caperton
et
al
massey
coal
et
argued
march
decided
june
west
virginia
jury
found
respondents
coal
company
affiliates
hereinafter
massey
liable
fraudulent
misrepresentation
concealment
tortious
interference
existing
contractual
relations
awarded
petitioners
hereinafter
caperton
million
damages
west
virginia
held
judicial
elections
knowing
state
appeals
consider
appeal
blankenship
massey
chairman
principal
officer
supported
brent
benjamin
rather
incumbent
justice
seeking
reelection
million
contributions
exceeded
total
amount
spent
benjamin
supporters
benjamin
committee
benjamin
fewer
votes
massey
filed
appeal
caperton
moved
disqualify
benjamin
due
process
clause
state
code
judicial
conduct
based
conflict
caused
blankenship
campaign
involvement
justice
benjamin
denied
motion
indicating
found
nothing
showing
bias
litigant
reversed
million
verdict
rehearing
process
justice
benjamin
refused
twice
recuse
reversed
jury
verdict
four
months
later
justice
benjamin
filed
concurring
opinion
defending
opinion
recusal
decision
held
circumstances
case
due
process
requires
recusal
pp
due
process
clause
incorporated
rule
requiring
recusal
judge
direct
personal
substantial
pecuniary
interest
case
tumey
ohio
also
identified
additional
instances
objective
matter
require
recusal
probability
actual
bias
part
judge
decisionmaker
high
constitutionally
tolerable
withrow
larkin
two
instances
place
present
case
proper
context
pp
first
involved
local
tribunals
judge
financial
interest
case
outcome
less
considered
personal
direct
common
law
tumey
village
mayor
authority
try
accused
violating
law
prohibiting
possession
alcoholic
beverages
faced
two
potential
conflicts
received
salary
supplement
performing
judicial
duties
funded
fines
assessed
received
supplement
upon
conviction
sums
fines
deposited
village
general
treasury
fund
village
improvements
repairs
disqualification
required
principle
procedure
offer
possible
temptation
average
man
judge
forget
burden
proof
required
convict
defendant
might
lead
hold
balance
nice
clear
true
state
accused
denies
latter
due
process
law
ward
monroeville
conviction
another
mayor
invalidated
even
though
fines
assessed
went
town
general
fisc
mayor
faced
possible
created
executive
responsibilities
village
finances
recusal
also
required
alabama
justice
cast
deciding
vote
upholding
punitive
damages
award
lead
plaintiff
nearly
identical
suit
pending
alabama
lower
courts
aetna
life
ins
lavoie
proper
constitutional
inquiry
whether
fact
justice
influenced
whether
sitting
case
offer
possible
temptation
average
judge
lead
hold
balance
nice
clear
true
ibid
degree
kind
interest
sufficient
disqualify
judge
defined
precision
test
objective
component
pp
second
instance
emerged
criminal
contempt
context
judge
pecuniary
interest
case
determined
earlier
proceeding
whether
criminal
charges
brought
proceeded
try
convict
petitioners
murchison
finding
man
judge
case
man
permitted
try
cases
interest
outcome
noted
circumstances
case
prior
relationship
required
recusal
judge
prior
relationship
defendant
well
information
acquired
prior
proceeding
critical
reiterating
rule
defendant
criminal
contempt
proceedings
tried
judge
one
reviled
contemnor
mayberry
pennsylvania
rests
relationship
judge
defendant
noted
objective
inquiry
whether
judge
actually
biased
whether
average
judge
position
likely
neutral
unconstitutional
bias
pp
objective
standards
implementing
due
process
clause
require
proof
actual
bias
question
justice
benjamin
subjective
findings
impartiality
propriety
need
determine
whether
actual
bias
rather
question
whether
realistic
appraisal
psychological
tendencies
human
weakness
interest
poses
risk
actual
bias
prejudgment
practice
must
forbidden
guarantee
due
process
adequately
implemented
withrow
serious
risk
actual
bias
person
personal
stake
particular
case
significant
disproportionate
influence
placing
judge
case
raising
funds
directing
judge
election
campaign
case
pending
imminent
proper
inquiry
centers
contribution
relative
size
comparison
total
amount
contributed
campaign
total
amount
spent
election
apparent
effect
contribution
outcome
whether
contributions
necessary
sufficient
cause
benjamin
victory
election
decided
fewer
votes
blankenship
campaign
contributions
compared
total
amount
contributed
campaign
well
total
amount
spent
election
significant
disproportionate
influence
outcome
risk
blankenship
influence
engendered
actual
bias
sufficiently
substantial
must
forbidden
guarantee
due
process
adequately
implemented
ibid
temporal
relationship
campaign
contributions
justice
election
pendency
case
also
critical
reasonably
foreseeable
pending
case
newly
elected
justice
allegation
quid
pro
quo
agreement
extraordinary
contributions
made
time
blankenship
vested
stake
outcome
man
allowed
judge
cause
similar
fears
bias
arise
without
parties
consent
man
chooses
judge
cause
applying
principle
judicial
election
process
serious
objective
risk
actual
bias
required
justice
benjamin
recusal
pp
massey
amici
err
predicting
decision
lead
adverse
consequences
ranging
flood
recusal
motions
unnecessary
interference
judicial
elections
point
instance
involving
judicial
campaign
contributions
presents
potential
bias
comparable
circumstances
case
extreme
measure
may
codes
conduct
rigorous
recusal
standards
due
process
requires
recusal
disputes
resolved
without
resort
constitution
making
constitutional
standard
application
rare
pp
reversed
remanded
kennedy
delivered
opinion
stevens
souter
ginsburg
breyer
joined
roberts
filed
dissenting
opinion
scalia
thomas
alito
joined
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
hugh
caperton
et
petitioners
massey
coal
company
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
