new
york
class
argued
november
decided
february
two
new
york
city
police
officers
observed
respondent
driving
speed
limit
car
cracked
windshield
traffic
violations
new
york
law
stopped
emerged
car
approached
one
officers
officer
opened
car
door
look
vehicle
identification
number
vin
located
left
doorjamb
automobiles
officer
find
vin
doorjamb
reached
car
interior
move
papers
obscuring
area
dashboard
vin
located
later
model
automobiles
officer
saw
handle
gun
protruding
underneath
driver
seat
seized
gun
respondent
arrested
state
trial
denied
motion
suppress
gun
evidence
respondent
convicted
criminal
possession
weapon
appellate
division
new
york
upheld
conviction
new
york
appeals
reversed
holding
absence
justification
search
respondent
car
besides
traffic
violations
search
prohibited
gun
must
accordingly
excluded
evidence
held
new
york
appeals
decision
rest
adequate
independent
state
ground
deprive
jurisdiction
appeals
opinion
mentions
new
york
constitution
direct
conjunction
federal
constitution
makes
use
federal
new
york
cases
analysis
lacks
requisite
plain
statement
rests
state
grounds
moreover
determining
search
question
prohibited
looked
federal
constitution
state
statute
authorizes
officers
demand
drivers
reveal
vin
merely
holding
statute
provided
justification
search
pp
police
officer
action
searching
respondent
car
violate
fourth
amendment
pp
important
role
played
vin
pervasive
governmental
regulation
automobiles
efforts
federal
government
regulations
assure
vin
placed
plain
view
respondent
reasonable
expectation
privacy
vin
placement
papers
obscuring
vin
insufficient
create
privacy
interest
vin
pp
officer
search
sufficiently
unintrusive
constitutionally
permissible
light
respondent
lack
reasonable
expectation
privacy
vin
fact
officers
observed
respondent
commit
two
traffic
violations
concerns
officers
safety
pp
delivered
opinion
burger
blackmun
powell
rehnquist
joined
part
ii
brennan
marshall
stevens
joined
powell
filed
concurring
opinion
burger
joined
post
brennan
filed
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
marshall
stevens
joined
post
white
filed
dissenting
opinion
stevens
joined
post
steven
kartagener
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
mario
merola
marc
cogan
argued
cause
pro
hac
vice
respondent
brief
william
hellerstein
fred
inbau
wayne
schmidt
james
manak
david
crump
daniel
hales
james
murphy
francis
looney
filed
brief
americans
effective
law
enforcement
et
al
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
justice
delivered
opinion
case
must
decide
whether
order
observe
vehicle
identification
number
vin
generally
visible
outside
automobile
police
officer
may
reach
passenger
compartment
vehicle
move
papers
obscuring
vin
driver
stopped
traffic
violation
exited
car
hold
circumstances
police
officer
action
violate
fourth
amendment
afternoon
may
new
york
city
police
officers
lawrence
meyer
william
mcnamee
observed
respondent
benigno
class
driving
speed
limit
car
cracked
windshield
driving
cracked
windshield
speeding
traffic
violations
new
york
law
see
veh
traf
law
mckinney
respondent
followed
officers
ensuing
directive
pull
respondent
emerged
car
approached
officer
meyer
officer
mcnamee
went
directly
respondent
vehicle
respondent
provided
officer
meyer
registration
certificate
proof
insurance
stated
driver
license
meanwhile
officer
mcnamee
opened
door
respondent
car
look
vin
located
left
doorjamb
automobiles
manufactured
officer
find
vin
doorjamb
reached
interior
respondent
car
move
papers
obscuring
area
dashboard
vin
located
later
model
automobiles
officer
mcnamee
saw
handle
gun
protruding
one
inch
underneath
driver
seat
officer
seized
gun
respondent
promptly
arrested
respondent
also
issued
summonses
traffic
violations
undisputed
police
officers
reason
suspect
respondent
car
stolen
contained
contraband
respondent
committed
offense
traffic
violations
disputed
respondent
committed
traffic
violations
charged
day
arrest
issued
valid
driver
license
state
trial
denied
motion
suppress
gun
evidence
respondent
convicted
criminal
possession
weapon
third
degree
see
penal
law
mckinney
appellate
division
new
york
upheld
conviction
without
opinion
app
div
new
york
