jones
argued
february
decided
june
petitioner
sentenced
death
crime
kidnaping
resulting
victim
death
petitioner
sentence
imposed
pursuant
federal
death
penalty
act
et
seq
sentencing
hearing
district
instructed
jury
provided
four
decision
forms
record
sentencing
recommendation
refused
petitioner
request
instruct
jury
consequences
jury
deadlock
jury
unanimously
recommended
petitioner
sentenced
death
district
imposed
sentence
accordance
jury
recommendation
fifth
circuit
affirmed
held
judgment
affirmed
affirmed
justice
thomas
delivered
opinion
respect
parts
ii
concluding
eighth
amendment
require
jury
instructed
consequences
failure
agree
pp
petitioner
argues
federal
death
penalty
act
requires
judge
sentencing
jury
retiring
deliberations
reports
unable
reach
unanimous
verdict
case
sentencing
duty
falls
upon
district
pursuant
pp
eighth
amendment
however
require
jury
instructed
consequences
breakdown
deliberative
process
instruction
bearing
jury
role
sentencing
process
moreover
jury
system
object
secure
unanimity
government
strong
interest
jury
express
conscience
community
ultimate
life
death
question
charge
sort
petitioner
suggests
might
well
undermine
strong
governmental
interest
addition
congress
chose
require
instruction
given
declines
invoke
supervisory
power
federal
courts
require
instruction
given
every
capital
case
circumstances
pp
reasonable
likelihood
jury
led
believe
petitioner
receive
sentence
less
life
imprisonment
event
recommend
unanimously
sentence
death
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
release
pp
petitioner
claims
instruction
pertaining
jury
sentencing
recommendation
combination
decision
forms
led
confusion
warranting
reversal
sentence
due
process
clause
eighth
amendment
act
petitioner
voice
objections
raises
jury
retired
see
fed
rule
crim
proc
claim
error
subject
limited
appellate
review
plain
error
johnson
pp
review
relief
warranted
unless
error
plain
affects
substantial
rights
petitioner
argument
falls
short
satisfying
even
first
requirement
error
occurred
proper
standard
reviewing
claims
allegedly
ambiguous
instructions
caused
jury
confusion
whether
reasonable
likelihood
jury
applied
challenged
instruction
way
violates
constitution
likelihood
district
gave
explicit
instructions
consequences
nonunanimity
passages
petitioner
argues
led
jury
confusion
viewed
context
entire
instructions
lack
ambiguity
decision
forms
accompanying
instructions
create
reasonable
likelihood
confusion
effect
nonunanimity
district
explicit
instruction
jury
unanimous
exhortation
jury
discuss
punishment
attempt
reach
agreement
make
doubtful
jury
thought
compelled
recommend
lesser
sentence
event
disagreement
even
assuming
arguendo
plain
error
occurred
petitioner
show
affected
substantial
rights
district
admonished
jury
concern
effect
lesser
sentence
recommendation
moreover
assuming
jurors
confused
consequences
deadlock
petitioner
show
confusion
necessarily
worked
detriment
likely
jurors
loathe
recommend
lesser
sentence
compromised
life
imprisonment
sentence
death
sentence
cf
romano
oklahoma
pp
assuming
arguendo
district
erred
allowing
jury
consider
nonstatutory
aggravating
factors
vague
overbroad
duplicative
violation
eighth
amendment
error
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
appellate
may
conduct
review
considering
either
whether
absent
invalid
factor
jury
reached
verdict
whether
result
invalid
aggravating
factor
precisely
defined
see
clemons
mississippi
fifth
circuit
performed
first
sort
analysis
explanation
appears
sufficient
even
analysis
perfunctory
plain
alternative
mode
analysis
error
indeed
harmless
nonstatutory
aggravating
factors
precisely
defined
writing
jury
reached
recommendation
government
argument
jury
cured
factors
infirmity
written
pp
thomas
announced
judgment
delivered
opinion
respect
parts
ii
rehnquist
scalia
kennedy
jj
joined
opinion
respect
part
rehnquist
kennedy
joined
ginsburg
filed
dissenting
opinion
stevens
souter
joined
breyer
joined
parts
ii
iii
louis
jones
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
june
justice
thomas
delivered
opinion
except
part
petitioner
sentenced
death
committing
kidnaping
resulting
death
victim
sentence
imposed
federal
death
penalty
act
et
seq
ed
supp
iii
presented
three
questions
whether
petitioner
entitled
instruction
effect
jury
deadlock
whether
reasonable
likelihood
jury
led
believe
petitioner
receive
sentence
less
life
imprisonment
event
reach
unanimous
sentence
recommendation
whether
submission
jury
two
allegedly
duplicative
vague
overbroad
nonstatutory
aggravating
factors
harmless
error
answer
first
two
questions
third
view
error
allowing
jury
consider
challenged
factors
assuming
error
arguendo
think
clear
error
harmless
petitioner
louis
jones
kidnaped
private
tracie
joy
mcbride
gunpoint
goodfellow
air
force
base
san
angelo
texas
brought
house
sexually
assaulted
soon
thereafter
petitioner
drove
private
mcbride
bridge
outside
san
angelo
repeatedly
struck
head
tire
iron
died
petitioner
administered
blows
severe
force
victim
body
found
medical
examiners
observed
large
pieces
skull
driven
cranial
cavity
missing
government
charged
petitioner
inter
alia
kidnaping
death
resulting
victim
violation
offense
punishable
life
imprisonment
death
exercising
discretion
federal
death
penalty
act
et
seq
government
decided
seek
latter
sentencing
option
petitioner
tried
district
northern
district
texas
found
guilty
jury
district
conducted
separate
sentencing
hearing
pursuant
initial
matter
sentencing
jury
required
find
petitioner
requisite
intent
see
concluded
petitioner
intentionally
killed
victim
intentionally
inflicted
serious
bodily
injury
resulting
death
even
finding
intent
however
defendant
unless
sentencing
jury
also
finds
government
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
least
one
statutory
aggravating
factors
set
forth
see
petitioner
charged
committing
homicide
government
prove
statutory
aggravating
factors
set
forth
ed
supp
iii
different
statutory
aggravating
factors
crimes
punishable
death
set
forth
jury
unanimously
found
two
factors
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
agreed
petitioner
caused
death
victim
commission
another
crime
see
committed
offense
especially
heinous
cruel
depraved
manner
see
petitioner
became
jury
decide
whether
receive
death
sentence
making
selection
decision
act
requires
sentencing
jury
consider
aggravating
mitigating
factors
determine
whether
former
outweigh
latter
mitigating
factors
whether
aggravating
factors
alone
sufficient
warrant
death
sentence
act
however
requires
exacting
proof
aggravating
factors
mitigating
ones
although
jury
must
unanimously
agree
government
established
existence
aggravating
factor
beyond
reasonable
doubt
jury
may
consider
mitigating
factor
weighing
process
long
one
juror
finds
defendant
established
existence
preponderance
evidence
addition
two
statutory
aggravators
established
petitioner
jury
also
unanimously
found
two
aggravators
nonstatutory
variety
proved
one
set
forth
victim
impact
evidence
victim
vulnerability
evidence
mitigating
factors
least
one
juror
found
petitioner
proposed
seven
jurors
wrote
factor
petitioner
raised
special
findings
form
weighing
aggravating
mitigating
factors
jury
unanimously
recommended
petitioner
sentenced
death
app
district
imposed
sentence
accordance
jury
recommendation
pursuant
appeals
fifth
circuit
affirmed
sentence
granted
certiorari
affirm
ii
first
decide
question
whether
petitioner
entitled
instruction
consequences
jury
deadlock
petitioner
requested
relevant
part
following
instruction
event
due
deliberation
reflection
jury
unable
agree
unanimous
decision
sentence
imposed
advise
impose
sentence
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
release
event
unable
agree
sentence
life
without
possibility
release
death
unanimous
sentence
less
life
without
possibility
release
report
vote
sentence
defendant
life
without
possibility
release
app
petitioner
view
eighth
amendment
requires
jury
instructed
effect
inability
agree
alternatively
argues
invoke
supervisory
power
federal
courts
require
instruction
given
turn
petitioner
eighth
amendment
argument
question
statutory
interpretation
calls
attention
fifth
circuit
held
district
err
refusing
petitioner
requested
instruction
substantively
correct
see