west
virginia
june
justice
kennedy
delivered
opinion
case
appeals
west
virginia
reversed
trial
judgment
entered
jury
verdict
million
five
justices
heard
case
vote
reverse
question
presented
whether
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
violated
one
justices
majority
denied
recusal
motion
basis
motion
justice
received
campaign
contributions
extraordinary
amount
efforts
board
chairman
principal
officer
corporation
found
liable
damages
precedents
objective
standards
require
recusal
probability
actual
bias
part
judge
decisionmaker
high
constitutionally
tolerable
withrow
larkin
applying
precedents
find
circumstances
case
due
process
requires
recusal
august
west
virginia
jury
returned
verdict
found
respondents
massey
coal
affiliates
hereinafter
massey
liable
fraudulent
misrepresentation
concealment
tortious
interference
existing
contractual
relations
jury
awarded
petitioners
hugh
caperton
harman
development
harman
mining
sovereign
coal
sales
hereinafter
caperton
sum
million
compensatory
punitive
damages
june
state
trial
denied
massey
motions
challenging
verdict
damages
award
finding
massey
intentionally
acted
utter
disregard
caperton
rights
ultimately
destroyed
caperton
businesses
conducting
analyses
massey
concluded
financial
interest
app
march
trial
denied
massey
motion
judgment
matter
law
blankenship
massey
chairman
chief
executive
officer
president
verdict
appeal
west
virginia
held
judicial
elections
knowing
appeals
west
virginia
consider
appeal
case
blankenship
decided
support
attorney
sought
replace
justice
mcgraw
justice
mcgraw
candidate
reelection
attorney
sought
replace
brent
benjamin
addition
contributing
statutory
maximum
benjamin
campaign
committee
blankenship
donated
almost
million
sake
kids
political
organization
formed
organization
opposed
mcgraw
supported
benjamin
app
blankenship
donations
accounted
total
funds
raised
blankenship
spent
addition
independent
expenditures
direct
mailings
letters
soliciting
donations
well
television
newspaper
advertisements
support
brent
benjamin
bold
typeface
omitted
quoting
blankenship
state
campaign
financial
disclosure
filings
provide
perspective
blankenship
million
contributions
total
amount
spent
benjamin
supporters
three
times
amount
spent
benjamin
committee
caperton
contends
blankenship
spent
million
total
amount
spent
campaign
committees
candidates
combined
brief
petitioners
benjamin
received
votes
mcgraw
received
votes
app
october
massey
filed
petition
appeal
west
virginia
highest
caperton
moved
disqualify
benjamin
due
process
clause
west
virginia
code
judicial
conduct
based
conflict
caused
blankenship
campaign
involvement
justice
benjamin
denied
motion
april
indicated
carefully
considered
bases
accompanying
exhibits
proffered
movants
found
objective
information
show
justice
bias
litigant
justice
prejudged
matters
comprise
litigation
justice
anything
fair
impartial
december
massey
filed
petition
appeal
challenge
adverse
jury
verdict
west
virginia
appeals
granted
review
november
reversed
million
verdict
massey
majority
opinion
authored
justice
davis
joined
justices
benjamin
maynard
found
massey
conduct
warranted
type
judgment
rendered
case
reversed
nevertheless
based
two
independent
grounds
first
clause
contained
contract
massey
party
barred
suit
west
virginia
second
res
judicata
barred
suit
due
judgment
massey
party
justice
starcher
dissented
stating
majority
opinion
morally
legally
wrong
justice
albright
also
dissented
accusing
majority
misapplying
law
introducing
sweeping
law
jurisprudence
may
well
come
back
haunt
us
caperton
sought
rehearing
parties
moved
disqualification
three
five
justices
decided
appeal
photos
surfaced
justice
maynard
vacationing
blankenship
french
riviera
case
pending
justice
maynard
granted
caperton
recusal
motion
side
justice
starcher
granted
massey
recusal
motion
apparently
based
public
criticism
blankenship
role
elections
recusal
memorandum
justice
starcher
urged
justice
benjamin
recuse
well
noted
blankenship
bestowal
personal
wealth
political
tactics
created
cancer
affairs
justice
benjamin
declined
justice
starcher
suggestion
denied
caperton
recusal
motion
granted
rehearing
justice
benjamin
capacity
acting
chief
justice
selected
judges
cookman
fox
replace
recused
justices
caperton
moved
third
time
disqualification
arguing
justice
benjamin
failed
apply
correct
standard
west
virginia
law
whether
reasonable
prudent
person
knowing
objective
facts
harbor
doubts
justice
benjamin
ability
fair
impartial
caperton
also
included
results
public
opinion
poll
indicated
west
virginians
doubted
justice
benjamin
fair
impartial
justice
benjamin
refused
withdraw
noting
push
poll
neither
credible
sufficiently
reliable
serve
basis
elected
judge
disqualification
april
divided
reversed
jury
verdict
decision
justice
davis
filed
modified
version
prior
opinion
repeating
two
earlier
holdings
joined
justice
benjamin
judge
fox
justice
albright
joined
judge
cookman
dissented
majority
opinion
unsupported
facts
existing
case
law
also
fundamentally
unfair
sadly
justice
neither
honored
served
majority
app
dissent
also
noted
genuine
due
process
implications
arising
federal
law
respect
justice
benjamin
failure
recuse
app
citing
aetna
life
ins
lavoie
murchison
four
months
later
month
petition
writ
certiorari
filed
justice
benjamin
filed
concurring
opinion
defended
merits
majority
opinion
well
decision
recuse
rejected
caperton
challenge
participation
case
due
process
clause
west
virginia
law
justice
benjamin
reiterated
direct
personal
substantial
pecuniary
interest
case
app
quoting
lavoie
supra
adopting
standard
merely
concluded
seems
little
invitation
subject
west
virginia
justice
