plains
commerce
bank
long
family
land
cattle
et
argued
april
decided
june
petitioner
plains
commerce
bank
bank
bank
sold
land
owned
fee
simple
tribal
reservation
respondents
longs
indian
couple
leasing
land
option
purchase
claim
bank
discriminated
selling
parcel
nonmembers
tribe
terms
favorable
bank
offered
sell
couple
sued
tribal
asserting
inter
alia
discrimination
claims
bank
objection
tribal
concluded
jurisdiction
proceeded
trial
jury
ruled
bank
three
claims
including
discrimination
claim
awarded
longs
damages
plus
interest
supplemental
judgment
also
gave
longs
option
purchase
portion
fee
land
still
occupied
nullifying
bank
sale
land
tribal
appeals
affirmed
bank
filed
suit
federal
district
contending
tribal
judgment
null
void
relevant
tribal
lacked
jurisdiction
longs
discrimination
claim
district
granted
longs
summary
judgment
finding
tribal
jurisdiction
proper
bank
consensual
relationship
longs
company
also
respondent
brought
bank
within
first
category
tribal
civil
jurisdiction
nonmembers
outlined
montana
eighth
circuit
affirmed
concluding
tribe
authority
regulate
business
conduct
persons
voluntarily
dealing
tribal
members
including
nonmember
sale
fee
land
held
bank
article
iii
standing
pursue
challenge
respect
damages
option
purchase
bank
injured
fact
see
lujan
defenders
wildlife
tribal
exercise
jurisdiction
discrimination
claim
unpersuaded
longs
claim
damages
award
premised
entirely
verdict
bank
challenged
rather
discrimination
claim
verdict
form
allowed
jury
make
damages
award
finding
liability
individual
claims
jury
based
damages
award
whole
part
discrimination
finding
bank
also
injured
option
purchase
longs
discrimination
claim
sought
deed
land
relief
fact
remedial
purchase
option
applied
portion
total
parcel
eliminate
injury
bank
obligation
sell
land
longs
tribal
judgment
judgment
effectively
nullified
portion
sale
third
party
injuries
remedied
ruling
tribal
lacked
jurisdiction
judgment
discrimination
claim
null
void
pp
tribal
jurisdiction
adjudicate
discrimination
claim
concerning
bank
sale
fee
land
pp
general
rule
tribes
possess
authority
come
within
borders
montana
restricts
tribal
authority
nonmember
activities
taking
place
reservation
particularly
strong
nonmember
activity
occurs
land
owned
fee
simple
strate
contractors
tribal
land
converted
fee
simple
tribe
loses
plenary
jurisdiction
see
county
yakima
confederated
tribes
bands
yakima
nation
moreover
tribe
members
convey
fee
land
third
parties
tribe
loses
former
right
absolute
exclusive
use
occupation
conveyed
lands
south
dakota
bourland
thus
tribe
authority
regulate
use
fee
land
brendale
confederated
tribes
bands
yakima
nation
montana
provides
two
exceptions
tribes
may
exercise
civil
jurisdiction
reservations
even
fee
lands
tribe
may
regulate
taxation
licensing
means
activities
nonmembers
enter
consensual
relationships
tribe
members
commercial
dealing
contracts
leases
arrangements
ibid
tribe
may
exercise
civil
authority
conduct
fee
lands
within
reservation
conduct
threatens
direct
effect
political
integrity
economic
security
health
welfare
tribe
neither
exception
authorizes
tribal
courts
exercise
jurisdiction
longs
discrimination
claim
pp
tribal
lacks
jurisdiction
hear
claim
tribe
lacks
civil
authority
regulate
bank
sale
fee
land
tribe
adjudicative
jurisdiction
exceed
legislative
jurisdiction
strate
supra
montana
permit
tribes
regulate
sale
fee
land
rather
permits
tribal
regulation
nonmember
conduct
inside
reservation
implicates
tribe
sovereign
interests
one
exception
see
brendale
supra
never
upheld
montana
extension
tribal
civil
authority
nonmembers
land
nevada
hicks
found
montana
authorized
tribe
regulate
sale
land
makes
good
sense
given
limited
nature
tribal
sovereignty
liberty
interests
nonmembers
tribal
sovereign
interests
confined
managing
tribal
land
see
worcester
georgia
pet
protecting
tribal
controlling
internal
relations
see
montana
supra
regulations
approved
montana
flow
limited
interests
see
duro
reina
none
interests
justified
tribal
regulation
nonmember
sale
fee
land
tribe
justify
regulation
sale
fee
land
reference
power
superintend
tribal
land
fee
parcels
ceased
tribal
land
regulation
fee
land
sales
justified
tribe
interest
protecting
internal
relations
direct
harm
sustained
fee
land
sale
sustained
point
land
passes
indian
hands
resale
causes
additional
damage
regulating
fee
land
sales
also
runs
risk
subjecting
nonmembers
tribal
regulatory
authority
without
consent
bill
rights
apply
tribes
nonmembers
say
laws
regulations
governing
tribal
territory
tribal
laws
regulations
may
applied
nonmembers
consented
tribal
authority
expressly
action
even
regulation
must
stem
tribe
inherent
sovereign
authority
set
conditions
entry
preserve
control
internal
relations
reason
bank
anticipated
general
business
dealings
longs
permit
tribe
regulate
bank
sale
land
owned
fee
simple
longs
attempt
salvage
position
arguing
discrimination
claim
read
challenge
bank
whole
course
commercial
dealings
unavailing
claims
involve
bank
general
dealings
discrimination
claim
discrimination
claim
tied
specifically
fee
land
sale
discrimination
claim
pp
second
montana
exception
stems
sovereign
interests
giving
rise
first
also
inapplicable
conduct
covered
exception
must
injure
tribe
must
imperil
subsistence
tribal
community
montana
land
issue
owned
party
least
years
resale
another
hardly
imperil
subsistence
welfare
tribe
ibid
pp
contrary
longs
argument
bank
sought
tribal
aid
serving
process
longs
bank
pending
eviction
action
bank
consent
tribal
jurisdiction
discrimination
claim
bank
consistently
contended
tribal
lacked
jurisdiction
reversed
roberts
delivered
opinion
scalia
kennedy
thomas
alito
joined
stevens
souter
ginsburg
breyer
joined
part
ii
ginsburg
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
stevens
souter
breyer
joined
plains
commerce
bank
petitioner
long
family
land
cattle
company
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
