sattazahn
pennsylvania
argued
november
decided
january
pennsylvania
law
verdict
penalty
phase
capital
proceedings
must
death
jury
unanimously
finds
least
one
aggravating
circumstance
mitigating
circumstance
one
aggravating
circumstances
outweighing
mitigating
circumstances
must
life
imprisonment
instances
may
discharge
jury
determines
jury
unanimously
agree
sentence
must
enter
life
sentence
petitioner
jury
reported
trial
judge
hopelessly
deadlocked
life
imprisonment
discharged
jury
entered
life
sentence
appeal
pennsylvania
superior
reversed
petitioner
murder
conviction
remanded
new
trial
second
trial
pennsylvania
sought
death
penalty
jury
convicted
petitioner
time
jury
imposed
death
sentence
affirming
pennsylvania
found
neither
fifth
amendment
double
jeopardy
clause
fourteenth
amendment
due
process
clause
barred
pennsylvania
seeking
death
penalty
retrial
held
bar
pennsylvania
seeking
death
penalty
retrial
pp
defendant
convicted
murder
sentenced
life
imprisonment
succeeds
conviction
set
aside
appeal
jeopardy
terminated
life
sentence
imposed
connection
initial
conviction
raises
bar
death
sentence
retrial
stroud
line
cases
commencing
bullington
missouri
found
double
jeopardy
clause
applies
proceedings
hallmarks
trial
guilt
innocence
relevant
inquiry
context
whether
defendant
received
life
sentence
first
time
around
whether
first
life
sentence
acquittal
based
findings
sufficient
establish
legal
entitlement
life
sentence
findings
government
failed
prove
one
aggravating
circumstances
beyond
reasonable
doubt
arizona
rumsey
pp
protections
triggered
jury
deadlocked
petitioner
first
sentencing
proceeding
prescribed
life
sentence
pursuant
pennsylvania
law
jury
first
proceeding
deadlocked
made
findings
respect
alleged
aggravating
circumstance
result
nonresult
fairly
called
acquittal
based
findings
sufficient
establish
legal
entitlement
life
sentence
neither
entry
life
sentence
judge
acquittal
pennsylvania
scheme
judge
discretion
fashion
sentence
finds
jury
deadlocked
makes
findings
resolves
factual
matters
pennsylvania
also
made
finding
pennsylvania
legislature
intended
statutorily
required
entry
life
sentence
create
entitlement
even
without
acquittal
pp
dictum
scott
support
proposition
double
jeopardy
bars
retrial
defendant
case
fully
tried
motion
enters
life
sentence
mere
prospect
second
proceeding
implicate
perils
double
jeopardy
clause
seeks
protect
pp
due
process
clause
also
bar
pennsylvania
seeking
death
penalty
retrial
nothing
fourteenth
amendment
indicates
life
liberty
interest
pennsylvania
law
may
given
petitioner
first
proceeding
life
sentence
somehow
immutable
deprived
interest
operation
process
invoked
invalidate
underlying
murder
conviction
declines
hold
due
process
clause
provides
greater
protection
double
jeopardy
clause
pp
affirmed
scalia
announced
judgment
delivered
opinion
respect
parts
ii
iv
rehnquist
kennedy
thomas
joined
opinion
respect
part
iii
rehnquist
thomas
joined
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
ginsburg
filed
dissenting
opinion
stevens
souter
breyer
joined
david
allen
sattazahn
petitioner
pennsylvania
writ
certiorari
pennsylvania
eastern
district
january
justice
scalia
announced
judgment
delivered
opinion
respect
parts
ii
iv
opinion
respect
part
iii
chief
justice
justice
thomas
case
consider
applicability
fifth
amendment
double
jeopardy
clause
context
proceedings
sunday
evening
april
petitioner
david
allen
sattazahn
accomplice
jeffrey
hammer
hid
wooded
area
waiting
rob
richard
boyer
manager
heidelberg
family
restaurant
sattazahn
carried
ruger
semiautomatic
pistol
hammer
revolver
accosted
boyer
restaurant
parking
lot
closing
time
guns
drawn
demanded
bank
deposit
bag
containing
day
receipts
boyer
threw
bag
toward
roof
restaurant
petitioner
commanded
boyer
retrieve
bag
instead
complying
boyer
tried
run
away
petitioner
hammer
fired
shots
boyer
fell
dead
two
men
grabbed
deposit
bag
fled
commonwealth
pennsylvania
prosecuted
petitioner
sought
death
penalty
may
jury
returned
conviction
murder
various
charges
accordance
pennsylvania
law
proceeding
moved
penalty
phase
see
cons
stat
cons
stat
supp
commonwealth
presented
evidence
one
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
commission
murder
perpetration
felony
see
petitioner
presented
