moncrieffe
holder
attorney
general
argued
october
decided
april
immigration
nationality
act
ina
noncitizen
convicted
aggravated
felony
deportable
iii
also
ineligible
discretionary
relief
ina
lists
aggravated
felony
illicit
trafficking
controlled
substance
relevant
includes
conviction
offense
controlled
substances
act
csa
makes
punishable
felony
one
year
imprisonment
see
conviction
state
law
constitutes
punishable
csa
proscribes
conduct
punishable
felony
federal
law
lopez
gonzales
petitioner
moncrieffe
jamaican
citizen
legally
found
police
grams
marijuana
car
pleaded
guilty
georgia
law
possession
marijuana
intent
distribute
federal
government
sought
deport
reasoning
conviction
aggravated
felony
possession
marijuana
intent
distribute
csa
offense
punishable
five
years
imprisonment
immigration
judge
ordered
moncrieffe
removed
board
immigration
appeals
affirmed
fifth
circuit
denied
moncrieffe
petition
review
rejecting
reliance
makes
marijuana
distribution
punishable
misdemeanor
offense
involves
small
amount
remuneration
holding
felony
provision
provides
default
punishment
offense
held
noncitizen
conviction
marijuana
distribution
offense
fails
establish
offense
involved
either
remuneration
small
amount
marijuana
aggravated
felony
ina
pp
categorical
approach
generally
employed
determine
whether
state
offense
comparable
offense
listed
ina
see
nijhawan
holder
noncitizen
actual
conduct
irrelevant
instead
state
statute
defining
crime
conviction
examined
see
whether
fits
within
generic
federal
definition
corresponding
aggravated
felony
gonzales
state
offense
categorical
match
conviction
offense
involved
facts
equating
generic
federal
offense
shepard
examines
state
conviction
necessarily
involved
facts
underlying
case
presumes
conviction
rested
upon
nothing
least
th
acts
criminalized
determining
whether
even
acts
encompassed
generic
federal
offense
johnson
pp
categorical
approach
applies
illicit
trafficking
controlled
substance
generic
crim
nijhawan
thus
state
drug
offense
must
meet
two
conditions
must
necessarily
proscribe
conduct
offense
csa
csa
must
necessarily
prescribe
felony
punishment
conduct
possession
marijuana
intent
distribute
clearly
federal
crime
question
whether
georgia
law
necessarily
proscribes
conduct
punishable
felony
csa
title
provides
certain
exceptions
violation
marijuana
distribution
statute
punishable
term
imprisonment
years
however
one
exceptions
provides
person
violates
statute
distributing
small
amount
marihuana
remuneration
shall
treated
simple
drug
possessor
misdemeanant
dovetailing
provisions
create
two
mutually
exclusive
categories
punishment
csa
marijuana
distribution
offenses
one
felony
fact
conviction
georgia
statute
standing
alone
reveal
whether
either
remuneration
small
amount
involved
moncrieffe
conviction
correspond
either
csa
felony
csa
misdemeanor
thus
conviction
necessarily
involve
facts
correspond
offense
punishable
felony
csa
pp
government
contrary
arguments
unpersuasive
government
contends
irrelevant
merely
mitigating
sentencing
factor
element
offense
understanding
inconsistent
holder
recognized
congress
chosen
define
generic
federal
offense
reference
punishment
may
necessary
take
account
federal
sentencing
factors
government
also
asserts
marijuana
distribution
conviction
presumptively
felony
csa
makes
neither
felony
misdemeanor
provision
default
government
approach
lead
absurd
result
conviction
statute
punishes
misdemeanor
conduct
nevertheless
categorical
aggravated
felony
government
proposed
remedy
anomaly
noncitizens
given
opportunity
immigration
proceedings
demonstrate
predicate
marijuana
distribution
convictions
involved
small
amount
marijuana
remuneration
inconsistent
ina
text
categorical
approach
government
procedure
require
nation
overburdened
immigration
courts
conduct
precisely
sort
post
hoc
investigation
facts
predicate
offenses
long
deemed
undesirable
require
uncounseled
noncitizens
locate
witnesses
years
fact
finally
government
concerns
consequences
decision
exaggerated
escaping
aggravated
felony
treatment
mean
escaping
deportation
marijuana
distribution
offense
still
render
noncitizen
deportable
controlled
substances
offender
found
aggravated
felon
noncitizen
may
seek
relief
removal
asylum
cancellation
removal
attorney
general
may
discretion
deny
relief
finds
noncitizen
actually
serious
drug
trafficker
pp
reversed
remanded
sotomayor
delivered
opinion
roberts
scalia
kennedy
ginsburg
breyer
kagan
joined
thomas
alito
filed
dissenting
opinions
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
adrian
moncrieffe
petitioner
eric
holder
attorney
general
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
april
justice
sotomayor
delivered
opinion
immigration
nationality
act
ina
stat
et
provides
noncitizen
convicted
aggravated
felony
may
deported
country
ina
also
prohibits
attorney
general
granting
discretionary
relief
removal
aggravated
felon
matter
compelling
case
among
crimes
classified
aggravated
felonies
thus
lead
harsh
consequences
illicit
drug
trafficking
offenses
must
decide
whether
category
includes
state
criminal
statute
extends
social
sharing
small
amount
marijuana
hold
ina
allows
government
deport
various
classes
noncitizens
overstay
visas
convicted
certain
crimes
including
drug
offenses
ordinarily
noncitizen
found
deportable
one
grounds
may
ask
attorney
general
certain
forms
discretionary
relief
removal
like
asylum
fear
persecution
home
country
cancellation
removal
among
things
lawfully
present
number
years
noncitizen
convicted
one
narrower
set
crimes
classified
aggravated
felonies
deportable
iii
also
ineligible
discretionary
forms
relief
see
ii
ina
defines
aggravated
felony
include
host
offenses
among
illicit
trafficking
controlled
substance
general
term
defined
ina
includ
es
drug
trafficking
crime
defined
section
title
ibid
turn
defines
drug
trafficking
crime
mean
felony
punishable
controlled
substances
act
two
