genesis
healthcare
corp
et
al
symczyk
argued
december
decided
april
respondent
brought
collective
action
fair
labor
standards
act
flsa
behalf
employees
similarly
situated
ignored
petitioners
offer
judgment
federal
rule
civil
procedure
district
finding
individuals
joined
suit
rule
offer
fully
satisfied
claim
concluded
respondent
suit
moot
dismissed
lack
jurisdiction
third
circuit
reversed
held
respondent
individual
claim
moot
collective
action
explaining
allowing
defendants
pick
named
plaintiffs
certification
calculated
rule
offers
frustrate
goals
collective
actions
case
remanded
district
allow
respondent
seek
conditional
certification
successful
relate
back
date
complaint
held
respondent
personal
interest
representing
putative
unnamed
claimants
continuing
interest
preserve
suit
mootness
suit
appropriately
dismissed
lack
jurisdiction
pp
courts
appeals
disagree
whether
unaccepted
rule
offer
fully
satisfies
plaintiff
individual
claim
sufficient
render
claim
moot
respondent
conceded
issue
properly
raise
thus
assumes
without
deciding
petitioners
offer
mooted
individual
claim
pp
mootness
principles
control
outcome
case
respondent
individual
claim
became
moot
suit
became
moot
personal
interest
representing
others
action
avoid
outcome
respondent
relies
cases
arose
context
rule
class
actions
inapposite
rule
actions
fundamentally
different
flsa
collective
actions
cases
inapplicable
facts
pp
neither
sosna
iowa
parole
geraghty
support
respondent
position
geraghty
extended
principles
sosna
held
class
action
rendered
moot
named
plaintiff
individual
claim
becomes
moot
class
duly
certified
denials
class
certification
motions
provided
action
acquired
independent
legal
status
district
erroneous
denial
class
certification
corrected
ruling
appeal
relates
back
time
erroneous
denial
however
geraghty
holding
explicitly
limited
cases
named
plaintiff
claim
remains
live
time
district
denies
class
certification
see
respondent
yet
moved
conditional
certification
claim
became
moot
district
anticipatorily
ruled
request
thus
certification
decision
claim
related
back
fundamentally
essential
sosna
geraghty
fact
putative
class
acquires
independent
legal
status
certified
rule
contrast
flsa
conditional
certification
produce
class
independent
legal
status
join
additional
parties
action
pp
line
cases
holding
inherently
transitory
claim
necessarily
moot
upon
termination
named
plaintiff
claim
see
county
riverside
mclaughlin
similarly
inapplicable
respondent
argues
defendant
use
rule
offers
pick
named
plaintiff
process
complete
renders
action
inherently
transitory
rationale
developed
address
circumstances
challenged
conduct
effectively
unreviewable
plaintiff
possessed
personal
stake
suit
long
enough
litigation
run
course
invariably
focused
fleeting
nature
challenged
conduct
giving
rise
claim
defendant
litigation
strategy
unlike
claim
injunctive
relief
damages
claim
evade
review
offer
full
settlement
insulate
claim
review
putative
plaintiffs
may
foreclosed
vindicating
rights
respondent
suit
remain
free
suits
pp
finally
deposit
guaranty
nat
bank
roper
support
respondent
claim
purposes
served
flsa
provisions
frustrated
defendants
use
rule
pick
named
plaintiffs
process
run
course
roper
named
plaintiffs
individual
claims
became
moot
district
denied
rule
class
certification
motion
entered
judgment
favor
based
defendant
offer
judgment
found
named
plaintiffs
appeal
denial
certification
possessed
ongoing
personal
economic
stake
substantive
controversy
namely
shift
portion
attorney
fees
expenses
successful
class
litigants
respondent
conceded
petitioners
offer
provided
complete
relief
asserted
continuing
economic
interest
shifting
attorney
fees
costs
moreover
roper
tethered
unique
significance
rule
class
certification
decisions
pp
reversed
thomas
delivered
opinion
roberts
scalia
kennedy
alito
joined
kagan
filed
dissenting
opinion
ginsburg
breyer
sotomayor
joined
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
genesis
healthcare
corporation
et
petitioners
laura
symczyk
writ
certiorari
appeals
third
