equal
employment
opportunity
commission
waffle
house
argued
october
decided
january
respondent
employees
must
sign
agreement
requiring
employment
disputes
settled
binding
arbitration
eric
baker
suffered
seizure
fired
respondent
filed
timely
discrimination
charge
equal
employment
opportunity
commission
eeoc
alleging
discharge
violated
title
americans
disabilities
act
ada
eeoc
subsequently
filed
enforcement
suit
baker
party
alleging
respondent
employment
practices
including
baker
discharge
disability
violated
ada
violation
intentional
done
malice
reckless
indifference
complaint
requested
injunctive
relief
eradicate
effects
respondent
past
present
unlawful
employment
practices
specific
relief
designed
make
baker
whole
including
backpay
reinstatement
compensatory
damages
punitive
damages
malicious
reckless
conduct
respondent
petitioned
federal
arbitration
act
faa
stay
eeoc
suit
compel
arbitration
dismiss
action
district
denied
relief
fourth
circuit
concluded
arbitration
agreement
baker
respondent
foreclose
enforcement
action
eeoc
party
contract
independent
statutory
authority
bring
suit
federal
district
venue
proper
nevertheless
held
eeoc
limited
injunctive
relief
precluded
seeking
relief
faa
policy
favoring
enforcement
private
arbitration
agreements
outweighs
eeoc
right
proceed
federal
seeks
primarily
vindicate
private
rather
public
interests
held
agreement
employer
employee
arbitrate
disputes
bar
eeoc
pursuing
judicial
relief
backpay
reinstatement
damages
ada
enforcement
action
pp
ada
directs
eeoc
exercise
enforcement
powers
remedies
procedures
set
forth
title
vii
civil
rights
act
enforcing
ada
prohibitions
employment
discrimination
basis
disability
following
amendments
title
vii
eeoc
authority
bring
suit
enjoin
employer
engaging
unlawful
employment
practices
pursue
reinstatement
backpay
compensatory
punitive
damages
title
vii
ada
actions
thus
statutes
unambiguously
authorize
eeoc
obtain
relief
seeks
prove
case
respondent
neither
statutes
cases
suggest
existence
arbitration
agreement
private
parties
materially
changes
eeoc
statutory
function
remedies
otherwise
available
pp
despite
faa
policy
favoring
arbitration
agreements
nothing
faa
authorizes
compel
arbitration
issues
parties
already
covered
agreement
faa
mention
enforcement
public
agencies
ensures
enforceability
private
agreements
arbitrate
otherwise
purport
place
restriction
nonparty
choice
judicial
forum
pp
fourth
circuit
based
decision
evaluation
competing
policies
implemented
ada
faa
rather
language
either
statutes
arbitration
agreement
baker
respondent
eeoc
prosecute
claim
baker
consent
prayer
relief
dictated
baker
lower
analysis
might
persuasive
charge
filed
exact
opposite
true
ada
clearly
makes
eeoc
master
case
conferring
authority
evaluate
strength
public
interest
stake
determine
whether
public
resources
committed
recovery
relief
moreover
appeals
attempt
balance
policy
goals
arbitration
agreement
clear
language
inconsistent
cases
holding
faa
require
parties
arbitrate
agreed
volt
information
sciences
board
trustees
leland
stanford
junior
eeoc
party
contract
agreed
arbitrate
claims
faa
proarbitration
policy
goals
require
agency
relinquish
statutory
authority
pursue
relief
regardless
forum
employer
employee
chosen
resolve
disputes
pp
although
employee
conduct
may
effectively
limit
relief
eeoc
obtain
example
employee
fails
mitigate
damages
accepts
monetary
settlement
see
ford
motor
eeoc
baker
sought
arbitration
indication
entered
settlement
negotiations
respondent
fact
ordinary
principles
res
judicata
mootness
mitigation
may
apply
eeoc
claims
mean
eeoc
claim
merely
derivative
recognized
several
situations
eeoc
stand
employee
shoes
see
occidental
life
ins
cal
eeoc
context
statute
specifically
grants
eeoc
exclusive
authority
choice
forum
prayer
relief
charge
filed
pp
reversed
remanded
stevens
delivered
opinion
kennedy
souter
ginsburg
breyer
joined
thomas
filed
dissenting
opinion
rehnquist
scalia
joined
equal
employment
opportunity
commission
petitioner
waffle
house
writ
certiorari
appeals
fourth
circuit
january
justice
stevens
delivered
opinion
question
presented
whether
agreement
employer
employee
arbitrate
disputes
bars
equal
employment
opportunity
commission
eeoc
pursuing
judicial
relief
backpay
reinstatement
damages
enforcement
action
alleging
employer
violated
title
americans
disabilities
act
ada
stat
et
seq
ed
supp
application
employment
respondent
eric
baker
agreed
dispute
claim
concerning
employment
settled
binding
arbitration
condition
employment
prospective
waffle
house
employees
required
sign
application
containing
similar
mandatory
arbitration
agreement
see
app
baker
began
working
grill
operator
one
respondent
restaurants
august
sixteen
days
later
suffered
seizure
work
soon
thereafter
discharged
baker
initiate
arbitration
proceedings
seven
years
since
termination
file
timely
charge
discrimination
eeoc
alleging
discharge
violated
ada
investigation
unsuccessful
attempt
conciliate
eeoc
filed
enforcement
action
respondent
federal
district
district
south
pursuant
ada
ed
civil
rights
act
added
stat
baker
party
case
eeoc
complaint
alleged
respondent
engaged
employment
practices
violated
ada
including
discharge
baker
disability
violation
intentional
done
malice
reckless
indifference
federally
protected
rights
complaint
requested
grant
injunctive
relief
eradicate
effects
respondent
past
present
unlawful
employment
practices
order
specific
relief
designed
make
baker
whole
including
backpay
reinstatement
compensatory
damages
award
punitive
damages
malicious
reckless
conduct
app
respondent
filed
petition
federal
arbitration
act
faa
et
stay
eeoc
suit
compel
arbitration
dismiss
action
based
factual
determination
baker
actual
employment
contract
included
arbitration
provision
district
denied
motion
appeals
granted
interlocutory
appeal
held
valid
enforceable
arbitration
agreement
baker
respondent
exist
proceeded
consider
effect
binding
arbitration
agreement
baker
waffle
house
eeoc
filed
action
name
public
interest
behalf
baker
reviewing
relevant
statutes
language