statues
relevant
chain
definitions
ends
provides
felony
offense
maximum
term
imprisonment
authorized
one
year
upshot
noncitizen
conviction
offense
controlled
substances
act
csa
makes
punishable
one
year
imprisonment
counted
aggravated
felony
immigration
purposes
conviction
either
state
federal
law
may
qualify
state
offense
constitutes
punishable
controlled
substances
act
proscribes
conduct
punishable
felony
federal
law
lopez
gonzales
petitioner
adrian
moncrieffe
jamaican
citizen
came
legally
three
traffic
stop
police
found
grams
marijuana
car
equivalent
two
three
marijuana
cigarettes
moncrieffe
pleaded
guilty
possession
marijuana
intent
distribute
violation
code
ann
georgia
statute
providing
lenient
treatment
offenders
trial
withheld
entering
judgment
conviction
imposing
term
imprisonment
instead
required
moncrieffe
complete
five
years
probation
charge
expunged
app
brief
petitioner
alleging
georgia
conviction
constituted
aggravated
felony
federal
government
sought
deport
moncrieffe
government
reasoned
possession
marijuana
intent
distribute
offense
csa
punishable
five
years
imprisonment
thus
aggravated
felony
immigration
judge
agreed
ordered
moncrieffe
removed
app
pet
cert
board
immigration
appeals
bia
affirmed
conclusion
appeal
appeals
denied
moncrieffe
petition
review
rejected
moncrieffe
reliance
upon
provision
effect
makes
marijuana
distribution
punishable
misdemeanor
offense
involves
small
amount
marijuana
remuneration
held
federal
criminal
prosecution
default
sentencing
range
marijuana
distribution
offense
csa
felony
provision
rather
misdemeanor
provision
moncrieffe
georgia
offense
penalized
possession
marijuana
intent
distribute
concluded
equivalent
federal
felony
ibid
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflict
among
courts
appeals
respect
whether
conviction
statute
criminalizes
conduct
described
felony
provision
misdemeanor
provision
statute
punishes
marijuana
distribution
without
regard
amount
remuneration
conviction
offense
proscribes
conduct
punishable
felony
lopez
reverse
ii
government
alleges
state
conviction
qualifies
aggravated
felony
ina
generally
employ
categorical
approach
determine
whether
state
offense
comparable
offense
listed
ina
see
nijhawan
holder
gonzales
approach
look
facts
particular
prior
case
instead
whether
state
statute
defining
crime
conviction
categorically
fits
within
generic
federal
definition
corresponding
aggravated
felony
citing
taylor
generic
mean
offenses
must
viewed
abstract
see
whether
state
statute
shares
nature
federal
offense
serves
point
comparison
accordingly
state
offense
categorical
match
generic
federal
offense
conviction
state
offense
involved
facts
equating
generic
federal
offense
shepard
plurality
opinion
whether
noncitizen
actual
conduct
involved
facts
quite
irrelevant
ex
rel
guarino
uhl
hand
examine
state
conviction
necessarily
involved
facts
underlying
case
must
presume
conviction
rested
upon
nothing
least
th
acts
criminalized
determine
whether
even
acts
encompassed
generic
federal
offense
johnson
see
guarino
rule
without
qualification
first
cases
addressed
state
statutes
contain
several
different
crimes
described
separately
held
may
determine
particular
offense
noncitizen
convicted
examining
charging
document
jury
instructions
case
guilty
plea
plea
agreement
plea
colloquy
comparable
judicial
record
factual
basis
plea
nijhawan
quoting
shepard
second
focus
minimum
conduct
criminalized
state
statute
invitation
apply
legal
imagination
state
offense
must
realistic
probability
theoretical
possibility
state
apply
statute
conduct
falls
outside
generic
definition
crime
categorical
approach
long
pedigree
nation
immigration
law
see
das
immigration
penalties
criminal
convictions
resurrecting
categorical
analysis
immigration
law
rev
tracing
judicial
decisions
back
reason
ina
asks
offense
noncitizen
convicted
iii
acts
committed
onviction
relevant
statutory
hook
holder
slip
see
ex
rel
mylius
uhl
aggravated
felony
issue
illicit
trafficking
controlled
substance
generic
crim
nijhawan
categorical
approach
applies
ibid
explained
supra
aggravated
felony
encompasses
state
offenses
proscrib
conduct
punishable
felony
csa
lopez
words
satisfy
categorical
approach
state
drug
offense
must
meet
two
conditions
must
necessarily
proscribe
conduct
offense
csa
csa
must
necessarily
prescribe
felony
punishment
conduct
moncrieffe
convicted
georgia
statute
makes
crime
possess
one
control
manufacture
deliver
distribute
dispense
administer
purchase
sell
possess
intent
distribute
marijuana
code
ann
know
plea
agreement
moncrieffe
convicted
last
offenses
app
brief
petitioner
shepard
therefore
must
determine
whether
possession
marijuana
intent
distribute
necessarily
conduct
punishable
felony
csa
begin
relevant
conduct
criminalized
csa
question
federal
crime
possess
intent
distribute
controlled
substance
one
marijuana
far
state
federal
provisions
correspond
enough
generically
defined
federal
crime
felony
punishable
controlled
substances
act
offense
csa
thus
must
look
punishment
csa
imposes
offense
section
divided
two
subsections
relevant
titled
unlawful
acts
includes
offense
described
titled
penalties
subsection
tells
us
person
violates
subsection
shall
punished
depending
circumstances
crime
type
quantity
controlled
substance
involved
whether
repeat
offense
subsection
provides
person
commits
violation
subsection
involving
less
kilograms
marihuana
person
shall
except
provided
paragraphs
subsection
sentenced
term
imprisonment
years
felon
one
exceptions
important
paragraph
provides
notwithstanding
paragraph
subsection
person
violates
subsection
section
distributing
small
amount
marihuana
remuneration
shall
treated
simple
drug
possessor
purposes
means
dovetailing
provisions
create
two
mutually
exclusive
categories
punishment
csa
marijuana
distribution
offenses
one
felony
one
way
know
whether
marijuana
distribution
offense
punishable
felony
