virginia
argued
february
decided
may
petitioner
virginia
inmate
serving
time
murder
committed
another
murder
prison
work
detail
case
engendered
substantial
publicity
local
news
media
trial
judge
denied
motion
individual
voir
dire
refused
ask
proposed
questions
relating
content
news
items
potential
jurors
might
seen
read
initially
judge
questioned
prospective
jurors
group
asking
four
separate
questions
effect
pretrial
publicity
information
case
obtained
means
one
juror
admitted
formed
belief
guilt
excused
cause
judge
conducted
voir
dire
panels
four
time
juror
indicated
acquired
knowledge
case
outside
sources
asked
whether
formed
opinion
one
juror
equivocated
impartiality
excused
judge
sua
sponte
several
others
excused
various
reasons
although
eventually
sworn
admitted
read
heard
something
case
none
indicated
formed
opinion
based
outside
information
biased
way
jury
found
guilty
capital
murder
judge
sentenced
death
virginia
affirmed
finding
criminal
defendant
may
properly
ask
voir
dire
whether
juror
previously
acquired
information
case
defendant
constitutional
right
explore
content
acquired
information
entitled
know
whether
juror
remain
impartial
light
previously
obtained
information
held
trial
judge
refusal
question
prospective
jurors
specific
contents
news
reports
exposed
violate
sixth
amendment
right
impartial
jury
right
due
process
fourteenth
amendment
pp
cases
stressed
wide
discretion
granted
trial
courts
conducting
voir
dire
area
pretrial
publicity
areas
might
tend
show
juror
bias
example
holding
trial
voir
dire
questioning
must
cover
subject
possible
juror
racial
bias
aldridge
careful
specify
particulars
done
pp
assertion
voir
dire
must
merely
cover
subject
pretrial
publicity
persuasive
although
precise
inquiries
contents
news
reports
potential
juror
read
might
reveal
sense
juror
general
outlook
life
use
exercising
peremptory
challenges
benefit
basis
making
content
questions
pretrial
publicity
constitutional
requirement
since
peremptory
challenges
required
constitution
ross
oklahoma
moreover
although
content
questions
might
helpful
assessing
whether
juror
impartial
questions
constitutionally
compelled
trial
failure
ask
renders
defendant
trial
fundamentally
unfair
see
murphy
florida
furthermore
contrary
situation
aldridge
supra
judicial
consensus
even
weight
authority
favoring
position
even
federal
courts
appeals
required
content
inquiries
expressly
done
constitutional
grounds
pp
misplaces
reliance
irvin
dowd
held
pretrial
publicity
connection
capital
trial
tainted
particular
jury
pool
defendant
entitled
matter
federal
constitutional
law
change
venue
case
deal
constitutional
requirement
voir
dire
inquiry
clear
opinion
extensive
inquiry
trial
made
moreover
pretrial
publicity
although
substantial
nearly
damaging
extensive
found
exist
irvin
adverse
pretrial
publicity
create
presumption
prejudice
jurors
claims
impartial
believed
patton
yount
case
pp
also
misplaces
reliance
american
bar
association
standards
criminal
justice
require
interrogation
juror
individually
respect
read
heard
case
substantial
possibility
ineligible
serve
exposure
potentially
prejudicial
material
standards
leave
trial
initial
determination
whether
substantial
possibility
based
substantive
eligibility
standard
stricter
impartiality
standard
required
constitution
see
patton
supra
commended
majority
courts
considered
question
pp
voir
dire
examination
conducted
trial
case
means
perfunctory
adequately
covered
subject
possible
bias
pretrial
publicity
pp
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
white
scalia
souter
joined
filed
concurring
opinion
post
marshall
filed
dissenting
opinion
part
iv
blackmun
stevens
joined
post
kennedy
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
john
blume
appointment
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
mark
olive
john
mclees
assistant
attorney
general
virginia
argued
cause
respondent
brief
mary
sue
terry
attorney
general
lane
kneedler
chief
deputy
attorney
general
stephen
rosenthal
deputy
attorney
general
jerry
slonaker
senior
assistant
attorney
general
thomas
daniel
assistant
attorney
general
kenneth
mogill
filed
brief
national
jury
project
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
chief
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
petitioner
dawud
majid
convicted
murdering
woman
prince
william
county
virginia
prison
work
detail
sentenced
death
case
engendered
substantial
publicity
venirepersons
eventually
sworn
jurors
answered
voir
dire
read
heard
something
case
none
read
heard
something
indicated
formed
opinion
based
outside
information
affect
ability
determine
petitioner
guilt
innocence
based
solely
evidence
presented
trial
petitioner
contends
however
sixth
amendment
right
impartial
jury
right
due
process
fourteenth
amendment
violated
trial
judge
refused
question
prospective
jurors
specific
contents
news
reports
exposed
reject
petitioner
submission
inmate
virginia
department
corrections
haymarket
correctional
unit
serving
sentence
murder
conviction
september
transferred
virginia
department
transportation
vdot
headquarters
prince
william
county
assigned
work
detail
supervised
vdot
employee
lunch
break
escaped
perimeter
fence
vdot
facility
made
way
nearby
shopping
center
using
sharp
instrument
fashioned
vdot
shop
murdered
robbed
gladys
nopwasky
owner
retail
carpet
flooring
store