june
chief
justice
roberts
delivered
opinion
case
concerns
sale
fee
land
tribal
reservation
bank
individuals
following
sale
indian
couple
customers
bank
defaulted
loans
claimed
bank
discriminated
offering
land
terms
favorable
bank
offered
couple
sued
claim
tribal
bank
contested
jurisdiction
tribal
concluded
jurisdiction
proceeded
hear
case
ultimately
ruled
bank
awarded
indian
couple
damages
right
purchase
portion
fee
land
question
presented
whether
tribal
jurisdiction
adjudicate
discrimination
claim
concerning
bank
sale
fee
land
owned
hold
long
family
land
cattle
company
long
company
company
ranching
farming
operation
incorporated
laws
south
dakota
lands
located
cheyenne
river
sioux
indian
reservation
massive
acre
affair
reservation
appreciably
diminished
congress
present
consists
roughly
million
acres
located
dewey
ziebach
counties
south
dakota
long
company
respondent
along
ronnie
lila
long
husband
wife
together
least
percent
company
shares
ronnie
lila
long
enrolled
members
cheyenne
river
sioux
indian
tribe
longs
company
customers
many
years
plains
commerce
bank
bank
located
miles
reservation
crow
flies
hoven
south
dakota
bank
like
long
company
south
dakota
corporation
ties
reservation
business
dealings
tribal
members
bank
made
first
commercial
loan
long
company
series
agreements
followed
part
agreements
kenneth
long
ronnie
long
father
mortgaged
bank
acres
fee
land
owned
inside
reservation
time
kenneth
long
death
summer
kenneth
long
company
owed
bank
spring
ronnie
lila
long
began
negotiating
new
loan
contract
bank
effort
shore
company
flagging
financial
fortunes
come
terms
outstanding
debts
several
months
parties
finally
reached
agreement
december
year
two
agreements
precise
company
bank
signed
fresh
loan
contract
according
kenneth
long
estate
deeded
previously
mortgaged
fee
acreage
bank
lieu
foreclosure
app
return
bank
agreed
cancel
company
debt
make
additional
operating
loans
parties
also
agreed
lease
arrangement
company
received
lease
acres
deeded
bank
option
purchase
land
end
term
point
longs
claim
bank
began
treating
badly
longs
say
bank
initially
offered
favorable
purchase
terms
lease
agreement
allegedly
proposing
sell
land
back
longs
contract
deed
bank
eventually
rescinded
offer
longs
claim
citing
jurisdictional
might
caused
bank
financing
owned
entity
reservation
case
came
punishing
winter
longs
lost
head
cattle
blizzards
season
result
long
company
unable
exercise
option
purchase
leased
acreage
lease
contract
expired
nevertheless
longs
refused
vacate
property
prompting
bank
initiate
eviction
proceedings
state
petition
cheyenne
river
sioux
tribal
serve
longs
notice
quit
meantime
bank
sold
acres
fee
land
owned
couple
june
longs
continued
occupy
parcel
land
bank
sold
remaining
acres
two
nonmembers
july
longs
long
company
filed
suit
bank
tribal
seeking
injunction
prevent
eviction
property
reverse
sale
land
asserted
variety
claims
including
breach
contract
bad
faith
violation
remedies
discrimination
discrimination
claim
alleged
bank
sold
land
nonmembers
terms
favorable
offered
company
bank
asserted
answer
lacked
jurisdiction
also
stated
counterclaim
tribal
found
jurisdiction
denied
bank
motion
summary
judgment
counterclaim
proceeded
trial
four
causes
action
submitted
jury
breach
contract
bad
faith
violation
remedies
discrimination
jury
found
longs
three
four
causes
including
discrimination
claim
awarded
general
verdict
denying
bank
motion
judgment
notwithstanding
verdict
finding
jurisdiction
adjudicate
longs
claims
tribal
entered
judgment
awarding
longs
plus
interest
later
supplemental
judgment
awarded
longs
option
purchase
acres
land
still
occupied
terms
offered
original
purchase
option
effectively
nullifying
bank
previous
sale
land
bank
appealed
cheyenne
river
sioux
tribal
appeals
affirmed
judgment
trial
bank
filed
instant
action
district
district
south
dakota
seeking
declaration
tribal
judgment
null
void
relevant
tribal
lacked
jurisdiction
longs
discrimination
claim
district
granted
summary
judgment
longs
found
tribal
jurisdiction
proper
bank
entered
consensual
relationship
longs
long
company
supp
sd
according
district
relationship
brought
bank
within
first
category
tribal
civil
jurisdiction
nonmembers
outlined
montana
see
supp
appeals
eighth
circuit
affirmed
longs
discrimination
claim
held
arose
directly
preexisting
commercial
relationship
bank
bank
chose
deal
longs
effectively
consented
substantive
regulation
tribe
antidiscrimination
tort
claim
another
way
regulating
commercial
transactions
parties
see
ibid
sum
tribe
authority
regulate
business
conduct
persons
voluntarily
deal
tribal
members
including
nonmember
sale
fee
land
ibid
granted
certiorari
reverse
ii
considering
tribal
authority
adjudicate
discrimination
claim
must
first
address
longs
contention
bank
lacks
standing
raise
jurisdictional
challenge
first
place
though
longs
raised
standing
argument
first
time
bear
independent
obligation
assure
jurisdiction
proper
proceeding
merits
see
steel
citizens
better
environment
begin
noting
whether
tribal
adjudicative
authority
nonmembers
federal
question
see
iowa
mut
ins
laplante
national
farmers
union
ins
crow
tribe
tribal
found
lack
jurisdiction
judgment
nonmember
necessarily
null
void
longs
contest
settled
principle
argue
instead
bank
suffered
injury
fact
required
article
iii
provision
see
lujan
defenders
wildlife
longs
appear
recognize
argument
somewhat
counterintuitive
concede
jury
found
bank
guilty
discrimination
awarded
plus
interest
longs
contend
jury
damages
award
fact
premised
entirely
rather
discrimination
claim
bank
presently
challenge
verdict
support
argument
longs
point
amended
complaint
tribal
complaint
comprised
nine
counts
several
counts
sought
damages
discrimination
count
relief
discrimination
claim
longs
asked
granted
possession
title
land
app
longs
contend
damage
award
therefore
nothing
discrimination
claim
result
decision
finding
jurisdiction
respect
claim
