sanabria
argued
november
decided
june
title
ed
makes
federal
offense
five
persons
conduct
illegal
gambling
business
violation
law
place
business
located
petitioner
along
several
others
indicted
violating
single
count
charging
defendants
gambling
business
involved
numbers
betting
betting
horse
races
violation
specified
massachusetts
statute
government
evidence
trial
district
showed
defendants
engaged
horse
betting
numbers
betting
close
government
case
defense
counsel
argued
government
failed
prove
violation
massachusetts
statute
statute
prohibit
numbers
betting
horse
betting
defendants
rested
trial
judge
granted
motion
exclude
evidence
numbers
betting
granted
motion
acquit
petitioner
lack
evidence
connection
business
case
remaining
defendants
went
jury
convicted
government
appealed
ed
order
excluding
evidence
judgment
acquitting
petitioner
sought
new
trial
portion
indictment
relating
numbers
betting
appeals
held
jurisdiction
appeal
taking
view
although
terms
authorizes
government
appeal
orders
dismissing
indictment
one
counts
word
counts
refers
discrete
basis
imposing
criminal
liability
since
numbers
allegations
discrete
bases
liability
duplicitously
joined
single
count
district
action
constituted
dismissal
numbers
charge
acquittal
insufficient
evidence
charge
therefore
authorized
appeal
dismissal
numbers
charge
went
hold
double
jeopardy
clause
fifth
amendment
bar
retrial
petitioner
voluntarily
terminated
proceedings
numbers
portion
count
moving
effect
dismiss
vacated
judgment
acquittal
remanded
new
trial
numbers
charge
held
retrial
numbers
theory
liability
barred
double
jeopardy
clause
pp
appeals
erroneously
characterized
district
action
dismissal
numbers
theory
one
count
charged
district
order
language
indictment
stricken
indictment
amended
judgment
acquittal
entered
entire
count
found
petitioner
guilty
violating
without
specifying
respect
one
theory
liability
pp
extent
district
found
indictment
description
offense
narrow
warrant
admission
certain
evidence
ruling
erroneous
evidentiary
ruling
led
acquittal
insufficient
evidence
judgment
acquittal
however
erroneous
bars
prosecution
aspect
count
hence
bars
appellate
review
trial
error
pp
even
said
district
dismissed
numbers
allegation
retrial
theory
subject
petitioner
second
trial
offense
acquitted
participation
single
gambling
business
single
offense
matter
many
state
statutes
enterprise
violated
regard
single
gambling
business
petitioner
acquitted
government
charged
single
gambling
business
discrete
violations
state
law
business
may
committed
severable
order
avoid
double
jeopardy
clause
bar
retrials
offense
pp
defendant
acquitted
matter
egregiously
erroneous
legal
rulings
leading
judgment
acquittal
might
exception
constitutional
rule
forbidding
successive
trials
offense
fong
foo
thus
numbers
evidence
erroneously
excluded
judgment
acquittal
produced
thereby
final
unreviewable
lee
jeffers
distinguished
pp
marshall
delivered
opinion
burger
brennan
stewart
powell
joined
stevens
joined
parts
iii
white
joined
stevens
filed
concurring
opinion
post
blackmun
filed
dissenting
opinion
rehnquist
joined
post
francis
dimento
argued
cause
filed
briefs
petitioner
frank
easterbrook
argued
cause
pro
hac
vice
brief
solicitor
general
mccree
assistant
attorney
general
civiletti
sidney
glazer
justice
marshall
delivered
opinion
issue
presented
whether
may
appeal
criminal
case
midtrial
ruling
resulting
exclusion
certain
evidence
subsequently
entered
judgment
acquittal
resolution
issue
depends
application
double
jeopardy
clause
fifth
amendment
somewhat
unusual
facts
case
petitioner
indicted
along
several
others
violating
ed
makes
federal
offense
conduct
finance
manage
supervise
direct
part
illegal
gambling
business
business
defined
one
conducted
five
persons
violation
law
place
business
located
operates
least
days
earns
least
one
day
indictment
charged
relevant
part
defendants
gambling
business
involved
accepting
recording
registering
bets
wagers
parimutual
sic
number
pool
result
trial
contest
skill
speed
endurance
beast
business
violation
laws
commonwealth
massachusetts
wit
chapter
section
government
evidence
trial
showed
defendants
engaged
primarily
horse
betting
numbers
betting
close
government
case
petitioner
counsel
represented
defendants
moved
judgment
acquittal
clients
joined
counsel
defendants
