florida
jardines
argued
october
decided
march
police
took
dog
jardines
front
porch
dog
gave
positive
alert
narcotics
based
alert
officers
obtained
warrant
search
revealed
marijuana
plants
jardines
charged
trafficking
cannabis
florida
approved
trial
decision
suppress
evidence
holding
officers
engaged
fourth
amendment
search
unsupported
probable
cause
held
investigation
jardines
home
search
within
meaning
fourth
amendment
pp
government
obtains
information
physically
intruding
persons
houses
papers
effects
within
original
meaning
fourth
amendment
undoubtedly
occurred
jones
pp
fourth
amendment
core
stands
right
man
retreat
home
free
governmental
intrusion
silverman
area
immediately
surrounding
associated
home
curtilage
part
home
fourth
amendment
purposes
oliver
officers
entered
curtilage
front
porch
classic
exemplar
area
activity
home
life
extends
pp
officers
entry
explicitly
implicitly
invited
need
shield
eyes
passing
home
public
thoroughfares
california
ciraolo
man
set
foot
upon
neighbour
close
without
leave
entick
carrington
wils
eng
police
officer
armed
warrant
may
approach
home
hopes
speaking
occupants
private
citizen
might
kentucky
king
scope
license
limited
particular
area
also
specific
purpose
customary
invitation
enter
curtilage
simply
conduct
search
pp
unnecessary
decide
whether
officers
violated
jardines
expectation
privacy
katz
pp
affirmed
scalia
delivered
opinion
thomas
ginsburg
sotomayor
kagan
joined
kagan
filed
concurring
opinion
ginsburg
sotomayor
joined
alito
filed
dissenting
opinion
roberts
kennedy
breyer
joined
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
florida
petitioner
joelis
jardines
writ
certiorari
florida
march
justice
scalia
delivered
opinion
consider
whether
using
dog
homeowner
porch
investigate
contents
home
search
within
meaning
fourth
amendment
detective
william
pedraja
police
department
received
unverified
tip
marijuana
grown
home
respondent
joelis
jardines
one
month
later
department
drug
enforcement
administration
sent
joint
surveillance
team
jardines
home
detective
pedraja
part
team
watched
home
fifteen
minutes
saw
vehicles
driveway
activity
around
home
see
inside
blinds
drawn
detective
pedraja
approached
jardines
home
accompanied
detective
douglas
bartelt
trained
canine
handler
arrived
scene
dog
dog
trained
detect
scent
marijuana
cocaine
heroin
several
drugs
indicating
presence
substances
particular
behavioral
changes
recognizable
handler
detective
bartelt
dog
leash
owing
part
dog
wild
nature
app
pet
cert
tendency
dart
around
erratically
searching
dog
approached
jardines
front
porch
apparently
sensed
one
odors
trained
detect
began
energetically
exploring
area
strongest
point
source
odor
detective
bartelt
explained
dog
began
tracking
airborne
odor
tracking
back
forth
engaging
called
bracketing
back
forth
back
forth
detective
bartelt
gave
dog
full
six
feet
leash
plus
whatever
safe
distance
give
testified
needed
give
dog
much
distance
detective
pedraja
stood
back
occurring
get
knocked
dog
spinning
around
trying
find
source
sniffing
base
front
door
dog
sat
trained
behavior
upon
discovering
odor
strongest
point
detective
bartelt
pulled
dog
away
door
returned
vehicle
left
scene
informing
detective
pedraja
positive
alert
narcotics
basis
learned
home
detective
pedraja
applied
received
warrant
search
residence
warrant
executed
later
day
jardines
attempted
flee
arrested
search
revealed
marijuana
plants
charged
trafficking
cannabis
trial
jardines
moved
suppress
marijuana
plants
ground
canine
investigation
unreasonable
search
trial
granted
motion
florida
third
district
appeal
reversed
petition
discretionary
review
florida
quashed
decision
third
district
appeal
approved
trial
decision
suppress
holding
relevant
use
trained
narcotics
dog
investigate
jardines
home
fourth
amendment
search
unsupported
probable
cause
