middendorf
henry
argued
january
decided
march
together
henry
et
al
middendorf
secretary
navy
et
also
certiorari
uniform
code
military
justice
ucmj
provides
four
methods
disposing
cases
involving
servicemen
offenses
general
special
summary
disciplinary
punishment
pursuant
art
ucmj
general
special
may
impose
substantial
penalties
resemble
judicial
proceedings
nearly
always
presided
lawyer
judges
lawyer
counsel
sides
article
punishment
conducted
personally
accused
commanding
officer
administrative
method
dealing
minor
offenses
summary
lying
informal
art
procedure
judicial
procedures
general
special
designed
exercise
justice
promptly
relatively
minor
offenses
informal
proceeding
conducted
single
commissioned
officer
acting
judge
factfinder
prosecutor
defense
counsel
jurisdiction
noncommissioned
officers
enlisted
personnel
impose
maximum
sentences
days
confinement
hard
labor
days
hard
labor
without
confinement
two
months
restriction
specified
limits
reduction
lowest
enlisted
pay
grade
forfeiture
pay
one
month
accused
consent
trial
summary
case
either
referred
special
general
dismissed
various
enlisted
members
marine
corps
hereinafter
plaintiffs
charged
part
unauthorized
absences
brought
class
action
district
challenging
authority
military
try
summary
without
providing
counsel
plaintiffs
consented
writing
tried
summary
without
counsel
advised
tried
special
counsel
provided
apprised
maximum
sentences
imposable
two
procedures
district
entered
judgment
plaintiffs
appeals
vacated
judgment
remanded
case
reconsideration
light
opinion
daigle
warner
wherein
held
right
counsel
sixth
amendment
summary
absolute
fifth
amendment
due
process
right
every
case
military
defendant
might
imprisoned
line
gagnon
scarpelli
counsel
required
accused
makes
request
based
timely
colorable
claim
defense
mitigating
circumstances
assistance
counsel
necessary
order
adequately
present
defense
held
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
summary
since
proceeding
criminal
prosecution
term
used
amendment
pp
even
civilian
context
fact
proceeding
result
loss
liberty
ipso
facto
mean
proceeding
criminal
prosecution
sixth
amendment
purposes
gagnon
scarpelli
supra
gault
taken
account
summary
occurs
military
rather
civilian
community
considerations
supporting
conclusion
criminal
prosecution
least
strong
factors
held
dispositive
cases
charges
plaintiffs
counterpart
carry
little
popular
opprobrium
penalties
comparable
civilian
sanctions
pp
summary
unlike
criminal
trial
adversary
proceeding
pp
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
require
counsel
provided
accused
summary
proceeding
pp
though
loss
liberty
may
result
summary
implicates
due
process
question
whether
embodies
right
counsel
depends
upon
analysis
interests
accused
regime
subject
making
analysis
deference
must
given
congress
determination
art
constitution
counsel
provided
type
proceeding
supporting
congress
decision
fact
presence
counsel
convert
brief
informal
hearing
may
readily
convened
concluded
attenuated
proceeding
time
military
personnel
thus
consuming
military
resources
unwarranted
degree
see
ex
rel
toth
quarles
pp
accused
feels
counsel
essential
situation
envisaged
appeals
reliance
daigle
warner
supra
may
elect
trial
counsel
provided
special
proceeding
though
thus
expose
possibility
greater
penalties
decision
involving
kind
choice
often
occurs
civilian
criminal
cases
constitutionally
decisive
pp
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
burger
white
blackmun
powell
joined
powell
filed
concurring
opinion
blackmun
joined
post
stewart
filed
dissenting
statement
post
marshall
filed
dissenting
opinion
brennan
joined
post
stevens
took
part
consideration
decision
cases
harvey
stone
argued
cause
pro
hac
vice
petitioners
respondents
reargument
deputy
solicitor
general
frey
argued
cause
parties
original
argument
stone
brief
solicitor
general
bork
assistant
attorney
general
petersen
harriet
shapiro
sidney
glazer
merlin
staring
robertson
max
halliday
nathan
zahm
reargued
cause
petitioners
respondents
briefs
wirin
fred
okrand
david
addlestone
thomas
geisler
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
february
plaintiffs
enlisted
members
marine
corps
brought
class
action
district
central
district
california
challenging
authority
military
try
summary
without
providing
counsel
five
plaintiffs
charged
unauthorized
absences
violation
art
ucmj
convicted
summary
sentenced
inter
alia
periods
confinement
ranging
days
hard
labor
three
plaintiffs
two
charged
inter
alia
unauthorized
absence
one
assault
art
ucmj
ordered
stand
trial
summary
convened
convicted
provided
counsel
awaiting
trial
informed
counsel
provided
convicted
plaintiffs
informed
prior
trial
afforded
counsel
refuse
trial
summary
desired
event
refusal
cases
referred
special
counsel
provided
plaintiffs
consented
writing
proceed
trial
summary
without
counsel
plaintiffs
records
reviewed
approved
staff
judge
advocate
pursuant
art
ucmj
plaintiffs
file
petition
review
judge
advocate
general
navy
pursuant
art
ucmj
district
plaintiffs
brought
class
action
seeking
habeas
corpus
release
confinement
injunction
future
confinement
resulting
uncounseled
summary
convictions
order
vacating
convictions
previously
convicted
district
allowed
suit
proceed
class
action
expunged
plaintiffs
convictions
released
plaintiffs
members
class
confinement
issued
worldwide
injunction
summary
without
counsel
disposition
case
merits
occasion
reach
question
whether
fed
rule
civ
proc
providing
class
actions
applicable
petitions
habeas
corpus
see
harris
nelson
whether
district
properly
determined
remedial
order
entitled
enforced
outside
territorial
limits
district
sat
appeals
vacated
judgment
district
remanded
case
reconsideration
light
appeals
opinion
daigle
warner
daigle
held
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
summary
likewise
held
absolute
fifth
amendment
due
process
right
counsel
every
case
military
defendant
might
imprisoned
however
citing
gagnon
scarpelli
hold
counsel
required
accused
makes
request
based
timely
colorable
claim
defense
mitigating
circumstances
assistance
counsel
necessary
order
adequately
present
defense
mitigating
circumstances
daigle
made
exception
general
rule
cases
counsel
reasonably
available
instance
required
granted
certiorari
ucmj
provides
four
methods
disposing
cases
involving
offenses
committed
servicemen
general
special
summary
disciplinary
punishment
administered
commanding
officer
pursuant
art
ucmj
general
special
resemble
judicial
proceedings
nearly
always
presided
lawyer
judges
lawyer
counsel
prosecution
defense
general
authorized
award
lawful
sentence
including