mitigating
circumstances
lack
significant
history
prior
criminal
convictions
age
time
crime
see
pennsylvania
law
provides
penalty
phase
capital
proceedings
iv
verdict
must
sentence
death
jury
unanimously
finds
least
one
aggravating
circumstance
mitigating
circumstance
jury
unanimously
finds
one
aggravating
circumstances
outweigh
mitigating
circumstances
verdict
must
sentence
life
imprisonment
cases
may
discretion
discharge
jury
opinion
deliberation
result
unanimous
agreement
sentence
case
shall
sentence
defendant
life
imprisonment
sides
presented
evidence
jury
deliberated
hours
app
returned
note
signed
foreman
read
jury
hopelessly
deadlocked
life
imprisonment
one
deeply
entrenched
sic
position
expect
anyone
change
position
petitioner
moved
subparagraph
subparagraph
roman
numeral
jury
discharged
enter
sentence
life
imprisonment
trial
judge
accordance
pennsylvania
law
discharged
jury
hung
indicated
enter
required
life
sentence
later
petitioner
appealed
pennsylvania
superior
concluded
trial
judge
erred
instructing
jury
connection
various
offenses
petitioner
charged
including
murder
accordingly
reversed
petitioner
murder
conviction
remanded
new
trial
commonwealth
sattazahn
super
remand
pennsylvania
filed
notice
intent
seek
death
penalty
addition
aggravating
circumstance
alleged
first
sentencing
hearing
notice
also
alleged
second
aggravating
circumstance
petitioner
significant
history
felony
convictions
involving
use
threat
violence
person
based
guilty
pleas
murder
multiple
burglaries
robbery
entered
first
trial
petitioner
moved
prevent
pennsylvania
seeking
death
penalty
adding
second
aggravating
circumstance
retrial
trial
denied
motion
superior
affirmed
denial
app
pennsylvania
declined
review
ruling
commonwealth
sattazahn
second
trial
jury
convicted
petitioner
murder
time
imposed
sentence
death
direct
appeal
pennsylvania
affirmed
verdict
guilt
sentence
death
retrial
relying
earlier
decision
commonwealth
martorano
concluded
neither
double
jeopardy
clause
due
process
clause
barred
pennsylvania
seeking
death
penalty
petitioner
retrial
granted
certiorari
ii
double
jeopardy
clause
fifth
amendment
commands
person
shall
subject
offence
twice
put
jeopardy
life
limb
clause
defendant
placed
jeopardy
offense
jeopardy
terminates
respect
offense
defendant
may
neither
tried
punished
second
time
offense
north
carolina
pearce
defendant
convicted
murder
sentenced
life
imprisonment
appeals
conviction
succeeds
set
aside
held
jeopardy
terminated
life
sentence
imposed
connection
initial
conviction
raises
bar
death
sentence
retrial
stroud
stroud
offense
issue
murder
sentence
imposed
judge
make
findings
order
impose
death
penalty
bullington
missouri
however
held
double
jeopardy
clause
apply
proceedings
proceedings
hallmarks
trial
guilt
innocence
identified
several
aspects
missouri
sentencing
proceeding
resembled
trial
including
requirement
prosecution
prove
certain
statutorily
defined
facts
beyond
reasonable
doubt
support
sentence
death
procedure
explained
explicitly
requires
jury
determine
whether
prosecution
proved
case
since
concluded
sentence
life
imprisonment
signifies
jury
already
acquitted
defendant
whatever
necessary
impose
death
sentence
double
jeopardy
clause
bars
state
seeking
death
penalty
retrial
quoting
state
ex
rel
westfall
mason
mo
bardgett
dissenting
however
careful
emphasize
mere
imposition
life
sentence
raises
bar
discussed
stroud
case
defendant
convicted
murder
sentenced
life
imprisonment
obtained
reversal
conviction
new
trial
solicitor
general
confessed
error
stroud
unanimously
held
double
jeopardy
clause
bar
imposition
death
penalty
new
trial
distinguished
bullington
stroud
said
fact
stroud
separate
sentencing
proceeding
prosecution
required
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
otherwise
additional
facts
order
justify
particular
sentence
bullington
made
clear
acquittal
sentencing
phase
rather
mere
imposition
life
sentence
required
give
rise
protections
later
decisions
refined
bullington
rationale
arizona
rumsey
state
argued
sentencing
phase
based
evidence
presented
guilt
phase
three
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
present
trial
however
found
statutory
aggravator
existed
accordingly
entered
judgment
accused
favor
issue
death
state