circuit
april
justice
thomas
delivered
opinion
fair
labor
standards
act
flsa
et
provides
employee
may
bring
action
recover
damages
specified
violations
act
behalf
similarly
situated
employees
granted
certiorari
resolve
whether
case
justiciable
lone
plaintiff
individual
claim
becomes
moot
hold
justiciable
flsa
establishes
federal
overtime
guarantees
modified
contract
section
flsa
stat
amended
gives
employees
right
bring
private
cause
action
behalf
behalf
employees
similarly
situated
specified
violations
flsa
suit
brought
behalf
employees
known
collective
action
see
roche
sperling
respondent
formerly
employed
petitioners
registered
nurse
pennypack
center
philadelphia
pennsylvania
filed
complaint
behalf
persons
similarly
situated
app
respondent
alleged
petitioners
violated
flsa
automatically
deducting
minutes
time
worked
per
shift
meal
breaks
certain
employees
even
employees
performed
compensable
work
breaks
respondent
remained
sole
plaintiff
throughout
proceedings
sought
statutory
damages
alleged
violations
petitioners
answered
complaint
simultaneously
served
upon
respondent
offer
judgment
federal
rule
civil
procedure
offer
included
alleged
unpaid
wages
addition
reasonable
attorneys
fees
costs
expenses
may
determine
petitioners
stipulated
respondent
accept
offer
within
days
service
offer
deemed
withdrawn
respondent
failed
respond
allotted
time
period
petitioners
filed
motion
dismiss
lack
jurisdiction
petitioners
argued
offered
respondent
complete
relief
individual
damages
claim
longer
possessed
personal
stake
outcome
suit
rendering
action
moot
respondent
objected
arguing
petitioners
inappropriately
attempting
pick
named
plaintiff
process
unfold
district
found
undisputed
individuals
joined
respondent
suit
rule
offer
judgment
fully
satisfied
individual
claim
concluded
petitioners
rule
offer
judgment
mooted
respondent
suit
dismissed
lack
jurisdiction
appeals
reversed
agreed
potential
plaintiff
opted
suit
petitioners
offer
fully
satisfied
respondent
individual
claim
precedents
whether
offer
accepted
generally
moots
plaintiff
claim
nevertheless
held
respondent
collective
action
moot
explained
calculated
attempts
defendants
pick
named
plaintiffs
strategic
rule
offers
certification
short
circuit
process
thereby
frustrate
goals
collective
actions
determined
case
must
remanded
order
allow
respondent
seek
conditional
certification
district
respondent
successful
district
relate
certification
motion
back
date
respondent
filed
ibid
ii
article
iii
constitution
limits
jurisdiction
federal
courts
cases
controversies
restricts
authority
federal
courts
resolving
legal
rights
litigants
actual
controversies
valley
forge
christian
college
americans
separation
church
state
quoting
liverpool
new
york
philadelphia
commissioners
emigration
order
invoke
jurisdiction
plaintiff
must
demonstrate
possesses
legally
cognizable
interest
stake
outcome
action
see
camreta
greene
slip
quoting
summers
earth
island
institute
requirement
ensures
federal
judiciary
confines
constitutionally
limited
role
adjudicating
actual
concrete
disputes
resolutions
direct
consequences
parties
involved
corollary
requirement
actual
controversy
must
extant
stages
review
merely
time
complaint
filed
arizonans
official
english
arizona
quoting
preiser
newkirk
intervening
circumstance
deprives
plaintiff
personal
stake
outcome
lawsuit
point
litigation
action
longer
proceed
must
dismissed
moot
lewis
continental
bank
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
proceedings
courts
concluded
petitioners
rule
offer
afforded
respondent
complete
relief
thus
mooted
flsa
claim
see
wl
ed
may
respondent
contends
rulings
erroneous
petitioners
rule
offer
lapsed
without
entry
judgment
brief
respondent
amicus
curiae
similarly
urges
hold
petitioners
unaccepted
offer
moot
flsa
claim
affirm
appeals
basis
brief
courts
appeals
disagree
whether
offer
fully
satisfies
plaintiff
claim
sufficient
render
claim
reach
question
resolve
split
issue
properly
us
third
circuit
clearly
held
case
respondent
individual
claim
moot
acceptance
respondent