death
art
ucmj
special
may
award
discharge
six
months
confinement
hard
labor
forfeiture
pay
per
month
six
months
case
enlisted
member
reduction
lowest
pay
grade
art
ucmj
article
punishment
conducted
personally
accused
commanding
officer
administrative
method
dealing
minor
offenses
parker
levy
summary
occupies
position
informal
nonjudicial
disposition
art
procedure
general
special
purpose
exercise
justice
promptly
relatively
minor
offenses
simple
form
procedure
manual
mcm
informal
proceeding
conducted
single
commissioned
officer
jurisdiction
noncommissioned
officers
enlisted
personnel
art
ucmj
presiding
officer
acts
judge
factfinder
prosecutor
defense
counsel
presiding
officer
must
inform
accused
charges
name
accuser
call
witnesses
accused
desires
call
mcm
accused
must
consent
trial
summary
trial
may
ordered
special
general
maximum
sentence
elements
may
imposed
summary
one
month
confinement
hard
labor
days
hard
labor
without
confinement
two
months
restriction
specified
limits
reduction
lowest
enlisted
pay
grade
forfeiture
pay
one
month
art
ucmj
ii
question
whether
accused
constitutional
right
counsel
much
debated
never
squarely
resolved
see
reid
covert
dicta
ex
parte
milligan
wall
said
framers
constitution
doubtless
meant
limit
right
trial
jury
sixth
amendment
persons
subject
indictment
presentment
fifth
ex
parte
quirin
said
cases
arising
land
naval
forces
expressly
excepted
fifth
amendment
deemed
excepted
implication
sixth
find
unnecessary
case
finally
resolve
broader
aspects
question
since
conclude
even
sixth
amendment
held
applicable
proceedings
summary
provided
cases
criminal
prosecution
within
meaning
amendment
conclusion
course
answer
ultimate
question
whether
plaintiffs
entitled
counsel
summary
proceeding
shift
frame
reference
sixth
amendment
guarantee
counsel
criminal
prosecutions
fifth
amendment
prohibition
deprivation
life
liberty
property
without
due
process
law
argersinger
hamlin
held
sixth
amendment
provision
assistance
counsel
extended
misdemeanor
prosecutions
civilian
courts
conviction
result
imprisonment
summary
may
impose
days
confinement
hard
labor
doubtless
military
equivalent
imprisonment
yet
fact
outcome
proceeding
may
result
loss
liberty
even
civilian
life
mean
sixth
amendment
guarantee
counsel
applicable
gagnon
scarpelli
respondent
faced
prospect
sent
prison
result
revocation
probation
held
revocation
proceeding
nonetheless
criminal
proceeding
took
pains
case
observe
critical
differences
criminal
trials
probation
parole
revocation
hearings
society
probationer
parolee
stakes
preserving
differences
criminal
trial
state
represented
prosecutor
formal
rules
evidence
force
defendant
enjoys
number
procedural
rights
may
lost
timely
raised
jury
trial
defendant
must
make
presentation
understandable
untrained
jurors
short
criminal
trial
system
adversary
proceeding
unique
characteristics
revocation
hearing
hand
state
represented
prosecutor
parole
officer
orientation
described
formal
procedures
rules
evidence
employed
members
hearing
body
familiar
problems
practice
probation
parole
mean
indicate
hearing
held
must
conform
requirements
criminal
trial
even
usual
administrative
hearing
hold
hearing
must
measure
essentials
due
process
fair
treatment
summary
noted
one
four
types
proceedings
military
imposes
discipline
punishment
remove
holding
argersinger
civilian
context
apply
require
counsel
summary
proceeding
simply
loss
liberty
may
result
proceeding
seem
inescapable
counsel
likewise
required
lowest
level
military
proceeding
dealing
minor
offenses
even
art
nonjudicial
punishment
may
imposed
administratively
commanding
officer
may
result
imposition
upon
enlisted
man
correctional
custody
hard
labor
consecutive
days
think
analysis
made
cases
gagnon
gault
well
considerations
peculiar
military
counsel
mechanical
application
argersinger
admittedly
gagnon
distinguishable
defendant
earlier
sentenced
close
orthodox
criminal
prosecution
gault
distinguishable
juvenile
faced
possible
initial
confinement
result
proceeding
question
nevertheless
based
conclusion
counsel
required
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
rather
determination
hearing
criminal
prosecution
within
meaning
sixth
amendment
seems
us
indisputably
clear
therefore
even
civilian
context
fact
proceeding
result
loss
liberty
ipso
facto
mean
proceeding
criminal
prosecution
purposes
sixth
amendment
fact
confinement
imposed
first
instance
result
proceeding
make
criminal
prosecution
consider
addition
fact
summary
occurs
military
community
rather
civilian
community
believe
considerations
supporting
conclusion
criminal
prosecution
least
strong
held
dispositive
gagnon
gault
dissent
points
post
gault
gave
weight
rehabilitative
purpose
juvenile
proceedings
involved
factor
present
summary
undoubtedly
gault
gagnon
factually
distinguishable
summary
proceeding
together
surely
stand
proposition
even
civilian
community
proceeding
may
result
deprivation
liberty
nonetheless
criminal
proceeding
within
meaning
sixth
amendment
elements
sufficiently
distinguish
traditional
civilian
criminal
trial
summary
proceeding
likewise
different
traditional
trial
many
respects
important
occurs
within
military
community
latter
factor
long
line
decisions
every
bit
significant
every
bit
entitled
given
controlling
weight
fact
gagnon
defendant
previously
sentenced
fact
gault
proceeding
rehabilitative
purpose
recently
noted
difference
diverse
civilian
community
much
tightly
regimented
military
community
parker
levy
said
ucmj
equated
civilian
criminal
code
various
versions
articles
war
preceded
regulate
aspects
conduct
members
military
civilian
sphere
left
unregulated
civilian
criminal
code
carves
relatively
small
segment
potential
conduct
declares
criminal
uniform
code
military
justice
essays
varied
regulation
much
larger
segment
activities
tightly
knit
military
community
ibid
much
conduct
proscribed
military
criminal
conduct
civilian
sense
word
example
plaintiffs
charged
solely
unauthorized
absence
offense
counterpart
carries
little
popular
opprobrium
conviction
offense
likely
consequences
accused
beyond
immediate
punishment
meted
military
unlike
conviction
civilian
misdemeanors
vagrancy
larceny
carry
stamp
bad
character
conviction
token
penalties
may
meted
summary
limited
one
month
confinement
hard
labor
days
hard
labor
without
confinement
two
months
restriction
specified
limits
sanctions
may
imposed
affecting
property
interest
limited
reduction
grade
attendant
loss
pay
forfeiture
detention
portion
one
month
pay
finally
summary
procedurally
quite
different
criminal
trial
first
place
adversary
proceeding
yet
adversary
nature
civilian
criminal
proceedings
