chandler
et
al
miller
governor
georgia
et
argued
january
decided
april
held
georgia
requirement
candidates
state
office
pass
drug
test
fit
within
closely
guarded
category
constitutionallypermissible
suspicionless
searches
pp
uncontested
georgia
drug
testing
requirement
imposed
law
enforced
state
officials
effects
search
within
meaning
fourth
fourteenth
amendments
pivotal
question
whether
searches
reasonable
reasonable
fourth
amendment
search
ordinarily
must
based
individualized
suspicion
wrongdoing
see
vernonia
particularized
exceptions
main
rule
sometimes
warranted
based
special
needs
beyond
normal
need
law
enforcement
see
skinner
special
needs
alleged
courts
must
undertake
context
specific
inquiry
examining
closely
competing
private
public
interests
advanced
parties
see
von
raab
evaluating
georgia
ballot
access
drug
testing
statute
measure
plainly
tied
individualized
suspicion
eleventh
circuit
sought
balance
competing
interests
line
precedents
immediately
point
skinner
von
raab
vernonia
pp
precedents
remain
guides
assessing
validity
georgia
statute
despite
respondents
invitation
apply
framework
extraordinarily
deferential
state
measures
setting
conditions
candidacy
state
office
precedent
suggests
state
sovereign
power
establish
qualifications
state
offices
diminishes
constraints
state
action
imposed
fourth
amendment
pp
georgia
testing
method
relatively
noninvasive
therefore
special
need
showing
made
state
faulted
excessive
intrusion
however
georgia
failed
show
special
need
substantial
important
enough
override
individual
acknowledged
privacy
interest
sufficiently
vital
suppress
fourth
amendment
normal
requirement
individualized
suspicion
respondents
contend
unlawful
drug
use
incompatible
holding
high
state
office
drug
use
draws
question
official
judgment
integrity
jeopardizes
discharge
public
functions
including
antidrug
law
enforcement
efforts
undermines
public
confidence
trust
elected
officials
notably
lacking
respondents
presentation
indication
concrete
danger
demanding
departure
fourth
amendment
main
rule
statute
enacted
repondents
concede
response
fear
suspicion
drug
use
state
officials
demonstrated
problem
drug
abuse
cases
necessary
validity
testing
regime
see
von
raab
shore
assertion
special
need
suspicionless
general
search
program
see
skinner
vernonia
contrast
effective
testing
regimes
upheld
skinner
von
raab
vernonia
georgia
certification
requirement
well
designed
identify
candidates
violate
antidrug
laws
credible
means
deter
illicit
drug
users
seeking
state
office
test
date
selected
candidate
thus
prohibitively
addicted
abstain
pretest
period
sufficient
avoid
detection
respondents
reliance
decision
von
raab
sustained
drug
testing
program
customs
service
officers
prior
promotion
transfer
certain
high
risk
positions
despite
absence
documented
drug
abuse
problem
among
service
employees
misplaced
hardly
decision
opening
broad
vistas
suspicionless
searches
von
raab
must
read
unique
context
drug
interdiction
become
agency
primary
enforcement
mission
covered
posts
directly
involved
drug
interdiction
otherwise
required
customs
officers
carry
firearms
employees
access
vast
sources
valuable
contraband
officers
targets
succumbed
bribery
drug
smugglers
moreover
feasible
subject
customs
service
employees
kind
day
day
scrutiny
norm
traditional
office
environments
telling
contrast
conduct
candidates
public
office
attracts
attention
notably
beyond
norm
ordinary
work
environments
left
close
review
georgia
scheme
state
seeks
display
commitment
struggle
drug
abuse
georgia
asserts
evidence
drug
problem
among
state
elected
officials
officials
typically
perform
high
risk
safety
sensitive
tasks
required
certification
immediately
aids
interdiction
effort
need
revealed
symbolic
special
fourth
amendment
shields
society
state
action
diminishes
personal
privacy
symbol
sake
pp
expresses
opinion
medical
examinations
designed
provide
certification
candidate
general
health
financial
disclosure
requirements
speak
drug
testing
private
sector
domain
unguarded
fourth
amendment
constraints
pp
reversed
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
stevens
scalia
kennedy
souter
thomas
breyer
joined
rehnquist
filed
dissenting