csa
lopez
know
whether
conditions
described
paragraph
present
absent
conviction
georgia
statute
sell
ing
marijuana
example
seem
establish
remuneration
presence
remuneration
mean
paragraph
implicated
thus
conviction
necessarily
conduct
punishable
felony
csa
paragraph
contrast
fact
conviction
possession
intent
distribute
marijuana
standing
alone
reveal
whether
either
remuneration
small
amount
marijuana
involved
possible
neither
know
georgia
prosecutes
offense
defendant
possesses
small
amount
marijuana
see
taylor
state
app
grams
distribution
require
remuneration
see
hadden
state
app
moncrieffe
conviction
correspond
either
csa
felony
csa
misdemeanor
ambiguity
point
means
conviction
necessarily
involve
facts
correspond
offense
punishable
felony
csa
categorical
approach
moncrieffe
convicted
aggravated
felony
iii
government
advances
different
approach
leads
different
result
view
misdemeanor
provision
irrelevant
categorical
analysis
paragraph
merely
mitigating
exception
csa
offense
one
elements
offense
brief
respondent
possession
intent
distribute
marijuana
presumptive
ly
felony
csa
government
asserts
state
offense
elements
presumptively
aggravated
felony
two
contentions
related
reject
first
government
reads
cases
hold
categorical
approach
concerned
elements
offense
relevant
categorical
analysis
enough
satisfy
categorical
inquiry
government
suggests
elements
moncrieffe
georgia
offense
csa
offense
possession
marijuana
controlled
substance
intent
distribute
understanding
inconsistent
decision
address
elements
sentencing
factors
recognized
congress
chosen
define
generic
federal
offense
reference
punishment
may
necessary
take
account
federal
sentencing
factors
see
slip
case
relevant
csa
offense
simple
possession
becomes
punishable
csa
sentencing
factor
recidivism
authorizes
additional
punishment
beyond
one
year
criterion
felony
scalia
concurring
judgment
slip
therefore
called
generic
federal
offense
recidivist
simple
possession
even
though
crime
actually
separate
offense
csa
rather
offense
elements
sentencing
factors
majority
opinion
slip
words
must
state
offense
conviction
meet
elements
generic
federal
offense
defined
ina
csa
must
punish
offense
felony
facts
giving
rise
csa
offense
establish
crime
may
either
felony
misdemeanor
depending
upon
presence
absence
certain
factors
elements
crime
qualify
aggravated
felony
conviction
predicate
offense
must
necessarily
establish
factors
well
government
attempts
distinguish
ground
sentencing
factor
narrow
aggravating
exception
turned
misdemeanor
felony
whereas
narrow
mitigation
exception
turns
felony
misdemeanor
brief
respondent
argument
hinges
upon
government
second
assertion
marijuana
distribution
conviction
presumptively
felony
simply
incorrect
government
argument
collapses
result
marijuana
distribution
neither
felony
misdemeanor
know
whether
conditions
paragraph
attach
section
makes
crime
punishable
five
years
imprisonment
except
provided
paragraph
makes
punishable
misdemeanor
otwithstanding
paragraph
small
amount
marihuana
remuneration
involved
emphasis
added
csa
text
makes
neither
provision
default
rather
drafted
exclusive
like
bia
fifth
circuit
government
believes
felony
provision
default
practice
federal
criminal
prosecutions
marijuana
distribution
operate
see
matter
aruna
brief
respondent
true
every
appeals
considered
question
held
defendant
eligible
sentence
government
proves
possessed
marijuana
intent
distribute
government
need
negate
factors
case
see
outen
describing
mitigating
exception
hamlin
collecting
cases
instead
burden
defendant
show
qualifies
lesser
sentence
cf
discount
text
however
creates
default
punishment
favor
procedural
overlay
burdens
proof
apply
hypothetical
federal
criminal
prosecution
rejected
fifth
circuit
approach
examined
whether
conduct
punished
felony
prosecuted
federal
slip
outcome
hypothetical
prosecution
relevant
inquiry
rather
focused
categorical
inquiry
whether
record
conviction
predicate
offense
necessarily
establishes
conduct
csa
terms
makes
punishable
felony
slip
analogy
federal
prosecution
misplaced
another
reason
appeals
cases
government
cites
distinguished
elements
sentencing
factors
determine
facts
must
proved
jury
light
sixth
amendment
concerns
addressed
apprendi
new
jersey
courts
considered
provision
complete
crime
upon
fewest
facts
outen
significant
apprendi
identify
jury
find
defendant
receive
maximum
sentence
concerns
apply
context
consider
generic
federal
offense
abstract
actual
federal
offense
prosecuted
jury
concern
facts
csa
relies
upon
distinguish
felonies
misdemeanors
facts
must
found
jury
opposed
judge
burden
proving
facts
federal
differences
made
clear
purposes
ina
generic
federal
offense
may
defined
reference
traditional
sense
sentencing
factors
slip
see
also
scalia
concurring
judgment
slip
describing
generic
federal
offense
controlled
substances
act
felony
indeed
distinction
elements
sentencing
factors
exist
congress
added
illicit
drug
trafficking
list
aggravated
felonies
abuse
act
stat
courts
time
understood
contain
sentencing
factors
draw
line
felony
misdemeanor
see
campuzano
controls
finally
fundamental
flaw
government
approach
render
even
undisputed
misdemeanor
aggravated
felony
english
language
tells
us
expect
leaves
us
wary
government
position
lopez
consider
conviction
new
york
statute
provides
person
guilty
criminal
sale
marihuana
fifth
degree
knowingly
unlawfully
sells
without
consideration
marihuana
aggregate
weight
two
grams
less
one
cigarette
containing
marihuana
penal
law
ann
west
emphasis
added
statute
criminalizes
distribution
small
amount
marijuana
remuneration
convictions
statute
fit
within
csa
misdemeanor
provision
government
categorically
deem
conviction
statute
aggravated
felony
statute
contains
corresponding
elements
distributing
marijuana
government
believes
marijuana
distribution
offenses
punishable
felonies
anomaly
result
case
noncitizen
convicted
