crist
bretz
argued
november
decided
june
federal
rule
jeopardy
attaches
jury
trial
jury
empaneled
sworn
rule
reflects
protects
defendant
interest
retaining
chosen
jury
integral
part
fifth
amendment
guarantee
double
jeopardy
made
applicable
fourteenth
amendment
hence
montana
statute
providing
jeopardy
attach
first
witness
sworn
constitutionally
applied
jury
trial
pp
affirmed
stewart
delivered
opinion
brennan
white
marshall
blackmun
stevens
joined
blackmun
filed
concurring
opinion
post
burger
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
powell
filed
dissenting
opinion
burger
rehnquist
joined
post
robert
keller
special
assistant
attorney
general
montana
reargued
cause
appellants
briefs
michael
greely
attorney
general
william
leaphart
appointment
reargued
cause
filed
briefs
appellee
cline
charles
moses
reargued
cause
filed
briefs
appellee
bretz
kenneth
geller
argued
cause
reargument
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
brief
solicitor
general
mccree
assistant
attorney
general
civiletti
deputy
solicitor
general
easterbrook
alan
sobol
justice
stewart
delivered
opinion
case
involves
aspect
constitutional
guarantee
twice
put
jeopardy
precise
issue
whether
federal
rule
governing
time
jeopardy
attaches
jury
trial
binding
montana
fourteenth
amendment
federal
rule
jeopardy
attaches
jury
empaneled
sworn
montana
statute
provides
jeopardy
attach
first
witness
sworn
appellees
merrel
cline
bretz
brought
trial
montana
charges
grand
larceny
obtaining
money
property
false
pretenses
several
counts
preparing
offering
false
evidence
jury
empaneled
sworn
following
selection
process
first
witness
sworn
however
appellees
filed
motion
drawing
attention
allegation
charge
defendants
illegal
conduct
began
january
effective
january
particular
statute
relied
count
information
mont
rev
codes
ann
repealed
prosecutor
moved
amend
information
claiming
typographical
error
date
defendants
alleged
violation
statute
commenced
actually
january
date
alleged
grand
larceny
count
trial
judge
denied
prosecutor
motion
amend
information
dismissed
count
state
promptly
unsuccessfully
asked
montana
writ
supervisory
control
ordering
trial
judge
allow
amendment
returning
trial
prosecution
asked
trial
judge
dismiss
entire
information
new
one
filed
motion
granted
jury
dismissed
new
information
filed
charging
appellees
grand
larceny
obtaining
money
property
false
pretenses
charges
based
conduct
commencing
january
change
dates
new
charge
described
essentially
offense
charged
earlier
defective
count
second
jury
selected
sworn
appellees
moved
dismiss
new
information
claiming
double
jeopardy
clauses
montana
constitutions
barred
second
prosecution
motion
denied
trial
began
appellees
found
guilty
count
sentenced
terms
imprisonment
montana
previously
denied
appellees
habeas
corpus
relief
state
ex
rel
bretz
sheriff
mont
affirmed
judgment
bretz
ground
state
law
jeopardy
attached
first
trial
state
cline
mont
meantime
appellees
brought
habeas
corpus
proceeding
federal
district
alleging
convictions
unconstitutionally
obtained
second
trial
violated
fifth
fourteenth
amendment
guarantee
double
jeopardy
federal
denied
petition
holding
montana
statute
providing
jeopardy
attach
first
witness
sworn
violate
constitution
held
alternative
even
jeopardy
attached
second
prosecution
justified
manifest
necessity
supported
first
dismissal
cunningham
district
supp
appeals
ninth
circuit
reversed
held
federal
rule
governing
time
jeopardy
attaches
integral
part
constitutional
guarantee
thus
binding
upon
fourteenth
amendment
appellate
held
manifest
necessity
montana
trial
judge
dismissal
defective
count
accordingly
second
prosecution
constitutionally
permissible
appellants
appealed
pursuant
seeking
review
holding
appeals
montana
constitutionally
