board
county
commissioners
wabaunsee
county
kansas
umbehr
argued
november
decided
june
term
contract
wabaunsee
county
kansas
county
haul
trash
respondent
umbehr
outspoken
critic
petitioner
board
county
commissioners
board
commissioners
voted
terminate
prevent
automatic
renewal
contract
allegedly
took
umbehr
criticism
badly
brought
suit
two
section
district
granted
summary
judgment
tenth
circuit
reversed
relevant
part
remanded
holding
first
amendment
protects
independent
contractors
governmental
retaliation
speech
extent
protection
must
determined
weighing
government
interests
contractor
free
speech
interests
stake
accordance
balancing
test
applied
government
employment
context
pickering
board
ed
township
high
school
dist
held
first
amendment
protects
independent
contractors
termination
prevention
automatic
renewal
government
contracts
retaliation
exercise
freedom
speech
pickering
balancing
test
adjusted
weigh
government
interests
contractor
rather
employer
determines
extent
protection
pp
obvious
similarities
government
employees
government
contractors
respect
issue
guided
government
employment
precedents
among
things
precedents
recognized
government
workers
constitutionally
protected
dismissal
publicly
privately
criticizing
employer
policies
see
perry
sindermann
also
acknowledged
first
amendment
guarantee
absolute
freedom
speech
see
connick
myers
required
deferential
weighing
government
employer
legitimate
interests
employees
first
amendment
rights
see
pickering
supra
parties
attempts
differentiate
independent
contractors
government
employees
unavailing
arguments
imposition
liability
force
accommodated
applying
existing
government
employee
framework
moreover
application
nuanced
pickering
approach
superior
brightline
rule
giving
government
carte
blanche
terminate
independent
contractors
exercising
speech
rights
although
individual
government
interests
less
strong
independent
contractor
case
fact
contractors
similar
relevant
respects
government
employees
compels
conclusion
form
balancing
analysis
apply
pp
neither
dissent
fears
excessive
litigation
assertion
allocation
government
contracts
basis
political
bias
longstanding
tradition
deprive
independent
contractors
protection
description
requirements
wide
range
government
contracting
laws
voluntarily
adopted
federal
state
authorities
suggests
government
contracting
norms
incompatible
political
bias
proliferated
without
unduly
burdening
government
laws
long
history
pp
nonrenewal
retaliation
protected
speech
activities
pass
balance
government
interests
free
speech
interests
conclusion
independent
contractors
enjoy
first
amendment
protection
requires
affirmance
tenth
circuit
decision
remand
case
prevail
umbehr
must
show
initially
termination
contract
motivated
speech
matter
public
concern
see
connick
supra
must
therefore
prove
mere
fact
criticized
board
members
terminated
board
valid
defense
show
preponderance
evidence
light
knowledge
perceptions
policies
time
termination
board
members
terminated
contract
regardless
speech
see
mt
healthy
city
bd
ed
doyle
board
also
prevail
demonstrate
county
legitimate
interests
contractor
deferentially
viewed
outweigh
free
speech
interests
stake
see
pickering
supra
umbehr
prevails
evidence
board
members
discovered
facts
termination
led
later
termination
anyway
evidence
mitigation
loss
means
subsequent
trash
hauling
contracts
cities
county
relevant
assessing
appropriate
remedy
umbehr
suit
concerns
termination
nonrenewal
commercial
relationship
government
need
address
possibility
suits
bidders
applicants
new
government
contracts
rely
relationship
pp
affirmed
remanded
delivered
opinion
respect
parts
iii
rehnquist
stevens
kennedy
souter
ginsburg
breyer
joined
opinion
respect
part
stevens
kennedy
souter
ginsburg
breyer
joined
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
thomas
joined
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
end
syllabus
board
county
commissioners
county
kansas
petitioner
keen
umbehr
term
contract
umbehr
outspoken
critic
petitioner
board
county
commissioners
wabaunsee
county
board
governing
body
county
umbehr
spoke
board
meetings
wrote
critical
letters
editorials
local
newspapers
regarding
county
landfill
user
rates
cost
obtaining
official
documents
county
alleged
violations
board
kansas
open
meetings
act
county
alleged
mismanagement
taxpayers
money
topics
allegations
violation
kansas
open
meetings
act
vindicated
consent
decree
signed
board
members
umbehr
also
ran
unsuccessfully
election
board
board
members
allegedly
took
umbehr
criticism
badly
threatening
official
county
newspaper
censorship
publishing
writings
voted
terminate
prevent
automatic
renewal
umbehr
contract
county
attempt
termination
failed
technical
defect
board
succeeded
terminating
umbehr
contract
vote
umbehr
subsequently
negotiated
new
contracts
five
six
cities
previously
served
umbehr
brought
suit
two
majority
board
members
individual
official
capacities
section
alleging
terminated
government
contract
retaliation
criticism
county
board
board
members
moved
summary
judgment
district
assumed
umbehr
contract
terminated
retaliation
speech
suffered
consequential
damages
held
first
amendment
prohibit
board
considering
umbehr
expression
factor
deciding
continue
trash
hauling
contract
end
contract
annual
term
independent
contractor
umbehr
entitled
first
amendment
protection
afforded
public
employees
umbehr
mcclure
supp
also
held
claims
board
members
individual
capacities
barred