rendering
invalid
warrant
based
upon
information
gathered
search
granted
certiorari
limited
question
whether
officers
behavior
search
within
meaning
fourth
amendment
ii
fourth
amendment
provides
relevant
part
right
people
secure
persons
houses
papers
effects
unreasonable
searches
seizures
shall
violated
amendment
establishes
simple
baseline
one
much
history
formed
exclusive
basis
protections
government
obtains
information
physically
intruding
persons
houses
papers
effects
within
original
meaning
fourth
amendment
undoubtedly
occurred
jones
slip
reason
decision
katz
property
rights
sole
measure
fourth
amendment
violations
soldal
cook
county
though
katz
may
add
baseline
subtract
anything
amendment
protections
government
engage
physical
intrusion
constitutionally
protected
area
knotts
brennan
concurring
judgment
principle
renders
case
straightforward
one
officers
gathering
information
area
belonging
jardines
immediately
surrounding
house
curtilage
house
held
enjoys
protection
part
home
gathered
information
physically
entering
occupying
area
engage
conduct
explicitly
implicitly
permitted
homeowner
fourth
amendment
indicates
precision
places
things
encompassed
protections
persons
houses
papers
effects
oliver
fourth
amendment
therefore
prevent
investigations
conducted
private
property
example
officer
may
subject
katz
gather
information
called
open
fields
even
fields
privately
owned
fields
enumerated
amendment
text
hester
comes
fourth
amendment
home
first
among
equals
amendment
core
stands
right
man
retreat
home
free
unreasonable
governmental
intrusion
silverman
right
little
practical
value
state
agents
stand
home
porch
side
garden
trawl
evidence
impunity
right
retreat
significantly
diminished
police
enter
man
property
observe
repose
outside
front
window
therefore
regard
area
immediately
surrounding
associated
home
cases
call
curtilage
part
home
fourth
amendment
purposes
oliver
supra
principle
ancient
durable
roots
distinction
home
open
fields
old
common
law
hester
supra
identity
home
blackstone
called
curtilage
homestall
house
protects
privileges
branches
appurtenants
blackstone
commentaries
laws
england
area
around
home
intimately
linked
home
physically
psychologically
privacy
expectations
heightened
california
ciraolo
boundaries
curtilage
generally
clearly
marked
conception
defining
curtilage
rate
familiar
enough
easily
understood
daily
experience
oliver
doubt
officers
entered
front
porch
classic
exemplar
area
adjacent
home
activity
home
life
extends
ibid
since
officers
investigation
took
place
constitutionally
protected
area
turn
question
whether
accomplished
unlicensed
physical
law
enforcement
officers
need
shield
eyes
passing
home
public
thoroughfares
ciraolo
officer
leave
gather
information
sharply
circumscribed
steps
thoroughfares
enters
fourth
amendment
protected
areas
permitting
example
visual
observation
home
public
navigable
airspace
careful
note
done
physically
nonintrusive
manner
ibid
entick
carrington
wils
eng
case
undoubtedly
familiar
every
american
statesman
time
founding
boyd
general
rule
clearly
ur
law
holds
property
every
man
sacred
man
set
foot
upon
neighbour
close
without
leave
wils
eng
undisputed
detectives
four
feet
four
companion
firmly
planted
constitutionally
protected
extension
jardines
home
question
whether
given
leave
even
implicitly
license
may
implied
habits
country
notwithstanding
strict
rule
english
common
law
entry
upon
close
mckee
gratz
holmes
accordingly
recognized
knocker
front
door
treated
invitation
license
attempt
entry
justifying
ingress
home
solicitors
hawkers
peddlers
kinds
breard
alexandria
implicit
license
typically
permits
visitor
approach
home
front
path
knock
promptly
wait
briefly
received
absent
invitation
linger
longer
leave
complying
terms
traditional
invitation
require
legal
knowledge
generally
