cheney
vice
president
et
al
district
district
columbia
et
argued
april
decided
june
counsel
record
petitioners
cheney
et
al
theodore
olson
solicitor
general
washington
dc
respondent
sierra
club
alan
morrison
public
citizen
litigation
group
washington
dc
respondent
judicial
watch
paul
orfanedes
judicial
watch
washington
dc
president
established
national
energy
policy
development
group
group
give
advice
make
recommendations
energy
policy
assigning
number
federal
agency
heads
assistants
serve
group
members
authorizing
vice
president
group
chairman
include
federal
officers
appropriate
group
issued
final
report
according
government
terminated
operations
respondents
filed
separate
actions
later
consolidated
district
alleging
group
complied
federal
advisory
committee
act
faca
inter
alia
imposes
variety
disclosure
requirements
entities
meeting
definition
advisory
committee
relevant
committee
entity
subgroup
established
utilized
president
exclud
ing
committee
composed
wholly
permanent
federal
officers
employees
app
complaint
alleged
nonfederal
employees
private
lobbyists
regularly
attended
fully
participated
group
nonpublic
meetings
de
facto
group
members
group
benefit
exemption
therefore
subject
faca
requirements
suit
sought
declaratory
relief
injunction
requiring
defendants
including
vice
president
government
officials
serving
group
produce
materials
allegedly
subject
faca
requirements
among
rulings
district
granted
defendants
motion
dismiss
denied
others
held
faca
substantive
requirements
enforced
vice
president
government
participants
mandamus
act
agency
defendants
administrative
procedure
act
deferred
ruling
whether
faca
disclosure
duty
sufficiently
clear
nondiscretionary
mandamus
issue
also
deferred
ruling
government
contention
disregard
exemption
apply
faca
group
violate
principles
interfere
president
vice
president
constitutional
prerogatives
instead
allowed
respondents
conduct
discovery
ascertain
group
structure
membership
thus
determine
whether
de
facto
membership
doctrine
applied
acknowledging
discovery
might
raise
serious
constitutional
questions
explained
government
assert
executive
privilege
protect
sensitive
materials
disclosure
noted
discovery
respondents
evidentiary
support
allegations
de
facto
members
group
government
prevail
statutory
grounds
even
appropriate
address
constitutional
issues
explained
discovery
orders
provide
factual
development
necessary
determine
extent
alleged
intrusion
executive
constitutional
authority
ordered
respondents
submit
discovery
plan
approved
plan
due
course
entered
orders
allowing
discovery
proceed
denied
government
motion
certification
respect
discovery
orders
petitioners
sought
writ
mandamus
appeals
vacate
discovery
orders
relief
dismissed
mandamus
petition
ground
alternative
avenues
relief
remained
available
citing
nixon
held
petitioners
order
guard
intrusion
president
prerogatives
must
first
assert
executive
privilege
particularity
district
lower
sustained
privilege
appeals
observed
petitioners
able
obtain
relief
sought
district
rejected
claim
mandamus
might
well
appropriate
long
conflict
remained
hypothetical
held
authority
exercise
extraordinary
remedy
mandamus
although
acknowledging
scope
respondents
discovery
requests
overly
broad
appeals
nonetheless
agreed
district
petitioners
bear
burden
invoking
executive
privilege
objecting
discovery
orders
detailed
precision
held
respondents
preliminary
argument
mandamus
petition
jurisdictionally
time
rejected
respondents
assert
government
basic
argument
one
discovery
immunity
need
invoke
executive
privilege
make
particular
objections
discovery
requests
mandamus
petition
filed
within
days
district
denied
motion
dismiss
federal
rule
appellate
procedure
theory
last
day
filing
appeals
september
whereas
mandamus
petition
notice
appeal
filed
november
however
rule
plain
terms
applies
filing
notice
appeal
inapplicable
mandamus
petition
writs
act
respondents
alternative
argument
mandamus
petition
barred
equitable
doctrine
laches
also
fails
laches
might
bar
petitioner
slept
rights
especially
delay
prejudicial
chapman
county
douglas
however
flurry
motions
government
filed
district
denied
dismissal
motion
overcomes
respondents
argument
accept
argument
laches
apply
government
motions
amounted
little
dilatory
tactics
given
drastic
nature
mandamus
holdings
writ
may
issue
alternative
avenues
relief
remain
available
government
faulted
attempting
resolve
dispute
less
drastic
means
pp
appeals
erred
concluding
lacked
authority
issue
mandamus
government
protect
rights
asserting
executive
privilege
district
pp
mandamus
drastic
extraordinary
remedy
reserved
really
extraordinary
causes
ex
parte
fahey
conditions
obtaining
may
demanding
insuperable
issued
mandamus
inter
alia
restrain
lower
whose
actions
threaten
separation
powers
embarrassing
executive
branch
ex
parte
peru
vice
president
party
argument
appeals
entertained
mandamus
action
might
present
different
considerations
however
vice
president
group
comembers
subjects
discovery
orders
mandamus
petition
alleges
orders
threaten
substantial
intrusions
process
closest
president
advise
facts
allegations
remove
case
category
ordinary
discovery
orders
interlocutory
appellate
review
unavailable
mandamus
otherwise
president
communications
activities
encompass
vastly
wider
range
sensitive
material
true
ordinary
individual
nixon
president
law
judiciary
must
afford
presidential
confidentiality
greatest
possible
protection
recognizing
paramount
necessity
protecting
executive
branch
vexatious
litigation
might
distract
energetic
performance
constitutional
duties
considerations
inform
appeals
evaluation
mandamus
petition
involving
president
vice
president
accepted
mandamus
standards
broad
enough
allow
prevent
lower
interfering
coequal
branch
ability
discharge
constitutional
responsibilities
see
ex
parte
peru
supra
pp
appeals
labored
mistaken
assumption
assertion
executive
privilege
necessary
precondition
government
objections
view
requirement
vice
president
group
colleagues
bear
burden
invoking
executive
privilege
narrow
specificity
objecting
discovery
requests
detailed
precision
mandated
nixon
rejection
absolute
unqualified
presidential
privilege
immunity
judicial
process
circumstances
even
compared
nixon
criminal
subpoenas
involving
president
civil
discovery
militates
respondents
position
checks
civil
discovery
analogous
constraints
imposed
criminal
justice
system
filter
insubstantial
legal
claims
federal
rule
civil
procedure
sanctions
private
attorneys
obligation
candor
judicial
tribunal
proved
insufficient
discourage
filing
meritless
claims
executive
branch
finally
narrowly
tailored
subpoena
orders
nixon
precisely
identified
specific
ally
enumerated
relevant
materials
clear
abuse
discretion
bankers
life
casualty
holland
must
also
ask
whether
district
actions
constituted
unwarranted
impairment
another
branch
performance
constitutional
duties
pp
absent
overriding
concerns
need
avoid
piecemeal
litigation
see
schlagenhauf
holder
declines
direct
appeals
issue
mandamus
district
case
considered
issues
appeals
abused
discretion
failing
issue
writ
instead
relied
mistaken
reading
nixon
prematurely
terminated
inquiry
without
even
reaching
weighty
objections
raised
case
exercising
discretion
determine
whether
mandamus
appropriate
circumstances
issuance
writ
vested
discretion
petition
made
leaves
appeals
address
parties
arguments
matters
bearing
whether
mandamus
issue
bearing
mind
burdens
imposed
executive
branch
future
proceedings
special
considerations
applicable
president
vice
president
suggest
lower
courts
sensitive
government
requests
interlocutory
appeals
reexamine
whether
statute
embodies
de
facto
membership
doctrine
pp
vacated
remanded
kennedy
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
stevens
breyer
joined
scalia
thomas
joined
parts
ii
iii
iv
stevens
filed
concurring
opinion
thomas
filed
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
scalia
joined
ginsburg
filed
dissenting
opinion
souter
joined
richard
cheney
vice
president
et
petitioners
district
district
columbia
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
june
justice
kennedy
delivered
opinion
district
district
columbia
entered
discovery
orders
directing
vice
president
senior
officials
executive
branch
produce
information
task
force
established
give
advice
make
policy
recommendations
president
case
requires
us
consider
circumstances
appeals
may
exercise
power
issue
writ
mandamus
modify
dissolve
orders
virtue
overbreadth
enforcement
might
interfere
officials
discharge
duties
impinge
upon
president
constitutional
prerogatives
days
assuming
office
president
george
bush
issued
memorandum
establishing
national
energy
policy
development
group
nepdg
group
group
directed
develo
national
energy
policy
designed
help
private
sector
government
levels
promote
dependable
affordable
environmentally
sound
production
distribution
energy
future
app
president
assigned
number
agency
heads
assistants
employees
federal
government
serve
members
committee
authorized
vice
president
chairman
group
invite
officers
federal
government
participate
appropriate
five
months
later
nepdg
issued
final
report
according
government
terminated
operations
following
publication
report
respondents
judicial
watch
sierra
club
filed
separate
actions
later
consolidated