required
recognize
purposes
constitutional
guarantee
double
jeopardy
jeopardy
attaches
criminal
trial
jury
empaneled
sworn
postponed
consideration
probable
jurisdiction
sub
nom
crist
cline
case
argued
thereafter
case
set
reargument
parties
asked
address
following
two
questions
rule
heretofore
applied
federal
courts
jeopardy
attaches
jury
trials
jury
sworn
constitutionally
mandated
hold
constitution
require
jeopardy
attach
trial
state
federal
jury
nonjury
first
witness
sworn
ii
unstated
premise
questions
posed
reargument
rule
jeopardy
attaches
jury
trials
jury
sworn
constitutionally
mandated
rule
binding
montana
since
double
jeopardy
prohibition
fifth
amendment
applies
fourteenth
amendment
constitutional
standards
must
apply
equally
federal
state
courts
benton
maryland
single
dispositive
question
therefore
whether
federal
rule
integral
part
constitutional
guarantee
double
jeopardy
clause
fifth
amendment
stated
brief
compass
shall
person
subject
offence
twice
put
jeopardy
life
limb
deceptively
plain
language
given
rise
problems
subtle
complex
problems
illustrated
less
eight
cases
argued
term
case
however
presents
single
straightforward
issue
concerning
point
jury
trial
defendant
deemed
put
jeopardy
point
reached
subsequent
prosecution
defendant
bring
guarantee
double
jeopardy
even
potentially
play
serfass
illinois
somerville
fifth
amendment
guarantee
double
jeopardy
derived
english
common
law
followed
relatively
simple
rule
defendant
put
jeopardy
conviction
acquittal
complete
trial
primary
purpose
served
rule
akin
served
doctrines
res
judicata
collateral
estoppel
preserve
finality
judgments
clear
early
years
national
history
constitutional
guarantee
double
jeopardy
considered
equally
limited
scope
justice
story
explained
double
jeopardy
clause
mean
person
shall
tried
offence
second
time
jury
shall
discharged
without
giving
verdict
case
life
limb
judicially
said
put
jeopardy
story
commentaries
constitution
pp
basic
reason
holding
defendant
put
jeopardy
even
though
criminal
proceeding
terminates
verdict
perhaps
best
stated
green
underlying
idea
one
deeply
ingrained
least
system
jurisprudence
state
resources
power
allowed
make
repeated
attempts
convict
individual
alleged
offense
thereby
subjecting
embarrassment
expense
ordeal
compelling
live
continuing
state
anxiety
insecurity
well
enhancing
possibility
even
though
innocent
may
found
guilty
reason
holding
jeopardy
attaches
jury
empaneled
sworn
lies
need
protect
interest
accused
retaining
chosen
jury
interest
described
wade
hunter
supra
defendant
valued
right
trial
completed
particular
tribunal
interest
roots
deep
historic
development
trial
jury
system
criminal
justice
throughout
history
ran
strong
tradition
banded
together
jury
discharged
completed
solemn
task
announcing
verdict
regardless
historic
origin
however
defendant
valued
right
trial
completed
particular
tribunal
within
protection
constitutional
guarantee
double
jeopardy
since
right
lies
foundation
federal
rule
jeopardy
attaches
jury
empaneled
sworn
martin
linen
supply
supra
serfass
supra
illinois
somerville
jorn
plurality
opinion
follows
montana
view
jeopardy
attaches
impermissible
fourteenth
amendment
unless
said
federal
rule
core
double
jeopardy
clause
see
pointer
texas
malloy
hogan
ker
california
asking
us
hold
appellants
argue
federal
standard
arbitrarily
chosen
rule
convenience
similar
lack
constitutional
status
federal
requirement
unanimous
verdict
jurors
held
bind
apodaca
oregon
williams
florida
see
ballew
georgia
rule
jeopardy
attaches
jury
sworn
simply
arbitrary
exercise
linedrawing
argument
might
well
persuasive
might
reasonably
concluded
jeopardy
constitutionally
attach
first
witness
sworn
provide
consistency
jury
nonjury
trials
indeed
might
concluded
point