managed
without
incident
nation
girl
scouts
thus
police
officer
armed
warrant
may
approach
home
knock
precisely
private
citizen
might
kentucky
king
slip
introducing
trained
police
dog
explore
area
around
home
hopes
discovering
incriminating
evidence
something
else
customary
invitation
invitation
engage
canine
forensic
investigation
assuredly
inhere
act
hanging
find
visitor
knocking
door
routine
even
sometimes
unwelcome
spot
visitor
exploring
front
path
metal
detector
marching
bloodhound
garden
saying
hello
asking
permission
inspire
us
well
call
police
scope
license
express
implied
limited
particular
area
also
specific
purpose
consent
traffic
stop
officer
checking
anonymous
tip
body
trunk
permit
officer
rummage
trunk
narcotics
background
social
norms
invite
visitor
front
door
invite
conduct
state
points
decisions
holding
subjective
intent
officer
irrelevant
see
ashcroft
whren
cases
merely
hold
stop
search
objectively
reasonable
vitiated
fact
officer
real
reason
making
stop
search
nothing
validating
reason
thus
defendant
heard
complain
although
speeding
officer
real
reason
stop
racial
harassment
see
however
question
precisely
whether
officer
conduct
objectively
reasonable
search
described
depends
upon
whether
officers
implied
license
enter
porch
turn
depends
upon
purpose
entered
behavior
objectively
reveals
purpose
conduct
search
anyone
think
license
iii
state
argues
investigation
forensic
narcotics
dog
definition
implicate
legitimate
privacy
interest
state
cites
authority
decisions
place
jacobsen
illinois
caballes
held
respectively
canine
inspection
luggage
airport
chemical
testing
substance
fallen
parcel
transit
canine
inspection
automobile
lawful
traffic
stop
violate
reasonable
expectation
privacy
described
katz
last
term
considered
argument
much
like
jones
held
tracking
automobile
whereabouts
using
gps
receiver
fourth
amendment
search
government
argued
katz
standard
show
ed
search
occurred
defendant
expectation
whereabouts
public
roads
jones
slip
proposition
least
much
support
case
law
one
state
marshals
see
knotts
gps
receiver
physically
mounted
defendant
automobile
thus
intruding
effects
held
tracking
vehicle
movements
search
person
fourth
amendment
rights
rise
fall
katz
formulation
jones
supra
slip
katz
test
added
substituted
traditional
understanding
fourth
amendment
unnecessary
consider
government
gains
evidence
physically
intruding
constitutionally
protected
areas
jones
supra
slip
thus
need
decide
whether
officers
investigation
jardines
home
violated
expectation
privacy
katz
one
virtue
fourth
amendment
baseline
keeps
easy
cases
easy
officers
learned
learned
physically
intruding
jardines
property
gather
evidence
enough
establish
search
occurred
related
reason
find
irrelevant
state
argument
echoed
dissent
forensic
dogs
commonly
used
police
centuries
argument
apparently
directed
holding
kyllo
surveillance
home
search
government
uses
device
general
public
use
explore
details
home
previously
unknowable
without
physical
intrusion
emphasis
added
implication
statement
inclusio
unius
est
exclusio
alterius
government
uses
physical
intrusion
explore
details
home
including
curtilage
antiquity
tools
bring
along
irrelevant
government
use
trained
police
dogs
investigate
home
immediate
surroundings
search
within
meaning
fourth
amendment
judgment
florida
therefore
affirmed
ordered
kagan
concurring
florida
petitioner
joelis
jardines
writ
certiorari
florida
march
justice
kagan
justice
ginsburg
justice
sotomayor
join
concurring
simple
analogy
clinches
case
privacy
well
property
grounds
stranger
comes
front
door
home
carrying
binoculars
see
ante
knock
say
hello
instead
stands
porch
uses
binoculars
peer
windows
home
furthest
corners
take
long
binoculars
really
fine
couple
minutes
uncommon
behavior
allows
learn
details
life
disclose
one
visitor
trespassed
