massachusetts
argued
november
decided
june
petitioner
drug
trial
prosecution
introduced
certificates
state
laboratory
analysts
stating
material
seized
police
connected
petitioner
cocaine
certain
quantity
required
massachusetts
law
certificates
sworn
notary
public
submitted
prima
facie
evidence
asserted
petitioner
objected
asserting
crawford
washington
required
analysts
testify
person
trial
disagreed
certificates
admitted
petitioner
convicted
massachusetts
appeals
affirmed
rejecting
petitioner
claim
certificates
admission
violated
sixth
amendment
held
admission
certificates
violated
petitioner
sixth
amendment
right
confront
witnesses
pp
crawford
witness
testimony
defendant
inadmissible
unless
witness
appears
trial
witness
unavailable
defendant
prior
opportunity
certificates
affidavits
fall
within
core
class
testimonial
statements
covered
confrontation
clause
asserted
substance
found
petitioner
possession
prosecution
claimed
cocaine
certain
weight
precise
testimony
analysts
expected
provide
called
trial
certificates
made
crawford
required
testimonial
statements
circumstances
lead
objective
witness
reasonably
believe
statement
available
use
later
trial
relevant
massachusetts
law
sole
purpose
provide
prima
facie
evidence
substance
composition
quality
net
weight
petitioner
entitled
confronted
persons
giving
testimony
trial
pp
arguments
advanced
avoid
rather
straightforward
application
crawford
rejected
respondent
claim
analysts
subject
confrontation
accusatory
witnesses
finds
support
sixth
amendment
text
case
law
affiants
testimonial
statements
nearly
contemporaneous
observations
fact
alter
statements
testimonial
character
support
proposition
witnesses
testify
regarding
facts
observed
crime
scene
exempt
confrontation
absence
interrogation
irrelevant
witness
volunteers
testimony
less
witness
sixth
amendment
purposes
affidavits
qualify
traditional
official
business
records
argument
analysts
subject
confrontation
statements
result
neutral
scientific
testing
little
invitation
return
decision
ohio
roberts
held
evidence
particularized
guarantees
trustworthiness
admissible
without
confrontation
petitioner
power
subpoena
analysts
substitute
right
confrontation
finally
requirements
confrontation
clause
may
relaxed
make
prosecution
task
burdensome
event
practice
many
already
accords
today
decision
serious
disruption
predicted
respondent
dissent
materialized
pp
mass
app
reversed
remanded
scalia
delivered
opinion
stevens
souter
thomas
ginsburg
joined
thomas
filed
concurring
opinion
kennedy
filed
dissenting
opinion
roberts
breyer
alito
joined
luis
petitioner
massachusetts
writ
certiorari
appeals
massachusetts
june
justice
scalia
delivered
opinion
massachusetts
courts
case
admitted
evidence
affidavits
reporting
results
forensic
analysis
showed
material
seized
police
connected
defendant
cocaine
question
presented
whether
affidavits
testimonial
rendering
affiants
witnesses
subject
defendant
right
confrontation
sixth
amendment
boston
police
officers
received
tip
kmart
employee
thomas
wright
engaging
suspicious
activity
informant
reported
wright
repeatedly
received
phone
calls
work
picked
front
store
blue
sedan
return
store
short
time
later
police
set
surveillance
kmart
parking
lot
witnessed
precise
sequence
events
wright
got
car
upon
return
one
officers
detained
searched
finding
four
clear
white
plastic
bags
containing
substance
resembling
cocaine
officer
signaled
officers
scene
arrest
two
men
car
one
petitioner
luis
officers
placed
three
men
police
cruiser
short
drive
police
station
officers
observed
passengers
fidgeting
making
furtive
movements
back
car
depositing
men
station
searched
police
cruiser
found
plastic
bag
containing
smaller
plastic
bags
hidden
partition
front
back
seats
submitted
seized
evidence
state
laboratory
required
law
conduct
chemical
analysis
upon
police
request
mass
laws
ch
west
charged
distributing
cocaine
trafficking
cocaine
amount
grams
ch
trial
prosecution
placed
evidence
bags
seized
wright
police
cruiser
also
submitted
three
certificates
analysis
showing
results
forensic
analysis
performed
seized
substances
certificates
reported
weight
seized
bags
stated
bags
examined
following
results
substance
found
contain
cocaine
app
pet
cert
certificates
sworn
notary
public
analysts
state
laboratory
institute
massachusetts
department
public
health
required
massachusetts
law
mass
laws
ch
petitioner
objected
admission
certificates
asserting
confrontation
clause
decision
crawford
washington
required
analysts
testify
person
objection
overruled
certificates
admitted
pursuant
state
law
prima
facie
evidence
composition
quality
net
weight
narcotic
analyzed
mass
laws
ch
jury
found
guilty
appealed
contending
among
things
admission
certificates
violated
sixth
amendment
right
confronted
witnesses
appeals
massachusetts
rejected
claim
affirmance
order
mass
app
wl
july
relying
massachusetts
judicial
decision
commonwealth
verde
mass
held
authors
certificates
forensic
analysis
subject
confrontation
sixth
amendment
judicial
denied
review
mass
granted
certiorari
ii
sixth
amendment
constitution
made
applicable
via
fourteenth
amendment
pointer
texas
provides
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
right
confronted
witnesses
crawford
reviewing
clause
historical
underpinnings
held
guarantees
defendant
right
confront
witness
testimony
defendant
thus
inadmissible
unless
witness
appears
trial
witness
unavailable
defendant
prior
opportunity
opinion
described
class
testimonial
statements
covered
confrontation
clause
follows
various
formulations
core
class
testimonial
statements
exist
ex
parte
testimony
functional
equivalent
material
affidavits
custodial
examinations
prior
testimony
defendant
unable
similar
pretrial
statements
declarants
reasonably
expect
used
prosecutorially
extrajudicial
statements
contained
formalized
testimonial
materials
affidavits
depositions
prior
testimony
confessions
statements
made
circumstances
lead
objective
witness
reasonably
believe
statement
available
use
later
trial
internal
quotation
marks
citations
omitted
little
doubt
documents
issue
case
fall
within
core
class
testimonial
statements
thus
described
description
category
mentions
affidavits
twice
see
also
white
illinois
thomas
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
confrontation
clause
implicated
extrajudicial
statements
insofar
contained
formalized
testimonial
materials
affidavits
depositions
prior
testimony
confessions
documents
issue
denominated
massachusetts
law
certificates
quite
plainly
affidavits
declaration
facts
written
sworn
declarant
officer
authorized
administer
oaths
black
law
dictionary
ed
incontrovertibly
declaration
affirmation
made
purpose
establishing
proving
fact
crawford
supra
quoting
webster
american
dictionary
english
language
fact
question
substance
found
possession
codefendants
prosecution
claimed
cocaine
precise
testimony
analysts
expected
provide
called
trial
certificates
functionally
identical
live
testimony
precisely
witness
direct
examination
davis
washington
emphasis
deleted
moreover
affidavits
circumstances
lead
objective
witness
reasonably
believe
statement
available
use
later
trial
crawford
supra
massachusetts
law
sole
purpose
affidavits
provide
prima
facie
evidence
composition
quality
net
weight
analyzed
substance
mass
laws
ch
safely
assume
analysts
aware
affidavits
evidentiary
purpose
since
purpose
stated
relevant
provision
reprinted
affidavits
see
app
pet
cert
short
decision
crawford
analysts
affidavits
testimonial
statements
analysts
witnesses
purposes
sixth
amendment
absent
showing
analysts
unavailable
testify
trial
petitioner
prior
opportunity
petitioner
entitled
confronted
analysts
trial
crawford
supra
iii
respondent
dissent
advance
potpourri
analytic
arguments
effort
avoid
rather
straightforward
application
holding
crawford
addressing
however
must
assure
reader
falsity
dissent
opening
alarum
sweep
ing
away
accepted
rule
governing
admission
scientific
evidence
established
least
years
extends
across
least
six
federal
courts
appeals
post
opinion
kennedy
vast
majority
cases
dissent
cites
support
claim
come
last
years
last
surprisingly
nearly
rely
decision
ohio
roberts
theory
unconfronted
testimony
admissible
long
bore
indicia
reliability
see
post
six
federal
courts
appeals
cases
cited
dissent
five
postdated
expressly
relied
roberts
see
post
sixth
predated
roberts
relied
entirely
erroneous
theory
see
kay
rejecting
confrontation
clause
challenge
reasonable
necessity
evidence
evidence
qualities
reliability
trustworthiness
review
cases
predate
roberts
era
yields
mixed
picture
dissent
notes
three
state
decisions
early
century
denied
confrontation
respect
certificates
analysis
regarding
substance
alcohol
content
see
post
citing
cases
massachusetts
connecticut
virginia
state
courts
era
reached
opposite
conclusion
see
torres
state
tex
crim
app
volrich
state
wl
ohio
least
much
entirely
clear
faithfully
applying
crawford
facts
case
overruling
years
settled
jurisprudence
dissent
seeks
overturn
precedent
resurrecting
roberts
mere
five
years
rejected
crawford
turn