argued
inter
alia
government
failed
prove
violation
state
statutory
section
alleged
indictment
since
mass
laws
ch
west
construed
state
courts
prohibit
numbers
betting
applied
betting
games
competition
horse
races
government
responded
violation
state
law
jurisdictional
element
federal
statute
every
defendant
must
found
violating
state
law
district
accepted
government
theory
denied
defendants
motion
stating
defendant
convicted
must
found
joined
illegal
enterprise
way
petitioner
counsel
sought
clarification
whether
numbers
pool
allegation
still
case
indicated
counsel
presented
authority
proposition
include
numbers
betting
also
expressed
view
however
petitioner
counsel
correct
exclude
evidence
bets
numbers
government
demurred
arguing
exclusion
numbers
evidence
necessarily
follow
acceptance
petitioner
theory
taking
lead
petitioner
counsel
next
moved
strike
limit
evidence
motion
denied
defendants
rested
trial
judge
announced
reversing
earlier
ruling
motion
exclude
evidence
discovered
massachusetts
case
holding
numbers
betting
prohibited
ch
struck
evidence
numbers
betting
apparently
believed
action
required
indictment
failure
set
forth
proper
section
point
counsel
moved
judgment
acquittal
petitioner
alone
arguing
evidence
connection
activities
government
disagree
evidence
insufficient
show
petitioner
involvement
operation
repeated
earlier
argument
relating
jurisdictional
nature
violation
rejected
contention
stating
offense
established
terms
government
charged
violation
petitioner
connected
operation
mean
horse
operation
concluded
think
done
granted
petitioner
motion
judgment
acquittal
entered
order
embodying
ruling
later
day
next
day
government
moved
reconsider
ruling
striking
evidence
concerning
operation
illegal
numbers
pool
decision
granting
defendant
thomas
sanabria
motion
judgement
sic
acquittal
prompted
government
arguments
support
reconsideration
asked
defense
counsel
raised
objection
indictment
citation
earlier
prejudice
resulted
petitioner
failure
cite
proper
section
counsel
responded
objection
ripened
end
government
case
asked
take
judicial
notice
need
allege
actual
prejudice
denied
motions
reconsider
indicated
granted
motion
restore
numbers
evidence
also
vacated
judgment
acquittal
case
remaining
defendants
went
jury
theory
gambling
business
engaged
horse
betting
convicted
government
filed
timely
appeal
decision
order
excluding
evidence
entering
judgment
acquittal
denying
motion
reconsideration
conceding
review
district
ruling
insufficient
evidence
petitioner
involvement
horse
betting
government
sought
new
trial
portion
indictment
relating
numbers
betting
appeals
first
circuit
held
first
jurisdiction
appeal
although
jurisdictional
statute
ed
terms
authorizes
government
appeal
orders
dismissing
indictment
one
counts
word
count
interpret
ed
refer
discrete
basis
imposition
criminal
liability
viewing
numbers
allegations
discrete
bas
es
criminal
liability
duplicitously
joined
single
count
characterized
district
action
dismissal
numbers
charge
acquittal
insufficient
evidence
charge
concluded
authorized
appeal
dismissal
numbers
charge
double
jeopardy
clause
bar
future
prosecution
charge
consistent
analysis
found
petitioner
voluntarily
terminated
proceedings
numbers
portion
count
moving
effect
dismiss
since
dismissal
imported
ruling
petitioner
criminal
liability
since
petitioner
motion
attributable
prosecutorial
judicial
overreaching
applied
rule
permitting
retrials
prosecution
terminated
defendant
request
mistrial
citing
dinitz
double
jeopardy
bar
new
trial
went
resolve
merits
appeal
government
favor
held
based
intervening
first
circuit
decision
district
erred
dismissing
numbers
theory
accordingly
judgment
acquittal
vacated
case
remanded
government
may
try
defendant
portion
indictment
charges
violation
based
upon
numbering
sic
activities
granted
certiorari
limiting
review
related
issues
appealability
double
jeopardy
reverse
ii
wilson
found
primary
purpose
double
jeopardy
clause
prevent
successive
trials
government
appeals
per
se
thus
held
indictment
dismissed
guilty
verdict
rendered
double
jeopardy
clause
bar
appeal
since
verdict
simply
reinstated
without
new
trial
government
successful
new
trial
follow
upon
government
appeal
necessarily
forbid
however
limited
circumstances
second
trial
offense
constitutionally
permissible
