ocasio
argued
october
decided
may
petitioner
samuel
ocasio
former
police
officer
participated
kickback
scheme
officers
routed
damaged
vehicles
accident
scenes
auto
repair
shop
exchange
payments
shopowners
petitioner
charged
obtaining
money
shopowners
color
official
right
violation
hobbs
act
conspiring
violate
hobbs
act
violation
trial
district
rejected
petitioner
argument
hobbs
act
prohibits
obtaining
property
another
hobbs
act
conspiracy
requires
proof
alleged
conspirators
agreed
obtain
property
someone
outside
conspiracy
petitioner
convicted
counts
fourth
circuit
affirmed
petitioner
challenges
conspiracy
conviction
contending
convicted
conspiring
shopowners
obtain
money
color
official
right
held
defendant
may
convicted
conspiring
violate
hobbs
act
based
proof
reached
agreement
owner
property
question
obtain
property
color
official
right
pp
general
federal
conspiracy
statute
petitioner
convicted
makes
crime
conspire
commit
offense
section
use
term
conspire
incorporates
principles
conspiracy
law
established
case
law
fundamental
characteristic
conspiracy
joint
commitment
endeavor
completed
satisfy
elements
underlying
substantive
criminal
offense
salinas
conspirator
need
agree
commit
substantive
offense
even
capable
committing
order
convicted
sufficient
conspirator
agreed
underlying
crime
committed
member
conspiracy
capable
committing
see
holte
gebardi
pp
basic
principles
conspiracy
law
resolve
case
establish
alleged
hobbs
act
conspiracy
government
needed
prove
agreement
conspirator
commit
element
substantive
offense
petitioner
shopowners
reached
agreement
shared
common
purpose
petitioner
police
officers
obtain
property
another
shopowners
color
official
right
pp
contrary
petitioner
claims
decision
dissolve
distinction
extortion
conspiracy
commit
extortion
transform
every
bribe
public
official
conspiracy
commit
extortion
petitioner
exaggerates
impact
decision
argument
create
serious
practical
problems
approach
validity
charge
hobbs
act
conspiracy
often
depend
difficult
questions
little
culpability
pp
affirmed
alito
delivered
opinion
kennedy
ginsburg
breyer
kagan
joined
breyer
filed
concurring
opinion
thomas
filed
dissenting
opinion
sotomayor
filed
dissenting
opinion
roberts
joined
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
samuel
ocasio
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
fourth
circuit
may
justice
alito
delivered
opinion
petitioner
samuel
ocasio
former
officer
baltimore
police
department
participated
kickback
scheme
owners
local
auto
repair
shop
petitioner
baltimore
officers
reported
scene
auto
accident
persuaded
owners
damaged
cars
vehicles
towed
repair
shop
exchange
service
officers
received
payments
shopowners
petitioner
convicted
obtaining
money
shopowners
color
official
right
violation
hobbs
act
conspiring
violate
hobbs
act
violation
challenges
conspiracy
conviction
contending
matter
law
convicted
conspiring
shopowners
obtain
money
color
official
right
reject
argument
contrary
principles
conspiracy
law
hernan
alexis
moreno
mejia
known
moreno
edwin
javier
mejia
known
mejia
brothers
operated
majestic
auto
repair
shop
majestic
majestic
struggling
attract
customers
moreno
mejia
made
deal
baltimore
police
officer
jhonn
corona
exchange
kickbacks
officer
corona
refer
motorists
whose
cars
damaged
accidents
majestic
towing
repairs
officer
corona
spread
word
members
force
eventually
many
officers
sent
damaged
cars
majestic
exchange
payments
per
referral
petitioner
began
participate
scheme
several
occasions
convinced
accident
victims
cars
towed
majestic
often
sending
car
majestic
petitioner
called
moreno
scene
accident
ensure
make
model
car
extent
damage
car
insurance
coverage
allow
shopowners
turn
profit
repairs
directing
vehicle
majestic
petitioner
call
moreno
request
payment
police
often
among
first
arrive
scene
accident
baltimore
officers
well
positioned
route
damaged
vehicles
majestic
result
kickback
scheme
highly
successful
substantially
increased
majestic
volume
business
profits
early
provided
majestic
least
customers
moreno
mejia
petitioner
nine
baltimore
officers
indicted
shopowners
officers
eventually
pleaded
guilty
pursuant
plea
deals
petitioner
superseding
indictment
petitioner
charged
three
counts
violating
hobbs
act
extorting
money
moreno
consent
color
official
right
parties
agree
type
extortion
petitioner
convicted
obtaining
property
another
consent
color
official
right
rough
equivalent
describe
bribe
evans
prove
offense
government
need
show
public
official
obtained
payment
entitled
knowing
payment
made
return
official
acts
petitioner
another
baltimore
officer
kelvin
quade
manrich
also
charged
violating
general
federal
conspiracy
statute
indictment
alleged
petitioner
manrich
conspired
moreno
mejia
baltimore
officers
bring
sort
substantive
violations
petitioner
charged
trial
petitioner
began
raise
variant
legal
argument
brought
case
sought
jury
instruction
stating
order
convict
defendant
conspiracy
commit
extortion
color
official
right
government
must
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
conspiracy
obtain
money
property
person
member
conspiracy
app
support
instruction
petitioner
relied
sixth
circuit
decision
brock
concerned
two
bail
bondsmen
made
payments
clerk
exchange
alteration
records
sixth
circuit
held
covered
hobbs
act
alleged
conspirators
must
formed
agreement
obtain
another
say
formed
agreement
obtain
property
someone
outside
conspiracy
district
rule
request
prior
trial
petitioner
codefendant
manrich
pleaded
guilty
trial
close
prosecution
case
close
evidence
petitioner
moved
judgment
acquittal
conspiracy
count
based
brock
district