misdemeanor
federal
directly
even
case
government
logic
need
treat
federal
misdemeanor
conviction
aggravated
felony
conviction
establishes
elements
offense
presumptively
felony
imagine
congress
took
trouble
incorporate
statutory
scheme
felonies
misdemeanors
courts
presume
felony
treatment
ignore
factors
distinguish
felonies
misdemeanors
lopez
recognizing
approach
leads
consequences
congress
intended
government
hedges
argument
proposing
remedy
noncitizens
given
opportunity
immigration
proceedings
demonstrate
predicate
marijuana
distribution
convictions
involved
small
amount
marijuana
remuneration
federal
criminal
defendant
sentencing
brief
respondent
procedure
adopted
bia
matter
castro
rodriguez
endorsed
justice
alito
dissent
post
solution
entirely
inconsistent
ina
text
categorical
approach
noted
relevant
ina
provisions
ask
noncitizen
convicted
inquiry
immigration
proceedings
limited
accordingly
iii
see
slip
government
cites
statutory
authority
factfinding
immigration
none
apparent
ina
indeed
government
main
categorical
argument
seem
preclude
inquiry
government
correct
fact
conviction
alone
constitutes
csa
felony
brief
respondent
marijuana
distribution
convictions
categorically
convictions
drug
trafficking
aggravated
felony
mandatory
deportation
follow
statute
room
government
factfinding
procedure
government
ways
moreover
procedure
government
envisions
require
precisely
sort
post
hoc
investigation
facts
predicate
offenses
long
deemed
undesirable
categorical
approach
serves
practical
purposes
promotes
judicial
administrative
efficiency
precluding
relitigation
past
convictions
minitrials
conducted
long
fact
chambers
see
also
mylius
yet
government
approach
nation
overburdened
immigration
courts
entertain
weigh
testimony
example
friend
noncitizen
may
shared
marijuana
cigarette
party
local
police
officer
recalls
contrary
cash
traded
hands
result
two
noncitizens
convicted
offense
might
obtain
different
aggravated
felony
determinations
depending
evidence
remains
available
perceived
individual
immigration
judge
categorical
approach
designed
avoid
potential
unfairness
taylor
see
also
mylius
furthermore
minitrials
government
proposes
possible
noncitizen
locate
witnesses
years
fact
notwithstanding
removal
proceedings
noncitizens
guaranteed
legal
representation
often
subject
mandatory
detention
little
ability
collect
evidence
see
katzmann
legal
profession
unmet
needs
immigrant
poor
geo
legal
ethics
brief
national
immigrant
justice
center
et
al
amici
curiae
brief
immigration
law
professors
amici
curiae
noncitizen
removal
proceedings
similarly
situated
defendant
federal
criminal
prosecution
government
suggestion
csa
procedures
readily
replicated
immigration
proceedings
therefore
misplaced
cf
slip
rejecting
government
argument
procedures
governing
determination
recidivism
sentencing
factor
satisfied
immigration
proceeding
government
defends
proposed
immigration
proceedings
subsequent
step
outside
categorical
approach
light
section
nature
brief
respondent
argument
rests
upon
nijhawan
considered
another
aggravated
felony
offense
involves
fraud
deceit
loss
victim
victims
exceeds
held
threshold
applied
categorically
required
component
generic
offense
instead
called
approach
allows
examination
immigration
particular
circumstances
offender
committed
crime
particular
occasion
nijhawan
government
suggests
factors
like
monetary
threshold
thus
similarly
amenable
inquiry
explained
nijhawan
however
unlike
provision
illicit
trafficking
controlled
substance
generic
crim
categorical
approach
applies
provision
see
also
slip
distinction
evident
structure
ina
monetary
threshold
limitation
written
ina
scope
aggravated
felony
fraud
monetary
threshold
set
words
calls
examination
conduct
involved
commission
offense
conviction
nijhawan
locating
exception
ina
proper
suggests
intent
relevant
facts
found
immigration
proceedings
ina
incorporates
criminal
statutes
wholesale
held
must
refer
generic
crimes
categorical
approach
applies
finally
government
suggests
immigration
task
daunting
cases
noncitizen
convicted
new
york
statute
previously
discussed
convicted
directly
true
cases
record
conviction
might
reveal
face
predicate
offense
punishable
misdemeanor
offenses
social
sharing
marijuana
minitrials
concerning
convictions
georgia
government
suggests
even
record
conviction
may
often
address
factors
noncitizens
advised
immigration
consequences
conviction
defense
counsel
required
padilla
kentucky
result
counsel
build
appropriate
record
facts
fresh
brief
respondent
even
assuming
defense
counsel
something
simply
required
effective
counsel
assumption
experience
always
bear
argument
unavailing
reason
believe
state
courts
regularly
uniformly
admit
evidence
going
facts
remuneration
irrelevant
offense
charged
short
avoid
absurd
consequences
flow
government
narrow
understanding
categorical
approach
government
proposes
solution
largely
undermines
categorical
approach
cure
worse
disease
suggests
government
simply
wrong
government
fears
consequences
decision
concerns
exaggerated
government
observes
like
georgia
half
criminalize
marijuana
distribution
statutes
require
remuneration
minimum
quantity
marijuana
result
government
contends
noncitizens
convicted
marijuana
distribution
offenses
avoid
aggravated
felony
determinations
purely
convictions
resolve
whether
offenses
involved
federal
felony
conduct
misdemeanor
conduct
even
though
many
prosecutions
involve
either
remuneration
larger
amounts
marijuana
escaping
aggravated
felony
treatment
mean
escaping
deportation
though
means
avoiding
mandatory
removal
see
slip
marijuana
distribution
offense
even
misdemeanor
still
render
noncitizen
deportable
controlled
substances
offender
point
found
aggravated
felon
noncitizen
may
seek
relief
removal
asylum
cancellation
removal
assuming
satisfies
eligibility
criteria
forms
relief
discretionary
attorney
general
may
discretion
deny
relief
finds