arizona
concluded
trial
erred
interpretation
one
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
remanded
new
sentencing
proceeding
produced
sentence
death
setting
sentence
aside
explained
double
jeopardy
principle
relevant
rumsey
case
invoked
bullington
acquittal
merits
sole
decisionmaker
proceeding
final
bars
retrial
charge
trial
entered
findings
denying
existence
seven
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
required
state
law
entered
judgment
respondent
favor
issue
death
judgment
based
findings
sufficient
establish
legal
entitlement
life
sentence
amounts
acquittal
merits
bars
retrial
appropriateness
death
penalty
ibid
emphasis
added
rumsey
thus
reaffirmed
relevant
inquiry
purposes
whether
defendant
received
life
sentence
first
time
around
rather
whether
first
life
sentence
acquittal
based
findings
sufficient
establish
legal
entitlement
life
sentence
findings
government
failed
prove
one
aggravating
circumstances
beyond
reasonable
doubt
later
case
line
poland
arizona
involved
two
defendants
convicted
murder
sentenced
death
appeal
arizona
set
aside
convictions
jury
consideration
nonrecord
evidence
found
insufficient
evidence
support
one
aggravating
circumstance
found
trial
concluded
however
sufficient
evidence
support
different
aggravating
circumstance
trial
thought
proved
remanded
retrial
defendants
convicted
murder
sentence
death
imposed
decided
circumstances
double
jeopardy
clause
implicated
distinguished
bullington
rumsey
ground
poland
unlike
cases
neither
judge
jury
acquitted
defendant
first
capital
sentencing
proceeding
entering
findings
sufficient
establish
legal
entitlement
life
sentence
normally
retrial
following
hung
jury
violate
double
jeopardy
clause
richardson
petitioner
contends
however
given
unique
treatment
afforded
proceedings
bullington
protections
triggered
jury
deadlocked
first
sentencing
proceeding
prescribed
sentence
life
imprisonment
pursuant
pennsylvania
law
disagree
bullington
line
cases
discussed
touchstone
protection
proceedings
whether
acquittal
petitioner
establish
jury
acquitted
first
proceeding
jury
verdict
form
returned
foreman
stated
jury
deadlocked
whether
impose
death
penalty
made
findings
respect
alleged
aggravating
circumstance
result
appropriately
fairly
called
acquittal
based
findings
sufficient
establish
legal
entitlement
life
sentence
rumsey
supra
entry
life
sentence
judge
acquittal
either
pennsylvania
explained
pennsylvania
sentencing
scheme
judge
discretion
fashion
sentence
finds
jury
deadlocked
statute
directs
enter
life
sentence
deliberation
result
unanimous
agreement
sentence
shall
sentence
defendant
life
imprisonment
emphasis
added
judge
makes
findings
resolves
factual
matter
since
judgment
based
findings
resolve
factual
matter
sufficient
establish
legal
entitlement
life
sentence
default
judgment
trigger
double
jeopardy
bar
death
penalty
upon
retrial
quoting
martorano
argued
perhaps
statutorily
required
entry
life
sentence
creates
entitlement
even
without
acquittal
pennsylvania
legislature
intended
intended
life
sentence
survive
vacation
underlying
conviction
pennsylvania
however
find
intent
statute
eminently
good
cause
state
simple
interest
closure
might
make
willing
accept
default
penalty
life
imprisonment
conviction
affirmed
case
except
issue
end
unwilling
case
must
retried
anyway
interest
conservation
resources
might
make
willing
leave
sentencing
issue
unresolved
default
life
sentence
place
cost
resolving
empaneling
new
jury
likelihood
repetition
much
guilt
phase
first
trial
though
eager
attend
unfinished
business
new
jury
new
trial
anyway
iii
bullington
rumsey
poland
decided
proceedings
understood
sentencing
proceedings
whatever
hallmarks
trial
might
borne
bullington
differed
trials
respect
crucial
purposes
double
jeopardy
clause
dealt
sentence
imposed
offence
capital
murder
thus
search
rationale
support
bullington
progeny
continually
tripped
text
double
jeopardy
clause
recent
developments
however
illuminated
part
jurisprudence
decision
apprendi
new
jersey
clarified
constitutes
element
offense
purposes
sixth
amendment
guarantee
put
simply
existence
fact
prior
conviction
increases
maximum
punishment
may
imposed
defendant
fact
matter
state
labels
constitutes
element
must
found
jury
beyond
reasonable