qualified
immunity
ruling
affirmed
appeal
issue
appeals
tenth
circuit
reversed
except
qualified
immunity
holding
independent
contractor
protected
first
amendment
retaliatory
governmental
action
employee
extent
protection
determined
weighing
government
interests
contractor
free
speech
interests
stake
accordance
balancing
test
used
determine
government
employees
first
amendment
rights
pickering
board
ed
township
high
school
dist
therefore
remanded
official
capacity
claims
district
proceedings
including
consideration
whether
termination
fact
retaliatory
board
members
original
defendants
suit
subsequently
resigned
positions
board
board
substituted
petitioner
see
rule
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflict
courts
appeals
regarding
whether
extent
independent
contractors
protected
first
amendment
fifth
eighth
circuits
agree
tenth
circuit
see
blackburn
marshall
copsey
swearingen
north
mississippi
communications
jones
smith
cleburne
county
hospital
cert
denied
see
sweeney
bond
cert
denied
see
also
abercrombie
catoosa
allowing
independent
contractor
sue
termination
based
speech
political
activities
third
seventh
circuits
however
held
independent
contractor
property
interest
contract
government
right
contract
terminated
retaliation
exercise
first
amendment
freedoms
political
affiliation
participation
see
horn
kean
en
banc
truck
northlake
reversed
post
downtown
auto
parks
milwaukee
cert
denied
triad
chicago
housing
cert
denied
agree
tenth
circuit
independent
contractors
protected
pickering
balancing
test
adjusted
weigh
government
interests
contractor
rather
employer
determines
extent
protection
therefore
affirm
ii
precedents
long
since
rejected
justice
holmes
famous
dictum
policeman
may
constitutional
right
talk
politics
constitutional
right
policeman
mcauliffe
mayor
new
bedford
mass
recognizing
constitutional
violations
may
arise
deterrent
chilling
effect
governmental
efforts
fall
short
direct
prohibition
exercise
first
amendment
rights
laird
tatum
modern
unconstitutional
conditions
doctrine
holds
government
may
deny
benefit
person
basis
infringes
constitutionally
protected
freedom
speech
even
entitlement
benefit
perry
sindermann
held
government
workers
constitutionally
protected
dismissal
refusing
take
oath
regarding
political
affiliation
see
wieman
updegraff
keyishian
board
regents
univ
state
publicly
privately
criticizing
employer
policies
see
perry
supra
mt
healthy
city
bd
ed
doyle
givhan
western
line
consol
school
expressing
hostility
prominent
political
figures
see
rankin
mcpherson
except
political
affiliation
may
reasonably
considered
appropriate
job
qualification
supporting
affiliating
particular
political
party
see
branti
finkel
see
also
treasury
employees
government
employees
protected
undue
burdens
expressive
activities
created
prohibition
accepting
honoraria
abood
detroit
bd
government
employment
conditioned
making
making
financial
contributions
particular
political
causes
protecting
first
amendment
freedoms
however
acknowledged
first
amendment
create
property
tenure
rights
guarantee
absolute
freedom
speech
first
amendment
guarantee
freedom
speech
protects
government
employees
termination
speech
matters
public
concern
see
connick
myers
speech
merely
private
employment
matters
unprotected
prevail
employee
must
prove
conduct
issue
constitutionally
protected
substantial
motivating
factor
termination
employee
discharges
burden
government
escape
liability
showing
taken
action
even
absence
protected
conduct
see
mt
healthy
supra
even
termination
protected
speech
may
justified
legitimate
countervailing
government
interests
sufficiently
strong
government
employees
first
amendment
rights
depend
balance
interests
employee
citizen
commenting
upon
matters
public
concern
interest
state
employer
promoting
efficiency
public
services
performs
employees
pickering
striking
balance
concluded
government
interest
achieving
goals
effectively
efficiently
possible
elevated
relatively
subordinate
interest
acts
sovereign
significant
one
acts
employer
waters
slip
plurality
opinion
therefore
consistently
given
greater
deference
government
predictions
harm
used
justify
restriction
employee
speech
predictions
harm
used
justify
restrictions
speech
public
large
slip
accord
treasury
employees
supra
parties
invite
us
differentiate
independent
contractors
employees
board
urges
us
extend
first
amendment
rights
government
employees
contractors
umbehr
joined
solicitor
general
amicus
curiae
contends
proof
retaliation
contractors
political
speech
government
required
justify
actions
narrowly
tailored
serve
compelling
state
interest
parties
observe
independent
contractors
general
umbehr
particular
work
greater
remove
government
officials
government
employees
board
view
key
feature
independent
contractor
contract
give
government
right
supervise
control
details
work
done
board
argues
lack
control
accentuates
government
need
work
done
someone
trusts
cf
branti
supra
certain
positions
government
employment
implicate
need
trust
award
basis
party
political
affiliation
justified
resort
sanction
termination
unsatisfactory
performance
umbehr
hand
argues
government
interests
maintaining
harmonious
working
environments
relationships
recognized
government
employee
cases
attenuated
contractor
work
government
workplace
interact
daily
government
officers
employees
also
points
extent
publicly
perceived
independent
contractor
government
concern
political
statements
confused
