district
argued
february
decided
june
charged
three
defendants
conspiring
destroy
one
destroying
government
property
response
defendants
pretrial
motion
disclosure
electronic
surveillance
information
government
filed
affidavit
attorney
general
stating
approved
wiretaps
purpose
gather
ing
intelligence
information
deemed
necessary
protect
nation
attempts
domestic
organizations
attack
subvert
existing
structure
government
basis
affidavit
surveillance
logs
filed
sealed
exhibit
government
claimed
surveillances
though
warrantless
lawful
reasonable
exercise
presidential
power
protect
national
security
district
holding
surveillances
violative
fourth
amendment
issued
order
disclosure
overheard
conversations
appeals
upheld
title
iii
omnibus
crime
control
safe
streets
act
authorizes
electronic
surveillance
specified
crimes
contains
provision
nothing
law
limits
president
constitutional
power
protect
overthrow
government
clear
present
danger
structure
existence
government
government
relies
support
contention
excepting
national
security
surveillances
act
warrant
requirement
congress
recognized
president
authority
conduct
surveillances
without
prior
judicial
approval
held
section
merely
disclaimer
congressional
intent
define
presidential
powers
matters
affecting
national
security
grant
authority
conduct
warrantless
national
security
surveillances
pp
fourth
amendment
shields
private
speech
unreasonable
surveillance
requires
prior
judicial
approval
type
domestic
security
surveillance
involved
case
pp
government
duty
safeguard
domestic
security
must
weighed
potential
danger
unreasonable
surveillances
pose
individual
privacy
free
expression
pp
freedoms
fourth
amendment
properly
guaranteed
domestic
security
surveillances
conducted
solely
within
discretion
executive
branch
without
detached
judgment
neutral
magistrate
pp
resort
appropriate
warrant
procedure
frustrate
legitimate
purposes
domestic
security
searches
pp
powell
delivered
opinion
douglas
brennan
marshall
stewart
blackmun
joined
douglas
filed
concurring
opinion
post
burger
concurred
result
white
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
post
rehnquist
took
part
consideration
decision
case
assistant
attorney
general
mardian
argued
cause
briefs
solicitor
general
griswold
robert
keuch
william
gossett
argued
cause
respondents
district
eastern
district
michigan
et
al
brief
abraham
sofaer
arthur
kinoy
argued
cause
respondents
sinclair
et
al
brief
william
bender
william
kunstler
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
stephen
schlossberg
international
union
automobile
aerospace
agricultural
implement
workers
america
uaw
benjamin
dreyfus
black
panther
party
et
al
briefs
amici
curiae
filed
herman
schwartz
melvin
wulf
erwin
ellmann
american
civil
liberties
union
et
al
john
ligtenberg
american
federation
teachers
american
friends
service
committee
justice
powell
delivered
opinion
issue
us
important
one
people
country
government
involves
delicate
question
president
power
acting
attorney
general
authorize
electronic
surveillance
internal
security
matters
without
prior
judicial
approval
successive
presidents
century
authorized
surveillance
varying
degrees
without
guidance
congress
definitive
decision
case
brings
issue
first
time
resolution
matter
national
concern
requiring
sensitivity
government
right
protect
unlawful
subversion
attack
citizen
right
secure
privacy
unreasonable
government
intrusion
case
arises
criminal
proceeding
district
eastern
district
michigan
charged
three
defendants
conspiracy
destroy
government
property
violation
one
defendants
plamondon
charged
dynamite
bombing
office
central
intelligence
agency
ann
arbor
michigan
pretrial
proceedings
defendants
moved
compel
disclose
certain
electronic
surveillance
information
conduct
hearing
determine
whether
information
tainted
evidence
indictment
based
government
intended
offer
trial
response
government
filed
affidavit
attorney
general
acknowledging
agents
overheard
conversations
plamondon
participated
affidavit
also
stated
attorney
general
approved
wiretaps
gather
intelligence
information
deemed
necessary
protect
nation
attempts
domestic
organizations
attack
subvert
existing
structure
government
logs
surveillance
filed
sealed
exhibit
camera
inspection
district
basis
attorney
general
affidavit
sealed
exhibit
government
asserted
surveillance
lawful
though
conducted
without
prior
judicial
approval
reasonable
exercise
president
power
exercised
attorney
general
protect
national
security
district
held
surveillance
violated
fourth
amendment
ordered
government
make
full
disclosure
plamondon
overheard
conversations
supp
ed
government
filed
appeals
sixth
circuit
petition
writ
mandamus
set
aside
district
order
stayed
pending
final
disposition
case
concluding
jurisdiction
held
surveillance
unlawful
district
properly
required
disclosure
overheard
conversations
granted
certiorari
title
iii
omnibus
crime
control
safe
streets
act
authorizes
use
electronic
surveillance
classes
crimes
carefully
specified
surveillance
subject
prior
order
section
sets
forth
detailed
particularized
application
necessary
obtain
order
well
carefully
circumscribed
conditions
use
act
represents
comprehensive
attempt
congress
promote
effective
control
crime
protecting
privacy
individual
thought
expression
much
title
iii
drawn
meet
constitutional
requirements
electronic
surveillance
enunciated
berger
new
york
katz
together
elaborate
surveillance
requirements
title
iii
following
proviso
nothing
contained
chapter
section
communications
act
stat
shall
limit
constitutional
power
president
take
measures
deems
necessary
protect
nation
actual
potential
attack
hostile
acts
foreign
power
obtain
foreign
intelligence
information
deemed
essential
security
protect
national
security
information
foreign
intelligence
activities
shall
anything
contained
chapter
deemed
limit
constitutional
power
president
take
measures
deems
necessary
protect
overthrow
government
force
unlawful
means
clear
present
danger
structure
existence
government
contents
wire
oral
communication
intercepted
authority
president
exercise
foregoing
powers
may
received
evidence
trial
hearing
proceeding
interception
reasonable
shall
otherwise
used
disclosed
except
necessary
implement
power
emphasis
supplied
think
language
well
legislative
history
statute
refutes
interpretation
relevant
language
nothing
contained
chapter
shall
limit
constitutional
power
president
take
measures
deems
necessary
protect
section
certainly
confers
power
language
wholly
inappropriate
purpose
merely
provides
act
shall
interpreted
limit
disturb
power
president
may
constitution
short
congress
simply
left
presidential
powers
found
view
reinforced
general
context
title
iii
section
broadly
prohibits
use
electronic
surveillance
xcept
otherwise
specifically
provided
chapter
subsection
thereof
contains
four
specific
exceptions
specified
exceptions
statutory
language
follows
shall
unlawful
intercept
particular
type
communication
described
express
grant
authority
conduct
surveillances
found
authorizes
attorney
general