returned
prison
work
crew
vdot
discarding
bloodied
shirt
murder
weapon
near
highway
three
months
trial
petitioner
submitted
trial
support
motion
change
venue
newspaper
articles
relating
murder
one
articles
discussed
details
murder
investigation
included
information
petitioner
prior
criminal
record
app
fact
rejected
parole
six
times
accounts
alleged
prison
infractions
details
prior
murder
serving
sentence
time
murder
comment
death
penalty
available
convicted
earlier
murder
indications
confessed
killing
gladys
nopwasky
several
articles
focused
alleged
laxity
supervision
work
gangs
argued
reform
prison
system
trial
judge
deferred
ruling
venue
motion
making
attempt
seat
jury
joint
appendix
shortly
date
set
trial
petitioner
submitted
trial
judge
proposed
voir
dire
questions
filed
motion
individual
voir
dire
trial
denied
motion
individual
voir
dire
ruled
voir
dire
begin
collective
questioning
venire
venire
broken
panels
four
necessary
deal
issues
publicity
trial
also
refused
ask
petitioner
proposed
questions
relating
content
news
items
potential
jurors
might
read
seen
prospective
jurors
summoned
courtroom
questioned
group
asked
judge
whether
anyone
acquired
information
alleged
offense
accused
news
media
source
potential
jurors
replied
prospective
jurors
asked
source
content
prior
knowledge
asked
following
questions
information
heard
received
read
whatever
source
information
affect
impartiality
case
anyone
say
read
seen
heard
whatever
information
may
acquired
whatever
source
affect
impartiality
impartial
considering
ladies
gentlemen
answered
affirmative
heard
read
case
believe
enter
jury
box
open
mind
await
entire
case
presented
reaching
fixed
opinion
conclusion
guilt
innocence
accused
view
everything
seen
heard
read
information
whatever
source
acquired
case
anyone
believes
become
juror
enter
jury
box
open
mind
wait
entire
case
presented
reaching
fixed
opinion
conclusion
guilt
innocence
accused
trial
conducted
voir
dire
prospective
jurors
panels
four
whenever
potential
juror
indicated
read
heard
something
case
juror
asked
whether
formed
opinion
whether
nonetheless
impartial
none
eventually
seated
stated
formed
opinion
gave
indication
biased
prejudiced
defendant
swore
enter
jury
box
open
mind
wait
entire
case
presented
reaching
conclusion
guilt
innocence
juror
indicated
discussed
case
anyone
asked
questions
determine
discussion
took
place
whether
juror
open
mind
despite
discussion
one
juror
equivocated
whether
enter
jury
box
open
mind
removed
sua
sponte
trial
judge
one
juror
dismissed
cause
frank
concerning
effect
feelings
toward
members
islamic
faith
toward
defense
counsel
one
juror
dismissed
inability
impose
death
penalty
another
removed
based
upon
statement
upon
finding
capital
murder
consider
penalty
less
death
app
prosecution
defense
peremptorily
challenged
potential
jurors
remaining
seated
sworn
jurors
two
alternates
petitioner
renew
motion
change
venue
make
objection
composition
jury
jurors
decided
petitioner
case
one
time
another
read
heard
something
case
none
indicated
formed
opinion
case
biased
way
jury
found
petitioner
guilty
capital
murder
recommended
sentenced
death
taking
matter
advisement
reviewing
presentence
report
trial
judge
accepted
jury
recommendation
sentenced
death
appealed
contending
entitled
new
trial
result
judge
failure
permit
proposed
voir
dire
questions
divided
vote
virginia
affirmed
conviction
sentence
finding
criminal
defendant
may
properly
ask
voir
dire
whether
juror
previously
acquired
information
case
defendant
constitutional
right
explore
content
acquired
information
rather
accused
entitled
know
whether
juror
remain
impartial
light
previously
obtained
information
granted
certiorari
affirm
cases
dealing
requirements
voir
dire
two
kinds
tried
federal
courts
therefore
subject
supervisory
power
see
aldridge
connors
tried
state
courts
respect
authority
limited
enforcing
commands
constitution
see
turner
murray
ristaino
ross
ham
south
carolina
brief
review
cases
instructive
connors
said
suitable
inquiry
permissible
order
ascertain
whether
juror
bias
opinion
prejudice
affect
control
fair
determination
issues
tried
inquiry
conducted
supervision
great
deal
must
necessity
left
sound
discretion
rule
civil
cases
rule
must
applied
criminal
cases
obligation
empanel
impartial
jury
lies
first
instance
trial
judge
must
rely
largely
immediate
perceptions
federal
judges
accorded
ample
discretion
determining
best
conduct
voir
dire
ristaino
ross
supra
held
constitution
require
trial
judge
question
prospective
jurors
racial
prejudice
every
case
races
defendant
victim
differ
turner
murray
supra
held
capital
case
involving
charge
murder
white
person
black
defendant
questions
must
asked
enjoy
latitude
setting
standards
voir
dire
federal
courts
supervisory
power
interpreting
provisions
fourteenth
amendment
respect
voir
dire
state
courts
two
parallel
themes
emerge
sets
cases
first
possibility
racial
prejudice
black
defendant
charged
violent
crime
white
person
sufficiently
real
fourteenth
amendment
requires
inquiry
made
racial
prejudice
second
trial
retains
great
latitude
deciding
questions
asked
voir
dire
said
supra
despite
importance
adequacy
voir
dire
easily
subject
appellate
review
trial
judge
function
point
trial
unlike
jurors
later
trial
must
reach
conclusions
impartiality
credibility
relying
evaluations
demeanor
evidence
responses
questions