appealability
case
therefore
turns
whether
new
trial
ordered
violate
command
fifth
amendment
person
shall
subject
offence
twice
put
jeopardy
life
limb
deciding
whether
second
trial
permissible
must
immediately
confront
fact
petitioner
acquitted
indictment
verdict
acquittal
may
reviewed
without
putting
defendant
twice
jeopardy
thereby
violating
constitution
recently
described
fundamental
rule
history
double
jeopardy
jurisprudence
martin
linen
supply
quoting
ball
fundamental
nature
rule
manifested
explicit
extension
situations
acquittal
based
upon
egregiously
erroneous
foundation
fong
foo
see
green
fong
foo
appeals
held
district
erred
various
rulings
lacked
power
direct
verdict
acquittal
government
rested
case
accepted
appeals
holding
district
erred
nevertheless
found
double
jeopardy
clause
violated
appeals
set
aside
judgment
acquittal
directed
petitioners
tried
offense
thus
defendant
acquitted
trial
may
retried
offense
even
legal
rulings
underlying
acquittal
erroneous
government
take
issue
basic
principles
indeed
concedes
acquittal
insufficient
evidence
refers
theory
liability
unreviewable
bars
second
trial
charge
disputed
question
however
whether
retrial
numbers
theory
liability
offense
petitioner
acquitted
government
contends
accordance
reasoning
appeals
numbers
theory
dismissed
count
judgment
acquittal
entered
therefore
petitioner
acquitted
numbers
theory
petitioner
responds
district
dismiss
anything
rather
struck
evidence
acquitted
petitioner
entire
count
assuming
arguendo
dismissal
numbers
theory
urges
retrial
theory
nevertheless
barred
second
trial
statutory
offense
first
consider
whether
appeals
correctly
characterized
district
action
dismissal
numbers
theory
government
view
numbers
theory
dismissed
case
effectively
government
actually
charged
crime
two
counts
district
dismissed
numbers
count
first
difficulty
argument
encounters
government
fact
charge
offense
two
counts
legal
consequences
ordinarily
flow
actually
happened
party
might
done
vantage
hindsight
see
central
tablet
mfg
precise
manner
indictment
drawn
ignored
important
function
indictment
ensure
case
proceedings
taken
defendant
similar
offence
record
sho
accuracy
extent
may
plead
former
acquittal
conviction
cochran
quoted
approval
russell
hanger
regard
one
count
fact
charged
petitioner
least
formally
acquitted
persuaded
correct
characterize
trial
action
dismissal
discrete
portion
count
form
exalted
substance
determining
double
jeopardy
consequences
ruling
terminating
prosecution
serfass
jorn
goldman
neither
appropriate
entirely
ignore
form
order
entered
trial
see
barber
district
issued
two
orders
one
excluding
certain
evidence
entering
judgment
acquittal
single
count
charged
language
indictment
ordered
stricken
compare
alberti
indictment
amended
judgment
acquittal
entered
entire
count
found
petitioner
guilty
crime
violating
ed
without
specifying
respect
one
theory
liability
defendant
set
bar
tried
offense
unlawfully
engaging
illegal
gambling
business
violation
title
code
sections
allowed
defendant
motion
judgment
acquittal
close
government
evidence
hereby
ordered
defendant
thomas
sanabria
hereby
acquitted
offense
charged
ordered
defendant
thomas
sanabria
hereby
discharged
go
without
day
must
assume
trial
interpretation
indictment
erroneous
see
supra
every
erroneous
interpretation
indictment
purposes
deciding
evidence
admissible
regarded
dismissal
district
find
count
failed
charge
necessary
element
offense
cf
lee
rather
found
indictment
description
offense
narrow
warrant
admission
certain
evidence
extent
believe
ruling
properly
characterized
erroneous
evidentiary
ruling
led
acquittal
insufficient
evidence
judgment
acquittal
however
erroneous
bars
prosecution
aspect
count
hence
bars
appellate
review
trial
error
martin
linen
supply
fong
foo
green
ball
even
government
correct
district
dismissed
numbers
allegation
view
retrial
theory
subject
petitioner
second
trial
offense
acquitted
congress
prosecution
establishes
defines
offenses
limitations
imposed
double
jeopardy
clause
legislative
power
define
offenses
brown
ohio
congress
defined
statutory
offense
prescription
allowable
unit
prosecution
universal
credit
bell
braverman
nielsen
prescription
determines
scope
protection
afforded
prior
conviction
acquittal
whether
particular
course
conduct
involves
one
distinct
