merrill
lynch
pierce
fenner
smith
inc
et
al
manning
et
argued
december
decided
may
respondent
greg
manning
held
two
million
shares
stock
escala
group
inc
claims
lost
investment
share
price
plummeted
petitioners
merrill
lynch
financial
institutions
collectively
merrill
lynch
devalued
escala
naked
short
sales
stock
unlike
typical
short
sale
person
borrows
stock
broker
sells
buyer
open
market
later
purchases
number
shares
return
broker
seller
naked
short
sale
borrow
stock
puts
market
never
delivers
promised
shares
buyer
practice
injure
shareholders
driving
stock
price
regulated
securities
exchange
commission
regulation
sho
prohibits
intentionally
failing
deliver
securities
thereby
curbing
market
manipulation
manning
former
escala
shareholders
collectively
manning
filed
suit
new
jersey
state
alleging
merrill
lynch
actions
violated
new
jersey
law
though
manning
chose
bring
claims
federal
securities
laws
rules
complaint
referred
explicitly
regulation
sho
cataloguing
past
accusations
merrill
lynch
flouting
requirements
suggesting
transactions
issue
violated
regulation
merrill
lynch
removed
case
federal
district
asserting
federal
jurisdiction
two
grounds
first
invoked
general
federal
question
statute
grants
district
courts
jurisdiction
civil
actions
arising
federal
law
also
invoked
securities
exchange
act
exchange
act
grants
federal
district
courts
exclusive
jurisdiction
suits
equity
actions
law
brought
enforce
liability
duty
created
exchange
act
rules
regulations
thereunder
manning
moved
remand
case
state
arguing
neither
statute
gave
federal
authority
adjudicate
claims
district
denied
motion
third
circuit
reversed
first
decided
confer
jurisdiction
manning
claims
arose
state
law
necessarily
raise
federal
issues
district
appropriate
forum
exchange
act
held
covers
cases
satisfy
arising
test
general
federal
jurisdiction
held
jurisdictional
test
established
test
deciding
case
arises
federal
law
pp
section
text
readily
supports
meaning
parties
two
alternatives
merrill
lynch
argues
plain
language
requires
expansive
rule
suit
either
explicitly
implicitly
asserts
breach
exchange
act
duty
brought
enforce
duty
even
plaintiff
seeks
relief
solely
state
law
natural
reading
text
however
confers
federal
jurisdiction
action
commenced
order
give
effect
exchange
act
requirement
brought
enforce
language
thus
stops
short
embracing
complaint
happens
mention
duty
established
exchange
act
meanwhile
manning
far
restrictive
interpretation
suit
brought
enforce
brought
directly
statute
veers
far
opposite
direction
instead
language
best
read
capture
suits
brought
exchange
act
rare
suit
claim
rises
falls
plaintiff
ability
prove
violation
federal
duty
existing
jurisdictional
test
well
captures
classes
suits
brought
enforce
duty
provision
federal
jurisdiction
civil
actions
arising
federal
law
federal
jurisdiction
often
attaches
federal
law
creates
cause
action
asserted
may
also
attach
claim
necessarily
raise
stated
federal
issue
actually
disputed
substantial
federal
forum
may
entertain
without
disturbing
congressionally
approved
balance
federal
state
power
grable
sons
metal
products
darue
engineering
pp
precedents
interpreting
term
brought
enforce
likewise
interpreted
jurisdictional
grant
coextensive
construction
arising
standard
see
pan
american
matsushita
elec
industrial
epstein
pp
construing
consistent
text
precedent
cover
suits
arise
exchange
act
serves
goals
consistently
underscored
interpreting
jurisdictional
statutes
gives
due
deference
important
role
state
courts
promotes
administrative
simplicity
major
virtue
jurisdictional
statute
hertz
friend
judges
litigants
familiar
arising
standard
works
test
generally
provides
ready
answers
jurisdictional
questions
pp
affirmed
kagan
delivered
opinion
roberts
kennedy
ginsburg
breyer
alito
joined
thomas
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
sotomayor
joined
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
merrill
lynch
pierce
fenner
smith
et
petitioners
greg
manning
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
third
circuit
may
justice
kagan
delivered
opinion
section
securities
exchange
act
exchange
act
stat
amended
et
grants
federal
district
courts
exclusive
jurisdiction
suits
equity
actions
law
brought
enforce
liability
duty
created
exchange
act
rules
regulations
thereunder
hold
today
jurisdictional
test
established
provision
one
used
decide
case
arises
federal
law
see
respondent
greg
manning
held
two
million
shares
stock
escala
group
company
traded
nasdaq
escala
share
price
plummeted
manning
lost
investment
manning
blames
petitioners
merrill
lynch
several
financial
institutions
collectively
merrill
lynch
devaluing
escala
period
naked
short
sales
stock
typical
short
sale
security
one
made
borrower
rather
owner
stock