argument
contrary
alter
appeals
judgment
impermissible
absence
respondent
see
northwest
airlines
county
kent
trans
world
airlines
thurston
moreover
even
rule
apply
respondent
waiver
issue
still
prevent
us
reaching
district
respondent
conceded
offer
complete
relief
generally
moot
plaintiff
claim
point
plaintiff
retains
personal
interest
outcome
litigation
app
wl
respondent
made
similar
concession
brief
appeals
see
app
failed
raise
argument
brief
opposition
petition
certiorari
therefore
assume
without
deciding
petitioners
rule
offer
mooted
respondent
individual
claim
see
baldwin
reese
iii
turn
question
whether
respondent
action
remained
justiciable
based
allegations
complaint
straightforward
application
mootness
principles
compels
answer
absence
claimant
opting
respondent
suit
became
moot
individual
claim
became
moot
lacked
personal
interest
representing
others
action
flsa
authorizes
aggrieved
employee
bring
action
behalf
employees
similarly
situated
mere
presence
allegations
complaint
save
suit
mootness
individual
claim
order
avoid
outcome
respondent
relies
almost
entirely
upon
cases
arose
context
federal
rule
civil
procedure
class
actions
particularly
parole
geraghty
deposit
guaranty
nat
bank
roper
sosna
iowa
cases
inapposite
rule
actions
fundamentally
different
collective
actions
flsa
see
roche
scalia
dissenting
cases
terms
inapplicable
facts
follows
action
appropriately
dismissed
moot
respondent
contends
sufficient
personal
stake
case
based
statutorily
created
action
interest
representing
similarly
situated
employees
brief
respondent
support
argument
respondent
cites
decision
geraghty
turn
roots
sosna
neither
case
supports
position
sosna
held
class
action
rendered
moot
named
plaintiff
individual
claim
becomes
moot
class
duly
certified
reasoned
district
certifies
class
class
unnamed
persons
described
certification
acquire
legal
status
separate
interest
asserted
named
plaintiff
result
live
controversy
may
continue
exist
even
claim
named
plaintiff
becomes
moot
geraghty
narrowly
extended
principle
denials
class
certification
motions
held
action
acquired
independent
legal
status
described
sosna
district
erroneous
denial
class
certification
corrected
ruling
appeal
relates
back
time
erroneous
denial
certification
motion
geraghty
inapposite
explicitly
limited
holding
cases
named
plaintiff
claim
remains
live
time
district
denies
class
certification
see
respondent
yet
moved
conditional
certification
claim
became
moot
district
ruled
request
claim
instead
became
moot
prior
events
foreclosing
recourse
geraghty
simply
certification
decision
respondent
claim
related
back
fundamentally
essential
decisions
sosna
geraghty
fact
putative
class
acquires
independent
legal
status
certified
rule
flsa
contrast
conditional
certification
produce
class
independent
legal
status
join
additional
parties
action
sole
consequence
conditional
certification
sending
written
notice
employees
see
roche
supra
turn
become
parties
collective
action
filing
written
consent
even
respondent
secure
conditional
certification
ruling
remand
nothing
ruling
preserve
suit
mootness
respondent
also
advances
argument
based
separate
related
line
cases
held
inherently
transitory
claim
necessarily
moot
upon
termination
named
plaintiff
claim
like
decision
geraghty
line
cases
began
sosna
similarly
inapplicable
concluding
expiration
named
claim
following
certification
moot
class
action
sosna
suggested
named
plaintiff
individual
claim
becomes
moot
district
opportunity
rule
certification
motion
issue
otherwise
evade
review
certification
might
relate
back
filing
complaint
since
held
doctrine
may
apply
rule
cases
certain
persons
similarly
situated
continue
subject
challenged
conduct
claims
raised
inherently
transitory
trial
even
enough
time
rule
motion
class
certification
proposed
representative
individual
interest
expires
county
riverside
mclaughlin
quoting
geraghty
supra
turn
citing
gerstein
pugh
invoking
doctrine
respondent
argues
defendants
strategically
use
rule
offers
pick
named
plaintiffs
process
complete
rendering