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
wash
ington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
walker
chandler
et
petitioners
zell
miller
governor
georgia
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
eleventh
circuit
april
justice
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
fourth
amendment
requires
government
respect
right
people
secure
persons
unreasonable
searches
seizures
restraint
government
conduct
generally
bars
officials
undertaking
search
seizure
absent
individualized
suspicion
searches
conducted
without
grounds
suspicion
particular
individuals
upheld
however
certain
limited
circumstances
see
treasury
employees
von
raab
circumstances
include
brief
stops
questioning
observation
fixed
border
patrol
checkpoint
martinez
fuerte
sobriety
checkpoint
michigan
dept
state
police
sitz
administrative
inspections
closely
regulated
businesses
new
york
burger
georgia
requires
candidates
designated
state
offices
certify
taken
drug
test
test
result
negative
code
ann
hereinafter
confront
case
question
whether
requirement
ranks
among
thelimited
circumstances
suspicionless
searches
warranted
relying
precedents
sustaining
drug
testing
programs
student
athletes
customs
employees
railway
employees
see
vernonia
school
dist
acton
slip
random
drug
testing
students
participate
interscholastic
sports
von
raab
drug
tests
customs
service
employees
seek
transfer
promotion
certain
positions
skinner
railway
labor
executives
drug
alcohol
tests
railway
employees
involved
train
accidents
violate
particular
safety
rules
appeals
eleventh
circuit
judged
georgia
law
constitutional
reverse
judgment
georgia
requirement
candidates
state
office
pass
drug
test
hold
fit
within
closely
guarded
category
constitutionally
permissible
suspicionless
searches
prescription
issue
approved
georgia
legislature
orders
ach
candidate
seeking
qualify
nomination
election
state
office
shall
condition
qualification
required
certify
candidate
tested
negative
illegal
drugs
georgia
first
apparently
remains
state
condition
candidacy
state
office
drug
test
georgia
statute
qualify
place
ballot
candidate
must
present
certificate
state
approved
laboratory
form
approved
secretary
state
reporting
candidate
submitted
urinalysis
drug
test
within
days
prior
qualifying
nomination
election
results
negative
statute
lists
llegal
drug
marijuana
cocaine
opiates
amphetamines
phencyclidines
designated
state
offices
governor
lieutenant
governor
secretary
state
attorney
general
state
school
superintendent
commissioner
insurance
commissioner
agriculture
commissioner
labor
justices
judges
appeals
judges
superior
courts
district
attorneys
members
general
assembly
members
public
service
commission
candidate
drug
tests
administered
manner
consistent
department
health
human
services
guidelines
fed
reg
professionally
valid
procedures
approved
georgia
commissioner
human
resources
see
candidate
may
provide
test
specimen
laboratory
approved
state
office
candidate
personal
physician
see
app
joint
statement
undisputed
facts
urine
sample
obtained
approved
laboratory
determines
whether
five
specified
illegal
drugs
present
prepares
certificate
reporting
test
results
candidate
petitioners
libertarian
party
nominees
state
offices
subject
requirements
party
nominated
walker
chandler
office
lieutenant
governor
sharon
harris
office
commissioner
agriculture
james
walker
office
member
general
assembly
may
one
month
deadline
submission
certificates
required
petitioners
chandler
harris
walker
filed
action
district
northern
district
georgia
asserted
inter
alia
drug
tests
required
violated
rights
first
fourth
fourteenth
amendments
constitution
namingas
defendants
governor
zell
miller
two
state
officials
involved
administration
petitioners
requested
declaratory
injunctive
relief
barring
enforcement
statute
june
district
denied
petitioners
motion
preliminary
injunction
stressing
importance
state
offices
sought
relative
unintrusiveness
testing
procedure
found
unlikely
petitioners
prevail
merits
claims
app
pet
cert
petitioners
apparently
submitted
drug
tests
obtained
certificates
required
appeared
ballot
see
tr
oral
arg
election
parties
jointly
moved
entry
final
judgment
stipulated
facts
