kiowa
tribe
oklahoma
manufacturing
technologies
argued
january
decided
may
held
indian
tribes
enjoy
sovereign
immunity
civil
suits
contracts
whether
contracts
involve
governmental
commercial
activities
whether
made
reservation
matter
federal
law
tribe
subject
suit
congress
authorized
suit
tribe
waived
immunity
see
three
affiliated
tribes
fort
berthold
reservation
wold
engineering
respondent
request
confine
immunity
transactions
reservations
tribal
governmental
activities
rejected
precedents
drawn
distinctions
see
puyallup
tribe
department
game
cases
allowing
apply
substantive
laws
tribal
activities
occurring
outside
indian
country
involving
nonmembers
recognized
tribes
continue
enjoy
immunity
suit
see
oklahoma
tax
citizen
band
potawatomi
tribe
oklahoma
appeals
belief
federal
law
mandate
immunity
mistaken
matter
federal
law
subject
diminution
three
affiliated
tribes
supra
nevertheless
tribal
immunity
doctrine
developed
almost
accident
precedents
reciting
see
fidelity
guaranty
rest
early
cases
assumed
immunity
without
extensive
reasoning
see
turner
wisdom
perpetuating
doctrine
may
doubted
chooses
adhere
earlier
decisions
deference
congress
see
potawatomi
supra
may
wish
exercise
authority
limit
tribal
immunity
explicit
legislation
see
santa
clara
pueblo
martinez
congress
done
thus
far
petitioner
waived
immunity
governs
pp
reversed
ennedy
delivered
opinion
ehnquist
onnor
calia
outer
reyer
joined
tevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
homas
insburg
joined
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
kiowa
tribe
oklahoma
petitioner
manufacturing
technologies
writ
certiorari
civil
appeals
ofoklahoma
first
division
may
justice
kennedy
delivered
opinion
commercial
suit
indian
tribe
oklahoma
appeals
rejected
tribe
claim
sovereign
immunity
case
law
date
often
recites
rule
tribal
immunity
suit
precedents
rest
early
cases
assumed
immunity
without
extensive
reasoning
adhere
decisions
reverse
judgment
petitioner
kiowa
tribe
indian
tribe
recognized
federal
government
tribe
owns
land
oklahoma
addition
holds
land
state
trust
tribe
though
record
vague
key
details
facts
appear
follows
tribal
entity
called
kiowa
industrial
development
commission
agreed
buy
respondent
manufacturing
technologies
certain
stock
issued
aviation
april
tribe
business
committee
signed
promissory
note
name
tribe
note
tribe
agreed
pay
manufacturing
technologies
plus
interest
face
note
recites
signed
carnegie
oklahoma
tribe
complex
land
held
trust
tribe
according
respondent
however
tribe
executed
delivered
note
manufacturing
technologies
oklahoma
city
beyond
tribe
lands
note
obligated
tribe
make
payments
oklahoma
city
note
specify
governing
law
paragraph
entitled
waivers
governing
law
provide
nothing
note
subjects
limits
sovereign
rights
kiowa
tribe
oklahoma
app
tribe
defaulted
respondent
sued
note
state
tribe
moved
dismiss
lack
jurisdiction
relying
part
sovereign
immunity
suit
trial
denied
motion
entered
judgment
respondent
oklahoma
appeals
affirmed
holding
indian
tribes
subject
suit
state
breaches
contract
involving
commercial
conduct
oklahoma
declined
review
judgment
granted
certiorari
ii
matter
federal
law
indian
tribe
subject
suit
congress
authorized
suit
tribe
waived
immunity
see
three
affiliated
tribes
fort
berthold
reservation
wold
engineering
santa
clara
pueblo
martinez
fidelity
guaranty
usf
date
cases
sustained
tribal
immunity
suit
without
drawing
distinction
based
tribal
activities
occurred
one
case
state
asserted
jurisdiction
tribal
fishing
reservation
puyallup
tribe
department
game
held
tribe
claim
immunity
well
founded
though
discuss
relevance
fishing
taken
place