denied
motions
concluding
fourth
circuit
already
rejected
brock
holding
spitler
district
also
refused
give
petitioner
proposed
instruction
instead
adopted
sort
standard
instructions
typically
used
conspiracy
cases
see
generally
sand
et
modern
federal
jury
instructions
criminal
order
convict
petitioner
conspiracy
charge
jury
told
prosecution
required
prove
two
persons
entered
unlawful
agreement
petitioner
knowingly
willfully
became
member
conspiracy
least
one
member
conspiracy
knowingly
committed
least
one
overt
act
overt
act
committed
objective
conspiracy
caution
ed
mere
knowledge
acquiescence
without
participation
unlawful
plan
sufficient
demonstrate
membership
conspiracy
app
rather
explained
conspirators
must
mutual
understanding
cooperate
accomplish
unlawful
act
petitioner
must
joined
conspiracy
intention
aiding
accomplishment
unlawful
ends
jury
found
petitioner
guilty
conspiracy
count
three
substantive
extortion
counts
district
sentenced
concurrent
terms
months
prison
four
counts
appeal
fourth
circuit
petitioner
primary
argument
one
pressed
district
conspiracy
conviction
fatally
flawed
conspirators
agreed
obtain
money
person
member
conspiracy
fourth
circuit
rejected
petitioner
argument
affirmed
convictions
granted
certiorari
affirm
ii
longstanding
principles
conspiracy
law
defendant
may
convicted
conspiring
violate
hobbs
act
based
proof
entered
conspiracy
objective
obtaining
property
another
conspirator
consent
color
official
right
analyzing
petitioner
arguments
begin
text
statute
convicted
namely
general
federal
conspiracy
statute
makes
crime
conspire
commit
offense
emphasis
added
section
use
term
conspire
incorporates
principles
conspiracy
law
established
case
law
fundamental
characteristic
conspiracy
joint
commitment
endeavor
completed
satisfy
elements
underlying
substantive
criminal
offense
salinas
see
bishop
commentaries
criminal
law
rev
ed
conspiracy
modern
law
generally
defined
confederacy
two
persons
accomplish
unlawful
purpose
hawley
mcgregor
criminal
law
ed
similar
lafave
criminal
law
ed
similar
although
conspirators
must
pursue
criminal
objective
conspirator
need
agree
commit
facilitate
every
part
substantive
offense
salinas
supra
defendant
must
merely
reach
agreement
specific
intent
underlying
crime
committed
member
conspiracy
grenig
lee
federal
jury
practice
instructions
criminal
ed
emphasis
added
see
also
explaining
defendant
must
intend
agree
must
intend
substantive
offense
committed
emphasis
added
government
prove
defendant
intended
commit
underlying
offense
instead
conspirators
plan
calls
conspirators
perpetrate
crime
others
provide
support
supporters
guilty
perpetrators
salinas
supra
see
sand
supra
hen
people
enter
conspiracy
accomplish
unlawful
end
every
member
becomes
agent
conspirators
carrying
conspiracy
simple
examples
illustrate
important
point
entering
dwelling
historically
element
burglary
see
lafave
supra
person
may
conspire
commit
burglary
without
agreeing
set
foot
inside
targeted
home
enough
conspirator
agrees
help
person
actually
enter
dwelling
perhaps
serving
lookout
driving
getaway
car
likewise
specific
intent
distribute
drugs
oneself
required
secure
conviction
participating
conspiracy
piper
agreeing
store
drugs
one
house
support
conspiracy
may
sufficient
ibid
unnecessary
member
conspiracy
agree
commit
element
substantive
offense
also
conspirator
may
convicted
even
though
incapable
committing
substantive
offense
salinas
supra
see
rabinowich
person
may
guilty
conspiring
although
incapable
committing
objective
offense
sand
supra
ou
may
find
defendant
guilty
conspiracy
despite
fact
incapable
committing
substantive
crime
applied
principles
two
cases
involving
mann
act
see
act
june
ch
stat
section
mann
act
made
crime
transport
woman
cause
transported
across
state
lines
immoral
holte
federal
grand
jury
charged
woman
clara
holte
conspiring
man
named
chester
laudenschleger
violate
provision
district
dismissed
charge
holte
holding
woman
holte
convicted
substantive
offense
transporting
causing
transported
across
state
lines
also
convicted
conspiring
commit
offense
succinct
opinion
justice
holmes
rejected
argument
stating
plainly
person
may
conspire
commission
crime
third
person
even
commit
substantive
crime
dissent
argued
holding
effectively
turned
every
woman
acquiesced
covered
interstate
trip
conspirator
see
opinion
lamar
disagreed
acknowledged
may
degree
coöperation
insufficient
make
woman
conspirator
refused
rule
possibility
woman
conspire
cause
transported
illustrate
point
provided
example
woman
played
active
role
planning
carrying
expanded
points
gebardi
another
mann
act
conspiracy
case
man
woman
convicted
conspiring
transport
woman
one
state
another
immoral
purpose
deciding
case
gebardi
explicitly
reaffirmed
longstanding
principle
ncapacity
one
commit
substantive
offense
necessarily
imply
may
impunity
conspire
others
able
commit
moreover
fully
accepted
holte
holding
woman
convicted
conspiring
cause
transported
across
state
lines
see
held
evidence
insufficient
support
conspiracy
convictions
show
ed
woman
went
willingly
upon
journeys
purposes
alleged
noting
evidence
woman
active
moving
spirit
conceiving
carrying
transportation
held
evidence
mere
consent
acquiescence
enough
holte
gebardi
make
perfectly
clear
person
may
convicted
conspiring
commit
substantive
offense
personally
commit
also
show
person
consent
acquiescence
inherent
underlying
substantive
offense
something
bare
consent
acquiescence
may
needed
prove
person
conspirator
basic
principles
conspiracy
law
resolve
case
order
establish
existence
conspiracy
violate
hobbs
act
government
obligation
demonstrate