transaction
person
borrows
stock
broker
sells
buyer
open
market
later
purchases
number
shares
return
broker
short
seller
hope
stock
price
decline
time
sells
borrowed
shares
time
buys
replacements
pay
back
loan
happens
seller
gets
pocket
difference
minus
associated
transaction
costs
naked
short
sale
contrast
seller
borrowed
otherwise
obtained
stock
puts
market
never
delivers
promised
shares
buyer
see
naked
short
selling
antifraud
rule
securities
exchange
commission
sec
release
fed
reg
practice
beyond
effect
individual
purchasers
serve
tool
drive
company
stock
price
course
injures
shareholders
like
manning
sec
regulates
short
sales
federal
level
commission
regulation
sho
issued
exchange
act
prohibits
short
sellers
intentionally
failing
deliver
securities
thereby
curbs
market
manipulation
see
cfr
lawsuit
manning
joined
six
former
escala
shareholders
alleges
merrill
lynch
facilitated
engaged
naked
short
sales
escala
stock
violation
new
jersey
law
complaint
asserts
merrill
lynch
participated
short
sales
times
neither
possessed
intention
obtaining
sufficient
stock
deliver
buyers
app
pet
cert
amended
complaint
conduct
manning
charges
contravened
provisions
new
jersey
racketeer
influenced
corrupt
organizations
act
rico
new
jersey
criminal
code
new
jersey
uniform
securities
law
also
adds
ran
afoul
new
jersey
common
law
negligence
unjust
enrichment
interference
contractual
relations
see
manning
chose
bring
claims
federal
securities
laws
rules
complaint
however
referred
explicitly
regulation
sho
describing
purposes
rule
cataloguing
past
accusations
merrill
lynch
flouting
requirements
see
complaint
couched
description
short
selling
issue
terms
suggesting
merrill
lynch
violated
regulation
addition
infringing
new
jersey
law
see
manning
brought
complaint
new
jersey
state
merrill
lynch
removed
case
federal
district
see
allowing
removal
civil
action
federal
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
merrill
lynch
asserted
federal
jurisdiction
two
grounds
first
invoked
general
federal
question
statute
grants
district
courts
jurisdiction
civil
actions
arising
federal
law
second
maintained
suit
belonged
federal
virtue
exchange
act
provision
relevant
part
grants
district
courts
exclusive
jurisdiction
suits
equity
actions
law
brought
enforce
liability
duty
created
exchange
act
rules
regulations
thereunder
manning
moved
remand
case
state
arguing
neither
statute
gave
federal
authority
adjudicate
collection
claims
district
denied
motion
see
nj
mar
app
pet
cert
appeals
third
circuit
reversed
ordering
remand
case
state
see
third
circuit
first
decided
federal
question
statute
confer
suit
manning
claims
brought
state
law
none
necessarily
raised
federal
issue
held
exchange
act
make
district
appropriate
forum
relying
construction
nearly
identical
jurisdictional
provision
appeals
found
covers
cases
involving
exchange
act
satisfy
arising
test
federal
question
statute
see
citing
pan
american
petroleum
superior
del
new
castle
district
lacked
jurisdiction
manning
suit
exclusive
forum
merrill
lynch
sought
review
solely
whether
commits
manning
case
federal
see
pet
cert
circuit
split
provision
granted
certiorari
affirm
ii
like
third
circuit
read
conferring
exclusive
federal
jurisdiction
suits
aris
exchange
act
pursuant
general
federal
question
statute
see
text
readily
supports
meaning
either
parties
two
alternatives
precedents
interpreting
identical
statutory
language
positively
compel
conclusion
construction
fits
practice
reading
jurisdictional
laws
long
consistent
language
respect
traditional
role
state
courts
federal
system
establish
clear
administrable
rules
section
noted
earlier
provides
federal
district
courts
exclusive
jurisdiction
suits
equity
actions
law
brought
enforce
liability
duty
created
exchange
act
rules
regulations
thereunder
see
supra
much
wording
appears
nine
federal
jurisdictional
provisions
mostly
enacted
like
part
new
regulatory
merrill
lynch
argues
plain
unambiguous
language
requires
expansive
understanding
scope
brief
petitioners
whenever
says
merrill
lynch
plaintiff
complaint
either
explicitly
implicitly
assert
defendant
breached
exchange
act
duty
suit
brought
enforce
duty
federal
exclusive
jurisdiction
reply
brief
see
tr
oral
arg
confirming
allegations
need
express
merrill
lynch
contends
even
plaintiff
case
brings
claims
complaint
seeks
relief
solely
state
law
see
reply
brief
merrill
lynch
continues
even
plaintiff
prevail
claims
without
proving
alleged
breach
exchange
act
duty
violation
regulation
sho
actually
occurred
see
tr
oral
arg
words
enforce
focus
necessarily
decide
natural
reading
text
extend
far
brought
context
means
commenced
black
law
dictionary
ed
word
expressing
purpose
consequence
concise
oxford
dictionary
enforce
means
give
force
effect
webster