according
appeals
provides
new
jury
shall
impaneled
new
sentencing
hearing
guilt
phase
jury
discharged
good
cause
requires
district
impanel
second
jury
hold
second
sentencing
hearing
event
jury
deadlock
id
government
interprets
statute
way
although
reading
nuanced
urges
judgment
affirmed
ground
petitioner
however
reads
act
differently
view
whenever
jury
reaches
result
unanimous
verdict
recommending
death
sentence
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
release
duty
sentencing
falls
upon
district
pursuant
reads
upon
recommendation
section
defendant
sentenced
death
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
release
shall
sentence
defendant
accordingly
otherwise
shall
impose
lesser
sentence
authorized
law
notwithstanding
law
maximum
term
imprisonment
offense
life
imprisonment
may
impose
sentence
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
release
petitioner
argument
based
construction
term
therwise
argues
term
means
jury
retiring
deliberations
reports
unable
reach
unanimous
verdict
sentencing
determination
passes
dissent
also
concludes
post
petitioner
view
statute
better
one
phrase
good
cause
plainly
encompasses
events
juror
disqualification
read
expansively
include
jury
failure
reach
unanimous
decision
nevertheless
eighth
amendment
require
jury
instructed
consequences
failure
agree
sure
said
eighth
amendment
requires
sentence
death
imposed
arbitrarily
see
buchanan
angelone
order
capital
sentencing
scheme
pass
constitutional
muster
must
perform
narrowing
function
respect
class
persons
eligible
death
penalty
must
also
ensure
capital
sentencing
decisions
rest
upon
individualized
inquiry
ibid
instruction
petitioner
requested
bearing
called
eligibility
phase
capital
sentencing
process
called
selection
phase
cases
held
order
satisfy
requirement
capital
sentencing
decisions
rest
upon
individualized
inquiry
scheme
must
allow
broad
inquiry
constitutionally
relevant
mitigating
evidence
id
petitioner
argue
district
failure
give
requested
instruction
prevented
jury
considering
evidence
theory
district
failure
instruct
jury
consequences
deadlock
give
rise
eighth
amendment
problem
different
sort
also
held
jury
affirmatively
misled
regarding
role
sentencing
process
romano
oklahoma
way
however
jury
affirmatively
misled
district
refusal
give
petitioner
proposed
instruction
truth
matter
proposed
instruction
bearing
jury
role
sentencing
process
rather
speaks
happens
event
jury
unable
fulfill
role
deliberations
break
jury
unable
produce
unanimous
sentence
recommendation
petitioner
argument
although
less
clear
appears
death
sentence
arbitrary
within
meaning
eighth
amendment
jury
given
bit
information
might
possibly
influence
individual
juror
voting
behavior
contention
merit
never
suggested
example
eighth
amendment
requires
jury
instructed
consequences
breakdown
deliberative
process
contrary
long
view
object
jury
system
secure
unanimity
comparison
views
arguments
among
jurors
allen
recognized
capital
sentencing
proceeding
government
strong
interest
jury
express
conscience
community
ultimate
question
life
death
lowenfield
phelps
citation
omitted
view
charge
jury
sort
proposed
petitioner
might
well
effect
undermining
strong
governmental
interest
similarly
decline
exercise
supervisory
powers
require
instruction
consequences
deadlock
given
every
capital
case
drafting
act
congress
chose
require
instruction
cf
district
shall
instruct
jury
considering
whether
sentence
death
justified
shall
consider
race
color
religious
beliefs
national
origin
sex
defendant
victim
jury
recommend
sentence
death
unless
concluded
recommend
sentence
death
crime
question
matter
race
color
religious
beliefs
national
origin
sex
defendant
victim
may
petitioner
point
us
decision
new
jersey
requiring
exercise
supervisory
authority
jury
informed
sentencing
consequences
nonunanimity
see
new
jersey
ramseur
course
new
jersey
practice
relevance
decision
power
persuade
several
declined
require
similar
instruction
see
north
carolina
mccarver
brogie
oklahoma
crim
app
calhoun
maryland
md
coulter
alabama
crim
app
justus
virginia
find
reasoning
virginia
justus
far
persuasive
new
jersey
especially
light
strong
governmental
interest
recognized
jury
render
unanimous
sentence
recommendation
properly
refused
instruction
offered
defendant
told
jury
reach
agreement
appropriate
punishment
dismiss
impose
life
sentence
correct
statement
law
concerned
procedural
matter
one
subject
instruction
open
invitation
jury
avoid
responsibility
disagree
light
legitimate
reasons
instructing
jury
consequences
deadlock
light
congressional
silence
exercise
supervisory
powers
require
instruction
sort
petitioner
sought
given
every
case
cf
shannon
petitioner
argues
jury
led
believe
reach
unanimous
sentence
recommendation
receive
sentence
less
severe
life
imprisonment
proposed
instruction
consequences
deadlock
necessary
correct
jury
erroneous
impression
moreover
contends
alleged
confusion
independently
warrants
reversal
sentence
due
process
clause
eighth
amendment
act
grounds
due
process
claim
assertion
sentences
may
based
materially
untrue
assumptions
eighth
amendment
claim
contention
jury
entitled
accurate
sentencing
information
statutory
claim
argument
jury
confusion
available
sentencing
options
constitutes
arbitrary
factor
put
petitioner
claim
proper
context
must
briefly
review
jury
instructions
sentencing
procedures
used
trial
instructing
jury
aggravating
mitigating
factors
explaining
process
weighing
factors
district
gave
following
instructions
pertaining
jury
sentencing
recommendation
based
upon
consideration
jury
unanimous
vote
shall
recommend
whether
defendant
sentenced
death
sentenced
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
release
sentenced
lesser
sentence
unanimously
conclude
aggravating
factors
found
exist
sufficiently
outweigh
mitigating
factor
factors
found
exist
absence
mitigating
factors
aggravating
factors
sufficient
justify
sentence
death
may
recommend
sentence
death
keep
mind
however
regardless
findings
respect
aggravating
mitigating
factors
never
required
recommend
death
sentence
recommend
imposition
death
sentence
required
impose
sentence
recommend
sentence
life
without
possibility
release
required
impose
sentence
recommend
lesser
sentence
imposed
required
impose
sentence
authorized
law
deciding
recommendation
make
concerned
question
sentence
defendant
might
receive
event
determine
recommend
death
sentence
sentence
life
without
possibility
release
matter
decide
event
conclude
sentence
death
life
without
possibility
release
recommended
app
district
also
provided
jury
four
decision
forms
record
recommendation
instructions
explaining
forms
district
told
jury
choice
form
depended
recommendation
forms
decision
form
used
determine
sentence
death
imposed
government
failed
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
existence
required
intent
part
defendant
required
aggravating
factor
decision
form
used
unanimously
recommend
sentence
death
imposed
decision
form
decision
form
used
determine
sentence
death
imposed
unanimously
find
aggravating
factor
factors
found
exist
sufficiently
outweigh
mitigating
factor
factors
found
exist
unanimously
find
aggravating
factor
factors
found
exist
sufficient
justify
sentence
death
mitigating
factor
found
exist
regardless
findings
respect
aggravating
mitigating
factors
unanimous
recommending
sentence
death
imposed
decision
form
used
unanimously
recommend
sentence
imprisonment
life
without
possibility
release
imposed
decision
form
used
recommend
lesser
sentence
imposed
petitioner
maintains
instructions
combination
decision
forms
led
jury
believe
failed
recommend
unanimously
sentence
death
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
release
required
use
decision
form
impose
sentence
less
life
imprisonment
scope
review
shaped
whether
petitioner
properly
raised
preserved
objection
instructions
trial
party
generally
may
assign
error
jury
instruction
fails
object
jury
retires
stat
distinctly
matter
party
objects
grounds
objection
fed
rule
crim
proc
timeliness
specificity
requirements
apply
sentencing
phase
well
trial
see
see
also
fed
rules
crim
proc
enable
trial
correct
instructional
mistakes
jury
retires
way
help
avoid
burdens
unnecessary
retrial
objection
directed
verdict
motion
jury
retires