appeals
reversed
reasoned
police
officer
intrusion
undertaken
obtain
information
exposed
hidden
areas
car
therefore
constituted
search
although
recognized
search
vin
generally
involves
minimal
intrusion
limited
potential
locations
agreed
compelling
law
enforcement
interest
positively
identifying
vehicles
involved
accidents
automobile
thefts
thought
decisive
facts
case
reveal
reason
officer
suspect
criminal
activity
besides
traffic
infractions
act
protect
safety
state
statutory
provision
authorizes
officers
demand
drivers
reveal
vin
provided
justification
officer
entry
respondent
car
officer
taken
advantage
statute
asked
see
vin
respondent
moved
papers
away
intrusion
occurred
absence
justification
search
besides
traffic
infractions
new
york
appeals
ruled
gun
must
excluded
evidence
granted
certiorari
reverse
ii
respondent
asserts
without
jurisdiction
hear
case
decision
new
york
appeals
rests
adequate
independent
state
ground
disagree
opinion
new
york
appeals
mentions
new
york
constitution
direct
conjunction
constitution
cf
michigan
long
opinion
makes
use
federal
new
york
cases
analysis
generally
citing
proposition
see
opinion
lacks
requisite
plain
statement
rests
state
grounds
michigan
long
supra
accordingly
holding
michigan
long
directly
applicable
hen
state
decision
fairly
appears
rest
primarily
federal
law
interwoven
federal
law
adequacy
independence
possible
state
law
ground
clear
face
opinion
accept
reasonable
explanation
state
decided
case
way
believed
federal
law
required
respondent
claim
opinion
rested
independent
adequate
state
statutory
grounds
also
without
merit
new
york
appeals
hold
new
york
vehicle
traffic
law
prohibited
search
issue
rejecting
assertion
petitioner
merely
held
provided
justification
search
emphasis
added
determining
police
officer
action
prohibited
looked
federal
constitution
state
statute
moreover
new
york
adheres
general
rule
statutory
construction
resolve
case
courts
decide
constitutional
issues
see
ashwander
tva
brandeis
concurring
peters
new
york
city
housing
authority
since
new
york
appeals
discussed
statutory
constitutional
grounds
may
infer
believed
statutory
issue
insufficient
resolve
case
discussion
statute
therefore
constituted
independent
adequate
state
ground
iii
officer
observing
respondent
commit
two
traffic
violations
exit
car
attempted
determine
vin
respondent
automobile
reaching
remove
papers
obscuring
vin
officer
intruded
passenger
compartment
vehicle
vin
consists
dozen
digits
unique
vehicle
required
cars
trucks
see
cfr
vin
roughly
analogous
serial
number
deciphered
reveal
place
automobile
manufacturer
production
run
also
make
model
engine
type
place
manufacture
vehicle
see
vin
significant
thread
web
regulation
automobile
see
generally
fed
reg
ease
vin
allows
identification
particular
vehicle
assists
various
levels
government
many
ways
federal
government
vin
improves
efficacy
recall
campaigns
assists
researchers
determining
risks
driving
various
makes
models
automobiles
combination
state
insurance
laws
vin
reduces
number
injured
accidents
go
uncompensated
lack
insurance
conjunction
state
registration
requirements
safety
inspections
vin
helps
ensure
automobile
operators
driving
safe
vehicles
making
automobile
theft
difficult
vin
safeguards
property
also
life
limb
see
fed
reg
noting
stolen
vehicles
disproportionately
likely
involved
automobile
accidents
facilitate
vin
usefulness
laudable
governmental
purposes
federal
law
requires
vin
placed
plain
view
someone
outside
automobile
vin
passenger
cars
manufactured
shall
located
inside
passenger
compartment
shall
readable
without
moving
part
vehicle
vehicle
glazing
daylight
lighting
conditions
observer
vision
snellen
whose
eye
point
located
outside
vehicle
adjacent
left
windshield
pillar
character
vin
subject
paragraph
shall
minimum
height
mm
cfr
emphasis
added
citizen
surrender
protections
fourth
amendment
entering
automobile
see
delaware
prouse
supra
nonetheless
state
intrusion
particular
area
whether
automobile
elsewhere
result
fourth
amendment
violation
unless
area
one
constitutionally
protected
reasonable
expectation
privacy
katz
harlan
concurring
see
oliver
maryland
macon
recognized
physical
characteristics