government
political
positions
mitigated
board
dissent
post
retort
cost
fending
litigation
potential
government
contracting
practices
ossify
prophylactic
rules
avoid
potential
litigation
liability
outweigh
interests
independent
contractors
typically
less
financially
dependent
government
contracts
government
employees
arguments
imposition
liability
force
accommodated
applying
existing
framework
government
employee
cases
independent
contractors
mt
healthy
assures
government
ability
terminate
contracts
long
retaliation
protected
first
amendment
activity
pickering
requires
deferential
weighing
government
legitimate
interests
dangers
burdensome
litigation
de
facto
imposition
rigid
contracting
rules
necessitate
attentive
application
mt
healthy
requirement
proof
causation
substantial
deference
mandated
pickering
connick
waters
government
reasonable
view
legitimate
interests
per
se
denial
liability
board
dissent
generalization
independent
contractors
may
less
dependent
government
government
employees
see
post
justify
denial
first
amendment
protection
contractors
tests
established
government
employment
cases
must
judicially
administered
sensitivity
governmental
needs
first
amendment
rights
must
neglected
umbehr
claim
speech
threatens
government
interests
contractor
less
interests
employer
also
inform
application
pickering
test
umbehr
correct
board
exercised
sovereign
power
citizen
response
political
speech
required
demonstrate
action
narrowly
tailored
serve
compelling
governmental
interest
case
government
employment
cases
board
exercised
contractual
power
interests
public
service
provider
including
interest
free
intensive
judicial
supervision
daily
management
functions
potentially
implicated
deference
therefore
due
government
reasonable
assessments
interests
contractor
therefore
see
reason
believe
proper
application
pickering
balancing
test
accommodate
differences
employees
independent
contractors
ample
reason
believe
nuanced
approach
recognizes
variety
interests
may
arise
independent
contractor
cases
superior
brightline
rule
distinguishing
independent
contractors
employees
brightline
rule
proposed
board
dissent
give
government
carte
blanche
terminate
independent
contractors
exercising
first
amendment
rights
brightline
rule
leave
first
amendment
rights
unduly
dependent
whether
state
law
labels
government
service
provider
contract
contract
employment
contract
services
distinction
best
poor
proxy
interests
stake
see
comment
political
patronage
public
contracting
chi
rev
legally
relevant
distinction
exists
employees
contractors
terms
either
government
interest
using
patronage
employee
contractor
interest
free
speech
cf
perry
prohibition
unconstitutional
conditions
speech
applies
regardless
public
employee
contractual
claim
job
determining
constitutional
claims
basis
formal
distinctions
manipulated
largely
government
agencies
concerned
see
logue
noting
independent
contractors
often
employed
perform
tasks
otherwise
performed
salaried
government
employees
enterprise
consistently
eschewed
see
lefkowitz
turley
context
privilege
fail
see
difference
constitutional
magnitude
threat
job
loss
employee
state
threat
loss
contracts
contractor
cf
colorado
republican
campaign
committee
federal
election
commission
slip
opinion
breyer
government
foreclose
exercise
first
amendment
rights
mere
labels
quoting
naacp
button
escobedo
illinois
declining
exalt
form
substance
determining
temporal
scope
sixth
amendment
protections
crowell
benson
regard
must
cases
constitutional
limits
invoked
mere
matters
form
substance
required
chicago
chicago
determining
due
process
law
regard
must
substance
form
industries
kelco
disposal
concurring
part
dissenting
part
applicability
provision
constitution
never
depended
vagaries
state
federal
law
furthermore
arguments
made
parties
demonstrate
far
clear
general
matter
whether
balance
interests
stake
favorable
government
independent
contractor
cases
employee
cases
unconstitutional
conditions
precedents
span
spectrum
government
employees
whose
close
relationship
government
requires
balancing
important
free
speech
government
interests
claimants
tax
exemptions
speiser
randall
users
public
facilities
lamb
chapel
center
moriches
union
free
school
healy
james
recipients
small
government
subsidies
fcc
league
women
voters
much
less
dependent
government
like
ordinary
citizens
whose
viewpoints
matters
public
concern
government
legitimate
interest
repressing
first
amendment
permits
neither
firing
janitors
discriminatory
pricing
state
lottery
tickets
based
government
disagreement
certain
political
expression
independent
contractors
appear
us
lie
somewhere
case
government
employees
closest
relationship
government
unconstitutional
conditions
precedents
involve
persons
less
close
relationships
government
board
dissent
assertion
post
decision
represents
unwarranted
extension
special
protections
afforded
government
employees
therefore
persuasive
examples
dissent
cites
post
view
stuff
principles
formed
post
quoting
rutan
supra
scalia
dissenting
consider
example
practice
courtroom
patronage
whereby
lected
judges
owe
nomination
election
party
give
organization
lucrative
refereeships
trusteeships
receiverships
often
yield
legal
fees
unjustified
work
required
tolchin
tolchin
victor
political
patronage
clubhouse
white
house
see
also
wolfinger
political
machines
withered
away
revisionist
thoughts
politics
similar
award
gift
political
supporters
guise
research
grants
tolchin