noncitizen
actually
member
one
world
dangerous
drug
cartels
post
opinion
alito
may
deny
relief
concludes
negative
equities
outweigh
positive
equities
noncitizen
case
reasons
result
extent
rejection
government
broad
understanding
scope
felony
may
practical
effect
policing
nation
borders
limited
one
slip
event
serious
drug
traffickers
may
adjudicated
aggravated
felons
regardless
likely
convicted
greater
trafficking
offenses
necessarily
establish
small
amount
marijuana
involved
see
code
ann
supp
separate
provision
trafficking
pounds
marijuana
course
offenders
conduct
fall
conduct
serious
conduct
required
trigger
trafficking
statute
brief
respondent
offenders
may
avoid
aggravated
felony
status
operation
categorical
approach
government
objection
underinclusive
result
little
attack
categorical
approach
prefer
degree
imperfection
heavy
burden
relitigating
old
prosecutions
see
supra
err
side
underinclusiveness
ambiguity
criminal
statutes
referenced
ina
must
construed
noncitizen
favor
see
slip
leocal
ashcroft
finally
government
suggests
holding
frustrate
enforcement
aggravated
felony
provisions
like
refers
federal
firearms
statute
contains
exception
antique
firearm
government
fears
conviction
state
firearms
law
lacks
exception
deemed
fail
categorical
inquiry
requires
realistic
probability
theoretical
possibility
state
apply
statute
conduct
falls
outside
generic
definition
crime
defeat
categorical
comparison
manner
noncitizen
demonstrate
state
actually
prosecutes
relevant
offense
cases
involving
antique
firearms
government
points
makes
passport
fraud
aggravated
felony
except
noncitizen
shows
committed
offense
assist
immediate
family
member
exception
provided
ina
held
nijhawan
inquiry
apply
provision
comparable
third
time
seven
years
considered
whether
government
properly
characterized
drug
offense
illicit
trafficking
controlled
substance
thus
aggravated
felony
hold
government
approach
defies
terms
slip
quoting
lopez
sharing
small
amount
marijuana
remuneration
let
alone
possession
intent
fit
easily
trafficking
means
sort
commercial
dealing
slip
quoting
lopez
sensible
state
statute
criminalizes
conduct
csa
treats
misdemeanor
designated
aggravated
felony
hold
may
noncitizen
conviction
marijuana
distribution
offense
fails
establish
offense
involved
either
remuneration
small
amount
marijuana
conviction
aggravated
felony
ina
contrary
judgment
appeals
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
thomas
dissenting
adrian
moncrieffe
petitioner
eric
holder
attorney
general
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
april
justice
thomas
dissenting
plain
reading
identifies
two
requirements
must
satisfied
state
offense
qualify
felony
punishable
controlled
substances
act
csa
first
offense
must
felony
second
offense
must
capable
punishment
csa
lopez
gonzales
thomas
dissenting
moncrieffe
offense
marijuana
intent
distribute
satisfies
elements
one
disputes
georgia
punishes
moncrieffe
offense
felony
see
code
ann
supp
except
otherwise
provided
subsection
code
section
code
section
person
violates
subsection
shall
guilty
felony
upon
conviction
thereof
shall
punished
imprisonment
less
one
year
ten
years
offense
punishable
csa
involved
possess
ion
intent
manufacture
distribute
dispense
controlled
substance
accordingly
moncrieffe
offense
drug
trafficking
crime
constitutes
aggravated
felony
immigration
nationality
act
ina
rejected
plain
meaning
lopez
defendant
convicted
state
felony
offense
misdemeanor
csa
held
offense
constitute
punishable
csa
punishable
felony
federal
law
quoting
emphasis
added
dissented
lopez
warned
inquiry
whether
state
offense
constitute
felony
hypothetical
federal
prosecution
cause
significant
inconsistencies
explained
one
inconsistency
arise
alien
defendant
never
convicted
actual
state
felony
subject
deportation
based
hypothetical
federal
prosecution
precise
issue
arose
holder
instead
following
logic
lopez
however
contorted
law
avoid
harsh
result
compelled
decision
defendant
convicted
crime
state
categorized
misdemeanor
offense
felony
csa
prior
conviction
slip
held
offense
constitute
aggravated
felony
state
prosecutor
charged
existence
prior
conviction
thus
defendant
actually
convicted
crime
punishable
felony
federal
law
slip
concurring
judgment
explained
decision
inconsistent
lopez
defendant
conduct
punishable
felony
csa
lopez
wrongly
decided
proper
reading
supported
result
slip
crime
conviction
misdemeanor
result
qualify
felony
punishable
csa
see
ibid
declined
apply
lopez
unwilling
apply
indeed
declined
follow
logic
lopez
natural
end
majority
approach
leads
anomalous
result
undisputed
federal
sentencing
purposes
moncrieffe
offense
constitute
federal
felony
unless
prove
distributed
small
amount
marijuana
remuneration
cf
outen
sotomayor
agreeing
government
mitigating
exception
default
provision
need
negate
factors
support
sentence
holds
purposes
ina
moncrieffe
offense
necessarily
correspond
federal
misdemeanor
regardless
whether
fact
prove
distributed
small
amount
marijuana
remuneration
ante
asserting
neither
default
provision
decision
thus
effect
treating
substantial
number
state
felonies
federal
misdemeanors
even
result
federal
felony
convictions
majority
notes
third
time
seven
years
considered
whether
government
properly
characterized
drug
offense
felony
ante
brought
upon
principle
uniting
lopez
decision
today
appears
government
consistently
loses
continues
disregard
plain
meaning
expect
types
cases
endlessly
needlessly
recur
respectfully
dissent
alito
dissenting
adrian
moncrieffe
petitioner
eric
holder
attorney
general
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
april
justice
alito
dissenting
decision
case
supported
language
immigration
nationality
act
ina
precedents
leads
results
congress
clearly
intend
ina
convicted
certain
offenses
may
removed
country
ed
supp
many
instances
attorney
general
acting
board
immigration
appeals
bia
discretion