automobile
use
result
lessened
expectation
privacy
therein
one
lesser
expectation
privacy
motor
vehicle
function
transportation
seldom
serves
one
residence
repository
personal
effects
car
little
capacity
escaping
public
scrutiny
travels
public
thoroughfares
occupants
contents
plain
view
cardwell
lewis
plurality
opinion
automobiles
unlike
homes
subject
pervasive
continuing
governmental
regulation
controls
including
periodic
inspection
licensing
requirements
everyday
occurrence
police
stop
examine
vehicles
license
plates
inspection
stickers
expired
violations
exhaust
fumes
excessive
noise
noted
headlights
safety
equipment
proper
working
order
south
dakota
opperman
factors
generally
diminish
reasonable
expectation
privacy
automobiles
applicable
fortiori
vin
discussed
vin
plays
important
part
pervasive
regulation
government
automobile
motorist
must
surely
expect
regulation
occasion
require
state
determine
vin
vehicle
individual
reasonable
expectation
privacy
vin
thereby
diminished
especially
true
case
driver
committed
traffic
violation
see
delaware
prouse
supra
foremost
method
enforcing
traffic
vehicle
safety
regulations
acting
upon
observed
violations
vehicle
stops
traffic
violations
occur
countless
times
day
occasions
licenses
registration
papers
subject
inspection
drivers
without
ascertained
emphasis
added
addition
unreasonable
expectation
privacy
object
required
law
located
place
ordinarily
plain
view
exterior
automobile
vin
mandated
visibility
makes
similar
exterior
car
trunk
glove
compartment
exterior
car
course
thrust
public
eye
thus
examine
constitute
search
see
cardwell
lewis
supra
sum
important
role
played
vin
pervasive
governmental
regulation
automobile
efforts
federal
government
ensure
vin
placed
plain
view
hold
reasonable
expectation
privacy
vin
think
makes
difference
papers
respondent
car
obscured
vin
plain
view
officer
recently
emphasized
efforts
restrict
access
area
generate
reasonable
expectation
privacy
none
otherwise
exist
see
oliver
supra
placement
trespassing
signs
secluded
property
create
legitimate
privacy
interest
marihuana
fields
object
issue
identification
number
behind
transparent
windshield
automobile
driven
upon
public
roads
believe
placement
obscuring
papers
insufficient
create
privacy
interest
vin
mere
viewing
formerly
obscured
vin
therefore
violation
fourth
amendment
evidence
respondent
sought
suppressed
vin
however
gun
handle
officer
saw
interior
car
reaching
papers
covered
vin
interior
automobile
subject
expectations
privacy
exist
respect
one
home
car
interior
whole
nonetheless
subject
fourth
amendment
protection
unreasonable
intrusions
police
agree
new
york
appeals
intrusion
space
constituted
search
cf
delaware
prouse
topping
automobile
detaining
occupants
constitute
seizure
even
though
purpose
stop
limited
resulting
detention
quite
brief
must
decide
therefore
whether
search
constitutionally
permissible
respondent
remained
car
police
justified
asking
move
papers
obscuring
vin
new
york
law
authorizes
demand
officers
see
vin
see
even
state
law
explicit
point
difficulty
concluding
demand
inspect
vin
like
demand
see
license
registration
papers
within
scope
police
authority
pursuant
traffic
violation
stop
see
prouse
supra
respondent
stayed
vehicle
acceded
request
officer
officer
needed
intrude
passenger
compartment
respondent
chose
however
exit
vehicle
without
removing
papers
covered
vin
officer
chose
conduct
search
without
asking
respondent
return
car
must
therefore
decide
whether
officer
acted
within
bounds
fourth
amendment
conducting
search
hold
keeping
driver
vehicle
car
routine
traffic
stop
probably
typical
police
practice
see
schultz
hunt
traffic
investigation
enforcement
nonetheless
concern
safety
police
held
officers
may
consistent
fourth
amendment
exercise
discretion
require
driver
commits
traffic
violation
exit
vehicle
even
though
lack
particularized
reason
believing
driver
possesses
weapon
pennsylvania
mimms
per
curiam
impute
respondent
propensity
violence
conscious
fact
respondent
voluntarily
left
vehicle
facts
case
may
used
illustrate
one
principal
justifications
discretion
given
police
officers
pennsylvania
mimms
driver
seat
respondent
loaded
pistol
hand
mimms
allows