collective
actions
transitory
effect
brief
respondent
cases
invoking
inherently
transitory
rationale
apply
inherently
transitory
rationale
developed
address
circumstances
challenged
conduct
effectively
unreviewable
plaintiff
possessed
personal
stake
suit
long
enough
litigation
run
course
plaintiff
might
seek
instance
bring
class
action
challenging
constitutionality
temporary
pretrial
detentions
named
plaintiff
face
considerable
challenge
preserving
individual
claim
mootness
since
pretrial
custody
likely
end
prior
resolution
claim
see
gerstein
supra
address
problem
explained
cases
transitory
nature
conduct
giving
rise
suit
effectively
insulate
defendants
conduct
review
certification
potentially
relate
back
filing
complaint
mclaughlin
supra
doctrine
invariably
focused
fleeting
nature
challenged
conduct
giving
rise
claim
defendant
litigation
strategy
see
swisher
brady
spencer
kemna
case
respondent
complaint
requested
statutory
damages
unlike
claims
injunctive
relief
challenging
ongoing
conduct
claim
damages
evade
review
remains
live
settled
judicially
resolved
barred
statute
limitations
defendant
attempt
obtain
settlement
insulate
claim
review
full
settlement
offer
addresses
plaintiff
alleged
harm
making
plaintiff
whole
settlement
may
collateral
effect
foreclosing
unjoined
claimants
rights
vindicated
respondent
suit
putative
plaintiffs
remain
free
vindicate
rights
suits
less
able
claims
settled
adjudicated
following
respondent
suit
suit
never
filed
finally
respondent
argues
purposes
served
flsa
provisions
example
efficient
resolution
common
claims
lower
individual
costs
associated
litigation
frustrated
defendants
use
rule
pick
named
plaintiffs
process
run
course
respondent
appeals
purported
find
support
position
decision
roper
roper
named
plaintiffs
individual
claims
became
moot
district
denied
motion
class
certification
rule
subsequently
entered
judgment
favor
based
defendant
bank
offer
judgment
maximum
recoverable
amount
damages
addition
interest
costs
held
even
though
district
entered
judgment
named
plaintiffs
favor
nevertheless
appeal
denial
motion
certify
class
found
particular
circumstances
case
named
plaintiffs
possessed
ongoing
personal
economic
stake
substantive
controversy
namely
shift
portion
attorney
fees
expenses
successful
class
dicta
underscore
importance
district
class
certification
decision
observe
allowing
defendants
party
plaintiffs
affirmative
ruling
achieved
frustrate
objectives
class
actions
roper
holding
turned
specific
factual
finding
plaintiffs
possessed
continuing
personal
economic
stake
litigation
even
defendants
offer
judgment
already
explained
respondent
conceded
petitioners
offer
provided
complete
relief
individual
claims
brief
opposition
failed
assert
continuing
economic
interest
shifting
attorney
fees
costs
others
moreover
roper
dictum
tethered
unique
significance
certification
decisions
proceedings
whatever
significance
conditional
certification
may
proceedings
tantamount
class
certification
rule
appeals
concluded
respondent
individual
claim
became
moot
following
petitioners
rule
offer
judgment
assumed
without
deciding
correct
reaching
question
granted
certiorari
conclude
respondent
personal
interest
representing
putative
unnamed
claimants
continuing
interest
preserve
suit
mootness
respondent
suit
therefore
appropriately
dismissed
lack
jurisdiction
judgment
appeals
third
circuit
reversed
ordered
kagan
dissenting
genesis
healthcare
corporation
et
petitioners
laura
symczyk
writ
certiorari
appeals
third
circuit
april
justice
kagan
justice
ginsburg
justice
breyer
justice
sotomayor
join
dissenting
today
resolves
imaginary
question
based
mistake
courts
made
case
others
like
issue
majority
tells
us
whether
collective
brought
fair
labor
standards
act
flsa
et
justiciable
lone
plaintiff
individual
claim
becomes
moot
ante
embedded
within
question
crucial
premise
individual
claim
become
moot
lower
courts
held
majority
assumes
without
deciding
premise
bogus
plaintiff
individual
claim
never
became
moot
addition
similar
claim
damages
ever