offenses
statute
depends
congressional
choice
allowable
unit
prosecution
defined
participation
single
illegal
gambling
business
congress
assimilate
state
gambling
laws
per
se
federal
penal
code
define
discrete
acts
gambling
independent
federal
offenses
see
see
also
iannelli
government
need
prove
defendant
performed
act
gambling
prohibited
state
law
participation
gambling
business
federal
offense
gambling
business
must
violate
state
law
government
recognizes
participation
single
gambling
business
single
offense
matter
many
state
statutes
enterprise
violated
brief
government
undisputed
theory
case
single
gambling
business
engaged
horse
betting
numbers
betting
regard
single
business
participation
concededly
single
offense
doubt
petitioner
truly
acquitted
recently
defined
acquittal
resolution
correct
factual
elements
offense
charged
lee
quoting
martin
linen
supply
supra
petitioner
found
guilty
failure
proof
key
factual
element
offense
charged
connected
illegal
gambling
business
see
supra
government
charged
business
engaged
horse
betting
petitioner
acquitted
acquittal
bar
prosecution
participating
gambling
business
time
period
numbers
theory
trial
disregarded
government
allegation
numbers
betting
render
acquittal
theory
less
acquittal
offense
charged
double
jeopardy
clause
fragile
guarantee
limitations
avoided
simple
expedient
dividing
single
crime
series
temporal
spatial
units
brown
ohio
hold
today
discrete
bases
liability
defined
legislature
see
recognizing
single
violation
statute
alleged
either
theory
government
nevertheless
contends
separate
counts
proper
acquittal
petitioner
count
bar
another
prosecution
numbers
count
brief
although
may
circumstances
true
petitioner
acquitted
insufficient
proof
element
crime
counts
share
connected
single
gambling
business
see
supra
finding
fact
stands
absolute
bar
prosecution
participation
business
government
charged
single
gambling
business
discrete
violations
state
law
business
may
committed
severable
order
avoid
double
jeopardy
clause
bar
retrials
offense
indeed
government
argument
discrete
bases
liability
warranting
reprosecution
following
final
judgment
acquittal
one
discrete
basis
quite
similar
unsuccessful
argument
presented
braverman
braverman
convicted
received
consecutive
sentences
four
separate
counts
conspiracy
count
alleging
conspiracy
violate
separate
substantive
provision
federal
narcotics
laws
government
conceded
single
conspiracy
existed
concedes
single
gambling
business
existed
nonetheless
urged
separate
punishments
appropriate
single
conspiracy
several
discrete
objects
firmly
rejected
argument
precise
nature
extent
conspiracy
must
determined
reference
agreement
embraces
defines
objects
whether
object
single
agreement
commit
one
many
crimes
either
case
agreement
constitutes
conspiracy
statute
punishes
one
agreement
taken
several
agreements
hence
several
conspiracies
envisages
violation
several
statutes
rather
one
double
jeopardy
clause
less
offended
government
seeks
try
petitioner
twice
single
offense
instead
seeking
punish
twice
braverman
two
offenses
purposes
barring
consecutive
sentences
single
trial
necessarily
purposes
barring
successive
prosecutions
brown
ohio
supra
accordingly
even
numbers
allegation
dismissed
conclude
subsequent
trial
petitioner
conducting
illegal
gambling
business
issue
first
trial
subject
second
trial
offense
acquitted
iii
question
remaining
whether
exceptions
constitutional
rule
forbidding
successive
trials
offense
see
supra
apply
short
answer
question
exception
permitting
retrial
defendant
acquitted
matter
egregiously
erroneous
fong
foo
legal
rulings
leading
judgment
might
government
nevertheless
argues
relying
principally
lee
jeffers
petitioner
waived
double
jeopardy
rights
moving
dismiss
numbers
allegation
objecting
form
allegation
prior
trial
lee
held
retrial
permissible
district
midtrial
decision
granting
defendant
motion
dismiss
indictment
failure
state
offense
functionally
indistinguishable
declaration
mistrial
defendant
request
mistrial
analogy
relied
lee
manifestly
inapposite
although
jeopardy
attached
lee
verdict
rendered
indeed
petitioner
conceded
district
termination
first
trial
acquittal
contrast
trial
proceeded
verdict
petitioner
acquitted
lee
trial
clearly
contemplate
reprosecution
granted
defendant
motion
neither
petitioner
motion