january
district
entered
final
judgment
respondents
divided
eleventh
circuit
panel
affirmed
settled
law
accepted
drug
tests
required
statute
rank
searches
true
drug
testing
programs
issue
skinner
von
raab
reasoned
serves
special
needs
interests
ordinary
needs
law
enforcement
therefore
endeavored
balance
individual
privacy
expectations
government
interests
determine
whether
impractical
require
warrant
level
individualized
suspicion
particular
context
quoting
von
raab
examining
state
interests
involved
acknowledged
absence
record
drug
abuse
elected
officials
georgia
nonetheless
observed
people
georgia
place
trust
elected
officials
liberty
safety
economic
well
ultimate
responsibility
law
enforcement
consequently
vested
highest
executive
authority
makepublic
policy
general
frequently
supervise
georgia
drug
interdiction
efforts
particular
must
persons
appreciative
perils
drug
use
ibid
noted
nature
high
public
office
demands
highest
levels
honesty
clear
sightedness
clear
thinking
ibid
reciting
responsibilities
offices
petitioners
sought
appeals
perceived
positions
particularly
susceptible
risks
bribery
blackmail
government
entitled
guard
ibid
quoting
von
raab
turning
petitioners
privacy
interests
eleventh
circuit
emphasized
tests
conducted
office
candidate
private
physician
making
intrusion
even
less
approved
von
raab
also
noted
statute
reference
federally
approved
drug
testing
guidelines
ibid
drug
test
reveal
presence
absence
indicia
use
particular
drugs
information
health
candidate
furthermore
candidate
control
release
test
results
candidate
test
positive
forfeit
opportunity
run
office
event
nothing
divulged
law
enforcement
officials
ibid
another
consideration
said
reality
candidates
high
office
must
expect
voters
demand
disclosures
physical
emotional
mental
fitness
position
ibid
concluding
state
interests
outweighed
privacy
intrusion
caused
required
certification
held
statute
applied
petitioners
inconsistent
fourth
fourteenth
amendments
ibid
judge
barkett
dissented
view
balance
state
candidates
interests
appropriate
state
failed
establish
special
governmental
need
regime
nothing
special
immediate
generalized
governmental
interests
involved
observed
warrant
suspension
fourth
amendment
requirement
individualized
suspicion
searches
seizures
granted
petition
certiorari
reverse
begin
discussion
case
uncontested
point
georgia
drug
testing
requirement
imposed
law
enforced
state
officials
effects
search
within
meaning
fourth
fourteenth
amendments
see
skinner
tr
oral
arg
brief
amicus
curiae
collection
testing
urine
meet
georgia
certification
statute
constitutes
search
subject
demands
fourth
amendment
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
explained
skinner
government
ordered
collection
testing
urine
intrudes
upon
expectations
privacy
society
long
recognized
reasonable
intrusions
searches
fourth
amendment
focus
question
searches
reasonable
reasonable
fourth
amendment
search
ordinarily
must
based
individualized
suspicion
wrongdoing
see
vernonia
slip
particularized
exceptions
main
rule
sometimes
warranted
based
special
needs
beyond
normal
need
law
enforcement
skinner
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
special
needs
concerns
crime
detection
alleged
justification
fourth
amendment
intrusion
courts
must
undertake
context
specific
inquiry
examining
closely
competing
private
public
interests
advanced
parties
see
von
raab
see
also
skinner
stated
limited
circumstances
privacy
interests
implicated
search
minimal
important
governmental
interest
furthered
intrusion
placed
jeopardy
requirement
individualized
suspicion
search
may
reasonable
despite
absence
suspicion
evaluating
georgia
ballot
access
drug
testing
statute
measure
plainly
tied
individualized
suspicion
eleventh
circuit
sought
balance
individual
privacy
expectations
state
interests
quoting
von
raab
line
precedents
immediately
point
skinner
von
raab
vernonia
review
decisions
inspecting
georgia
law
skinner
concerned
federal
railroad
administration
fra
regulations
required
blood
urine
tests
rail
employees
involved
train
accidents
regulations
also
authorized
railroads
administer
breath
urine
tests
employees
violated
certain
safety
rules
fra
adopted
drug