contract
concluded
agreement
foreclose
enforcement
action
eeoc
party
contract
independent
statutory
authority
bring
suit
federal
district
venue
proper
nevertheless
held
eeoc
precluded
seeking
relief
policy
goals
expressed
faa
required
giving
effect
baker
arbitration
agreement
majority
explained
eeoc
seeks
relief
charging
party
federal
policy
favoring
enforcement
private
arbitration
agreements
outweighs
eeoc
right
proceed
federal
circumstance
eeoc
public
interest
minimal
eeoc
seeks
primarily
vindicate
private
rather
public
interests
hand
eeoc
pursuing
injunctive
relief
balance
tips
favor
eeoc
enforcement
efforts
federal
public
interest
dominates
eeoc
action
therefore
according
appeals
employee
signed
mandatory
arbitration
agreement
eeoc
remedies
enforcement
action
limited
injunctive
relief
several
courts
appeals
considered
issue
reached
conflicting
conclusions
compare
eeoc
frank
nursery
crafts
employee
agreement
arbitrate
affect
eeoc
independent
statutory
authority
pursue
enforcement
action
injunctive
relief
backpay
damages
federal
eeoc
kidder
peabody
allowing
eeoc
pursue
injunctive
relief
federal
precluding
monetary
relief
merrill
lynch
pierce
fenner
smith
nixon
cert
denied
granted
eeoc
petition
certiorari
resolve
conflict
reverse
ii
congress
directed
eeoc
exercise
enforcement
powers
remedies
procedures
set
forth
title
vii
civil
rights
act
enforcing
ada
prohibitions
employment
discrimination
basis
disability
ed
accordingly
provisions
title
vii
defining
eeoc
authority
provide
starting
point
analysis
title
vii
enacted
authorized
private
actions
individual
employees
public
actions
attorney
general
cases
involving
pattern
practice
discrimination
eeoc
however
merely
authority
investigate
possible
conciliate
charges
discrimination
see
general
telephone
northwest
eeoc
congress
amended
title
vii
authorize
eeoc
bring
enforcement
actions
indeed
observed
amendments
created
system
eeoc
intended
bear
primary
burden
litigation
amendments
authorize
courts
enjoin
employers
engaging
unlawful
employment
practices
order
appropriate
affirmative
action
may
include
reinstatement
without
moreover
amendments
specify
judicial
districts
actions
may
mention
arbitration
proceedings
congress
amended
title
vii
allow
recovery
compensatory
punitive
damages
complaining
party
term
includes
private
plaintiffs
eeoc
amendments
apply
ada
claims
well
complaining
party
eeoc
may
bring
suit
enjoin
employer
engaging
unlawful
employment
practices
pursue
reinstatement
backpay
compensatory
punitive
damages
thus
statutes
unambiguously
authorize
eeoc
obtain
relief
seeks
complaint
prove
case
respondent
prior
amendments
recognized
difference
eeoc
enforcement
role
individual
employee
private
cause
action
occidental
life
ins
cal
eeoc
general
telephone
supra
occidental
presented
question
whether
eeoc
enforcement
actions
subject
statutes
limitations
govern
individuals
claims
engaging
unsuccessful
conciliation
process
eeoc
filed
suit
federal
district
behalf
female
employee
alleging
sex
discrimination
granted
defendant
motion
summary
judgment
ground
eeoc
claim
time
barred
eeoc
filed
suit
california
statute
limitations
run
reversed
procedural
structure
created
amendments
eeoc
function
simply
vehicle
conducting
litigation
behalf
private
parties
hold
otherwise
undermined
agency
independent
statutory
responsibility
investigate
conciliate
claims
subjecting
eeoc
inconsistent
limitations
periods
general
telephone
eeoc
sought
bring
discrimination
claim
behalf
female
employees
general
telephone
facilities
four
without
certified
class
representative
federal
rule
civil
procedure
relying
plain
language
title
vii
legislative
intent
behind
amendments
held
eeoc
required
comply
rule
need
look
authority
bring
suit
name
purpose
among
others
securing
relief
group
aggrieved
individuals
light
provisions
granting
eeoc
exclusive
jurisdiction
claim
days
employee
files
charge
concluded
eeoc
merely
proxy
victims
discrimination
enforcement
suits
considered
representative
actions
subject
rule
backdrop
decisions
occidental
general
telephone
congress
expanded
remedies
available
eeoc
enforcement
actions
include
compensatory
punitive
damages
language
statute
either
cases
suggesting
existence
arbitration
agreement
private
parties
materially
changes
eeoc
statutory
function
remedies
otherwise
available
iii
faa
enacted
stat
reenacted
codified
title
code
amended
since
enactment
title
vii
explained
purpose
reverse
longstanding
judicial
hostility
arbitration
agreements
existed
english
common
law
adopted
american
courts
place
arbitration
agreements
footing
contracts
gilmer
lane
faa
broadly
provides
written
provision
contract
evidencing
transaction
involving
commerce
settle
arbitration
controversy
thereafter
arising
contract
shall
valid
irrevocable
enforceable
save
upon
grounds
exist
law
equity
revocation
contract
employment
contracts
except
covering
workers
engaged
transportation
covered
act
circuit
city
stores
adams
faa
provides
stays
proceedings
federal
district
courts
issue
proceeding
referable
arbitration
orders
compelling
arbitration
one
party
failed
refused
comply
arbitration
agreement
see
read
provisions
manifest
liberal
federal
policy
favoring
arbitration
agreements
gilmer
absent
ambiguity
agreement
however
language
contract
defines
scope
disputes
subject
arbitration
see
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
faa
proarbitration
policy
operate
without
regard
wishes
contracting
parties
nothing
statute
authorizes
compel
arbitration
issues
parties
already
covered
agreement
faa
mention
enforcement
public
agencies
ensures
enforceability
private
agreements
arbitrate
otherwise
purport
place
restriction
nonparty
choice
judicial
forum
iv
appeals
based
decision
evaluation
competing
policies
implemented
ada
faa
rather
language
text
either
statutes
arbitration
agreement
baker
respondent
recognized
eeoc
never
agreed
arbitrate
statutory
claim
must
also
recognize
case
eeoc
party
arbitration
agreement
eeoc
independent
statutory
authority
vindicate
public
interest
opined
permitting
eeoc
prosecute
baker
claim