officer
guard
possibility
requiring
driver
exit
car
briefly
clearly
mimms
also
allowed
officers
detain
respondent
briefly
outside
car
voluntarily
exited
completed
investigation
question
remains
however
whether
officers
effect
seizure
respondent
necessary
detain
briefly
outside
vehicle
also
effect
search
vin
may
necessary
detention
pistol
beneath
seat
course
disappear
respondent
closed
car
door
behind
returned
respondent
immediately
automobile
placed
officers
situation
holding
mimms
allows
officers
avoid
permitting
individual
detained
possible
access
dangerous
weapon
benefit
partial
concealment
provided
car
exterior
see
pennsylvania
mimms
supra
light
danger
officers
safety
presented
returning
respondent
immediately
car
think
search
obtain
vin
prohibited
fourth
amendment
fourth
amendment
terms
prohibits
unreasonable
searches
seizures
noted
ready
test
determining
reasonableness
balancing
need
search
seize
invasion
search
seizure
entails
camara
municipal
justifying
particular
intrusion
police
officer
must
able
point
specific
articulable
facts
taken
together
rational
inferences
facts
justifiably
warrant
intrusion
terry
ohio
omitted
brackets
terry
officer
safety
less
directly
served
detention
something
objectively
justifiable
suspicion
necessary
justify
intrusion
balance
tip
favor
legality
governmental
intrusion
pennsylvania
mimms
supra
officers
personally
observed
seized
individual
commission
traffic
offense
requesting
exit
vehicle
michigan
summers
officers
obtained
warrant
search
house
person
seized
leaving
came
upon
facts
pennsylvania
mimms
michigan
summers
differ
respects
facts
case
similarities
strong
enough
balancing
governmental
interests
governmental
intrusion
undertaken
cases
also
appropriate
three
factors
involved
mimms
summers
present
case
safety
officers
served
governmental
intrusion
intrusion
minimal
search
stemmed
probable
cause
focusing
suspicion
individual
affected
search
indeed
officers
probable
cause
stemmed
directly
observing
respondent
commit
violation
law
undertake
necessary
balancing
nature
quality
intrusion
individual
fourth
amendment
interests
importance
governmental
interests
alleged
justify
intrusion
place
conclusion
search
permissible
follows
recognized
delaware
prouse
governmental
interest
highway
safety
served
obtaining
vin
first
order
particular
method
obtaining
vin
justified
concern
officers
safety
critical
issue
intrusiveness
government
action
place
supra
blackmun
concurring
judgment
also
weighs
favor
allowing
search
search
focused
objective
intrusive
necessary
fulfill
objective
search
far
less
intrusive
formal
arrest
permissible
traffic
offense
new
york
law
see
veh
traf
law
mckinney
supp
crim
proc
law
mckinney
little
intrusive
demand
respondent
eyes
officers
move
papers
vin
clear
initial
objective
officer
law
present
one
two
locations
either
inside
doorjamb
atop
dashboard
thus
ordinarily
plain
view
someone
outside
automobile
neither
locations
subject
reasonable
expectation
privacy
officer
checked
locations
two
locations
officer
root
interior
respondent
automobile
proceeding
examine
vin
reach
compartments
open
containers
even
intrude
interior
checked
doorjamb
vin
intrude
officer
simply
reached
directly
unprotected
space
vin
located
move
offending
papers
hold
search
sufficiently
unintrusive
constitutionally
permissible
light
lack
reasonable
expectation
privacy
vin
fact
officers
observed
respondent
commit
two
traffic
violations
conclusion
expose
police
officers
potentially
grave
risks
without
significantly
reducing
intrusiveness
ultimate
conduct
viewing
vin
said
officers
entitled
part
undoubtedly
justified
traffic
stop
note
holding
today
authorize
police
officers
enter
vehicle
obtain
vin
vin
visible
outside
automobile
vin
plain
view
someone
outside
vehicle
justification
governmental
intrusion
passenger
compartment
see
judgment
new
york
appeals
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
petitioner
invites
us
hold
respondent
status
unlicensed
driver
deprived
reasonable
expectations
privacy
vehicle
officers
within
discretion
prohibited
respondent
driving
car
away
impounded
car
later
conducted
inventory
search
thereof
cf
south
dakota
opperman
police
may
conduct
inventory
