscience
test
see
also
consorti
material
deviation
reasonableness
less
deviation
required
find
award
excessive
shock
conscience
weinstein
korn
miller
new
york
civil
practice
para
section
new
standard
reviewing
given
greater
power
review
size
jury
award
heretofore
afforded
although
phrased
direction
new
york
intermediate
appellate
courts
section
deviates
materially
standard
construed
new
york
courts
instructs
state
trial
judges
well
see
inya
ide
hyundai
app
div
dept
error
trial
apply
shock
conscience
test
motion
set
aside
damages
proper
standard
whether
award
materially
deviates
reasonable
compensation
cochetti
gralow
app
div
dept
settled
law
trial
courts
conduct
materially
deviates
inquiry
shurgan
tedesco
app
div
dept
approving
trial
application
materially
deviates
standard
see
also
lightfoot
union
carbide
supp
sdny
established
applicable
state
trial
appellate
application
section
trial
level
key
case
determine
whether
award
deviates
materially
reasonable
compensation
new
york
state
courts
look
awards
approved
similar
cases
see
leon
peppe
realty
app
div
dept
awards
line
recent
awards
sustained
appellate
courts
johnston
joyce
app
div
dept
reducing
award
maximum
amount
previously
allowed
similar
type
harm
new
york
former
shock
conscience
test
courts
also
referred
analogous
cases
see
senko
fonda
app
div
dept
deviates
materially
standard
however
design
operation
influences
outcomes
tightening
range
tolerable
awards
see
consorti
iii
parties
arguments
suggest
cplr
section
appraised
erie
tompkins
decisions
erie
path
substantive
procedural
substantive
section
deviates
materially
standard
controls
much
plaintiff
awarded
procedural
appellate
division
parallel
application
section
federal
appellate
level
sync
federal
system
division
trial
appellate
functions
allocation
weighted
seventh
amendment
dispositive
question
therefore
whether
federal
courts
give
effect
substantive
thrust
trial
decision
civil
cases
classification
law
substantive
procedural
erie
purposes
sometimes
challenging
endeavor
guaranty
trust
york
early
interpretation
erie
propounded
test
oes
significantly
affect
result
litigation
federal
disregard
law
state
controlling
action
upon
claim
parties
state
ordering
application
state
statute
limitations
equity
proceeding
federal
said
guaranty
trust
federal
exercising
jurisdiction
solely
diversity
citizenship
parties
outcome
litigation
federal
substantially
far
legal
rules
determine
outcome
litigation
tried
state
ibid
see
also
ragan
merchants
transfer
warehouse
local
law
creates
cause
action
qualifies
federal
must
follow
suit
different
measure
cause
action
one
transgress
principle
erie
later
pathmarking
case
qualifying
guaranty
trust
explained
test
must
applied
mechanically
sweep
manner
variations
instead
application
must
guided
twin
aims
erie
rule
discouragement
forumshopping
avoidance
inequitable
administration
laws
hanna
plumer
informed
decisions
address
question
whether
new
york
deviates
materially
standard
codified
cplr
section
standard
important
effect
upon
fortunes
one
litigants
failure
apply
unfairly
discriminate
citizens
forum
state
likely
cause
plaintiff
choose
federal
start
point
parties
debate
gasperini
acknowledges
statutory
cap
damages
supply
substantive
law
erie
purposes
see
reply
brief
petitioner
state
matter
substantive
law
may
among
things
eliminate
availability
damages
particular
claim
entirely
limit
factors
jury
may
consider
determining
damages
place
absolute
cap
amount
damages
available
substantive
law
applicable
federal
sitting
diversity
see
also
tr
oral
arg
consorti
although
cplr
provide
analogous
control
new
york
legislature
codified
section
new
standard
one
requires
closer
review
common
law
shock
conscience
test
see
supra
rigorous
comparative
evaluations
attend
application
section
deviates
materially
standard
see
supra
foster
predictability
legislature
required
reviewing
overturning
verdict
section
state
reasons
including
factors
considered
relevant
see
cplr
section
supra
think
fair
conclusion
cplr
maximum
amount
recoverable
set
statute
rather
determined
case
law
brief
city
new
york
amicus
curiae
sum
section
contains
procedural
instruction
see
supra
state
objective
manifestly
substantive
cf
healy
milwaukee
metropolitan
sewerage
thus
appears
federal
courts
ignore
change
new
york
standard
persist
applying
shock
conscience
test
damage
awards
claims
governed
new
york
law
substantial
variations
state
federal
money
judgments
may
expected
see
hanna
therefore
agree
second
circuit
new
york
check
excessive
damages
implicates
called
erie
twin
aims
see
supra
erie
principle
precludes
federal
giving
claim
longer
life
claim
state
ragan
erie
precludes
recovery
federal
significantly
larger
recovery
tolerated
state
essential
characteristic
described
byrd
diversity
suit
negligence
pivotal
issue
fact
tried
judge
case
state
byrd
held
despite
state
practice
plaintiff
entitled
jury
trial
federal
ruling
said
guaranty
trust
test
insufficient
guide
cases
presenting
countervailing
federal
interests
see
byrd
described
countervailing
federal
interests
present
byrd
way
federal
system
independent
system
administering
justice
litigants
properly
invoke
jurisdiction
essential
characteristic
system
manner
civil
commonlaw
actions
distributes
trial
functions
judge
jury
seventh
amendment
assigns
decisions
disputed
questions
fact
jury
ibid
omitted
suits
common
law
value
controversy
shall
exceed
twenty
dollars
right
trial
jury
shall
preserved
fact
tried
jury
shall
otherwise
according
rules
common
law
amdt
contrast
appellate
review
federal
trial
denial
motion
set
aside
jury
verdict
excessive
relatively
late
less
secure
development
review
deemed
inconsonant
seventh
amendment
clause
see
lincoln
power
williamson
osenton
see
also
moore
federal
practice
para
collecting
cases
subsequently
recognized
even
cases
erie
doctrine
arising
wholly
federal
question
settled
twice
granted
certiorari
decide
unsettled
issue
ultimately
resolved
cases
grounds
see
grunenthal
long
island
neese
southern
today
expressly
held
seventh
amendment
allows
appellate
review
district
denial
motion
set
aside
award
excessive
industries
kelco
disposal
successive
reminders
question
worthy
attention
noted
without