become
moot
event
majority
decision
founded
unfounded
assumption
meaning
application
decision
turn
explaining
majority
thinks
happen
proposed
collective
flsa
action
something
fact
never
happens
individual
flsa
claim
errantly
thought
done
case
reasons
describe
feel
free
relegate
majority
decision
furthest
reaches
mind
situation
addresses
never
arise
consider
facts
case
keeping
eye
anything
render
part
moot
respondent
laura
symczyk
brought
suit
provision
flsa
behalf
others
similarly
situated
app
complaint
alleged
former
employer
petitioner
genesis
healthcare
corporation
genesis
violated
flsa
treating
minutes
every
shift
unpaid
meal
break
even
employee
worked
time
genesis
answered
complaint
simultaneously
made
offer
judgment
federal
rule
civil
procedure
settlement
proposal
covered
symczyk
individual
claim
tune
lost
wages
offer
according
terms
deemed
withdrawn
symczyk
accept
within
days
app
deadline
came
went
without
reply
case
proceeded
normal
fashion
district
setting
schedule
discovery
pause
moment
ask
whether
seen
anything
yet
moot
symczyk
individual
claim
neither
nevertheless
genesis
moved
dismiss
symczyk
suit
ground
moot
supposed
logic
went
like
genesis
offered
symczyk
complete
relief
individual
damages
claim
effectively
reject
ed
ffer
failing
respond
longer
personal
stake
legally
cognizable
interest
outcome
action
accordingly
dismiss
claims
relying
circuit
precedent
district
agreed
dismissed
case
lack
jurisdiction
without
awarding
symczyk
damages
relief
based
solely
unaccepted
offer
genesis
made
see
app
pet
cert
citing
weiss
regal
collections
finally
appeals
third
circuit
concurred
genesis
offer
mooted
symczyk
individual
claim
though
also
holding
still
proceed
collective
action
see
view
wrong
wrong
wrong
made
clear
earlier
term
long
parties
concrete
interest
however
small
outcome
litigation
case
moot
chafin
chafin
slip
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
case
becomes
moot
impossible
grant
effectual
relief
whatever
prevailing
party
ibid
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
measures
unaccepted
offer
judgment
moot
case
plaintiff
rejects
offer
however
good
terms
interest
lawsuit
remains
ability
grant
relief
unaccepted
settlement
offer
like
unaccepted
contract
offer
legal
nullity
operative
effect
every
law
student
learns
recipient
rejection
offer
leaves
matter
offer
ever
made
minneapolis
louis
columbus
rolling
mill
nothing
rule
alters
basic
principle
contrary
rule
specifies
unaccepted
offer
considered
withdrawn
fed
rule
civ
proc
assuming
case
live
plaintiff
stake
grant
relief
litigation
carries
unmooted
reason
symczyk
individual
claim
alive
well
district
dismissed
suit
recall
genesis
made
settlement
offer
rule
symczyk
decided
accept
days
expired
suit
went
forward
symczyk
individual
stake
lawsuit
thus
remained
always
ditto
capacity
grant
relief
offer
lapsed
symczyk
possessed
unsatisfied
claim
redress
awarding
damages
long
remained
true
symczyk
claim
moot
district
send
away
friendly
suggestion
third
circuit
rethink
theory
note
courts
appeals
try
home
point
said
conflicts
nothing
opinion
majority
attempt
argue
la
third
circuit
unaccepted
settlement
offer
mooted
symczyk
individual
damages
claim
instead
majority
hangs
hat
finding
waiver
see
ante
majority
notes
correctly
symczyk
accepted
third
circuit
rule
briefs
also
failed
challenge
brief
opposition
petition
certiorari
contested
first
merits
brief
enables
majority
assume
without
deciding
mootness
symczyk
individual
claim
reach
question
relating
proposed
collective
action
ante
noted
similar
case
assum
ing
facts
show
ridiculous
predicate
question
party
think
challenge
settled
circuit
precedent
runs
risk
avoided
lebron
national
railroad
passenger
corporation
question
symczyk
raises
unaccepted
settlement
offer
moot
individual
flsa
claim
logically
prior
thus
inextricably
intertwined
question
majority
rushes
resolve
unaccepted
settlement
offer
mooted
symczyk
individual
flsa
claim
proceed
consider
proposed
collective
action
indeed
former
much
part
parcel
latter
question
genesis
presented