significantly
trample
strong
federal
policy
favoring
arbitration
baker
agreed
submit
claim
arbitration
effectuate
policy
distinguished
injunctive
relief
held
eeoc
barred
obtaining
latter
public
interest
served
eeoc
pursues
make
whole
relief
outweighed
policy
goals
favoring
arbitration
eeoc
seeks
broad
injunctive
relief
appeals
view
public
interest
overcome
goals
underpinning
true
eeoc
prosecute
claim
baker
consent
prayer
relief
dictated
baker
analysis
might
persuasive
charge
filed
exact
opposite
true
statute
eeoc
command
process
eeoc
exclusive
jurisdiction
claim
days
time
employee
must
obtain
letter
agency
prosecuting
claim
however
eeoc
files
suit
employee
independent
cause
action
although
employee
may
intervene
eeoc
suit
fact
eeoc
takes
position
may
pursue
claim
employee
behalf
even
employee
disavowed
desire
seek
relief
brief
petitioner
statute
clearly
makes
eeoc
master
case
confers
agency
authority
evaluate
strength
public
interest
stake
absent
textual
support
contrary
view
public
agency
province
determine
whether
public
resources
committed
recovery
relief
agency
makes
determination
statutory
text
unambiguously
authorizes
proceed
judicial
forum
respondent
dissent
contend
title
vii
supports
appeals
bar
relief
statute
limits
eeoc
recovery
appropriate
relief
determined
see
brief
respondent
post
thomas
dissenting
rely
provides
finding
liability
may
enjoin
respondent
engaging
unlawful
employment
practice
order
affirmative
action
may
appropriate
may
include
limited
reinstatement
hiring
employees
without
back
pay
equitable
relief
deems
appropriate
ed
emphasis
added
claim
provision
limits
remedies
available
directs
courts
eeoc
determine
relief
appropriate
proposed
reading
flawed
two
reasons
first
plain
language
statute
term
appropriate
refers
subcategory
claims
equitable
relief
damages
provision
authorizing
compensatory
punitive
damages
separate
section
statute
limited
language
dissent
responds
pointing
phrase
may
recover
arguing
provides
authority
prohibiting
relief
see
post
contention
highlights
second
error
proposed
reading
appropriate
may
recover
read
support
respondent
position
discretionary
language
constitute
authorization
per
se
rules
natural
reading
text
terms
obviously
refer
trial
judge
discretion
particular
case
order
reinstatement
award
damages
amount
warranted
facts
case
permit
announce
categorical
rule
precluding
expressly
authorized
form
relief
inappropriate
cases
employee
signed
arbitration
appeals
wisely
adopt
respondent
reading
instead
simply
sought
balance
policy
goals
faa
clear
language
title
vii
agreement
may
coherent
approach
inconsistent
recent
arbitration
cases
faa
directs
courts
place
arbitration
agreements
equal
footing
contracts
require
parties
arbitrate
agreed
volt
information
sciences
board
trustees
leland
stanford
junior
see
also
prima
paint
flood
conklin
mfg
purpose
congress
make
arbitration
agreements
enforceable
contracts
faa
bottom
policy
guaranteeing
enforcement
private
contractual
arrangements
mitsubishi
motors
soler
look
first
whether
parties
agreed
arbitrate
dispute
general
policy
goals
determine
scope
agreement
ambiguities
language
agreement
resolved
favor
arbitration
volt
override
clear
intent
parties
reach
result
inconsistent
plain
text
contract
simply
policy
favoring
arbitration
implicated
arbitration
faa
matter
consent
coercion
ambiguity
one
asserts
eeoc
party
contract
agreed
arbitrate
claims
goes
without
saying
contract
bind
nonparty
accordingly
proarbitration
policy
goals
faa
require
agency
relinquish
statutory
authority
agreed
even
policy
goals
underlying
faa
necessitate
limit
eeoc
statutory
authority
line
drawn
appeals
injunctive
relief
creates
uncomfortable
fit
avowed
purpose
preserving
eeoc
public
function
favoring
arbitration
purpose
category
relief
overinclusive
underinclusive
example
overinclusive
punitive
damages
benefit
individual
employee
also
serve
obvious
public
function
deterring
future
violations
see
newport
fact
concerts
punitive
damages
definition
intended
compensate
injured
party
rather
punish
tortfeasor
deter
others
similar
extreme
conduct
restatement
second
torts
punitive
damages
may
often
greater
impact
behavior
employers
threat
injunction
yet
eeoc
precluded
seeking
form
relief
appeals
compromise
scheme
underinclusive
injunctive
relief
although
seemingly
seen
closely
tied
employees
injury
public
interest
see
occidental
rehnquist
dissenting
injunctive
relief
may
appear
broad
based
nonetheless
redress
individuals
compromise
solution
reached
appeals
turns
effectively
forum
selection
clause
waiver
nonparty
statutory
remedies
federal
policy
favoring
arbitration
trumps
plain
language
title
vii
contract
eeoc
barred
pursuing
claim
outside
arbitral
forum
statutory
language
clear
eeoc
authority
pursue
relief
regardless
forum
employer
employee
chosen
resolve
rather
attempt
split
difference
persuaded
pursuant
title
vii
ada
whenever
eeoc
chooses
among
many
charges
filed
year
bring
enforcement
action
particular
case
agency
may
seeking
vindicate
public
interest
simply
provide
relief
employee
even
pursues
entirely
relief
hold
otherwise
undermine
detailed
enforcement
scheme
created
congress
simply
give
greater
effect
agreement
private
parties
even
contemplate
eeoc
statutory
true
respondent
amici
argued
baker
conduct
may
effect
limiting
relief
eeoc
may
obtain
example
failed
mitigate
damages
accepted
monetary
settlement
recovery
eeoc
limited
accordingly
see
ford
motor
eeoc
title
vii
claimant
forfeits
right
backpay
refuses
job
substantially
equivalent
one
denied
eeoc
goodyear
aerospace
employee
settlement
rendered
personal
claims
moot
eeoc
steel
individuals
litigated
claims
precluded
res
judicata
obtaining
individual
relief
subsequent
eeoc
action
based
claims
noted
goes
without
saying
courts
preclude
double
recovery
individual
general
telephone
question
concerning
validity
claim
character
relief
appropriately
awarded
either
judicial
arbitral
forum
presented
record
baker
sought
arbitration
claim
indication
entered
settlement
negotiations
respondent
open
question
whether
settlement