property
exceeding
license
granted
members
public
say
drop
mail
distribute
campaign
flyers
yes
also
invaded
reasonable
expectation
privacy
nosing
intimacies
sensibly
thought
protected
disclosure
katz
harlan
concurring
yes
course
done
case
case
every
way
matters
police
officers
came
joelis
jardines
door
instrument
deployed
detect
things
inside
perceive
unassisted
used
animal
mineral
contra
dissent
see
post
opinion
alito
noting
ubiquity
dogs
american
households
significance
determining
whether
search
occurred
detective
bartelt
dog
neighbor
pet
come
porch
leisurely
stroll
discussed
earlier
term
dogs
highly
trained
tools
law
enforcement
geared
respond
distinctive
ways
specific
scents
convey
clear
reliable
information
human
partners
see
florida
harris
slip
op
poodle
street
binoculars
piece
plain
glass
like
binoculars
dog
specialized
device
discovering
objects
plain
view
plain
smell
hypothetical
device
aimed
home
private
inviolate
expect
places
things
fourth
amendment
protects
activity
trespass
yes
holds
also
invasion
privacy
yes
well
today
treats
case
property
rubric
write
separately
note
happily
decided
looking
jardines
privacy
interests
decision
along
lines
looked
well
much
like
one
talked
right
man
retreat
home
free
unreasonable
governmental
intrusion
ante
quoting
silverman
insisted
maintaining
practical
value
right
preventing
police
officers
standing
adjacent
space
trawl
ing
evidence
impunity
ante
explained
expectations
home
surrounding
area
ante
quoting
california
ciraolo
determined
police
officers
invade
shared
expectations
use
trained
canine
assistants
reveal
within
confines
home
otherwise
found
see
ante
nn
surprising
case
involving
search
home
property
concepts
privacy
concepts
align
law
property
naturally
enough
influence
shared
social
expectations
places
free
governmental
incursions
georgia
randolph
see
rakas
illinois
sentiment
home
originating
property
law
also
denotes
common
understanding
extending
even
beyond
law
formal
protections
especially
private
sphere
jardines
home
property
also
intimate
familiar
space
analysis
proceeding
facts
today
decision
reveals
runs
mostly
along
path
think
one
divergence
decided
case
privacy
grounds
realized
kyllo
already
resolved
kyllo
held
police
officers
conducted
search
used
device
detect
heat
emanating
private
home
even
though
committed
trespass
highlighting
intention
draw
firm
bright
line
entrance
house
announced
following
rule
government
uses
device
general
public
use
explore
details
home
previously
unknowable
without
physical
intrusion
surveillance
presumptively
unreasonable
without
warrant
ibid
firm
bright
rule
governs
case
police
officers
conducted
search
used
device
general
public
use
trained
dog
explore
details
home
presence
certain
substances
otherwise
discovered
without
entering
premises
dissent
argument
device
dog
change
equation
kyllo
made
clear
tool
issue
may
crude
sophisticated
may
old
new
dogs
actually
go
back
years
centuries
post
decades
may
either
smaller
bigger
breadbox
still
least
device
general
public
use
training
home
violates
minimal
expectation
privacy
expectation
exists
acknowledged
reasonable
mean
device
dissent
implies
see
post
means
police
officers
use
examine
home
without
warrant
exigent
circumstance
see
brigham
city
stuart
describing
exigencies
allowing
warrantless
search
home
thoughts
suggesting
focus
jardines
privacy
interests
make
easy
cas
easy
twice
ante
join
opinion
full
alito
dissenting
florida
petitioner
joelis
jardines
writ
certiorari
florida
march
justice
alito
chief
justice
tice
kennedy
justice
breyer
join
dissenting
decision
important
fourth
amendment
case
based
putative
rule
trespass
law
nowhere
found
annals
jurisprudence
law
trespass
generally
gives
members
public
license
use
walkway
approach
front
door
house
remain
brief
time
license
limited
persons