attachment
jeopardy
moved
steps
forward
backward
without
constitutional
significance
federal
rule
jeopardy
attaches
jury
trial
settled
part
federal
constitutional
law
rule
reflects
protects
defendant
interest
retaining
chosen
jury
hold
rule
grounded
periphery
double
jeopardy
concerns
concerns
finality
judgments
minimization
harassing
exposure
harrowing
experience
criminal
trial
valued
right
continue
chosen
jury
combined
produce
federal
law
jury
trial
jeopardy
attaches
jury
empaneled
sworn
agree
appeals
time
jeopardy
attaches
jury
trial
serves
lynchpin
double
jeopardy
jurisprudence
illinois
somerville
supra
case
involving
application
double
jeopardy
clause
fourteenth
amendment
said
jeopardy
attached
first
jury
selected
sworn
today
explicitly
hold
somerville
assumed
federal
rule
jeopardy
attaches
jury
empaneled
sworn
integral
part
constitutional
guarantee
double
jeopardy
judgment
affirmed
footnotes
prosecution
based
upon
transaction
former
prosecution
barred
former
prosecution
following
circumstances
former
prosecution
improperly
terminated
except
provided
subsection
improper
termination
prosecution
termination
reasons
amounting
acquittal
takes
place
first
witness
sworn
verdict
informed
argument
conviction
merrel
cline
reversed
see
state
cline
mont
charges
dismissed
appeal
therefore
become
moot
motion
asked
prosecution
evidence
limited
time
period
alleged
information
cunningham
case
involving
issue
consolidated
appellees
case
appellants
specifically
waived
challenge
appeals
ruling
manifest
necessity
intimate
view
correctness
addition
present
case
see
arizona
washington
wheeler
burks
ante
greene
massey
ante
sanabria
post
swisher
brady
scott
post
halsbury
laws
england
ed
established
least
turner
case
eng
rule
embodied
defensive
pleas
former
conviction
former
acquittal
although
pleas
mention
jeopardy
blackstone
commented
based
universal
maxim
man
brought
jeopardy
life
offence
blackstone
commentaries
see
generally
sigler
double
jeopardy
see
mayers
yarbrough
bis
vexari
new
trials
successive
prosecutions
harv
rev
see
also
friedland
double
jeopardy
ali
administration
criminal
law
double
jeopardy
perhaps
first
expression
concept
state
concluded
jeopardy
may
attach
prior
verdict
wide
different
verdict
given
jeopardy
verdict
commonwealth
cook
serg
perez
case
trial
judge
discharged
deadlocked
jury
defendant
argued
discharge
bar
second
trial
case
long
understood
standing
proposition
jeopardy
attached
first
trial
despite
former
jeopardy
second
trial
barred
double
jeopardy
clause
manifest
necessity
discharge
first
jury
see
tateo
wade
hunter
fact
close
reading
short
opinion
case
support
view
purporting
decide
constitutional
question
simply
settling
problem
arising
administration
federal
criminal
justice
cast
new
light
perez
late
date
academic
interest
two
cases
decided
wake
perez
simply
followed
precedential
authority
simmons
thompson
become
clear
least
time
kepner
decided
jeopardy
attach
even
trial
culminate
jury
verdict
person
jeopardy
regularly
charged
crime
tribunal
properly
organized
competent
try
undoubtedly
jurisdictions
trial
one
accused
crime
jury
verdict
acquittal
conviction
must
jury
legal
jeopardy
attach
jury
called
charged
deliverance
accused
see
also
dinitz
wilson
gori
see
kepner
supra
supra
trial
juries
first
merely
substitute
inscrutable
methods
decisionmaking
trial
battle
compurgation
ordeal
see
holdsworth
history
english
law
ed
see
also
plucknett
concise
history
common
law
ed
soon
evolved
however
rational
instrument
decisionmaking
serving
representative
group
peers
sit
judgment
defendant
guilt
illustrative
tradition
practice
keeping
jury
together
unfed
without
drink
delivered
unanimous
verdict
see
trin
hen
vii
pl
see
plucknett
supra
lord
coke
put
matter
jury
sworn
charged