claim
bank
appeals
change
anything
persuaded
jury
verdict
form
consisted
six
special
interrogatories
covering
claim
asserted
bank
another
one
covering
amount
damages
awarded
damages
interrogatory
specifically
allowed
jury
make
award
finding
liability
individual
claims
answered
yes
numbers
amount
damages
awarded
plaintiffs
emphasis
added
jury
found
bank
three
special
interrogatories
including
number
discrimination
claim
bank
jurors
found
intentionally
discriminate
plaintiffs
ronnie
lila
long
jury
entered
award
facts
establish
jury
based
damages
award
whole
part
finding
discrimination
addition
option
purchase
longs
argue
requiring
bank
void
sale
nonmembers
parcel
sell
parcel
instead
constitute
tribal
actually
denied
relief
longs
sought
bank
discrimination
supplemental
judgment
tribal
refused
permit
longs
long
company
purchase
land
requested
instead
granting
option
purchase
acres
longs
occupied
time
see
supplemental
judgment
long
family
land
cattle
maciejewski
app
pet
cert
even
partial
relief
longs
insist
crafted
equitable
remedy
claim
see
brief
respondents
event
bank
really
suffered
harm
gain
much
income
selling
longs
selling
nonmembers
see
arguments
defeat
bank
standing
longs
requested
remedy
alleged
discrimination
possession
title
subject
land
app
received
option
acquire
portion
exactly
see
app
pet
cert
tribal
silence
supplemental
judgment
claim
exactly
option
purchase
meant
remedy
immaterial
see
ibid
four
claims
presented
jury
discrimination
claim
sought
deed
land
relief
see
amended
complaint
app
fact
remedial
purchase
option
applied
portion
total
parcel
eliminate
bank
injury
bank
obligation
sell
land
longs
tribal
judgment
indeed
bank
already
sold
acreage
third
parties
tribal
judgment
effectively
nullified
portion
sale
judicially
imposed
burden
certainly
qualifies
injury
standing
purposes
longs
speculation
bank
make
much
money
selling
land
selling
parcel
nonmembers
argument
entirely
beside
point
adequate
injury
compelled
undo
one
deed
enter
another
particularly
individuals
previously
defaulted
loans
respect
damages
option
purchase
bank
injured
tribal
exercise
jurisdiction
discrimination
claim
injuries
remedied
ruling
favor
bank
tribal
lacked
jurisdiction
judgment
discrimination
claim
null
void
ultimate
collateral
consequence
determination
whatever
may
vacatur
general
damages
award
vacatur
option
purchase
new
trial
claims
alter
fact
bank
shown
injury
traceable
challenged
action
likely
redressed
favorable
ruling
allen
wright
bank
article
iii
standing
pursue
challenge
iii
nearly
two
centuries
recognized
indian
tribes
distinct
independent
political
communities
worcester
georgia
pet
qualified
exercise
many
powers
prerogatives
see
wheeler
frequently
noted
however
sovereignty
indian
tribes
retain
unique
limited
character
centers
land
held
tribe
tribal
members
within
reservation
see
mazurie
tribes
retain
authority
govern
members
territory
subject
ultimately
congress
see
also
nevada
hicks
ribes
retain
sovereign
interests
activities
occur
land
owned
controlled
tribe
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
part
residual
sovereignty
tribes
retain
power
legislate
tax
activities
reservation
including
certain
activities
nonmembers
see
navajo
tribe
determine
tribal
membership
see
santa
clara
pueblo
martinez
regulate
domestic
relations
among
members
see
fisher
district
sixteenth
judicial
dist
per
curiam
may
also
exclude
outsiders
entering
tribal
land
see
duro
reina
tribes
general
matter
possess
authority
come
within
borders
inherent
sovereign
powers
indian
tribe
extend
activities
nonmembers
tribe
montana
explained
oliphant
suquamish
tribe
tribes
virtue
incorporation
american
republic
lost
right
governing
person
within
limits
except
emphasis
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
general
rule
restricts
tribal
authority
nonmember
activities
taking
place
reservation
particularly
strong
nonmember
activity
occurs
land
owned
fee
simple
called
fee
land
strate
contractors
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
thanks
indian
general
allotment
act
stat
amended
et
millions
acres
fee
land
located
within
contiguous
borders
indian
tribes
see
atkinson
trading
shirley
history
general
allotment
act
successor
statutes
well
rehearsed
precedents
see
montana
supra
county
yakima
confederated
tribes
bands
yakima
nation
suffice
say
effect
act
convert
millions
acres
formerly
tribal
land
fee
simple
parcels
fully
alienable
free
charge
encumbrance
whatsoever
supp
see
cohen
handbook
federal
indian
law
pp
ed
hereinafter
cohen
cases
made
clear
tribal
land
converted
fee
simple
tribe
loses
plenary
jurisdiction
see
county
yakima
supra
general
allotment
act
permits
yakima
county
impose
ad
valorem
tax
fee
land
located
within
reservation
goudy
meath
rendering
allotted
lands
alienable
general
allotment
act
exposed
state
assessment
forced
sale
taxes
heff
fee
land
subject
plenary
state
jurisdiction
upon
issuance
trust
patent
superseded
burke
act
stat
among
powers
lost
authority
prevent
land
sale
see
county
yakima
supra
general
allotment
act
granted
fee
holders
power
voluntary
sale
surprisingly
free
alienability
holder
core
attribute
fee
simple
moynihan
introduction
law
real
property
ed
moreover
tribe
tribal
members
convey
parcel
fee
land
tribe
loses
former
right
absolute
exclusive
use
occupation
conveyed
lands
south
dakota
bourland
emphasis
added
necessarily
entails
loss
regulatory
jurisdiction
use
land
others
ibid
general
rule
tribe
authority
way
tribal
ordinance
actions
tribal
courts
regulate
use
fee
land
brendale
confederated
tribes
bands
yakima
nation
opinion
white
recognized
two
exceptions
principle
circumstances
tribes
may
exercise
civil
jurisdiction
reservations
even
fee
lands
montana
first
tribe
may
regulate
taxation
licensing
means
activities
nonmembers
enter
consensual
relationships
tribe
members
commercial
dealing
contracts
leases
arrangements
ibid
second
tribe
may
exercise
civil
authority