make
application
federal
judge
surveillance
may
provide
evidence
certain
offenses
offenses
described
meticulous
care
specificity
act
authorizes
surveillance
procedure
followed
specified
subsection
thereof
requires
application
judge
competent
jurisdiction
prior
order
approval
detail
information
required
application
subsection
prescribes
necessary
elements
probable
cause
judge
must
find
issuing
order
authorizing
interception
subsection
sets
forth
required
contents
order
subsection
sets
strict
time
limits
order
provision
made
subsection
emergency
situation
found
exist
attorney
general
principal
prosecuting
attorney
state
respect
conspiratorial
activities
threatening
national
security
interest
situation
emergency
surveillance
may
conducted
application
order
approving
interception
made
within
hours
order
obtained
application
therefore
denied
interception
deemed
violation
act
view
interrelated
provisions
delineating
permissible
interceptions
particular
criminal
activity
upon
carefully
specified
conditions
incongruous
congress
legislated
respect
important
complex
area
national
security
single
brief
nebulous
paragraph
comport
sensitivity
problem
involved
extraordinary
care
congress
exercised
drafting
sections
act
therefore
think
conclusion
inescapable
congress
intended
make
clear
act
simply
legislate
respect
national
security
surveillances
legislative
history
supports
interpretation
relevant
colloquy
senators
hart
holland
mcclellan
senate
floor
holland
section
senator
hart
read
affirmatively
give
power
affirmatively
conferring
power
upon
president
simply
saying
nothing
herein
shall
limit
power
president
constitution
certainly
grant
thing
nothing
affirmative
statement
mcclellan
president
make
understood
trying
take
anything
away
holland
senator
correct
hart
president
intention
expand
language
constitutional
power
clearly
mcclellan
even
though
intended
hart
however
agreed
language
regarded
intending
grant
authority
including
authority
put
bug
president
addition
president
think
exchange
makes
clear
nothing
section
even
attempts
define
limits
president
national
security
power
present
law
always
found
extremely
vague
section
merely
says
president
power
exercise
way
affected
title
iii
emphasis
supplied
ii
important
outset
emphasize
limited
nature
question
case
raises
constitutional
challenge
electronic
surveillance
specifically
authorized
title
iii
omnibus
crime
control
safe
streets
act
question
doubt
necessity
obtaining
warrant
surveillance
crimes
unrelated
national
security
interest
katz
berger
new
york
instant
case
requires
judgment
scope
president
surveillance
power
respect
activities
foreign
powers
within
without
country
attorney
general
affidavit
case
surveillances
deemed
necessary
protect
nation
attempts
domestic
organizations
attack
subvert
existing
structure
government
emphasis
supplied
evidence
involvement
directly
indirectly
foreign
power
present
inquiry
though
important
therefore
narrow
one
addresses
question
left
open
katz
supra
whether
safeguards
prior
authorization
magistrate
satisfy
fourth
amendment
situation
involving
national
security
begin
inquiry
noting
president
fundamental
duty
art
ii
constitution
preserve
protect
defend
constitution
implicit
duty
power
protect
government
subvert
overthrow
unlawful
means
discharge
duty
president
attorney
general
may
find
necessary
employ
electronic
surveillance
obtain
intelligence
information
plans
plot
unlawful
acts
government
use
surveillance
internal
security
cases
sanctioned
less
continuously
various
presidents
attorneys
general
since
july
herbert
brownell
attorney
general
president
eisenhower
urged
use
electronic
surveillance
internal
international
security
matters
grounds
acting
government
turn
telephone
carry
intrigue
success
plans
frequently
rests
upon
piecing
together
shreds
information
received
many
sources
many
nests
participants
conspiracy
often
dispersed
stationed
various
strategic
positions
government
industry
throughout
country
said
basic
function
government
provide
security
individual
property
miranda
arizona
white
dissenting
unless
government
safeguards
capacity
function
preserve
security
people
society
become
disordered
rights
liberties
endangered
chief
justice
hughes
reminded
us
cox
new
hampshire
civil
liberties
guaranteed
constitution
imply
existence
organized
society
maintaining
public
order
without
liberty
lost
excesses
unrestrained
abuses
national
security
cases
moreover
often
reflect
convergence
first
fourth
amendment
values
present
cases
ordinary
crime
though
investigative
duty
executive
may
stronger
cases
also
greater
jeopardy
constitutionally
protected
speech
historically
struggle
freedom
speech
press
england
bound
issue
scope
search
seizure
power
marcus
search
warrant
history
abundantly
documents
tendency
government
however
benevolent
benign
motives
view
suspicion
fervently
dispute
policies
fourth
amendment
protections
become
necessary
targets
official
surveillance
may
suspected
unorthodoxy
political
beliefs
danger
political
dissent
acute
government
attempts
act
vague
concept
power
protect
domestic
security
given
difficulty
defining
domestic
security
interest
danger
abuse
acting
protect
interest
becomes
apparent
senator
hart
addressed
dilemma
floor
debate
read
fear
saying
president
motion
declare
name
favorite
poison
draft
dodgers
black
muslims
ku
klux
klan
civil
rights
activists
clear
present
danger
structure
existence
government
iii
fourth
amendment
absolute
terms
task
examine
balance
basic
values
stake
case
duty
government
protect
domestic
security
potential
danger
posed
unreasonable
surveillance
individual
privacy
free
expression
legitimate
need
government
safeguard
domestic
security
requires
use
electronic
surveillance
question
whether
needs
citizens
privacy
free
expression
may
better
protected
requiring
warrant
surveillance
undertaken
must
also
ask
whether
warrant
requirement
unduly
frustrate
efforts
government
protect
acts
subversion
overthrow
directed
though
fourth
amendment
speaks
broadly
unreasonable
searches
seizures
definition
reasonableness
turns
least
part
specific
commands
warrant
clause
argued
relevant
test
whether
reasonable
procure
search
warrant
whether
search
reasonable
rabinowitz
view
however
overlooks
second
clause
amendment
warrant
clause
fourth
amendment
dead
language
rather
valued
part
constitutional
law
decades
determined
result
scores
scores
cases
courts
country
inconvenience
somehow
weighed
claims
police
efficiency
important
working
part
machinery
government
operating
matter
course
check
mistakenly
overzealous
executive
officers
part
system
law
enforcement
coolidge
new
hampshire
two
centuries
ago
lord
mansfield
held
principles
prohibited
warrants
ordered
arrest
unnamed
individuals
officer
might
conclude
guilty
seditious
libel
fit
said
mansfield
receiving
judging
information
left
discretion
officer
magistrate
judge
give
certain
directions
officer
leach
three
king
messengers
tr
lord
mansfield
formulation
touches
heart
fourth
amendment
directive
practical
governmental
search
seizure
represent
efforts