case
life
member
discharged
give
verdict
coke
institutes
ed
english
said
late
rule
seems
command
confinement
jury
till
death
agree
avoid
consequence
exception
introduced
practice
blackstone
described
words
except
case
evident
necessity
winsor
queen
amicus
curiae
makes
similar
argument
nonjury
trials
jeopardy
attach
first
witness
sworn
serfass
alternatively
proposes
due
process
sliding
interest
balancing
test
trial
proceeded
justification
required
midtrial
termination
montana
alternatively
proposes
jeopardy
held
attach
prima
facie
case
made
premise
defendant
truly
jeopardy
legal
literature
provides
least
one
approach
jeopardy
attach
soon
process
selecting
jury
begins
see
schulhofer
jeopardy
mistrials
rev
justice
blackmun
concurring
although
join
opinion
write
emphasize
fact
content
rest
result
seems
ante
solely
defendant
valued
right
trial
completed
particular
tribunal
factor
mentioned
justice
black
speaking
wade
hunter
approach
also
support
conclusion
jeopardy
attaches
beginning
jury
selection
process
see
schulhofer
jeopardy
mistrials
rev
interests
involved
well
repetitive
stress
anxiety
upon
defendant
continuing
embarrassment
possibility
prosecutorial
overreaching
opening
statement
perhaps
true
interests
used
support
argument
jeopardy
attaches
point
jury
sworn
bring
interests
focus
however
point
jury
sworn
defendant
interest
jury
reaches
highest
plateau
opportunity
prosecutorial
overreaching
thereafter
increases
substantially
stress
possible
embarrassment
defendant
sustained
chief
justice
burger
dissenting
rulemaking
matter
result
reached
reasonable
one
decision
constitutionalize
rule
jeopardy
attaches
point
jury
sworn
bind
reject
another
example
constitutional
guarantees
trivialized
insistence
mechanical
uniformity
state
federal
practice
course
reason
state
federal
rules
must
period
swearing
jury
swearing
first
witness
concerns
underlying
constitutional
guarantee
double
jeopardy
simply
threatened
meaningful
sense
even
least
sanguine
assumptions
prosecutorial
behavior
cautious
constitutionalizing
every
procedural
device
found
useful
federal
courts
thereby
foreclosing
experimentation
different
approaches
equally
compatible
constitutional
principles
things
good
desirable
mandated
constitution
remain
free
procedures
attuned
special
problems
criminal
justice
system
state
local
levels
principles
federalism
readily
compromised
sake
uniformity
finding
sustenance
perhaps
considerations
convenience
certainly
constitution
countless
times
past
years
extolled
virtues
allowing
serve
laboratories
experiment
procedures
differ
followed
federal
courts
yet
continue
press
procrustean
federal
mold
holding
produce
great
mischief
continues
repeat
business
trivializing
constitution
matters
better
left
accordingly
join
justice
powell
dissent
justice
powell
chief
justice
justice
rehnquist
join
dissenting
rule
jeopardy
attaches
jury
trial
moment
jury
sworn
mandated
constitution
product
historical
accident
embodied
decision
without
slightest
consideration
policies
purports
serve
policies
served
equally
well
rule
fixing
attachment
jeopardy
swearing
first
witness
uphold
montana
statute
even
one
assumed
fifth
amendment
requires
attachment
jeopardy
swearing
jury
view
rule
incidental
purpose
double
jeopardy
clause
hence
incorporated
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
applicable
therefore
dissent
correctly
observes
ante
clear
early
years
national
history
constitutional
guarantee
double
jeopardy
restricted
cases
complete
trial
culminating
acquittal
conviction
limited
debate
double
jeopardy
clause
house
representatives
confirms
proposition
annals
cong
see
generally
wilson
consonant
prevailing
english
practice
regarding
pleas
bar
pleas
autrefois
acquit
autrefois
convict
implemented
maxim
repeated