undoubtedly
counsel
allowed
see
individual
jurors
answer
questions
exactly
read
better
sense
juror
general
outlook
life
might
revealed
revelation
use
exercising
peremptory
challenges
since
peremptory
challenges
required
constitution
ross
oklahoma
benefit
basis
making
content
questions
pretrial
publicity
constitutional
requirement
questions
might
also
effect
causing
jurors
reevaluate
answers
whether
formed
opinion
case
necessarily
speculative
acceptance
petitioner
claim
require
potential
juror
interrogated
individually
even
interrogation
conducted
panels
four
jurors
trial
descriptions
one
juror
pretrial
publicity
obviously
communicated
three
members
panel
interrogated
prospect
harm
good
done
interrogation
petitioner
says
questioning
accomplished
juror
questionnaires
submitted
advance
trial
written
answers
give
counsel
exposure
demeanor
juror
course
answering
content
questions
trial
case
expressed
reservations
interrogating
jurors
individually
might
make
jurors
feel
trial
concern
feelings
sensibilities
potential
jurors
allowed
defeat
inquiry
necessary
protect
constitutional
right
believe
content
questions
constitutionally
required
whether
trial
decides
put
questions
content
publicity
potential
juror
must
make
decision
end
questioning
juror
believed
says
formed
opinion
case
questions
content
publicity
jurors
exposed
might
helpful
assessing
whether
juror
impartial
constitutionally
compelled
however
enough
questions
might
helpful
rather
trial
failure
ask
questions
must
render
defendant
trial
fundamentally
unfair
see
murphy
florida
aldridge
seminal
case
requiring
inquiry
racial
prejudice
opinion
makes
clear
reaching
result
relied
heavily
unanimous
body
precedents
holding
inquiry
made
subject
pretrial
publicity
however
similar
consensus
even
weight
authority
favoring
petitioner
position
among
decisions
cited
us
parties
virginia
south
carolina
state
lucas
cert
denied
massachusetts
commonwealth
burden
mass
app
pennsylvania
commonwealth
dolhancryk
super
refused
adopt
rule
courts
appeals
fifth
circuit
davis
seventh
circuit
dellinger
cert
denied
ninth
circuit
silverthorne
held
circumstances
inquiry
required
appeals
eleventh
circuit
held
montgomery
courts
appeals
eight
district
columbia
circuits
appear
take
intermediate
position
poludniak
cert
denied
sub
nom
weigand
haldeman
app
cert
denied
sub
nom
ehrlichman
even
federal
courts
appeals
required
inquiry
made
expressly
placed
decision
constitutional
grounds
noted
cases
stressed
wide
discretion
granted
trial
conducting
voir
dire
area
pretrial
publicity
areas
inquiry
might
tend
show
juror
bias
particularly
respect
pretrial
publicity
think
primary
reliance
judgment
trial
makes
good
sense
judge
sits
locale
publicity
said
effect
brings
evaluation
claim
perception
depth
extent
news
stories
might
influence
juror
trial
course
impute
perceptions
jurors
examined
perceptions
assistance
deciding
detailed
inquiry
make
members
jury
venire
petitioner
relies
heavily
opinion
irvin
dowd
support
position
case
held
pretrial
publicity
connection
capital
trial
tainted
jury
pool
gibson
county
indiana
defendant
entitled
matter
federal
constitutional
law
change
venue
another
county
opinion
case
details
great
length
extraordinary
publicity
attended
defendant
prosecution
conviction
murder
barrage
newspaper
headlines
articles
cartoons
pictures
unleashed
defendant
six
seven
months
preceding
trial
newspapers
stories
appeared
delivered
regularly
approximately
dwellings
gibson
county
evansville
radio
tv
stations
likewise
blanketed
county
also
carried
extensive
newscasts
covering
incidents
life
stake
requiring
much
petitioner
tried
atmosphere
undisturbed
huge
wave
public
passion
jury
one
members
admit
hearing
testimony
possessing
belief
guilt
ibid
trial
findings
juror
impartiality
may
overturned
manifest
error
patton
yount
quoting
irvin
dowd
supra
patton
acknowledged
adverse
pretrial
publicity
create
presumption
prejudice
community
jurors
claims
impartial
believed
case
trial
case
confronted
wave
public
passion
engendered
pretrial
publicity
occurred
connection
irvin
trial
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
might
well
required
extensive
examination
potential
jurors
undertook
showings
comparable
cases
differ
kind
community
coverage
took
place
extent
media
coverage
unlike
community
involved
irvin
county
petitioner
tried
prince
william
population
one
nine
murders
committed
county
year
part
metropolitan
washington
statistical
area
population
million
unfortunately
hundreds
murders
committed
year
irvin
news
accounts
included
details
defendant
confessions
burglaries
six
murders
including
one
tried
well
unaccepted
offer
plead
guilty
order
avoid
death
sentence
contained
numerous
opinions
guilt
well
opinions
appropriate
punishment
news
reports
favorable
contain
sort
damaging
information
much
pretrial
publicity
aimed
department
corrections
criminal
justice
system
general
criticizing
furlough
programs
made
crimes
possible
killing
ultimately
results
charge
capital
murder
engender
considerable
media
coverage
one
may
engendered
occurrence
presidential
campaign
similar
crime
committed
massachusetts
inmate
became
subject
national
debate
pretrial
publicity
case
appears
substantial
kind
extent
found
exist
irvin
petitioner
also
relies
standards
criminal
justice
ed
promulgated
american
bar
association
standards
require
interrogation