conspirator
agreed
personally
commit
even
capable
committing
substantive
offense
hobbs
act
extortion
sufficient
prove
conspirators
agreed
underlying
crime
committed
member
conspiracy
capable
committing
words
conspirator
must
specifically
intended
conspirator
commit
element
substantive
exactly
happened
petitioner
moreno
mejia
share
common
purpose
namely
petitioner
police
officers
commit
every
element
substantive
extortion
offense
salinas
petitioner
officers
obtain
property
color
official
right
something
moreno
mejia
incapable
public
officials
petitioner
officers
obtain
money
another
moreno
mejia
majestic
although
moreno
mejia
incapable
committing
underlying
substantive
offense
reasoning
holte
gebardi
conspire
commit
hobbs
act
extortion
agreeing
help
petitioner
officers
commit
substantive
offense
see
holte
conspiracy
officer
employé
government
offence
commit
held
many
years
fall
within
conspiracy
section
penal
code
see
also
salinas
supra
gebardi
supra
rabinowich
reasons
clear
petitioner
convicted
conspiring
obtain
property
shopowners
consent
color
official
right
effort
escape
conclusion
petitioner
argues
usual
rules
apply
type
hobbs
act
conspiracy
charged
case
basic
argument
ultimately
follows
members
conspiracy
must
share
criminal
objective
objective
conspiracy
charged
case
obtain
money
another
consent
color
official
right
moreno
mejia
objective
obtaining
money
another
money
question
accordingly
incapable
members
conspiracy
charged
case
since
insufficient
evidence
record
show
petitioner
conspired
anyone
moreno
mejia
must
acquitted
see
reply
brief
argument
fails
simple
reason
contrary
petitioner
claim
shopowners
common
criminal
objective
objective
conspirator
including
moreno
mejia
obtain
money
another
rather
petitioner
baltimore
officers
see
app
superseding
indictment
purpose
conspiracy
moreno
mejia
enrich
bpd
baltimore
police
department
officers
exchange
bpd
officers
exercise
official
positions
influence
cause
vehicles
towed
otherwise
delivered
majestic
petitioner
dispute
properly
convicted
three
substantive
hobbs
act
violations
based
proof
obtained
money
another
criminal
objective
petitioner
moreno
mejia
agreed
petitioner
baltimore
officers
commit
substantive
violations
nature
thus
rules
conspiracy
law
petitioner
properly
charged
convicted
conspiring
shopowners
nothing
text
hobbs
act
even
remotely
undermines
conclusion
petitioner
invocation
rule
principles
unavailing
petitioner
argues
interpretation
makes
hobbs
act
sweep
broadly
creating
national
antibribery
law
displacing
carefully
crafted
network
state
federal
statutes
contends
charge
conspiring
obtain
money
conspirator
consent
color
official
right
tantamount
charge
soliciting
accepting
bribe
allowing
charge
undermines
federal
bribery
statute
applicable
state
local
officials
state
bribery
laws
also
argues
extortion
conspiracies
sort
known
prior
enactment
hobbs
act
evidence
congress
meant
act
plow
new
ground
subtext
arguments
seems
unnatural
prosecute
bribery
basis
statute
prohibiting
extortion
held
evans
hobbs
act
extortion
color
official
right
includes
rough
equivalent
describe
bribe
petitioner
ask
us
overturn
evans
see
brief
petitioner
tr
oral
arg
occasion
already
held
prohibits
rough
equivalent
bribery
principled
basis
precluding
prosecution
conspiracies
commit
petitioner
also
exaggerates
reach
decision
claims
dissolve
distinction
extortion
conspiracy
commit
extortion
every
act
extortion
hobbs
act
requires
property
obtained
consent
petitioner
argues
proof
consent
always
nearly
always
establish
existence
conspiratorial
agreement
thus
allow
government
turn
virtually
every
extortion
case
conspiracy
case
plenty
instances
consent
required
hobbs
act
enough
constitute
sort
agreement
needed
law
conspiracy
used
hobbs
act
phrase
consent
designed
distinguish
extortion
obtaining
property
another
consent
emphasis
added
robbery
obtaining
personal
property
person
presence
another
emphasis
added
thus
consent
simply
signifies
taking
property
circumstances
falling
short
robbery
consent
quite
different
mens
rea
necessary
conspiracy
conclusion
clear
language
prohibiting
obtaining
property
another
consent
induced
wrongful
use
actual
threatened
force
violence
fear
emphasis
added
language
applies
example
store
owner
makes
periodic
protection
payments
gang
members
fear
otherwise
trash
store
payments
obtained
store
owner
grudging
consent
store
owner
simply
making
demanded
payments
enter
conspiratorial
agreement
gang
members
conducting
shakedown
see
salinas
conspirators
must
pursue
criminal
objective
bailey
conspiracy
requires
heightened
mental
state
anderson
prosecution
must
show
offender
acted
specific
intent
mere
acquiescence
mann
act
violation
insufficient
create
conspiracy
see
gebardi
holte
minimal
consent
required
trigger
insufficient
form
conspiratorial
agreement
interpretation
thus
turn
virtually
every
act
extortion
conspiracy
reading
transform
every
bribe
public
official
conspiracy
commit
extortion
consent
required
pay
bribe
necessarily
create
conspiratorial
agreement
cases
bribe
payor
merely
complying
official
demand
payor
lacks
mens
rea
necessary
conspiracy
see
linas
supra
bailey
supra
anderson
supra
gebardi
supra
example
imagine
health
inspector
demands
bribe
restaurant
owner
threatening
close
restaurant
owner
pay
owner
reluctantly
pays
bribe
order
keep
business
open
owner
consented
inspector
demand
mere
acquiescence
demand
form
petitioner
exaggerates
impact
decision
argument
create
serious
practical
problems
validity
charge
hobbs
act
conspiracy
often
depend
difficult
questions
little
criminal
culpability
case
example
ownership
money
obtained