conduct
fee
lands
within
reservation
conduct
threatens
direct
effect
political
integrity
economic
security
health
welfare
tribe
rules
become
known
montana
exceptions
case
elaborated
terms
exceptions
concern
regulation
activities
nonmembers
conduct
fee
land
given
montana
proposition
inherent
sovereign
powers
indian
tribe
extend
activities
nonmembers
tribe
atkinson
supra
quoting
montana
supra
efforts
tribe
regulate
nonmembers
especially
fee
land
presumptively
invalid
atkinson
supra
burden
rests
tribe
establish
one
exceptions
montana
general
rule
allow
extension
tribal
authority
regulate
nonmembers
fee
land
atkinson
exceptions
limited
ones
construed
manner
swallow
rule
severely
shrink
strate
bank
contends
neither
exception
authorizes
tribal
courts
exercise
jurisdiction
longs
discrimination
claim
issue
case
agree
according
precedents
tribe
adjudicative
jurisdiction
exceed
legislative
jurisdiction
reaffirm
principle
today
hold
tribal
lacks
jurisdiction
hear
longs
discrimination
claim
tribe
lacks
civil
authority
regulate
bank
sale
fee
land
longs
discrimination
claim
challenges
sale
fee
land
despite
longs
attempt
recharacterize
claim
turning
bank
alleged
failure
pay
respondents
loans
promised
tribal
trust
land
brief
respondents
fact
longs
brought
discrimination
claim
seeking
land
sales
set
aside
ground
sale
nonmembers
terms
favorable
bank
extended
longs
violated
tribal
tort
law
quoting
plaintiffs
amended
complaint
app
see
also
brief
amicus
curiae
discrimination
claim
thus
concerned
sale
fee
parcel
bank
acquired
estate
status
land
relevant
insofar
bears
application
montana
exceptions
case
hicks
souter
concurring
acres
issue
alienated
cheyenne
river
sioux
tribal
trust
converted
fee
simple
parcels
part
act
may
stat
commonly
called
allotment
act
see
brief
respondents
general
allotment
act
provided
division
tribal
land
fee
simple
parcels
owned
individual
tribal
members
act
also
mandated
allotments
held
trust
owners
period
years
longer
president
discretion
time
parcel
owners
authority
sell
convey
land
see
supp
act
released
particular
indian
owners
restrictions
ahead
schedule
vesting
full
fee
ownership
see
stat
congress
passed
indian
reorganization
act
stat
et
pu
end
allotment
reservation
land
return
allotted
land
allotment
status
leaving
fully
alienable
allottees
heirs
assigns
county
yakima
tribal
tort
law
longs
attempting
enforce
however
operates
restraint
alienation
set
limits
nonmembers
may
engage
commercial
transactions
transactions
specifically
nonmembers
sale
fee
lands
regulates
substantive
terms
bank
able
offer
fee
land
sale
respondents
principal
amicus
acknowledge
tribal
tort
issue
form
regulation
see
brief
respondents
brief
amicus
curiae
see
also
riegel
medtronic
slip
argue
regulation
fully
authorized
first
montana
exception
mistaken
montana
permit
indian
tribes
regulate
sale
fee
land
montana
progeny
permit
tribal
regulation
nonmember
conduct
inside
reservation
implicates
tribe
sovereign
interests
montana
expressly
limits
first
exception
activities
nonmembers
allowing
regulated
extent
necessary
protect
tribal
control
internal
relations
see
big
horn
cty
elect
cooperative
adams
montana
grant
tribe
unlimited
regulatory
adjudicative
authority
nonmember
rather
montana
limits
tribal
jurisdiction
first
exception
regulation
activities
nonmembers
internal
quotations
omitted
emphasis
added
cited
four
cases
explanation
montana
first
exception
involved
regulation
activities
reservation
discernable
effect
tribe
members
first
concerned
tribal
jurisdiction
contract
dispute
arising
sale
merchandise
indian
reservation
see
williams
lee
three
involved
taxes
economic
activity
nonmembers
see
washington
confederated
tribes
colville
reservation
cases
tribe
significant
interest
subject
matter
tribes
retain
authority
tax
activities
property
taking
place
situated
indian
lands
morris
hitchcock
upholding
tribal
taxes
nonmembers
grazing
cattle
fee
land
within
tribal
territory
buster
wright
creek
nation
possessed
power
levy
permit
tax
nonmembers
privilege
business
within
reservation
cases
since
montana
followed
pattern
permitting
regulation
certain
forms
nonmember
conduct
tribal
land
upheld
within
tribe
sovereign
authority
imposition
severance
tax
natural
resources
removed
nonmembers
tribal
land
see
merrion
jicarilla
apache
tribe
approved
tribal
taxes
imposed
leasehold
interests
held
tribal
lands
well
sales
taxes
imposed
nonmember
businesses
within
reservation
see
similarly
approved
licensing
requirements
hunting
fishing
tribal
land
see
new
mexico
mescalero
apache
tribe
tellingly
one
minor
exception
never
upheld
montana
extension
tribal
civil
authority
nonmembers
land
hicks
supra
emphasis
added
see
atkinson
tribe
may
tax
nonmember
activity
fee
land
strate
tribal
lacks
jurisdiction
tort
suit
involving
accident
land
montana
supra
tribe
authority
regulate
nonmember
hunting
fishing
fee
land
exception
brendale
confederated
tribes
bands
yakima
nation
even
fits
general
rubric
noted
case
permitted
tribe
restrain
particular
uses
fee
land
zoning
regulations
majority
held
montana
authorize
yakima
nation
impose
zoning
regulations
fee
land
located
area
reservation
nearly
half
acreage
owned
nonmembers
opinion
white
opinion
stevens
five
justices
concluded
montana
permit
tribe
impose
different
zoning
restrictions
nonmember
fee
land
isolated
heart
closed
portion
reservation
opinion
stevens
though
agree
rationale
see
opinion
blackmun
whether
permitted
regulation
nonmember
activity
fee
land
given
case
case
found
montana
authorized
tribe
regulate
sale
land
rather
montana
cases
always
concerned
nonmember
conduct
land
see
hicks
montana
strate
concern
tribal
authority
regulate
nonmembers
activities
fee
land
emphasis
added
atkinson
conduct
nonmembers
fee
land
souter
concurring
activities
nonmembers
bourland
use
land
brendale
supra
use
fee
land
montana
supra
first
exception
covers
activities
nonmembers
distinction
sale
land
conduct
precedent