juror
individually
respect
prospective
juror
read
heard
case
substantial
possibility
individual
jurors
ineligible
serve
exposure
potentially
prejudicial
material
standards
course
leave
trial
initial
determination
whether
substantial
possibility
importantly
standards
relating
voir
dire
based
substantive
rule
renders
potential
juror
subject
challenge
cause
without
regard
state
mind
exposed
remembers
highly
significant
information
incriminating
matters
may
inadmissible
evidence
stricter
standard
juror
eligibility
held
constitution
require
aba
standard
answers
questions
content
without
disqualify
juror
sitting
constitutional
standard
hand
relevant
question
whether
community
remembered
case
whether
jurors
fixed
opinions
judge
impartially
guilt
defendant
patton
supra
constitutional
standard
answers
questions
content
alone
reveal
juror
remembered
facts
case
sufficient
disqualify
juror
required
jurors
totally
ignorant
facts
issues
involved
irvin
aba
standards
indicated
previous
discussion
state
federal
decisions
commended
majority
courts
considered
question
fact
particular
rule
may
thought
better
view
mean
incorporated
fourteenth
amendment
cupp
naughten
voir
dire
examination
conducted
trial
case
means
perfunctory
asked
entire
venire
jurors
four
separate
questions
effect
pretrial
publicity
information
case
obtained
means
one
juror
admitted
formed
belief
petitioner
guilt
excused
cause
trial
conducted
voir
dire
panels
four
time
individual
juror
indicated
acquired
knowledge
case
outside
sources
asked
whether
formed
opinion
none
jurors
seated
indicated
formed
opinion
one
juror
equivocated
impartiality
excused
trial
motion
several
jurors
excused
reasons
quite
possible
voir
dire
interrogation
revealed
one
jurors
formed
opinion
case
trial
might
decided
question
succeeding
jurors
extensively
voir
dire
examination
serves
dual
purposes
enabling
select
impartial
jury
assisting
counsel
exercising
peremptory
challenges
aldridge
ham
held
subject
possible
racial
bias
must
covered
questioning
trial
course
examination
potential
jurors
careful
specify
particulars
done
instance
require
questioning
individual
jurors
facts
experiences
might
led
racial
bias
petitioner
case
insists
matter
constitutional
right
subject
possible
bias
pretrial
publicity
covered
questions
specifically
dealing
content
juror
read
asked
reasons
previously
stated
hold
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
reach
far
voir
dire
examination
conducted
trial
case
consistent
provision
judgment
virginia
accordingly
affirmed
footnotes
approved
proposed
questions
allow
following
questions
regarding
content
jurors
read
heard
case
seen
read
heard
case
get
information
get
information
discuss
anyone
expressed
opinion
case
trial
ask
several
requested
questions
concerning
prior
knowledge
case
acquired
information
case
newspapers
television
conversations
source
discussed
case
anyone
silverthorne
appeals
ninth
circuit
held
jurors
interrogated
contents
news
reports
read
later
case
polizzi
cert
denied
sub
nom
emprise
held
pretrial
publicity
case
substantial
enough
require
extended
interrogation
pointed
silverthorne
articles
defendant
radio
television
coverage
testified
senate
committee
government
operations
panel
potential
jurors
exposed
publicity
excused
formed
opinion
giese
cert
denied
distinguished
silverthorne
commenting
trial
observation
must
guide
effect
pretrial
publicity
justice
concurring
justice
marshall
insists
trial
judge
assessed
realistically
jurors
credibility
without
first
identifying
information
individual
juror
exposed
disagree
true
trial
judge
know
precisely
individual
juror
read
case
undeniably
aware
however
full
range
information
reported
submitted
support
motion
change
venue
newspaper
articles
relating
murder
ante
trial
judge
thus
aware
long
voir
dire
allegedly
prejudicial
information
prospective
jurors
might
exposed
information
mind
trial
judge
determine
whether
believe
jurors
assurances
able
enter
jury
box
open
mind
end
questioned
prospective
jurors
repeatedly
whether
exposure
pretrial
publicity
impaired
ability
impartial
one
juror
equivocated
excused
trial
motion
ante
jurors
ultimately
selected
trial
judge
determined
assurances
impartiality
credible
observed
patton
yount
credibility
determinations
kind
entitled
special
deference
reversed
manifest
error
dissent
correct
point
trial
judge
done
decided
discretion
ask
juror
recount
remembered
reading
case
fact
remains
however
trial
judge
familiar
potentially
prejudicial
publicity
jurors
might
exposed
hearing
individual
jurors
repeat
judge
already
knew
might
still
helpful
particular
juror
tone
voice
demeanor
might
suggested
trial
judge
juror
formed
opinion
case
therefore
excused
conclude
however
content
questions
indispensable
violates
sixth
amendment
trial
evaluate
juror
credibility
instead
reference
full
range
potentially
prejudicial
information
reported
accordingly
join
opinion
justice
marshall
justice
blackmun
justice
stevens
join
part
iv
dissenting
today
decision
turns
critical
constitutional
guarantee
sixth
amendment
right
impartial
jury
hollow
formality
petitioner
dawud
majid
capital
murder
trial
preceded
exceptionally
prejudicial
publicity
jury
selection
jurors
ultimately
convicted
murder
sentenced
death
admitted
exposure
publicity
nonetheless
majority
concludes
trial
obligation
ask
individuals
knew
case
seating
jury
instead