intend
speak
occupant
actually
mail
carriers
persons
delivering
packages
flyers
examples
individuals
may
lawfully
approach
front
door
without
intending
converse
license
restricted
categories
visitors
occupant
dwelling
likely
welcome
acknowledges
license
applies
even
solicitors
hawkers
peddlers
kinds
ante
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
license
even
extends
police
officers
wish
gather
evidence
occupant
asking
potentially
incriminating
questions
according
however
police
officer
case
detective
bartelt
committed
trespass
accompanied
otherwise
lawful
visit
front
door
respondent
house
dog
franky
authority
evidencing
rule
dogs
domesticated
years
ubiquitous
country
britain
time
adoption
fourth
amendment
acute
sense
smell
used
law
enforcement
yet
unable
find
single
case
nation
supports
rule
decision
based
thus
trespass
law
provides
support
holding
today
decision
also
inconsistent
test
adopted
katz
reasonable
person
understands
odors
emanating
house
may
detected
locations
open
public
reasonable
person
count
strength
odors
remaining
within
range
detectible
dog
smelled
human
reasons
hold
search
within
meaning
fourth
amendment
took
place
case
reverse
decision
opinion
may
leave
reader
mistaken
impression
detective
bartelt
franky
remained
respondent
property
prolonged
period
time
conducted
exploration
front
yard
see
ante
trawl
evidence
impunity
marching
bloodhound
garden
happened
detective
bartelt
franky
approached
front
door
via
driveway
paved
path
route
visitor
customarily
franky
kind
leash
dog
owner
might
franky
approached
door
started
track
airborne
odor
held
head
high
began
bracketing
area
pacing
back
forth
order
determine
strongest
source
smell
app
detective
bartelt
knew
minute
observed
behavior
franky
detected
drugs
upon
locating
odor
strongest
source
franky
sat
base
front
door
point
detective
bartelt
franky
immediately
returned
patrol
car
critical
fact
omits
respondent
counsel
explained
oral
argument
entire
process
walking
driveway
front
path
front
door
waiting
franky
find
strongest
source
odor
walking
back
car
took
approximately
minute
two
tr
oral
arg
thus
amount
time
franky
detective
remained
front
porch
even
less
also
fails
mention
detective
bartelt
apparently
personally
smell
odor
marijuana
coming
house
another
officer
subsequently
stood
front
porch
detective
pedraja
notice
smell
able
identify
app
ii
concludes
conduct
case
search
detective
bartelt
exceeded
boundaries
license
approach
house
recognized
law
trespass
interpretation
scope
license
unfounded
said
members
public
may
lawfully
proceed
along
walkway
leading
front
door
house
custom
grants
license
breard
alexandria
lakin
ames
mass
bishop
commentaries
law
rule
encompasses
categories
visitors
homeowners
almost
certainly
wish
allow
approach
front
doors
friends
relatives
mail
carriers
persons
making
deliveries
also
reaches
categories
visitors
less
universally
welcome
solicitors
hawkers
peddlers
like
law
might
attempt
draw
fine
lines
categories
welcome
unwelcome
visitors
distinguishing
example
tolerable
intolerable
peddlers
girl
scouts
selling
cookies
versus
adults
selling
aluminum
siding
police
officers
agreeable
disagreeable
missions
gathering
information
bothersome
neighbor
versus
asking
potentially
incriminating
questions
law
trespass
attempted
difficult
taxonomy
see
desnick
american
broadcasting
onsent
entry
often
given
legal
effect
even
though
entrant
intentions
known
owner
property
cause
perfectly
understandable
generally
ethical
least
lawful
reasons
revoke
consent
cf
skinner
ogallala
public
school
neb
order
determine
business
invitation
implied
inquiry
subjective
assessment
visitor
chose
visit
premises
particular
instance
crown
cork
seal
kane
md
noting
many
cases
invitation
implied
circumstances
custom
test
objective
stresses
custom
appearance
things
opposed
undisclosed