petitioner
far
clear
appears
funds
came
majestic
account
app
evidence
period
petitioner
membership
conspiracy
majestic
converted
limited
liability
company
regular
business
corporation
app
pp
transformation
money
obtained
petitioner
may
come
corporate
funds
corporation
entity
distinct
shareholders
therefore
even
petitioner
interpretation
applicable
law
moreno
mejia
agreed
petitioner
obtain
money
another
suppose
moreno
mejia
made
payments
taking
money
personal
bank
account
dictate
different
outcome
suppose
majestic
partnership
payments
came
company
account
mean
moreno
agreed
officers
obtain
money
another
insofar
obtain
mejia
share
partnership
funds
mejia
similarly
agreed
officers
obtain
money
another
insofar
obtain
share
belonging
moreno
consider
example
suppose
owner
manager
nightclub
reach
agreement
public
official
owner
bribe
official
approve
club
liquor
license
application
petitioner
approach
public
official
club
manager
may
guilty
conspiring
commit
extortion
agreed
official
obtain
property
another
owner
property
obtained
reply
brief
owner
prosecuted
apparent
reason
however
manager
owner
culpable
situation
iii
defendant
may
convicted
conspiring
violate
hobbs
act
based
proof
reached
agreement
owner
property
question
obtain
property
color
official
right
petitioner
joined
agreement
conspiracy
conviction
must
stand
judgment
appeals
fourth
circuit
affirmed
ordered
breyer
concurring
samuel
ocasio
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
fourth
circuit
may
justice
breyer
concurring
agree
sentiment
expressed
dissenting
opinion
justice
thomas
evans
may
well
wrongly
decided
see
post
think
exceptionally
difficult
question
whether
extortion
within
meaning
hobbs
act
really
rough
equivalent
taking
bribe
evans
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
especially
admittedly
decided
question
case
without
benefit
full
briefing
extortion
history
see
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
neither
party
case
briefed
argued
question
present
case
underscores
problems
evans
raises
example
scenario
presented
today
public
health
inspector
asks
money
restaurant
owner
exchange
favorable
reports
see
ante
courts
juries
draw
difficult
distinction
somewhat
involuntary
behavior
bribe
payor
voluntary
behavior
bribe
payor
may
determine
whether
conspiracy
compare
holte
finding
transported
woman
conspire
violate
mann
act
gebardi
finding
conspiracy
nonetheless
must
case
take
evans
good
law
see
tr
oral
arg
petitioner
take
th
holding
evans
given
join
majority
opinion
full
thomas
dissenting
samuel
ocasio
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
fourth
circuit
may
justice
thomas
dissenting
today
holds
extortionist
conspire
commit
extortion
person
extorting
see
ante
holding
exposes
flaw
understanding
extortion
view
started
wrong
path
evans
wrongly
equated
extortion
bribery
holding
evans
made
seem
plausible
extortionist
conspire
victim
rather
embrace
view
extend
evans
errors
accordingly
respectfully
dissent
hobbs
act
makes
crime
obstruc
dela
affec
commerce
extortion
act
defines
extortion
obtaining
property
another
consent
induced
wrongful
use
actual
threatened
force
violence
fear
color
official
right
evans
held
obtain
conviction
extortion
color
official
right
government
need
show
public
official
obtained
payment
entitled
knowing
payment
made
return
official
acts
therefore
interpreted
extortion
hobbs
act
rough
equivalent
bribe
dissented
evans
holding
disregarded
definite
meaning
color
official
right
element
extortion
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
common
law
essential
money
property
obtained
color
office
pretense
officer
entitled
thereto
virtue
office
money
thing
received
must
claimed
accepted
right
office
person
paying
must
yielded
official
authority
ibid
quoting
anderson
wharton
criminal
law
procedure
pp
emphasis
deleted
congress
enacted
hobbs
act
offense
thus
understood
involve
merely
wrongful
taking
public
official
wrongful
taking
false
pretense
official
right
emphasis
deleted
given
established
meaning
extortion
adopted
hobbs
act
evans
erred
equating
extortion
taking
bribe
bribery
extortion
different
crimes
ibid
extortion
public
official
sole
wrongdoer
ibid
official
acts
color
office
law
regards
payor
innocent
victim
accomplice
ibid
official
solicits
takes
bribe
contrast
color
office
pretense
official
entitlement
ibid
bribery
payor
knows
recipient
official
entitled
payment
well
official
may
punished
offense
ibid
emphasis
deleted
ii
relying
evans
definition
hobbs
act
extortion
see
ante
holds
extortionist
conspire
commit
extortion
person
extorting
ante
holding
irreconcilable
correct
understanding
hobbs
act
extortion
needlessly
extends
evans
error
conspiracy
context
general
federal
conspiracy
statute
makes
crime
two
persons
conspire
commit
offense
guilty
conspiracy
commit
extortion
two
persons
must
conspire
obtai
property
another
consent
induced
color
official
right
correct
understanding
hobbs
act
extortion
illogical
wrong
say
two
people
conspired
extort
one
explained
hobbs
act
extortion
case
perpetrator
public
official
payor
victim
participant
see
evans
thomas
dissenting
understanding
irreconcilable
view
extortionist
extortion
payor
payor
conspires
public
official
payor
pay
official
whatever
two
said
done
conspired
obtain
payments
official
pretense
official
entitlement
ibid
extortionist
payor
know
official
entitled
payments
matter
office
conspired
commit
hobbs
act
extortion
record
confirms
scheme
involve
extortion
common
law
understood
crime
far
victimizing
owners
alexis
moreno
edwin
mejia
allegedly
extortionate
scheme
benefited
repair
shop
time
shop
business