majority
holds
trial
discharged
obligation
ensure
jurors
impartiality
merely
asking
jurors
whether
thought
fair
majority
reasoning
unacceptable
prospective
juror
exposed
prejudicial
pretrial
publicity
trial
realistically
assess
juror
impartiality
without
first
establishing
juror
already
learned
case
procedures
employed
case
wholly
insufficient
eliminate
risk
jury
entered
jury
box
predisposed
dissent
majority
concedes
charges
engendered
substantial
publicity
ante
news
reports
favorable
ante
seeks
minimize
impact
pretrial
publicity
arguing
extensive
cases
come
ibid
majority
observation
completely
beside
point
regardless
widely
disseminated
news
charges
might
simple
fact
matter
persons
jury
admitted
read
heard
case
majority
carefully
avoids
discussion
specific
nature
pretrial
publicity
impossible
assess
fairly
claim
without
first
examining
precisely
written
case
prior
trial
september
gladys
nopwasky
stabbed
death
retail
carpet
flooring
store
owned
dale
city
virginia
several
weeks
later
inmate
serving
sentence
murder
indicted
murdering
nopwasky
facts
developed
trial
established
committed
murder
escaping
site
virginia
department
transportation
work
detail
see
circumstances
murder
generated
intense
local
interest
political
controversy
press
focused
gross
negligence
corrections
officials
responsible
overseeing
work
detail
escaped
reported
instance
facility
assigned
enclosed
high
fence
single
strand
barbed
wire
across
top
see
app
sup
hereinafter
also
reported
lax
supervision
facility
allowed
inmates
ready
access
alcohol
drugs
weapons
slip
away
work
detail
extended
periods
without
detection
shortly
charges
became
public
state
official
charge
administering
corrections
highway
programs
issued
public
apology
satisfied
number
area
residents
wrote
editorials
demanding
state
officials
responsible
inmate
program
fired
area
leaders
pushed
increased
controls
programs
see
officials
responded
introduction
stiffer
restrictions
prison
work
crews
suspension
furloughs
inmates
convicted
violent
crimes
explaining
new
policies
director
virginia
department
corrections
acknowledged
explosive
public
reaction
charges
intensified
case
willie
horton
whose
rape
assault
maryland
woman
furlough
became
major
issue
presidential
campaign
world
uproar
right
official
quoted
stating
ibid
naturally
great
deal
media
coverage
controversy
devoted
details
crime
stories
carried
front
pages
local
papers
almost
extremely
prejudicial
readers
local
papers
learned
nopwasky
discovered
pool
blood
clothes
pulled
semen
body
described
particularly
macabre
side
story
local
paper
reported
raping
murdering
nopwasky
returned
work
site
share
lunch
members
prison
detail
readers
also
learned
confessed
crime
banner
headlines
murderer
confesses
killing
woman
inmate
said
admit
killing
press
accompanied
news
indictment
proud
announcement
virginia
secretary
transportation
public
safety
state
already
secured
acknowledgment
responsibility
murder
see
subsequent
stories
reported
upon
confronted
charges
initially
offered
incredible
claim
entered
store
help
nopwasky
witnessing
another
man
attempting
rape
however
according
reports
eventually
abandoned
story
confessed
stabbed
nopwasky
twice
steel
spike
neck
chest
gotten
dispute
price
oriental
rugs
one
stories
carried
headline
accused
killer
says
stabbed
dale
city
woman
argument
another
story
reported
admitted
least
contemplated
raping
nopwasky
according
article
told
authorities
thought
cross
mind
sex
item
reported
story
captioned
headline
says
decided
raping
nopwasky
ibid
see
also
headline
reading
laxity
factor
sex
killing
read
detailed
reporting
background
come
away
little
doubt
fully
capable
committing
brutal
murder
accused
one
front
page
story
set
forth
details
murder
cab
driver
see
another
entitled
accused
killer
history
prison
trouble
stated
cited
violations
prison
rules
denied
parole
six
times
also
reported
suspect
recent
prison
beating
several
stories
reported
strayed
dale
city
work
detail
go
numerous
criminal
forays
murdering
nopwasky
sometimes
stealing
beer
wine
another
occasion
breaking
private
home
quoted
local
paper
department
corrections
report
acknowledged
described
model
prisoner
contacted
reporter
one
fellow
inmates
described
lustful
individual
strange
stuff
maybe
inmate
quoted
saying
knew
something
going
happen
indeed
readers
learned
murder
nopwasky
avoided
state
permitted
seek
death
penalty
murder
case
story
headlined
avoided
death
murder
one
paper
reported
decision
year
earlier
furman
georgia
temporarily
invalidated
death
penalty
prosecutor
earlier
trial
case
capital
murder
app
reported
press
prosecutor
indicted
murdering
nopwasky
concurred
case
underscored
need
swifter
capital
punishment
finally
area
residents
following
controversy
told
uncertain
terms
local
officials
already
convinced
guilt
local
congressman
announced
deeply
distressed
news
constituent
gladys
nopwasky
murdered
convicted
murderer
serving
highway
department
work
program
demanded
explanation
decisions
allowed
person
like
dawud
commit
murder
opponent
congressional
election
member
virginia
house
delegates
likewise
wrote
editorial
stated
outraged
department
corrections
inmate
apparently
murdered
resident
dale
city
assuring
public
right
person
charged
crime
local
police
chief
explained
lost
many
murder
cases
lately
evidence
come
point
indeed
virtue
intense
media
coverage
point