preserve
claim
error
leary
objections
raised
jury
completed
deliberations
see
singer
lopez
cf
oil
request
instruction
jury
retires
preserve
objection
instruction
actually
given
otherwise
district
judges
speculate
sorts
objections
might
implied
request
instruction
issue
rulings
implied
objections
defendant
never
intends
raise
rule
contradict
rule
mandate
party
state
distinctly
grounds
objection
petitioner
voice
objections
instructions
decision
forms
raises
jury
retired
see
app
rule
read
literally
bar
review
petitioner
claim
error
decisions
instead
held
appellate
may
conduct
limited
review
plain
error
fed
rule
crim
proc
johnson
olano
lopez
supra
namet
petitioner
however
contends
federal
death
penalty
act
creates
exception
relies
language
act
providing
appellate
shall
remand
case
finds
sentence
death
imposed
influence
passion
prejudice
arbitrary
factor
according
petitioner
alleged
jury
confusion
available
sentencing
options
arbitrary
factor
thus
warrants
resentencing
even
properly
preserve
objection
argument
rests
untenable
reading
act
statute
explicitly
announce
exception
review
congressional
intent
create
exception
inferred
overall
scheme
statutory
language
must
read
context
phrase
gathers
meaning
words
around
jarecki
searle
see
also
gustafson
alloyd
subsection
petitioner
relies
upon
provides
reversal
warranted
proceedings
involved
legal
error
requiring
reversal
sentence
properly
preserved
appeal
rules
criminal
procedure
language
makes
clear
congress
sought
impose
timely
objection
requirement
sentencing
intend
equate
phrase
arbitrary
factor
legal
error
petitioner
broad
interpretation
drain
independent
meaning
review
instructions
plain
error
review
relief
warranted
unless
error
plain
affects
substantial
rights
johnson
supra
olano
supra
appellate
review
doctrine
course
circumscribed
exercise
power
rule
sparingly
see
young
frady
cf
henderson
kibbe
rare
case
improper
instruction
justify
reversal
criminal
conviction
objection
made
trial
appellate
exercise
discretion
correct
plain
error
seriously
affect
fairness
integrity
public
reputation
judicial
proceedings
olano
supra
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
young
supra
atkinson
petitioner
argument
depends
premise
instructions
decision
forms
led
jury
believe
recommend
unanimously
lesser
sentence
falls
short
satisfying
even
first
requirement
doctrine
see
error
occurred
considered
similar
claims
allegedly
ambiguous
instructions
caused
jury
confusion
see
victor
nebraska
estelle
mcguire
boyde
california
proper
standard
reviewing
claims
whether
reasonable
likelihood
jury
applied
challenged
instruction
way
violates
constitution
estelle
supra
quoting
boyde
supra
see
also
victor
supra
applying
reasonable
likelihood
standard
direct
review
state
criminal
conviction
reasonable
likelihood
jury
applied
instructions
incorrectly
district
expressly
inform
jury
impose
lesser
sentence
case
deadlock
simply
told
jury
recommended
lesser
sentence
impose
sentence
authorized
law
app
district
expressly
require
jury
select
decision
form
reach
agreement
instead
exhorted
jury
discuss
issue
punishment
one
another
effort
reach
agreement
notwithstanding
absence
explicit
instruction
consequences
nonunanimity
petitioner
identifies
several
passages
believes
support
inference
jury
confused
point
trains
portion
instructions
telling
jury
decide
sentence
recommend
sentence
death
life
without
possibility
release
petitioner
argues
statement
coupled
two
earlier
references
lesser
sentence
option
caused
jury
infer
district
impose
lesser
sentence
unanimously
agree
sentence
death
life
without
possibility
release
maintains
inference
strengthened
later
instruction
order
bring
back
verdict
recommending
punishment
death
life
without
possibility
release
twelve
must
unanimously
vote
favor
specific
penalty
according
petitioner
failure
mention
lesser
sentence
option
statement
strongly
implied
contradistinction
first
two
options
lesser
sentence
option
require
jury
unanimity
petitioner
parses
passages
finely
decisions
repeatedly
cautioned
instructions
must
evaluated
isolation
context
entire
charge
see
bryan
park
cupp
naughten
boyd
agree
fifth
circuit
passages
viewed
context
entire
instructions
lack
ambiguity
given
reading
petitioner
advances
see
previously
held
instructions
might
ambiguous
abstract
cured
read
conjunction
instructions
bryan
supra
victor
supra
estelle
supra
petitioner
claim
far
weaker
evaluated
bryan
victor
estelle
jury
case
received
explicit
instruction
unanimous
prior
admonition
jury
concern
ultimate
sentence
recommend
death
life
without
possibility
release
trial
expressly
instructed
jury
unambiguous
language
sentencing
recommendation
unanimous
vote
specifically
stated
jury
unanimous
vote
shall
recommend
whether
defendant
sentenced
death
sentenced
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
release
sentenced
lesser
sentence
app
instructions
contrast
specified
jury
act
unanimously
example
district
explicitly
told
jury
findings
mitigating
circumstances
unlike
aggravating
circumstances
unanimous
sure
district
used
phrase
unanimously
frequently
read
alongside
unambiguous
charge
sentencing
recommendation
unanimous
instructions
explicitly
identifying
jury
need
unanimous
passages
identified
petitioner
create
reasonable
likelihood
jury
believed
deadlock
cause
district
impose
lesser
sentence
petitioner
also
relies
alleged
ambiguities
decision
forms
explanatory
instructions
stresses
fact
decision
form
lesser
sentence
recommendation
unlike
decision
forms
death
sentence
life
without
possibility
release
contain
phrase
unanimous
vote
required
foreperson
signature
features
decision
form
according
petitioner
led
jury
conclude
nonunanimity
result
lesser
sentence
according
petitioner
instructions
accompanying
decision
form
unlike
respecting
decision
forms
mention
unanimity
thereby
increasing
likelihood
confusion
respect
aspect
petitioner
argument
agree
fifth
circuit
lthough
verdict
forms
standing
alone
persuaded
jury
conclude
unanimity
required
lesser
sentence
option
confusion
created
verdict
forms
clarified
considered
light
entire
jury
instruction
district
explicit
instruction
jury
unanimous
exhortation
jury
discuss
punishment
attempt
reach
agreement
app
make
doubtful
jury
thought
compelled
employ
decision
form
event
disagreement
petitioner
also
places
much
weight
fact
decision
form
required
foreperson
signature
although
contained
space
foreperson
signature
form
like
others
used
phrase
jury
recommend
thereby
signaling
form
represented
jury
recommendation
moreover
elsewhere
jury
foreperson
alone
signed
jury
forms
indicate
jury
unanimous
agreement
specifically
jury
foreperson
signed
special
findings
form
jury
required
indicate
unanimous
agreement
aggravating
factor
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
circumstances
think
decision
forms
accompanying
instructions
created
reasonable
likelihood
confusion
effect
nonunanimity
even
assuming
arguendo
error
occurred
plain
petitioner
show
affected
substantial
rights
confusion
among
jurors
effect
lesser
sentence
recommendation
allayed
district
admonition
jury
concern
effect
recommendation
see
supra
quoting
app
jurors
presumed
followed
instructions
see
shannon
richardson
marsh
even
jurors
lingering
doubts
effect
deadlock
therefore
instructions
made
clear
set
aside
concerns
either
report
unable
reach
agreement
recommend
lesser
sentence
believed
option
moreover
even
assuming
jurors
confused
consequences
deadlock
petitioner
show
confusion
necessarily
worked
detriment
likely
jurors
loathe
recommend
lesser
sentence
compromised
sentence
life
imprisonment
death
sentence
effect
alleged
error
uncertain
defendant
meet
burden
showing
error
actually
affected
substantial
rights
cf
romano
romano
considered
similar
argument
namely
jurors
disregarded
trial
judge
instructions
given
undue
weight
certain
evidence
rejecting
argument
noted
even
assuming
jury
disregarded
trial
judge
instructions
seems
equally
plausible
evidence
made
jurors
inclined
impose
death
sentence
made
less
inclined
ibid
speculation
effect
lesser
sentence
recommendation
like
evidence
romano
indeterminate
effect
outcome
proceeding
conclude
alleged
error
district
instructions
affected
petitioner
substantial
rights
see
park
lopez
iii
apart
claimed
instructional
error
petitioner
argues