officer
gather
evidence
wrongful
acts
judgment
magistrate
collected
evidence
sufficient
justify
invasion
citizen
private
premises
conversation
inherent
concept
warrant
issuance
neutral
detached
magistrate
coolidge
new
hampshire
supra
katz
supra
requirement
probable
cause
instructs
magistrate
baseless
searches
shall
proceed
fourth
amendment
freedoms
properly
guaranteed
domestic
security
surveillances
may
conducted
solely
within
discretion
executive
branch
fourth
amendment
contemplate
executive
officers
government
neutral
disinterested
magistrates
duty
responsibility
enforce
laws
investigate
prosecute
katz
supra
douglas
concurring
charged
investigative
prosecutorial
duty
sole
judges
utilize
constitutionally
sensitive
means
pursuing
tasks
historical
judgment
fourth
amendment
accepts
unreviewed
executive
discretion
may
yield
readily
pressures
obtain
incriminating
evidence
overlook
potential
invasions
privacy
protected
speech
may
well
instant
case
government
surveillance
plamondon
conversations
reasonable
one
readily
gained
prior
judicial
approval
never
sustained
search
upon
sole
ground
officers
reasonably
expected
find
evidence
particular
crime
voluntarily
confined
activities
least
intrusive
means
consistent
end
katz
supra
fourth
amendment
contemplates
prior
judicial
judgment
risk
executive
discretion
may
reasonably
exercised
judicial
role
accords
basic
constitutional
doctrine
individual
freedoms
best
preserved
separation
powers
division
functions
among
different
branches
levels
government
harlan
thoughts
dedication
keeping
judicial
function
balance
independent
check
upon
executive
discretion
satisfied
government
argues
extremely
limited
judicial
review
indeed
review
never
reach
surveillances
failed
result
prosecutions
prior
review
neutral
detached
magistrate
means
effectuating
fourth
amendment
rights
beck
ohio
true
exceptions
warrant
requirement
chimel
california
terry
ohio
mcdonald
carroll
exceptions
number
carefully
delineated
katz
supra
general
serve
legitimate
needs
law
enforcement
officers
protect
preserve
evidence
destruction
even
carving
exceptions
reaffirmed
principle
police
must
whenever
practicable
obtain
advance
judicial
approval
searches
seizures
warrant
procedure
terry
ohio
supra
chimel
california
supra
government
argues
special
circumstances
applicable
domestic
security
surveillances
necessitate
exception
warrant
requirement
urged
requirement
prior
judicial
review
obstruct
president
discharge
constitutional
duty
protect
domestic
security
told
surveillances
directed
primarily
collecting
maintaining
intelligence
respect
subversive
forces
attempt
gather
evidence
specific
criminal
prosecutions
said
type
surveillance
subject
traditional
warrant
requirements
established
govern
investigation
criminal
activity
ongoing
intelligence
gathering
brief
reply
brief
government
insists
courts
practical
matter
neither
knowledge
techniques
necessary
determine
whether
probable
cause
believe
surveillance
necessary
protect
national
security
security
problems
government
contends
involve
large
number
complex
subtle
factors
beyond
competence
courts
evaluate
reply
brief
final
reason
exemption
warrant
requirement
government
believes
disclosure
magistrate
even
significant
portion
information
involved
domestic
security
surveillances
create
serious
potential
dangers
national
security
lives
informants
agents
secrecy
essential
ingredient
intelligence
gathering
requiring
prior
judicial
authorization
create
greater
danger
leaks
addition
judge
clerk
stenographer
officer
like
law
assistant
bailiff
may
apprised
nature
surveillance
brief
contentions
behalf
complete
exemption
warrant
requirement
urged
behalf
president
national
security
domestic
implications
merit
careful
consideration
certainly
reject
lightly
especially
time
worldwide
ferment
civil
disorders
country
prevalent
less
turbulent
periods
history
doubt
pragmatic
force
government
position
think
case
made
requested
departure
fourth
amendment
standards
circumstances
described
justify
complete
exemption
domestic
security
surveillance
prior
judicial
scrutiny
official
surveillance
whether
purpose
criminal
investigation
ongoing
intelligence
gathering
risks
infringement
constitutionally
protected
privacy
speech
security
surveillances
especially
sensitive
inherent
vagueness
domestic
security
concept
necessarily
broad
continuing
nature
intelligence
gathering
temptation
utilize
surveillances
oversee
political
dissent
recognize
constitutional
basis
president
domestic
security
role
think
must
exercised
manner
compatible
fourth
amendment
case
hold
requires
appropriate
prior
warrant
procedure
accept
government
argument
internal
security
matters
subtle
complex
judicial
evaluation
courts
regularly
deal
difficult
issues
society
reason
believe
federal
judges
insensitive
uncomprehending
issues
involved
domestic
security
cases
certainly
courts
recognize
domestic
security
surveillance
involves
different
considerations
surveillance
ordinary
crime
threat
subtle
complex
senior
law
enforcement
officers
convey
significance
one
may
question
whether
probable
cause
surveillance
believe
prior
judicial
approval
fracture
secrecy
essential
official
intelligence
gathering
investigation
criminal
activity
long
involved
imparting
sensitive
information
judicial
officers
respected
confidentialities
involved
judges
may
counted
upon
especially
conscious
security
requirements
national
security
cases
title
iii
omnibus
crime
control
safe
streets
act
already
imposed
responsibility
judiciary
connection
crimes
espionage
sabotage
treason
may
involve
domestic
well
foreign
security
threats
moreover
warrant
application
involves
public
adversary
proceedings
ex
parte
request
magistrate
judge
whatever
security
dangers
clerical
secretarial
personnel
may
pose
minimized
proper
administrative
measures
possibly
point
allowing
government
provide
necessary
clerical
assistance
thus
conclude
government
concerns
justify
departure
case
customary
fourth
amendment
requirement
judicial
approval
prior
initiation
search
surveillance
although
added
burden
imposed
upon
attorney
general
inconvenience
justified
free
society
protect
constitutional
values
think
government
domestic
surveillance
powers
impaired
significant
degree
prior
warrant
establishes
presumptive
validity
surveillance
minimize
burden
justification
judicial
review
means
least
importance
reassurance
public
generally
indiscriminate
wiretapping
bugging
citizens
occur
iv
emphasize
concluding
opinion
scope
decision
stated
outset
case
involves
domestic
aspects
national
security
addressed
express
opinion
issues
may
involved
respect
activities
foreign
powers
agents
decision
rest
language
section
title
iii
omnibus
crime
control
safe
streets
act
act
attempt
define
delineate
powers
president
meet
domestic
threats
national
security
moreover
hold
type
standards
procedures
prescribed
title
iii
necessarily
applicable
case
recognize
domestic
security
surveillance
may
involve
different
policy
practical
considerations
surveillance
ordinary
crime
gathering
security
intelligence
often
long
range