supra
allocation
contracts
based
contributions
resulting
compound
bribery
extortion
kickbacks
heard
costs
democracy
practice
beer
politics
whereby
wholesale
liquor
licenses
issued
state
traded
campaign
contributions
extortion
political
support
campaign
contributions
pain
branded
communist
caro
power
broker
robert
moses
fall
new
york
favorable
consideration
courts
public
agencies
expected
one
city
clients
political
attorneys
public
jobs
wolfinger
supra
question
reportedly
asked
party
official
businessman
reluctant
contribute
mayoralty
campaign
look
expletive
deleted
want
contract
examples
cited
dissent
many
involve
patronage
employment
appointments
rather
contracting
cf
comment
political
patronage
patronage
systems
traditionally
centered
around
distribution
government
jobs
emphasis
added
may
suggest
abuses
power
name
patronage
highly
unusual
post
may
also
case
victims
whose
speech
chilled
whose
contributions
extracted
government
action
often
honorable
prudent
businessmen
post
quoting
heard
supra
dissent
examples
establish
open
unchallenged
tradition
allocating
government
contracts
basis
political
less
basis
disapproval
political
speech
dissent
sources
note
patronage
practices
report
denied
disavowed
alleged
practitioners
see
wolfinger
supra
significant
secret
specialized
contexts
defense
contracting
operat
atmosphere
uninhibited
usual
challenges
representative
government
tolchin
supra
many
cases
illegal
see
heard
supra
course
agree
dissent
mere
obnoxious
ness
post
criminality
make
practice
unconstitutional
however
dissent
examples
covert
widely
condemned
sometimes
illegal
government
action
legitimize
government
discrimination
based
viewpoint
one
speech
one
political
affiliations
involved
sum
neither
board
umbehr
persuaded
us
difference
constitutional
magnitude
lefkowitz
independent
contractors
employees
context
independent
government
contractors
similar
relevant
respects
government
employees
although
speaker
government
interests
less
strong
independent
contractor
case
therefore
conclude
form
balancing
analysis
apply
iii
finally
emphasize
limited
nature
decision
today
umbehr
suit
concerns
termination
commercial
relationship
government
need
address
possibility
suits
bidders
applicants
new
government
contracts
rely
relationship
subject
limitations
caveats
however
recognize
right
independent
government
contractors
terminated
exercising
first
amendment
rights
judgment
appeals
therefore
affirmed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
joins
dissenting
taken
together
today
decisions
board
waubansee
cty
umbehr
ante
truck
service
northlake
ante
demonstrate
process
called
reasoned
adjudication
formalistic
sense
today
addition
another
justice
believes
basis
proscribing
unconstitutional
practices
violate
explicit
text
constitution
regarded
constitutional
ever
since
framing
see
bennis
michigan
slip
thomas
concurring
one
think
inconceivable
elrod
branti
extended
far
beyond
rutan
massive
field
government
contracting
yet
amazingly
two
lopsided
votes
profoundly
disturbing
varying
political
practices
across
vast
country
coast
coast
transformed
overnight
institution
whose
conviction
constitution
means
fickle
basic
reason
dissent
today
one
reasons
gave
one
joined
justice
rutan
hen
practice
expressly
prohibited
text
bill
rights
bears
endorsement
long
tradition
open
widespread
unchallenged
use
dates
back
beginning
republic
proper
basis
striking
venerable
accepted
tradition
laid
examining
table
scrutinized
conformity
abstract
principle
first
amendment
adjudication
devised
contrary
traditions
stuff
principles
formed
uncertain
areas
points
reference
legitimacy
illegitimacy
practices
figured
appears
latest
rule
test
balancing
test
devised
placed
us
collision
course
landmark
practice
former
must
recalculated
us
latter
must
abandoned
citizens
know
way
formulate
constitutional
jurisprudence
reflects
principles
adhered
time
american
people
rather
favored
personal
necessarily
shifting
philosophical
dispositions
majority
rutan
supra
scalia
dissenting
omitted
case
today
observes
long
since
rejected
justice
holmes
famous
dictum
policeman
may
constitutional
right
talk
politics
constitutional
right
policeman
umbehr
ante
quoting
mcauliffe
mayor
new
bedford
mass
see
ante
quoting
activist
also
repeatedly
rejects
important
aphorism
justice
holmes
expresses
fundamental
philosophy
inseparable
part
approach
constitutional
law
case
challenging
constitutionality
federal
estate
tax
ground
unapportioned
direct
tax
violation
article
section
justice
holmes
wrote
matter
disposed
attempt
make
scientific
distinction
least
difficult
interpretation
language
traditional
practical
historical
ground
kind
tax
always
regarded
antithesis
direct
tax
upon
point
page
history
worth
volume
logic
new
york
trust
eisner
emphasis
added
ii
decision
enter
field
justified
consideration
ever
justification
democratic
institutions
government
paying
adequate
attention
problems
presents
american
people
evidently
decided
political
influence
government
contracting
like
many
things
entirely
constitutional
entirely
desirable
set
passing
laws
prohibit
instances
consequence
government
contracting
subject
extraordinary
number
laws
regulations
federal
state
local
levels
similar
systems
detailed
statutes
regulations
exist
throughout
addition
various
statutes
criminalizing
bribes
government
officials
forms
public
corruption
enacted
legislation
imposing
competitive
bidding
requirements
various
types
contracts
government
