arlington
central
school
district
board
education
murphy
et
argued
april
decided
june
respondents
prevailed
individuals
disabilities
education
act
idea
action
require
petitioner
school
board
pay
son
private
school
tuition
sought
fees
services
rendered
educational
consultant
proceedings
relying
idea
provision
permits
award
reasonable
attorneys
fees
part
costs
prevailing
parents
district
granted
motion
part
affirming
second
circuit
noted
crawford
fitting
gibbons
west
virginia
univ
hospitals
casey
provision
read
permit
recovery
expert
fees
without
explicit
statutory
authority
concluded
congressional
conference
committee
report
relating
casey
referencing
report
showed
idea
authorized
reimbursement
held
section
authorize
prevailing
parents
recover
expert
fees
pp
resolution
question
guided
fact
congress
enacted
idea
pursuant
spending
clause
congress
broad
power
set
terms
disburses
federal
money
conditions
attaches
state
acceptance
funds
must
set
unambiguously
pennhurst
state
school
hospital
halderman
fund
recipients
bound
conditions
accept
voluntarily
knowingly
knowingly
accept
conditions
unaware
unable
ascertain
ibid
thus
question
whether
idea
furnishes
clear
notice
regarding
expert
fees
pp
begins
idea
text
language
plain
courts
function
enforce
according
terms
hartford
underwriters
ins
union
planters
bank
provides
award
reasonable
attorneys
fees
even
hint
acceptance
idea
funds
makes
state
responsible
reimbursing
prevailing
parents
services
experts
costs
term
art
generally
include
expert
fees
use
costs
rather
expenses
strongly
suggests
meant
provision
making
liable
expenses
moreover
says
may
award
costs
may
award
attorney
fees
part
costs
language
simply
adds
reasonable
attorney
fees
list
recoverable
costs
set
general
statute
covering
taxation
costs
strictly
limited
thus
text
authorize
award
additional
expert
fees
certainly
fails
present
clear
notice
required
spending
clause
idea
provisions
point
strongly
direction
little
significance
provision
handicapped
children
protection
act
requiring
general
accounting
office
collect
data
awards
prevailing
parties
idea
cases
making
mention
consultants
experts
fees
fact
provision
directed
gao
compile
data
hours
spent
consultants
idea
cases
mean
congress
intended
compensate
prevailing
parties
fees
billed
consultants
pp
crawford
fitting
casey
strongly
reinforce
conclusion
idea
unambiguously
authorize
prevailing
parents
recover
expert
fees
crawford
fitting
reasoning
supports
conclusion
term
costs
like
costs
federal
rule
civil
procedure
provision
issue
defined
categories
expenses
enumerated
conclusion
buttressed
principle
recognized
crawford
fitting
statute
construed
authorize
taxing
witness
fees
costs
unless
statute
refer
explicitly
witness
fees
conclusion
idea
authorize
expert
fee
awards
confirmed
even
dramatically
casey
held
provision
wording
virtually
identical
empower
district
award
expert
fees
prevailing
party
second
circuit
misunderstood
meaning
casey
relied
state
conference
committee
report
set
correct
interpretation
provided
clear
notice
required
spending
clause
thrust
simply
attorneys
fees
standing
alone
generally
understood
encompassing
expert
fees
pp
respondents
additional
arguments
unpersuasive
idea
goals
ensur
ing
children
disabilities
available
free
appropriate
public
education
safeguarding
parents
right
challenge
adverse
school
decisions
general
provide
much
support
reading
idea
idea
legislative
history
insufficient
help
everything
history
overwhelmingly
suggests
expert
fees
may
recovered
pp
reversed
remanded
alito
delivered
opinion
roberts
scalia
kennedy
thomas
joined
ginsburg
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
souter
filed
dissenting
opinion
breyer
filed
dissenting
opinion
stevens
souter
joined
arlington
central
school
district
board
education
petitioner
pearl
murphy
et
vir
writ
certiorari
appeals
second
circuit
june
justice
alito
delivered
opinion
individuals
disabilities
education
act
idea
act
provides
may
award
reasonable
attorneys
fees
part
costs
parents
prevail
action
brought
act
stat
granted
certiorari
decide
whether
provision
authorizes
prevailing
parents
recover
fees
services
rendered
experts
idea
actions
hold
respondents
pearl
theodore
murphy
filed
action
idea
behalf
son
joseph
murphy
seeking
require
petitioner
arlington
central
school
district
board
education
pay
son
private
school
tuition
specified
school
years
respondents
prevailed
district
supp
sdny
appeals
second
circuit
affirmed
prevailing
parents
respondents
sought
fees
services
educational
consultant
marilyn
arons
assisted
respondents
throughout
idea
proceedings
district
granted
respondents
request
part
held
value
arons
time
spent
hearing
request
ruling
respondents
favor
properly
considered
charges
incurred
action
proceeding
brought
act
see
wl
sdny
july
reduced
maximum
recovery
district
also
held
arons
nonlawyer
compensated
time
spent
expert
consulting
services
time
spent
legal
representation
concluded
relevant
time
characterized
falling
within
compensable
category
thus
allowed
compensation
full
appeals
second
circuit
affirmed
acknowledging
circuits
taken
opposite
view
appeals
second
circuit
held
congress
intended
authorize
reimbursement
expert
fees
idea
actions
began
discussing
two
decisions
holding
expert
fees
recovered
taxed
costs
particular
provisions
see
crawford
fitting
gibbons
interpreting
fed
rule
civ
proc
west
virginia
univ
hospitals
casey
interpreting
according
decisions
noted
provision
read
permit
prevailing
party
recover
expert
fees
without
statutory
authority
indicating
congress
intended
sort
ultimately
though
persuaded