involves
interrelation
various
sources
types
information
exact
targets
surveillance
may
difficult
identify
surveillance
operations
many
types
crime
specified
title
iii
often
emphasis
domestic
intelligence
gathering
prevention
unlawful
activity
enhancement
government
preparedness
possible
future
crisis
emergency
thus
focus
domestic
surveillance
may
less
precise
directed
conventional
types
crime
given
potential
distinctions
title
iii
criminal
surveillances
involving
domestic
security
congress
may
wish
consider
protective
standards
latter
differ
already
prescribed
specified
crimes
title
iii
different
standards
may
compatible
fourth
amendment
reasonable
relation
legitimate
need
government
intelligence
information
protected
rights
citizens
warrant
application
may
vary
according
governmental
interest
enforced
nature
citizen
rights
deserving
protection
said
camara
municipal
cases
fourth
amendment
requires
warrant
search
obtained
probable
cause
standard
particular
decision
search
tested
constitutional
mandate
reasonableness
determining
whether
particular
inspection
reasonable
thus
determining
whether
probable
cause
issue
warrant
inspection
need
inspection
must
weighed
terms
reasonable
goals
code
enforcement
paragraph
course
attempt
guide
congressional
judgment
rather
delineate
present
scope
opinion
attempt
detail
precise
standards
domestic
security
warrants
decision
katz
sought
set
refined
requirements
specified
criminal
surveillances
constitute
title
iii
hold
however
prior
judicial
approval
required
type
domestic
security
surveillance
involved
case
approval
may
made
accordance
reasonable
standards
congress
may
prescribe
surveillance
plamondon
conversations
unlawful
conducted
without
prior
judicial
approval
courts
correctly
held
alderman
controlling
requires
disclosure
accused
impermissibly
intercepted
conversations
stated
alderman
trial
appropriate
place
defendant
counsel
enforceable
orders
unwarranted
disclosure
materials
may
entitled
inspect
judgment
appeals
hereby
affirmed
justice
rehnquist
took
part
consideration
decision
case
footnotes
attorney
general
affidavit
reads
follows
john
mitchell
duly
sworn
deposes
says
attorney
general
affidavit
submitted
connection
government
opposition
disclosure
defendant
plamondon
information
concerning
overhearing
conversations
occurred
course
electronic
surveillances
government
contends
legal
defendant
plamondon
participated
conversations
overheard
government
agents
monitoring
wiretaps
employed
gather
intelligence
information
deemed
necessary
protect
nation
attempts
domestic
organizations
attack
subvert
existing
structure
government
records
department
justice
reflect
installation
wiretaps
expressly
approved
attorney
general
submitted
affidavit
sealed
exhibit
containing
records
intercepted
conversations
description
premises
subjects
surveillances
copies
memoranda
reflecting
attorney
general
express
approval
installation
surveillances
certify
prejudice
national
interest
disclose
particular
facts
concerning
surveillances
camera
accordingly
sealed
exhibit
referred
herein
submitted
solely
camera
inspection
copy
sealed
exhibit
furnished
defendants
request
conclusion
hearing
matter
place
sealed
exhibit
sealed
envelope
return
department
justice
retained
seal
may
submitted
appellate
may
review
matter
jurisdiction
challenged
appeals
ground
district
order
interlocutory
appealable
issue
correctly
held
jurisdiction
relying
upon
writs
act
cases
cited
opinion
attack
made
appropriateness
writ
mandamus
procedure
exceptions
relate
certain
activities
communication
common
carriers
federal
communications
commission
specified
situations
party
communication
consented
interception
title
subsection
reads
follows
procedure
interception
wire
oral
communications
application
order
authorizing
approving
interception
wire
oral
communication
shall
made
writing
upon
oath
affirmation
judge
competent
jurisdiction
shall
state
applicant
authority
make
application
application
shall
include
following
information
identity
investigative
law
enforcement
officer
making
application
officer
authorizing
application
full
complete
statement
facts
circumstances
relied
upon
applicant
justify
belief
order
issued
including
details
particular
offense
committed
ii
particular
description
nature
location
facilities
place
communication
intercepted
iii
particular
description
type
communications
sought
intercepted
iv
identity
person
known
committing
offense
whose
communications
intercepted
full
complete
statement
whether
investigative
procedures
tried
failed
reasonably
appear
unlikely
succeed
tried
dangerous
statement
period
time
interception
required
maintained
nature
investigation
authorization
interception
automatically
terminate
described
type
communication
first
obtained
particular
description
facts
establishing
probable
cause
believe
additional
communications
type
occur
thereafter
full
complete
statement
facts
concerning
previous
applications
known
individual
authorizing
making
application
made
judge
authorization
intercept
approval
interceptions
wire
oral
communications
involving
persons
facilities
places
specified
application
action
taken
judge
application
application
extension
order
statement
setting
forth
results
thus
far
obtained
interception
reasonable
explanation
failure
obtain
results
final
sentence
contents
interception
authority
president
exercise
foregoing
powers
may
received
evidence
interception
reasonable
sentence
seems
intended
assure
president
conducts
lawful
surveillance
pursuant
whatever
power
may
possess
evidence
admissible
cong
rec
senator
mcclellan
sponsor
bill
exchange
constitutes
time
expressly
debated
senate
house
floor
report
senate
judiciary
committee
explicit
exchange
floor
appears
recognize
national
security
power
president
whatever
may
deemed
disturbed
see
also
national
security
wiretap
presidential
prerogative
judicial
responsibility
author
concludes
congress
took
amounted
position
neutral
noninterference
question
constitutionality
warrantless
national
security
wiretaps
authorized
president
cal
rev
section
refers
constitutional
power
president
two
types
situations
necessary
protect
attack
hostile
acts
intelligence
activities
foreign
power
ii
necessary
protect
overthrow
government
clear
present
danger
structure
existence
government
although
specified
situations
sometimes
referred
national
security
threats
term
national
security
used
first
sentence
respect
activities
foreign
powers
case
involves
second
sentence
threat
emanating
according
attorney
general
affidavit
domestic
organizations
although
attempt
precise
definition
use
term
domestic
organization
opinion
mean
group
organization
whether
formally
informally
constituted
composed
citizens
significant
connection
foreign
power
agents
agencies
doubt
cases
difficult
distinguish
domestic
foreign
unlawful
activities
directed
government
collaboration
varying
degrees
domestic
groups
organizations
agents
agencies
foreign
powers
case
enactment
title
iii
reflects
congressional
recognition
importance
surveillance
combatting
various
types
crime
frank