system
vagaries
day
framework
predictability
stability
yield
supposition
innuendo
partisan
manipulations
app
granted
certiorari
ii
axiomatic
fair
trial
fair
tribunal
basic
requirement
due
process
murchison
supra
recognized
however
matters
relating
judicial
disqualification
rise
constitutional
level
ftc
cement
institute
early
leading
case
subject
tumey
ohio
stated
matters
kinship
personal
bias
state
policy
remoteness
interest
seem
generally
matters
merely
legislative
discretion
tumey
concluded
due
process
clause
incorporated
rule
judge
must
recuse
direct
personal
substantial
pecuniary
interest
case
ibid
rule
reflects
maxim
man
allowed
judge
cause
interest
certainly
bias
judgment
improbably
corrupt
integrity
federalist
cooke
ed
madison
see
frank
disqualification
judges
yale
rule
disqualification
bias
prejudice
permitted
matters
left
statutes
judicial
codes
lavoie
supra
see
also
part
iv
infra
discussing
judicial
codes
personal
bias
prejudice
alone
sufficient
basis
imposing
constitutional
requirement
due
process
clause
lavoie
supra
new
problems
emerged
discussed
common
law
however
identified
additional
instances
objective
matter
require
recusal
circumstances
experience
teaches
probability
actual
bias
part
judge
decisionmaker
high
constitutionally
tolerable
withrow
place
present
case
proper
context
two
instances
required
recusal
merit
discussion
first
involved
emergence
local
tribunals
judge
financial
interest
outcome
case
although
interest
less
considered
personal
direct
common
law
problem
addressed
tumey
mayor
village
authority
sit
judge
jury
try
accused
violating
state
law
prohibiting
possession
alcoholic
beverages
inherent
structure
two
potential
conflicts
first
mayor
received
salary
supplement
performing
judicial
duties
funds
compensation
derived
fines
assessed
case
fines
assessed
upon
acquittal
thus
received
salary
supplement
convicted
defendant
second
sums
criminal
fines
deposited
village
general
treasury
fund
village
improvements
repairs
held
due
process
clause
required
disqualification
direct
pecuniary
interest
outcome
official
motive
convict
graduate
fine
help
financial
needs
village
held
despite
observing
doubtless
mayors
allow
consideration
costs
case
affect
judgment
articulated
controlling
principle
every
procedure
offer
possible
temptation
average
man
judge
forget
burden
proof
required
convict
defendant
might
lead
hold
balance
nice
clear
true
state
accused
denies
latter
due
process
law
ibid
thus
concerned
traditional
prohibition
direct
pecuniary
interest
also
concerned
general
concept
interests
tempt
adjudicators
disregard
neutrality
concern
conflicts
resulting
financial
incentives
elaborated
ward
monroeville
invalidated
conviction
another
mayor
monroeville
unlike
tumey
mayor
received
money
instead
fines
mayor
assessed
went
town
general
fisc
held
fact
mayor
tumey
shared
directly
fees
costs
define
limits
principle
principle
instead
turned
mayor
might
face
mayor
executive
responsibilities
village
finances
may
make
partisan
maintain
high
level
contribution
finances
mayor
ibid
reiterated
another
case
term
judge
financial
stake
need
direct
positive
appeared
tumey
gibson
berryhill
administrative
board
composed
optometrists
pecuniary
interest
sufficient
substance
preside
hearing
competing
optometrists
lavoie
clarified
reach
due
process
clause
regarding
judge
financial
interest
case
justice
cast
deciding
vote
alabama
uphold
punitive
damages
award
insurance
company
refusal
pay
claim
time
vote
justice
lead
plaintiff
nearly
identical
lawsuit
pending
alabama
lower
courts
deciding
vote
surmised
undoubtedly
insurance
defendant
justice
suit
stressed
required
decide
whether
fact
justice
influenced
proper
constitutional
inquiry
whether
sitting
case
alabama
offer
possible
temptation
average
judge
lead
hold
balance
nice
clear
true
ibid
quoting
monroeville
supra
turn
quoting
tumey
supra
underscored
degree
kind
interest
sufficient
disqualify
judge
sitting
defined
precision
quoting
murchison
view
however
important
test
objective
component
lavoie
proceeded
distinguish
state
justice
particular
interest
case
required
recusal
interests
constitutional
concern
instance
justices
might
conceivably
slight
pecuniary
interest
due
potential
membership
suit
insurance
companies
interest
remote
insubstantial
violate
constitutional
constraints
quoting
marshall
jerrico
second
instance
requiring
recusal
discussed
common
law
emerged
criminal
contempt
context
judge
pecuniary
interest
case
challenged
conflict
arising
participation
earlier
proceeding
characterized
first
proceeding
perhaps
pejoratively
grand
jury
murchison
first
proceeding
provided
state
law
judge
examined
witnesses
determine
whether
criminal
charges
brought
judge
called
two
petitioners
one
petitioner
answered
questions
judge
found
untruthful
charged
perjury
second
declined
answer
ground
counsel
state
law
seemed
permit
judge
charged
contempt
judge
proceeded
try
convict
petitioners
set
aside
convictions
grounds
judge
conflict
interest
trial
stage
earlier
participation
followed
decision
charge
due
process
clause
required
disqualification
recited
general
rule
man
judge
case
adding
man
permitted
try
cases
interest
outcome
noted
disqualifying
criteria
defined
precision
circumstances
relationships
must
considered
ibid
circumstances
prior
relationship
required
recusal
part
grand
jury
process
judge
nature
things
wholly
disinterested
conviction
acquittal
accused
practical
matter
difficult
impossible
judge
free
influence
took
place
secret
session
murchison
careful
distinguish
circumstances
relationship
constitution
require
recusal
noted
grand
jury
part
accusatory
process
ordinary
lay
grand
juror
adjudication
trial
judge
contempt
committed
judge