statement
conference
committee
report
relating
casey
made
reference
report
citing
conf
based
authorities
concluded
required
interpret
idea
authorize
award
costs
prevailing
parents
incur
hiring
experts
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflict
among
circuits
respect
whether
congress
authorized
compensation
expert
fees
prevailing
parents
idea
actions
compare
goldring
district
columbia
cadc
neosho
school
dist
clark
ex
rel
clark
lagrange
school
dist
reverse
ii
resolution
question
presented
case
guided
fact
congress
enacted
idea
pursuant
spending
clause
art
cl
see
schaffer
weast
like
statutory
predecessor
idea
provides
federal
funds
assist
state
local
agencies
educating
children
disabilities
conditions
funding
upon
state
compliance
extensive
goals
procedures
board
ed
hendrick
hudson
central
school
westchester
cty
rowley
congress
broad
power
set
terms
disburses
federal
money
see
south
dakota
dole
congress
attaches
conditions
state
acceptance
federal
funds
conditions
must
set
unambiguously
see
pennhurst
state
school
hospital
halderman
rowley
supra
egislation
enacted
pursuant
spending
power
much
nature
contract
therefore
bound
federally
imposed
conditions
recipients
federal
funds
must
accept
voluntarily
knowingly
pennhurst
knowingly
accept
conditions
unaware
unable
ascertain
ibid
thus
present
case
must
view
idea
perspective
state
official
engaged
process
deciding
whether
state
accept
idea
funds
obligations
go
funds
must
ask
whether
state
official
clearly
understand
one
obligations
act
obligation
compensate
prevailing
parents
expert
fees
words
must
ask
whether
idea
furnishes
clear
notice
regarding
liability
issue
case
iii
considering
whether
idea
provides
clear
notice
begin
text
stated
time
courts
must
presume
legislature
says
statute
means
means
statute
says
connecticut
nat
bank
germain
statutory
language
plain
sole
function
courts
least
disposition
required
text
absurd
enforce
according
terms
hartford
underwriters
ins
union
planters
bank
quoting
ron
pair
enterprises
turn
quoting
caminetti
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
governing
provision
idea
provides
action
proceeding
brought
section
discretion
may
award
reasonable
attorneys
fees
part
costs
parents
child
disability
prevailing
party
provision
provides
award
reasonable
attorneys
fees
provision
even
hint
acceptance
idea
funds
makes
state
responsible
reimbursing
prevailing
parents
services
rendered
experts
respondents
contend
interpret
term
costs
accordance
meaning
ordinary
usage
therefore
read
authorize
reimbursement
costs
parents
incur
idea
proceedings
including
expert
costs
brief
respondents
argument
multiple
flaws
one
thing
appeals
case
acknowledged
term
art
generally
include
expert
fees
use
term
art
rather
term
expenses
strongly
suggests
meant
provision
makes
participating
liable
expenses
incurred
prevailing
parents
connection
idea
case
example
travel
lodging
expenses
lost
wages
due
time
taken
work
moreover
contrary
respondents
suggestion
say
may
award
costs
prevailing
parents
rather
says
may
award
reasonable
attorney
fees
part
costs
prevailing
parents
language
simply
adds
reasonable
attorney
fees
incurred
prevailing
parents
list
costs
prevailing
parents
otherwise
entitled
recover
list
otherwise
recoverable
costs
obviously
list
set
general
statute
governing
taxation
costs
federal
recovery
witness
fees
strictly
limited
authorizes
travel
reimbursement
per
diem
thus
text
authorize
award
additional
expert
fees
certainly
fails
provide
clear
notice
required
spending
clause
provisions
idea
point
strongly
direction
authorizing
award
reasonable
attorney
fees
act
contains
detailed
provisions
designed
ensure
awards
indeed
reasonable
see
absence
comparable
provisions
relating
expert
fees
strongly
suggests
recovery
expert
fees
authorized
moreover
lack
reference
expert
fees
gives
rise
similar
inference
provision
generally
requires
parents
receive
full
explanation
procedural
safeguards
available
refers
expressly
attorneys
fees
makes
mention
expert
fees
respondents
contend
interpretation
supported
provision
handicapped
children
protection
act
required
general
accounting
office
gao
collect
certain
data
stat
hereinafter
gao
study
provision
provision
little
significance
present
purposes
gao
study
provision
directed
comptroller
general
acting
gao
compile
data
among
things
specific
amount
attorneys
fees
costs
expenses
awarded
prevailing
party
idea
cases
particular
period
time
number
hours
spent
personnel
including
attorneys
consultants
involved
action
proceeding
expenses
incurred
parents
state
educational
agency
local
educational
agency
subparagraph
provide
support
respondents
position
directed
gao
compile
data
awards
prevailing
parties
expense
hiring
consultants
subparagraph
says
subparagraph
makes
mention
consultants
experts
subparagraph
similarly
help
respondents
subparagraph
directs
gao
study
number
hours
spent
idea
cases
personnel
including
consultants
says
nothing
award
fees
consultants
congress
directed
gao
compile
statistics
hours
spent
consultants
idea
cases
follow
congress
meant
compensate
prevailing
parties
fees
billed
consultants
respondents
maintain
congress
direction
gao
inexplicable
congress
anticipate
expenses
recoverable
brief
respondents
incorrect
many
reasons
congress
might
wanted
gao
gather
data
expenses
taxed
costs
knowing
costs
incurred
idea
litigants
might
useful
considering
future
procedural
amendments
might
affect
costs
future
amendment
regarding
fee
shifting
fact
apparent
gao
study
provision
covered
expenses
taxed
costs
example
gao
instructed
compile
statistics
hours
spent
attorneys