various
legal
arguments
raised
respondent
dissent
respondent
first
argues
analysts
subject
confrontation
accusatory
witnesses
directly
accuse
petitioner
wrongdoing
rather
testimony
inculpatory
taken
together
evidence
linking
petitioner
contraband
see
brief
respondent
finds
support
text
sixth
amendment
case
law
sixth
amendment
guarantees
defendant
right
confronted
witnesses
emphasis
added
extent
analysts
witnesses
question
resolved
certainly
provided
testimony
petitioner
proving
one
fact
necessary
conviction
substance
possessed
cocaine
contrast
text
confrontation
clause
text
adjacent
compulsory
process
clause
confirms
analysis
confrontation
clause
guarantees
defendant
right
confronted
witnesses
compulsory
process
clause
guarantees
defendant
right
call
witnesses
favor
amdt
text
amendment
contemplates
two
classes
witnesses
defendant
favor
prosecution
must
produce
former
defendant
may
call
latter
contrary
respondent
assertion
third
category
witnesses
helpful
prosecution
somehow
immune
confrontation
often
indeed
perhaps
usually
case
adverse
witness
testimony
taken
alone
suffice
convict
yet
respondent
fails
cite
single
case
testimony
admitted
absent
defendant
opportunity
unsurprisingly
since
holding
contrary
longstanding
case
law
kirby
considered
kirby
conviction
receiving
stolen
property
evidence
consisted
part
records
conviction
three
individuals
found
guilty
stealing
relevant
property
though
evidence
proved
property
stolen
kirby
received
nevertheless
ruled
admission
records
violated
kirby
rights
confrontation
clause
see
also
king
turner
mood
eng
confession
one
defendant
stolen
certain
goods
used
evidence
another
defendant
accused
receiving
stolen
property
respondent
dissent
argue
analysts
subject
confrontation
conventional
typical
ordinary
witnesses
sort
whose
ex
parte
testimony
notoriously
used
trial
sir
walter
raleigh
post
brief
respondent
true
recognized
crawford
ex
parte
examinations
sort
used
raleigh
trial
long
thought
paradigmatic
confrontation
violation
paradigmatic
case
identifies
core
right
confrontation
limits
right
confrontation
invented
response
use
ex
parte
examinations
raleigh
case
tr
use
provoked
outcry
precisely
flouted
deeply
rooted
tradition
live
testimony
subject
adversarial
testing
crawford
supra
citing
blackstone
commentaries
laws
england
see
also
crawford
supra
case
purported
distinctions
respondent
dissent
identify
case
sir
walter
raleigh
conventional
accusers
survive
scrutiny
dissent
first
contends
conventional
witness
recalls
events
observed
past
analyst
report
contains
observations
test
post
doubtful
analyst
reports
case
characterized
reporting
observations
affidavits
completed
almost
week
tests
performed
see
app
pet
cert
tests
performed
november
affidavits
sworn
december
regardless
dissent
misunderstands
role
played
case
law
dissent
notes
factor
given
substantial
weight
davis
post
fact
decision
disproves
dissent
position
considered
admissibility
statements
made
police
officers
responding
report
domestic
disturbance
time
officers
arrived
assault
ended
victim
statements
written
oral
sufficiently
close
time
alleged
assault
trial
admitted
affidavit
present
sense
impression
davis
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
though
witness
statements
davis
events
reported
nevertheless
held
admitted
absent
opportunity
confront
witness
second
reason
dissent
contends
analysts
conventional
witnesses
thus
subject
confrontation
observe
neither
crime
human
action
related
post
dissent
provides
authority
particular
limitation
type
witnesses
subject
confrontation
conceivable
witnesses
fit
description
outside
scope
confrontation
clause
example
police
officer
investigative
report
describing
crime
scene
admissible
absent
opportunity
examine
officer
dissent
novel
exception
coverage
confrontation
clause
exempt
expert
witnesses
hardly
unconventional
class
witnesses
third
respect
dissent
asserts
analysts
conventional
witnesses
thus
subject
confrontation
statements
provided
response
interrogation
ibid
see
also
brief
respondent
explained
framers
willing
exempt
volunteered
testimony
answers
questions
exempt
answers
detailed
interrogation
davis
supra
respondent
dissent
cite
authority
aware
none
holding
person
volunteers
testimony
less
defendant
brief
respondent
one
responding
interrogation
event
analysts
affidavits
case
presented
response
police
request
see
mass
laws
ch
affidavit
submitted
response
police
officer
request
write
happened
suffices
trigger
sixth
amendment
protection
apparently
see
davis
thomas
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
analysts
testimony
subject
confrontation
well
respondent
claims
difference
confrontation
clause
purposes
testimony
recounting
historical
events
prone
distortion
manipulation
testimony
issue
resul
neutral
scientific
testing
brief
respondent
relatedly
respondent
dissent
argue
confrontation
forensic
analysts
little
value
one
reasonably
expect
laboratory
professional
feel
quite
differently
results
scientific
test
look
defendant
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
post
argument
little
invitation
return
overruled
decision
roberts
held
evidence
particularized
guarantees
trustworthiness
admissible
notwithstanding
confrontation
clause
said
crawford
response
argument
remains
true
sure
clause
ultimate
goal
ensure
reliability
evidence
procedural
rather
substantive
guarantee
commands
evidence
reliable
reliability
assessed
particular
manner
testing
crucible
dispensing
confrontation
testimony
obviously
reliable
akin
dispensing
jury
trial
defendant
obviously
guilty
sixth
amendment
prescribes
respondent
dissent
may
right
ways
cases
better
ways
challenge
verify
results
forensic
constitution
guarantees
one
way
confrontation
license
suspend
confrontation
clause
preferable
trial
strategy
available
evident
respondent
calls
neutral
scientific
testing
neutral
reliable
respondent
suggests
forensic
evidence
uniquely
immune
risk
manipulation
according
recent
study
conducted
auspices
national
academy
sciences
majority
laboratories
producing
forensic
evidence
administered
law
enforcement
agencies
police
departments
laboratory
administrator
reports
head
agency
national
research
council
national
academies
strengthening
forensic
science
path
forward
prepublication
copy
hereinafter
national
academy
report
ecause
forensic
scientists
often
driven
work
need
answer
particular
question
related
issues
particular
case
sometimes
face
pressure
sacrifice
appropriate
methodology
sake
expediency
forensic
analyst
responding
request
law
enforcement
official
may
feel
pressure
incentive
alter
evidence
manner
favorable
prosecution
confrontation
one
means
assuring
accurate
forensic
analysis
true
dissent
notes
honest
analyst
alter
testimony
forced
confront
defendant
post
said
fraudulent
analyst
see
brief
national
innocence
network
amicus
curiae
discussing
cases
documented
drylabbing
forensic
analysts
report
results
tests
never
performed
national
academy
report
discussing
documented
cases
fraud
error
involving
use
forensic
evidence
like
eyewitness
fabricated
account
police
analyst
provides
false
results
may
oath
open
reconsider
false
testimony
see
coy
iowa
course
prospect
confrontation
deter
fraudulent
analysis
first
place
confrontation
designed
weed
fraudulent
analyst
incompetent
one
well
serious
deficiencies
found
forensic
evidence
used
criminal
trials
one
commentator
asserts
legal
community
concedes
varying
degrees
urgency
system
produces
erroneous
convictions
based
discredited
forensics
metzger
cheating
constitution
vand
rev
one
study
cases
exonerating
evidence
resulted
overturning
criminal
convictions
concluded
invalid
forensic
testimony
contributed
convictions
cases
garrett
neufeld
invalid
forensic
science
testimony
wrongful
convictions
rev
national
academy
report
concluded
forensic
science
system
encompassing
research
practice
serious
problems
addressed
national
commitment
overhaul
current
structure
supports
forensic
science
community
country
national
academy
report
emphasis
original
like
expert
witnesses
generally
analyst
lack
proper
training
deficiency
judgment
may
disclosed
case
illustrative
affidavits
submitted
analysts
contained
statement
substance
found
contain
cocaine
app
pet
cert
time
trial
petitioner
know
tests
analysts
performed
whether
tests
routine
whether
interpreting
results
required
exercise
judgment
use
skills
analysts
may
possessed
still
know
precise
tests
used
analysts
told
laboratories
use
methodology
recommended
scientific
working
group
analysis
seized
drugs
app
brief
petitioner
least
methodology
requires
exercise
judgment
presents
risk
error
might
explored
see
giannelli
imwinkelried
scientific
evidence
pp
ch
ed
identifying
four
critical
errors
analysts
may
commit
interpreting
results
commonly
used
gas
spectrometry
analysis
shellow
application
daubert
identification
drugs
shepard
expert
scientific
evidence
quarterly
noting
spectrometers
may
equipped
computerized
matching
systems
forensic
analysts
crime
laboratories
typically
utilize
feature
instrument
rely
exclusively
subjective
judgment
true
many
types
forensic
evidence