trial
rulings
contemplated
second
trial
since
single
offense
involved
petitioner
went
judgment
offense
trial
terminates
judgment
acquittal
double
jeopardy
principles
governing
permissibility
retrial
declaration
mistrial
lee
bearing
jeffers
support
government
position
defendant
first
tried
convicted
conspiring
distribute
narcotics
violation
eight
members
agreed
subsequent
trial
conducting
continuing
criminal
enterprise
violation
time
period
offense
since
violation
lesser
included
offense
violation
prior
first
trial
however
jeffers
specifically
opposed
government
effort
try
indictments
together
part
ground
involved
distinct
offenses
reasoning
jeffers
necessarily
contemplated
second
trial
four
members
found
elect
ed
two
offenses
tried
separately
raising
potential
double
jeopardy
problem
waived
objection
ground
successive
trials
instant
case
presents
quite
different
situation
petitioner
counsel
never
argued
horse
betting
numbers
distinct
offenses
fortiori
argue
contemplate
separate
trials
theory
multo
fortiori
elect
undergo
successive
trials
finally
agree
appeals
case
present
hypothetical
situation
reserved
judgment
serfass
defendant
afforded
opportunity
obtain
determination
legal
defense
prior
trial
nevertheless
knowingly
allows
placed
jeopardy
raising
defense
quoting
solicitor
general
see
petitioner
legal
defense
single
offense
charged
participating
illegal
gambling
business
violation
unlike
questions
whether
indictment
offense
statute
unconstitutional
conduct
set
forth
indictment
violates
statute
proof
may
presented
support
valid
indictment
sufficiency
proof
legal
defenses
required
even
capable
resolved
trial
former
instances
ruling
defendant
favor
completely
precludes
conviction
least
indictment
even
numbers
language
struck
trial
legal
reason
petitioner
convicted
indictment
codefendants
acquittal
resulted
insufficiency
government
proof
trial
establish
petitioner
connection
gambling
business
trial
judge
erroneously
understood
charged
government
real
quarrel
judgment
acquittal
numbers
evidence
erroneously
excluded
judgment
acquittal
produced
thereby
final
unreviewable
neither
ed
double
jeopardy
clause
permits
government
obtain
relief
adverse
rulings
result
defense
motions
lead
termination
criminal
trial
defendant
favor
see
wilson
hold
defendant
waives
double
jeopardy
protection
whenever
trial
error
favor
midtrial
motion
leads
acquittal
undercut
adversary
assumption
system
criminal
justice
rests
see
jeffers
stevens
dissenting
part
concurring
judgment
part
vitiate
one
fundamental
rights
established
fifth
amendment
trial
rulings
led
erroneous
resolution
defendant
favor
merits
charge
fong
foo
makes
clear
double
jeopardy
clause
absolutely
bars
second
trial
circumstances
appeals
thus
lacked
jurisdiction
government
appeal
accordingly
judgment
appeals
reversed
justice
white
joins
parts
iii
opinion
footnotes
prohibition
illegal
gambling
businesses
whoever
conducts
finances
manages
supervises
directs
owns
part
illegal
gambling
business
shall
fined
imprisoned
five
years
used
section
illegal
gambling
business
means
gambling
business
violation
law
state
political
subdivision
conducted
ii
involves
five
persons
conduct
finance
manage
supervise
direct
part
business
iii
remains
substantially
continuous
operation
period
excess
thirty
days
gross
revenue
single
day
gambling
includes
limited
bookmaking
maintaining
slot
machines
roulette
wheels
dice
tables
conducting
lotteries
policy
bolita
numbers
games
selling
chances
therein
state
means
state
district
columbia
commonwealth
puerto
rico
territory
possession
indictment
alleged
full
june
continuing
thereafter
including
november
revere
massachusetts
within
district
massachusetts
defendants
unlawfully
knowingly
wilfully
conduct
finance
manage
supervise
direct
part
illegal
gambling
business
wit
accepting
recording
registering
bets
wagers
parimutual
sic
number
pool
result
trial
contest
skill
speed
endurance
beast
said
illegal
gambling
business
violation
laws
commonwealth
massachusetts
wit
chapter
section
place
said
gambling
business
conducted
ii
involved
five
persons
conducted
financed
managed
supervised
directed
owned
part
said
business
iii
substantially
continuous
operation
period
excess
thirty
days
gross
revenue
two
thousand
dollars
single
day
violation
title
code
sections
district
judge
asked
exclusion