involved
idea
action
proceeding
even
though
act
provide
recovery
attorney
fees
prevailing
state
local
educational
similarly
gao
directed
compile
data
expenses
incurred
parents
parents
prevail
thus
eligible
recover
taxed
costs
sum
terms
idea
overwhelmingly
support
conclusion
prevailing
parents
may
recover
costs
experts
consultants
certainly
terms
idea
fail
provide
clear
notice
needed
attach
condition
state
receipt
idea
funds
iv
thus
far
considered
text
idea
perhaps
strongest
support
interpretation
idea
supplied
decisions
reasoning
crawford
fitting
casey
light
decisions
see
said
idea
gives
state
unambiguous
notice
regarding
liability
expert
fees
crawford
fitting
rejected
argument
similar
respondents
argument
term
costs
construed
reference
prevailing
parents
expenses
argued
crawford
fitting
federal
rule
civil
procedure
provides
award
costs
prevailing
party
authorizes
award
costs
listed
held
however
rule
give
district
judge
discretion
tax
whatever
costs
may
seem
appropriate
rather
term
costs
rule
defined
list
set
recovery
witness
fees
see
strictly
limited
observed
broader
interpretation
rule
mean
rule
implicitly
effected
partial
repeal
provisions
warned
lightly
infer
congress
repealed
either
rule
provision
referring
explicitly
witness
fees
reasoning
crawford
fitting
strongly
supports
conclusion
term
costs
like
term
rule
defined
categories
expenses
enumerated
conclusion
buttressed
principle
recognized
crawford
fitting
statute
construed
authorizing
taxation
witness
fees
costs
unless
statute
refer
explicitly
witness
fees
see
also
ibid
absent
explicit
statutory
contractual
authorization
taxation
expenses
litigant
witness
costs
federal
courts
bound
limitations
set
decision
casey
confirms
even
dramatically
idea
authorize
award
expert
fees
casey
noted
interpreted
provision
relevant
wording
virtually
identical
wording
compare
ibid
authorizing
award
reasonable
attorneys
fees
part
costs
prevailing
parents
ed
permitting
prevailing
parties
certain
civil
rights
actions
awarded
reasonable
attorney
fee
part
costs
held
empower
district
award
expert
fees
prevailing
party
casey
supra
decide
favor
respondents
interpret
virtually
identical
language
exactly
opposite
meaning
indeed
go
hold
relevant
language
idea
unambiguously
means
exactly
opposite
nearly
identical
language
held
mean
casey
appeals
noted
heavily
influenced
casey
see
quoting
misunderstood
meaning
text
accompanying
argued
based
analysis
several
statutes
term
attorney
fees
include
expert
fees
commented
petitioners
invocation
conference
committee
report
relating
stated
conferees
intend
ed
term
attorneys
fees
part
costs
include
reasonable
expenses
fees
expert
witnesses
reasonable
costs
test
evaluation
found
necessary
preparation
case
quoting
conf
ellipsis
original
statement
commented
apparent
effort
depart
ordinary
meaning
define
term
art
state
conference
committee
report
set
correct
interpretation
much
less
report
sufficient
despite
language
statute
provide
clear
notice
required
spending
clause
thrust
simply
term
attorneys
fees
standing
alone
generally
understood
encompassing
expert
fees
thus
crawford
fitting
casey
strongly
reinforce
conclusion
idea
unambiguously
authorize
prevailing
parents
recover
expert
fees
respondents
make
several
arguments
based
text
idea
arguments
show
idea
provides
clear
notice
regarding
award
expert
fees
respondents
argue
interpretation
idea
furthers
act
overarching
goal
ensur
ing
children
disabilities
available
free
appropriate
public
education
well
goal
safeguard
ing
rights
parents
challenge
school
decisions
adversely
affect
child
brief
respondents
goals
however
general
provide
much
support
respondents
reading
terms
idea
idea
obviously
seek
promote
goals
expense
considerations
including
fiscal
considerations
idea
intended
instances
broad
goals
identified
respondents
expense
fiscal
considerations
goals
cited
respondents
little
bolster
argument
narrow
question
presented
finally
respondents
vigorously
argue
congress
clearly
intended
prevailing
parents
compensated
expert
fees
rely
legislative
history
particular
following
statement
conference
committee
report
discussed
conferees
intend
term
fees
part
costs
include
reasonable
expenses
fees
expert
witnesses
reasonable
costs
test
evaluation
found
necessary
preparation
case
conf
whatever
weight
legislative
history
merit
another
context
sufficient
putting
legislative
history
aside
see
virtually
support
respondents
position
circumstances
everything
legislative
history
overwhelming
suggests
expert
fees
may
recovered
legislative
history
simply
enough
spending
clause
case
key
majority
members
houses
intend
clearly
told
regarding
conditions
go
along
acceptance
funds
face
unambiguous
text
idea
reasoning
crawford
fitting
casey
say
legislative
history
respondents
rely
sufficient
provide
requisite
fair
notice
reverse
judgment
appeals
second
circuit
remand
case
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
arlington
central
school
district
board
education
petitioner
pearl
murphy
et
vir
writ
certiorari
appeals
second
circuit
june
justice
ginsburg
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
agree
main
resolution
case
part
ways
opinion
one
respect
extracts
pennhurst
state
school
hospital
halderman
clear
notice
requirement
deems
applicable
case
congress
enacted
individuals
disabilities
education
act
idea
legislation
issue
pennhurst
pursuant
spending
clause
ante
extraction
judgment
unwarranted
pennhurst
clear
notice
requirement
unmoored
context
confronted
plea
impose
unexpected
condition
compliance
new
programmatic
obligation
participating
bell
new
jersey
controversy