yet
drawn
distinction
governmental
commercial
activities
tribe
see
ibid
recognizing
tribal
immunity
fishing
may
well
commercial
activity
oklahoma
tax
citizen
band
potawatomi
tribe
recognizing
tribal
immunity
suit
taxation
cigarette
sales
usf
supra
recognizing
tribal
immunity
lease
though
respondent
asks
us
confine
immunity
suit
transactions
reservations
governmental
activities
precedents
drawn
distinctions
cases
allowing
apply
substantive
laws
tribal
activities
contrary
recognized
state
may
authority
tax
regulate
tribal
activities
occurring
within
state
outside
indian
country
see
mescalero
apache
tribe
jones
see
also
organized
village
kake
egan
say
substantive
state
laws
apply
conduct
however
say
tribe
longer
enjoys
immunity
suit
potawatomi
example
reaffirmed
oklahoma
may
tax
cigarette
sales
tribe
store
nonmembers
tribe
enjoys
immunity
suit
collect
unpaid
state
taxes
difference
right
demand
compliance
state
laws
means
available
enforce
see
oklahoma
appeals
nonetheless
believed
federal
law
mandate
tribal
immunity
resting
holding
decision
hoover
oklahoma
cert
denied
hoover
oklahoma
held
tribal
immunity
commercial
activity
like
decision
exercise
jurisdiction
sister
state
solely
matter
comity
citing
nevada
hall
according
hoover
state
holds
open
breach
contract
suits
may
allow
citizens
sue
sovereigns
acting
within
state
often
noted
however
immunity
possessed
indian
tribes
coextensive
see
blatchford
native
village
noatak
blatchford
distinguished
state
sovereign
immunity
tribal
sovereign
immunity
tribes
constitutional
convention
thus
parties
mutuality
concession
makes
surrender
immunity
suit
sister
plausible
accord
idaho
coeur
tribe
idaho
slip
tribal
immunity
matter
federal
law
subject
diminution
three
affiliated
tribes
supra
washington
confederated
tribes
colville
reservation
though
doctrine
tribal
immunity
settled
law
controls
case
note
developed
almost
accident
doctrine
said
opinions
rest
opinion
turner
see
potawatomi
supra
though
turner
indeed
cited
authority
immunity
examination
shows
simply
stand
proposition
case
arose
lands
within
creek
nation
public
domain
subject
powers
sovereign
people
turner
supra
creek
nation
gave
individual
creek
grazing
rights
portion
creek
nation
public
lands
creeks
turn
leased
grazing
rights
turner
built
long
fence
around
land
mob
creek
indians
tore
fence
congress
passed
law
allowing
turner
sue
creek
nation
claims
claims
dismissed
turner
suit
opinion
justice
brandeis
affirmed
stated
fundamental
obstacle
recovery
immunity
sovereign
suit
lack
substantive
right
recover
damages
resulting
failure
government
officers
keep
peace
turner
liability
existed
general
law
quoted
language
heart
turner
best
assumption
immunity
sake
argument
reasoned
statement
doctrine
one
even
say
congress
assumed
congressional
enactment
needed
overcome
tribal
immunity
different
reason
congress
pass
act
tribal
government
dissolved
without
authorization
congress
nation
sued
least
without
consent
fact
tribal
dissolution
sovereign
status
predicate
legislation
authorizing
suit
turner
slender
reed
supporting
principle
tribal
sovereign
immunity
turner
passing
reference
immunity
however
become
explicit
holding
tribes
immunity
suit
held
usf
saying
indian
nations
exempt
suit
without
congressional
authorization
citing
turner
supra
sovereigns
indian
nations
enjoyed
immunity
judicial
attack
absent
consent
sued
later
cases
albeit
little
analysis
reiterated
doctrine
puyallup
santa
clara
pueblo
martinez
three
affiliated
tribes
blatchford
supra
coeur
supra
slip
doctrine
tribal
immunity
came
attack
years
ago
potawatomi
supra
petitioner
asked
us
abandon
least
narrow
doctrine
cause