district
respondents
alleged
nepdg
failed
comply
procedural
disclosure
requirements
federal
advisory
committee
act
faca
act
app
faca
enacted
monitor
numerous
committees
boards
commissions
councils
similar
groups
established
advise
officers
agencies
executive
branch
federal
government
prevent
wasteful
expenditure
public
funds
may
result
proliferation
public
citizen
department
justice
subject
specific
exemptions
faca
imposes
variety
disclosure
requirements
groups
meet
definition
advisory
committee
relevant
advisory
committee
means
committee
board
commission
council
conference
panel
task
force
similar
group
subcommittee
subgroup
thereof
established
utilized
president
except
definition
excludes
committee
composed
wholly
permanent
officers
employees
federal
government
app
respondents
dispute
president
appointed
federal
government
officials
nepdg
agree
nepdg
established
president
memorandum
composed
wholly
permanent
officers
employees
federal
government
ibid
complaint
alleges
however
employees
including
private
lobbyists
regularly
attended
fully
participated
meetings
app
judicial
watch
complaint
relying
association
american
physicians
surgeons
clinton
cadc
aaps
respondents
contend
regular
participation
individuals
made
de
facto
members
committee
according
complaint
involvement
role
functionally
indistinguishable
formal
members
result
respondents
argue
nepdg
benefit
act
exemption
subsection
subject
faca
requirements
vice
president
cheney
nepdg
government
officials
served
committee
alleged
de
facto
members
named
defendants
suit
seeks
declaratory
relief
injunction
requiring
produce
materials
allegedly
subject
faca
requirements
defendants
moved
dismiss
district
granted
motion
part
denied
part
acknowledged
faca
create
private
cause
action
basis
dismissed
respondents
claims
defendants
nepdg
dissolved
sued
defendant
claims
dismissed
well
district
held
however
faca
substantive
requirements
enforced
vice
president
government
participants
nepdg
mandamus
act
agency
defendants
administrative
procedure
act
apa
district
recognized
disclosure
duty
must
clear
nondiscretionary
mandamus
issue
must
among
things
final
agency
actions
apa
apply
according
district
premature
decide
questions
held
respondents
alleged
sufficient
facts
keep
vice
president
defendants
case
district
deferred
ruling
government
contention
disregard
exemption
apply
faca
nepdg
violate
principles
separation
powers
interfere
constitutional
prerogatives
president
vice
president
instead
allowed
respondents
conduct
discovery
ascertain
nepdg
structure
membership
thus
determine
whether
de
facto
membership
doctrine
applies
judicial
watch
national
energy
policy
dev
group
supp
dc
acknowledging
discovery
might
raise
serious
constitutional
questions
district
explained
government
assert
executive
privilege
protect
sensitive
materials
disclosure
district
view
issues
executive
privilege
much
limited
scope
broad
constitutional
challenge
raised
government
district
adopted
approach
attempt
avoid
constitutional
questions
noting
discovery
respondents
evidentiary
support
allegations
regular
participation
lobbyists
industry
executives
nepdg
government
prevail
statutory
grounds
furthermore
district
explained
even
appropriate
address
constitutional
issues
factual
development
necessary
determine
extent
alleged
intrusion
executive
constitutional
authority
denied
part
motion
dismiss
ordered
respondents
submit
discovery
plan
due
course
district
approved
respondents
discovery
plan
entered
series
orders
allowing
discovery
proceed
see
cadc
app
reproducing
orders
entered
denied
government
motion
certification
respect
discovery
orders
petitioners
sought
writ
mandamus
appeals
vacate
discovery
orders
direct
district
rule
basis
administrative
record
dismiss
vice
president
suit
vice
president
also
filed
notice
appeal
orders
see
cohen
beneficial
industrial
loan
nixon
divided
panel
appeals
dismissed
petition
writ
mandamus
vice
president
attempted
interlocutory
appeal
cheney
cadc
respect
mandamus
majority
declined
issue
writ
ground
alternative
avenues
relief
remained
available
citing
nixon
supra
majority
held
petitioners
guard
intrusion
president
prerogatives
must
first
assert
privilege
reading
nixon
moreover
privilege
claims
must
made
particularity
majority
view
district
sustains
privilege
petitioners
able
obtain
relief
seek
district
rejects
claim
executive
privilege
creates
imminent
risk
disclosure
allegedly
protected
presidential
communications
mandamus
might
well
appropriate
avoid
letting
cat
bag
long
separation
powers
conflict
petitioners
anticipate
remains
hypothetical
panel
held
authority
exercise
extraordinary
remedy
mandamus
majority
acknowledged
scope
respondents
requests
overly
broad
seeks
far
limited
items
respondents
entitled
district
ultimately
determines
nepdg
subject
faca
requests
produce
also
go
well
beyond
faca
requirements
ibid
respondents
discovery
also
goes
well
beyond
need
prove
nonetheless
agreed
district
petitioners
bear
invoking
executive
privilege
filing
objections
discovery
orders
precision
quoting
order
similar
reasons
majority
rejected
vice
president
interlocutory
appeal
nixon
held
president
appeal
interlocutory
subpoena
order
without
place
posture
disobeying
order
merely
trigger
procedural
mechanism
review
majority
however
found
case
inapplicable
vice
president
cheney
unlike
nixon
yet
asserted
privilege
majority
view
vice
president
forced
choose
disclosure
suffering
contempt
failure
obey
order
majority
held
require
vice
president
assert
privilege
create
unnecessary
confrontation
two
branches
government
described
nixon
judge
randolph
filed
dissenting
opinion
view
aaps
de
facto
membership
doctrine
mistaken
constitution
bars
application
nepdg
allowing
discovery
determine
applicability
de
facto
membership
doctrine
concluded
inappropriate
issued
writ
mandamus
directing
dismissal
complaints
granted
certiorari
vacate
judgment
appeals
remand
case
proceedings
reconsider
government
mandamus
petition
ii
preliminary
matter
address
respondents
argument
government
petition
writ
mandamus
jurisdictionally
time
alternatively
barred
equitable
doctrine
laches
according
respondents
government
basic
argument
one
discovery
immunity
need
invoke
executive
privilege
make
particular
objections
discovery
requests
mandamus
petition
filed
appeals
within
days
district
denied
government
motion
dismiss
see
fed
rule
app
proc
officer
agency
party
notice
appeal
may
filed
party
within
days
judgment
order
appealed
entered
theory
last
day
making
filing
appeals
september
government
however
file
mandamus
petition
notice
appeal
november
four
months
district
issued
order
respondents
view
commenced
time
appeal
even
respondents
acknowledge
however
rule
plain
terms
applies
filing
notice
appeal
brief
respondent
sierra
club
rule
inapplicable
government
mandamus
petition
writs
act
vacate
appeals
judgment
remand
case
proceedings
consider
whether
writ
mandamus
issued
need
decide
whether
vice
president
also
appealed
district
orders
nixon
collateral
order
doctrine
express
opinion
whether
vice
president
notice
appeal
timely
filed
respondents
argument
mandamus
petition
barred
laches
withstand
scrutiny
laches
might
bar
petition
writ
mandamus
petitioner
slept
upon
rights
especially
delay
prejudicial
party
rights
persons
chapman
county
douglas
flurry
activity
following
district
denial
motion
dismiss
overcomes
respondents
argument
government
neglected
assert
rights
government
filed
among
papers
motion
protective
order
september
motion
stay
pending
appeal
october
motion
leave
appeal
pursuant
october
even
agree
baseline
measuring
timeliness
government
mandamus
petition
district
order
denying
motion
dismiss
government
active
litigation
posture
far
neglect
delay
make
application
laches
appropriate
accept
furthermore
respondents
argument
laches
apply
motions
filed
government
following
district
denial
motion
dismiss
amounted
little
dilatory
tactics
delay
obstruct
proceedings
brief
respondent
sierra
club
light
drastic
nature
mandamus
precedents
holding
mandamus
may
issue
long
alternative
avenues
relief
remain
available
government
faulted
attempting
resolve
dispute
less
drastic
means
law
put
litigants
impossible
position
exhaust
alternative
remedies
petitioning
mandamus
one
hand
file
mandamus
petition
earliest
possible
moment
avoid
laches
petition
properly
appeals
consideration
iii
come
central
issue
case
whether
appeals
correct
conclude
ha
authority
exercise
extraordinary
remedy
mandamus
ground
government
protect
rights
asserting
executive
privilege
district
writ
mandamus
lower
codified
courts
established
act
congress
may
issue
writs
necessary
appropriate
aid
respective
jurisdictions
agreeable
usages
principles
law
drastic
extraordinary
remedy
reserved
really
extraordinary
causes
ex
parte
fahey
traditional
use
writ
aid
appellate
jurisdiction
common
law
federal
courts
confine
mandamus
sought
lawful
exercise
prescribed
jurisdiction
roche
evaporated
milk
although
courts
confined
arbitrary
technical
definition
exceptional
circumstances
amounting
judicial
power
clear
abuse
discretion
bankers
life
casualty
holland
justify
invocation
extraordinary
remedy
writ
one
potent
weapons
judicial
arsenal
three
conditions
must
satisfied
may
issue
kerr
dist
northern
dist
first
party
seeking
issuance
writ
must
adequate
means
attain
relief
desires
condition