one
touchstones
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
extended
petty
offenses
argersinger
hamlin
argersinger
relied
gideon
wainwright
held
adversary
system
criminal
justice
person
haled
assured
fair
trial
unless
counsel
provided
seems
us
obvious
truth
governments
state
federal
quite
properly
spend
vast
sums
money
establish
machinery
try
defendants
accused
crime
lawyers
prosecute
everywhere
deemed
essential
protect
public
interest
orderly
society
accused
extended
right
witness
summary
aid
accused
accused
desires
ask
questions
suggested
accused
behalf
accused
obtain
attendance
witnesses
administer
oath
examine
obtain
evidence
may
tend
disprove
negative
guilt
charges
explain
acts
omissions
charged
show
extenuating
circumstances
establish
grounds
mitigation
determining
findings
explain
accused
right
testify
merits
remain
silent
give
accused
full
opportunity
exercise
election
mcm
iii
appeals
likewise
concluded
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
summary
proceedings
applying
due
process
standards
fifth
amendment
adopted
standard
gagnon
scarpelli
made
right
counsel
depend
upon
nature
serviceman
defense
unable
agree
appeals
properly
applied
gagnon
military
context
recognize
plaintiffs
either
convicted
due
appear
summary
may
subjected
loss
liberty
property
consequently
entitled
due
process
law
guaranteed
fifth
amendment
however
whether
process
embodies
right
counsel
depends
upon
analysis
interests
individual
regime
subject
wolff
mcdonnell
making
analysis
must
give
particular
deference
determination
congress
made
authority
regulate
land
naval
forces
art
counsel
provided
summary
held
burns
wilson
rights
men
armed
forces
must
perforce
conditioned
meet
certain
overriding
demands
discipline
duty
civil
courts
agencies
must
determine
precise
balance
struck
adjustment
framers
especially
entrusted
task
congress
omitted
given
one
member
military
appeals
took
issue
claim
military
necessity
taking
latter
chief
judge
darden
statements
applying
least
equal
force
members
left
congress
previous
determination
counsel
required
thus
need
decide
whether
factors
militating
favor
counsel
summary
extraordinarily
weighty
overcome
balance
struck
congress
first
consider
effect
providing
counsel
summary
observed
gagnon
scarpelli
supra
introduction
counsel
proceeding
alter
significantly
nature
proceeding
counsel
provided
accused
state
turn
normally
provide
counsel
lawyers
training
disposition
advocates
bound
professional
duty
present
available
evidence
arguments
support
clients
positions
contest
vigor
adverse
evidence
views
observed
ex
rel
toth
quarles
primary
business
armies
navies
fight
ready
fight
wars
occasion
arise
trial
soldiers
maintain
discipline
merely
incidental
army
primary
fighting
function
extent
responsible
performance
primary
function
diverted
necessity
trying
cases
basic
fighting
purpose
armies
served
ilitary
tribunals
probably
never
constituted
way
kind
qualifications
constitution
deemed
essential
fair
trials
civilians
federal
courts
timely
colorable
claim
defense
mitigating
circumstances
assistance
counsel
necessary
order
adequately
present
defense
mitigating
circumstances
true
exercising
option
accused
subjects
greater
possible
penalties
imposed
special
proceeding
however
find
possible
detriment
constitutionally
decisive
frequently
approved
much
difficult
decision
daily
faced
civilian
criminal
defendants
plead
guilty
lesser
included
offense
brady
case
defendant
gives
right
counsel
right
trial
furthermore
elects
exercise
right
trial
stands
convicted
serious
offense
likely
bear
increased
penalties
choices
necessary
part
criminal
justice
system
criminal
process
like
rest
legal
system
replete
situations
requiring
making
difficult
judgments
course
follow
mcmann
richardson
although
defendant
may
right
even
constitutional
dimensions
follow
whichever
course
chooses
constitution
token
always
forbid
requiring
choose
mcgautha
california
reversed
justice
stewart
dissents
believing
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
requires
defendant
accorded
assistance
counsel
summary
proceeding
footnotes
including
two
among
original
six
plaintiffs
later
intervened
one
plaintiffs
also
charged
several
offenses
including
assault
superior
noncommissioned
officer
art
uniform
code
military
justice
ucmj
plaintiffs
informed
consented
pursuant
terms
navy
staff
judge
advocate
memorandum
force
el
toro
marine
corps
air
station
plaintiffs
stationed
record
example
plaintiff
henry
following
entry
appears
record
accused
advised
tried
summary
represented
appointed
military
counsel
instead
summary
officer
thoroughly
impartially
inquire
sides
matter
assure
interests
government
accused
safeguarded
case
referred
special
sic
provided
counsel
addition
accused
informed
maximum
punishment
imposable
case
summary
sic
special
sic
foregoing
statutory
rights
counsel
special
sic
least
one
plaintiff
mclean
found
guilty
certain
charges
summary
upon
review
supervisory
authority
level
guilty
findings
certain
charges
upon
convicted
reversed
plaintiffs
arguably
failed
exhaust
military
remedies
however
defendants
urge
exhaustion
required
practice
judge
advocate
general
defer
consideration
petitions
issue
pending
completion
litigation
issue
federal
courts
since
exhaustion
requirement
designed
protect
military
undue
interference
federal
courts
schlesinger
councilman
military
waive
requirement
feels
review
federal
courts
necessary
see
sosna
iowa
class
included
members
navy
marine
corps
required
date
order
stand
trial
summary
afforded
counsel
supp
features
mandatory
general
special
may
seldom
convened
without
military
judge
cases
senior
member
presides
appointed
defense
counsel
special
required
attorney
unless
attorney
obtained
physical
conditions
military
exigencies
addition
appointed
counsel
general
special
accused
may
retain
civilian
counsel
expense
may
represented
military
lawyer
selection
lawyer
reasonably
available
arts
ucmj
maximum
punishments
may
imposed
art
days
correctional
custody
days
restriction
specified
limits
days
extra
duties
forfeiture
one
month
pay
per
month
two
months
detention
one
month
pay
per
month
three
months
reduction
grade
enlisted
members
attached
embarked
vessel
may
sentenced
three
days
confinement
bread
water
diminished
rations
correctional
custody
necessarily
confinement
intended
served
way
allows
normal
performance
duty
together
intensive
counselling
persons
serving
correctional
custody
however
may
confined
art
see
department
navy
secnav
inst
corrections
manual
june
department
army
pamphlet
correctional
custody
june
department
air
force
reg
correctional
custody
additionally
officer
must
inform