new
international
dictionary
english
language
confers
federal
jurisdiction
action
commenced
order
give
effect
exchange
act
requirement
language
emphasizing
suit
designed
accomplish
stops
short
embracing
complaint
happens
mention
duty
established
exchange
act
consider
example
simple
action
breach
contract
plaintiff
alleges
atmospheric
reasons
defendant
conduct
also
violated
exchange
act
still
less
defendant
bad
actor
infringed
statute
another
occasion
merrill
lynch
view
cover
suit
indeed
merrill
lynch
points
incidental
assertions
basis
federal
jurisdiction
see
brief
petitioners
supra
hypothetical
suit
brought
enforce
state
contract
law
exchange
act
plaintiff
get
relief
seeks
showing
breach
agreement
without
proving
violation
federal
securities
law
suit
achieve
supposed
even
issues
involving
exchange
act
never
come
critiquing
merrill
lynch
position
similar
grounds
manning
proposes
far
restrictive
interpretation
language
one
going
beyond
needs
prevail
see
brief
respondents
according
manning
suit
brought
enforce
exchange
act
duties
liabilities
brought
directly
statute
claims
asserts
duties
means
vindicate
created
exchange
act
view
everything
depends
justice
holmes
famously
said
another
jurisdictional
context
law
creates
cause
action
american
well
works
layne
bowler
complaint
asserts
right
action
deriving
exchange
act
associated
regulation
suit
must
proceed
federal
complaint
brings
claims
case
belongs
state
forum
manning
claims
even
contrary
third
circuit
held
success
state
claim
necessarily
hinges
proving
defendant
breached
exchange
act
duty
see
brief
respondents
manning
view
text
requirements
although
better
merrill
lynch
veers
far
opposite
direction
doubt
manning
says
suit
asserting
exchange
act
cause
action
fits
within
scope
bringing
suit
prototypical
way
enforcing
exchange
act
duty
way
rare
occasions
suggested
suit
raising
claim
rises
falls
plaintiff
ability
prove
violation
federal
duty
see
grable
sons
metal
products
darue
engineering
smith
kansas
city
title
trust
manner
action
necessarily
depends
showing
defendant
breached
exchange
act
suit
also
fall
within
compass
suppose
example
state
statute
simply
makes
illegal
violation
exchange
act
involving
naked
short
selling
plaintiff
seeking
relief
state
law
must
undertake
prove
cornerstone
suit
defendant
infringed
requirement
federal
statute
indeed
hypothetical
plaintiff
project
accordingly
suit
even
though
asserting
claim
also
brought
enforce
duty
created
exchange
act
existing
jurisdictional
test
well
captures
classes
suits
brought
enforce
duty
noted
earlier
provides
federal
jurisdiction
civil
actions
arising
federal
law
see
supra
found
statutory
term
satisfied
either
two
circumstances
directly
often
federal
jurisdiction
attaches
federal
law
creates
cause
action
asserted
set
cases
manning
highlights
offering
view
even
claim
finds
origins
state
law
special
small
category
cases
arising
jurisdiction
still
lies
gunn
minton
slip
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
explained
federal
jurisdiction
claim
necessarily
raise
stated
federal
issue
actually
disputed
substantial
federal
forum
may
entertain
without
disturbing
congressionally
approved
balance
federal
state
power
grable
see
gunn
slip
framing
standard
test
description
typically
fits
cases
like
described
cause
action
brought
enforce
duty
created
exchange
act
claim
success
depends
giving
effect
federal
requirement
accordingly
agree
jurisdictional
test
matches
one
formulated
applied
cases
involving
exchange
act
case
meets
arising
standard
commands
go
federal
merrill
lynch
objects
rule
construes
completely
different
language
phrases
arising
brought
enforce
respectively
mean
exactly
thing
reply
brief
deny
point
think
far
less
odd
merrill
lynch
test
jurisdiction
grounded
provision
particular
phrasing
long
read
words
arising
article
iii
extend
quite
broadly
cases
federal
question
ingredient
action
merrell
dow
pharmaceuticals
thompson
quoting
osborn
bank
wheat
statutory
context
however
opted
give
words
narrower
scope
light
history
demands
reason
coherence
dictates
sound
judicial
policy
romero
international
terminal
operating
resulting
test
turn
text
nothing
remarkable
fitting
even
neatly
differently
worded
statutory
provision
merrill
lynch
claim
congress
use
new
brought
enforce
language
shows
intent
depart
settled
even
linguistically
ungrounded
test
statutory
arising
jurisdiction
test
existed
recently
noted
caselaw
construing
many
decades
including
exchange
act
passed
highly
unruly
gunn
slip
referring
canvas
old
opinions
look
ing
like
one
jackson
pollock
got
first
muddled
backdrop
impossible
infer
congress
enacting
wished
depart
understand
arising
standard
reached
conclusion
two
unrelated
decisions
addressed
brought
enforce
language
issue
see
pan
