martin
pittsburgh
argued
decided
december
reuben
martin
brought
action
recover
compensation
personal
injuries
time
martin
injured
train
railroad
company
employ
railway
postal
clerk
route
extending
cleveland
ohio
pittsburg
pennsylvania
injuries
arose
derailing
pennsylvania
train
negligence
crew
work
train
permitting
switch
leading
side
track
open
among
defenses
company
pleaded
law
pennsylvania
passed
april
alleged
applicable
relieved
responsibility
reply
plaintiff
denied
existence
applicability
statute
moreover
defended
ground
statute
existing
applicable
void
first
contrary
power
delegated
congress
establish
postoffices
post
roads
second
repugnant
commerce
clause
constitution
third
conflict
equal
protection
due
process
clauses
amendment
also
clause
prohibiting
state
making
enforcing
law
shall
abridge
privileges
immunities
citizens
trial
jury
held
statute
question
applicable
valid
hence
operative
defeat
recovery
verdict
judgment
favor
railroad
company
severally
affirmed
circuit
state
ohio
charles
koonce
robert
murray
william
anderson
plaintiff
error
james
wilson
arrel
wilson
harrington
defendant
error
justice
white
making
foregoing
statement
delivered
opinion
quote
pennsylvania
statute
april
upon
case
turns
enacted
senate
house
representatives
commonwealth
pennsylvania
general
assembly
met
hereby
enacted
authority
person
shall
sustain
personal
injury
loss
life
lawfully
engaged
employed
roads
works
depots
premises
railroad
company
train
car
therein
thereon
company
person
employee
right
action
recovery
cases
company
shall
exist
person
employee
provided
section
shall
apply
passengers
application
statute
valid
presents
federal
question
unconcerned
matter
although
may
observed
passing
conceded
argument
bar
settled
construction
given
statute
pennsylvania
plaintiff
railway
postal
clerk
passenger
greater
rights
event
injured
course
employment
employee
railroad
company
application
statute
thus
construed
railway
postal
clerk
conflict
power
congress
establish
postoffices
post
roads
price
pennsylvania
ed
sup
question
effect
foreclosed
plaintiff
error
case
brought
judgment
pennsylvania
holding
railway
postal
clerk
passenger
within
meaning
pennsylvania
act
hence
right
recover
injuries
suffered
consequence
negligence
employee
company
federal
ground
relied
upon
substantially
one
asserted
power
government
establish
postoffices
post
roads
effect
legislation
congress
act
postmaster
general
appointing
mail
clerks
thereunder
fully
considering
subject
case
dismissed
substantial
federal
ground
involved
saying
ed
sup
person
thus
carried
mail
matter
without
extra
charge
passenger
charge
mail
compensation
made
transportation
charge
fact
employment
defendant
bound
contract
government
carry
affect
question
company
contracted
person
charge
freight
train
carry
without
additional
compensation
statutes
authorize
employment
direct
service
therefore
make
person
engaged
passenger
deprive
character
construing
pennsylvania
statute
give
persons
employed
right
railroad
company
belong
person
similar
employment
others
brings
us
second
contention
repugnancy
pennsylvania
statute
commerce
clause
constitution
apparent
decision
price
case
previously
referred
deciding
question
must
determine
application
statute
plaintiff
error
wholly
irrespective
fact
time
injured
railway
postal
clerk
words
validity
invalidity
statute
adjudged
precisely
plaintiff
time
injury
serving
hire
employment
private
individual
corporation
circumstances
stated
case
pennsylvania
hughes
ed
sup
clearly
establishes
unsoundness
contention
pennsylvania
statute
question
void
conflict
commerce
clause
case
horse
shipped
point
state
new
york
point
state
pennsylvania
bill
lading
limited
right
recovery
exceeding
injury
might
occasioned
animal
transit
horse
hurt
within
state
pennsylvania
negligence
connecting
carrier
courts
pennsylvania
applying
pennsylvania
doctrine
denies
right
common
carrier
limit
liability
injuries
resulting
negligence
recovery
sum
value
animal
writ
error
judgment
pennsylvania
affirmed
held
least
absence
legislation
congress
subject
effect
commerce
clause
constitution
deprive
state
pennsylvania
authority
legislate
within
jurisdiction
concerning
liability
common
carriers
although
legislation
might
extent
indirectly
affect
interstate
commerce
ruling
hughes
case
effect
reiterated
principle
adopted
applied
chicago
solan
ed
sup
iowa
statute
forbidding
common
carrier
contracting
exempt
liability
sustained
person
injured
interstate
transportation
contention
cases
referred
operation
state
laws
sustained
augment
liability
carrier
therefore
rulings
inapposite
consequence
application
state
statute
may
lessen
carrier
liability
rests
upon
distinction
without
difference
result
previous
rulings
recognize
absence
action
congress
power
legislate
course
power
involved
authority
regulate
state
might
deem
best
public
good
without
reference
whether
effect
legislation
might
limit
broaden
responsibility
carrier
words
assertion
federal
right
disposed
determine
question
power
involve
considering
wisdom
lawful
power
may
stated
conditions
exerted
views
previously
stated
adequate
dispose
assertion
pennsylvania
statute
void
repugnancy
amendment
conceded
contended
plaintiff
error
recovered
statute
follow
legislature
pennsylvania
preventing
recovery
took
away
vested
right
right
property
accident
cause
action
asserted
arisen
occurred
long
passage
statute
difficult
grasp
contention
statute
deprived
plaintiff
error
rights
stated
contention
reason
must
rest
upon
proposition
state
pennsylvania
without
power
legislate
subject
proposition
adversely
disposed
must
since
clearly
follow
argument
relied
upon
maintained
state
without
power
subject
said
state
authority
premises
authority
even
extend
prescribing
rule
applicable
conditions
wholly
arising
future
contention
plaintiff
error
citizen
constitutional
right
travel
one
state
another
entitled
result
accident
happening
pennsylvania
cause
action
allowed
laws
state
different
form
reiterate
pennsylvania
statute
repugnant
commerce
clause
constitution
conceding
accident
happened
ohio
right
recover
fact
deprive
state
pennsylvania
authority
legislate
affect
persons
things
within
borders
commerce
clause
controlling
absence
legislation
congress
follows
necessity
plaintiff
error
incident
right
travel
state
state
possess
privilege
accident
happening
pennsylvania
exert
cause
action
given
laws
state
immunity
exempting
control
state
legislation
proposition
statute
denied
plaintiff
error
equal
protection
laws
arbitrarily
unnaturally
classification
made
deprived
railway
mail
clerks
rights
passengers
might
enjoyed
statute
enacted
without
merit
classification
made
statute
alone
embrace
railway
mail
clerks
places
class
clerks
others
whose
employment
railroad
subjects
greater
peril
passengers
strictest
sense
general
difference
renders
imposible
reason
say
within
meaning
amendment
legislature
pennsylvania
classifying
passengers
strict
sense
one
class
subject
greater
risks
including
railway
mail
clerks
another
acted
arbitrarily
violate
equal
protection
clause
amendment
judgment
affirmed