commonly
used
criminal
prosecutions
wide
variability
across
forensic
science
disciplines
regard
techniques
methodologies
reliability
types
numbers
potential
errors
research
general
acceptability
published
material
national
academy
report
see
also
discussing
problems
subjectivity
bias
unreliability
common
forensic
tests
latent
fingerprint
analysis
analysis
toolmark
firearms
analysis
contrary
respondent
dissent
suggestion
little
reason
believe
confrontation
useless
testing
analysts
honesty
proficiency
methodology
features
commonly
focus
experts
respondent
argues
analysts
affidavits
admissible
without
confrontation
akin
types
official
business
records
admissible
common
law
brief
respondent
affidavits
qualify
traditional
official
business
records
even
authors
subject
confrontation
nonetheless
documents
kept
regular
course
business
may
ordinarily
admitted
trial
despite
hearsay
status
see
fed
rule
evid
case
regularly
conducted
business
activity
production
evidence
use
trial
decision
palmer
hoffman
made
distinction
clear
held
accident
report
provided
employee
railroad
company
qualify
business
record
although
kept
regular
course
railroad
operations
calculated
use
essentially
business
analysts
certificates
like
police
reports
generated
law
enforcement
officials
qualify
business
public
records
precisely
reason
see
rule
defining
public
records
excluding
however
criminal
cases
matters
observed
police
officers
law
enforcement
personnel
respondent
seeks
rebut
limitation
noting
common
law
results
coroner
inquest
admissible
without
opportunity
confrontation
previously
noted
whatever
status
coroner
reports
common
law
england
accorded
special
status
american
practice
see
crawford
giles
california
slip
breyer
dissenting
evidence
official
records
coroner
inquest
rev
dissent
identifies
single
class
evidence
though
prepared
use
trial
traditionally
admissible
clerk
certificate
authenticating
official
record
copy
thereof
use
evidence
see
post
clerk
authority
regard
narrowly
circumscribed
permitted
certify
correctness
copy
record
kept
office
authority
furnish
evidence
trial
lawsuit
interpretation
record
contains
shows
certify
substance
effect
state
wilson
la
see
also
state
champion
wigmore
evidence
ed
dissent
suggests
fact
exception
makes
difference
see
post
contrary
makes
difference
world
shows
even
line
cases
establishing
one
narrow
exception
dissent
able
identify
simultaneously
vindicates
general
rule
applicable
present
case
clerk
affidavit
authenticate
provide
copy
otherwise
admissible
record
analysts
create
record
sole
purpose
providing
evidence
far
probative
cases
prosecution
sought
admit
evidence
clerk
certificate
attesting
fact
clerk
searched
particular
relevant
record
failed
find
like
testimony
analysts
case
clerk
statement
serve
substantive
evidence
defendant
whose
guilt
depended
nonexistence
record
clerk
searched
although
clerk
certificate
qualify
official
record
respondent
definition
prepared
public
officer
regular
course
official
duties
although
clerk
certainly
conventional
witness
dissent
approach
clerk
nonetheless
subject
confrontation
see
people
bromwich
people
goodrode
wigmore
supra
respondent
also
misunderstands
relationship
hearsay
exceptions
confrontation
clause
stated
crawford
hearsay
exceptions
covered
statements
nature
testimonial
example
business
records
statements
furtherance
conspiracy
business
public
records
generally
admissible
absent
confrontation
qualify
exception
hearsay
rules
created
administration
entity
affairs
purpose
establishing
proving
fact
trial
testimonial
whether
qualify
business
official
records
analysts
statements
prepared
specifically
use
petitioner
trial
testimony
petitioner
analysts
subject
confrontation
sixth
amendment
respondent
asserts
find
confrontation
clause
violation
case
petitioner
ability
subpoena
analysts
power
whether
pursuant
state
law
compulsory
process
clause
substitute
right
confrontation
unlike
confrontation
clause
provisions
use
defendant
witness
unavailable
simply
refuses
appear
see
davis
witness
subpoenaed
appear
trial
converting
prosecution
duty
confrontation
clause
defendant
privilege
state
law
compulsory
process
clause
shifts
consequences
state
accused
fundamentally
confrontation
clause
imposes
burden
prosecution
present
witnesses
defendant
bring
adverse
witnesses
value
defendant
replaced
system
prosecution
presents
evidence
via
ex
parte
affidavits
waits
defendant
subpoena
affiants
chooses
finally
respondent
asks
us
relax
requirements
confrontation
clause
accommodate
trial
adversary
process
brief
respondent
clear
whence
derive
authority
confrontation
clause
may
make
prosecution
criminals
burdensome
equally
true
right
trial
jury
privilege
confrontation
clause
like
constitutional
provisions
binding
may
disregard
convenience
also
doubt
accuracy
respondent
dissent
dire
predictions
dissent
respondent
amici
highlight
substantial
total
number
analyses
performed
state
federal
laboratories
recent
years
tests
implicated
prosecutions
small
fraction
cases
actually
proceed
trial
see
brief
law
professors
amici
curiae
nearly
convictions
state
federal
courts
obtained
via
guilty
plea
perhaps
best
indication
sky
fall
today
decision
done
already
many
already
adopted
constitutional
rule
announce
many
others
permit
defendant
assert
forfeit
silence
confrontation
clause
right
receiving
notice
prosecution
intent
use
forensic
analyst
report
cataloging
state
laws
despite
widespread
practices
evidence
criminal
justice
system
ground
halt
one
way
another
empower
defendant
insist
upon
analyst
appearance
trial
indeed
massachusetts
defendant
may
subpoena
analyst
appear
trial
see
brief
respondent
yet
indication
obstructionist
defendants
abusing
privilege
dissent
finds
evidence
far
less
reassuring
promised
post
doubts
rest
two
flawed
premises
first
dissent
believes
state
statutes
requiring
defendant
give
early
notice
intent
confront
analyst
statutes
may
invalidated
reasoning
post
simplest
form
statutes
require
prosecution
provide
notice
defendant
intent
use
analyst
report
evidence
trial
defendant
given
period
time
may
object
admission
evidence
absent
analyst
appearance
live
trial
see
code
ann
tex
code
crim
proc
art
vernon
ohio
rev
code
ann
west
contrary
dissent
perception
statutes
shift
burden
whatever
defendant
always
burden
raising
confrontation
clause
objection
statutes
simply
govern
time
within
must
free
adopt
procedural
rules
governing
objections
see
wainwright
sykes
common
require
defendant
exercise
rights
compulsory
process
clause
advance
trial
announcing
intent
present
certain
witnesses
see
fed
rules
crim
proc
comment
alibi
notice
rules
preclusion
sanction
procedural
default
chi
rev
discussing
cataloguing
state
rules
taylor
illinois
williams
florida
conceivable
reason
similarly
compelled
exercise
confrontation
clause
rights
trial
see
people
discussing
approving
colorado
provision
today
decision
disrupt
criminal
prosecutions
many
large
whose
practice
already
accord
confrontation
second
dissent
notes
several
cases
already
adopted
rule
pursuant
decision
crawford
independently
matter
state
law
post
may
assessing
likely
practical
effects
today
ruling
irrelevant
courts
adopted
rule
matters
true
many
decisions
recent
dissent
dire
predictions
accurate
given
large
number
drug
prosecutions
state
level
one
expected
immediate
dramatic
results
absence
evidence
telling
surprising
defense
attorneys
clients
often
stipulate
nature
substance
ordinary
drug
case
unlikely
defense
counsel
insist
live
testimony
whose
effect
merely
highlight
rather
cast
doubt
upon
forensic
analysis
defense
attorneys
want
antagonize
judge
jury
wasting
time
appearance
witness
whose
testimony
defense
counsel
intend
rebut
amicus
brief
filed
district
attorneys
support
commonwealth
massachusetts
case
upon
appeals
relied
said
almost
always
case
analysts
certificates
admitted
without
objection
generally
defendants
object
admission
drug
certificates
likely
benefit
defendant
testimony
brief
district
attorneys
support
commonwealth
mass
omitted
given
strategic
considerations
light
experience
already
provide
similar
protections
defendants
little
reason
believe
decision
today
commence
parade
horribles
respondent
dissent
predict
case
involves
little
application
holding
crawford
washington
sixth
amendment
permit
prosecution
prove
case
via
ex
parte
affidavits
admission
evidence
therefore
reverse
judgment
appeals
massachusetts
remand
case
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
luis
petitioner
massachusetts
writ
certiorari
appeals
massachusetts
june
justice
thomas
concurring
write
separately
note
continue
adhere
position
confrontation
clause
implicated
extrajudicial
statements
insofar
contained
formalized
testimonial
materials
affidavits
depositions
prior
testimony
confessions
white
illinois
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
see
also
giles
california
slip
concurring
opinion
characterizing
statements
within
scope
confrontation
clause
include
sufficiently
formal
resemble
marian
examinations
mirandized
custodial
accompanied
similar
indicia
formality
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