blackstone
man
twice
placed
jeopardy
offense
interposed
basis
actual
verdict
acquittal
conviction
pleas
bar
embody
res
judicata
policy
describes
ante
double
jeopardy
clause
directed
see
haskell
cas
cc
washington
people
goodwin
johns
sup
cf
people
olcott
johns
cas
sup
kent
remains
english
rule
see
supra
existed
separate
rule
english
practice
become
intertwined
doctrine
pleas
bar
development
double
jeopardy
clause
rule
based
upon
dictum
lord
coke
ury
retorned
sworn
verdict
must
heard
discharged
coke
institutes
ed
accord
rule
arose
aspect
jury
practice
rather
element
guarantee
double
jeopardy
supported
several
facts
first
applied
civil
cases
well
criminal
kirk
jeopardy
period
year
books
rev
second
early
cases
treaties
laid
clear
standard
effect
failure
follow
rule
see
germain
doctor
student
dialogue
ch
third
seems
never
pleaded
successfully
bar
second
prosecution
period
year
books
rule
said
arisen
kirk
supra
fourth
blackstone
dealt
rule
governing
discharge
jury
section
pleas
bar
discussion
dealing
verdicts
compare
blackstone
commentaries
hence
reasonably
clear
rule
forbidding
discharge
jury
arose
circumstances
medieval
england
jurors
counties
facts
occurred
summoned
give
testimony
westminster
trial
based
facts
seems
invariable
rule
never
found
connection
cases
english
common
law
problem
two
trials
offense
kirk
supra
omitted
notwithstanding
origin
aspect
jury
practice
rule
discharge
jury
became
useful
defense
crown
oppression
century
reaction
tyrannical
practice
queen
charlesworth
eng
discharging
juries
permitting
reindictment
acquittal
appeared
likely
strong
judges
declared
capital
cases
juror
withdrawn
though
parties
consent
criminal
cases
capital
juror
may
withdrawn
parties
consent
otherwise
king
perkins
holt
eng
whether
strict
rule
ever
stringently
applied
modified
soon
announced
king
kinloch
fost
eng
event
seems
never
furnished
basis
plea
autrefois
acquit
rather
viewed
matter
committed
discretion
trial
judge
writ
error
lie
plea
bar
future
prosecution
allowed
queen
winsor
cox
queen
charlesworth
supra
eng
thus
english
judges
adapted
lord
coke
rule
protection
interests
later
recognized
country
within
sphere
double
jeopardy
clause
compare
queen
winsor
supra
green
refused
import
rule
realm
pleas
bar
latter
informed
framing
double
jeopardy
clause
rule
jury
practice
rule
well
might
come
regard
aspect
due
process
absorbed
country
double
jeopardy
clause
concerned
perez
wheat
sitting
perez
justice
washington
one
year
earlier
written
jeopardy
spoken
fifth
amendment
interpreted
mean
nothing
short
acquittal
conviction
prisoner
judgment
thereupon
haskell
justice
story
authored
opinion
perez
nine
years
later
explain
treatise
constitution
meaning
double
jeopardy
clause
party
shall
tried
second
time
offence
convicted
acquitted
offence
charged
verdict
jury
judgment
passed
thereon
story
commentaries
constitution
seems
unlikely
either
members
perez
thought
decision
interpreting
fifth
amendment
declared
discharge
jury
verdict
grounds
manifest
necessity
bar
retrial
justices
washington
story
believed
double
jeopardy
clause
embraced
actual
acquittal
conviction
must
viewed
perez
involving
independent
rule
barring
needless
discharges
jury
decisions
throughout
early
centuries
dealing
discharges
jury
ambiguous
read
merely
reaffirming
principle
perez
discharges
verdict
may
justified
manifest
necessity
without
adding
fifth
amendment
gloss
throughout
century
however
many
state
courts
began
blend
rule
needless
discharges
juries
guarantee
double
jeopardy
contained
federal
state
constitutions
recognized
discharge
rule
provided
significant
protection
twice
vexed
right
trial
jury
little
value
citizen
criminal
prosecution
guarantee
double
jeopardy
violated
accused
left
without
remedy
judge
arbitrarily
discharge