disapproval
courts
appeals
engage
review
district
excessiveness
determinations
applying
abuse
discretion
standard
see
grunenthal
noted
circuit
decisions
point
referred
appellate
review
role
district
determine
whether
jury
verdict
within
confines
set
state
law
determine
reference
federal
standards
developed
rule
whether
new
trial
remittitur
ordered
appeals
review
district
determination
standard
new
york
dominant
interest
respected
without
disrupting
federal
system
recognized
federal
district
capable
performing
checking
function
apply
state
deviates
materially
standard
line
new
york
case
law
evolving
cplr
section
recall
regard
deviates
materially
standard
serves
guide
applied
trial
well
appellate
courts
new
york
see
supra
within
federal
system
practical
reasons
combine
seventh
amendment
constraints
lodge
district
appeals
primary
responsibility
application
section
opportunity
consider
evidence
living
courtroom
context
taylor
washington
terminal
cadc
appellate
judges
see
cold
paper
record
district
applications
deviates
materially
standard
subject
appellate
review
standard
circuits
employ
inadequacy
excessiveness
asserted
appeal
abuse
discretion
see
wright
miller
federal
practice
procedure
section
collecting
cases
see
moore
federal
practice
para
light
erie
doctrine
federal
appeals
must
guided
standard
state
law
supplies
second
circuit
said
reverse
must
abuse
discretion
nature
problem
counsels
restraint
must
give
benefit
every
doubt
judgment
trial
judge
dagnello
iv
ordered
justice
stevens
dissenting
agree
reasoning
opinion
disagree
disposition
case
affirm
judgment
appeals
also
reject
suggestion
seventh
amendment
limits
power
federal
appellate
sitting
diversity
decide
whether
jury
award
damages
exceeds
limit
established
state
law
recognize
state
rules
appellate
procedure
necessarily
bind
federal
appellate
courts
majority
persuasively
shows
however
new
york
merely
adopted
new
procedure
allocating
decisionmaking
function
trial
appellate
courts
ante
instead
new
york
courts
held
jury
awards
reviewed
appeal
must
conform
requirement
deviat
materially
amounts
awarded
like
cases
ante
new
york
chosen
tie
damages
ceiling
awards
traditionally
recovered
similar
cases
rather
legislatively
determined
inflexible
monetary
sum
none
concern
given
nature
command
appeals
second
circuit
correctly
concluded
consorti
armstrong
world
industries
superseded
new
york
excessiveness
standard
applies
federal
diversity
cases
controlled
new
york
law
consorti
erred
basing
conclusion
part
fact
new
york
statute
requires
state
appellate
division
apply
standard
nevertheless
faithful
rules
decisions
act
construed
erie
tompkins
holding
limitation
size
judgment
ignored
similarly
appeals
correctly
followed
consorti
case
considered
whether
damages
awarded
materially
deviated
damages
awarded
similar
cases
endorse
opinions
respects
although
majority
agrees
appeals
new
york
law
establishes
size
damages
may
awarded
chooses
vacate
remand
majority
holds
federal
appeals
review
abuse
discretion
district
decision
deny
motion
new
trial
based
jury
excessive
award
result
concludes
district
given
opportunity
apply
first
instance
deviates
materially
standard
new
york
law
imposes
ante
district
opportunity
consider
propriety
jury
award
erred
appeals
corrected
error
drawing
reasonable
inferences
favor
petitioner
reason
suppose
appeals
reached
conclusion
district
permissibly
disagree
remand
require
district
repeat
task
already
reviewing
therefore
affirm
judgment
appeals
ii
early
cases
state
reexamination
clause
prohibits
appellate
review
excessive
jury
awards
foreclose
practice
altogether
see
southern
div
bennett
may
admitted
true
excess
appeared
matter
law
instance
statute
fixed
maximum
verdict
exceeded
question
might
arise
wright
miller
kane
federal
practice
procedure
section
pp
ed
indeed
last
years
consistently
reserved
question
whether
constitution
permits
review
ante
meantime
every
appeals
agreed
seventh
amendment
establishes
bar
wright
miller
section
taking
question
open
one
start
certain
basic
principles
well
settled
jury
verdicts
binding
either
trial
judges
appellate
courts
unauthorized
law
verdict
may
insupportable
matter
law
either
deficiencies
evidence
award
damages
larger
permitted
law
award
excessive
matter
diversity
case
larger
applicable
state
law
trial
judge
duty
set
aside
failure
error
law
appeals
duty
correct
appeal
principles
sufficiently
well
established
seventh
amendment
issue
arise
appellate
ordered
new
trial
jury
award
exceeded
monetary
cap
allowable
damages
new
york
chosen
define
legal
limit
less
mathematical
terms
require
different
constitutional
conclusion
new
york
limitation
requires
legal
inquiry
wholly
divorced
facts
quality
necessarily
make
question
one
factfinder
rather
reviewing
three
times
term
assigned
appellate
courts
task
independently
reviewing
similarly
mixed
questions
law
fact
see
ornelas
slip
markman
westview
instruments
slip
thompson
keohane
slip
appellate
review
proper
mixed
questions
require
courts
construe
record
inferences
favor
factfinder
decision
determine
whether
facts
found
legal
standard
met
see
ornelas
slip
quoting
swint
following
procedure
appeals
reexamine
fact
determined
jury
merely
identified
portion
judgment
constitutes
unlawful
excess
see
dimick
schiedt
even
review
appeals
implicates
reexamination
clause
according
rules
common
law
amdt
vii
common
law
trial
judge
sitting
nisi
prius
recommended
whether
judicial
panel
sitting
en
banc
westminster
accept
jury
award
en
banc
ruled
motion
new
trial
entered
judgment
wright
miller
section
petitioner
correctly
points
procedure
motions
new
trial
based
excessiveness
technically
subject
appellate
review
riddell
new
trial
common
law
yale
seems
clear
criminal
civil
cases
trial
judge
power
grant
new
trial
recourse
must
however
nisi
prius
judge
often
serve
en
banc
essentially
position
modern
appeals
considered
legality
jury
award
light
trial
judge
opinion
without
firsthand
knowledge
transpired
see
blume
review
facts
jury
seventh
amendment
jud
soc
petitioner
also
contends
common
law
en
banc
grant
new
trial
trial
judge
recommended
contention
undermined
numerous
cases
granted
new
trials
without
making
reference
trial
judge
view
damages
see