came
referrals
police
officers
moreno
mejia
worked
ocasio
officers
maximize
shop
profits
scheme
moreno
mejia
pleaded
guilty
hobbs
act
extortion
conspiracy
belying
claim
innocent
victims
government
maintain
owners
paid
ocasio
based
assertion
false
pretense
official
right
payment
thomas
dissenting
government
instead
emphatic
moreno
mejia
participated
full
partners
scheme
record
refutes
suggestion
th
scheme
brief
whatever
crime
ocasio
may
committed
conspiracy
commit
extortion
sure
conclusion
plausible
evans
redefinition
extortion
reason
extend
evans
error
blurring
distinction
bribery
extortion
evans
make
seem
plausible
extortionist
victim
conspire
extort
victim
today
takes
another
step
away
understanding
extortion
hobbs
act
adopted
iii
decision
unfortunate
expands
federal
criminal
liability
way
conflicts
principles
federalism
even
evans
decided
nearly
years
ago
hobbs
act
already
served
engine
stunning
expansion
federal
criminal
jurisdiction
field
traditionally
policed
state
local
laws
acts
public
corruption
state
local
officials
thomas
dissenting
disregarding
distinction
extortion
bribery
evans
expanded
hobbs
act
allow
federal
prosecutors
reach
conduct
state
local
government
officials
see
expansion
unwarranted
congress
made
intent
regulate
state
officials
unmistakably
clear
language
hobbs
act
gregory
ashcroft
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
basis
reading
hobbs
act
expansively
evans
supra
thomas
dissenting
see
jones
nless
congress
conveys
purpose
clearly
deemed
significantly
changed
balance
prosecution
crimes
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
today
broadens
hobbs
act
reach
enable
federal
prosecutors
punish
conspiracy
participants
bribery
scheme
invasion
state
sovereign
functions
substantial
federal
government
expansively
charge
state
local
officials
easily
obtain
pleas
convictions
officials
government
prosecute
sweeping
conspiracy
charges
easier
induce
payors
plead
testify
state
local
officials
thus
wrenches
presumptive
control
officials
wrongdoing
evans
cites
statutory
text
clearly
authorizing
intrusion
matters
presumptively
left
jones
supra
evans
need
overreach
state
law
already
punishes
conduct
issue
see
md
crim
law
code
ann
punishing
bribery
bribery
public
official
cf
brock
one
doubts
criminal
laws
prohibiting
citizens
bribing
public
officials
think
reason
doubt
willingness
invoke
laws
citizens
engage
brazen
bribery
scheme
evans
reaches
decision
barely
nod
sovereignty
interests
tramples
see
ante
summarily
dismissing
unavailing
ocasio
invocation
principles
federalism
evans
agree
consistent
hobbs
act
text
hold
extortionist
conspire
commit
extortion
person
extorting
accordingly
reverse
appeals
judgment
upholding
ocasio
conspiracy
conviction
reasons
respectfully
dissent
sotomayor
dissenting
samuel
ocasio
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
fourth
circuit
may
justice
sotomayor
chief
justice
joins
dissenting
group
conspirators
sets
extort
another
person
ordinarily
think
proposing
extort
money
property
victim
outside
group
one
group
conspiratorial
entity
victim
another
person
upholding
conspiracy
conviction
interprets
phrase
extorting
property
another
hobbs
act
contrary
natural
holds
group
conspirators
agree
obtain
property
another
violation
act
even
agree
transfer
property
among
natural
logical
way
interpret
phrase
another
respectfully
dissent
indictment
charged
ocasio
former
baltimore
police
officer
participating
kickback
scheme
engineered
owners
local
auto
repair
shop
brothers
herman
moreno
edwin
mejia
ocasio
baltimore
officers
referred
victims
brothers
shop
body
repair
work
exchange
moreno
mejia
paid
ocasio
referral
indictment
pleaded
ocasio
officers
brothers
conspired
violation
federal
conspiracy
statute
commit
extortion
violation
hobbs
act
federal
conspiracy
statute
applies
whenever
two
persons
conspire
commit
federal
offense
least
one
acts
furtherance
offense
hobbs
act
federal
offense
punishes
hoever
commits
extortion
defines
extortion
obtaining
property
another
consent
color
official
right
extortion
includes
taking
bribe
see
evans
putting
together
charging
ocasio
conspiring
commit
extortion
prosecutors
charged
agreeing
take
bribes
another
person
trial
rather
attempt
prove
ocasio
agreed
officers
take
bribes
moreno
mejia
government
contended
ocasio
agreed
take
brothers
bribes
brothers
agreed
ocasio
obtain
property
another
person
someone
ocasio
argued
contrast
impossible
group
people
agree
obtain
property
another
without
evidence
another
person
outside
conspiratorial
agreement
gave
property
ocasio
conceded
alone
violate
hobbs
act
taking
bribe
one
brothers
maintained
brothers
group
also
violate
conspiracy
statute
agreeing
one
take
bribe
rejects
ocasio
interpretation
ii
hobbs
act
criminalizes
extortion
public
official
obtains
property
another
question
define
another
context
conspiracy
commit
extortion
another
relational
word
describes
one
entity
connected
different
entity
particular
describes
entity
different
distinct
one
first
considered
collegiate
dictionary
ed
case
conspiracy
violate
hobbs
act
obtaining
property
another
relevant
entity
consider
conspiratorial
group
federal
generic
conspiracy
statute
makes
crime
two
people
conspire
gives
word
conspire
conventional
meaning
see
salinas
conspire
agree
crux
conspiracy
collective
criminal
agreement
partnership
crime
callanan
natural
reading
conspiring
obtain
property
another
collective
agreement
obtain
property
entity
different
distinct
conspiracy
ocasio
moreno
mejia
agree
ocasio
obtain
property
person
different
distinct
conspirators
group
agreed
ocasio
take
property
moreno
mejia
people