search
car
impounded
multiple
parking
violations
nix
williams
discussing
inevitable
discovery
exception
exclusionary
rule
petitioner
also
argues
fourth
amendment
violation
police
arrested
respondent
see
veh
traf
law
mckinney
supp
crim
proc
law
mckinney
searched
passenger
compartment
time
arrest
cf
new
york
belton
arrested
respondent
searched
car
impounding
pursuant
arrest
see
cady
dombrowski
however
reach
questions
justice
powell
chief
justice
joins
concurring
join
opinion
write
emphasize
unique
important
governmental
interests
served
inspection
vehicle
identification
number
vin
officer
making
lawful
stop
vehicle
right
duty
inspect
vin
vin
visible
outside
vehicle
voluntarily
disclosed
driver
officer
may
enter
vehicle
extent
necessary
read
vin
explains
vin
essentially
serial
number
identifying
certain
features
vehicle
affixed
provides
effective
reliable
means
positive
identification
vehicle
vin
occupies
central
position
elaborate
federal
state
regulation
automobiles
frequently
depends
positive
identification
federal
regulations
direct
manufacturers
place
vin
location
plain
view
observer
standing
outside
vehicle
cfr
answered
correctly
question
presented
case
applying
conventional
fourth
amendment
analysis
believe
however
officer
efforts
observe
vin
need
subjected
scrutiny
courts
properly
apply
police
intruded
vehicle
arrest
search
evidence
crime
officer
lawfully
stopped
motor
vehicle
traffic
infraction
officer
entitled
inspect
license
registration
documents
see
delaware
prouse
pennsylvania
mimms
per
curiam
unquestionably
officer
also
may
look
windshield
observe
vin
record
without
implicating
fourth
amendment
concerns
respondent
contend
reasonably
contended
action
violates
federal
constitution
question
raised
facts
case
therefore
whether
fourth
amendment
offended
incremental
intrusion
resulting
officer
efforts
observe
vin
respondent
vehicle
lawfully
stopped
cf
pennsylvania
mimms
supra
problem
officer
vin
located
dashboard
behind
windshield
obscured
papers
sequence
events
transpired
well
stated
opinion
suffice
say
respondent
left
vehicle
talk
one
officers
officer
sought
determine
vin
automobile
officer
duty
required
see
vin
outside
car
driver
exited
vehicle
officer
entered
car
extent
necessary
move
papers
covering
vin
observed
handgun
protruding
beneath
front
seat
appeals
new
york
held
intrusion
unlawful
search
agreeing
search
occurred
today
sustains
officer
action
reasoning
familiar
cases
applying
fourth
amendment
principles
automobiles
view
fourth
amendment
question
may
stated
simply
whether
officer
efforts
inspect
vin
reasonable
finding
case
officer
entry
respondent
vehicle
opening
door
reaching
hand
dashboard
reasonably
necessary
achieve
lawful
purpose
respondent
remained
seat
observes
officer
properly
requested
remove
papers
obstructing
vin
absence
compliance
request
arrest
lawful
cf
people
ellis
lawful
traffic
stop
officers
properly
arrested
driver
failure
produce
license
identification
view
important
public
purposes
served
vin
system
minimal
expectation
privacy
vin
hold
police
officer
lawfully
stops
motor
vehicle
may
inspect
vin
remove
obstruction
preventing
inspection
driver
vehicle
either
unwilling
unable
cooperate
suggest
course
fourth
amendment
inapplicable
context
officer
may
use
vin
inspection
pretext
searching
vehicle
contraband
weapons
may
officer
undertake
entry
extensive
reasonably
necessary
remove
obstruction
read
vin
justice
brennan
justice
marshall
justice
stevens
join
concurring
part
dissenting
part
agree
decision
new
york
appeals
rest
adequate
independent
state
ground
see
michigan
long
therefore
join
part
ii
opinion
also
agree
police
conducted
search
respondent
vehicle
inspect
vehicle
identification
number
vin
ante
however
disagree
search
constitutionally
permissible
extent
respectfully
dissent
facts
bear
repetition
officers
meyer
mcnamee
pulled
respondent
observing
commit
minor
traffic
violations
respondent
emerged
car
closed
door
joined
officer
meyer
rear
vehicle
respondent
gave
officer
meyer
car
registration
certificate
proof
insurance
driver
license
meanwhile
without
first
examining
documents
unaware
respondent
driver
license
officer
mcnamee
opened
door
car
look
vin
doorjamb