presence
open
likened
proceedings
judge
prior
relationship
defendant
well
information
acquired
prior
proceeding
critical
import
following
murchison
held
mayberry
pennsylvania
reason
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
defendant
criminal
contempt
proceedings
given
public
trial
judge
one
reviled
contemnor
reiterated
rule
rests
relationship
judge
defendant
judge
vilified
pennsylvania
judge
necessarily
becomes
embroiled
running
bitter
controversy
one
cruelly
slandered
likely
maintain
calm
detachment
necessary
fair
adjudication
considered
specific
circumstances
presented
case
noted
every
attack
judge
disqualifies
sitting
ibid
distinguished
case
ungar
sarafite
ruled
lawyer
challenge
though
recalcitrant
disagreeable
commentary
still
insulting
attack
upon
integrity
judge
carrying
potential
bias
require
disqualification
mayberry
supra
quoting
ungar
supra
inquiry
objective
one
asks
whether
judge
actually
subjectively
biased
whether
average
judge
position
likely
neutral
whether
unconstitutional
potential
bias
iii
based
principles
described
cases
turn
issue
us
problem
arises
context
judicial
elections
framework
presented
precedents
reviewed
discussed
caperton
contends
blankenship
pivotal
role
getting
justice
benjamin
elected
created
constitutionally
intolerable
probability
actual
bias
though
bribe
criminal
influence
justice
benjamin
nevertheless
feel
debt
gratitude
blankenship
extraordinary
efforts
get
elected
temptation
caperton
claims
strong
inherent
human
nature
conflict
confronted
tumey
monroeville
city
benefited
financially
defendant
conviction
well
conflict
identified
murchison
mayberry
judge
object
defendant
contempt
justice
benjamin
careful
address
recusal
motions
explain
reasons
view
controlling
standard
disqualification
order
four
separate
opinions
issued
course
appeal
explained
actual
bias
established
found
basis
recusal
caperton
failed
provide
objective
evidence
objective
information
merely
subjective
belief
bias
app
anyone
point
actual
conduct
activity
part
termed
app
words
based
facts
presented
caperton
justice
benjamin
conducted
probing
search
actual
motives
inclinations
found
none
improper
question
subjective
findings
impartiality
propriety
determine
whether
actual
bias
following
accepted
principles
legal
tradition
respecting
proper
performance
judicial
functions
judges
often
inquire
subjective
motives
purposes
ordinary
course
deciding
case
mean
inquiry
simple
one
work
deciding
cases
goes
every
day
hundreds
courts
throughout
land
judge
one
might
suppose
find
easy
describe
process
followed
thousand
times
nothing
farther
truth
cardozo
nature
judicial
process
judge
inquires
reasons
seem
leading
particular
result
precedent
stare
decisis
text
purpose
law
constitution
logic
scholarship
experience
common
sense
fairness
disinterest
neutrality
among
factors
work
bring
coherence
process
seek
respect
resulting
judgment
judges
often
explain
reasons
conclusions
rulings
instances
introspection
often
attends
process
may
reveal
judge
assumed
proper
controlling
factor
real
one
work
judge
discovers
personal
bias
improper
consideration
seems
actuating
cause
decision
influence
difficult
dispel
real
possibility
undermining
neutrality
judge
may
think
necessary
consider
withdrawing
case
difficulties
inquiring
actual
bias
fact
inquiry
often
private
one
simply
underscore
need
objective
rules
otherwise
may
adequate
protection
judge
simply
misreads
misapprehends
real
motives
work
deciding
case
judge
inquiry
actual
bias
one
law
easily
superintend
review
though
actual
bias
disclosed
doubt
grounds
appropriate
relief
lieu
exclusive
reliance
personal
inquiry
appellate
review
judge
determination
respecting
actual
bias
due
process
clause
implemented
objective
standards
require
proof
actual
bias
see
tumey
mayberry
lavoie
defining
standards
asked
whether
realistic
appraisal
psychological
tendencies
human
weakness
interest
poses
risk
actual
bias
prejudgment
practice
must
forbidden
guarantee
due
process
adequately
implemented
withrow
turn
influence
issue
case
every
campaign
contribution
litigant
attorney
creates
probability
bias
requires
judge
recusal
exceptional
case
cf
mayberry
supra
course
every
attack
judge
disqualifies
sitting
lavoie
supra
pecuniary
interests
remote
conclude
serious
risk
actual
bias
based
objective
reasonable
perceptions
person
personal
stake
particular
case
significant
disproportionate
influence
placing
judge
case
raising
funds
directing
judge
election
campaign
case
pending
imminent
inquiry
centers
contribution
relative
size
comparison
total
amount
money
contributed
campaign
total
amount
spent
election
apparent
effect
contribution
outcome
election
applying
principle
conclude
blankenship
campaign
efforts
significant
disproportionate
influence
placing
justice
benjamin
case
blankenship
contributed
million
unseat
incumbent
replace
benjamin
contributions
eclipsed
total
amount
spent
benjamin
supporters
exceeded
amount
spent
benjamin
campaign
committee
app
caperton
claims
blankenship
spent
million
total
amount
spent
campaign
committees
candidates
combined
brief
petitioners
massey
responds
blankenship
support
significant
cause
benjamin
victory
end
people
west
virginia
elected
based
many
reasons
blankenship
efforts
massey
points
every
major
state
newspaper
one
endorsed
benjamin
brief
respondents
also
contends
mcgraw
cost
election
giving
speech
campaign
speech
opposition
seized
upon
advantage
ibid
justice
benjamin
raised
similar
arguments
asserted
outcome
election
due
primarily
campaign
message
well
mcgraw
devastat
ing
speech
made
number
controversial
claims
became
matter
statewide
discussion
media
internet
elsewhere
app
see
also
nn
nn
app
nn
whether
blankenship