tribal
businesses
become
far
removed
tribal
internal
affairs
retained
doctrine
however
theory
congress
failed
abrogate
order
promote
economic
development
tribal
potawatomi
rationale
must
said
challenged
inapposite
modern
tribal
enterprises
extending
well
beyond
traditional
tribal
customs
activities
justice
stevens
separate
opinion
criticized
tribal
immunity
founded
upon
anachronistic
fiction
suggested
might
extend
offreservation
commercial
activity
concurring
opinion
reasons
doubt
wisdom
perpetuating
doctrine
one
time
doctrine
tribal
immunity
suit
might
thought
necessary
protect
nascent
tribal
governments
encroachments
interdependent
mobile
society
however
tribal
immunity
extends
beyond
needed
safeguard
tribal
evident
tribes
take
part
nation
commerce
tribal
enterprises
include
ski
resorts
gambling
sales
cigarettes
see
mescalero
jones
potawatomi
supra
seminole
tribe
florida
economic
context
immunity
harm
unaware
dealing
tribe
know
tribal
immunity
choice
matter
case
tort
victims
considerations
might
suggest
need
abrogate
tribal
immunity
least
overarching
rule
respondent
ask
us
repudiate
principle
outright
suggests
instead
confine
reservations
noncommercial
activities
decline
draw
distinction
case
defer
role
congress
may
wish
exercise
important
judgment
congress
acted
background
deci
sions
restricted
tribal
immunity
suit
limited
circumstances
see
mandatory
liability
insurance
ii
gaming
activities
statutes
declared
intention
alter
see
nothing
program
construed
affecting
modifying
diminishing
otherwise
impairing
sovereign
immunity
suit
enjoyed
indian
tribe
see
also
potawatomi
discussing
indian
financing
act
stat
et
seq
considering
congress
role
reforming
tribal
immunity
find
instructive
problems
sovereign
immunity
foreign
countries
tribal
immunity
foreign
sovereign
immunity
began
judicial
doctrine
chief
justice
marshall
held
courts
jurisdiction
armed
ship
foreign
state
even
american
port
schooner
exchange
mcfaddon
cranch
holding
narrow
opinion
came
regarded
extending
virtually
absolute
immunity
foreign
sovereigns
verlinden
central
bank
nigeria
state
department
issued
came
known
tate
letter
announcing
policy
denying
immunity
commercial
acts
foreign
nation
see
difficulties
implementing
principle
led
congress
enact
foreign
sovereign
immunities
act
resulting
predictable
precise
rules
see
discussing
foreign
sovereign
immunities
act
like
foreign
sovereign
immunity
tribal
immunity
matter
federal
law
verlinden
supra
although
taken
lead
drawing
bounds
tribal
immunity
congress
subject
constitutional
limitations
alter
limits
explicit
legislation
see
santa
clara
pueblo
fields
congress
position
weigh
accommodate
competing
policy
concerns
reliance
interests
capacity
legislative
branch
address
issue
comprehensive
legislation
counsels
caution
us
area
congress
occasionally
authorized
limited
classes
suits
indian
tribes
always
liberty
dispense
tribal
immunity
limit
potawatomi
supra
yet
done
light
concerns
decline
revisit
case
law
choose
defer
congress
tribes
enjoy
immunity
suits
contracts
whether
contracts
involve
governmental
commercial
activities
whether
made
reservation
congress
abrogated
immunity
petitioner
waived
immunity
governs
case
contrary
decision
oklahoma
appeals
reversed
kiowa
tribe
oklahoma
petitioner
manufacturing
technologies
writ
certiorari
civil
appeals
ofoklahoma
first
division
may
justice
stevens
justice
thomas
justice
ginsburg
join
dissenting
absent
express
federal
law
contrary
indians
going
beyond
reservation
boundaries
generally
held
subject
nondiscriminatory
state
law
otherwise
applicable
citizens
state
mescalero
apache
tribe
jones
federal
statute
treaty
provides