honda
motor
oberg
slip
citing
cases
moreover
early
english
cases
repeatedly
state
power
order
new
trial
jury
returned
excessive
award
rested
rather
judge
blackstone
identifies
excessive
damages
independent
basis
may
grant
new
trial
makes
mention
requirement
trial
judge
must
recommend
blackstone
commentaries
even
read
favorably
petitioner
therefore
meaningful
distinction
exists
practice
considered
new
trial
motion
first
instance
practice
challenged
appellate
reviews
district
ruling
new
trial
motion
see
riddell
yale
justice
stone
explained
dissenting
opinion
joined
chief
justice
hughes
justice
brandeis
justice
cardozo
seventh
amendment
intended
endure
unnumbered
generations
concerned
substance
form
nothing
history
language
suggest
amendment
purpose
preserve
essentials
jury
trial
known
common
law
adoption
constitution
reason
often
refused
construe
intended
perpetuate
changeless
form
minutiae
trial
practice
existed
english
courts
beginning
language
regarded
subservient
single
purpose
amendment
preserve
essentials
jury
trial
actions
law
serving
distinguish
suits
equity
admiralty
see
parsons
bedford
pet
safeguard
jury
function
encroachment
common
law
permit
thus
interpreted
seventh
amendment
guarantees
suitors
actions
law
shall
benefits
trial
issues
fact
jury
prescribe
particular
procedure
benefits
shall
obtained
forbid
curtail
function
jury
decide
questions
fact
adoption
amendment
restrict
control
jury
verdict
previously
exercised
confine
trial
judge
determining
issues
jury
particular
forms
trial
practice
vogue
dimick
schiedt
early
intricate
english
history
justify
limited
assertion
federal
appellate
courts
must
limited
particular
highly
deferential
standard
excessiveness
review
courts
hesitant
disturb
jury
awards
less
cases
reasonably
certain
measure
damages
afforded
graham
law
new
trials
cases
civil
criminal
ed
washington
damages
contract
common
law
rev
new
york
prescribed
objective
legal
limitation
damages
appellate
may
reverse
jury
damages
award
conscience
shocked
sense
justice
outraged
dagnello
long
island
cf
honda
motor
oberg
citing
english
cases
may
surely
follow
sovereign
command
jury
materially
deviated
awards
granted
juries
anything
new
york
standard
though
less
deferential
certain
iii
majority
persuasive
demonstration
new
york
law
sets
forth
substantive
limitation
size
jury
awards
seems
refute
contention
new
york
merely
asked
appellate
courts
reexamine
facts
majority
analysis
thus
seem
undermine
conclusion
reexamination
clause
relevant
case
certainly
decision
byrd
make
clause
relevant
considered
whether
seventh
amendment
first
clause
influence
decision
give
effect
rule
denying
right
jury
altogether
byrd
blue
ridge
rural
elec
cooperative
holding
way
requires
us
consult
amendment
second
clause
determine
standard
review
district
application
state
substantive
law
disagreement
tempered
however
majority
carefully
avoids
defining
strictly
abuse
discretion
standard
announces
extent
majority
relies
practical
reasons
conclusion
appeals
give
weight
district
assessment
determining
whether
state
substantive
law
properly
applied
ante
disagree
analysis
matter
federal
administration
recognized
contexts
need
according
deference
lower
resolution
legal
yet
questions
see
ornelas
slip
pierce
underwood
indeed
familiar
somewhat
circular
maxim
deems
error
law
abuse
discretion
end
therefore
disagreement
label
majority
attaches
standard
appellate
review
obscure
far
fundamental
point
agree
whatever
influence
seventh
amendment
may
said
exert
erie
requires
federal
appellate
courts
sitting
diversity
apply
damage
control
standard
state
law
supplies
ante
iv
justice
scalia
chief
justice
justice
thomas
join
dissenting
today
overrules
longstanding
line
precedent
years
prohibited
federal
appellate
courts
reviewing
refusals
district
courts
set
aside
civil
jury
awards
contrary
weight
evidence
one
reason
given
overruling
cases
courts
appeals
time
decided
ignore
unreasoned
capitulation
nullification
long
regarded
core
component
bill
seventh
amendment
prohibition
appellate
reexamination
civil
jury
wrong
us
much
less
courts
appeals
decide
seventh
amendment
restriction
review
jury
findings
outlived
usefulness
also
holds
today
state
practice
relates
division
duties
state
judges
juries
must
followed
federal
courts
diversity
cases
issue
prior
cases
directly
contrary
reverse
judgment
appeals
respectfully
dissent
amendment
congress
response
one
principal
objections
proposed
constitution
raised
ratification
debates
failure
ensure
right
trial
jury
civil
actions
federal
desire
explicit
constitutional
guarantee
reexamination
jury
findings
explained
justice
story
sitting
circuit
justice
specifically
prompted
article
iii
conferral
appellate
jurisdiction
law
fact
upon
ne
powerful
objections
urged
constitution
recounted
authority
enable
without
new
jury
whole
facts
settled
previous
jury
wonson
cas
cc
mass
second
clause
amendment
responded
concern
providing
uits
common
law
fact
tried
jury
shall
otherwise
according
rules
common
law
amdt
reexamination
clause
put
rest
apprehensions
new
trials
appellate
courts
wonson
adopting
broad
fashion
rules
common
law
govern
interference
jury
determinations
content
law
familiar
fixed
see
ibid
common
law
alluded
common
law
individual
state
probably
differs
common
law
england
grand
reservoir
jurisprudence
dimick
schiedt
seventh
amendment
effect
adopted
rules
common
law
respect
trial
jury
rules
existed
quite
plainly
barred
reviewing
courts
entertaining
claims
jury
verdict
contrary
evidence
common
law
review
judgments
writ
error
limited
questions
law
see
wonson
supra
blackstone
commentaries
laws
england
writ
error
lies
upon
matter
law
arising
upon
face
proceedings
evidence
required
substantiate
support
holdsworth
history
english
law
ed
cf
ross
rittenhouse
dall
mckean
principle
expressly
acknowledged
governing
federal
practice
parsons
bedford
pet
story
held
error
assigned
district
refusal
allow
transcription
witness
testimony
serve
statement
facts
case
appeal
notwithstanding
right
transcription
state
practices
made
applicable
federal
courts
congress
explained
whole
object
transcription
present
evidence
order
establish
error
verdict
matters
fact
mode
review
simply
unavailable