part
rather
distinct
conspiracy
three
people
agree
agreed
obtain
property
person
involved
brock
understanding
another
refers
someone
outside
conspiracy
consistent
plain
meaning
hobbs
act
also
precedent
explaining
purpose
conspiracy
law
target
conduct
group
crimes
conspiracy
law
punishes
collective
criminal
agreement
ombination
roup
association
criminal
purposes
dangerous
separate
individuals
acting
alone
callanan
conspiracy
partnership
crime
confederation
scheme
enterprise
pinkerton
accordingly
law
treats
conspiracy
least
ways
entity
distinct
individual
members
defendant
guilty
conspiracy
agrees
conspiratorial
group
intends
commit
elements
criminal
offense
salinas
conspirator
must
intend
endeavor
completed
satisfy
elements
substantive
criminal
offense
focus
group
conduct
endeavor
agreed
commit
collectively
individual
members
conspiracy
act
advance
conspiratorial
endeavor
act
behalf
agents
conspiracy
performance
hyde
matter
single
member
group
undertakes
commit
every
element
offense
linas
partners
criminal
plan
must
agree
pursue
criminal
objective
may
divide
work
yet
responsible
acts
one
member
acts
agent
conspiracy
furthering
collective
endeavor
actions
attributable
others
individual
agent
alone
pinkerton
see
also
long
partnership
crime
continues
partners
act
carrying
forward
accordingly
whether
criminal
conspiracy
exists
depends
conspirators
agreed
group
principle
confirms
another
best
understood
relating
conspiratorial
enterprise
another
person
outside
conspiracy
conspiracy
obtain
property
another
group
agreement
least
one
member
group
obtain
property
someone
part
endeavor
departing
natural
reading
text
holds
ocasio
punished
conspiracy
ocasio
obtained
property
another
moreno
mejia
ocasio
moreno
mejia
agreed
ocasio
engage
conduct
order
reach
conclusion
implicitly
assumes
hobbs
act
use
another
takes
reference
point
single
member
conspiracy
ocasio
rather
group
conspirators
whole
see
ante
basis
assumption
never
explains
based
plain
language
hobbs
act
natural
reading
text
seems
foreclose
moreno
mejia
distinct
different
group
formed
collective
criminal
agreement
assumption
follow
prior
precedent
first
principles
conspiracy
law
see
part
iii
infra
plain
meaning
statute
general
principles
conspiracy
law
lead
conclusion
conspiracy
commit
extortion
obtaining
property
another
violation
hobbs
act
exist
conspirators
agree
obtain
property
someone
outside
conspiracy
iii
ground
decision
hobbs
act
use
language
another
instead
relies
says
principles
conspiracy
law
ante
avail
principles
derived
decisions
turn
interpreting
text
another
federal
statute
mann
act
remaining
generic
principles
cites
resolve
precise
question
case
whether
hobbs
act
use
phrase
obtain
property
another
adopts
perspective
individual
conspirator
conspiratorial
group
collective
best
support
comes
cases
interpreting
mann
act
made
crime
person
knowingly
transport
interstate
foreign
commerce
woman
girl
purpose
prostitution
debauchery
ante
quoting
ch
stat
emphasis
deleted
one
decisions
held
even
though
transported
woman
girl
ostensibly
victim
crime
nothing
statute
precluded
prosecutors
also
convicting
woman
conspiring
another
person
transport
illegally
holte
derives
generic
principle
conspiracy
law
victim
hobbs
act
extortion
also
liable
like
victim
mann
act
violation
ante
stretches
mann
act
case
beyond
tethers
holte
based
analysis
entirely
text
act
generic
principles
conspiracy
law
unlike
hobbs
act
use
another
person
mann
act
prohibits
transporting
woman
based
language
concluded
woman
held
liable
conspiring
others
violate
act
holte
example
professional
prostitute
suggest
carry
journey
buy
railroad
tickets
see
also
stat
mann
act
specifying
procuring
obtaining
ticket
tickets
assistance
criminal
sort
thus
held
within
letter
act
see
reason
act
held
apply
emphasis
added
moreover
holte
based
holding
text
relevant
substantive
offense
reasoning
consistent
actual
principles
conspiracy
adopt
perspective
conspiratorial
group
determine
conduct
violated
text
statute
members
alleged
mann
act
conspiracy
agree
transport
illegally
woman
group
enterprise
logically
naturally
intend
transport
female
member
group
logic
hold
case
hobbs
act
requires
conspirators
agree
obtain
property
another
unlike
another
relational
word
requires
determining
group
similarly
attempts
create
generic
conspiracy
principle
cites
gebardi
another
mann
act
case
relies
act
text
gebardi
considered
question
whether
woman
merely
acquiesced
transported
held
liable
conspiring
violate
act
held
conspiracy
exist
woman
aided
assisted
transportation
something
mere
agreement
mere
acquiescence
transported
based
decision
explicitly
language
mann
act
punish
woman
transporting
woman
fall
within
ban
statute
must
least
assist
someone
else
transporting
procuring
transportation
accordingly
reasoned
necessary
implication
congress
decision
include
woman
merely
consents
scope
act
mann
act
conspiracy
statute
came
construed
together
necessarily
congress
intend
woman
nevertheless
always
held
liable
conspirator
later
characterized
gebardi
holding
exceptio
limited
character
ordinary
conspiracy
law
based
definition
substantive
offense
text
statute
pinkerton
whatever
ordinary
conspiracy
principles
might
dictate
clear
congress
intended
outcome
case
tries
elicit
general
principle
conspiracy
law
gebardi
ostensible
victim
statute
woman
transported
person
paying
bribe
convicted
merely
acquiesces
transportation
bribe
active
participant
conspiratorial
group
nevertheless
found
guilty
conspiracy
ante
draws
rough
analogy
attempt
cabin
scope
future
hobbs
act
conspiracy
charges
exclude
potential
defendants
whose
participation