impanel
juries
one
obtained
render
verdict
state
demands
attorney
prosecution
desires
protection
oppression
new
trial
may
ordered
trying
last
resort
value
boasted
right
commonwealth
century
development
state
courts
defendant
valued
right
trial
completed
particular
tribunal
appeared
decisions
first
time
also
without
analysis
element
double
jeopardy
clause
wade
hunter
policies
underlying
valued
right
spelled
wade
rationale
expressed
green
supra
case
involving
midtrial
discharge
jury
appears
echo
state
courts
century
earlier
state
resources
power
allowed
make
repeated
attempts
convict
individual
alleged
offense
thereby
subjecting
embarrassment
expense
ordeal
compelling
live
continuing
state
anxiety
insecurity
well
enhancing
possibility
even
though
innocent
may
found
guilty
accepted
almost
without
articulated
thought
doctrine
double
jeopardy
clause
protects
needless
discharge
jury
proceeded
adopt
similar
lack
reason
analysis
implementing
rule
jeopardy
attaches
jury
sworn
downum
trial
declared
mistrial
jury
sworn
witnesses
called
finding
absence
imperious
necessity
held
fifth
amendment
barred
reprosecution
downum
opinion
contains
discussion
point
jeopardy
attachment
policies
underlying
selection
swearing
jury
determinative
moment
nevertheless
swearing
jury
accepted
since
downum
constitutional
line
demarcation
attachment
jeopardy
see
illinois
somerville
sisson
even
though
case
presented
contest
issue
following
lead
state
courts
simply
enlisted
doctrine
concerning
needless
discharge
juries
service
double
jeopardy
principles
largely
without
analysis
apparently
little
awareness
history
view
however
consistency
federal
courts
assumed
without
question
swearing
jury
triggers
jeopardy
accept
established
supervisory
rule
within
federal
system
acceptance
supervisory
rule
primarily
grounds
long
tenure
convenience
justification
elevating
constitutional
doctrine
hesitant
constitutionalize
rule
derives
support
framers
understanding
english
practice
double
jeopardy
clause
derived
supported
doctrinal
reasoning
reaches
constitutional
dimension
restraint
doubly
indicated
respect
rule
since
applied
jury
trials
criminal
case
tried
jeopardy
attach
begins
hear
evidence
serfass
compelling
reason
suggested
today
earlier
decisions
time
jeopardy
attaches
different
depending
upon
whether
defendant
valued
right
asserted
jury
trial
rather
bench
trial
turn
next
examination
jury
trial
rule
light
double
jeopardy
policies
belatedly
thought
advance
ii
three
aspects
criminal
process
ordinarily
precede
initial
introduction
evidence
jury
trial
motions
jury
selection
opening
statements
defendants
vitally
interested
yet
far
clear
trigger
attachment
jeopardy
defendants
may
sometimes
must
see
fed
rule
crim
proc
move
various
rulings
indictment
admissibility
evidence
trial
motions
practical
terms
may
decide
defendant
case
sometimes
may
require
devotion
time
energies
resources
exceeding
necessary
trial
yet
never
held
jeopardy
attaches
making
deciding
pretrial
motions
see
serfass
supra
appellee
contend
otherwise
clear
central
concern
double
jeopardy
clause
regarded
solely
protecting
repeated
expenditures
defendant
efforts
resources
opening
statements
may
made
bench
jury
trials
either
type
trial
statements
counsel
questions
may
prompt
prosecutor
abort
dismissing
indictment
otherwise
proceedings
view
reindicting
defendant
commencing
anew
prosecutor
also
may
simply
request
continuance
gain
time
meet
unexpected
defense
stratagem
although
motion
rarely
prevail
event
delay
postponement
occasioned
result
phase
trial
equally
adverse
defendant
without
regard
whether
tried
jury
due
process
clause
protect
defendant
either
case
prosecutorial
abuse
thus
respect
phase
criminal
trial
appears
difference
substance
jury
bench
trials
terms
serving