designed
ensure
writ
used
substitute
regular
appeals
process
fahey
supra
second
petitioner
must
satisfy
burden
showing
right
issuance
writ
clear
indisputable
kerr
supra
quoting
banker
life
casualty
supra
third
even
first
two
prerequisites
met
issuing
exercise
discretion
must
satisfied
writ
appropriate
circumstances
kerr
supra
citing
schlagenhauf
holder
hurdles
however
demanding
insuperable
issued
writ
restrain
lower
actions
threaten
separation
powers
embarrass
ing
executive
arm
government
ex
parte
peru
result
intrusion
federal
judiciary
delicate
area
relations
supra
citing
maryland
soper
vice
president
party
case
argument
appeals
entertained
action
mandamus
notwithstanding
district
denial
motion
certification
might
present
different
considerations
however
vice
president
comembers
nepdg
subjects
discovery
orders
mandamus
petition
alleges
orders
threaten
substantial
intrusions
process
closest
operational
proximity
president
advise
president
app
facts
allegations
remove
case
category
ordinary
discovery
orders
interlocutory
appellate
review
unavailable
mandamus
otherwise
well
established
president
communications
activities
encompass
vastly
wider
range
sensitive
material
true
individual
nixon
short
long
recognized
position
constitutional
scheme
office
president
occupies
quoting
nixon
fitzgerald
breyer
concurring
judgment
nixon
explained
principles
mean
president
law
rather
simply
acknowledge
public
interest
requires
coequal
branch
government
afford
presidential
confidentiality
greatest
protection
consistent
fair
administration
justice
give
recognition
paramount
necessity
protecting
executive
branch
vexatious
litigation
might
distract
energetic
performance
constitutional
duties
considerations
inform
appeals
evaluation
mandamus
petition
involving
president
vice
president
accepted
mandamus
standards
broad
enough
allow
appeals
prevent
lower
interfering
coequal
branch
ability
discharge
constitutional
responsibilities
see
ex
parte
peru
supra
recognizing
jurisdiction
issue
writ
action
political
arm
government
taken
within
appropriate
sphere
must
promptly
recognized
delay
inconvenience
prolonged
litigation
must
avoided
prompt
termination
proceedings
district
see
also
clinton
jones
supra
recognized
ven
branch
arrogate
power
doctrine
requires
branch
impair
another
performance
constitutional
duties
quoting
loving
iv
appeals
dismissed
concerns
relying
nixon
held
even
though
respondents
discovery
requests
overbroad
go
well
beyond
faca
requirements
vice
president
former
colleagues
nepdg
shall
bear
burden
invoking
privilege
narrow
specificity
objecting
discovery
requests
detailed
precision
view
result
required
nixon
rejection
absolute
unqualified
presidential
privilege
immunity
judicial
process
circumstances
nixon
refused
recognize
broad
claims
confidentiality
president
asserted
executive
privilege
majority
reasoned
nixon
must
rejected
fortiori
petitioners
claim
discovery
immunity
privilege
even
invoked
according
majority
executive
branch
invoke
executive
privilege
maintain
separation
powers
mandamus
relief
premature
analysis
however
overlooks
fundamental
differences
two
cases
nixon
bear
weight
appeals
puts
upon
first
unlike
case
concerns
respondents
requests
information
use
civil
suit
nixon
involves
proper
balance
executive
interest
confidentiality
communications
constitutional
need
production
relevant
evidence
criminal
proceeding
decision
explicit
concerned
balance
president
generalized
interest
confidentiality
need
relevant
evidence
civil
litigation
address
conflict
president
assertion
generalized
privilege
confidentiality
constitutional
need
relevant
evidence
criminal
trials
distinction
nixon
drew
criminal
civil
proceedings
matter
formalism
explained
need
information
criminal
context
much
weightier
historic
al
commitment
rule
law
nowhere
profoundly
manifest
view
twofold
aim
criminal
justice
guilt
shall
escape
innocence
suffer
quoting
berger
light
fundamental
comprehensive
need
every
man
evidence
criminal
justice
system
must
executive
branch
first
assert
privilege
resist
disclosure
privilege
claims
shield
information
grand
jury
proceeding
criminal
trial
expansively
construed
derogation
search
truth
need
information
use
civil
cases
far
negligible
share
urgency
significance
criminal
subpoena
requests
nixon
nixon
recognized
right
production
relevant
evidence
civil
proceedings
constitutional
dimensions
also
observed
nixon
primary
constitutional
duty
judicial
branch
justice
criminal
prosecutions
withholding
materials
tribunal
ongoing
criminal
case
information
necessary
carrying
tasks
conflict
function
courts
art
iii
ibid
impairment
essential
functions
another
branch
impermissible
withholding
information
case
however
hamper
another
branch
ability
perform
essential
functions
quite
way
ibid
district
ordered
discovery
remedy
known
statutory
violations
ascertain
whether
faca
disclosure
requirements
even
apply
nepdg
first
place
even
faca
embodies
important
congressional
objectives
consequence
respondents
inability
obtain
discovery
seek
difficult
private
complainants
vindicate
congress
policy
objectives
faca
even
argument
sake
reasoning
judge
randolph
dissenting
opinion
end
rejected
faca
statutory
objectives
extent
frustrated
follow
article
iii
authority
congress
central
article
powers
impaired
situation
fairness
compared
nixon
ability
fulfill
constitutional
responsibility
resolve
cases
controversies
within
jurisdiction
hinges
availability
certain
indispensable
information
party
need
information
one
facet
problem
important
factor
weighing
opposite
direction
burden
imposed
discovery
orders
routine
discovery
dispute
discovery
requests
directed
vice
president
senior
government
officials
served
nepdg
give
advice
make
recommendations
president
executive
branch
highest
level
seeking
aid
courts
protect
constitutional
prerogatives
already
noted
special
considerations
control
executive
branch
interests
maintaining
autonomy
office
safeguarding
confidentiality
communications
implicated
held
one
occasion
high
respect
owed
office
chief
executive
matter
inform
conduct
entire
proceeding
including
timing
scope
discovery
clinton
altogether
misplaced
even
compared
nixon
criminal
subpoenas
involve
president
civil
discovery
militates
respondents
position
observation
nixon
production
confidential
information
disrupt
functioning
executive
branch
applied
mechanistic
fashion
civil
litigation
criminal
justice
system
various
constraints
albeit
imperfect
filter
insubstantial
legal
claims
decision
prosecute
criminal
case
example
made
publicly
accountable
prosecutor
subject
budgetary
considerations
ethical
obligation
win
zealously
advocate
client
also
serve
cause
justice
rigors
penal
system
also
mitigated
responsible
exercise
prosecutorial
discretion
contrast
analogous
checks
civil
discovery
process
although
federal
rule
civil
procedure
sanctions
available
private
attorneys
also
owe
obligation
candor
judicial
tribunal
safeguards
proved
insufficient
discourage
filing
meritless
claims
executive
branch
view
visibility
offices
president
vice
president
effect
actions
countless
people
easily
identifiable
target
suits
civil
damages
nixon
fitzgerald
supra
finally
narrow
subpoena
orders
nixon
stand
altogether
different
footing
overly
broad
discovery
requests
approved
district
case
criminal
subpoenas
nixon
required
satisfy
exacting
standards
relevancy
admissibility
specificity
interpreting
fed
rule
crim
proc
intended
provide
means
discovery
burden
showing
standards
met
moreover
fell
party
requesting
information
order
require
production
prior
trial
moving
party
must
show
applicable
standards
met
nixon
addressed
issue
executive
privilege
satisfied
special
prosecutor
surmounted
demanding
requirements
sustained
rule
challenge
occasion
reach
claim
privilege
asserted
respect
subpoenaed
material
specificity
subpoena
requests
serves
important
safeguard
unnecessary
intrusion
operation
office
president
contrast
nixon
subpoena
orders
precisely
identified
specific
ally
enumerated
relevant
materials
discovery
requests
panel
majority
acknowledged
ask
everything
sky
documents
identifying
referring
staff
personnel
contractors
consultants
employees
task
force
documents
establishing
referring
documents
identifying
referring
staff
personnel
contractors
consultants
employees
documents
identifying
referring
persons
participating
preparation
report
activities
task
force
documents
concerning
communication
relating
activities
task
force
activities
preparation
report
documents
concerning
communication
relating
activities
task
force
activities
preparation
report
person
list
agencies
app
preceding
excerpt
respondents
first
request
production
documents
emphasis
added
beginning
respondents
first
set
interrogatories
similarly
unbounded
scope
given
breadth
discovery
requests
case
compared
narrow
subpoena
orders
nixon
precedent
provides
support
proposition
executive
branch
shall
bear
burden
invoking
executive
privilege
sufficient
specificity
making
particularized
objections
sure
nixon
held
president
assertion
broad
undifferentiated
need
confidentiality
invocation
absolute
unqualified
executive
privilege
withhold
information
face
subpoena
orders
holding
judiciary
may
direct
appropriate
process
executive
nixon
fitzgerald
government
however
fact
object
scope
discovery
asked
district
narrow
way
arguments