arbitration
judgment
affect
validity
eeoc
claim
character
relief
eeoc
may
seek
issue
whether
fact
baker
signed
mandatory
arbitration
agreement
limits
remedies
available
eeoc
text
relevant
statutes
provides
clear
answer
question
authorize
courts
balance
competing
policies
ada
faa
agency
judgment
concerning
remedies
authorized
law
shall
seek
given
case
moreover
simply
follow
cases
holding
employee
conduct
may
affect
eeoc
recovery
eeoc
claim
merely
derivative
recognized
several
situations
eeoc
stand
employee
shoes
see
occidental
eeoc
comply
state
statutes
limitations
general
telephone
eeoc
satisfy
rule
requirements
gilmer
eeoc
precluded
seeking
classwide
equitable
relief
behalf
employee
signed
arbitration
agreement
context
statute
specifically
grants
eeoc
exclusive
authority
choice
forum
prayer
relief
charge
filed
fact
ordinary
principles
res
judicata
mootness
mitigation
may
apply
eeoc
claims
contradict
decisions
render
eeoc
proxy
employee
judgment
appeals
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
equal
employment
opportunity
commission
petitioner
waffle
house
writ
certiorari
appeals
fourth
circuit
january
justice
thomas
chief
justice
justice
scalia
join
dissenting
holds
today
equal
employment
opportunity
commission
eeoc
commission
may
obtain
remedies
behalf
employee
agreed
arbitrate
discrimination
claims
employer
decision
conflicts
federal
arbitration
act
faa
et
basic
principle
eeoc
must
take
victim
discrimination
finds
absent
explicit
statutory
authorization
contrary
agree
eeoc
may
behalf
employee
employee
agreed
accordingly
affirm
judgment
appeals
starting
work
grill
operator
respondent
waffle
house
eric
scott
baker
filled
signed
employment
application
application
included
arbitration
clause
providing
dispute
claim
concerning
applicant
employment
waffle
house
subsidiary
franchisee
waffle
house
terms
conditions
benefits
employment
settled
binding
arbitration
app
dispute
arbitration
agreement
waffle
house
baker
falls
comfortably
within
scope
faa
see
circuit
city
stores
adams
provides
written
provision
contract
evidencing
transaction
involving
commerce
settle
arbitration
controversy
thereafter
arising
contract
transaction
shall
valid
irrevocable
enforceable
neither
contest
claims
arising
federal
employment
discrimination
laws
baker
claim
waffle
house
discharged
violation
americans
disabilities
act
ada
et
seq
ed
supp
may
subject
compulsory
arbitration
see
gilmer
lane
holding
claim
arising
age
discrimination
employment
act
adea
et
seq
ed
may
subject
compulsory
arbitration
therefore
dispute
baker
signing
arbitration
agreement
waived
ability
either
bring
ada
claim
waffle
house
consequently
obtain
relief
forum
eeoc
complaint
sought
obtain
relief
baker
seek
asking
make
baker
whole
providing
reinstatement
backpay
compensatory
damages
pay
baker
punitive
app
responses
interrogatories
directives
produce
filed
day
complaint
eeoc
stated
unambiguously
amounts
recovered
defendant
employer
litigation
received
directly
baker
based
charge
discrimination
defendant
employer
eeoc
also
admitted
bring
ing
action
behalf
eric
scott
baker
allowing
eeoc
obtain
remedies
baker
therefore
concludes
eeoc
may
behalf
baker
conclusion
rests
upon
following
premise
advanced
eeoc
arbitration
agreement
employer
employee
may
limit
remedies
commission
may
obtain
title
vii
grants
eeoc
right
obtain
statutory
remedies
action
brings
brief
petitioner
eeoc
contends
statute
clear
terms
authorizes
obtain
listed
forms
relief
referring
types
relief
set
forth
ed
including
injunctive
relief
reinstatement
backpay
well
forms
relief
listed
compensatory
punitive
damages
brief
petitioner
endorsing
eeoc
position
concludes
statutes
unambiguously
authorize
eeoc
obtain
relief
seeks
complaint
prove
case
respondent
ante
position
however
inconsistent
relevant
statutory
provision
eeoc
statutory
right
bring
suit
see
statutory
entitlement
obtain
particular
remedy
rather
plain
language
makes
clear
role
decide
whether
enjoin
respondent
order
affirmative
action
may
appropriate
may
include
limited
reinstatement
hiring
employees
without
back
pay
equitable
relief
deems
appropriate
emphasis
added
whether
particular
remedy
appropriate
given
case
question
see
albemarle
paper
moody
title
vii
scheme
implicitly
recognizes
may
cases
calling
one
remedy
another
choices
course
left
first
instance
district
courts
selgas
american
airlines
clear
title
vii
case
discretion
fashion
relief
comprised
equitable
remedies
sees
appropriate
parties
may
determine
equitable
remedies
available
congress
wished
give
eeoc
authority
determine
whether
particular
remedy
appropriate
clearly
knew
draft
language
effect
see
providing
eeoc
shall
authority
enforce
prohibition
employment
discrimination
within
federal
agencies
appropriate
remedies
including
reinstatement
hiring
employees
without
back
pay
effectuate
policies
section
congress
specifically
declined
grant
eeoc
authority
empowered
commission
bring
lawsuits
private
employers
original
house
version
original
senate
version
equal
employment
opportunity
act
granted
eeoc
powers
similar
possessed
national
labor
relations
board
adjudicate
complaint
implement
remedy
see
reprinted
legislative
history
equal
employment
opportunity
act
pp
bills
amended
however
reached
floor
houses
congress
replace
authority
power
prosecute
action
see
cong
rec
cong
rec
statutory
scheme
enacted
congress
thus
entitles
neither
eeoc
employee
upon
filing
lawsuit
obtain
particular
remedy
establishing
employer
discriminated
violation
cases
governs
provision
unambiguously
requires
determine
relief
appropriate
particular
ii
congress
given
eeoc
authority
usurp
traditional
role
courts
determine
constitutes
appropriate
relief
given
case
necessary
examine
whether
appropriate
allow
eeoc
obtain
relief
baker
notwithstanding
fact
baker
signing
arbitration
agreement
waived
ability
seek
relief
behalf
judicial
forum
two
reasons
conclude
appropriate
allow
eeoc
behalf
baker
baker
precluded
begin
eeoc
litigates
obtain
relief
behalf
particular
employee
commission
must
take
individual
finds
whether
eeoc
employee