testing
program
response
evidence
drug
alcohol
abuse
railroad
employees
obvious
safety
hazards
posed
abuse
documented
link
drug
alcohol
impaired
employees
incidence
train
accidents
recognizing
urinalysis
tests
conspicuously
raised
evident
privacy
concerns
noted
two
offsetting
considerations
first
regulations
reduced
intrusiveness
collection
process
important
railway
employees
reason
participation
industry
regulated
pervasively
ensure
safety
diminished
expectations
privacy
urpassing
safety
interests
concluded
warranted
fra
testing
program
drug
tests
deter
illegal
drug
use
railroad
employees
workers
positioned
cause
great
human
loss
signs
impairment
become
noticeable
supervisors
program
also
helped
railroads
obtain
invaluable
information
causes
major
train
accidents
see
testing
without
showing
individualized
suspicion
essential
explained
vital
interests
served
see
employees
forecast
timing
accident
safety
violation
events
trigger
testing
employee
inability
avoid
detection
simply
staying
drug
free
prescribed
test
time
significantly
enhanced
deterrent
effect
program
see
ibid
furthermore
imposing
individualized
suspicion
requirementfor
drug
test
chaotic
aftermath
train
accident
seriously
impede
employer
ability
discern
cause
accident
indeed
waiting
suspect
individuals
identified
likely
result
loss
deterioration
evidence
furnished
tests
finally
vernonia
sustained
random
drug
testing
program
high
school
students
engaged
interscholastic
athletic
competitions
program
context
critical
local
governments
bear
large
responsibilities
public
school
system
guardian
tutor
children
entrusted
care
slip
immediate
crisis
slip
caused
sharp
increase
drug
use
school
district
slip
sparked
installation
program
district
findings
established
student
athletes
among
drug
users
leaders
drug
culture
slip
decision
noted
students
within
school
environment
lesser
expectation
privacy
members
population
generally
slip
quoting
new
jersey
powell
concurring
emphasized
importance
deterring
drug
use
schoolchildren
risk
injury
drug
using
student
athlete
cast
engaged
playing
field
see
vernonia
slip
respondents
urge
precedents
examined
sole
guides
assessing
constitutional
validity
georgia
statute
special
needs
analysis
contend
must
viewed
different
lens
implicates
georgia
sovereign
power
reserved
tenth
amendment
establish
qualifications
seek
state
office
respondents
rely
gregory
ashcroft
upheld
federal
statutory
equal
protection
clause
challenges
missouri
mandatory
retirement
age
state
judges
found
age
classification
reasonable
barred
federal
legislation
see
gregory
reaffirmed
enjoy
wide
latitude
establish
conditions
candidacy
state
office
setting
conditions
may
disregard
basic
constitutional
protections
see
mcdaniel
paty
invalidating
state
provision
prohibiting
members
clergy
serving
delegates
state
constitutional
convention
communist
party
ind
whitcomb
voiding
loyalty
oath
condition
ballot
access
bond
floyd
georgia
legislature
exclude
elected
representative
ground
antiwar
statements
cast
doubt
ability
take
oath
aware
precedent
suggesting
state
power
establish
qualifications
state
offices
sovereign
power
prosecute
crime
diminishes
constraints
state
action
imposed
fourth
amendment
therefore
reject
respondents
invitation
apply
case
framework
extraordinarily
deferential
state
measures
setting
conditions
candidacy
state
office
guides
remain
skinner
von
raab
vernonia
turning
guides
note
first
testing
method
georgia
statute
describes
relatively
noninvasive
therefore
special
need
showing
made
state
faulted
excessive
intrusion
georgia
statute
invokes
drug
testing
guidelines
applicable
federal
programs
upheld
skinner
von
raab
see
brief
amicus
curiae
von
raab
state
permits
candidate
provide
urine
specimen
office
private
physician
results
test
given
first
tothe
candidate
controls
dissemination
report
state
effectively
limited
invasiveness
testing
procedure
concentrate
core
issue
certification
requirement
warranted
special
need
precedents
establish
proffered
special
need
drug
testing
must
substantial
important
enough
override
individual
acknowledged
privacy
interest
sufficiently
vital
suppress
fourth
amendment
normal
requirement
individualized
suspicion
see
supra
georgia