writ
error
see
concluded
congress
directed
federal
courts
follow
state
practices
change
effect
conclusiveness
verdict
jury
upon
facts
litigated
trial
serious
doubts
whether
unconstitutional
seventh
amendment
prohibition
courts
facts
tried
jury
manner
modes
known
common
law
facts
granting
new
trial
issue
tried
record
properly
returnable
award
venire
facias
de
novo
appellate
error
law
intervened
proceedings
evidence
us
competent
reverse
judgment
error
verdict
jury
trial
error
law
appearing
upon
record
reverse
judgment
upon
examination
evidence
may
opinion
jury
returned
verdict
less
amount
jury
acted
upon
gross
mistake
facts
governed
improper
influence
bias
remedy
therefore
rested
general
power
set
aside
verdict
whether
refusal
exercise
power
erroneous
power
restricted
constitution
determination
questions
law
arising
upon
record
authority
extend
facts
tried
jury
instructions
correctly
defining
legal
rights
parties
parsons
bedford
supra
railroad
fraloff
common
law
major
civil
actions
initiated
panels
judges
sitting
courts
westminster
trial
always
held
bar
however
inconvenience
jurors
witnesses
travel
westminster
given
rise
practice
allowing
trials
held
countryside
single
itinerant
judge
nisi
prius
trial
called
limited
jury
deciding
matter
fact
dispute
accomplished
verdict
entered
record
exceptions
instructions
rulings
nisi
prius
returned
en
banc
westminster
see
generally
holdsworth
history
english
law
radcliffe
cross
english
legal
system
ed
requests
new
trials
made
nisi
prius
judge
en
banc
prior
proceedings
entry
judgment
see
holdsworth
supra
riddell
new
trial
common
law
yale
motions
altogether
separate
appeal
writ
error
followed
entry
judgment
holdsworth
supra
radcliffe
cross
supra
nonetheless
respondent
argues
role
en
banc
westminster
essentially
appellate
body
reviewing
proceedings
appellate
judges
capable
examining
evidence
granting
new
trial
view
verdict
contrary
weight
evidence
see
blume
review
facts
jury
seventh
amendment
jud
soc
riddell
supra
two
difficulties
argument
first
characterization
westminster
appellate
body
role
respect
initiation
action
entertaining
motions
new
trial
entry
judgment
cause
tried
bar
nisi
prius
regard
actions
deciding
motion
new
trial
appellate
latter
instance
supposes
functional
distinction
none
existed
second
difficulty
trial
held
nisi
prius
judges
en
banc
apparently
order
new
trial
nisi
prius
judge
certified
dissatisfied
verdict
sure
many
cases
mention
made
judge
certificate
many
indications
required
predicate
setting
aside
verdict
rendered
nisi
prius
respondent
unable
identify
single
case
new
trial
granted
absence
certification
short
seem
new
trial
except
upon
approval
judge
presided
trial
heard
evidence
persuaded
prior
cases
correct
common
law
reexamination
facts
found
jury
undertaken
trial
appellate
review
restricted
writ
error
challenge
judgment
upon
matters
law
even
doubt
point
hesitant
advance
view
common
law
forbears
far
better
acquainted
subject
event
question
apply
rules
common
law
federal
appellate
consideration
motions
new
trials
one
already
clearly
categorically
answered
precedents
said
dimick
schiedt
discussing
status
remittitur
rules
common
law
doctrine
accepted
law
hundred
years
uniformly
applied
federal
courts
time
finds
support
practice
english
courts
prior
adoption
constitution
lightly
reconsidered
disturbed
time
question
whether
orders
motions
new
trial
fact
reviewable
common
law
long
since
passed
cases
reaching
back
early
century
establish
constitution
forbids
federal
appellate
courts
reexamine
fact
found
jury
trial
prohibition
encompasses
review
district
refusal
set
aside
verdict
contrary
weight
evidence
precedent
affirmatively
supports
proposition
cases
upon
relies
neither
affirmed
rejected
practice
appellate
review
adopted
courts
development
light
past
cases
amounts
studied
waywardness
intermediate
appellate
bench
unaccountable
reluctance
grunenthal
long
island
neese
southern
stand
precedents
undeniable
illogic
disposition
two
district
denial
new
trial
motion
confront
lawfulness
reversal
authority
weakest
negative
sort
weight
assigned
statement
industries
kelco
disposal
seemingly
approving
appellate
review
denials
new
trials
punitive
damages
claimed
excessive
like
grunenthal
neese
explicitly
avoided
question
us
today
see
even
significantly
involved
review
jury
punitive
damages
award
unlike
measure
actual
damages
suffered
presents
question
historical
predictive
fact
see
craft
level
punitive
damages
really
fact
tried
jury
none
cases
holding
reexamination
clause
prevents
federal
appellate
review
claims
excessive
damages
appear
damages
truly
punitive
component
event
statements
puts
forward
basis
dispensing
prior
cases
rather
circuit
courts
appeals
unanimous
agree
ment
may
review
refusals
set
aside
jury
awards
claimed
weight
evidence
ante
current
unanimity
deemed
controlling
notwithstanding
relatively
late
origin
practice
ante
without
inquiry
reasoning
set
forth
appeals
decisions
contents
citations
two
federal
appellate
cases
assurances
two
leading
treatises
view
however
meager
intellectual
provenance
might
universally
held
see
ante
credit
one
treatises
describes
dramatic
change
doctrine
represented
appellate
review
denials
new
trial
orders
generally
accomplished
blizzard
dicta
repetition
alone
given
legitimacy
doctrine
doubtful
constitutionality
wright
miller
kane
federal
practice
procedure
section
pp
ed
suggestion
rationale
might
underlie
approval
review
found
quotation
dagnello
long
island
effect
review
denial
new
trial
motion
conducted
sufficiently
deferential
standard
poses
question
law
ante
quoting
dagnello
supra
test
seventh
amendment
sets
forth
whether
possible
characterize
appeal
denial
new
trial
raising
legal
question
possible
review
claim
without
engaging
reexamin
ation
facts
tried
jury
manner
otherwise
allowed
common
law
determining
whether
particular
award
excessive
requires
one
first
determine
nature
extent
undeniably
requires
reviewing
facts
case
review
also
entails
application
legal
standard
whether
shocks
conscience
deviates
materially
makes
difference
necessarily
also
required
reexamination
facts
found
jury
last
analysis
frankly
abandons
pretense
faithfulness
common
law
suggesting
meaning