files
particular
lawsuit
employee
ultimate
beneficiary
relief
relevance
employee
circumstances
therefore
change
simply
eeoc
rather
employee
litigating
case
must
consider
circumstances
fashioning
appropriate
result
eeoc
ability
obtain
relief
often
limited
actions
employee
whose
behalf
commission
may
wish
bring
lawsuit
employee
signs
agreement
waive
settle
discrimination
claims
employer
example
eeoc
may
recover
relief
employee
behalf
see
eeoc
cosmair
eeoc
goodyear
aerospace
see
also
eeoc
guidance
waivers
ada
civil
rights
laws
eeoc
compliance
manual
bna
apr
hereinafter
eeoc
compliance
manual
recognizing
valid
waiver
settlement
agreement
precludes
eeoc
recovering
relief
employee
addition
employee
fails
mitigate
damages
limits
ability
obtain
relief
whether
files
lawsuit
eeoc
files
action
behalf
see
ford
motor
eeoc
employee
unilateral
attempt
pursue
discrimination
claim
may
also
limit
eeoc
ability
obtain
relief
employee
rejects
merits
claim
private
lawsuit
brought
employee
example
res
judicata
bars
eeoc
recovering
relief
behalf
employee
later
action
see
eeoc
harris
chernin
aforementioned
situations
general
principle
applies
extent
eeoc
seeking
relief
particular
employee
able
obtain
relief
employee
employee
recover
bringing
lawsuit
eeoc
therefore
able
obtain
relief
baker
lawsuit
baker
waived
right
seek
relief
judicial
forum
signing
arbitration
agreement
concludes
eeoc
claim
merely
derivative
employee
claim
argues
recognized
several
situations
eeoc
stand
employee
shoes
see
ante
opinion
however
attacks
straw
man
case
turn
whether
eeoc
claim
wholly
derivative
employee
claim
like
appeals
question
eeoc
ability
seek
declaratory
injunctive
relief
case
particular
employee
baker
able
pursue
relief
rather
dispute
turns
whether
eeoc
ability
obtain
relief
dependent
upon
victim
ability
obtain
relief
claims
three
cases
support
argument
eeoc
claim
merely
derivative
employee
claim
see
gilmer
lane
occidental
life
ins
cal
eeoc
actual
nature
dispute
properly
understood
however
apparent
cases
support
position
none
suggests
eeoc
allowed
recover
relief
behalf
employee
waived
ability
obtain
relief
signing
valid
arbitration
agreement
gilmer
example
addressed
whether
arbitration
procedures
inadequate
discrimination
cases
allow
broad
equitable
relief
class
actions
rejecting
argument
noted
valid
arbitration
agreements
preclude
eeoc
bringing
actions
seeking
equitable
relief
ibid
conspicuously
absent
opinion
however
suggestion
eeoc
obtain
relief
behalf
employee
signed
valid
arbitration
agreement
cf
ibid
similarly
general
telephone
held
lawsuits
filed
eeoc
considered
representative
actions
federal
rule
civil
procedure
reaching
conclusion
noted
eeoc
merely
proxy
victims
discrimination
sure
agree
extent
eeoc
seeks
declaratory
equitable
relief
commission
undoubtedly
acts
representative
specific
employee
vindicate
public
interest
preventing
employment
discrimination
ibid
neither
dual
function
anything
general
telephone
detracts
proposition
eeoc
seeks
secure
relief
may
obtain
relief
individual
individual
obtain
even
eeoc
recognizes
dual
nature
see
eeoc
compliance
manual
citing
general
telephone
supra
compliance
manual
eeoc
every
charge
filed
eeoc
carries
two
potential
claims
relief
charging
party
claim
individual
relief
eeoc
claim
vindicate
public
interest
preventing
employment
discrimination
eeoc
compliance
manual
reason
private
agreement
eliminate
individual
right
personal
recovery
interfere
eeoc
right
enforce
ada
seeking
relief
benefit
public
victims
employer
unlawful
practices
validly
waived
claims
final
case
cited
occidental
life
ins
eeoc
held
state
statutes
limitations
apply
lawsuits
brought
eeoc
nlike
typical
litigant
statute
limitations
might
appropriately
run
eeoc
required
law
refrain
commencing
civil
action
discharged
administrative
duties
also
noted
statute
limitations
issue
case
circumstances
directly
conflict
timetable
administrative
action
expressly
established
act
precluding
eeoc
seeking
remedies
behalf
employee
signed
arbitration
agreement
however
way
impede
commission
discharging
administrative
duties
directly
conflict
provision
statute
fact
result
entirely
consistent
federal
policy
underlying
decision
occidental
employment
discrimination
claims
resolved
quickly
see
inappropriate
allow
eeoc
obtain
relief
behalf
baker
case
contravene
liberal
federal
policy
favoring
arbitration
agreements
embodied
faa
see
moses
cone
memorial
hospital
mercury
constr
terms
faa
waffle
house
arbitration
agreement
baker
valid
enforceable
see
part
supra
reasons
however
faa
implicated
case
eeoc
party
arbitration
agreement
goes
without
saying
contract
bind
nonparty
ante
analysis
entirely
misses
point
relevant
question
whether
eeoc
bound
baker
agreement
arbitrate
rather
whether
give
effect
arbitration
agreement
waffle
house
baker
whether
instead
allow
eeoc
reduce
arbitration
agreement
nullity
believe
faa
compels
former
allowing
eeoc
pursue
relief
behalf
baker
circumstances
eviscerates
baker
arbitration
agreement
waffle
house
liberates
baker
consequences
agreement
waffle
house
gains
nothing
anything
worse
cases
eeoc
brings
enforcement
action
continue
utilize
arbitration
agreements
future
face
prospect
defending
two
different
forums
two
different
parties
seeking
precisely
relief
face
eeoc
employee
arbitral
forum
decide
whether
arbitral
judgment
affect
validity
eeoc
claim
character
relief
eeoc
may
seek
ante
given
reasoning
opinion
however
proverbial
handwriting
wall
eeoc
indeed
master
case
ante
see
employee
independent
decision
pursue
arbitral
proceedings
affect
validity
eeoc
claim
later
case
determine
unfavorable
arbitral
judgment
employee
precludes
eeoc
seeking
similar
relief
employee
jurisprudence
stand
following
proposition
eeoc
may
seek
relief
employee
signed
arbitration
agreement
unless
employee
decides
rather
abide
agreement
arbitrate
claim
reconciling
result
faa
however
seem
impossible
task
make
mockery
rationale
underlying
holding
eeoc
master
case
ibid
assuming
means
says
arbitral
judgment
preclude
eeoc
claim
relief
going
forward
courts
adjust
damages
awards