cancel
aliens
convicted
especially
serious
crimes
however
ineligible
cancellation
removal
among
serious
crimes
carry
consequence
illicit
trafficking
controlled
substance
holding
today
however
drug
traffickers
half
granted
dispensation
even
alien
convicted
possessing
tons
marijuana
intent
distribute
alien
eligible
remain
country
marijuana
distribution
major
source
income
world
dangerous
drug
cartels
dept
justice
national
drug
intelligence
center
national
drug
threat
assessment
holds
alien
convicted
participating
activity
may
petition
remain
country
decision
also
means
consequences
conviction
illegal
possession
intent
distribute
vary
radically
depending
state
case
prosecuted
consider
example
alien
arrested
near
border
possession
large
supply
marijuana
holding
alien
prosecuted
convicted
georgia
possession
intent
distribute
eligible
cancellation
removal
instead
caught
florida
side
line
convicted
florida
possession
intent
distribute
small
amount
marijuana
remuneration
covered
separate
statutory
provision
compare
stat
alien
likely
ineligible
congress
intended
certainly
text
ina
support
result
analyzing
relevant
ina
provisions
starting
point
provides
lawful
permanent
resident
alien
subject
removal
may
apply
discretionary
cancellation
removal
convicted
aggravated
felony
term
aggravated
felony
encompasses
illicit
tracking
controlled
substance
including
drug
trafficking
crime
defined
latter
provision
defines
drug
trafficking
crime
include
felony
punishable
controlled
substances
act
et
thus
felony
punishable
csa
aggravated
felony
alien
prior
federal
conviction
straightforward
matter
determine
whether
conviction
felony
punishable
csa
introduces
complication
provision
statutory
definition
felony
applies
offense
described
paragraph
whether
violation
federal
state
law
emphasis
added
noted
statutory
definition
aggravated
felony
includes
felony
punishable
csa
therefore
makes
necessary
determine
meant
state
offense
felony
punishable
csa
obviously
contemplates
bia
identify
conduct
associated
state
offense
determine
whether
conduct
supported
qualifying
conviction
federal
identifying
evaluating
relevant
conduct
question
confounds
analysis
turning
question
however
preliminary
principles
established
lopez
gonzales
held
felony
status
controlled
federal
state
law
result
relevant
conduct
identified
must
determined
whether
proof
conduct
support
felony
conviction
csa
federal
definition
felony
crime
punishable
imprisonment
one
year
consequently
proof
relevant
conduct
support
conviction
csa
maximum
term
imprisonment
one
year
state
conviction
qualifies
conviction
felony
ii
brings
us
central
question
presented
case
determine
evaluate
conduct
constitutes
state
offense
one
possibility
conduct
irrelevant
elements
state
crime
alien
convicted
matter
called
categorical
approach
taylor
generally
used
approach
determining
whether
state
conviction
falls
within
federal
definition
crime
see
section
defines
felony
crime
punishable
imprisonment
year
element
crime
particular
case
involves
use
threat
force
read
context
phrase
burglary
ii
likely
refers
elements
statute
conviction
facts
defendant
conduct
discussed
also
departed
important
ways
pure
categorical
approach
opinion
case
conveys
impression
analysis
based
categorical
approach
simply
contrary
pure
categorical
approach
leads
quickly
conclusion
petitioner
georgia
conviction
conviction
aggravated
felony
elements
georgia
offense
follows
knowledge
possession
marijuana
intent
code
ann
son
state
app
proof
elements
sufficient
support
conviction
maximum
punishment
offense
imprisonment
five
years
supp
enough
qualify
felony
treatment
thus
pure
categorical
approach
petitioner
georgia
conviction
qualify
conviction
aggravated
felony
render
ineligible
cancellation
removal
departs
analysis
provides
means
defendant
convicted
violating
ed
may
lower
maximum
term
imprisonment
one
year
provision
person
violates
distributing
small
amount
marihuana
remuneration
shall
treated
defendant
convicted
simple
possession
defendant
convicted
lesser
offense
faces
maximum
punishment
one
year
imprisonment
provided
defendant
prior
simple
possession
conviction
supp
reading
provision
together
proceeds
csa
created
offense
base
offense
punishable
misdemeanor
offense
possession
intent
distribute
small
amount
possession
intent
distribute
remuneration
punishable
felony
csa
actually
created
offense
pure
categorical
approach
lead
conclusion
petitioner
georgia
conviction
aggravated
felony
elements
georgia
offense
suffice
prove
offense
require
proof
petitioner
possessed
small
amount
marijuana
intended
obtain
remuneration
distribution
instead
proof
elements
georgia
crime
merely
establish
violation
base
offense
misdemeanor
csa
however
contain
provision
alter
elements
offense
notes
every
appeals
consider
question
held
default
offense
mitigating
sentencing
guideline
see
outen
sotomayor
describing
mitigating
exception
hamlin
collecting
cases
disagree
ante
confirmation
interpretation
provided
use
term
small
amount
meant
alter
elements
congress
surely
used
vague
term
due
process
requires
elements
criminal
statute
defined
specificity
connally
general
constr
accordingly
apparent
modify
elements
instead
constitutes
essence
mandatory
sentencing
guideline
provision
defendant
convicted
violating
defendant
may
attempt
prove
possessed
small
amount
marijuana
intend
obtain
remuneration
distribution
defendant
succeeds
convincing
sentencing
judge
maximum
term
imprisonment
lowered
one
year
sum
contrary
impression
opinion
seeks
convey
analysis
follow
pure
categorical
approach
iii
analysis
supported
prior
case
law
claims
approach
follows
decision
holder
case
unlike
opinion
faithfully
pure
categorical
approach
alien
convicted
texas
simple
possession
controlled
substance
slip
time
conviction
prior
state
conviction
simple
possession
fact
charged
proved
trial
apparently
taken
account
setting
sentence
days
jail
slip
arguing