petitioner
kiowa
tribe
oklahoma
immunity
application
oklahoma
law
commercial
activities
opinion
extend
judgemade
doctrine
sovereign
immunity
authority
state
courts
decide
whether
accord
immunity
indian
tribes
matter
comity
doctrine
sovereign
immunity
amalgam
two
quite
different
concepts
one
applicable
suits
sovereign
courts
suits
courts
another
sovereign
nevada
hall
former
category
sovereign
power
determine
jurisdiction
courts
define
substantive
legal
rights
citizens
adequately
ex
plains
lesser
authority
define
immunity
kawananakoa
polyblank
sovereign
claim
immunity
courts
second
sovereign
however
normally
depends
second
sovereign
law
schooner
exchange
mcfaddon
cranch
indian
tribe
assertion
immunity
state
judicial
proceeding
unique
implicates
law
three
different
sovereigns
tribe
state
federal
government
correctly
observes
doctrine
tribal
immunity
judicial
jurisdiction
developed
almost
accident
ante
origin
attributed
two
federal
cases
involving
three
five
civilized
tribes
former
case
turner
rejected
claim
creek
nation
whose
tribal
government
dissolved
explains
case
provides
slender
reed
support
doctrine
even
federal
ante
latter
case
fidelity
guaranty
usf
federal
government
sought
recover
royalties
due
coal
leases
executed
behalf
choctaw
chickasaw
nations
held
government
action
barred
prior
judgment
entered
different
federal
holding
prior
judgment
void
far
undertakes
fix
credit
indian
nations
id
rested
two
grounds
first
companion
case
decided
day
ruled
justiciable
courts
congress
consented
consideration
ibid
statute
authorized
prior
adjudication
federal
government
second
ground
statement
supported
citation
turner
two
eighth
circuit
decisions
addressing
immunity
two
five
civilized
tribes
indian
nations
exempt
suit
without
congressional
authorization
ibid
emphasis
added
holding
extends
federal
cases
litigating
behalf
tribe
moreover
turner
usf
arose
conduct
occurred
indian
reservations
subsequent
cases
made
clear
legislative
jurisdiction
conduct
indian
tribes
even
onreservation
activities
thus
litigation
consumed
decade
included
three
decisions
rejected
tribe
claim
doctrine
sovereign
immunity
precluded
state
washington
regulating
fishing
activities
puyallup
reservation
puyallup
tribe
department
game
true
incident
important
holding
vacated
portions
decree
directed
tribe
id
action
however
little
practical
effect
upheld
portions
decree
granting
relief
entire
class
indians
represented
tribe
although
justice
blackmun
one
strongest
supporters
indian
rights
wrote
separately
express
doubts
continuing
vitality
day
doctrine
tribal
immunity
enunciated
fidelity
guaranty
opinion
purport
extend
explain
doctrine
moreover
tribe
predominant
argument
state
courts
washington
without
jurisdiction
regulate
fishing
activities
reservation
id
occasion
consider
validity
injunction
relating
solely
fishing
several
cases
since
puyallup
broadly
referred
tribes
immunity
suit
little
analysis
ante
considering
controversies
arising
reservation
territory
santa
clara
pueblo
martinez
tribe
member
daughter
lived
santa
clara
pueblo
reservation
sued
federal
challenge
validity
tribal
membership
law
agreed
tribe
lacked
jurisdiction
decide
intratribal
controvers
affecting
matters
tribal
sovereignty
id
decision
three
affiliated
tribes
fort
berthold
reservation
wold
engineering
held
north
dakota
require
tribe
blanket
waiver
sovereign
immunity
condition
permitting
tribe
sue
private
parties
state
condition
unduly
intrusive
tribe
common
law
sovereign
immunity
thus
ability
govern
according
laws
required
tribe
open
coercive
jurisdiction
state
courts
matters
occurring
reservation
id
recently
held
federal