double
jeopardy
policies
situation
differ
respects
jury
selected
defendant
voir
dire
challenges
participates
selection
factfinder
unusual
process
entail
major
effort
extend
protracted
period
case
pretrial
motions
expenditure
effort
alone
sufficient
trigger
attachment
jeopardy
federal
rule
attachment
jury
trials
offers
basis
double
jeopardy
claim
prosecutor
dissatisfied
jury
selection
process
successful
dismissing
prosecution
last
juror
seated
indeed
whole
panel
sworn
defendant
protection
denial
abuse
rights
respect
lies
due
process
clause
moreover
double
jeopardy
clause
viewed
guarantee
defendant
claim
factfinder
perceived
favorably
inclined
toward
cause
interest
bar
pretrial
reassignment
case
one
judge
another
even
though
may
waived
jury
trial
belief
original
judge
viewed
case
favorably
thus
double
jeopardy
clause
interest
trial
completed
particular
tribunal
wade
hunter
must
refer
interest
retaining
factfinder
thought
disposed
favorably
toward
defendant
one
event
distinguish
one
factfinder
another
eyes
law
general
double
jeopardy
clause
particular
beginning
factfinder
work
stated
green
defendant
placed
jeopardy
put
trial
factfinder
emphasis
added
jury
undertaken
constitutional
duty
hearing
evidence
trial
quite
clearly
way
prosecution
case
begun
unfold
trier
fact
cf
scott
post
testimony
commences
evidence
alleged
criminal
conduct
presented
factfinder
becomes
matter
public
record
defendant
public
embarrassment
anxiety
begin
point
retrial
mean
repeating
painful
embarrassing
testimony
together
possibility
earlier
trial
run
strengthen
prosecution
case
retrial
example
prosecution
witnesses
may
better
prepared
rigors
thus
defendant
strong
interest
taking
case
first
jury
witnesses
testify
carsey
app
leventhal
concurring
rationale
double
jeopardy
clause
implicated
threshold
crossed
crucial
time
double
jeopardy
clause
purposes
evident
attachment
rule
bench
trials
judge
embarked
upon
factfinding
mission
defendant
justified
concluding
ordeal
begun
hands
judge
may
expect
matter
proceed
finish
principle
apply
jury
trials
thus
montana
rule
fixing
attachment
jeopardy
swearing
first
witness
consonant
central
concerns
double
jeopardy
clause
furnishes
clear
line
demarcation
attachment
jeopardy
places
line
advance
point
real
jeopardy
fifth
amendment
terms
said
begin
iii
even
conclude
fifth
amendment
merely
virtue
long
unreasoned
acceptance
required
attachment
jeopardy
swearing
jury
hold
fourteenth
amendment
necessarily
imposes
requirement
upon
issue
turn
answer
question
whether
jeopardy
attachment
point
fundamental
guarantees
double
jeopardy
clause
apodaca
oregon
powell
concurring
judgment
ludwig
massachusetts
powell
concurring
previous
discussion
makes
clear
jury
trial
rule
accorded
constitutional
status
today
implicates
rights
identified
fundamental
constitutional
sense
basis
incorporating
fourteenth
amendment
see
duncan
louisiana
harlan
dissenting
iv
aside
paying
cryptic
homage
hitherto
unexplained
valued
right
particular
jury
even
attempt
justify
holding
fifth
amendment
mandates
rule
attachment
adopts
identifies
policy
double
jeopardy
clause
interests
fair
system
criminal
justice
elevate
right
constitutional
status
rule
even
linedrawing
finds
support
logic
significant
convenience
perceive
reason
impose
effect
supervisory
rule
practice
upon
courts
every
state
union
blackstone
commentaries
see
also
coke
institutes
ed
archbold
pleading
evidence
practice
criminal
cases
ed
interestingly
blackstone
wrote
jury
discharged
soon
sworn
evidence
introduced
blackstone
commentaries
relatively
recent
edition
blackstone
compiled
earliest
editions
indicates
close
evidence
may
point
rule
discharge
jury
originally
fixed
authority
ehrlich
ehrlich
blackstone
hale
pleas
crown
stokes
ingersoll
ed
infamous
ireland