doubt
last
term
recognized
import
apprendi
context
proceedings
ring
arizona
held
aggravating
circumstances
make
defendant
eligible
death
penalty
operate
functional
equivalent
element
greater
offense
slip
emphasis
added
say
purposes
sixth
amendment
guarantee
underlying
offense
murder
distinct
lesser
included
offense
murder
plus
one
aggravating
circumstances
whereas
former
exposes
defendant
maximum
penalty
life
imprisonment
latter
increases
maximum
permissible
sentence
death
accordingly
held
sixth
amendment
requires
jury
judge
find
existence
aggravating
circumstances
found
mere
preponderance
evidence
beyond
reasonable
doubt
slip
think
principled
reason
distinguish
context
constitutes
offense
purposes
sixth
amendment
guarantee
constitutes
offence
purposes
fifth
amendment
double
jeopardy
clause
cf
monge
california
scalia
dissenting
fundamental
distinction
facts
elements
criminal
offense
facts
go
sentence
delimits
boundaries
important
constitutional
rights
like
sixth
amendment
right
trial
jury
also
provides
foundation
entire
double
jeopardy
jurisprudence
world
double
jeopardy
clause
must
apply
proceedings
consistent
text
fifth
amendment
jury
unanimously
concludes
state
failed
meet
burden
proving
existence
one
aggravating
circumstances
protections
attach
acquittal
offense
murder
plus
aggravating
circumstance
thus
rumsey
correct
focus
whether
factfinder
made
findings
constituted
acquittal
aggravating
circumstances
reason
issue
central
proceeding
comparable
trial
citing
bullington
supra
rather
murder
plus
one
aggravating
circumstances
separate
offense
murder
simpliciter
purposes
double
jeopardy
clause
murder
pennsylvania
law
offense
petitioner
convicted
guilt
phase
proceedings
properly
understood
lesser
included
offense
murder
plus
aggravating
circumstance
see
ring
supra
slip
thus
petitioner
first
sentencing
jury
unanimously
concluded
pennsylvania
failed
prove
aggravating
circumstances
conclusion
operate
acquittal
greater
offense
bar
pennsylvania
retrying
petitioner
greater
offense
thus
seeking
death
penalty
retrial
cf
rumsey
supra
happened
petitioner
convicted
guilt
phase
first
trial
lesser
offense
murder
sentencing
phase
jury
deliberated
without
reaching
decision
death
life
without
making
findings
regarding
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
hours
judge
dismissed
jury
hung
entered
life
sentence
accordance
pennsylvania
law
explained
supra
neither
judge
jury
acquitted
petitioner
greater
offense
murder
plus
aggravating
circumstance
thus
petitioner
appealed
succeeded
invalidating
conviction
lesser
offense
bar
pennsylvania
retrying
petitioner
lesser
greater
offense
jeopardy
never
terminated
respect
either
cf
green
citing
ball
selvester
iv
dissent
reads
decision
scott
supporting
proposition
defendant
case
fully
tried
motion
entered
final
judgment
life
sentence
terminating
trial
proceedings
post
double
jeopardy
clause
bars
retrial
several
problems
reasoning
first
understatement
say
scott
home
case
like
petitioner
post
ginsburg
dissenting
statement
upon
dissent
relies
double
jeopardy
may
attach
trial
judge
terminates
proceedings
favorably
defendant
basis
related
factual
guilt
innocence
least
defendant
either
found
guilty
least
insisted
issue
guilt
submitted
first
trier
fact
emphasis
added
nothing
dictum
tentative
one
may
thin
reed
rest
hitherto
unknown
constitutional
prohibition
entirely
rational
course
making
hung
jury
failure
convict
provisionally
final
subject
change
case
must
retried
anyway
second
dictum
scott
even
embrace
present
case
petitioner
insist
upon
merits
determination
contrary
asked
jury
dismissed
hung
dissent
recognizes
jury
announced
deadlocked
petitioner
move
jury
discharged
life
sentence
entered
cons
stat
post
response
say
judge
grant
motion
instead
made
legal
determination
whether
petitioner
entitled
judgment
sought
ibid
surely
protections
hinge
whether
trial
characterizes
action
response
motion
cf
scott
supra
actually
happened
case
happened
scott
denied
protection
defendant
moved
entry
judgment
favor
procedural
grounds
delay
indictment
hung
jury
judge
measured
facts
length
delay
likelihood
jury
producing
verdict
legal
standard
determine
whether
relief
appropriate
concluding
granted
relief
circumstances
prospect
second
proceeding
implicate
perils