nonstatutory
aggravating
factors
found
considered
jury
see
supra
vague
overbroad
duplicative
violation
eighth
amendment
district
error
allowing
jury
consider
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
eighth
amendment
appeals
correctly
recognized
see
permits
capital
sentencing
juries
consider
evidence
relating
victim
personal
characteristics
emotional
impact
murder
victim
family
deciding
whether
eligible
defendant
receive
death
sentence
see
payne
tennessee
state
may
legitimately
conclude
evidence
victim
impact
murder
victim
family
relevant
jury
decision
whether
death
penalty
imposed
reason
treat
evidence
differently
relevant
evidence
treated
petitioner
dispute
general
matter
evidence
appropriate
sentencing
jury
consideration
see
reply
brief
petitioner
objection
two
nonstatutory
aggravating
factors
duplicative
vague
overbroad
render
use
case
unconstitutional
point
fifth
circuit
agreed
although
ultimately
ruled
government
favor
ground
alleged
error
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
id
government
renews
argument
nonstatutory
aggravators
case
constitutionally
valid
oral
argument
however
suggested
case
comes
us
assumption
nonstatutory
aggravating
factors
invalid
government
question
tr
oral
arg
prevailing
party
government
entitled
defend
judgment
ground
properly
raised
see
el
paso
natural
gas
neztsosie
slip
northwest
airlines
county
kent
prevailing
party
need
defend
judgment
ground
properly
raised
long
party
seeks
preserve
change
judgment
suggested
granted
certiorari
government
rephrasing
petitioner
questions
third
question
whether
appeals
correctly
held
submission
invalid
nonstatutory
aggravating
factors
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
presumes
error
must
assume
nonstatutory
aggravating
factors
erroneous
tr
oral
arg
convinced
reformulated
question
presumes
error
question
whether
nonstatutory
aggravating
factors
constitutional
fairly
included
within
third
question
presented
might
answer
question
hether
appeals
correctly
held
submission
invalid
nonstatutory
aggravating
factors
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
explaining
fifth
circuit
incorrect
holding
error
without
doubt
government
done
better
call
attention
fact
planned
argue
nonstatutory
aggravating
factors
valid
petitioning
stage
affirmatively
concede
nonstatutory
aggravators
invalid
see
brief
opposition
absent
concession
think
government
argument
properly
presented
first
address
petitioner
contention
two
nonstatutory
aggravating
factors
impermissibly
duplicative
fifth
circuit
reasoned
plain
meaning
term
personal
characteristics
used
nonstatutory
aggravator
necessarily
includes
young
age
slight
stature
background
unfamiliarity
jury
asked
consider
problem
thought
duplication
led
double
counting
aggravating
factors
following
tenth
circuit
decision
mccullah
fifth
circuit
view
weighing
scheme
double
counting
tendency
skew
process
give
rise
risk
arbitrary
thus
unconstitutional
death
sentence
fifth
circuit
words
may
thumb
scale
favor
death
jury
asked
weigh
aggravating
factor
twice
ibid
never
held
aggravating
factors
duplicative
render
constitutionally
invalid
passed
double
counting
theory
tenth
circuit
advanced
mccullah
fifth
circuit
appears
followed
said
weighing
process
may
impermissibly
skewed
sentencing
jury
considers
invalid
factor
see
stringer
black
petitioner
argument
reasoning
fifth
tenth
circuits
us
reach
quite
different
proposition
two
aggravating
factors
duplicative
weighing
process
necessarily
skewed
factors
therefore
invalid
even
accepting
sake
argument
petitioner
double
counting
theory
nevertheless
several
problems
fifth
circuit
application
theory
case
phrase
personal
characteristics
used
factor
obviously
include
specific
personal
characteristics
listed
young
age
slight
stature
background
unfamiliarity
san
angelo
especially
light
fact
went
refer
impact
crime
victim
family
context
considering
effect
crime
victim
family
natural
understand
personal
characteristics
refer
aspects
victim
character
personality
family
miss
important
extent
ambiguity
arising
factors
drafted
government
argument
jury
made
clear
went
entirely
different
areas
aggravation
former
clearly
went
victim
vulnerability
latter
captured
victim
individual
uniqueness
effect
crime
family
see
record
ou
consider
victim
young
age
slight
stature
background
unfamiliarity
san
angelo
area
barely
five
feet
tall
weighs
approximately
pounds
ideal
victim
id
ou
consider
victim
personal
characteristics
effects
instant
offense
family
heard
young
woman
heard
mother
heard
friends
knew
special
unique
loving
caring
lot
offer
world
even
phrase
personal
characteristics
used
factor
understood
include
specific
personal
characteristics
listed
factors
whole
duplicative
best
certain
evidence
relevant
two
different
aggravating
factors
moreover
risk
weighing
process
skewed
eliminated
district
instruction
jury
simply
count
number
aggravating
mitigating
factors
reach
decision
based
number
greater
rather
consider
weight
value
factor
app
also
view
fifth
circuit
incorrectly
concluded
factors
unconstitutionally
vague
view
nonstatutory
aggravating
factors
challenged
fail
ed
guide
jury
discretion
distinguish
murder
murder
appeals
relying
decision
maynard
cartwright
also
opinion
use
terms
background
personal
characteristics
unfamiliarity
without
definition
instruction
left
jury
discretion
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
ensuring
sentence
death
infected
bias
caprice
controlling
objective
examine
eligibility
selection
factors
vagueness
tuilaepa
california
vagueness
review
however
quite
deferential
ibid
long
aggravating
factor
core
meaning
criminal
juries
capable
understanding
pass
constitutional
muster
ibid
assessed
deferential
standard
factors
challenged
surely
vague
jury
difficulty
understanding
factor
designed
ask
consider
whether
victim
especially
vulnerable
petitioner
attack
difficulty
comprehending
factor
asked
consider
victim
personal
traits
effect
crime
family
even
factors
written
somewhat
vague
fifth
circuit
wrong
conclude
factors
given
definition
see
explained
government
argument
made
absolutely
clear
nonstatutory
factor
meant
finally
turn
petitioner
contention
challenged
nonstatutory
factors
overbroad
aggravating
factor
overbroad
sentencing
jury
fairly
conclude
aggravating
circumstance
applies
every
defendant
eligible
death
penalty
arave
creech
however
specifically
considered
means
factor
overbroad
important
selection
purposes
especially
sets
forth
victim
vulnerability
victim
impact
evidence
course
every
murder
impact
victim
family
friends
victims
often
chosen
vulnerability
might
seem
factors
apply
every
eligible
defendant
thus
fall
within
eighth
amendment
proscription
overbroad
factors
correct
decided
payne
even
though
concepts
victim
impact
victim
vulnerability
may
well
relevant
every
case
evidence
victim
vulnerability
victim
impact
particular
case
inherently
individualized
evidence
surely
relevant
selection
phase
decision
given
sentencer
consider
circumstances
crime
deciding
whether
impose
death
penalty
see
tuilaepa
common
importance
eligibility
selection
stages
process
neutral
principled
guard
bias
caprice
sentencing
decision
id
long
victim
vulnerability
victim
impact
factors
used
direct
jury
individual
circumstances
case
think
principle
disturbed
factors
directed
jury
evidence
specific
case
think
overbroad
way
offended
constitution
error
case
rests
loose
drafting
nonstatutory
aggravating
factors
made
clear
victim
vulnerability
victim
impact
evidence
appropriate
subjects
capital
sentencer
consideration
assuming
use
loosely
drafted
factors
indeed
error
conclude
error
harmless
review
death
sentence
may
performed
least
two
different
ways
appellate
may
choose
consider
whether
absent
invalid
factor
jury
reached
verdict
may
choose
instead
consider
whether
result
invalid
aggravating
factor
precisely
defined
see
clemons
mississippi
fifth
circuit
chose
perform
first
sort
analysis
ultimately
concluded
jury
returned
recommendation
death
even
considered
two
supposedly
invalid
aggravating
factors
removing
offensive
aggravating
factors
balance
left
two
statutory
aggravating
factors
eleven
mitigating
factors
consider
deciding
whether
beyond
reasonable
doubt
death
sentence
imposed
invalid
aggravating
factors
never
submitted
jury
sentencing