foregoing
cases
demonstrate
entirely
logical
given
limited
nature
tribal
sovereignty
liberty
interests
nonmembers
virtue
incorporation
tribe
sovereign
interests
confined
managing
tribal
land
see
worcester
persons
allowed
enter
indian
land
assent
tribal
members
protect
ing
tribal
control
ling
internal
relations
see
montana
supra
logic
montana
certain
activities
fee
land
say
business
enterprise
employing
tribal
members
certain
uses
say
commercial
development
may
intrude
internal
relations
tribe
threaten
tribal
extent
activities
land
uses
may
regulated
see
hicks
supra
tribal
assertion
regulatory
authority
nonmembers
must
connected
right
indians
make
laws
governed
put
another
way
certain
forms
nonmember
behavior
even
fee
land
may
sufficiently
affect
tribe
justify
tribal
oversight
tribes
generally
interest
regulating
conduct
nonmembers
may
regulate
nonmember
behavior
implicates
tribal
governance
internal
relations
regulations
approved
montana
flow
directly
limited
sovereign
interests
tribe
traditional
undisputed
power
exclude
persons
tribal
land
duro
example
gives
power
set
conditions
entry
land
via
licensing
requirements
hunting
regulations
see
bourland
supra
regulatory
authority
goes
hand
hand
power
exclude
much
taxation
justified
similar
basis
see
colville
taxing
power
may
exercised
nonmembers
far
nonmembers
may
accept
privileges
trade
residence
taxes
may
attached
conditions
quoting
powers
indian
tribes
emphasis
added
power
tax
certain
nonmember
activity
also
justified
necessary
instrument
territorial
management
merrion
insofar
taxation
enables
tribal
government
raise
revenues
essential
services
pay
employees
provide
police
protection
general
carry
functions
keep
peace
order
ibid
justice
ginsburg
wonders
sorts
regulations
permissible
montana
regulating
sale
fee
land
see
post
reason
regulation
sale
fee
land
unlike
justified
reference
tribe
sovereign
interests
definition
fee
land
owned
nonmembers
already
removed
tribe
immediate
control
see
strate
tribes
lack
power
assert
fee
land
landowner
right
occupy
exclude
already
alienated
tribal
trust
tribe
justify
regulation
land
sale
reference
power
superintend
tribal
land
fee
parcels
ceased
tribal
land
regulation
fee
land
sales
justified
tribe
interests
protecting
internal
relations
direct
harm
political
integrity
tribe
sustains
result
fee
land
sale
sustained
point
land
passes
indian
hands
point
tribe
members
lose
ability
use
land
purposes
land
sold
fee
simple
passed
beyond
tribe
immediate
control
mere
resale
land
works
additional
intrusion
tribal
relations
resale
causes
additional
damage
suggest
sale
land
impact
tribe
uses
land
put
may
well
change
owner
owner
uses
may
well
affect
tribe
members
cases
bear
see
supra
tribe
may
quite
legitimately
seek
protect
members
noxious
uses
threaten
tribal
welfare
security
nonmember
conduct
land
key
point
threat
tribe
sovereign
interests
flows
changed
uses
nonmember
activities
rather
mere
fact
resale
tribe
able
fully
vindicate
sovereign
interests
protecting
members
preserving
tribal
regulating
nonmember
activity
land
within
limits
set
forth
cases
tribe
independent
interest
restraining
alienation
land
thus
authority
regulation
fee
land
sale
beyond
tribe
sovereign
powers
runs
risk
subjecting
nonmembers
tribal
regulatory
authority
without
commensurate
consent
tribal
sovereignty
remembered
sovereignty
outside
basic
structure
constitution
lara
kennedy
concurring
judgment
bill
rights
apply
indian
tribes
see
talton
mayes
indian
courts
differ
traditional
american
courts
number
significant
respects
hicks
souter
concurring
nonmembers
part
tribal
government
say
laws
regulations
govern
tribal
territory
consequently
laws
regulations
may
fairly
imposed
nonmembers
nonmember
consented
either
expressly
actions
even
regulation
must
stem
tribe
inherent
sovereign
authority
set
conditions
entry
preserve
tribal
control
internal
relations
see
montana
commenting
policy
goals
congress
adopted
general
allotment
act
noted
simply
suggestion
history
act
congress
intended
settle
upon
alienated
allotted
lands
subject
tribal
regulatory
authority
fact
said
defies
common
sense
suppose
congress
meant
subject
tribal
jurisdiction
simply
virtue
nonmember
purchase
land
fee
simple
ibid
congress
anticipate
tribal
jurisdiction
run
land
see
reason
nonmember
think
either
longs
point
bank
case
hardly
surprised
tribe
assertion
regulatory
power
parties
business
dealings
bank
lengthy
commercial
relationships
long
company
brief
respondents
justice
ginsburg
echoes
point
see
post
emphasized
repeatedly
context
comes
tribal
regulatory
authority
penny
pound
atkinson
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
bank
may
reasonably
anticipated
various
commercial
dealings
longs
trigger
tribal
authority
regulate
transactions
question
need
decide
reason
bank
anticipated
general
business
dealings
respondents
permit
tribe
regulate
bank
sale
land
owned
fee
simple
even
courts
recognized
longs
discrimination
claim
novel
one
arose
directly
lakota
tradition
embedded
cheyenne
river
sioux
tradition
custom
including
lakota
sense
justice
fair
play
decency
others
supp
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
upshot
require
bank
offer
terms
sale
prospective
buyer
defaulted
several
previous
transactions
bank
offered
different
buyer
without
history
default
surely
typical
regulation
whatever
bank
anticipated
whatever
consensual
relationship
may
established
bank
dealing
longs
jurisdictional
consequences
relationship
extend
bank
subsequent
sale
fee
land
longs
acknowledge
obliquely
critical
importance
land
status
emphasize
long
company
operated
reservation
fee
trust
lands
brief
respondents
note
fee
land
issue
agreement
previously
belonged
tribal
member
facts
however
change
status
land
time
challenged
sale
regardless
long
company
operated
fee
land
whose
sale
longs
seek
restrain
owned
bank
relevant
time
indeed
owned
kenneth
long
see
hicks
supra
souter
concurring
land