government
contracting
standard
area
state
regulation
model
procurement
code
developed
set
forth
book
complete
proposed
statutes
regulations
explanations
see
aba
section
urban
state
local
government
law
model
procurement
code
state
local
governments
enacted
legislation
based
model
code
see
aba
section
urban
state
local
government
law
annotations
model
procurement
code
ed
statutes
cited
local
jurisdictions
also
adopted
legislation
based
model
procurement
code
see
ix
thousands
counties
municipalities
time
devised
measures
new
york
city
example
ach
year
enter
approximately
contracts
worth
almost
billion
regulated
public
contracting
process
myriad
codes
regulations
seek
assure
scrupulous
neutrality
choosing
contractors
consequently
impose
multiple
layers
investigation
accountability
anechiarico
jacobs
purging
corruption
public
contracting
solutions
part
problem
rev
hereinafter
anechiarico
jacobs
examples
federal
state
local
statutes
codes
ordinances
regulations
multiplied
fill
many
volumes
way
government
contracts
regulated
way
public
policy
problems
arise
area
addressed
since
founding
republic
see
federal
procurement
regulations
policy
practice
procedures
describing
history
federal
government
procurement
regulation
laws
regulations
brought
field
degree
discrimination
discernment
predictability
achieved
blunt
instrument
constitutional
prohibition
title
code
federal
regulations
contain
pages
make
fine
distinctions
permitting
certain
actions
government
acquisition
areas
prohibiting
others
similarly
many
competitive
bidding
statutes
cited
contain
exceptions
simply
written
include
contracts
particular
dollar
amount
covering
certain
subject
matters
political
unit
decision
enact
contracting
regulations
suspend
regulations
certain
circumstances
amounts
decision
permit
degree
political
favoritism
shall
discuss
shortly
umbehr
first
amendment
permits
least
none
known
litigation
iii
possible
dig
cleats
point
end
holding
first
amendment
requires
city
chicago
potholes
republican
wards
democratic
defensible
point
termination
indefensible
exercise
public
employment
public
employee
always
individual
public
employee
highest
political
level
exempt
elrod
virtually
always
individual
rich
termination
denial
public
job
termination
denial
livelihood
public
contractor
hand
usually
corporation
contract
loses
rarely
entire
business
even
indispensable
part
entire
business
judge
posner
put
although
business
firms
sell
government
government
contractors
also
private
customers
contractor
get
particular
government
contract
bids
outs
incumbent
state
laws
requiring
award
contract
low
bidder
laws
enforced
end
world
government
entities
bid
private
ones
well
like
losing
job
lafalce
houston
opinion
shrugs
concern
response
reason
believe
governments
bear
like
burden
employment
context
defending
suits
alleging
denial
first
amendment
freedoms
public
contractors
ante
burden
suggested
likely
much
greater
employment
context
relevant
question
one
rejects
history
determinant
simply
whether
governments
bear
whether
inconvenience
bearing
outbalanced
degree
abridgment
supposed
first
amendment
rights
corporate
shareholders
part
occur
burden
imposed
umbehr
dismisses
risk
litigation
analogy
employment
context
analogy
many
laws
type
discussed
aware
says
evidence
excessive
abusive
litigation
provisions
umbehr
ante
sure
aware
evidence
existed
fact
litigation
nonexcessive
conveniently
imprecise
term
provisions
scant
indication
nonexcessive
first
amendment
uncertainty
breeds
litigation
laws
clear
detailed
whether
violated
typically
easy
ascertain
contract
put
bid
umbehr
new
first
amendment
contrast
requires
sensitive
balancing
case
factual
question
whether
political
affiliation
disfavored
speech
reason
award
loss
contract
usually
litigable
short
experience
laws
little
predictive
value
additionally
asserts
line
drawn
employment
independent
contracting
applicability
provision
constitution
never
depended
vagaries
state
federal
law
umbehr
ante
quoting
industries
kelco
disposal
concurring
part
dissenting
part
see
also
umbehr
ante
citing
cases
state
law
frequently
plays
dispositive
role
issue
whether
constitutional
provision
applicable
fact
invented
first
amendment
right
fired
political
views
litigation
field
government
employment
revolved
around
fourteenth
amendment
due
process
clause
asked
whether
firing
deprived
plaintiff
property
interest
without
due
process
property
interest
entitled
fourteenth
amendment
protection
roperty
interests
said
created
constitution
rather
created
dimensions
defined
existing
rules
understandings
stem
independent
source
state
law
law
texas
teacher
respondent
position
contractual
claim
job
tenure
respondent
federal
constitutional
claim
defeated
perry
sindermann
internal
quotation
marks
citation
omitted
see
also
mt
healthy
city
bd
ed
doyle
whether
government
entity
possesses
eleventh
amendment
immunity
depends
least
part
upon
nature
entity
created
state
law
spoken
thus
far
though
problem
involved
practical
one
though
best
possible
worlds
judicial
system
resources
governmental
entities
manage
desirable
individual
suffer
disadvantage
whatever
hands
government
solely
political
denial
employment
refusal
contracts
discrimination
social
programs
even
potholes
believe
first
amendment
guarantees
say
believe
whatever
like
subject
exceptions
obscenity
fighting
words
without
going
jail
fined
guarantee
beyond
simple
question
assumes
ability
discourage
eccentric
views
mild
means
historically