case
tr
five
defendants
accused
high
treason
permitted
jury
deliberate
three
defendants
instructed
jury
evidence
whitebread
fenwick
sufficient
convict
even
though
full
satisfy
private
conscience
therefore
discharged
jury
two
declaring
convenient
already
proved
stay
proof
may
come
ibid
reindicted
convicted
executed
whitebread
case
tr
despite
pleas
former
jeopardy
conway
lynch
queen
ir
irish
queen
bench
review
writ
error
prisoners
convictions
reindictment
holding
trial
judge
failed
state
record
condition
necessity
prompted
discharge
first
jury
abuse
discretion
preventing
subsequent
trial
english
queen
bench
however
rejected
view
charlesworth
winsor
indeed
adopted
view
justice
crampton
dissented
conway
lynch
see
also
coolidge
cas
cc
mass
story
despite
view
clearly
expressed
justice
story
commentaries
evidence
year
following
publication
beginning
consider
rule
discharge
jury
embodying
double
jeopardy
concerns
see
gilbert
cas
cc
mass
perez
concerned
pleas
bar
therefore
double
jeopardy
clause
supported
recognition
doctrine
manifest
necessity
necessity
example
discovery
incontrovertible
evidence
previously
acquitted
person
guilty
sufficed
overcome
valid
plea
bar
necessity
went
propriety
discharging
jury
see
bigelow
recognizes
perez
probably
viewed
double
jeopardy
case
ante
simmons
logan
thompson
dreyer
illinois
lovato
new
mexico
see
also
morris
cas
cc
mass
curtis
see
keerl
montana
cf
kepner
see
also
shoemaker
cas
cc
watson
cas
sdny
see
state
garrigues
semble
commonwealth
cook
serg
state
bailey
mahala
state
state
roe
morgan
state
ind
people
webb
cal
nolan
state
teat
state
miss
ex
parte
maxwell
mitchell
state
ohio
state
ward
ark
people
gardner
commonwealth
hart
mass
state
paterno
la
ann
mcdonald
state
state
sommers
dulin
lillard
see
people
goodwin
johns
sup
commonwealth
wade
mass
hoffman
state
md
bigelow
state
van
ness
american
treatises
also
included
rule
discharge
jury
heading
double
jeopardy
see
bigelow
estoppel
ed
bishop
commentaries
criminal
law
ed
cooley
constitutional
limitations
ed
see
generally
ali
administration
criminal
law
commentary
pp
leading
english
criminal
law
treatise
contrary
see
chitty
criminal
law
perkins
ed
see
state
supra
morgan
state
supra
state
redman
iowa
people
webb
supra
nolan
state
supra
state
davis
mitchell
state
supra
state
ward
supra
people
gardner
supra
state
paterno
supra
mcdonald
state
supra
state
sommers
supra
dulin
lillard
supra
accord
bishop
supra
cooley
supra
see
bigelow
supra
similarly
today
explore
reasons
supporting
valuation
particular
right
merely
announcing
valued
ante
government
downum
conceded
jeopardy
attaches
time
jury
sworn
brief
support
concession
government
cited
lovato
new
mexico
apparently
believing
lovato
involved
discharge
jury
immediately
swearing
case
however
witnesses
sides
sworn
actually
furnished
support
concession
since
parties
dispute
point
jeopardy
attachment
discuss
matter
rule
attachment
put
issue
discussed
downum
owe
sub
silentio
determination
less
deference
holding
arrived
full
argument
consideration
see
monell
new
york
city
dept
social
services
powell
concurring
particularly
constitutional
case
serfass
petitioner
sought
point
attachment
moved
forward
filing
pretrial
motions
refusal
fix
attachment
jeopardy
stage
litigation
require
consideration
policies
underlying
rule
assumed
downum
reaffirmed
today
apparently
defense
counsel
often
choose
reserve
opening
statements
close
prosecution
case
tr
oral
arg
brief
reargument
amicus
curiae
course
followed
early
disclosure
defense
strategy
least
one
commentator
proposed
fixing
jeopardy
attachment
start
voir
dire
order
protect
defendant
interest
juror
selected
schulhofer
jeopardy
mistrials
rev
proposal
however
historical
foundation
clear
grounding
concerns
double
jeopardy
clause