accused
right
remain
silent
allow
witnesses
summary
officer
accused
may
testify
present
evidence
behalf
accused
found
guilty
may
make
statement
sworn
unsworn
extenuation
mitigation
mcm
record
trial
reviewed
convening
officer
art
ucmj
thereafter
judge
advocate
art
ucmj
sentence
elements
may
imposed
one
sentence
enlisted
persons
fourth
enlisted
pay
grade
may
sentenced
confinement
hard
labor
summary
reduced
except
next
inferior
grade
mcm
compare
wiener
bill
rights
original
practice
harv
rev
finds
historic
precedent
application
right
counsel
henderson
constitution
original
understanding
harv
rev
concludes
original
intent
framers
apply
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
military
compare
daigle
warner
betonie
sizemore
since
brother
marshall
analysis
sixth
amendment
applies
military
appear
right
counsel
right
jury
trial
likewise
guaranteed
amendment
come
duncan
louisiana
right
presumably
obtain
cases
summary
short
periods
confinement
may
impose
surely
apply
special
general
empowered
impose
sentences
far
excess
held
duncan
maximum
imposed
without
jury
whatever
may
merits
selective
incorporation
fourteenth
amendment
sixth
amendment
makes
absolutely
distinction
right
jury
trial
right
counsel
chief
judge
darden
dissenting
alderman
made
similar
observation
may
argued
counsel
required
summary
since
constitute
criminal
convictions
article
proceedings
nonjudicial
corrective
nature
effect
confinement
former
correctional
custody
latter
difficult
distinguish
see
gault
consequently
difficulty
sustaining
position
counsel
must
provided
summary
may
dispensed
article
proceedings
may
result
correctional
custody
section
provides
commanding
officer
grade
major
lieutenant
commander
may
impose
inter
alia
consecutive
days
correctional
custody
ii
duty
hours
may
include
hard
labor
brother
marshall
argues
post
nn
military
considers
summary
conviction
criminal
admiral
hearn
navy
judge
advocate
general
describe
convictions
criminal
state
commanding
officer
decision
utilize
summary
opposed
art
administrative
punishment
might
turn
judgment
best
interests
service
begin
put
record
infractions
serviceman
accumulated
several
art
punishments
type
offense
joint
hearings
military
justice
subcommittee
constitutional
rights
senate
committee
judiciary
special
subcommittee
senate
committee
armed
services
hearings
army
assistant
judge
advocate
general
pointed
one
advantage
summary
held
accused
art
proceeding
latter
adjudged
company
commander
nominal
accuser
whereas
summary
knows
nothing
case
ibid
dissent
also
refers
us
army
acknowledgment
collateral
consequences
flowing
summary
conviction
post
quoted
text
portion
army
written
response
following
question
effects
serviceman
career
conviction
summary
special
disjunctive
question
makes
impossible
tell
whether
portion
quoted
addressed
special
summary
finally
whatever
conclusions
may
drawn
author
article
rev
cited
dissent
post
impact
summary
conviction
little
aid
present
considerations
article
written
inception
ucmj
operation
year
discusses
sentencing
terms
interaction
code
corresponding
manual
course
undergone
substantial
revision
intervening
years
lightly
assumed
author
conclusions
drawn
time
valid
respect
present
ucmj
mcm
manner
currently
implemented
various
services
brother
marshall
notes
post
technically
even
serious
noncapital
ucmj
offenses
may
tried
summary
little
practical
effect
upon
serviceman
accused
given
ceilings
punishments
imposed
art
seem
inconceivable
serious
charge
striking
commissioned
officer
art
ucmj
general
impose
sentence
ever
prosecuted
impose
maximum
confinement
hard
labor
one
month
occurred
accused
charged
summary
doubt
delighted
good
fortune
fact
dissent
notes
post
summary
conducted
navy
nonmilitary
offenses
regard
figure
substantial
sense
dissent
apparently
held
johnson
zerbst
sixth
amendment
embodies
realistic
recognition
obvious
truth
average
defendant
professional
legal
skill
protect
brought
tribunal
power
take
life
liberty
wherein
prosecution
presented
experienced
learned
counsel
one
factors
discussed
nature
proceedings
offenses
punishments
necessarily
dispositive
rather
three
combine
distinctive
nature
military
life
discipline
lead
conclusion
dissent
discussing
factors
independently
attempting
demonstrate
factor
stand
force
come
grips
analysis
judge
quinn
broad
view
applicability
bill
rights
members
military
well
established
concurring
culp
stated
protections
run
armed
forces
unless
excluded
directly
necessary
implication
provisions
constitution
see
also
jacoby
prior
enactment
ucmj
positive
law
suggested
summary
abolished
congress
rejected
suggestion
instead
provided
person
tried
summary
objected
thereto
unless
previously
refused
art
punishment
stat
prior
amendments
code
elimination
summary
proposed
rejected
subcommittee
constitutional
rights
senate
committee
judiciary
summary
report
hearings
constitutional
rights
military
personnel
instead
art
exception
right
refuse
eliminated
compromise
favoring
retention
summary
abolish
thus
apparent
congress
considered
matter
depth
period
confinement
may
imposed
summary
stands
marked
contrast
period
confinement
minimum
three
years
imposed
juvenile
proceeding
gault
article
ucmj
provides
pertinent
part
person
respect
summary
jurisdiction
may
brought
trial
summary
objects
thereto
article
ucmj
provides
accused
right
represented
defense
general
special
civilian
counsel
provided
military
counsel
selection
reasonably
available
defense
counsel
detailed
section
title
dissent
criticizes
failure
discuss
gault
supra
point
gault
inapposite
contrary
assertion
dissent
post
gault
tried
adult
courts
subject
maximum
sentence
two
months
rather
six
years
actually
received
speculate
result
gault
waiver
available
adult
sentence
greater
rather
less
juvenile
means
follows
dissent
suggests
post
result
obtain
system
civilian
context
gideon
wainwright
argersinger
hamlin
held
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
applicable
context
reasoning
jackson
one
penalized
exercising
constitutional
right
come
play
however
held
constitutional
right
counsel
summary
issue
penalized
exercise
right
presented
justice
powell
justice
blackmun
joins
concurring
agree
substance
holding
opinion
join
write
separately
emphasize
factor
view
distinguishes
case
argersinger
hamlin
one
sentence
expresses
fundamental
basis
distinction
long
recognized
military
necessity
specialized
society
separate
civilian
society
parker
levy
laws
traditions
governing
military
discipline
long
history
founded
unique
military
exigencies
powerful
past
contemporary
vitality
repeatedly
recognized
congress
recognize
course
one
constitutional
rights
surrendered
upon