ignored
see
app
arguing
case
resolved
far
short
inquiries
plaintiffs
proposed
suggesting
alternatives
limi
discovery
defendants
object
scope
plaintiffs
discovery
requests
undue
burden
imposed
scope
plaintiffs
requests
broader
reasonably
calculated
lead
admissible
evidence
state
general
objections
purposes
clarity
record
preclude
later
argument
including
general
objections
waived
addition
government
objected
burden
arise
district
insistence
vice
president
winnow
discovery
orders
asserting
specific
claims
privilege
making
particular
objections
app
tr
status
hearing
noting
concerns
disrupting
effective
functioning
presidency
ompliance
order
imposes
burden
office
vice
president
real
burden
completed
done
everything
honor
asked
us
today
burden
gone
realized
arguments
rejected
see
order
noting
numerous
occasions
rejected
government
assertion
orders
requiring
respond
fashion
discovery
requests
creates
burden
executive
branch
contrary
district
appeals
conclusions
nixon
leave
sole
option
inviting
executive
branch
invoke
executive
privilege
remaining
otherwise
powerless
modify
party
overly
broad
discovery
requests
executive
privilege
extraordinary
assertion
power
lightly
invoked
reynolds
executive
privilege
asserted
coequal
branches
government
set
collision
course
judiciary
forced
difficult
task
balancing
need
information
judicial
proceeding
executive
article
ii
prerogatives
inquiry
places
courts
awkward
position
evaluating
executive
claims
confidentiality
autonomy
pushes
fore
difficult
questions
separation
powers
checks
balances
occasion
constitutional
confrontation
two
branches
avoided
whenever
possible
nixon
supra
recognition
concerns
sound
precedent
district
columbia
district
courts
explore
avenues
short
forcing
executive
invoke
privilege
asked
enforce
executive
branch
unnecessarily
broad
subpoenas
poindexter
supp
defendant
poindexter
trial
criminal
charges
sought
district
enforce
subpoena
orders
president
reagan
obtain
allegedly
exculpatory
materials
executive
considered
subpoenas
unreasonable
oppressive
rejecting
defendant
argument
executive
must
first
assert
executive
privilege
narrow
subpoenas
district
agreed
president
undesirable
matter
constitutional
public
policy
compel
president
make
decision
privilege
respect
large
array
documents
ibid
decided
narrow
scope
subpoenas
allow
executive
consider
whether
invoke
executive
privilege
respect
smaller
number
documents
following
narrowing
subpoenas
one
example
choices
available
district
appeals
case
discussed
outset
principles
mandamus
jurisdiction
appeals
may
exercise
power
issue
writ
upon
finding
exceptional
circumstances
amounting
judicial
power
clear
abuse
discretion
bankers
life
case
implicates
separation
powers
appeals
must
also
ask
part
inquiry
whether
district
actions
constituted
unwarranted
impairment
another
branch
performance
constitutional
duties
especially
district
analysis
whether
mandamus
relief
appropriate
constrained
principles
similar
outlined
supra
limit
appeals
use
remedy
panel
majority
however
failed
ask
question
instead
labored
mistaken
assumption
assertion
executive
privilege
necessary
precondition
government
objections
absence
overriding
concerns
sort
discussed
schlagenhauf
discussing
among
things
need
avoid
piecemeal
litigation
settle
important
issues
first
impression
areas
bears
special
responsibility
decline
petitioners
invitation
direct
appeals
issue
writ
district
moreover
case
considered
issues
appeals
abused
discretion
failing
issue
writ
instead
appeals
relying
mistaken
reading
nixon
prematurely
terminated
inquiry
government
refused
assert
privilege
without
even
reaching
weighty
objections
raised
case
much
less
exercised
discretion
determine
whether
writ
appropriate
circumstances
ante
issuance
writ
matter
vested
discretion
petition
made
presented
original
writ
mandamus
see
ex
parte
peru
leave
appeals
address
parties
arguments
respect
challenge
aaps
discovery
orders
matters
bearing
whether
writ
mandamus
issue
also
addressed
first
instance
appeals
considering
additional
briefs
arguments
deems
appropriate
note
courts
mindful
burdens
imposed
executive
branch
future
proceedings
special
considerations
applicable
president
vice
president
suggest
courts
sensitive
requests
government
interlocutory
appeals
reexamine
example
whether
statute
embodies
de
facto
membership
doctrine
judgment
appeals
district
columbia
vacated
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
richard
cheney
vice
president
et
petitioners
district
district
columbia
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
june
justice
stevens
concurring
broad
discovery
encouraged
serves
salutary
purpose
facilitating
prompt
fair
resolution
concrete
disputes
normal
case
entirely
appropriate
require
responding
party
make
particularized
objections
discovery
requests
circumstances
however
requesting
party
required
assume
heavy
burden
persuasion
discovery
allowed
two
interrelated
considerations
support
taking
approach
case
nature
remedy
respondents
requested
district
nature
statute
sought
enforce
relevant
respondents
judicial
watch
sierra
club
sought
writ
mandamus
mandamus
extraordinary
remedy
available
plaintiff
defendant
owes
clear
nondiscretionary
duty
heckler
ringer
thus
persuade
district
entitled
mandamus
relief
respondents
establish
petitioners
nondiscretionary
duty
comply
federal
advisory
committee
act
faca
app
et
particular
faca
requirement
records
related
advisory
committee
work
made
public
requirement
still
enforceable
respondent
sierra
club
concedes
national
energy
policy
development
group
nepdg
longer
exists
see
judicial
watch
national
energy
policy
dev
group
supp
dc
relying
appeals
novel
de
facto
member
doctrine
ante
respondents
sought
make
showing
obtaining
records
entitled
win
lawsuit
words
respondents
sought
obtain
discovery
information
nepdg
work
order
establish
entitlement
information
thus
granting
broad
discovery
case
effectively
prejudged
merits
respondents
claim
mandamus
relief
outcome
entirely
inconsistent
extraordinary
nature
writ
circumstances
instead
requiring
petitioners
object
particular
discovery
requests
district
required
respondents
demonstrate
particular
requests
tend
establish
theory
case
therefore
think
appropriate
appeals
vacate
district
discovery
order
nevertheless
join
opinion
judgment
architect
de
facto
member
doctrine
appeals
appropriate
forum
direct
future
proceedings
case
richard
cheney
vice
president
et
petitioners
district
district
columbia
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
june
justice
ginsburg
justice
souter
joins
dissenting
government
seeking
writ
mandamus
appeals
district
columbia
brief
urged
case
resolved
without
discovery
see
app
brief
petitioners
reply
brief
vacating
judgment
appeals
however
remands
consideration
whether
mandamus
appropriate
due
overbreadth
district
discovery
orders
see
ante
appeals
observed
appeared
government
never
asked
district
narrow
discovery
cheney
cadc
emphasis
original
given
government
decision
resist
discovery
mandamus
relief
based
exorbitance
discovery
orders
least
premature
therefore
affirm
judgment
appeals
denying
allow
district
first
instance
pursue
expressed
intention
tightly
rei
discovery
judicial
watch
national
energy
policy
dev
group
supp
dc
government
request
discovery
issue
sought
civil
action
filed
respondents
judicial
watch
sierra
club
gain
information
concerning
membership
operations
task
force
national
energy
policy
development
group
nepdg
respondents
filed
suit
federal
advisory
committee
act
faca
app
et
seq
respondents
named
among
defendants
vice
president
senior
executive
branch
officials
see
app
ante
granting
part
denying
part
government
motions
dismiss
see
supp
district
approved
respondents
extensive
discovery
plan
included
detailed
interrogatories
sweeping
requests
production
documents
see
app
pet
cert
app
later
order
district
directed
government
produce
documents
privilege
log
app
pet
cert
discovery
plan
drawn
judicial
watch
sierra
club
indeed
unbounded
scope
ante
accord
initial
approval
plan
district
however
given
stunning
disregard
concerns
cf
ante
order
district
invited
detailed
precise
object
ions
discovery
requests
instructed
government
identify
explain
invocations
privilege
particularity
app
pet
cert
avoid
duplication
district
provided
government
identify
documents
information
responsive
discovery
requests
ha
already
released
judicial
watch
sierra
club
different
fora
anticipating
proceedings
concerning
discovery
district
suggested
government
submit
privileged
documents
seal
consideration
appoint
equivalent
special
master
maybe
retired
judge
review
allegedly
privileged
documents
app
government
file
specific
objections
supply
particulars
support
assertions
privilege
instead
government
urged
district
rule
judicial
watch
sierra
club
discovery
see
governmen
position
discovery
appropriate
far
tell
petitioners
never
asked
district
narrow
discovery
matters
respondents
need
support
allegation
faca
applies
nepdg
emphasis
original
government
view
resolution
case
ha
flow
administrative
record
sans
discovery
app
without
taking
district
suggestion
readiness
rein
discovery
see
supp
government
behalf
vice
president
moved
unsuccessfully
protective
order
certification
interlocutory
appeal
pursuant
see
see
app
pet
cert
district
denial
protective
order
supp
dc
district
denial