reached
long
trial
ii
question
us
whether
light
charged
atmosphere
surrounded
case
trial
constitutionally
obliged
ask
eight
jurors
admitted
exposure
pretrial
publicity
identify
precisely
read
seen
heard
majority
answers
question
negative
according
majority
trial
need
ask
prospective
juror
admitted
exposure
pretrial
publicity
whether
prospective
juror
views
impartial
cases
majority
asserts
never
gone
far
require
trial
courts
engage
content
questioning
impose
requirement
prove
unduly
burdensome
administration
justice
accept
analysis
long
repeatedly
recognized
exposure
pretrial
publicity
may
undermine
defendant
sixth
amendment
guarantee
trial
impartial
jury
irvin
dowd
rideau
louisiana
sheppard
maxwell
murphy
florida
patton
yount
order
jury
fulfill
constitutional
role
juror
must
set
aside
preconceptions
case
base
verdict
solely
evidence
trial
irvin
dowd
supra
theory
system
conclusions
reached
case
induced
evidence
argument
open
outside
influence
whether
private
talk
public
print
patterson
colorado
ex
rel
attorney
general
nonetheless
today
called
upon
address
great
detail
procedures
necessary
assure
protection
right
impartial
jury
sixth
amendment
particular
although
cases
indicate
trial
conclusion
particular
juror
overwhelmed
pretrial
publicity
reviewable
manifest
error
patton
yount
supra
quoting
irvin
dowd
supra
never
indicated
type
voir
dire
trial
must
undertake
order
findings
merit
special
deference
patton
yount
supra
quoting
bose
consumers
union
issue
today
case
essentially
one
first
impression
majority
observation
racial
bias
cases
never
gone
far
require
content
questioning
see
ante
irrelevant
even
assuming
scope
voir
dire
setting
need
greater
scope
voir
dire
setting
inference
drawn
failure
decisions
like
ham
south
carolina
aldridge
require
questioning
individual
jurors
facts
experiences
might
led
racial
bias
ante
sole
issue
cases
whether
inquiry
racial
bias
required
indeed
firm
conclusion
drawn
jurisprudence
prospective
juror
assurances
equal
task
dispositive
accused
rights
murphy
florida
supra
justice
observed
individual
juror
may
interest
concealing
bias
may
unaware
smith
phillips
concurring
opinion
natural
human
pride
suggest
negative
answer
whether
reason
juror
fair
impartial
dellinger
compare
irvin
dowd
supra
doubt
juror
sincere
said
fair
impartial
petitioner
psychological
impact
requiring
declaration
one
fellows
often
father
simply
impossible
square
today
decision
established
principle
prospective
juror
admits
exposure
pretrial
publicity
trial
must
elicit
simple
profession
swearing
person
jury
extent
considered
matter
emphasized
case
attended
adverse
pretrial
publicity
trial
undertake
searching
questioning
potential
jurors
screen
fixed
opinions
guilt
innocence
nebraska
press
assn
stuart
emphasis
added
accord
brennan
concurring
judgment
anything
less
renders
defendant
right
impartial
jury
meaningless
see
ham
carolina
supra
marshall
concurring
part
dissenting
part
recognized
reservation
opportunity
prove
actual
bias
guarantee
defendant
right
impartial
jury
dennis
fact
defendant
bears
burden
establishing
juror
partiality
see
wainwright
witt
irvin
dowd
supra
makes
imperative
defendant
entitled
meaningful
examination
jury
selection
order
elicit
potential
biases
possessed
prospective
jurors
view
prospective
juror
admits
exposure
pretrial
publicity
content
questioning
must
part
voir
dire
least
three
reasons
first
content
questioning
necessary
determine
whether
type
extent
publicity
prospective
juror
exposed
disqualify
juror
matter
law
cases
recognize
certain
circumstances
exposure
particularly
inflammatory
publicity
creates
strong
presumption
prejudice
jurors
claims
impartial
believed
patton
yount
supra
see
murphy
florida
instance
irvin
dowd
supra
concluded
capital
defendant
constitutionally
entitled
change
venue
one
exposed
inflammatory
media
descriptions
crime
confession
possibly
fairly
judged
case
publicity
saturated
community
defendant
trial
see
similarly
rideau
louisiana
presumed
community
prejudice
mandating
change
venue
petitioner
filmed
confession
obtained
police
interrogation
broadcast
local
television
three
consecutive
days
see
individual
exposed
publicity
qualitatively
akin
publicity
issue
irvin
rideau
necessarily
disqualified
jury
service
matter
earnestly
professes
impartiality
unless
trial
asks
prospective
juror
exactly
read
heard
case
able
determine
whether
juror
comes
within
class
cf
murphy
florida
supra
performing
careful
analysis
content
pretrial
publicity
jurors
exposed
rejecting
impartiality
challenge
sheppard
maxwell
observing
jurors
exposed
prejudicial
publicity
trial
criticizing
trial
failure
ask
jurors
whether
read
heard
specific
prejudicial
comment
case
second
even
pretrial
publicity
extreme
make
juror
exposure
per
se
disqualifying
content
questioning
still
essential
give
legal
depth
trial
finding
impartiality
one
reasons
juror
may
unaware
bias
smith
phillips
concurring
issue
impartiality
mixed
question
law
fact
see
irvin
dowd
resolution
necessarily
draws
upon
trial
legal
expertise
case
trial
asks
prospective
juror
merely
whether
impartial
may
well
get
answer
product
juror
confusion
impartiality
asking
prospective
juror
addition
identify
read
heard
case
corresponding
impressions
formed
trial
able
confirm
impartiality
juror
professes
impartiality
sixth
amendment
demands
third
content
questioning
facilitates
accurate