lower
key
concerns
educational
programs
idea
directs
school
districts
provide
remedies
available
noncomplying
district
ibid
see
post
breyer
dissenting
repeated
references
spending
clause
derived
clear
notice
requirement
see
ante
questionable
grounds
well
one
thing
idea
enacted
pursuant
congress
spending
clause
authority
also
pursuant
fourteenth
amendment
see
smith
robinson
idea
predecessor
education
handicapped
act
set
congress
aid
complying
constitutional
obligations
provide
public
education
handicapped
furthermore
clear
notice
prop
needed
case
given
twin
pillars
judgment
securely
rests
first
explains
ante
specific
provisions
idea
overwhelmingly
support
conclusion
prevailing
parents
may
recover
costs
experts
consultants
ante
provisions
place
controls
fees
recoverable
attorneys
services
without
mentioning
costs
parents
might
incur
professional
services
controls
geared
costs
second
develops
prior
decisions
closely
point
strongly
suppor
even
confir
dramatically
today
holding
idea
trains
attorneys
fees
authorize
award
covering
amounts
paid
payable
services
educational
consultant
ante
citing
crawford
fitting
gibbons
west
virginia
univ
hospitals
casey
contrary
conclusion
justice
breyer
dissent
relies
dominantly
conference
report
stating
conferees
view
term
attorneys
fees
part
costs
includes
expenses
fees
expert
witnesses
payments
tests
necessary
preparation
case
conf
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
including
costs
consultants
tests
make
good
sense
light
idea
overarching
goal
provide
free
appropriate
public
education
children
disabilities
see
post
breyer
dissenting
congress
compose
texts
statutes
numerous
varied
ignore
alter
common
import
terms
attorneys
fees
costs
context
legislation
see
ed
supp
iii
added
specifically
include
expert
fees
part
attorney
fee
casey
citing
variously
composed
statutes
explicitly
shift
expert
fees
well
attorney
fees
given
constant
meaning
formulation
attorneys
fees
part
costs
federal
legislation
liberty
rewrite
statutory
text
adopted
houses
congress
submitted
president
add
several
words
congress
wisely
might
included
ball
conclude
properly
left
congress
provide
elects
consultant
fees
testing
expenses
beyond
idea
implementing
regulations
already
along
specifications
conditions
limitations
geared
fees
expenses
congress
may
deem
appropriate
cf
listing
attorneys
fees
expert
consulting
fees
among
procedural
safeguards
school
districts
must
inform
parents
sum
although
disagree
rationale
extent
invokes
clear
notice
requirement
tied
spending
clause
agree
discussion
idea
terms
ante
decisions
crawford
casey
ante
accordingly
concur
part
opinion
join
judgment
arlington
central
school
district
board
education
petitioner
pearl
murphy
et
vir
writ
certiorari
appeals
second
circuit
june
justice
souter
dissenting
join
justice
breyer
dissent
add
word
say
outright
otherwise
implicit
agree
distinction
draws
case
barnes
gorman
see
post
citing
barnes
supra
souter
concurring
beyond
emphasize
importance
handicapped
children
protection
act
stat
amended
note
mandated
study
known
government
accountability
office
section
equal
dignity
provision
enacted
statute
makes
justice
breyer
resort
related
conference
report
reasonable
course
arlington
central
school
district
board
education
petitioner
pearl
murphy
et
vir
writ
certiorari
appeals
second
circuit
june
justice
breyer
justice
stevens
justice
souter
join
dissenting
individuals
disabilities
education
act
idea
act
et
supp
says
may
award
reasonable
attorneys
fees
part
costs
parents
prevailing
parties
unlike
believe
word
costs
includes
authorizes
payment
costs
experts
word
costs
define
scope
neither
phrase
attorneys
fees
part
costs
members
congress
make
clear
intent
among
things
approving
conference
report
specified
term
fees
part
costs
include
reasonable
expenses
expert
witnesses
reasonable
costs
test
evaluation
found
necessary
preparation
parent
guardian
case
action
proceeding
conf
appendix
infra
senator
representative
voiced
opposition
statement
discussion
preceding
vote
conference
report
last
vote
bill
sent
president
find
good
reason
interpret
language
statute
meaning
precise
opposite
congress
told
us
intended
two
strong
reasons
interpreting
statutory
phrase
include
award
expert
fees
first
congress
said
intended
phrase
second
interpretation
furthers
idea
statutorily
defined
purposes
congress
added
idea
provision
enacted
handicapped
children
protection
act
hcpa
stat
senator
lowell
weicker
introduced
relevant
bill
cong
rec
introduced
sought
overturn
determination
version
idea
civil
rights
statutes
authorize
courts
award
attorneys
fees
prevailing
parents
idea
cases
see
smith
robinson
bill
provided
action
proceeding
brought
subsection
discretion
may
award
reasonable
attorney
fee
part
costs
parent
legal
representative
handicapped
child
youth
prevailing
party
cong
rec
see
hearings
debate
several
senators
introduced
new
bill
senate
put
cap
attorneys
fees
legal
services
lawyers
time
explicitly
authorized
award
reasonable
attorney
fee
reasonable
witness
fees
reasonable
expenses
civil
action
addition
costs
parent
prevailing
party
emphasis
added
senator
objected
latter
provision
objected
cap
see
additional
views
senators
kerry
kennedy
pell
dodd
simon
metzenbaum
matsunaga
accepting
provision
objecting
cap
aspects
bill
bipartisan
group
senators
led
senators
hatch
weicker
proposed
alternative
bill
authorized
courts
award
reasonable
attorney
fee
addition
costs
parent
prevailed
additional
views
senators
hatch
weicker
stafford
dole
pell
matsunaga
simon
kerry
kennedy
metzenbaum
dodd
grassley
cong
rec
senator
weicker