intention
visitor
course
license
certain
spatial
temporal
limits
visitor
must
stick
path
typically
used
approach
front
door
paved
walkway
visitor
traipse
garden
meander
backyard
take
circuitous
detours
veer
pathway
visitor
customarily
use
see
robinson
virginia
app
en
banc
wells
police
exceeded
scope
implied
invitation
bypassed
front
door
proceeded
directly
back
yard
state
harris
crim
app
substantial
unreasonable
departure
area
public
impliedly
invited
exceeds
scope
implied
invitation
internal
quotation
marks
brackets
omitted
lafave
search
seizure
hereinafter
lafave
hen
police
come
private
property
conduct
investigation
legitimate
purpose
restrict
movements
places
visitors
expected
go
walkways
driveways
porches
observations
made
vantage
points
covered
fourth
amendment
footnotes
omitted
general
matter
may
visitor
come
front
door
middle
night
without
express
invitation
see
state
cada
idaho
app
furtive
intrusion
late
night
predawn
hours
conduct
expected
ordinary
visitors
indeed
observed
resident
premises
cause
great
alarm
similarly
visitor
may
linger
front
door
extended
period
see
app
case
cope
concurring
part
dissenting
part
thing
squatter
rights
front
porch
stranger
may
plop
uninvited
spend
afternoon
front
porch
rocking
chair
throw
sleeping
bag
spend
night
lurk
front
porch
looking
windows
license
limited
amount
time
customarily
take
approach
door
pause
long
enough
see
someone
home
expressly
invited
stay
longer
leave
understand
law
trespass
scope
implied
license
visitor
adheres
limitations
necessarily
required
ring
doorbell
knock
door
attempt
speak
occupant
example
mail
carriers
persons
making
deliveries
individuals
distributing
flyers
may
leave
items
carrying
depart
without
making
attempt
converse
pedestrian
motorist
looking
particular
address
may
walk
front
door
order
check
house
number
hard
see
sidewalk
road
neighbor
knows
residents
away
may
approach
door
retrieve
accumulation
newspapers
might
signal
potential
burglar
house
unoccupied
majority
acknowledges
implied
license
approach
front
door
extends
police
see
ante
recognized
kentucky
king
police
officers
engage
search
approach
front
door
residence
seek
engage
termed
knock
talk
knocking
door
seeking
speak
occupant
purpose
gathering
evidence
see
slip
law
enforcement
officers
armed
warrant
knock
door
private
citizen
might
see
also
lafave
objectionable
officer
come
upon
part
property
opened
public
common
use
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
even
objective
knock
talk
obtain
evidence
lead
homeowner
arrest
prosecution
license
approach
still
applies
words
gathering
evidence
even
damning
evidence
lawful
activity
falls
within
scope
license
approach
officers
walk
front
door
house
permitted
see
hear
smell
whatever
detected
lawful
vantage
point
california
ciraolo
fourth
amendment
protection
home
never
extended
require
law
enforcement
officers
shield
eyes
passing
home
public
thoroughfares
cada
supra
olice
officers
restricting
activity
areas
public
impliedly
invited
permitted
intrusion
level
observation
expected
reasonably
respectful
citizen
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
lafave
detective
bartelt
exceed
scope
license
approach
respondent
front
door
adhered
customary
path
approach
middle
night
remained
front
door
short
period
less
minute
two
concludes
detective
bartelt
went
far
objectiv
purpose
conduct
search
ante
emphasis
added
means
take
anyone
aware
detective
bartelt
infer
subjective
purpose
gather
evidence
point
standard
knock
talk
police
visits
likewise
constitute
searches
exception
visits
serve
warrants
civil
process
police
almost
always
approach
homes
purpose
discovering
information
certainly
objective
knock
talk
offers
meaningful
way
distinguishing
objective
purpose
knock
talk
objective
purpose
detective
bartelt
conduct
contends
knock
talk
different