trial
factfinding
recognized
impartiality
determination
essentially
one
credibility
patton
yount
prospective
juror
acknowledges
exposure
pretrial
publicity
precise
content
publicity
constitutes
contextual
information
essential
accurate
assessment
whether
prospective
juror
profession
impartiality
believable
trial
declines
develop
background
finding
impartiality
simply
merit
appellate
deference
view
circumstances
case
presented
clear
need
content
questioning
exactly
persons
jury
admitted
exposed
information
case
trial
shown
see
supra
stories
printed
prior
trial
extraordinarily
prejudicial
made
less
inflammatory
headlines
typically
used
introduce
much
pretrial
publicity
type
long
thought
uniquely
destructive
juror
ability
maintain
open
mind
case
particular
reports
confession
see
nebraska
press
assn
stuart
brennan
concurring
judgment
rideau
louisiana
supra
irvin
dowd
supra
statements
prominent
public
officials
attesting
guilt
see
nebraska
press
assn
stuart
supra
brennan
concurring
judgment
sheppard
maxwell
supra
reports
unsavory
past
see
irvin
dowd
supra
profoundly
prejudicial
nature
published
newspapers
prior
trial
juror
exposed
bulk
certainly
disqualified
matter
law
standards
set
irvin
rideau
indeed
single
story
headlined
murderer
confesses
killing
woman
app
alternatively
story
headlined
accused
killer
says
stabbed
dale
city
woman
argument
opinion
destructive
effect
upon
impartiality
anyone
read
filmed
confession
rideau
upon
members
community
broadcast
minimum
without
inquiry
stories
read
eight
members
jury
acknowledged
exposure
pretrial
publicity
trial
position
credit
individual
professions
impartiality
according
justice
trial
obliged
pose
content
questions
trial
judge
familiar
potentially
prejudicial
publicity
jurors
might
exposed
ante
concurring
opinion
find
observation
perplexing
judge
awareness
contents
extraordinarily
prejudicial
stories
written
substitute
knowledge
whether
prospective
jurors
aware
content
stories
explained
judge
ignorance
jurors
exposure
particular
stories
renders
findings
juror
impartiality
unworthy
appellate
deference
indeed
least
two
stories
rendered
person
read
per
se
unqualified
sit
jury
trial
judge
awareness
stories
makes
even
inexcusable
willingness
seat
jurors
without
first
ascertaining
read
case
answer
protest
justice
trial
repeatedly
asked
prospective
jurors
whether
thought
fair
ibid
prospective
juror
admits
exposure
pretrial
publicity
juror
assertion
impartiality
insufficient
establish
impartiality
constitutional
purposes
see
juror
assertion
impartiality
becomes
sufficient
merely
repetition
finally
reject
majority
claim
content
questioning
rejected
unduly
burden
trial
courts
see
ante
sixty
years
ago
chief
justice
hughes
rejected
similar
contention
argument
advanced
behalf
government
detrimental
administration
law
courts
allow
questions
jurors
racial
religious
prejudices
think
far
injurious
permit
thought
persons
entertaining
disqualifying
prejudice
allowed
serve
jurors
inquiries
designed
elicit
fact
disqualification
barred
surer
way
devised
bring
processes
justice
disrepute
aldridge
case
majority
solicitude
administrative
convenience
wholly
gratuitous
numerous
federal
circuits
adopted
sorts
procedures
screening
juror
bias
majority
disparages
excessively
intrusive
see
addonizio
content
questioning
sequestered
voir
dire
cert
denied
davis
content
questioning
silverthorne
content
questioning
rule
crim
proc
subd
sequestered
voir
dire
state
pokini
haw
content
questioning
state
goodson
la
content
questioning
sequestered
voir
dire
state
claybrook
sequestered
voir
dire
state
herman
sequestered
voir
dire
state
finley
sequestered
voir
dire
see
also
colabella
recommending
sequestered
voir
dire
cases
involving
prejudicial
pretrial
publicity
harris
cert
denied
sub
nom
clay
american
bar
association
standards
criminal
justice
ed
judicial
conference
revised
report
judicial
conference
committee
operation
jury
system
free
press
fair
trial
issue
additionally
two
guarantee
criminal
defendants
sequestered
voir
dire
matter
right
capital
cases
see
rule
crim
proc
crim
proc
art
vernon
short
majority
anxiety
difficult
credit
light
number
jurisdictions
concluded
meaningful
steps
taken
insulate
proceedings
juror
bias
without
compromising
judicial
efficiency
iii
given
pervasiveness
modern
communications
difficulty
effacing
prejudicial
publicity
minds
jurors
trial
courts
must
take
strong
measures
ensure
balance
never
weighed
accused
sheppard
maxwell
reason
simple
compelling
system
justice
jury
may
strip
man
liberty
life
irvin
dowd
iv
even
believe
procedures
employed
jury
selection
satisfied
requirements
sixth
amendment
still
vacate
death
sentence
adhere
view
death
penalty
circumstances
cruel
unusual
punishment
prohibited
eighth
fourteenth
amendments
gregg
georgia
marshall
dissenting
due
process
clause
likewise
guarantees
criminal
defendant
right
impartial
jury
see
ristaino
ross
recognized
types
extrajudicial
influences
also
automatically
require
juror
disqualification
see
turner
louisiana
jurors
placed
custody
deputy
sheriffs
key
prosecution
witnesses
presumed
incapable
rendering
impartial
verdict
leonard
per
curiam
prospective
jurors
heard
trial
announce
defendant
guilty
verdict
first
trial
presumed
incapable
rendering
impartial
verdict
second
trial
similar
charges
majority
suggests
content
questions
necessary
community
saturated
wave