finding
reached
inside
remove
papers
obstructing
view
vin
dashboard
mcnamee
saw
gun
handle
protruding
underneath
driver
seat
respondent
arrested
eventually
convicted
criminal
possession
weapon
issued
summonses
traffic
violations
mcnamee
conducted
search
even
though
undisputed
police
officers
reason
suspect
respondent
car
stolen
contained
contraband
respondent
committed
offense
traffic
violations
ante
ii
fourth
amendment
guarantees
right
people
secure
persons
houses
papers
effects
unreasonable
searches
seizures
fundamental
right
preserved
requirement
searches
conducted
pursuant
warrant
issued
independent
judicial
officer
california
carney
found
fourth
amendment
violation
certain
warrantless
police
searches
cars
see
carroll
narrow
exception
applies
searches
vehicles
supported
probable
cause
ross
officer
mcnamee
search
respondent
car
clearly
without
probable
cause
therefore
patently
unconstitutional
contrary
holding
rests
reasoning
logic
grounded
fourth
amendment
jurisprudence
rather
strained
irrelevant
analysis
substitute
absence
probable
cause
struggles
balance
governmental
interest
highway
safety
served
obtaining
vin
concern
officers
safety
nature
quality
intrusion
took
place
ante
takes
long
step
toward
balancing
oblivion
protections
fourth
amendment
affords
michigan
long
supra
brennan
dissenting
police
justification
whatever
let
alone
probable
cause
search
vin
therefore
amount
balancing
make
search
respondent
car
constitutional
says
much
important
role
played
vin
pervasive
governmental
regulation
automobile
holds
respondent
reasonable
expectation
privacy
vin
ante
aspect
analysis
particularly
baffling
course
vin
plays
significant
part
federal
state
schemes
regulating
automobiles
federal
regulations
require
vehicle
manufacturers
install
vins
may
read
outside
passenger
compartment
see
cfr
however
even
assuming
respondent
reasonable
expectation
privacy
vin
relevant
question
decide
officer
mcnamee
look
vin
outside
respondent
vehicle
searched
car
without
respondent
consent
order
locate
vin
focusing
object
search
vin
misses
issue
must
decide
whether
interior
search
car
discover
object
constitutional
regardless
whether
reasonable
expectation
privacy
vin
respondent
clearly
retained
reasonable
expectation
privacy
respect
area
searched
police
car
interior
noted
fact
certain
information
must
kept
may
public
nature
automatically
sanction
police
intrusion
private
space
order
obtain
cf
noting
state
law
requires
drivers
furnish
police
vehicle
identification
vehicles
mobile
subject
pervasive
government
regulation
individual
justifiable
expectation
privacy
vehicle
less
home
california
carney
supra
held
warrantless
searches
cars
may
sometimes
violate
fourth
amendment
searches
supported
probable
cause
see
carroll
supra
ross
supra
individual
operating
traveling
automobile
lose
reasonable
expectation
privacy
simply
automobile
use
subject
government
regulation
delaware
prouse
see
also
carroll
doctrine
declare
field
day
police
searching
automobiles
fourth
amendment
constrains
state
authority
search
automobiles
guise
regulation
fact
government
uses
vin
part
scheme
regulating
automobiles
insufficient
justify
search
passenger
compartment
retrieve
information
rather
ordinarily
case
car
search
vin
search
must
supported
probable
cause
see
supra
automobile
automobile
must
probable
cause
search
eliminate
requirement
officer
able
explain
reasons
actions
leaves
police
discretion
utterly
without
limits
pennsylvania
mimms
stevens
dissenting
case
police
clearly
lacked
probable
cause
search
vin
suggests
respondent
traffic
infractions
provided
requisite
probable
cause
ground
probable
cause
focusing
suspicion
individual
affected
search
ante
analysis
makes
mockery
fourth
amendment
question
respondent
traffic
offenses
gave
police
probable
cause
stop
car
demand
form
vehicle
identification
delaware
prouse
supra
sort
routine
traffic
stop
generally
gives
police
opportunity
inspect
vin
car
windshield
fourth
amendment
protections
evaporate
supplies
requisite
probable
cause
search
vin
visible
exterior
car
plainly
search
interior
vin
unnecessary
since
respondent
supplied
car
registration
certificate
suggestion
inadequate
supplies
iota
reasoning
support