campaign
contributions
necessary
sufficient
cause
benjamin
victory
proper
inquiry
much
like
determining
whether
judge
actually
biased
proving
ultimately
drives
electorate
choose
particular
candidate
difficult
endeavor
likely
lend
certain
conclusion
particularly
true
procedure
judicial
factfinding
sole
trier
fact
one
accused
bias
due
process
requires
objective
inquiry
whether
contributor
influence
election
circumstances
offer
possible
temptation
average
judge
lead
hold
balance
nice
clear
true
tumey
supra
election
decided
fewer
votes
see
app
blankenship
campaign
contributions
comparison
total
amount
contributed
campaign
well
total
amount
spent
election
significant
disproportionate
influence
electoral
outcome
risk
blankenship
influence
engendered
actual
bias
sufficiently
substantial
must
forbidden
guarantee
due
process
adequately
implemented
withrow
supra
temporal
relationship
campaign
contributions
justice
election
pendency
case
also
critical
reasonably
foreseeable
campaign
contributions
made
pending
case
newly
elected
justice
million
adverse
jury
verdict
entered
election
appeals
next
step
state
trial
dealt
motions
became
apparent
absent
recusal
justice
benjamin
review
judgment
cost
biggest
donor
company
million
although
allegation
quid
pro
quo
agreement
fact
remains
blankenship
extraordinary
contributions
made
time
vested
stake
outcome
man
allowed
judge
cause
similar
fears
bias
arise
without
consent
parties
man
chooses
judge
cause
applying
principle
judicial
election
process
serious
objective
risk
actual
bias
required
justice
benjamin
recusal
justice
benjamin
undertake
extensive
search
actual
bias
indicated
one
step
judicial
process
objective
standards
may
also
require
recusal
whether
actual
bias
exists
proved
due
process
may
sometimes
bar
trial
judges
actual
bias
best
weigh
scales
justice
equally
contending
parties
murchison
failure
consider
objective
standards
requiring
recusal
consistent
imperatives
due
process
find
blankenship
significant
disproportionate
influence
coupled
temporal
relationship
election
pending
case
offer
possible
temptation
average
judge
lead
hold
balance
nice
clear
true
lavoie
quoting
monroeville
turn
quoting
tumey
extreme
facts
probability
actual
bias
rises
unconstitutional
level
iv
decision
today
addresses
extraordinary
situation
constitution
requires
recusal
massey
amici
predict
various
adverse
consequences
follow
recognizing
constitutional
violation
ranging
flood
recusal
motions
unnecessary
interference
judicial
elections
disagree
facts
us
extreme
measure
parties
point
instance
involving
judicial
campaign
contributions
presents
potential
bias
comparable
circumstances
case
true
extreme
cases
often
test
bounds
established
legal
principles
sometimes
administrable
standard
may
available
address
perceived
wrong
also
true
extreme
cases
likely
cross
constitutional
limits
requiring
intervention
formulation
objective
standards
particularly
true
due
process
violated
see
county
sacramento
lewis
reiterating
prohibition
executive
abuse
power
shocks
conscience
kennedy
concurring
explaining
objective
considerations
including
history
precedent
controlling
principle
due
process
standard
recusal
cases
illustrative
case
dealt
extreme
facts
created
unconstitutional
probability
bias
defined
precision
lavoie
quoting
murchison
yet
articulated
objective
standard
protect
parties
basic
right
fair
trial
fair
tribunal
careful
distinguish
extreme
facts
cases
interests
rise
constitutional
level
see
lavoie
supra
mayberry
murchison
supra
see
also
part
ii
supra
case
nothing
done
worth
noting
effects
lack
thereof
prior
decisions
even
though
standards
announced
cases
raised
questions
similar
might
asked
decision
today
flooded
monroeville
murchison
motions
perhaps
due
part
extreme
facts
standards
sought
address
courts
proved
quite
capable
applying
standards
less
extreme
situations
one
must
also
take
account
judicial
reforms
implemented
eliminate
even
appearance
partiality
almost
every
state
west
virginia
included
adopted
american
bar
association
objective
standard
judge
shall
avoid
impropriety
appearance
impropriety
aba
annotated
model
code
judicial
conduct
canon
see
brief
american
bar
association
amicus
curiae
aba
model
code
test
appearance
impropriety
whether
conduct
create
reasonable
minds
perception
judge
ability
carry
judicial
responsibilities
integrity
impartiality
competence
impaired
canon
commentary
see
also
code
judicial
conduct
canon
commentary
west
virginia
code
judicial
conduct
also
requires
judge
disqualify
proceeding
judge
impartiality
might
reasonably
questioned
canon
see
also
justice
judge
magistrate
judge
shall
disqualify
proceeding
impartiality
might
reasonably
questioned
canon
question
disqualification
focuses
whether
objective
assessment
judge
conduct
produces
reasonable
question
impartiality
judge
subjective
perception
ability
act
fairly
state
ex
rel
brown
dietrick
see
also
liteky
kennedy
concurring
judgment
nder
judge
disqualified
appears
harbors
aversion
hostility
disposition
kind
person
set
aside
judging
dispute
indeed
require
recusal
based
campaign
contributions
similar
case
see
code
miss
code
judicial
conduct
canon
codes
conduct
serve
maintain
integrity
judiciary
rule
law
conference
chief
justices
underscored
codes
principal
safeguard
judicial
campaign
abuses
threaten
imperil
public
confidence
fairness
integrity
nation
elected
judges
brief
conference
chief
justices
amicus
curiae
vital
state
interest
courts
system
elaborate
principles
law
course
resolving
disputes
power
prerogative
perform
function
rest
end
upon
respect
accorded
judgments
citizen
respect
judgments
depends
turn
upon
issuing
absolute
probity
judicial
integrity
consequence
state
interest