american
matsushita
elec
industrial
epstein
time
viewed
phrase
coextensive
construction
arising
pan
american
involved
natural
gas
act
nga
exclusive
jurisdiction
provision
containing
language
materially
indistinguishable
case
began
state
natural
gas
purchaser
sued
producer
breach
contract
setting
sale
prices
prior
alleged
breach
producer
filed
contractual
rates
federal
power
commission
nga
required
relying
submission
complaint
mention
producer
claimed
buyer
suit
brought
enforce
liability
deriving
nga
filed
rate
must
proceed
federal
see
rejected
argument
decision
explained
use
term
brought
enforce
rather
arising
made
difference
jurisdictional
analysis
inquiry
wrote
affected
want
language
contained
federal
question
statute
limitation
associated
arising
jurisdiction
continued
clearly
implied
alternative
phrasing
ibid
short
linguistic
distinction
two
jurisdictional
provisions
extend
meaning
pan
american
thus
went
analyze
jurisdictional
issue
manner
set
arising
precedents
federal
question
jurisdiction
lies
wrote
appears
face
complaint
determination
suit
depends
upon
question
federal
law
inquiry
focuses
particular
claims
suitor
makes
complaint
meaning
whether
plaintiff
seeks
relief
state
federal
law
addition
suggested
federal
adjudicate
suit
stating
claim
included
element
essential
one
violation
federal
right
quoting
gully
first
nat
bank
meridian
principles
arising
jurisdiction
laid
held
enable
federal
resolve
buyer
case
prevail
merely
proving
breach
contract
see
pan
american
establishes
action
brought
enforce
duty
liability
created
federal
statute
nothing
nothing
less
action
arising
law
merrill
lynch
reads
pan
american
narrowly
holding
confer
federal
jurisdiction
complaint
unlike
manning
fails
reference
federal
law
see
brief
petitioners
argument
ignores
pan
american
express
statement
equivalence
language
federal
question
statute
brought
enforce
limitation
meaning
scope
arising
important
merrill
lynch
disregards
pan
american
analytical
structure
decision
proceeds
reviewing
arising
precedents
articulating
principles
animating
caselaw
applying
tenets
dispute
hand
thus
showed
well
told
brought
enforce
jurisdiction
mirrors
arising
fallback
merrill
lynch
claims
pan
american
irrelevant
relied
legislative
history
distinct
nga
finding
brought
enforce
language
coterminous
arising
see
brief
petitioners
premise
argument
true
enough
support
holding
quoted
committee
report
describing
conferring
federal
jurisdiction
cases
arising
act
accept
conclusion
merrill
lynch
draws
statement
courts
give
two
identically
worded
statutory
provisions
passed
less
five
years
apart
markedly
different
meanings
indeed
result
merrill
lynch
approach
still
odder
eight
jurisdictional
provisions
containing
brought
enforce
language
see
supra
presumably
merrill
lynch
courts
inspect
legislative
histories
decide
whether
read
statutes
reproducing
arising
standard
adopting
merrill
lynch
alternative
view
demanding
yet
another
jurisdictional
test
hard
pressed
imagine
less
sensible
way
construing
repeated
iterations
phrase
brought
enforce
jurisdictional
provisions
federal
code
event
matsushita
addressed
equated
brought
enforce
arising
standards
decision
arose
action
corporate
directors
breach
fiduciary
duty
issue
whether
state
handling
suit
approve
settlement
releasing
addition
state
claims
actually
brought
potential
exchange
act
claims
committed
federal
deciding
state
described
twice
three
times
conferring
exclusive
jurisdiction
suits
arising
exchange
act
see
section
confers
exclusive
jurisdiction
upon
federal
courts
suits
arising
exchange
act
section
prohibits
state
courts
adjudicating
claims
arising
exchange
act
section
prohibit
state
courts
exercising
jurisdiction
suits
arising
exchange
act
emphases
added
took
given
jurisdictional
test
mimicked
one
general
federal
question
statute
still
matsushita
thought
clear
suit
filed
closely
resembled
manning
mix
state
federal
law
fell
outside
grant
exclusive
jurisdiction
noted
claims
brought
matsushita
complaint
sought
relief
breach
duty
support
claims
plaintiffs
charged
much
manning
defendants
conduct
also
violated
federal
securities
laws
see
supra
found
presence
accusation
insufficient
trigger
cause
pleaded
wrote
remained
state
action
notwithstanding
potential
federal
issue
suit
enforce
rights
obligations
exchange
act
thus
rejected
position
merrill
lynch
takes
precludes
state
adjudicating
case
even
brought
state
law
plaintiff
asserts
exchange
act
breach
construing
consistent
text
precedent
cover
suits
arise
exchange
act
serves
goals
consistently
underscored
interpreting
jurisdictional
statutes
reading
unlike
merrill
lynch
gives
due
deference
important
role
state
courts
federal
system
standard
adopt
straightforward
administrable
alternative
merrill
lynch
offers
respect