explained
bill
enable
courts
compensate
parents
whatever
reasonable
costs
incur
fully
secure
guaranteed
eha
fee
shifting
statutes
intent
awards
include
discretion
reasonable
attorney
fees
necessary
expert
witness
fees
reasonable
expenses
necessary
parents
vindicate
claim
free
appropriate
public
education
handicapped
child
emphasis
added
word
opposition
statement
provision
voiced
senate
floor
passed
without
recorded
vote
house
version
bill
also
reflected
intention
authorize
recovery
expert
costs
following
house
hearings
committee
education
labor
produced
substitute
bill
authorized
courts
award
reasonable
attorneys
fees
expenses
costs
prevailing
parents
pp
emphasis
added
house
report
stated
phrase
costs
includes
expenses
expert
witnesses
reasonable
costs
study
report
test
project
found
necessary
preparation
parents
guardian
due
process
hearing
state
administrative
review
civil
action
well
traditional
costs
expenses
incurred
course
litigating
case
depositions
interrogatories
emphasis
added
one
objected
statement
time
reached
floor
another
substitute
bill
introduced
cong
rec
new
bill
change
respect
text
authorization
expenses
costs
add
provision
however
directed
general
accounting
office
gao
known
government
accountability
office
see
note
supp
study
report
congress
fiscal
impact
provision
see
newly
substituted
bill
passed
house
without
recorded
vote
members
house
senate
including
primary
sponsors
hcpa
met
conference
work
certain
differences
conclusion
negotiations
produced
conference
report
contained
text
bill
joint
explanatory
statement
committee
conference
see
conf
appendix
infra
conference
accepted
house
bill
gao
provision
amendment
expanding
data
collection
requirements
gao
study
include
information
regarding
amount
funds
expended
local
educational
agencies
state
educational
agencies
civil
actions
administrative
proceedings
accepted
minor
changes
provisions
provided
senate
house
versions
conferees
explained
slightly
different
wording
senate
bill
house
amendment
provide
awarding
attorneys
fees
addition
costs
senate
recedes
house
house
recedes
senate
amendment
clarifying
discretion
may
award
reasonable
attorneys
fees
part
costs
change
wording
incorporates
marek
chesny
decision
conferees
intend
term
fees
part
costs
include
reasonable
expenses
fees
expert
witnesses
reasonable
costs
test
evaluation
found
necessary
preparation
parent
guardian
case
action
proceeding
well
traditional
costs
incurred
course
litigating
case
emphasis
added
citation
omitted
conference
report
returned
senate
house
motion
put
adopt
conference
report
senate
house
agreed
conference
report
voice
votes
see
appendix
infra
senate
appendix
infra
house
objection
raised
conference
report
statement
provision
intended
authorize
expert
costs
concede
sponsors
legislation
mention
anything
floor
expert
consultant
fees
time
conference
report
submitted
ante
ginsburg
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
believe
silence
significant
light
fact
every
senator
three
five
representatives
spoke
floor
previously
signed
name
conference
report
report
made
congress
intent
clear
first
page
explanation
see
appendix
infra
every
senator
representative
took
floor
preceding
votes
voiced
strong
support
conference
report
cong
rec
senate
house
upshot
members
houses
congress
voted
adopt
statutory
text
us
conference
report
made
clear
statute
words
include
expert
costs
question
act
basic
purpose
supports
interpreting
provision
language
include
expert
costs
idea
guarantees
free
appropriate
public
education
children
disabilities
supp
see
also
defining
free
appropriate
public
education
one
provided
public
expense
without
charge
defining
special
education
specially
designed
instruction
cost
parents
meet
unique
needs
child
disability
emphasis
added
parents
every
right
become
involved
act
efforts
provide
education
indeed
act
encourages
participation
idea
ensur
es
families
disabled
children
meaningful
opportunities
participate
education
children
school
assures
parents
may
question
school
district
decisions
appropriate
child
may
secure
help
experts
parents
right
accompanied
advised
counsel
individuals
special
knowledge
training
respect
problems
children
disabilities
see
generally
schaffer
weast
slip
detailing
act
procedures
board
ed
hendrick
hudson
central
school
westchester
cty
rowley
emphasizing
importance
act
procedural
guarantees
practical
significance
act
participatory
rights
procedural
protections
may
seriously
diminished
parents
unable
obtain
reimbursement
costs
experts
idea
cases
experts
necessary
see
kuriloff
goldberg
mediation
fair
way
resolve
special
education
disputes
first
empirical
findings
harv
negotiation
rev
detailing
findings
study
showing
high
correlation
use
experts
success
parents
challenging
school
district
plan
kuriloff
justice
served
due
process
affecting
outcome
special
education
hearings
pennsylvania
law
contemp
prob
see
also
brief
national
disability
rights
network
et
al
amici
curiae
collecting
sources
cf
schaffer
supra
slip
ginsburg
dissenting
vast
majority
parents
whose
children
require
benefits
protections
provided
idea
lack
knowledge
educational
resources
available
child
sophistication
mount
effective
case
iep
internal
quotation
marks
alterations
omitted
experts
also
expensive
see
brief
respondents
collecting
district
decisions
awarding
expert
costs
ranging
noting
three
reported
cases
expert
awards
exceeded
costs
experts
may
make
much
dent
school
district
budget
many
experts
use
idea
proceedings
already
staff
cf
oberti
board
ed
clementon
school
parents
award
costs
may
matter
enormously
without
potential