certification
district
hearing
government
motion
stay
pending
interlocutory
appeal
government
argued
injury
submitting
discovery
absence
compelling
showing
need
respondents
app
see
supp
dc
district
order
denying
stay
despite
absence
flurry
activity
ante
government
motion
contesting
terms
discovery
plan
proposing
substitute
plan
see
government
fact
object
scope
discovery
asked
district
narrow
way
ante
support
statement
points
government
objections
proposed
discovery
plan
response
interrogatories
production
requests
contention
discovery
unduly
burdensome
see
ante
app
true
government
disputed
definition
term
meeting
respondents
interrogatories
stated
passing
discovery
limited
written
interrogatories
limited
scope
issue
membership
appeals
noted
government
mentioned
excessive
discovery
support
plea
shielded
discovery
government
argument
burden
document
production
unconstitutional
burden
app
similarly
anchored
government
urged
district
hearing
underlying
position
going
produce
anything
government
bottom
line
firmly
consistently
review
limited
administrative
record
frame
resolution
case
accord
administrative
record
consist
presidential
memorandum
establishing
nepdg
nepdg
public
report
office
vice
president
response
judicial
watch
request
permission
attend
nepdg
meetings
include
anything
respondents
gain
discovery
indeed
government
acknowledged
district
litigation
strategy
involved
opposition
discovery
plan
whole
lieu
focused
objections
see
government
stated
choose
offer
written
objections
discovery
plan
sounding
government
leitmotif
hearing
proposed
discovery
plan
district
stated
government
file
objections
rein
discovery
government
view
discovery
appropriate
without
endeavoring
correct
misunderstanding
district
part
government
underscored
resistance
discovery
asserting
respondents
entitled
discovery
supplement
administrative
record
motion
protective
order
government
similarly
declared
unqualified
opposition
discovery
see
memorandum
support
defendants
motion
protective
order
reconsideration
nos
egs
egs
petitioners
respectfully
request
enter
protective
order
relieving
obligation
respond
respondents
discovery
requests
emphasis
added
see
district
short
ignored
concrete
pleas
narrow
discovery
see
ante
however
voice
concern
government
failure
heed
instructions
told
government
precise
constitutional
objections
let
know
determine
whether
discovery
plan
appropriate
said
well
unconstitutional
without
elaborating
said
plaintiff
proposed
discovery
plan
approved
defendants
submitting
specific
objections
plaintiff
proposed
request
rule
objections
let
know
objections
chose
app
denied
certification
district
government
sought
writ
mandamus
appeals
see
mandamus
petition
government
asked
appellate
vacate
discovery
orders
issued
district
direct
decide
case
basis
administrative
record
supplemental
affidavits
may
require
direct
vice
president
dismissed
defendant
support
requests
government
argued
case
adjudicated
without
discovery
constitution
principles
comity
preclude
discovery
president
vice
president
especially
without
demonstration
compelling
focused
countervailing
interest
appeals
acknowledged
discovery
plan
presented
respondents
approved
district
goes
well
beyond
respondents
need
appellate
nevertheless
denied
mandamus
petition
concluding
government
concern
remain
ed
hypothetical
far
ordering
immediate
disclosure
communications
senior
executive
branch
officials
information
relevant
advice
formulated
president
appeals
observed
district
directed
government
initially
produce
documents
privilege
log
citation
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
app
pet
cert
appeals
stressed
district
accommodate
concerns
short
denying
discovery
compelling
invocation
executive
privilege
see
principally
appeals
stated
discovery
narrowed
government
move
encompass
whether
officials
participated
nepdg
extent
government
identify
relevant
materials
produced
litigation
thus
avoiding
undue
reproduction
see
app
pet
cert
supra
appropriate
narrowing
discovery
allowed
still
impels
vice
president
claim
privilege
district
entertain
privilege
claims
review
allegedly
privileged
documents
camera
mindful
judiciary
responsibility
police
separation
powers
litigation
involving
executive
appeals
expressed
confidence
district
respond
petitioners
concern
narrow
discovery
ensure
respondents
obtain
need
prove
case
ii
repeatedly
observed
writ
mandamus
extraordinary
remedy
reserved
extraordinary
situations
gulfstream
aerospace
mayacamas
citing
kerr
dist
northern
dist
see
ante
reiterates
party
seeking
issuance
writ
must
adequate
means
attain
relief
desires
kerr
ante
throughout
litigation
government
declined
move
reduction
district
discovery
order
accommodate
concerns
see
supra
remands
case
appeals
consider
whether
mandamus
writ
issue
ordering
district
explore
avenues
short
forcing
executive
invoke
privilege
particular
narrow
scope
discovery
ante
nothing
district
orders
appeals
opinion
however
suggests
either
courts
refuse
reasonably
accommodate
concerns
see
supra
parties
seeking
mandamus
writ
decline
avail
opportunities
obtain
relief
district
writ
mandamus
ordering
relief
discovery
surely
doubtful
proposition
district
moreover
err
failing
narrow
discovery
initiative
although
cites
poindexter
supp
dc
sound
precedent
narrowing
discovery
see
ante
target
subpoena
case
former
president
reagan
unlike
petitioners
case
affirmatively
requested
narrowing
district
subject
criticism
awaits
party
motion
tightening
scope
discovery
certainly
makes
clear
indisputable
error
adhering
principle
party
initiation
kerr
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
review
mandamus
stage
proceedings
least
comprehensible
means
test
government
position
discovery
appropriate
litigation
see
brief
petitioners
etitioners
arguments
nature
claim
immunity
remanding
consideration
measures
apparently
rejects
position
otherwise
remand
based
overbreadth
discovery
requests
make
sense
nothing
record
however
intimates
refusal
reduce
discovery
indeed
appeals
already
suggested
tailored
discovery
avoid
effectively
prejudg
ing
merits
respondents
claim
ante
stevens
concurring
see
respondents
need
documents
referring
involvement
officials
see
also
ante
stevens
concurring
interrogatories
depositions
might
determined
whether
employees
voted
nepdg
recommendations
drafted
portions
committee
report
accord
appeals
confident
moved
district
protect
petitioners
legitimate
interests
keep
discovery
within
appropriate
limits
therefore
affirm
judgment
appeals
richard
cheney
vice
president
et
al
district
district
columbia
et
al
petition
writ
certiorari
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
decided
march
memorandum
justice
scalia
motion
recuse
cases
consolidated
motion
filed
behalf
respondent
sierra
club
private
respondent
judicial
watch
join
motion
publicly
stated
believe
facts
hunting
trip
satisfy
legal
standards
requiring
recusal
judicial
watch
statement
available
clerk
case
file
district
nominal
party
mandamus
action
course
made
appearance
since
cases
consolidated
however
recusal
one
entail
recusal
decision
whether
judge
impartiality
made
light
facts
existed
surmised
reported
see
microsoft
rehnquist
opinion
respecting
recusal
facts
follows
five
years
going
louisiana
long
recess
camp
friend
met
two
hunting
companions
baton
rouge
one
dentist
worker
field
handicapped
rehabilitation
last
three
years
accompanied
trip
lives
near
friend
host
wallace
carline
never
far
know
business
reports
described
energy
industry
executive
sense
summons
boardrooms
exxonmobil
con
edison
runs
company
provides
services
equipment
rental
oil
rigs
gulf
mexico
december
visit
learned
carline
admirer
vice
president
cheney
knowing
vice
president
well
acquainted
years
serving
together
ford
administration
enthusiastic
asked
whether
carline
like
invite
next
year
hunt
answer
yes
conveyed
invitation
warm
recommendation
spring
received
acceptance
subject
course
superseding
demands
vice
president
time
summer
vice
president
said
go
welcome
fly
louisiana
national
security
requirements
course
must
fly
government
plane
invitation
later
extended
space
available
son
joining
hunt
first
time
accepted
trip
set
long
granted
certiorari
present
case
indeed
petition
certiorari
even
filed
departed
andrews
air
force
base
monday
january
flying
gulfstream
jet
owned
government
landed
patterson
louisiana
went
car
dock
carline
met
us
take
us
boat
trip
hunting
camp
arrived
us
joining
hunters
making
hunters
also
present
time
members
carline
staff
course
vice
president
staff
security
detail
intimate
setting
group
hunted
afternoon
tuesday
wednesday
mornings
fished
two
boats
tuesday
afternoon
meals
common
sleeping
rooms
two
three
except
vice
president
quarters
hunting
blinds
turned
never
hunted
blind
vice
president
alone
time
trip
except
perhaps
instances
brief
unintentional
recall
walking
boat
perhaps
going
dinner
course
said
word
present
case
vice
president
left
camp
wednesday
afternoon
two
days
arrival
stayed
hunt
son
late
friday
morning
three
us
returned
washington
commercial
flight
new
orleans
ii
let
respond
outset
sierra
club
suggestion
resolve
doubts
favor
recusal
motion
recuse
might
sound
advice
sitting
appeals
see
aguinda
place
taken
another
judge
case
proceed
normally
however
consequence
different
proceeds
eight
justices
raising
possibility
reason
tie