extortion
amounts
mere
acquiescence
ignores
reasoning
gebardi
reliance
express
terms
mann
act
generic
conspiracy
principles
led
exclude
woman
merely
acquiesces
transported
addition
mann
act
argues
interpretation
correct
mejia
moreno
held
liable
conspiring
commit
extortion
even
though
incapable
committing
substantive
crime
public
officials
mejia
moreno
obtain
property
color
official
right
ante
true
enough
principle
lead
conclusion
another
takes
perspective
ocasio
reference
point
opposed
conspiratorial
group
example
suppose
politician
lobbyist
conspire
lobbyist
tell
clients
pay
politician
bribes
exchange
official
acts
lobbyist
obtain
bribes
color
official
right
charged
substantive
hobbs
act
extortion
violation
conspiracy
still
violate
hobbs
act
see
evans
conspiratorial
group
obtained
property
another
clients
outside
conspiracy
exists
lobbyist
politician
suppose
lobbyist
instead
agrees
pay
bribe
back
question
heart
case
principle
therefore
work
thinks
entirely
consistent
say
obtaining
property
another
violation
hobbs
act
requires
conspirators
agree
obtain
property
someone
outside
conspiracy
say
every
conspirator
enters
agreement
need
capable
committing
substantive
offense
finally
raises
policy
concerns
mentions
odd
immunize
ostensible
victims
conspiracy
commit
extortion
mejia
moreno
play
active
role
conspiracy
members
ante
perhaps
odd
concern
warrant
contortion
conspiracy
law
criminal
statutes
like
federal
antibribery
laws
state
laws
reach
similar
conduct
see
criminalizing
bribery
state
local
tribal
officials
specified
circumstances
md
crim
law
code
ann
criminalizing
bribery
public
employee
course
government
attempted
convict
ocasio
conspiracy
facts
without
relying
odd
theory
example
proving
ocasio
conspired
baltimore
police
officers
extort
property
brothers
effort
make
sure
ocasio
moreno
mejia
get
deserts
atextual
interpretation
hobbs
act
exposes
innocent
victims
extortion
charges
conspired
extorter
whenever
agree
pay
bribe
says
worry
limit
scope
conspiracy
exclude
potential
defendants
whose
participation
extortion
amounts
mere
acquiescence
analogizing
gebardi
ante
gebardi
grounded
mere
acquiescence
standard
text
mann
act
see
supra
without
textual
hook
hobbs
act
rests
intuitions
drawn
basic
examples
restaurant
owner
threatened
closure
health
official
reluctantly
pays
bribe
says
owner
guilty
conspiracy
ante
according
consented
extortion
mere
acquiescence
official
demand
create
conspiratorial
agreement
ibid
contrast
says
nightclub
owner
pursues
liquor
license
asking
manager
bribe
public
official
clearly
guilty
conspiracy
ante
agreed
public
official
official
obtain
property
another
exchange
license
ibid
examples
raise
questions
answers
mere
consent
tip
conspiracy
depend
whose
idea
whether
bribe
floated
official
demand
suggestion
happy
citizen
pay
public
official
much
money
involved
whether
citizen
gained
benefit
liquor
license
avoided
loss
closing
restaurant
many
times
citizen
paid
bribes
whether
ever
resisted
paying
called
police
say
leaves
federal
prosecutors
answer
questions
first
instance
raising
specter
potentially
charging
everybody
conspiracy
seeing
sticks
flips
three
people
agree
obtain
property
another
everyday
understanding
agreement
intend
obtain
property
someone
outside
conspiracy
reaches
opposite
conclusion
based
entirely
assumption
hobbs
act
use
another
takes
reference
point
vantage
ocasio
alone
rather
group
endeavor
constitutes
conspiracy
offers
explanation
grounded
either
text
statute
principles
conspiracy
law
assumption
correct
conspiracy
long
criticized
vague
elastic
fitting
whatever
prosecutor
needs
given
case
see
krulewitch
jackson
concurring
warned
view
disfavor
attempts
broaden
already
pervasive
nets
conspiracy
prosecutions
grunewald
today
reaching
unnatural
outcome
predicated
unsupported
assumption
says
never
mind
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
full
provided
follows
person
shall
knowingly
transport
cause
transported
aid
assist
obtaining
transportation
transporting
interstate
foreign
commerce
territory
district
columbia
woman
girl
purpose
prostitution
debauchery
immoral
purpose
intent
purpose
induce
entice
compel
woman
girl
become
prostitute
give
debauchery
engage
immoral
practice
shall
knowingly
procure
obtain
cause
procured
obtained
aid
assist
procuring
obtaining
ticket
tickets
form
transportation
evidence
right
thereto
used
woman
girl
interstate
foreign
commerce
territory
district
columbia
going
place
purpose
prostitution
debauchery
immoral
purpose
intent
purpose
part
person
induce
entice
compel
give
practice
prostitution
give
debauchery
immoral
practice
whereby
woman
girl
shall
transported
interstate
foreign
commerce
territory
district
columbia
shall
deemed
guilty
felony
upon
conviction
thereof
shall
punished
fine
exceeding
five
thousand
dollars
imprisonment
five
years
fine
imprisonment
discretion
act
june
ch
stat
emphasis
added
assumed
holte
convicted
principal
substantive
offense
causing
transported
across
state
lines
noted
might
possible
woman
violate
mann
act
different
way
aiding
procuring
form
transportation
covered
interstate
trip
holte
see
stat
aid
assist
obtaining
transportation
woman
commit
substantive
violation
explained
reason
also
convicted
conspiring
commit
offense
see
however
refused
hold
ground
woman
like
holte
convicted
conspiring
violate
thus
addressed
broader
question
whether
possible
woman
holte
position
commit
offense
conspiring
laudenschleger
procure
transportation
cause
holte
transported
wrote
suppose
instance
professional
prostitute
well
able
look
man
suggest
carry
journey
within
act
hope
blackmailing
man
buy
railroad
tickets