employed
set
face
may
well
important
social
cohesion
take
uncomfortable
example
real
life
organization
shall
call
white
aryan
supremacist
party
though
organization
involved
actual
incident
mind
undoubtedly
entitled
constitution
maintain
propagate
racist
antisemitic
views
department
housing
urban
development
lets
contracts
private
security
forces
maintain
law
order
units
public
housing
must
really
treat
bidder
others
may
determine
views
organization
political
views
wishes
subsidize
public
funds
political
views
wishes
hold
exemplar
law
residents
public
housing
state
local
regulation
described
earlier
takes
account
reality
even
requirements
applicable
far
always
almost
invariably
require
contract
awarded
lowest
bidder
lowest
responsible
bidder
word
responsible
important
word
lowest
cohen
public
construction
contracts
law
interpreted
permit
elected
officials
exercise
political
discretion
new
york
courts
example
upheld
agency
refusals
award
contract
low
bidder
contractor
technically
financially
capable
morally
responsible
anechiarico
jacobs
leading
case
picone
new
york
misc
sup
cty
stated
determining
whether
lowest
bidder
particular
contract
lowest
responsible
bidder
new
york
city
officials
permissibly
considered
whether
bidder
possessed
integrity
moral
worth
new
jersey
similarly
said
settled
legislative
mandate
bidder
responsible
embraces
moral
integrity
surely
embraces
capacity
supply
labor
materials
trap
rock
industries
kohl
future
presumably
permitted
disfavored
moral
views
bidder
never
verbalized
otherwise
first
amendment
produce
entitlement
contract
least
guarantee
lawsuit
treading
area
left
realm
law
entered
domain
political
science
rutan
scalia
dissenting
judge
posner
rightly
perceived
issue
today
disposes
like
textbook
exercise
logic
raises
profound
questions
political
science
exceed
judicial
competence
answer
lafalce
houston
iv
decision
umbehr
appears
improvement
trilogy
one
sense
rutan
recent
decisions
provided
government
justify
patronage
employment
practices
proved
patronage
narrowly
tailored
vital
governmental
interests
rutan
supra
four
us
dissent
explained
hat
standard
finds
support
cases
argued
new
constitutional
right
invented
criterion
violation
test
announced
pickering
board
ed
township
high
school
dist
rutan
supra
scalia
dissenting
thus
appears
happy
development
umbehr
explicitly
rejects
suggestion
urged
umbehr
amicus
curiae
proof
retaliation
contractors
political
speech
government
required
justify
actions
narrowly
tailored
serve
compelling
state
interest
umbehr
ante
accord
ante
instead
holds
pickering
balancing
test
adjusted
weigh
government
interests
contractor
rather
employer
determines
extent
independent
contractors
protection
first
amendment
ante
pickering
balancing
course
requires
assessment
government
contractor
interests
pickering
progeny
involve
post
hoc
analysis
one
employee
speech
impact
employee
public
responsibilities
treasury
employees
slip
see
also
slip
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
pickering
requires
application
rankin
mcpherson
connick
myers
pickering
board
ed
township
high
school
dist
clear
opinion
umbehr
anticipates
deferential
weighing
government
legitimate
interests
ante
emphasis
added
accords
eference
government
reasonable
assessments
interests
contractor
ante
emphasis
removed
uch
nuanced
approach
umbehr
says
recognizes
variety
interests
may
arise
independent
contractor
cases
superior
brightline
rule
ante
sets
umbehr
however
rips
part
iii
latter
opinion
makes
application
first
amendment
facts
case
found
single
reference
pickering
see
ante
indeed
quite
astonishing
concludes
need
inquire
government
interests
patronage
contracting
may
generally
much
less
particular
case
elrod
branti
establish
patronage
justify
coercion
person
political
beliefs
associations
ante
leaving
aside
coercion
assertion
obviously
contradicts
need
balancing
announced
companion
umbehr
decision
rejection
balancing
evident
elsewhere
rejects
irrelevant
seventh
circuit
observation
lafalce
houston
contractors
elect
curr
favor
diverse
political
parties
ground
fact
hat
citizens
thus
find
way
mitigate
governmental
overreaching
refrain
complaining
excuse
wrongs
done
exercise
rights
ante
whether
government
action
issue
wrong
precisely
issue
case
thought
per
umbehr
determined
balancing
one
thought
two
opinions
products
courts
last
resort
two
different
legal
systems
presenting
fertile
material
course
freedom
speech
single
paragraph
veritable
deus
ex
machina
legal
analysis
reconciles
irreconcilable
penultimate
paragraph
portion
opinion
sets
forth
general
principles
law
governing
case
see
ante
advises
henceforth
freedom
speech
alluded
bill
rights
divided
two
categories
right
free
speech
apply
balancing
test
pickering
since
right
free
speech
presumably
exhaust
free
speech
clause
political
affiliation
apply
rigid
rule
elrod
branti
least
says
advantage
confining
inquiry
political
affiliation
alone
concerned
one
beliefs
allegiances
subject
probing
testing
government
ante
frankly
advantage
discern
novel
distinction
provides
explanation
matter
difficult
grasp
two
opinions
issue
day
raises
many
questions
right
free
speech
category
come
play
contractor
republican
says
republican
point
course
fatal
need
probing
testing
allegiance
disappears
right
free
speech
issue
goes
still
says
believe
principles
set
forth
republican
platform
perhaps
one
must
decide
whether
rubicon
right
free
speech
protected
political
affiliation
crossed
basis