vote
find
unable
resolve
significant
legal
issue
presented
case
thus
justices
stated
statement
recusal
policy
think
serve
public
interest
go
beyond
requirements
statute
recuse
excess
caution
whenever
relative
partner
firm
us
acted
lawyer
earlier
stage
even
one
unnecessary
recusal
impairs
functioning
available
clerk
case
file
moreover
granting
motion
insofar
outcome
particular
case
concerned
effectively
casting
vote
petitioner
petitioner
needs
five
votes
overturn
judgment
makes
difference
whether
needed
fifth
vote
missing
cast
side
cast
even
recusal
course
must
take
take
basis
established
principles
practices
said
done
something
requires
course
recused
reason
term
see
elk
grove
unified
school
district
newdow
cert
granted
believe
however
established
principles
practices
require
thus
permit
recusal
present
case
recusal
required
reason
actions
described
impartiality
might
reasonably
questioned
result
follow
sizable
group
persons
hunting
camp
vice
president
never
hunted
blind
opportunity
private
conversation
possibility
suggest
friend
friendship
ground
recusal
justice
personal
fortune
personal
freedom
friend
issue
traditionally
ground
recusal
official
action
issue
matter
important
official
action
ambitions
reputation
government
officer
rule
required
members
remove
cases
official
actions
friends
issue
utterly
disabling
many
justices
reached
precisely
friends
incumbent
president
senior
officials
earliest
days
modern
times
justices
close
personal
relationships
president
officers
executive
john
quincy
adams
hosted
dinner
parties
featuring
luminaries
chief
justice
marshall
justices
johnson
story
todd
attorney
general
wirt
daniel
webster
memoirs
john
quincy
adams
adams
ed
diary
entry
mar
justice
harlan
wife
often
white
house
see
hayes
family
pass
sunday
evening
small
group
visiting
singing
hymns
harlan
memories
long
life
justice
stone
tossed
around
medicine
ball
members
hoover
administration
mornings
outside
white
house
memoirs
herbert
hoover
justice
douglas
regular
president
franklin
roosevelt
poker
parties
chief
justice
vinson
played
poker
president
truman
simon
independent
journey
life
william
douglas
mccullough
truman
rule
disqualified
much
youngstown
sheet
tube
sawyer
case
challenged
president
truman
seizure
steel
mills
justices
knew
truman
well
four
appointed
rule
surely
required
justice
holmes
recusal
northern
securities
case
challenged
president
theodore
roosevelt
initiative
see
novick
honorable
justice
life
oliver
wendell
holmes
holmes
fanny
dined
white
house
every
week
two
said
however
case
different
federal
officer
vice
president
cheney
actually
named
party
means
rarity
beginning
current
term
excluding
habeas
actions
fewer
cases
federal
executive
officers
named
official
capacity
every
federal
civil
cases
pending
officer
named
traditionally
made
difference
proposition
friendship
considered
affect
impartiality
suits
regardless
name
suits
officer
plaintiff
seek
relief
personally
government
officer
defendant
seek
relief
personally
government
federal
law
provides
automatic
substitution
new
officer
originally
named
officer
replaced
see
federal
rule
civil
procedure
federal
rule
appellate
procedure
rule
caption
sierra
club
complaint
action
designates
defendant
vice
president
richard
cheney
official
capacity
vice
president
chairman
national
energy
policy
development
group
app
emphasis
added
body
complaint
repeats
paragraph
defendant
richard
cheney
sued
official
capacity
vice
president
chairman
cheney
energy
task
force
emphasis
added
sierra
club
relied
upon
fact
rather
personal
suit
basis
denying
petition
asserted
brief
opposition
presidential
immunity
discovery
clinton
jones
private
suit
urely
vice
president
subordinate
white
house
officials
greater
immunity
claim
especially
lawsuit
relates
official
actions
office
primary
relief
sought
declaratory
judgment
brief
opposition
richard
cheney
name
appears
suit
head
government
committee
allegedly
comply
federal
advisory
committee
act
faca
app
may
reason
office
custody
government
documents
plaintiffs
seek
person
become
head
committee
obtain
custody
documents
plaintiffs
name
person
cheney
dismissed
unlike
defendant
nixon
clinton
jones
supra
cheney
represented
personal
attorney
department
justice
person
solicitor
general
courts
levels
referred
arguments
arguments
government
see
cheney
cadc
judicial
watch
nat
energy
policy
development
group
supp
dc
recusal
motion
however
asserts
following
critical
issue
justice
scalia
recusal
understanding
legal
dispute
administrative
decision
conduct
central
case
vice
president
integrity
line
chicago
tribune
motion
recuse
think
certainly
far
legal
issues
immediately
presented
concerned
legal
dispute
administrative
decision
asked
determine
powers
district
possessed
faca
whether
appeals
asserted
mandamus
appellate
jurisdiction
district
nothing
says
subjects
bearing
upon
reputation
integrity
richard
cheney
moreover
even
affirms
decision
allows
discovery
proceed
district
issue
ultimately
present
still
bearing
upon
reputation
integrity
richard
cheney
issue
quite
simply
whether
private
individuals
de
facto
members
national
energy
policy
development
group
nepdg
matters
whether
caused
cheney
someone
else
whether
cheney
even
aware
de
facto
status
de
facto
members
according
circuit
law
records
minutes
nepdg
must
made
public
recusal
motion
asserts
however
richard
cheney
reputation
integrity
line
respondents
alleged
inter
alia
vice
president
head
task
force
responsible
involvement
energy
industry
executives
operations
task
force
result
task
force
became
subject
faca
ibid
far
sierra
club
complaint
concerned
simply
true
vice
president
cheney
singled
caused
involvement
energy
executives
even
allegation
made
irrelevant
case
faca
assertedly
requires
disclosure
private
members
task
force
matter
energy
industry
executives
ralph
nader
matter
responsible
membership
vice
president
one
particular
see
vice
president
reputation
integrity
line
agency
head
reputation
integrity
line
virtually
suits
accuse
agency
acting
quote
administrative
procedure
act
arbitrar
ily
capricious
ly
abuse
discretion
otherwise
accordance
law
beyond
accusation
nothing
illegal
immoral
making
energy
industry
executives
members
task
force
energy
people
probably
think
good
idea
allowing
happen
vice
president
went
beyond
assigned
powers
worse
every
agency
head
done
action
judicially
set
aside
sure
political
consequences
disclosure
fact
vice
president
favored
business
interests
especially
sector
business
formerly
connected
political
consequences
concern
possibility
convert
official
suit
private
one
possibility
exists
greater
lesser
degree
virtually
suits
involving
agency
action
expect
judges
take
account
political
consequences
assess
high
low
degree
ask
judges
precisely
seems
quite
wrong
quite
impossible
make
recusal
depend
upon
degree
political
damage
particular
case
expected
inflict
sum
see
nothing
case
takes
category
normal
litigation
friendship
appearance
friendship
one
named
officers
require
recusal
recusal
motion
claims
fact
justice
scalia
daughter
sic
vice
president
guest
air
force
two
flight
louisiana
means
accepted
sizable
gift
party
pending
case
gift
measured
thousands
dollars
motion
recuse
let
speak
first
value
though
principal
point
flight
cost
government
nothing
since
condition
invitation
though
flight
vice
president
plane
indeed
free
since
returning
purchased
least
expensive
tickets
cost
precisely
paid
gone
back
commercial
flights
words
none
us
saved
cent
flying
vice
president
plane
purpose
going
saving
money
avoiding
inconvenience
taken
car
new
orleans
morgan
city
considerable
inconvenience
friends
meet
plane
new
orleans
schedule
separate
boat
trips
hunting
camp
us
vice
president
party
sure
flying
vice
president
jet
comfortable
convenient
flying
commercially
accommodation
matter
address
next
paragraph
principal
point
however
social
courtesies
provided
government
expense
officials
whose
business
business
official
capacity
hitherto
thought
prohibited
members
congress
others
frequently
invited
accompany
executive
branch
officials
government
planes
space
available
sort
gift
thought
likely
affect
judge
impartiality
suggested
fact
ethics
government
act
app
et
requires
annual
reporting
transportation
provided
reimbursed
excludes
requirement
transportation
provided
see
committee
financial
disclosure
administrative
office
courts
financial
disclosure
report
filing
instructions
judicial
officers
employees
daresay
hypothetical
charity
auction
much
bid
dinner
two
white
house
flight
louisiana
vice
president
jet
justices
accept
former
regularity
matter
pending
justices
spouses
invited
believe
december
christmas
reception
residence
vice
president
included
opportunity
photograph
vice
president
cheney
several
justices
attended
fully
accord
proprieties
iii
learned
sierra
club
filed
recusal
motion
case
assumed
motion
replete
citations
legal
authority
provide
instances
cases
activity
similar
occurred
justices
recused
least
asked
fact
however
motion
cites
two
cases
assertedly
relevant
issue
nine
appeals
cases
single
one
even
involves
motion
gives
single
instance
even
remotely
similar
circumstances
justice
recused
asked
recuse
instead
argument
section
motion
consists
almost
entirely
references
quotations
newspaper
editorials
core
sierra
club
argument
follows
sierra
club
makes
motion
damage
integrity
system