avoid
double
recovery
see
ante
employee
instance
able
recover
arbitration
later
concludes
action
brought
eeoc
employee
actually
entitled
damages
one
assumes
award
eeoc
additional
give
employee
suppose
however
situation
reversed
arbitrator
awards
employee
later
determines
employee
entitled
damages
required
order
employee
return
employer
seriously
doubt
decision
thus
places
employers
utilizing
arbitration
agreements
serious
disadvantage
employees
allowed
two
bites
apple
one
arbitration
one
litigation
conducted
eeoc
able
benefit
favorable
two
rulings
result
however
discourages
use
arbitration
agreements
thus
completely
inconsistent
policies
underlying
faa
explicitly
decides
today
whether
fact
baker
signed
mandatory
arbitration
agreement
limits
remedies
available
eeoc
opinion
sets
path
logical
principled
stopping
point
example
statute
clearly
makes
eeoc
master
case
ante
filing
charge
puts
commission
command
process
likely
decision
employee
decision
enter
settlement
agreement
employer
longer
preclude
eeoc
obtaining
relief
employee
suggests
ordinary
principles
mootness
may
apply
eeoc
claims
ante
observation
given
reasoning
opinion
seems
largely
beside
point
go
without
saying
mootness
principles
apply
eeoc
claims
instance
eeoc
settles
claims
employer
commission
obviously
continue
pursue
claims
employee
settlement
agreement
employer
however
moot
action
brought
eeoc
preclude
eeoc
seeking
relief
rather
settlement
may
limit
eeoc
ability
obtain
relief
employee
signing
settlement
agreement
see
goodyear
aerospace
real
question
addressed
decision
today
whether
employee
enter
agreement
employer
limits
relief
eeoc
may
seek
employee
behalf
view
employee
compromise
eeoc
ability
obtain
particular
remedies
signing
arbitration
agreement
see
employee
may
permitted
exact
thing
signing
settlement
agreement
see
scherk
noting
one
purpose
faa
place
arbitration
agreements
upon
footing
contracts
citation
omitted
reasoning
example
forecloses
argument
inappropriate
award
relief
case
employee
already
settled
claim
statutory
provision
according
permit
announce
categorical
rule
precluding
expressly
authorized
form
relief
inappropriate
cases
employee
signed
arbitration
agreement
surely
constitute
authorization
per
se
rul
barring
eeoc
obtaining
remedies
behalf
employee
signed
valid
settlement
agreement
ante
unfortunately
therefore
likely
logic
opinion
eeoc
able
seek
relief
behalf
employees
already
settled
claims
result
however
contradict
suggestion
gilmer
employment
discrimination
disputes
settled
without
eeoc
involvement
importantly
discourage
employers
entering
settlement
agreements
thus
frustrate
congress
desire
expedite
relief
victims
discrimination
see
ford
motor
eeoc
occidental
life
resolve
employment
discrimination
disputes
see
encouraging
alternative
means
dispute
resolution
including
settlement
negotiations
avoid
litigation
ada
iii
rather
allowing
eeoc
undermine
valid
enforceable
arbitration
agreement
employer
employee
manner
sanctioned
today
choose
different
path
stated
courts
liberty
pick
choose
among
congressional
enactments
two
statutes
capable
duty
courts
absent
clearly
expressed
congressional
intention
contrary
regard
effective
pittsburgh
lake
erie
railway
labor
executives
case
think
eeoc
statutory
authority
enforce
ada
easily
reconciled
faa
congress
indicated
ada
enforcement
scheme
interpreted
manner
undermines
faa
rather
two
separate
places
congress
specifically
encouraged
use
arbitration
resolve
disputes
ada
first
ada
congress
stated
appropriate
extent
authorized
law
use
alternative
means
dispute
resolution
including
settlement
negotiations
conciliation
facilitation
mediation
factfinding
minitrials
arbitration
encouraged
resolve
disputes
arising
chapter
emphasis
added
second
congress
used
virtually
identical
language
encourage
use
arbitration
resolve
disputes
ada
civil
rights
act
see
pub
stat
eeoc
contends
provisions
apply
dispute
commission
signed
arbitration
agreement
waffle
house
provisions
encourage
arbitration
parties
consented
arbitration
reply
brief
petitioner
remarkably
eeoc
time
questions
whether
even
statutory
authority
take
step
see
brief
petitioner
result
eeoc
view
seems
congress
encouraged
use
arbitration
resolve
disputes
ada
situations
eeoc
wish
bring
enforcement
action
limiting
principle
however
nowhere
found
use
arbitration
resolve
disputes
ada
clearly
authorized
law
see
part
supra
consequently
see
indication
congress
intended
grant
eeoc
authority
enforce
ada
manner
undermines
valid
enforceable
arbitration
last
years
expanded
reach
scope
faa
holding
instance
statute
applies
even
claims
state
contrary
state
statutes
see
terminix
dobson
southland
keating
always
agreed
jurisprudence
area
see
supra
thomas
dissenting
seems
good
goose
good
gander
impose
faa
upon
absence
indication
congress
intended
result
see
southland
supra
dissenting
yet
refuse
interpret
federal
statute
manner
compatible
faa
especially
congress
expressly
encouraged
claims
federal
statute
resolved
arbitration
given
utter
lack
statutory
support
holding
conclude
decision
today
rooted
notion
employment
discrimination
claims
treated
differently
claims
context
arbitration
thought
however
decisively
repudiated
principle
gilmer
see
holding
arbitration
agreements
enforced
without
contravening
important
social
policies
furthered
adea
reasons
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
agreement
parties
agree
dispute
claim
concerning
applicant
employment
waffle
house
subsidiary
franchisee
waffle
house
terms
conditions
benefits
employment
including
whether
dispute
claim
arbitrable
settled
binding
arbitration
arbitration
proceedings
shall
conducted
commercial
arbitration
rules
american
arbitration
association
effect
time
demand
arbitration
made
decision
award
arbitrator
made
said
rules
shall
exclusive
final
binding
parties
heirs
executors
administrators
successors
assigns
costs
expenses
arbitration
shall
borne
evenly
parties
app
evidence
employment
practices
alleged
complaint
yet
presented
course
express
opinion
merits
eeoc
case
note
one
hand
state
human
rights