entering
armed
services
rights
applied
often
held
light
unique
military
exigencies
necessarily
govern
many
aspects
military
service
see
parker
levy
supra
recognition
since
founding
republic
congress
enacted
special
legislation
applicable
armed
services
including
current
provisions
uniform
code
military
justice
summary
art
ucmj
find
basis
holding
constitution
compels
equating
purposes
requiring
counsel
provided
military
summary
courts
civilian
criminal
courts
noted
opinion
relatively
petty
offenses
customarily
come
summary
often
involve
military
offenses
unknown
civilian
society
case
example
plaintiffs
charged
unauthorized
absence
sure
courts
also
try
offenses
violations
civilian
criminal
law
typically
petty
offenses
committed
defendants
subject
military
discipline
occasion
case
address
whether
constitution
requires
providing
counsel
special
general
proceedings
serious
civil
felonies
often
charged
indeed
armed
services
required
statute
provide
counsel
cases
art
ucmj
schlesinger
councilman
referring
uniform
code
said
congress
attempted
balance
military
necessities
governing
discipline
equally
significant
interest
ensuring
fairness
servicemen
charged
military
offenses
formulate
mechanism
often
competing
interests
adjusted
result
congress
created
integrated
system
military
courts
review
procedures
recently
held
absent
waiver
person
may
imprisoned
offense
whether
classified
petty
misdemeanor
felony
unless
represented
counsel
trial
argersinger
hamlin
today
refuses
apply
argersinger
holding
defendants
summary
proceedings
assuming
purposes
opinion
sixth
amendment
applies
general
holds
special
characteristics
summary
particular
simply
criminal
prosecutions
within
meaning
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
therefore
inapplicable
dissent
preliminarily
summary
aside
clear
citizen
surrender
right
appointed
counsel
enters
military
inconceivable
example
conclude
defendant
general
proceeding
sentences
severe
life
imprisonment
may
imposed
entitled
protection
constitution
affords
civilian
defendant
facing
even
day
imprisonment
see
argersinger
hamlin
supra
surely
sworn
risk
lives
defend
constitution
derive
benefit
right
counsel
right
become
even
firmly
entrenched
jurisprudence
past
several
generations
see
gideon
wainwright
powell
alabama
question
might
arise
whether
general
guarantee
counsel
defendants
placed
fifth
amendment
sixth
amendment
conviction
sixth
amendment
guarantee
amendment
provides
explicit
guarantee
counsel
criminal
prosecutions
since
recently
observed
convened
adjudicate
charges
criminal
violations
military
law
parisi
davidson
seem
criminal
prosecutions
sixth
amendment
therefore
applies
face
legitimate
dispute
among
scholars
true
whether
framers
expressly
intended
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
apply
military
see
ante
historical
evidence
somewhat
ambiguous
reading
sources
suggests
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
intended
framers
apply
even
historical
evidence
plainly
showed
contrary
certainly
determinative
contemporary
scope
sixth
amendment
chief
justice
hughes
observed
statement
constitution
meant
time
adoption
means
intended
say
great
clauses
constitution
must
confined
interpretation
framers
conditions
outlook
time
placed
upon
statement
carries
refutation
home
bldg
loan
assn
blaisdell
short
belief
sixth
amendment
demands
defendants
ordinarily
accorded
counsel
special
characteristics
summary
particular
deprive
status
criminal
prosecutions
sixth
amendment
inapplicable
cases
us
today
course
proposition
major
part
opinion
addressed
turn
ii
conclusion
summary
criminal
prosecutions
face
surprising
one
less
case
summary
directed
adjudicating
charges
criminal
violations
military
law
conviction
summary
lead
confinement
one
month
nevertheless
finds
conclusion
mandated
combination
four
factors
limitations
punishment
meted
summary
nature
offenses
defendant
tried
nature
summary
proceeding
distinctive
nature
military
life
discipline
ante
totally
unpersuaded
considerations
others
whether
taken
singly
combination
justify
denying
summary
defendants
right
assistance
counsel
one
safeguards
sixth
amendment
deemed
necessary
insure
fundamental
human
rights
life
liberty
johnson
zerbst
course
true
summary
may
adjudge
confinement
excess
one
month
manual
mcm
argersinger
held
length
confinement
wholly
irrelevant
determining
applicability
right
counsel
aware
prospect
imprisonment
however
short
time
seldom
viewed
accused
trivial
petty
matter
baldwin
new
york
plurality
opinion
held
argersinger
fact
confinement
duration
determinative
right
counsel
insofar
today
uses
ceiling
summary
defendant
sentence
support
holding
much
finding
argersinger
inapplicable
rejecting
basis
argersinger
holding
support
holding
observes
uch
conduct
proscribed
military
criminal
conduct
civilian
sense
word
ante
intimates
conviction
many
offenses
normally
tried
summary
consequences
beyond
immediate
punishment
meted
military
ante
observations
misleading
irrelevant
summary
generally
designed
deal
relatively
minor
offenses
see
mcm
statutory
matter
summary
proceeding
used
try
noncapital
offense
triable
general
special
art
ucmj
see
moore
offense
plaintiffs
tried
unauthorized
absence
counterpart
substantial
proportion
offenses
actually
tried
summary
offenses
larceny
assault
also
constitute
criminal
offenses
committed
civilian
indeed
one
servicemen
cases
charged
assault
therefore
misleading
suggest
fundamental
difference
type
conduct
chargeable
summary
type
conduct
deemed
criminal
civilian
sector
implication
summary
conviction
consequences
beyond
immediate
punishment
ante
also
inaccurate
one
central
distinctions
art
nonjudicial
punishment
summary
conviction
latter
regarded
criminal
conviction
criminal
conviction
collateral
consequences
military
civilian
life
army
readily
acknowledged
conviction
creates
criminal
record
color
consideration
subsequent
misconduct
soldier
noncommissioned
officer
may
survive
one
summary
without
reduction
effected
unlikely
one
conviction
record
survive
second
trial
retain
status
conviction
officer
devastating
aftereffect
upon
career
described
cases
sentence
passover
promotion
list
may
serve
basis
initiation
administrative
elimination
action
man
fact
criminal
conviction
record
handicap
civilian
life
may
interfere
job
opportunities
may
counted
difficulty
civilian
law
enforcement
agency
general
tends
marked
man
therefore
wholly
unrealistic
suggest
impact
summary
conviction
lies
exclusively
immediate
punishment
meted
summary
convictions
carry
potential
stigma
injury
career
increased
punishment
future
offenses
way
convictions
civilian
criminal
trials
convictions
general