involves
talking
invited
ante
emphasis
deleted
police
officer
approaches
front
door
house
accordance
limitations
already
discussed
may
gather
evidence
means
talking
officer
may
observe
items
plain
view
smell
odors
coming
house
ciraolo
supra
cada
idaho
lafave
objective
purpose
argument
stand
must
fall
back
particular
instrument
detective
bartelt
used
detect
odor
marijuana
namely
dog
entire
body
decisions
found
single
case
holding
visitor
front
door
home
commits
trespass
visitor
accompanied
dog
leash
contrary
common
law
allowed
even
unleashed
dogs
wander
private
property
without
committing
trespass
williams
liability
animals
ingham
treatise
property
animals
wild
domestic
rights
responsibilities
arising
therefrom
cf
markesinis
deakin
tort
law
ed
responds
dog
problem
behavior
involved
use
dog
ante
support
law
trespass
proposition
dogs
keen
sense
smell
used
law
enforcement
centuries
antiquity
practice
evidenced
scottish
law
made
crime
disturb
tracking
dog
men
coming
pursuing
thieves
seizing
malefactors
brown
et
records
parliaments
scotland
st
andrews
online
http
bringing
tracking
dog
front
door
home
constituted
trespass
one
expect
least
one
case
arisen
past
years
found
none
reasons
real
law
trespass
provides
support
holding
today
claims
reasoning
ancient
durable
roots
ante
trespass
rule
really
newly
struck
counterfeit
iii
concurring
opinion
attempts
provide
alternative
ground
today
decision
namely
detective
bartelt
conduct
violated
respondent
reasonable
expectations
privacy
already
rejected
similar
identical
argument
see
illinois
caballes
event
see
basis
concluding
occupants
dwelling
reasonable
expectation
privacy
odors
emanate
dwelling
reach
spots
members
public
may
lawfully
stand
clear
occupant
house
reasonable
expectation
privacy
respect
odors
smelled
human
beings
standing
places
see
johns
officers
came
closer
detected
distinct
odor
marihuana
probable
cause
believe
vehicles
contained
contraband
ventresca
scent
fermenting
mash
supported
probable
cause
warrant
johnston
reasonable
expectation
privacy
drug
agents
inquisitive
nostrils
draw
line
odors
smelled
humans
detectible
dogs
consider
situation
point
view
occupant
building
marijuana
grown
methamphetamine
manufactured
occupant
reason
follows
know
odors
may
emanate
building
atmospheric
conditions
force
direction
wind
may
affect
strength
odors
reach
spot
members
public
may
lawfully
stand
also
know
people
much
acute
sense
smell
idea
might
standing
one
spots
question
odors
house
reach
location
addition
know
odors
coming
building
reach
locations
may
strong
enough
detected
dog
confident
faint
smelled
human
finely
tuned
expectation
entirely
unrealistic
see
evidence
society
prepared
recognize
reasonable
attempt
show
respondent
reasonable
expectation
privacy
odor
marijuana
wafting
house
concurrence
argues
case
like
kyllo
held
police
officers
conducted
search
used
thermal
imaging
device
detect
heat
emanating
house
ante
opinion
kagan
however
already
rejected
argument
use
dog
use
thermal
imaging
device
see
caballes
argument
advanced
concurrence
appears
justice
souter
caballes
dissent
see
persuaded
contrary
interpretation
propounded
concurrence
kyllo
best
understood
decision
use
new
technology
kyllo
focused
fact
thermal
imaging
device
form
technology
general
public
use
expressed
concern
citizens
mercy
advancing
technology
use
restricted
dog
however
new
form
technology
device
noted
use
dogs
acute
sense
smell
law
enforcement
dates
back
many
centuries
concurrence
suggests
decision
much
like
actual
decision
simply
holding
based
sees
intrusion
constitutionally
protected
area
ante
quoting
knotts
brennan
concurring
judgment
result
apply
dog
alerts
public
sidewalk
street
corridor
building
dog
handler
lawfully
admitted
concurrence
approach
much
wider
reach
police
used
thermal
imaging
device
kyllo
public
street