state
courts
time
declined
construe
federal
jurisdictional
statutes
expansively
language
fairly
read
requires
reiterated
need
give
ue
regard
rightful
independence
state
governments
particularly
power
provide
determination
controversies
courts
romero
quoting
healy
ratta
shamrock
oil
gas
sheets
decisions
put
point
reflect
deeply
felt
traditional
reluctance
expand
jurisdiction
federal
courts
broad
reading
jurisdictional
statutes
romero
interpretive
stance
serves
among
things
keep
actions
like
manning
state
thus
help
maintain
constitutional
balance
state
federal
judiciaries
concern
state
prerogatives
disappear
merrill
lynch
suggests
face
statute
granting
exclusive
federal
jurisdiction
see
brief
petitioners
contrary
statute
mandates
rather
permits
federal
jurisdiction
thus
depriving
state
courts
ability
adjudicate
certain
claims
reluctance
endorse
broad
reading
romero
anything
grows
stronger
especially
construction
offered
place
federal
actions
bringing
claims
created
state
law
even
claims
might
raise
federal
issues
sure
grant
exclusive
federal
jurisdiction
merrill
lynch
reminds
us
indicates
congress
wanted
greater
uniformity
construction
effective
expert
application
federal
law
usual
brief
petitioners
quoting
matsushita
greater
mean
total
critical
question
remains
far
grant
extends
resolving
issue
lightly
read
statute
alter
usual
constitutional
balance
sending
actions
claims
federal
complaint
references
federal
duty
precedents
construing
exclusive
grants
federal
jurisdiction
illustrate
principles
pan
american
example
denied
state
resolution
claims
potentially
implicating
nga
meaning
jeopardize
uniform
system
regulation
statute
established
reasoned
ability
review
state
decisions
federal
questions
sufficiently
protect
federal
interests
similarly
tafflin
levitt
permitted
state
courts
adjudicate
civil
rico
actions
might
raise
issues
scope
federal
crimes
alleged
predicate
acts
even
though
federal
courts
exclusive
jurisdiction
offenses
laws
expressed
confidence
state
courts
look
federal
interpretations
relevant
criminal
statutes
accordingly
saw
significant
danger
inconsistent
application
federal
criminal
law
incompatibility
federal
interests
tafflin
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
state
courts
deciding
claims
address
possible
issues
exchange
act
meaning
even
merrill
lynch
thinks
decisions
wholly
avoidable
admits
nothing
prevent
state
courts
resolving
exchange
act
questions
result
defenses
counterclaims
see
brief
petitioners
pan
american
see
little
difference
terms
policies
merrill
lynch
invokes
issues
instead
appear
complaint
like
manning
indeed
congress
likely
contemplated
complaints
intermingling
state
federal
questions
brought
state
congress
specifically
affirmed
capacity
courts
hear
securities
actions
predictably
raise
issues
coinciding
overlapping
intersecting
act
see
matsushita
example
hardly
surprising
suit
like
one
alleging
short
sales
violation
state
securities
law
plaintiff
might
say
defendant
previously
breached
federal
prohibition
similar
conduct
see
supra
describing
manning
complaint
less
troubling
state
consider
issue
lose
ability
adjudicate
suit
raising
causes
action
reading
line
caselaw
also
promotes
administrative
simplicity
major
virtue
jurisdictional
statute
hertz
friend
judges
litigants
familiar
arising
standard
works
part
test
provides
ready
answers
jurisdictional
questions
existing
body
precedent
gives
guidance
whenever
borderline
cases
crop
see
supra
contrast
one
experience
merrill
lynch
alternative
standard
spring
nothing
govern
suits
involving
exchange
act
nine
discrete
spheres
federal
law
see
supra
listing
statutes
brought
enforce
language
supra
noting
merrill
lynch
backup
claim
legislative
histories
might
compel
different
tests
different
statutes
adopting
untested
approach
forcing
courts
toggle
back
forth
arising
standard
undermine
consistency
predictability
litigation
result
disserves
courts
parties
alike
making
matters
worse
merrill
lynch
rule
simple
plaintiffs
avoid
else
excruciating
courts
police
rule
plaintiff
electing
bring
claims
state
purge
complaint
references
federal
securities
law
escape
removal
omissions
nothing
change
way
plaintiff
present
case
trial
merely
make
complaint
less
informative
recognizing
potential
kind
avoidance
merrill
lynch
argues
judge
go
behind
face
complaint
determine
whether
product
artful
pleading
see
tr
oral
arg
plaintiffs
literally
whited
deleted
references
reg
ulation
sho
still
understand
complaint
allege
breach
rule
fact
plaintiffs
cite
change
fact
idea
make
judgment
get
cold
comfort
merrill
lynch
assurance
question
arise
case
next
third
fourth
fifth
case
road
jurisdictional
tests
built
single
dispute
merrill
lynch
threatens
become
either
useless
drafting
rule
tortuous
inquiry