highest
order
republican
party
white
kennedy
concurring
reason
may
choose
adopt
recusal
standards
rigorous
due
process
requires
see
also
bracy
gramley
distinguishing
constitutional
floor
ceiling
set
common
law
statute
professional
standards
bench
bar
due
process
clause
demarks
outer
boundaries
judicial
disqualifications
congress
course
remain
free
impose
rigorous
standards
judicial
disqualification
find
mandated
today
lavoie
supra
codes
judicial
conduct
provide
protection
due
process
requires
disputes
disqualification
resolved
without
resort
constitution
application
constitutional
standard
implicated
case
thus
confined
rare
instances
judgment
appeals
west
virginia
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
hugh
caperton
et
petitioners
massey
coal
company
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
west
virginia
june
chief
justice
roberts
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
justice
alito
join
dissenting
course
share
majority
sincere
concerns
need
maintain
fair
independent
impartial
judiciary
one
appears
fear
decision
undermine
rather
promote
values
today
recognized
exactly
two
situations
federal
due
process
clause
requires
disqualification
judge
judge
financial
interest
outcome
case
judge
trying
defendant
certain
criminal
contempts
vaguer
notions
bias
appearance
bias
never
basis
disqualification
either
common
law
constitutional
precedents
issues
instead
addressed
legislation
rules
today
however
enlists
due
process
clause
overturn
judge
failure
recuse
probability
bias
unlike
established
grounds
disqualification
probability
bias
defined
limited
way
new
rule
provides
guidance
judges
litigants
recusal
constitutionally
required
inevitably
lead
increase
allegations
judges
biased
however
groundless
charges
may
end
result
far
erode
public
confidence
judicial
impartiality
isolated
failure
recuse
particular
case
presumption
honesty
integrity
serving
adjudicators
withrow
larkin
judges
take
oath
uphold
constitution
apply
law
impartially
trust
live
promise
see
republican
party
white
kennedy
concurring
even
inadvertence
judges
lack
firmness
wisdom
quoting
bridges
california
thus
identified
two
situations
due
process
clause
requires
disqualification
judge
judge
financial
interest
outcome
case
judge
presiding
certain
types
criminal
contempt
proceedings
well
established
judge
may
preside
case
direct
personal
substantial
pecuniary
interest
tumey
ohio
principle
relatively
straightforward
largely
tracks
longstanding
rule
regarding
judicial
recusal
see
frank
disqualification
judges
yale
common
law
disqualification
clear
simple
judge
disqualified
direct
pecuniary
interest
nothing
else
example
defendant
due
process
rights
violated
tried
judge
paid
service
convicts
defendant
tumey
supra
see
also
aetna
life
ins
lavoie
recusal
required
judge
decision
related
case
clear
immediate
effect
enhancing
legal
status
settlement
value
case
connally
georgia
per
curiam
may
also
violate
due
process
judge
presides
criminal
contempt
case
resulted
defendant
hostility
towards
judge
mayberry
pennsylvania
defendant
directed
steady
stream
expletives
ad
hominem
attacks
judge
throughout
trial
defendant
subsequently
charged
criminal
contempt
concluded
given
public
trial
judge
one
reviled
contemnor
see
also
taylor
hayes
judge
become
embroiled
running
controversy
defendant
subsequently
preside
defendant
criminal
contempt
trial
decisions
area
also
emphasized
due
process
clause
require
recusal
questions
judicial
qualification
may
involve
constitutional
validity
thus
matters
kinship
personal
bias
state
policy
remoteness
interest
seem
generally
matters
merely
legislative
discretion
tumey
supra
see
also
lavoie
supra
subject
two
exceptions
described
questions
judicial
recusal
regulated
common
law
statute
professional
standards
bench
bar
bracy
gramley
given
case
number
factors
give
rise
probability
appearance
bias
friendship
party
lawyer
prior
employment
experience
membership
clubs
associations
prior
speeches
writings
religious
affiliation
countless
considerations
never
held
due
process
clause
requires
recusal
reasons
even
though
viewed
presenting
probability
bias
many
state
statutes
require
recusal
based
probability
appearance
bias
alone
sufficient
basis
imposing
constitutional
requirement
due
process
clause
lavoie
supra
emphasis
added
course
free
adopt
broader
recusal
rules
constitution
requires
every
state
developments
continuously
incorporated
due
process
clause
ii
departing
clear
line
recusal
constitutionally
required
majority
repeatedly
emphasizes
need
objective
standard
ante
majority
analysis
objective
inquire
justice
benjamin
motives
decisionmaking
process
standard
majority
articulates
probability
bias
fails
provide
clear
workable
guidance
future
cases
basic
level
unclear
whether
new
probability
bias
standard
somehow
limited
financial
support
judicial
elections
applies
judicial
recusal
questions
generally
fundamental
questions
well
little
help
majority
courts
determine
much
money
much
money
level
contribution
expenditure
gives
rise
probability
bias
determine
whether
given
expenditure
disproportionate
disproportionate
independent
expenditures
treated
direct
contributions
candidate
campaign
contributions
independent
outside
groups
supporting
candidate
matter
whether
litigant
contributed
candidates
made
large
expenditures
connection
elections
amount
issue
case
matter
case
employment
dispute
stake
plaintiffs
sought
relief
injunction
declaratory
judgment
analysis
change
depending
whether
judge
whose
disqualification
sought
sits
trial
appeals
state
long
probability
bias
last
probability
bias
diminish
time
election
recedes
matter
whether
judge
plans
run
reelection
disproportionately