hearing
government
placed
great
emphasis
two
statutory
aggravating
factors
found
unanimously
jury
jones
caused
death
victim
commission
offense
kidnapping
offense
committed
especially
heinous
cruel
depraved
manner
involved
torture
serious
physical
abuse
victim
part
two
special
findings
form
jury
failed
find
government
proved
least
one
statutory
aggravating
factors
beyond
reasonable
doubt
deliberations
ceased
leaving
jury
powerless
recommend
death
penalty
therefore
ability
jury
recommend
death
penalty
hinged
finding
least
one
statutory
aggravating
factor
conversely
jury
findings
regarding
aggravating
factors
required
jury
recommend
death
penalty
removing
two
aggravating
factors
mix
conclude
two
remaining
statutory
aggravating
factors
unanimously
found
jury
support
sentence
death
even
considering
eleven
mitigating
factors
found
one
jurors
consequently
error
harmless
death
sentence
imposed
beyond
reasonable
doubt
invalid
aggravating
factors
never
submitted
jury
petitioner
claims
analysis
perfunctory
infirm
argument
largely
based
following
passage
clemons
circumstances
require
detailed
explanation
based
record
us
possibly
agree
error
giving
invalid
especially
heinous
instruction
harmless
emphasis
added
clemons
however
involved
quite
different
facts
especially
heinous
aggravating
factor
determined
unconstitutionally
vague
remaining
aggravating
factor
murder
committed
robbery
pecuniary
gain
state
repeatedly
emphasized
invalid
factor
said
little
valid
aggravator
see
despite
mississippi
said
likewise
opinion
beyond
reasonable
doubt
jury
verdict
without
especially
heinous
atrocious
cruel
aggravating
circumstance
ibid
quoting
clemons
state
miss
quite
understandably
required
detailed
explanation
based
record
circumstances
detailed
explanation
record
required
clemons
may
necessary
case
cf
sochor
florida
federal
requirement
state
courts
adopt
particular
formulaic
indication
review
harmless
error
pass
scrutiny
even
fifth
circuit
analysis
perfunctory
think
plain
alternative
mode
analysis
error
indeed
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
federal
death
sentences
set
aside
basis
errors
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
factors
precisely
defined
writing
jury
surely
reached
recommendation
government
argument
jury
see
record
cured
nonstatutory
factors
infirmity
written
satisfied
jury
case
actually
understood
factor
designed
put
therefore
doubt
jury
reached
conclusion
aggravators
precisely
defined
writing
foregoing
reasons
judgment
appeals
affirmed
ordered
louis
jones
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
june
justice
ginsburg
justice
stevens
justice
souter
join
justice
breyer
joins
parts
ii
iii
dissenting
federal
death
penalty
act
fdpa
ed
supp
iii
establishes
complex
regime
applicable
government
seeks
ultimate
penalty
defendant
found
guilty
offense
potentially
punishable
death
case
pathmarking
first
application
fdpa
two
questions
comprehend
petitioner
core
objections
warrant
prime
attention
first
congress
specifies
two
sentencing
options
offense
death
life
without
possibility
release
must
jury
told
exactly
death
decision
stand
despite
misleading
trial
lesser
sentence
instructions
specifically
instructions
open
construction
lack
unanimous
jury
vote
either
life
death
allow
judge
impose
sentence
less
severe
life
prison
second
jury
unable
agree
unanimous
recommendation
case
death
life
without
possibility
release
sentencing
options
must
judge
impose
life
sentence
judge
required
permitted
impanel
second
jury
make
life
death
decision
appeals
fifth
circuit
confronted
two
questions
resolved
prosecution
fifth
circuit
also
tolerated
trial
submission
two
nonstatutory
aggravating
factors
jury
although
appeals
found
factors
duplicative
vague
lower
courts
disposition
death
despite
flawed
trial
proceedings
tolerance
flaws
disregard
basic
guide
ccurate
sentencing
information
indispensable
prerequisite
jury
determination
whether
defendant
shall
live
die
gregg
georgia
joint
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
indispensable
prerequisite
satisfied
case
reverse
remand
life
death
decision
may
made
accurately
informed
trier
authorizing
federal
death
penalty
small
category
cases
congress
enacted
comprehensive
death
penalty
legislation
see
fdpa
stat
applicable
existing
newly
declared
death
eligible
offenses
see
stat
fdpa
prescribes
procedures
principally
provides
separate
sentencing
hearing
whenever
government
seeks
death
penalty
defendants
found
guilty
covered
offense
see
homicide
cases
act
instructs
jury
must
respond
sequentially
three
inquiries
imposition
death
penalty
requires
unanimity
three
first
jury
determines
whether
killing
death
resulting
defendant
intentional
engagement
activity
see
second
jury
decides
aggravating
factors
statutory
nonstatutory
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
third
jury
finds
least
one
statutory
aggravators
proposed
government
jury
determines
whether
aggravating
factors
sufficiently
outweigh
mitigating
factors
warrant
death
sentence
absent
mitigating
factors
whether
aggravators
alone
warrant
sentence
mitigating
factors
seven
statutory
others
tending
death
sentence
individually
determined
juror
unlike
aggravating
factors
jury
must
unanimously
agree
beyond
reasonable
doubt
standard
mitigating
factor
may
considered
jury
weighing
process
one
juror
finds
factor
proved
preponderance
evidence
see
weighing
numeric
perceived
significance
number
aggravating
mitigating
factors
determines
decision
ii
louis
jones
crime
atrocious
commission
followed
jones
precipitous
decline
fortune
termination
army
career
february
jones
forcibly
abducted
private
tracie
joy
mcbride
gunpoint
goodfellow
air
force
base
san
angelo
texas
course
abduction
jones
struck
private
michael
alan
peacock
handgun
leaving
unconscious
thereafter
jones
sexually
assaulted
killed
mcbride
leaving
body
bridge
located
miles
outside
san
angelo
see
fall
jones
tried
jury
convicted
kidnaping
death
resulting
violation
see
separate
sentencing
hearing
followed
determine
whether
jones
punished
death
see
id
close
sentencing
hearing
jones
submitted
proposed
jury
instructions
jones
instruction
advised
jury
must
sentence
jones
life
without
possibility
release
rather
death
one
persuaded
justice
demands
jones
execution
app
jones
instruction
advised
jury
unable
agree
unanimous
decision
sentence
imposed
jury
inform
judge
impose
sentence
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
release
id
proposed
instructions
nos
although
inartfully
drawn
unquestionably
sought
convey
core
information
jurors
agree
death
sentencing
option
jury
judge
life
without
possibility
release
jones
also
objected
vagueness
grounds
two
three
nonstatutory
aggravators
proposed
government
see
id
district
rejected
jones
proposed
instructions
nos
refused
strike
modify
nonstatutory
aggravators
jones
objected
see
id
trial
instructed
jury
recommend
death
life
without
possibility
release
lesser
sentence
event
decide
lesser
sentence
see
id
jury
apparently
found
case
close
rejected
three
seven
aggravators
government
urged
see
one
jurors
found
specific
mitigating
factors
submitted
jones
see
ibid
jury
deliberated
day
half
returning
verdict
recommending
death
jones
moved
new
trial
ground
supported
postsentence
juror
statements
instructions
misled
jurors
specifically
jones
urged
charge
led
jurors
believe
deadlock
result
lesser
sentence
avoid
outcome
jones
asserted
jurors
favored
life
without
possibility
release
changed
votes
approve
death
verdict
see
app
vote
change
jones
maintained
hypothetical
backed
juror
statements
see
id
district
denied
new
trial
motion
id
appeals
fifth
circuit
affirmed
death
sentence
appeals
ruled
first
district
correctly
refused
instruct
jury
deadlock
yield
sentence
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
release
jury
deadlock
fdpa
fifth
circuit
stated
occasion
automatic
life
sentence
instead
declared
deadlock
necessitate
second
sentencing
hearing
newly
impaneled
jury
id
appeals
observed
lthough
use
instructions
inform
jury
consequences
hung
jury
ha
affirmed
federal
courts
never
affirmatively
required
give
instructions
id
next
appeals
determined
instructions
read
entirety
led
reasonable
jury
conclude
result
imposition
lesser
sentence
id
jones
rely
juror
statements
fifth
circuit
held
show
jury