hogan
district
attorney
new
york
county
years
described
telephonic
interception
pursuant
order
single
valuable
weapon
law
enforcement
fight
organized
crime
cong
rec
crime
commission
appointed
president
johnson
noted
great
majority
law
enforcement
officials
believe
evidence
necessary
bring
criminal
sanctions
bear
consistently
higher
echelons
organized
crime
obtained
without
aid
electronic
surveillance
techniques
maintain
techniques
indispensable
develop
adequate
strategic
intelligence
concerning
organized
crime
set
specific
investigations
develop
witnesses
corroborate
testimony
serve
substitutes
necessary
step
process
organized
crime
investigations
prosecutions
report
president
commission
law
enforcement
administration
justice
challenge
crime
free
society
month
attorney
general
tom
clark
advised
president
truman
necessity
using
wiretaps
cases
vitally
affecting
domestic
security
may
president
roosevelt
authorized
attorney
general
jackson
utilize
wiretapping
matters
involving
defense
nation
questionable
whether
language
meant
apply
solely
domestic
subversion
nature
extent
wiretapping
apparently
varied
different
administrations
attorneys
general
except
sharp
curtailment
attorney
general
ramsey
clark
latter
years
johnson
administration
electronic
surveillance
used
organized
crime
domestic
security
cases
least
since
memorandum
clark
truman
brief
brief
respondents
cong
rec
brownell
public
security
wire
tapping
cornell
see
also
rogers
case
wire
tapping
yale
government
asserts
bombing
incidents
january
july
involved
government
related
facilities
respondents
dispute
statistics
incorporating
many
frivolous
incidents
well
bombings
nongovernmental
facilities
precise
level
activity
however
relevant
disposition
case
brief
brief
respondents
reply
brief
professor
alan
westin
written
likely
course
future
conflict
value
privacy
new
technology
law
enforcement
much
book
details
techniques
physical
electronic
surveillance
possible
threats
personal
privacy
psychological
personality
testing
electronic
information
storage
retrieval
contemporary
threats
privacy
emanate
directly
pressures
crime
control
privacy
freedom
though
total
number
intercepts
authorized
state
federal
judges
pursuant
tit
iii
omnibus
crime
control
safe
streets
act
surveillance
may
involve
interception
hundreds
different
conversations
average
intercept
involved
people
conversations
incriminating
cong
rec
cong
rec
subsequent
assurances
quoted
part
opinion
implied
statutory
grant
contraction
definition
presidential
power
eased
senator
misgivings
view
accepted
chimel
california
considered
government
contention
search
judged
general
reasonableness
standard
without
reference
warrant
clause
concluded
argument
founded
little
subjective
view
regarding
acceptability
certain
sorts
police
conduct
considerations
relevant
fourth
amendment
interests
unconfined
analysis
fourth
amendment
protection
area
approach
evaporation
point
lasson
history
development
fourth
amendment
constitution
use
word
judicial
connote
traditional
fourth
amendment
requirement
neutral
detached
magistrate
government
argues
domestic
security
wiretaps
upheld
courts
review
nless
appears
attorney
general
determination
proposed
surveillance
relates
national
security
matter
arbitrary
capricious
constitutes
clear
abuse
broad
discretion
attorney
general
obtain
information
helpful
president
protecting
government
various
unlawful
acts
brief
see
supra
view
warrantless
surveillance
though
impermissible
domestic
security
cases
may
constitutional
foreign
powers
involved
see
smith
supp
cd
cal
american
bar
association
project
standards
criminal
justice
electronic
surveillance
approved
draft
supp
see
also
clay
think
unnecessary
time
facts
case
consider
arguments
advanced
government
basis
scope
decision
alderman
justice
douglas
concurring
join
opinion
add
words
support
important
phase
campaign
police
intelligence
agencies
obtain
exemptions
warrant
clause
fourth
amendment
due
clandestine
nature
electronic
need
acute
placing
government
heavy
burden
show
exigencies
situation
make
course
imperative
abuses
search
incident
arrest
partly
deterred
threat
damage
actions
offending
officers
risk
adverse
publicity
possibility
reform
political
process
latter
safeguards
however
ineffective
lawless
wiretapping
bugging
victims
totally
unaware
moreover
even
risk
exclusion
tainted
evidence
appear
negligible
deterrent
value
inasmuch
frankly
concedes
primary
purpose
searches
fortify
intelligence
collage
rather
accumulate
evidence
support
indictments
convictions
warrant
clause
held
inapplicable
federal
intelligence
machine
literally
enjoy
unchecked
discretion
federal
agents
wish
rummage
months
end
every
conversation
matter
intimate
personal
carried
selected
telephone
lines
simply
seize
utterances
may
add
sense
pulse
domestic
underground
told
one
national
security
wiretap
lasted
months
monitored
conversations
senator
edward
kennedy
found
recently
warrantless
devices
accounted
average
days
listening
per
device
compared
per
device
average
devices
installed
order
concluded
government
revelations
posed
frightening
possibility
conversations
untold
thousands
citizens
country
monitored
secret
devices
judge
authorized
may
remain
operation
months
perhaps
years
time
even
innocent
random
caller
uses
telephones
tapped
line
become
flagged
number
government
data
bank
see
laird
tatum
term
gross
invasions
privacy
epitomize
evil
warrant
clause
directed
unfortunate
witness
hazards
police
intrusions
receive
prior
sanction
independent
magistrates
example
weeks
mapp
ohio
chimel
california
entire
homes
ransacked
pursuant
warrantless
searches
indeed
kremen
entire
contents
cabin
totaling
items
dish
rag
seized
incident
arrest
occupant
taken
san
francisco
study
fbi
agents
similar
case
von
cleef
new
jersey
police
without
warrant
searched
arrestee
house
three
hours
eventually
seizing
several
thousand
articles
including
books
magazines
catalogues
mailing
lists
private
correspondence
open
unopened
photographs
drawings
film
silverthorne
lumber
federal
agents
without
shadow
authority
raided
offices
one
petitioners
proprietors
earlier
jailed
made
clean
sweep
books
papers
documents
found
justice
holmes
termed
tactic
outrage
stanford
texas
state
police
seized
items
literature
including
writings
justice
black
pursuant
general
search
warrant
issued
inspect
alleged
subversive
home
domestic
security
said
involved
draw
case
outside
mainstream
fourth
amendment
law
rather
recurring
desire
reigning
officials
employ
dragnet
techniques
intimidate
critics
lies
core
prohibition
excesses
use
general
warrants
writs
assistance
led
ratification
fourth
amendment
entick
carrington
tr
eng
decided
one
finds
striking
parallel
executive
warrants
utilized
secretary
state
issued
general
executive
warrants
messengers
authorizing
roam
seize
libelous
material
libellants
sovereign
entick
critic
crown
victim
one
general
search
seditious
publications
impounded
brought
successful
damage
action
trespass
messengers
verdict
sustained
appeal
lord
camden
wrote
sweeping
tactics
validated
secret
cabinets