ineligible
cancellation
removal
government
maintained
second
possession
conviction
qualified
ina
conviction
aggravated
felony
slip
government
contended
second
prosecution
held
federal
punished
sentence
two
years
due
prior
simple
possession
conviction
slip
severe
sentence
however
required
federal
prosecutor
file
formal
charge
alleging
prior
conviction
given
opportunity
defend
charge
heightened
sentence
imposed
unless
found
prior
conviction
occurred
slip
rejection
government
argument
thus
represented
straightforward
application
pure
categorical
approach
elements
texas
offense
convicted
knowledge
intent
possession
controlled
substance
without
prescription
nothing
slip
tex
health
safety
code
ann
west
proof
prior
simple
possession
conviction
required
proof
appears
offered
maximum
penalty
imposed
federal
law
simple
possession
without
proof
prior
simple
possession
conviction
one
year
imprisonment
thus
proof
federal
elements
texas
offense
permitted
sentence
consequently
state
conviction
qualify
felony
punishable
csa
iv
unsupported
either
categorical
approach
prior
cases
decision
rests
instead
belief
share
application
pure
categorical
approach
case
lead
results
congress
surely
intend
suppose
alien
found
possess
two
marijuana
cigarettes
convicted
state
possession
intent
distribute
based
evidence
give
one
cigarettes
friend
pure
categorical
approach
alien
regarded
committed
aggravated
felony
classification
plainly
step
csa
assessment
severity
alien
crime
csa
alien
obtain
treatment
misdemeanant
taking
advantage
reason
agree
alien
treated
committed
aggravated
felony
order
avoid
result
however
necessary
depart
categorical
approach
done
particular
way
departed
little
recommend
begin
approach
analytically
confused
already
discussed
treats
modified
elements
fact
thing
obviously
knows
suggest
changes
elements
criminal
law
addition
approach
leads
strange
disruptive
results
noted
beginning
opinion
initial
matter
leads
major
drug
crimes
half
excluded
category
illicit
trafficking
controlled
substance
moreover
leads
significant
disparities
equally
culpable
defendants
adopted
categorical
avoid
disparities
treatment
defendants
convicted
different
committing
criminal
conduct
see
taylor
rejecting
view
state
law
determined
meaning
burglary
hat
mean
person
convicted
unlawful
possession
firearm
receive
sentence
enhancement
based
exactly
conduct
depending
whether
state
prior
conviction
happened
call
conduct
yet
reintroduces
significant
disparity
treatment
drug
offenders
avoided
candidly
acknowledging
categorical
approach
congress
wishes
make
federal
law
dependent
certain
prior
state
convictions
faces
difficult
task
ina
provisions
discussed
confront
problem
clear
objective
identify
categories
criminal
conduct
evidence
high
degree
societal
danger
alien
found
engaged
conduct
allowed
obtain
permission
remain
country
since
vast
majority
crimes
prosecuted
state
courts
congress
naturally
looked
state
well
federal
convictions
metric
identifying
dangerous
aliens
state
criminal
codes
vary
widely
state
crimes
defined
broadly
encompass
serious
much
less
serious
cases
cases
involving
state
provisions
pure
categorical
approach
may
frustrate
congress
objective
said
categorical
approach
finds
support
term
conviction
taylor
supra
shepard
never
held
pure
categorical
approach
dictated
use
think
ordinary
speech
said
person
convicted
something
something
may
include
facts
go
beyond
bare
elements
relevant
criminal
offense
example
might
said
art
thief
convicted
stealing
rembrandt
oil
painting
even
though
neither
identity
artist
medium
used
painting
elements
standard
offense
larceny
see
lafave
substantive
criminal
law
ed
reasons
departures
categorical
approach
warranted
already
sanctioned
departures
several
circumstances
see
taylor
supra
modified
categorical
approach
gonzales
categorical
approach
exclude
convictions
unless
realistic
probability
theoretical
possibility
state
apply
statute
conduct
falls
outside
generic
definition
crime
nijhawan
holder
interpreting
enumerated
aggravated
felony
generic
crime
consistent
flexibility
already
recognized
hold
categorical
approach
controlling
state
conviction
issue
based
state
statute
encompasses
substantial
number
cases
qualify
federal
standard
substantial
number
situations
appropriate
look
beyond
elements
state
offense
rely
well
facts
admitted
state
taking
realistic
view
clearly
proved
look
beyond
elements
particularly
appropriate
case
like
involves
civil
proceeding
expert
agency
regularly
undertakes
factual
inquiries
far
daunting
involved
see
negusie
holder
applying
approach
present
case
find
georgia
statute
petitioner
convicted
broadly
encompasses
relatively
minor
offenses
possession
small
amount
marijuana
intent
share
serious
crimes
possession
intent
distribute
large
amounts
marijuana
exchange
millions
dollars
profit
also
find
petitioner
opportunity
bia
show
criminal
conduct
fell
category
relatively
minor
offenses
carved
administrative
record
bia
takes
entirely
sensible
view
alien
convicted
possession
intent
distribute
may
show
conviction
aggravated
felony
proving
conduct
fell
within
matter
petitioner
whatever
reason
availed
opportunity
show
conviction
involved
small
amount
marijuana
present
evidence
even
contend
offense
involved
remuneration
administrative
record
result
think
alternative
affirm
decision
appeals
turn
affirmed
bia
footnotes
addition
asylum
noncitizen
fears
persecution
may
seek
withholding
removal
deferral
removal
convention
torture
cruel
inhuman
degrading
treatment
punishment
cat
art
treaty
doc
cfr
forms
relief
require
noncitizen
show
greater
likelihood
persecution
torture
home
necessary
asylum
attorney
general
discretion
deny
relief
noncitizen
establishes
eligibility
conviction
aggravated
felony
effect
cat
eligibility
render
noncitizen
ineligible
withholding
removal
sentenced
aggregate
term
imprisonment
least
years
aggravated
felonies
parties
agree
resolution