holding
respondent
traffic
infractions
gave
police
probable
cause
search
vin
content
simply
conclude
governmental
interest
highway
safety
served
obtaining
vin
first
order
ante
although
agree
government
strong
interest
promoting
highway
safety
see
delaware
prouse
supra
fail
see
vin
search
conducted
advanced
interest
despite
lengthy
exposition
variety
purposes
served
vin
respondent
car
searched
identified
interests
officers
intended
identify
considered
unsafe
vehicle
done
without
searching
respondent
car
thus
mere
fact
state
utilizes
vin
conjunction
regulations
designed
promote
highway
safety
give
police
reason
search
information
every
time
motorist
violates
traffic
law
absent
reason
search
vin
government
admittedly
strong
interest
promoting
highway
safety
validate
intrusion
resulting
search
respondent
vehicle
iii
relying
pennsylvania
mimms
supra
michigan
summers
next
attempts
support
holding
ground
light
danger
officers
safety
presented
returning
respondent
immediately
car
uncover
vin
search
obtain
vin
prohibited
fourth
amendment
ante
neither
cited
decision
supports
argument
summers
police
detained
occupant
home
searched
pursuant
valid
warrant
held
seizure
constitutional
served
several
important
law
enforcement
interests
including
officer
safety
search
warrant
provided
reasonable
basis
police
determine
occupant
engaged
criminal
activity
therefore
detained
contrast
reason
officers
search
car
inspect
vin
officers
knew
respondent
committed
minor
traffic
violations
may
given
opportunity
inspect
vin
provide
reason
search
interior
car
mimms
police
stopped
automobile
traffic
infraction
ordered
driver
step
outside
vehicle
driver
emerged
officers
noticed
large
bulge
jacket
frisking
discovered
loaded
revolver
held
actions
protected
officer
safety
police
legitimately
order
driver
car
made
lawful
traffic
stop
unlike
situation
mimms
intrusion
case
search
respondent
vehicle
directly
serve
officer
safety
nevertheless
finds
returned
respondent
immediately
automobile
clear
papers
dashboard
obscuring
vin
placed
officers
situation
holding
mimms
allows
officers
avoid
ante
forgets
police
reason
search
interior
reason
return
respondent
car
thus
state
interest
protecting
officer
safety
validate
search
course
officers
reasonable
grounds
suspect
traffic
stop
presented
threat
safety
authorized
search
respondent
vehicle
weapons
see
michigan
long
however
neither
officer
ever
suggested
situation
posed
danger
specifically
found
facts
reveal
reason
officer
act
protect
safety
absence
even
slightest
suspicion
danger
search
respondent
car
justified
grounds
officer
safety
iv
finally
finds
critical
issue
intrusiveness
government
action
also
weighs
favor
allowing
search
ante
effort
minimize
extent
intrusion
see
ante
wo
wash
officer
mcnamee
clearly
searched
respondent
car
opening
door
reaching
passenger
compartment
remove
papers
dashboard
even
engage
excavation
search
exposed
areas
passenger
compartment
visible
outside
vehicle
narrow
intrusions
involved
terry
ohio
progeny
judged
balancing
test
rather
general
principle
fourth
amendment
seizures
must
supported
standards
probable
cause
intrusions
fell
far
short
kind
intrusion
associated
arrest
dunaway
new
york
search
conducted
substantially
intrusive
ordinary
traffic
stop
starkly
exposes
impropriety
strained
effort
sanction
mcnamee
patently
illegal
search
balancing
approach
place
justice
blackmun
noted
concern
emerging
tendency
part
convert
terry
decision
general
statement
fourth
amendment
requires
seizure
reasonable
cf
brennan
concurring
result
kolender
lawson
brennan
concurring
florida
royer
brennan
concurring
result
event
even
limited
search
justified
balancing
extent
intrusion
importance
governmental
interests
allegedly
served
alone
legalize
search
respondent
car
situations
approved
limited
intrusions
less
probable
cause
always
required
police
officer
able
point
specific
articulable
facts
taken
together
rational
inferences
facts
reasonably
warrant
intrusion
terry
ohio
see
michigan
long
supra
police
must
reasonable
belief
suspect
dangerous
may
gain
immediate
control
weapons
search
areas
passenger
compartment
weapons
may
placed
hidden
delaware
prouse
police
must
reasonable
suspicion