double
jeopardy
clause
seeks
protect
post
ginsburg
dissenting
dissent
stresses
defendant
circumstances
subject
ordeal
second
life
death
trial
compel
live
continuing
state
anxiety
insecurity
ibid
quoting
green
supra
see
also
post
even
dissent
must
admit
post
found
concern
determinative
double
jeopardy
circumstances
case
hardly
presents
specter
state
relentlessly
pursuing
defendant
either
found
guilty
least
insisted
issue
guilt
submitted
first
trier
fact
scott
supra
instead
see
state
number
perfectly
understandable
reasons
supra
quite
reasonably
agreed
accept
default
penalty
life
imprisonment
conviction
affirmed
case
except
issue
end
pursue
interest
one
complete
opportunity
convict
violated
case
must
retried
anyway
post
quoting
arizona
washington
addition
claim
petitioner
raises
freestanding
claim
alleging
deprivation
due
process
violation
fourteenth
amendment
contends
regardless
whether
imposition
death
sentence
second
trial
violated
double
jeopardy
clause
unfairly
deprived
life
liberty
interests
life
sentence
resulting
first
sentencing
proceeding
frames
argument
terms
pennsylvania
created
constitutionally
protected
life
liberty
interest
finality
life
judgment
statutorily
mandated
result
deadlocked
jury
right
vested
found
jury
deadlocked
imposed
mandatory
life
sentence
subjecting
etitioner
capital
resentencing
right
vested
violated
ue
rocess
reply
brief
petitioner
think
section
fourteenth
amendment
commands
state
shall
deprive
person
life
liberty
property
without
due
process
law
emphasis
added
nothing
indicates
life
liberty
interest
pennsylvania
law
may
given
petitioner
life
sentence
imposed
first
capital
sentencing
proceeding
somehow
immutable
deprived
interest
operation
process
invoked
invalidate
underlying
murder
conviction
based
bottom
petitioner
claim
nothing
claim
different
clothing
said
bill
rights
speaks
explicit
terms
many
aspects
criminal
procedure
expansion
constitutional
guarantees
rubric
due
process
clause
invites
undue
interference
considered
legislative
judgments
careful
balance
constitution
strikes
liberty
order
medina
california
decline
petitioner
invitation
hold
due
process
clause
provides
greater
protection
double
jeopardy
clause
pennsylvania
correctly
concluded
neither
fifth
amendment
double
jeopardy
clause
fourteenth
amendment
due
process
clause
barred
pennsylvania
seeking
death
penalty
petitioner
retrial
judgment
therefore
affirmed
david
allen
sattazahn
petitioner
pennsylvania
writ
certiorari
pennsylvania
eastern
district
january
justice
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
join
parts
ii
iv
opinion
case
join
part
iii
extend
reach
apprendi
new
jersey
continue
believe
case
wrongly
decided
see
dissenting
see
also
ring
arizona
slip
dissenting
remains
view
apprendi
rule
fact
increases
maximum
penalty
must
treated
element
crime
required
constitution
history
prior
cases
slip
resolve
petitioner
double
jeopardy
claim
sole
ground
bullington
missouri
progeny
life
sentence
imposed
operation
law
capital
sentencing
jury
deadlocks
fails
reach
unanimous
verdict
acquittal
merits
barring
retrial
death
penalty
sentencing
proceedings
bear
hallmarks
trial
held
arizona
rumsey
acquittal
merits
sole
decisionmaker
proceeding
final
bars
retrial
charge
defendant
acquitted
death
penalty
purposes
double
jeopardy
sentencer
decide
prosecution
proved
case
death
penalty
appropriate
poland
arizona
emphasis
deleted
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
absence
acquittal
clean
slate
rule
recognized
north
carolina
pearce
applies
double
jeopardy
bar
arises
case
jury
deadlocks
penalty
phase
capital
trial
decide
prosecution
failed
prove
case
death
penalty
rather
jury
makes
decision
petitioner
jury
agre
prosecution
ha
proved
case
bullington
supra
emphasis
added
make
findings
existence
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
see
rumsey
supra
trial
judge
entered
findings
denying
existence
seven
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
resulting
judgment
based
findings
sufficient
establish
legal
entitlement
life
sentence
amounts
acquittal
merits
bars
retrial
appropriateness
death
penalty
short
jury
acquit
petitioner
death
penalty
bullington
rumsey
pennsylvania
law
mandates
life
sentence
capital
sentencing
jury
deadlocks
reasons
given