reexamination
clause
fixed
ante
contrary
view
prior
discussions
reexamination
clause
adopted
see
supra
believes
ignore
explicit
command
fact
tried
jury
shall
otherwise
reexamined
according
rules
common
law
insisted
juries
male
consist
jurors
common
law
ante
desperate
analogy
since
course
comparison
specificity
command
reexamination
clause
specificity
command
jury
abandonment
traditional
view
reexamination
clause
major
step
indeed
ii
acknowledges
state
procedural
rules
general
matter
permitted
interfere
allocation
functions
federal
system
see
ante
indeed
least
partly
reason
rejects
direct
application
section
appellate
level
inconsistent
essential
characteristic
federal
presumably
means
review
denials
motions
new
trials
see
ante
scope
concern
oddly
circumscribed
essential
characteristic
federal
jury
specifically
role
federal
trial
reviewing
jury
judgments
apparently
counts
little
approves
accommodat
ion
achieved
district
courts
review
jury
verdicts
deviates
materially
standard
regards
means
giving
effect
state
purposes
without
disrupting
federal
system
ante
changing
standard
trial
judges
review
jury
verdicts
disrupt
federal
system
plainly
inconsistent
strong
federal
policy
allowing
state
rules
disrupt
relationship
federal
byrd
blue
ridge
rural
elec
cooperative
opinion
even
acknowledge
let
alone
address
dislocation
discussed
precisely
point
issue
industries
kelco
disposal
gave
answer
altogether
contrary
one
provided
today
rejected
request
fashion
federal
rule
limiting
size
awards
federal
courts
reaffirming
principle
erie
tompkins
diversity
action
lawsuit
state
law
provides
basis
decision
propriety
award
punitive
damages
factors
jury
may
consider
determining
amount
questions
state
law
opinion
expressly
stated
ederal
law
control
issues
involving
proper
review
jury
award
federal
district
appeals
reviewing
award
punitive
damages
said
role
district
determine
whether
jury
verdict
within
confines
state
law
determine
reference
federal
standards
developed
rule
whether
new
trial
remittitur
ordered
distinction
necessarily
applies
judgment
review
compensatory
damages
state
substantive
law
controls
injuries
compensable
amount
federal
standards
determine
whether
award
exceeds
lawful
degree
may
set
aside
order
new
trial
remittitur
disavow
statements
indeed
even
discuss
presumably
overrules
least
state
rule
governs
whether
new
trial
remittitur
ordered
characterized
substantive
nature
rate
reason
asserts
giving
manifestly
substantive
ante
since
operates
contro
much
plaintiff
awarded
tightening
range
tolerable
awards
ante
although
less
readily
classified
substantive
statutory
cap
damages
nonetheless
designed
provide
analogous
control
ante
making
new
trial
mandatory
award
deviat
es
materially
reasonable
see
ante
see
seems
quite
wrong
regard
provision
substantive
rule
erie
purposes
analog
statutory
cap
damages
ante
fails
utterly
absolutely
fundamental
distinction
rule
law
ordinarily
imposed
upon
jury
trial
instructions
rule
review
simply
determines
closely
jury
verdict
scrutinized
compliance
instructions
tighter
standard
reviewing
jury
determinations
plausibly
called
substantive
disposition
tighter
appellate
standard
reviewing
determinations
one
like
provides
additional
assurance
law
complied
like
one
leaves
law
unchanged
commits
classic
erie
mistake
regarding
whatever
changes
outcome
substantive
see
ante
factor
considered
see
byrd
ere
outcome
consideration
strong
case
might
appear
saying
federal
follow
state
practice
affirmative
countervailing
considerations
work
never
intended
serve
talisman
hanna
plumer
power
convert
classic
elements
process
assuring
law
observed
substantive
law
right
jury
make
findings
fact
example
generally
thought
favor
plaintiffs
advantage
often
thought
significant
enough
basis
forum
selection
one
argue
erie
confers
right
jury
federal
wherever
state
courts
provide
seventh
amendment
erie
require
federal
courts
dispense
jury
whenever
state
courts
event
exaggerates
difference
state
standard
make
concludes
different
outcomes
likely
ensue
depending
whether
law
applied
state
deviates
materially
standard
section
shocks
conscience
standard
see
ante
course
federal
appellate
standard
federal
standard
granting
new
trials
must
compared
new
york
standard
determine
whether
substantially
different
results
far
clear
standard
shocks
conscience
indeed
even
clear
asserts
shocks
conscience
standard
erroneous
actually
applied
district
courts
second
circuit
second
circuit
test
reversing
grant
new
trial
excessive
verdict
whether
award
clearly
within
maximum
limit
reasonable
range
ismail
cohen
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
district
uses
standard
affirmed
many
decisions
express
shocks
conscience
criterion
see
koerner
club
mediterranee
supp
sdny
used
standard
indisputably
egregious
banff
express
supp
sdny
adopted
inverse
second
circuit
test
reversing
grant
new
trial
namely
clearly
outside
maximum
limit
reasonable
range
paper
schoeller
technical
papers
supp
sdny
moreover
decisions
say
shocks
conscience
fact
apply
rule
much
less
stringent
one
case
example
says
award
sustained
new
york
deviates
materially
rule
shocks
conscience
see
joint
eastern
dist
asbestos
litigation
supp
sdny
rev
grounds
sum
least
highly
questionable
whether
consistent
outcome
differential
claimed
even
exists
seems
far
likely
produce
consistent
difference
state
federal
appellate
standards
leaves
untouched
disposition
second
circuit
reviews
abuse
discretion
whereas
new
york
appellate
courts
engage
de
novo
review
material
deviation
giving
defendant
double
shot
getting
damages
award
set
aside
result
produce
conformity
erroneously
believes
erie
requires
one
adopted
second
circuit
rejected
de
novo
federal
appellate
review
section
standard
say
application
section
place
federal
standard
consistently
produce
disparate
results
suggest
decision
made
today
momentous
one
principle
state
standard
governs
great
importance
since
bears
potential
destroy
uniformity
federal
practice
integrity
federal
system
view
state
rule
directed
courts
determine
award
excessive
inadequate
deviates
degree
proper
measure
compensation
applied
federal
courts
effectively
requiring
federal
judges
determine
amount
damages