davis
washington
opinion
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
reiterating
clause
encompasses
extrajudicial
statements
contained
types
formalized
materials
listed
white
supra
join
opinion
case
documents
issue
case
quite
plainly
affidavits
ante
fall
within
core
class
testimonial
statements
governed
confrontation
clause
ibid
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
luis
petitioner
massachusetts
writ
certiorari
appeals
massachusetts
june
justice
kennedy
chief
justice
justice
breyer
justice
alito
join
dissenting
sweeps
away
accepted
rule
governing
admission
scientific
evidence
today
scientific
analysis
introduced
evidence
without
testimony
analyst
produced
rule
established
least
years
extends
across
least
six
federal
courts
appeals
yet
undoes
based
two
recent
opinions
say
nothing
forensic
analysts
crawford
washington
davis
washington
remarkable
confidently
disregards
century
jurisprudence
learn
misinterpreted
confrontation
clause
hardly
arcane
provision
constitution
first
years
existence
immediate
systemic
concern
makes
attempt
acknowledge
real
differences
laboratory
analysts
perform
scientific
tests
conventional
witnesses
witnesses
word
framers
used
confrontation
clause
crawford
davis
dealt
ordinary
witnesses
women
seen
two
cases
victim
crime
question
cases
stand
proposition
formal
statements
made
conventional
witness
one
personal
knowledge
aspect
defendant
guilt
may
admitted
without
witness
appearing
trial
meet
accused
face
face
crawford
davis
say
indeed
said
facts
anyone
makes
testimonial
statement
witness
purposes
confrontation
clause
even
person
fact
witnessed
nothing
give
personal
knowledge
defendant
guilt
crawford
davis
concerned
typical
witnesses
done
sensible
thing
limited
holding
witnesses
defined
indeed
justice
thomas
warned
opinion
davis
approach
become
disconnected
history
unnecessary
prevent
abuse
reliance
word
testimonial
little
help
course
word
appear
text
clause
dictates
matter
constitutional
law
set
rules
governing
kinds
evidence
may
admitted
without
testimony
indeed
today
opinion
bear
even
onerous
burden
crawford
least
guidance
hearsay
rule
rest
assured
evidence
ell
within
firmly
rooted
hearsay
exception
confrontation
clause
bar
admission
ohio
roberts
overruled
crawford
without
guidance
established
body
law
guess
future
rules
distill
sparse
constitutional
text
see
méndez
crawford
washington
critique
stan
rev
discussing
unanswered
questions
regarding
testimonial
statements
opinion
suggests
body
formalistic
wooden
rules
divorced
precedent
common
sense
underlying
purpose
clause
ruling
vast
potential
disrupt
criminal
procedures
already
give
ample
protections
misuse
scientific
evidence
reasons
fully
explained
opinion
elicits
respectful
dissent
says
results
scientific
test
may
introduced
evidence
defendant
right
confront
analyst
ante
one
must
assume
term
though
appears
nowhere
confrontation
clause
nevertheless
constitutional
substance
must
elaborated
future
cases
accepted
definition
analyst
established
precedent
define
term
consider
many
people
play
role
routine
test
presence
illegal
drugs
one
person
prepares
sample
drug
places
testing
machine
retrieves
machine
printout
often
graph
showing
frequencies
radiation
absorbed
sample
masses
sample
molecular
fragments
see
giannelli
imwinkelried
scientific
evidence
ed
describing
common
methods
identifying
drugs
including
infrared
spectrophotometry
nuclear
magnetic
resonance
gas
chromatography
mass
spectrometry
second
person
interprets
graph
machine
prints
perhaps
comparing
printout
published
standardized
graphs
known
drugs
ibid
meanwhile
third
person
perhaps
independent
contractor
calibrated
machine
done
certified
machine
good
working
order
finally
fourth
person
perhaps
laboratory
director
certifies
subordinates
followed
established
procedures
evident
four
persons
analyst
confronted
rule
announces
today
witnesses
must
appear
confrontation
practical
purposes
forbidden
use
scientific
tests
criminal
trials
discussed
requiring
even
one
individuals
testify
threatens
disrupt
end
many
prosecutions
guilt
clear
newly
found
formalism
holds
sway
see
part
infra
possible
read
opinion
however
say
four
must
testify
one
contributed
test
result
least
respects
made
representation
test
person
one
represents
pure
sample
properly
drawn
entered
machine
produced
particular
printout
person
two
represents
printout
corresponds
known
drug
person
three
represents
machine
properly
calibrated
time
person
four
represents
others
performed
jobs
accord
established
procedures
four
power
introduce
error
laboratory
technician
might
adulterate
sample
independent
contractor
might
botch
machine
calibration
forth
reasons
errors
may
range
animus
particular
suspect
criminal
suspects
unintentional
oversight
gross
negligence
mistake
surprise
plausible
case
made
deeming
person
testing
process
analyst
opinion
consider
independent
contractor
calibrated
testing
machine
least
routine
case
machine
result
appears
unmistakable
result
accuracy
depends
entirely
machine
calibration
calibration
turn
proved
contractor
certification
job
properly
certification
appears
testimonial
statement
definition
formal
statement
offered
truth
matter
asserted
made
purpose
later
prosecution
see
ante
clear
ruling
independent
contractor
also
analyst
consider
person
interprets
machine
printout
interpretation
may
call
exercise
professional
judgment
close
cases
see
giannelli
imwinkelried
supra
assume
person
deliberately
introduces
error
interpretive
step
one
likely
permit
human
error
affect
test
result
exercise
judgment
might
make
participant
analyst
implies
much
see
ante
must
yet
consider
laboratory
director
certifies
ultimate
results
director
arguably
effective
person
confront
revealing
ambiguity
findings
variations
procedures
problems
office
familiar
standard
procedures
office
variations
problems
prior
cases
particular
analysts
prosecution
may
seek
introduce
certification
evidence
implies
statements
actually
entered
evidence
require
confrontation
see
ante
mean
director
also
analyst
even
certification
relies
upon
restates
work
performed
subordinates
offers
principles
historical
precedent
determine
persons
analyst
contribute
test
result
equally
remote
scene
personal
stake
outcome
even
know
accused
concerned
performance
role
conducting
test
argued
analyst
must
testify
person
signed
certificate
view
laboratory
one
employee
sign
certificates
appear
spare
analysts
burden
already
rejected
arrangement
made
clear
davis
permit
testimonial
statement
one
witness
enter
evidence
testimony
second
think
conceivable
protections
confrontation
clause
readily
evaded
policeman
laboratory
employee
signs
certificate
recite
unsworn
hearsay
testimony
declarant
analyst
performs
actual
test
instead
declarant
sign
deposition
indeed
one
point
case
english
early
american
state
federal
cited
logic
holding
cabined
person
signs
certificates
signatory
restating
testimonial
statements
true
analysts
whoever
might
analysts
must
testify
person
today
decision
demonstrates
even
narrow
category
scientific
tests
identify
drug
define
clarity
analyst
outside
narrow
category
range
scientific
tests
may
affected
new
confrontation
right
staggering
see
comment
toward
definition
testimonial
autopsy
reports
embody
qualities
testimonial
statement
cal
rev
noting
every
held
autopsy
reports
testimonial
warning
contrary
rule
effectively
functio
statute
limitations
murder
difficult
confine
point
damage
holding
contexts
consider
two
establishing
chain
custody
authenticating
copy
document
obligation
prosecution
establish
chain
custody
evidence
sent
testing
laboratories
establish
identity
integrity
physical
evidence
tracing
continuous
whereabouts
criminal
law
meeting
obligation
requires
representations
one
officer
retrieved
evidence
crime
scene
second
officer
checked
evidence
locker
third
officer
verified
locker
seal
intact
forth
iron
logic
enamored
seem
require
testimony
human
link
chain
custody
course
never
law
see
lott
aps
chain
custody
normally
go
weight
evidence
rather
admissibility
jur
evidence
fact
one
persons
control
fungible
substance
testify
trial
without
make
substance
testimony
relating
inadmissible
supra
generally
necessary
every
witness
handled
evidence
testify
answer
say
prosecution
decide
steps
chain
custody
crucial
require
evidence
ante
case
determines
links
chain
crucial
prosecution
number
cases
crucial
link
chain
available
testify
evidence
excluded
lack
proper
foundation
consider
another
context
holding
may
cause
disruption
practice
authenticating
copies
documents
means
certificate
document
custodian
stating
copy
accurate
see
fed
rule
evid
order
copy
public
record
must
certified
correct
custodian
rule
business
record
must
accompanied
written
declaration
custodian
one
possible
reading
opinion
recordkeepers
required
testify
far
courts
read
crawford
davis
impose
largely
meaningless
requirement
see
adefehinti
cadc
certificates
authenticating
bank
records
may
admitted
without
confrontation
ellis
certificate
authenticating
hospital
records
breadth
ruling
today
undefined
scope
may
well