failed
show
justification
special
need
kind
respondents
defense
statute
rests
primarily
incompatibility
unlawful
drug
use
holding
high
state
office
statute
justified
respondents
contend
use
illegal
drugs
draws
question
official
judgment
integrity
jeopardizes
discharge
public
functions
including
antidrug
law
enforcement
efforts
undermines
public
confidence
trust
elected
officials
brief
respondents
statute
according
respondents
serves
deter
unlawful
drug
users
becoming
candidates
thus
stops
attaining
high
state
office
notably
lacking
respondents
presentation
indication
concrete
danger
demanding
departure
fourth
amendment
main
rule
nothing
record
hints
hazards
respondents
broadly
describe
real
simply
hypothetical
georgia
polity
statute
enacted
counsel
respondents
readily
acknowledged
oral
argument
response
fear
suspicion
drug
use
state
officials
question
indication
anywhere
record
georgia
particular
problem
state
officeholders
drug
abusers
see
also
counsel
respondents
affirms
absence
evidence
state
officeholders
georgia
drug
problems
demonstrated
problem
drug
abuse
cases
necessary
validity
testing
regime
see
von
raab
shore
assertion
special
need
suspicionless
general
search
program
proof
unlawful
drug
use
may
help
clarify
substantiate
precise
hazards
posed
use
thus
evidence
drug
alcohol
use
railway
employees
engaged
safety
sensitive
tasks
skinner
see
immediate
crisis
prompted
sharp
rise
students
use
unlawful
drugs
vernonia
see
slip
bolstered
government
school
officials
arguments
drug
testing
programs
warranted
appropriate
contrast
effective
testing
regimes
upheld
skinner
von
raab
vernonia
georgia
certification
requirement
well
designed
identify
candidates
violate
antidrug
laws
scheme
credible
means
deter
illicit
drug
users
seeking
election
state
office
test
date
scheduled
candidate
anytime
within
days
prior
qualifying
place
ballot
secret
counsel
respondents
acknowledged
oral
argument
users
illegal
drugs
save
prohibitively
addicted
abstain
pretest
period
sufficient
avoid
detection
see
tr
oral
arg
even
indulgedrespondents
argument
one
purpose
might
detect
unable
abstain
see
tr
oral
arg
respondents
shown
argued
persons
likely
candidates
public
office
georgia
moreover
respondents
offered
reason
ordinary
law
enforcement
methods
suffice
apprehend
addicted
individuals
appear
limelight
public
stage
section
short
needed
work
ferret
lawbreakers
respondents
barely
attempt
support
statute
ground
respondents
amicus
curiae
rely
heavily
decision
von
raab
sustained
drug
testing
program
customs
service
officers
prior
promotion
transfer
certain
high
risk
positions
despite
absence
documented
drug
abuse
problem
among
service
employees
see
brief
respondents
brief
amicus
curiae
see
also
posts
question
von
raab
directly
involved
drug
interdiction
otherwise
required
service
member
carry
firearm
see
government
compelling
interest
ensuring
front
line
interdiction
personnel
physically
fit
unimpeachable
integrity
judgment
public
bear
risk
employees
may
suffer
impaired
perception
judgment
promoted
positions
may
need
employ
deadly
hardly
decision
opening
broad
vistas
suspicionless
searches
von
raab
must
read
unique
context
customs
service
reported
announcing
testing
program
customs
employees
federal
workers
routinely
exposed
vast
network
organized
crime
inextricably
tied
illegal
drug
use
national
treasury
employees
union
von
raab
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
aff
part
vacated
part
stressed
rug
interdiction
ha
become
agency
primary
enforcement
mission
employees
question
access
vast
sources
valuable
contraband
furthermore
customs
officers
ha
targets
bribery
drug
smugglers
numerous
occasions
several
succumbed
temptation
ibid
respondents
overlook
telling
difference
von
raab
georgia
candidate
drug
testing
program
von
raab
feasible
subject
employees
required
carry
firearms
concerned
interdiction
controlled
substances
work
product
kind
day
day
scrutiny
norm
traditional
office
environments
candidates
public
office
contrast
subject
relentless
scrutiny
peers
public
press
conduct
attracts
attention
notably
beyond
norm
ordinary
work
environments
left
close
review
georgia
scheme
image
state
seeks
project
requiring
candidates
public
office