de
novo
effectively
taking
matter
away
jury
entirely
cf
byrd
consider
state
rule
allowed
defendant
second
trial
damages
judgment
ultimately
amount
lesser
two
jury
awards
cf
wonson
describing
massachusetts
practice
second
jury
trial
appeal
reasoning
opinion
even
rule
applied
federal
courts
foregoing
describes
think
erie
analysis
flawed
view
one
even
reach
erie
question
case
standard
applied
district
ruling
motion
new
trial
set
forth
rule
federal
rules
civil
procedure
provides
new
trial
may
granted
reasons
new
trials
heretofore
granted
actions
law
courts
emphasis
added
undeniably
federal
standard
federal
district
courts
second
circuit
interpreted
standard
permit
granting
new
trials
quite
clear
jury
reached
seriously
erroneous
result
letting
verdict
stand
result
miscarriage
justice
koerner
club
mediterranee
supp
sdny
quoting
bevevino
saydjari
assuming
reason
question
correct
interpretation
rule
requires
undeniable
federal
rule
sufficiently
broad
cause
direct
collision
state
law
implicitly
control
issue
thereby
leaving
room
operation
law
burlington
northern
woods
simply
possible
give
controlling
effect
federal
standard
state
standard
reviewing
jury
award
choice
apply
federal
rule
exercise
called
congress
power
regulate
matters
though
falling
within
uncertain
area
substance
procedure
rationally
capable
classification
either
hanna
small
irony
declaration
today
appellate
review
refusals
grant
new
trials
error
fact
control
necessary
proper
fair
administration
justice
ante
objection
precisely
sort
control
federal
appellate
judges
gave
birth
reexamination
clause
seventh
amendment
alas
drew
amendment
citizens
approved
envision
age
constitution
means
whatever
thinks
indeed
whatever
courts
appeals
recently
thought
mean
added
revision
seventh
amendment
disregard
congress
instructions
rule
one
must
conclude
bad
day
constitution
distinctive
article
iii
courts
general
role
jury
courts
particular
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
plaintiff
gasperini
petitioner
citizen
california
defendant
center
respondent
incorporated
principal
place
business
new
york
see
blackman
michael
friedman
publishing
group
app
div
dept
award
reduced
per
transparency
absence
evidence
establish
uniqueness
nierenberg
wursteria
app
div
dept
award
reduced
per
slide
evidence
showed
photographer
earned
little
slide
sales
alen
macweeney
esquire
app
div
dept
award
reduced
per
transparency
evidence
indicated
images
generic
distinguished
prior
ruling
girard
studio
group
young
rubicam
app
div
dept
permitting
award
reduced
per
slide
evidence
showed
lost
slides
represented
classics
long
career
legislature
sought
particularly
curtail
medical
dental
malpractice
contain
already
high
malpractice
premiums
legislative
findings
declaration
ch
laws
mckinney
full
civ
prac
law
rules
cplr
section
appellate
division
shall
review
questions
law
questions
fact
appeal
judgment
order
original
instance
appeal
order
county
appellate
term
determining
appeal
reviewing
money
judgment
action
itemized
verdict
required
rule
hundred
eleven
chapter
contended
award
excessive
inadequate
new
trial
granted
unless
stipulation
entered
different
award
appellate
division
shall
determine
award
excessive
inadequate
deviates
materially
reasonable
compensation
appeal
money
judgment
action
contended
award
excessive
inadequate
appellate
division
shall
set
forth
decision
reasons
therefor
including
factors
considered
complying
subdivision
section
hundred
one
chapter
concerning
matters
covered
federal
rules
civil
procedure
characterization
question
usually
unproblematic
settled
rule
point
consonant
rules
enabling
act
section
constitution
federal
rule
applies
regardless
contrary
state
law
see
hanna
plumer
burlington
northern
woods
federal
courts
interpreted
federal
rules
however
sensitivity
important
state
interests
regulatory
policies
see
walker
armco
steel
reaffirming
decision
ragan
merchants
transfer
warehouse
state
law
rather
rule
determines
diversity
action
commences
purposes
tolling
state
statute
limitations
rule
makes
reference
tolling
state
limitations
observed
accordingly
found
direct
conflict
healy
milwaukee
metropolitan
sewerage
state
provision
offers
settlement
plaintiffs
compatible
federal
rule
limited
offers
defendants
hanna
keyed
question
erie
twin
aims
full
hanna
instructed
federal
courts
ask
whether
application
state
rule
make
important
difference
character
result
litigation
failure
enforce
unfairly
discriminate
citizens
forum
state
whether
application
rule
important
effect
upon
fortunes
one
litigants
failure
enforce
likely
cause
plaintiff
choose
federal
specifically
addressed
issue
courts
appeals
held
district
application
state
statutory
caps
diversity
cases
post
verdict
violate
seventh
amendment
see
davis
omitowoju
clause
seventh
amendment
impede
federal
application
statutory
cap
boyd
bulala
application
statutory
cap
violate
seventh
amendment
right
trial
jury
justice
scalia
questions
whether
federal
district
courts
new
york
actually
appl
apply
shock
conscience
test
assessing
jury
award
excessiveness
post
collecting
various
formulations
review
standard
federal
district
standard
must
come
appeals
district
judges
southern
district
new
york
sits
alone
renders
decisions
binding
others
indeed
ismail
cohen
authority
upon
justice
scalia
relies
second
circuit
stated
district
courts
test
damage
awards
excessiveness
shock
conscience
standard
see
remittitur
effect
statement
shocked
jury
award
damages
see
also
scala
moore
mccormack
lines
federal
courts
judgment
stand
damages
awarded
excessive
shock
judicial
conscience
internal
quotation
marks
citation
omitted
justice
scalia
questions
whether
application
cplr
courts
within
second
circuit
see
supra
fact
yield
consistent
outcome
differentials
see
post
numbers
second
circuit
believed
revealing
see
difference
award
see
supra
per
transparency
see
supra
fairly
described
insubstantial
see
rights
state
law
governs
amount
properly
awarded
punitive
damages
subject
ultimate
federal
constitutional
check
exorbitancy
see
bmw
north
america
gore
slip
industries
kelco
disposal
evenhanded
approach
require
federal
deference
endeavors
like
new
york
control
compensatory
damages
excessiveness
see
infra