courts
must
deemed
erred
risk
consequence
tell
us
something
wrong
analysis
driven
nothing
wooden
application
crawford
davis
definition
testimonial
divorced
guidance
history
precedent
common
sense
way
predict
future
applications
today
holding
surely
part
justification
formalism
must
lie
predictability
nothing
predictable
however
uncertainty
disruption
must
ensue
precedent
guide
us
let
us
assume
analyst
person
interprets
machine
printout
result
makes
sense
confrontation
clause
designed
serve
detect
errors
scientific
tests
instead
done
conducting
new
test
new
test
impossible
defendant
may
call
expert
explain
jury
test
flaws
dangers
relying
extraordinary
case
particular
analyst
testimony
necessary
defense
course
defendant
may
subpoena
analyst
frets
defendant
may
unable
analyst
unavailable
simply
refuses
appear
ante
laboratory
analysts
difficult
locate
compel
discussed
analysts
already
devote
considerable
time
appearing
subpoenaed
see
part
infra
see
also
brief
state
alabama
et
al
amici
curiae
neither
petitioner
amici
offer
reason
believe
defendants
trouble
subpoenaing
analysts
cases
analysts
testimony
necessary
facts
case
illustrate
formalistic
pointless
nature
reading
clause
petitioner
knew
well
advance
trial
commonwealth
introduce
tests
bags
cocaine
available
test
entered
evidence
yet
petitioner
made
effort
trial
mount
defense
analysts
results
petitioner
challenged
tests
reliability
seeking
discovery
concerning
testing
methods
used
qualifications
laboratory
analysts
see
mass
rule
crim
proc
petitioner
sought
conduct
test
see
rule
seek
test
indeed
argue
drug
cocaine
rather
dispute
authenticity
samples
tested
accuracy
tests
performed
petitioner
argued
jury
prosecution
shown
possessed
dealt
drugs
despite
prepared
defense
analysts
results
petitioner
counsel
made
described
pro
forma
objection
admitting
results
without
testimony
presumably
one
particular
analyst
today
deciding
objection
sustained
transforms
confrontation
clause
sensible
procedural
protection
distortion
criminal
justice
system
difficult
perceive
holding
advance
purposes
confrontation
clause
one
purpose
confrontation
impress
upon
witnesses
gravity
conduct
see
coy
iowa
witness
brought
face
person
words
condemn
might
refine
reformulate
reconsider
even
recant
earlier
statements
see
ibid
purpose
alleviate
danger
interrogations
adversarial
government
officials
might
distort
witness
testimony
clause
guards
danger
bringing
interrogation
neutral
public
forum
courtroom
see
maryland
craig
scalia
dissenting
discussing
value
confrontation
right
guarding
child
distorted
coerced
recollections
see
also
cal
supra
private
questioning
police
officers
prosecutors
exert
pressure
witness
without
high
risk
discovered
courtroom
questioning
contrast
public
performed
front
jury
judge
defendant
pressure
therefore
harder
exert
neither
purpose
served
rule
announces
today
plausible
laboratory
analyst
retract
prior
conclusion
upon
catching
sight
defendant
result
condemns
analyst
far
removed
particular
defendant
indeed
claims
personal
knowledge
defendant
guilt
analyst
performs
hundreds
thousands
tests
year
remember
particular
test
link
defendant
say
analysts
infallible
may
well
state
introduce
machine
printout
raw
results
laboratory
analysis
call
expert
interpret
test
particularly
test
complex
little
known
establish
chain
custody
reliability
laboratory
state
failed
meet
burden
proof
result
follows
state
must
prove
case
beyond
reasonable
doubt
without
relying
presumptions
unreliable
hearsay
like
see
gypsum
refusing
permit
presumption
intent
effectively
eliminate
intent
ingredient
quoting
morissette
state
must
permit
defendant
challenge
analyst
result
see
holmes
south
carolina
affirming
defendant
right
meaningful
opportunity
present
complete
defense
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
rules
evidence
including
governing
reliability
hearsay
principles
latitude
given
expert
witnesses
rules
irrebutable
presumptions
overriding
principle
prosecution
must
make
case
beyond
reasonable
doubt
part
protections
accused
however
latitude
determining
rules
defined
confrontation
clause
addresses
must
testify
simply
follow
however
clause
lieu
rules
set
forth
controls
prosecution
must
call
every
issue
suppose
instance
defense
challenges
procedures
secure
chain
custody
evidence
sent
lab
returned
police
defense
right
call
witnesses
show
chain
custody
secure
mean
demand
prosecution
case
chief
person
chain
custody
undoubted
opportunity
taint
tamper
evidence
must
called
prosecution
confrontation
clause
true
lab
technicians
confrontation
clause
simply
needed
matters
defendant
even
dispute
accuracy
analyst
work
confrontation
adds
nothing
sake
negligible
benefits
threatens
disrupt
forensic
investigations
across
country
put
prosecutions
nationwide
risk
dismissal
based
erratic
instances
particular
laboratory
technician
invested
new
constitutional
designation
analyst
simply
appear
consider
first
costs
today
decision
imposes
criminal
trials
enjoys
weeks
often
months
notice
cases
argued
receive
briefs
well
advance
argument
ordered
busy
trial
contrast
must
consider
attorneys
schedules
also
witnesses
juries
trial
courts
huge
caseloads
processed
within
strict
time
limits
cases
may
unexpectedly
plead
last
minute
others
unexpectedly
may
juries
stay
longer
predicted
others
must
reconstituted
analyst
hope
trial
top
priority
scheduling
analyst
must
instead
face
prospect
waiting
days
hallway
outside
courtroom
called
offer
testimony
consist
little
rote
recital
written
report
see
part
supra
matters
stood
today
opinion
analysts
already
spent
considerable
time
appearing
witnesses
cases
defendant
unlike
petitioner
case
contested
analyst
result
subpoenaed
analyst
see
brief
alabama
et
al
amici
curiae
testifying
takes
time
ante
today
opinion
always
case
analysts
certificates
admitted
without
massachusetts
courts
requiring
analysts
also
appear
far
greater
number
cases
defendants
dispute
analyst
result
imposes
enormous
costs
administration
justice
setting
aside
moment
crimes
scientific
evidence
required
consider
costs
ruling
impose
state
drug
prosecutions
alone
recent
year
data
available
drug
possession
trafficking
resulted
felony
convictions
state
courts
across
country
see
dept
justice
bureau
justice
statistics
durose
langan
felony
sentences
state
courts
july
roughly
convictions
products
plea
bargains
see
means
state
courts
saw
drug
trials
single
year
analysts
responsible
testing
drugs
issue
cases
bear
crushing
burden
example
district
attorney
philadelphia
prosecuted
drug
crimes
brief
national
dist
attorneys
association
et
al
amici
curiae
assuming
number
remains
assuming
cases
end
plea
bargain
city
drug
analysts
required
testify
trials
next
year
cleveland
district
attorney
prosecuted
drug
crimes
ibid
assuming
number
holds
cases
end
plea
bargain
city
drug
analysts
two
work
part
time
must
testify
drug
cases
next
year
federal
government
may
face
even
graver
difficulties
operations
widespread
example
fbi
laboratory
quantico
virginia
supports
federal
state
local
investigations
across
country
employees
conduct
one
million
scientific
tests
year
dept
justice
fbi
laboratory
message
fbi
laboratory
director
http
visited
june
available
clerk
case
file
decision
means
million
tests
reaches
jury
least
one
laboratory
analysts
must
board
plane
find
way
unfamiliar
courthouse
sit
waiting
read
aloud
notes
made
months
ago
purchases
meddling
confrontation
clause
dear
price
price
measured
taxpayer
dollars
alone
guilty
defendants
go
free
technical
grounds
direct
result
today
decision
adding
nothing
process
analyst
always
make
courthouse
time
may
ill
may
country
may
unable
travel
inclement
weather
may
moment
waiting
outside
courtroom
another
defendant
exercise
right
invents
today
reason
analyst
make
courthouse
time
holds
jury
learn
analyst
findings
unless
unlikely
turn
events
defendant
previously
analyst
ante
result
many
cases
prosecution
meet
burden
proof
guilty
defendant
goes
free
technicality
results
acquittal
reviewed
appeal
holding
windfall
defendants
one
unjustified
demonstrated
deficiency
trials
historical
requirement
established
constitutional
precedent
ii
problems
today
decision
imprecise
definition
analyst
lack
perceptible
benefit
heavy
societal
costs
moment
constitution
fact
require
rule
today
constitution
fundamental
mistake
read
confrontation
clause
referring
kind
statement
namely
testimonial
statement
must
excluded
evidence
clause
refer
kinds
statements
clause
contain
word
testimonial
text
instead
refers
kinds
persons
namely
witnesses
defendant
laboratory
analysts
witnesses
defendant
words
understood
framing
simply
authority
proposition
instead
clause
refers
conventional
witness
meaning
one
witnesses
perceives
event
gives
personal
knowledge
aspect
defendant
guilt
crawford
davis
concerned
kind
ordinary
witness
nothing
confrontation
clause
text
history
precedent
justifies
decision
expand
cases
clause
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
right
confronted
witnesses
amdt
though
virtually
evidence
drafters
confrontation
clause
intended
mean
white
illinois
thomas