special
quite
apart
flimsy
factual
basis
observations
nature
offenses
tried
summary
lack
collateral
consequences
convictions
already
determined
argersinger
irrelevant
applicability
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
argersinger
teaches
right
counsel
triggered
potential
confinement
regardless
trivial
petty
offense
may
seem
see
logic
therefore
preclude
suggestion
right
counsel
activated
potential
confinement
deactivated
absence
collateral
consequences
conviction
nature
summary
proceeding
proceeding
nonadversary
nature
relatedly
protective
functions
presiding
officer
third
factor
according
helps
make
unnecessary
provision
counsel
accused
reliance
without
substantial
foundation
characterizes
summary
nonadversary
offers
little
explanation
characterization
advances
contention
right
counsel
inapplicable
argument
simply
furnishing
counsel
transform
proceeding
adversary
proceeding
argument
simply
observation
argument
must
either
something
peculiar
goal
summary
proceeding
makes
right
counsel
inapplicable
elements
conduct
proceeding
render
counsel
unnecessary
extent
characterization
summary
nonadversary
meant
convey
something
goal
purpose
proceeding
totally
unpersuasive
sense
summary
proceeding
far
less
nonadversary
juvenile
delinquency
proceedings
held
right
counsel
applicable
gault
gault
dispute
proper
purpose
juvenile
justice
system
rehabilitative
rather
punitive
parties
juvenile
delinquency
proceeding
might
striving
adjudication
disposition
best
interests
child
traditional
notion
kindly
juvenile
judge
highly
appropriate
one
see
yet
gault
confronted
reality
however
beneficial
goal
delinquency
proceedings
potential
result
confinement
individual
institution
ibid
factor
mandated
accused
juvenile
offenders
entitled
representation
counsel
distinguished
situation
gault
summary
special
rehabilitative
purpose
rather
central
immediate
purpose
discipline
violated
ucmj
goals
juvenile
delinquency
proceedings
insufficient
justification
denial
counsel
follows
fortiori
goals
summary
similarly
insufficient
second
possible
meaning
conveyed
characterizing
summary
nonadversary
presence
elements
conduct
proceeding
render
independent
counsel
unnecessary
reflected
observation
function
presiding
officer
quite
different
participant
civilian
trial
ante
responsibility
presiding
officer
act
judge
jury
prosecutor
defense
counsel
combined
intimates
presiding
officer
duty
advise
accused
rights
ability
help
accused
assemble
facts
examine
witnesses
accusers
make
defense
counsel
unnecessary
particularly
light
absence
formal
prosecutor
proceeding
find
argument
unpersuasive
powell
alabama
rejected
notion
judge
effectively
discharge
obligations
counsel
accused
largely
judge
participate
necessary
conferences
counsel
accused
sometimes
partake
inviolable
character
confessional
true
powell
unrepresented
defendant
opposed
traditional
prosecutor
gault
supra
prosecutor
participants
delinquency
proceedings
juvenile
mother
probation
officers
judge
participants
presumably
interested
welfare
juvenile
yet
held
matter
protective
judge
participants
might
juvenile
entitled
independent
counsel
irreconcilable
conflict
among
roles
summary
presiding
officer
inevitably
prevents
functioning
effectively
substitute
defense
counsel
instance
defendant
right
remain
silent
testify
see
art
ucmj
mcm
intelligent
decision
whether
exercise
right
requires
consultation
whether
testifying
hurt
help
case
inevitably
involves
sharing
confidences
counsel
full
consultation
possibly
take
place
defense
counsel
also
playing
role
judge
prosecutor
defense
counsel
also
serves
prosecutor
judge
effectively
unavailable
many
necessary
conferences
counsel
accused
powell
alabama
supra
well
making
implementation
critical
tactical
strategic
trial
decisions
helpful
presiding
officer
might
defendant
inconsistent
roles
bar
adequate
substitute
independent
defense
counsel
sum
nothing
assertedly
nature
summary
either
terms
goals
alternative
safeguards
renders
unnecessary
assistance
counsel
finally
draws
notions
military
necessity
justify
conclusion
right
counsel
inapplicable
summary
proceedings
concerns
discipline
obedience
occasion
true
justify
imposing
restrictions
military
unconstitutional
civilian
context
see
parker
levy
denials
traditional
rights
group
approved
without
examination
especially
group
comprises
members
military
engaged
endeavor
national
service
frequently
fraught
danger
sacrifice
examination
persuaded
denial
right
counsel
summary
justified
military
necessity
substance
asserted
justification
discipline
efficiency
morale
demand
utilization
expeditious
disciplinary
procedure
relatively
minor
offenses
seem
however
art
nonjudicial
punishment
speedily
imposed
commander
carry
stigma
criminal
conviction
provides
procedure
indeed
amendments
art
greatly
expanded
availability
nonjudicial
punishment
resulted
sharp
decrease
utilization
summary
therefore
pressing
need
streamlined
summary
proceeding
order
supply
expeditious
disciplinary
procedure
moreover
means
clear
guaranteeing
counsel
summary
defendants
result
significantly
longer
time
periods
preferral
charges
punishment
fairly
conducted
proceedings
absence
counsel
timesaving
enjoyed
might
well
result
presiding
officer
something
less
adequate
substitute
independent
defense
counsel
especially
difficult
accept
federal
parties
claim
military
necessity
view
fact
well
decision
argersinger
services
allowed
summary
defendants
retain
counsel
expense
given
fact
federal
parties
argument
reduced
contention
defendants
afford
retain
counsel
must
matter
military
necessity
denied
counsel
summary
proceedings
sustaining
contention
means
defeat
principles
equality
justice
military
sworn
defend
fundamental
notions
fairness
subverted
rights
poor
alone
sacrificed
cause
military
necessity
also
significant
military
appeals
uscma
body
recognized
expertise
dealing
military
problems
applied
argersinger
summary
without
giving
hint
military
necessity
posed
problem
alderman
indeed
judge
duncan
explicitly
noted
record
contains
evidence
convinces
application
argersinger
rule
followed
system
military
necessity
concurring
part
dissenting
part
even
alderman
decided
air
force
army
applied
argersinger
summary
rather
advancing
theoretically
available
military
necessity
argument
see
priest
leads
doubt
whether
even
military
opinion
military
necessity
dictated
denial
counsel
virtually
ignoring
factors
cast
doubt
justification
defers
asserted
congressional
judgment
counsel
provided
summary
ante
congress
evaluation
military
necessity
clearly
entitled
deference
departure
position
past
suggest
need
come
conclusion
validity
argument
based
military
necessity