contracting
authority
motivation
matter
whether
contractor
says
republican
even
says
believes
republican
platform
long
reason
disfavored
simply
whatever
says
believes
republican
analysis
change
perhaps
contracting
authority
really
nothing
republicans
ca
stand
people
believe
republican
platform
stands
except
perhaps
change
contractor
never
actually
said
perhaps
never
actually
said
believed
republican
platform
many
variations
provide
endless
diversion
courts
appeals
one
sanguine
believe
facts
involving
right
free
speech
facts
involving
political
affiliation
actually
segregated
separate
categories
arises
course
problem
involved
one
expect
rigid
test
elrod
nonbalancing
prevail
certainly
happens
elsewhere
law
one
categorically
liable
defamatory
statement
liable
threatening
statement
places
subject
immediate
fear
physical
harm
utterance
combines
sir
shall
punch
lying
mouth
least
defamatory
portion
categorically
actionable
however
new
first
amendment
law
told
specific
instances
employee
speech
expression
require
balancing
pickering
context
intermixed
political
affiliation
requirement
balancing
rather
categorical
liability
result
ante
confusion
enough
explanatory
paragraph
makes
doubly
sure
setting
forth
comprehensible
rule
adding
immediately
description
elrod
rather
pickering
balancing
test
applies
political
affiliation
cases
following
true
hand
inquiry
whether
affiliation
requirement
reasonable
one
inevitable
adjudication
required
even
political
affiliation
test
government
imposed
ante
said
rutan
hat
means
anybody
guess
scalia
dissenting
worse
still
learn
conduct
balancing
may
perhaps
includ
ed
among
many
cases
require
balancing
one
intermixed
cases
discussed
paragraph
immediately
ante
one
inclined
ask
conduct
balancing
answer
contained
next
brief
paragraph
opinion
appeals
based
understanding
pleadings
considered
simply
affiliation
case
held
based
circuit
precedent
constitutional
protection
one
simply
outside
contractor
consider
case
terms
disagree
appeals
conclusion
ante
unless
course
pickering
balancing
never
support
granting
motion
dismiss
proposition
today
opinion
total
confusion
must
stand
nothing
else
explains
assert
intermixed
case
requires
pickering
balancing
acknowledge
complaint
may
set
forth
intermixed
case
yet
reverse
dismissal
without
determining
whether
complaint
set
forth
intermixed
case
proceeding
conduct
least
preliminary
pickering
balancing
course
reason
principle
particular
issue
consequence
making
given
burdens
discovery
say
nothing
trial
make
litigation
subject
even
useful
device
harassment
weapon
commercial
competition
must
acknowledged
however
proceeding
way
present
case
one
unquestionable
advantage
leaves
entirely
district
clean
without
guidance
assistance
us
mess
figure
whether
saying
vote
paxson
paxson
hack
paxson
project
municipal
stadium
wasteful
whatever
else
gratzianna
campaign
posters
might
said
removes
case
political
affiliation
clause
constitution
places
within
right
free
speech
clause
one
final
observation
sweep
today
holdings
opinion
umbehr
swallowed
camel
first
amendment
extension
contracting
penultimate
paragraph
demonstrates
judicial
conservatism
ostentatiously
straining
following
gnat
finally
emphasize
limited
nature
decision
today
umbehr
suit
concerns
termination
commercial
relationship
government
need
address
possibility
suits
bidders
applicants
new
government
contracts
rely
relationship
umbehr
ante
facts
umbehr
course
involved
termination
nothing
vague
commercial
relationship
government
board
commissioners
terminated
umbehr
contract
fuzzier
terminology
used
presumably
involve
termination
contract
far
appears
paid
promised
anything
placed
list
operators
offered
individual
contracts
came
company
right
sue
city
failed
call
city
right
sue
company
turned
offered
tow
short
might
called
infinity
things
might
called
commercial
relationship
city
one
operators
regularly
called
quoted
statement
umbehr
invites
bar
believe
therefore
declined
draw
line
first
amendment
liability
short
firing
government
employment
elrod
branti
short
nonhiring
government
employment
rutan
short
termination
government
contract
umbehr
short
denial
government
contract
someone
commercial
relationship
government
may
take
firm
stand
extending
constitution
every
little
thing
comes
denying
government
contract
someone
commercial
relationship
likely
fact
even
believable
begun
make
habit
disclaiming
natural
foreseeable
jurisprudential
consequences
pathbreaking
opinions
major
step
abridgment
people
right
govern
portrayed
extremely
limited
indeed
sui
juris
romer
evans
slip
op
announced
last
month
asserted
colorado
constitutional
amendment
issue
distinctive
defies
conventional
inquiry
confounds
normal
process
judicial
review
virginia
ante
announced
two
days
ago
purported
address
specifically
educational
opportunity
recognized
district
appeals
unique
cases
announced
today
emphasize
limited
nature
decision
umbehr
ante
people
deceived
present
sits
major
undemocratic
restructuring
national
institutions
mores
constantly
progress
say
hard
cases
make
bad
law
cases
today
set
blood
boiling
arrogance
seem
display
part
elected
officials
shall
american
system
justice
let
insolent
politicians
get
away
one
tends
forget
heard
plaintiffs
tale
suits
dismissed
trial
facts
recites
opinions
assume
truth
allegations
made
preliminary
evidence
presented
plaintiffs
idea
whether
allegations
true
true
certainly
highly
unusual
elected
officials
thrive
arrogance
every
extreme
case
sort