moncrieffe
georgia
case
nevertheless
conviction
ina
defines
term
see
brief
petitioner
brief
respondent
compare
case
garcia
holder
aggravated
felony
julce
mukasey
martinez
mukasey
aggravated
felony
wilson
ashcroft
construed
different
provision
ina
concerns
cancellation
removal
also
requires
determining
whether
noncitizen
convicted
aggravated
felony
emphasis
added
analysis
contexts
full
provides
except
authorized
subchapter
shall
unlawful
person
knowingly
intentionally
manufacture
distribute
dispense
possess
intent
manufacture
distribute
dispense
controlled
substance
pertinent
part
ed
supp
provide
except
otherwise
provided
section
title
person
violates
subsection
section
shall
sentenced
follows
case
less
kilograms
marihuana
except
case
marihuana
plants
regardless
weight
kilograms
hashish
one
kilogram
hashish
oil
person
shall
except
provided
paragraphs
subsection
sentenced
term
imprisonment
years
fine
exceed
greater
authorized
accordance
provisions
title
defendant
individual
defendant
individual
notwithstanding
paragraph
subsection
person
violates
subsection
section
distributing
small
amount
marihuana
remuneration
shall
treated
provided
section
title
section
title
although
paragraph
speaks
distributing
marijuana
parties
agree
also
applies
inchoate
offense
possession
intent
distribute
drug
matter
castro
rodriguez
bia
see
brief
petitioner
brief
respondent
csa
define
small
amount
bia
suggested
grams
serve
useful
guidepost
castro
rodriguez
noting
ina
exempts
deportable
controlled
substances
offenses
single
offense
involving
possession
one
use
grams
less
marijuana
meaning
small
amount
issue
case
need
define
term
justice
alito
statute
obviously
requires
examination
whether
conduct
associated
state
offense
supported
qualifying
conviction
federal
csa
post
dissenting
opinion
emphasis
added
see
also
post
echoes
fifth
circuit
approach
noted
text
opinion
explicitly
rejected
reasoning
based
conditional
perfect
formulations
see
also
slip
criticizing
approach
focuses
facts
known
immigration
serve
basis
state
conviction
punishment
emphasis
altered
instead
explained
supra
holding
depended
upon
fact
conviction
establish
fact
necessary
distinguish
misdemeanor
felony
punishment
csa
true
government
also
cites
provides
government
need
negative
exemption
exception
set
forth
csa
instead
burden
going
forward
evidence
respect
exemption
exception
shall
upon
person
claiming
benefit
brief
respondent
even
assuming
exception
applies
terms
trial
hearing
proceeding
csa
rather
different
proceedings
ina
addition
new
york
appears
separate
offenses
conduct
see
cal
health
safety
code
ann
west
supp
rev
stat
ann
stat
comp
ch
west
iowa
code
stat
stat
ann
supp
ohio
rev
code
ann
lexis
cum
supp
rev
stat
stat
tit
purdon
supp
codified
laws
supp
tex
health
safety
code
ann
west
code
ann
lexis
similarly
justice
alito
dissent
suggests
disagrees
first
premises
categorical
approach
says
strange
disruptive
resul
defendants
convicted
different
committing
criminal
conduct
might
suffer
different
collateral
consequences
depending
upon
define
statutes
conviction
post
yet
longstanding
natural
result
categorical
approach
focuses
criminal
conduct
defendant
commit
rather
facts
necessarily
established
conviction
state
offense
different
state
offenses
necessarily
establish
different
facts
track
uniform
federal
definition
generic
offense
taylor
whatever
disparity
may
create
defendants
whose
conduct
ensures
defendants
whose
convictions
establish
facts
treated
consistently
thus
predictably
federal
law
taylor
chief
concern
adopting
categorical
approach
see
footnotes
section
supp
increases
punishment
trafficking
marijuana
decreases
punishment
simple
possession
ounce
less
marijuana
neither
provision
applicable
moncrieffe
offense
possession
intent
distribute
correctly
points
moncrieffe
sentenced
offender
ante
provision
alter
felony
status
offense
rather
gives
courts
discretion
impose
probation
instead
imprisonment
without
entering
conviction
majority
recognizes
petitioner
waived
argument
convicted
immigration
nationality
act
ante
see
iii
providing
aliens
convicted
aggravated
felony
admission
deportable
providing
aliens
convicted
aggravated
felony
ineligible
cancellation
removal
defining
aggravated
felony
illicit
trafficking
controlled
substance
including
drug
trafficking
crime
defined
defining
drug
trafficking
crime
felony
punishable
csa
footnotes
alien
term
used
relevant
provisions
immigration
nationality
act
term
encompass
noncitizens
compare
defining
alien
include
person
citizen
national
defining
national
see
also
miller
albright
ginsburg
dissenting
disagreement
proposition
ante
difficult
understand
quite
plainly
suggests
held
state
conviction
qualify
aggravated
felony
must
determine
meant
state
felony
punishable
csa
way
identifying
set
relevant
conduct
asking
whether
based
conduct
alien
felony
prosecuted
csa
federal
referred
hypothetical
approach
addressing
entirely
different
question
specifically
set
conduct
relevant
holder
slip
held
relevant
set
conduct
consisted
fact
charged
proved
proceeding
set
conduct
proved
hypothetical
federal
proceeding
defends
interpretation
arguing
holder
recourse
hypothetical
approach
determining
criminal
prosecution
likely
proceeded
see
ante
true
enough
discussed
see
supra
categorical
approach
require
conjecture
whether
hypothetical
federal
prosecutor
likely
charge
prove
prior
conviction
mean
also
precludes
analysis
structure
federal
criminal
statute
hand
indeed
cases
done
little
else
see
supra
slip
discussing
procedural
protections
enjoyed
prosecuted
federally
gonzales
term
theft
offense
includes
crime
aiding
abetting
theft
offense
instead
adopted
categorical
approach
based
combination
factors
including
judicial
efficiency
see
taylor
practical
difficulties
potential
unfairness
factual
approach
daunting
cases
government
alleges
defendant
actual
conduct
fit
generic
definition
burglary
trial
determine
conduct