fact
misled
sentenced
death
see
id
although
federal
rule
evidence
applicable
fdpa
proceedings
see
reasons
allowing
jurors
undermine
verdicts
trial
proceedings
apply
equal
force
sentencing
hearings
appeals
view
district
err
plainly
conveying
jury
misinformation
three
sentencing
options
available
death
life
imprisonment
without
release
lesser
sentence
see
noting
fdpa
takes
account
three
possibilities
see
kidnaping
statute
authorizes
two
sentences
death
life
imprisonment
see
fifth
circuit
acknowledged
district
erred
giving
jury
lesser
sentence
option
substantive
kidnaping
statute
takes
precedence
death
penalty
sentencing
provisions
limits
options
death
life
imprisonment
without
release
appeals
nevertheless
concluded
district
error
plain
fdpa
new
prior
opinion
addressed
question
hence
clearly
established
law
place
time
jones
sentencing
hearing
ibid
fifth
circuit
also
considered
jones
challenge
nonstatutory
aggravators
presented
jury
government
request
held
two
found
jury
victim
young
age
slight
stature
background
unfamiliarity
san
angelo
texas
personal
characteristics
effect
offense
family
duplicative
also
impermissibly
vague
overbroad
id
declined
upset
death
verdict
however
believed
death
sentence
imposed
beyond
reasonable
doubt
invalid
aggravating
factors
never
submitted
jury
id
iii
governing
law
gave
jones
jury
sentencing
phase
life
without
release
death
choice
district
however
introduced
erroneously
third
prospect
lesser
sentence
app
moreover
told
jury
concerned
lesser
sentence
might
hat
matter
decide
ibid
jury
choice
clouded
misinformation
set
reasons
concluding
misinformation
rendered
jury
death
verdict
unreliable
district
instructed
jury
ou
jury
unanimous
vote
shall
recommend
whether
defendant
sentenced
death
sentenced
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
release
sentenced
lesser
sentence
recommend
lesser
sentence
imposed
required
impose
sentence
authorized
law
deciding
recommendation
make
concerned
question
sentence
defendant
might
receive
event
determine
recommend
death
sentence
sentence
life
without
possibility
release
matter
decide
event
conclude
sentence
death
life
without
possibility
release
recommended
order
bring
back
verdict
recommending
punishment
death
life
without
possibility
release
twelve
must
unanimously
vote
favor
specific
penalty
app
instructions
misinformed
jury
two
intertwined
respects
first
wrongly
identified
lesser
sentence
option
second
instructions
open
reading
absent
juror
unanimity
death
life
without
release
district
impose
lesser
sentence
fifth
circuit
submission
acknowledged
charge
error
see
ante
section
defines
crime
governs
calls
death
life
imprisonment
nothing
less
neither
parole
credits
reduce
life
sentence
see
brief
agree
petitioner
sentences
imposed
death
life
without
release
kidnapping
statute
authorizes
death
life
imprisonment
neither
parole
credits
reduce
life
sentence
third
option
listed
fdpa
provision
lesser
sentence
available
substantive
statute
confine
sentence
life
death
fifth
circuit
found
error
obvious
clear
readily
apparent
conspicuous
disagree
rank
district
misconstruction
plain
error
fdpa
unquestionably
procedural
statute
alter
substantive
prescriptions
serious
doubt
existed
score
flawed
charge
simply
include
nonexistent
option
understood
convey
absent
juror
unanimity
lesser
sentence
might
imposed
message
came
instructions
jury
must
unanimous
bring
back
verdict
recommending
punishment
death
life
without
possibility
release
app
lesser
sentence
possible
id
jury
concerned
sentence
defendant
might
receive
event
determine
recommend
death
sentence
sentence
life
without
possibility
release
ibid
jones
proposed
instructions
sentenced
life
without
possibility
release
jury
agree
death
see
supra
nn
made
apparent
sought
close
door
flawed
charge
left
open
least
reasonable
likelihood
flawed
charge
tainted
jury
deliberations
see
boyde
california
claim
instruction
subject
erroneous
interpretation
proper
inquiry
whether
reasonable
likelihood
jury
applied
challenged
instruction
erroneously
recently
noted
jury
may
swayed
toward
death
believes
defendant
otherwise
may
serve
less
life
prison
see
simmons
south
carolina
plurality
opinion
entirely
reasonable
sentencing
jury
view
defendant
eligible
parole
greater
threat
society
defendant
jurors
may
persuaded
switch
life
death
ward
juror
wanted
chance
lesser
sentence
judge
common
fifth
circuit
solicitor
general
insists
likely
jurors
supporting
death
persuaded
jurors
give
way
vote
life
sentence
see
ante
brief
demur
say
position
suffice
potential
confuse
existed
instructions
tilted
jury
toward
death
instructions
introduce
level
uncertainty
unreliability
factfinding
process
tolerated
capital
case
beck
alabama
capital
sentencing
game
chicken
life
death
turns
happenstance
whether
particular
life
jurors
death
jurors
case
first
give
order
avoid
perceived
third
sentencing
outcome
unacceptable
either
set
jurors
reply
brief
fifth
circuit
held
district
obliged
tell
jury
jones
default
penalty
life
without
possibility
release
part
appeals
viewed
instruction
substantively
correct
fifth
circuit
comprehended
law
jury
deadlocked
second
sentencing
hearing
held
front
second
jury
impaneled
purpose
id
fdpa
seems
clear
provide
second
shot
death
dispositive
provision
read
act
first
shall
sentence
defendant
death
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
release
jury
recommends
continues
otherwise
shall
impose
lesser
sentence
authorized
law
notwithstanding
law
maximum
term
imprisonment
offense
life
imprisonment
may
impose
sentence
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
release
therwise
clause
requiring
judge
sentencing
becomes
operative
jury
fails
make
unanimous
recommendation
close
deliberations
fifth
circuit
attention
deflected
path
provides
sentencing
hearing
jury
impaneled
purpose
hearing
jury
determined
defendant
guilt
discharged
good
cause
discharge
good
cause
however
reasonably
read
cover
extension
juror
disqualification
due
exposure
prejudicial
extrinsic
information
illness
provision
read
expansively
encompass
failure
reach
unanimous
life
death
decision
government
refers
background
rule
allowing
retrial
jury
unable
reach
verdict
urges
fdpa
read
light
rule
brief
retrial
prevailing
rule
capital
proceedings
government
survey
state
laws
shows
life
death
cases
require
judge
sentencing
jury
deadlocked
see
id
app
brief
identifying
imposes
sentence
upon
deadlock
three
new
sentencing
hearing
possible
see
also
acker
lanier
law
discretion
capital
jury
death
penalty
statutes
proposals
reform
crim
bull
capital
juries
final
sentencing
authority
deadlocked
sentencing
jury
transformed
lifelocked
jury
jury
inability
produce
unanimous
verdict
results
defendant
sentenced
life
imprisonment
life
imprisonment
without
parole
footnotes
omitted
furthermore
time
congress
adopted
fdpa
identical
language
predecessor
abuse
death
penalty
act
construed
mandate
sentencing
upon
jury
deadlock
see
chandler
jury
recommend
death
district
sentences
defendant
pitera
supp
edny
absent
recommendation
death
must
sentence
house
report
suggests
congress
understood
approved
construction
see
jury
unanimous
judge
shall
impose
sentence
pursuant
section
iv
piled
key
instructional
error
trial
presented
jury
duplicative
vague
nonstatutory
aggravating
factors
told
jury
consider
aggravators
established
beyond
reasonable
doubt
factors
victim
young
age
slight
stature
background
unfamiliarity
san
angelo
texas
victim
personal
characteristics
effect
instant
offense
family
jury
found
see
ibid
district
clarify
meaning
terms
background
personal
characteristics
see
id
notably
term
personal
characteristics
aggravator
necessarily
included
young
age
slight
stature
background
unfamiliarity
factors
jury
told
consider
aggravator
attribute
genuine
disagreement
proposition
see
ante
double
counting
aggravators
creates
risk
arbitrary
death
sentence
see
also
mccullah
double
counting
aggravating
factors
especially
weighing
scheme
tendency
skew
weighing
process
creates
risk
death
sentence
imposed
fifth
circuit
considered
district
lapse
inconsequential
concluding
two
remaining
statutory
aggravating
factors
support
sentence
death
even
considering
eleven
mitigating
factors
appellate
courts
hesitate
assert
confidence
elimination
improperly
considered
aggravating
circumstances
possibly