status
might
well
impact
one
perhaps
montana
exceptions
atkinson
supra
souter
concurring
status
territory
tribal
fee
land
may
much
likelihood
facts
exist
relevant
montana
exceptions
longs
attempt
salvage
position
arguing
discrimination
claim
best
read
challenge
bank
whole
course
commercial
dealings
longs
stretching
back
decade
sale
fee
land
brief
respondents
argument
unavailing
longs
first
point
claims
involve
bank
course
dealings
ibid
discrimination
claim
us
claim
tied
specifically
sale
fee
ibid
count
six
longs
amended
complaint
tribal
alleges
selling
longs
land
plains
commerce
bank
unfairly
discriminated
company
longs
app
emphasis
added
relief
longs
claimed
get
possession
title
land
back
longs
discrimination
claim
short
attempt
regulate
terms
bank
may
sell
land
regulation
outside
scope
tribe
sovereign
authority
justice
ginsburg
asserts
federal
government
every
state
county
municipality
make
nondiscrimination
law
governing
real
property
transactions
tribes
able
well
post
argument
completely
overlooks
reason
cases
like
montana
one
arise
tribal
jurisdiction
unlike
jurisdiction
governmental
entities
cited
justice
ginsburg
generally
extend
nonmembers
see
montana
supra
sovereign
authority
indian
tribes
limited
ways
state
federal
authority
contrary
justice
ginsburg
suggestion
bedrock
principle
vary
depending
desirability
particular
regulation
montana
provides
certain
circumstances
tribes
may
exercise
authority
conduct
nonmembers
even
conduct
takes
place
fee
land
conduct
taking
place
land
sale
land
two
different
things
cheyenne
river
sioux
tribe
lost
authority
restrain
sale
fee
simple
parcels
inside
borders
land
sold
part
allotment
act
nothing
montana
gives
back
neither
district
appeals
relied
decision
second
montana
exception
eighth
circuit
declined
address
exception
applicability
see
district
strongly
suggested
passing
second
exception
apply
see
supp
district
correct
reasons
explained
second
montana
exception
stems
sovereign
interests
give
rise
first
interests
reach
regulating
sale
fee
land
second
exception
authorizes
tribe
exercise
civil
jurisdiction
conduct
menaces
political
integrity
economic
security
health
welfare
tribe
montana
conduct
must
injure
tribe
must
imperil
subsistence
tribal
community
ibid
one
commentator
noted
th
elevated
threshold
application
second
montana
exception
suggests
tribal
power
must
necessary
avert
catastrophic
consequences
cohen
sale
formerly
fee
land
third
party
quite
possibly
disappointing
tribe
fairly
called
catastrophic
tribal
see
strate
land
question
owned
party
least
years
brief
respondents
time
project
tribal
proceeded
without
interruption
land
resale
another
hardly
imperil
subsistence
welfare
tribe
montana
supra
accordingly
hold
second
montana
exception
inapplicable
case
finally
address
longs
argument
bank
consented
tribal
jurisdiction
discrimination
claim
seeking
assistance
tribal
courts
serving
notice
quit
brief
respondents
longs
refused
vacate
land
bank
initiated
eviction
proceedings
south
dakota
state
bank
asked
tribal
appoint
process
server
able
reach
longs
seeking
tribal
aid
serving
process
tribal
members
pending
action
think
constitute
consent
future
litigation
tribal
notably
longs
file
complaint
bank
tribal
bank
promptly
contended
answer
lacked
jurisdiction
brief
amicus
curiae
circumstances
find
bank
consent
litigation
conduct
tribal
jurisdiction
longs
discrimination
claim
judgment
appeals
eighth
circuit
reversed
ordered
plains
commerce
bank
petitioner
long
family
land
cattle
company
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
june
justice
ginsburg
justice
stevens
justice
souter
justice
breyer
join
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
agree
petitioner
plains
commerce
bank
bank
article
iii
standing
contest
jurisdiction
cheyenne
river
sioux
tribal
therefore
join
part
ii
opinion
take
issue
jurisdictional
ruling
insofar
relates
tribal
supplemental
judgment
judgment
tribal
ordered
bank
give
ronnie
lila
long
option
repurchase
fee
land
bank
already
contracted
sell
individuals
see
app
pet
cert
dissent
decision
however
extent
overturns
tribal
principal
judgment
awarding
longs
damages
amount
plus
interest
see
app
judgment
disturb
bank
sale
fee
land
simply
responded
claim
bank
commercial
dealings
longs
treated
disadvantageously
tribal
affiliation
racial
identity
claim
genre
hold
one
tribal
competent
adjudicate
appeals
correctly
understood
longs
case
heart
sale
fee
land
tribal
reservation
bank
individuals
ante
rather
case
power
tribe
hold
nonmembers
like
bank
minimum
standard
fairness
voluntarily
deal
tribal
members
case
basis
discrimination
claim
longs
essentially
asserted
bank
offered
terms
conditions
transactions
less
favorable
terms
conditions
offered
although
tribal
reinstate
longs
owners
ranch
lands
family
decades
hold
bank
answerable
damages
law
traditional
remedy
tortious
injury
longs
experienced
pathmarking
case
montana
restated
absent
treaty
statute
indian
tribes
generally
lack
authority
regulate
activities
nonmembers
stating
general
rule
montana
also
identified
two
exceptions
tribe
may
regulate
taxation
licensing
means
activities
nonmembers
enter
consensual
relationships
tribe
members
commercial
dealing
contracts
leases
arrangements
tribe
may
also
retain
inherent
power
exercise
civil
authority
conduct
fee
lands
within
reservation
conduct
threatens
direct
effect
political
integrity
economic
security
health
welfare
tribe
citations
omitted
two
exceptions
montana
explained
recognize
indian
tribes
retain
inherent
sovereign
power
exercise
forms
civil
jurisdiction
reservations
even
fee
lands
emphasis
added
montana
specifically
addressed
regulatory
jurisdiction
tribes
see
since
clarified
tribe
authority
regulate
activity
nonmembers
tribal
courts
presumably
adjudicatory
authority
disputes
arising
activity
see
strate
contractors
nonmembers
tribe
adjudicative
jurisdiction
coincides
legislative
jurisdiction
view
clear
case
application