numbers
evidence
necessarily
follow
government
responded
defendants
charged
operating
gambling
business
violation
state
law
question
horse
race
aspect
violation
state
law
aspects
bets
well
violation
state
law
merely
jurisdictional
element
must
satisfied
prior
initiation
federal
prosecution
commonwealth
boyle
mass
government
time
argue
previously
see
supra
numbers
evidence
relevant
show
aspects
bets
even
used
prove
business
violated
state
law
instead
urged
numbers
evidence
admissible
proof
similar
acts
petitioner
consistently
maintained
properly
moved
exclude
numbers
evidence
irrelevant
indictment
characterization
gambling
business
district
properly
granted
evidentiary
motion
see
tr
oral
arg
district
properly
granted
petitioner
motion
judgment
acquittal
excluding
numbers
evidence
grounds
insufficient
evidence
text
judgment
quoted
infra
support
motions
government
argued
failure
cite
mass
laws
ch
west
indictment
technical
defect
causing
prejudice
defendants
subject
correction
trial
fed
rule
crim
proc
see
infra
numbers
evidence
restored
case
government
argued
vacating
judgment
acquittal
proper
since
resulted
solely
erroneous
exclusion
evidence
since
new
trial
necessary
view
fact
jury
discharged
trial
explained
reasoning
follows
motion
granted
think
probably
motion
reconsider
acquittal
sanabria
allowed
new
decisions
wilson
jenkins
serfass
decided
last
term
seem
say
judgment
acquittal
judgment
dismissal
entered
legal
grounds
opposed
containing
importing
finding
fact
reversal
decision
require
new
trial
may
reversed
fong
foo
jury
discharged
necessary
draw
new
jury
start
new
trial
jenkins
specifically
distinguished
fong
foo
group
another
provision
authorizes
government
appeal
orders
suppressing
excluding
evidence
made
defendant
put
jeopardy
verdict
finding
indictment
government
contend
ruling
excluding
numbers
evidence
appealable
provision
plain
terms
moreover
second
paragraph
authorize
appeal
since
ruling
excluding
evidence
occurred
defendant
put
jeopardy
verdict
cf
morrison
morrison
cert
denied
morrison
held
failure
cite
mass
laws
ch
west
similarly
worded
indictment
harmless
error
based
morrison
concluded
indictment
sufficient
give
notice
numbers
activity
basis
upon
government
sought
establish
criminal
liability
petition
certiorari
filed
one
day
time
time
requirement
rule
jurisdictional
schacht
petitioner
filed
motion
supported
affidavits
seeking
waiver
requirement
grant
petitioner
motion
petition
certiorari
presented
four
questions
review
first
three
relating
whether
government
appeal
authorized
statute
barred
double
jeopardy
clause
fourth
question
sought
review
appeals
ruling
indictment
gave
sufficient
notice
government
intent
rely
evidence
numbers
betting
order
limited
grant
certiorari
first
three
questions
accordingly
must
assume
district
erred
ruling
indictment
encompass
numbers
allegation
failure
cite
mass
laws
ch
west
jenkins
contrast
held
appeal
order
dismissing
indictment
jeopardy
attached
verdict
barred
successful
appeal
require
proceedings
devoted
resolution
factual
issues
going
elements
offense
charged
see
lee
new
trial
permitted
defendant
successfully
appeals
conviction
ball
mistrial
declared
manifest
necessity
wade
hunter
defendant
requests
mistrial
absence
prosecutorial
judicial
overreaching
dinitz
indictment
dismissed
defendant
request
circumstances
functionally
equivalent
mistrial
lee
supra
see
also
jeffers
several
occasions
observed
jurisdictional
statute
authorizing
government
appeals
ed
intended
remove
statutory
barriers
appeals
orders
terminating
prosecutions
martin
linen
supply
quoting
wilson
therefore
turn
immediately
constitutional
issues
without
constitutional
significance
entered
judgment
acquittal
rather
directing
jury
bring
verdict
acquittal
giving
erroneous
instructions
resulted
acquittal
martin
linen
supply
supra
sisson
difficulty
allowing
defendant
rights
turn
government
might
done
illustrated
considering
government
alleged
theory
liability
separate
count
indictment
subject
objection
grounds
multiplicity
charging
single
offense
separate
counts
see
infra
government
might
forced
elect
count
proceed
petitioner
universal
credit
probably
chosen
proceed
numbers
theory
evidence
apparently
stronger
event
however
petitioner
acquitted
count
instant
problem
arisen
appeals
erred
apparent
view
government
drawn