reimbursement
parents
may
well
lack
services
experts
entirely
see
department
education
wagner
et
individual
household
characteristics
youth
disabilities
report
national
longitudinal
tion
pp
finding
disabled
children
live
poverty
live
households
incomes
less
see
department
ofeducation
wagner
et
ren
serve
demographic
characteristics
elementary
middle
school
students
disabilities
households
available
http
designdocs
seels
children
visited
june
available
clerk
case
file
finding
disabled
children
live
households
incomes
less
word
act
statutory
right
free
appropriate
education
may
mean
little
must
pay
hundreds
dollars
obtain
previously
avoided
interpretations
bring
kind
result
see
school
comm
burlington
department
ed
construing
idea
provision
granting
equitable
authority
courts
include
power
order
reimbursement
parents
switch
child
private
schools
decision
later
proves
correct
without
cost
reimbursement
prevailing
parents
child
right
free
appropriate
public
education
parents
right
participate
fully
developing
proper
individualized
education
plan
iep
procedural
safeguards
less
complete
florence
county
school
dist
four
carter
holding
prevailing
parents
barred
reimbursement
switching
child
private
school
meet
idea
definition
free
appropriate
education
carter
explained
idea
intended
ensure
children
disabilities
receive
education
appropriate
free
read
provisions
bar
reimbursement
circumstances
case
defeat
statutory
purpose
citation
omitted
read
word
costs
requiring
successful
parents
bear
expenses
experts
suffers
problem
today
result
leave
many
parents
guardians
without
expert
firepower
match
opposition
schaffer
supra
slip
far
cry
level
playing
field
congress
envisioned
ii
majority
makes
essentially
three
arguments
interpretation
says
statute
purpose
legislative
history
simply
enough
overcome
fact
spending
clause
case
text
statute
prior
cases
hold
term
costs
include
expert
costs
ante
find
arguments
convincing
outset
majority
says
guided
fact
congress
enacted
idea
pursuant
spending
clause
ante
spending
clause
case
majority
adds
key
majority
members
houses
intend
clearly
told
regarding
conditions
go
along
acceptance
funds
ante
thus
statute
conditions
must
set
ante
citing
pennhurst
state
school
hospital
halderman
rowley
must
ask
whether
statute
furnishes
clear
notice
regarding
liability
issue
case
ante
agree
statute
face
clearly
tell
must
pay
expert
fees
prevailing
parents
agree
majority
posed
right
question
one
thing
repeatedly
examined
nature
extent
financial
burdens
idea
imposes
without
reference
spending
clause
rule
see
burlington
supra
private
school
fees
carter
supra
smith
continuous
nursing
service
see
thomas
joined
kennedy
dissenting
cases
ask
whether
statute
furnishes
clear
notice
affirmative
obligation
liability
issue
another
thing
neither
pennhurst
case
suggests
every
spending
detail
spending
clause
statute
must
spelled
unusual
clarity
contrary
held
pennhurst
requirement
congress
unambiguously
set
condition
grant
federal
money
necessarily
apply
legislation
setting
forth
remedies
available
noncomplying
state
bell
new
jersey
emphasis
added
rejecting
argument
elementary
secondary
education
act
unambiguously
provide
secretary
recover
federal
funds
misused
state
added
pennhurst
require
congress
specifically
identify
proscribe
condition
spending
clause
legislation
jackson
birmingham
bd
rejecting
argument
pennhurst
precluded
interpreting
title
ix
private
cause
action
encompass
retaliation
internal
quotation
marks
alterations
omitted
see
also
bennett
kentucky
dept
denied
implication
suits
spending
clause
legislation
suits
contract
principles
apply
issues
raise
barnes
gorman
emphasis
added
statements
holdings
surprising
basic
objective
pennhurst
requirement
demand
textual
clarity
respect
every
detail
ambiguity
precise
nature
statutory
program
details
particularly
kind
might
anticipated
rarely
relevant
basic
question
accepted
federal
government
funds
known
nature
accompanying
conditions
often
later
details
judicial
interpretation
lead
one
wonder
whether
funding
recipients
agreed
enter
basic
program
given
nature
details
clear
entered
program
regardless
time
view
statutory
detail
highly
complex
program
involving
say
transportation
schools
environment
simply
lens
linguistic
clarity
rather
assess
meanings
terms
basic
legislative
purpose
risk
set
judicial
interpretations
prevent
program
overall
achieving
basic
objectives
might
well
reduce
program
details
incoherence
case
detail
permitting
parents
recover
expert
fees
lead
awards
indeterminate
magnitude
untethered
compensable
harm
consequently
pose
concern
recipients
federal
funding
reasonably
anticipated
barnes
souter
joined
concurring
citation
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
unlike
say
punitive
damages
award
costs
expert
parties
neither
unorthodox
indeterminate
thus
throw
doubt
whether
entered
program
determinations
whether
idea
requires
provide
continuing
nursing
services
cedar
rapids
supra
reimbursement
private
school
tuition
burlington
supra
call
linguistic
clarity
precise
content
recoverable
costs
call
clarity
fortiori
believes
statute
language
unambiguous
must
disagree
provision
issue
says
may
award
reasonable
attorneys
fees
part
costs
parents
prevail
action
brought
act
supp
statute
neither
defines
word
costs
points
source
law
definition
word
costs
alone
says
nothing
costs
falls
within
scope
neither
statutory
phrase
part
costs
parents
child
disability
prevailing
party
taken
entirety
unambiguously
foreclose
award
expert
fees
agree
read
literally
provision
clearly
grant
authority
award
costs
one
might
read