affect
balance
barclay
florida
adding
overlapping
aggravators
disturbing
misinformation
conveyed
charge
see
basis
concluding
made
difference
thumb
removed
death
side
scale
quoting
stringer
black
fifth
circuit
tolerance
error
case
refusal
face
reconciled
recognition
woodson
north
carolina
plurality
opinion
death
qualitatively
different
jury
weighing
process
infected
trial
misperceptions
law
legitimacy
ensuing
death
sentence
hinge
defense
counsel
shortfalls
reviewing
speculation
decision
jury
made
absent
infection
vacate
jury
sentencing
decision
remand
case
new
sentencing
hearing
one
proceed
accuracy
superintendents
fdpa
demand
footnotes
justice
scalia
joins
part
opinion
phrased
special
findings
form
returned
jury
statutory
aggravating
factors
read
defendant
louis
jones
caused
death
tracie
joy
mcbride
injury
resulting
death
tracie
joy
mcbride
occurred
commission
offense
kidnapping
defendant
louis
jones
committed
offense
especially
heinous
cruel
depraved
manner
involved
torture
serious
physical
abuse
tracie
joy
mcbride
app
term
nonstatutory
aggravating
factor
used
refer
aggravating
factor
specifically
described
section
provides
jury
may
consider
whether
aggravating
factor
notice
given
exists
pursuant
government
decides
seek
death
penalty
must
provide
notice
aggravating
factors
proposes
prove
justifying
sentence
death
phrased
special
findings
form
nonstatutory
aggravating
factors
read
tracie
joy
mcbride
young
age
slight
stature
background
unfamiliarity
san
angelo
texas
tracie
joy
mcbride
personal
characteristics
effect
instant
offense
tracie
joy
mcbride
family
constitute
aggravating
factor
offense
app
mitigating
factors
jury
found
set
forth
special
findings
form
along
number
jurors
found
factor
brackets
follows
defendant
louis
jones
significant
prior
criminal
record
defendant
louis
jones
capacity
appreciate
wrongfulness
defendant
conduct
conform
requirements
law
significantly
impaired
regardless
whether
capacity
impaired
constitute
defense
charge
defendant
louis
jones
committed
offense
severe
mental
emotional
disturbance
defendant
louis
jones
subjected
physical
sexual
emotional
abuse
child
deprived
sufficient
parental
protection
needed
defendant
louis
jones
served
country
well
desert
storm
grenada
years
army
defendant
louis
jones
likely
inmate
defendant
louis
jones
remorseful
crime
committed
defendant
louis
jones
daughter
harmed
emotional
trauma
father
execution
defendant
louis
jones
unusual
substantial
internally
generated
duress
stress
time
offense
defendant
louis
jones
suffered
numerous
neurological
psychological
disorders
time
offense
app
seven
jurors
added
petitioner
mitigating
factor
without
elaboration
app
thus
approved
use
supplemental
charge
encourage
jury
reporting
deadlocked
engage
deliberations
see
allen
even
capital
sentencing
juries
see
lowenfield
phelps
insignificant
courts
appeals
addressed
question
far
aware
uniform
rejecting
argument
constitution
requires
instruction
consequences
jury
inability
agree
see
coe
bell
green
french
chandler
evans
thompson
indeed
fifth
circuit
alternative
reached
conclusion
case
see
decision
forms
read
follows
decision
form
jury
determined
sentence
death
imposed
government
failed
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
existence
required
intent
part
defendant
required
aggravating
factor
decision
form
based
upon
consideration
whether
aggravating
factor
factors
found
exist
sufficiently
outweigh
mitigating
factor
factors
found
exist
absence
mitigating
factors
whether
aggravating
factor
factors
sufficient
justify
sentence
death
recommend
unanimous
vote
sentence
death
imposed
decision
form
jury
recommend
unanimous
verdict
sentence
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
release
decision
form
jury
recommend
lesser
sentence
app
petitioner
argue
district
instructions
lesser
sentence
option
standing
alone
constituted
reversible
error
although
parties
agree
jury
found
petitioner
guilty
kidnaping
resulting
death
possible
sentences
death
life
sentence
see
brief
petitioner
brief
see
also
petitioner
made
argument
fifth
circuit
however
concluded
instructions
lesser
sentence
option
rise
level
plain
error
petitioner
concedes
boyde
standard
applies
extent
advancing
constitutional
claim
relying
prior
decision
andres
contends
lenient
standard
applies
extent
seeks
relief
statute
directly
decisions
boyde
estelle
however
foreclose
reading
andres
boyde
noted
prior
decisions
including
andres
less
clear
articulating
single
workable
standard
evaluating
claims
instruction
prevented
jury
consideration
constitutionally
relevant
evidence
order
supply
single
formulation
courts
employ
deciding
kind
federal
question
announced
reasonable
likelihood
standard
made
point
later
estelle
noting
boyde
made
point
settle
single
standard
review
jury
instructions
reasonable
likelihood
standard
considering
many
different
phrasings
previously
used
relevant
portion
instruction
read
also
recall
previously
told
twelve
unanimously
agree
particular
aggravating
circumstance
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
consider
quite
opposite
true
regard
mitigating
factors
finding
respect
mitigating
factor
may
made
one
members
jury
member
finds
preponderance
evidence
existence
mitigating
factor
may
consider
factor
established
weighing
aggravating
mitigating
factors
regardless
number
jurors
agree
mitigating
factor
established
app
petitioner
also
urges
us
take
cognizance
two
affidavits
prepared
jury
returned
sentencing
recommendation
one
affidavit
attached
petitioner
new
trial
motion
executed
investigator
federal
public
defender
juror
contacted
public
defender
office
affidavit
attached
petitioner
motion
reconsider
district
order
denying
motion
new
trial
executed
one
jurors
fifth
circuit
ruled
petitioner
rely
affidavits
undermine
jury
sentencing
recommendation
petitioner
raise
independent
determination
questions
presented
believe
issue
fairly
included
within
therefore
decline
review
ruling
fifth
circuit
see
rule
berkemer
mccarty
dissent
treat
aspect
government
argument
waived
post
justice
ginsburg
explained
unanimous
caterpillar
lewis
rule
nonjurisdictional
argument
raised
respondent
brief
opposition
petition
writ
certiorari
may
deemed
waived
id
emphasis
added
done
issue
raised
brief
opposition
predicate
intelligent
resolution
question
presented
ohio
robinette
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
also
caterpillar
instances
treated
issue
raised
opposition
fairly
included
within
question
presented
certainly
case
assessing
error
including
whether
error
essential
intelligent
resolution
whether
error
harmless
moreover
caterpillar
parties
addressed
issue
briefs
oral
argument
ibid
contrast
cases
dissent
looks
support
position
good
reasons
decline
exercise
discretion
roberts
galen
inc
per
curiam
claims
declined
consider
appear
sufficiently
developed
us
assess
south
central
bell
telephone
alabama
slip
op
argument
respondent
raised
first
time
merits
brief
argument
normally
expect
notice
especially
unlike
case
respondent
argument
appear
raised
considered
tenth
circuit
decision
subsequent
mccullah
emphasized
factors
impermissibly
overlap
unless
one
necessarily
subsumes
cooks
ward
petitioner
argues
term
personal
characteristics
vague
jury
may
thought
consider
victim
race
petitioner
race
factor
light
remainder
factor
government
argument
respect
factor
fail
see
possibility
event
accordance
death
penalty
act
explicit
command
district
instructed
jury
consider
race
reaching
decision
app
jurors
presumed
followed
instructions
see
richardson
marsh
reiterate
point
made
tuilaepa
california
held
quite
similar
factors
vague
see
maynard
cartwright
whether
murder
especially
heinous
atrocious
cruel
upholding
numerous
factors
vagueness
challenges
see
collecting
cases
footnotes
granted
certiorari
three
questions
phrased
whether
petitioner
entitled
jury
instruction
jury
failure
agree
sentencing
recommendation
automatically
result
sentence
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
release
whether
reasonable
likelihood
jury
instructions
led
jury
believe
deadlock
penalty
recommendation
automatically
result
sentence
less
severe
life
imprisonment
whether
appeals
correctly
held
submission
invalid
aggravating
factors
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
also
brief
think
fair