submit
drug
testing
georgia
displays
commitment
struggle
drug
abuse
suspicionless
tests
according
respondents
signify
candidates
elected
fit
serve
constituents
free
influence
illegal
drugs
georgia
asserts
evidence
drug
problem
among
state
elected
officials
officials
typically
perform
high
risk
safety
sensitive
tasks
required
certification
immediately
aids
interdiction
effort
need
revealed
short
symbolic
special
term
draws
meaning
case
law
von
raab
customs
service
defended
officer
drug
test
program
part
way
demonstrate
agency
commitment
enforcement
thelaw
see
brief
treasury
employees
von
raab
pp
von
raab
however
rely
justification
indeed
need
set
good
example
genre
sufficient
overwhelm
fourth
amendment
objection
care
took
explain
needs
skinner
von
raab
vernonia
ranked
special
wasted
many
words
entirely
unnecessary
perhaps
even
misleading
elaborations
pathmarking
dissenting
opinion
justice
brandeis
recognized
importance
teaching
example
government
potent
omnipresent
teacher
good
ill
teaches
whole
people
example
olmstead
justice
brandeis
explained
olmstead
government
set
bad
example
introduced
criminal
proceeding
evidence
obtained
unlawful
government
wiretap
immaterial
intrusion
aid
law
enforcement
experience
teach
us
guard
protect
liberty
government
purposes
beneficent
men
born
freedom
naturally
alert
repel
invasion
liberty
evil
minded
rulers
greatest
dangers
liberty
lurk
insidious
encroachment
men
zeal
well
meaning
without
understanding
note
finally
matters
opinion
treat
georgia
singular
drug
test
candidates
part
medical
examination
designed
provide
certification
candidate
general
health
express
noopinion
examinations
touch
financial
disclosure
requirements
implicate
different
concerns
procedures
see
barry
city
new
york
upholding
city
financial
disclosure
law
elected
appointed
officials
candidates
city
office
certain
city
employees
plante
gonzalez
upholding
florida
financial
disclosure
requirements
certain
public
officers
candidates
employees
speak
drug
testing
private
sector
domain
unguarded
fourth
amendment
constraints
see
jacobsen
reiterate
risk
public
safety
substantial
real
blanket
suspicionless
searches
calibrated
risk
may
rank
reasonable
example
searches
routine
airports
entrances
courts
official
buildings
see
von
raab
case
public
safety
genuinely
jeopardy
fourth
amendment
precludes
suspicionless
search
matter
conveniently
arranged
reasons
stated
judgment
appeals
eleventh
circuit
reversed
walker
chandler
et
petitioners
zell
miller
governor
georgia
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
eleventh
circuit
april
chief
justice
rehnquist
dissenting
fear
novelty
georgia
law
led
distort
fourth
amendment
doctrine
order
strike
notes
impliedly
turning
nose
georgia
first
apparently
remains
state
condition
candidacy
state
office
drug
test
ante
heed
oft
quoted
words
justice
brandeis
dissent
new
state
ice
liebmann
one
happy
incidents
federal
system
single
courageous
state
may
citizens
choose
serve
laboratory
try
novel
social
economic
experiments
without
risk
rest
country
novelty
vice
novel
experiments
course
must
comply
constitution
mere
novelty
strike
doubt
use
illegal
drugs
abuse
legal
drugs
one
major
problems
society
cases
involving
drug
use
extend
numerous
occupations
railway
employees
skinner
railway
labor
executives
border
patrol
officers
treasury
employees
von
raab
high
school
students
vernonia
school
dist
acton
machine
operators
paperworkers
misco
take
bolder
person
say
widespread
drug
usage
never
extend
candidates
public
office
governor
georgia
says
othing
record
hints
hazards
respondents
broadly
describe
real
simply
hypothetical
georgia
polity
ante
surely
state
need
wait
drug
addict
one
inclined
use
drugs
illegally
run
actually
become
governor
installs
prophylactic
mechanism
held
much
von
raab
first
petitioners
argue
program
unjustified
based
belief
testing
reveal
drug
use
covered
employees
pressing
argument
petitioners
point
service
testing
scheme
implemented
response
perceived
drug
problem
among
customs
employees
petitioners
first
contention
evinces
unduly
narrow
view
context
service
testing
program
implemented
petitioners
dispute
doubt
drug
abuse
one
serious
problems
confronting
society
today