referencing
another
federal
statute
provides
authority
see
ante
see
also
federal
taxation
cost
statute
reading
inevitable
provision
indeed
entire
act
says
nothing
statute
one
consistent
language
read
provision
embodying
general
authority
award
costs
also
specifying
inclusion
reasonable
attorneys
fees
part
costs
saying
example
may
award
reasonable
attorneys
fees
part
costs
award
latter
reading
linguistically
less
natural
legislatively
likely
majority
alternative
reading
federal
general
statute
applies
solely
federal
courts
produce
jumble
different
cost
definitions
applicable
similar
idea
administrative
proceedings
different
see
judge
clerk
may
tax
costs
following
emphasis
added
result
particularly
odd
idea
actions
must
begin
state
due
process
hearings
federal
cost
statute
clearly
apply
overwhelming
majority
actions
never
appealed
see
gao
report
ranking
minority
member
committee
health
education
labor
pensions
senate
special
education
numbers
formal
disputes
generally
low
using
mediation
strategies
resolve
conflicts
approximately
administrative
hearings
annually
appealed
state
federal
see
also
moore
district
columbia
cadc
en
banc
joining
circuits
holding
idea
authorizes
award
attorney
fees
parent
prevails
idea
administrative
proceedings
parents
appeal
file
actions
either
state
federal
courts
supp
congress
obviously
wanted
content
word
costs
vary
state
state
proceeding
proceeding
ante
majority
reading
text
plausible
possible
reading
majority
persuasive
argument
focus
either
spending
clause
lack
statutory
ambiguity
rather
majority
says
costs
term
art
light
law
long
practice
excluding
expert
fees
scope
word
costs
along
cases
interpreting
word
similarly
statutes
legislative
history
simply
enough
ante
perfectly
willing
assume
majority
correct
traditional
scope
word
costs
two
cases
held
word
costs
limited
list
set
forth
include
fees
paid
experts
see
crawford
fitting
gibbons
interpreting
fed
rule
civ
proc
west
virginia
univ
hospitals
casey
interpreting
congress
free
redefine
terms
art
see
casey
citing
examples
statutes
shift
litigation
including
expert
witness
fees
suggested
might
well
statutory
provision
worded
manner
similar
statute
indeed
cited
conference
report
language
issue
characterizing
language
apparent
effort
depart
ordinary
meaning
define
term
art
noting
congress
made
effort
respect
regardless
statute
indicates
congress
intend
use
word
costs
term
art
hcpa
added
provision
idea
also
added
another
provision
directing
gao
conduct
study
impact
amendments
idea
made
section
year
period
following
act
effective
date
stat
determine
fiscal
impact
provision
ordered
gao
submit
report
congress
containing
among
things
following
information
data
geographically
representative
select
sample
indicating
specific
amount
attorneys
fees
costs
expenses
awarded
prevailing
party
action
proceeding
date
enactment
act
fiscal
year
range
fees
costs
expenses
awarded
actions
proceedings
section
categorized
type
complaint
sample
number
hours
spent
personnel
including
attorneys
consultants
involved
action
proceeding
expenses
incurred
parents
state
educational
agency
local
educational
agency
emphasis
added
congress
intended
word
costs
authorize
award
costs
listed
federal
cost
statute
use
word
expenses
part
amount
awarded
prevailing
party
used
term
art
costs
cover
expenses
federal
costs
statute
cover
expenses
least
congress
wanted
gao
study
cf
referring
expenses
solely
refer
special
interpretation
services
provided
actions
initiated
congress
asking
gao
statute
study
numbers
hours
spent
personnel
include
among
personnel
attorneys
consultants
experts
consultants
congress
want
gao
study
hours
experts
spent
unless
thought
help
keep
track
costs
statute
imposed
course
one
might
speculation
find
answers
questions
one
might
example
imagine
congress
wanted
gao
study
expenses
payment
expert
fees
engendered
proceedings
state
federal
law
requires
might
receivable
ante
see
supra
one
might
think
word
expenses
surplusage
ante
see
duncan
walker
expressing
ce
treat
statutory
terms
surplusage
setting
especially
play
pivotal
role
statutory
scheme
one
might
believe
congress
interested
hours
experts
spent
fees
obtained
ante
answers
necessarily
consistent
purpose
gao
study
provision
purpose
revealed
language
provision
position
statute
placement
reference
indicate
congress
ordered
study
help
keep
track
magnitude
reimbursements
earlier
part
new
statute
namely
mandated
see
stat
stating
purpose
gao
study
determine
impact
section
reimbursement
requirement
mandates
payment
costs
speculate
know
congress
intended
gao
study
cover
told
gao
conference
report
word
costs
included
costs
experts
surprisingly
gao
made
clear
understood
precisely
congress
asked
final
report
gao
wrote
parents
receive
reimbursement
state
local
education
agencies
attorney
fees
related
expenses
prevailing
party
part
administrative
hearings
proceedings
expert
witness
fees
costs
tests
evaluations
found
necessary
case
costs
services
rendered
administrative
proceedings
examples
reimbursable
expenses
gao
briefing
report
congressional
requesters
special
education
attorney
fees
provision
public
law
least
amounts
indication
congress
intended
word
costs
term
art
used
statutes
issue
casey
crawford
fitting
rather
including
certain
additional
expenses
claims
tradition
interpretation
given
statutes
strong
prevent
us
examining
legislative
history
history
clear
matter
congress
intended
statutory
phrase
attorneys
fees
part
costs
include
costs
experts
see
part
supra
iii
reasons
set
forth
agree
majority
conclusion
even
less
agree
failure
consider
fully
statute
legislative
history
history