alleged
expect
thousands
contracts
awarded
favoritism
basis
one
get
excited
democratic
mayor
gives
city
municipal
bond
business
known
solid
democratic
law
away
solid
republican
law
firm
business
previous
republican
administration
else
new
declines
give
construction
contract
new
municipal
stadium
company
opposed
bond
issue
construction
fact
tried
get
stadium
built
across
river
next
state
else
expect
awards
cable
monopoly
entirely
responsible
local
company
always
good
citizen
means
supported
money
personal
efforts
management
civic
initiatives
vast
majority
electorate
favor
though
oppose
hooray
favoritism
happens
time
american
political
life
one
ever
thought
first
amendment
constitution
must
living
another
world
day
day
case
case
busy
designing
constitution
country
recognize
depending
upon
today
cases
one
chooses
consider
authoritative
either
thrown
vast
numbers
practices
routine
american
political
life
order
get
rid
bad
apples
umbehr
purpose
mind
subjected
routine
practices
endless
uncertain
litigation
dissent
footnotes
chief
justice
joins
part
opinion
board
also
asserts
state
local
government
decisions
individual
contracts
insulated
tenth
amendment
legislative
immunity
constitutional
scrutiny
liability
see
brief
petitioner
tenth
amendment
claim
raised
petition
address
see
rule
claims
board
members
official
capacities
us
immunity
suit
section
extends
public
servants
individual
capacities
see
leatherman
tarrant
county
narcotics
intelligence
coordination
unit
legislative
immunity
claim
moot
see
code
section
section
section
supp
alaska
stat
ann
section
rev
stat
ann
section
ark
code
ann
section
cal
pub
cont
code
ann
section
west
supp
cal
pub
util
code
ann
section
west
cal
rev
tax
code
ann
section
west
supp
rev
stat
section
supp
stat
section
supp
del
code
tit
section
tit
section
stat
section
supp
section
supp
code
ann
section
section
supp
haw
rev
stat
section
supp
idaho
code
section
section
supp
section
section
section
idaho
sess
laws
ch
comp
ch
section
ch
section
ch
section
supp
ind
code
section
supp
iowa
code
section
stat
ann
section
supp
section
supp
sess
laws
rev
stat
ann
section
baldwin
la
rev
stat
ann
section
west
rev
stat
tit
section
md
ann
code
art
section
supp
md
laws
ch
art
section
supp
md
nat
res
code
ann
section
supp
mass
laws
ch
section
supp
comp
laws
ann
section
west
supp
stat
section
supp
miss
code
ann
section
section
supp
mo
rev
stat
section
supp
mont
code
ann
section
neb
rev
stat
section
rev
stat
section
rev
stat
ann
section
section
vi
supp
section
stat
ann
section
west
stat
ann
section
alt
county
govt
law
section
mckinney
mun
law
section
mckinney
supp
stat
section
section
cent
code
section
supp
ohio
rev
code
ann
section
section
okla
tit
section
tit
section
tit
section
rev
stat
section
cons
stat
section
supp
laws
section
supp
code
ann
section
supp
codified
laws
section
section
supp
section
section
section
code
ann
section
supp
tex
educ
code
ann
section
tex
loc
govt
code
ann
section
supp
utah
code
ann
section
stat
tit
section
code
ann
section
rev
code
section
supp
code
section
stat
section
supp
section
supp
wyo
stat
section
see
section
certain
federal
contracting
laws
rendered
inapplicable
contract
subcontract
greater
cal
pub
cont
code
ann
section
west
supp
requirement
certain
goods
materials
applicable
contracts
involving
annual
expenditure
fifty
thousand
dollars
comp
ch
section
requirement
certain
construction
contracts
applicable
contracts
mun
law
section
mckinney
supp
covering
contracts
less
purchase
contracts
less
codified
laws
section
supp
requiring
competitive
bidding
process
certain
contracts
involv
ing
expenditure
thousand
dollars
texas
local
govt
code
ann
section
supp
applying
contract
require
expenditure
exceeding
see
idaho
code
section
stat
ann
section
ohio
rev
code
ann
section
supp
okla
tit
section
utah
code
ann
section
see
del
code
tit
section
stat
section
supp
stat
section
rev
stat
ann
section
code
ann
section
makes
brief
attempt
minimize
seriousness
litigation
concern
pointing
amicus
brief
filed
behalf
respondents
position
represents
six
years
since
opinion
rutan
suits
alleging
first
amendment
violations
employment
decisions
filed
illinois
state
officials
ante
fact
brief
said
least
eighteen
cases
brief
illinois
state
officials
amici
curiae
emphasis
added
includes
suits
state
officials
officials
illinois
counties
even
numerous
municipalities
statistics
pertain
employment
suits
discussed
contracting
suits
much
numerous
also
says
found
reported
case
tenth
circuit
involving
first
amendment
patronage
claim
independent
contractor
six
years
since
appeals
first
recognized
claims
see
abercrombie
catoosa
ante
respect
abercrombie
discussed
issue
two
short
paragraphs
obscure
case
even
district
umbehr
located
tenth
circuit
cite
though
discussed
cases
jurisdictions
umbehr
mcclure
supp
tenth
circuit
reversed
district
basis
noted
simply
assumed
independent
contractor
assert
first
amendment
retaliation
claim
given
little
reasoning
matter
merely
suggested
without
analysis
emphasis
added
abercrombie
short
muffled
clarion
even
courts
hear
much
less
public
large
see
cal
pub
cont
code
ann
section
west
supp
comp
ch
section
ch
section
mun
law
section
mckinney
supp
dissenters
rutan
republican
party
agreed
greatly
exaggerates
constraints
entailed
patronage
call
coercion
since
generally
make
distinction
inducement
compulsion
public
official
offered
bribe
coerced
violate
law
private
citizen
offered
patronage
job
coerced
work
party
scalia
dissenting