lacked
authority
entertain
oklahoma
claims
unpaid
taxes
cigarette
sales
made
tribal
trust
land
treated
reservation
territory
oklahoma
tax
citizen
band
potawatomi
tribe
sum
treated
doctrine
sovereign
immunity
judicial
jurisdiction
settled
law
none
cases
applied
doctrine
purely
conduct
despite
broad
language
used
prior
cases
quite
wrong
suggest
merely
following
precedent
simply
never
considered
whether
tribe
immune
suit
meaningful
nexus
tribe
land
sovereign
functions
moreover
none
opinions
attempted
set
forth
reasoned
explanation
distinction
power
regulate
offreservation
conduct
indian
tribes
power
adjudicate
disputes
arising
conduct
accordingly
agree
late
repudiate
doctrine
entirely
following
reasons
extend
doctrine
beyond
present
contours
ii
three
compelling
reasons
favor
exercise
judicial
restraint
first
power
assumed
belongs
first
instance
congress
fact
congress
may
nullify
modify
grant
virtually
unlimited
tribal
immunity
justify
performance
legislative
function
merely
announcing
rule
comity
federal
judges
observe
announcing
rule
state
power
reasons
undergird
strong
presumption
construing
federal
statutes
state
law
see
cipollone
liggett
group
apply
added
force
rules
absence
congressional
statute
treaty
defining
indian
tribes
sovereign
immunity
creation
federal
default
rule
immunity
might
theory
justified
federal
interests
setting
rule
however
deferring
congress
exercising
caution
ante
creating
law
fails
identify
federal
interests
supporting
extension
sovereign
concedes
present
doctrine
lacks
justification
ante
completely
ignores
state
interests
opinion
thus
far
cry
comprehensive
inquiry
indian
law
context
described
three
affiliated
tribes
calls
examination
congressional
plan
also
nature
state
federal
tribal
interests
stake
quoting
white
mountain
apache
tribe
bracker
stronger
reasons
needed
fill
gap
left
congress
second
rule
strikingly
anomalous
indian
tribe
enjoy
broader
immunity
federal
government
foreign
nations
matter
national
policy
waived
immunity
tort
liability
liability
arising
commercial
activities
see
federal
tort
claims
act
tucker
act
congress
also
decided
foreign
sovereign
immunities
act
foreign
may
sued
federal
state
courts
claims
based
upon
commercial
activities
carried
activities
elsewhere
direct
effect
state
may
sued
courts
another
state
nevada
hall
fact
surrendered
aspects
sovereignty
joined
union
even
arguably
present
legitimate
basis
concluding
indian
tribes
retainedor
indeed
ever
sovereign
immunity
offreservation
commercial
conduct
third
rule
unjust
especially
respect
tort
victims
opportunity
negotiate
waiver
sovereign
immunity
yet
nothing
reasoning
limits
rule
lawsuits
arising
voluntary
contractual
relationships
governments
like
individuals
pay
debts
held
accountable
unlawful
injurious
conduct
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
shaw
general
notion
drawn
chief
justice
marshall
opinion
worcester
georgia
pet
kansas
indians
wall
new
york
indians
wall
indian
reservation
distinct
nation
within
whose
boundaries
state
law
penetrate
yielded
closer
analysis
confronted
course
subsequent
developments
diverse
concrete
situations
organized
village
kake
egan
dussias
heeding
demands
justice
justice
blackmun
indian
law
opinions
rev
particular
asserted
private
party
assumed
barred
sovereign
immunity
concerned
construction
system
tribe
reservation
three
affiliated
tribes
cites
blatchford
native
village
noatak
idaho
coeur
tribe
idaho
reiterated
doctrine
tribal
sovereign
immunity
ante
cases
upheld
state
sovereign
immunity
eleventh
amendment
sued
federal
indian
tribe
passing
references
tribes
immunity
suit
discuss
scope
immunity
course
dicta