done
right
today
newspapers
largest
circulation
largest
largest
called
justice
scalia
step
aside
equal
import
counterbalance
controversy
single
newspaper
argued
recusal
american
public
reflected
nation
newspaper
editorials
unanimously
concluded
appearance
favoritism
objective
observer
compelled
conclude
justice
scalia
impartiality
questioned
facts
satisfy
section
mandates
recusal
merely
justice
impartiality
reasonably
questioned
motion
recuse
implications
argument
staggering
must
recuse
significant
portion
press
deemed
american
public
demands
motion
attaches
exhibits
press
editorials
relies
many
even
facts
right
length
hunting
trip
together
said
several
days
san
francisco
chronicle
four
days
boston
globe
nine
days
san
antonio
spent
hours
together
hunting
camp
asserted
vice
president
spent
time
alone
rushes
huddled
together
louisiana
marsh
plenty
time
talk
privately
los
angeles
times
spent
quality
time
bonding
together
duck
blind
atlanta
simply
reason
think
two
discuss
pending
case
buffalo
news
described
vice
president
never
blind
never
discussed
case
washington
officials
know
rules
know
discussing
judges
pending
cases
anyone
else
forbidden
palm
beach
post
stated
transportation
provided
appropriately
oil
services
company
newsday
private
jet
whisked
scalia
louisiana
vice
president
flew
government
plane
cincinnati
enquirer
said
scalia
cheney
guest
private
camp
louisiana
cheney
wallace
carline
guest
various
newspapers
described
carline
energy
company
official
atlanta
oil
industrialist
cincinnati
enquirer
oil
company
executive
contra
costa
times
oilman
minneapolis
star
tribune
energy
industry
executive
washington
post
descriptions
misleading
inaccuracies
pertaining
facts
regard
law
vast
majority
editorials
display
recognition
central
proposition
federal
officer
ordinarily
regarded
personal
party
interest
suit
display
recognition
facilely
assume
contrary
precedent
suits
mere
political
damage
characterize
destruction
cheney
reputation
integrity
ground
recusal
blast
largely
inaccurate
uninformed
opinion
determine
recusal
question
well
established
recusal
inquiry
must
made
perspective
reasonable
observer
informed
surrounding
facts
circumstances
microsoft
rehnquist
opinion
respecting
recusal
emphases
added
citing
liteky
iv
sierra
club
apparently
unable
summon
forth
single
example
justice
recusal
even
motion
justice
recusal
circumstances
similar
able
accomplish
seemingly
difficult
task
finding
couple
examples
establishing
negative
recusal
motion
recusal
occur
circumstances
similar
justice
white
robert
kennedy
first
example
pertains
justice
sat
retired
years
ago
byron
white
justice
white
close
friends
attorney
general
robert
kennedy
days
white
served
kennedy
deputy
attorney
general
january
justice
went
skiing
vacation
colorado
robert
kennedy
family
secretary
defense
robert
mcnamara
family
members
kennedy
family
skiing
best
mcnamara
leaves
colorado
terms
vacation
marvelous
denver
post
hutchinson
man
whizzer
white
skiing
colorado
like
hunting
louisiana
particularly
successful
time
skiing
vacation
pending
least
two
cases
robert
kennedy
official
capacity
attorney
general
party
see
kennedy
kennedy
first
moreover
press
might
said
plausibly
said
reputation
integrity
attorney
general
issue
department
justice
decreed
deportation
resident
alien
grounds
member
communist
party
found
evidence
adduced
department
inadequate
besides
cases
naming
kennedy
another
case
pending
time
skiing
vacation
argued
kennedy
two
weeks
later
see
gray
sanders
case
important
kennedy
administration
time
argument
everybody
knew
apportionment
cases
far
behind
gray
significant
step
march
toward
reynolds
sims
decision
announced
news
see
high
voids
county
unit
vote
times
mar
georgia
unit
voting
voided
washington
post
mar
attorney
general
kennedy
argued
affirmance
district
ruling
georgia
democratic
party
voting
system
violated
principle
kennedy
argument
certainly
put
line
reputation
lawyer
well
important
policy
brother
administration
justice
jackson
franklin
roosevelt
second
example
pertains
justice
one
distinguished
occupants
seat
appointed
robert
jackson
justice
jackson
took
recusal
obligation
particularly
seriously
see
jewell
ridge
coal
mine
workers
jackson
concurring
denial
rehearing
oblique
criticism
justice
black
decision
recuse
case
argued
former
law
partner
nonetheless
saw
nothing
wrong
maintaining
close
personal
relationship
engaging
quite
frequen
socializing
president
whose
administration
acts
came
regularly
jackson
man
insider
portrait
franklin
roosevelt
barrett
ed
april
two
spent
weekend
delightful
house
party
general
watson
charlottesville
virginia
invited
ride
president
ride
back
omitted
pending
time
argued
next
month
one
important
cases
concerning
scope
permissible
federal
action
commerce
clause
wickard
filburn
justice
jackson
wrote
opinion
roosevelt
secretary
agriculture
rather
roosevelt
named
federal
officer
case
doubt
important
president
see
nothing
wrong
justice
white
justice
jackson
socializing
including
vacationing
accepting
rides
friends
seemingly
anyone
else
time
denver
post
critical
reported
skiing
vacation
nothing
enthusiasm
friendship
basis
recusal
assuredly
friends
sued
personally
activity
suggests
close
friendship
must
avoided
friendship
basis
recusal
suits
social
contacts
evidence
friendship
suggest
impropriety
whatever
course
claimed
editorials
claimed
times
changed
considered
proper
even
recently
byron
white
day
longer
may
true
regard
earlier
rare
phenomenon
justice
serving
advisor
confidant
president
though
activity
incompatible
separation
powers
widely
known
occurring
hardly
said
generally
approved
properly
abandoned
constant
practice
justices
enjoying
friendship
social
intercourse
members
congress
officers
executive
branch
abandoned
since
believe
impartiality
reasonably
questioned
think
proper
recuse
see
microsoft
alone
conclusive
another
consideration
moves
direction
recusal
judgment
harm
withdraw
case
press
argued
vice
president
suffer
political
damage
lose
appeal
remand
discovery
establish
energy
industry
representatives
de
facto
members
nepdg
press
elevated
possible
political
damage
status
impending
stain
reputation
integrity
vice
president
since
political
damage
often
comes
government
losing
suits
since
political
damage
readily
characterized
stain
reputation
integrity
recusing
face
charges
give
elements
press
veto
participation
justices
social
contacts
even
known
friends
named
official
intolerable
recusal
also
encourage
investigative
journalists
suggest
improprieties
demand
recusals
inappropriate
increasingly
silly
reasons
los
angeles
times
already
suggested
improper
sit
case
argued
law
school
dean
whose
school
visited
several
weeks
visited
invitation
predecessor
see
new
trip
trouble
scalia
paper
asserted
improper
speak
dinner
honoring
cardinal
bevilaqua
given
urban
family
council
philadelphia
according
times
false
report
organization
engaged
litigation
seeking
prevent
civil
unions
case
presenting
question
whether
civil
unions
lawful
whether
homosexual
sodomy
constitutionally
criminalized
see
lawrence
texas
political
branches
perhaps
survive
constant
baseless
allegations
impropriety
become
staple
washington
reportage
people
must
confidence
integrity
justices
exist
system
assumes
corruptible
slightest
friendship
favor
atmosphere
press
eager
find
noted
outset
one
private
respondents
case
called
recusal
expressed
confidence
rule
impartially
indeed
counsel
private
respondent
seek
impose
seems
standard
regarding
friendship
appearance
friendship
acceptance
social
favors
stringent
observe
two
days
brief
opposition
petition
case
filed
lead
counsel
sierra
club
friend
wrote
warm
note
inviting
come
stanford
law
school
speak
one
classes
available
clerk
case
file
judges
teaching
classes
law
schools
normally
transportation
expenses
paid
saw
nothing
amiss
friendly
letter
invitation
surely
thought
otherwise
applied
standards
urged
present
motion
sure
believe
friendship
persons
current
administration
might
cause
favor
government
cases
brought
issue
issue
whether
personal
friendship
vice
president
might
cause
favor
government
cases
named
none
suspicions
regarding
impartiality
erroneous
suspicions
hasten
protest
bears
upon
recusal
question
simply
put
whether
someone
thought
decide
case
impartially
despite
friendship
vice
president
reasonably
believe
decide
impartially
went
hunting
friend
accepted
invitation
fly
government
plane
reasonable
think
justice
bought
cheap
nation
deeper
trouble
imagined
newspaper
editorials
appended
motion
make
clear
received
good
deal
embarrassing
criticism
adverse
publicity
connection
matters
issue
even
point
becoming
motion
cruelly
accurately
fodder
comedians
motion
recuse
done
good
conscience
pleased
demonstrate
integrity
immediately
silence
criticism
getting
case
since
believe
basis
recusal
motion
denied
richard
cheney
vice
president
et
petitioners
district
district
columbia
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
june
justice
thomas
justice
scalia
joins
concurring
part
dissenting
part
agree
remedy
mandamus
drastic
one
invoked
extraordinary
situations
kerr
dist
northern
dist
framing
review
appeals
judgment
recognizes
hurdle
observing
petitioner
must
satisfy
burden
showing
right
issuance
writ
clear
indisputable
ante
quoting
kerr
supra
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
reaching