granted
certiorari
actually
looks
like
symczyk
like
majority
genesis
asked
whether
case
becomes
moot
lone
plaintiff
receives
offer
defendants
satisfy
plaintiff
claims
pet
cert
symczyk
course
respond
merely
receiving
offer
moot
claim
majority
refusal
consider
obviously
correct
answer
impedes
intelligent
resolution
question
presented
ohio
robinette
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
taking
fallacy
premise
majority
ensures
reach
wrong
decision
still
might
think
majority
approach
least
benefit
future
flsa
case
individual
claim
damages
fact
becomes
moot
know
collective
allegations
even
much
said
majority
opinion
individual
claims
cases
never
become
moot
therefore
never
need
reach
issue
majority
resolves
majority
decision
fit
nothing
aside
getting
case
wrong
serves
address
problem
see
consider
collective
flsa
action
seeking
damages
unfolds
plaintiff
like
symczyk
let
us
call
smith
highlight
typicality
sues
behalf
others
determine
whether
smith
serve
representative
party
considers
whether
workplace
policy
suit
challenges
similarly
affected
employees
supervises
discovery
notification
oversee
joinder
want
smith
represent
hoffman
sperling
period
majority
observes
class
independent
legal
status
ante
time
smith
claim
perfect
health
damages
claim
past
conduct
employer
extinguish
adopting
new
employment
practices
indeed
claim
survive
even
smith
demise
belonging
estate
smith
individual
claim
short
going
away
easily
wait
time
involved
assembling
collective
action
accord
ante
claim
damages
evade
review
remains
live
settled
judicially
resolved
introduce
settlement
offer
picture
assume
finally
decides
whether
permit
collective
action
defendant
proposes
pay
smith
value
individual
claim
exchange
abandonment
entire
litigation
smith
agrees
course
like
plaintiff
assent
settlement
ending
suit
assuming
smith
agree
wishes
proceed
behalf
employees
offer
ever
succeed
mooting
case
already
shown
circumstances
defendant
makes
offer
plaintiff
declines
nothing
else
occurs
facts
smith
claim
ever
lawsuit
continues
onward
suppose
defendant
additionally
requests
enter
judgment
smith
favor
though
objection
amount
offered
satisfy
individual
claim
approve
motion
declare
case
ground
smith
stake
course
less
preposterous
least
smith
unlike
symczyk
get
money
impermissible
well
starters
rule
precludes
imposing
judgment
plaintiff
like
smith
based
unaccepted
settlement
offer
made
pursuant
terms
text
rule
contemplates
enter
judgment
plaintiff
accepts
offer
see
rule
plaintiff
serves
written
notice
accepting
offer
either
party
may
file
offer
notice
acceptance
plus
proof
service
clerk
must
enter
judgment
rule
prohibits
considering
unaccepted
offer
purpose
allocating
litigation
costs
including
purpose
entering
judgment
either
party
see
rule
evidence
unaccepted
offer
admissible
except
proceeding
determine
costs
injunction
accords
rule
exclusive
purpose
promote
voluntary
cessation
litigation
imposing
costs
plaintiffs
spurn
certain
settlement
offers
see
marek
chesny
rule
provides
appropriate
mechanism
terminate
lawsuit
without
plaintiff
consent
inherent
authority
enter
unwanted
judgment
smith
individual
claim
service
wiping
proposed
collective
action
sure
discretion
halt
lawsuit
entering
judgment
plaintiff
defendant
unconditionally
surrenders
plaintiff
obstinacy
madness
prevents
accepting
total
victory
may
take
tack
supposed
capitulation
fact
fails
give
plaintiff
law
authorizes
sought
judgment
satisfying
individual
claim
give
plaintiff
like
smith
exercising
right
sue
behalf
employees
requested
complaint
relief
class
deposit
guaranty
nat
bank
roper
rehnquist
concurring
collective
action
brought
flsa
class
action
may
prior
certification
eliminate
entire
suit
acceding
defendant
proposal
make
named
plaintiff
whole
course
collective
action
begin
thereby
frustrate
congress
decision
give
flsa
plaintiffs
opportunity
proceed
collectively
hoffman
see
roper
plaintiff
smith
choice
defendant
whether
satisfaction
individual
claim
without
redress
viable
classwide
allegations
sufficient
bring
lawsuit
end