principled
ante
read
indigent
petitioner
arguments
questions
presented
willingness
overlook
loose
drafting
consistently
shows
evaluating
government
case
see
ante
see
also
ante
adopting
government
merits
brief
arguments
although
arguments
mentioned
brief
opposition
predecessor
abuse
act
authorized
death
penalty
murder
resulting
certain
offenses
see
fdpa
procedures
apply
federal
offense
sentence
death
provided
repeal
act
differs
respects
see
mandatory
appointment
habeas
counsel
provision
investigative
expert
services
congress
enacted
three
statutes
authorizing
death
penalty
antihijacking
act
stat
repealed
fdpa
stat
air
piracy
criminal
law
procedure
technical
amendments
act
stat
witness
killing
department
defense
authorization
act
stat
amending
uniform
military
justice
act
establish
weighing
procedures
martials
considering
death
penalty
espionage
earlier
federal
statutes
authorizing
death
penalty
remained
books
invoked
following
decision
furman
georgia
per
curiam
led
hiatus
death
penalty
adjudications
see
little
federal
death
penalty
history
thoughts
department
justice
role
ford
urb
see
id
estimating
fdpa
applies
least
offenses
sentencing
hearing
jury
unless
defendant
approval
government
moves
hearing
see
section
allows
death
penalty
defendant
found
guilty
homicide
defendant
determined
beyond
reasonable
doubt
sentencing
hearing
intentionally
killed
victim
intentionally
inflicted
serious
bodily
injury
resulted
death
victim
intentionally
participated
act
contemplating
life
person
taken
intending
lethal
force
used
connection
person
one
participants
offense
victim
died
direct
result
act
intentionally
specifically
engaged
act
violence
knowing
act
created
grave
risk
death
person
one
participants
offense
participation
act
constituted
reckless
disregard
human
life
victim
died
direct
result
act
fdpa
lists
aggravating
factors
homicide
allows
jury
consider
whether
aggravating
factor
notice
given
government
exists
nonstatutory
aggravators
may
include
factors
concerning
effect
offense
victim
victim
family
see
little
supra
weighing
requires
qualitative
quantitative
evaluation
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
jones
instruction
read
relevant
part
fair
impartial
consideration
evidence
case
one
persuaded
justice
demands
jones
execution
jury
must
return
decision
capital
punishment
must
fix
jones
punishment
life
prison
without
possibility
release
app
jones
instruction
read
relevant
part
even
single
juror
persuaded
beyond
reasonable
doubt
jones
execution
required
case
entire
jury
must
render
decision
death
event
jury
must
fix
punishment
life
prison
without
possibility
release
unless
twelve
members
jury
determine
jones
receive
death
penalty
impose
sentence
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
release
event
due
deliberation
reflection
jury
unable
agree
unanimous
decision
sentence
imposed
advise
impose
sentence
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
release
event
unable
agree
life
without
possibility
release
death
unanimous
sentence
less
life
without
possibility
release
report
vote
sentence
defendant
life
without
possibility
release
app
defendant
objections
charge
jones
particularly
direct
ed
attention
proposed
instruction
id
jury
rejected
following
aggravators
crime
involved
substantial
planning
premeditation
see
crime
created
grave
risk
person
victim
see
jones
posed
future
danger
lives
safety
persons
found
aggravators
jones
killed
victim
commission
kidnaping
see
crime
especially
heinous
cruel
depraved
see
victim
young
age
slight
stature
background
unfamiliarity
san
angelo
texas
victim
personal
characteristics
effect
offense
family
see
nn
one
jurors
found
jones
ten
specific
mitigating
factors
none
found
eleventh
stating
factors
defendant
background
character
militate
death
penalty
see
seven
found
existence
additional
mitigating
factor
submitted
jones
see
problem
describes
failure
give
jury
bit
information
might
possibly
influence
individual
juror
voting
behavior
ante
rather
jury
affirmatively
misled
cf
ante
repeated
misinformation
charge
decision
forms
conveyed
verdict
forms
compounded
error
allowing
jurors
return
decision
statement
jury
recommend
lesser
sentence
app
jones
press
district
identification
lesser
sentence
option
independent
ground
reversal
error
however
essential
component
argument
misinformation
conveyed
district
led
jury
believe
deadlock
result
sentence
justice
breyer
believe
district
submission
jury
instructions
amounted
plain
error
view
judge
failure
submit
defense
proposed
instruction
amounted
abuse
discretion
proposed
instruction
legally
correct
judge
failure
give
likely
rested
upon
erroneous
view
law
corrected
false
impression
created
remaining
instructions
see
cooter
gell
hartmarx
app
order
denying
defendant
motion
new
trial
cf
fifth
circuit
noted
jones
counsel
proposed
language
referring
lesser
sentence
reviewed
plain
error
rather
discounting
error
invited
district
use
defense
counsel
requested
language
although
jones
counsel
propose
lesser
sentence
language
see
app
jones
proposed
instructions
nos
made
one
thing
clear
view
jury
judge
required
impose
life
without
possibility
release
jury
agree
death
see
supra
nn
appears
recognize
beyond
genuine
debate
jones
possible
sentences
death
life
sentence
ante
face
district
lesser
sentence
instructions
four
times
given
jury
difficult
comprehend
see
error
occurred
see
ante
general
rule
government
observes
repeats
party
requested
instruction
given
relieved
requirement
state
distinctly
objection
instruction
given
brief
quoting
wright
federal
practice
procedure
ed
see
also
ante
also
true
however
requirement
objections
employed
woodenly
applied
application
serve
ends
designed
rather
made
trap
unwary
wright
supra
jones
proposed
instruction
default
sentence
life
without
possibility
release
apprised
district
government
essential
position
precedent
supports
fifth
circuit
affirmation
statements
attesting
juror
understanding
instructions
inadmissible
see
statements
jones
submitted
assert
apprehension
lesser
sentence
judge
might
impose
fact
caused
jurors
vote
death
sentence
see
app
matter
grave
discount
statements
altogether
cf
jorgensen
york
ice
machinery
hand
many
defects
jury
deliberation
require
reversal
nothing
evidence
shall
competent
prove
facts
facts
require
verdict
set
aside
concededly
facts
misinformation
district
failure
repeat
unanimity
requirement
time
mentioned
jury
sentencing
options
advise
consequences
deadlocked
jury
harmful
error
heart
jones
case
therefore
see
cause
dispute
eighth
amendment
require
jury
instructed
consequences
failure
agree
ante
judgment
however
obliged
life
death
case
make
clear
jury
jones
minimum
sentence
life
without
possibility
release
oral
argument
counsel
maintained
prosecutor
jury
deadlocked
request
new
panel
allow
judge
decide
sentence
see
tr
oral
arg
done
government
maintained
event
second
deadlock
obligation
impose
sentence
see
id
like
fdpa
abuse
act
provides
new
sentencing
jury
jury
discharged
good
cause
iii
immediately
providing
death
sentence
upon
jury
recommendation
therwise
shall
impose
sentence
death
authorized
law
abuse
act
unlike
fdpa
binding
recommendation
jury
make
death
counsel
specifically
objected
factors
see
app
government
argues
contrary
fifth
circuit
conclusion
aggravating
factors
duplicative
vague
overbroad
see
brief
granted
certiorari
government
reformulated
questions
presumed
incorrectness
aggravators
see
supra
brief
opposition
government
challenge
fifth
circuit
determination
error
focused
solely
whether
error
harmless
nevertheless
addresses
government
newly
raised
argument
see
ante
hold
government
tighter
rein
dismiss
tardy
argument
waived
see
roberts
galen
per
curiam
south
central
bell
telephone
alabama
cf
rule
evident
issue
held
back
government
predicate
intelligent
resolution
question
presented
ohio
robinette
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
ante
treats
two
issues
separate
independent
ruling
first
error
proceeds
assume
error
next
concludes
error
harmless
either
holding
support
disposition
see
hasting
holding
presumed
error
harmless
rather
deciding
whether
fact
error
explains
question
review
granted
assumed
error
question
resolved
whether
analysis
applied
id
stevens
concurring
decide
case
ground
error
without
reaching
harmless
error
question