artful
pleading
one
good
reason
reject
iii
section
provides
exclusive
federal
jurisdiction
class
cases
arise
exchange
act
purposes
text
naturally
read
supports
rule
adopted
view
two
prior
cases
reading
statute
promotes
twin
goals
important
interpreting
jurisdictional
grants
respecting
state
courts
providing
administrable
standards
holding
requires
remanding
manning
suit
state
third
circuit
found
district
jurisdiction
manning
suit
claims
sought
relief
state
law
none
necessarily
raised
federal
issue
see
supra
merrill
lynch
challenge
ruling
therefore
take
given
means
decision
today
district
also
lacked
jurisdiction
accordingly
affirm
judgment
ordered
thomas
concurring
judgment
merrill
lynch
pierce
fenner
smith
et
petitioners
greg
manning
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
third
circuit
may
justice
thomas
justice
sotomayor
joins
concurring
judgment
concludes
respondents
suit
belongs
state
satisfy
multifactor
atextual
standard
used
assess
whether
suit
one
arising
federal
law
ante
agree
suit
belongs
state
rest
conclusion
statute
us
securities
exchange
act
statute
use
phrase
arising
provide
sound
basis
adopting
standard
instead
provides
federal
jurisdiction
suit
brought
enforce
exchange
act
requirements
language
establishes
straightforward
test
complaint
alleges
claim
necessarily
depends
breach
requirement
created
act
confers
exclusive
federal
jurisdiction
suit
complaint
allege
claims
statute
confers
federal
jurisdiction
suit
return
state
accordingly
concur
judgment
section
provides
district
courts
shall
exclusive
jurisdiction
suits
equity
actions
law
brought
enforce
liability
duty
created
chapter
rules
regulations
thereunder
explains
natural
reading
confers
federal
jurisdiction
action
commenced
order
give
effect
exchange
act
requirement
ante
see
also
webster
new
international
dictionary
english
language
enforce
means
give
force
give
effect
providing
exclusive
jurisdiction
federal
district
courts
certain
suits
strips
state
courts
jurisdiction
suits
put
differently
suit
belongs
federal
complaint
requires
enforce
exchange
act
duty
liability
contrast
suit
belongs
state
complaint
assert
purely
causes
action
require
binding
legal
determinations
rights
liabilities
exchange
act
judgment
merits
exchange
act
breach
matsushita
elec
industrial
epstein
suit
enforce
rights
obligations
act
thus
fall
within
scope
provide
federal
jurisdiction
suits
brought
enforce
liabilities
duties
state
law
every
case
happens
involve
allegations
act
violated
provision
leaves
state
courts
authority
suits
involving
act
regulations
statutory
context
bolsters
understanding
context
confirms
congress
reserved
authority
state
courts
adjudicate
matters
although
act
provides
numerous
federal
rights
remedies
also
generally
preserves
rights
remedies
may
exist
law
equity
claims
litigated
state
courts
general
jurisdiction
provision
shows
congress
plainly
contemplated
possibility
dual
litigation
state
federal
courts
relating
securities
transactions
matsushita
supra
natural
reading
text
preserves
dual
role
federal
state
courts
congress
contemplated
confirms
mere
allegations
exchange
act
breaches
alone
deprive
state
courts
jurisdiction
natural
reading
promotes
uniform
interpretation
federal
securities
laws
congress
sought
ensure
gave
federal
courts
exclusive
jurisdiction
federal
suits
textual
approach
fosters
uniformity
leaves
federal
courts
presumptively
familiar
intricate
federal
securities
laws
task
adjudicat
ing
exchange
act
claims
matsushita
state
courts
decide
cases
complaint
pleads
claims
resolve
merits
exchange
act
rights
liabilities
trespass
ing
upon
exclusive
territory
federal
courts
statutory
text
structure
thus
support
straightforward
test
section
confers
federal
jurisdiction
case
complaint
alleges
claims
necessarily
depend
establishing
breach
exchange
act
requirement
third
circuit
correct
remand
suit
state
respondents
complaint
seek
enforce
liability
duty
created
exchange
act
regulations
although
respondents
complaint
alleges
different
places
petitioners
violated
exchange
act
regulations
complaint
bring
claims
requiring
enforcement
exchange
act
regulations
complaint
instead
brings
causes
action
seek
enforce
duties
liabilities
created
state
law
count
alleges
petitioners
violated
state
law
investing
money
derived
racketeering
see
app
pet
cert
amended
complaint
citing
stat
ann
west
counts
allege
standard
contract
tort
claims
unjust
enrichment
unlawful
interference
economic
advantage
tortious
interference
contractual
relations
unlawful
interference
contractual
relations
claims
breach
covenant
good
faith
fair
dealing
negligence
see
app
pet
cert
amended
complaint
count
pleads
freestanding
claim
punitive
exemplary
damages
see
amended
complaint
none
claims
requires
enforce
give
effect