commission
also
investigated
baker
claim
found
basis
suit
hand
eeoc
chooses
file
suit
response
small
number
many
charges
received
year
see
infra
keeping
normal
appellate
practice
cases
arising
pleading
stage
assume
arguendo
eeoc
case
meritorious
one
member
panel
dissented
agreed
district
matter
fact
arbitration
clause
included
baker
actual
contract
employment
section
provides
powers
remedies
procedures
set
forth
sections
title
shall
powers
remedies
procedures
subchapter
provides
commission
attorney
general
person
alleging
discrimination
basis
disability
violation
provision
chapter
regulations
promulgated
section
title
concerning
employment
injunctions
appropriate
affirmative
action
equitable
relief
accrual
back
pay
reduction
back
pay
limitations
judicial
orders
finds
respondent
intentionally
engaged
intentionally
engaging
unlawful
employment
practice
charged
complaint
may
enjoin
respondent
engaging
unlawful
employment
practice
order
affirmative
action
may
appropriate
may
include
limited
reinstatement
hiring
employees
without
back
pay
payable
employer
employment
agency
labor
organization
case
may
responsible
unlawful
employment
practice
equitable
relief
deems
appropriate
back
pay
liability
shall
accrue
date
two
years
prior
filing
charge
commission
interim
earnings
amounts
earnable
reasonable
diligence
person
persons
discriminated
shall
operate
reduce
back
pay
otherwise
allowable
section
provides
district
place
subject
jurisdiction
shall
jurisdiction
actions
brought
subchapter
action
may
brought
judicial
district
state
unlawful
employment
practice
alleged
committed
judicial
district
employment
records
relevant
practice
maintained
administered
judicial
district
aggrieved
person
worked
alleged
unlawful
employment
practice
respondent
found
within
district
action
may
brought
within
judicial
district
respondent
principal
office
purposes
sections
title
judicial
district
respondent
principal
office
shall
cases
considered
district
action
might
brought
framework
assumes
federal
policy
favoring
arbitration
undermined
unless
eeoc
remedies
limited
failed
consider
however
benefits
arbitration
already
built
eeoc
statutory
duties
unlike
individual
employees
eeoc
pursue
claim
without
first
engaging
conciliation
process
thus
eeoc
ever
filed
suit
case
attempted
reach
settlement
respondent
also
neglected
take
account
eeoc
files
suit
small
fraction
charges
employees
file
example
fiscal
year
eeoc
received
charges
employment
discrimination
although
eeoc
found
reasonable
cause
charges
filed
lawsuits
intervened
others
equal
employment
opportunity
commission
enforcement
statistics
litigation
visited
http
contrast
employment
discrimination
lawsuits
filed
see
administrative
office
judicial
business
courts
table
numbers
suggest
eeoc
files
less
two
percent
antidiscrimination
claims
federal
indeed
even
among
cases
finds
reasonable
cause
eeoc
files
suit
less
five
percent
cases
surely
permitting
eeoc
access
relief
cases
employee
agreed
binding
arbitration
yet
brought
claim
arbitration
negligible
effect
federal
policy
favoring
arbitration
justice
thomas
notes
interpretation
title
vii
faa
depend
many
cases
eeoc
chooses
prosecute
particular
year
see
post
dissenting
opinion
yet
dissent
predicts
holding
reduce
arbitration
agreement
nullity
post
discourag
use
arbitration
agreements
post
discourage
employers
entering
settlement
agreements
post
claims
highly
implausible
given
eeoc
litigation
practice
past
years
speculating
impact
decision
might
behavior
employees
employers
think
worth
recognizing
eeoc
files
suit
less
one
percent
charges
filed
year
justice
thomas
implicitly
recognizes
distinction
qualifying
description
courts
role
determining
appropriate
relief
given
case
particular
case
see
post
appeals
holding
limited
holding
eeoc
may
pursue
relief
specific
individuals
waived
right
judicial
forum
volt
parties
construction
contract
agreed
arbitrate
disputes
relating
contract
specified
california
law
apply
one
party
sought
compel
arbitration
invoked
california
statute
authorizes
stay
arbitration
pending
resolution
related
litigation
third
parties
bound
agreement
inconsistent
rulings
possible
concluded
faa
california
statute
faa
confer
right
compel
arbitration
dispute
time
confers
right
obtain
order
directing
arbitration
proceed
manner
provided
parties
agreement
quoting
similarly
faa
enables
respondent
compel
baker
arbitrate
claim
expand
range
claims
subject
arbitration
beyond
provided
agreement
decision
mastrobuono
shearson
lehman
hutton
inconsistent
position
mastrobuono
reiterated
clear
contractual
language
governs
interpretation
arbitration
agreements
provision
case
ambiguous
read
agreement
favor
arbitration
faa
rules
distinguished
volt
ground
reviewing
federal
construction
contract
regardless
standard
review
case
appeals
recognized
eeoc
bound
agreement
much
clear
volt
mastrobuono
direct
courts
respect
terms
agreement
without
regard
federal
policy
favoring
arbitration
held
federal
statutory
claims
may
subject
arbitration
agreements
enforceable
pursuant
faa
agreement
determines
choice
forum
cases
recognized
agreeing
arbitrate
statutory
claim
party
forgo
substantive
rights
afforded
statute
submits
resolution
arbitral
rather
judicial
forum
mitsubishi
motors
soler
gilmer
lane
extent
appeals
construed
employee
agreement
submit
claims
arbitral
forum
waiver
substantive
statutory
prerogative
eeoc
enforce
claims
whatever
relief
whatever
forum
eeoc
sees
fit
obscured
crucial
distinction
ran
afoul
precedent
injunctive
relief
remedy
available
employee
signed
arbitration
agreement
little
incentive
file
charge
eeoc
greater
percentage
work
force
becomes
subject
arbitration
agreements
condition
employment
see
voluntary
arbitration
worker
disputes
endorsed
groups
wall
june
reporting
american
arbitration
association
estimates
million
employees
covered
arbitration
agreements
designating
administer
arbitration
proceedings
pool
charges
eeoc
choose
cases
best
vindicate
public
interest
likely
get
smaller
become
distorted
generally
reluctant
approve
rules
may
jeopardize
eeoc
ability