committed
trespass
ante
therefore
dog
nose
like
thermal
imaging
device
fourth
amendment
purposes
search
occur
dog
alerted
public
sidewalk
corridor
apartment
building
true
dog
trained
sniff
marijuana
dangerous
quarry
explosives
violent
fugitive
kidnaped
child
see
ground
hampering
legitimate
law
enforcement
way
iv
conduct
police
officer
case
constitute
trespass
violate
respondent
reasonable
expectations
privacy
hold
conduct
search
therefore
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
oral
argument
state
amicus
solicitor
general
argued
jardines
conceded
lower
courts
officers
right
misstates
record
jardines
conceded
nothing
unsurprising
proposition
officers
lawfully
approached
home
knock
front
door
hopes
speaking
course
much
dissent
seems
agree
inquire
appearance
things
post
opinion
alito
typica
visitor
might
cause
alarm
resident
premises
expected
ordinary
visitors
expected
respectful
citizen
post
good
questions
answers
incompatible
dissent
outcome
presumably
dissent
even
try
argue
customary
usual
reasonable
respectful
ordinary
typical
nonalarming
stranger
explore
curtilage
home
trained
drug
dogs
dissent
insists
argument
must
rest
upon
particular
instrument
detective
bartelt
used
detect
odor
marijuana
dog
post
dog
problem
behavior
involved
use
dog
think
typical
person
find
cause
great
kind
reaction
dissent
quite
rightly
relies
upon
justify
rule
post
find
stranger
snooping
front
porch
without
dog
dissent
let
police
whatever
want
way
gathering
evidence
long
stay
use
baseball
analogy
long
stick
path
typically
used
approach
front
door
paved
walkway
ibid
vantage
point
presumably
peer
house
binoculars
impunity
law
even
state
concedes
see
tr
oral
arg
dissent
argues
citing
king
gathering
evidence
even
damning
evidence
lawful
activity
falls
within
scope
license
approach
post
false
generalization
king
establishes
fourth
amendment
search
approach
home
order
speak
occupant
invited
mere
purpose
discovering
information
post
course
engaging
permitted
conduct
cause
violate
fourth
amendment
one
impliedly
invited
enter
protected
premises
home
order
nothing
conduct
search
footnotes
dissent
claims
alternatively
illinois
caballes
controls
case
nearly
see
post
caballes
concerned
dog
sniff
automobile
traffic
stop
see
also
florida
harris
held
people
expectations
privacy
much
lower
cars
homes
see
arizona
gant
wyoming
houghton
new
york
class
cardwell
lewis
plurality
opinion
dissent
principal
reason
concluding
violation
privacy
occurred
case
police
officers
might
detect
aroma
wafting
house
works
better
officers
smell
drugs
coming
house
use
information
human
sniff
search
agree
follow
person
loses
expectation
privacy
many
scents
within
home
nose
capably
tells
usually
detectible
humans
standing
outside
indeed
kyllo
already
decided
much
response
identical
argument
dissent
case
see
stevens
dissenting
noting
humans
sometimes
detect
heat
emanating
building
kyllo
stated
dissent
comparison
thermal
imaging
various
circumstances
outside
observers
might
able
perceive
without
technology
heat
home
quite
irrelevant
fact
equivalent
information
sometimes
obtained
means
make
lawful
use
means
violate
fourth
amendment
event
time
question
outside
observer
discerned
relative
heat
kyllo
home
without
thermal
imaging
footnotes
see
sloane
dogs
war
police
work
patrol
crim
hereinafter
sloane
derr
dog
history
america
olsen
daily
life
england
sloane
see
app
app
brief
respondent
depiction
respondent
home
notes
franky
leash
leash
standard
equipment
ordinary
dog
owners
see
stregowski
four
dog
leash
varieties
http
internet
materials
visited
mar
available
clerk
case
file
humans
naturally
much
acute
sense
smell
others
humans
trained
detect
distinguish
odors
detected
without
training
see
hancock
primer
smell
http
individuals
employed
perfume
wine
industries
example
amazingly
acute
sense
smell
ibid