requirement
created
act
thus
confer
federal
jurisdiction
count
presents
closer
call
trigger
federal
jurisdiction
count
pleads
petitioners
violated
state
law
makes
unlawful
person
participate
racketeering
enterprise
amended
complaint
citing
stat
ann
alleged
racketeering
includes
violating
new
jersey
uniform
securities
law
fraud
deception
misappropriation
committing
theft
taking
state
law
committing
theft
deception
state
law
app
pet
cert
amended
complaint
respondents
allege
sec
expressly
noted
naked
short
selling
involves
omission
material
fact
part
securities
fraud
allegation
amended
complaint
vindicating
claim
require
enforcement
federal
duty
liability
new
jersey
law
encompasses
fraudulent
conduct
necessarily
rest
violation
federal
law
regulation
see
west
fraud
deceit
include
ny
misrepresentation
word
conduct
manner
material
fact
either
present
past
omission
disclose
fact
see
app
pet
cert
invoking
et
although
count
refers
securities
exchange
commission
view
naked
short
selling
count
require
respondents
establish
violation
federal
securities
law
prevail
fraud
claim
respondents
cause
action
count
seeks
enforce
duties
liabilities
created
state
law
necessarily
depend
breach
exchange
act
duty
liability
provide
federal
jurisdiction
claim
ii
although
acknowledges
natural
reading
ante
holds
adopts
jurisdictional
test
uses
evaluate
jurisdiction
see
ante
see
also
ante
federal
courts
power
review
cases
arising
federal
law
including
complaint
brings
claims
necessarily
raise
stated
federal
issue
actually
disputed
substantial
federal
forum
may
entertain
without
disturbing
congressionally
approved
balance
federal
state
judicial
responsibilities
grable
sons
metal
products
darue
engineering
wrongly
equates
phrase
arising
phrase
brought
enforce
interprets
latter
require
case
raising
claims
mee
standard
case
proceed
federal
ante
see
ante
none
rationales
adopting
rule
persuasive
first
argues
impossible
infer
congress
enacting
wished
depart
understand
standard
test
depart
ante
case
law
construing
explains
many
decades
including
exchange
act
passed
highly
unruly
ibid
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
congress
enacts
statute
uses
different
language
prior
statute
normally
presume
congress
convey
different
meaning
see
crawford
burke
explaining
change
phraseology
creates
presumption
change
intent
congress
used
different
language
two
statutes
without
thereby
intending
change
meaning
given
know
presumption
force
case
law
notes
highly
unruly
exchange
act
enacted
given
importance
clarity
jurisdictional
statutes
see
hertz
friend
quite
stretch
infer
congress
wished
embrace
unpredictable
test
especially
true
given
use
words
supporting
convoluted
standard
section
ask
example
whether
federal
issue
substantial
whether
ruling
issue
upset
congressionally
approved
balance
federal
state
power
indeed
even
use
words
supporting
standard
see
ante
acknowledging
standard
turn
text
rather
refused
give
full
effect
broa
phras
ing
instead
continuously
construed
limited
provision
based
extratextual
considerations
history
demands
reason
coherence
sound
judicial
policy
romero
international
terminal
operating
faced
plain
focused
text
like
however
rely
considerations
importing
factors
jurisprudence
substantiality
requirement
balance
requirement
risks
narrowing
class
cases
congress
meant
cover
plain
text
reasons
unwise
read
decision
adopt
standard
next
relies
two
prior
decisions
pan
american
petroleum
superior
del
new
castle
matsushita
see
ante
neither
case
justifies
decision
apply
standard
pan
american
held
delaware
state
courts
jurisdiction
contract
claims
arose
contracts
sale
natural
gas
reached
decision
even
though
provision
natural
gas
act
provided
exclusive
federal
jurisdiction
suits
enforce
liability
duty
created
act
quoting
statute
pan
american
lends
support
view
today
applied
precedents
explained
natural
gas
act
use
term
enforce
rather
made
difference
jurisdictional
analysis
ante
see
pan
american
supra
see
also
ante
pan
american
require
engraft
standard
onto
pan
american
carefully
analyze
natural
gas
act
text
assess
contemporary
meaning
central
phrase
brought
enforce
instead
relied
legislative
history
reasoning
authoritative
congressional
committee
reports
implied
limitation
natural
gas
act
jurisdictional
text
reasoning
warrant
respect
especially
true
pan
american
holding
consistent
natural
gas
act
brought
enforce
language
complaint
case
asser
right
natural
gas
act
instead
asked
adjudicate
standard
contract
claims
disposition
pan
american
rests
comfortably
statutory
text
standard
matsushita
provides
even
less
support
holding
today
case
held
delaware
courts
issue
judgment
approving
settlement
releasing
claims
even
though
settlement
released
claims
virtue
solely
within
jurisdiction