montana
first
consensual
relationships
exception
therefore
reach
longs
alternative
argument
complaint
also
fits
within
montana
second
exception
ronnie
lila
long
husband
wife
owners
long
family
land
cattle
company
long
company
enrolled
members
cheyenne
river
sioux
tribe
although
long
company
incorporated
south
dakota
enterprise
overwhelmingly
tribal
character
interactions
bank
long
company
property
situated
operations
enterprise
occurred
within
cheyenne
river
sioux
indian
reservation
long
company
articles
incorporation
required
indian
ownership
majority
corporation
shares
requirement
reflected
long
company
status
business
entity
eligible
bureau
indian
affairs
bia
loan
guarantees
see
cfr
requiring
least
indian
ownership
loan
guarantees
among
incentives
bia
offers
promote
development
indian
enterprises
long
company
formed
take
advantage
bia
incentives
history
bank
commercial
dealings
long
company
long
family
lengthy
complex
business
relationship
dates
ronnie
long
parents
one
member
tribe
mortgaged
acres
land
bank
gain
working
capital
ranch
security
bank
loans
years
longs
mortgaged
land
personal
property
bank
benefited
significantly
long
company
status
business
entity
bia
loan
guarantees
allowed
greatly
reduce
lending
risk
ibid
eventually
bank
collected
bia
almost
net
losses
resulting
loans
longs
see
supp
sd
case
app
discrimination
claim
issue
rests
allegedly
unfair
conditions
bank
exacted
longs
sought
loans
sustain
operation
ranch
following
death
ronnie
father
bank
longs
entered
agreement
mortgaged
land
deeded
bank
exchange
bank
canceling
debt
making
additional
loans
keep
ranch
business
longs
given
lease
property
option
buy
land
back
lease
term
expired
negotiating
sessions
arrangements
held
tribe
offices
facilitated
tribal
officers
bia
employees
viewing
deal
given
comparative
light
longs
charged
bank
offered
resell
ranch
land
terms
less
advantageous
bank
offered
similar
dealings
claim
courts
prior
one
found
fit
within
montana
exception
activities
nonmembers
enter
commercial
dealing
contracts
leases
arrangements
tribal
members
cf
strate
citing
williams
lee
montana
exception
justifies
adjudication
claims
arising
sales
transaction
nonmember
plaintiff
member
defendants
convinced
courts
got
right
case
bears
emphasis
involves
unwitting
outsider
forced
litigate
unfamiliar
rules
procedures
tribal
cf
nevada
hicks
souter
concurring
hardly
stranger
tribal
system
bank
regularly
filed
suit
forum
see
brief
cheyenne
river
sioux
tribe
amicus
curiae
bank
enlisted
aid
serve
notice
quit
longs
connection
eviction
proceedings
bank
later
filed
counterclaim
eviction
motion
summary
judgment
case
longs
commenced
tribal
summary
judgment
motion
bank
stated
without
qualification
tribal
ha
jurisdiction
subject
matter
action
app
bank
wanted
avoid
responding
tribal
application
tribal
law
means
readily
hand
bank
included
forum
selection
arbitration
clauses
agreements
longs
bank
drafted
see
brief
respondents
ii
resolving
case
ground
neither
argued
addressed
holds
tribe
may
impose
regulation
even
nondiscrimination
requirement
bank
dealings
tribal
members
regarding
fee
lands
see
ante
read
montana
case
instruct
find
position
perplexing
first
question
separation
land
sales
tied
lending
activities
activities
nonmembers
enter
consensual
relationships
tribe
members
montana
sales
land
related
conduct
surely
activities
within
ordinary
sense
word
see
county
yakima
confederated
tribes
bands
yakima
nation
excise
tax
remains
tax
upon
indian
activity
selling
land
emphasis
added
cf
oxford
english
dictionary
ed
defining
sale
action
act
selling
def
second
notes
absence
case
nd
ing
montana
authorized
tribe
regulate
sale
fee
land
ante
neither
held
montana
prohibits
regulation
montana
later
cases
intended
remove
land
sales
resulting
loan
transactions
entirely
tribal
governance
spoken
plainly
effect
instead
montana
listed
examples
consensual
relationships
tribes
might
authority
regulate
commercial
dealing
contracts
leases
presumably
reference
leases
includes
leases
fee
land
nonmember
lease
fee
land
member
differentiated
montana
exception
purposes
sale
land
enforcement
antidiscrimination
command
less
important
tribal
dignity
cf
ante
command
relates
land
sales
relates
commercial
relationships
nonmembers
members
iii
earlier
observed
see
supra
agree
tribal
authority
grant
longs
option
purchase
parcel
bank
contracted
sell
individuals
unaffiliated
tribe
third
parties
contracts
bank
disturbed
based
montana
exception
activities
nonmembers
enter
consensual
relationships
tribe
members
although
tribal
overstepped
supplemental
judgment
ordering
bank
give
longs
option
purchase
land
third
parties
contracted
buy
see
app
pet
cert
scarcely
follows
tribal
lacked
jurisdiction
adjudicate
longs
discrimination
claim
order
principal
judgment
see
app
monetary
recognizes
bank
may
reasonably
anticipated
various
commercial
dealings
longs
trigger
tribal
authority
regulate
transactions
ante
today
decision
furthermore
purports
leave
longs
claims
untouched
ante
noting
bank
presently
challenge
verdict
ante
emphasizes
nly
discrimination
claim
us
claim
tied
specifically
sale
fee
land
ante
tribal
proper
forum
longs
claim
bank
broken
promise
acted
deceptively
transactions
issue
one
hard
put
understand
tribe
likewise
enforce
courts
law
commands
thou
shall
discriminate
tribal
members
terms
conditions
offer
transactions
federal
government
every
state
county
municipality
make
nondiscrimination
law
governing
contracts
generally
real
property
transactions
particular
see
tribe
lack
comparable
authority
shield
members
discrimination
engaging
commercial
relationships
including
lending
fighting
issue
tribal
trial
eighth
circuit
underscored
whether
bank
denied
longs
favorable
terms
deal
solely
basis
race
tribal
affiliation
longs
maintained
bank
initially
offered
favorable
terms
proposing
sell
mortgaged
land
back
contract
deed
thereafter
bank
sent
letter
ronnie
long
withdrawing
initial
offer