ante
transform
life
sentence
acquittal
petitioner
neither
acquitted
convicted
death
penalty
first
trial
double
jeopardy
clause
offended
retrial
determine
whether
death
appropriate
punishment
offenses
need
say
david
allen
sattazahn
petitioner
pennsylvania
writ
certiorari
pennsylvania
eastern
district
january
justice
ginsburg
justice
stevens
justice
souter
justice
breyer
join
dissenting
case
concerns
events
terminat
jeopardy
purposes
double
jeopardy
clause
richardson
specific
controversy
involves
entry
final
judgment
mandated
state
law
jury
deadlock
question
presented
whether
final
judgment
entered
qualifies
event
concludes
hold
pennsylvania
capital
jury
deadlocks
sentencing
stage
proceeding
state
law
requires
trial
enter
judgment
imposing
life
sentence
see
cons
stat
supp
ordinarily
judgment
thus
imposed
final
government
may
neither
appeal
sentence
retry
sentencing
question
second
jury
see
brief
petitioner
tr
oral
arg
sentencing
question
retried
retrial
barred
double
jeopardy
clause
defendant
successfully
appeals
underlying
conviction
convicted
today
holds
entry
life
sentence
jury
deadlock
measured
double
jeopardy
clause
block
retrial
life
death
question
rules
life
sentence
although
final
state
law
see
equivalent
acquittal
merits
ante
quoting
arizona
rumsey
double
jeopardy
case
law
indeed
attac
particular
significance
acquittal
scott
jurisprudence
accords
absolute
finality
jury
verdict
acquittal
matter
erroneous
decision
burks
stresses
hung
jury
sattazahn
sentencing
proceeding
acqui
merits
ante
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
two
undebatable
points
inevitably
dispositive
case
decisions
recognize
jeopardy
terminate
circumstances
acquittal
cf
richardson
double
jeopardy
clause
terms
applies
event
acquittal
terminates
original
jeopardy
emphasis
prior
case
decided
whether
jeopardy
terminated
entry
sentence
jury
deadlocked
sentencing
question
see
question
genuinely
debatable
tenable
argument
supporting
side
comprehending
double
jeopardy
decisions
light
underlying
purposes
double
jeopardy
clause
conclude
jeopardy
terminate
circumstances
hold
herein
explained
trial
entered
final
judgment
life
sattazahn
double
jeopardy
clause
barred
pennsylvania
seeking
death
penalty
second
time
standard
way
defendant
secure
final
judgment
favor
gain
case
involves
atypical
situation
defendant
prevails
final
judgment
without
acquittal
unusual
situation
double
jeopardy
jurisprudence
recognizes
existence
scott
stated
primary
purpose
double
jeopardy
clause
protect
integrity
final
determinations
guilt
innocence
acknowledged
however
also
developed
body
law
guarding
separate
related
interest
defendant
avoiding
multiple
prosecutions
even
final
determination
guilt
innocence
made
ibid
interests
observed
may
involved
two
different
situations
first
trial
judge
declares
mistrial
second
trial
judge
terminates
proceedings
favorably
defendant
basis
related
factual
guilt
innocence
ibid
first
category
mistrials
instructive
although
case
hand
fit
within
category
deciding
whether
reprosecution
permissible
mistrial
balanced
valued
right
defendant
trial
completed
particular
tribunal
summoned
sit
judgment
public
interest
insuring
justice
meted
offenders
ibid
internal
quotation
marks
citation
omitted
weighing
interests
decided
mistrials
declared
motion
prosecution
sua
sponte
terminate
jeopardy
unless
stopping
proceedings
required
manifest
necessity
see
downum
hung
jury
long
recognized
meets
manifest
necessity
criterion
justifies
trial
declaration
mistrial
defendant
subsequent
reprosecution
arizona
washington
retrial
also
permissible
defendant
successfully
seeks
avoid
trial
prior
conclusion
motion
mistrial
scott
unless
motion
intentionally
provoked
government
actions
ordinarily
uch
motion
defendant
deemed
deliberate
election
part
forgo
valued
right
guilt
innocence
determined
first
trier
fact
second
category
described
scott
termination
trial
defendant
favor
determination
factual
guilt
innocence
distinguished
first
based
quality
finality
termination
order
imports
trial
declares
mistrial
invariably
contemplates
prosecutor
permitted
proceed
anew
notwithstanding
defendant
plea
double
jeopardy
motion
terminate
granted
contrast
trial
obviously
contemplates
proceedings
terminate
favor
defendant
scott
example