large
expenditure
made
industry
association
trade
union
physicians
group
plaintiffs
bar
must
judge
recuse
cases
affect
association
interests
must
judge
recuse
cases
party
lawyer
member
group
matter
much
litigant
contributed
association
case
involves
social
ideological
issue
rather
financial
one
must
judge
recuse
cases
involving
say
abortion
rights
received
disproportionate
support
individuals
feel
strongly
either
side
issue
supporter
wants
help
elect
judges
tough
crime
must
judge
recuse
criminal
cases
candidate
draws
disproportionate
support
particular
racial
religious
ethnic
group
case
involves
issue
particular
importance
group
supporter
party
pending
imminent
case
interests
affected
decision
analysis
apply
supporter
chooses
judge
case
someone
else
case
implicates
regulatory
issue
great
importance
party
making
expenditures
even
though
direct
financial
interest
outcome
facial
challenge
agency
rulemaking
suit
seeking
limit
agency
jurisdiction
must
judge
vote
outcome
determinative
order
constitute
due
process
violation
due
process
analysis
consider
underlying
merits
suit
matter
whether
decision
clearly
right
wrong
matter
state
law
lower
decision
favor
supporter
affirmed
merits
appeal
panel
debt
gratitude
supporter
moot
due
process
claim
judge
voted
supporter
many
cases
judge
disagrees
supporter
message
tactics
judge
expressly
disclaims
support
person
assume
elected
judges
feel
debt
hostility
towards
major
opponents
candidacies
must
judge
recuse
cases
involving
individuals
groups
spent
large
amounts
money
trying
unsuccessfully
defeat
independent
review
judge
recusal
decision
panel
judges
completely
foreclose
due
process
claim
debt
gratitude
endorsements
newspapers
interest
groups
politicians
celebrities
also
give
rise
constitutionally
unacceptable
probability
bias
measure
whether
support
disproportionate
close
personal
friendship
judge
party
lawyer
give
rise
probability
bias
matter
whether
campaign
expenditures
come
party
party
attorney
lawyer
must
judge
recuse
every
case
involving
attorney
unconstitutional
vary
state
state
particular
history
expensive
judicial
elections
majority
objective
test
analyze
due
process
issue
lens
reasonable
person
reasonable
lawyer
reasonable
judge
role
causation
play
analysis
sends
conflicting
signals
point
majority
asserts
hether
blankenship
campaign
contributions
necessary
sufficient
cause
benjamin
victory
proper
inquiry
ante
elsewhere
opinion
majority
considers
apparent
effect
contribution
outcome
election
ante
whether
litigant
able
choos
judge
cause
ante
causation
pertinent
factor
know
whether
contribution
expenditure
effect
outcome
election
judge
landslide
judge
primarily
opponent
missteps
due
process
analysis
less
probing
incumbent
judges
typically
great
advantage
elections
challengers
final
must
pending
case
respect
contributor
interest
example
issue
appeal
whether
certify
class
plaintiffs
recusal
required
issue
pending
case
ultimate
liability
cases
implicated
doctrine
must
case
pending
time
election
reasonably
likely
brought
important
unanticipated
case
filed
shortly
election
impute
probability
bias
one
party
another
contribution
corporation
get
imputed
executives
contribution
expenditure
one
family
member
get
imputed
family
members
election
nonpartisan
election
vote
whether
retain
incumbent
type
support
disqualifying
supporter
expenditures
used
fund
voter
registration
efforts
rather
television
advertisements
contributions
expenditures
connection
primary
aggregated
general
election
contributor
supported
different
candidate
primary
dilute
debt
gratitude
procedures
must
followed
challenge
state
judge
failure
recuse
may
caperton
claims
raised
direct
review
may
claims
also
brought
federal
district
allows
person
deprived
federal
right
state
official
sue
damages
claims
available
proper
defendants
judge
whole
clerk
cases
already
closed
losing
parties
cases
seek
collateral
relief
federal
district
statutes
limitation
applied
suits
proper
remedy
successful
caperton
motion
must
parties
start
scratch
lower
courts
part
lower
judgment
retained
litigant
waive
due
process
claim
waits
decision
raise
claim
ripe
decision
judge
actions
vote
suggest
probability
bias
parties
entitled
discovery
respect
judge
recusal
decision
judge
erroneously
fails
recuse
apply
review
judge
get
respond
allegation
probably
biased
reputation
solely
hands
parties
case
parties
settle
caperton
claim
part
broader
settlement
case
leave
judge
way
salvage
reputation
uncertainties
quickly
come
mind
judges
litigants
surely
encounter
others
forced
wish
apply
majority
decision
different
circumstances
today
opinion
requires
state
federal
judges
simultaneously
act
political
scientists
candidate
win
election
economists
financial
support
disproportionate
psychologists
likely
debt
gratitude
inability
formulate
judicially
discernible
manageable
standard
strongly
counsels
recognition
novel
constitutional
right
see
vieth
jubelirer
plurality
opinion
holding
political
gerrymandering
claims
nonjusticiable
based
lack
workable
standards
kennedy
concurring
judgment
failings
many
proposed
standards
measuring
burden
gerrymander
imposes
make
intervention
improper
need
consider
countless
questions
helps
explain
common
law
constitutional
jurisprudence
never
required
disqualification
vague
grounds
probability
appearance
bias
iii
credit
seems
recognize
inherently
boundless
nature
new
rule
poses
problem
majority
answer
present
case
extreme
one
need
worry
cases
ante
repeats
point
see
ante
exceptional
case
ante
extreme
facts
ibid
decision
today
addresses
extraordinary
situation
ante
facts
us
extreme
measure
ante
rule
confined
rare
instances
much
whistling
past
graveyard
claims
little
chance
success
nonetheless