indictment
two
counts
single
count
duplicitous
single
gambling
business
alleged
hence
single
offense
see
infra
single
offense
normally
charged
one
count
rather
several
even
different
means
committing
offense
alleged
see
fed
rule
crim
proc
advisory
committee
notes
fed
rule
crim
proc
ed
supra
appeals
might
warranted
dismissing
appeal
failure
notice
specify
arguably
appealable
ruling
rendered
believed
critical
ruling
district
indictment
failed
charge
violation
numbers
theory
critical
ruling
concluded
dismissal
set
forth
notice
appeal
since
government
authorized
appeal
adverse
rulings
criminal
cases
especially
important
specify
precisely
claims
appealable
ruling
appeals
however
must
concluded
notice
sufficient
bring
review
legal
ruling
preceding
order
excluding
evidence
mistake
designating
judgment
appealed
always
fatal
long
intent
appeal
specific
ruling
fairly
inferred
probing
notice
party
misled
prejudiced
daily
mirror
new
york
news
per
curiam
jones
nelson
government
designation
issue
sic
appeal
apparently
filed
notice
set
forth
trial
judge
erred
ruling
chapter
section
encompass
illegal
numbers
operation
result
erred
granting
motion
strike
motion
judgment
acquittal
district
interpretation
indictment
encompassing
charge
gambling
business
engaged
numbers
betting
violation
state
law
require
numbers
evidence
excluded
even
indictment
charged
defendants
conducted
illegal
gambling
business
engaged
activities
violation
state
law
evidence
relating
numbers
betting
admissible
absent
actual
surprise
prejudice
show
defendants
connection
part
illegal
gambling
business
government
repeatedly
argued
district
violation
state
law
jurisdictional
element
need
proved
respect
business
district
erroneous
assumption
numbers
evidence
excluded
may
resulted
part
government
failure
repeat
full
earlier
argument
see
supra
judge
ruled
encompass
numbers
betting
see
supra
see
supra
numbers
evidence
excluded
judgment
acquittal
entered
even
adhered
ruling
scope
indictment
case
gone
jury
presumably
instructions
jurors
find
gambling
business
engaged
horse
betting
defendants
conducted
part
gambling
business
agree
appeals
see
supra
statutory
barrier
appeal
order
dismissing
portion
count
one
express
purpose
ed
permit
appeals
orders
dismissing
indictments
one
counts
count
usual
organizational
subunit
indictment
therefore
appear
congress
intended
authorize
appeals
order
dismissing
indictment
whole
part
congress
hardly
meant
appealability
depend
initial
decision
prosecutor
charge
one
count
also
charged
two
decision
frequently
fortuitous
purposes
interests
served
rule
import
empty
formalism
statute
expressly
designed
eliminate
echnical
distinctions
pleadings
limitations
appeals
conf
accord
note
appeals
considered
question
reached
similar
result
alberti
see
note
twice
jeopardy
yale
single
violation
single
statute
issue
analyze
case
evidence
test
frequently
used
determine
whether
single
transaction
may
give
rise
separate
prosecutions
convictions
punishments
separate
statutes
see
gavieres
blockburger
gore
iannelli
see
also
brown
ohio
jones
cert
denied
case
controlled
decisions
permitting
prosecution
statutes
defining
criminal
offense
discrete
act
prior
conviction
acquittal
distinguishable
discrete
act
separate
violation
statute
see
ebeling
morgan
burton
cf
ladner
bell
hawes
numerous
cases
recognized
ed
proscribes
degree
participation
illegal
gambling
business
except
participation
mere
bettor
see
dimuro
cert
denied
leon
brick
smaldone
cert
denied
hunter
cert
denied
ceraso
becker
vacated
grounds
similarly
government
need
prove
defendant
participated
illegal
gambling
business
days
grossed
single
day
business
existed
days
met
earnings
criteria
graham
per
curiam
marrifield
schaefer
cert
denied
sub
nom
del
pietro
smaldone
supra
see
dimario
cert
denied
finding
petitioner
connected
gambling
business
necessarily
meant
found
conduct
finance
manage
supervise
direct
see
see
wright
federal
practice
procedure
see
also
sabella
friendly
hanf
cert
denied
see
also
jackson
government
may
double
jeopardy
clause
fragment
fact
single
crime
components
government
concedes
required
bring
theories
liability
single
trial
single
punishment
imposed
upon
conviction
one
theory
brief
true
factual
determination
made
petitioner
engaged
numbers
betting
thus
bar
prosecution
petitioner
different
offense