trial
granted
defendant
motion
dismiss
one
count
indictment
prior
submission
jury
ground
preindictment
delay
prosecution
wanted
reinstate
proceedings
face
ruling
simply
refiled
indictment
instead
seek
reversal
decision
trial
pursuing
appeal
sattazahn
case
falls
within
scott
second
category
jury
deadlocked
sentencing
stage
mistrial
declared
pennsylvania
law
provided
trial
proceedings
terminate
sattazahn
favor
government
simply
sentencing
issue
hung
jury
sattazahn
case
mak
completion
first
proceeding
impossible
wade
hunter
instead
pennsylvania
law
required
judge
bring
proceeding
conclusion
entering
final
judgment
imposing
life
sentence
see
cons
stat
supp
double
jeopardy
law
respect
scott
second
category
relatively
undeveloped
observed
outset
see
supra
never
decided
whether
jeopardy
terminates
upon
entry
final
judgment
favorable
defendant
jury
deadlocks
however
addressed
termination
trial
prior
submission
case
jury
scott
case
underscores
ante
decision
denied
double
jeopardy
protection
allowing
second
prosecution
scott
however
stressed
defendant
deliberately
ch
ose
seek
termination
proceedings
basis
unrelated
factual
guilt
innocence
prosecution
preindictment
delay
ruling
scott
placing
defendant
case
outside
zone
double
jeopardy
protection
sum
tied
absence
completed
first
trial
episode
defendant
choice
abort
initial
trial
proceedings
government
explained
quite
willing
continue
production
evidence
defendant
elected
seek
termination
trial
grounds
unrelated
guilt
innocence
scarcely
picture
state
relentlessly
pursuing
defendant
either
found
guilty
least
insisted
issue
guilt
submitted
first
trier
fact
ibid
ii
scott
true
home
case
like
sattazahn
reasoning
nevertheless
lends
credence
view
judgment
life
prompted
procedural
move
defendant
part
creates
legal
entitlement
protected
double
jeopardy
clause
cf
rumsey
judgment
based
factual
findings
sufficient
establish
legal
entitlement
life
sentence
bars
retrial
scott
recognized
defendants
double
jeopardy
interest
avoiding
multiple
prosecutions
even
determination
guilt
innocence
interest
implicated
preverdict
judgments
terminating
trials
interest
avoiding
renewed
prosecution
following
final
judgment
surely
engaged
sattazahn
life
sentence
significantly
greater
finality
dismissal
preindictment
delay
scott
pennsylvania
law
noted
earlier
see
supra
government
sought
retry
sentencing
question
even
appeal
moreover
discrete
analysis
scott
perils
double
jeopardy
clause
seeks
protect
plainly
implicated
prospect
second
capital
sentencing
proceeding
determination
defendants
sattazahn
position
subject
ordeal
second
life
death
trial
compel
live
continuing
state
anxiety
insecurity
green
despite
attendant
generation
anxiety
insecurity
allowed
retrial
hung
jury
mistrials
order
give
state
one
complete
opportunity
convict
violated
laws
washington
see
wade
defendant
valued
right
trial
completed
particular
tribunal
must
instances
subordinated
public
interest
fair
trials
designed
end
judgments
state
already
opportunity
prosecution
presented
evidence
jury
jury
deadlocked
final
judgment
entered
direction
state
legislature
instance
government
quite
willing
continue
production
evidence
thwarted
motion
scott
also
sanctioned
retrial
scott
even
though
case
involved
final
adjudication
defendant
voluntarily
avoided
subjecting
determination
guilt
innocence
first
proceeding
successfully
moving
prior
submission
case
jury
dismissal
count
question
preindictment
delay
ibid
see
green
suggesting
double
jeopardy
protection
apply
defendant
consents
dismissal
first
jury
situation
unlike
scott
sattazahn
successfully
avoid
question
guilt
innocence
submitted
first
jury
issue
guilt
case
indeed
submitted
first
trier
fact
scott
sattazahn
thus
forced
run
gantlet
death
green
sattazahn
bring
termination
first
jury
deadlocked
state
law
directly
mandated
trial
end
short
reasons
thought
double
jeopardy
protection
attach
scott
absent
recognize
novel
close
question
sattazahn
acquitted
death
penalty
case
fully
tried
motion
entered
final
judgment
life
sentence
terminating
trial
proceedings
decide
double
jeopardy
issue
sattazahn
favor
reasons
herein
stated
giving
weight
two
ultimate
considerations
first
holding
confronts
defendants
perilous
choice
one
previously
declined
impose
circumstances
see