see
robel
parker
levy
cf
new
york
times
regardless
weight
properly
accorded
clear
congressional
determination
military
necessity
determination
case
congressional
action
referred
congress
refusal
abolish
summary
altogether
concurrent
extending
serviceman
opportunity
reject
trial
summary
refers
action
evidence
congress
considered
depth
matter
whether
counsel
required
summary
ante
evidence
offered
detailed
congressional
consideration
specific
question
feasibility
providing
counsel
summary
importantly
indication
congress
made
judgment
military
necessity
requires
denial
constitutional
right
counsel
summary
defendants
congress
lack
discussion
military
necessity
enough
throw
substantial
doubt
inferences
timing
congressional
action
cited
certainly
action
occurred
substantially
decision
argersinger
thus
even
assume
congress
decision
retain
summary
represents
considered
conclusion
counsel
provided
judgment
made
time
even
civilian
defendants
subject
prison
terms
less
six
months
recognized
constitutional
right
counsel
therefore
little
reason
congress
undertake
detailed
consideration
necessary
make
finding
military
necessity
concluding
counsel
need
provided
summary
defendants
sum
simply
indication
congress
ever
made
clear
determination
military
necessity
precludes
applying
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
summary
proceedings
indeed
characterizes
congressional
determination
vaguest
terms
never
expressly
claims
congress
made
determination
military
necessity
thus
read
opinion
grant
almost
total
deference
act
congress
dealing
military
iii
rejects
even
limited
holding
appeals
provision
counsel
summary
proceedings
evaluated
matter
due
process
basis
accused
defense
particular
case
explains
summary
defendants
counsel
appointed
refusing
trial
summary
proceeding
trial
special
acknowledged
consequence
exposure
greater
possible
penalties
given
conviction
summary
criminal
prosecution
sixth
amendment
unnecessary
deal
detail
due
process
question
event
however
special
option
may
offered
additional
support
treatment
sixth
amendment
issue
shall
briefly
assess
significance
analogizes
decision
whether
expose
oneself
special
counsel
proceed
summary
without
counsel
decision
faced
civilian
defendant
whether
proceed
trial
plead
guilty
lesser
included
offense
according
right
given
civilian
defendant
right
counsel
right
trial
ante
analogy
flawed
one
civilian
defendant
pleads
guilty
necessarily
gives
whatever
rights
might
thereafter
accorded
enable
protect
claim
innocence
conditions
pleading
guilty
logically
mandated
ones
contrast
condition
military
defendant
opting
tried
summary
denial
counsel
imposed
one
must
therefore
viewed
suspicion
indeed
force
analogy
entirely
dissipated
fact
civilian
defendant
pleads
guilty
forfeits
much
right
counsel
necessary
consequence
plea
fully
entitled
counsel
process
leading
plea
including
negotiations
government
possibility
plea
actual
decision
plead
defendant
also
entitled
counsel
sentencing
proceeding
might
follow
making
plea
doubt
scheme
acceptance
guilty
pleas
conditioned
full
abandonment
right
counsel
unconstitutional
contrast
today
approves
denial
counsel
summary
defendant
stages
purposes
including
least
regards
sailors
marines
decision
whether
reject
trial
summary
accused
opts
summary
parallel
accepted
guilty
plea
right
counsel
either
adjudicative
sentencing
phase
proceeding
conditioning
provision
counsel
defendant
subjecting
risk
additional
punishment
suffers
defect
scheme
disapproved
jackson
right
trial
jury
conditioned
defendant
subjecting
possibility
capital
punishment
analysis
correct
applied
sixth
amendment
argersinger
guarantee
counsel
trial
offense
carrying
potential
imprisonment
reduced
nullity
state
constitutionally
establish
two
levels
imprisonment
offense
lower
tier
defendants
willing
proceed
trial
without
counsel
higher
one
insist
assistance
counsel
inconceivable
sixth
amendment
tolerate
result
iv
right
counsel
termed
pervasive
rights
accorded
accused
result
action
today
accused
persons
protected
constitution
federal
defendants
state
defendants
juveniles
adults
civilians
soldiers
enlisted
men
tried
summary
imprisoned
without
accorded
right
counsel
expected
result
based
justifications
far
substantial
relied
respectfully
dissent
argue
framers
intend
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
apply
point
congressional
proceedings
seem
assume
right
applicability
see
henderson
constitution
original
understanding
harv
rev
materials
cited
therein
fact
traditional
late
century
allow
accused
serviceman
legal
assistance
take
opposite
position
point
inter
alia
contemporary
treatises
see
wiener
bill
rights
original
practice
harv
rev
materials
cited
therein
lack
mention
right
counsel
first
military
codes
constitution
fact
counsel
appear
military
proceedings
allowed
limited
role
given
case
whether
sixth
amendment
right
trial
jury
course
determinative
whether
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
indeed
argersinger
stated
reject
therefore
premise
since
prosecutions
crimes
punishable
imprisonment
less
six
months
may
tried
without
jury
may
also
tried
without
lawyer
compare
duncan
louisiana
indicated
fifth
amendment
express
exemption
military
requirement
indictment
grand
jury
also
exempts
military
inferentially
sixth
amendment
right
trial
jury
parker
reason
assume
inferences
fifth
amendment
exemption
drawn
regard
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
even
federal
parties
suggest
settling
issue
regard
military
ipso
facto
settled
sixth
amendment
issues
well
even
pure
due
process
analysis
used
however
counsel
mind
still
required
many
factors
analyzed
sixth
amendment
context
see
part
ii
infra
fully
relevant
due
process
analysis
see
gagnon
scarpelli
morrissey
brewer
gagnon
adopts
approach
right
counsel
probation
revocation
proceedings
fact
dealing
trial
result
criminal
conviction
mandates
counsel
made
available
every
case
see
gagnon
supra
looks
analysis
gagnon
scarpelli
supra
support
distinctions
draws
criminal
prosecutions
sixth
amendment
summary
find
reliance
questionable
say
least
intimates
ante
holding
gagnon
probation
revocation
hearing
part
criminal
prosecution
based
factors
relating
manner
hearings
conducted
factors
absence
prosecutor
informality
proceedings
however
inaccurate
reflection
said
gagnon
gagnon
conclusion
stated
early
opinion
probation
revocation
hearing
stage
criminal
prosecution
dependent
manner
proceedings
conducted
rather
held
follow
conclusion
morrissey
brewer
supra
revocation
parole
part
criminal
prosecution
following
analysis
morrissey
held
determinative
parole
arises
end
criminal
prosecution
including
imposition