public
passion
irvin
see
ante
majority
argument
misses
point
irvin
case
stands
proposition
community
subject
unrelenting
prejudicial
pretrial
publicity
entire
community
presumed
exposed
publicity
prejudiced
entitling
defendant
change
venue
see
irvin
dowd
case
however
argue
pretrial
publicity
extensive
enough
create
presumption
community
prejudice
rather
argues
publicity
prejudicial
enough
create
presumption
prejudice
part
individual
juror
actually
read
questioning
one
prospective
juror
murder
bank
robbery
trial
susan
saxe
provides
particularly
dramatic
example
phenomenon
initially
queried
juror
admitted
read
case
insisted
impartial
following
colloquy
ensued
said
read
defendant
done
mean
well
know
done
know
know
done
see
guilty
innocent
go
whole
trial
ca
read
something
paper
say
girl
guilty
know
understand
well
sure
sure
mean
say
know
done
well
know
girl
went
held
bank
policeman
shot
justice
claims
patton
yount
squarely
foreclose
argument
juror
may
disqualified
matter
law
exposed
prejudicial
pretrial
publicity
ante
concurring
opinion
misreads
patton
far
rejecting
principle
patton
expressly
recognized
teaching
irvin
dowd
juror
exposure
prejudicial
pretrial
publicity
may
create
great
presumption
juror
prejudice
jurors
claims
impartial
believed
patton
merely
found
publicity
case
character
justify
finding
presumed
prejudice
see
today
opinion
addresses
extent
constitution
requires
content
questioning
cases
involving
pretrial
publicity
majority
acknowledges
federal
circuits
mandated
content
questioning
pretrial
publicity
cases
done
exercise
supervisory
powers
matter
constitutional
law
see
ante
consequently
nothing
today
opinion
read
overturning
use
content
questioning
circuits
today
decision
prevent
federal
circuits
following
suit
justice
kennedy
dissenting
confident
case
fall
latter
category
majority
demonstrates
differences
case
us
cases
like
irvin
inquiry
view
directed
question
actual
impartiality
seated
jurors
related
question
whether
trial
judge
conducted
adequate
examination
eight
jurors
acknowledged
exposure
press
accounts
trial
deciding
whether
seat
individual
juror
issue
whether
juror
lay
aside
opinion
formed
result
pretrial
publicity
render
verdict
based
evidence
presented
irvin
dowd
supra
required
jurors
totally
ignorant
facts
issues
involved
days
swift
widespread
diverse
methods
communication
important
case
expected
arouse
interest
public
vicinity
scarcely
best
qualified
serve
jurors
formed
impression
opinion
merits
case
respect
submit
justice
marshall
dissent
misreads
precedents
failing
note
distinction
two
quite
different
questions
addressed
appears
conflate
two
categories
cases
suggests
individual
exposed
publicity
qualitatively
akin
publicity
issue
irvin
rideau
necessarily
disqualified
jury
service
matter
earnestly
professes
impartiality
ante
justice
marshall
wrote
earlier
occasion
cases
like
irvin
rideau
made
stand
proposition
juror
exposure
information
state
defendant
prior
convictions
news
accounts
crime
charged
alone
presumptively
deprives
defendant
due
process
murphy
florida
supra
age
national
press
capacity
saturate
news
information
given
trial
dubious
proposed
rule
juror
must
disqualified
per
se
exposure
certain
level
publicity
without
added
pressure
huge
wave
public
passion
irvin
dowd
supra
rule
adopted
suspects
many
celebrated
cases
might
able
claim
virtual
immunity
trial
unlike
majority
however
alignment
concerns
expressed
justice
marshall
colleagues
dissent
find
voir
dire
case
inadequate
informed
ruling
jurors
qualified
sit
view
juror
acknowledgement
exposure
pretrial
publicity
initiates
duty
assess
individual
juror
ability
impartial
patton
yount
supra
determined
federal
habeas
review
statutory
presumption
correctness
attach
state
determination
particular
juror
impartial
found
good
reasons
apply
statutory
presumption
correctness
trial
resolution
questions
determination
made
extended
voir
dire
proceeding
designed
specifically
identify
biased
veniremen
determination
essentially
one
credibility
therefore
largely
one
demeanor
willingness
accord
substantial
deference
trial
finding
juror
impartiality
rests
expectation
trial
conduct
sufficient
voir
dire
determine
credibility
juror
professing
impartial
single
way
voir
dire
juror
limit
trial
judge
wide
discretion
determine
appropriate
form
content
voir
dire
questioning
little
interaction
may
required
make
individual
determination
juror
willingness
ability
set
aside
preconceived
ideas
evidence
case
guilt
innocence
defendant
trial
judge
might
choose
ask
content
publicity
juror
encountered
knowledge
help
deciding
whether
juror
claim
impartiality
accepted
judge
also
evaluate
impartiality
explaining
trial
processes
asking
general
questions
juror
commitment
follow
law
trial
instructions
instance
questions
trial
judge
asked
case
suffice
asked
individual
jurors
received
meaningful
responses
correct
asking
content
questions
front
jurors
may
harm
good
agree
justice
need
content
questioning
disappears
trial
judge
evaluating
juror
impartiality
assumes
hypothesis
jurors
read
seen
pretrial
publicity
difficulty
voir
dire
case
expressed
dissenting
justices
virginia
questions
case
deficient
prospective
jurors
simply
remain
silent
implied
indication
lack
bias
prejudice
gave
trial
effective
opportunity
assess
demeanor
prospective
juror
disclaiming
bias
whiting
dissenting
submit
respectful
dissent