federal
courts
see
explained
hile
prohibits
state
courts
adjudicating
claims
arising
exchange
act
prohibit
state
courts
approving
release
exchange
act
claims
settlement
suits
properly
exercised
jurisdiction
suits
arising
state
law
federal
law
concurrent
jurisdiction
complaint
case
assert
ed
purely
causes
action
state
courts
issue
judgment
merits
exclusively
federal
claims
deprive
state
courts
jurisdiction
relies
matsushita
case
three
times
described
conferring
exclusive
jurisdiction
suits
exchange
act
ante
citing
matsushita
decide
whether
adopts
standard
passing
use
phrase
arising
bear
weight
places
sure
matsushita
support
judgment
today
matsushita
emphasized
state
courts
adjudicate
suit
involving
issues
complaint
assert
ed
purely
causes
action
require
state
courts
issue
binding
legal
determinations
rights
liabilities
exchange
act
judgment
merits
exchange
act
breach
statements
consistent
text
standard
see
supra
invoking
matsushita
finally
argues
interpretation
serves
goals
precedents
consistently
underscored
interpreting
jurisdictional
statutes
affording
proper
deference
state
courts
promoting
administrable
jurisdictional
rules
ante
see
ante
hewing
text
serves
goals
well
better
adopting
standard
first
view
preserves
state
courts
authority
adjudicate
numerous
claims
provide
relief
consistent
exchange
act
design
see
supra
explained
view
places
respondents
causes
action
state
see
supra
view
thus
decline
construe
federal
jurisdictional
statut
expansively
language
fairly
read
requires
ante
second
textual
test
also
administrable
standard
standard
anything
clear
grable
thomas
concurring
standard
involves
numerous
judgments
matters
degree
readily
susceptible
bright
lines
noted
satisfy
standard
claim
must
raise
federal
issue
among
things
actually
disputed
substantial
distur
congressionally
approved
balance
opinion
standard
calls
accommodation
judgment
kaleidoscopic
situations
present
federal
issue
selective
process
picks
substantial
causes
web
lays
ones
aside
quoting
gully
first
nat
bank
meridian
standard
may
many
things
one
consistently
provides
ready
answers
hard
jurisdictional
questions
ante
view
promises
better
adopt
view
apply
reasons
concur
judgment
footnotes
compare
case
barbara
new
york
stock
exchange
construing
narrowly
sparta
surgical
national
assn
securities
dealers
construing
broadly
hawkins
national
assn
securities
dealers
per
curiam
section
also
grants
federal
courts
exclusive
jurisdiction
violations
exchange
act
rules
regulations
thereunder
manning
argues
violations
language
applies
criminal
proceedings
sec
enforcement
actions
see
brief
respondents
merrill
lynch
although
conceding
much
believes
violations
clause
irrelevant
private
suits
damages
goes
brought
enforce
language
quoted
text
see
reply
brief
given
parties
thus
taken
violations
language
table
address
meaning
see
securities
act
federal
power
act
connally
hot
oil
act
natural
gas
act
trust
indenture
act
investment
company
act
investment
advisers
act
international
wheat
agreement
act
interstate
land
sales
full
disclosure
act
concurrence
adopts
slightly
different
approach
placing
federal
exchange
act
claims
plus
claims
necessarily
raising
exchange
act
issue
see
post
thomas
concurring
judgment
words
concurrence
ask
arising
test
whether
federal
issue
embedded
claim
also
substantial
actually
disputed
capable
resolution
federal
without
disrupting
congressionally
approved
balance
see
post
grable
sons
metal
products
darue
engineering
construed
jurisdictional
statute
whether
using
words
brought
enforce
arising
matter
draw
concurrence
line
long
contemplated
exercising
federal
jurisdiction
claims
necessarily
raising
federal
issues
inquired
well
whether
issues
really
substantially
disputed
see
kins
walker
shulthis
mcdougal
similarly
long
emphasized
need
circumstances
make
sensitive
judgments
congressional
intent
judicial
power
federal
system
merrell
dow
pharmaceuticals
thompson
late
juncture
see
virtue
trying
pull
apart
interconnected
strands
necessity
indeed
thus
creating
gap
brought
enforce
arising
standards
conflict
precedent
undermine
important
goals
interpreting
jurisdictional
statutes
see
infra
discussing
prior
decisions
equating
two
tests
highlighting
need
respect
state
courts
benefits
using
single
standard
section
grants
federal
courts
exclusive
jurisdiction
suits
equity
actions
law
brought
enforce
liability
duty
created
nga
rule
regulation
order
thereunder
stat
romero
continued
reluctance
must
even
forcefully
felt
expansion
proposed
first
time
years
jurisdiction
conferred
exchange
act
passed
mere
years
ago
believe
point
still
stands
footnotes
explains
parties
pressed
us
construe
language
conferring
jurisdiction
violations
exchange
act
rules
regulations
see
ante
like
focus
brought
enforce
language