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
certain
framers
contemplate
analyst
conducts
scientific
test
far
removed
crime
considered
witnes
defendant
framers
concerned
typical
witness
one
perceived
event
gave
rise
personal
belief
aspect
defendant
guilt
evidence
framers
understood
clause
extend
unconventional
witnesses
discussed
significant
evidence
contrary
see
part
infra
circumstances
historical
evidence
support
position
meager
form
solid
basis
history
preceding
contemporaneous
framing
constitution
boumediene
bush
slip
quoting
reid
covert
frankfurter
concurring
result
goes
dangerously
wrong
bases
constitutional
interpretation
upon
historical
guesswork
infamous
treason
trial
sir
walter
raleigh
provides
excellent
examples
kinds
witnesses
confrontation
clause
refers
raleigh
case
tr
see
crawford
raleigh
trial
informs
understanding
clause
time
framing
one
notorious
instances
abuse
witnesses
statements
ante
raleigh
accusers
claimed
heard
raleigh
speak
treason
witnesses
conventional
sense
limit
confrontation
clause
witnesses
like
raleigh
trial
today
expands
clause
include
laboratory
analysts
analysts
differ
ordinary
witnesses
least
three
significant
ways
first
conventional
witness
recalls
events
observed
past
analyst
report
contains
observations
test
observation
recorded
time
made
unlike
usual
act
testifying
typical
witness
must
recall
previous
event
perceived
thus
may
misperceived
misremembered
analyst
making
contemporaneous
observation
need
rely
memory
instead
reports
observations
time
made
gave
consideration
substantial
weight
davis
primary
purpose
victim
call
enable
police
assistance
meet
ongoing
emergency
rather
establish
prove
past
events
potentially
relevant
later
criminal
prosecution
see
also
people
geier
cal
cites
authority
holding
observation
recorded
time
made
act
witness
ing
purposes
confrontation
clause
second
analyst
observes
neither
crime
human
action
related
often
analyst
know
defendant
identity
much
less
personal
knowledge
aspect
defendant
guilt
analyst
distance
crime
defendant
space
time
suggests
analyst
witness
defendant
conventional
sense
third
conventional
witness
responds
questions
interrogation
see
raleigh
case
supra
laboratory
tests
conducted
according
scientific
protocols
dependent
upon
controlled
interrogation
sort
put
differently
statements
require
confrontation
produced
involvement
adversarial
government
officials
responsible
investigating
prosecuting
crime
cal
indication
analysts
work
state
laboratory
institute
division
massachusetts
department
public
health
adversarial
petitioner
evidence
adversarial
officials
played
role
formulating
analysts
certificates
rather
acknowledge
expands
confrontation
clause
beyond
conventional
witnesses
relies
recent
opinions
crawford
davis
ante
assumes
little
analysis
crawford
davis
extended
clause
person
makes
testimonial
statement
confident
tone
disguise
thinness
two
reeds
neither
crawford
davis
considered
whether
clause
extends
persons
far
removed
crime
connection
defendant
instead
cases
concerned
conventional
witnesses
davis
supra
witnesses
victims
defendants
assaults
crawford
supra
witness
saw
defendant
stab
victim
true
crawford
davis
employed
term
testimonial
thereby
suggested
testimonial
statement
person
matter
distant
defendant
crime
subject
confrontation
clause
suggestion
part
holding
crawford
davis
opinions
used
adjective
testimonial
avoid
awkward
phrasing
required
reusing
noun
witness
today
transforms
turn
phrase
new
sweeping
legal
rule
holding
anyone
makes
formal
statement
purpose
later
prosecution
matter
removed
crime
must
considered
witness
defendant
ante
cites
authority
justify
expansive
new
interpretation
historical
evidence
supports
conclusion
confrontation
clause
understood
extend
beyond
conventional
witnesses
include
analysts
conduct
scientific
tests
far
removed
crime
defendant
indeed
little
evidence
contradicts
interpretation
though
framers
forensic
scientists
use
another
kind
unconventional
witness
copyist
copyist
work
may
essential
criminal
prosecution
forensic
analyst
convict
man
bigamy
example
state
often
requires
marriage
records
see
williams
state
state
potter
original
records
taken
archive
prosecution
must
rely
copies
records
made
purpose
introducing
copies
evidence
trial
see
ibid
case
copyist
honesty
diligence
important
analyst
copyist
falsifies
copy
even
misspells
name
transposes
date
flaws
lead
jury
convict
much
depends
honesty
diligence
copyist
often
prepares
affidavit
certifying
copy
true
accurate
certificate
beyond
question
testimonial
statement
definition
formal
statement
offered
truth
two
matters
copyist
honesty
copy
accuracy
prepared
criminal
prosecution
framers
era
copyists
affidavits
accepted
without
hesitation
american
courts
see
percheman
pet
opinion
marshall
see
also
advisory
committee
note
fed
rule
evid
common
law
recognized
procedure
authenticating
copies
public
records
certificate
wigmore
evidence
chadbourn
rev
courts
admitted
copyists
affidavits
criminal
well
civil
trials
see
williams
supra
potter
supra
demonstrates
framing
generation
contrast
today
consider
confrontation
clause
require
confrontation
unconventional
authors
testimonial
statements
attempts
explain
away
historical
exception
rule
noting
copyist
authority
narrowly
circumscribed
ante
explain
matters
matter
laboratory
analysts
authority
also
deemed
narrowly
circumscribed
may
excused
testifying
drawing
fine
distinctions
squared
avowed
allegiance
formalism
determining
whether
witness
authority
narrowly
circumscribed
nothing
crawford
testimonial
framework
instead
appears
much
closer
rule
ohio
roberts
statement
admitted
without
testimony
bears
adequate
indicia
reliability
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
keeping
traditional
understanding
confrontation
clause
dowdell
rejected
challenge
use
certificates
sworn
clerk
trial
judge
reporter
stating
defendants
present
trial
certificates
like
copyist
certificate
met
every
requirement
current
definition
testimonial
rejecting
defendants
claim
use
certificates
violated
confrontation
clause
dowdell
explained
officials
executed
certificates
witnesses
accused
asked
testify
facts
concerning
defendants
guilt
innocence
indeed
recently
davis
reaffirmed
dowdell
insisting
every
author
testimonial
statement
appear
confrontation
pain
excluding
statement
evidence
violence
framers
sensible
limited
conception
right
confront
witnesses
defendant
addition
lacking
support
historical
practice
precedent
decision
also
contrary
authority
extending
least
years
six
federal
courts
appeals
almost
years
ago
three
state
courts
held
state
constitutions
require
analysts
testify
case
much
like
one
massachusetts
judicial
upheld
admission
certificate
stating
liquid
seized
defendant
contained
alcohol
even
though
author
certificate
testify
commonwealth
slavski
mass
highest
courts
connecticut
virginia
reached
similar
conclusions
constitutions
state
torello
bracey
commonwealth
two
state
courts
appear
read
state
constitution
require
contrary
result
state
clark
mont
laboratory
drug
report
requires
confrontation
montana
constitution
nlike
federal
counterpart
state
birchfield
see
suggesting
typical
notice
requirement
lawful
federal
constitution
crawford
authority
stronger
still
sixth
amendment
require
analysts
testify
federal
courts
appeals
consider
issue
agreed
sherman
scott
minner
kerby
baker
reardon
manson
kay
see
also
manocchio
moran
autopsy
report
stating
cause
victim
death
state
courts
appeals
armed
forces
accord
see
appendix
infra
cases
cited
appendixes
concern
doctors
coroners
calibrators
rather
laboratory
analysts
reasoning
much
eleven
state
courts
upheld
statutes
reduce
eliminate
right
confrontation
requiring
defendant
take
affirmative
steps
prior
trial
summon
analyst
see
ibid
statutes
may
invalidated
reasoning
decisions
appear
contrary
today
opinion
see
part
infra
remaining
far
endorsing
view
appear
addressed
question
prior
crawford
weight
authority
proffers
two
cases
intermediate
state
courts
appeals
ante
practical
level
today
ruling
cause
less
disruption
hearsay
rules
already
required
analysts
testify
require
least
sixteen
state
courts
held
evidentiary
rules
permit
scientific
test
results
calibration
certificates
observations
medical
personnel
enter
evidence
without
testimony
see
appendix
infra
federal
courts
appeals
reached
conclusion
applying
federal
hearsay
rule
garnett
per
curiam
gilbert
per
curiam
ware
see
oates
report
prepared
law
enforcement
admissible
exceptions
federal
hearsay
rule
modern
trend
state
courts
away
rule
toward
admission
scientific
test
results
without
testimony
perhaps
recognized
increasing
reliability
scientific
testing
see
appendix
infra
citing
cases
three
overruling
limiting
previous
precedents
adopted
rule
matter
state
law
appears
mere
six
courts
continue
interpret
hearsay
laws
require
analysts
testify
see
ibid
course
courts
grounded
decisions
state
law
rather
constitution
legislatures
power
abrogate
courts
interpretation
costs
shown
outweigh
benefits
today
strips
authority
carving
minority
view
constitutional
text
state
legislatures
members
authority
shape
rules