defendant
argued
byrd
although
personal
injury
plaintiff
employed
independent
contractor
work
plaintiff
engaged
perform
work
done
defendant
employees
therefore
defendant
maintained
plaintiff
ranked
statutory
employee
whose
sole
remedy
state
workers
compensation
law
sameness
work
plaintiff
defendant
employees
performed
presented
fact
question
state
jury
trial
available
resolve
see
walker
sauvinet
see
moore
federal
practice
para
pp
ed
common
law
origin
trial
power
grant
deny
new
trial
inviting
rethinking
additur
question
later
day
justice
stone
joined
chief
justice
hughes
justices
brandeis
cardozo
found
nothing
history
language
seventh
amendment
forcing
incongruous
position
federal
trial
may
deny
motion
new
trial
plaintiff
consents
decrease
judgment
proper
amount
may
condition
denial
motion
defendant
consent
comparable
increase
recovery
dimick
schiedt
dissenting
professed
refusal
answer
question
presented
grunenthal
long
island
justices
harlan
stewart
observed
grunenthal
indeed
reviewed
refusal
district
set
aside
jury
verdict
excessiveness
harlan
dissenting
stewart
dissenting
justice
harlan
commented
like
brother
stewart
utter
loss
understand
manages
review
district
decision
find
proper
time
proclaiming
avoided
decision
issue
whether
appellate
courts
ever
may
review
actions
concerned
punitive
damages
agree
second
circuit
however
purposes
deciding
whether
state
federal
law
applicable
question
whether
award
compensatory
damages
exceeds
permitted
law
materially
different
question
whether
award
punitive
damages
exceeds
permitted
law
consorti
justice
scalia
disagrees
ready
destroy
uniformity
federal
practice
regard
cf
post
render
judgment
described
astonishing
authority
upon
relies
compare
post
wright
miller
kane
federal
practice
procedure
section
ed
astonishing
passed
three
opportunities
ultimately
reject
view
courts
appeals
meaning
seventh
amendment
fixed
civil
juries
remain
unquestionably
common
law
twelve
good
men
true
blackstone
commentaries
see
capital
traction
hof
trial
jury
primary
usual
sense
term
common
law
american
constitutions
trial
jury
twelve
men
see
colgrove
battin
jury
civil
trials
satisfies
seventh
amendment
guarantee
procedures
regarded
compatible
seventh
amendment
although
conformity
practice
common
law
amendment
adopted
include
new
trials
restricted
determination
damages
gasoline
products
champlin
refining
federal
rule
civil
procedure
motion
judgment
matter
law
see
wright
miller
federal
practice
procedure
section
pp
ed
see
also
parklane
hosiery
shore
issue
preclusion
absent
mutuality
parties
violate
seventh
amendment
although
common
law
existed
permitted
issue
preclusion
mutuality
rule
posited
justice
scalia
post
surely
incompatible
existence
federal
system
independent
system
administering
justice
byrd
blue
ridge
rural
elec
cooperative
discern
disagreement
examples
among
many
federal
judges
considered
case
justice
scalia
finds
federal
rule
civil
procedure
federal
standard
new
trial
motions
direct
collision
leaving
room
operation
state
law
like
relevant
prescription
rule
remained
unchanged
since
adoption
federal
rules
rule
encompassing
uncontroversial
indeed
hornbook
law
usual
ground
rule
motion
damages
excessive
see
wright
law
federal
courts
ed
whether
damages
excessive
must
governed
law
candidate
governance
law
gives
rise
claim
law
new
york
see
section
shall
power
prescribe
general
rules
procedure
uch
rules
shall
abridge
enlarge
modify
substantive
right
standard
excessiveness
matte
state
federal
common
law
see
also
fallon
meltzer
shapiro
hart
wechsler
federal
courts
federal
system
ed
observing
continued
since
hanna
plumer
interpret
federal
rules
avoid
conflict
important
state
regulatory
policies
citing
walker
armco
steel
liability
rules
split
apart
justice
scalia
says
must
save
seventh
amendment
gasperini
claim
others
like
governed
curious
law
law
apply
controversy
state
forepart
federal
hindquarter
beast
may
brutish
little
judgment
creation
conceivable
conflict
federal
rule
civil
procedure
application
new
york
damages
limit
case
controlled
erie
rules
decisions
act
rather
rules
enabling
act
limitation
federal
procedural
rules
conflict
state
substantive
rights
see
ely
irrepressible
myth
erie
harv
rev
see
also
sibbach
wilson
rule
state
new
trials
may
granted
reasons
new
trials
heretofore
granted
actions
law
courts
hardly
constitutes
command
federal
courts
must
always
substitute
federal
limits
size
judgments
set
several
cases
founded
upon
state
law
causes
action
even
time
rule
adoption
federal
courts
bound
apply
state
statutory
law
cases
thus
disagree
justice
scalia
view
separate
federal
standard
determine
whether
award
exceeds
lawful
degree
may
set
aside
order
new
trial
remittitur
post
view
award
exceeds
lawful
legal
error
occurred
may
corrected
certainly
dimick
premise
power
overturn
award
exceeds
lawful
limits
degree
excess
reason
justice
scalia
wrong
contend
westminster
acted
appellate
fashion
entertained
motions
new
trials
causes
tried
bar
entertained
causes
tried
nisi
prius
post
former
cases
en
banc
entertain
motion
new
trial
heard
evidence
latter
sometimes
entertain
motion
heard
report
evidence
nisi
prius
judge
although
honda
involved
review
punitive
damages
awards
expressly
noted
basis
suggesting
different
standards
judicial
review
applied
punitive
compensatory
damages
twentieth
century
slip
indeed
many
decisions
relied
upon
honda
involved
compensatory
damages
authority
suggest
judicial
review
former
secure
historical
pedigree
judicial
review
latter
see
bright
eynon
burr
eng
denison
concurring
granting
new
trial
refusing
must
depend
upon
legal
discretion
guided
nature
circumstances
particular
case
directed
view
attainment
justice
wood
gunston
sty
eng
discretion
cases
grant
new
tryal
must
judicial
arbitrary
discretion
frequent
books
take
notice
miscarriages
juries
grant
new
tryals
upon
per
curiam
decision
donovan
penn
shipping
provides
support
proposition
federal
appellate
courts
confined
federal
standard
excessiveness
case
held
plaintiff
consented
remittitur
challenge
adequacy
appeal
although
stated
dicta
proper
role
trial
appellate
courts
federal
system
reviewing
size
jury
verdicts
however
matter
federal
law
broad
statement
supported