liability
depend
proof
fact
cf
ashe
swenson
single
gambling
business
theoretically
may
violate
many
laws
state
prohibiting
gambling
specifies
six
means
defendant
may
illegally
participate
business
conducting
financing
managing
supervising
directing
owning
accept
government
theory
varied
one
time
charge
separate
count
defendant
reprosecuted
following
acquittals
others
two
different
gambling
businesses
alleged
proved
separate
convictions
punishments
proper
see
american
tobacco
holding
braverman
inapplicable
two
distinct
conspiracies
alleged
always
easy
ascertain
whether
one
gambling
businesses
proved
see
dimuro
bobo
difficulties
presented
sides
agree
single
gambling
business
existed
tanner
cert
denied
see
mayes
cert
denied
young
cohen
see
also
short
powe
weiss
nd
holding
jeffers
subjected
second
trial
four
justices
view
total
punishment
imposed
jeffers
excess
authorized
single
violation
relied
part
fact
jeffers
argued
district
two
statutes
involved
distinct
offenses
never
affirmatively
argued
difference
two
statutes
great
authorize
separate
punishments
joined
voting
vacate
excess
punishment
four
justices
believed
jeffers
constitutionally
subjected
another
trial
justice
white
believed
jeffers
subjected
second
trial
separate
punishments
argument
made
numbers
allegations
highlighted
fact
petitioner
counsel
argue
behalf
another
defendant
evidence
relating
defendant
betting
dog
races
excluded
theory
government
case
horse
numbers
business
dog
betting
stands
separate
business
government
must
prove
one
business
like
multiple
conspiracy
record
justice
stevens
concurring
although
join
text
opinion
agree
dictum
true
statutory
barrier
appeal
order
dismissing
portion
count
ante
equally
true
statutory
authority
appeal
necessarily
follows
least
faithful
concept
federal
courts
jurisdiction
conferred
congress
appeals
jurisdiction
appeal
criminal
appeals
act
ed
authorizes
appeal
order
district
dismissing
indictment
information
one
counts
except
appeal
shall
lie
double
jeopardy
clause
constitution
prohibits
prosecution
emphasis
added
plain
terms
statute
encompass
present
case
putting
one
side
question
whether
acquittal
may
properly
regarded
order
dismissing
indictment
within
meaning
statute
see
martin
linen
supply
stevens
concurring
statutory
grant
appellate
jurisdiction
still
unequivocally
limited
review
dismissal
one
counts
statute
refer
subunit
indictment
portion
count
ante
counts
unambiguous
term
art
prior
amendment
rule
statutory
interpretation
criminal
appeals
act
strictly
construed
government
right
appeal
carroll
present
pattern
interpretation
exemplified
martin
linen
supra
simply
abandon
approach
reverses
direction
entirely
reads
statute
whatever
manner
favor
government
appeal
course
true
legislative
history
act
indicates
congress
intended
liberally
construed
expression
legislative
intent
give
us
license
ignore
words
statute
fact
even
suggest
language
one
counts
ambiguous
instead
argues
words
given
proper
meaning
act
intended
eliminate
echnical
distinctions
pleadings
ante
argument
hollow
ring
light
prior
assertion
precise
manner
indictment
drawn
ignored
important
function
indictment
ensure
case
proceedings
taken
defendant
similar
offense
record
show
accuracy
extent
may
plead
former
acquittal
conviction
ante
furthermore
judgment
rule
government
may
appeal
dismissal
portion
count
provided
portion
establishes
discrete
basis
liability
fosters
rather
eliminates
technical
distinctions
encourages
exactly
sort
nearsighted
parsing
indictments
amendment
intended
discourage
therefore
join
portion
decision
criminal
appeals
act
permits
appeal
portion
count
clearly
reason
well
reasons
stated
text
opinion
appeals
decision
must
reversed
justice
blackmun
justice
rehnquist
joins
dissenting
case
course
odd
unusual
one
factually
procedurally
case
afford
little
guidance
precedent
continuing
struggle
create
order
understanding
confusion
lengthening
list
decisions
double
jeopardy
clause
thought
however
principles
enunciated
late
last
term
lee
deem
difficult
case
government
one
application
facts
share
distinction
lee
ante
agree
lee
manifestly
inapposite
lee
misdescription
trial
nature
order
lee
maneuvers
result
surrender
right
receive
verdict
jury
drawn
appears
petitioner
succeeded
indictment
read
one
way
trial
another
way
situation
required
affirm
judgment
appeals