evidence
therefore
errs
relies
great
measure
recent
report
national
academy
sciences
ante
discussing
national
research
council
national
academies
strengthening
forensic
science
path
forward
prepublication
copy
report
directed
rather
elected
representatives
congress
state
legislatures
unlike
members
power
competence
determine
whether
scientific
tests
unreliable
whether
testimony
proper
solution
problem
rejects
understanding
extending
across
least
years
six
federal
courts
appeals
constitution
require
analysts
testify
analysis
may
introduced
evidence
authority
rely
speculation
meaning
word
testimonial
made
two
recent
opinions
said
nothing
scientific
analysis
scientific
analysts
iii
attempt
show
sky
fall
today
decision
ante
makes
three
arguments
none
withstands
scrutiny
unconvincing
effort
play
threat
today
new
rule
disrupt
even
end
criminal
prosecutions
professes
hope
defense
counsel
decline
raise
soon
known
objection
ante
bases
expectation
understanding
defense
attorneys
surrender
constitutional
rights
attorneys
want
antagonize
judge
jury
wasting
time
ibid
reasoning
troubling
least
two
levels
first
speculation
rests
apparent
belief
nation
trial
judges
jurors
unwilling
accept
zealous
advocacy
antagonize
punish
advocates
adverse
rulings
ibid
offers
support
stunning
slur
integrity
nation
courts
commonplace
defense
request
conclusion
prosecution
opening
case
directed
verdict
acquittal
prosecution
failed
prove
element
crime
even
element
technical
rather
obvious
movement
car
interstate
commerce
case
must
dismissed
today
one
thought
judges
angered
defense
making
motions
counsel
sort
obligation
avoid
troublesome
prosecution
done
law
requires
prove
case
second
even
right
expect
trial
judges
feel
antagonize
objections
vent
anger
punishing
lawyer
way
authority
support
suggestion
lawyer
may
shirk
professional
duties
avoid
judicial
displeasure
good
reason
cites
authority
suggestion
contrary
us
least
long
understood
defense
counsel
duty
zealous
advocate
every
client
recognized
bedrock
principle
competent
criminal
defense
lawyer
must
put
prosecution
proof
adversarial
process
protected
sixth
amendment
requires
accused
acting
role
advocate
anders
california
right
effective
assistance
counsel
thus
right
accused
require
prosecution
case
survive
crucible
meaningful
adversarial
testing
true
adversarial
criminal
trial
conducted
kind
testing
envisioned
sixth
amendment
occurred
process
loses
character
confrontation
adversaries
constitutional
guarantee
violated
cronic
footnotes
omitted
see
also
aba
model
code
professional
responsibility
canon
aba
compendium
professional
responsibility
rules
standards
duty
lawyer
client
legal
system
represent
client
zealously
within
bounds
law
footnotes
omitted
instant
case
demonstrates
zealous
defense
counsel
defend
clients
convict
prosecution
must
prove
substance
cocaine
new
rule
apparently
analyst
testimony
suffices
prove
fact
course
also
large
universe
crimes
ranging
homicide
robbery
scientific
evidence
necessary
prove
element
cases
scientific
evidence
necessary
prove
element
crime
rule
requires
prosecution
call
person
identified
analyst
requirement
become
new
prosecutorial
duty
linked
proving
state
case
beyond
reasonable
doubt
unless
ashamed
new
rule
inexplicable
seeks
limit
damage
hoping
defense
counsel
derelict
duty
insist
prosecution
prove
case
simply
way
adversarial
system
works
event
hope
sure
prove
unfounded
surmises
unlikely
defense
counsel
insist
live
testimony
whose
effect
merely
highlight
rather
cast
doubt
upon
forensic
analysis
ante
optimistic
prediction
misunderstands
criminal
trials
work
defense
plan
challenge
test
result
highlight
ing
result
testimony
harm
defense
supposes
analyst
reach
courtroom
time
testify
however
objection
grants
defense
great
windfall
analyst
work
come
evidence
given
prospect
windfall
may
secure
acquittal
zealous
advocates
pledge
prior
trial
raise
objection
defense
counsel
accept
risk
jury
may
hear
analyst
live
testimony
exchange
chance
analyst
fails
appear
government
case
collapses
defense
substance
harmless
instead
accused
possess
testimony
technician
formalism
detract
defense
case
support
unlikely
hope
relies
brief
law
professors
amici
curiae
reports
nearly
convictions
obtained
via
guilty
plea
thus
require
testimony
laboratory
analysts
ante
consider
holding
alter
statistics
defense
bar
today
gains
formidable
power
require
government
transport
analyst
courtroom
time
trial
zealous
counsel
insist
upon
concessions
plea
bargain
lenient
sentence
exchange
relinquishing
remarkable
power
reassurance
sky
fall
today
decision
ante
notes
many
enacted
statutes
require
defendant
assert
confrontation
clause
right
prior
trial
else
forfeit
silence
ibid
implies
shifting
burden
defendant
take
affirmative
steps
produce
analyst
statutes
reduce
burden
prosecution
holds
statutes
valid
view
shift
burden
whatever
ante
conclusion
welcome
premise
appears
flawed
even
calls
simplest
form
statutes
impose
requirements
defendant
must
make
formal
demand
proper
service
well
trial
statutes
impose
requirements
instance
requiring
defense
counsel
subpoena
analyst
show
good
cause
demanding
analyst
presence
even
affirm
oath
intent
analyst
see
generally
metzger
cheating
constitution
vand
rev
future
case
may
find
onerous
statutes
violate
confrontation
clause
impos
burden
defendant
bring
adverse
witnesses
ante
statutes
thus
provide
little
reassurance
case
impose
meaningless
formalism
across
board
effort
support
assessment
today
decision
cause
disruption
cites
decisions
asserts
already
adopted
constitutional
rule
announce
today
ante
assures
us
evidence
criminal
justice
system
ground
halt
se
ante
inspection
citations
prove
far
less
reassuring
promised
seven
decided
courts
considered
bound
crawford
cases
thus
offer
support
assertion
state
jurists
independently
adopted
interpretation
matter
state
law
quite
contrary
debate
seven
courts
far
intended
crawford
sweep
see
state
belvin
wells
concurring
part
dissenting
part
believe
majority
extended
crawford
davis
decisions
beyond
intended
reach
citations
omitted
correct
courts
overbroad
reading
crawford
endorse
seven
jurisdictions
might
well
change
position
moreover
seven
courts
adopted
position
wake
crawford
decisions
quite
recent
yet
subject
widespread
adverse
results
formalism
mandates
today
citations
also
fail
reassure
different
reason
five
citations
including
cases
come
reduced
confrontation
right
four
enacted
statute
requiring
defendant
give
early
notice
intent
confront
analyst
see
part
supra
colorado
people
rev
stat
defendant
must
give
notice
days
trial
georgia
compare
miller
state
striking
earlier
notice
statute
requiring
defendant
show
good
cause
prior
trial
call
analyst
code
ann
defendant
must
give
notice
days
trial
illinois
people
mcclanahan
comp
ch
defendant
must
give
notice
within
days
receipt
report
oregon
state
birchfield
suggesting
typical
notice
requirement
lawful
see
rev
stat
defendant
must
give
notice
days
trial
fifth
state
mississippi
excuses
prosecution
producing
analyst
conducted
test
long
produces
someone
compare
barnette
state
miss
cited
mcgowen
state
miss
sixth
amendment
require
confrontation
particular
analyst
conducted
test
possible
neither
mississippi
practice
statutes
reconciled
holding
see
part
supra
disruption
caused
today
decision
yet
take
place
laboratory
analysts
conduct
routine
scientific
tests
kind
conventional
witnesses
confrontation
clause
refers
judgment
appeals
massachusetts
affirmed
appendixes
following
authorities
held
prior
crawford
confrontation
clause
require
confrontation
analyst
conducted
routine
scientific
test
vietor
mil
app
laboratory
drug
report
state
cosgrove
howard
baber
state
test
commonwealth
harvard
mass
laboratory
drug
report
derosa
first
judicial
dist
state
ex
rel
carson
city
per
curiam
test
state
coombs
test
state
fischer
laboratory
drug
report
commonwealth
carter
laboratory
drug
report
applying
law
state
tavares
laboratory
analysis
victim
bodily
fluid
state
hutto
fingerprint
state
best
app
state
christian
app
test
state
sosa
app
laboratory
drug
report
following
authorities
held
prior
crawford
confrontation
clause
require
confrontation
results
autopsy
hospital
reports
describing
victim
injuries
people
clark
cal
autopsy
report
henson
state
del
treating
physician
report
victim
injuries
medical
conclusions
redacted
collins
state
ind
autopsy
report
state
wilburn
la
hospital
record
stating
victim
cause
death
citing
state
parker
la
ann
coroner
written
inquest
stating
cause
death
state
garlick
md
blood
test
showing
presence
illegal
drug
people
kirtdoll
treating
physician
report
describing
victim
injuries
state
spikes
ohio
treating
physician
report
defendant
injuries
state
kreck
laboratory
report
stating
murder
victim
blood
contained
poison
following
authorities
held
prior
crawford
confrontation
clause
require
confrontation
certificates
stating
instruments
good
working
order
time
test
state
ing
haw
certificate
police
car
speedometer
working
order
accord
state
ofa
haw
app
per
curiam
certificate
breathalyzer
working
order
state
ruiz
app
state
dilliner
state
huggins
alaska
app