little
reason
believe
american
workplaces
immune
pervasive
social
problem
normal
fourth
amendment
analysis
individual
expectation
privacy
important
factor
equation
perversely
relies
fact
candidate
office
gives
much
privacy
andidates
public
office
subject
relentless
scrutiny
peers
public
press
ante
reason
sustaining
fourth
amendment
claim
says
effect
kind
drug
test
candidates
required
georgia
law
unnecessary
scrutiny
already
subjected
reason
candidacy
enable
people
detect
drug
use
part
strange
holding
indeed
one
might
easily
say
railroad
employees
skinner
customs
officials
von
raab
subjected
sort
scrutiny
fellow
employees
supervisors
clear
teaching
cases
government
required
settle
sort
vague
uncanalized
scrutiny
fact
preventing
persons
use
illegal
drugs
concealing
fact
public
legitimate
government
interest
cases
indicate
government
may
require
drug
test
privacy
concerns
ordinarily
implicated
urinalysis
drug
testing
negligible
vernonia
supra
slip
procedures
used
collecting
analyzing
urine
samples
set
reduce
intrusiveness
process
georgia
law
candidate
may
produce
test
specimen
doctor
office
must
one
least
intrusive
types
urinalysis
drug
tests
conceivable
although
concedes
nonetheless
manages
count
factor
state
kind
test
person
tested
advance
notice
given
therefore
able
abstain
drug
use
necessary
period
time
one
may
sure
test
random
therefore
apt
ensnare
users
fault
intrusiveness
cf
von
raab
von
raab
described
compelling
government
interest
ensuring
many
covered
employees
use
drugs
even
duty
use
creates
risks
bribery
blackmail
government
entitled
guard
emphasis
added
risks
bribery
blackmail
high
level
officials
state
government
using
illegal
drugs
seem
least
significant
duty
customs
officials
even
important
however
treatment
third
class
tested
employees
von
raab
handle
classified
materials
relegates
discussion
ante
dismisses
although
lack
factual
development
record
von
raab
prevented
us
determining
handle
classified
materials
consider
weight
proffered
governmental
interest
readily
agree
government
compelling
interest
protecting
truly
sensitive
information
compulsion
circumstances
reasons
might
compromise
information
department
navyv
egan
also
agree
employees
seek
promotions
positions
handle
sensitive
information
required
submit
urine
test
service
screening
program
especially
positions
covered
category
require
background
investigations
medical
examinations
intrusions
may
expected
diminish
expectations
privacy
respect
urinalysis
test
lest
readers
expect
holding
case
extended
case
notes
drug
test
part
medical
examination
designed
provide
certification
candidate
general
health
ante
inconceivable
case
involving
sort
requirement
decided
differently
present
case
sort
urinalysis
involved
possible
basis
distinction
say
state
far
greater
interest
candidate
general
health
respect
propensity
use
illegal
drugs
sort
policy
judgment
surely
must
left
legislatures
rather
announced
high
federal
judiciary
nothing
fourth
amendment
part
constitution
prevents
state
enacting
statute
whose
principal
vice
may
seem
misguided
even
silly
members
affirm
judgment
appeals
footnotes
also
rejected
equal
protection
free
speech
pleasmade
petitioners
hold
incompatible
fourth
fourteenth
amendments
reach
petitioners
pleas
amicus
curiae
support
respondents
suggests
case
may
become
moot
continuing
controversy
regarding
completed
election
petitioners
sue
behalf
class
failed
assert
courts
intended
run
covered
state
office
future
election
see
brief
amicus
curiae
reject
suggestion
mootness
petitioner
chandler
represented
officer
plans
run
counsel
state
contest
representation
see
tr
oral
arg
see
also
defective
allegations
jurisdiction
curable
amendment
trial
appellate
stages
service
program
also
required
tests
individuals
promoted
transferred
positions
handle
classified
material
agreed
government
ha
compelling
interest
protecting
truly
sensitive
information
however
rule
aspect
program
see
record
clarify
whether
category
defined
regulation
encompas
sed
customs
employees
likely
gain
access
sensitive
information
treasury
employees
von
raab
applicant
promotion
transfer
know
precisely
action
taken
application
contrast
potential
candidate
knows
start
timing
relevant
events