citation
two
cases
hana
plumer
byrd
blue
ridge
rural
elec
cooperative
involve
review
jury
awards
objection
repeatedly
made
following
constitutional
convention
see
martin
genuine
information
records
federal
convention
pp
farrand
ed
gerry
reply
landholder
ratifying
conventions
see
elliot
debates
federal
constitution
virginia
convention
statements
mason
henry
north
carolina
convention
statements
bloodworth
spencer
prior
adoption
amendment
concerns
addressed
congress
judiciary
act
stat
expressly
directed
providing
reexamin
ation
civil
judgments
upon
writ
error
shall
reversal
either
circuit
error
fact
section
stat
restriction
remained
place
revisions
judicial
code
see
stat
section
amendment
relied
upon
least
twice
prevent
actual
new
trials
wonson
justice
story
rejected
claim
right
retry
appeal
matter
unsuccessfully
put
jury
district
acceptance
practice
local
law
based
ruling
statutory
grounds
interpretation
statutory
jurisdiction
dictated
view
contrary
interpretation
contravene
seventh
amendment
justices
murray
wall
relied
wonson
invalidating
seventh
amendment
federal
habeas
statute
provided
removal
certain
judgments
state
courts
purposes
retrial
federal
see
wabash
mcdaniels
without
authority
disturb
judgment
upon
ground
damages
excessive
doubted
whether
order
overruling
motion
new
trial
based
upon
ground
erroneous
power
restricted
determination
questions
law
arising
upon
record
railroad
company
fraloff
arkansas
valley
land
cattle
mann
owever
ascertained
verdict
large
granting
refusing
new
trial
circuit
subject
review
citing
parsons
bedford
pet
railroad
fraloff
lincoln
power
permitted
sitting
errors
case
wherein
damages
fixed
verdict
jury
take
notice
claim
excessive
damages
complaint
action
jury
reason
complain
instructions
error
jury
allowing
unreasonable
amount
redressed
motion
new
trial
citing
parsons
supra
fraloff
supra
chicago
chicago
southern
div
bennett
case
mere
excess
upon
evidence
matter
dealt
trial
present
question
reexamination
upon
writ
error
citing
lincoln
supra
fairmount
glass
works
cub
fork
coal
rule
review
action
federal
trial
granting
denying
motion
new
trial
error
fact
settled
long
unbroken
line
decisions
frequently
applied
ground
motion
damages
awarded
jury
excessive
inadequate
footnotes
omitted
grounds
granting
new
trial
want
notice
trial
flagrant
misbehavior
party
prevailing
toward
jury
may
influenced
verdict
gross
misbehavior
jury
among
also
appears
judge
report
certified
jury
brought
verdict
without
contrary
evidence
reasonably
dissatisfied
therewith
given
exorbitant
damages
judge
misdirected
jury
found
unjustifiable
verdict
blackstone
commentaries
laws
england
footnotes
omitted
emphases
omitted
see
ibid
new
trial
granted
appears
judge
report
certified
jury
brought
verdict
without
contrary
evidence
reasonably
dissatisfied
therewith
see
berks
mason
say
eng
bright
eynon
burr
eng
see
also
note
limitations
trial
jury
illinois
rev
exhaustive
examination
early
english
cases
revealed
single
case
english
common
law
ever
granted
new
trial
evidence
unless
judge
judges
sat
jury
stated
open
certified
verdict
evidence
dissatisfied
verdict
justice
stevens
understands
blackstone
say
new
trials
granted
excessiveness
even
nisi
prius
judge
dissatisfied
damages
awarded
see
ante
blackstone
phrasing
certainly
allows
reading
see
supra
indications
suggest
dissatisfaction
presiding
judge
played
role
motion
new
trial
based
claim
excessive
damages
based
claim
erroneous
verdict
see
boulsworth
pilkington
jones
eng
anonymous
wils
eng
redshaw
brook
wils
eng
sharpe
brice
black
eng
cases
cited
justice
stevens
ante
contrary
one
case
tried
bar
nisi
prius
judge
see
wood
gunston
sty
eng
judge
presided
trial
panel
ruled
new
trial
motion
recommended
new
trial
see
bright
eynon
supra
eng
second
circuit
notwithstanding
practice
respect
excessiveness
claims
review
district
determination
jury
liability
ruling
supported
weight
evidence
see
stonewall
ins
asbestos
claims
management
decision
one
rulings
simply
unavailable
appellate
review
eighth
circuit
questioned
whether
seventh
amendment
permits
appellate
review
determinations
see
thongvanh
thalacker
see
also
white
pence
loss
understand
charge
keeping
faith
requiring
courts
appeals
destroy
uniformity
federal
practice
ante
thought
decisions
established
uniformity
commentators
observations
astonishing
us
actually
heed
precedents
see
quoting
wright
miller
kane
federal
practice
procedure
section
ed
prediction
today
fulfills
gasoline
products
champlin
refining
case
cited
arguably
involved
slightest
departure
practices
regarding
review
jury
findings
held
sure
new
trial
ordered
damages
alone
even
though
common
law
practice
setting
verdict
aside
part
satisfying
change
one
form
rather
substance
quoting
lord
mansfield
effect
form
sake
must
set
aside
whole
verdict
quoting
edie
east
india
black
eng
hardly
maintained
whether
jury
damages
award
may
set
aside
appeal
matter
form
also
cites
wright
miller
federal
practice
procedure
section
ed
discussion
federal
rule
civil
procedure
permits
motion
judgment
matter
law
neglects
mention
discussion
held
reservation
decision
fashion
recognized
common
law
section
since
reject
application
new
york
standard
grounds
need
consider
whether
constitutes
reexamination
jury
verdict
manner
otherwise
according
rules
common
law
justice
stevens
thinks
award
exceeds
lawful
result
legal
error
may
corrected
appellate
ante
sort
legal
error
involved
imposition
legal
consequences
case
damages
light
facts
law
may
warrant
suggest
every
fact
may
reviewed
may
ensue
erroneous
factual
determination
legal
error
destroy
notion
factfinding
function
reserved
jury
shocks
conscience
standard
traditional
one
seem
clear
opinion
justice
story
quoted
approvingly
ante
effect
remittitur
granted
clearly
appear
jury
given
damages
excessive
relation
person
injury
blunt
little
cas
cc
mass
agree
entire
progression
reasoning
ante
leading
conclusion
state
law
must
determine
hether
damages
excessive
question
whether
damages
excessive
quite
separate
question
jury
award
may
set
aside
excessiveness
see
supra
latter
governed
rule
said
district
courts
determine
reference
federal
standards
developed
rule
whether
new
trial
remittitur
ordered
emphasisadded