sentence
revocation
deprives
individual
absolute
liberty
every
citizen
entitled
conditional
liberty
properly
dependent
observance
special
parole
restrictions
mcm
prescribed
executive
order
september
supplement
uniform
code
military
justice
ucmj
attempts
evade
argersinger
clear
mandate
relying
decisions
gagnon
scarpelli
supra
gault
gagnon
already
observed
supra
lends
support
sixth
amendment
analysis
case
gault
true
held
juvenile
delinquency
proceedings
even
though
might
result
confinement
criminal
prosecutions
sixth
amendment
mckeiver
pennsylvania
see
opinion
brennan
however
conclusion
undoubtedly
based
predominantly
rehabilitative
purpose
juvenile
justice
system
factor
shown
infra
manifestly
present
summary
context
gault
apply
sixth
amendment
course
hold
due
process
right
counsel
applicable
juvenile
delinquency
proceedings
pose
threat
confinement
course
punishment
ceilings
imposed
summary
applicable
matter
offense
tried
popular
opprobrium
resulting
conviction
serious
crime
factor
places
considerable
stock
ante
likely
severe
whatever
magnitude
punishment
popular
opprobrium
course
significant
practical
effect
ante
serviceman
future
see
figures
supplied
federal
parties
indicate
summary
conducted
navy
nonmilitary
offenses
brief
federal
parties
see
also
fidell
summary
proposal
harv
legis
see
also
joint
hearings
military
justice
subcommittee
constitutional
rights
senate
committee
judiciary
special
subcommittee
senate
committee
armed
services
hereinafter
cited
hearings
senate
testimony
judge
advocate
general
navy
observed
serviceman
convicted
summary
opposed
one
punished
art
begins
acquire
record
convictions
hearings
see
also
subcommittee
constitutional
rights
senate
committee
judiciary
summary
report
hearings
constitutional
rights
military
personnel
hearings
constitutional
rights
military
personnel
subcommittee
constitutional
rights
senate
committee
judiciary
see
also
fidell
supra
feld
martial
sentence
fair
foul
rev
intimates
decision
gault
might
different
gerald
gault
faced
period
confinement
significantly
less
three
years
duration
ante
however
opinion
contained
hint
limitation
held
right
counsel
applicable
whenever
juvenile
faced
proceedings
may
result
commitment
institution
juvenile
freedom
curtailed
general
military
trial
marked
manifest
destiny
retributive
justice
ilitary
law
always
continues
primarily
instrument
discipline
justice
glasser
justice
captain
levy
columbia
forum
parker
differences
advanced
distinguish
punishment
imposed
art
confinement
result
summary
see
shamel
quinn
number
summary
per
year
armed
services
dropped
percentage
total
military
caseload
dropped
fidell
supra
chief
explanation
phenomenon
lies
expansion
nonjudicial
punishment
powers
accomplished
according
federal
parties
cases
average
time
period
preferral
charges
final
review
summary
increased
days
since
military
appeals
applied
argersinger
military
alderman
supp
mem
federal
parties
parties
concede
possible
ascribe
changed
experience
exclusively
injection
counsel
summary
proceedings
ibid
nothing
offered
federal
parties
indicate
average
time
summary
proceeding
lengthened
result
providing
counsel
defendants
see
hearings
testimony
brig
kenneth
hodson
asst
judge
adv
military
justice
department
army
testimony
manss
judge
adv
air
force
testimony
rear
wilfred
hearn
judge
adv
navy
letter
june
chairman
senate
committee
armed
services
acting
general
counsel
department
treasury
indeed
acknowledging
provision
either
law
regulation
appointment
counsel
summary
department
treasury
indicated
six
years
argersinger
decided
treasury
department
policy
coast
guard
military
counsel
summary
supplied
upon
request
reasonably
available
moreover
following
exchange
took
place
letter
senate
subcommittee
constitutional
rights
navy
judge
advocate
general
corps
question
defendants
permitted
official
defense
department
service
policy
regulation
counsel
assist
summary
courts
answer
lthough
right
individual
representation
extended
accused
summary
policy
regulation
general
practice
naval
service
accord
representation
request
accused
question
man
requests
appointment
counsel
legal
otherwise
practice
grant
requests
answer
yes
dependent
upon
reasonable
availability
requested
counsel
see
schlesinger
councilman
noyd
bond
decisions
uscma
final
indeed
ironic
federal
parties
statutorily
barred
appealing
alderman
secured
rejection
lawsuit
originally
brought
federal
servicemen
seeking
protections
later
accorded
alderman
see
also
daigle
warner
cert
pending
appeals
ninth
circuit
noted
hile
navy
argues
vigor
naval
discipline
suffer
severely
appointed
counsel
required
summary
scant
support
record
relying
previously
stated
views
judge
quinn
one
members
alderman
majority
judge
quinn
failure
alderman
opinion
explicitly
mention
argument
declines
view
alderman
rejection
argument
disagree
priest
decided
months
alderman
uscma
recognized
albeit
another
context
military
necessity
may
affect
application
traditional
constitutional
rights
members
military
parties
alderman
briefed
argument
great
detail
judge
quinn
concurred
priest
opinion
factors
plus
judge
duncan
explicit
reference
argument
lead
read
alderman
rejection
argument
alderman
supra
duncan
concurring
part
dissenting
part
seem
however
serviceman
option
subjecting
possibility
special
lends
little
support
due
process
analysis
held
gault
decision
left
unmentioned
treatment
fifth
amendment
question
matter
due
process
accused
offenders
absolute
right
counsel
juvenile
delinquency
proceedings
surely
holding
different
case
juvenile
given
opportunity
voluntarily
subject
adult
criminal
proceedings
counsel
subject
harsher
punishment
neither
ucmj
mcm
contains
indication
serviceman
must
provided
counsel
assist
making
determination
whether
consent
object
trial
summary
internal
army
guidelines
appear
allow
consultation
counsel
making
determination
see
military
justice
handbook
guide
summary
trial
procedure
department
army
pamphlet
navy
guidelines
contain
provision
assuming
option
scheme
presents
serviceman
sort
realistic
choice
availability
also
substantially
undercuts
federal
parties
argument
see
supra
federal
parties
argue
matter
military
necessity
minor
offenses
must
disposed
summary
proceedings
without
giving
defendants
benefit
counsel
yet
option
scheme
serviceman
assured
counsel
simply
rejecting
trial
summary
thus
scheme
render
unattainable
goal
claimed
matter
military
necessity
sustained
kentucky
system
due
process
double
jeopardy
attacks
colten
kentucky
careful
note
system
defendant
face
realistic
threat
prison
sentence
inferior
without
help
counsel
schaefer
federalism
state
criminal
procedure
harv
rev
officers
subject
summary