green
decision
defendant
sentenced
life
jury
deadlock
chooses
appeal
underlying
conviction
faces
possibility
death
successful
appeal
convicted
retrial
hand
defendant
loses
appeal
chooses
forgo
appeal
final
judgment
life
stands
words
defendant
sattazahn
position
must
relinquish
either
right
file
potentially
meritorious
appeal
entitlement
avoid
death
penalty
previously
declined
interpret
double
jeopardy
clause
manner
puts
defendants
bind
green
rejected
argument
appealing
murder
conviction
prolonged
jeopardy
related
murder
charge
noted
ruling
question
favor
prosecutor
require
defendants
barter
constitutional
protection
second
prosecution
offense
punishable
death
price
successful
appeal
erroneous
conviction
another
offense
law
concluded
place
defendants
incredible
dilemma
ibid
although
sattazahn
required
barter
entitlement
life
right
appeal
rather
constitutional
protection
nevertheless
believe
considerations
advanced
green
inform
decision
second
punishment
sattazahn
faced
death
penalty
unique
severity
finality
monge
california
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
qualities
heighten
sattazahn
double
jeopardy
interest
avoiding
second
prosecution
hazards
second
trial
possible
conviction
green
later
cases
demonstrates
death
indeed
penalty
different
others
reasons
stated
hold
jeopardy
terminated
sattazahn
sentence
judge
entered
final
judgment
life
therefore
reverse
judgment
pennsylvania
footnotes
justice
kennedy
joins
part
iii
opinion
footnotes
typical
criminal
jury
unable
agree
verdict
contrast
judge
declares
mistrial
prosecutor
immediate
right
reprosecute
counts
jury
hung
see
richardson
martin
linen
supply
many
times
said
double
jeopardy
clause
protects
integrity
final
judgments
see
crist
bretz
primary
purpose
served
double
jeopardy
clause
akin
served
doctrines
res
judicata
collateral
estoppel
preserve
finality
judgments
scott
primary
purpose
double
jeopardy
clause
protect
integrity
final
judgment
declarations
appears
used
final
judgment
interchangeably
acquittal
see
crist
referring
english
rule
defendant
put
jeopardy
conviction
acquittal
complete
trial
scott
equating
term
final
judgment
final
determination
guilt
innocence
considered
dismissals
indictments
contemplate
possibility
immediate
reprosecution
without
appeal
analyzed
mistrials
see
lee
dismissal
based
insufficient
indictment
treated
mistrial
double
jeopardy
purposes
government
simply
file
new
indictment
without
appealing
dismissal
identifies
policy
reasons
legislature
might
prefer
provide
entry
judgment
reopened
defendant
mount
successful
appeal
see
ante
automatically
follow
however
provisional
judgment
compatible
double
jeopardy
clause
cf
infra
urging
prospect
second
death
penalty
proceeding
heightens
double
jeopardy
concerns
governing
statute
provides
may
discretion
discharge
jury
opinion
deliberation
result
unanimous
agreement
sentence
case
shall
sentence
defendant
life
imprisonment
cons
stat
supp
sattazahn
case
jury
deliberated
hours
judge
announced
received
communication
foreperson
indicating
jury
hopelessly
deadlocked
app
stated
bring
jury
inquire
foreperson
jury
whether
deliberations
productive
ibid
point
sattazahn
move
jury
discharged
life
sentence
entered
ibid
judge
grant
sattazahn
motion
instead
conducted
inquiry
determine
whether
jury
hopelessly
deadlocked
found
discharged
jury
announced
virtue
law
enter
life
sentence
app
judge
stage
never
referred
back
sattazahn
motion
read
record
judge
decision
conduct
inquiry
discharge
jury
enter
life
sentence
prompted
defensive
motion
simply
jury
announcement
deadlocked
statute
instructs
also
held
double
jeopardy
clause
bar
imposition
greater
sentence
retrial
defendant
successfully
appeals
conviction
see
north
carolina
pearce
difrancesco
basic
design
double
jeopardy
provision
bar
repeated
attempts
convict
consequent
subjection
defendant
embarrassment
expense
anxiety
insecurity
significant
application
prosecution
right
review
sentence
determined
however
purposes
double
jeopardy
clause
capital
sentencing
proceedings
involving
proof
one
aggravating
factors
treated
trials
separate
offenses
mere
sentencing
proceedings
see
ante
ring
arizona
bullington
missouri
decisions
permitting
resentencing
appeal
noncapital
convictions
thus
address
question
presented
case