motorist
unlicensed
car
unregistered
either
vehicle
occupant
otherwise
subject
seizure
stop
automobile
detain
driver
police
must
reasonable
suspicion
vehicle
contains
illegal
aliens
order
stop
car
question
occupants
citizenship
case
respondent
traffic
infractions
give
police
reason
search
vin
police
offered
justification
reasonably
warrant
intrusion
sum
decision
today
still
another
steps
road
evisceration
protections
fourth
amendment
willingness
sanction
car
search
police
probable
cause
conduct
highlights
trend
however
find
holding
particularly
disturbing
none
factors
relies
upon
lack
reasonable
expectation
privacy
vin
officers
observing
respondent
commit
minor
traffic
violations
government
interest
promoting
highway
safety
shielding
officers
danger
allegedly
limited
nature
search
took
place
gave
police
reason
search
vin
disregards
admonition
justice
jackson
fourth
amendment
rights
mere
rights
belong
catalog
indispensable
freedoms
among
deprivations
rights
none
effective
cowing
population
crushing
spirit
individual
putting
terror
every
heart
uncontrolled
search
seizure
one
first
effective
weapons
arsenal
every
arbitrary
government
brinegar
dissenting
opinion
footnotes
notes
ease
vin
allows
identification
particular
vehicle
assists
various
levels
government
many
ways
ante
examples
explains
vin
improves
efficacy
recall
campaigns
assists
researchers
determining
risks
driving
various
makes
models
automobiles
helps
reduc
number
injured
accidents
go
uncompensated
lack
insurance
ensures
automobile
operators
driving
safe
vehicles
making
automobile
theft
difficult
safeguards
property
also
life
limb
ibid
analogy
respondent
emerged
car
without
vehicle
registration
certificate
driver
license
read
opinion
hold
police
searched
passenger
compartment
order
locate
documents
even
though
also
play
important
roles
state
regulation
automobiles
important
reasons
balancing
inquiries
conducted
except
limited
circumstances
place
brennan
concurring
result
protections
intended
framers
easily
disappear
consideration
balancing
multifarious
circumstances
presented
different
cases
dunaway
new
york
general
rule
framers
fourth
amendment
balanced
interests
involved
decided
seizure
reasonable
supported
judicial
warrant
based
probable
cause
place
supra
blackmun
concurring
judgment
justice
powell
concurring
opinion
joined
chief
justice
find
vin
visible
outside
vehicle
voluntarily
disclosed
driver
officer
may
enter
vehicle
extent
necessary
read
vin
ante
even
agree
standard
case
officer
mcnamee
searched
respondent
car
without
ever
asking
voluntarily
disclose
vin
location
justice
white
justice
stevens
joins
dissenting
police
officer
involved
case
entered
interior
respondent
automobile
area
protected
fourth
amendment
unreasonable
searches
seizures
car
may
searched
without
warrant
probable
cause
one
suggests
precondition
search
existed
entry
solely
remove
obstruction
prevented
vin
seen
outside
car
issue
whether
governmental
interest
obtaining
vin
entering
protected
area
sufficient
outweigh
owner
privacy
interest
interior
car
unprepared
least
reasons
gives
conclude
class
remained
car
refused
officer
order
turn
registration
certificate
remove
article
obscuring
vin
justification
entering
interior
car
necessary
read
vin
enter
search
registration
certificate
glove
compartment
may
cases
class
sanctioned
refusal
case
never
held
refusal
permit
search
glove
compartment
even
different
refusal
entry
find
registration
certificate
case
one
different
kind
refusal
nothing
nonconsensual
entry
search
without
probable
cause
without
emergent
circumstances
makes
difference
law
requires
vin
visible
outside
car
otherwise
requirement
vin
carried
prominent
location
trunk
car
justify
searches
area
whenever
stop
traffic
violation
thus
join
opinion
effect
holds
search
car
vin
permissible
whenever
legal
stop
whether
driver
even
asked
consent
nevertheless
class
unlicensed
police
constitutionally
required
merely
give
citation
let
unlicensed
driving
continue
arguably
one
officers
legally
driven
car
away
process
noticed
gun
car
towed
inspected
station
class
arrested
driving
without
license
entire
car
searched
eschews
possible
alternative
rationales
rests
judgment
grounds
accept