investigate
select
cases
broad
sample
claims
cf
eeoc
shell
oil
crucial
commission
ability
investigate
charges
systemic
discrimination
impaired
occidental
life
ins
cal
eeoc
footnotes
admittedly
case
involves
claim
ada
gilmer
addressed
compulsory
arbitration
context
adea
nevertheless
see
reason
employee
required
abide
agreement
arbitrate
ada
claim
assessing
whether
congress
precluded
enforcement
arbitration
agreement
respect
particular
statutory
claim
held
party
held
arbitration
agreement
unless
congress
evinced
intention
preclude
waiver
judicial
remedies
statutory
rights
issue
mitsubishi
motors
soler
text
ada
suggest
congress
intended
ada
claims
fall
outside
purview
faa
indeed
ada
expressly
encourages
use
arbitration
forms
alternative
dispute
resolution
rather
litigation
resolve
claims
statute
appropriate
extent
authorized
law
use
alternative
means
dispute
resolution
including
settlement
negotiations
conciliation
facilitation
mediation
factfinding
minitrials
arbitration
encouraged
resolve
disputes
arising
act
eeoc
prayer
relief
also
requested
enjoin
waffle
house
engaging
discriminatory
employment
practice
asked
order
waffle
house
institute
policies
practices
programs
provide
equal
employment
opportunities
qualified
individuals
disabilities
eradicate
effect
past
present
unlawful
employment
practices
app
appeals
concluded
baker
arbitration
agreement
preclude
eeoc
seeking
relief
waffle
house
appealed
ruling
see
although
eeoc
complaint
alleged
waffle
house
engaged
unlawful
employment
practices
violation
ada
mentioned
instances
discriminatory
conduct
part
waffle
house
discharge
baker
app
emphasis
added
title
ada
expressly
incorporates
powers
remedies
procedures
set
forth
title
vii
includes
procedures
applicable
enforcement
actions
well
equitable
relief
available
eeoc
also
points
title
vii
gives
eeoc
individual
victim
discrimination
choice
forum
eeoc
files
enforcement
action
see
since
statute
gives
victim
say
matter
eeoc
argues
employee
signing
arbitration
agreement
able
effectively
negate
ex
ante
eeoc
statutory
authority
choose
forum
brings
suit
brief
petitioner
wisely
rely
heavily
argument
since
nothing
appeals
decision
prevents
eeoc
choosing
file
suit
appropriate
judicial
district
set
forth
rather
appeals
holding
limits
remedies
eeoc
may
obtain
decides
institute
judicial
action
see
fact
implicitly
admits
much
contradicting
earlier
assertion
statutes
unambiguously
authorize
eeoc
obtain
relief
seeks
complaint
prove
case
respondent
ante
emphasis
added
later
concludes
statutory
scheme
gives
trial
judge
discretion
particular
case
order
reinstatement
award
damages
amount
warranted
facts
case
ante
similarly
eeoc
authority
obtain
legal
remedies
also
greater
employee
acting
behalf
title
enacted
part
civil
rights
act
pub
stat
provides
eeoc
employee
may
recover
compensatory
punitive
damages
addition
forms
relief
authorized
emphasis
added
nothing
however
alters
fundamental
proposition
judiciary
determine
relief
relief
plaintiffs
may
recover
statute
particular
plaintiff
entitled
statutory
language
purport
grant
eeoc
employee
absolute
right
obtain
damages
every
case
proven
discrimination
despite
operation
legal
doctrines
time
bar
accord
satisfaction
case
binding
agreement
arbitrate
agree
order
determine
whether
particular
remedy
appropriate
necessary
examine
specific
facts
case
hand
see
ante
reason
statutory
scheme
permit
us
announce
categorical
rule
barring
lower
courts
ever
awarding
form
relief
expressly
authorized
statute
set
facts
arises
different
cases
however
cases
adjudicated
consistent
manner
therefore
surely
may
specify
particular
circumstances
inappropriate
trial
courts
award
certain
types
relief
remedies
eeoc
consistently
recognized
commission
represents
individual
employees
files
action
case
instance
eeoc
stated
answers
interrogatories
brought
action
behalf
eric
scott
baker
see
part
supra
moreover
eeoc
maintained
numerous
cases
attorneys
relationship
charging
parties
communications
charging
parties
therefore
privileged
see
eeoc
johnson
higgins
dist
lexis
sdny
eeoc
mcdonnell
douglas
supp
ed
mo
recognized
remedies
also
serve
public
goals
antidiscrimination
statutes
see
mckennon
nashville
banner
publishing
nevertheless
eeoc
seeking
remedies
serving
public
interest
extent
employee
seeking
relief
litigation
arbitration
also
serving
public
interest
eeoc
seeking
broader
relief
unique
role
vindicating
public
interest
comes
fore
commission
motivation
secure
relief
likely
greater
individual
employee
may
primarily
concerned
securing
relief
also
reasons
faa
enables
respondent
compel
baker
arbitrate
claim
expand
range
claims
subject
arbitration
beyond
provided
ment
ante
explain
however
eeoc
ada
claim
baker
behalf
differs
meaningful
respect
ada
claim
baker
compelled
submit
arbitration
vast
majority
cases
individual
employee
arbitral
proceeding
resolved
parallel
action
brought
eeoc
see
maltby
private
justice
employment
arbitration
civil
rights
colum
human
rights
rev
reporting
arbitration
average
employment
discrimination
case
resolved
nine
months
average
employment
discrimination
case
filed
federal
district
resolved
almost
two
years
provision
appropriate
extent
authorized
law
use
alternative
means
dispute
resolution
including
settlement
negotiations
conciliation
facilitation
mediation
factfinding
minitrials
arbitration
encouraged
resolve
disputes
arising
acts
provisions
federal
law
amended
title
among
acts
provisions
federal
law
amended
civil
rights
act
ada
see
pub
stat
see
relevance
suggestion
decision
negligible
effect
federal
policy
favoring
arbitration
eeoc
brings
relatively
lawsuits
ante
view
either
eeoc
authorized
statute
undermine
valid
enforceable
arbitration
agreements
one
issue
case
one
read
commission
enforcement
authority
faa
harmonious
manner
jurisprudence
proper
interpretation
relevant
statutes
depend
many
cases
eeoc
chooses
prosecute
particular
year
simply
see
statutory
basis
implication
eeoc
authority
undermine
valid
enforceable
arbitration
agreements
long
commission
opts
interfere
relatively
limited
number
agreements