bureaus
every
subject
kingdom
thrown
open
search
inspection
messenger
whenever
secretary
state
shall
think
fit
charge
even
suspect
person
author
printer
publisher
seditious
libel
related
similar
proceeding
huckle
money
wils
eng
judge
presided
entick
appeal
held
another
victim
despotic
practice
saying
enter
man
house
virtue
nameless
warrant
order
procure
evidence
worse
spanish
inquisition
see
also
wilkes
wood
tr
eng
early
boyd
recently
stanford
texas
supra
berger
new
york
coolidge
new
hampshire
supra
tyrannical
invasions
described
assailed
entick
huckle
wilkes
practices
also
endured
colonists
recognized
primary
abuses
ensured
warrant
clause
prominent
place
bill
rights
see
landynski
search
seizure
lasson
history
development
fourth
amendment
constitution
note
warrantless
searches
light
chimel
return
original
understanding
rev
illustrated
flood
cases
us
term
laird
tatum
gelbard
egan
caldwell
gravel
kleindienst
mandel
currently
throes
another
national
seizure
paranoia
resembling
hysteria
surrounded
alien
sedition
acts
palmer
raids
mccarthy
era
register
dissent
petition
governments
redress
subjected
scrutiny
grand
juries
fbi
even
military
associates
interrogated
homes
bugged
telephones
wiretapped
befriended
secret
government
informers
patriotism
loyalty
questioned
senator
sam
ervin
chaired
hearings
military
surveillance
civilian
dissidents
warns
exaggeration
talk
terms
hundreds
thousands
dossiers
senator
kennedy
mentioned
supra
found
frightening
possibility
conversations
untold
thousands
monitored
secret
devices
privacy
implicated
also
stake
reach
government
power
intimidate
critics
executive
attempts
excuse
tactics
essential
defense
internal
subversion
obliged
remind
without
apology
long
commitment
preservation
bill
rights
corrosive
environment
precisely
expedients
justice
brandeis
said
concurring
whitney
california
independence
revolution
cowards
fear
political
change
exalt
order
cost
liberty
chief
justice
warren
put
way
robel
concept
national
defense
deemed
end
justifying
power
designed
promote
goal
implicit
term
national
defense
notion
defending
values
ideas
set
nation
apart
indeed
ironic
name
national
defense
sanction
subversion
liberties
make
defense
nation
worthwhile
warrant
clause
stood
barrier
intrusions
officialdom
privacies
life
barrier
lowered
permit
suspected
subversives
intimate
conversations
pillaged
abodes
mail
secretly
searched
authority
defeat
terrifying
claim
inherent
power
need
stand
enduring
values
served
fourth
amendment
stated
last
term
coolidge
new
hampshire
times
unrest
whether
caused
crime
racial
conflict
fear
internal
subversion
basic
law
values
represents
may
appear
unrealistic
extravagant
values
authors
fundamental
constitutional
concepts
times
altogether
unlike
right
personal
security
arbitrary
intrusions
times
changed
reducing
everyman
scope
pleases
urban
industrial
world
changes
made
values
served
fourth
amendment
less
important
much
fear
erosion
sense
privacy
independence
omnipresent
electronic
ear
government
likelihood
fomenters
domestic
upheaval
modify
form
governing
appendix
opinion
douglas
concurring
federal
wiretapping
bugging
ordered
executive
ordered
devices
devices
days
use
days
minimum
maximum
year
number
use
number
rounded
rounded
ratio
days
used
average
days
use
executive
ordered
per
devices
ordered
executive
ordered
ordered
devices
source
letter
assistant
attorney
general
robert
mardian
senator
edward
kennedy
march
source
figures
withheld
request
justice
department
reports
administrative
office
courts
coolidge
new
hampshire
mcdonald
chimel
california
jeffers
see
bivens
six
unknown
named
agents
federal
bureau
narcotics
letter
senator
edward
kennedy
members
administrative
procedure
practice
senate
judiciary
committee
senator
kennedy
included
letter
chart
comparing
wiretapping
bugging
federal
agencies
chart
reproduced
appendix
opinion
statistical
breakdown
duration
location
implementing
agency
wiretap
orders
issued
state
federal
judges
see
administrative
office
courts
report
applications
orders
authorizing
approving
interception
wire
oral
communications
washington
post
may
final
kennedy
supra
see
also
schwartz
report
costs
benefits
electronic
surveillance
american
civil
liberties
union
schwartz
legitimation
electronic
eavesdropping
politics
law
order
rev
complete
itemization
objects
seized
see
appendix
kremen
side
atlantic
argument
concerning
validity
general
search
warrants
centered
around
writs
assistance
used
customs
officers
detection
smuggled
goods
lasson
history
development
fourth
amendment
constitution
february
writs
expired
six
months
death
george
ii
boston
merchants
petitioned
superior
opposition
granting
new
writs
merchants
represented
james
otis
later
became
leader
movement
independence
otis
completely
electrified
large
audience
room
denunciation
england
whole
policy
toward
colonies
argument
general
warrants
john
adams
young
man
less
years
age
yet
admitted
bar
spectator
many
years
later
described
scene
words
say
solemn
manner
otis
oration
writs
assistance
breathed
nation
breath
life
flame
fire
every
man
crowded
audience
appeared
go
away
ready
take
arms
writs
assistance
first
scene
opposition
arbitrary
claims
great
britain
child
independence
born
years
namely
grew
manhood
declared
free
see
donner
cerruti
grand
jury
network
nixon
administration
secretly
perverted
traditional
safeguard
individual
rights
nation
see
also
caldwell
gravel
gelbard
egan
nos
see
times
july
grand
jury
investigation
times
staff
published
pentagon
papers
times
april
tighten
surveillance
radicals
times
informants
bugs
collect
data
black
panthers
washington
post
may
fbi
calls
everybody
talks
washington
post
may
black
activists
fbi
targets
washington
post
may
bedroom
peeking
sharpens
fbi
files
concerning
fbi
investigation
daniel
schorr
television
correspondent
critical
government
see
times
times
wiretapping
bugging
martin
luther
king
fbi
see
navasky
kennedy
justice
wiretapping
eleanor
roosevelt
john
lewis
fbi
see
theoharis
meyer
national
security
justification
electronic
eavesdropping
elusive
exception
wayne
rev
see
laird
tatum
see
also
federal
data
banks
computers
bill
rights
hearings
constitutional
rights
senate
committee
judiciary
sess
times
informers
used
national
security
reasons
throughout
twentieth
century
deployed
combat
perceived
internal
threat
radicals
early
fears
began
focus
communism
groups
thought
connection
communist
party
heavily
infiltrated
infiltration
party
intense
one
former
fbi
agent
estimated
ratio
one
informant
every
members
recently
attention
shifted
militant
antiwar
civil
rights
groups
part
support
groups
among
university
students
throughout
country
informers
seem
become
ubiquitous
campus
insight
scope
current
use
informers
provided
media
papers
fbi
documents
stolen
early
bureau
office
media
pennsylvania
papers
disclose
fbi
attempts
infiltrate
conference
war
resisters
haverford
college
august
convention
national
association
black
students
june
also
reveal
fbi
endeavors
recruit
informers
ranging
bill
collectors
apartment
janitors
effort
develop
constant
surveillance