makes
congress
purpose
clear
ultimate
judicial
goal
interpret
language
light
statute
purpose
seeking
purpose
avoid
substitution
judicial
legislative
reading
language
light
maintain
democratic
link
voters
legislators
statutes
ultimate
implementation
upon
legitimacy
constitutional
system
rests
view
keep
faith
interpretive
goal
must
retain
traditional
interpretive
tools
text
structure
history
purpose
faithful
interpretation
art
well
science
rule
canon
rule
use
tools
automatically
advance
cf
helvering
gregory
hand
nothing
constitution
forbids
us
giving
significant
weight
legislative
history
disregarding
clear
statement
legislative
report
adopted
without
opposition
houses
congress
majority
reached
result
member
congress
expected
overtly
desired
adopted
interpretation
undercuts
rather
furthers
statute
purpose
free
appropriate
public
education
children
disabilities
see
circuit
city
stores
adams
stevens
joined
souter
ginsburg
breyer
dissenting
method
statutory
interpretation
deliberately
uninformed
hence
unconstrained
may
produce
result
consistent
views
things
may
also
defeat
purpose
provision
enacted
adopted
approach
fear
divorces
law
life
see
duncan
supra
breyer
joined
ginsburg
dissenting
reasons
respectfully
dissent
appendix
opinion
breyer
text
act
omitted
graphic
omitted
see
printed
opinion
appendix
opinion
breyer
excerpts
congressional
record
cong
rec
senate
handicapped
children
protection
act
conference
report
weicker
president
submit
report
committee
conference
ask
immediate
consideration
presiding
officer
report
stated
legislative
clerk
read
follows
committee
conference
disagreeing
votes
two
houses
amendments
house
bill
amend
education
handicapped
act
authorize
award
reasonable
attorneys
fees
certain
prevailing
parties
clarify
effect
education
handicapped
act
rights
procedures
remedies
laws
relating
prohibition
discrimination
met
full
free
conference
agreed
recommend
recommend
respective
houses
report
signed
majority
conferees
presiding
officer
without
objection
senate
proceed
consideration
conference
report
floor
statements
omitted
weicker
president
move
adoption
conference
report
presiding
officer
question
agreeing
conference
report
conference
report
agreed
weicker
president
move
reconsider
vote
conference
report
agreed
appendix
opinion
breyer
excerpts
congressional
record
cong
rec
house
conference
report
handicapped
children
protection
act
williams
speaker
call
conference
report
senate
bill
amend
education
handicapped
act
authorize
award
reasonable
attorneys
fees
certain
prevailing
parties
clarify
effect
education
handicapped
act
rights
procedures
remedies
laws
relating
prohibition
discrimination
clerk
read
title
senate
bill
floor
statements
omitted
williams
speaker
yield
back
balance
time
move
previous
question
conference
report
previous
question
ordered
conference
report
agreed
footnotes
subparagraph
refers
costs
expenses
awarded
prevailing
parties
generally
presumed
statutory
language
superfluous
argued
provision
manifests
expectation
prevailing
parties
awarded
certain
expenses
included
list
costs
set
expert
fees
intended
among
unenumerated
expenses
argument
fails
whatever
expectation
language
might
seem
evidence
fact
remains
neither
provision
idea
authorizes
award
expenses
costs
recognizing
respondents
argue
entitled
recover
expenses
costs
expert
fees
recoverable
costs
result
reference
awards
expenses
costs
support
respondents
position
reference
expenses
may
relate
idea
actions
brought
state
expenses
costs
might
receivable
reference
may
surplusage
generally
presumed
statutes
contain
surplusage
instances
surplusage
unknown
attorneys
fees
provision
provided
award
prevailing
parents
see
congress
amended
include
two
additional
awards
see
stat
amendments
provided
awards
prevailing
party
state
educational
agency
local
educational
agency
complaint
filed
frivolous
presented
improper
purpose
harass
delay
increase
cost
litigation
see
ii
iii
supp
respondents
note
gao
report
stated
expert
witness
fees
reimbursable
expenses
see
brief
respondents
citing
gao
special
education
attorney
fees
provision
public
law
passing
reference
report
issued
agency
responsible
implementing
idea
plainly
insufficient
provide
clear
notice
regarding
scope
conditions
attached
receipt
idea
funds
footnotes
relevant
statement
conference
report
reads
entirety
conferees
intend
term
fees
part
costs
include
reasonable
expenses
fees
expert
witnesses
reasonable
costs
test
evaluation
found
necessary
preparation
parent
guardian
case
action
proceeding
well
traditional
costs
incurred
course
litigating
case
conf
although
conference
report
goes
consider
matters
including
controls
attorneys
fees
nothing
said
expert
witness
fees
test
costs
time
conference
report
submitted
senate
house
sponsors
legislation
mention
anything
floor
expert
consultant
fees
altogether
clear
however
purpose
legislation
reverse
decision
smith
robinson
smith
held
statute
designed
prevailing
parents
entitled
attorneys
fees
see
cong
rec
remarks
weicker
adopting
legislation
rejecting
reasoning
smith
versus
robinson
remarks
kerry
vital
legislation
reverses
decision
smith
versus
robinson
remarks
bartlett
support
provisions
conference
agreement
response
decision
smith
versus
robinson
authoriz
awarding
reasonable
attorneys
fees
parents
prevail
special
education
cases
remarks
biaggi
legislation
clearly
supports
intent
congress
back
corrects
believe
gross
misinterpretation
law
attorneys
fees
provided
individuals
denied
access
educational
parent
right
independent
educational
evaluation
public
expense
parent
disagrees
evaluation
obtained
public
agency