state
conway
app
following
decisions
reduced
right
confront
results
scientific
tests
upholding
statutes
require
defendant
take
affirmative
steps
prior
trial
summon
analyst
johnson
state
ark
defendant
must
give
notice
days
trial
state
davison
iowa
iowa
code
ann
state
crow
defendant
must
give
notice
within
days
receiving
result
must
show
result
challenged
trial
state
christianson
defendant
must
give
notice
days
trial
state
miller
defendant
must
give
notice
within
days
receiving
result
must
show
result
challenged
trial
state
smith
defendant
must
subpoena
analyst
state
hancock
see
state
birchfield
reducing
defendant
burden
state
hughes
defendant
must
subpoena
analyst
magruder
commonwealth
defendant
must
call
person
performing
analysis
state
expense
people
app
defendant
must
give
notice
state
analyst
days
trial
state
matthews
la
app
defendant
must
give
notice
five
days
trial
following
authorities
hold
state
rules
evidence
permit
results
routine
scientific
tests
admitted
evidence
without
confrontation
state
torres
haw
ray
victim
body
state
davis
iowa
laboratory
analysis
victim
bodily
fluid
state
taylor
mo
microscopic
comparison
wood
chip
retrieved
defendant
clothing
wood
crime
scene
state
snider
mont
laboratory
drug
report
people
porter
app
div
report
robertson
commonwealth
laboratory
analysis
victim
bodily
fluid
kreck
laboratory
report
stating
murder
victim
blood
contained
poison
following
authorities
hold
state
rules
evidence
permit
autopsy
hospital
reports
admitted
evidence
without
confrontation
people
williams
cal
app
autopsy
report
henson
supra
report
physician
examined
victim
wilburn
hospital
record
stating
victim
cause
death
garlick
blood
test
state
reddick
per
curiam
autopsy
report
stating
factual
findings
opinions
medical
examiner
people
nisonoff
following
authorities
hold
state
rules
evidence
permit
certificates
state
scientific
instruments
good
working
order
admitted
evidence
without
confrontation
wester
state
alaska
certificate
stating
breathalyzer
machine
working
order
best
state
del
certificate
breathalyzer
working
order
state
rines
manufacturer
certificate
stating
test
kit
working
order
admissible
exception
mcilwain
state
miss
taking
minority
view
following
authorities
interpret
state
hearsay
rules
require
confrontation
results
routine
scientific
tests
observations
medical
personnel
state
idaho
laboratory
drug
report
inadmissible
state
hearsay
rule
spears
state
miss
nurse
observation
victim
inadmissible
state
hearsay
rule
constitution
state
james
chemical
analysis
victim
bodily
fluid
inadmissible
state
hearsay
rule
cole
state
tex
crim
app
laboratory
drug
report
inadmissible
state
hearsay
rule
state
workman
ut
state
williams
wi
see
confrontation
violation
expert
testified
based
test
results
prepared
analyst
summary
include
decisions
find
test
results
inadmissible
state
failed
lay
proper
foundation
rather
endorse
minority
view
cases
merely
reaffirm
government
burden
prove
authenticity
evidence
applicability
exception
state
hearsay
rule
see
state
fisher
iowa
laboratory
test
victim
bodily
fluid
inadmissible
exception
prosecution
show
kept
regular
course
business
state
foster
foundation
laid
introduction
test
prosecution
show
test
conducted
usual
course
business
moon
state
md
blood
alcohol
test
inadmissible
insufficient
foundational
evidence
test
conducted
reliable
manner
cf
davis
laboratory
test
victim
bodily
fluid
admitted
exception
state
hearsay
rule
garlick
laboratory
test
defendant
blood
falls
within
firmly
rooted
hearsay
exception
three
espoused
minority
view
appear
changed
course
degree
people
lewis
hospital
record
describing
victim
injuries
inadmissible
hearsay
overruled
kirtdoll
noting
year
long
history
lewis
never
relied
upon
actually
deny
admission
evidence
business
entry
record
criminal
case
see
people
mcdaniel
per
curiam
police
laboratory
report
inadmissible
hearsay
state
tims
ohio
hospital
record
describing
victim
injuries
inadmissible
hearsay
overruled
spikes
ohio
state
henderson
laboratory
drug
report
inadmissible
absent
confrontation
abrogated
statute
recognized
hughes
statute
permitted
defendant
subpoena
analyst
prepared
blood
alcohol
report
defendant
waived
right
confront
analyst
footnotes
contrary
dissent
suggestion
post
opinion
kennedy
hold
case
anyone
whose
testimony
may
relevant
establishing
chain
custody
authenticity
sample
accuracy
testing
device
must
appear
person
part
prosecution
case
dissent
correct
obligation
prosecution
establish
chain
custody
post
mean
everyone
laid
hands
evidence
must
called
stated
dissent
quotation
lott
gaps
chain
custody
normally
go
weight
evidence
rather
admissibility
prosecution
decide
steps
chain
custody
crucial
require
evidence
testimony
introduced
must
defendant
objects
introduced
live
additionally
documents
prepared
regular
course
equipment
maintenance
may
well
qualify
nontestimonial
records
see
infra
exception
single
case
relied
longstanding
massachusetts
precedent
see
commonwealth
harvard
mass
others
simply
irrelevant
since
involved
medical
reports
created
treatment
purposes
testimonial
decision
today
see
baber
state
state
garlick
md
right
confrontation
may
course
waived
including
failure
object
offending
evidence
may
adopt
procedural
rules
governing
exercise
objections
see
infra
respondent
cites
decision
gray
maryland
case
indeed
distinguish
evidence
incriminating
face
evidence
bec
omes
incriminating
linked
evidence
introduced
later
trial
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
entirely
different
purpose
determining
nontestifying
codefendant
confession
redacted
remove
mention
defendant
admitted
evidence
instruction
jury
consider
confession
evidence
nonconfessor
premise
case
without
limiting
instruction
even
admission
redacted
confession
containing
evidence
latter
sort
violated
defendant
sixth
amendment
rights
see
though
surely
always
forensic
analyses
autopsies
breathalyzer
tests
repeated
specimens
used
analyses
often
lost
degraded
contrary
dissent
suggestion
post
rel
great
measure
deficiencies
analysts
shown
report
resolve
constitutional
question
presented
case
analysts
swore
affidavits
provided
testimony
therefore
subject
confrontation
reach
conclusion
analysts
always
possessed
scientific
acumen
mme
curie
veracity
mother
theresa
discuss
report
refute
suggestion
category
evidence
uniquely
reliable
analysts
empty
formalism
early
cases
likewise
involve
records
prepared
administration
entity
affairs
use
litigation
see
king
rhodes
leach
eng
admitting
evidence
ship
king
martin
camp
eng
vestry
book
king
aickles
leach
eng
prison
logbook
dissent
reliance
decision
dowdell
see
post
opinion
kennedy
similarly
misplaced
opinion
stated
dowdell
noted
davis
washington
judge
clerk
made
statements
issue
dowdell
witnesses
purposes
confrontation
clause
statements
concerned
conduct
defendants
prior
trial
facts
regarding
defendants
guilt
innocence
earlier
line
century
cases
also
supports
notion
forensic
analysts
certificates
admitted
evidence
public
business
records
see
commonwealth
waite
mass
shivers
newton
sup
state
campbell
three
cases
defendants
prosecuted
selling
adulterated
milk
objected
admission
state
chemists
certificates
analysis
three
cases
objection
defeated
chemist
testified
live
trial
prosecution
came
forward
live
witnesses
three
cases
suggests
doubt
admissibility
certificates
without
opportunity
dissent
provides
calculations
regarding
number
appearances
result
today
ruling
post
numbers
rely
various
unfounded
assumptions
prosecution
place
evidence
drug
analysis
certificate
every
case
defendant
never
stipulate
nature
controlled
substance
even
stipulation
made
every
defendant
object
evidence
otherwise
demand
appearance
analyst
assumptions
wildly
unrealistic
discussed
figures
produce
reflect
fact
occurred
jurisdictions
already
adopted
rule
announce
today
state
johnson
people
state
birchfield
state
march
mo
thomas
state
caulfield
las
vegas
walsh
people
mcclanahan
miller
state
barnette
state
miss
dissent
notes
post
state
statutes
requir
defense
counsel
subpoena
analyst
show
good
cause
demanding
analyst
presence
even
affirm
oath
intent
analyst
occasion
today
pass
constitutionality
every
variety
statute
commonly
given
label
suffices
say
referred
simplest
form
statutes
supra
constitutional
provisions
place
number
require
confrontation
without
indication
dire
consequences
predicted
dissent
materialized
contrary
dissent
suggestion
post
cast
aspersions
trial
judges
trust
antagonized
requests
analysts
appearance
trial
expect
defense
attorneys
refrain
zealous
representation
clients
simply
expect
defense
attorneys
believe
clients
interests
furthered
objections
analysts
reports
whose
conclusions
counsel
intention
challenging
course
express
view
whether
error
harmless
massachusetts
appeals
reach
question
decline
address
first
instance
cf
coy
iowa
connection
determination
however
disagree
dissent
contention
post
analyst
testimony
suffices
prove
fact
substance
cocaine
today
opinion
insisting
upon
retention
confrontation
requirement
way
alters
type
evidence
including
circumstantial
evidence
sufficient
sustain
conviction