black
communities
new
left
organizations
times
april
philadelphia
black
community
instance
whole
range
buildings
including
offices
congress
racial
equality
southern
christian
leadership
conference
black
coalition
ibid
singled
surveillance
building
employees
similar
informers
working
fbi
note
developments
law
national
security
interest
civil
liberties
harv
rev
accounts
impersonation
journalists
police
fbi
agents
soldiers
order
gain
confidences
dissidents
see
press
freedoms
pressure
report
twentieth
century
fund
task
force
government
press
revelation
army
infiltration
political
organizations
spying
senators
governors
congressmen
see
federal
data
banks
computers
bill
rights
hearings
subcommittee
constitutional
rights
senate
committee
judiciary
sess
discussed
dissent
denial
certiorari
williamson
among
media
papers
suggestion
fbi
investigation
dissidents
stepped
order
enhance
paranoia
endemic
circles
serve
get
point
across
fbi
agent
behind
every
mailbox
times
march
times
senate
peace
advocates
said
presidential
adviser
aiding
abetting
enemy
amicus
curiae
brief
submitted
senator
sam
ervin
laird
tatum
new
york
times
powell
mccormack
robel
aptheker
secretary
state
baggett
bullitt
youngstown
sheet
tube
sawyer
duncan
kahanamoku
white
steer
de
jonge
oregon
ex
parte
milligan
wall
mitchell
harmony
note
national
security
wiretap
presidential
prerogative
judicial
responsibility
cal
rev
continue
belief
extremely
difficult
write
search
warrant
specifically
naming
particular
conversations
seized
therefore
attempt
amount
general
warrant
abuse
condemned
fourth
amendment
said
dissenting
osborn
devices
lay
dragnet
indiscriminately
sweeps
conversations
within
scope
without
regard
nature
conversations
participants
warrant
authorizing
devices
different
general
warrants
fourth
amendment
intended
prohibit
ratios
less
meaningful
since
surveillance
program
initial
stage
justice
white
concurring
judgment
case
arises
indictment
charging
conspiracy
injure
injury
government
property
count
charged
robert
plamondon
two
codefendants
conspiring
fourth
person
injure
government
property
dynamite
count
ii
charged
plamondon
alone
dynamiting
injuring
government
property
ann
arbor
michigan
defendants
moved
compel
disclose
among
things
logs
records
electronic
surveillance
directed
unindicted
coconspirators
premises
defendants
coconspirators
also
moved
hearing
determine
whether
electronic
surveillance
disclosed
tainted
evidence
grand
jury
indictment
based
government
intended
use
trial
asked
dismissal
indictment
taint
determined
exist
opposing
motion
submitted
affidavit
attorney
general
disclosing
defendant
plamondon
participated
conversations
overheard
government
agents
monitoring
wiretaps
employed
gather
intelligence
information
deemed
necessary
protect
nation
attempts
domestic
organizations
attack
subvert
existing
structure
government
wiretaps
expressly
approved
attorney
general
records
intercepted
conversations
copies
memorandum
reflecting
attorney
general
approval
submitted
seal
solely
camera
inspection
characterized
district
position
electronic
monitoring
plamondon
conversations
without
judicial
warrant
lawful
exercise
power
president
safeguard
national
security
district
granted
motion
defendants
holding
president
constitutional
power
employ
electronic
surveillance
without
warrant
gather
information
domestic
organizations
absent
probable
cause
judicial
authorization
challenged
wiretap
infringed
plamondon
fourth
amendment
rights
ordered
government
disclose
defendants
records
monitored
conversations
directed
hearing
held
determine
existence
taint
either
indictment
evidence
introduced
trial
government
petition
mandamus
require
district
vacate
order
denied
appeals
held
fourth
amendment
barred
warrantless
electronic
surveillance
domestic
organizations
even
direction
president
agreed
district
wiretaps
involved
therefore
constitutionally
infirm
must
turn
defendants
records
overheard
conversations
purpose
determining
whether
government
evidence
tainted
affirm
appeals
statutory
ground
urged
brief
without
reaching
intimating
views
respect
constitutional
issue
decided
district
appeals
title
iii
omnibus
crime
control
safe
streets
act
forbids
pain
criminal
penalties
civil
actions
damages
wiretapping
eavesdropping
undertaken
accordance
specified
procedures
obtaining
judicial
warrants
authorizing
surveillance
section
establishes
general
prohibition
electronic
eavesdropping
xcept
otherwise
specifically
provided
statute
later
sections
provide
detailed
procedures
judicial
authorization
official
interceptions
oral
communications
procedures
followed
interception
subject
prohibitions
section
however
specifies
situations
general
prohibitions
apply
addition
provides
nothing
contained
chapter
section
communications
act
stat
shall
limit
constitutional
power
president
take
measures
deems
necessary
protect
nation
actual
potential
attack
hostile
acts
foreign
power
obtain
foreign
intelligence
information
deemed
essential
security
protect
national
security
information
foreign
intelligence
activities
shall
anything
contained
chapter
deemed
limit
constitutional
power
president
take
measures
deems
necessary
protect
overthrow
government
force
unlawful
means
clear
present
danger
structure
existence
government
contents
wire
oral
communication
intercepted
authority
president
exercise
foregoing
powers
may
received
evidence
trial
hearing
proceeding
interception
reasonable
shall
otherwise
used
disclosed
except
necessary
implement
power
interception
without
judicial
warrant
covered
provisions
clear
argument
illegal
unless
saved
majority
asserts
disclaimer
exception
however
labeled
apparent
face
section
legislative
history
interception
one
described
reached
statutory
ban
unwarranted
electronic
eavesdropping
defendants
district
moved
production
logs
electronic
surveillance
might
subjected
government
responded
conversations
plamondon
intercepted
took
position
turnover
surveillance
records
necessary
interception
complied
law
clearly
government
prevail
necessary
demonstrate
first
interception
involved
subject
statutory
requirement
judicial
approval
wiretapping
surveillance
within
scope
secondly
act
forbid
warrantless
wiretap
surveillance
consistent
fourth
amendment
made
claim
case
statute
may
constitutionally
applied
surveillance
issue
denied
comply
act
surveillance
must
either
supported
warrant
fall
within
bounds
exceptions
provided
nevertheless
read
opinions
district
appeals
neither
stopped
inquire
whether
challenged
interception
illegal
statute
proceeded
directly
constitutional
issue
without
adverting
rule
courts
abjure
constitutional
issues
except
necessary
decision
case
ashwander
tennessee
valley
authority
concurring
opinion
conclude
record
us
surveillance
undertaken
government
case
illegal
statute
find
unnecessary
therefore
improper
consider
decide
constitutional
questions
courts
improvidently
reached
threshold
statutory
question
simply
put
electronic
surveillance
undertaken
government
case
measure
deemed
necessary
president
implement
either
first
second
branch
exception