question
majority
answers
never
arise
means
analysis
majority
propounds
never
majority
assumes
individual
claim
become
moot
asks
whether
collective
allegations
still
proceed
virtue
doctrine
doctrine
comes
play
confronts
jurisdictional
gap
individual
claim
becoming
moot
certify
representative
action
flsa
case
damages
gap
occur
unless
mistakenly
creates
explained
plaintiff
individual
claim
remains
live
way
decision
whether
join
new
plaintiffs
litigation
without
gap
span
doctrine
relevance
neither
majority
resolved
case
along
circuit
split
see
ante
correcting
third
circuit
view
unaccepted
settlement
offer
mooted
symczyk
individual
claim
instead
chose
address
issue
predicated
misconception
way
aids
one
ever
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
lower
courts
borrowed
terminology
describe
process
joining
express
opinion
propriety
use
nomenclature
note
significant
differences
certification
federal
rule
civil
procedure
joinder
process
relation
back
doctrine
developed
context
class
actions
rule
address
circumstance
named
plaintiff
claim
becomes
moot
prior
certification
class
case
raises
two
circumstances
applied
doctrine
first
named
plaintiff
claim
inherently
becomes
moot
prior
certification
motion
certification
may
relate
back
filing
complaint
see
county
riverside
mclaughlin
second
held
certification
motion
denied
named
plaintiff
claim
subsequently
becomes
moot
appellate
reversal
certification
decision
may
relate
back
time
denial
see
parole
geraghty
compare
weiss
regal
collections
mccauley
trans
union
llc
resolve
question
whether
rule
offer
fully
satisfies
plaintiff
claims
sufficient
moot
action
supra
note
courts
appeals
sides
issue
recognized
plaintiff
claim
may
satisfied
even
without
plaintiff
consent
courts
maintain
unaccepted
offer
complete
relief
alone
sufficient
moot
individual
claim
weiss
supra
greisz
household
bank
courts
held
face
unaccepted
offer
complete
relief
district
courts
may
enter
judgment
favor
plaintiffs
accordance
defendants
rule
offer
judgment
ed
donnelly
see
also
mccauley
trans
union
llc
contrary
dissent
assertion
see
post
opinion
kagan
nothing
nature
flsa
actions
precludes
satisfaction
thus
mooting
individual
claim
component
suit
run
course
roper
distinguishable
facts
need
consider
continuing
validity
light
subsequent
decision
lewis
continental
bank
see
interest
attorney
fees
course
insufficient
create
article
iii
case
controversy
none
exists
merits
underlying
claim
footnotes
majority
also
justifies
approach
ground
symczyk
file
certiorari
objecting
third
circuit
decision
symczyk
got
judgment
wanted
third
circuit
majority
agrees
necessary
respondent
seeks
alter
judgment
ante
see
gressman
geller
shapiro
bishop
hartnett
practice
ed
party
satisfied
action
lower
appeal
order
defend
judgment
favor
ground
third
circuit
reversed
district
dismissal
symczyk
flsa
suit
ruling
collective
action
go
forward
even
though
individual
claim
moot
accordingly
accepting
symczyk
new
argument
lead
modifying
appellate
judgment
affirming
different
ground
event
never
held
requirement
jurisdictional
see
choose
excuse
absence
reasons
discussed
next
consider
issue
raised
see
vance
terrazas
similarly
questionable
deployment
adjudicatory
authority
see
comcast
behrend
joint
opinion
ginsburg
breyer
jj
observing
dissent
ruling
good
day
case
good
thing
majority
opinion
also
misconceives
decisions
applying
doctrine
majority
painstakingly
distinguishes
decisions
individual
facts
misses
common
confronted
situation
class
representative
individual
claim
became
moot
make
final
decision
propriety
class
litigation
used
principles
preserve
ability
adjudicate
merits
classwide
questions
representative
raised
see
county
riverside
mclaughlin
swisher
brady
gerstein
pugh
see
also
parole
geraghty
sosna
iowa
symczyk
individual
claim
became
moot
failed
accept
genesis
offer
judgment
case
fit
comfortably
alongside
precedents
district
enough
time
rule
motion
certification
back
doctrine
properly
invoked
preserve
merits
case
judicial
resolution
mclaughlin
internal
quotation
marks
omitted