pay
fare
jersey
city
new
york
within
letter
act
see
reason
act
held
apply
path
reasoning
gebardi
reached
conclusions
essentially
follows
first
perceived
mann
act
congressional
judgment
woman
convicted
offense
created
provision
consent
acquiesce
interstate
trip
gebardi
concluded
transported
woman
never
convicted
language
prohibiting
person
transporting
woman
causing
woman
transported
across
state
lines
immoral
purpose
see
act
punish
woman
transporting
respect
statutory
language
making
crime
assist
someone
else
transporting
procuring
transportation
held
aiding
assisting
requires
mere
consent
acquiescence
see
also
rosemond
slip
aiding
abetting
requires
intent
facilitate
commission
offense
second
turning
issue
conspiracy
reasoned
something
woman
mere
consent
acquiescence
needed
avoid
undermining
congressional
judgment
saw
framed
holding
follows
perceive
failure
mann
act
condemn
woman
participation
transportations
effected
mere
consent
evidence
affirmative
legislative
policy
leave
acquiescence
unpunished
gebardi
supra
emphasis
added
section
also
requires
one
conspirators
commit
overt
act
furtherance
offense
petitioner
dispute
element
satisfied
government
argues
lower
courts
long
held
private
person
may
guilty
type
hobbs
act
extortion
aider
abettor
see
brief
occasion
reach
question
petitioner
position
evolved
course
litigation
noted
petitioner
requested
jury
instruction
stating
order
convict
defendant
conspiracy
commit
extortion
color
official
right
government
must
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
conspiracy
obtain
money
property
person
member
conspiracy
app
instruction
long
shopowners
named
conspirators
petitioner
convicted
even
ample
evidence
prove
conspired
baltimore
officers
obtain
money
shopowners
indeed
first
raised
brock
argument
see
brock
another
officer
manrich
still
case
charged
conspiracy
petition
writ
certiorari
appears
based
broad
argument
question
presented
phrased
follows
conspiracy
commit
extortion
require
conspirators
agree
obtain
property
someone
outside
conspiracy
pet
cert
argument
petitioner
opening
brief
similar
see
brief
petitioner
arguing
hobbs
act
conspiracy
requires
conspirators
agree
among
wrongly
obtain
property
someone
outside
ring
conspiracy
government
brief
pointed
argument
strange
implications
see
brief
assume
sufficient
evidence
prove
petitioner
conspired
baltimore
officers
obtain
money
moreno
mejia
petitioner
original
broad
argument
charge
valid
long
moreno
mejia
named
conspirators
naming
indictment
render
charge
invalid
indictments
however
often
attempt
name
conspirators
indictment
case
see
app
charging
petitioner
manrich
conspired
among
others
persons
unknown
strange
decision
name
moreno
mejia
rendered
otherwise
valid
charge
defective
course
petitioner
might
make
even
broader
argument
conspiracy
charge
fail
moreno
mejia
although
named
conspirators
indictment
later
listed
conspirators
response
bill
particulars
government
took
position
trial
perhaps
seeking
introduce
statements
exemption
hearsay
rule
response
government
argument
petitioner
reply
brief
claimed
argument
actually
narrower
one
consider
matter
law
moreno
mejia
members
conspiracy
aim
obtaining
money
consent
color
official
right
see
reply
brief
reply
brief
contends
acceptance
narrower
argument
requires
acquittal
insufficient
evidence
show
conspired
anyone
moreno
mejia
ibid
appeals
however
concluded
otherwise
see
nevertheless
decision
based
primarily
grounds
address
petitioner
argument
ultimately
refined
rule
applies
criminal
statute
contains
grievous
ambiguity
uncertainty
seizing
everything
aid
derived
make
guess
congress
intended
muscarello
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
unmindful
federalism
concerns
implicated
case
concerns
raised
rejected
evans
see
thomas
dissenting
construction
hobbs
act
repugnant
basic
tenets
federalism
accept
controlling
see
part
infra
justice
thomas
argues
evans
wrongly
decided
position
makes
sense
extent
simply
refuses
accept
case
founders
insofar
suggests
even
evans
accepted
relation
substantive
hobbs
act
charges
extended
conspiracy
cases
see
post
dissenting
opinion
extend
evans
errors
post
holding
needlessly
extends
evans
error
conspiracy
context
post
today
takes
another
step
away
understanding
extortion
hobbs
act
adopted
strange
provision
criminal
code
meant
one
thing
respect
charges
substantive
violation
something
different
cases
involving
conspiracy
commit
offense
petitioner
also
claims
naming
moreno
mejia
conspirators
opened
door
prosecutors
employ
potent
evidentiary
rules
conspiracy
charges
make
available
see
brief
petitioner
naming
shopowners
effect
joinder
defendant
named
superseding
indictment
manrich
joined
even
shopowners
named
naming
moreno
mejia
effect
admissibility
evidence
overt
acts
committed
baltimore
officers
named
petitioner
footnotes
justice
thomas
sets
forth
believes
evans
wrongly
decided
ante
dissenting
opinion
party
asks
us
overrule
evans
case
question
considered
see
also
oxford
english
dictionary
ed
one
one
originally
second
two
things
subsequently
extended
anything
additional
remaining
beyond
already
considered
additional
emphasis
deleted
oxford
english
dictionary
ed
webster
new
international
dictionary
ed
different
distinct
separate
one
one
considered
new
oxford
american
dictionary
ed
used
refer
different
person
thing
one
already
mentioned
known
american
heritage
dictionary
ed
distinctly
different
first
moreover
oddity
hobbs
act
failure
punish
bribe
payors
conspiring
bribe
takers
may
partly
explained
decision
hold
extortion
hobbs
act
reaches
public
official
accepts
bribe
first
place
see
ante
thomas
dissenting