carved
general
requirement
warrant
answer
seems
must
turn
affidavit
attorney
general
offered
opposition
defendants
motion
disclose
surveillance
records
apparent
nothing
whatsoever
affidavit
suggesting
surveillance
undertaken
within
first
branch
exception
protect
foreign
attack
gather
foreign
intelligence
protect
national
security
information
sole
assertion
monitoring
issue
employed
gather
intelligence
information
deemed
necessary
protect
nation
attempts
domestic
organizations
attack
subvert
existing
structure
government
app
neither
conclude
characterization
wiretap
employed
fell
within
exception
recognized
second
sentence
utterly
fails
assume
responsibility
judgment
congress
demanded
surveillance
necessary
prevent
overthrow
force
unlawful
means
clear
present
danger
structure
existence
government
affidavit
speaks
attempts
attack
subvert
makes
reference
force
unlawfulness
articulates
conclusion
attempts
involved
clear
present
danger
existence
structure
government
shortcomings
affidavit
measured
patent
indeed
oral
argument
conceded
less
specific
inquiry
put
government
counsel
think
affidavit
standing
alone
satisfies
safe
streets
act
assistant
attorney
general
answered
sir
rely
upon
affidavit
tr
oral
arg
government
counsel
however
seek
save
case
reference
camera
exhibit
submitted
district
supplement
attorney
general
affidavit
said
exhibit
includes
request
wiretap
approval
submitted
attorney
general
request
asserted
need
avert
clear
present
danger
structure
existence
government
attorney
general
endorsed
approval
request
unconvinced
mere
endorsement
attorney
general
request
approval
submitted
must
taken
attorney
general
opinion
wiretap
necessary
avert
clear
present
danger
existence
structure
government
affidavit
later
filed
specifically
characterizing
purposes
interception
least
impliedly
grounds
prior
approval
attorney
general
said
tap
undertaken
secure
intelligence
thought
necessary
protect
attempts
attack
subvert
structure
government
attorney
general
approval
interception
given
judicially
cognizable
meaning
different
meaning
seems
ascribed
affidavit
filed
obviously
must
proceedings
district
moreover
reluctant
proceed
first
instance
examine
camera
material
either
sustain
reject
surveillance
necessary
measure
avert
dangers
referred
congress
excepted
warrant
requirement
surveillance
president
assume
responsibility
deeming
essential
measure
protect
clear
present
danger
judge
satisfy
congressional
requirement
without
necessary
threshold
determination
interception
opinion
contrary
terms
statute
subject
therefore
prohibition
contained
use
fruits
warrantless
electronic
surveillance
evidence
trial
remain
two
additional
interrelated
reasons
reaching
constitutional
issue
first
even
determined
attorney
general
purported
authorize
electronic
surveillance
purposes
exempt
general
provisions
act
remain
issue
whether
discretion
properly
authorized
concedes
act
attorney
general
authorizing
warrantless
wiretap
subject
judicial
review
extent
brief
seems
improvident
proceed
constitutional
questions
determined
act
bar
interception
question
second
assumption
surveillance
involved
fell
within
exception
provided
constitutional
issue
need
reached
case
fruits
wiretap
inadmissible
statutory
grounds
criminal
proceedings
pending
respondent
plamondon
section
contents
wire
oral
communication
intercepted
authority
president
exercise
foregoing
powers
may
received
evidence
trial
hearing
proceeding
interception
reasonable
shall
otherwise
used
disclosed
except
necessary
implement
power
emphasis
added
determination
district
reasonable
use
fruits
wiretap
plamondon
necessary
implement
purposes
tap
authorized
conclusion
long
statutory
grounds
excluding
evidence
fruits
disposed
improvident
reach
constitutional
issue
thus
affirm
judgment
appeals
unless
prepared
reconsider
necessity
adversary
rather
camera
hearing
respect
taint
camera
proceedings
sufficient
taint
discerned
judge
case
whatever
legality
tap
attorney
general
affidavit
concluded
certify
prejudice
national
interest
disclose
particular
facts
concerning
surveillances
camera
accordingly
sealed
exhibit
referred
herein
submitted
solely
camera
inspection
copy
sealed
exhibit
furnished
defendants
request
conclusion
hearing
matter
place
sealed
exhibit
sealed
envelope
return
department
justice
retained
seal
may
submitted
appellate
may
review
matter
app
agree
majority
analysis
import
surely
congress
meant
least
determined
specified
circumstances
president
constitutionally
intercept
communications
without
warrant
general
ban
apply
limitation
applicability
confined
situations
specifically
described
thus
even
assuming
constitutionality
warrantless
surveillance
authorized
president
uncover
private
official
graft
forbidden
federal
statute
interception
illegal
type
presidential
action
saved
act
provision
stated
text
infra
claim
congress
powerless
require
warrants
surveillances
president
otherwise
barred
fourth
amendment
undertaking
without
warrant
see
tr
oral
arg
take
answer
congress
forbid
president
suggest
power
case
mardian
assistant
attorney
general
issue
well
next
question
suggest
say
though
congress
forbid
president
mardian
think
rule
announced
colony
catering
within
certain
limits
congress
severely
restrict
power
president
area
well
let
assume
congress
says
attorney
general
president
may
authorize
attorney
general
specific
situations
carry
electronic
surveillance
attorney
general
certifies
clear
present
danger
security
mardian
think
congress
already
provided
well
say
congress
power
limit
surveillances
situations
conditions
satisfied
mardian
yes
concur
honor
see
also
tr
oral
arg
camera
document
contained
affidavit
contained
comply
safe
streets
act
mardian
concur
honor
government
appears
shifted
ground
respect
initial
brief
government
quoted
attorney
general
affidavit
said
without
qualification
grounds
upon
attorney
general
authorized
surveillance
present
case
brief
moreover
counsel
government
stated
oral
argument
camera
submission
intended
justification
authorization
simply
proof
fact
authorization
granted
attorney
general
signature
tr
oral
arg
later
oral
argument
however
government
said
affidavit
never
intended
basis
justifying
surveillance
question
justification
suggest
partial
justification
contained
camera
exhibit
submitted
judge
keith
rely
upon
affidavit
camera
exhibit
tr
oral
arg
reply
brief
government
says
flatly
camera
documents
affidavit
proper
basis
determining
ground
upon
attorney
general
acted
reply
brief
procedures
practice
time
request
issue
apparently
resulted
attorney
general
merely
countersigning
request
asserted
need
wiretap
told
present
procedures
attorney
general
makes
express
written
finding
clear
present
danger
structure
existence
government
authorizes
tap
tr
oral
arg
whenever
wire
oral
communication
intercepted
part
contents
communication
evidence
derived
therefrom
may
received
evidence
trial
hearing
proceeding
grand
jury
department
officer
agency
regulatory
body
legislative
committee
authority
state
political
subdivision
thereof
disclosure
information
violation
chapter