frequently
filed
success
rate
certiorari
petitions
approximately
yet
previous
term
filed
every
one
caperton
motions
appeals
actions
claim
judge
biased
probably
biased
bringing
judge
judicial
system
disrepute
future
litigants
assert
case
really
extreme
thus
far
extreme
cases
often
test
bounds
established
legal
principles
cost
yielding
desire
correct
extreme
case
rather
adhering
legal
principle
cost
demonstrated
often
captured
legal
aphorism
hard
cases
make
bad
law
consider
cautionary
tale
decisions
halper
hudson
historically
held
double
jeopardy
clause
applies
criminal
penalties
civil
ones
see
helvering
mitchell
halper
held
civil
penalty
violate
clause
overwhelmingly
disproportionate
damages
defendant
caused
resulted
clear
injustice
acknowledged
inquiry
exact
pursuit
assured
litigants
announcing
rule
rare
case
case
one
us
see
also
kennedy
concurring
today
holding
stress
constitutes
objective
rule
grounded
nature
sanction
facts
particular
case
eight
years
later
granted
certiorari
hudson
concerns
wide
variety
novel
double
jeopardy
claims
spawned
wake
halper
see
also
novel
claim
recognized
halper
turned
rare
test
adopted
case
overwhelmingly
disproportionate
proved
unworkable
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
thus
abandoned
halper
rule
ruing
ill
considered
deviation
longstanding
double
jeopardy
principles
déjà
vu
enough
make
one
swoon
today
majority
departs
clear
longstanding
constitutional
rule
accommodate
extreme
case
involving
grossly
disproportionate
amounts
money
believe
come
regret
decision
well
courts
forced
deal
wide
variety
caperton
motions
claiming
title
extreme
disproportionate
convinced
extreme
case
true
blankenship
spent
large
amount
money
connection
election
point
emphasized
strongly
enough
direct
contribution
blankenship
justice
benjamin
campaign
control
money
spent
campaigns
go
great
lengths
develop
precise
messages
strategies
insensitive
ad
campaign
independent
third
party
might
distort
campaign
message
cause
backlash
candidate
even
though
candidate
responsible
ads
see
buckley
valeo
per
curiam
unlike
contributions
independent
expenditures
may
well
provide
little
assistance
candidate
campaign
indeed
may
prove
counterproductive
see
also
brief
conference
chief
justices
amicus
curiae
citing
examples
judicial
elections
independent
expenditures
backfired
hurt
candidate
campaign
majority
repeatedly
characterizes
blankenship
spending
contributions
campaign
contributions
ante
accurate
refer
independent
expenditures
blankenship
contributed
benjamin
campaign
moreover
blankenship
independent
expenditures
appear
grossly
disproportionate
compared
expenditures
election
sake
kids
independent
group
received
approximately
funding
blankenship
spent
connection
election
app
large
independent
expenditures
also
made
support
justice
benjamin
opponent
consumers
justice
independent
group
received
large
contributions
plaintiffs
bar
spent
approximately
million
race
blankenship
made
large
expenditures
connection
several
previous
west
virginia
elections
undercuts
notion
involvement
election
intended
influence
outcome
particular
pending
litigation
brief
petitioners
also
far
clear
blankenship
expenditures
affected
outcome
election
justice
benjamin
comfortable
margin
many
observers
believed
justice
benjamin
opponent
doomed
candidacy
giving
speech
made
several
curious
allegations
speech
described
local
media
deeply
disturbing
worse
app
justice
benjamin
opponent
also
refused
give
interviews
participate
debates
one
major
west
virginia
newspapers
endorsed
justice
benjamin
justice
benjamin
might
voters
west
virginia
thought
better
judge
opponent
unlike
majority
say
degree
certainty
blankenship
cho
se
judge
cause
ante
give
voters
west
virginia
credit
old
cliché
sometimes
cure
worse
disease
sure
cases
probability
bias
lead
prudent
judge
step
aside
judge
fails
maybe
one
believe
opening
door
recusal
claims
due
process
clause
amorphous
probability
bias
bring
judicial
system
undeserved
disrepute
diminish
confidence
american
people
fairness
integrity
courts
hope
wrong
respectfully
dissent
hugh
caperton
et
petitioners
massey
coal
company
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
west
virginia
june
justice
scalia
dissenting
principal
purpose
exercise
certiorari
jurisdiction
clarify
law
see
rule
chief
justice
dissent
makes
painfully
clear
principal
consequence
today
decision
create
vast
uncertainty
respect
point
law
raised
litigated
cases
least
elect
judges
course
urged
upon
us
grounds
preserve
public
confidence
judicial
system
brief
petitioners
decision
opposite
effect
else
eroding
public
confidence
nation
judicial
system
perception
litigation
game
party
resourceful
lawyer
play
win
seemingly
interminable
legal
proceedings
wonderfully
incapable
delivering
justice
opinion
reinforce
perception
adding
vast
arsenal
lawyerly
gambits
come
known
caperton
claim
facts
relevant
adjudicating
litigated
likewise
law
governing
indeterminate
years
come
forever
many
billable
hours
spent
poring
volumes
campaign
finance
reports
many
contesting
nonrecusal
decisions
every
available
means
talmudic
maxim
instructs
respect
scripture
turn
turn
therein
babylonian
talmud
tractate
aboth
ch
mishnah
epstein
ed
divinely
inspired
text
may
contain
answers
earthly
questions
due
process
clause
assuredly
today
continues
quixotic
quest
right
wrongs
repair
imperfections
constitution
alas
quest
succeed
wrongs
imperfections
called
nonjusticiable
best
possible
worlds
judges
sometimes
recuse
even
clear
commands
prior
due
process
law
require
undoubtedly
relevant
question
however
whether
good
harm
seeking
correct
imperfection
expansion
constitutional
mandate
manner
ungoverned
discernable
rule
answer
obvious