citing
jurisdictional
problems
posed
long
company
status
owned
entity
reservation
quoting
letter
charles
simon
vice
president
bank
hoven
ronnie
long
apr
app
final
agreement
bank
promised
financing
instead
gave
longs
lease
option
purchase
required
large
balloon
payment
within
days
lease
expiration
longs
unable
make
required
payment
within
specified
deadline
bank
sold
land
nonmembers
favorable
terms
complaint
longs
alleged
bank
allowed
ten
years
pay
land
bank
permit
longs
even
days
pay
land
uch
unfair
discrimination
bank
prevented
longs
long
company
buying
back
land
bank
app
although
allegations
bank
contracts
sell
nonmembers
central
longs
lawsuit
transactions
third
parties
wrong
longs
complained
rather
tribal
trial
observed
contracts
nonmembers
simply
supplied
evidence
bank
denied
longs
privilege
contracting
deed
status
tribal
members
app
pet
cert
emphasis
added
tribal
instructed
jury
hold
bank
liable
discrimination
claim
less
favorable
terms
given
longs
rested
solely
upon
longs
race
tribal
identity
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
response
special
interrogatory
jury
found
defendant
bank
intentionally
discriminate
plaintiffs
ronnie
lila
long
lease
option
purchase
based
solely
upon
status
indians
tribal
members
app
neither
instruction
special
finding
necessitated
regulation
interference
bank
sales
individuals
see
ante
tellingly
bank
principal
jurisdictional
argument
bore
relationship
position
embraces
bank
recognized
longs
indeed
complaining
discriminatory
conduct
familiar
sort
cf
jones
alfred
mayer
bars
racial
discrimination
sale
rental
property
hicks
held
tribal
courts
exercise
jurisdiction
claim
arising
federal
law
case
relying
hicks
bank
insisted
longs
discrimination
claim
heard
tribal
arose
federal
antidiscrimination
law
specifically
tribal
appeals
however
held
claim
arose
lakota
common
law
resembled
federal
state
antidiscrimination
measures
see
app
pet
cert
longs
requested
remedy
tribal
authority
grant
namely
option
repurchase
land
bank
already
contracted
sell
nonmember
third
parties
see
supra
limitation
however
affect
jurisdiction
hear
longs
discrimination
claim
award
damages
claim
nature
relief
available
jurisdiction
attaches
course
different
question
whether
jurisdiction
adjudicate
controversy
avco
machinists
see
also
davis
passman
urisdiction
question
whether
federal
power
hear
case
relief
question
various
remedies
federal
may
make
procedural
rules
applicable
cheyenne
river
sioux
tribal
courts
federal
rules
demand
one
form
relief
confine
trial
remedial
authority
see
law
order
code
cheyenne
river
sioux
tribe
rule
civ
proc
final
judgment
shall
grant
relief
party
whose
favor
rendered
entitled
even
relief
demanded
pleadings
fed
rule
civ
proc
materially
identical
lose
jurisdiction
claim
merely
lacks
authority
provide
form
relief
party
primarily
demands
see
avco
wright
miller
kane
federal
practice
procedure
pp
ed
type
relief
requested
demand
determines
whether
jurisdiction
case
authority
provide
another
remedy
suffices
permit
adjudicate
merits
claim
see
avco
reasons
stated
leave
undisturbed
tribal
initial
judgment
see
app
awarding
longs
damages
prejudgment
interest
costs
redress
bank
breach
contract
bad
faith
discrimination
accordingly
affirm
large
part
judgment
appeals
footnotes
justice
ginsburg
questions
distinction
sales
activities
ground
ales
land
related
conduct
surely
within
ordinary
sense
word
post
think
distinction
readily
understandable
event
question
whether
sale
generic
sense
action
question
whether
land
ownership
sale
activities
within
meaning
montana
cited
precedents
justice
ginsburg
contends
tribal
jurisdiction
longs
claims
hard
understand
jurisdiction
also
extend
discrimination
claim
post
first
said
tribal
jurisdiction
claims
question
us
decline
speculate
answer
moreover
claims
longs
prevailed
concern
breach
loan
agreement
see
app
bad
faith
connection
bureau
indian
affairs
loan
guarantees
see
present
claim
involves
substantive
regulation
sale
fee
land
point
relief
requested
longs
partially
granted
tribal
rebut
longs
contention
claim
focus
sale
fee
land
contrary
justice
ginsburg
assertion
however
nature
remedy
drive
jurisdictional
ruling
see
post
remedy
invalid
jurisdiction
way
around
footnotes
longs
joined
discrimination
claim
claims
breach
contract
dealings
jury
found
favor
longs
three
claims
app
latter
claims
alleged
bank
never
provided
operating
loans
promised
parties
negotiations
result
longs
asserted
company
able
sustain
ranching
operation
particularly
harsh
winter
ibid
nothing
opinion
precludes
decision
claims
tribal
see
ante
criticizes
tribal
requir
ing
bank
offer
terms
sale
prospective
buyer
defaulted
several
previous
transactions
bank
offered
different
buyer
without
history
default
ante
criticism
unfair
first
record
confirm
longs
riskier
buyers
nonmembers
bank
eventually
sold
land
overlooked
bank
loans
longs
sheltered
bia
loan
guarantees
see
supra
determination
longs
encountered
intentional
discrimination
based
solely
status
tribal
members
way
inhibited
bank
differentiating
evenhandedly
among
borrowers
based
creditworthiness
proscription
discrimination
simply
required
bank
offer
longs
terms
offered
similarly
situated
types
longs
discrimination
claim
ante
quoting
tribal
appeals
derived
applicable
law
lakota
tradition
ante
quoting
supp
sd
case
concerning
content
tribe
law
however
appeals
drew
tribal
tradition
custom
also
looked
federal
state
law
see
app
pet
cert
state
courts
may
draw
upon
federal
law
appropriate
see
dawson
birenbaum
federal
courts
may
look
state
law
fill
gaps
see
kimbell
foods
may
tribal
courts
borrow
law
federal
government
see
cohen
handbook
federal
indian
law
regard
checks
discrimination
tribal
appeals
observed
direct
laudable
convergence
federal
state
tribal
concern
app
pet
cert
case
see
app
complaint
avco
sought
injunctive
relief
also
included
residual
clause
asking
relief
see
avco
aero
lodge
assn
mach
aerospace
workers