disposition
barely
mentions
fact
respondents
judicial
watch
sierra
club
face
precisely
burden
obtain
relief
district
proper
question
presented
appeals
whether
clear
indisputable
petitioners
right
order
ing
discovery
orders
issued
district
direct
ing
decide
case
basis
administrative
record
supplemental
affidavits
may
require
direct
ing
vice
president
dismissed
defendant
cadc
quoting
emergency
pet
writ
mandamus
cheney
cadc
question
appeals
faced
also
necessarily
account
fact
respondents
sought
mandamus
relief
district
proceeded
mandamus
respondents
demonstrate
district
clear
indisputable
right
federal
advisory
committee
act
faca
materials
respondents
right
materials
clear
indisputable
petitioners
right
relief
appeals
clear
one
need
look
district
opinion
conclude
respondents
right
relief
district
unclear
hence
mandamus
unavailable
indeed
district
acknowledged
recognition
applying
faca
meetings
among
presidential
advisors
formidable
constitutional
difficulties
judicial
watch
national
energy
policy
dev
group
supp
dc
quoting
public
citizen
department
justice
putting
aside
serious
constitutional
questions
raised
respondents
challenge
district
even
determine
whether
faca
applies
national
energy
policy
development
group
nepdg
statutory
matter
supp
noting
possibility
discovery
petitioners
might
prevail
summary
judgment
statutory
grounds
acknowledge
appeals
de
facto
member
doctrine
see
association
american
physicians
surgeons
clinton
cadc
district
authorized
undertake
broad
discovery
determine
whether
faca
government
employees
exception
app
applies
application
de
facto
member
doctrine
authorize
broad
discovery
nepdg
potential
offend
constitution
separation
powers
actual
application
faca
nepdg
randolph
dissenting
thus
existence
doctrine
support
district
actions
respondents
must
conduct
discovery
order
prove
right
relief
much
less
clear
indisputable
right
relief
mandamus
unwarranted
writ
issue
although
district
might
later
conclude
faca
applies
nepdg
statutory
matter
application
constitutional
mere
fact
district
might
rule
respondents
favor
establish
clear
right
relief
necessary
mandamus
otherwise
writ
mandamus
turn
freestanding
cause
action
plaintiffs
seeking
enforce
virtually
statute
even
provide
private
remedy
district
clearly
exceeded
authority
case
reverse
judgment
appeals
remand
case
instruction
issue
writ
footnotes
interrogatories
depositions
might
determined
example
whether
employees
voted
nepdg
recommendations
drafted
portions
committee
report
view
substantive
participation
nature
even
arguably
sufficient
warrant
classifying
employee
de
facto
committee
member
footnotes
appeals
also
concluded
altogether
correctly
view
lacked
ordinary
appellate
jurisdiction
vice
president
appeal
see
cf
ante
leaving
question
undecided
order
addressing
petitioners
motions
dismiss
district
stated
premature
inappropriate
determine
whether
relief
obtained
vice
president
judicial
watch
national
energy
policy
dev
group
supp
dc
immediate
review
interlocutory
ruling
allowed
rare
cases
doctrine
inappropriate
order
case
inherently
tentative
final
word
subject
gulfstream
aerospace
mayacamas
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
government
agencies
produced
relevant
documents
related
freedom
information
act
litigation
see
supp
section
title
allows
appeals
discretion
entertain
appeal
interlocutory
order
hen
district
judge
shall
opinion
order
involves
controlling
question
law
substantial
ground
difference
opinion
immediate
appeal
order
may
materially
advance
ultimate
termination
litigation
limiting
discovery
issue
membership
appeals
indicated
agreement
see
respondents
need
names
persons
participated
nepdg
activities
description
person
role
activities
nepdg
must
discover
whether
officials
participated
extent
internal
quotation
marks
ellipsis
brackets
omitted
according
government
boxes
documents
potentially
responsive
respondents
discovery
requests
documents
identified
likely
responsive
boxes
contained
approximately
twelve
boxes
app
box
requires
one
two
attorney
days
review
prepare
rough
privilege
log
following
review
privilege
logs
must
finalized
responsive
emails
identified
printed
numbered
petitioners
expect
privilege
review
logging
process
equally
due
expected
quantity
individual
emails
agency
petitioners
responses
interrogatories
gave
rote
hardly
illuminating
responses
refusing
basis
executive
deliberative
process
privileges
forthcoming
see
defendant
department
energy
response
plaintiff
first
set
interrogatories
nos
egs
egs
defendant
office
management
budget
response
plaintiff
first
set
interrogatories
nos
egs
egs
suggests
appeals
labored
mistaken
assumption
assertion
executive
privilege
necessary
precondition
government
objections
ante
appeals
however
described
constitutional
concern
hypothetical
merely
executive
privilege
asserted
also
light
measures
district
take
narrow
carefully
focu
discovery
see
also
questions
district
invocation
federal
mandamus
statute
provides
district
courts
shall
original
jurisdiction
action
nature
mandamus
compel
officer
employee
agency
thereof
perform
duty
owed
plaintiff
see
ante
supp
see
also
chandler
judicial
council
tenth
circuit
holding
mandamus
writs
act
improper
expressing
opinion
relief
federal
mandamus
statute
question
whether
allows
enforcement
faca
vice
president
district
concluded
premature
inappropriate
determine
whether
relief
mandamus
issue
supp
government
moreover
contested
propriety
relief
passing
petition
appeals
mandamus
relief
see
app
government
asserted
mandamus
petition
general
writ
mandamus
used
circumvent
limits
provision
directly
providing
review
administrative
question
decided
district
barely
raised
petition
mandamus
hardly
qualifies
grounds
drastic
extraordinary
mandamus
relief
ex
parte
fahey
justice
thomas
urges
respondents
obtain
relief
discovery
needed
prove
right
relief
ante
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
emphasis
original
first
appeals
recognized
see
supra
infra
government
move
district
contain
discovery
second
agree
applicant
seeking
mandamus
writ
must
show
federal
defendant
owes
clear
nondiscretionary
duty
heckler
ringer
emphasis
added
writ
may
issue
words
federal
law
grants
discretion
federal
officer
rather
imposing
duty
federal
law
imposes
obligation
however
suit
precluded
simply
facts
must
developed
ascertain
whether
federal
command
dishonored
congress
enacted
mak
convenient
aggrieved
persons
file
actions
nature
mandamus
stafford
briggs
address
rare
instance
federal
defendant
upon
law
unequivocally
places
obligation
concedes
failure
measure
obligation
agree
interlocutory
appeal
may
become
appropriate
later
juncture
litigation
see
ante
note
decision
whether
allow
appeal
lies
first
instance
district
sound
discretion
see
supra
footnotes
questions
presented
petition
accepted
review
follows
whether
federal
advisory
committee
act
faca
app
et
construed
authorize
broad
discovery
process
vice
president
senior
advisors
gathered
information
advise
president
important
national
policy
matters
based
solely
unsupported
allegation
complaint
advisory
group
constituted
president
expressly
directed
advisory
group
reported
whether
appeals
mandamus
appellate
jurisdiction
review
district
unprecedented
discovery
orders
litigation
pet
cert
statement
facts
indicated
way
daughter
accompany
married
son
given
ride
relatives
favor
hunters
leaving
washington
favor
go
new
orleans
meet
unrelated
invitees
hunt
undoubtedly
occurred
financially
flight
worth
little
motion
cites
third
case
public
citizen
department
justice
case
involving
faca
recused
speculates
reason
recusal
assistant
attorney
general
office
legal
counsel
provided
opinion
concluded
applying
faca
presidential
advisory
committees
unconstitutional
asserts
also
grounds
recusal
opinion
assistant
attorney
general
addressed
precise
question
presented
public
citizen
whether
american
bar
association
standing
committee
federal
judiciary
provided
advice
president
concerning
judicial
nominees
regulated
advisory
committee
faca
concluded
withdrawal
case
required
mandates
recusal
judge
served
governmental
employment
capacity
expressed
opinion
concerning
merits
particular
case
controversy
never
expressed
opinion
concerning
merits
present
case
murphy
least
involved
judge
going
vacation
named
defendant
suit
judge
departed
vacation
prosecutor
murphy
case
immediately
sentencing
murphy
obviously
prosecutor
personally
involved
outcome
case
way
nominal
defendant
suit
times
reporter
interviewed
former
president
urban
family
council
told
categorically
council
neither
party
provided
financial
support
litigation
filed
papers
case
publicly
available
showed
council
party
los
angeles
times
nonetheless
devoted
lengthy
article
point
words
lead
sentence
justice
antonin
scalia
gave
keynote
dinner
speech
philadelphia
advocacy
group
waging
legal
battle
gay
rights
serrano
savage
scalia
addressed
advocacy
group
key
decision
mar
five
days
later
weekend
edition
paper
printed
insistence
council
retraction
acknowledging
asserted
fact
wrong
though
merely
one
incidental
fact
long
piece
rather
central
fact
upon
long
piece
based
without
story
see
record
mar
inaccurate
facts
insinuations
article
brought
paper
attention
council
corrected
see
betty
jean
wolfe
president
urban
family
council
richard
serrano
los
angeles
times
mar
available
clerk
case
file